Tuesday, 2014-01-07

*** samcdona_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:00
*** radix__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:00
*** markpeek1 has joined #openstack-meeting00:01
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting00:01
*** lifeless_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:02
*** rwsu has quit IRC00:02
*** krotscheck has quit IRC00:02
*** samcdona has quit IRC00:02
*** dims_ has quit IRC00:02
*** tanisdl has quit IRC00:02
*** garyduan has quit IRC00:02
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:02
*** krtaylor has quit IRC00:02
*** hemna_ has quit IRC00:02
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:02
*** herndon has quit IRC00:02
*** gokrokve has quit IRC00:02
*** branen__ has quit IRC00:02
*** tr3buchet has quit IRC00:02
*** funzo has quit IRC00:02
*** markpeek has quit IRC00:02
*** radix_ has quit IRC00:02
*** jecarey has quit IRC00:02
*** weshay has quit IRC00:02
*** slagle has quit IRC00:02
*** medberry has quit IRC00:02
*** jcooley has quit IRC00:02
*** lifeless has quit IRC00:02
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC00:02
*** martines_ has quit IRC00:02
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC00:02
*** obondarev has quit IRC00:02
*** tanisdl_ is now known as tanisdl00:02
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando00:03
*** esheffield has quit IRC00:03
*** samcdona_ is now known as samcdona00:03
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** esheffield has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** martines_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** tr3buchet has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** yamahata has quit IRC00:05
*** jcooley has joined #openstack-meeting00:06
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting00:06
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting00:11
*** fifieldt has quit IRC00:13
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC00:13
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** oubiwann has quit IRC00:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** xuhanp has quit IRC00:14
*** gokrokve has quit IRC00:18
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC00:19
*** Mandell has quit IRC00:21
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting00:24
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting00:25
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC00:26
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC00:29
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
*** fungi has quit IRC00:30
*** markwash has quit IRC00:30
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting00:33
*** pvaneck has quit IRC00:33
*** eharney has quit IRC00:34
*** rnirmal has quit IRC00:36
*** asalkeld has quit IRC00:37
*** dims_ is now known as dims00:37
*** lifeless_ is now known as lifeless00:40
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom00:41
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:41
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz00:49
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-meeting00:50
*** SridarK has quit IRC00:50
*** Edward-Zhang has joined #openstack-meeting00:51
*** pablosan has quit IRC00:53
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting00:54
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom00:54
*** krotscheck has quit IRC00:55
*** prad has quit IRC00:58
*** clarkb2 is now known as clarkb01:00
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz01:01
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC01:07
*** stevemar2 has joined #openstack-meeting01:09
*** nelsnels_ has quit IRC01:10
*** stevemar2 has quit IRC01:10
*** stevemar has quit IRC01:10
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** stevemar has quit IRC01:11
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting01:12
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC01:13
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting01:13
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting01:14
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting01:14
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC01:15
*** stevemar has quit IRC01:15
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting01:15
*** Swami has quit IRC01:16
*** gongysh has quit IRC01:17
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting01:18
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC01:18
*** weshay has quit IRC01:18
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting01:19
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting01:20
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** stevemar has quit IRC01:23
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting01:24
*** epim has quit IRC01:26
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom01:32
*** kenhui has quit IRC01:32
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away01:34
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting01:35
*** cdub has quit IRC01:35
*** weshay has quit IRC01:36
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting01:36
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting01:36
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz01:38
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC01:38
*** mdomsch has joined #openstack-meeting01:38
*** boris-42 has quit IRC01:39
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting01:39
*** rdxc has quit IRC01:40
*** dkranz has quit IRC01:41
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting01:43
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting01:46
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting01:48
*** mdomsch has quit IRC01:49
*** prad has joined #openstack-meeting01:52
*** michchap_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:52
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:52
*** prad has quit IRC01:52
*** michchap has quit IRC01:53
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting01:54
*** bdpayne has quit IRC01:56
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul01:57
*** AaronGr is now known as AaronGr_Zzz02:00
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC02:00
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting02:00
*** sushils has quit IRC02:01
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting02:02
*** cdub has quit IRC02:02
*** sarob has quit IRC02:04
*** anniec has quit IRC02:04
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** stevemar2 has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** stevemar has quit IRC02:07
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC02:07
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting02:09
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:14
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC02:14
*** rossk has quit IRC02:14
*** obondarev_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** stevemar2 has quit IRC02:15
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting02:17
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom02:19
*** ayoung is now known as a_yakshaver02:20
*** tanisdl has quit IRC02:23
*** a_yakshaver is now known as ayoung02:24
*** Edward-Zhang has quit IRC02:25
*** stevemar has quit IRC02:26
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting02:28
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting02:30
*** stevemar has quit IRC02:35
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC02:37
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting02:38
*** RajeshMohan has quit IRC02:38
*** RajeshMohan has joined #openstack-meeting02:38
*** stevemar has quit IRC02:40
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting02:41
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting02:42
*** pablosan has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** stevemar has quit IRC02:46
*** stevemar2 has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** stevemar2 has quit IRC02:48
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC02:55
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz02:57
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting02:59
*** Edward-Zhang has joined #openstack-meeting03:01
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:01
*** hemna has quit IRC03:01
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:03
*** yamahata has quit IRC03:03
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:04
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom03:05
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC03:06
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:08
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:09
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz03:10
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom03:12
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:12
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting03:15
*** spzala has quit IRC03:16
*** sushils has quit IRC03:17
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:21
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:23
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting03:23
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC03:25
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:25
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:26
*** epico has quit IRC03:31
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:31
*** corvus is now known as jeblair03:31
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC03:32
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting03:33
*** Edward-Zhang has quit IRC03:33
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting03:33
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC03:34
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting03:37
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:37
*** weshay has quit IRC03:38
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:40
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz03:40
*** ayoung has quit IRC03:41
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting03:42
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:42
*** markvoelker1 has joined #openstack-meeting03:42
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting03:43
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-meeting03:43
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:44
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting03:44
*** paragan has quit IRC03:44
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting03:44
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:46
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting03:47
*** krotscheck has quit IRC03:47
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:47
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:48
*** sushils has quit IRC03:50
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:51
*** yamahata has quit IRC03:52
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:53
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC03:55
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:55
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting03:55
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting03:56
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:56
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting03:58
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:58
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting03:58
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting03:59
*** Linz has quit IRC03:59
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:00
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:01
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:03
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:05
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC04:05
*** bdpayne has quit IRC04:06
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:08
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting04:09
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:09
*** gokrokve has quit IRC04:10
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:12
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:13
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:15
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:16
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC04:16
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting04:17
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:17
*** spzala has quit IRC04:18
*** terriyu has quit IRC04:19
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:19
*** markwash has quit IRC04:20
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:20
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:21
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC04:21
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC04:22
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:23
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting04:24
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC04:24
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:25
*** yanghe has joined #openstack-meeting04:26
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting04:28
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:29
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting04:29
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:30
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:32
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting04:33
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:33
*** evgenyf has quit IRC04:35
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC04:36
*** kenhui has quit IRC04:36
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC04:36
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC04:38
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:39
*** Edward-Zhang has joined #openstack-meeting04:39
*** yanghe has quit IRC04:40
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away04:42
*** pablosan has quit IRC04:43
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:43
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away04:44
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:47
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting04:47
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:48
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** zhiyan has left #openstack-meeting04:49
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** Edward-Zhang has quit IRC04:50
*** Edward-Zhang has joined #openstack-meeting04:50
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:53
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:54
*** markwash has quit IRC04:56
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:56
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:57
*** RajeshMohan has quit IRC04:58
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:58
*** RajeshMohan has joined #openstack-meeting04:58
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting04:59
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC05:00
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:00
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:02
*** Linz has quit IRC05:03
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:03
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting05:05
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:08
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC05:08
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:09
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC05:10
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting05:11
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:11
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja05:12
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:13
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting05:13
*** markpeek1 has quit IRC05:14
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:14
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:16
*** sc68cal has quit IRC05:16
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:18
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting05:18
*** markwash has quit IRC05:19
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:20
*** Linz has quit IRC05:23
*** blamar has quit IRC05:24
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC05:24
*** jecarey_ has quit IRC05:24
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting05:25
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting05:25
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:26
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting05:27
*** markwash has quit IRC05:27
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting05:28
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting05:28
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:29
*** vipul has quit IRC05:29
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC05:29
*** vipul has joined #openstack-meeting05:30
*** gduan has quit IRC05:30
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC05:30
*** zul has quit IRC05:30
*** comay has quit IRC05:30
*** aignatov_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:30
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting05:31
*** medberry has joined #openstack-meeting05:31
*** medberry has quit IRC05:31
*** medberry has joined #openstack-meeting05:31
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting05:31
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
*** DuncanT-1 has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
*** epico has quit IRC05:33
*** jang has joined #openstack-meeting05:33
*** devanand1 has joined #openstack-meeting05:33
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting05:33
*** ivoks_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** Brainspa1kle has joined #openstack-meeting05:35
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC05:36
*** oubiwann has quit IRC05:36
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC05:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:36
*** marios has quit IRC05:36
*** rwsu has quit IRC05:36
*** lifeless has quit IRC05:36
*** harlowja has quit IRC05:36
*** ihrachys has quit IRC05:36
*** andreaf has quit IRC05:36
*** lintan has quit IRC05:36
*** crank has quit IRC05:36
*** haleyb has quit IRC05:36
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** crank has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC05:37
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** comay has quit IRC05:37
*** lintan has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** ctracey` has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** jang1 has quit IRC05:39
*** DuncanT- has quit IRC05:39
*** Brainspackle has quit IRC05:39
*** pleia2 has quit IRC05:39
*** sbadia has quit IRC05:39
*** skraynev has quit IRC05:39
*** ctracey has quit IRC05:39
*** aignatov has quit IRC05:39
*** rch has quit IRC05:39
*** ivoks has quit IRC05:39
*** akscram has quit IRC05:39
*** shardy has quit IRC05:39
*** sirushti has quit IRC05:39
*** devananda has quit IRC05:39
*** _sirushti has joined #openstack-meeting05:39
*** skraynev has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** _sirushti is now known as sirushti05:40
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting05:41
*** sbadia has joined #openstack-meeting05:41
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting05:42
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC05:42
*** pleia2 has joined #openstack-meeting05:43
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting05:44
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting05:44
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting05:45
*** shardy has joined #openstack-meeting05:46
*** akscram has joined #openstack-meeting05:47
*** rch has joined #openstack-meeting05:47
*** slagle_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:49
*** yogeshme_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:50
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting05:50
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC05:51
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:51
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting05:51
*** Linz has quit IRC05:52
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC05:52
*** sirushti has quit IRC05:52
*** lifeless has quit IRC05:52
*** Brainspa1kle has quit IRC05:52
*** garyduan has quit IRC05:52
*** cdub has quit IRC05:52
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC05:52
*** jcooley has quit IRC05:52
*** slagle has quit IRC05:52
*** jcooley_ is now known as jcooley05:52
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:53
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:54
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** yogeshme_ has quit IRC05:56
*** Brainspackle has joined #openstack-meeting05:57
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting05:57
*** sirushti has joined #openstack-meeting05:57
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting05:57
*** gyee_ has quit IRC05:58
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:58
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting05:59
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting06:00
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:00
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting06:01
*** rch has quit IRC06:02
*** rch has joined #openstack-meeting06:02
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:02
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:04
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC06:04
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting06:05
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting06:05
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting06:06
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC06:06
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting06:07
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:09
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:10
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC06:11
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:11
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting06:12
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:13
*** oubiwann has quit IRC06:13
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:15
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:17
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC06:17
*** gokrokve has quit IRC06:17
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting06:18
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:19
*** cdub has quit IRC06:21
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
*** kenhui has quit IRC06:22
*** gokrokve has quit IRC06:23
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:25
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting06:27
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:27
*** Edward-Zhang has quit IRC06:27
*** marios has quit IRC06:27
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting06:29
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:29
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:31
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC06:31
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:33
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:34
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:37
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting06:37
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:37
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting06:39
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:39
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:40
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:45
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:46
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC06:46
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting06:48
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:48
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:50
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:52
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:53
*** reed has quit IRC06:53
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:54
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:56
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:58
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting06:59
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:00
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:02
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:04
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:05
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:07
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC07:07
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC07:08
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:08
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:10
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting07:10
*** masayukig has joined #openstack-meeting07:11
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:13
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC07:13
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC07:14
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:14
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:16
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:21
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC07:22
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:22
*** loq_mac has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
*** doron_afk has joined #openstack-meeting07:27
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:29
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:31
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:32
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:34
*** ivoks_ is now known as ivoks07:37
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:37
*** ivoks has quit IRC07:38
*** ivoks has joined #openstack-meeting07:38
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:39
*** loq_mac has quit IRC07:40
*** rossk has joined #openstack-meeting07:40
*** loq_mac has joined #openstack-meeting07:40
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:41
*** loq_mac has quit IRC07:43
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:43
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away07:45
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:45
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** loq_mac has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting07:46
*** rossk has quit IRC07:48
*** stevemar has quit IRC07:51
*** doron_afk is now known as doron07:52
*** doron is now known as doron_afk07:54
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting08:02
*** chandankumar has quit IRC08:06
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting08:10
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting08:25
*** afazekas has quit IRC08:26
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting08:27
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting08:28
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8708:29
*** chandankumar has quit IRC08:29
*** afazekas has quit IRC08:31
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:32
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:37
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC08:39
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting08:40
*** coolsvap has quit IRC08:41
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** Mandell has quit IRC08:46
*** MaxV_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:47
*** saschpe_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:49
*** saschpe has quit IRC08:50
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC08:52
*** jtomasek has quit IRC08:52
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
*** jaimegil has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting08:55
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting08:55
*** mdurnosvistov has joined #openstack-meeting08:56
*** loq_mac has quit IRC08:56
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting08:59
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting09:04
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting09:08
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting09:10
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC09:10
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting09:18
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting09:18
*** uaberme has joined #openstack-meeting09:19
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting09:22
*** fallenpegasus2 has joined #openstack-meeting09:25
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC09:25
*** Edward-Zhang has joined #openstack-meeting09:27
*** lsmola_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
*** fallenpegasus2 has quit IRC09:34
*** jroovers has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
*** Edward-Zhang has quit IRC09:35
*** jaimegil has quit IRC09:45
*** michchap_ has quit IRC09:46
*** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov09:47
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting09:47
*** fifieldt has quit IRC09:51
*** xuhanp has quit IRC09:53
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting09:57
*** topshare has joined #openstack-meeting09:59
*** topshare has quit IRC10:00
*** chandankumar_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:01
*** topshare has joined #openstack-meeting10:01
*** _SergeyLukjanov is now known as SergeyLukjanov10:07
*** jtomasek has quit IRC10:09
*** bgorski has joined #openstack-meeting10:22
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting10:24
*** masayukig has quit IRC10:24
*** gongysh has quit IRC10:28
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** sushils has quit IRC10:31
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting10:31
*** saschpe_ has quit IRC10:32
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC10:33
*** paragan has quit IRC10:33
*** topshare has quit IRC10:37
*** epico has quit IRC10:40
*** rossella_s_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:49
*** rossella_s has quit IRC10:53
*** rossella_s_ is now known as rossella_s10:53
*** yassine has quit IRC10:55
*** coolsvap has quit IRC10:55
*** yaguang has quit IRC10:58
*** bgorski has quit IRC11:02
*** yamahata has quit IRC11:08
*** bgorski has joined #openstack-meeting11:09
*** jroovers has quit IRC11:09
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting11:17
*** lbragstad has quit IRC11:23
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting11:24
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting11:26
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting11:29
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC11:34
*** MaxV_ has quit IRC11:39
*** jroovers has joined #openstack-meeting11:42
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting11:44
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC11:44
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting11:45
*** MaxV_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:56
*** coolsvap has quit IRC11:58
*** uaberme has quit IRC12:06
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting12:16
*** doron_afk is now known as doron12:20
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting12:26
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting12:26
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:31
*** jtomasek_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:32
*** b3nt_pin has joined #openstack-meeting12:33
*** b3nt_pin is now known as beagles12:33
*** anniec has quit IRC12:33
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec12:33
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:33
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting12:35
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting12:44
*** doron is now known as doron_afk12:44
*** jtomasek_ is now known as jtomasek12:46
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting12:55
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:58
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting12:59
*** nosnos has quit IRC13:00
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** afazekas has quit IRC13:02
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** jhenner has quit IRC13:04
*** mrunge has quit IRC13:04
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting13:05
*** nosnos has quit IRC13:06
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting13:07
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC13:13
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting13:16
*** evgenyf has quit IRC13:17
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC13:19
*** amotoki has quit IRC13:19
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting13:23
*** jroovers has quit IRC13:26
*** jtomasek has quit IRC13:27
*** jay-lau-513 has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** amrith has quit IRC13:30
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting13:32
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** doron_afk is now known as doron13:36
*** DrBacchus has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** michchap has quit IRC13:38
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** jtomasek has quit IRC13:38
*** _ruhe is now known as ruhe13:40
*** Edward-Zhang has joined #openstack-meeting13:47
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** yuyangbj has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting13:50
*** dzyu has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** DrBacchus has quit IRC13:55
*** DrBacchus has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** ItSANgo has quit IRC13:57
*** doron is now known as doron_afk13:57
*** jhenner has quit IRC13:58
*** yuyangbj_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
annegentle_doc team meeting in here13:59
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_13:59
*** AJaeger has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** Fdot has quit IRC14:00
*** Sam-I-Am has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** cloudon1 has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** lbragstad has quit IRC14:04
*** Edward-Zhang has quit IRC14:05
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
*** saschpe has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** saschpe has quit IRC14:14
*** doron_afk is now known as doron14:16
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
*** ItSANgo has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
*** dims has quit IRC14:17
*** changbl has quit IRC14:17
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** nermina has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** matrohon has quit IRC14:18
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** dims is now known as Guest7183514:19
*** Guest71835 has quit IRC14:19
*** Guest71835 has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz14:20
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov14:22
*** Sam-I-Am has left #openstack-meeting14:22
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** jeckersb_gone is now known as jeckersb14:23
*** Guest71835 has quit IRC14:24
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting14:26
*** nshaikh has left #openstack-meeting14:26
*** saschpe has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
*** markwash has quit IRC14:30
*** yassine has quit IRC14:31
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC14:32
*** saschpe has quit IRC14:34
*** AJaeger has left #openstack-meeting14:36
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting14:40
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** kenhui has quit IRC14:42
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:46
*** oubiwann has quit IRC14:46
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** nermina has quit IRC14:49
*** ruhe is now known as _ruhe14:49
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez14:51
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting14:52
*** nermina has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
*** burt has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** toan-tran has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** PaulMurray has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
n0ano#startmeeting scheduler15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan  7 15:00:29 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: scheduler)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'scheduler'15:00
n0anoanyone here for the scheduler meeting?15:00
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
cloudon1yes15:00
PaulMurrayhi n0ano, I'm here15:00
* coolsvap : yes, for first time here15:01
n0anocoolsvap, welcome (we don't bite)15:01
*** doron is now known as doron_afk15:01
coolsvapn0ano:  :)15:01
garykhi, i am here15:02
toan-tranhi all15:02
alaskihi15:02
*** marun has quit IRC15:02
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
n0anoI wanted to talk about the the no-db scheduler but Boris doesn't seem to be around, let's change the order a bit15:03
n0ano#topic Scheduler code forklift15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Scheduler code forklift (Meeting topic: scheduler)"15:03
n0anoif you've been following the mail list you should see that I think we have the new gantt tree up to where it is publicly usable15:04
*** yuyangbj_ has quit IRC15:04
n0anoJenkins passes (with non-voting test failures) so we can follow the normal procedures to approve and commit changes15:04
cloudon1Can I please ask how the Gantt work implementing (I think) nova-oslo-scheduler relates to the forklift-scheduler-breakout BP proposed by Rob Collins and discussed before Christmas?15:05
n0anofor anyone interested in working on it there's an etherpad with lots of details...15:05
n0ano#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler15:05
garykn0ano: i have an idea which may help us move forward with integration into other modules15:06
n0anocloudon1, I believe that gantt is that proposal, Rob Collins has been heavily involved in getting the tree up and running15:06
n0anogaryk, go ahead15:06
cloudon1Ah, OK, thanks, that wasn't clear15:06
garykwould it be worthwhile for us to move the scheduling code to be objects. that is, we will have a object end point that will work via the db15:06
*** alcabrera has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
garykthe the gantt could speak with a nova object module and say a cinder one and gather all of the data without having to worry about database migrations.15:07
n0anogaryk, as a second step yes, the first step is to use all of the current APIs, exactly as they exist, and just get nova to call the code in the new tree15:07
garykwhy is it not part of the first step, that is, it will save us a huge migration from nova afterwards15:08
*** doron_afk is now known as doron15:08
PaulMurrayn0ano there are patches in progress moving compute_node to objects15:08
PaulMurraydon't really understand how these and forklift coordinate?15:09
garyki think that is the scheduler code was objectified (sorry no idea how to describe it)15:09
n0anohow would that save us, a migration would have to happen to move to objects no matter when we do it, using the current APIs just get's things going now15:09
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann15:09
garykthen it will be easier to 'pluck' out and maintain moving forwards15:09
garykinsetad of talking object version 1.0, we will talk object version 2.015:09
garyki think that it is inline with the way that objects work with versions, say havana and icehosue15:10
n0anogaryk, not seeing it, my plan is to track scheduler changes to the nova tree (small set of files, easily automated) and push those changes to gantt15:10
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
garyki understand that. but i think that the tracking should start from the time that we do the object support15:10
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** yuyangbj has quit IRC15:11
garykif you guys want i can do the object support in the up and coming week15:11
PaulMurrayat the scheduler15:11
garykyes. at the scheduler.15:11
n0anogaryk, if you do the object support to the nova scheduler code then I intend to just pull that into gantt15:11
garykat the moment it talks directly with the db. maybe it should talk obejcts15:11
PaulMurrayok - we are working on compute node end along with intel guys15:11
garykdoes it sound logical and reasonable to do the scheduler code as objects?15:12
garykPaulMurray: and this will be based on or done in conjuction with what you guys are doing15:12
coolsvapgaryk:  I think it does15:13
n0anogaryk, ah, that's a question, I'm not opposed to that so making it an object would be OK15:13
*** yaguang has quit IRC15:13
PaulMurraygaryk: good - we are trying to get metrics/extra_resources/pci working15:13
alaskigaryk: I think it's reasonable to use objects15:13
garykok, cool. i'll give it a bash to move it to objects.15:13
PaulMurraygaryk - great15:14
n0anoanyway, as I see it the four main tasks for the gantt tree right now are...15:14
n0ano1) Get the unit tests working15:14
*** dkranz has quit IRC15:14
n0ano2) Get nova to call into the gantt tree15:15
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
n0ano3) Get the documentation working15:15
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC15:15
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
n0ano4) Start working on futures (RESTful API to make gantt a separate sevice usable by others than Nova)15:15
n0anoThe first 3 are critical and help on those areas would be greatly apprcieated15:16
n0anowe can coordinate efforts throught the etherpad15:16
*** funzo has quit IRC15:18
coolsvapI can work on #3 to start with and co-ordinate someone in #1 & #215:18
n0anocoolsvap, great, I'd suggest you just tack a note onto the end of the etherpad about what you're doing and go for it15:19
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
garyki think that prior to the REST definitions we need to do some serious thinking15:19
garykneutron and cinder services both break with heavy load. do we want a similar model here?15:20
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC15:20
garykhope i am not stepping on peoples toes but we are getting a lot of flack in neutron about this15:20
n0anogaryk, +1, I don't want to solve neutron and cinder now but I would like to address them with futures15:20
*** doron is now known as doron_afk15:20
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
n0anogaryk, neutron doesn't like the idea of a common scheduler, they'd prefer to do that work themselves?15:21
garykno, i am not talkking about adding scheduling for cinder and neutron resources. i am talking about learning about their painpoints and see how we can have a service that is interfaced from nova and will not be the achilles heal.15:21
n0anoah, agreed, no argument at all15:22
*** safchain has quit IRC15:22
n0anoI think making gantt a schedluer for nova, even moving to objects and separate service, is relatively easy, making it general enough for everyone will be a lot harder15:23
*** oubiwann_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:23
*** nermina has quit IRC15:24
n0anoanyway, the tree is open and there's lots to do, we can continue on the mailing list15:24
n0anomoving on, is boris-42 or glikson here?15:24
toan-tranjust a question, what does neutron do with scheduler?15:24
*** oubiwann has quit IRC15:25
n0anotoan-tran, I belive they have their own, rudimentary scheduler, they need that capability15:25
*** doron_afk is now known as doron15:25
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC15:25
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
n0anoif a common service can satisfy their needs then fine, otherwise they would just stick with their own code15:26
n0anoanyway, I wanted to talk no-db and multiple scheduler drivers but the people involved aren't here15:27
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
n0ano#topic opens15:27
*** openstack changes topic to "opens (Meeting topic: scheduler)"15:27
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
n0anoI'm hearing silence15:28
alaskiI have a thought I can throw out there15:29
n0anoalaski, throw away15:29
alaskithis is just some brainstorming from yesterday, but I was considering the idea of having a different approach to scheduling where there's a precalculated set of slots that can be filled and a scheduling request reserves a slot to send a build to15:30
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
alaskiso the heavy calculations for resource allocation become a background process basically15:30
*** alcabrera has left #openstack-meeting15:31
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom15:31
alaskiwell not allocation exactly, but defining what can fit where15:31
n0anohmm, my immediate thought is deadlock and latency, have you thought about those issues?15:31
*** dzyu has quit IRC15:32
*** dzyu has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
garykalaski: that could work if the resources that you have are predictable15:32
alaskilatency could certainly be an issue, but maybe not enough to have an effect, would need some testing15:32
alaskin0ano: I'm not sure where a deadlock would occur15:32
garykkind of like a memory pool. i think that things like ensembles and taking other services into account complicate issue a tad15:33
alaskigaryk: sure.  I'm thinking in terms of flavors right now, but maybe that's not enough to quantify it all15:33
toan-tranalaski: which kind of slot are you referring to?15:33
PaulMurrayI guess you could maintain pools - like memory allocation - and free space that's allocated as usual if no pre-defined fits15:33
*** saschpe has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
n0anoyou have a `set of slots', that means a limited set of resources15:33
*** oz_akan_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
*** oz_akan_ has left #openstack-meeting15:33
PaulMurraycould catch a large percentage of requests15:34
alaskia slot would basically equate to a flavor, an allocatable resource15:34
garykonce you start to add things like affinity, anti affinity, and other constraints then it becomes more challeging15:34
alaskiset of resources15:34
garykif the types scheduled are homogenous then it is a very good idea15:34
garykyou can do prefetching etc. and know ahead of time the placement stragtegy15:34
*** markvan has quit IRC15:35
*** moe813 has quit IRC15:35
garyknot sure if mike is around. i am sure that he understand the placement cost and complexity very well15:36
n0anoalaski, sounds interesting, are you at the point of creating a blueprint on this yet?15:36
*** saschpe has quit IRC15:36
*** moe813 has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
alaskiso there are definitely some holes in the idea, but I was curious how it might play out with some work.15:37
alaskin0ano: not at the bp stage.  But I may prototype something to see how badly it falls apart, or doesn't15:37
n0anoI'm not hearing any serious arguments against it (although things like affinity/anti-affinity need to be considered) so a prototype would be very interesting15:38
*** _ruhe is now known as ruhe15:38
alaskiMainly I was trying to see if some precalculations could help with speed, and this was my first concept15:38
*** ArthurBerezin has quit IRC15:39
toan-tranalaski does it help if we have some kind of request histogram?15:39
alaskicool, if/when I get something together I'll throw it up for additional eyes15:39
PaulMurrayvery interesting alaski - thanks15:39
alaskitoan-tran: I can see some uses for that, but it may be a bit before it can be used15:39
toan-tranbecause we have some ideas on the precalculation too15:40
toan-tranour idea is to create some VM beforehand15:40
toan-tranmainly based on popular flavors15:40
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
toan-tranthe VMs will be deployed beforehand in NFS15:41
toan-transo when a user requests for a VM15:41
toan-tranthese VMs can be directly "transferred" into hand of the user15:41
n0anotoan-tran, not sure how you're going to pre-create a VM, what image would you start?15:41
toan-trann0ano: based on popukar image15:42
toan-tranfor instance, that's would be images for trial offer15:42
n0anotoan-tran, maybe, I have to say I'm skeptical15:42
alaskiit's a very interesting idea, and has been lightly discussed before but there are some hurdles to overcome15:43
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting15:43
alaskitoan-tran: the tenant transfer of the vm is one of the bigger road blocks that needs to be solved15:43
toan-tranyeah, that's where we're stuck here :)15:44
*** nermina has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** evgenyf has quit IRC15:44
*** [1]evgenyf is now known as evgenyf15:44
boris-42n0ano hi15:45
n0anoboris-42, great you're here15:45
n0ano#topic no-db scheduler update15:45
*** openstack changes topic to "no-db scheduler update (Meeting topic: scheduler)"15:45
n0anoboris-42, any news?15:45
*** luis_fdez has joined #openstack-meeting15:45
boris-42n0ano happy new year=) and marry christmas=)15:46
*** anniec has left #openstack-meeting15:46
boris-42n0ano actually there is no updates, because of holidays15:46
boris-42n0ano but we are going in 2-3 days to make some kind of live demo15:46
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
boris-42n0ano and benchmark openstack at scale using Rally15:46
boris-42n0ano old VS new scheduler15:46
n0anoboris-42, NP, I've been blaming the holidays for all my delays, it's a common issue15:47
boris-42n0ano yep but seems like Rally15:47
boris-42n0ano is ready for such kinds of benchmarks15:47
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
boris-42n0ano so will try to get some interesting results15:47
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
n0anowill be interesting to see those results, are you holding off on the patches for nova ultil after that?15:48
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
boris-42n0ano ?15:48
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
boris-42n0ano there is a lot of work around, especially we will try to put data from cinder to nova scheduler15:49
n0anoI thought you had changes for nova that were ready to be reviewed15:49
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away15:49
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga15:49
boris-42n0ano https://review.openstack.org/#/c/45867/15:49
boris-42https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/no-db-scheduler,n,z15:49
boris-42But there will be more15:50
*** hartsocks1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
boris-42n0ano it works but doesn't pass all tests=)15:50
boris-42n0ano I think we will quick all them15:50
boris-42n0ano after 9 Jan15:50
*** hartsocks has quit IRC15:51
n0anoah, that is clearly an issue, so when you fix the test failure you should be mergeable into the tree, right?15:51
boris-42n0ano yep15:51
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting15:51
*** blamar has quit IRC15:51
boris-42n0ano but there will be more patches, to show how it will work with to data sources (cinder/nova)15:52
boris-42n0ano and cleanup of old code (compute_nodes tables and db.api)15:52
boris-42n0ano and refactoring of nova.api to get compute_nodes though scheduler15:52
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC15:53
n0anothat's OK, cleanup of the old code is only to be expected15:53
boris-42n0ano why only?)15:53
boris-42n0ano how about merging cinder and nova scchedulers?)15:53
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting15:53
n0anos/only to be/to be15:53
* n0ano bad english15:53
boris-42ah15:53
*** hartsocks1 has quit IRC15:54
*** kevinconway_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** euanh has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** euanh has left #openstack-meeting15:55
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** kevinconway has quit IRC15:55
*** kevinconway_ is now known as kevinconway15:56
n0anowell, we're aproaching the top of the hour, unless there are any last minute issues15:56
*** markvan has quit IRC15:56
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC15:57
n0anohearing silence, I'll thank everyone and we'll talk again next week15:57
n0ano#endmeeting15:57
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:57
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan  7 15:57:53 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:57
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2014/scheduler.2014-01-07-15.00.html15:57
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2014/scheduler.2014-01-07-15.00.txt15:57
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2014/scheduler.2014-01-07-15.00.log.html15:57
alaskithanks15:58
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** PaulMurray has left #openstack-meeting15:58
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** amrith has quit IRC16:00
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
primeministerp#startmeeting16:01
openstackprimeministerp: Error: A meeting name is required, e.g., '#startmeeting Marketing Committee'16:01
*** claytonc has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
primeministerp#startmeeting hyper-v16:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan  7 16:01:24 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is primeministerp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'hyper_v'16:01
primeministerphey all16:01
primeministerphope everyone had a good holiday break16:01
*** xuhanp has quit IRC16:01
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** dzyu has quit IRC16:01
primeministerpcouple updates, currently finalizing or ci run, so hopefully that will be active today or tomorrow.16:02
*** Linz has quit IRC16:02
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
*** cloudon1 has left #openstack-meeting16:03
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
primeministerpout side of that, all of us on the hyper-v side are pretty much heads down trying to finalize the ci infra and automation16:03
*** lijli has quit IRC16:04
primeministerpsome others are travelling16:04
primeministerpwe'll end for now w/ more updates next week16:04
*** eharney_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:04
primeministerp#endmeeting16:04
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:04
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan  7 16:04:29 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:04
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-01-07-16.01.html16:04
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-01-07-16.01.txt16:04
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-01-07-16.01.log.html16:04
*** eharney has quit IRC16:05
*** lijli has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** rnirmal has quit IRC16:07
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** eharney_ is now known as eharney16:08
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:08
*** belmoreira has quit IRC16:08
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** SergeyLukjanov is now known as _SergeyLukjanov16:10
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** dims_ is now known as dims16:10
*** toan-tran has quit IRC16:11
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** belmoreira has quit IRC16:13
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** funzo has quit IRC16:14
*** alex_xu has quit IRC16:15
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:16
*** yamahata has quit IRC16:16
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** chandankumar has quit IRC16:16
*** shmcfarl has joined #openstack-meeting16:17
*** doron is now known as doron_afk16:17
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting16:17
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC16:17
*** shmcfarl has left #openstack-meeting16:18
*** claytonc has left #openstack-meeting16:18
*** stevemar has quit IRC16:20
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:21
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** euanh has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** euanh has left #openstack-meeting16:21
*** Linz has quit IRC16:23
*** stevemar has quit IRC16:23
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting16:25
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:25
*** gyee_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:29
*** stevemar has quit IRC16:29
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** AaronGr_Zzz is now known as AaronGr16:32
*** stevemar has quit IRC16:32
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:33
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:33
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting16:33
*** egallen has quit IRC16:34
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** doron_afk is now known as doron16:34
*** chandankumar_ has quit IRC16:35
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC16:36
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
*** shmcfarl has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
*** Linz has quit IRC16:37
*** hartsocks1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:38
*** hartsocks has quit IRC16:39
*** bauzas has quit IRC16:40
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:40
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC16:41
*** dkranz has quit IRC16:41
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
*** stevemar has quit IRC16:44
*** marun has quit IRC16:44
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting16:45
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting16:46
*** terriyu has quit IRC16:48
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC16:48
*** ruhe is now known as ruhe_away16:49
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** rossella_s_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC16:49
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** Zak__ has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** julim has quit IRC16:51
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC16:52
*** rossella_s has quit IRC16:52
*** rossella_s_ is now known as rossella_s16:52
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk16:52
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting16:54
*** ruhe_away is now known as ruhe16:54
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** herndon has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** stevemar has quit IRC16:57
*** ruhe is now known as ruhe_away16:58
*** jhenner has quit IRC16:58
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC16:59
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** stevemar has quit IRC17:00
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** dkranz has quit IRC17:00
*** Zak__ has quit IRC17:00
*** jrodom has quit IRC17:01
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** garyk has quit IRC17:01
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
*** markmcclain has quit IRC17:02
*** ruhe_away is now known as ruhe17:03
*** akuznets_ has quit IRC17:03
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC17:04
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** DennyZhang has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** badgerj has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** joel_c has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** anniec has quit IRC17:07
*** ArthurBerezin has quit IRC17:07
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
*** rwsu has quit IRC17:08
*** andreaf has quit IRC17:08
*** badgerj is now known as _cjones_17:08
*** marun has quit IRC17:09
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** prad has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC17:10
joel_cis there a murano meeting today?17:10
*** stevemar has quit IRC17:12
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
gokrokveHi joel_c!17:12
gokrokveNo Russia is in holidays17:13
gokrokveDo you have any specific questions?17:13
jaypipesgokrokve: you're in Mountain View :P17:13
*** jlibosva has quit IRC17:13
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC17:13
gokrokvejoel_c: Yes. I missed both holidays American and Russian. Just was working all these days :-)17:13
joel_cgokrokve: no specific questions.17:13
jaypipesgokrokve: :)17:14
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
gokrokvejoel_c: OK. So lets wait for next week.17:14
joel_cgokrokve: it's not too late.  (take a break)17:14
*** pablosan has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
gokrokveHow are the holidays? Enjoyed good weather in Arizona?17:14
joel_cgokrokve: They were great.  The weather couldn't be better.17:15
gokrokvejoel_c: Cool!17:15
*** paragan has quit IRC17:17
_cjones_ayoung, I'm trying to make use of the latest Domain driver configuration in Keystone.17:17
*** Mandell has quit IRC17:18
*** neelashah has quit IRC17:23
*** stevemar has quit IRC17:25
*** bgorski has quit IRC17:26
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:26
*** doron is now known as doron_afk17:26
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away17:27
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga17:27
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
*** yassine has quit IRC17:28
*** jecarey has quit IRC17:28
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting17:29
*** MaxV_ has quit IRC17:30
*** doron_afk has quit IRC17:31
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC17:32
*** rossella_s has quit IRC17:32
*** markwash has quit IRC17:32
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
*** marun has quit IRC17:33
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
*** DennyZhang has quit IRC17:36
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman17:37
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC17:37
*** oubiwann_ has quit IRC17:38
*** safchain has quit IRC17:39
*** markpeek has quit IRC17:40
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting17:40
*** DennyZhang has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
*** BBG_Stephen has joined #openstack-meeting17:42
*** markpeek1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:42
*** edleafe- has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
*** radix_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:45
*** zigo_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:45
*** derekh has quit IRC17:46
*** persia__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
*** cyeoh_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** briancli1e has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** seiflotfy__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
* ayoung in meetingroom overwatch17:50
*** rnirmal has quit IRC17:50
*** blamar has quit IRC17:50
*** edleafe has quit IRC17:50
*** bknudson has quit IRC17:50
*** bfirsh has quit IRC17:50
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC17:50
*** markpeek has quit IRC17:50
*** whenry has quit IRC17:50
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC17:50
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC17:50
*** briancline has quit IRC17:50
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC17:51
*** persia has quit IRC17:51
*** seiflotfy_ has quit IRC17:51
*** radix has quit IRC17:51
*** cyeoh has quit IRC17:51
*** zigo has quit IRC17:51
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** bfirsh_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC17:51
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** marekd has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** mrunge has quit IRC17:51
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** seiflotfy__ is now known as seiflotfy_17:52
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC17:53
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** kwss has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** ygbo has quit IRC17:57
*** jgallard has quit IRC17:57
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** lbragstad has quit IRC17:58
*** DennyZhang has quit IRC17:58
dolphm\o/17:58
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
henrynashhi17:58
*** nkinder has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
marekdo/17:58
kwsshi :)17:58
gyee_\o17:58
dolphmayoung bknudson gyee henrynash morganfainberg stevemar marekd: o/17:59
bknudsondolphm: hi17:59
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:59
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n317:59
stevemaro/17:59
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz17:59
* ayoung pops up out of his spider hole17:59
ayoungMeeting area secure!17:59
ayounghenrynash, how the heck are you!17:59
gyee_the intcy wintcy spider17:59
stevemarayoung, thx for securing it17:59
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away17:59
*** oubiwann_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
henrynashayoung: I'm good…sort for being MIA18:00
henrynashsorry for being….18:00
dolphm#startmeeting keystone18:00
lbragstadhi18:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan  7 18:00:44 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dolphm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:00
dolphm#topic Reminder: Hackathon January 15-17th @ Rackspace in San Antonio, TX18:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Reminder: Hackathon January 15-17th @ Rackspace in San Antonio, TX (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:00
dolphmNEXT WEEK ^^18:00
stevemaryay!18:00
topolo/18:00
dolphm#link https://gist.github.com/dolph/5cfa70c02f5b141060c518:01
stevemarflight and hotel booked18:01
ayoungdolphm, Red Hat is sending me + 1.5 others18:01
topolI assume its warm in San Anton18:01
dolphmhopefully everyone interested is booked up by now18:01
dolphmtopol: it's COLD this week :(18:01
dolphmtopol: 15-17 F this morning18:01
henrynashdolphm: I'm 50-50 right now, I'll confirm in the next 48 hrs18:01
dolphmsupposed to be 70 by end of week18:01
ayoungtwo people from Dogtag development team.  One is going to be coding with us, one half with us, and also working wirth Barbican folks18:02
topolfind us good places to eat and I'll be fine18:02
dolphm#link https://www.google.com/search?q=weather+78259&oq=weather+7825918:02
dolphmweather ^18:02
stevemardolphm, i'm at -17F today, it'll be a welcome change18:02
ayoungWe have space for how many people?18:02
*** brich has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** oubiwann has quit IRC18:02
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
stevemargyee, are you in?18:02
dolphmayoung: working on getting a room finalized today/tomorrow... wednesday is apparently a really busy day for this kind of thing18:02
topolwhats the dress code at rackspace. Yes Im always the nerd who asks that question18:03
gyee_stevemar, no, I don't have the approval18:03
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman18:03
ayoungtopol, pants are required18:03
* gyee_ is sad18:03
dolphmtopol: tshirt and jeans?18:03
stevemarany hp folk coming?18:03
dolphmsnuggies18:03
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
ayoungThis is texas.18:03
ayoungJeans are formal wear18:03
stevemarpants are always a good call18:03
dolphmayoung: ++18:03
ayoungSpurs optional.18:03
gyee_stevemar, none from our team18:03
stevemargyee_, boo18:03
ayoungMinimum belt buckle size requirements have been relaxed for out-of-towners, though.18:04
dolphmwe'll have some PhD students from university of texas san antonio dropping in -- they're interested in contributing ABAC18:04
topolayoung, /me thank god!18:04
*** dwchadwick has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
dwchadwickhi everyone18:05
*** ildikov has quit IRC18:05
kwsshi18:05
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away18:05
*** euanh has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
ayoungdwchadwick, kwss we are just getting through the Hackathon admin things first...18:05
*** euanh has left #openstack-meeting18:06
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting18:06
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja18:06
ayoungis everyone staying at the Courtyard ?18:06
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting18:06
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:06
topolayoung,  I am. And will have a rental18:06
ayounghttp://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/satca-courtyard-san-antonio-airport/18:06
dolphm#action if you're attending for sure, and haven't already, give me a poke so i have a rough head count / list of names to leave at the front desk18:07
*** alee__ has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
*** evgenyf has quit IRC18:07
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
dolphmit sounds like we'll have a room right at the main entrance, so it'll be VERY easy for everyone to find18:07
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC18:07
dolphmi'll keep the gist up to date with anything new18:08
ayoungdolphm, got an estimated head count?18:08
*** vijendar has quit IRC18:09
dolphmayoung: a LOT of people are planning on dropping in at some point... i need to put together a list of everyone that will be here all 3 days though18:09
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC18:09
*** bknudson has quit IRC18:09
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC18:09
*** whenry has quit IRC18:09
*** jlibosva has quit IRC18:09
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
dolphm#topic Changes to keystone-core18:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Changes to keystone-core (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:10
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
dolphmOur review queue is painfully long, I think that's a given!18:10
topolone rule at the hackathon. No one is allowed to mention Army has lost to Navy 12 years in a row18:10
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
dolphmin reviewing the current members of keystone-core, we've got several people that haven't participated lately, so I'll be cleaning them out in favor of some new names18:11
ayoungtopol, mention it away.  I've come to acceptance on that point.18:11
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
dolphmto be removed: Andy Smith (termie), Devin Carlen, Gabriel Hurley, and Joe Heck18:11
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
topolayoung, no. I refuse.  Im on the Army side18:11
dolphmand the fun part...18:12
dolphmafter discussing with keystone-core, effective today...18:12
dolphm(and with unanimous support!)18:12
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
henrynashdrum roll18:12
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
dolphmi'll be adding Steve Martinelli (stevemar), Jamie Lennox (jamielennox), and David Stanek (dstanek)!18:12
gyee_w00t!18:12
dolphmwelcome to keystone-core!18:12
*** dims has quit IRC18:13
stevemarwoot woot18:13
marekdcool!!18:13
henrynashyeee Haaa!!18:13
lbragstadcongrats!18:13
stevemarcongrats jamielennox and dstanek :)18:13
ayoungThis should come as a surprise to no one.  They are all doing great things.18:13
dolphmunfortunately dstanek is teaching a python class somewhere in the frozen north today lol18:13
gyee_amen brother!18:13
dolphmayoung: ++18:13
henrynashayoung: seconded18:13
topolstevemar,  jamielennox, dstanek EXTREMELY WELL DESERVED.   CONGRATULATIONS18:13
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
*** gokrokve has quit IRC18:13
ayoungNote that the addition of core members is a very selfish decision.  It is an Ack that we need more help.18:14
*** akrivoka has joined #openstack-meeting18:14
jamielennoxah, shucks guys18:14
ayoungI see it as a fait-accompli, as I've treated opinions from these guys bascially like core for a while now.  But good to have the public acknowledgment.  And the +2 / -2 ability.18:15
dolphmit'll take me a bit to make the changes in a few places, but if you don't have +2 / -2 by end of day, give me a poke18:16
dolphmbecause i probably did something wrong18:16
*** dwchadwick has quit IRC18:17
dolphm#topic Federation18:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Federation (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:17
*** dwchadwick has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
dolphmayoung: (i believe you added this today) floor is yours18:17
topoldolphm, can you send a formal email regarding the new core members.  It helps for me to send those notes around18:17
dolphmtopol: of course18:17
ayoungYeah, lates last week18:17
ayoungOK, so Federation is getting a lot of attention, and we need to get it right.18:17
ayoungthe biggest issue is the public APIs18:17
gyee_topol, just give stevemar that bonus he deserves! :)18:18
ayoungheh18:18
stevemargyee_ ++18:18
ayounglets start with this18:18
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
atiwariayoung, not just public API but some data model changed needed18:18
ayounghttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/62417/18:18
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
ayoungatiwari, its all important, but API definitions are going to be froZen in i2 Time18:19
ayoungso we need to clear this up now.  Fixes can come after that18:19
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
atiwariayoung, that is true I have requested to add optional domain_id in IdP API18:20
ayoungkwss, dwchadwick we've had the side conversation about the "method" = federated18:20
*** markpeek1 has quit IRC18:20
ayoungversus18:20
ayoung"method" = SAML etc18:20
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting18:20
dwchadwickcorrect. And we propose a common method for all federated protocols18:20
gyee_ayoung, federation deals with authentication18:20
ayoungPretty certain method=federated is based on some bad assumptions18:20
ayoungfirst18:21
ayoungI think that we can say that all of the federated API docs follow the same rules18:21
gyee_authn plugin deals with authentication18:21
ayoungthere is not going to be a "SAML" implementation that is *not* federated18:21
dwchadwickfirst bad assumption of ayoung. Federation = auth. No. federation = authn + authz18:21
ayoungcommonality of functionality is at the implementation level, not the API18:22
gyee_dwchadwick, authz is is openstack-specific18:22
ayoungdwchadwick, I didn't say that, gyee_ did.18:22
*** _cjones_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:22
ayoungin this case, federation is an way of getting in authZ attributes18:22
dwchadwickcorrect18:22
ayoungauthentication is a subset of that.18:22
gyee_federation establishes an identity and that's it18:22
ayounggyee_, nope18:22
dwchadwickcorrect18:22
*** Linz has quit IRC18:22
dolphmayoung: i don't think they're "bad" assumptions - just slightly too specific for the API layer (?)18:22
ayoungit also provides additional attributes used to make authZ decisions, and that is critical to understand18:23
dwchadwickand an identity (= set of attributes) is used for authz by Openstack services18:23
dolphmit's also a superficial issue, IMO18:23
atiwaridwchadwick, I think Authz can be derived from federation18:23
dwchadwickagreed18:23
ayoungdolphm, my ideal would be to do Federation without any new APIs18:24
dolphmatiwari: i don't think anyone disagrees there18:24
dwchadwickbut federation is essentially about managing trust in third parties18:24
atiwarigood18:24
ayoungand I think that it is possible to do that18:24
dolphmayoung: that's my train of thought as well -- but i haven't thought it all the way through yet18:24
ayoungfor example, if we front Keystone with mod_auth_mellon, what we end up with is just a new set of attributes passed to the keystone layer18:24
dwchadwickso we have one method for managing the trust, and it is called federated but we can call it something else if the name bugs you18:24
atiwariquestion, what about openId connect which has Authz as based component18:24
topolSo I have been talking to lots of customers on this topic.   We need to work with saml and openid connect as both are pervasive18:25
ayoungatiwari, good question, but can you hold it for a moment?18:25
ayounglet me talk through SAML first, and then we'll talk openid18:25
topolatiwari ++ exactly18:25
atiwarisure18:25
dwchadwicktopol - agreed18:25
ayoungagreed, and I think the answers to one will cover the other18:25
dwchadwicktopol - plus you need to allow for the next big protocol as well (such as ABFAB maybe)18:25
*** jpich has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
dwchadwickayoung - disagree. Dont talk about SAML only18:26
ayoungI've been critical of the token request format for a while.  I'd like to18:26
ayoungdwchadwick, we will, one thing at a time18:26
ayoungI'd like to focus on using the existing mechanism of the web for authentication where possible18:26
ayoungSAML  kindof blurs that18:27
ayoungin that it sort of does cryptographically secure authentication.  But we don't want to implement that in Keystone.  Too hard to get right.  What we want18:27
ayoungis to consume it18:27
dwchadwickbut we are not talking simply authn (as un/pw does that)18:27
ayoungdwchadwick, understood.18:27
dwchadwickwe are talking federation which includes authz as well18:27
gyee_we talking about the one-line impl?18:27
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
ayoungso ideally we would configure Apache (or other) to do all of the SAML work, and then Keystone responsibilites would start at the mapping layer18:28
dwchadwickgyee - the one line implementation is that is needed on top of the trust management18:28
ayoungwhich is why I wanted to focus on that BP first18:28
dwchadwickayoung - wrong. Mapping comes after trust management18:28
ayoungSo, first question, do we absolutely even need a new API for token request?18:29
gyee_no18:29
gyee_not with the apache approach18:29
ayoungdwchadwick, trust setup would happen before token request18:29
dwchadwickagreed18:29
atiwari+218:29
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
dwchadwicktrust setup = setting trust policies18:29
gyee_that setup would be just like an external auth18:29
ayoungnow, there is a question about how dynamic the apache approach would be.18:30
dwchadwicktrust setup does not equal validating the attributes that you are presented with18:30
ayoungdwchadwick, define trust set up, please?18:30
gyee_keystone trust IdP18:30
dwchadwickconfiguring the IDPs that you trust18:30
ayoungOr, actually18:30
ayoungok18:30
marekdayoung: afaik not as dynamic as we would like to have, but sufficiently dynamic for now :-)18:30
dwchadwickconfiguring the attributes you trust IDPs to issue18:30
ayoungso we have APIs for those progressing, right?18:31
*** MaxV_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:31
atiwariI think it is meta data needed at ST for trust IdP18:31
dwchadwickconfiguring the mapping of these attributes into keystone authz properties18:31
ayounghttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/62604/18:31
ayoungfor example.  Now, that is specific to SAML.18:31
dolphmthe apache + mod_shib/mod_melon + IdP + protocol + mapping approach effectively creates a new route to produce openstack tokens18:32
dwchadwickAyoung - what do you trust Apache front end to do. That is the 1000 dollar question18:32
gyee_if we are using apache approach, all those APIs are not required18:32
dolphmso, it's a new API, but there's no "identity API" spec for the request, beyond the URL that apache is protecting18:32
stevemargyee_ i believe so18:32
gyee_apache + mapping, and we are done with the first round18:33
dwchadwickgyee. they are not required if you trust apache to do everything. you dont even need attribute mapping18:33
gyee_you still need attribute map18:33
gyee_apache will return attributes in env vars18:33
ayoungdwchadwick, dolphm, I would guess it would need to work something like this:  Apache is set up to accept a broad band of authentication sources (IdPs) and validate that the documesnt are authenticat (all the crypto heavy lifting) and then Keystone would take the aenv vars it is passed and say "yes, these pass my policy"  or "no, we don't accep[t from that IdP"18:33
atiwariguys, that is why I was asking for an architectural diagram so that every know what we are working on18:33
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
stevemargyee, that is what i thought18:34
topolatiwari ++18:34
ayoungatiwari, I feel your pain.  But that is what we are trying to nail down here.18:34
dolphmin the mod_mellon case, you'd just configure mod_mellon to protect GET /v3/OS-FEDERATION/identity_providers/cern/protocols/saml2 with a configuration for cern + saml2, and keystone then knows what mapping to apply to the response, and output an authz'd token18:34
*** jrodom has quit IRC18:34
dolphmmod_shib works similarly18:34
dolphmhttps://code.google.com/p/modmellon/wiki/GenericSetup18:34
gyee_yep18:35
ayoungdolphm, so adding a new IdP would be a change to Apache config.  It would require an apache restart18:35
bknudsonhow does keystone know? is the mapping in a config file or keystone api?18:35
ayoungbknudson, mapping API is also under review.18:35
dwchadwickNoone has yet answered the 1000 dollar question. Come on guys. What do you trust Apache to do18:35
dolphmayoung: yes18:35
gyee_bknudson, in theory, mapping can be just middleware18:35
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
ayoung#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/identity-api,n,z18:36
atiwariayoung +1, it has to be dynamic18:36
dolphmgyee_: it's in review as middleware today18:36
dolphmatiwari: eventually18:36
gyee_dolphm, alrighty then18:36
dolphmdwchadwick: why not trust an existing implementation to take care of a bunch of fragile work?18:36
ayoungatiwari, I hear you.  Its just that I don't think we can get there in Icehouse18:36
dolphmdwchadwick: why NOT leverage that?18:36
dolphmayoung: ++18:36
ayoungdwchadwick, I trust Apache to validate a SAML assertion and provide the attributes to Keystone.18:37
dwchadwickyou can if you are sure that it does the job properly.18:37
dwchadwickayoung. That is not enough18:37
marekddwchadwick: in general i trust  every parameter mod_shib provides me with...18:37
bknudsonI'd trust existing and deployed apache code over code that hasn't been written.18:37
atiwariayoung and dolphm at least we can add optional domain_id in IdP config18:37
ayoungdwchadwick, agreed.  That is why we take those attributes and post process them in the mapping layer.18:37
atiwariso that other use case can be supported18:37
dwchadwicktoday I can send attributes from my trusted IDP to apache and have it trust them even though it should not18:38
kwssso we move the trust management and call it on all methods of authn removing the need for a specific plugin?18:38
*** ndipanov is now known as ndipanov_gone18:38
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
ayoungdwchadwick, if Apache sends along a variable that says "these attributes were verified by IdP=X  we can then have the mapping layer say "but IdP=X can't assert those variables"18:39
marekddwchadwick: by default apache modules let you configure a very simple map of accepted attributes.18:39
*** DrBacchus has quit IRC18:39
ayoungdwchadwick, understand, we've shifted a bit from a "eventual design" to "what can be done in icehouse time" mindset here.18:40
ayoungWe can always do more in the future.18:40
gyee_that's the slogan18:40
gyee_:)18:40
ayoungwhat is the term MVP?  Minimal Viable Product?18:40
dwchadwickGiven that we have already implemented the current design, then why dont you think it can be ready for icehouse18:40
gyee_"We can always do more in the future."18:40
bknudsondwchadwick: is the implementation posted somewhere?18:41
dwchadwickyes has been for about a week now18:41
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting18:41
dwchadwickits about 700 lines long. Its the first proof of concept18:41
dolphmbknudson: ++18:41
dwchadwickI think the team here  can easily make it perfect for icehouse18:42
kwsshttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/64454/18:42
gyee_perfect is a big word18:42
dwchadwickgood enough then18:42
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting18:43
dwchadwickyour MVP requires an Apache front end, which some institutions have already rejected18:43
dwchadwicke.g. Brazil has an operational system based on our design and a mixture of their own code and ours18:44
atiwaridwchadwick ++18:44
marekdbut this code stil relies that the input is a JSON request, something like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62604/, right?18:44
dolphmdwchadwick: out of curiousity, rejected on what basis?18:44
jamielennoxdwchadwick: i think apache is more about what we can use now - if there becomes a wsgi  middleware for handling all this then it can be added to the mix later18:44
dolphmjamielennox: ++18:45
dwchadwickon a basis of trust management and hops in the chain. Apache is an overhead they dont want18:45
*** olaph has joined #openstack-meeting18:45
atiwariApache need static configuration which is not scalable18:45
ayoungdwchadwick, in your review above, how is the SAML document validated?18:46
ayoungkwss, that question is actually for you18:46
dwchadwickIt uses pySAML code, which was not written by us but it publicly available18:46
kwssthe saml protocol handing module is not in that review, only the apache2 module which expects prevalidated attributes from the apache module18:47
*** dims has quit IRC18:47
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:47
*** shmcfarl has quit IRC18:47
*** Leonr has quit IRC18:47
*** tongli has quit IRC18:47
*** haleyb has quit IRC18:47
*** martines_ has quit IRC18:47
marekdkwss: module like mod_mellon, mod_shib?18:47
kwssyes18:47
ayoungright...so pySAML is doing crypto in Python?  Or calls to the OpenSSL librarites?18:47
*** shmcfarl has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
dolphmayoung: pySAML uses m2crypto18:48
gyee_ha18:48
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
ayoungdolphm, is that acceptable?18:48
marekdkwss: so, why would you need some parameters like phase {negotiation, validation} and so on? mod_shib does everything as far as i am concerned.18:48
ayoungdwchadwick, there are performance issues around crypto and python, exacerbated by Eventlet.18:48
dwchadwickmarekd - correct if you have the apache front end18:48
*** martines_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
kwssthe other phases are for using the same mechanism for other protocols18:49
*** rossk has joined #openstack-meeting18:49
dwchadwickwe have published performance results in our paper, and pySAML works perfectly well18:49
marekddwchadwick: kwss mentioned she expects validated attributes from apache module...maybe i am misunderstandind something..18:49
dolphmayoung: that's your ball park :P18:49
*** Ildi has joined #openstack-meeting18:49
dolphmit's not a blocker for me18:49
dwchadwickmarek. If Apache does the saml protocol, then it simply passes the attributes to Keystone for trust management18:50
dolphmbut i'm easily edumacatable18:50
dwchadwickif pysaml does the saml protocol, then we dont need an Apache front end18:50
ayoungOK...so we would want to make it transparent to the user.  They should know that they are using SAML, but not know what Keystone is doing18:50
* gyee_ looks up the word edumacatable18:50
ayoungthe request should look the same regardless18:50
topolayoung +118:50
dolphmgyee_: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=edumacated18:50
ayoungso there should not be an explicit apache218:50
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
gyee_haha18:51
*** julim_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
*** krtaylor has quit IRC18:51
dwchadwickthe request will always look the same to the end user since they will be talking to their own IDP to authenticate18:51
dwchadwickend users dont see underlying protocol exchanges18:51
ayoungdwchadwick, I mean the JSON document that is passed to keystone to get a token.18:51
ayoungdwchadwick, yes they do18:51
*** Ildi is now known as ildikov_18:51
atiwariayoung, JSON comes between apache and keystone18:52
dwchadwickthe JSON doc is standardised to be the same regardless of the federation protocol or whether Apache is in the picture or not18:52
atiwariuser will not see the JSON18:52
ayoungdwchadwick, remember, that we can't even say for certain that the user is using the python-keystoneclient.  All of these APIs need to be acallable from third party implementations18:52
dwchadwickthis is the feature of our design - its protocol independent federation18:52
dolphmwhere does JSON come into play? in the apache + mod_shib / mod_mellon case, there's no JSON at all18:53
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
*** oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann18:53
ayoungain't no such critter18:53
*** colinmcn_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC18:53
ayoungdolphm, there would still be a JSON document passed to the auth controller.18:53
dwchadwickIts simple. There is an Apache page that converts the headers into a json doc in the standard format18:53
ayoungI mean, I would love to get rid of that18:53
ayoungdwchadwick, ahhh18:54
*** resker has joined #openstack-meeting18:54
ayoungmod_rewrite type logic....18:54
dwchadwickyes18:54
dolphmayoung: okay i think i follow... but it would never be serialized JSON.. it's just a python dict being passed to auth?18:54
dolphmor to the token backend?18:54
marekddwchadwick: so you want to make apache httpd communicate with standalone keystone over the network, right?18:54
*** jcoufal-mob has joined #openstack-meeting18:54
ayoungdolphm, up until now I was thinking env vars passed through.18:54
dwchadwicki thought it already did that18:54
ayoungdwchadwick, "over the network" no18:55
ayoungits assumed to be a local call18:55
dolphmayoung: ++ they do. the mapping picks up env vars and converts them into something that existing code can produce a token based on18:55
dolphmayoung: like, a pre-auth'd auth request18:55
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
dolphmEXTERNAL_USER-style18:55
dwchadwickKristy is just now getting an APache front end up so that we can learn more about using it, as it is not something we have used so far18:55
dwchadwickwe use Apache to run SAML IDPs and SPs, but not to front Keystone18:56
dwchadwickSorry I must go now for my personal appointment18:56
*** rlandy has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
ayoungdolphm, dwchadwick I think I need a bit to process this, but I'm not certain it changes anything.  I don't love the mod_rewrite approach.18:56
dolphmdwchadwick: same sort of advantage when you're fronting keystone, not to mention the performance gains over keystonea-ll18:56
ayoungdwchadwick, thanks for your time....18:56
dolphmayoung: ++ i'd like to review both side by side in the mean time -- they're both viable approaches and if we have a head start on a better long term solution, it certainly deserves consideration for icehouse18:57
dolphmlet's evaluate in review, and pick it up next time!18:57
dolphm(< 1 min left)18:57
topoldolphm ++18:57
ayoungdolphm, still don't need moehod=federated18:58
ayoungmethod18:58
ayoungkwss, can you stick around in #openstack-dev?18:58
*** jhenner has quit IRC18:58
kwssayoung: yea no problem18:58
gyee_dolphm, ++, we like the Republican's, a big tent18:58
dolphm#endmeeting18:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:58
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan  7 18:58:50 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:58
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-01-07-18.00.html18:58
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-01-07-18.00.txt18:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-01-07-18.00.log.html18:58
dolphmgyee_: i don't even know what that means18:59
ayounghenrynash, you too?18:59
*** kwss has quit IRC18:59
*** lbragstad has left #openstack-meeting18:59
henrynashayoung: sorry, gotta duck out, but will be back on later18:59
ayounghenrynash, OK.  I need to talk with you19:00
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
fungiinfra time?19:00
henrynashayoung: OK19:00
*** ctracey` is now known as ctracey19:00
*** anniec has quit IRC19:00
*** julim has quit IRC19:01
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC19:01
*** bknudson has quit IRC19:01
*** changbl has quit IRC19:01
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC19:01
*** _cjones_ has quit IRC19:01
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC19:01
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC19:01
*** whenry has quit IRC19:01
*** esker has quit IRC19:01
*** dwchadwick has quit IRC19:01
*** henrynash has quit IRC19:01
*** radix_ is now known as radix19:01
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting19:02
fungii know we're probably short clarkb, jeblair, pleia2, anteaya...19:02
fungii can chair a meeting if anybody has things to discuss19:02
* fungi checks the agenda19:02
*** brich has quit IRC19:02
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting19:02
* olaph coughs19:02
fungiwe have agenda items for mordred, hub_cap, lifeless, pleia2, SergeyLukjanov, zaro, clarkb and pabelanger19:02
*** DrBacchus has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
*** jpich has quit IRC19:03
fungii'll just do this...19:03
SergeyLukjanovfungi, hi19:04
fungi#startmeeting infra19:04
*** shmcfarl has quit IRC19:04
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan  7 19:04:07 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is fungi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:04
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:04
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)"19:04
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'infra'19:04
fungi#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting19:04
SergeyLukjanovfungi, absolutely no updates from my side - holidays and vacation19:04
*** jrodom has quit IRC19:04
fungiSergeyLukjanov: yeah, i think i'm probably going to end this meeting *very* early, just going through the motions so we ahve a log published for the curious19:05
*** jcoufal-mob has quit IRC19:05
fungi#topic Actions from last meeting19:06
fungiweird... no topic line update?19:06
*** jsavak has quit IRC19:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: infra)"19:06
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** jcoufal-m has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
*** morganfainberg is now known as Guest7316219:07
fungifungi: move tarballs.o.o to static.o.o19:07
fungithat happened19:07
fungino other outstanding action items listed at...19:07
fungi#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-12-17-19.02.html19:07
*** Guest73162 has quit IRC19:07
*** Guest73162 has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman19:07
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
funginone of the people pinged from the agenda have piped up, except SergeyLukjanov who has no new updates, so...19:08
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
fungi#topic Open discussion19:08
*** Guest73162 is now known as needscoffee19:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: infra)"19:08
*** rlandy has left #openstack-meeting19:08
fungianybody have anything else of importance?19:09
zarosounds pretty quiet19:09
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom19:09
fungioh, we have zaro19:09
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-meeting19:09
zarocool, open discussion for next 45mins?19:10
fungizaro: want to give any updates on "Jenkins 1.540 upgrade" or "Maven clouddoc plugin move" or "Private gerrit for security reviews" or "Upgrade gerrit" for posterity?19:10
fungior just save updates for next week when there are more people not traveling19:10
zaro++19:10
* fungi is fine either way19:10
*** nkinder has left #openstack-meeting19:10
fungii think open discussion for the next 5 minutes, and then i end the meeting if nobody shows up with anything urgent19:11
fungibecause various stuff and things are broken, and i'd like to get back to fixing them19:11
*** atiwari has quit IRC19:12
SlickNikHey guys. I just want to give a quick update the trove-tempest work. Though hub_cap may have covered this already.19:12
SlickNikI'm still working on the image-building.19:12
fungiand also i have a conference call i need to jump on at 20:00 utc19:12
*** jtomasek has quit IRC19:12
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:12
SlickNikBut have various patches to the infra config and devstack/devstack-gate repos to enable the tempest run for trove.19:13
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting19:13
fungiSlickNik: awesome19:13
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting19:13
SlickNikThat should allow us to at least get started writing API / Taskmanager /Conductor tests which don't rely on the guest agent.19:13
fungiSlickNik: you should update the agenda and put your slick nick on there in place of (or in addition to) mordred and hub_cap19:13
fungi#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting19:14
SlickNikfungi: will do19:14
fungithat way we'll ping you next time we discuss it19:14
*** stevemar is now known as morganfainberg219:14
*** morganfainberg2 is now known as stevemar19:14
SlickNikHere are the patches I am talking about:19:14
SlickNikhhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/65065/19:14
SlickNikhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/65040/19:14
SlickNikhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/64913/19:14
*** needscoffee is now known as not_stevemar19:15
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting19:15
SlickNikFeel free to review them at your convenience.19:15
fungi#topic Trove testing19:15
SlickNikWill keep you posted with progress.19:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Trove testing (Meeting topic: infra)"19:15
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65065/19:15
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/65040/19:15
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64913/19:15
SlickNikthanks fungi19:15
*** not_stevemar has quit IRC19:15
SlickNikThat's all I had.19:15
fungii think i have those starred already, so hopefully i'll get to them soonish19:16
fungi#topic Open discussion19:16
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: infra)"19:16
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away19:16
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga19:16
SlickNikNo worries, not blocked or anything, so when you have some time.19:16
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away19:16
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga19:16
fungiother items of note... we have two new jenkins masters (jenkins03 and jenkins04) as of this morning utc, which only harbor nodepool nodes19:19
fungijenkins-dev, 02, 03 and 04 are running newer 1.543 while jenkins.o.o and 01 are still on older 1.52519:20
*** bfirsh_ is now known as bfirsh19:20
*** bfirsh has quit IRC19:20
fungizuul seems pretty hammered by the load we're throwing at it today19:20
funginodepoold is eating a fair amount of memory--hopefully someone finds time to look into that and make sure it's kosher19:20
*** bfirsh has joined #openstack-meeting19:21
*** jcoufal-m has quit IRC19:21
fungipip 1.5 and virtualenv 1.11 were released, causing some pain where tox sitepackages is enabled and for projects with requirements not hosted directly on pypi19:21
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC19:22
*** ildikov has quit IRC19:22
zarofungi: why not upgrade all jenkins?19:22
fungizaro: we wanted to bake it in on jenkins02 initially and roll back if there were problems19:23
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
fungibut the new masters we just spun up got the newer version. we'll plan to upgrade the remaining masters maybe this weekend or next week19:23
fungii can do that with one hand tied behind my back, as long as i get a few free moments19:24
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
fungithere's some discussing about initially curtailing the scope of voting ability for third-party ci until those systems can prove themselves19:24
fungithat's all the major/ongoing stuff which springs to mind. anyone with questions on those or other topics, feel free to pop into #openstack-infra19:25
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC19:25
*** jtomasek has quit IRC19:26
*** jhenner has quit IRC19:26
* fungi performs his rendition of john cage's 4'33" of silence19:26
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away19:27
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting19:27
zarois zuul overloaded?  do we have plans to scale?19:28
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez19:28
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:28
fungizaro: i think it's taking a bit of a beating, but want to get jeblair to weigh in on it once he's up and had his walk in the park19:29
fungithe downtime for a zuul resize would be fairly disruptive, so it's something we need to consider carefully19:29
fungithe alternative would be building a replacement (maybe on a performance flavor instead)19:29
*** jroovers has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC19:30
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
fungibut the cutover for that also seems like it could be touchy/nontrivial so not something i'm going to embark on without support19:31
fungiany final requests before i call this meeting a wrap?19:31
fungigoing once19:32
fungigoing twice19:32
olaph'bicycle race' by queen?19:32
*** nermina has quit IRC19:32
* fungi wants to ride his bicycle19:33
fungi#endmeeting19:33
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:33
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan  7 19:33:32 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:33
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-01-07-19.04.html19:33
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-01-07-19.04.txt19:33
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-01-07-19.04.log.html19:33
fungithanks everybody!19:33
*** whenry has quit IRC19:33
*** jlibosva has quit IRC19:35
*** colinmcn_ has quit IRC19:36
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
*** mrodden has quit IRC19:36
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** stevemar has quit IRC19:38
*** MaxV_ has quit IRC19:39
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
*** jprovazn has quit IRC19:40
*** jbryce has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
*** divyeshk has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** obondarev_ has quit IRC19:44
*** sushils has quit IRC19:44
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
*** divyeshk has left #openstack-meeting19:44
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting19:45
*** jtomasek has quit IRC19:46
*** resker has quit IRC19:48
*** Guest has joined #openstack-meeting19:48
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting19:48
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
*** stevemar has quit IRC19:50
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting19:52
*** esker has quit IRC19:53
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8719:53
*** afazekas has quit IRC19:54
*** ndipanov_gone has quit IRC19:55
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
*** Guest is now known as jtomasek19:57
*** armax has left #openstack-meeting19:58
*** ArthurBerezin has quit IRC19:59
ttxAnyone here for the TC meeting ?20:00
ttxrussellb, markmc, annegentle, mikal, mordred, jgriffith, vishy, markmcclain, jeblair, lifeless, sdague, dhellmann : around ?20:00
russellbo/20:00
dhellmannhere20:00
ttxwe have 3+ members at LCA20:00
ttxlet's see if we have quorum20:00
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:01
*** jcoufal has quit IRC20:01
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away20:01
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja20:02
sdagueo/20:02
markmcclaino/20:02
ttxthat makes 5, we need 2 more20:02
mordredo/20:02
vishyo/20:02
*** nermina has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
ttxawesome20:02
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
*** joshuamckenty has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
*** sarob has quit IRC20:02
ttx#startmeeting tc20:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan  7 20:02:44 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)"20:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'20:02
ttxOur first meeting of 2014. how time flies20:02
ttx#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee20:03
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
*** Ajaeger1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
*** joshuamckenty has left #openstack-meeting20:03
ttx#topic Diversity as a requirement for incubation20:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Diversity as a requirement for incubation (Meeting topic: tc)"20:03
ttx#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022546.html20:03
*** lblanchard has quit IRC20:03
ttxThat one generated a long thread just before the holidays20:03
ttxConsensus generally was that we should not *require* diversity before incubation, but require it for graduation instead (options 2/3)20:04
ttxSteve Dake's email appeared to win the internet: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022592.html20:04
*** olaph has left #openstack-meeting20:04
ttxWhat about 2 or 3 ? Some people prefer 2, some people prefer 320:04
ttxAt this point I think requiring "letters of intent" from companies that they would contribute to project Y if it was ever incubated is a bit useless20:04
sdaguettx: agreed20:05
ttxIf we think project Y is relevant, that matters more than a promise of support that might not be followed up20:05
ttxSo I think I'm going to propose option 220:05
ttx"2. Do not require diversity for incubation, but require it for graduation, and remove projects from incubation if they fail to attract a diverse community"20:05
ttxI'll propose it as a patch to reference/incubation-integration-requirements20:05
ttxcomments / thoughts ?20:05
dhellmannoption 2 sounds best, but what do we need to change for the graduation requirements to reflect the diversity requirement there?20:05
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
dhellmannand do we need some sort of "out" clause like what appears in option 3?20:06
mordredI agree with 220:06
ttxdhellmann: we need to remove the diversity requirement from the incubation part, I think20:06
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
*** MaxV has quit IRC20:06
dhellmannsure, I mean, how do we tighten up the graduation requirements to indicate that it is still a part of graduation and that projects that fail to attract a diverse contributor base won't graduation and may lose their incubation status (after some period of time)20:07
ttxany project failing to meet graduation requirements can be out, no specific clause needed ?20:07
dhellmannwe've said projects won't graduate if they don't meet the requirements, but I wasn't aware that "not graduate" might mean "might lose incubation status"20:07
ttxdhellmann: i think we can cover that as we visit incubation status more regularly20:08
dhellmannor do we not want that?20:08
mordredyou know - we may not need to have a specific policy on that20:08
mordredwe could come back to a project that's not gaining diversity20:08
dhellmannI wasn't thinking of a specific time frame, just to actually say that we may consider that action20:08
ttxwe want that, but I think we can cover it in the "incubation" explanation wikipage20:08
*** ayoung is now known as marvin_the_andro20:08
mordredsay "hi, we think you're not gaining diversity, and if you donm't by X, we're going to delist you"20:08
ttxmordred: +120:08
sdagueyeh +1 to that20:08
* flaper87 sneaks in20:09
flaper87that sounds reasonable to me!20:09
dhellmannI guess I'm not being clear.20:09
* mordred hands flaper87 a cookie20:09
ttxdhellmann: that can be part of our "graduation requirements" feedback20:09
dhellmannDoes anything in the process document actually say that right now?20:09
dhellmannok20:09
* flaper87 eats that cookie and the rest20:10
ttxdhellmann: i'll make sure the docs cover the case and make it clear that incubation is not a permanent status20:10
*** gyee_ has quit IRC20:10
dhellmannok, that's all I was looking for :-)20:10
ttxhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects has an arrow pointing back up.20:10
ttxbut I'll add a sentence there :)20:10
dhellmannok20:11
*** marvin_the_andro is now known as ayoung20:11
ttx#action ttx to propose the change to reference/incubation-integration-requirements20:11
ttx#action ttx to make sure https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/NewProjects mentions losing incubation status as a possibility20:11
ttxanything else on that subject ?20:11
mordrednope. that sounds great20:12
* ttx spots a few other rthings that need to be updated on that wikipage anyway20:12
ttx#topic Need to recognize/bless projects pre-incubation20:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Need to recognize/bless projects pre-incubation (Meeting topic: tc)"20:12
ttx#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-December/022202.html20:12
ttxThis was an older thread. If we follow the direction we just decided on diversity as a requirement, I think we solve most of the chicken-and-egg issue that prompted that thread20:12
ttxAnd therefore we don't need to do anything about recognizing projects pre-incubation20:13
*** alee__ has left #openstack-meeting20:13
ttxThat doesn't mean we should not track Incubation/Graduation status for projects on some wiki page, though20:13
ttxThat would not count as "blessing", but would provide easy(ier) reference for all people tracking progress20:13
mordred++20:13
ttxdoes that make sense ?20:13
jgriffithDo we want formal checkpoints for this as well?20:13
mordredor, in a yaml file somewhere so that it's parseable and stuff20:13
jgriffithie like each milestone..20:14
flaper87++20:14
dhellmannyeah, maybe in the governance repo? we need to vote on the status anyway, right?20:14
sdaguejgriffith: checkpoints would be good20:14
flaper87erm, ttx ++20:14
ttxmordred: status is actually in the latest projects.yaml change I proposed20:14
ttxdhellmann: ^20:14
mordred++20:14
ttxvishy: you mentioned to me being interested in having such a reference. Would a wiki page work for you as a tracking tool ?20:14
* jgriffith fears another hidden wiki page20:15
ttxmordred: still, gathering our feedback and list of graduation or incubation requirements in some wikipage has some educational value20:15
ttxor would you rather have it on some governance file ?20:15
vishyyes20:16
* ttx prefers wikipage because it's less like an endorsement20:16
vishyor actually i would prefer to just add the extra info the existing page20:16
ttxjust some "incubation/graduation status" page20:16
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman20:17
ttxvishy: the existign page is likely to be replaced by one of the autogenerated pages though20:17
ttx(next topic)20:17
* annegentle_ sneaks into the back row and sits20:17
ttxanyway, I think we can solve that as we get better at publishing governance docs20:17
sdagueyeh, agreed, I actually think if we start using the repo instead of the wiki, finding things is going to be simpler20:18
ttxthings will fall naturally into place as we begin autopublishing20:18
*** sarob has quit IRC20:18
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:18
ttxwhich brings us to our next topic20:18
ttxunless someone has something to add to this one20:18
* ttx waits for the mandatory minute of lag20:19
ttx#topic Governance docs publication20:20
*** openstack changes topic to "Governance docs publication (Meeting topic: tc)"20:20
ttxSo... we need to auto-publish governance docs so that a human-readable version can be found on some webserver20:20
ttxQuestion is.. where and how. Sean originally started to work on this at:20:20
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61380/20:20
ttxThen Anne questioned this approach at:20:20
*** akrivoka has quit IRC20:20
ttx#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-tc/2013-December/000462.html20:20
ttxThat thread reached consensus that publication to a website (with clear links to the repo) was the right solution...20:20
ttx...but there was still disagreement that docs.openstack.org was the right host for that.20:21
ttxSuggestions included www.o.o/governance, www.o.o/tc/governance... but at this point www.o.o is not under our direct control yet20:21
jbryceare the artifacts going to be primarily static markup files?20:21
*** jamespage_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
jbrycehtml etc20:21
ttxWe could easily use governance.o.o or some other subdomain, though20:21
sdaguejbryce: yes20:21
ttxjbryce: I think so, yes. sdague ?20:21
ttxok20:21
mordredworks for me20:22
jbrycewe can create a user on www that gives you access to drop files into a subdirectory20:22
annegentle_jbryce: so far they're just text, https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/incubation-integration-requirements20:22
sdaguejbryce: it's basically a very similar publisher to how the development docs go on docs.openstack.org20:22
sdaguerst -> html20:22
ttxannegentle, sdague: had a question about that, actually:20:22
jbrycesdague: ok, got it20:22
ttxannegentle_, sdague: Can we add some transformation so that, for example, the project.yaml file can be turned into a set of HTML files describing programs and their contents ?20:22
dhellmannttx: we can write a sphinx extension to do that20:22
ttx(this question is probably dead stupid)20:22
ttxdhellmann: ok20:23
sdagueyeh, seems like we'd just need some preprocessor20:23
sdaguebut I think that's futures. I think step one is the getting anything publishing, then we can expand20:23
dhellmann+120:23
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away20:23
sdaguethe current review is just a doc build, it's not a publish20:23
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga20:23
ttxjbryce: so we could potentially opublish somewhere on www.o.o ?20:23
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting20:24
jbryceyep. we have /foundation/tech-committee already and we could create a subdir under that for you to drop files in20:24
sdaguethe publish we'd have to work out as an infra job, to a target20:24
*** sarob has quit IRC20:24
annegentle_jbryce: is that subdir accessible via ftp or?20:24
ttxannegentle_: would that URL work for you ?20:24
jbryceyes, but i'd prefer sftp = )20:24
annegentle_I'm fine with anything but docs.openstack.org :)20:24
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting20:24
mordredjbryce: we'd prefer sftp too :)20:24
annegentle_jbryce: yeah sftp is good20:25
sdagueyeh, it will mean giving infra root the password, and some assist on the publish job there20:25
sdaguebut I think we can sort that offline20:25
jbrycesounds good20:25
ttxok, cool20:25
ttxsdague: are we unblocked ?20:26
annegentle_jbryce: is http://www.openstack.org/foundation/governance ok? for one less nest?20:26
*** marekd is now known as marekd|away20:26
ttxannegentle_:  /foundation/tech-committee20:26
sdaguettx: ask annegentle_, she has the -1 on the review :)20:26
annegentle_ttx: yeah I'm asking if it's possible to not go under tech-committee20:26
annegentle_sdague: I need the commit message amended20:26
jbrycei'd rather keep it with the tech-committee as there are other governance-related foundation things that wouldn't be included20:26
annegentle_sdague: then I'm happy to +120:27
sdagueannegentle_: I continue to be confused about that. Can you put exactly what you'd like in the commit message in a comment20:27
annegentle_sdague: delete all mention of docs.openstack.org20:27
ttxjbryce: would www.o.o/tech-committee be an option ?20:27
ttxor does it have to match the top nav20:28
annegentle_sdague: suggested edits on review20:28
*** shakayumi has quit IRC20:28
*** dwchadwick has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
jbrycewe're getting ready to refresh the foundation section and nav overall and i think it would be neater for the long term to have the hierarchy20:28
dhellmannare we going to try to make the theme of these docs match the theme of the rest of the site?20:28
*** esker has quit IRC20:29
ttxannegentle_: we'd probably move the membership down to /foundation/tech-committee/members20:29
jbrycefor instance, we can probably decorate basic markup files to add the nav/them of the website20:29
ttxso the rest could be published under /foundation/tech-committee directly20:29
* dwchadwick slaps ayoung around a bit with a large trout20:29
jbryceif we keep it in the hierarchy20:29
*** sarob has quit IRC20:29
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:29
ayoungsmoke me a kipper20:29
annegentle_jbryce: dhellmann: I'd prefer the files match the rest of that site20:29
dhellmannI don't think it's a good idea to have anyone else editing these files after they are published. Anything that needs to be changed should happen as part of the publishing process, in the job run on -infra20:30
jbrycedhellmann: i'm pretty sure we can get that for free with the hierarchy20:30
*** belmoreira has quit IRC20:30
jbrycedhellmann: decoration in real-time, without touching the content of the files that are transferred20:30
sdagueok, so there is phase 2 here for publishing that includes theming to match the foundation site20:31
ttxfancy20:31
dhellmannjbryce: ok, so we'd need to know what skeleton html format would be needed to make that work out properly20:31
jbrycee.g. file says <div>governance is awesome</div> and the web server adds the headers and footers when the page is served20:31
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting20:31
jbrycedhellmann: roger20:31
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:31
sdaguedo we have a volunteer for that, I'm afraid that will die on the vine?20:31
ttxlets' start by publishing the charter under /foundation/tech-committee/charter and iterate from there ?20:32
sdaguewith the existing sphinx theme? or did we just say we couldn't until we had the new templates20:32
ttxI think existing sphinx theme is better han no publication at all20:33
sdagueok20:33
dhellmannI agree. Creating a whole new theme is going to take some time.20:33
jbryceyou can drop whatever you want in there and it might be easiest to start with the existing theme just to get the publishing mechanics down20:33
ttxwe'll just not advertise that URL that much until it's clean :)20:33
*** dwchadwick has left #openstack-meeting20:33
sdagueworks for me, I can continue to shephard through the existing theme publish to get the minimum working20:33
*** esker has quit IRC20:33
annegentle_thanks sdague20:33
jbrycesdague: feel free to ping me offline for the publishing piece20:34
sdagueannegentle_: review updated20:34
sdaguejbryce: will do. As we need infra folks, it will wait until next week when they are back to full staff20:34
sdaguefungi is being run too rampant this week20:34
ttx#action sdague to drive governance autopublication step 1: get the charter autopublished under www.o.o/foundation/tech-committee/charter20:34
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
*** sarob_ has quit IRC20:35
ttxthen we'll seek volunteers for the next steps20:35
ttxanything more on that topic ?20:35
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
*** belmoreira has quit IRC20:35
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
ttx(mandatory minute of lag again)20:36
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting20:36
annegentle_none here20:36
ttxlet us all observe a minute of silence while the topic dies20:36
ttx#topic Mention scope expansion in incubation requirements20:36
*** openstack changes topic to "Mention scope expansion in incubation requirements (Meeting topic: tc)"20:36
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/62612/20:36
ttxThat one was abandoned over the holidays20:36
ttxThere were a few -1s about the specific language around this, with some consensus around "measured progression".20:37
ttxjgriffith had a -1 around the idea itself, though20:37
ttxPersonally, I think it's good to have this in the requirements, as it gives us some leverage to reject projects "just because there are too many projects in incubation already"20:37
ttxBecause we might need to reject projects purely on bandwidth reasons at some point, and "measured progression" is what it's about20:37
jgriffithttx: I guess the problem I have is how do you enforce it?20:37
jgriffithttx: it's awfully subjetive20:37
jgriffithsubjective20:37
*** epim has joined #openstack-meeting20:38
*** anniec has quit IRC20:38
mordredI thnk I agree with jgriffith20:38
ttxjgriffith: I see your point20:38
ttxmost of the other requirements are objective20:38
mordredI think that we don't need to enumerate everything that we might have a subjective viewpoint on20:38
annegentle_amen to bandwidth reasons20:38
jgriffithmordred: :)20:38
mordredwe may make decisions basesd on bandwidth - but we may make decisions based on many htings that are judgement calls - that's why we're a body of humans20:39
annegentle_but yeah we'd have to have a metric/measurement other than ttx and infra and docs are swamped :)20:39
mordredannegentle_: I think that's an excellent measurement20:39
jgriffithttx: I suppose the more I think about *something* does need to be there for incubation20:39
mordredbut I don't tihnk we need to pre-tell people about it20:39
ttxmordred: fine with dropping it as long as it's clear that incubation relies on finite resources and some perfectly-good projects might have to wait for their turn at some point20:39
*** _cjones__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:39
*** _cjones__ has left #openstack-meeting20:39
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting20:39
mordredttx: I guess I'm just saying that we needed to be clear about the diversity thing because it became an issue for projects and a planning issue and is a real problem to solve20:40
annegentle_mordred: anne's hair on fire metric20:40
*** sarob has quit IRC20:40
ttxwe established that 3 in incubation and 2 new integrated projects per cycle was doable20:40
*** belmoreira has quit IRC20:40
mordredI'm not sure that us mentioning that we are worried about finite resources does anything to solve a problem that we currently have in communication20:40
sdagueagreed20:40
ttxI'm pretty sure 6 in incubation or 4 added per cycle would be too much20:40
*** funzo has quit IRC20:40
jgriffithttx: sdague mordred sorry... I may be confused on the intent here20:41
ttxagree, let's let that requirement die20:41
mordredjgriffith: I'm always confused20:41
ttxjgriffith: I think we agree with you20:41
jgriffithttx: limit projects per cycle I get20:41
jgriffithOk :)20:41
jgriffithmordred: ditto20:41
annegentle_ttx: mordred: even communicating these limits could just mean a need for waitlisting, etc. Sigh.20:41
ttxannegentle_: and you can't really come with hard numbers. Some projects need more care than others.20:42
annegentle_ttx: truth20:42
ttxI think it's just at some point one of us will scream20:42
ttxhard to predict when.20:43
jgriffithjust a moment ago :)20:43
mordredyup20:43
ttxok, anything more on that subject ? We'll let that change remain abandoned20:43
ttxmaybe markmc will revive it and defend it bettert than I did20:43
ttx#topic Open discussion20:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: tc)"20:44
ttxAnything else, anyone ?20:44
sdaguenothing from me20:45
ttxI recently proposed a project/program map into programs.yaml20:45
ttxwhich asks plenty of fun questions20:45
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/6509620:45
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:45
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
ttxlike is grenade a devstack or a QA thing20:46
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting20:46
sdaguettx: it's QA20:46
ttxor like is openstack/requirements a Release management or a Infra thing20:46
sdaguethat was previously established20:46
ttxmostly academic questions20:46
ttxsdague: cool, thx20:46
*** mdurnosvistov has quit IRC20:47
ttxor is storyboard an infra or release management thing20:47
ttxso feel free to tear it apart20:47
ttxthera re also a number of openstack*/* projects that have no parent program20:47
ttxopenstack-dev/openstack-qa20:48
ttxopenstack-dev/sandbox20:48
ttxopenstack/governance20:48
ttxopenstack/melange20:48
ttxopenstack/openstack20:48
ttxopenstack/openstack-chef20:48
annegentle_ttx: I like your academia20:48
ttxopenstack/python-melangeclient20:48
ttxopenstack/python-openstackclient20:48
russellbshould we have an orphan section?  heh20:48
ttxsome of them may just need to die20:48
ttxmelange/chef20:48
annegentle_now ttx is killing orphans20:48
ttxsome badly need a home (python-openstackclient)20:48
ttxsdague: is openstack-dev/openstack-qa a real thing ?20:48
russellbthere is chef stuff actively developed on stackforge20:48
mordredactually - we've talked about melange before20:49
mordredand how to handle it20:49
sdaguettx: it's a very old artifact20:49
mordredbecause it's not a real thing anymore20:49
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n320:49
mordredbut I don't like the idea of deleting it20:49
mordredsince it _was_ a real thing in the past20:49
ttxsandbox openstack/openstack and governance can stay in limbo because they are true orphans I think20:49
jgriffitharchive grouping20:49
mordredopenstack-chef is bonghits and can be deleted20:49
sdagueopenstack-attic20:49
mordredI suggested to jeblair a while back moving  melange to stackforge20:49
jgriffithsdague: +120:49
mordredso that should anyone want to do anything with it, they could20:49
russellbyeah stackforge seems fine20:49
sdagueif we want to keep stuff around, lets get it out of real namespaces20:50
markmcclainsdague: +120:50
ttxI'd like to have only prgram children or true orphans in openstack*/*20:50
jgriffithI'm not so sure how I feel about stackforge20:50
jgriffithbut if nobody else has an issue ok by me20:50
ttxso that we can generally say "contributing to openstack*/* gives you ATC rights20:50
russellbstackforge means nothing about how active something is20:50
russellbor whether it's crap or not20:50
sdagueI don't think putting dead projects on stackforge is productive20:50
ttxmordred: could we kill openstack-dev/sandbox while we are at it ?20:50
jgriffithrussellb: that last point is kinda the problem I have with it :)20:51
sdaguerussellb: yeh, but lets not make it sourceforge, the home of dead projects20:51
jgriffithLOL20:51
russellbheh20:51
ttxdon't really want commits to that to count as atc-granting20:51
sdagueso if we know it's dead, throw it in the attic20:51
russellbthat's funny..20:51
russellbattic is fine i guess20:51
jgriffithnow we need a basement and we'll be all set20:51
russellbattic can be dead stuff from openstack/20:51
ttxisn't stackforge the basement ?20:51
sdagueopenstack-rootcellar20:52
ttxor is it the garage ?20:52
russellbwe could create a basement for dead stackforge projects20:52
jgriffithttx: shed20:52
russellbstackforge-basement and openstack-attic20:52
dhellmannsdague: beat me to it20:52
jgriffithrussellb: LOL20:52
ttxI would do attic/ rather than openstack-attic, so that openstack*/ matches all "official" projects20:52
ttxas in atc-rights-granting20:53
sdaguettx: I doubt we're ok to grab github.com/attic20:53
jgriffithttx: good strategy IMO20:53
ttxsdague: sounds risky20:53
mordredttx: we use openstack-dev/sandbox20:53
sdagueanyway, we could sort out naming offline20:53
sdagueif we are agreed that there should be an "attic"20:53
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting20:54
russellbwfm20:54
ttxsdague: bikeshedding is what open discussion is for20:54
russellbyeah it is fun to bikeshed20:54
ttxmordred: oh20:54
*** jroovers has quit IRC20:54
jgriffithmore bikeshedding would greatly improve the world20:54
sdaguethen I'd have all kinds of places to store my bike20:55
jgriffithThere's always some good humor hidden there20:55
ttxmordred: I guess we could count sandbox as a true orphan too20:55
jgriffithsdague: OHHH!!!20:55
annegentle_stackforge is a garage, baby20:55
jgriffithforget attic... "bike-shed"20:55
ttxbtw, file extensions on .gitignore wins the openstack-dev thread of the week20:55
jgriffithha!20:56
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC20:56
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
* jgriffith laughs.. then cries20:56
ttxmordred: looking at http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/sandbox/ I think nobody would miss it, but please enlighten me20:57
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz20:57
ttxI guess that's all for today ?20:59
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away20:59
mordredttx: jeblair made it so that people could 'practice' with our process/tools20:59
ttxmordred: could it live on stackforge instead ?20:59
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom20:59
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC21:00
ttxmordred: i'm fine with making it a true orphan if not21:00
*** krotscheck has quit IRC21:00
ttxand.. no time left21:00
ttx#endmeeting21:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan  7 21:00:56 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-01-07-20.02.html21:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-01-07-20.02.txt21:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-01-07-20.02.log.html21:01
mordredttx: I see no reason it can't be in stackforge21:01
ttxdhellmann, dolphm, jd__, markwash, jgriffith, russellb, stevebaker, david-lyle, markmcclain, slicknik: around ?21:01
dolphmo/21:01
russellbohai21:01
markmcclaino/21:01
ttxnotmyname is excused, slicknick standing in for hub_cap21:01
dhellmanno/21:01
jgriffith\o/21:01
ttx(maybe)21:01
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
SlickNiko/21:01
stevebakero/21:01
ttxstevebaker: you missed our 1:1 90min ago :)21:02
jd__o/21:02
ttx#startmeeting project21:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan  7 21:02:34 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: project)"21:02
david-lyleo/21:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'project'21:02
*** jroovers has joined #openstack-meeting21:02
stevebakerttx: I did, new irc client - still configuring alerts21:02
ttxstevebaker: we can do it just after this one21:02
stevebakerok21:02
ttx#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting21:02
ttx#topic Icehouse-221:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Icehouse-2 (Meeting topic: project)"21:03
ttxWe looked into icehouse-2 progress during the 1:1s today21:03
ttxonly two weeks left before icehouse-2. how time flies21:03
ttxWe are a bit late overall and I fear congestion at the gate next week21:03
ttxSo land what you can this week :)21:03
ttx(if you can, eh)21:03
russellbdang holidays21:03
ttxWe'll probably defer anything "not started" next Tuesday.21:04
ttxin other news, we ahve a few topics up for discussion21:04
ttx#topic Nova-network deprecation status21:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Nova-network deprecation status (Meeting topic: project)"21:04
ttx#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-January/023555.html21:04
ttxWe said we'd make a final call after icehouse-2, but now is a good time to take the pulse on this21:04
*** kenhui1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
ttxmarkmcclain, russellb: what's the status at this point ?21:05
russellbsdague: and if you're around, QA perspective would be good too21:05
markmcclainwe're actively working on closing the gaps from both a feature and QA side21:05
markmcclainwe're meeting next week to sprint on Neutron/Tempest21:06
russellbthink they'll be closed by icehouse-2?  or still a ways off?21:06
*** jamielennox has left #openstack-meeting21:06
*** jorisroovers has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
sdagueit still feels a bit off from there to me21:06
*** akrivoka has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
*** jroovers has quit IRC21:06
ttxthere is also a general perception that built over time that make people oversensitive to the issue21:07
sdaguemy experience is it's at least 4 - 6 weeks to stabalize the parallel jobs, and those aren't lit yet21:07
ttxIdeally feature parity would let us keep nova-network frozen21:07
markmcclainyeah stabilizing the jobs has uncovered other issues21:07
ttxthen we can wait for more confidence before marking deprecated21:07
sdagueI don't know where we stand on the feature matches, that's just the qa side21:07
markmcclainwhich has been a good thing, but has slowed velocity down21:08
russellbmarkmcclain: how about the feature parity bits?21:08
russellbthere really wasn't too much left there21:08
russellbone big thing, really21:08
markmcclainmulti-host?21:08
markwasho/21:08
russellbyeah21:08
markmcclainso still have two different groups working on it21:08
jog0what about having a good open source default that scales moderately well21:08
*** topol has quit IRC21:09
ttxjog0: do we ahve that in the nova-network case ?21:09
markmcclainthey're working from different positions that have different payoffs (ie one gets us a good solution short term and the other pays off long term)21:09
ttx("moderately scalable")21:09
jog0ttx: AFIK yes21:09
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting21:09
russellbjog0: yeah i guess that was the other thing21:09
sdagueso salv-orlando said a bunch of the issues are ovs 1.321:09
sdaguewhen moving to ovs 2.0 a lot of issues fixed themselves21:10
russellbi was actually just talking to a user yesterday saying that they were trying neutron with OVS on 200 nodes and it fell over badly21:10
russellbnova-network was/is fine21:10
russellbwith havana21:10
markmcclainas part of the parallel testing we've been uncovering and fixing some of scaling issues21:10
*** jcoufal has quit IRC21:10
russellbthat's good21:10
jog0russellb: thats a a great benchmark to try to match here21:10
markmcclainOVS 2.0 is the direction to head long term21:10
russellbso maybe icehouse will fair better21:10
sdaguerussellb: any idea what ovs version?21:10
markmcclainbut will require some distro support21:10
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
russellbsdague: nope, but i can find out21:10
russellbwhatever we have in RHEL i suspect21:11
sdaguerussellb: that would be helpful, just to get more data21:11
russellband i should know the answer to that ...21:11
ttxrussellb: there are two pieces I think... you need feature parity to keep nova-network frozen. you need performance parity / stability partity before marking it deprecated21:11
sdagueI agree, we should have a scaling threshold21:11
markmcclainrussellb: would love to know how their cluster fell over21:11
*** jodom has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
*** jrodom has quit IRC21:11
russellbttx: working on getting more info21:11
russellberr, markmcclain ^^21:11
russellbwill point you to info once i have it21:12
markmcclainttx: so feature parity is being worked through testing21:12
ttxrussellb: I think we may get to feature parity, but fear that perf/stability parity might be farther away, not even talking about the confidence to build around it21:12
russellbttx: the problem is that we've had a *much* longer time between freeze and deprecation than is healthy21:12
ttx(in icehouse)21:12
markmcclainperformance parity depends on what you're measuring21:13
sdagueI do think all of this paints a story that isn't going to close in icehouse21:13
russellbso ... i'm tempted to unfreeze, and revisit a freeze (and deprecation) when we have a much better feel for when that will happen21:13
*** jorisroovers has quit IRC21:13
sdagueI think some huge strides have been made, which have been great21:13
russellbsdague: that's what i'm afraid of21:13
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
markmcclainunfreezing is bad idea because it creates a moving target21:13
ttxyes, great progress and velocity, the track is just longer than expected21:13
sdaguebut I don't think we're going to close on all of it in icehouse, not in a way I'd feel comfortable with21:13
jog0markmcclain: and the migration story (re: a doc saying if useing nova-network use this in neutron )21:13
dhellmannmarkmcclain: +121:14
ttxrussellb: how much would unfreezing really create a moving target ? what would make it in, really ?21:14
russellbi don't expect major work21:14
jgriffithjust curious are there signficant proposals out there for changes to nova-net?21:14
markmcclainjog0: we can get those docs written21:14
ttxbugfixes, new features ?21:14
russellbbut there are all kinds of things we haven't bothered doing because it was on it's way out21:15
markmcclainmy question is that if folks want to change nova-net are they contributing to neutron?21:15
markmcclainif not then we're fragmenting the devs21:15
russellbno-db-compute is one example21:15
russellband that was a couple releases ago21:15
sdagueyeh, and I don't think it's reasonable to ask nova-network folks to work on neutron if they can't deploy it at scale in their envs.21:15
russellbmore minor things21:15
russellbkeeping it up to date with the rest of nova21:15
russellblots of that kind of stuff we have passed on while it's frozen21:16
ttxmarkmcclain: I think russell is more talking about nova infra changes that were applied everywhere but in nova-net, like no-db-compute21:16
sdaguehonestly, I'd be +1 with the unfreeze, as I do think it's been frozen too long21:16
russellbmostly, yes21:16
russellbso maybe just a softer freeze21:16
markmcclainsdague: but when they don't contribute we lose that information and the problem being solve because it is not shared21:16
russellblike ... we don't really want *major* work on it, because that should be neutron21:16
russellbbut we'll let smaller enhancements, and other infrastructure work to keep it up to date with the rest of nova21:16
ttxrussellb: we could have a soft freeze (no new feature, just keep it up to date)21:16
russellbno major new features anyway21:17
ttxsome of those would still count as "features" but would not widen the gap21:17
markmcclainmoving to no db type stuff makes sense21:17
jgriffithrussellb: but then what do "minor" enhancements buy you anyway?21:17
ttxlike 'adopt nova new object model'21:17
russellbjgriffith: probably something we'd have to take case by case21:17
jgriffithrussellb: fair21:17
russellbttx: yes, that's been the biggest pain21:17
*** julim_ has quit IRC21:17
jgriffithttx: that's an example I'm not sure I fully understand21:18
russellbrpc versioning stuff, no-db-compute stuff, nova objects stuff ... all avoided nova-network21:18
ttxmarkmcclain: so we could have a freeze for any feature that would widen the gap21:18
russellbhas gone for a few releases now21:18
*** mrodden1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:18
russellband it's adding up21:18
ttxbut not a strict code freeze21:18
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting21:18
SlickNik+1 on ttx / russelb's idea of a 'soft' freeze.21:18
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting21:18
markmcclaina freeze on features makes sense will allowing framework changes to made21:19
ttxmarkmcclain: if you get to feature parity, then we can easily argue that feature dev should happen in neutron21:19
russellbperformance enhancements would be OK i think21:19
russellbsomeone told me they had some of those they hadn't submitted because they thought they would be rejected21:19
*** mrodden has quit IRC21:19
russellbprobably right21:19
markmcclainperformance enhancements should be ok as long as the information is shared with Neutron team21:19
ttxit's just that nova-net users might not be ready to switch in icehouse, and need a working nova-net21:19
sdagueso I think this just needs to be more incentive for the neutron team to close the basic gaps.21:19
markmcclainwe might have already solved some of the same issues21:20
* russellb nods21:20
russellbof course, the other big problem with all of this is our messaging to the community at large21:20
russellbi think it's pretty ... cloudy right now21:20
ttxok, we can revisit the state after your neutron sprint ?21:20
ttxbut I think this half-freeze has potential21:20
markmcclainyeah I think we'll have a better idea where we stand after the 17th21:21
russellbsounds good21:21
ttxall that said, I'm very pleased with the focus on those issues in the neutron team21:21
ttxit's just that the gap was deep21:22
ttxand covering it can take longer than expected21:22
ttxwhich brings us to the next topic21:22
ttx#topic Gate stability (jgriffith)21:23
*** openstack changes topic to "Gate stability (jgriffith) (Meeting topic: project)"21:23
*** vgnbkr_1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
*** julim has quit IRC21:23
jgriffithSo going into next week I'm a bit concerned21:23
ttxjgriffith: anything on your mind ? the 78-deep gate queue ?21:23
jgriffithttx: that would be correct21:23
jgriffithI'm wondering if we need to rethink som things21:24
jgriffithwe don't seem to be solving the problem21:24
ttxmordred, fungi, jeblair, clarkb: around?21:24
jgriffithOr am I the only one that thinks there's a problem?21:24
sdaguejeblair and clarkb are in .au21:24
ttxsdague: mordred is too21:24
russellbwell today there was a n ova problem that put us way behind21:24
jgriffithsounds like maybe I'm in the minority21:24
ttxor is he no21:24
russellblibvirt package was updated by accident21:24
ttxt21:24
sdaguejgriffith: definitely a problem. Still very few people working on race bugs21:25
*** jamespage_ has quit IRC21:25
russellband that caused all nova patches to fail until it was resolved21:25
sdagueand we had compounding issues21:25
mordredttx: sup?21:25
russellbalso for reference ... http://not.mn/gate_status.html21:25
jgriffithrussellb: yeah... make sense but I guess my quesiton is we continue to uncover more of these "races" than we fix21:25
russellbbut that was just today21:25
ttxmordred: weekly "do we need to rethink some things about the gate" topic21:25
jgriffithI'm beginning to wonder if our testing approach might need some tweaking?21:25
mordredttx: yeah.21:25
* jgriffith ducsk while everybody throws things at him21:25
russellbjgriffith: have any tweaks in mind?21:26
markmcclainjgriffith: I also think that we keep finding races because we're adding better tests21:26
russellbi generally always end up back at "we just need to fix the problems" ...21:26
jgriffithrussellb: So I just started thinking about this yesterday21:26
sdaguejgriffith: at lot of these races have been here a long time21:26
mordredjgriffith: well - I think the problem is that what needs tweaking is what people hack on and how - but we've been using hte gate as a stick to try to force people to do so21:26
sdaguejust no one is working on them21:26
jd__russellb: +1 :)21:26
jgriffithOk21:26
jgriffithMaybe I'm completely off base here then21:26
mordredjgriffith: I agree we may need to think of new things - but not tech things in the gate- I think we may not be motivating people successfully21:26
fungittx: yeah, here21:27
jgriffithI don't agree that it's "nobody working on them though"21:27
russellbi think the motivation issue is key21:27
* jog0 thinks of beer21:27
russellbmost nova gate bugs are collecting dust i think21:27
ttxone bug, one beer21:27
jgriffithI think there's a number of things going on that are not helping21:27
jgriffithworkign on the issues may be part of it21:27
ttxsdague: any specific project to shame ?21:28
jgriffithbut there are a TON of distractions21:28
jgriffithgitignore, vim heading, __init__ files, typos in comments21:28
jgriffithand my favorite the 10 part commits (one line each)21:28
jgriffithThis adds stress to the review queues, the gates etc etc21:28
dhellmannjog0: maybe you're onto something -- a special party at the summit for contributors to the race issues?21:28
sdaguettx: not really, I'm still working towards better dashboard, but I get dragged down until actually trying to debug the key issues as well21:28
jgriffithand takes attention/focus away from those races in the gates21:28
jgriffithand trying to determine better ways of exposing those races early/first time around21:29
jog0so http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/ lists about 20 bugs or so that are actively happening in the gate21:29
ttxI think we are at a key moment -- adding better tests so catching more bugs, with the tooling and reporting slightly behind and people not all lined up to fix them21:29
ttxtrick is overall, that means stuff is getting better21:30
jgriffithttx: I fully agree with that21:30
ttxyes, it hurts our velocity21:30
jgriffithand I apologize that I'm not bringing this up with a proposal other than maybe rethink some things21:30
jog0jgriffith: as for distractions, I think you just need to -2 more21:30
ttxbut then, maybe we shoudln't be that much fast as long as we have those bugs around21:30
jgriffithjog0: sure21:30
jgriffithok21:30
sdagueI also think that given the review load, I think it's totally ok to start -2ing things at this point that aren't useful21:30
sdagueit's i2 almost21:30
russellbhurting the velocity is probably good if our quality is hurting21:31
sdagueand so time to start shedding review load21:31
jd__"You frustration I hear", said ttx, "but on the right path we are."21:31
ttxthe tension comes when the bugs are on one project and the delays hit other projects (see the discussion from last meeting)21:31
russellbvelocity is only useful if the quality stays high21:31
jgriffithWell it seems I'm in the minority on some of this so we can move on21:31
*** RajeshMohan has quit IRC21:31
jog0jgriffith: here was one i just did https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64393/21:31
dolphmrussellb: ++21:31
ttxjd__: summarizing, you are good at.21:31
*** RajeshMohan has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
sdaguejgriffith: I think you are not in the minority in believing the current situation sucks21:31
notmynamejgriffith: I agree with your concern21:32
jgriffithsdague: to be clear, I'm not hear to say "this sucks"21:32
russellbttx: totally get the cross project tensions  ... not sure what to do about that21:32
* notmyname just woke up at 5am in AUS21:32
jgriffithI was hoping to get some thought on maybe doing something "differently"21:32
jgriffithwhehter that be changes in how we gate... changes in philosophy on commits during certain periods of time etc21:32
sdaguejgriffith: yeh, so to me differently is having any gate bug go a week without an update21:32
jgriffithand of course getting discovered issues worked on21:33
jog0jgriffith:  when there are critical gate bugs, I think its very reasonable to ignore all other reviews and work on the gate / other ciritcal bug21:33
sdaguehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1257626 - last updated a month ago21:33
ttxjgriffith: there is some potential around slarter gate queues, as notmyname proposed last meeting21:33
ttxsmarter*21:33
sdagueit's like #4 on the list21:33
jgriffithsdague: agree, and yet we have bugs with 500+ rechecks from August21:33
ttxwhich needs some dev help to happen21:33
sdaguejgriffith: right, that was my point on "*no one* is working on them"21:33
sdaguewhich really should have been: not enough people are working on them21:33
russellbit seems like more people fixing these bugs is the biggest issue by far21:33
jgriffithsdague: fair enough21:33
russellband people want to work on the fun stuff (features etc)21:34
jog0russellb: agreed21:34
jgriffithalright... so that's all fair21:34
ttxthings are tolerable until we get hit by some external issue and then the day is lost21:34
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC21:34
jgriffithits going to hit the fan next week :)21:34
ttxso it's a bit of a fragile equilibrium21:34
sdaguettx: honestly, I'm not convinced we're at tolerable21:34
sdagueeven without external events21:34
jgriffithmaybe when that happens people will be more interested21:34
jgriffithas in their stuff isn't landing21:35
*** dvarga has quit IRC21:35
sdaguebut the pain threshold hasn't seemed to bother enough people to dive in21:35
sdagueI htink the queue is 22hrs deep right now21:35
jgriffithsdague: ttx I'd say we are not21:35
jgriffithby a long shot21:35
ttxsdague: might be a european perspective. At least we have the option of sneaking our patches before the queue fails21:35
jgriffithttx: LOL21:35
jog0ttx: with a 22 hour queue you don't21:35
sdaguettx: yeh, not at the moment you don't21:35
jgriffithOk, that's all I have I guess.  I'll think on how to motivate more effort on bug fixes21:36
ttxsdague: about current situation, is it just backlog, or some persisting issue ?21:36
jeblairo/21:36
jgriffithand I would ideally love to come up with a solution to expose things first time around21:36
sdaguettx: so there were a few compounding events, like the libvirt upgrade21:36
sdaguejgriffith: so math is actually against us on that one21:36
jog0https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1253896 is my favorite bug21:36
*** jdob has quit IRC21:36
david-lylebounty system? don't know who provides the prize though21:37
sdaguettx: and now zuul is so hammered, it's actually also timing out bugs21:37
jgriffithsdague: and you can't beat math as I've always said in the past21:37
jog0filed and critical since second half of november21:37
notmynamejgriffith: I'd be happy to work with you figure something out21:37
jgriffithnotmyname: thx21:37
markwashkidnapping first born, anyone?21:37
markmcclainjog0: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/1253896 has actually been seeing active work21:37
jgriffithnotmyname: There's a lot of really sharp people already thinking/working on it21:38
ttxI'd suggest cloning salvatore orlando a few thousand times21:38
jgriffithIt'd be interesting if we all got together on something other than "get more people working on it"21:38
markmcclainttx: +121:38
markwashthat was a test. good news. you passed21:38
sdaguejgriffith: maybe. I'm not sure we're going to clever our way out of fixing bugs though :)21:39
jgriffithsdague: I'm personally a firm believer in smarter rather than harder :)21:39
jog0jgriffith: so right now all we have is the atomic gate is wedged stop +2ing tactic21:39
jog0which is not a good one to use21:39
jgriffithmy point is how to NOT wedge the gate in the first place21:40
*** marun has quit IRC21:40
ttxI think the concept of slowing down feature development until bugs are fixed is good. The problem is that the pain shared by everyone, but not everyone can fix those bugs where they are21:40
jgriffithand I don't buy the "fix the bugs"21:40
jgriffithbecause there's something wrong IMO with either our code, or how we're testing21:40
ttxhence the frustration21:40
jog0jgriffith: so your concerend so many bugs are getting into the gate?21:40
sdaguejgriffith: put all of openstack into 1 single threaded process21:40
* jgriffith proposes a quality / tech-debt release.. no new features :)21:41
sdaguethe issue is really races between components21:41
jgriffithjog0: exactly21:41
sdaguewhich means there are timing challenges, which is why they show up 1 or 2% of the time21:41
jgriffithsdague: if that's true we need to look at what we're doing as a whole21:41
jgriffithie the design/arch of OpenStack21:41
markwashI guess I feel like if someone contributed a test that failed to glance, I wouldn't even look at it, because it would make my unit test suite unusable, even if the test reflected an actual bug. . so I'm not sure how nondeterministic failures are really different21:41
jog0the odds are against us21:41
jgriffithbut I don't necessarily know if I agree21:41
jgriffiththere are things that are done in tests that aren't really valid sometimes IMO21:41
ttxok, we need to move on21:42
ttxno magic bullet again21:42
jgriffithk.. thanks everyone21:43
ttxalthough I've hope that the current efforts already in progress will improve the situation21:43
ttx(new elastic-recheck reporting, smarter queues, moar neutron parallel testing)21:43
ttxnext topic21:43
ttx#topic Brick library (jgriffith)21:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Brick library (jgriffith) (Meeting topic: project)"21:43
ttxjgriffith: you again21:43
jgriffithoi21:44
ttxyou're on fire21:44
russellbgogogo21:44
jgriffithOk... so I've talked with some folks on this21:44
jgriffithCinder came up with this idea of brick.. basicly mini-cinder service21:44
jgriffithdo things like manage LVM/local storage on compute nodes21:44
jgriffithlong term goal is things like scheduling local disk on instance nodes21:45
jgriffithalso things like manilla, trove etc21:45
jgriffithIMO should leverage cinder for block storage rather than write their own21:45
jgriffithMy proposal is to skip incubation in oslo and create a lib right out of the gate21:45
jgriffithit would fall under Cinder21:46
jgriffiththen once that's set up of course go through and pull into the other projects21:46
jgriffithI've chatted with a couple of folks and wanted to get all the PTL's up to speed21:46
russellbi don't think we really incubate any other library right?  incubating libs in oslo was just while the API was unstable21:46
ttxjgriffith: is it a library ?21:46
jd__sounds sane21:46
jgriffithmake sure there are no objections21:46
russellbseems fine to me21:47
jgriffithttx: it's not yet, I need to turn it in to one :)21:47
jd__not sure about the oslo part, but dhellmann might have an opinion21:47
jgriffithI'll need help from ttx and the infra gurus on that front :)21:47
ttxno need for incubation in the oslo sense21:47
jgriffithjd__: I spoke with dhellmann on this, skip oslo21:47
russellband no need for incubation in the normal sense either right?21:47
jgriffith^^ skip oslo was what we came up with21:47
jgriffithrussellb: that's what I'm hoping21:47
dhellmannyeah, we discussed this and I agree it doesn't make sense for this to go through the oslo-incubator21:47
russellbworks for me21:47
jd__jgriffith: ok, so that would be just a standard Python library?21:47
jgriffithrussellb: I'm hoping it's use in cinder has been the "incubatio"21:47
ttxjgriffith: one question left was the use of the openstack namespace for the lib name, right21:48
sdaguejgriffith: this become oslo.foo or cinder.foo?21:48
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:48
jgriffithttx: yes21:48
*** evgenyf has quit IRC21:48
jgriffithsdague: that's the million dollar question :)21:48
jd__please make a standard Python lib, don't zope it21:48
*** amrith has quit IRC21:48
jgriffithjd__: noted :)21:48
ttxjd__: nice :)21:48
dhellmannsdague: it can only be cinder.brick if cinder is converted to a namespace package (which isn't a bad idea, but will involve some code churn)21:48
* jgriffith hates code churn21:48
russellbjust brick seems fine21:48
jgriffithbut if it's worth the end result I'm down for it21:48
russellbif not already taken21:49
jgriffithI'll deal with a name if needed21:49
sdagueok, so the only thing to note is we'll need to gate it like the oslo.config and oslo.messaging libs21:49
*** neelashah has quit IRC21:49
jgriffithsdague: that's the part I'm going to need some help on, at least some guidance21:49
sdagueas that's our current policy for things like that (which might get revisted)21:49
dhellmannsure, normally that's what I'd say, but this is really only intended to be used by openstack apps so that's why we were discussing a global namespace21:49
jgriffithsdague: roger that21:49
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC21:49
*** sarob has quit IRC21:49
sdaguejgriffith: yeh the oslo graduation section lays most of it out21:49
ttxis this really only intended to be used by openstack apps ?21:50
sdagueand ttx is going through it with oslo.rootwrap right now21:50
ttxlots of fun21:50
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
ttxvaguely documented on the oslo page now21:50
jgriffithttx: well I'm not desiging it with anybody else in mind but I don't have a problem if others pick it up use it21:50
jgriffithbut I don't want to maintain it in that perspective21:50
jgriffithLife is much simpler when it's "openstack only" IMO21:51
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:51
jgriffithanyway, I just wanted to run this by the other projects21:51
jgriffithmostly russellb (so thanks russellb )21:51
ttxjgriffith: do you need anything more on that subject, or can we move on ?21:51
jgriffithmake sure there's now "WTH is this"21:51
jgriffithttx: move on... thanks everyone21:52
russellbjgriffith: sure!21:52
ttx#topic Red Flag District / Blocked blueprints21:52
*** openstack changes topic to "Red Flag District / Blocked blueprints (Meeting topic: project)"21:52
ttxNo blocked blueprint afaict21:52
ttxAny blocked work that this meeting could help unblock ?21:52
ttx78-deep gate doesn't count.21:52
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting21:53
jog076*21:53
ttxyay21:53
sdagueso coming back to the gate issue, one thing we haven't tried is global gate bug fix days. Especially if you got a lot of PTLs and top tech folks to sign up for devoting a day it might shake some of these loose.21:54
*** kenhui has quit IRC21:54
*** jpich has joined #openstack-meeting21:54
sdagueelaphant gun approach21:54
russellbsdague: i'd love to do that21:54
ttxmondays are good moments for that. Clean gate21:54
*** sarob has quit IRC21:54
stevebakersounds like a good idea21:55
russellbit's not a long term sustainable approach ... but it's good for playing catchup21:55
russellband i think we need to play catchup right now21:55
ttx+121:55
jog0++21:55
SlickNik+121:55
russellbi'd be happy to devote at least a full day, if not a couple21:55
ttxsdague: go for it21:55
sdaguedamn, I just signed myself up for organizing that didn't I....21:55
ttxjust track the results to see if it made a difference :)21:55
russellbsdague: sure did21:56
russellbttx: good call21:56
ttx#topic Incubated projects21:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Incubated projects (Meeting topic: project)"21:56
sdagueok, well with montreal I'll plan to do one post i221:56
* NobodyCam is here for ironic21:56
ttx4 minutes for questions if any21:56
* SergeyLukjanov here too21:56
ttxNobodyCam: are we stil on track for an icehouse-2 functional milestone of ironic ?21:56
*** jcoufal-m has joined #openstack-meeting21:56
NobodyCamIronic update. we are looking mostly good. we may have a issue with neutron intragration, but have already started on a fall back plan for that case21:57
ttxSergeyLukjanov: https://launchpad.net/savanna/+milestone/icehouse-2 looking good21:57
SergeyLukjanovttx, yup, heat integration is already landed21:58
ttxfwiw we should have some incubation status intermediary meeting soon at the TC level21:58
ttxwill keep you posted21:58
*** bdehamer has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
NobodyCamgreat21:59
ttx#action ttx to organize intermediary incubation status TC meeting soon21:59
ttxany question ?21:59
ttxno time left for open discussion21:59
NobodyCamThank you all22:00
ttx#endmeeting22:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan  7 22:00:28 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-01-07-21.02.html22:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-01-07-21.02.txt22:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-01-07-21.02.log.html22:00
*** matty_dubs has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
SlickNikThanks guys!22:01
ttxstevebaker: waiting for you in #openstack-relmgr-office22:01
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-meeting22:01
*** Ajaeger1 has quit IRC22:01
mrunge#startmeeting Horizon22:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Jan  7 22:01:39 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mrunge. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Horizon)"22:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'horizon'22:01
mrungehello and welcome22:01
jtomasekhey22:01
lsmolahello22:02
akrivokahey22:02
jcoufal-mo/22:02
jpichHey22:02
bdehamerhello22:02
jomaraahoy22:02
mrungesadly, David can't attend right now, but he will join us later22:02
*** DrBacchus has quit IRC22:03
mrungelet's have a brief look at the agenda22:03
mrungehttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Horizon22:03
*** hartsocks has quit IRC22:03
mrunge#topic project update22:03
*** openstack changes topic to "project update (Meeting topic: Horizon)"22:03
mrungeicehouse-2 milestone is due on jan 23rd (?)22:03
mrungeI may be wrong there22:03
mrungestill, everything not merged next tuesday will be moved to icehouse-322:04
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC22:04
jpichMilestone-proposed branch cut-off is usually 2 days before the date22:04
mrungedavid mentioned something like january 14th22:04
mrungeI'll take this as an opportunity, to look at bugs and blueprints targeted for i-222:05
mrungehttps://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/icehouse-222:05
*** gyee has quit IRC22:05
*** pdmars has quit IRC22:06
*** anniec has quit IRC22:06
mrungecurrently, we have 13 bugs without code, one of them confirmed22:06
*** peristeri has joined #openstack-meeting22:06
mrungeand 19 bugs needing code reviews22:06
mrungeshall we inspect them in more detail?22:07
*** jodom has quit IRC22:07
lifelessttx: hallo from perth22:07
*** jbryce has quit IRC22:07
*** ruhe is now known as _ruhe22:08
*** stevemar has quit IRC22:08
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC22:09
lsmolamrunge, could you plese give this one high priority https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/126650522:09
mrungeesp. I'd love to see both bugs with prio high merged for i-2 if possible22:09
lsmolamrunge, prevents line chart from working22:10
lsmolamrunge, and it is tribial fix22:10
mrungelsmola, done22:10
lsmolamrunge, mvidori did too much refactoring :-)22:10
lsmolathanks22:10
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
mrungeand also targeted to i-222:10
*** TheSheep has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
lsmolacool, thank you22:10
MaxVit is currently on merge22:10
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
mrungeyes, I got a report, that the "select all" jscript doesn't work any more22:11
lsmolaMaxV, great, didnt noticed22:11
mrungebut I didn't file a bug until now22:11
MaxVmrunge: fill the bug I can make a quick patch22:12
mrungemaxv will do tomorrow, as it's quite late here22:12
akrivokamrunge: that should be already fixed, I believe22:12
jpichDidn't this get fixed recently?22:12
akrivokahttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/61467/22:12
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC22:12
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
mrungejpich, yes, looks like it22:13
jpichThanks, akrivoka! I think a duplicate was filed since then22:13
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting22:13
mrungewhen did we release i-1?22:13
mrungethe report is against i-122:13
mrungeso we might check it again22:13
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC22:13
mrungeother important bugs to be targeted for i-2?22:14
*** jroovers has joined #openstack-meeting22:14
jpichi-1 was Dec 5th22:14
mrungeyes,and it was merged on 27th22:14
mrungeso, not included22:14
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:14
*** jroovers has joined #openstack-meeting22:15
akrivokathis is probably the new duplicate report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/126682522:15
mrungeyupp,22:15
jpichakrivoka: Yep, just updated it22:15
mrungelooks like it22:15
mrungecool22:15
akrivokacool, thanks jpich !22:16
jpichNp :)22:16
mrungedoes anyone know more about https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/1265032 ?22:17
*** stevemar has quit IRC22:17
mrungeit looks quite serious22:17
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting22:17
*** ohnoimdead has joined #openstack-meeting22:18
mrungeat least, it will be difficult to debug in production, when that happens22:18
lsmolamrunge, hmm from what I understood it just show wrong data for couple of minutes22:18
jpichIMO it's always been the case so far, that it can take a bit of time for the floating IP to be displayed on the Instances page22:18
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting22:19
mrungeas far as we don't rely on shown data22:20
mrungeanything else?22:20
mrunge#topic meeting time22:20
*** openstack changes topic to "meeting time (Meeting topic: Horizon)"22:20
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
mrungethanks to lblanchard, we had the doodle22:22
mrungehttp://www.doodle.com/q8q6iu8gcqp6c4xa22:22
*** fungi has quit IRC22:22
mrungeand it looks like best times are 2 pm or 4 pm UTC22:22
mrungeboth are not ideal22:22
mrungeat 2 pm, we'll exclude david-lyle , at 4pm we'll exclude amotoki22:23
mrungeif anyone of you didn't answer the poll yet, please do so!!22:23
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting22:24
mrungeopinions here?22:25
MaxVdone22:25
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
lsmolamrunge, I guess we should ask amotoki and david-lyle which is less worse for them :-)22:26
*** dprince has quit IRC22:26
mrungeit's way early or very late for them...22:26
TheSheepwe could also try and ask people to relax their rules a little and add times that are not ideal for them, but still possible22:26
*** joesavak has quit IRC22:26
TheSheepmaybe another time will appear22:27
jcoufal-mDone22:27
TheSheepwhich is equally uncomfortable for everyone22:27
matty_dubsThe current time is OK for me (though I'm not actively doing Horizon right now), but I know it's already pretty inconvenient for, say, all of Europe.22:28
lsmolaTheSheep, :-)22:28
jpichThere's also the "alternate every week" solution that projects like Ceilometer are using to accommodate different timezones22:28
lsmolajpich, yes22:28
mrungematty_dubs, well, this time gets worse for Europeans during summer time...22:29
akrivokaI think for most of us located in the central europe, this will be a welcome change :)22:29
*** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:29
matty_dubsjpich: That's not a bad idea. I think there comes a point where it's just impossible to get everyone in a meeting unless people are willing to call in at 3am or something.22:30
david-lyle_o/22:30
lsmolahello22:30
mrungehey david-lyle_ welcome back22:30
jcoufal-m\o22:30
david-lyle_Sorry I'm late22:30
*** fungi has quit IRC22:30
mrungedavid, we just have talked about meeting time22:31
*** rnirmal has quit IRC22:31
david-lyle_I don't have any history so carry on22:31
*** weshay is now known as weshay_afk22:31
mrungeand it looks like 2 or 4 pm (UTC) is best22:31
mrungeboth are not idea22:31
mrungeideal22:32
mrungeeither we cut of amotoki or you22:32
david-lyle_Poll didn't reveal a consensus seemed like22:32
*** kenhui1 has quit IRC22:33
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
lblanchardo/ sorry I'm a bit late :)22:33
mrungedavid-lyle_, for 15 out of 20 persons those times would work22:33
lsmolalblanchard, hello22:33
mrungewhich is something I didn't expect22:34
david-lyle_Was I one? Can't remember :)22:34
*** kenhui has quit IRC22:34
mrungedavid-lyle_, http://www.doodle.com/q8q6iu8gcqp6c4xa is the poll22:34
mrungebut it may be hard to read on a small display22:35
mrungeI'd leave it to our PTL to decide that later ;-)22:35
david-lyle_Ah yes.  I was thinking 2:00 utc22:35
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom22:36
*** stevemar has quit IRC22:36
*** thomasem has quit IRC22:36
david-lyle_All right there were some late votes  I think.  I'll pick when I have a big screen22:36
*** shakayum_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
mrungeyes, that's quite early for you, I think. not sure if that could/would work for Australians22:36
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
mrunge#topic Discuss integration of Tuskar UI22:36
*** openstack changes topic to "Discuss integration of Tuskar UI (Meeting topic: Horizon)"22:36
mrungewho brought the topic? who can enlighten us here?22:37
*** noslzzp has quit IRC22:37
*** shakayumi has quit IRC22:37
david-lyle_I have not had a chance to work on coordinating this yet with the holidays22:37
lsmolamrunge, me?22:37
lsmola:-)22:37
david-lyle_Need to get with infra and lifeless22:38
mrungelsmola, anything to add here?22:38
*** ohnoimdead has quit IRC22:38
mrungedavid-lyle_, should we move it to the next meeting?22:38
lsmolamrunge, well there was a consensus of what we want, so nothing to add from my side22:38
lsmoladavid-lyle_, great, thank you22:39
david-lyle_Yes, hopefully by that time we'll have it done22:39
*** dkranz has quit IRC22:39
lsmolayaaaay22:39
*** ayoung has quit IRC22:40
mrungegreat22:40
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
mrunge#topic open floor22:40
*** openstack changes topic to "open floor (Meeting topic: Horizon)"22:40
jcoufal-mAwesome :)22:40
lblanchardlsmola: With help from julim on requirements I was able to put together these: http://people.redhat.com/~lsurette/OpenStack/Horizon%20Admin%20Overview%20Pages_2.0.pdf22:40
mrungeanything else?22:40
*** sarob has quit IRC22:40
lblanchardfeedback from any and all is welcome…these are directed towards updating the admin overview page22:41
*** shakayum_ has quit IRC22:41
lsmolalblanchard, excellent22:41
lblanchardlsmola: currently working on the resource usage page22:41
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting22:41
lblanchardlsmola: hope to have a design by next meeting to run by you :)22:41
*** stevemar is now known as stevemar-afk22:41
david-lyle_lblanchard:  looks good22:42
mrungeit's quite full, right?22:42
lsmolalblanchard, very cool, thank you22:42
lblancharddavid-lyle: thanks22:42
lblanchardmrunge: it is22:42
mrungeor it looks packed with stuff22:42
david-lyle_Implementation detail, asynchronous data loading22:42
lsmolalblanchard, I will check the overview pages tomorrow, to see what will be possible with current ceilometer22:43
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting22:43
mrungeany chance to make it less dense?22:43
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting22:43
lblanchardmrunge: I've talked to a number of solution architects about this in the past…they are not new users to these applications and would like to have as much information as needed on one screen…they will drill in for more details. We could think about pulling some details out though.22:43
*** jcoufal-m has quit IRC22:43
lblanchardmrunge: I hope to do some usability testing too!22:43
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:43
*** jcoufal-m has joined #openstack-meeting22:43
david-lyle_It really is a dashboard view22:44
mrungelblanchard, are people used to look at those pages, e.g because others do it like this?22:44
*** funzo has quit IRC22:44
david-lyle_Is this for all users or admins?22:44
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC22:44
lblancharddavid-lyle: this is meant for admins22:44
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
david-lyle_Limited subset for domain admins and members?22:44
lblanchardmrunge: I think it depends on the user...22:44
lblanchardmrunge: consumers who are looking at a new website might go running and hiding :)22:45
*** ivasev has quit IRC22:45
*** stevemar-afk has quit IRC22:45
*** burt has quit IRC22:45
lblanchardmrunge: but administrators want info…I will definitely ask around though about the density…I do agree it is pushing it!22:45
david-lyle_Operators tend to want massive amounts of status especially  if there is the posibility of alarms22:45
*** sarob has quit IRC22:45
mrungelblanchard, I like it, because it sums up a massive amount of data22:46
lblancharddavid-lyle: also, the idea would be to have a global area for alerts at the top22:46
lblanchardwe need to do some thinking around how to make this work best22:46
lsmolamrunge, btw. the future plan is to make these pages configurable22:46
mrungeand I assume, you get used to it.22:46
mrungelsmola, no. honestly?22:46
mrungethen we need a database22:46
*** topol has quit IRC22:46
mrungeto store config22:46
lsmolamrunge, well why not, there will be a lot of ceilometer metrics22:47
lblanchardlsmola, mrunge: configurable would be nice, but…if we know the users enough we won't need this :)22:47
mrungecurrently, horizon doesn't need that22:47
david-lyle_We are approaching that eventuality I worry22:47
lsmolamrunge, also specific to some users (they can add their own)22:47
lblanchardit's kind of an excuse for not knowing EXACTLY what our users want…we should be able to figure it out!22:47
mrungesp we don't have to hazzle with database migrations and such stuff22:47
lblanchardI think this would be an amazing start at least22:47
lblanchardthen we could run it by a bunch of people and continuously improve it22:48
*** IlyaE has quit IRC22:48
mrungeyes, a good step ahead22:48
david-lyle_I imagine it will come in incrementally as far as patches anyway22:48
lblanchardjulim might have more feedback too, I will add this as a link to the BP and be sure to keep it updated22:48
lblancharddavid-lyle: for sure22:48
*** funzo has quit IRC22:49
lsmolayep, but it is a more distant future anyway22:49
lsmolanow we need the basics :-)22:49
david-lyle_Exactly22:49
lblanchardagreed22:50
*** shakayumi has quit IRC22:50
mrungecool.22:50
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk22:50
mrungeanything else?22:50
david-lyle_I will try to release openstack -auth tomorrow22:51
*** tanisdl has quit IRC22:51
mrungegreat david-lyle_ thank you. I'll try to add django-1.6 tests later then22:52
david-lyle_ If we can get things through the gate, we'll get support added22:53
mrungethat would be good, I think22:53
david-lyle_Matthias hopefully mentioned this already but there are only two weeks left in i-222:54
david-lyle_Anyone have any concerns other than the gate and reviews?22:54
lsmolaso till 22th?22:54
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:54
david-lyle_Sounds right22:54
lsmolaok22:55
jpichDo we want i-2 stuff to be merged by Tuesday, or have code up for review by Tuesday?22:55
mrungedavid-lyle_, actually, I told, we need i-2 stuff merged next Tuesday22:55
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
david-lyle_That would be saner as I fear we'll be fighting the gate for a while22:55
mrungebut that might be simply wrong22:56
lsmolaugh, we will need a ram22:56
mrungeyes, the gate became a real pain during the last few days22:56
jomaralsmola: you are a barbarian22:56
david-lyle_Hopefully the full stop of today will not be a problem again22:56
lsmolajomara, no, barbarian coulnt build a proper ram :-)22:57
*** rdxc has joined #openstack-meeting22:57
*** fungi has quit IRC22:58
*** jcoufal-m has quit IRC22:58
*** jcoufal-m has joined #openstack-meeting22:58
mrungeok, thanks for coming22:59
david-lyle_Thanks mrunge for hosting22:59
mrunge#endmeeting22:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:59
*** rossk_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:59
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jan  7 22:59:13 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2014/horizon.2014-01-07-22.01.html22:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2014/horizon.2014-01-07-22.01.txt22:59
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting22:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2014/horizon.2014-01-07-22.01.log.html22:59
*** rossk_ has quit IRC22:59
*** TheSheep has left #openstack-meeting22:59
lsmolathanks everybody, have a great night22:59
*** bdehamer has quit IRC22:59
mrungesame to you22:59
mrungedavid-lyle_, you're welcome!22:59
lblanchardthanks all, bye!22:59
akrivokagood night everyone22:59
jpichThanks everyone, have a good day/eve22:59
jomaranight22:59
*** david-lyle_ has quit IRC22:59
jcoufal-mG'night23:00
*** jpich has quit IRC23:00
jtomasekgood night all23:00
*** jcoufal-m has quit IRC23:00
*** rdxc has quit IRC23:00
*** rossk_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:00
*** jtomasek has quit IRC23:00
*** rossk_ has quit IRC23:00
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting23:00
*** akrivoka has quit IRC23:00
*** Leonr has quit IRC23:01
*** MaxV has quit IRC23:02
*** rossk has quit IRC23:02
*** nermina has quit IRC23:03
*** kenhui has quit IRC23:05
*** jecarey has quit IRC23:06
*** rossk has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** vijendar has quit IRC23:08
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC23:08
*** fungi has quit IRC23:08
*** mrunge has quit IRC23:09
*** lblanchard has quit IRC23:10
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting23:11
*** bpokorny has quit IRC23:13
*** bdehamer has joined #openstack-meeting23:16
*** peristeri has quit IRC23:17
*** lsmola has quit IRC23:18
*** bdehamer has quit IRC23:19
*** dims has quit IRC23:20
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC23:21
*** sacharya has quit IRC23:22
*** funzo has joined #openstack-meeting23:24
*** asalkeld has quit IRC23:26
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC23:26
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz23:30
*** haleyb has quit IRC23:31
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC23:32
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting23:32
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting23:36
*** jroovers has quit IRC23:36
*** oubiwann has quit IRC23:37
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** kenhui1 has joined #openstack-meeting23:38
*** ayoung has quit IRC23:38
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting23:39
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC23:41
*** matty_dubs is now known as matty_dubs|gone23:44
*** haleyb has quit IRC23:45
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting23:45
*** changbl has quit IRC23:46
*** pablosan has quit IRC23:47
*** cyeoh_ is now known as cyeoh23:48
*** anniec has quit IRC23:49
*** funzo has quit IRC23:50
*** prad has quit IRC23:50
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting23:52
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC23:57
*** _ruhe is now known as ruhe23:57
*** epim has quit IRC23:58
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!