Tuesday, 2015-03-24

*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting00:00
*** dims has quit IRC00:00
*** padkrish has quit IRC00:01
*** ijw has quit IRC00:01
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting00:02
*** achanda has quit IRC00:03
*** baoli has quit IRC00:06
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC00:12
*** igordcard_ has quit IRC00:13
*** annegentle has quit IRC00:14
*** emagana has quit IRC00:14
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting00:15
*** Swami_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:15
*** Swami has quit IRC00:16
*** rmoe has quit IRC00:16
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC00:16
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting00:17
*** Swami_ has quit IRC00:17
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting00:19
*** melwitt has quit IRC00:19
*** hogepodge has quit IRC00:20
*** sdake has quit IRC00:22
*** e0ne has quit IRC00:23
*** noslzzp has quit IRC00:24
*** varora has joined #openstack-meeting00:26
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC00:27
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC00:29
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting00:31
*** tsekiyama has joined #openstack-meeting00:32
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting00:33
*** spzala has quit IRC00:33
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting00:33
*** baoli has quit IRC00:35
*** asselin_ has quit IRC00:36
*** Mandell has quit IRC00:37
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** jhesketh has quit IRC00:43
*** jhesketh has joined #openstack-meeting00:43
*** appsdesh has quit IRC00:43
*** ayoung has quit IRC00:43
*** banix has quit IRC00:44
*** dmacpher has quit IRC00:44
*** dflorea has quit IRC00:44
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting00:44
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting00:45
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting00:45
*** john__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:46
*** garyh has quit IRC00:46
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:47
*** asettle has quit IRC00:47
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:47
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting00:47
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting00:49
*** dflorea has quit IRC00:49
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:50
*** wojdev has quit IRC00:50
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap00:50
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting00:51
*** asselin_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:53
*** tsekiyam_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:56
*** tsekiyama has quit IRC00:57
*** leeantho has quit IRC00:59
*** padkrish has quit IRC01:00
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting01:01
john__log start 201:02
*** tiswanso has joined #openstack-meeting01:02
*** sicrano has joined #openstack-meeting01:02
john__log01:04
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:04
*** tiswanso has quit IRC01:04
*** tiswanso has joined #openstack-meeting01:05
*** padkrish has quit IRC01:06
*** jwang_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:06
*** jwang__ has quit IRC01:09
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting01:09
*** aranjan has quit IRC01:10
*** duke278 has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** dannywilson has quit IRC01:12
*** john__ has quit IRC01:12
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting01:14
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting01:15
*** liusheng has quit IRC01:16
*** duke278 has quit IRC01:17
*** emagana has quit IRC01:17
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting01:18
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting01:19
*** annegentle has quit IRC01:20
*** niclem has quit IRC01:21
*** emagana has quit IRC01:23
*** tsekiyam_ has quit IRC01:30
*** mtanino has quit IRC01:32
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting01:32
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:34
*** unicell1 has quit IRC01:35
*** aranjan has quit IRC01:36
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting01:36
*** niclem has joined #openstack-meeting01:37
*** mrmartin has quit IRC01:38
*** AmirBaleghi110 has quit IRC01:38
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting01:38
*** AmirBaleghi110 has joined #openstack-meeting01:39
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting01:39
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC01:40
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting01:40
*** aranjan has quit IRC01:41
*** otter768 has quit IRC01:43
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** dims_ has quit IRC01:46
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC01:50
*** marcusvrn1 has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** marcusvrn1 has quit IRC01:56
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting01:57
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting01:59
*** ddieterly has quit IRC02:04
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** marcusvrn1 has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting02:07
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC02:08
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting02:09
*** marcusvrn1 has quit IRC02:11
*** baoli has quit IRC02:14
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** watanabe_isao has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting02:15
*** VW_ has quit IRC02:16
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting02:16
*** ijw_ has quit IRC02:19
*** neelashah has quit IRC02:21
*** annegentle has quit IRC02:21
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting02:22
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:23
*** eghobo has quit IRC02:25
*** kaisers1 has joined #openstack-meeting02:26
*** kaisers has quit IRC02:28
*** noslzzp has quit IRC02:28
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting02:28
*** jcoufal has quit IRC02:29
*** IanGovett has quit IRC02:29
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting02:37
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:38
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting02:39
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC02:39
*** killer_prince has quit IRC02:39
*** absubram has joined #openstack-meeting02:40
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting02:43
*** padkrish has quit IRC02:44
*** fnaval has quit IRC02:44
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting02:44
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince02:46
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting02:47
*** zul has quit IRC02:47
*** dims has quit IRC02:51
*** aranjan has quit IRC02:52
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** achanda has quit IRC02:53
*** banix has quit IRC02:55
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting02:59
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting03:00
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting03:01
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting03:01
*** marun has quit IRC03:01
*** padkrish has quit IRC03:04
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC03:05
*** gyee has quit IRC03:06
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting03:07
*** rfolco has quit IRC03:07
*** aranjan has quit IRC03:10
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting03:12
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting03:12
*** alex_xu has quit IRC03:12
*** tiswanso has quit IRC03:13
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting03:13
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting03:13
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC03:15
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting03:15
*** Longgeek_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:22
*** achanda has quit IRC03:24
*** chandankumar has quit IRC03:25
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC03:25
*** Longgeek has quit IRC03:25
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting03:25
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting03:28
*** spzala has quit IRC03:31
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** ddieterly has quit IRC03:34
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting03:36
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting03:37
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting03:37
*** hemna has quit IRC03:37
*** baoli has quit IRC03:37
*** watanabe_isao has quit IRC03:38
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting03:39
*** banix has quit IRC03:40
*** achanda has quit IRC03:41
*** sdake has quit IRC03:42
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting03:43
*** armax has quit IRC03:43
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting03:44
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting03:44
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting03:47
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting03:48
*** armax has quit IRC03:50
*** achanda has quit IRC03:53
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting03:55
*** sdake has quit IRC03:55
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting03:58
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting03:59
*** watanabe_isao has joined #openstack-meeting04:00
*** nijaba has quit IRC04:02
*** ujuc has quit IRC04:02
*** AmirBaleghi110 has quit IRC04:02
*** marun has quit IRC04:03
*** VW_ has quit IRC04:05
*** AmirBaleghi110 has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** nijaba has quit IRC04:06
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:07
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:09
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC04:15
*** dannywilson has quit IRC04:17
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting04:18
*** dims has quit IRC04:19
*** AmirBaleghi110 has quit IRC04:22
*** otter768 has quit IRC04:22
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:23
*** AmirBaleghi110 has joined #openstack-meeting04:23
*** annegentle has quit IRC04:23
*** VW_ has quit IRC04:26
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** asettle has quit IRC04:27
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC04:27
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting04:28
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting04:28
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC04:28
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC04:28
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:31
*** hogepodge has quit IRC04:32
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting04:33
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting04:33
*** VW_ has quit IRC04:34
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting04:34
*** xyang1 has quit IRC04:35
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting04:39
*** ddieterly has quit IRC04:39
*** BrianShang has quit IRC04:40
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** sanjayu has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** BrianShang has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** xyang1 has quit IRC04:43
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk04:44
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:44
*** yatin has joined #openstack-meeting04:47
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting04:51
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:51
*** ChuckC has joined #openstack-meeting04:51
*** chandankumar has quit IRC04:52
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting04:52
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:52
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting04:52
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting04:55
*** haleyb has quit IRC04:55
*** padkrish has quit IRC04:56
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting04:57
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting04:59
*** jamespage has quit IRC05:00
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting05:01
*** jamespage has joined #openstack-meeting05:01
*** chandankumar has quit IRC05:04
*** marun has quit IRC05:04
*** haleyb has quit IRC05:07
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting05:11
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away05:22
*** annegentle has quit IRC05:23
*** otter768 has quit IRC05:25
*** reed has quit IRC05:26
*** boris-42 has quit IRC05:28
*** BharatK has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting05:35
*** ajayaa has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** niclem has quit IRC05:37
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC05:37
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:40
*** ddieterly has quit IRC05:40
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting05:41
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince05:41
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC05:42
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting05:45
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:47
*** lpeer__ has joined #openstack-meeting05:49
*** numan has joined #openstack-meeting05:52
*** yatin has quit IRC05:53
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting05:58
*** shwetaap has quit IRC06:04
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting06:04
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting06:04
*** yamahata has quit IRC06:06
*** BrianShang has quit IRC06:06
*** yatin has joined #openstack-meeting06:06
*** BrianShang has joined #openstack-meeting06:07
*** dmacpher has quit IRC06:08
*** haleyb has quit IRC06:09
*** dims has quit IRC06:10
*** AmirBaleghi111 has joined #openstack-meeting06:11
*** AmirBaleghi110 has quit IRC06:12
*** achanda has quit IRC06:15
*** shankarprasad has joined #openstack-meeting06:17
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris06:18
*** lennyb has joined #openstack-meeting06:19
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** adahms has quit IRC06:23
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting06:28
*** sreshetn1 has joined #openstack-meeting06:29
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC06:37
*** sahid has joined #openstack-meeting06:43
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting06:48
*** mrunge has quit IRC06:48
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting06:48
*** aranjan has quit IRC06:50
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting06:52
*** irenab has quit IRC06:53
*** sreshetn1 has quit IRC06:53
*** fesp has quit IRC06:54
*** dulek_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:55
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting06:55
*** dulek_ is now known as dulek06:55
*** AmirBaleghi112 has joined #openstack-meeting06:55
*** AmirBaleghi111 has quit IRC06:56
*** dulek_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:01
*** dulek has quit IRC07:04
*** lpeer__ has quit IRC07:04
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting07:05
*** haleyb has quit IRC07:10
*** lpeer__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:11
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting07:13
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC07:14
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting07:14
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince07:14
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** rajeshr has joined #openstack-meeting07:18
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC07:18
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting07:19
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away07:19
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting07:20
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince07:20
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting07:20
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris07:20
*** spredzy|afk is now known as spredzy07:21
*** emagana has quit IRC07:22
*** ominakov has quit IRC07:22
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting07:22
*** fesp has joined #openstack-meeting07:24
*** sergef has joined #openstack-meeting07:24
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC07:25
*** annegentle has quit IRC07:25
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting07:25
*** sreshetn1 has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
*** emagana has quit IRC07:27
*** yamamoto has quit IRC07:29
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting07:30
*** otter768 has quit IRC07:30
*** AmirBaleghi112 has quit IRC07:34
*** bobmel_ has quit IRC07:34
*** fesp has quit IRC07:35
*** sreshetn1 has quit IRC07:35
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting07:37
*** navid__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:38
*** bvandenh has quit IRC07:38
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting07:40
*** ddieterly has quit IRC07:42
*** dulek_ has quit IRC07:43
*** dulek has joined #openstack-meeting07:43
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** yamahata has quit IRC07:46
*** sreshetn1 has joined #openstack-meeting07:48
*** jtomasek has quit IRC07:53
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** hichihara has quit IRC07:56
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting07:57
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:58
*** Longgeek_ has quit IRC07:58
*** nshaikh has quit IRC07:59
*** navid__ has quit IRC07:59
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting07:59
*** ildikov has quit IRC08:00
*** ajo has quit IRC08:00
anteaya#startmeeting third-party08:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 08:00:19 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.08:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.08:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: third-party)"08:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'third_party'08:00
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
anteayaraise your hand if you are here for the third-party meeting08:00
lennybHi08:00
anteayahello lennyb08:00
anteayahave we worked together yet?08:01
anteayaI'm not sure I know your nickname08:01
*** dims has quit IRC08:02
lennybanteaya, yeah, I accidentally added Nova CI for Mellanox as voting one08:02
anteayaah08:02
anteayathanks for attending a meeting08:03
anteayahow is mellanox coming along?08:03
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:03
lennybanteaya, btw, we sent an email asking to add our Nova CI as non-voting, and did not receive any answer.08:04
anteayaright08:04
*** viktors has left #openstack-meeting08:04
anteayaI'm not surprised08:04
anteayaI had advised nurit to attend a nova meeting to ask08:04
anteayayou sent an email during feature freeze time08:05
*** sarob has quit IRC08:05
anteayaI'm not suprised it was ignored08:05
anteayaI again suggest you attend the nova meeting08:05
anteayaand ask at the meeting08:05
lennybI now, I attended to the meeting, but probably at the wrong hour.08:05
anteayathe nova meeting08:05
anteayait alternates08:05
lennybyeah, #openstack-nova08:05
anteayano they meet in this channel08:06
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting08:06
anteayathe #openstack-nova channel is their discussion channel08:06
anteayawhen they meet they meet in this channel08:06
lennybah, I didnt know. I will look in the wiki for the "openning hours"08:06
anteayado you know how to see all the meetings?08:06
anteaya#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings08:07
anteayathis page has all our meetings08:07
*** jyuso has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** jyuso has left #openstack-meeting08:07
anteayaclick on the link for openstack compute (nova)08:07
*** jyuso has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** jyuso has left #openstack-meeting08:07
lennybthanks08:07
anteaya#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#OpenStack_Compute_.28Nova.2908:07
anteayathat takes you further down the page and more links08:08
anteayawhich take you here08:08
anteaya#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova08:08
*** jyuso1 has joined #openstack-meeting08:08
*** jyuso1 has left #openstack-meeting08:08
*** jyuso1 has joined #openstack-meeting08:08
*** jyuso1 has left #openstack-meeting08:08
anteayathey have the agenda for last weeks meeting up08:08
*** jyuso1 has joined #openstack-meeting08:09
anteayawhich means this weeks will be at the other time08:09
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting08:09
*** bvandenh has quit IRC08:09
anteayamake sense?08:10
*** liusheng has joined #openstack-meeting08:10
*** comay has quit IRC08:11
lennybyou mean, this Wednesday at 0400 UTC08:11
lennybsorry, I got it08:12
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting08:12
anteayano08:12
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting08:13
anteaya1400 was last week's meeting08:13
anteayathis week's meeting is at the other time option08:13
anteaya210008:13
*** scheuran has joined #openstack-meeting08:13
*** jordanP has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** sreshetn1 has quit IRC08:15
anteayalennyb: can you see that?08:17
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting08:17
*** kzaitsev has joined #openstack-meeting08:17
*** yatin has quit IRC08:18
*** ujuc has quit IRC08:18
lennybanteaya, yes. thanks.08:19
anteayaand they meet Thursday's not Wednesday's08:19
jordanPhi, is there any topic currently being discussed, or can I ask a question here and now ?08:19
lennybyeas, I saw. I was looking at nova third party ci meeting from https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#OpenStack_Compute_.28Nova.2908:20
*** bvandenh has quit IRC08:21
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting08:21
anteayajordanP: hi let's just finish with lennyb first08:21
jordanPanteaya, sure08:21
anteayanova third party ci meeting?08:21
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:22
anteayanova doesn't have a third party ci meeting08:22
*** aranjan has quit IRC08:22
anteayalennyb: ?08:23
lennybanteaya, you are correct.08:24
anteayaokay great08:24
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting08:24
anteayaso what time and where is the next nova meeting?08:24
anteayajust so I am sure you understand08:24
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:24
lennybthursday 2100 utc #openstack-meeting. next week 16:00utc08:25
anteayanext week 140008:25
anteayabut you got this week's meeting day time and place accurate08:26
anteayaso well done08:26
*** annegentle has quit IRC08:26
*** aloga has quit IRC08:26
anteayalet's move onto jordanP's question08:26
anteayajordanP: hello08:26
anteayajordanP: please go ahead08:26
lennybI am still young to learn new things :)08:26
jordanPright, so08:26
anteayalennyb: good, keep sticking around and asking questions08:27
jordanPI've sent an email 4 days ago08:27
jordanP[third-party]Properly format the status message with gerrit trigger08:27
jordanPI don't know wheter you read it08:27
anteayado you know how to link email posts?08:27
anteayago to lists.openstack.org08:27
jordanPno, I don't08:27
anteayafind the list08:27
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:28
anteayaread the archive find the link to the post08:28
anteayapost it here08:28
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC08:28
anteayacan you do that now?08:28
anteayathen we can all see the post you want to discuss08:28
jordanPyep08:28
anteayathanks08:28
jordanPhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059494.html08:28
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting08:28
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince08:28
jordanPI'll leave you 2min, so can can just read :)08:28
jordanPthe question is simple: what's your opinion :)08:29
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting08:29
*** pnavarro|off has joined #openstack-meeting08:29
*** hareeshp has joined #openstack-meeting08:30
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting08:30
anteayamy opinion is that many people use zuul08:30
anteayaand those that don't are just beginning and don't have the confidence to speak up on the mailing list and reply to your post08:31
anteayaso if you are looking for replies to your post I don't expect you to get any08:31
jordanPI thought so... :)08:31
anteayaas for reformatting I think you should go ahead and see what you can accomplish08:31
anteayaand if you get anywhere post again to your own thread with your results08:32
anteayaand thanks for caring enough to try to improve the experience for developers08:32
jordanPIMO gerrit trigger is easy to setup, and looks less scary than zuul. Most of use are familiar with jenkins, so I think supporting gerrit trigger makes sense08:32
*** zz_ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov08:32
jordanPmy goal is to propose a patch to slightly change the regex used to "capture" the comments posted by third party CIs08:33
jordanPI'll see how it goes08:33
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting08:34
anteayathat sounds like a good way forward08:36
anteayathank you for being proactive here08:36
anteayaI'm not sure if you are used to open source workflow08:36
anteayait seems that you are08:36
anteayaand unfortunately most folks in this space are not08:36
anteayaso the concept of replying to your email post is beyond them08:36
anteayawhich is sad08:37
anteayasince you are doing everything right08:37
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting08:37
anteayathanks jordanP08:37
jordanPanteaya, sure. Thanks08:37
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC08:38
anteayathank you08:38
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting08:38
anteayaanything more on your mind right now?08:38
jordanPme, no :)08:38
anteayathanks for speaking up08:39
*** aloga has joined #openstack-meeting08:39
anteayalennyb: anything more you want to talk about right now?08:39
lennybno.08:39
anteayaokay08:39
anteayathanks08:39
anteayaI'll wait a few more minutes and see if anyone else shows up08:39
*** watanabe_isao has quit IRC08:40
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting08:40
anteayayou are welcome to stick around if you like but it is not required08:40
lennybanteaya, is it easy/possible change gerrit account of CI ?08:40
anteayalennyb: it is possible08:40
anteayadid you create it yourself?08:40
anteaya#link http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#creating-a-service-account08:41
*** phil has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
lennybgreat, we would like to change Cinder CI gerrit account. It's not mine, but I want to associate it with email alias08:41
anteayaif you did follow these instructions to create the account you wish to change you have full access to the account and can do so08:41
*** phil is now known as Guest7233708:41
anteayado you know if you created the account yourself as opposed to having the infra team create it for you08:42
*** ddieterly has quit IRC08:42
lennybwe created it ourself, I believe.08:42
*** aepifanov has quit IRC08:42
*** hareeshp has quit IRC08:42
anteayagood08:43
anteayathen you can edit it to suit yourself08:43
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:43
anteayathe only part you can't change is the gerrit username08:43
anteayaall else you can edit08:43
anteayaand you can do so yourself08:43
*** hareeshp has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
lennybok, we want to change only email08:44
anteayayou can do that08:44
*** aloga has quit IRC08:44
*** mrunge has quit IRC08:46
*** aloga has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting08:47
lennybjordanP, check this link http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#creating-a-service-account08:47
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC08:47
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince08:47
lennybjordanP, there is a section about jenkins gerrit trigger08:48
*** pnavarro|off is now known as pnavarro08:48
*** hareeshp has quit IRC08:48
jordanPlennyb, the problem is how the results are reported bad08:48
*** hareeshp has joined #openstack-meeting08:48
anteayalennyb: if you go to the top of the document, in the upper left corner there is a menu08:48
jordanPmy setup works but there's a regex so that CI account appear on top in the Gerrit UI08:48
anteayaif you click a title on the menu you get a link to that section08:49
anteayalike this08:49
anteaya#link http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#the-jenkins-gerrit-trigger-plugin-way08:49
jordanPso that a code submiter knows easily if his patch broke a 3rd party driver08:49
lennybanteaya, I see it, thanks.08:50
anteayawell the actual point of a third party ci is for the driver operator to pay attention which patches are not compatible with their driver08:50
jordanPatm, for my CI, one has to click on the "toggle CI" button at the bottom to see the results of my CI08:50
anteayaand review the patch and suggest a fix that will work with the driver08:50
anteayajordanP: right08:50
anteayabecause your ci is commenting not voting08:50
jordanPanteaya, I am not sure. for example here : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165214/08:51
anteayaif your ci is stable and cinder agrees to allow you to vote verified on the patches your results will show up with the rest of the ci results08:51
anteayajordanP: which is your ci08:51
jordanPsome 3rd party CI are non-voting but they appear on the top left corner of the UI08:51
jordanPscality08:51
anteayawhich are non-voting but appear in the top left corner?08:52
*** liusheng has quit IRC08:52
jordanPanteaya, you have to click on the togger CI button to see it08:52
anteayagive me the name of a ci account and I'll check08:52
jordanPanteaya, top right, sorry08:52
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting08:52
anteayayes top right08:52
anteayawhich system is non-voting but appears on the top right?08:52
*** akamyshnikova has quit IRC08:53
jordanPgate-rally-dsvm-cinder08:53
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
jordanPbut it's not 3rd party :)08:53
anteayathat is a job08:53
anteayagate rally dsvm cinder is a job, not a ci account08:53
jordanPhaha, I think you're right, it's just a non-voting issue08:53
jordanPwhich makes it a non-issue, I just have to ask the fine guys from the cinder team then08:54
anteayaright now on this patch, no systems are posting votes08:54
jordanPanteaya, arf okay, so how come some system are in the top right corner ?08:54
anteayasince you can see in the column marked verified only jenkins has a response08:54
jordanPyep08:55
jordanPin fact, it's not that important that my 3rd party CI vote, but I'd like to be listed in the top right corner..08:55
*** sergef has quit IRC08:55
anteayaright08:56
anteayaand you are correct it is formatting08:56
anteayathe parser for that page looks for formatting in the comment08:56
anteayaif the comment format is the same is what jenkins posts it will put the results in the top right08:57
anteayaif it isn't it won't08:57
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting08:57
jordanPyep, okay, it's good to have this confirmation08:57
anteayaand I was wrong, these systems are not currently able to vote08:58
anteayathey have to be listed in this group to be able to vote: https://review.openstack.org/#/admin/groups/508,members08:58
anteayaI'll talk to thingee about that tomorrow08:58
jordanPanteaya, well I am not sure making 3rd party CI to vote is a gread idea08:58
jordanPit's too early08:58
jordanPimo08:59
anteayajordanP: me either but that isn't my choice08:59
jordanPyep08:59
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-meeting08:59
anteayait is my job to support the choices ptl's make08:59
anteayaso obviously I didn't do my job and tell him about this gerrit group08:59
jordanPI understand08:59
anteayaso I'll do that tomorrow08:59
anteayathanks08:59
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC08:59
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting08:59
anteayaand we are at time08:59
anteayait has been a fun meeting09:00
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting09:00
anteayathanks lennyb and jordanP09:00
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:00
anteayanice to work with you09:00
jordanPthanks anteaya09:00
anteayasee you next week09:00
jordanPeeah anteaya :)09:00
jordanPyep09:00
anteaya:)09:00
anteaya#endmeeting09:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"09:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 09:00:32 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2015/third_party.2015-03-24-08.00.html09:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2015/third_party.2015-03-24-08.00.txt09:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2015/third_party.2015-03-24-08.00.log.html09:00
anteaya#startmeeting nova-net-to-neutron-migration09:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 09:01:05 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.09:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.09:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova-net-to-neutron-migration)"09:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova_net_to_neutron_migration'09:01
anteayahello09:01
anteayaso last week we agreed that more needed to be done in this space than just working on the patches09:01
anteayamikal said that some work was underway to figure out what the next steps are09:02
anteayaand while I have seen a private email asking deployers for some notes of their setup09:02
anteayaI haven't seen anything in public yet09:02
anteayawhich is unfortunate09:02
anteayasince it would be nice to have a new direction before calling a halt to the old one09:03
anteayabut seeing as I'm the only one here09:03
anteayaand obondarev has put in great effort but doesn't seem to be getting support right now09:03
anteayait doesn't make sense to continue09:03
obondarevo/09:03
anteayaI'm looking forward to hearing more, hopefully in the next week or two09:04
anteayahi obondarev09:04
anteayajust making some notes09:04
anteayahave you any thoughts to share?09:04
obondarevanteaya: let me read the scroll..09:04
obondarevanteaya: the only thought I have is that we are blocked by the lack of feedback/interest09:06
anteayayes09:06
anteayaI agree09:06
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting09:06
anteayanow that feature freeze has past perhaps we can figure out from people what they think we should do next09:06
anteayaso hopefully this week we might get some indication09:07
anteayabut yes, we don't have any right now09:07
anteayaobondarev: do you agree?09:07
*** ygbo has quit IRC09:07
obondarevanteaya: yes09:07
anteayaI'm fine keeping the meeting open if we have something to talk about09:08
anteayabut if not I'm for closing it off and I can go back to bed09:08
anteayawhat do you think?09:08
*** ttrifonov is now known as zz_ttrifonov09:08
obondarevanteaya: agree09:08
anteayaI will try to follow up with mikal and sdague this week and see if we can get some guidance here09:09
anteayaobondarev: I just want to say thank you09:09
obondarevanteaya: thanks09:09
anteayaso nice to work with people who show up09:09
anteaya:)09:09
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting09:09
anteayaI really appreciate it09:09
obondarevanteaya: same for me :)09:09
anteaya:)09:09
*** zz_ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov09:09
anteayaso I'll let you go now and we will talk again, if not this week then at next week's meeting09:10
anteayaenjoy your day obondarev09:10
anteayasee you are the neutron meeting in a few hours09:10
anteayanight09:10
anteaya#endmeeting09:10
obondarevanteaya: thanks, enjoy your sleep :)!09:10
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"09:10
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 09:10:23 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:10
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_net_to_neutron_migration/2015/nova_net_to_neutron_migration.2015-03-24-09.01.html09:10
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_net_to_neutron_migration/2015/nova_net_to_neutron_migration.2015-03-24-09.01.txt09:10
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_net_to_neutron_migration/2015/nova_net_to_neutron_migration.2015-03-24-09.01.log.html09:10
anteayaobondarev: thanks09:10
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy09:12
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting09:15
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting09:15
*** kebray has quit IRC09:15
*** jordanP has left #openstack-meeting09:16
*** sreshetn1 has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting09:19
*** dims has quit IRC09:20
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC09:20
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting09:22
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince09:22
*** aranjan has quit IRC09:23
*** jlanoux_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:23
*** ujuc has quit IRC09:24
*** jlanoux has quit IRC09:25
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting09:26
*** yatin has joined #openstack-meeting09:27
*** BrianShang_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:28
*** BrianShang has quit IRC09:29
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting09:31
*** nshaikh has quit IRC09:31
*** otter768 has quit IRC09:31
*** jyuso1 has left #openstack-meeting09:32
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting09:32
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:35
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting09:39
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting09:39
*** e0ne has quit IRC09:40
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:40
*** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu09:43
*** ddieterly has quit IRC09:43
*** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy09:46
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting09:47
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC09:48
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince09:48
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting09:49
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting09:51
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting09:51
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** sarob has quit IRC09:54
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC09:54
*** evgenyf has quit IRC09:55
*** [1]evgenyf is now known as evgenyf09:55
*** achanda has quit IRC09:56
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC09:57
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting09:58
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince09:58
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC09:59
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting09:59
*** nshaikh has quit IRC09:59
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:59
*** amakarov_away is now known as amakarov10:01
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC10:01
*** sergef has joined #openstack-meeting10:03
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting10:07
*** lpeer__ has quit IRC10:08
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting10:10
*** pelix has joined #openstack-meeting10:15
*** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:17
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC10:17
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting10:17
*** sreshetn1 has quit IRC10:18
*** lpeer__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:21
*** epico has quit IRC10:21
*** wojdev has quit IRC10:21
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting10:22
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:26
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting10:29
*** ajayaa has quit IRC10:31
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting10:31
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting10:33
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting10:35
*** kzaitsev has quit IRC10:36
*** kzaitsev has joined #openstack-meeting10:36
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:37
*** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC10:37
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting10:39
*** oanufriev has joined #openstack-meeting10:41
*** kzaitsev has quit IRC10:42
*** kzaitsev has joined #openstack-meeting10:42
*** hareeshp has quit IRC10:44
*** ddieterly has quit IRC10:44
*** chandankumar_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:44
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC10:45
*** chandankumar has quit IRC10:46
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC10:47
*** rajeshr has quit IRC10:49
*** niclem has joined #openstack-meeting10:51
*** sreshetn1 has joined #openstack-meeting10:51
*** BrianShang_ has quit IRC10:52
*** BrianShang has joined #openstack-meeting10:53
*** aranjan has quit IRC10:54
*** vigneshvar has joined #openstack-meeting10:54
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away10:55
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris11:05
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting11:07
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_11:09
*** hichihara has quit IRC11:11
*** ildikov has quit IRC11:17
*** ajayaa has joined #openstack-meeting11:17
*** SridharG has left #openstack-meeting11:17
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC11:19
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting11:20
*** wojdev has quit IRC11:24
*** IanGovett has joined #openstack-meeting11:24
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting11:26
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting11:27
*** cdelatte has quit IRC11:28
*** jlanoux has joined #openstack-meeting11:28
*** jlanoux_ has quit IRC11:31
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:31
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:31
*** eghobo has quit IRC11:31
*** otter768 has quit IRC11:32
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_11:36
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting11:38
*** zul has quit IRC11:40
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting11:41
*** kzaitsev has quit IRC11:42
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting11:43
*** oanufriev has quit IRC11:44
*** sarob has quit IRC11:45
*** Guest47 has joined #openstack-meeting11:46
*** kzaitsev has joined #openstack-meeting11:46
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:46
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC11:46
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:46
*** jlanoux_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:47
*** kzaitsev has quit IRC11:48
*** kzaitsev has joined #openstack-meeting11:48
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting11:50
*** jlanoux has quit IRC11:50
*** banix has quit IRC11:53
*** kzaitsev has quit IRC11:53
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting11:53
*** dulek_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:55
*** kzaitsev has joined #openstack-meeting11:55
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** dulek has quit IRC11:58
*** xuhanp_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** niclem has quit IRC11:58
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** kzaitsev has quit IRC11:59
*** kzaitsev has joined #openstack-meeting11:59
*** kzaitsev_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:01
*** dulek_ has quit IRC12:04
*** dmacpher has quit IRC12:04
*** kzaitsev has quit IRC12:04
*** jaypipes has quit IRC12:06
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:06
*** dkusidlo has joined #openstack-meeting12:07
*** dkusidlo has quit IRC12:07
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting12:07
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting12:07
*** shankarprasad has quit IRC12:11
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting12:11
*** BharatK has quit IRC12:14
*** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu12:15
*** dims has quit IRC12:15
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting12:16
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting12:17
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting12:18
*** chandankumar_ has quit IRC12:18
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:18
*** evgenyf has quit IRC12:19
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting12:19
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting12:21
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting12:22
*** ujuc has quit IRC12:23
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting12:24
*** aranjan has quit IRC12:25
*** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy12:25
*** sreshetn1 has quit IRC12:26
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:27
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting12:27
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting12:28
*** banix has quit IRC12:28
*** jckasper has quit IRC12:29
*** dulek has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting12:31
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting12:32
*** aysyd has joined #openstack-meeting12:33
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting12:35
*** irenab has quit IRC12:36
*** ChuckC has quit IRC12:37
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr12:37
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting12:37
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting12:41
*** ildikov has quit IRC12:44
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting12:44
*** ddieterly has quit IRC12:45
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:46
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting12:47
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:47
*** annegentle is now known as Guest8313412:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:48
*** oanufriev has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** bknudson has quit IRC12:51
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC12:53
*** jang1 has joined #openstack-meeting12:53
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC12:54
*** Guest83134 is now known as agentlebus12:54
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting12:55
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting12:55
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:56
*** j05h has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** yatin has quit IRC12:56
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting12:57
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** subscope has quit IRC12:58
*** mpaolino has quit IRC12:59
*** dkranz has quit IRC13:00
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting13:00
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away13:00
*** ChuckC has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting13:02
*** thomasem has quit IRC13:02
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:04
*** changbl has quit IRC13:06
*** Chengyong_Lin has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** amotoki has quit IRC13:09
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
*** tochi has quit IRC13:10
*** zaneb has quit IRC13:10
*** ddieterly has quit IRC13:11
*** weshay has quit IRC13:11
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** agentlebus has quit IRC13:12
*** cdub has quit IRC13:13
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-meeting13:14
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
*** doude has quit IRC13:16
*** eharney has quit IRC13:16
*** ChrisPriceAB has joined #openstack-meeting13:16
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** rbowen has quit IRC13:20
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:20
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting13:20
*** neelashah has quit IRC13:24
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:24
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting13:27
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:27
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting13:28
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting13:28
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting13:28
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting13:29
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
*** hareeshp has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC13:32
*** ChuckC has quit IRC13:32
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC13:32
*** otter768 has quit IRC13:33
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr13:33
*** banix has quit IRC13:33
*** wojdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** sarob has quit IRC13:34
*** jckasper has quit IRC13:34
*** chandankumar has quit IRC13:35
*** wojdev has quit IRC13:35
*** wojdev_ is now known as wojdev13:35
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** ildikov has quit IRC13:36
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting13:41
*** lazy_prince is now known as killer_prince13:41
*** Guest47 has quit IRC13:42
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** rakesh_mishra has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
*** yapeng has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC13:46
*** tiswanso has joined #openstack-meeting13:46
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting13:46
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** nshaikh has quit IRC13:48
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** Gerald_K has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC13:54
*** aranjan has quit IRC13:54
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** johnbelamaric has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** Mwang2_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** xgerman has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
*** pritesh has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away13:57
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** ihrachyshka has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** lzachery has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
mesteryyo13:59
*** baoli has quit IRC13:59
xgermano/13:59
banix Hi13:59
*** j05h has quit IRC13:59
markmcclaino/13:59
*** sean-k-mooney has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
anteayao/13:59
yamamotohi13:59
swamireddy#startmeeting EC2-API13:59
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 13:59:55 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is swamireddy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:59
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:59
yamahatahello13:59
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: EC2-API)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ec2_api'14:00
mesteryswamireddy: Neutron meeting is now in this slot14:00
armaxhello14:00
amotokihi14:00
swamireddyops14:00
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez14:00
mesteryswamireddy: Can you cancel the EC2 meeting? You must have the wrong channel.14:00
swamireddysure....will end this meeting...14:00
marunhi14:00
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** pc_m has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
mesteryswamireddy: Thanks!14:00
swamireddy#endmeeting14:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 14:00:43 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:00
*** rackertom has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
rkukurahi14:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ec2_api/2015/ec2_api.2015-03-24-13.59.html14:00
*** achanda has quit IRC14:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ec2_api/2015/ec2_api.2015-03-24-13.59.txt14:00
*** mwang2__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ec2_api/2015/ec2_api.2015-03-24-13.59.log.html14:00
luqaso/14:00
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC14:00
rackertomo/14:00
sean-k-mooney\o14:01
mwang2__o/14:01
swamireddymestery:  Is this meeting weekly one?14:01
mesteryOK, lets get this packd neutron meeting started14:01
mesteryswamireddy: bi-weekly in this slot14:01
mesteryWe rotate14:01
mestery#startmeeting networking14:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 14:01:26 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: networking)"14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'networking'14:01
ihrachyshkao/14:01
mestery#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/Meetings Agenda14:01
anteayaswamireddy: I don't see any listing for ec2-api meeting on the meeting page: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings14:01
mestery#topic Announcements14:01
*** jamiem has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: networking)"14:01
mesteryWe're in the feature freeze now, trying to get ready to cut an RC114:02
swamireddymestery: Thanks...will take the next week slot on this. Thanks ..sorry for confusion..14:02
mesteryWe'll likely spend most of the meeting going over specs which are in RC114:02
*** bryan_att has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
mestery#info RCs: April 9-2314:02
mestery#info Kilo release: April 3014:02
mesterySo, lets move along since I think we'll need most of the time today.14:02
*** mrunge has quit IRC14:03
mesteryWe'll circle back to bugs in a bit14:03
mestery#topic Kilo-RC114:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Kilo-RC1 (Meeting topic: networking)"14:03
mestery#link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/kilo-rc114:03
swamireddyanteaya: Yet to update here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings, https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/EC2API#Agenda14:03
*** dboik_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
bryan_att#info Bryan Sullivan14:03
mesterybryan_att: I think you may be in the wrong meetiong, this is the neutron meeting14:03
dougwigO/14:03
*** julim has quit IRC14:03
mesteryOK, lets walk through the specs we have in RC1 yet14:03
mestery#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/subnet-allocation14:03
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
mesterysalv-orlando: In lieu of carl_baldwin being here, this one looks like it's making some progress.14:04
mesterysalv-orlando: Do you think we can land this one in the RC yet?14:04
mesteryarmax: Any thoughts on this one as well?14:04
salv-orlandomestery: I need to find pavel_bondar14:04
mesterysalv-orlando: Ack14:04
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting14:04
salv-orlandoI need to sync up with him and rearrange the outstanding patches14:04
armaxmestery: if I look at the list of patches pendind14:05
armaxpending14:05
armaxhttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/subnet-allocation,n,z14:05
mesterysalv-orlando: This is for subnet pool, are you thinking pluggalbe ipam?14:05
armaxwhich ones are deemed critical in order to have a semi-functional feature?14:05
armaxthe picture doesn’t look good14:05
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
mesteryarmax: Agree, wish carl_baldwin was here to help answer that :(14:05
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
mesteryOK, I've pinged carl, lets move on and circle back if he joins us in a bit.14:06
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
mesterycarl_baldwin: There you are!14:06
johnbelamaricarmax: subnet allocation from a subnet pool is the most critical in there14:06
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
*** neiljerr` has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
mesterycarl_baldwin: We're talking subnet pools and the chances of it merging in RC114:06
carl_baldwinmestery: hi, sorry to be late14:06
mesterycarl_baldwin: We need your expertise here :)14:06
salv-orlandoarmax, mestery: i have the full picture anyway14:06
salv-orlandoit's just that I need to speak with Pavel to check whether we can make it or not14:07
* carl_baldwin reading back14:07
mesterysalv-orlando: thanks!14:07
mesterysalv-orlando: IPAM is dependent on subnet pools?14:07
salv-orlandomestery: nope14:07
johnbelamaricsalv-orlando: last i spoke with Pavel we expect to be able to make it14:07
mesterysalv-orlando: Ack14:07
salv-orlandoI think subnet pools is fairly stable and should be able to complete14:07
*** Mwang2_ has quit IRC14:07
salv-orlandoIt's just not yet clear to me how long we are before removing the wip on the allocation patch14:08
*** vigneshvar has quit IRC14:08
mesterysalv-orlando: carl_baldwin may have an idea there14:08
carl_baldwinIt is getting close.14:08
salv-orlandoespecially now that we've agreed to not have a feature for wildcarded gateway and allocation pools14:08
*** rakesh_mishra has quit IRC14:08
*** sanjayu has quit IRC14:08
salv-orlandomestery: rtidwell might too, but he's not around14:08
carl_baldwinThere are just a few minor things that can be cleaned up this week.14:09
*** chandankumar has quit IRC14:09
mesterycarl_baldwin salv-orlando: Lets assume this one will make it then, and we can circle back next week if it still looks iffy, Sound ok?14:09
carl_baldwinrtidwell has been travelling14:09
carl_baldwinmestery: Yes.14:09
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
mesteryOK, lets move on14:09
*** kzaitsev_ has quit IRC14:09
mesteryNExt up are the IPAM BPs14:09
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
mestery#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/neutron-ipam14:10
mestery#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/reference-ipam-driver14:10
mesterysalv-orlando carl_baldwin: Back to you guys again here :)14:10
*** alevine has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** j05h has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** ftersin has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** ildikov has quit IRC14:10
salv-orlandoso14:11
* salv-orlando one second please...14:11
mesterysalv-orlando: no worries14:12
salv-orlandothe situation is fairly simple. We need to tweak again the interface14:12
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
ihrachyshka:D14:12
salv-orlandoin order to allow the driver to accept contextes. I and carl_baldwin agree this should not be how it is done, so we would like to make this a transient change14:12
johnbelamaricEarlier today pavel_bondar indicated he has resolved most test failures except OpenContrail CI - with the fix discussed on the ML14:12
*** ftersin has quit IRC14:12
carl_baldwinsalv-orlando: +114:13
*** ftersin has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
johnbelamaricthat's the fix i mean14:13
salv-orlandonow I think we can have code complete by the end of the week14:13
mesterysalv-orlando: Ack on that14:13
*** alevine has quit IRC14:13
salv-orlandowith an optional driver, and an "experimental" interface - this would be the situation for Kilo14:14
*** AmirBaleghi112 has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
salv-orlandoit is now up to the core team to decide whether to allow this in Kilo or not14:14
mesterysalv-orlando: Sounds tenuous here, we'd have to mark this as experimental maybe?14:14
salv-orlandoI and carl_baldwin do not have a vote here obviously ;)14:14
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2414:15
salv-orlandomestery: yes definetely experimental. We probably manage to add a non-voting job using the ipam driver before the end of kilo, but I am not able to guarantee that now, because this also depends on what infra-core thinks of this14:15
salv-orlandoand I've not pinged them yet about it14:15
mesteryThis all sounds like it will be hard to land in Kilo to be honest salv-orlando.14:15
ihrachyshkasalv-orlando, will we have a WARNING PLEASE DON'T USE IT in neutron.conf?14:15
carl_baldwinmestery: I think we were headed toward making it experimental weeks ago when we decided not to replace the baked in IPAM yet.14:15
markmcclainso I do think we have to be careful with experimental things.. our track record with experimental items has not been steller14:15
salv-orlandoihrachyshka: see, I have to admit one thing14:16
*** varora has left #openstack-meeting14:16
salv-orlandoin the past I've deferred work items in the same conditions as this one14:16
mesteryAnother option is to move this out of kilo, take the time to fix all of this, and land it early in liberty14:16
salv-orlandoas a core reviewer I mean14:16
*** ftersin has quit IRC14:16
*** oanufriev has left #openstack-meeting14:16
dougwigto reiterate what mark said, if we ship it experimental, and it's buggy, with our historical reputation, i don't think that experimental tag will mean much.14:16
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
salv-orlandoso this is why I'm saying - we can have the work done, and then it's up to you to judge. I do not want to influence in any direction, but I do not feel confident enough to say "here your pluggable IPAM driver, the code is reliable and you can use it without any worry"14:17
anteayasalv-orlando: what opinion are you looking for from infra?14:17
ihrachyshkawhat's the benefit of merging it now instead of early L? except obvious contributor frustration14:17
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
mesteryihrachyshka: Contributor frustration isn't a benefit in fact, but I see what you mean there :)14:17
salv-orlandoanteaya: adding yet another non-voting job for neutron. I'm not sure you might be ok with spending another node.14:17
ihrachyshkamestery, lol14:17
johnbelamaricihrachyshka: from my point of view we have several customers eagerly awaiting this...14:17
carl_baldwinI agree with salv-orlando, I don’t think there is a way we can land this all in one shot and say it is ready.14:17
anteayasalv-orlando: we have no policy about how many non-voting jobs a project can have14:18
mesterySo based on this input, I think we need to defer this to Liberty then. We don't need to re-approve the spec, and in fact can work to land it once the RC branch is cut.14:18
johnbelamariccarl_baldwin: yes, it has to stay experimental14:18
salv-orlandoihrachyshka: good point. I remember arguing with people in the past that since they were not adding any externally visible feature, there was no rush to merge their feature by a given deadline14:18
mesteryNo one wants to hear that I'm sure though14:18
*** kzaitsev has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
mesteryBut it's likely where this headed14:18
salv-orlandoI'll let to carl_baldwin and johnbelamaric to explain the benefits14:18
anteayaI can't see us wanting to police that, just use what you need14:18
salv-orlandoanteaya: thanks114:18
anteayathank you14:19
dougwigjohnbelamaric: could we land it all in stackforge as an external, so those customers could get at it?14:19
ihrachyshkawe should definitely do case-by-case post mortem on why pieces targeted are not shipped...14:19
mesteryWe're literally in the final weeks of Kilo.14:19
mesteryRather than rushing a big feature like this in at the end, I think it makes sense to do this early in Liberty to be honest.14:19
*** kzaitsev_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
ihrachyshkadougwig, that involves base db plugin refactor, I don't know whether it's reasonable to have it in stackforge14:19
markmcclainmestery: +1 to deferring.. we did it for IPv6 Icehouse and while frustrating I think we ended up in a better place when it landed in Juno14:19
amotokiIn my understanding, "experimental" means the minimum feature set is completed and it needs broader testing. if the expected minimum feature set is doen, it is okay to say it  experimental.14:20
johnbelamaricdougwig: certainly that's a possibility but it complicates things, as several of these customers expect to get the code from distributors (SUSE, RedHat, etc.) which will be much easier if it's in tree14:20
anteayayou are discussing adding an untested feature _after_ feature freeze?14:20
mesteryanteaya: When you put it that way.14:20
ihrachyshkamarkmcclain, we are actually worse of letting some ipv6 pieces in icehouse at all14:20
anteayajust doing a reality check14:20
johnbelamaricamotoki: the minimal feature set will be ready14:21
mesteryOK, I think we need to admit we can't land this in a decent shape in the next few weeks.14:21
mesteryAnd to do this right, lets just land this early in Liberty.14:21
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
mesteryThoughts?14:21
*** timcline has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
salv-orlandodougwig: the way it's been done so far requires a lot of patching in db_base_plugin_v214:21
salv-orlandoI'd rather defer than use stackforge for it14:21
dougwigsalv-orlando, johnbelamaric - understood.14:22
armaxsalv-orlando: +114:22
salv-orlandowe could put the drivers in stackforge14:22
ihrachyshkaI agree. The blame is hugely on review team14:22
markmcclainihrachyshka: we hid all of the IPv6 API changes because they weren't ready14:22
armaxstackforge seems more trouble than it’s worth for this14:22
mesteryarmax: ++14:22
salv-orlandoihrachyshka: nah I've been swamped by 1,000 things this release cycle and could not get my hands on it before end of January14:22
amotokiarmax: agree14:22
johnbelamaricmestery: well, clearly this is a big disappointment if we go that way - the plan was to not enable it by default14:22
*** esker has quit IRC14:22
ihrachyshkamarkmcclain, right, but ipv6 mode flags that were merged in I are not the best design solution, and they bite us often now14:22
*** kzaitsev has quit IRC14:22
carl_baldwinI’m not seeing how stack forge will work.  The drivers could go in there, but there is code to load and use the drivers that cannot.14:23
mesteryjohnbelamaric: I think the big issue is taking on new techinical debt for a feature which isn't tested yet ... in the feature freeze timeframe.14:23
*** dt_os has joined #openstack-meeting14:23
anteayamestery: ++14:23
markmcclain++14:23
dougwigmestery: if we're serious about focusing on quality, i think this has to be deferred.  i mean, we're after FF here.14:23
dougwigahh, beat me to it.14:23
dougwigmestery: +114:23
amotokimestery: +114:23
mesteryI don't see a need to re-propose the spec, we can literally just move to working to land these (with adequate testing) once the RC branch is cut14:24
mestery#info IPAM is deferred to Liberty14:24
* ihrachyshka side-notes that we also need to shrink dev cycle so that those cases are not so disappointing14:24
mesteryOK, lets move on to the next one.14:24
mestery#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/hyper-v-ovs-agent14:24
anteayaihrachyshka: good luck14:24
mesteryarmax: You've been looking at this one, along with amotoki. Thouughts?14:24
amotokimestery: it is better you announce which blueprints are automatically approved for L. it would be nice.14:24
salv-orlandodougwig: I have nothing to oppose to this decision. If carl_baldwin and johnbelamaric want to appeal we can discuss further on the mailing list14:25
armaxI made a couple of comments yesterday14:25
armaxbut last time I chechek didn’t see any feedback from the author14:25
mesteryamotoki: Yes, we'll get to that, but I'll do that.14:25
armaxchecking now14:25
*** aepifanov has quit IRC14:25
amotokithe split patch has been proposed. but ovs_lib one is still big.14:25
amotokiihrachyshka is checking it too.14:25
ihrachyshkaatuvenie was going to split it even more14:25
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
mesteryYes, I think it needs one more split yet.14:25
amotokiimho ovs_lib, polling, utils can be split into separate patches.14:26
ihrachyshkathere are some obvious ways to achieve it (lots of code was just moved around)14:26
amotokii believe we can land it soon. we alrady have all we need for hyper-v.14:26
armaxnow the question becomes how confident are we that this reshuffling this late in the cycle is not going to backfire?14:27
ihrachyshkaif it's mostly line-by-line identical, I'm not too scared of actual reshuffling.14:28
mesteryWe're almost halfway through the meeitng, so lets assume this one is ok for now, we can re-visit next week if needed.14:28
armaxevery day it passes to get this merged makes me increasingly unease14:28
mestery#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/restructure-l3-agent14:28
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting14:28
mesterycarl_baldwin: This one only has a few patches left14:28
mesterycarl_baldwin: I assume we can safely land these this week, so not much to discuss here. thoughts?14:28
carl_baldwinmestery: Yes, we’re past the big ones.14:29
carl_baldwinmestery: No, not much to discuss here.14:29
HenryGI have been reviewing, it looks good14:29
ihrachyshkathis one is not feature-ish, so could be easily postponed. but if all is in place and not intrusive, it's also ok merge.14:29
mesterycarl_baldwin: Great! An easy one. HenryG, thanks for that!14:29
mesteryLEts move on.14:29
mestery#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/ipv6-router14:29
*** timcline has quit IRC14:29
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
carl_baldwinHenryG has been doing great reviews on these BTW.  Kudos.14:29
mesteryHenryG: This one is dependent on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-ipv6-prefixes right?14:29
*** Mandell has quit IRC14:30
HenryGYes, but it is small (and a big bang for the LOC)14:30
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
absubrammestery: yes14:30
*** timcline has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
*** fredlhsu_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
HenryGIt needs a functional test added, I believe that is imminent14:30
mesteryHenryG: OK, I think the other one (multiple ipv6 prefixes) is not small and has lots of patche.14:30
mestery*patches14:30
HenryGOnly one is needed for the feature14:31
absubrammestery, HenryG: yes.. hoping to get that functional test change added by today.. was hitting a few issues with it yesterday14:31
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_14:31
absubramin running the functional tests that is.. not my change :p14:31
mesteryOK, lets circle back on these later in the week, we'll need the functional test for V6 routers and HenryG you can let me know which patch is needed for multiple prefixes.14:31
mesteryThe last two are LBaaS drivers which need working CI, whcih neitehr has.14:32
mesterydougwig: What is the date on those LBaaS ones we gve them?14:32
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
mestery#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/netscaler-lbass-v2-driver14:32
mestery#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/radware-lbaas-driver14:32
dougwigmestery: date was today, though i was going to give them until the end of the week, since they're not mainline code.14:32
mesterydougwig: OK, lets see if htey can get the CI working.14:32
dougwigthe radware driver is really close, in particular.14:33
mesteryOK, 28 minutes left now, lets continue down the agenda, some conentiious things left.14:33
mestery#topic MTU and vlan_transparency recovery mode14:33
*** openstack changes topic to "MTU and vlan_transparency recovery mode (Meeting topic: networking)"14:33
mesteryarmax filed two bugs to track the cleanups here14:33
mestery#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/143466714:33
openstackLaunchpad bug 1434667 in neutron "VLAN transparent feature cleanup" [High,Confirmed]14:33
armaxgaryk is not around14:33
mestery#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/143467114:33
openstackLaunchpad bug 1434671 in neutron "MTU advertisement feature cleanup" [High,Confirmed]14:33
armaxtoo bad14:33
mesteryarmax: Really? *sigh*14:33
mesteryWell, lets just see what we can do here.14:33
armaxmestery: I’ve pinged him, let see if he jumps in14:34
*** ajayaa has quit IRC14:34
mesteryI was out last Friday, so armax, can you summarize for me and the meeting minutes where we stand here?14:34
armaxanyway amotoki seems to favor the approach where the vlan_transparent attribute is an extension attribute14:34
*** sarob has quit IRC14:34
*** banix_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
armaxand keep the mtu one as is14:34
mesteryI thought garyk was in favor of that too?14:35
mesteryand salv-orlando as well?14:35
priteshmestery: last time garyk agreed that he was ok with mtu one, the vlan one still needs concensus.14:35
mesterypritesh: Ack14:35
*** ajayaa has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
mestery#info Plan is to keep the MTU attribute as-is, and look to make the vlan_transparent an extension attribute14:35
*** j05h has quit IRC14:35
garykhi, sorry for joining later14:35
ajothat's my opinion on the mtu bit at least.14:35
mesteryarmax: Looks like we may only need the one bug.14:35
mesterygaryk: yo14:35
*** j05h has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
ajo(hi :) )14:35
*** wojdev has quit IRC14:36
amotokiMTU one goes as-is without extension?14:36
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC14:36
*** jprovazn has quit IRC14:36
*** banix has quit IRC14:36
*** banix_ is now known as banix14:36
armaxamotoki: do you have concerns?14:36
amotokiI just wonder how to detect it from API perspective.14:36
garyki am in favor of the mtu being an extension too14:36
marunthat's the only way we have a chance of having tempest be able to test it14:37
marunso +1 for extension from me, too14:37
amotokii can go into the detail thursday and friday.14:37
garykat the moment it is read only and driven by ml2 plugin configurations14:37
armaxI am really not that swayed one way or another14:37
*** sadasu has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
mesteryHonestly, me either, but I'd like to resolve it so we can ship these in kilo. If that means extension attributes, lets just make that happen.14:38
dougwigcan we timebox this, lest we start to rehash last week?  it was going in circles.14:38
armaxwe can have both as extension attributes, it’ll take more work, so let’s agree now and waste no more time14:38
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
salv-orlandoI think the MTU patch makes sense.14:38
mestery#info move mtu and vlan_transparency to extension attributes14:38
marundoes anyone have alternate view about the testing?14:38
mesteryarmax: Done14:38
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
maruncan we sanely test without detecting feature via api extension?14:38
garykmestery: is anyone going to take it as an action item to do?14:38
ajomarun what's the exact issue with testing?14:39
dougwigmarun: depends on your definition of sanity.  :)14:39
ajo(whithout extension)14:39
mesterygaryk: I was hoping htis is where pritesh would jump in :)14:39
ajowithout14:39
garykmestery: ok, thank14:39
armaxmarun: we can’t selectively test the feeature if it wasn’t an extension14:39
amotokiajo: the issue is from API perspective. testing is one case.14:39
mesterypritesh: Are you ok with refactorign these to extensions?14:39
marundougwig: ^^14:39
tiswansogaryk, mestery:  I will work with pritesh as well14:39
mesterytiswanso: Awesome!14:39
tiswansofor the mtu14:39
garyktiswanso: thanks14:39
*** prad has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
priteshmestery: i am ok with vlan one, mtu i thoght should remain in core.14:39
mestery#action tiswanso and pritesh to refactor MTU and vlan_transparent into extension attributes14:40
mesterypritesh: See marun and amotoki's concerns around testing above.14:40
tiswansopritesh:  +1 --- would prefer it's in core as it makes sense :-)14:40
mesteryI think we need to move forward with these quickly to refactor or risk reviving garyk's reverts if we don't solve this.14:40
salv-orlandotiswanso, pritesh: being in core vs extension what difference makes for you?14:40
tiswansobut defer to the more knowledgeable about test practicalities14:40
salv-orlandojust trying to make sure you do not believe that an extension is a 2nd class api14:41
marunare we intending to start microversioning to avoid this kind of thing in L?14:41
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
salv-orlandomarun: indeed that why core vs extension is a moot point for me now14:41
*** ildikov has quit IRC14:41
armaxsalv-orlando: agreed14:41
*** sdake__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
armaxlet’s move both to be extension attributes and revisit in L14:41
salv-orlandomarun: but there's still lack of consensus on microversioning and saying good riddance to extensions14:41
mesteryOK, lets move on then.14:41
armaxI guess that’s the best we can do right now14:41
tiswansosalv-orlando:  I don't have a strong reason... was kind of viewing as 2nd class API but need to learn more details14:41
armaxtoo bad we didn’t have this conversation a while back14:41
mesteryWe have more to cover here, and I think the case to moving both to extension attributes has been made.14:41
priteshok so do we need FFE or do we do it in the bugs filed by armax14:41
mesterypritesh: Use the bugs please :)14:42
salv-orlandotiswanso: do you know that floating ips and security groups are extensons as well? they don't seem 2nd class APIs to me!14:42
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
armaxtiswanso: this is totally the wrong way to look ait it14:42
priteshmestery: will do thanks.14:42
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
amotokitiswanso: having API in core or extension is not a big thing. it does not necessarily mean the 2nd class API.14:42
*** achanda has quit IRC14:42
tiswansosalv-orlando:  thanks for the clarification... didn't know that14:42
mesteryFolks, 18 minutes left, lets stop bike shedding and move on :)14:42
mestery#topic Pylint -- In or out?14:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Pylint -- In or out? (Meeting topic: networking)"14:42
mesterydougwig: This is your yak to shave14:42
tiswansoI'm fine with the group's opinion.. just wanted to give my vote :-)14:43
dougwigoh, thanks.14:43
*** BrianB has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
mesterydougwig: 2 more items after this, so I'll hold this particular yak shaving to 6 minutes ;)14:43
dougwigi've been hesitant reviewing pylint patches, because i know the group is split.  did we ever make a group decision on pylint?  are we full-throttle merging it in, or is it's annoyance not worth it?14:43
carl_baldwinI think pylint has to be pinned or out.14:43
armaxI think that with the current arrangement of the jobs, keeping it unpinned it’s not a big deal14:44
ihrachyshkapylint++14:44
armaxwe can recover from a failure fairly quickly14:44
*** fnaval has quit IRC14:44
*** sdake has quit IRC14:44
ihrachyshkait should be on same par as pep8, no difference14:44
garykcould it be non voting?14:45
dougwigis it worth the trouble?  i like the idea of it, but i've been finding it's annoyance outweighs its usefulness.14:45
armaxgaryk: no14:45
ihrachyshkathere is some push-back against pinning it globally, but that's just wrong and should be pushed forward to avoid random failures14:45
carl_baldwinI’m pretty sure that pylint has cost us a couple days of gate time this cycle.14:45
ihrachyshkagaryk, non-voting == non-caring14:45
dougwigihrachyshka: globally in openstack there seems to be pushback against pylint in general14:45
* HenryG is a fan of a voting pylint14:45
garykif we can fix failures then legs go with it - unless it is really blocking14:45
armaxcarl_baldwin: that’s before the skip-if filter14:45
ajocan't we pin it locally?14:45
armaxthat marun did14:45
ihrachyshkacarl_baldwin, that's because it was not pinned14:45
armaxand the separate job14:45
armaxajo: no14:46
carl_baldwinihrachyshka: That is why I say pinned or out.14:46
anteayasomething in global requirements pinned locally creates a mess14:46
armaxihrachyshka: no, that’s because of the arrangement we had14:46
ajoarmax: it will be override when we take the global imports?14:46
armaxif today it broke we could disable it in tox14:46
ajorequirements, sorry14:46
ihrachyshkaajo, we can try too, but better handle it globally. we can back up to local pin if nothing goes globally for a month or so14:46
mesteryihrachyshka: See comments from anteaya on local pinning of a global requirement14:46
armaxand the change to disable it will less than  10 mins to merge14:47
ihrachyshkaanteaya, what's the problem with pin?14:47
armaxwith no fuss14:47
* marun is not a fan of pylint. let's spend our time writing better tests!14:47
dougwigwe have 2 minutes.  does anyone feel strongly that it should be *out* ?14:47
ajomestery, where? anteaya14:47
*** timcline_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
ihrachyshkaanteaya, pin as in <=current_version14:47
*** tsekiyama has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
anteayaany diversion from global requirements creates a mess for you14:47
anteayayou are async to the rest of openstack14:47
armaxmarun: that’s a good reason to make pylint moot14:47
* ihrachyshka notes that we pin hacking locally14:47
ajoanteaya, yes but it's a tool, not a lib..14:48
anteayabeing in sync with the rest of openstack is rather the point of global requirements14:48
armaxgetting rid of pylint because of infra related problems seems like solving the wrong problem14:48
ajoanteaya, if the problem is the global reqs transposing to local, we could fix that to read some sort of tags we set..14:48
clarkbjust put a pin in global requirements14:48
marunanteaya: global requirements is problematic for some use cases.14:48
*** yapeng has quit IRC14:48
ajoclarkb, that wasn't accepted14:48
marunanteaya: we need to start supporting pinning next cycle14:48
ihrachyshkaanteaya, the point of pin is to fix new issues on our schedule14:48
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
marunanteaya: but that's a debate for another time14:48
-amotoki- 5 min warning14:48
clarkbajo it wasnt? thats weird14:48
armaxI’d rather get rid of pylint because we write code that is so great that we no longer need it14:48
mesteryWe're yak shaving on the logistics of using pylint, but I've not seen if people really *want* it in yet.14:48
clarkbits how we do pep8 and pyflakes14:48
markmcclainmestery: I'd like to see pylint go away14:49
* carl_baldwin agrees with marun, has put his comments in the global pin patch review.14:49
ajoclarkb: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/163506/14:49
*** mpaolino has quit IRC14:49
garykis the yak shaving done in the bike shed?14:49
mesterygaryk: Yes14:49
ihrachyshkaok, next stop - dropping pep8 I guess14:49
dougwigwe're at time.14:49
marunihrachyshka: hardly14:49
mesteryOK, lets move on, we have two more bike sheds full of yaks for htis meeting14:49
mesteryWe didn't solve pylint here though.14:49
mesterydougwig: ML perhaps?14:49
dougwigmestery: ok14:49
mestery#topic DVR Gate Job14:50
*** openstack changes topic to "DVR Gate Job (Meeting topic: networking)"14:50
mesteryarmax: You're up!14:50
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting14:50
armaxI looked at this graph14:50
armaxhttp://graphite.openstack.org/render/?from=-10days&height=500&until=now&width=1200&bgcolor=ffffff&fgcolor=000000&yMax=100&yMin=0&target=color(alias(movingAverage(asPercent(stats.zuul.pipeline.check.job.check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr.FAILURE,sum(stats.zuul.pipeline.check.job.check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr.{SUCCESS,FAILURE})),%2736hours%27),%20%27check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-dvr%27),%27orange%27)&target=color(alias(movingAverag14:50
armaxasPercent(stats.zuul.pipeline.check.job.check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full.FAILURE,sum(stats.zuul.pipeline.check.job.check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full.{SUCCESS,FAILURE})),%2736hours%27),%20%27check-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full%27),%27blue%27)14:50
* mestery grumbles about bad paste14:50
*** timcline has quit IRC14:50
armaxto track the reliability of the DVR job14:50
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting14:50
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting14:50
armaxhttp://goo.gl/jF5zBP14:50
armaxis that better?14:51
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky|afk14:51
anteayamestery: yeah graphite urls are never short14:51
marunhuh, that's neat14:51
mesteryarmax: yes14:51
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** EmilienM|PTO is now known as EmilienM14:51
marunso we're down to a reasonable failure rate for the dvr job?14:51
salv-orlandoarmax: no you could do phishing using url shorteners. and then google is evil :)14:51
armaxthe long term plan is to have multi-node voting14:51
armaxswami is working on it14:51
* carl_baldwin has also been tracking this graph. Pleased with the current state.14:51
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
marunthat would imply actually testing dvr...14:51
armaxthe question is: do we want to making the single-node voting as an interim step?14:51
mesteryarmax: ++, I'm fine with that as the interim step14:52
armaxyes, making it voting means that DVR must be taken into account into any Routing feature and Testing14:52
mesteryAnd continuing down the multi-node tesitng path that swami is doing14:52
salv-orlandoarmax: I'm fine with that either. possibly after rc1 is out?14:52
mesteryWith the goal of having the multi-node job up at least non-voting soon14:52
armaxI was going to watch the job for another few days14:52
*** padkrish has quit IRC14:52
marunarmax: I'd like to see better docs so that other developers can have a clue as to how to fix problems as they occur.14:53
armaxsalv-orlando: I guess we probably need to take this to the ML too14:53
salv-orlandoarmax: cool14:53
marunarmax: right now, I'm pretty sure dvr is a mystery to most.14:53
armaxmarun: that should be true for anything in Neutron14:53
mesteryarmax: Ack, sounds like it14:53
amotokimy vote is to make it voting once Liberty is open.14:53
anteayaarmax: can you include a shortened link to this graph in the patch to make the job voting please?14:53
armaxI don’t see why DVR should be treated differently14:53
marunarmax: dvr is an order of magnitude more complicated though, if only in implementaiton.14:53
armaxanteaya: can do14:53
anteayaarmax: thanks14:53
armaxmarun: depends where you look from14:53
armaxmarun: but I can see what you mean14:53
armaxHA is no piece of cake either14:54
salv-orlandomarun: not at mistery at all. everybody knows what a dvr is - the thing you used to record movies back in the '90s14:54
armaxand that doesn’t even have tests14:54
armaxbesides a few functional onces14:54
armaxones14:54
marunarmax: it has pretty good functional ones, fwiw14:54
marunarmax: but no substitute for a proper integration test.14:54
* marun digresses14:54
*** kebray has quit IRC14:54
mesteryOK, lets move on here.14:54
mesteryOne item left14:54
mestery#topic LBaaS14:55
mesterydougwig: Is this one yours too?14:55
*** openstack changes topic to "LBaaS (Meeting topic: networking)"14:55
mesteryOr xgerman's?14:55
dougwigxgerman's14:55
*** hemnafk is now known as hemna14:55
xgermanmine14:55
mesteryxgerman: Please, go ahead.14:55
ajosalv-orlando: lol14:55
xgermanok, we want to make Horizon panels for LBaaS and I was tsrating to collect some use cases14:55
xgermanso please add them to the etherpad14:56
mestery#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/LBaaS_Horizon_Use_Cases14:56
anteayaxgerman: have you talked to david_lyle about this?14:56
xgermannot yet14:56
anteayahorizon is getting crowded to the point of being unusable14:56
anteayayeah um, maybe start there14:57
amotokiis it targetted to Liberty? right?14:57
*** VW_ has quit IRC14:57
dougwigamotoki: yes14:57
*** aranjan has quit IRC14:57
xgermanyes, Liberty, and we are talking to our UX designer Michael Hinnant14:57
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC14:57
amotokinice. we will deprecate LBaaS v1 API in Kilo and we need to support LBaaS v2 in L :)14:57
mesteryxgerman: Excellent, I'd make sure to talk to david-lyle as anteaya said.14:57
*** garyh has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
mesteryamotoki: Yes14:58
anteayasome would say, and I'm amoung them that horizon is unusable now14:58
anteayadue to overcrowding14:58
mestery#topic Open Discussion14:58
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: networking)"14:58
mesteryOK, a minute or so left.14:58
anteayaI have a question14:58
mesteryLets keep the focus on RC BPs and bugs now.14:58
anteaya#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059294.html14:58
mesteryBe cautious when merging code now14:58
mesterymarun: link from anteaya is your email about moving testing to neutron14:58
anteayain the thrid party meeting yesterday luqas asked what if anything third party folks should test when this test moves14:59
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
mestery1 minute left too :)14:59
anteayaI had no response to give him14:59
anteayawhat do you want third party folks to do?14:59
*** Guest72337 has quit IRC14:59
marunanteaya: keep running tempest for now14:59
anteayathank you, and when the test moves?14:59
mesteryOK, we've gotta end this now.14:59
marunanteaya: it will shortly be possible to have them run the tests from neutron14:59
anteayajust keep running tempest?14:59
mesteryLets move this to #openstack-neutron or ML thread.14:59
mesteryThanks folks!14:59
*** neelashah has quit IRC14:59
mestery#endmeeting14:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:59
armaxbye14:59
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 14:59:50 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2015/networking.2015-03-24-14.01.html14:59
yamamotobye14:59
dougwigbye14:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2015/networking.2015-03-24-14.01.txt14:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2015/networking.2015-03-24-14.01.log.html14:59
*** johnbelamaric has left #openstack-meeting14:59
amotokithanks14:59
yamahatabye14:59
ajobye :)15:00
*** pc_m has left #openstack-meeting15:00
*** neiljerr` has left #openstack-meeting15:00
xgermanbye15:00
rkukurabye15:00
*** xgerman has left #openstack-meeting15:00
*** markus_z has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting15:00
salv-orlando adieuuuu15:00
banixbye15:00
n0ano#startmeeting gantt15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 15:00:40 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** jasonamyers has left #openstack-meeting15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'gantt'15:00
*** ChuckC has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
n0anoanyone here to talk about the scheduler?15:00
*** raildo|away is now known as raildo15:01
alex_xuo/15:01
edleafeo/15:01
markus_zo/15:02
n0anolet's get started then...15:03
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** hareeshp has quit IRC15:03
*** absubram has left #openstack-meeting15:03
bauzas\o15:03
n0ano#topic Patch status - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Patch status - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-priorities-tracking (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:03
*** VW_ has quit IRC15:03
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
edleafeI have nothing to talk about for once15:03
n0anoedleafe, you're off the hook, all your patches got merged :-)15:03
edleafe:)15:03
*** hareeshp has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
bauzasI don't have much to say except I'm on my way too :)15:04
n0anoI am curious about Paul's, 4 of his got merged yesterday, is there hope for the remaining 5?15:04
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
*** jaypipes has quit IRC15:05
bauzasn0ano: which ones got merged ?15:05
n0anobauzas, check the priority page, the last 4 on his list15:05
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
* n0ano is still a little fuzzy on what can/cannot get merged after a freeze15:06
bauzasn0ano: oh ok, testing stuff15:06
bauzasn0ano: :)15:06
lxslio/15:06
edleafen0ano: is there a FFE for these?15:06
*** achanda has quit IRC15:06
sean-k-mooneyquit15:07
*** sean-k-mooney has left #openstack-meeting15:07
lxslin0ano: my patches got merged without any FFE (I know of) so a) yay!, b) not sure what's going on there15:07
n0anoI don't remember seeing one, I was letting Paul drive that15:07
lxslithink he plans to rebase them and cross fingers for +W15:07
n0anoPaul's patches are in the priority list, so maybe that means it gets an extension by definition15:08
*** mwang2__ has quit IRC15:08
edleafeI haven't seen Paul around much15:08
lxsliah could be it, mine were too15:08
edleafeI can rebase them15:08
lxslihe has a clash right now, let me ask him15:08
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC15:08
edleafen0ano: I wouldn't assume that15:08
*** mwang2_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
edleafejohnthetubaguy was pretty concerned about my patches barely making it *before* FF15:08
bauzasn0ano: honestly, don't brainstorm too much about that15:09
*** xuhanp_ has quit IRC15:09
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:09
n0anobauzas, meaning just let the process work?15:09
bauzasn0ano: meaning let the discussions happen on IRC :)15:09
lxsliedleafe: ok he's talking atm, can't imagine he'll mind though! Thank you15:10
n0anowell, my attitude is keep working things until someone does a -2 and officially moves it to the next release15:10
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
lxslin0ano: +1, no harm done by keeping up to date15:11
*** eddie__ has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
*** numan has quit IRC15:11
n0anorebasing would be good, edleafe can I have you work out who will do it?15:11
edleafen0ano: already on it15:11
n0anoedleafe, tnx15:12
*** wojdev has quit IRC15:12
n0anoI think that's all we can say about current patches (keep fingers crossed the the remaining ones get merged)15:12
*** rackertom has left #openstack-meeting15:12
n0ano#topic Vancouver design summit15:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Vancouver design summit (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:13
n0anoI wanted us to start thinking about what we want in a scheduler session at Vancouver...15:13
n0anomost of the ground work for cleaing up the APIs is done...15:13
*** fredlhsu_ has left #openstack-meeting15:14
n0anohopefully, the actual split will be fairly straight forward but we probably want to talk about that a bit15:14
bauzasn0ano: I was aiming to talk about the migration path15:14
*** pritesh has quit IRC15:14
bauzasn0ano: not talking about the project switch, but rather look at the steps for kicking out Gantt15:15
n0anobauzas, in what way, the goal is that the first gantt implementation will be a replacement for the current scheduler, there should be no migration (other than testing)15:15
*** Chengyong_Lin has quit IRC15:15
edleafen0ano: how about the data?15:15
bauzasn0ano: erm, I would like to share your optimism, but we're far from just a code split15:15
bauzasedleafe: we actually don't care about data, because scheduler doesn't persist anything15:16
edleafen0ano: we really need to define what data will be owned by gantt, and how it will get there from nova15:16
edleafebauzas: but it will after the split15:16
bauzasedleafe: that's post gantt-split15:16
bauzasedleafe: the current status is that only compute_nodes is readed by Scheduler15:16
edleafebauzas: yes, which we need to plan before we split15:16
bauzasedleafe: so my concern is more about how to share objects with Nova, how to release a client, which kind of shipment will be done for the scheduler, work on CI etc.15:17
edleafebauzas: and make it general enough so that cinder and others can use gantt for their scheduling15:17
bauzasedleafe: that's far too early to discuss that15:17
edleafebauzas: too early to implement, sure, but we need to have a direction15:18
bauzasedleafe: well, we have a direction15:18
n0anoI think I agree with both of you, start the discussion but be aware we're talking futures15:18
edleafen0ano: definitely post-liberty15:18
bauzasedleafe: and we even have a target design, lucky we are15:19
*** mwang2_ has quit IRC15:19
bauzasedleafe: so honestly, we have to stick with libery things15:19
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
bauzasedleafe: I mean for the Summit15:19
bauzasand at least for the Nova talks15:19
*** sadasu has quit IRC15:19
*** vikasd has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
bauzaswe can still do a BoF session for talking about that in between us and other peers15:19
bauzaswe can even take a pod15:20
*** vikasd has left #openstack-meeting15:20
n0anobauzas, I'd like to at least get people thinking about post-Liberty things, longer term planning can be helpful15:20
bauzasbut Nova sessions won't be post-L focused15:20
edleafebauzas: my only concern is that splitting becomes the final goal instead of a big first step15:20
*** ijw has quit IRC15:20
bauzasn0ano: 100% agreeing with you, but not during Nova sessions, that's it :)15:21
n0anoedleafe, splitting was never my end goal, getting other projects to use gantt, that's closer to my end game15:21
*** vikasd has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
bauzasn0ano: so, again, pods, BoFs, teasing at the end of a certain presentation15:21
n0anobauzas, +115:21
bauzasI think we all are in violent agreement then15:21
n0anoespecially the tease at the end of a discussion15:21
bauzaslet's keep Nova talks for Nova guys, and meet us together if we want to discuss post-L15:22
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting15:22
n0anoI don't want to to insular, it would be nice if we can get other projects involved in the post-L ideas15:22
bauzasn0ano: hence the BoF thing15:22
edleafeagreed - BoF is best for these talks15:23
n0anobauzas, yeah, I'm think of some sort of BoF for cross-project issues15:23
bauzasn0ano: we seriously need Cinder peers15:23
n0anobauzas, +215:23
bauzasn0ano: anyway, I don't even have the Design Summit agenda15:23
*** ijw has quit IRC15:23
bauzasso I don't know if we'll still rule out cross-project sessions15:24
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
n0anothat's why I wanted to start thinking about things so we can be ready as soon as the schedule becomes visible15:24
bauzasbut I can talk to Thierry this week15:24
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
alex_xun0ano: +115:24
bauzasn0ano: hence my point : let's keep focused on Nova split for L, and open a BoF and potentially a cross-project session for the rest15:25
n0anobauzas, if you want to ask him specifically if there are any x-project sessions that'd be great15:25
bauzasn0ano: I can15:25
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting15:25
bauzasn0ano: he'll be in Grenoble15:25
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC15:25
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting15:25
n0anoyou can get him in person?15:25
*** garyk has quit IRC15:25
bauzasn0ano: lol15:25
*** ijw has quit IRC15:25
* n0ano needs to brush up on France geography :-)15:26
bauzasn0ano: I wish I would be as famous as Kanye West, but at least I know Thierry :)15:26
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
*** schwicht has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
bauzasn0ano: you'll have some France maps by the end of the day - due to the plane crash15:27
n0anoIck, too true :-(15:27
*** lzachery has quit IRC15:27
n0anoI think we're in agreement, let's think on this subject and talk again next week15:27
n0ano#topic opens15:28
*** openstack changes topic to "opens (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:28
bauzasn0ano: I think we should be ready for opening up an etherpad next week then :D15:28
n0anoanyone have anything new for today?15:28
alex_xuI need a help on a bug15:28
bauzasn0ano: should we make an announcement ?15:28
alex_xu#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/142010215:28
openstackLaunchpad bug 1420102 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Periodic task for quota reservations expire should move out from scheduler" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Alex Xu (xuhj)15:28
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
n0anobauzas, sounds good to me15:28
bauzasfirst, alex_xu15:28
*** sdake__ has quit IRC15:29
bauzasalex_xu: good to see you, in particular so late for you15:29
bauzasalex_xu: I saw your patch, and I followed the reviews15:29
alex_xuThe early fix just move the expire periodic task into the conductor, but get some -1. Then I changed another way, but Joe said that way is too complex for now, we are in RC15:29
alex_xubauzas: thanks :)15:29
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
bauzasalex_xu: but IIRC it was about having this done post-K3 right ?15:29
alex_xuso the question is whether we want to target that bug for the K?15:29
bauzasalex_xu: I think we can defer to L15:30
edleafealex_xu: is it really a bug?15:30
*** dt_os has quit IRC15:30
edleafealex_xu: or just a step to separating scheduler?15:30
alex_xuedleafe: emm...not a bug15:30
bauzasalex_xu: edleafe: it was a wishlist bug, so technically not a bug15:30
n0anoalex_xu, at this stage I'd prefer to defer it, it isn't an issue until the split which is definitely after K15:30
edleafeyeah, then is should be in L15:30
alex_xuok, cool, we get agreement :)15:30
alex_xuI'm ok with L15:31
*** scheuran has quit IRC15:31
*** bernardo-silva has joined #openstack-meeting15:31
bauzascool15:31
bauzastime for an announcement then15:31
bauzashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/160506/8/nova/api/openstack/compute/contrib/hypervisors.py,cm15:31
bauzasoops15:31
bauzaslol15:31
bauzashttp://openstacksummitmay2015vancouver.sched.org/event/4ebfd98c565aaf9480d8389344ece74b#.VRGDTsuvhiU15:31
*** bernardo-silva has quit IRC15:32
*** rushil_ has quit IRC15:32
bauzasso, please be sure to arrive in Vancouver not later than Monday :)15:32
n0anohmm, wonder why I don't have a picture, I should do something about that15:32
bauzasn0ano: something messed up with your profile, because it was duplicated15:32
*** annegentle has quit IRC15:33
n0anoit's just my attempt at being anonymous :-)15:33
lxslinice, see you then :)15:33
bauzasn0ano: I should ask the Daft Punk15:33
*** otter768 has quit IRC15:33
alex_xuI will be there if I can go, if not I will watch the video also15:34
edleafelxsli: do you want to bring the ripe fruit to throw, or should I? :-P15:34
n0anoedleafe, tnx for the warning, I'll bring a shield :-)15:34
edleafen0ano: jsut stand behind bauzas15:34
bauzasedleafe: I will prepare myself by running a one-man-show standup before15:34
n0anoedleafe, +115:34
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
n0anowe're in silly time, anything else serious?15:35
edleafenope15:35
bauzasback to serious work then, enough chats15:35
n0anomost of my serious work `is` chatting :-(15:36
n0anoOk, tnx everyone, talk to you next week (if not before)15:36
n0ano#endmeeting15:36
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:36
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 15:36:34 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:36
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2015/gantt.2015-03-24-15.00.html15:36
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2015/gantt.2015-03-24-15.00.txt15:36
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2015/gantt.2015-03-24-15.00.log.html15:36
alex_xubye15:36
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
lxslithanks all15:37
*** sarob has quit IRC15:37
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting15:39
*** sreshetn1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
*** rajeshr has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting15:43
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
*** asselin_ has quit IRC15:46
*** AmirBaleghi112 has quit IRC15:47
*** appsdesh has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** balajiiyer1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
*** rmoe has quit IRC15:48
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
*** annegentle has quit IRC15:50
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC15:50
*** bradjones has quit IRC15:51
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting15:51
*** bradjones has quit IRC15:51
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting15:51
*** hareeshp has quit IRC15:53
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting15:53
*** jamiem has left #openstack-meeting15:54
*** markus_z has quit IRC15:55
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC15:55
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
*** rromans has quit IRC15:57
*** ItSANgo_ has quit IRC15:57
*** ItSANgo_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** tiswanso has left #openstack-meeting15:58
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away15:58
*** sdake has quit IRC15:58
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n316:00
*** emagana has quit IRC16:00
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC16:00
*** jdurgin1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** rrrobbb has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
*** EmilienM is now known as EmilienM|PTO16:02
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC16:03
*** ildikov is now known as ildikov_afk16:03
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-meeting16:04
*** amotoki has quit IRC16:04
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:05
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez16:06
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** j05h has quit IRC16:07
*** timcline_ has quit IRC16:08
*** timcline has joined #openstack-meeting16:09
*** leeantho has joined #openstack-meeting16:09
*** penick has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** unicell has quit IRC16:12
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC16:13
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_16:13
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** _ahale has quit IRC16:13
*** ahale has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** jprovazn has quit IRC16:14
*** dulek has quit IRC16:15
*** ahale has quit IRC16:15
*** atiwari has quit IRC16:15
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** melwitt has quit IRC16:17
*** ilyashakhat has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
*** kzaitsev_ has quit IRC16:18
*** j05h has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** thedodd has quit IRC16:19
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** garyk has quit IRC16:21
*** yamahata has quit IRC16:21
*** eghobo_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** rbowen has quit IRC16:22
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC16:22
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
*** jasonamyers has joined #openstack-meeting16:23
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting16:23
*** sdake__ has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** eghobo has quit IRC16:24
*** jasonamyers has left #openstack-meeting16:24
*** alop has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** sarob has quit IRC16:25
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting16:25
*** mestery has quit IRC16:26
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
*** sdake has quit IRC16:27
*** e0ne_ is now known as e0ne16:27
*** absubram has joined #openstack-meeting16:29
*** ihrachyshka has quit IRC16:29
*** jruano has quit IRC16:30
*** jasonamyers has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** jasonamyers has left #openstack-meeting16:30
*** tiswanso has joined #openstack-meeting16:31
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting16:31
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC16:32
*** eddie__ has quit IRC16:34
*** cbouch has quit IRC16:34
*** hareeshp has joined #openstack-meeting16:35
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC16:35
*** amotoki has quit IRC16:35
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:38
*** rushil has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** hareeshp has quit IRC16:41
*** jaypipes_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** hareeshp has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** jaypipes_ has left #openstack-meeting16:42
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
*** yatin has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
*** annegent_ has quit IRC16:42
*** annegentle has quit IRC16:43
*** bvandenh has quit IRC16:43
*** armax has quit IRC16:44
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** ijw has quit IRC16:46
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC16:46
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** leeantho has quit IRC16:47
*** sdake__ has quit IRC16:49
*** msdubov has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:50
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting16:51
*** Gerald_K has quit IRC16:52
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
*** sdake__ has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
*** jruano has quit IRC16:53
*** rajeshr has quit IRC16:55
*** sdake has quit IRC16:56
*** sergef has quit IRC16:56
*** chandankumar has quit IRC16:58
*** dflorea has quit IRC16:59
*** zaneb has quit IRC16:59
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** neelashah has quit IRC17:00
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** sreshetn1 has quit IRC17:02
*** baoli has quit IRC17:02
msdubov#startmeeting Rally17:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 17:02:31 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is msdubov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'rally'17:02
*** emagana has quit IRC17:02
*** redixin has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
redixinsup17:03
*** timcline_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** amaretskiy has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** tiswanso has quit IRC17:03
*** tosky has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
msdubovamaretskiy, redixin, oanufriev, olkonami, andreykurilin, rvasilets Hi17:04
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC17:04
*** dflorea has quit IRC17:04
andreykurilinmsdubov: hey!17:04
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC17:05
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** mpaolino has quit IRC17:05
*** oanufriev has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
msdubovLet's start17:06
msdubov#topic [Spec] New task input file format17:06
*** openstack changes topic to "[Spec] New task input file format (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:06
msdubov#link https://review.openstack.org/15906517:06
msdubovSo the important news is we have finishes this spec on the new task format17:06
andreykurilincool!17:06
*** timcline has quit IRC17:07
msdubovThe proposed format will be easier for newcomers and, what is no less important, will support parallel runs of different benchmark scenarios17:07
*** jlanoux_ has quit IRC17:07
*** yatin has quit IRC17:07
msdubovamaretskiy, redixin, oanufriev, olkonami, andreykurilin, rvasilets Does anyone have any specific concerns considering this spec?17:07
*** kevinbenton has quit IRC17:07
redixinmsdubov, is there blueprint about new task format?17:07
msdubovandreykurilin I remember you writing something about it in our chat earlier today17:07
andreykurilinmsdubov: yeah17:08
andreykurilinmsdubov: I have a small idea17:08
msdubovredixin Not sure, we don't worry about blueprints so much?17:08
boris-42hi everybody!17:08
andreykurilinhi boris-4217:08
redixinmsdubov, i saw "work items" in that spec, so i thought there is blueprint, and we can track this work now17:09
*** kzaitsev_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
*** ominakov has quit IRC17:10
msdubovandreykurilin: So what's your idea?17:10
andreykurilinmsdubov: It would be nice to have optional field in scenarios for store rally version.17:10
boris-42andreykurilin: hm what do you mean?17:10
redixinsome scenarius could be version specific17:11
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting17:11
amaretskiyafaik this is a kind of final format, so we do not need versioning17:11
*** tiswanso has joined #openstack-meeting17:11
andreykurilinmsdubov: if task.json is written for rally release N, several sceanarios appeared in N release and we will be able to run this task at rally N-117:11
andreykurilinboris-42: ^17:11
andreykurilininstead of InvalidTask format, such scenarios will be skipped17:11
boris-42andreykurilin:  I think it can be added to format latter17:12
boris-42andreykurilin: as a separated change and spec17:12
boris-42but in any case what about thrid party plugins?17:12
boris-42how you are going to check them and so on?17:12
msdubovboris-42: We can add yet another label to mark third-party, but then it starts to be too complicated imho17:13
*** rvasilets__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
msdubovI like that the current format is not overloaded17:13
msdubovnot too much fields17:13
msdubovso this is a kind of readable17:13
andreykurilinboris-42: how third party plygins are related here?)17:14
*** olkonami has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** pdb has quit IRC17:14
andreykurilinboris-42: the check will be simple. if rally.__version__ < task.scenarios.rally_version: do_skip17:14
*** pdb has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
andreykurilinthe check should compare actual rally version and version specified for scenario17:15
*** tiswanso has quit IRC17:15
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC17:17
*** markvan has quit IRC17:17
msdubovboris-42 andreykurilin Anything to add?17:17
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting17:17
boris-42andreykurilin: ah you mean that17:18
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja17:18
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting17:18
boris-42andreykurilin: so yep17:18
boris-42andreykurilin: idea seems interesting17:19
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_17:19
boris-42andreykurilin: maybe we should extend it like having that rally.__version__ should be less them something17:19
boris-42andreykurilin: in case of deleting scenarios?17:19
*** meteorfox has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
meteorfoxboris-42: hey17:20
msdubovmeteorfox: hey17:21
meteorfoxmsdubov: hi17:21
*** ygbo has quit IRC17:21
msdubovboris-42, andreykurilin, I suggest moving forward17:21
msdubovLet's discuss yet another spec17:21
msdubov#topic [Spec] Database migrations17:22
*** openstack changes topic to "[Spec] Database migrations (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:22
*** e0ne_ is now known as e0ne17:22
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting17:22
msdubovamaretskiy: Could you please tell us about your recent work on this?17:22
boris-42msdubov: it should be renamed17:22
boris-42msdubov: to "Rally upgrades"17:22
amaretskiyI've just submitted spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167319/17:22
amaretskiyhowever this spec requires further work17:23
amaretskiythe main point is that will be renamed Database migrations -> Rally Upgrades17:23
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
*** AmirBaleghi112 has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** xingchao has quit IRC17:25
amaretskiythis spec will describe also rally update17:26
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
amaretskiyso I'm planning to improve this spec a lot tomorrow17:26
amaretskiyeom17:26
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:26
*** chandankumar has quit IRC17:27
msdubovamaretskiy: Thanks17:27
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC17:27
*** rushil has quit IRC17:28
msdubov#topic Report charts17:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Report charts (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:28
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
msdubovamaretskiy: Any updates on your patches?17:28
*** Mandell has quit IRC17:28
amaretskiythere are 3 patches that are waiting revieews17:28
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
*** baoli has quit IRC17:28
amaretskiy1) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159458/17:29
amaretskiy2) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146814/17:29
amaretskiy3) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/161699/17:29
amaretskiyplease make reviews :)17:29
*** aepifanov has quit IRC17:29
*** dboik_ has quit IRC17:30
msdubovboris-42 redixin andreykurilin msdubov oanufriev ^17:30
amaretskiypatch 159458 will be updated today17:30
patchbotamaretskiy: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159458/17:30
meteorfoxamaretskiy: will do17:30
boris-42andreykurilin: uh this one will require https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146814/ a lot of reviews17:30
boris-42amaretskiy: ^17:30
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
boris-42amaretskiy: because of db changes17:30
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
boris-42amaretskiy: I think you should review my spec regarding to new db schema17:30
amaretskiyyes17:31
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
*** dflorea has quit IRC17:32
*** AmirBaleghi112 has quit IRC17:34
*** AmirBaleghi112 has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
msdubovok, nice17:34
msdubov#topic Plugin base17:34
*** openstack changes topic to "Plugin base (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:34
*** annegentle has quit IRC17:34
*** otter768 has quit IRC17:35
msdubovboris-42 What's the progress here? When are you going to update your patches?17:35
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
boris-42msdubov: I will try today17:36
boris-42msdubov: It's hard to do part related to benchmark.scenarios17:37
boris-42msdubov: they have different nature17:37
msdubovboris-42: I see17:37
boris-42so it is quite hard to unify them with the rest kinds of plugins17:37
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting17:37
boris-42msdubov: I have the idea to remove ScenarioGroups plugins at all17:37
boris-42msdubov: and have just Scenarios plugins17:37
msdubovboris-42: you mean the notion of scenario classes?17:38
msdubovboris-42: How it is going to look then?17:38
boris-42msdubov: it will look the same17:38
boris-42msdubov: but there will be some hacks17:38
boris-42msdubov: I am still looking for clean solution17:39
*** ttrifonov is now known as zz_ttrifonov17:39
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting17:40
msdubovboris-42: Okay, anyway you are working in relatively small steps so seems like we will get to Scenarios after a couple of patches17:41
*** browne has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
boris-42msdubov: yep17:42
boris-42msdubov: so after we get single base we will be able to work simultaneously17:43
boris-42on cleanup of code17:43
boris-42so it will be easy to add depraction messages17:43
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
boris-42info stuff will be just moved to plugins17:43
boris-42validation stuff will be moved to plguins17:43
boris-42so we will reduce amount of code a lot17:43
msdubovboris-42: Great17:43
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting17:44
boris-42that's all from my side17:44
boris-42msdubov: ^17:44
*** jdurgin1 has quit IRC17:44
msdubovboris-42: Thanks17:44
*** derekh has quit IRC17:45
msdubov#topic Free discussion17:45
*** openstack changes topic to "Free discussion (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:45
msdubovboris-42 redixin andreykurilin amaretskiy oanufriev meteorfox Anything else you would like to discuss?17:45
amaretskiynone from my side17:45
oanufrievno. thanks.17:45
meteorfoxmsdubov: nope17:46
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC17:46
redixinmsdubov, no17:46
*** sarob has quit IRC17:46
*** sreshetn1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
boris-42msdubov: can we get this merged https://review.openstack.org/#/c/167187/17:46
boris-42amaretskiy: redixin ^17:47
boris-42it's nasty stuff17:47
msdubovWill take a look17:47
msdubovoanufriev: Seems like you should take a look as well17:47
oanufrievok17:48
*** rbowen has quit IRC17:48
boris-42okay17:48
boris-42I think we can end meeting?17:48
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
boris-42msdubov: ^17:48
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC17:48
msdubovboris-42: Yep17:48
*** zz_jgrimm is now known as jgrimm17:48
msdubovThanks for participating17:48
msdubov#endmeeting17:49
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:49
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 17:49:08 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:49
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2015/rally.2015-03-24-17.02.html17:49
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2015/rally.2015-03-24-17.02.txt17:49
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2015/rally.2015-03-24-17.02.log.html17:49
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
*** tosky has left #openstack-meeting17:49
*** ijw has quit IRC17:50
*** msdubov has quit IRC17:51
*** haleyb has quit IRC17:51
*** tiswanso has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** dflorea has quit IRC17:53
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** sarob has quit IRC17:55
*** eghobo_ has quit IRC17:55
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** timcline_ has quit IRC17:56
*** balajiiyer1 has quit IRC17:57
*** timcline has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** tiswanso has quit IRC17:58
*** dflorea has quit IRC17:58
*** meteorfox has left #openstack-meeting17:58
*** baoli has quit IRC17:59
*** samueldmq has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** tiswanso has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
stevemaro/18:00
* lbragstad waves at stevemar18:00
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
*** xingchao has quit IRC18:01
bknudsonwaves at lbragstad and stevemar18:01
* stevemar waves back to lbragstad 18:01
stevemarbknudson!18:01
*** amaretskiy has left #openstack-meeting18:01
henrynashchocks away, chaps18:01
*** lhcheng has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
marekdhello18:01
*** rbak_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
lbragstadlight crew this week?18:02
lhchengo/18:02
lbragstador just trickling in...18:02
gyee\o18:02
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
morganfainbergo]18:03
morganfainbergdolphm, ayoung, dstanek, jamielennox, morganfainberg, stevemar, gyee, henrynash, topol, marekd, lbragstad, joesavak, shardy, fabiog, nkinder, lloydm, shrekuma, ksavich, hrybacki, rharwood, grantbow, vdreamarkitex, raildo, rodrigods, amakarov, ajayaa, hogepodge, breton, lhcheng, nonameentername, samueldmq, htruta, amolock, wanghong, fmarco76, davechen, dims18:03
morganfainberghttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/KeystoneMeeting#Main_Agenda18:03
morganfainbergwe have people here?18:03
amakarovhi!18:03
morganfainberg#startmeeting Keystone18:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 18:03:16 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is morganfainberg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:03
morganfainbergHi everyone!18:03
stevemarhowdy18:03
ayoungmorganfainberg, what was that?  a salute?  o]18:03
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
morganfainbergayoung, maybe18:03
rodrigodso/18:03
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
ayoungor "you must be this tall to enter the meeting..."18:03
htrutao-18:03
htrutaayoung: :(18:03
bknudsonwe're all here ooooooooooooo18:03
morganfainbergas stated we have results of FFEs18:03
raildoo/18:04
marekdHello18:04
samueldmqhello18:04
morganfainberg#topic FFE Results18:04
*** openstack changes topic to "FFE Results (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:04
morganfainberg#info Domain-SQL FFE Granted, please complete the work by end of week (this week)18:04
ayoung(^-^)ă‚ť18:04
morganfainbergI'll be unblocking the reviews after the meeting18:04
*** eghobo has quit IRC18:04
*** jcoufal has quit IRC18:04
morganfainberg#info IDP Registration FFE Granted, please complete this work by EOW18:04
dstanekhiya18:04
*** rbak has quit IRC18:05
morganfainberg#info ECP Wrap FFE Granted, Please complete this work by next meeting18:05
*** jaypipes has quit IRC18:05
*** jpipes has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
marekdmorganfainberg: thanks18:05
*** oanufriev has left #openstack-meeting18:05
*** mpaolino has quit IRC18:05
morganfainberg#info Reseller FFE - deferred until liberty. Risk based on restructuring of domains and scope of work is the reason for the delay.18:05
*** shwetaap has quit IRC18:06
morganfainbergjust going to move quickly through the start of the meeting18:06
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-meeting18:06
morganfainbergmost of it is just nnouncements18:06
morganfainbergor reminders18:06
stevemarall sounds good to me18:06
*** jpipes has quit IRC18:06
morganfainberg#topic Use kilo-rc-potential tag for triage18:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Use kilo-rc-potential tag for triage (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:06
*** safchain has quit IRC18:06
morganfainbergIf a bug is a nice to have (not a blocker) use the 'kilo-rc-potential' tag, do not assign it to the milestone18:06
morganfainbergif it is a blocker put it on the milestone18:06
*** kzaitsev_ has quit IRC18:07
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
morganfainberg#topic REMINDER: Feature Freeze and String Freeze in Effect.18:07
*** openstack changes topic to "REMINDER: Feature Freeze and String Freeze in Effect. (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:07
bknudsonwe can merge bug fixes either way?18:07
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
morganfainberg#undo18:07
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Topic object at 0x8b4f090>18:07
morganfainbergbknudson, yes.18:07
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
morganfainbergbknudson, as long as the bug isn't risky to fix18:07
*** redixin has quit IRC18:07
morganfainbergor introduces violations of string freeze18:07
morganfainbergetc18:07
morganfainbergand once merged go ahead and tag it to the milestone18:07
morganfainbergthe tag is just for triage18:08
*** emagana has quit IRC18:08
morganfainberg#topic REMINDER: Feature Freeze and String Freeze in Effect.18:08
*** openstack changes topic to "REMINDER: Feature Freeze and String Freeze in Effect. (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:08
morganfainberg#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StringFreeze18:08
morganfainbergplease be aware of string freeze when approving code.18:08
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
morganfainbergannnd thats it for my quick announcement stuff18:08
morganfainbergon to the meat18:09
morganfainberg#topic Log working group liasion18:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Log working group liasion (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:09
morganfainbergbknudson, o/18:09
bknudsonthere's a log working group that has held a couple of meetings18:09
bknudsonthey're looking for a liaison from each project.18:09
gyeewiki?18:09
*** leonchio_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
*** eghobo has quit IRC18:09
ayoungIts Log Its log Its Log Its log its heavy its made out of wood18:10
bknudson#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings#OpenStack_Log_Working_Group_Meeting18:10
*** rbak_ has quit IRC18:10
morganfainbergayoung, better than bad, it's good!18:10
bknudsonanyways, if someone wants to sign up to be the liaison for keystone then sign up.18:10
*** marrusl has quit IRC18:10
bknudsonif you love log18:10
ayoungbknudson, I nominate Topol18:10
*** marrusl has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
lbragstadbknudson: does it require sync responsibilities?18:10
ayounglogs are kindof like audit18:10
bknudsonworks for me.18:10
morganfainbergbest part is topol isn't here18:11
bknudsonthey might ask about making changes in keystone.18:11
dstanek++ for Uncle Brad18:11
henrynash(I’m actually Ok volunteeding if Topol is too bust)18:11
bknudsonto support whatever they're working on... e.g., request IDs18:11
henrynashor busy even18:11
morganfainbergok so henrynash please cicleup w/ topol and figure out which (or both) will do it18:11
henrynashmorganfainberg: will do18:12
*** breton has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
ayounghenrynash, we can't spare you18:12
dstanekhenrynash: isn't that really late for you?18:12
lbragstad 20:00 UTC18:12
bknudsonmaybe we need to redo the meeting time.18:12
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
marekdbknudson: this one or the log-working-group ?18:13
bknudsonthe log working group18:13
morganfainberghenrynash if the time doesn't work out for you, please let me/keystone group know18:13
morganfainberghenrynash, we can look for another liason18:13
henrynash(aaah  and if its 20:00 UTC then I may withdraw my application :-) )18:13
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris18:14
henrynashtopol & I will chat18:14
marekdit's beer time for henrynash :-)18:14
bknudsonok, that was it. if you're interested attend the meeting.18:14
morganfainberghenrynash, sounds good.18:14
*** jruano has quit IRC18:14
dstanekif we don't have any other volunteers i will do it - henrynash let me know if you/topol can't18:15
morganfainbergon the topic of logs18:15
bknudsonlogging in keystone is not the best.18:15
*** leeantho has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
morganfainberg#topic Drop curl notation in logs (especially server-side logs)18:15
*** ddieterly has quit IRC18:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Drop curl notation in logs (especially server-side logs) (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:15
bknudsonyou might have noticed.18:15
*** baoli_ has quit IRC18:15
*** ujuc has quit IRC18:15
morganfainbergThe request came that we should adjust the logging from KSC to not be "curl" debugging. you can't use the line anymore due to the obfuscation of the token18:15
*** ChrisPriceAB has quit IRC18:15
*** noslzzp has quit IRC18:15
morganfainbergthis is really more relevant from the session object itself not KSC.18:15
bknudsonwhat do they want that's so much better?18:16
marekdmorganfainberg: but you see how to call this line if you need to...18:16
morganfainberggive the important information but not wrap it in curl18:16
morganfainbergthats all that was being asked18:16
morganfainbergi said we'd bring it up at the meeting18:16
ayoungsystemd and journald  of course!18:16
morganfainbergdidn't say anything else.18:16
bknudsonmake it an option18:16
jamielennoxi like the curl command, i have used it a number of times - though i must say it's a pain that we obsfucated the token18:16
*** eghobo has quit IRC18:16
morganfainbergbknudson, i think it's fair that we offer a logging format18:16
*** annegentle has quit IRC18:16
lbragstadjamielennox: ++18:16
bknudsonthey can always mock it.18:17
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
bknudsonmy answer to everything now.18:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
*** sarob has quit IRC18:17
morganfainbergbknudson, if we just make it an option - a simple formatter that has known replacements i think that is sufficient18:17
morganfainbergand again this is session18:17
morganfainbergnot ksc proper18:17
*** Akshik has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
morganfainbergthe complaint comes from running nova in debug and seeing curl debug lines talking to neutron18:18
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:18
gyeeuse log filters?18:18
morganfainberganyway. nothing to be done yet, please mull it over when thinking about logging18:18
morganfainbergand logging enhancements18:18
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
bknudsonthat definitely isn't very handy to have curl lines there, and I assume it's a lot shorter to not use it.18:18
gyeebkundson, some of us still using curl for troubleshooting18:19
morganfainbergbknudson, i would agree we could be more terse in that case. it's one place our logging is good just in a not-that-useful format18:19
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
jamielennoxis there a different log level we could emit it on?18:20
morganfainbergwe can circle up on that as we have more logging discussion18:20
bknudsonit'll still have all the info18:20
jamielennoxtrace3 or something?18:20
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-meeting18:20
morganfainbergjamielennox, once trace is a thing again, yes18:20
marekdjamielennox: or maybe even try to separate curl logging and store in different file?!18:20
morganfainbergjamielennox, or something like that18:20
ayoungmorganfainberg, sounds like a spec is required there.  If we are going to be picky about log formats, we should actually design  them18:20
morganfainbergayoung, yeah. it's something to revisit in L.18:20
bknudsonuse tract now and it'll get logged higher than error18:20
bknudsontrace18:20
jamielennoxreally? didn't know that18:21
morganfainbergbknudson, yeah it has to wait until trace is again a "trace" level not a "traceback" thing18:21
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:21
morganfainberglets revisit in L18:21
morganfainbergwe wont get much done on this in kilo anyway18:21
jamielennoxmarekd: it'd require some sort of filter to seperate becasue other things in session log to debug18:21
clarkbwhatever you replace it with the general output is super handy18:21
morganfainbergwith the split of session and common stuff out of ksc coming in L it becomes interesting to consider18:21
clarkbjust recently used it to discover that keystone was returning an unroutable address to deal with tokens at which of course made nova/neutron fail18:22
morganfainbergclarkb, yes, the data needs to stay.18:22
morganfainbergclarkb, no question we don't want to eliminate any of the info18:22
morganfainbergclarkb, just maybe not add "curl" in the line18:22
morganfainbergand curl "flags"18:22
bknudsonhe he18:22
bknudson--insecure?18:22
morganfainbergbknudson, sigh yeah...18:22
morganfainbergthat would be one i'd like to *NOT* log18:23
morganfainberganyway18:23
bknudsonshould log a warning every time.18:23
morganfainbergbknudson CRITICAL18:23
morganfainberg:P18:23
morganfainbergok moooooving on18:23
morganfainberg#topic keystoneclient release:  auth-token-use-client18:24
*** openstack changes topic to "keystoneclient release: auth-token-use-client (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:24
morganfainbergbknudson, o/ again18:24
*** jpipes has joined #openstack-meeting18:24
morganfainberg#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144248/18:24
bknudsonoh, just wondering if we wanted a release of keystoneclient18:24
*** reed has quit IRC18:24
rodrigodsI do :)18:24
morganfainbergbknudson, we will have one for sure with RC18:24
rodrigodsHMT stuff is there18:24
morganfainbergwe can do another one earlier18:24
bknudsonthen I can make progress on my middleware bp to use keystoneclient.18:24
morganfainbergbknudson, i can cut a release today if you want... just remember g-r wont be updated18:25
morganfainbergso you can't really rely on the new stuff18:25
morganfainbergor g-r might not be updated18:25
morganfainbergfor a bit? till L?18:25
* morganfainberg isn't sure about the client minimums18:25
bknudsonI can deal with that.18:25
jamielennoxi'm pretty sure g-r is frozen for kilo18:25
amakarovbtw, are we still using keyring in keystoneclient?18:25
morganfainbergamakarov, ^ jamielennox18:25
bknudsonworst that they can do to me is -218:25
marekdamakarov: are we at all using it?18:25
bknudsonI hope that's the worst they can do.18:26
marekdjamielennox: what is g-r18:26
morganfainbergbknudson, i'll plan a ksc release today or tomorrow18:26
morganfainbergmarekd, global requirements18:26
bknudsonthanks!18:26
jamielennoxamakarov: it's still there, i'd be 50/50 if it works18:26
amakarovmarekd, I was asked about it yesterday and found remains of it in the code18:26
*** jaypipes has quit IRC18:26
bknudsonkeystone CLI is deprecated18:26
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
marekdamakarov: merged or proposed ?18:26
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
morganfainberg#action morganfainberg to release keystoneclient March 24 or 2518:26
jamielennoxit doesn't work with session and plugins18:26
*** rvasilets__ has quit IRC18:26
*** yassine has quit IRC18:26
morganfainbergamakarov we can't remove it if people use ksc cli18:27
amakarovmarekd, I think, just forgotten :)18:27
morganfainbergand rely on it18:27
morganfainbergbut ... ksc's cli is deprecated18:27
morganfainbergunless someone finds a security problem we will not be updating/changing it.18:27
amakarovmorganfainberg, well, but --os-keyring parameter isn't there18:27
morganfainbergopenstack client is way better18:27
jamielennoxthere's a message and everything now to say deprecated18:27
morganfainbergwhich reminds me of something i need to bug stevemar about...18:27
morganfainbergbut not here18:27
clarkbdoesn't openstackclient use keystone client?18:28
amakarovmorganfainberg, the question was from documentation team and I was a little confused18:28
morganfainbergactually18:28
stevemarmorganfainberg, another time, osc meeting is on thursday18:28
morganfainbergclarkb, not the CLI part18:28
*** achanda has quit IRC18:28
stevemarclarkb, yeah, but not the CLI parts18:28
morganfainbergstevemar, jamielennox, so ran into an issue trying to use OSC for bootstrapping a cloud18:28
morganfainbergstevemar, jamielennox, might be an old version of osc, i'll check with some folks and make sure to file appropriate bugs.18:29
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
morganfainbergbut it basically errored all over the place when trying to do things w/ the admin token for bootstrap, and we had to use keystone cli to make it work.18:29
morganfainbergstevemar, jamielennox, so maybe a doc update is needed.18:29
morganfainbergi'll get you guys info on it18:29
gyeemorganfainberg, the token_endpoint plugin still works for me18:29
stevemarmorganfainberg, sounds like an old issue, yeah get us info18:29
bknudsonseems like should use keystone-manage for that and get rid of admin token18:30
morganfainberghey, bknudson - guess what?18:30
bknudsontoo scary18:30
morganfainbergbknudson, yes i expect to be proposing that for L18:30
bknudsonmorganfainberg: what?18:30
morganfainberg#topic bandit update18:30
*** openstack changes topic to "bandit update (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:30
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
morganfainbergbknudson, o/ you again18:30
bknudsony, so they released bandit today18:30
bknudsonit's on pypi18:30
morganfainbergyay18:30
bknudsonso the next step is to get an experimental job in infra18:31
ayoungWhat is bandit and why do we care?18:31
*** xingchao has quit IRC18:31
stevemarayoung, its pretty neat18:31
bknudsonbandit is the static code analysis for security issues18:31
bknudsonwe had a presentation at this meeting a few weeks ago18:31
ayoungRight...I recall it18:31
lbragstadayoung: #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security/Projects/Bandit18:31
ayoungforgot the name, though18:31
morganfainbergbknudson, +1 on the infra change from me.18:31
bknudsonand there's a review to add the tox target18:32
dstanekbknudson: nice18:32
marekdbknudson: how do we use tox + bandit ?18:32
* morganfainberg is excited to see bandit run.18:32
marekdtox -ebandit18:32
morganfainbergmarekd, that is the idea18:32
lbragstadbknudson: is there a review already up for the exp. job?18:32
*** Fdot has quit IRC18:32
marekdand it would analyze the code?18:32
bknudsonlbragstad: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/157595/18:32
bknudsonis the infra review18:32
bknudsononce that merges I'll do recheck experimental a few times to make sure it works18:33
lbragstadbknudson: cool, thanks!18:33
bknudsonthen I'll probably update the job to nonvotine18:33
bknudsonnonvoting18:33
gyeehopefully a non-voting gate, I do worry about the false positives18:33
bknudsonand then update to make it voting.18:33
bknudsonif people are happy with it.18:33
marekd++18:33
morganfainberggyee, long term voting, but it'll go non-vote first18:33
bknudsonwe can discuss that later.18:33
*** emagana has quit IRC18:33
*** neelashah has quit IRC18:33
bknudsonthat was it.18:34
morganfainbergbknudson, i assume it'll be a check-only right?18:34
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
morganfainbergeven voting?18:34
bknudsonwe'll be the first to get it.18:34
morganfainbergvs. gate?18:34
bknudsonright now it's experimental18:34
gyeestatic code analysis I dealt with in the past tend to give out a ton of false positives18:34
bknudsongyee: we've got more control over bandit.18:34
morganfainbergright but longer view, doesn't need to be gate job, could remain check only18:34
dstanekgyee: i've been playing with this for a while and i don't think it'll be too much on an issue18:34
morganfainberganyway18:34
morganfainberguhm...18:35
*** VW_ has quit IRC18:35
morganfainbergso 2 more quick things.18:35
morganfainberg#topic no-spec BP review18:35
*** openstack changes topic to "no-spec BP review (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:35
morganfainberg#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+spec/plugin-wrapper18:35
morganfainberg#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+spec/generic-plugins18:36
morganfainbergfor the record i'm ok with this not having a spec18:36
morganfainbergbut please feel free to voice concerns if they need them18:36
* bknudson votes no spec reqd for these.18:36
gyeesame here18:36
marekdme too18:37
dstaneki see no reason to require it18:37
bknudsonalthough I wouldn't mind one.18:37
morganfainbergbknudson, no spec required != no spec provided18:37
bknudsonsince it would be nice to see a code sample18:37
morganfainberg;)18:37
jamielennoxyea, i don't think they need a spec, they're both reasonably trivial just more of a new feature than a bug18:37
morganfainbergok going onece18:37
morganfainbergtwice.....18:37
lbragstadworks for me18:38
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
morganfainbergjamielennox: please update the BPs and provide a link to this meeting notes saying no-spec confimed18:38
jamielennoxhaving said that there is a spec out for KSC that i'd like to bring to peoples attention: https://review.openstack.org/16458218:38
jamielennoxactually it's middleware i guess18:39
bknudsonjamielennox: for K?18:39
jamielennoxbknudson: doesn't matter it's client side18:39
morganfainbergah18:39
bknudsonwell, it matters what deployers ship18:39
morganfainbergbknudson, right18:40
morganfainberg#topic Open Discussion18:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: Keystone)"18:40
bknudsonI mean packagers18:40
jamielennoxbknudson: i don't mind if we don't merge till L, it won't make g-r for Kilo and there really isn't many services using the auth plugin yet anyway18:40
lbragstadI have a question. Does anyone know if other projects build on the bind supplied in the token?18:40
bknudsonjamielennox: I thought it was in devstack?18:41
bknudsonauth plugin18:41
morganfainberglbragstad, the bind like krb5 stuff?18:41
marekdI just wanted to say that I will be unavailable  next two weeks (actually starting from Friday afternoon), so if you have something you want me to do or talk please let's do this this week.18:41
ayoungSo...FreeIPA and LDAP testing in Check.  I think it is time18:41
jamielennoxbut it's possibly contentious as it will mean sending an X-Service-Token on every request and taking over control of the X-OpenStack-Request-ID18:41
ayoungI think we want to push toward this:18:41
morganfainbergayoung, functional scenarios. yes.18:41
morganfainbergayoung, 100%18:41
ayounginfra has an Ipa server that is basically untouched.  We  put a bunch of sample data in it18:42
jamielennoxbknudson: oh yea, that's in. This is the auth plugin that middleware passes to the services ENV['keystone.token_auth'] i think18:42
lbragstadmorganfainberg: the bind method that can be supplied on auth18:42
ayoungon Gate,  "mount" it as an external domain18:42
morganfainbergayoung, lets circle up on that.18:42
*** dannywilson has quit IRC18:42
jamielennoxlbragstad: afaik token binding never really got off the ground18:42
morganfainbergayoung, there are some mechanics about that proposal that wont really fly atm.18:42
ayoungmorganfainberg, and it will be the live test of henrynash 's domain in db code18:42
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting18:42
lbragstadjamielennox: ok, so you're not aware of anyone using it through the client?18:42
morganfainbergayoung, but it's just about standup not the test part18:43
henrynashayoung: yippee18:43
jamielennoxlbragstad: the way services shuffle the token around from service to service means as soon as we started to actually enforce things on binding everything stopped18:43
ayoungmorganfainberg, ok.  We'll talk After you get your coffee18:43
jamielennoxlbragstad: i'm not even sure it's exposed via the client18:43
morganfainbergjamielennox, i have an idea for L for that18:43
lbragstadjamielennox: ok, cool18:43
jamielennoxmorganfainberg: me too18:43
lbragstadjust because bind will put fernet tokens in the "unbound" case18:44
morganfainbergjamielennox, as soon as we get the FFEs done i'll start my write up for some ideas in L18:44
jamielennoxmorganfainberg: it's basically X-Service-Token and if you have something different you should probably -1 that blueprint i just mentioned18:44
dstanekhave to bail a little early to get my kids - i'll be back in the main channel in a bit18:44
morganfainberglbragstad, it would be nice to have token bind support in fernet - but that *could* land in L when we discuss how we address this.18:44
jamielennoxlbragstad: ah18:44
morganfainbergjamielennox, i have a different idea - slightly but it builds on service tokens18:44
*** annegentle has quit IRC18:45
jamielennoxlbragstad: yea i think your safe, in future i want to get it back, but it should always be optional additional data to the token so we can add it back later18:45
jamielennoxyou're18:45
lbragstadmorganfainberg: jamielennox yeah, unless when know how we can supply a format for it, it will boat the token. I'm not sure if it would make sense to put bind in the token format if it's only going to bloat it and no one uses it?18:45
morganfainbergjamielennox, i'll write up my Liberty thoughts soon. i need to anyway for when i do the PTL election things.18:45
lbragstads/when/we/18:46
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
morganfainberglbragstad, again it can probably wait till L when we have a direct path to supporting bind or a similar thing.18:46
morganfainberglbragstad, i think it would be useful but it's not critical today18:46
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
lbragstadmorganfainberg: ok, so I'll untag that bug for rc1?18:46
morganfainbergsure18:46
lbragstadand update it with a comment18:46
morganfainbergdowngrade it to medium if it isn't already18:47
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:47
lbragstadmorganfainberg: cool, it's already medium18:47
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
morganfainberganything else for the meeting?18:47
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC18:48
morganfainbergwe can let infra have the channel early it looks like18:48
amakarovrevocation issue: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/141854/18:48
morganfainbergaha18:48
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC18:48
*** evgenyf has quit IRC18:48
amakarovwill it be fixed by fernet tokens18:48
amakarovor it must to be done something?18:49
morganfainbergi think adam is correct, the issue is in the group data not being in the token.18:49
amakarov++18:49
morganfainbergi would like to see better revocations18:50
*** garyh has quit IRC18:50
morganfainbergso yes this would be a nice-to-have in kilo if we can really solve it18:50
amakarovso the solution is: 1) add group to revocation model; 2) wait for fernet?18:50
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away18:50
amakarov*rely on fernet (afaik it is complete)18:50
morganfainbergamakarov, i think we would need to update the token body format as well18:51
morganfainbergto catch PKI tokens18:51
morganfainbergwe don't want token formats to diverge in functionality too much18:51
morganfainberg(at all really)18:51
morganfainbergif it's in our tree that is18:51
morganfainberguuid could be solved in much the same way fernet is18:51
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting18:52
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:52
amakarovcan we just add group to existing tokens?18:52
amakarovtoken models18:52
*** dflorea has quit IRC18:53
marekdamakarov: i think lbragstad and dolphm would start to sharpen their knives for you18:53
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
*** AJaeger_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
marekdi hardly survived federation18:53
amakarovmarekd, thanks for the warning ))18:54
lbragstadmarekd: :)18:54
*** niclem has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
amakarovwell, let us put it this way: I'll propose a change and then we discuss it18:55
*** beecee has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
amakarovI still don't see obvious solution18:55
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
morganfainbergok i think this conversation can move back to -keystone18:56
morganfainberglets continue there18:56
morganfainbergThanks for coming all!18:56
morganfainberg#endmeeting18:56
marekdthanks.18:56
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:56
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 18:56:25 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:56
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2015/keystone.2015-03-24-18.03.html18:56
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2015/keystone.2015-03-24-18.03.txt18:56
*** marekd has left #openstack-meeting18:56
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2015/keystone.2015-03-24-18.03.log.html18:56
*** wojdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
*** dflorea has quit IRC18:57
*** yolanda has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
*** wojdev has quit IRC18:57
*** wojdev_ is now known as wojdev18:57
*** dneary has quit IRC18:58
*** notnownikki has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
*** ianw has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
*** dneary has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
*** pcrews has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
fungimmmmoremeetings19:00
*** achanda has quit IRC19:00
*** jamielennox has left #openstack-meeting19:00
jeblairhowdy infra folks19:00
anteayao/19:00
nibalizero/19:00
AJaeger_\o/19:00
jeblair#startmeeting infra19:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 19:00:24 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)"19:00
yolandao/19:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'infra'19:00
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
anteayanever enough meetings19:00
jeblair#link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting19:00
jeblair#link previous meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2015/infra.2015-03-17-19.01.html19:00
jeblairthis is going to be a very fast-paced meeting today19:00
jeblair#topic Schedule next project renames19:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Schedule next project renames (Meeting topic: infra)"19:00
*** pelix has quit IRC19:00
jeblairwe have some to do now, i believe19:00
jeblairat least bindep19:00
anteayayes19:00
notnownikkio/19:01
SpamapSo/19:01
jeblairis gnocchi ready to go too?19:01
clarkband gnocchi19:01
greghaynesO/19:01
timrco/19:01
timrcHowdy.19:01
*** sreshetn1 has quit IRC19:01
fungii'm around friday and saturday, whenever everyone else wants it done19:01
jheskethMorning19:01
mrmartino/19:01
petertr7Hello19:01
clarkbjeblair: I think so, they have a change up to reflect the post rename state19:01
asselino/19:01
jeblairhow about let's do the renames this friday?19:01
fungiwfm19:01
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
mordredo/19:01
anteayame too19:01
fungi1900utc? later?19:01
TheJuliao/19:01
pcrewso/19:01
cody-somerville\o_19:01
*** tchaypo has joined #openstack-meeting19:02
cineramaparty time in meeting city19:02
zehicleo/19:02
jeblairwould 2100 or 2200 be okay?19:02
anteayasure19:02
ianwo/19:02
fungiyep, that's fine for me too19:02
anteayaeither is fine with me19:02
krtayloro/19:02
*** tiswanso has quit IRC19:02
* SergeyLukjanov hereo/19:03
jeblair#agreed next renames 2200 utc friday mar 2719:03
jeblairsomeone want to send an email?19:03
fungii can19:03
jeblair#action fungi send announcement email for renames19:03
fungii'll put together a plan etherpad for it too19:03
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts19:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Meeting topic: infra)"19:03
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
jeblairI'm going to try to timebox the priority efforts to just a few minutes each so that we can get to our backlog.  If there are no issues blocking the effort that we need to discuss, let's just move on quickly.19:03
anteayafungi: cool, thanks19:03
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (Swift logs)19:04
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:enable_swift,n,z19:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Swift logs) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:04
jheskethNothing to discuss afaik, just rolling forward19:04
jeblaircool, thanks!19:04
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (Nodepool DIB)19:04
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:dib-nodepool,n,z19:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Nodepool DIB) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:04
*** dneary has quit IRC19:04
*** lhcheng has left #openstack-meeting19:04
mordredthis has done well19:04
jeblairmordred, fungi: anything to discuss?19:04
clarkbnot much here other than reviewing more tests and the bindep move and shade changes19:04
mordredgone19:04
fungithe bindep additions still need reviews (infra-core can actually +2 those as of last week), and i have a few more patches to write. no new blockers19:04
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC19:05
jeblairah yeah, i have forgotten to bindep. thanks for the reminder19:05
anteayafungi: does bindep have to be in a certain state before it moves?19:05
fungianteaya: nope19:05
anteayak19:05
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (Migration to Zanata)19:05
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:zanata,n,z19:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Migration to Zanata) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:05
cineramaoh hai. so we're making steady progress19:05
anteayapleia2: is away19:05
anteayaI think she said just reviews19:06
clarkbI just reviewed a stack of zanata related puppet19:06
clarkbcinerama: ^ let me know if you have questions about m comments19:06
fungii should do the same19:06
jeblairand stevenk has started a patch to install the client via puppet19:06
*** tiswanso has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
cineramaonly thing i really want to flag at the mo is that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165696/ needs to be deployed prior to us firing up zanata19:06
fungithanks cinerama19:06
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/16569619:06
*** rvasilets__ has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
jeblairhow do we make sure that's deployed?19:06
cinerama(tldr it's a change required for openstackid.org)19:07
fungii think mrmartin/smarcet need to tag a new release19:07
cineramai'm new to this game so i don't know how we do upgradey things19:07
mrmartinfungi: am I?19:07
clarkbcinerama: we can fire up zanata it just won't let us login right?19:07
fungimrmartin: smarcet i guess?19:07
jeblaircinerama: we're all new to openstackid :)19:07
mrmartinfungi: I can, if I know what we are releasing19:07
cineramaclarkb: yeah that's it. just need to let openstackid recognize a broader range of request strings so the libs zanata uses for openid will work19:08
fungibut point being 165696 needs to appear in a tag on that repo so it will get deployed into production19:08
fungipresumably it's just on master for now19:08
jeblairfungi: do we deploy specific tags, or... what?19:08
*** ijw has quit IRC19:08
cineramano rush since we need the other stuff to be ready first19:08
cineramaotoh having it in place earlier won't actually hurt anything19:08
* tchaypo waves19:09
fungijeblair: yeah, production deploys updates on each new tag while teh dev server deploys tip of master if memory serves. is that correct mrmartin?19:09
*** bobmel has quit IRC19:09
mrmartincorrect19:09
cineramathat's good to know - so we can just point it at openstackid-dev.o.o for now?19:09
fungicinerama: yes, should work19:09
jeblairi wonder how we do that, but i will learn about that on my own time :)19:09
cineramafungi: super19:09
samueldmqhi o/ (late, sorry)19:09
fungijeblair: puppet magics19:09
mrmartincinerama: but be careful, because the profile db behind openstackid-dev.o.o can be a bit old19:10
mrmartinso it is not sure that your account exists there.19:10
Rockyggood info to capture in infra doc...19:10
jeblairRockyg: yeah, i was thinking we should update http://ci.openstack.org/openstackid.html with deployment info19:10
jeblairi want to learn about it anyway so...19:10
zaroo/19:11
jeblair#action jeblair document openstack id deployment mechanism in http://ci.openstack.org/openstackid.html19:11
fungiagreed. right now it's comingled with basic documentation of the software itself19:11
Rockygkewl19:11
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting19:11
mrmartinif you want to integrate openstackid I suggest to do it with a local dev version first, it is easier to track the logs19:11
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting19:11
fungithere is a separate change proposed to get the software documentation added and published for openstackid19:11
mrmartinas I know smarcet is working on an integration doc for that.19:11
jeblairthis was useful :)  anything else on this topic?19:11
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/16519919:11
cineramamrmartin: good thinking there. on my local setup here i have an openstackid server setup19:11
fungifor reference19:12
*** ajayaa has quit IRC19:12
*** sreshetn1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:12
cineramanothing else to report on zanata - i just need to integrate and/or argue about everyone's feedback :)19:12
jeblaircinerama: cool, thanks!19:12
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (Downstream Puppet)19:12
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:downstream-puppet,n,z19:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Downstream Puppet) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:12
anteayalooks like just reviews required19:13
nibalizeryep19:13
jeblairanteaya: agreed19:13
clarkbso I have been reviewing them and very few actualy have the topic set19:13
nibalizerthis one keeps needing rebases https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162830/19:13
yolandain the same line, there are pending reviews for puppet-pupet and puppet-bandersnatch19:13
jeblairclarkb: oh that'll do it19:13
clarkbso would be good if you are workign on related items to use the topic19:13
anteayaclarkb: +19:14
asselinclarkb, I think you can update the topic19:14
fungipuppet-puppet is our latest ouroboros i guess19:14
clarkbI think asselin's make puppet-openstackci and nibalizer merge template and base are the only changes I saw there19:14
jeblairnibalizer: good point, we should try to land that soon19:14
anteayafungi: openstackci-openstackci is fun one too19:14
clarkbasselin: I can, but I am not going to hunt all of these changes down. I am just noticing that in my list of things to review there are very few changes19:14
asselinclarkb, ok I see19:14
jeblairanteaya: it should be puppet-openstackci19:14
*** rromans has joined #openstack-meeting19:14
anteayajeblair: that's what I thought too19:15
clarkbjeblair: anteaya and the puppetforge name is openstackinfra-openstackci19:15
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting19:15
asselinjeblair, clarkb suggested openstackinfra-openstackci19:15
jeblairyolanda: set the topics to "downstream-puppet" for the puppet and bandorsnatch changes19:15
anteaya#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/165588/4/metadata.json19:15
yolandaok19:15
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:15
jeblairyeah, i think our local repos have "puppet-foo" as the name, but they end up as "openstackinfra-foo" on the forge19:15
clarkbasselin: anteaya the repo should be puppet-openstackci, the puppetforge name is openstackinfra-openstackci19:15
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:15
yolandajeblair, shall i do the same for changes intended to make modules more reusable?19:15
anteayaclarkb: ah thank you19:15
anteayaclarkb: it is correct now19:16
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:16
asselinclarkb, what about all the other modules? seems they're all wrong?19:16
jeblairyolanda: i think so.19:16
notnownikkii can update the topics on the bandersnatch changes, yolanda19:16
*** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu19:16
yolandak19:16
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:16
clarkbasselin: yes they need to be updated19:16
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa19:17
nibalizerasselin: yep19:17
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2419:17
jeblairclarkb, asselin: where are they wrong?19:17
*** rrrobbb has quit IRC19:17
clarkbjeblair: in the metadata.json files19:17
notnownikkitopics changed19:17
jeblairah yeah19:17
jeblairso nibalizer and i are working through publishing the httpd module19:17
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting19:17
nibalizerjeblair: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/puppet-logstash/tree/metadata.json#n2 should be openstackinfra19:17
jeblairlet's finish working through that module before we make metadata changes to the others19:18
nibalizerjeblair: ok19:18
jeblairin case we find we have more to do19:18
asselinfungi, still have your mass update script?19:18
*** dneary has joined #openstack-meeting19:18
fungiasselin: in my head anyway19:18
*** dneary has quit IRC19:18
*** dneary has joined #openstack-meeting19:18
anteayasafe there19:18
*** j05h has quit IRC19:19
jeblairanything else on this?19:19
fungithere's not much to iterating over a list of projects matching a regex and then running sed -i in each and commiting/pushing via git-review19:19
anteayanot from me19:19
asselinno19:19
nibalizerjeblair: nope19:19
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (Askbot migration)19:19
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:askbot-site,n,z19:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Askbot migration) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:19
mrmartinok, so two reviews waiting here19:19
mrmartinI found the Chinese solr issue, and there was a missing cron job19:19
mrmartinso we are on good track again19:20
fungiyeah, evgeny suggested a few additional things for us to check/test during the eval time, so that helped19:20
*** eharney has quit IRC19:20
fungithanks for knocking those out mrmartin19:20
mrmartinI guess we need to do add a backup, and as fungi suggested the local backup scripts19:20
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:20
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:20
mrmartinI have only one question here, do we have pgsql-backup for bup similar to mysql-backup?19:20
jeblairyeah, we have an existing pattern with mysql dbs where we do a local database backup to disk, then that gets backed up by the system backup19:21
fungiaside from the chinese search problem, the rest are non-user-facing so i don't think we need to extend the eval time unless you do19:21
fungimrmartin: if you're asking whether pgsql-backup exists yet, not to my knowledge19:21
clarkbmrmartin: you would need to add postgresql specific local backups, but once you have that the bup backups will pick it up19:21
jeblairmrmartin: i don't think we have backed up a pg database yet, so we will have to develop some new puppet for that19:21
jeblairhow's that for triangulating an answer? :)19:21
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:21
anteayanice19:21
clarkbyou can likely use the mysql backup manifest as a good template, just change the command and output file as appropriate19:22
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
mrmartinawesome, so we have two options here, add a simple cron script to backup, or the nice one to create the missing pgsql bup that can be reused later.19:22
fungithe basic dump command is already in the migrate spec too19:22
jeblairmrmartin: i think our mysql backups actually just add a cron script19:22
*** hareeshp has quit IRC19:23
*** aepifanov has quit IRC19:23
mrmartinthe original ask deployment contains a cron scheduled backup script, so we can reuse that very quickly19:23
jeblairoh i see19:23
mrmartinand bup will backup those files too19:23
clarkbjeblair: yup and logrotate to keep a few iteratons around19:23
*** garyh has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:23
mrmartinso in case of a restore situation, we have a proper sql dataset.19:23
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
fungiprobably the one improvement i'd be interested in seeing to the original script on the current production ask.o.o is to rotate multiple db dumps like we do for mysql19:23
fungibut that's not critical to have day 119:23
mrmartinok, I check the mysql bup too, if it not seems to be too complicated, I do it quickly19:24
*** banix has quit IRC19:24
jeblairmrmartin: sounds like a plan19:24
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (Upgrading Gerrit)19:24
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:gerrit-upgrade,n,z19:24
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Upgrading Gerrit) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:24
fungiwe're on trusty now!19:24
jeblairyay we're on trusty! :)19:24
tchaypowooo19:24
jeblairnext step is "Gerrit 2.9 upgrade Saturday May 9, 2015"19:25
anteayahas there been any bugs?19:25
anteayaI haven' seen any19:25
fungiwe still need to dig into why the utf-8 update failed19:25
anteayaah that19:25
fungiand possibly retry that on friday19:25
clarkband trusty git doesn't do shallow clones?19:25
fungiright, that19:25
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:25
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
fungiwell, the git-http-backend cgi anyway19:25
jeblairso the utf-8 thing needs a bit more planning19:25
zarowe can a script to convert tables, ready to go.19:26
jeblairit seems it will involve table modifications, so we need to test with the actual production dataset19:26
zaro*we can/we have19:26
jeblairzaro: can we get you a copy of that for you to work with so you can test it out?19:26
fungican we dump/source it into a new trove instance and then try there?19:27
fungior is going it on a local mysqld fine?19:27
fungier, doing19:27
jeblairi think a local mysql and a local gerrit should be fine19:27
clarkbconsidering our mysql instance is mysql 5.1 we probably want something similar?19:27
clarkbunsure of how much mysql version affects row data encoding19:27
zaroyes, can do19:27
jeblair#action zaro test utf8 conversion with production database and local mysql/gerrit 2.819:28
jeblairzaro: i put 2.8 ^ there since we're talking about doing this before the 2.9 upgrade, so we should make sure to test it with the current version19:28
zarosounds good19:28
*** Akshik has quit IRC19:29
anteayazaro: the review queue for the patches is just review them, yes?19:29
fungizaro: i can get the database dump to wherever you need it19:29
jeblairif that's ready to go by friday, cool; if now, we'll do it the next time -- i don't want to rush it and mess up our data19:29
anteayaagreed19:29
jeblairzaro: thanks!19:29
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:30
jeblair#topic Election tooling (tristanC)19:30
*** openstack changes topic to "Election tooling (tristanC) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:30
zaroanteaya: don't understand your question19:30
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
anteaya#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/scaling-election-tooling19:30
*** gyee has quit IRC19:30
fungitristanC is on vacation this week i believe19:30
anteayawell I wrote the etherpad19:30
anteayaso let me know your thoughts19:30
anteayabascially as I explain on the etherpad the current election tooling doesn't scale19:30
anteayaand for the sake of both the election officials and the electorate it needs to19:31
anteayathis is a proposal to address that need19:31
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting19:31
anteayazaro: was just saying you aren't blocked on any gerrit patches, youjust need reviews to happen19:31
jeblairthe foundation has a system for nominating people for board elections; i think it would be cool to use that for other elections too19:32
anteayaand let's remember that when using an etherpad it is considered friendly to others to put your name in the top right hand corner19:32
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:32
anteayajeblair: great, how can we evaluate that system?19:32
anteayajeblair: I dno't know it19:32
*** doude has quit IRC19:32
jeblairanteaya: maybe it's part of the foundation web site?19:33
anteayaoh19:33
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
anteayaI'm hesitant to use something we don't have control over in infra19:33
fungiso the specific infra items being proposed for discussion: 1. git repos for nomination and platform info, 2. some publication mechanism for the same?19:33
anteayayes19:34
jeblairyeah, but i think it's worth acknowledging that there's a need that might be filled by work the foundation has already done19:34
anteayathat would be a reasonable tl;dr19:34
anteayaokay I'm fine with acknowledging that19:34
fungijust making sure we have actual topics to discuss rather than something nebulous19:34
*** emagana has quit IRC19:34
anteayano idea what the next step would be to investigate it19:34
anteayafungi: yes, topics are helpful19:34
jeblairfungi: i'm interested in the conversation that lead us to thinking that election nominations via git repo are a solution19:35
anteayathe publication mechnisim was let a need and more an extention of using a git repo19:35
anteayawell it lead me to thinking19:35
*** BrianB has quit IRC19:35
fungijeblair: i missed the conversation myself, only commented on the etherpad after i saw it19:35
jeblairit feels like git repos are the only tool we have and i'm wondering is there any other tools in that box over there19:35
*** breton has left #openstack-meeting19:35
anteayasince this is the first opportunity it has come beofre any group that could constitute an us19:35
*** otter768 has quit IRC19:36
anteayathere was no conversation19:36
jeblairanteaya: are you open to conversations about other solutions, or do you want only to discuss the mechanics of the proposal in the etherpad?19:36
anteayaI took a walk and realized git repos scale, and then wrote the etherpad19:36
*** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
anteayaoh by all means let's discuss19:36
fungiokay, so it's more of a straw man proposal19:36
anteayabut it has taken 3 weeks to get a discussion19:36
fungidefinitely good as a starting point19:37
anteayaand this is the only way I figured I could get the space to talk about it19:37
jeblairya, sorry, but we did better today :)19:37
anteayawe did19:37
anteayathank you19:37
anteayaso yes, discuss away19:37
anteayaelection officals need to retain their sanity19:37
anteayaelectorate need confidence in what is going on19:37
fungii agree being able to reuse the nomination system would be cool, since it already has a way to link your foundation profile to your nomination19:37
anteayathose are the only two stipulations in the solution19:37
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
jeblairokay, so i've suggested the alternative of trying to adapt the foundation election system to support other elections.  that is not easy because it's not (yet) an open development model and would require some code19:37
anteayawe have missed this round anyway19:38
anteayaas they had to make a decision to communicate to the electorate19:38
jeblairprobably talking with foundation folks about the progress of that and what would be involved would be useful19:38
anteayaso we have until next fall19:38
jeblairmay not be much more to say about that here :)19:38
anteayabut we do need something19:38
*** ibiris_away is now known as ibiris19:38
anteayajeblair: fair enough19:38
anteayaanyone with any other thoughts?19:39
anteayayou are welcome to add them to the etherpad19:39
clarkbjeblair: anteaya if we send something to the infra list about that we can poke people to go read it19:39
anteayaas a point of communication19:39
jeblairclarkb: sounds like a plan19:39
fungiso to step back, the specific problem we're trying to address is "it's messy and time consuming to have nominations posted to the ml, confirmed, and platform statements/q&a pasted into a wiki article by a small team of election officials"19:39
clarkband/or we can point at the etherpad if we add the option there19:39
* ianw will not mention storing candidates in a bitcoin side-chain :)19:39
anteayafungi: well it is overwhelming now19:39
*** morganfainberg is now known as needslesscoffee19:39
jeblairianw: creative! :)19:39
anteayafungi: plus having stackforge use the same process confuses the electorate19:39
*** AmirBaleghi112 has quit IRC19:39
anteayaas they keep thinking the election has started and they missed it19:40
jeblairi keep thinking that too19:40
anteayaso the tool needs to be clear to the electorate which are govenered elections and which aren't19:40
clarkbanteaya: I don't think your proposed system fixes that though19:40
fungiwait, what, we haven't? ;)19:40
anteayaclarkb: fair enough19:40
anteayalet's do better19:40
anteayaand yes19:41
anteayahaveing more elections to administer is hard to do19:41
*** aranjan has quit IRC19:41
anteayahence the sanity for officials bit19:41
anteayathanks for listening, we can come back to this again19:41
jeblairanteaya: i do think the git repo does solve a lot of problems; it may be the most expedient method of scaling this19:41
anteayaand yes more ideas and communication welcome19:41
anteayajeblair: that is what I thought19:41
*** achanda has quit IRC19:42
anteayawe don't have to build a thing19:42
anteayaand git scales19:42
jeblairanteaya: i think it will need a lot of details worked out19:42
anteayajeblair: fair enough19:42
anteayaacl permissions for one19:42
fungimaybe a list of features a solution needs/tasks it should handle is a better place to start (a requirements document of sorts) rather than jumping right into designing something19:42
clarkbfungi: +119:42
anteayasure19:42
anteayaI welcome help on doing that19:42
jeblairfungi: yes, i think there was some of that in the etherpad, but not organized as such19:42
anteayaas I may be too close to the issue to think broadly enough19:42
jeblairso let's work on a good problem statement + requirements19:43
fungiagreed. possibly with less focus on what we're doing now that doesn't work so well19:43
*** henrynash has quit IRC19:43
anteayasure19:43
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
jeblairand then push that to the infra list and follow it up with any broad ideas we have for addressing them19:43
anteayaso thanks for the time and support here19:43
fungii mean, those are lessons learned that we need to use when considering solutions, but not necessarily requirements themselves19:43
anteayatrue19:43
tchaypoLinux Australia has a thing called memberdb that I think does most of what we need19:43
tchaypobut from memory it’s either a messy pile of perl, or a messy pile of python translated from perl a decade ago19:44
jhesketherr, I would not advocate for memberdb19:44
anteayatchaypo: cool, I'd be interested in knowing more19:44
anteayajhesketh: ah okay19:44
tchaypoLA themselves are trying to get rid of it :)19:44
jeblairyeah, running our own election system is another interesting solution19:44
anteayaha ha ha19:44
ianwtchaypo: weren't they looking at getting rid of that?19:44
jheskethwell perhaps it's a contender, but it would need serious work19:44
tchaypobut it sounds like we have similar sets of requirements..19:44
anteayawe don't have to replace condorcet19:44
anteayait is wonderful19:44
jheskethnot so much get rid of as upgrade19:44
anteayajust the nominations part19:44
fungiwell, sounds like we might, but getting that fleshed out is really step 119:44
tchaypolet’s shelve that while we investigate git though19:45
anteayato be clear just nominations is what I am looking at19:45
anteayaour actual app for running the polls is wonderful19:45
jheskethto be clear, memberdb is horribly broken19:45
anteayajhesketh: ack19:45
funginominations and position/debate details per candidate sounds like19:45
tchaypoI think git should work well for the nominations19:45
jheskethbut that's not to say it can't be fixed19:45
*** varora has joined #openstack-meeting19:45
jeblairanteaya: i know you want help on this, but i'm going to action you to at least continue driving it :)19:45
tchaypowe have ability for approvals and such in gerrit19:46
anteayaI've taken a lot of time on this and thank you19:46
anteayajeblair: I'm fine driving19:46
jeblairanteaya: feel free to interpret this as "anteaya convince someone else to..." :)19:46
anteayabut we have seen what I come up with when alone19:46
anteayajeblair: will do19:46
anteayaso help welcome19:46
*** jtomasek has quit IRC19:46
anteayathanks all19:46
jeblair#action anteaya cause a problem statement and requirements regarding election tooling to be sent to the infra list so various solutions can be discussed19:46
* anteaya nods19:46
jeblairanteaya: and i'll be happy to help with that :)19:47
anteayathank you :)19:47
jeblair#topic Update bandersnatch (anteaya)19:47
*** openstack changes topic to "Update bandersnatch (anteaya) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:47
anteayathis is me again19:47
anteayamostly as driver19:47
anteayaas you can see in the agenda dsufft gave us a warning to update bandersnatch19:47
anteayaI don't know how to do that19:47
anteayabut I do know how to copy paste to an agenda19:48
anteayaso do we want to do that?19:48
jeblairdo we CD bandersnatch?19:48
clarkbwe should, its likely as simple as ensure => latest on our bandersnatch install with puppet19:48
clarkbI can look into that19:48
anteayathanks19:48
jeblairalso, worth checking if we have "-U" on that :)19:48
anteayathat's all from me19:48
*** VW_ has quit IRC19:49
jeblair#action clarkb make sure bandersnatch is being updated19:49
jeblair#topic Puppet Style19:49
fungiyeah, last time i manually upgraded the 4 servers19:49
*** openstack changes topic to "Puppet Style (Meeting topic: infra)"19:49
nibalizeryea iss ensuure => present right now19:49
jeblairspeaking of =>19:49
nibalizerso this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164819/19:49
fungimainly so that we could downgrade again easily if it turned out to be broken19:49
fungistylish!19:50
jeblairi'm inclined to lean toward sticking with the predominant puppet style for the moment19:50
nibalizeri think we've got some oppinions there19:50
jeblairi don't actually agree with the rules19:50
*** needslesscoffee is now known as morganfainberg19:50
jeblairbut i also think we've written some terrible puppet in the past, and we're trying to write some better puppet now19:50
nibalizerseems like the infra cores are in agreeent, and the people more heaviliy involved with the greater puppet community are in agreement19:50
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting19:51
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:51
jeblairand when we go out to tell people that they are doing module versioning wrong, i don't want our lack of arrow alignment to cause them to not take us seriously :)19:51
clarkbI think the trouble here is the people doing the review are predominantly the cores19:51
clarkband this is a problem with reviewing code19:51
anteayaI think adhereing to community style allows new people from the community to help us, rather than isolating us19:51
nibalizeri agree with anteaya19:51
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting19:51
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:51
nibalizerwill infra-cloud puppet live in system-config or outside?19:51
mordrednibalizer: stackforge19:51
clarkbso you have two camps which fall along lines of how much trouble is this to review19:51
mordrednibalizer: we're going to use the stackforge puppet modules19:51
nibalizerno i mean the composition layer19:52
fungii definitely don't find aligned columnar whitespace (beyond indentation) to be more readable. quite the contrary. but i'll concede that it's mostly a product of what you spend most of your time staring at19:52
mordrednibalizer: oh - that'll be us19:52
mordredI don't think the rocketship alignment helps19:52
mordredBUT19:52
mordredI also don't mind it19:52
cineramait also makes the changes noisy and wastes time19:52
mordredit doesn't bother me as much as others in my own brain19:52
cineramabut if that's what upstream do then i guess it is good to do it19:52
nibalizerlifting the restriction and allowing style to float will create inconsistency and that will be the most gross thing imho19:52
mordredso I could be on board with ditching or with keeping19:52
jeblaircinerama: what makes changes noisy?19:52
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:53
jeblaircinerama: (just want to be sure i understand what you're saying)19:53
nibalizerlifting the restriction and changing the entire codebase is a huge flurry of changes19:53
cineramajeblair: if one paramenter changes or is added then the spacing must be fixed for every line in that definition19:53
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:53
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting19:53
jeblairnibalizer: oh yeah, i think we would not change the codebase, just let it drift over time.19:53
jeblaircinerama: ah yes, i agree.  that's the very thing that prompted the proposal in fact.19:53
notnownikkiwhich is going to get read the most, the diffs or the resulting manifest? I'd go with making the most read one more readable. so I'm for keeping the alignment19:54
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
clarkbthats interesting, I predominantly read diffs :)19:54
nibalizeragain i feel that I should say that the gerrit ui uses dark/light green to show when a text blob has been changed instead of just moved19:54
*** serg_mel_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
jeblairnotnownikki: i hope the diffs, actually.  :)19:54
nibalizerso all the light green text in puppet is colored different than the line that was added/modified19:54
notnownikkijeblair, clarkb, but you're core :) we want to attract newbies19:54
*** doude has quit IRC19:54
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
notnownikkiand when we're making modules reusable...19:55
notnownikkifor downstream consumption19:55
cineramaftr i am not a core and i agree with those folks19:55
notnownikkimanifest readability matters19:55
jeblairnibalizer: yes, so does gertty.  that's just a small part of the issue.  it still requires someone to see and parse that information.19:55
fungiwhether or not aligned operators is more readable is mostly a matter of personal taste19:55
ianwi would say that emacs puppet-mode does by default doesn't seem to work with openstack puppet; it always wants to indent differently.  not sure if the spaces are confusing it but maybe this helps19:55
pabelangerFWIW: I do prefer the puppet lint checks19:55
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:55
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:56
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
jeblairso we do not have consensus now, and there are good arguments on either side19:56
jeblairi think we should put this to rest and leave it as is for now.19:56
mordredjeblair: ++19:56
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:56
*** niclem has quit IRC19:56
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
nibalizerto throw a wet mordred at the probleme, I could go to the place in git where the official puppet style guide is and propose lifting the arrow operator alignment requirement there19:56
SpamapSconsensus is overrated. ;)19:56
*** j05h has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
anteayanibalizer: good luck with that19:57
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
mordredwow. I've become a thing someone throws at something now. I suppose I had that coming19:57
fungiwe might also consider whether it's something we care about for modules published to the forge, but not for system-config19:57
clarkbI think it is also worth noting that we don't do everything that pep8 tells us to do19:57
clarkbor what hacking tells us to do19:57
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:57
pabelangerfungi, I would agree with that statement19:57
anteayanibalizer: but I'm in just to see you toss a wet mordred19:57
clarkbpuppet isn't being signled out as a special thing here, adapting format practices to local needs is common19:57
jeblairi may, at some point in the distant future, bring this up again when i believe everyone here has reviewed enough puppet to think like i do.  :)19:57
mordredclarkb: we _DO_ do everything pep8 the spec tells us to do19:57
notnownikkifungi, yeah i'd go for that19:57
mordredclarkb: just not pep8 the overreaching lint tool19:57
mordredjeblair: :)19:57
nibalizerjeblair: +1 for resting19:58
jeblairso does anyone object with keeping the status quo for now in order to achieve maximum average harmony? :)19:58
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
fungii expect mordred plans to solve this dilemma by replacing it with a bunch of yaml19:58
anteayaha ha ha19:58
*** varora has left #openstack-meeting19:58
nibalizerfungi: basically19:58
mrmartin:)19:58
anteaya+ status quo19:58
clarkbI am fine with aligned rockets, I have dealt with them for years :)19:58
jeblairnibalizer: (and i do like your wet mordred idea ;)19:58
*** jcoufal has quit IRC19:58
fungii'm in favor of revisiting at a later date19:58
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:58
jeblair#agreed stick with aligned rockets for now19:59
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting19:59
mordredfungi: actually ... in-tree hiera DOES fix large portions of this with yaml19:59
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC19:59
jeblair#secretplan wait until more people are reviewing puppet and see the light19:59
fungihowever it's not applied to system-config at the moment. i assume sticking with the status quo means leaving it not running for that repo19:59
jeblairfungi: ha!  how did that happen?19:59
mordredfungi: ++ status quo means status quo19:59
ttxI see some light20:00
fungijeblair: i think you ragedeleted it at one point, but i'd have to check git log ;)20:00
anteayattx is that the time?20:00
jeblairthanks all :)20:00
jeblair#endmeeting20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:00
pabelangerrocket alignment, clearly the platform needed to move to ansible20:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 20:00:28 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2015/infra.2015-03-24-19.00.html20:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2015/infra.2015-03-24-19.00.txt20:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2015/infra.2015-03-24-19.00.log.html20:00
ttxbut the tunnel is pretty long20:00
anteaya'tis20:00
vishyo/20:01
markmcclaino/20:01
dhellmanno/20:01
adrian_ottoo/20:01
ttxExperiencing pretty bad lag, hopefully will get better20:01
mikalHi20:01
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
*** notnownikki has quit IRC20:01
jeblairo/20:01
serg_mel_Hi, o/20:01
devanandasort of here, but really at a conference dinner20:01
mordredo/20:01
*** pabelanger has left #openstack-meeting20:01
ttxrussellb, jgriffith, annegentle, jaypipes, sdague : around ?20:01
mordredI have agreed to be devananda if needed20:02
ttxRussell is on in-flight wifi or not20:02
devanandaI approve of mordred being me if needed (and I'm likely to drop anyway, because wireless here is very spotty)20:02
ttxWe have quorum anyway20:02
* sarob lurking20:02
* mordred throws a fluffy milk cow at sarob20:02
ttx#startmeeting tc20:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar 24 20:02:49 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)"20:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'20:02
*** noslzzp has quit IRC20:03
ttxIf I disappear due to network issues, just pretent I'm here and continue20:03
ttxOur agenda for today:20:03
ttx#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee20:03
*** pcrews has left #openstack-meeting20:03
ttx#topic Final rubberstamping for library stable release procedures/policy20:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Final rubberstamping for library stable release procedures/policy (Meeting topic: tc)"20:03
*** yolanda has left #openstack-meeting20:03
*** fzdarsky|afk has quit IRC20:03
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/155072/20:03
ttxI put a question mark on that one because it doesn't have the usual pile up of +1s20:03
ttxSo it's more questionable than usual that it reached enough "consensus" for us to rubberstamp20:03
ttxThat said, it's a niche topic, so a lot of people just don't care20:04
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
ttxAlso, it's describing the process we are already following for Kilo cycle final stage20:04
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
ttxso I'd argue it's better to approve it (and refine it if necessary in the future) than pretend it's not there20:04
dhellmannalthough we do need the ptls for projects with client libraries to follow it, too20:04
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
*** annegentle is now known as Guest4526820:04
ttxAll people that had -1s in the past have reverted them to +1 later, except jeblair20:04
ttxso I'm at least waiting on that20:04
*** emagana has quit IRC20:04
ttxdhellmann: do you think we should technically wait a bit more ?20:05
ttxLike raise a ML thread to push it over the edge ?20:05
*** Guest45268 has quit IRC20:05
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC20:05
ttxWe discussed it twice at the cross-project meeting already20:05
mikalIs the goal to follow this for Kilo?20:05
dhellmannmikal: yes20:05
*** samueldmq has left #openstack-meeting20:05
dhellmannttx: at this point it seems a bit pointless to wait, but we can if you think that's going to mean more people understand it20:06
*** elo1 has quit IRC20:06
*** agentle has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
*** beecee has left #openstack-meeting20:06
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
ttxdhellmann: we could send an email about the process we'll follow in kilo to the ML -- inadvertantly mentioning that it's the one being under review as a spec anyway20:06
mikalI assume there will be reminders towards the end of a release cycle to do these things?20:06
* mikal worries about forgetful future me20:07
ttxwe need a ML post at some point anyway20:07
dhellmannttx: ok, I thought I posted once about it already but I can do it again20:07
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
*** amakarov is now known as amakarov_away20:07
*** baoli has quit IRC20:07
ttxdhellmann: if you posted something already, I may have mlissed it, maybe no point in doing it again20:07
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
ttxI'm fine passing it if we can get 7 TC members to approve it20:08
dhellmannttx: the thread I'm finding was tagged [oslo] so I'll start another20:08
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC20:08
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting20:08
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting20:08
ttxworst case scenario we'll revise it20:08
dhellmann#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-December/051874.html20:08
ttxI'm fine with both options (thread or pass now)20:08
mikalSo you need three more +2's then20:08
ttxwhat's the other TC members take ?20:08
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting20:08
jgriffithttx: my vote was go with it20:09
mikalI think you should merge it20:09
jgriffithmikal: +120:09
ttxjeblair: you fine reverting your past -1 ?20:09
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC20:09
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC20:10
jeblairttx: it was for an (important) clarification, so probably okay.  but i have not read the latest revision yet, sorry.20:10
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
jeblairttx: (as in, i don't think i saw any major obstacles once i understood it)20:10
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
ttxOK, let's do both approaches then. I'll approve once it gets 7 TC yes (hopefully later this week) *and* let's have a thread to communicate the kilo strategy anyway20:11
ttx(one not blocking the other)20:11
* dhellmann is composing that email right now20:11
ttxsounds good ?20:11
jgriffithttx: works for me20:12
jeblair+20:12
ttxok, let's move on20:12
ttx#topic Magnum - OpenStack Containers Service20:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Magnum - OpenStack Containers Service (Meeting topic: tc)"20:12
* adrian_otto is here for any Magnum related questions20:12
ttxThis is a proposed project addition:20:12
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/16108020:12
*** elo1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:12
ttxWe discussed it a couple weeks ago20:12
ttxMy personal feeling is that this project team behaves like "one of us"20:12
markmcclain++20:12
ttxThe only part we could question is whether they really help further the OpenStack Mission, and I think they help with the "platform" part...20:13
*** hongbin has quit IRC20:13
ttx...without diluting the value of existing key components.20:13
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:13
ttxso I'm +120:13
jgriffith+220:13
vishy+120:13
ttxquestions, comments ?20:13
mikalSo, I missed the meeting last time we discussed this20:13
mikalRemind me why we didn't +1 then?20:14
* sdake__ here for magnum Q's as well20:14
ttxmikal: I think there were concerns whether we should freeze approvals20:14
dhellmannttx: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-March/059811.html for reference on the previous topic20:14
ttxand we clarified that last week20:14
mikalOh, so process not magnum itself?20:14
*** elo1 has quit IRC20:14
agentlemikal: right20:14
mordredI'm +1 on this one - I think the are one of us and follow the 4 opens and they're don't do anything that makes me unhappy and adrian_otto is a nice guy20:14
ttxmikal: that was my understanding, maybe others opinion vary20:14
mikalOk, cool20:14
jeblairand we wanted to look at other applications, but it seems like we only had one other and we did that. :)20:15
adrian_otto;-)20:15
mikalmordred: he has nice hair too20:15
mordredmikal: this is very true.20:15
ttxMagnum was level 1. Let's move to level 220:15
anteayaadrian_otto reached out to me about how to address their elections without placing a burden on current tools20:15
mikalttx: you have 9 +1's there20:15
* dhellmann can't wait to meet adrian_otto now20:15
mordredadrian_otto: hope your hair doesn't let dhellmann down20:15
ttxalrighty, 30 secondsq left to record your approval20:15
adrian_ottodhellmann: we met in ATL20:15
ttxbefore I press the button20:15
mikalLOL20:15
sdake__adrian_otto has fine hair20:16
* dhellmann is ashamed20:16
* mordred hands dhellmann a web bunny rabbit of shame20:16
mordredgah20:16
mordredWET20:16
* mordred is ashamed20:16
ttxnow that you mention it -- nice hair is certainly hurting some of our key members pride20:16
mikalYou got the bunny wet?20:16
ttxwhich definitely counts as "not one of us"20:16
*** ibiris is now known as ibiris_away20:16
mordredttx: should we only accept projects with bad hair?20:16
mikalWe could get TC toupes?20:16
ttxok, approved20:16
ttxmordred: or bald guys20:16
anteayabald women too?20:17
ttxadrian_otto: you're in!20:17
agentle+1 anteaya20:17
mordredanteaya: absolutely20:17
dhellmannadrian_otto: I'm not sure whether to offer congratulations or condolences ;-)20:17
* sarob is in trouble20:17
ttxWelcome to the tent20:17
*** fzdarsky|afk has joined #openstack-meeting20:17
anteayaokay then20:17
jgriffithdhellmann: LOL20:17
agentlecome in out of the rain (or something?)20:17
mordredso far this meeting is winning best TC meeting20:17
* dhellmann wonders what was in everyone's coffee today20:17
sdake__dhellman both ;)20:17
ttxdhellmann: I may have poured powerful drugs in the water supply this morning20:18
dhellmannsdake__: too true! :-)20:18
jeblairwho else is doing a google image search for adrian otto and marveling at the fact that _all_ adrian ottos have amazing hair?20:18
ttx#topic Add a tag for affiliation diversity20:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Add a tag for affiliation diversity (Meeting topic: tc)"20:18
AJaeger_adrian_otto: please propose a patch to project-config to move the repos in the openstack namespace quickly. We have a rename sscheduled20:18
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/16385120:18
adrian_ottoAJaeger_: yes sir.20:18
dhellmannjeblair: it comes with access to that namespace20:18
ttxMore happiness all around! Great work going on here20:18
jeblairadrian_otto, AJaeger_: next rename is scheduled for friday20:18
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting20:18
adrian_ottook, we will act on that swiftly.20:19
ttxThe diversity tag is almost good to go, minor comments from anne and me20:19
jeblair(if we miss it, we'll do it in a couple weeks)20:19
agentlereally like the data-driven diversityt ag20:19
agentletag even20:19
*** timcline_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
*** timcline has quit IRC20:19
ttxliek I think a project were 2 orgs represent more than 80% or 90% of contributors could be considered "not diverse" the same way a project where one org has >50% is20:19
mordredso - I don't want to be a wet blanket on the otherwise awesome meeting20:19
mordredbecause I like this tag in many ways20:20
mordredHOWEVER20:20
ttxfear the wet mordred20:20
mordredthere is an implication in it that corporate affiliation matters20:20
mordredin that it implies that because I work for HP I am working for HP's motives20:20
mordredand, while I understand and agree with the intent20:20
* devananda hands mordred a towel to dry off20:20
mordredI do want to register taht I do not, inf act, make technical decisions based on HP's goals20:20
agentlemordred: I asked for "org" instead of "company" because I feel the same way20:20
ttxNot sure there is such implication20:20
*** doude has quit IRC20:20
dhellmannfrom the sense of the long term viability of a project, it might - if a company walks away from a project and takes their developers, that may hurt the remaining team's ability to continue producing the software20:20
*** eghobo has quit IRC20:20
mordreddhellmann: TOTALLY20:21
ttxmordred: the risk we are talking about here is a company pulling off all resources from a project in one go20:21
devanandamordred: I think the implication is slightly different. it implies that HP could prevent you from working on it any longer, if they chose to stop funding it20:21
mordredlike I said, I support the tag20:21
jgriffithmordred: I kinda get what you're saying.. HOWEVER20:21
jgriffith:)20:21
mikalmordred: its about the risk that HP will assign you to a new task though right?20:21
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
mikalmordred: not about the decisions you make while assigned somewhere20:21
jgriffithI also think that the whole point is just "data"20:21
mordredmikal: well, they can try that - I'm pretty sure you'd offer me a new job if they did20:21
ttxit's not really about a company controlling a project as much as the brittleness of a project that lacks diversity20:21
jgriffithas per the comment I made, it's not a "judgement"20:21
mikalmordred: sure, but there this is a thing which has happened to other people in the past20:21
mordredyup20:21
mordredtotally understand20:22
mordredtotally agree20:22
agentleI think it's data driven and people can make their own assessments on whether affiliation means a particular behavior would occur20:22
mordreddata is great20:22
jeblairyeah, i think it's useful because it is a signal about how broad the support for a project is in our community20:22
ttxmordred: I bet they wouldn't oiffer a jhob to your whole team though20:22
agentlewe'll do gender diversity data next right? :)20:22
*** dneary has quit IRC20:22
ttxagentle: oh, good one :)20:22
mikalagentle: I can script that one easily... Its just a script which always returns "no".20:22
AJaeger_agentle: and then geography or age?20:22
ttxmordred: but I see your point20:22
agentlebecause if I'm a woman I'll behave a certain way (which is what mordred is basically saying is a poor lumping?)20:22
jgriffithI think most folks know mordred *thinks* on is on behalf20:22
agentleheh20:22
mordredI just want to make sure we don't start judging people based on our impressions, good or bad, of their employer20:23
mordredand this seems like one tiny step down that road20:23
jgriffithmordred: very fair point20:23
agentlemordred: I think it's data and judgement occurs.20:23
*** rvasilets__ has quit IRC20:23
mordredI know we're already down it20:23
mordredand I agree with agentle20:23
devanandaI think it actually expresses something else very well - we all ignore the agency of individual developers to sustain a project because we (assume, probably correctly) that all openstack developers are paid t owork on openstack20:23
* mikal also doesn't want to be the one to have to assign strict genders to people20:23
ttxmordred: maybe the tag definition could use wording to discourage this usage of the tag20:23
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC20:23
ttxif it doesn't enough already20:23
mordredttx: maybe so - I may also be fine just having said it here in channel20:23
ttxi.e. assume good faith and all20:23
dhellmannmordred: no, but at the same time I could see a deployer not wanting to use something with only one company backing it, and I could see us deciding not to propose trademark use for a project that lacks some level of diversity20:23
anteayamikal: self-identification is the way to go20:24
ttxWhat do you all think of a cap on two-org share ?20:24
agentleI wondered if the sample size of the team matters, like if there are four team members, do we need to surface that?20:24
ttxlike top two-org should represent less than 85% or so of the metrics considered ?20:24
devanandaagentle: we used to require a min # of devs, yes20:24
dhellmannagentle: size of the core team would be another good metric for evaluating the long term health prospects for a project, so that could be another tag in this category20:24
agentledevananda: okay, then yeah I think I'm going the same line of thought as ttx20:24
jgriffithI'm wondering if people are reading this tag as something much more "important" than I am20:25
ttxwe'll probably use the same for the future team:size tag20:25
agentledhellmann: ok, that would work20:25
*** enterprisedc has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
dhellmannjgriffith: I anticipate applying these rules when deciding whether I want to vote yes for trademark use for a project.20:25
agentlejgriffith: it's interesting data, and uncovers makeup of teams, and will be useful comparision/trending over time20:25
devanandamordred: one more thing this exposes is a lack of pluggability in an app. most of the IaaS tools have pluggable drivers, which increases the diversity of contributions.20:25
jgriffithdhellmann: ahh.. ok, then that's going to change a bit of my opinions on these things I think20:26
* devananda cant type well tonight20:26
* russellb here now20:26
jgriffithdhellmann: as well as make the process MUCH more difficult I think20:26
*** fzdarsky|afk has quit IRC20:26
*** wojdev has quit IRC20:26
dhellmannjgriffith: difficult?20:26
ttxSo... details to iron out, but since this tag definition has broad support, I plan to approve it if any patchset reaches 7 YES in the coming week, so that we don't block on another meeting. Does that sound fair ?20:26
jgriffithdhellmann: by process I mean process of setting up tags20:26
devanandadhellmann: you vote whether or not to use apply the trademark t oa project?20:26
dhellmanndevananda: the bylaws say the TC is supposed to propose a sets of projects to the board for trademark consideration, so yes20:27
ttxat some point we'll have to20:27
ttxcurrently it's "the integarted release"20:27
* dhellmann is sitting on a tag proposal for that20:27
russellb"TC approved release"20:27
ttxand tomorrow it will be "the TC approved release"20:27
mordredme proposes integarted tag20:27
russellbis the base that the rest of the trademark policy starts from20:27
dhellmannright, I'll submit that next week when I get back from vacation20:28
devanandaah. right.20:28
*** dflorea has quit IRC20:28
russellbmordred: yep, coming full circle :-p20:28
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
mordredrussellb: :)20:28
ttxtrademark usage was one of the late additions to the meaning of "the integrated release"20:28
ttxthe last facet20:28
ttxsome would say the last straw20:28
* mordred would personally like to see the "proposed set of projects" stay static until someone else requests that we add something20:28
jgriffithgeesh... I was taking all of that literally20:28
mordredbut that's another conversation20:28
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC20:28
ttxyes, one step at a time :)20:28
* mordred starts running20:28
ttxI need to figure out if Defcore wants one "tc-approved releas" or one per trademark program first :)20:29
russellbmordred: right, will be easier to define and agree if we keep the scope contained20:29
ttxfun with bylaws wording.20:29
* sdague finally here, train late 20:29
mordredsdague: you missed the fun bits20:29
mordredsdague: now we're just doing work20:29
ttxsdague: you missed the part where we just agreed20:29
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
sdague\o/ for agreeing20:29
ttxOK, so to reiterate, back on topic...20:29
jgriffithsdague: don't believe them... it's a conspiracy20:30
ttxsince this tag definition has broad support, I plan to approve it if any patchset reaches 7 YES in the coming week, so that we don't block on another meeting. Does that sound fair ?20:30
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
*** elo1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
dhellmannttx: ++20:30
devanandattx: ++20:30
mikalworks for me20:30
jgriffithttx: as my vote in gerrit reflects +120:30
*** padkrish has quit IRC20:30
mordred++20:30
mordredttx: I voted +1 after having whined in channel20:30
ttxIf you think having a tow-org cap rule doesn't make sense, please chime in on review so that Russel knows how to do the next patchset20:31
agentlegot it.20:31
*** baoli has quit IRC20:31
ttx#topic Add proposal to rename core teams as maintainer teams20:31
russellbrelated data is on the review20:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Add proposal to rename core teams as maintainer teams (Meeting topic: tc)"20:31
russellbto see what the new rule would impact20:31
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/16366020:31
ttxThis one is failing to pick up support afaict20:31
*** ctlaugh has quit IRC20:32
ttxmost opinionated people (like me) so far with a -120:32
*** ctlaugh has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC20:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** mpaolino has quit IRC20:32
agentlein docs, we have been establishing "specialty teams" for reviews of particular guides.20:32
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
ttxI understand we may have a problem to solve there, but I fear the remedy is worse than the disease20:32
*** dflorea has quit IRC20:33
russellbyep, agree there's a problem20:33
agentleso it sounds similar to what jogo is proposing, but I think core is an okay word for both20:33
russellbjust don't think the name is it :)20:33
*** ijw has quit IRC20:33
jgriffithttx: russellb you'll have to enlighten me as to the problem20:33
jgriffithI'm not getting it20:33
russellbor at least changing it at this point isn't helpful enough20:33
sdagueI be ok with it. I do think that often times the core teams assume their only responsibility is gerrit and not owning the code and fixing bugs in it. But I don't feel super strongly on it.20:33
agentleand I've avoided "subteam" in preference to specialty team20:33
dhellmannagentle: that sounds a bit like what we do in oslo, with separate teams for some of the libs20:33
agentlewords do matter... but core is easy to type and already understood in the ecosystem...20:33
agentledhellmann: yeah20:33
ttxjgriffith: I'd say the problem is that "core reviewers" teams call themselves "core teams"20:34
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
agentlettx: do you have more context on the root problem "maintainer" would help solve (or encourage better behavior?)20:34
dhellmannI think I'd be more in favor of a proposal that tried to define the actual responsibilities of core teams, before renaming them.20:34
ttxand that implies caste/class where it should not20:34
russellband "core teams" are treated as the almighty20:34
agentlettx: that helps20:34
jgriffithmeh....20:34
mikalWell, its not as bad as it used to be20:34
ttxand then siolly companies gives you bonuses when you become a member20:35
mikalThere were no core parties in Paris IIRC20:35
jgriffithI think mountains can be made out of mole hills20:35
russellbright, make it a primary employment goal20:35
mordredmikal: yah there was20:35
mordredmikal: the architecture thing20:35
ttxwhich gives the wrong incentive to be one20:35
mikalmordred: huh, I must have skipped it then20:35
russellbfun party, don't get me wrong20:35
ttxjgriffith: I agree we have way larger fishes to fry20:35
jgriffithttx: hmmm... companies do that;20:35
* jgriffith works up is resume20:35
mordredso ...20:35
*** rushil has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
mordredI think this will be naturally changed by big tent20:35
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
sdaguechanging the name won't fix the wrong incentive problem20:36
mordredsdague: ++20:36
russellbyep, agree20:36
*** browne has left #openstack-meeting20:36
mikalSo, I don't think changing the name fixes misunderstandings from manager20:36
mikals20:36
mikalManagers want to measure things so they can incent behaviour20:36
russellbdon't think anyone thinks so :)20:36
mikalAny group membership is easy to measure20:36
mikalSo will be picked20:36
sdake__agree although companies do use it as a metric of success of their staff at multiple places :)20:36
dhellmannmanagers want people to become core because they think it means their code will land faster, right?20:36
ttxsdague: especially if we change it to "maintainers"20:36
russellbdhellmann: and it gets bragged about20:36
mikaldhellmann: I think its also because its an easy concept for them to understand20:36
sdake__dhellmann its a measure of influence not speed20:37
dhellmannmikal, russellb : fair20:37
russellbin reality, their code probably does land faster ...20:37
russellbbut i don't have data to show that20:37
dhellmannsdake__: I think that's a distinction without a difference in this case, but sure20:37
fungifwiw, companies who want to throw parties for core reviewers on projects are looking at an ever growing list of attendees. they're either going to have to scale back to some other criteria or stop altogether at some point anyway20:37
russellbanyway, not sure we need to debate the problem20:37
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting20:37
sdake__companies want core because customers want to now people to be involved in openstack20:37
sdaguerussellb: agree, this seems more beer talk20:37
sdake__now/know20:37
russellbmmm beer20:37
ttxanyway, this proposal in particular looks DOA -- but we may still want to pursue ways to address that issue20:38
mikalSo, I think the point here is this is more complicated than a name20:38
russellbttx: ++20:38
mikalAnd needs further discussion, probably not on this review20:38
jgriffithOr maybe they just want their employees doing work they enjoy?20:38
sdaguethough I spent a lot of time training previous employer lawyers on what core reviewer meant for open source rules20:38
jgriffithor maybe the employers believe in OpenStack and making it better as much as a lot of the people workign on it?20:38
ttxsolution might be to create more subteams20:38
sdaguebecause they understood maintainer as a concept20:38
jgriffithYou all are sooo jaded!20:38
jgriffith:)20:38
sdagueand had a pattern around that20:38
ttxwhere core reviewers would just be one team amongst others20:38
sdaguebut this was all new and required lots of hand holding20:38
dhellmannsdague: interesting point20:39
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting20:39
agentleI think it's about more specialty teams and more cores in the big tent.20:39
sdake__ttx imo that would create more hurdles for staff to jump to participate in openstack ;)20:39
ttxI feel "maintainers" (like "committers) would just entrench the elite dev thinking20:39
agentlebut I like to say big tent a lot20:39
*** leonchio_ has quit IRC20:39
russellbi like the size of our tent, but we need to start decorating20:40
jeblairagentle: the big tent changes everything!20:40
russellbnext topic?  :)20:40
*** sahid has quit IRC20:40
ttxyep, next topic20:40
ttx#topic Adding the Murano Application Catalog to OpenStack20:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Adding the Murano Application Catalog to OpenStack (Meeting topic: tc)"20:40
* serg_mel_ is here for any Murano related questions20:40
ttxOOoh. Level 220:40
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/162745/20:40
ttxHavne't voted yet, but feels like a pretty sane complement to "the platform"20:41
ttxI'm less involved with them than I was with Magnum community-wise so i'll let others talk20:41
ttxdon't talk all at the same time20:42
mordredI'm +1 on this one too20:42
mordredsimilar reasons - although I don't know serg_mel_'s hair20:42
*** reed has quit IRC20:42
mordredthey operate as one of us, I know of people who like the thing they're doing, they've been working with other projects20:43
ttxIt's been a long time Murano has been around and they always played by the openstack dev book20:43
mordredyup20:43
sdagueyeh, this seems fine. I think my only concern is actually unrelated to murano directly, but about glance mission expanding for a new use case (when existing mission isn't being kept up with)20:43
agentlegot a 404 for http://murano-docs.github.io/ - just me?20:43
*** baoli has quit IRC20:43
serg_mel_agentle: murano.readthedocs.org20:44
serg_mel_http://murano-docs.github.io/  - outdated - we can't clean-up google from this url :(20:44
* agentle fixes your wiki page20:44
ttxsdague: on that slightly off-topic tangent... I think on one hand Glance is indeed having trouble keeping up20:44
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting20:44
mikalttx: you have seven there20:44
ttxon the other it may attract new contributors to it20:44
ttxmikal: thanks for keeping track :)20:45
sdaguettx: but if the new contributors aren't addressing the existing backlog, that doesn't seem useful to me20:45
serg_mel_agentle: thank you!20:45
agentlewas also going to ask about the glance ties20:45
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC20:45
ttxsdague: it's a tangent though, since Murano currently uses its own repo20:45
sdaguettx: agreed20:45
ttx30 more seconds to register your happiness on that review20:45
sdagueI'm +1 on murano. I do think we should revisit the glance mission scope at some point.20:46
sdagueI also think that should we ever do a TC retreat, I have found the right place for it - http://www.pc.gc.ca/eng/pn-np/nb/fundy/activ/camping/yourtes-yurts.aspx20:46
agentleso does voting +1 on murano mean a descoping for glance's mission?20:46
ttxno20:46
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:47
mikalEven if there was 100% overlap, we allow competition now right?20:47
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-meeting20:47
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC20:47
ttxsdague: artifact repo is a FFE for glance in klilo though. If we thinnk it's a bad idea we need to move now20:47
sdaguemikal: it's not an overlap concern20:47
jeblairsdague: yurts _and_ bunkbeds!20:47
ttxapproved20:47
mikalTop bunk!20:47
sdaguejeblair: I stayed there 2 years ago, it was great20:47
* serg_mel_ is dancing 20:47
ttxserg_mel_: welcome to the OpenStack community20:48
dhellmannmikal: within reason ("not gratuitous")20:48
* anteaya stretches out on the women's side of the yurt20:48
serg_mel_ttx: Thank you!20:48
mikalttx: well, they were already part of the community...20:48
agentlettx: which "it" is meant for it's a bad idea?20:48
jeblairagain, with the condolences20:48
mordredjeblair: :)20:48
ttxmikal: arguably not, for some definition of it20:48
ttx#topic Housekeeping20:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Housekeeping (Meeting topic: tc)"20:48
markmcclainsdague: we'll need yurt 4 since that is only one that allows pets otherwise we'll have to leave the kittens, wet rabbits and fluffy milk cows at home20:48
ttxOur weekly repo additions, all approved by their PTLs, will approve after meeting unless someone -1s:20:48
fungiagentle: it == feature freeze exception for potential glance scope creep20:48
mordredserg_mel_: as with magnum - you should make us a renaming patch soon20:49
ttx* Adds puppet-bandersnatch to Infrastructure (https://review.openstack.org/163734)20:49
ttx* Add oslo.cache to reference/projects.yaml (https://review.openstack.org/164342)20:49
ttx* Add coreos-image-builder to Ironic (https://review.openstack.org/164370)20:49
serg_mel_jeblair: We will propose change ASAP20:49
* ttx checks last one20:49
ttx* Add puppet-puppet project (https://review.openstack.org/165438)20:49
ttxyes it has Jim's +1 now20:49
sdaguetripple puppet?20:49
mordredI approve all of these20:49
agentlejust trying to make sure I understand20:49
*** tiswanso has quit IRC20:49
ttxI'll have to figure in which order to approve them to minimize risk of conflict20:49
sdaguettx: or just rebase for folks, I'm perma +1 on housekeeping changes20:50
* mordred thinks puppet-puppet should win the prize for name20:50
ttxagentle: Murano uses its own repo for artifacts, but said it would move to using Glance's if that feature appears there20:50
agentlettx: ah ok that helps, thanks20:50
*** baoli has quit IRC20:50
*** __TheDodd__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
sdaguemordred: no, bork-bork would be a better name20:50
dhellmannttx: yeah, we agreed you could just rebase things we'd already approved. Let me know if you want me to do that again like last time.20:50
mordredsdague: HAHAHAHAHAHA20:50
mordredsdague: I literally lold20:50
ttxagentle: Sean was voicing concerns that Glance adds Artifact repo to its scope, since they have a hard time keeping up with just being an image thing20:51
ttxagentle: so the concerns are separate, but it's fair to raise the Glance scope/act ivity issue20:51
agentlettx: yeah20:51
agentlettx: ok20:51
ttx#topic Open discussion20:51
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: tc)"20:51
ttxSo.. Bod/TC meetign in Vancouver20:51
ttxNote that the members who will still be on the TC in May will have a Board/TC joint meeting on the Sunday before the event20:51
ttxSo plan travel accordingly if you want to join20:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting20:52
mordredwell, and you're ALL invited, even if you're not on the TC again20:52
ttxMeeting would start at 2:30pm like last time (except if delayed again :)20:52
mikalSo, 5pm start?20:52
agentlehe20:52
ttxI've been asked to ask:20:52
agentlehee even20:52
ttxWould you be interested in common dinner after that, or just drinks ?20:52
mordredmikal: just bring a big bottle of vodka20:52
sdagueI think we are owed martinis if it's delayed20:52
mordredttx: at the most recent board meeting20:52
ttxI'm fine with both options20:52
russellbi guess i'm fine with both20:53
mordredwe did a tapas style place that worked wellish for mingling20:53
russellbprobably rather drinks20:53
*** baoli has quit IRC20:53
russellbmordred: ++20:53
*** AJaeger_ has left #openstack-meeting20:53
*** thedodd has quit IRC20:53
agentledrinks in a yurt20:53
mordredI think the important thing is that we get to have converstaions with more than 2 people20:53
ttxmordred: right20:53
mordredagentle: ++20:53
agentleyeah mingling would be good20:53
sdagueyeh, I feel like the beer garden in atlanta was better than the paris dinner for talking20:53
jeblair++food but casual20:53
mikalIs all of Canadia yurts?20:53
mordredbut I do think _some_ food is important20:53
sdagueso something more beer gardeny20:53
dhellmannsdague: ++20:53
mordredbecause I will have been sitting in a board meeting all day20:53
*** ominakov has quit IRC20:53
mikalOh, Paris was too hot. I need somewhere with more airflow than that venue had.20:53
ttxmordred: so.. real food (so that we don't have to look for more after) but in a walk-around setting20:53
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-meeting20:53
mordredand if there's no food, my rage drinking will get me WAY to angry20:53
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting20:54
mikalOr board members to flap their arms.20:54
sdaguettx: ++20:54
jgriffithLOL20:54
sdaguealso mordred++20:54
jgriffithrage drinking :)20:54
mordredttx: doesn't have to be real - I'd be find with hummus and olives - just need _something_20:54
*** cdub has quit IRC20:54
anteayamikal: yes we all live in yurts20:54
russellbwhat if it's just hummus20:54
ttxHUMMUS IS REAL20:54
sdaguebecause then he'll start yelling at me about nova bugs :) get the man some food20:54
anteayamikal: and igloos20:54
ttxI'll convey that to Alan20:54
dhellmannare we planning a TC meeting of any sort at the summit?20:54
mordredrussellb: hummus cocktails20:54
mikalanteaya: igloo == snow yurt20:54
anteayamikal: you got it20:54
ttxdhellmann: we could technically to a cross-project "work session" with TC20:55
mikaldhellmann: I think a talky TC meeting is a good idea20:55
*** timcline_ has quit IRC20:55
david-lyleauthentic canadian hummus20:55
mikaldhellmann: i.e. more than just the dinner20:55
dhellmannmikal: right, more than just dinner20:55
ttxsince we have those now20:55
markmcclain++20:55
anteayapatios, vancouver will have patios20:55
*** dneary has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
ttxNext question: do you think we should do another "lunch with board & TC" event ?20:55
anteayabeer gardens not so much20:55
ttxI felt like last time it was pretty useless, but meh20:55
anteayayou should rent a boat20:55
mordredttx: I have foudn the last two of those useless20:55
anteayamany boats for rent in vancouver20:55
russellbttx: i found it useless20:55
dhellmannttx: I agree, it didn't do anything for me20:55
jeblairttx: agreed -- useless20:55
russellbi don't like being paraded around either20:55
ttxStop all agreeing!20:56
dhellmannthe breakfasts with the board were less so, because people who show up early for that are interested in talking20:56
mordredI think most of the people there do not care who we are, and that's fine20:56
mordredsame with the board, fwiw20:56
jgriffithI skipped it, so that should speak volumes to my view on it20:56
mikalI don't think I've ever shown up to one20:56
mikalThey make me uncomfortable20:56
russellbthey had these signs on tables for which tc or board member was supposed to sit there20:56
russellbit was awkward20:56
russellband useless20:56
jeblairwell, i mean, my sign was under a table in the corner next to the garbage20:56
ttxI did crash my table, where Jane Silber was more well-known than I was20:56
russellblol20:56
fungifrom what i saw, about half of the board/tc people's tables got squatted by randoms and the signs tossed20:57
sdagueguarded by a cougar?20:57
dhellmannIn paris I ended up at a table with a bunch of people who, while very nice, had no idea  who I was or why I was talking to them until I picked up the sign with my name that they had removed from their lunch table.20:57
russellbfungi: yep, mine did20:57
jeblairsdague: "beware of the leopard"20:57
anteayasdague: them we have20:57
agentledid anyone have good questions that wouldn't have otherwise been asked?20:57
anteayano leopards20:57
sdaguejeblair: that's it  :)20:57
ttxOk, I'll reply "no thanks"20:57
agentle(I didn't but got to ask questions)20:57
ttxAnything else, anyone ?20:57
fungiagentle: you mean besides "who are you anyway?"20:57
ttxin the remaining 3 minutes ?20:57
markmcclainI was close to the entrance and had a line of folks in paris… all proposing new extensions20:57
dhellmannagentle: not really20:58
russellbmarkmcclain: neworking people.20:58
mordredmarkmcclain: hahahaha20:58
russellbgah!20:58
anteayamarkmcclain: just you then20:58
mordredmarkmcclain: tell them all to just get DHCP right20:58
anteayalunch with just markmcclain20:58
ttxmarkmcclain: no, that's because you look so good20:58
*** dflorea has quit IRC20:58
mordredttx: his hair isn't quite as good at adrian_otto's20:58
markmcclainhaha20:58
jeblairyeah, we should just do "lunch with markmcclain"20:58
mordredjeblair: ++20:58
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
agentleI think there's usefulness in being accessible at certain times20:59
agentleI think lunching is an awkward time.20:59
ttxsome office hours ?20:59
agentlecoffee, tea, and the tc20:59
russellbmeh.  :)20:59
dhellmannagentle: ooo, sign me up for tea :-)20:59
Rockygdrinking games and the tc20:59
agentleI dunno, something about making us accessible without making us awkward.20:59
russellbpeople i really want to talk to are probably smart enough to figure out how to reach out20:59
ttxtea break with the tea C20:59
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** mrmartin has quit IRC20:59
agentleoh gawd. :)21:00
*** serg_mel_ has quit IRC21:00
mordredit's vancouver - we could do "get high with the TC"21:00
ttxyes, on that last pun...21:00
agentlelol21:00
ttx#endmeeting21:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar 24 21:00:30 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2015/tc.2015-03-24-20.02.html21:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2015/tc.2015-03-24-20.02.txt21:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2015/tc.2015-03-24-20.02.log.html21:00
jeblairoh thank goodness that's over21:00
mordredjeblair: :)21:00
ttxThanks everyone21:00
mordredwoohoo!21:00
russellbmordred: lol21:00
mikalLaters!21:00
ttxjeblair: all that agreement was starting to grow on me21:00
* mikal takes the kids to school21:00
* russellb proceeds to pick up his rental car21:01
russellbo/21:01
ttxAs a reminder, no cross-project meeting today21:01
jeblairttx: you should have a doctor look at that21:01
ttxsince of course we have no cross-project issue21:01
anteayattx happy sleep21:01
ttxnex time if you see one, please fill:21:01
ttxhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CrossProjectMeeting21:01
*** sarob has quit IRC21:01
*** sreshetn1 has quit IRC21:01
ttxand see you all next week!21:02
*** hongbin has left #openstack-meeting21:02
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
tchaypowell21:03
tchaypothat was a good meeting21:03
*** dflorea has quit IRC21:03
tchaypo*goes back to sleep*21:03
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
*** melwitt has quit IRC21:05
*** melwitt_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** harshs has quit IRC21:05
*** melwitt_ has quit IRC21:05
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC21:05
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** evgenyf has quit IRC21:07
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
*** aysyd has quit IRC21:08
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting21:09
*** adahms has joined #openstack-meeting21:09
*** harshs has quit IRC21:10
*** emagana has quit IRC21:10
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
*** AlanClark has quit IRC21:11
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:12
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC21:12
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC21:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC21:14
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting21:14
*** vikasd has quit IRC21:14
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC21:15
*** jruano has quit IRC21:16
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting21:17
*** e0ne is now known as e0ne_21:18
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:18
*** aranjan_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting21:20
*** aranjan has quit IRC21:20
*** ndipanov has quit IRC21:22
*** j05h has quit IRC21:23
*** aranjan_ has quit IRC21:23
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC21:23
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting21:25
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting21:26
*** julim has quit IRC21:26
*** lennyb has quit IRC21:28
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away21:32
*** emagana has quit IRC21:33
*** dkranz has quit IRC21:35
*** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-meeting21:36
*** noslzzp has quit IRC21:36
*** IanGovett1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:36
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC21:36
*** claudiub has quit IRC21:36
*** otter768 has quit IRC21:37
*** weshay has quit IRC21:37
*** dprince has quit IRC21:38
*** IanGovett has quit IRC21:39
*** thangp has quit IRC21:39
*** harshs has quit IRC21:40
*** redrobot has quit IRC21:42
*** asselin_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:42
*** VW_ has quit IRC21:46
*** rhochmuth has joined #openstack-meeting21:46
*** jckasper has quit IRC21:46
*** redrobot has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
*** asselin_ has quit IRC21:47
*** redrobot is now known as Guest938521:47
*** rhochmuth has left #openstack-meeting21:47
*** agentle has quit IRC21:48
*** mdbooth has quit IRC21:48
*** dloi_ has quit IRC21:48
*** peterstac has quit IRC21:48
*** tristanC has quit IRC21:48
*** markvan has quit IRC21:49
*** agentle has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
*** mdbooth has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
*** tristanC has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
*** dloi_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
*** peterstac has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
*** agentle has quit IRC21:50
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting21:53
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting21:54
*** baoli has quit IRC21:56
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC21:56
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n321:56
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting21:57
*** dflorea has quit IRC21:57
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting21:57
*** ijw_ has quit IRC21:57
*** dmacpher has quit IRC21:57
*** baoli has quit IRC21:58
*** vijendar has quit IRC21:58
*** kebray has quit IRC21:59
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
*** Guest9385 is now known as redrobot22:00
*** padkrish has quit IRC22:00
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:00
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** dflorea_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** intr1nsic has quit IRC22:01
*** jcook has quit IRC22:01
*** dstanek has quit IRC22:01
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting22:01
*** padkrish_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** bknudson has quit IRC22:04
*** achanda_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** banix has quit IRC22:04
*** adrian_otto has left #openstack-meeting22:04
*** dflorea_ has quit IRC22:05
*** intr1nsic has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja22:05
*** padkrish has quit IRC22:05
*** jruano has quit IRC22:05
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:06
*** achanda has quit IRC22:08
*** baoli has quit IRC22:08
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
*** VW_ has quit IRC22:11
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** changbl has quit IRC22:14
*** dstanek has joined #openstack-meeting22:14
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:14
*** jcook has joined #openstack-meeting22:14
*** pballand has quit IRC22:15
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting22:15
*** pballand has quit IRC22:17
*** pnavarro has quit IRC22:17
*** aranjan has joined #openstack-meeting22:17
*** henrynash has quit IRC22:20
*** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC22:23
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:23
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting22:23
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting22:24
*** j05h has joined #openstack-meeting22:24
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:25
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC22:25
*** VW_ has quit IRC22:26
*** baoli has quit IRC22:27
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:27
*** jrist has quit IRC22:28
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting22:28
*** pballand has quit IRC22:28
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting22:29
*** emagana has quit IRC22:29
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting22:29
*** dflorea has quit IRC22:30
*** aranjan has quit IRC22:30
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting22:30
*** Rockyg has quit IRC22:30
*** harshs has quit IRC22:32
*** xingchao has quit IRC22:34
*** eglynn has quit IRC22:34
*** dflorea has quit IRC22:35
*** crc32 has quit IRC22:35
*** __TheDodd__ has quit IRC22:35
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:35
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting22:37
*** niclem has joined #openstack-meeting22:38
*** dneary has quit IRC22:41
*** asettle has joined #openstack-meeting22:42
*** j05h has quit IRC22:43
*** BrianShang has quit IRC22:48
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting22:49
*** BrianShang has joined #openstack-meeting22:49
*** dflorea has quit IRC22:51
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting22:52
*** banix has quit IRC22:52
*** absubram has quit IRC22:53
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:53
*** bryan_att has quit IRC22:54
*** armax has quit IRC22:54
*** baoli has quit IRC22:55
*** dflorea has quit IRC22:56
*** baoli_ has quit IRC22:56
*** matrohon has quit IRC22:56
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting22:56
*** thomasem is now known as thomasem-away22:58
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:58
*** dannywilson has quit IRC22:59
*** padkrish_ has quit IRC23:00
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting23:01
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC23:01
*** ayoung has quit IRC23:01
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting23:01
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:02
*** penick has quit IRC23:02
*** padkrish_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:04
*** padkrish has quit IRC23:05
*** ddieterly has quit IRC23:05
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** markvoelker has quit IRC23:06
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** rbak has quit IRC23:07
*** prad has quit IRC23:07
*** penick has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC23:07
*** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting23:08
*** sdake__ has quit IRC23:10
*** dmacpher has quit IRC23:11
*** welldannit has joined #openstack-meeting23:11
*** banix has quit IRC23:12
*** dims has quit IRC23:14
*** kebray has quit IRC23:15
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting23:16
*** dims has quit IRC23:17
*** dstanek has quit IRC23:17
*** varora has joined #openstack-meeting23:17
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting23:17
*** dstanek has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** harshs has quit IRC23:18
*** garyh has quit IRC23:19
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC23:20
*** pballand has quit IRC23:20
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting23:20
*** penick has quit IRC23:22
*** Mandell has quit IRC23:22
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting23:24
*** yamamoto has quit IRC23:25
*** haleyb has quit IRC23:30
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting23:31
*** dflorea has quit IRC23:32
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting23:33
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting23:33
*** stevemar has quit IRC23:34
*** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC23:34
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting23:35
*** ChuckC has quit IRC23:35
*** asettle has quit IRC23:35
*** dflorea has quit IRC23:37
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** otter768 has quit IRC23:37
*** dflorea has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** ChuckC has joined #openstack-meeting23:39
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting23:39
*** tochi has joined #openstack-meeting23:39
*** ijw has quit IRC23:40
*** dkranz has quit IRC23:43
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting23:45
*** ajmiller has quit IRC23:45
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** jpipes has quit IRC23:48
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting23:49
*** penick has joined #openstack-meeting23:52
*** markvoelker has quit IRC23:52
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting23:52
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting23:53
*** ildikov_afk has quit IRC23:54
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** oomichi has quit IRC23:56
*** olkonami has quit IRC23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!