Wednesday, 2013-05-22

*** danwent has quit IRC00:01
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** ijw1 has quit IRC00:03
*** lloydde has quit IRC00:07
*** mkollaro has quit IRC00:07
*** rahmu has quit IRC00:13
*** liuxpei has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting00:15
*** liuxpei_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:15
*** sga has joined #openstack-meeting00:17
*** liuxpei has quit IRC00:18
*** sga has quit IRC00:19
*** markmcclain has quit IRC00:19
*** carl_baldwin has left #openstack-meeting00:29
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:30
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:31
*** neelashah has quit IRC00:31
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:33
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:45
*** stevemar has quit IRC00:48
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting00:52
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting00:55
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting00:56
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** Tross has quit IRC00:58
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting01:00
*** markmcclain1 has left #openstack-meeting01:02
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC01:03
*** markmcclain has quit IRC01:04
*** martine_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:04
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting01:05
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting01:19
*** jlucci has quit IRC01:22
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting01:24
*** terry7 has quit IRC01:26
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting01:27
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC01:32
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting01:32
*** markmcclain has quit IRC01:36
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC01:38
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting01:39
*** markmcclain has quit IRC01:39
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC01:41
*** fifieldt has quit IRC01:46
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting01:46
*** Tross has quit IRC01:47
*** danwent has quit IRC01:49
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** martine_ has quit IRC01:54
*** gongysh has quit IRC01:57
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting01:58
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting01:58
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC01:58
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting01:59
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting01:59
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting01:59
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:00
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:00
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting02:00
*** anniec has quit IRC02:03
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez02:04
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC02:04
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC02:05
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:13
*** hartsocks1 has joined #openstack-meeting02:22
*** hartsocks has quit IRC02:24
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n302:25
*** jecarey_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:28
*** jecarey has quit IRC02:29
*** dperaza1 has quit IRC02:31
*** jecarey_ has quit IRC02:34
*** saurabhs has quit IRC02:35
*** hemna has quit IRC02:38
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting02:42
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
*** timello has quit IRC02:58
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:01
*** Tross has quit IRC03:01
*** dwcramer has quit IRC03:03
*** ladquin is now known as ladquin_away03:09
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting03:16
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting03:16
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting03:17
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting03:19
*** ayurchen has quit IRC03:21
*** Tross has quit IRC03:21
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting03:26
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting03:29
*** sungju has quit IRC03:32
*** sungju has joined #openstack-meeting03:33
*** ewindisch has quit IRC03:35
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:39
*** neelashah has quit IRC03:40
*** vkmc has quit IRC03:41
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting03:42
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting03:43
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting03:43
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting03:45
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC03:47
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting03:49
*** Tross has quit IRC03:57
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** ewindisch has quit IRC04:06
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:09
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting04:11
*** changbl has quit IRC04:14
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC04:14
*** bdpayne has quit IRC04:23
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting04:24
*** bdperkin has quit IRC04:28
*** spzala has quit IRC04:32
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting04:32
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC04:40
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** sungju has quit IRC04:41
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** jkyle has quit IRC04:45
*** dwcramer has quit IRC04:56
*** jlucci has quit IRC04:58
*** ewindisch has quit IRC04:58
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC05:00
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting05:03
*** sungju has joined #openstack-meeting05:05
*** yaguang has quit IRC05:13
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting05:15
*** jlucci has quit IRC05:17
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting05:20
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC05:23
*** bdperkin has joined #openstack-meeting05:28
*** markpeek has quit IRC05:35
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting05:35
*** danwent has quit IRC05:40
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting05:44
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting05:48
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting05:48
*** reed has quit IRC05:50
*** boris-42 has quit IRC05:57
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting06:07
*** enikanorov_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:07
*** enikanorov has quit IRC06:09
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting06:10
*** _ozstacker_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:25
*** ozstacker has quit IRC06:28
*** IlyaE has quit IRC06:28
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:28
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting06:29
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting06:29
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting06:29
*** IlyaE has quit IRC06:31
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net06:31
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting06:39
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:41
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting06:42
*** gongysh has quit IRC06:44
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away06:47
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC06:47
*** Tross has quit IRC06:48
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting07:01
*** ndipanov has quit IRC07:02
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC07:02
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:03
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting07:03
*** RajeshMohan has quit IRC07:06
*** RajeshMohan has joined #openstack-meeting07:06
*** epim has quit IRC07:07
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting07:10
*** SlickNik has quit IRC07:10
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-meeting07:11
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting07:15
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting07:15
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting07:21
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting07:24
*** llu has quit IRC07:26
*** sungju has quit IRC07:26
*** Mandell has quit IRC07:28
*** flaper87 has quit IRC07:29
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-meeting07:30
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting07:30
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC07:31
*** llu has joined #openstack-meeting07:34
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC07:34
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** amyt has quit IRC07:50
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting07:51
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting07:53
*** martine has quit IRC07:56
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** BobBall has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
*** ndipanov has quit IRC08:04
*** gongysh has quit IRC08:07
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC08:17
*** psedlak has quit IRC08:18
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-meeting08:21
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting08:24
*** kirankv has joined #openstack-meeting08:29
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting08:30
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting08:31
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting08:39
*** psedlak has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC08:45
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC08:49
*** hanney has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC08:51
*** pnavarro has quit IRC08:58
*** ndipanov has quit IRC08:59
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting09:02
*** Yada has joined #openstack-meeting09:03
*** rahmu_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:03
*** kirankv has quit IRC09:03
*** markwash has quit IRC09:10
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting09:13
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC09:17
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting09:18
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC09:26
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:34
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando09:34
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:35
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:35
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando09:35
*** mikal has quit IRC09:42
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting09:44
*** ndipanov has quit IRC09:52
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:04
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:04
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando10:04
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:06
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:06
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:09
*** mikal has quit IRC10:18
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:25
*** pcm__ has quit IRC10:25
*** garyk has quit IRC10:25
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting10:34
*** ndipanov has quit IRC10:34
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:35
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting10:38
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:38
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting10:43
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez10:44
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:46
asalkeldsandywalsh, you about?10:49
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:55
*** afazekas has quit IRC10:57
*** yaguang has quit IRC11:00
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting11:07
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting11:15
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting11:16
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC11:19
*** pnavarro has quit IRC11:24
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC11:35
*** Yada has quit IRC11:40
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC11:46
*** hanney_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:47
*** hanney_ has quit IRC11:47
*** hanney_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:48
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting11:49
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting11:51
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC11:58
*** rahmu_ is now known as rahmu11:59
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting11:59
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting12:04
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC12:09
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting12:10
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC12:11
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting12:11
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting12:19
*** mrunge has quit IRC12:21
*** lbragstad has quit IRC12:29
*** johnthetubaguy1 is now known as johnthetubaguy12:30
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting12:34
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting12:35
*** eharney has quit IRC12:36
*** lpabon has quit IRC12:38
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** ewindisch has quit IRC12:39
*** dhellmann-away is now known as dhellmann12:41
*** egallen_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** egallen has quit IRC12:49
*** egallen_ is now known as egallen12:49
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting12:50
*** egallen has quit IRC12:51
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting12:53
*** ndipanov has quit IRC12:53
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann-away12:54
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** jhenner has quit IRC12:57
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting12:57
*** timello has quit IRC12:59
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting13:00
*** dperaza has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC13:02
*** timello has quit IRC13:07
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** shengjie has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
*** timello has quit IRC13:10
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
*** ctracey|away has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
*** Yada has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** eharney has quit IRC13:19
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting13:22
*** egallen has quit IRC13:27
*** matty_dubs|gone is now known as matty_dubs13:29
*** matty_dubs has left #openstack-meeting13:29
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** jcoufal has quit IRC13:33
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting13:34
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting13:41
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** bdpayne has quit IRC13:45
*** dolphm has quit IRC13:47
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** maoy has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** salv-orlando_ has quit IRC13:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** jlucci has quit IRC13:59
*** rosmaita_ is now known as rosmaita14:01
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** noslzzp has quit IRC14:03
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting14:04
*** ndipanov has quit IRC14:06
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
*** dhellmann-away is now known as dhellmann14:15
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
*** jcru has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
*** keith_bray has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** hartsocks1 has quit IRC14:29
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** rahmu has quit IRC14:34
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC14:35
*** ijw has quit IRC14:36
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** egallen has quit IRC14:38
*** amyt_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
*** amyt has quit IRC14:39
*** amyt_ is now known as amyt14:39
*** dolphm has quit IRC14:39
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net14:45
*** markwash has quit IRC14:46
*** amyt has quit IRC14:48
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** Yada has quit IRC14:51
*** dolphm has quit IRC14:52
*** timello has quit IRC14:54
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC14:54
*** jhenner has quit IRC14:59
jgriffithanybody here for Cinder?15:01
johnthetubaguyI am here for XenAPI15:01
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
jgriffithRuh roh15:01
jgriffithjohnthetubaguy: aren't you early?15:01
BobBallI'm here for XenAPI too15:01
guitarzancinder's in an hour right?15:01
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
jgriffithOoops! very sorry,15:01
jgriffithstupid DST15:01
*** jcru has quit IRC15:01
guitarzandst or something15:02
johnthetubaguylol, no worries15:02
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
johnthetubaguy#startmeeting XenAPI15:02
openstackMeeting started Wed May 22 15:02:14 2013 UTC.  The chair is johnthetubaguy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:02
*** pschaef has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: XenAPI)"15:02
BobBallyeah! pffft! Wait your turn! :D15:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'xenapi'15:02
johnthetubaguyhello people15:02
johnthetubaguywho is here for XenAPI?15:02
BobBallo/~15:02
BobBallMate should be here too15:03
BobBallbut he's not yet15:03
*** ladquin_away is now known as ladquin15:03
*** matelakat has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
BobBalland I'm working from home - hence can't shout at him over the wall15:03
matelakathi15:03
johnthetubaguyah, hello15:03
johnthetubaguyany more for any more?15:03
matelakatHe was shouting so loud, so I was able to hear it.15:03
BobBall:)15:04
* johnthetubaguy starts to write paper about proof of wormholes in cambridge15:04
BobBallI've got dozens of them in my garden... don't think we need a paper...15:04
johnthetubaguy#topic Actions from last week15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last week (Meeting topic: XenAPI)"15:04
johnthetubaguymatelakat did you document the bug finder?15:05
*** jlucci has quit IRC15:05
johnthetubaguydon't think there are any other actions15:06
matelakatI haven't documented the bugfinder.15:06
johnthetubaguyok15:06
BobBallbtw, while we wait for matelakat (ding) to answer...15:06
BobBalloh15:06
BobBallthere you go, he answered :D15:07
*** Yada has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
BobBallI'll wait my turn then15:07
johnthetubaguy#action matelakat to document bug finder in XenAPI team wiki15:07
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC15:07
johnthetubaguyok BobBall?15:07
*** ollie1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
*** ollie1 has left #openstack-meeting15:07
matelakatSorry guys, I am chatting with dan on smoke, which is quite important.15:07
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
BobBallwell it's not an action15:08
BobBallso I can wait my turn in the agenda15:08
BobBallshall we talk about QA then?15:08
BobBall(was that next in line?)15:08
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
johnthetubaguywe can, nothing else on the list15:08
johnthetubaguyanyone got any blueprint updates?15:08
matelakatno15:08
johnthetubaguy#action Bugs and QA15:09
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting15:09
johnthetubaguyso its bug day again, the bi weekly nova bug day anyways15:09
johnthetubaguydid some triage of the xenserver bugs again15:09
BobBallSo in terms of QA, as Mate says, we're currently working with Dan to figure out what needs to change in the XenServer scripts to get smokestack working again15:09
johnthetubaguyworking on the agent setting thing15:09
johnthetubaguycool15:09
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting15:09
johnthetubaguyquick update?15:09
BobBallMate could say more if you were interested, but I think the important thing is that Mate has promised not to sleep until it's back and working15:10
johnthetubaguy#info openstack xenapi driver uses PV tools to set the host name when using the agent, but XS 6.1 seems to have pulled this feature15:10
matelakatUpdates next week.15:10
johnthetubaguyI am interested what the plan is, and if I can help really15:10
matelakatI just started to work on this.15:10
johnthetubaguyOK15:10
BobBallMinor clarficiation on that John...15:10
matelakatI will let you know, if I need help.15:10
BobBallXS 6.1 _with the new tools_ does not support this15:11
johnthetubaguy#info matelakat working to get smokestack back up and running15:11
BobBallthe feature wasn't an official feature (bad excuse I know) but more importantly it didn't work in windows 2012 in some scenarios15:11
johnthetubaguyI hurd you can't attach block volumes to a running VM if you use the old tools on XS 6.1 though15:11
BobBallas such, it didn't make sense to port that feature over to the new-style drivers (which were a complete re-write anyway)15:11
*** garyk has quit IRC15:12
BobBallif we need a way to set the hostname then we should look at a PR to get it into the guest tools rather than the PV drivers15:12
johnthetubaguythat is my plan now15:12
BobBallthat would require a reboot (which we don't in the old-way of doing it) but would be using the MS supported methods and wouldn't break in the ways that we've seen it break15:12
BobBallI meant if we want XS to do it then the guest tools is the place it should be.  An OS solution that doesn't use the XS guest tools is of course fine too15:13
johnthetubaguywe need reboots for other things anyway, so would be good to add that in there15:13
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
johnthetubaguycloudbase-init does set the hostname for you too15:13
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
johnthetubaguybut that works regardless I think15:13
BobBallok15:13
johnthetubaguyOK, so...15:15
johnthetubaguy#topic Open Discussion15:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: XenAPI)"15:15
johnthetubaguyanything more to raise?15:15
BobBallyes15:15
BobBalldamnit15:15
BobBallI've forgotten what it was now though15:16
johnthetubaguyoops15:16
BobBalloh yes15:16
BobBallI thought it'd be worthwhile having a chat with Mate about the changes he's made for the Quantum integration15:16
BobBallMaru was surprised that a revised approach was needed15:16
*** HenryG_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
matelakatSo15:17
matelakatI think the DHCP change is not needed.15:17
*** HenryG_ has quit IRC15:17
matelakatHaving one agent controlling both domU and dom0 bridges does not sound good.15:17
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
matelakatSo I have a devstack change, that will eliminate this issue, and start two separate agents, one for domU, one for dom015:18
matelakatAnd create a "physnet" physical bridge.15:18
johnthetubaguyah, OK15:18
johnthetubaguyso routing the traffic in the DomU?15:18
matelakatSo that no code change is needed.15:18
BobBallboth agents in the domu you mean?15:18
matelakattunnelling with vlans.15:18
matelakatagents tun in domu, that's correct.15:19
*** ctracey|away is now known as ctracey15:19
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
johnthetubaguyyup, that makes sense I think15:19
matelakatI have a change for that.15:19
matelakatWait a sec.15:19
johnthetubaguyin the general case, you probably don't want that running on a VM anyway, or at least not on a nova-compute node15:19
johnthetubaguyit might mean what they do with mult-host support for DHCP will not work15:20
*** dhellmann has quit IRC15:20
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann15:20
*** HenryG has quit IRC15:20
BobBallok15:20
BobBallso john - which wouldn't work multi-host?15:20
BobBallMaru's way or Mate's way?15:20
johnthetubaguy#info while openstack network support for XenAPI L2 is going well, but L3 patch may not be needed15:21
johnthetubaguyerm, Mate's way15:21
johnthetubaguybut they haven't done multi-host yet15:21
BobBallWell a revised L2 patch is needed to remove the need for the L3 patch15:21
johnthetubaguyoh, interesting15:21
johnthetubaguyI guess that makes sense15:21
BobBallI think that's right matelakat ?15:21
matelakatI think only my setup will work with multi host.15:22
johnthetubaguybut that they implemented multi host yet?15:22
johnthetubaguyhave^15:22
*** changbl has quit IRC15:22
matelakatThat's not right, I am sorry, I think both should work - mine works for sure.15:22
johnthetubaguydo they have mult-host for DHCP now?15:23
matelakatIn multi-host, I meant mapping your network to physical nets.15:23
*** jlucci has quit IRC15:23
johnthetubaguyah, I mean running multiple DHCP15:23
johnthetubaguylike in nova's multi-host15:23
matelakatI think, it is really hard to discuss these things via IRC.15:24
johnthetubaguyI have a feeling they are dropping that stuff anyways15:24
johnthetubaguypossibly yes15:24
matelakatI know, my wife and my mother-in law are capable of discussing colors over the phone, but I am not that clever.15:24
johnthetubaguylol15:24
BobBallcolours need the woman gene...15:25
BobBallchromosone!15:25
matelakatFor me, networking needs a whiteboars.15:25
johnthetubaguyits bluey green with a hint of three week old dry grass15:25
BobBallIt's been too long since I've been at school :D15:25
* BobBall will not ask what a whiteboar is.15:25
matelakatSo, let's get back to this networking discussion.15:25
BobBallidd15:26
* johnthetubaguy thinks of some form of white pudding made from wild boar15:26
johnthetubaguyindeed15:26
johnthetubaguywhat was the issue here?15:26
matelakatI would like to associate proper meaning to those "multi-host", and "nova-like" words.15:26
BobBallso - John - are you happy that Mate's approach is better than the currently proposed approach?15:26
johnthetubaguyI think it is when you have one DHCP per host stuff is not great15:26
matelakatAre you visiting us this week John?15:26
johnthetubaguyno plans, but I could, tomorrow15:26
matelakatBob?15:27
BobBallI'm WFM in the morning15:27
BobBallbut I'll be in in the arvo hopefully15:27
matelakatI am sorry for all these things, but it is pointless for me to discuss networking through IRC.15:27
BobBallhaving a kitchen delivered!15:27
BobBallthat's fine :)15:27
johnthetubaguythat sounds important15:27
johnthetubaguyOK15:27
johnthetubaguyso maybe we are done for now, and we can answer questions people have next week15:28
matelakatOkay, so if you pop in to the office, you can have curry as well.15:28
BobBallI will probably be in post-curry15:28
matelakatLet me know your decision, John.15:28
matelakatSync-up, and have some diagrams.15:28
johnthetubaguyOk, will try drop by in the afternoon, will check with sally later15:29
BobBallI'm thinking maybe we need diagrams sketched out online15:29
johnthetubaguyoh, curry too maybe15:29
BobBallWe need to convince others on the patch review too15:29
johnthetubaguywe have diagrams, its just slow and hard to point15:29
BobBallok15:30
johnthetubaguywe can talk about the devstack refactoring as well I guess15:30
*** jcru has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
johnthetubaguyagree and end point for the networking config15:30
johnthetubaguyinformally at least15:30
johnthetubaguyso we all done now?15:30
BobBallthink so15:31
matelakataj15:31
matelakatstop15:31
matelakatQuestion15:31
johnthetubaguy#endmeeting15:31
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"15:31
openstackMeeting ended Wed May 22 15:31:13 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:31
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/xenapi/2013/xenapi.2013-05-22-15.02.html15:31
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/xenapi/2013/xenapi.2013-05-22-15.02.txt15:31
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/xenapi/2013/xenapi.2013-05-22-15.02.log.html15:31
matelakatAh15:31
johnthetubaguyquestion?15:31
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting15:31
matelakatIt's okay, tomorrow.15:31
johnthetubaguyok15:31
*** thingee has joined #openstack-meeting15:31
BobBallGreat - thanks guys :)15:31
BobBallbrb15:31
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:35
*** gongysh has quit IRC15:36
*** cian_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:37
*** jtomasek has quit IRC15:38
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting15:41
*** psedlak has quit IRC15:44
*** afazekas has quit IRC15:44
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC15:45
*** matelakat has left #openstack-meeting15:46
*** hanney has quit IRC15:48
*** hanney_ has quit IRC15:48
*** dachary has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
*** hanney has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
*** dhellmann has quit IRC15:51
*** vkmc has quit IRC15:51
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting15:52
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** pcm__ has quit IRC15:55
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** joel-coffman has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** n0ano has quit IRC15:58
*** avishay has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** hemnafk is now known as hemna16:00
jgriffithcinder?16:00
avishaycinder.16:00
*** varma has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** dachary has quit IRC16:00
kmartinCINDER16:00
jgriffith#startmeeting cinder16:00
openstackMeeting started Wed May 22 16:00:45 2013 UTC.  The chair is jgriffith. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: cinder)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'cinder'16:00
thingeeo/16:00
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** dachary has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** skolathu has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
jgriffithNote agenda #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderMeetings16:01
jgriffith#topic H1 freeze date16:01
*** openstack changes topic to "H1 freeze date (Meeting topic: cinder)"16:01
jgriffithSo just FYI freeze for H1 is Next Tuesday16:01
*** rushiagrawal has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
rushiagrawalHi all16:02
cian_Hi16:02
jgriffithhello rushiagrawal16:02
jgallardhi all16:02
jgriffitho/16:02
xyang_jgriffith: so the patch has to be merged by next Tuesday, right16:02
*** derekh has quit IRC16:02
*** winston-d has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
avishayHi16:02
*** _ozstacker_ has quit IRC16:02
winston-dhi16:02
jgriffithxyang_: correct16:02
xyang_hi16:02
jgriffithxyang_: which leads me to my question for you :)16:02
*** ozstacker has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
jgriffithxyang_: do you think you'll get through the legal team by then?16:03
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
hemnamorning16:03
jgriffithxyang_: we can always defer to H216:03
bswartzgood afternoon16:03
jgriffithnot a big deal at all16:03
dacharyhi16:03
avishaygood evening16:03
xyang_jgriffith: I'm still waiting.  Can I get back to you later today16:03
*** rushiagrawal1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
jgriffithxyang_: sure, that's fine16:03
jgriffithwinston-d: around?16:03
winston-djgriffith: yup!16:04
jgriffithI think you're rate limiting BP is pretty close (at least for the Cinder side) and first portion16:04
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
jgriffithwinston-d: shoot..wrong bp16:05
jgriffith:)16:05
jgriffithscheduler hints :)16:05
jgriffithwinston-d: should we change the owner on that?16:05
jgriffithFor those wondering what I'm talking about: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28945/16:06
winston-djgriffith: yes, please change to mirantis folk16:06
dacharythanks16:06
*** lindj has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
*** Yada has quit IRC16:06
jgriffithwinston-d: I went through it again last night, I think they covered the concerns folks raised16:06
*** rushiagr has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
jgriffithwinston-d: I think it's ready to go but needs another good going over by me an at least one or two others16:07
*** lakhindr_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
winston-djgriffith: there's something else needs fix. i'll post comments16:07
jgriffithwinston-d: I suspected that might be the case :)16:07
thingeethe concern I had with it that I haven't raised is whether it has to touch v2/volume.py if it's using the wsgi.extend decorator16:07
*** rushiagrawal has quit IRC16:07
jgriffiththingee: interesting16:08
*** rushiagrawal1 has quit IRC16:08
thingeeI haven't looked closely at how wsgi.extend works, but I wanted to play with the patch to see if it's necessary16:08
thingeeif I drop the ball on this, I can always change it later.16:08
jgriffiththingee: I don't know how that would work, but if you want to look at that, that's great16:09
winston-d:)16:09
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting16:09
jgriffiththingee: we've got time so that's fine by me16:09
jgriffiththingee: you might want to ask the Mirantis folks if they've already thought/looked at that16:09
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting16:09
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting16:09
*** boris-42 has quit IRC16:10
jgriffithSo most of the other things for H1 are on me :(16:10
jgriffithhttps://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/havana-116:10
*** ollie1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** jhenner has quit IRC16:10
jgriffithBut.. if anybody has some cycles, there are a few bugs that aren't asigned or triaged16:10
jgriffithAny volunteers?16:11
jgriffiththingee: you can't volunteer!16:11
winston-djgriffith: i'll take a look16:11
*** rushiagr has quit IRC16:11
jgriffithwinston-d: thanks16:11
* thingee needs to pull more all nighters16:11
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away16:12
* hemna needs to clone himself16:12
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net16:12
hemnaI'm kinda slammed at the moment16:12
jgriffithbswartz: any update on 1139129?16:12
thingeehttps://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bugs?orderby=status&start=016:12
* medberry will look a the queue but likely isn't ready to actually triage yet16:12
bswartzwhich 1139129?16:12
jgriffithmedberry: thanks Dave16:12
*** medberry is now known as med_16:12
jgriffithbswartz: your bug targetted for H116:12
bswartzno update sorry16:13
jgriffithbswartz: med_ et'all  https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/havana-116:13
jgriffithI'm most interested in the items that are targetted for H116:13
jgriffithThe link above is items that we *said* we'd have done for H1 including bugs16:13
*** rushiagr2 has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
jgriffithbswartz: any idea when you might have an update?16:13
med_nod16:14
bswartzjgriffith: that one hasn't fallen off my radar, it just hasn't been a high enough priority16:14
jgriffithbswartz: I've already removed your unified driver, sounds like that hasn't gone anywhere either?16:14
bswartzI'll plan on H216:14
jgriffithbswartz: K, I'll adjust16:14
bswartzjgriffith: the unified driver should be ready early in H216:14
*** luis_fdez has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
jgriffithbswartz: Ok, although it was originally slated for H116:15
jgriffithbswartz: cool... updated16:15
avishayjgriffith: I'm hoping bug 1122898 will be addressed by hemna's patch for H2 ("Refactor Cinder's iSCSI/FC attach code")16:16
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1122898 in cinder "Generic iSCSI copy volume<->image doesn't disconnect" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/112289816:16
jgriffithOk, anything folks see on that list they want to comment on before I ask some more questions about a few :)16:16
jgriffithavishay: ok, so you want to retarget that one as well?16:16
lakhindr_Jgriffith: is this the time to discuss the milestones of havana-1?16:16
avishayjgriffith: yessir16:16
jgriffithavishay: ko!16:16
jgriffithlakhindr_: yes but hold on a moment16:17
jgriffithI wanted to ask about the local disk stuff  :)16:17
med_jgriffith, I'll take a look t 116115716:17
*** dprince has quit IRC16:17
med_jgriffith, I'll take a look t 116155716:17
jgriffithmed_: awesome possum16:17
*** liuxpei_ has quit IRC16:17
hemnaavishay, subscribed to that one.   we'll have to test it with the refactor16:17
jgriffithmed_: if you *like* it, assign yourself pretty please :)16:17
jgriffithhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/local-disk-storage-utils16:18
avishayhemna: yep, thanks :)16:18
jgriffithso I threw that out there ^^16:18
jgriffithMeanwhile we have: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27051/16:18
jgriffithHere's my question....16:18
avishayyea...wanted to ask about that...16:18
jgriffithDo folks see or hear of an advantage regarding using raw disks over LVM?16:19
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
bswartzI see disadvantages16:19
eharneyseems unlikely, especially once you get to the snapshot features..16:19
avishayjgriffith: apparently you - you wrote in the review "This is awesome and very much needed/requested as of late." :)16:19
hemnaLVM provides more flexibility in the usage of the raw disk no?16:19
avishayjgriffith: but i don't have a use case for it personally16:19
med_the hadoop argument (or similar) seems to be valid16:20
jgriffithavishay: yes, and see my comments from last night... the point is I wanted to get input from others on this as well16:20
winston-di agree with med_ , performance concern could be one16:20
jgriffithMy testing doesn't show LVM taking that big of a hit on perf though which is why I wanted to bring this up16:20
jgriffithLVM gets a bad wrap from folks like DuncanT :)16:21
bswartzlol16:21
jgriffithBut that being said....16:21
jgriffithTwo folks pointing out a use case works for me16:21
avishayLVM can have bad performance when dealing with snapshots and such, but I can't imagine it being too noticeable if you're using it like a disk16:21
jgriffithavishay: not necessarily true either :)16:22
*** danwent has quit IRC16:22
jgriffithavishay: thin provisioning baby!!16:22
jgriffithOk... that's all I needed16:22
winston-dmaybe we can ask for some numbers from those folks16:22
avishayjgriffith: I said "can" :)16:22
jgriffithavishay: :)16:22
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
jgriffithSo if I'll figure out timing of Ann's patch versus the brick work16:22
jgriffithHer patch my be just an "introduction" so to speak :)16:23
avishayso what are the use cases?  i missed it?  hadoop?16:23
*** na_bot8 has quit IRC16:23
jgriffithavishay: mostly just a perf thing16:23
jgriffithavishay: TBH what started it was the bare metal stuff16:23
med_jgriffith, my hadoop "expert" would really expect some optimizations in hadoop to do the wrong thing if on LVM....16:24
jgriffithavishay: there's a real need for disk management fro Ironic and company16:24
avishayjgriffith: gotcha16:24
jgriffithkk16:24
jgriffithso we covered H1 and status in one shot :)16:24
jgriffithMoving along to lakhindr_16:25
lakhindr_I am here :-)16:25
jgriffith#topic Test code and example dirver files16:25
*** openstack changes topic to "Test code and example dirver files (Meeting topic: cinder)"16:25
jgriffithlakhindr_: I gave this it's own topic :)16:25
bswartzjgriffith: can we discuss the share service briefly?16:25
hemna:)16:25
jgriffithbswartz: sure there's time at the end16:25
bswartzokay16:25
jgriffithbswartz: or right after this, I'll bump it up on the list :)16:25
bswartzty16:25
jgriffithbswartz: yw16:26
jgriffithOk.. so: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28791/16:26
jgriffithFor those of you that haven't been following16:26
jgriffithThere's a debate here and I think lakhindr_ would like to get some input16:26
jgriffithSo I'm going to give him 5 minutes to make his case :)16:26
jgriffithStarting...  *NOW*16:26
hemnatime's up!16:27
lakhindr_(Thanks Jgriffith: Folks, I have a proposal, which I wanted to mail, but then thought let me first try http://paste.openstack.org/show/37593/)16:27
lakhindr_hemna: thanks :-)16:27
hemna:)16:27
jgriffithLULZ16:27
lakhindr_I am here to briefly discuss what I have in mind. I can email it too. But basically I find merit in simulating our back-end compared to say mocking everything.16:28
*** metral has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
lakhindr_It has simplicity and power. And with that in mind, if you look at my code you can see how self tests are run.16:28
jgriffithlakhindr_: I think folks get the point16:28
jgriffithlakhindr_: and I don't think simulating/mocking the backend is the debate16:28
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
lakhindr_Oh since you gave me 5 minutes, I thought I have to seak up :-)16:28
hemnalakhindr_, the 3PAR unit tests "simulate" the back end (array) as well via a reimplemented client class16:28
lakhindr_I was coming to that :-)16:28
jgriffithlakhindr_: ok, sorry go ahead but I didn't want you to waste your 5 minutes :)16:29
avishaythe storwize/svc tests work against a simulator as well as real storage16:29
lakhindr_Ah, so I have run afoul of some rules, e.g. where should a sample configuration file go. Some suggestion is, well don;t use it! But I prefer to.16:29
hemnaI think that's the crux of the -1's on the review16:30
lakhindr_And the question of where it should go is I think easily resolved when a vendor subdirectory contains all the stuff in one place.16:30
jgriffithlakhindr_: I thought it was resolved when we create block-storage-admin guide with driver config sections?16:31
jgriffiths/create/created/16:31
*** kchenweijie has quit IRC16:31
thingeelakhindr_: here's the issue I have with this. I want unit tests. I won't argue there is some gain in functional, but our tests are already slow with the mixture there is. I'd argue that your focus on your driver tests should be on the implementation, not if something can open a config.16:31
lakhindr_Jgriffith. I am not saying anything about the admin guide. We shall of course abide by that.16:31
lakhindr_My focus is on unit tests, thingee! And we are following all the requirements, indeed.16:32
lakhindr_And of course focus is on the driver actually! Config is part of it!16:32
jgriffithsighhh...  I fear there's no compromise here16:32
*** BobBall is now known as BobBall-Awawy16:32
*** BobBall-Awawy is now known as BobBall-Away16:32
avishayWhat's up with the separate config file trend instead of cinder.conf?16:33
lakhindr_avishay: that is too simple.16:33
jgriffithlakhindr_: I suspect what's going to happen:  Folks will keep -1 your patch until you at least attempt to address the points they've made16:33
avishaylakhindr_: what is too simple?16:33
hemnathe confusion I believe is that other driver's also have their sample configs in place....which set a bad precedent.16:34
lakhindr_avishay: as array configuration becomes more sophisticated they run beyond the scope of simple one liner config parameters16:34
thingeelakhindr_: can you tell me the problem with the current things provided to the drivers that are in cinder?16:34
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** briancline has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
hemnalakhindr_, that's what documentation is for IMHO16:34
avishayhemna: i know, that's why i'm asking why people started with this craziness :)16:34
thingeehemna: +116:34
hemnanot sample config files16:34
*** maoy has quit IRC16:34
lakhindr_thingee: I don't talk of the problems in other drivers, sorry.16:34
lakhindr_hemna: documentation is for what? sorry did not follow?16:35
jgriffithavishay: I have NO problem with people using external config files16:35
lakhindr_s/?$/.$/16:35
hemnalakhindr_, to describe the more complex configurations of the drivers.16:35
lakhindr_hemna: there is already a precedent. Many vendors already use it here!16:36
avishayjgriffith: i didn't say i had a problem with it, just asking why not use cinder.conf16:36
thingeelakhindr_: and some have spoke about being ok with removing them since we have proper docs now16:36
xyang_there's one benefit of this external config file, you don't have to restart cinder-volume.  With cinder.conf, you need to16:36
hemnathe more complex the configurations are for a driver(s), the better the documentation needs to be.  We don't need sample config files in the source code to help admins.16:36
*** kirankv has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
lakhindr_folks this is not about documentation. I agree we can document everything the way it is required. But I want to run tests off a real configuration file.16:37
thingeelakhindr_, hemna: and that's why I'm mentioning this. This is not cinder's concern. This is a vendors concern in making sure this conveyed in the proper channels.16:37
hemnaxyang_, I don't think that's the issue here.   using external configs for a driver is ok...the real issue is, do we allow/want sample config files in cinder source16:37
*** NobodyCam has quit IRC16:37
lakhindr_hemna: I say yes. Because we want to test off a sample config.16:38
*** rushiagr2 has quit IRC16:38
*** rushiagr has joined #openstack-meeting16:38
*** rushiagr2 has joined #openstack-meeting16:38
hemnathat config should be in the unit test code itself, not in the driver's source tree.16:38
xyang_hemna: that's ok. I'm ok to remove it.  I added it there based on some review comments a while back16:38
thingeelakhindr_: I've noticed windows storage for example has stuff for their particular tests in cinder.tests.windows16:38
jgriffithhemna: +116:38
jgriffiththingee: +1 for you too :)16:38
thingeeI'm asking hds do the same. Along with moving any simulation code out of the implementation into the test files like the other drivers.16:38
hemnathingee, +116:39
lakhindr_Hemna: would you like me to pollute cinder/cinder/tests with a config file?16:39
thingeelakhindr_: better than polluting the implementation16:39
hemnalakhindr_, pollute the test_hds.py :)16:39
winston-dhemna: +116:39
thingeehemna: +116:39
lakhindr_hemna: we have a basic disagreement there. Because I feel value in reading a real config file :-)16:39
hemnaI don't disagree with reading a "real config file"16:40
hemnajust put that "config file" as a string in test_hds.py16:40
lakhindr_Folks, if this is a big thing, I shall go your way. Just look at my paste bin, and give your comments when we have time. I can post it to some mailing list.16:40
winston-dlakhindr_: but you can cover that in tempest tests rather than in unit test16:40
thingeelakhindr_: that shouldn't be the focus of your test. Making sure a config file can open *everytime* in a test is not the focus.16:40
*** rushiagr has quit IRC16:40
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:40
lakhindr_sorry I don't know the tempest test..16:40
*** rushiagr2 has quit IRC16:40
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
lakhindr_thingee: sorry I don't think I agree with what is the 'focus'. That is so subjective..!16:41
winston-dlakhindr_: that's integration test framework16:41
*** jcru is now known as jcru|away16:41
lakhindr_OK. So then allow me to test things fully!16:41
*** NobodyCam has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
lakhindr_Why is the restriction in testing so tight, please, may I ask? We all have the same goal!16:42
hemnawe aren't against testing.  we just aren't for polluting the source tree with sample config files.16:42
jgriffithOk, we need to save some time for bswartz and I don't see this really being overly productive16:42
*** rushi_agr has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
avishayyes, this is going around in circles16:42
hemnayou can accomplish everything you want by just putting that sample config file as a string in your unit test code.16:42
avishayhemna: thank you for being the voice of reason :)16:43
kmartinlakhindr_: I think the community(along with most of cinder core) and expressed the way they would like you to move forward.16:43
lakhindr_OK.16:43
lakhindr_Can I still do the simulation then?16:43
jgriffithlakhindr_: if you have 3 or 4 folks -1 your patch w/ a recommendation it may be best to at least attempt to cooperate and implement their suggestions16:43
jgriffithlakhindr_: but I'll leave that up to you16:43
jgriffith#topic shares-service16:43
*** openstack changes topic to "shares-service (Meeting topic: cinder)"16:43
jgriffithbswartz: you're up16:43
lakhindr_I will cooperate with you guys of course!16:43
bswartzthanks jgriffith16:43
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
bswartzso we have resubmitted the shares service here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29821/16:44
*** jimfehlig has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** Ankit_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
bswartzfor those of you that don't remember the discussion from G3, this is adding support for management of NAS storage to openstack16:44
kmartinon to the next easy topic :)16:44
thingee:)16:45
avishaykmartin: haha16:45
jgriffithhaha16:45
*** Sagar has joined #openstack-meeting16:45
hemnas/openstack/cinder16:45
hemna:P16:45
*** skolathu has quit IRC16:45
bswartzEveryone agrees that management of NAS storage shouldn't be in cinder long term, but in teh short term, creating a new service in cinder is the fastest way to get the community started, and to get the feature into customer's hands16:45
bswartzyes hemna16:45
jgriffithbswartz: fast != correct16:46
bswartzthe main things we've done between G3 and now have been to write up some good documentation, and add tests to tempest, and also bring the share service up to parity with many new volume features from grizzly16:46
jgriffithbswartz: and I'm concerned about maintenance/support more than anything else16:46
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC16:47
jgriffithbswartz: I haven't seen the docs and tempest tests?16:47
bswartzNetApp is signing up to maintain and support the share service the community grows large enough16:47
jgriffithbswartz: what about your current code?16:47
bswartzjgriffith: the temptest tests are are in a gerrit WIP submission -- they can't go in until the service goes in16:47
*** epim has joined #openstack-meeting16:48
bswartzjgriffith: we also have devstack support coming, but that depends on the service going in as well16:48
jgriffithbswartz: sure, but you can share that stuff w/folks ya know16:48
jgriffithbswartz: again, why is all of this being done in a silo?16:48
bswartzwhat silo? we're posting everyting we do publicly16:48
thingeebswartz, jgriffith: this is true. Really it's going to slow down development on both shared and block in resources. especially if it's not long term (which I'm not going to argue about)16:48
hemnaIf we know that share service needs to live outside of cinder, and you've been working on this for how many releases now?  Lets just make this it's own separate service now.16:49
bswartzanyways I've talked with many of you already, and I'm just asking that you review the code, and +1 it if you like it16:49
*** ssshi has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
bswartzhemna: work needs to be done on olso before we can effectively split the code -- right now we effectively share a lot of low level cinder stuff16:50
hemnabswartz, we have a vested interest here at HP of getting share service in openstack.  But I still don't think it belongs in cinder.16:50
jgriffithbswartz: can you provide links to the devstack, tempest and docs you referred to?16:50
eharneyi think this inside Cinder vs. outside Cinder probably needs some ML discussion outside of just Cinder folks16:50
rushi_agrI'll share links soon..16:50
avishayto me having NAS in Cinder is almost as strange as Swift in Cinder16:50
jgriffithhemna: +1, my company as well16:50
thingeebswartz: from last time we spoke for g3, do we have any other vendors chiming in on the api?16:50
jgriffithrushi_agr: thanks :)16:50
eharneyi haven't heard much from other openstack folks on this16:51
hemnaavishay, +116:51
rushi_agrHopefully tomorrow16:51
jgriffithrushi_agr: oh... so it's not there yet?16:51
bswartztempest: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/26598/16:51
* jgriffith is confused16:51
jgriffithbswartz: cool.. thanks16:51
thingeeavishay: I've been say just put share in swift!16:51
hemnalol16:51
avishayhahah16:51
rushi_agrIts there...wanted to check as its a month old16:51
bswartzrushiagr: do you have the wiki link?16:51
jgriffiththingee: +116:51
avishaythingee: "here - your problem now!" :)16:52
jgriffithbswartz: rushi_agr so just an observation...16:52
thingeebswartz: but seriously any other vendors chime in on the api?16:52
jgriffithYou've got probably well over 10K lines of code associated with all of this16:52
bswartzeharney: are you online?16:52
jgriffithHow much harder would it really be to just create a project?16:52
bswartzyes we estimated about 10k of code16:52
bswartz10k lines16:52
eharneyyes16:52
rushi_agrThere is a wiki..need to search for it16:53
notmynamemaybe I missed a joke, but IRC beeps at me when swift is mentioned. is there something we should be doing on the swift side?16:53
bswartzI've talked to eharney about support for gluster in the share service16:53
*** glikson has quit IRC16:53
guitarzannotmyname: you missed a joke16:53
avishaynotmyname: no, it's a joke16:53
thingeenotmyname: run16:53
bswartzhopefully eharney will be able to find time to review16:53
avishaynotmyname: you might end up with 10k lines of code on your doorstep :P16:54
eharneyyes, i looked at it a bit ago, and will be diving back into the updated code shortly16:54
bswartzeharney: thx16:54
jgriffithnotmyname: you guys are going to imlement share-services in swift :)16:54
bswartzanyways, the big complaint about the code during grizzly was that it wasn't ready until G3 and people were nervous16:54
notmynamejgriffith: I'll be happy to -2 10k line patches in swift :-)16:55
hemnaand that it doesn't belong in cinder16:55
jgriffithnotmyname: :)16:55
bswartzwe're here now in H1 and we're committed to fixing any issues during havana, and tempest /cinderclient/devstack stuff will come not long after the code is accepted16:55
avishaynotmyname: lol16:55
jgriffithand that it only supported NetApp16:55
med_notmyname, as long as you don't +2 in cinder16:55
jgriffithmed_: HA!!16:55
* notmyname is not sure what a share service is16:55
jgriffithbswartz: so if it goes in and bugs get to a threshold and aren't being fixed, and it's not keeping up...16:56
jgriffithThat means it can be removed without objection?16:56
med_notmyname, nfs, smb, etc.16:56
notmynameah16:56
*** kchenweijie has quit IRC16:56
bswartzyeah if netapp can't maintain it or build a community to maintain it then it should be trashed, absolutely16:56
med_thinks NAS16:56
hemnajgriffith, pulling 8k lines of code spread throughout cinder....at the last minute of H3.16:56
hemnagives me chills16:56
bswartzwe're just asking for an opporunity to get started16:56
bswartzincubating a whole new project is a LONG process16:57
jgriffithbswartz: Just to be clear for the past year and a half there's been an opporunity16:57
bswartzWe'd like to do what nova-volume did16:57
jgriffithbswartz: you would've been through it by now FYI16:57
hemnaThe safest place for share service and the most flexibility for share service and it's core members I believe is in it's own project.16:57
jgriffithbswartz: and there's a reason that it's a long process16:58
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
jgriffithbswartz: this short cut is a dangerous deal whether you think so or not16:58
bswartzI think the community for shares will largely overlap with the community for block storage16:58
jgriffithbswartz: I don't think that's true16:58
jgriffithbswartz: I have a difficult time with resources on block as it is16:58
bswartznot 100%, but many storage vendors have solutions for both16:58
avishayThe community may overlap, but I think these two sides to Cinder will influence each other in bad ways16:58
jgriffithbswartz: I don't need more vendors adding drivers16:59
jgriffithbswartz: I need folks to work on the core project16:59
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
eharneyi still think the question of incubating within Cinder vs. starting another project needs to hit the ML for input from some non-Cinder folks16:59
jgriffithbswartz: anyhow...  I stil would urge you guys to do this right and create a project16:59
jgriffithbswartz: you've already done most of the work16:59
kmartinbswartz: say we allow it in cinder for the time being, would it almost be impossible to pull it back out when it becomes it's own service, we're talking 7500 lines of code, where it really belongs in the first place17:00
jgriffitheharney: we've tried that and there was very little input from the dev community17:00
thingeejgriffith, bswartz: own project and incubated by openstack +117:00
hemnathingee, +117:00
jgriffithkmartin: we did take steps to address that17:00
eharneyjgriffith: hrm, seems odd, but maybe that's why i haven't heard much from outside17:00
bswartzkmartin: disabling the service if we're not happy with it doesn't require changing much17:00
jgriffithkmartin: netapp and bswartz inparticular were extremely cooperative in working with me on the design last summer to help with that17:00
danwentjgriffith: heads up, i believe there's another meeting starting here very soon17:00
thingeebswartz: if it was its own project you could +2 it now17:01
*** Eustace has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
jgriffithdanwent: thank you sir17:01
thingeebswartz: :)17:01
jgriffithfolks, we're out of time17:01
jgriffith#openstack-cinder17:01
avishayown project +117:01
bswartzthanks everyone17:01
jgriffithwe're all there anyway17:01
*** thingee has left #openstack-meeting17:01
kmartinI was talking about pulling the code out, not disabling it17:01
jgriffith#endmeeting17:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"17:01
openstackMeeting ended Wed May 22 17:01:37 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:01
hartsocks#startmeeting VMwareAPI17:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2013/cinder.2013-05-22-16.00.html17:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2013/cinder.2013-05-22-16.00.txt17:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/cinder/2013/cinder.2013-05-22-16.00.log.html17:01
openstackMeeting started Wed May 22 17:01:41 2013 UTC.  The chair is hartsocks. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:01
*** avishay has left #openstack-meeting17:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: VMwareAPI)"17:01
*** cian_ has left #openstack-meeting17:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'vmwareapi'17:01
*** varma has quit IRC17:01
*** bdpayne has quit IRC17:01
hartsocks#topic salutations17:01
*** openstack changes topic to "salutations (Meeting topic: VMwareAPI)"17:02
*** lloydde has quit IRC17:02
hartsocksGreetings programmers!17:02
*** rsacharya has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
danwent:)17:02
ssshihi17:02
hartsocks#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/VMwareAPI#Agenda17:02
hartsocksOur agenda today.17:02
hartsocksSince this is only our second meeting I don't think it would be amiss to go around and do a quick introduction.17:02
*** luis_fdez has quit IRC17:02
*** bswartz has left #openstack-meeting17:03
hartsocksI'm Shawn Hartsock from VMware and I'm working on VMwareAPI in Nova full time. Who else is here?17:03
*** joel-coffman has quit IRC17:03
danwenthi, its dan wendlandt, also from vmware17:03
*** winston-d has left #openstack-meeting17:03
*** ollie1 has left #openstack-meeting17:03
woodspaI'm Patrick Woods from IBM.17:03
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
ssshiShanshi Shi here from ctrip.com17:03
danwentis eustace not here?17:04
kirankvHi, kiran from HP17:04
hartsocksAre the HP guys in the house? Ah hi!17:04
EustaceEustace from HP17:04
rsacharyaSrinivas from HP17:04
danwenti know a few others are lurking, but perhaps they are shy :)17:04
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC17:05
Davieyo/ hola17:05
hartsocksThey can just say hey if they like… or don't17:05
danwentok, let's dive in :)17:05
DavieyI'm loud and proud to be here. o/17:05
hartsocks*lol*17:05
danwentyes Daviey, no one would confuse you as being shy17:05
hartsocksIn case it gets dropped off due to time again… I've opened #openstack-vmware and I hang out there a bit.17:06
*** lpabon has quit IRC17:06
hartsocksYou can have general discussion there.17:06
danwentall the cool kids are doing it :P17:06
*** jgallard has quit IRC17:06
hartsocksIf that's everyone, we have some unfinished discussion from last time...17:07
hartsocks#topic continued Havana Blueprint discussion17:07
*** openstack changes topic to "continued Havana Blueprint discussion (Meeting topic: VMwareAPI)"17:07
hartsocks#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/multiple-clusters-managed-by-one-service17:07
hartsocks#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/accurate-capacity-of-clusters-for-scheduler17:07
hartsocksEustace, did you get back with legal on those copyright notices? Who can help with that?17:08
danwentwe need to get those blueprints assigned to the "havana" series17:08
danwentand targeted to a specific milestone17:08
danwenteither h-1 or h-217:08
danwentits getting quite late for h-117:09
EustaceDiscussions still in progress with Legal17:09
danwentif we want to shoot for h-1, i'd suggest we get the code posted for a Work-in-progress review ASAP17:09
danwentor actually, may be too late already17:09
hartsocksI'm thinking it's already too close a deadline unless the code can be posted *right now*17:09
danwenthttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Havana_Release_Schedule17:10
danwenthartsocks: yeah, i agree.  if HP is still dealing with legal stuff.17:10
kirankvI dont  think the copyright text is preventing from them getting tagged to a specific milestone17:10
danwentkirankv: ah, i misunderstood what Eustace was talking about17:10
danwentdo you have permission to post the code for review publicly?17:10
*** ijw has quit IRC17:11
danwentor do you need legal approval for that as well?17:11
kirankvok, the code in work in progress state will be sent for review before the cutoff17:11
danwentkirankv: what cutoff are you referring to?17:11
EustaceWe can post the code publically17:11
kirankvh-117:12
*** IlyaE has quit IRC17:12
*** metral_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
danwentkirankv: i expect a lot of review comments, so we likely need it posted for feedback more than a week before it would need to merge.17:12
*** metral has quit IRC17:12
*** metral_ is now known as metral17:12
danwentand the merge cutoff for H-1 is likely next tuesday17:13
kirankvfrom merge perpective h-2 seems realistic17:13
danwentkirankv: i agree.17:13
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
danwentI would still encourage for us to start getting feedback as soon as possible though.17:13
kirankvagree that there will be lot of comments and posting it earlier would help17:13
danwenthartsocks: can you work with russellb to make sure these blueprints get assigned to the 'havana' series and the 'h-2' milestone?17:13
hartsocksOkee dokee…17:14
russellbgoes into my review gueue when it's assigned, milestone is set, and then proposed to havana release series17:14
danwentif kirankv thinks they can get code posted for WIP in a week, h-2 should be a good target.17:14
hartsocks#action hartsocks to work with russellb to tag blueprints to H-217:14
kirankvwe had done our dev using G3 rc1 and its taking some time to get it on h17:14
danwentrussellb: there's already an 'assignee' in lp, if that is what you mean, or are you talking about somethign else?17:15
russellbjust need to set havana-2, and then set the series goal to havana17:15
danwentgot it.17:15
russellbthen it goes into my list of stuff proposed for havana that i need to review/approve17:16
danwentno one on our side has the permissions, so hopefully you can do that.17:16
danwentok, got it.17:16
russellbonce you're the assignee, you should be able to set the milestone and series17:16
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away17:16
Davieyrussellb: are you sure?17:16
danwentok, so kirankv, can you se the milestone on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/accurate-capacity-of-clusters-for-scheduler ?17:16
russellb99.8% sure of that :-)17:16
danwentto h-2?17:16
*** egallen has quit IRC17:16
danwentwe can test it live :)17:16
*** samc_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:17
Davieyoh sorry, thought we were talking about a bug.17:17
*** Yada has joined #openstack-meeting17:17
kirankvmilestone and series gone have been set17:18
hartsocks#undo17:18
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Action object at 0x3370650>17:18
hartsocksawesome.17:18
kirankvwill do the same for other blueprint as well17:18
danwentok, great17:18
hartsocks#action kirankv will set milestones on blueprints assigned17:18
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
danwentok, in terms of other blueprints, I think we'll be putting one in for being able to do volumes based on vSphere datastores17:19
danwentthis is something we talked about at the summit, but I don't think there is a BP for yet17:19
hartsocks#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova?searchtext=vmware17:20
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
danwenthartsocks: yeah, i haven't seen one for it.17:21
danwentbut this would likely be a blueprint first for cinder17:21
*** timello has quit IRC17:21
danwentand then a bug or blueprint to add 'attach' support for this type of datastore in nova.17:21
danwentor rather, this type of volume17:21
Davieydanwent: Is there planed to be a Quantum integration one?  I understood that is a current area of weakness ?17:21
danwentDaviey:  there is the existing NVP integration that will work.17:22
danwentDaviey: we're also looking at doing a quantum integration with the non-NVP vwmare networking, for existing deployments.17:22
Davieydanwent: Ah cool, there is interest in that aswell.17:22
danwentif there's anyone interested in working on that, please let me know, as I'm trying to find resources for it.17:22
danwenti have some people within vmware that can likely help, but may not be the full owner.17:23
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:23
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
danwentok, shall we move on to bugs?17:23
hartsocksAnything else on blueprints?17:24
ssshithere's also a glance bp https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/hypervisor-templates-as-glance-images17:24
Davieydanwent: I think we can offer some help, but probably not own17:24
DavieyI can't speak on behalf of who would be driving it.17:24
EustaceWe are working on a solution for that BP17:24
*** seanrob_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
Eustacenearly done17:24
danwentDaviey: ok, let's sync on that offline.17:25
danwentEustace: ok, looks already targeted for h-217:25
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC17:25
Eustacewe'll be able to get that code for review within a few days17:25
hartsocksgreat.17:26
danwentok, great.17:26
ssshithat's great17:26
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
hartsocksanything else else on blueprints?17:26
hartsocks#topic high priority bugs17:27
*** openstack changes topic to "high priority bugs (Meeting topic: VMwareAPI)"17:27
danwent#link all bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=vmware17:27
danwenthttps://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/118089717:27
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1180897 in nova "nova compute fails when vmware cluster has more than one ESXi Host" [Critical,Confirmed]17:27
danwentseems like this should be a very high priority…17:27
hartsocksI'm working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1178369 which was identified as a blocker… I am planning to move to 118089717:27
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1178369 in nova "VNC console does not work with VCDriver" [Medium,In progress]17:27
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
hartsocksI was on 1180897  but the VNC thing was raised as a blocker.17:28
*** seanrob has quit IRC17:28
hartsocksI have a work in progress patch on the VNC issue … still diagnosing the cluster issue.17:28
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
danwentyup, i think that makes sense.  if there's someone else with available cycles though, perhaps they could jump on the cluster issues as well.17:28
DavieyPersonally, i'm not sure how significant lack of VNC is as a blocker.17:29
hartsocksDaviey: IKR? That's why I was ignoring it. Turns out it's a huge issue.17:29
DavieyI mean, if that is users primary interface into instances.. then they are doing it wrongâ„¢17:29
danwentDaviey: its certainly a blocker in our internal cloud deployments, which use Horizon17:29
hartsocksand there you go…17:30
hartsocksSo let's not beat a dead horse.17:30
danwentits just an ease of use thing.17:30
Davieyok17:30
hartsocksWe're working on these two big issues.17:30
danwentespeically if you are using private networks, and don't want everything to have a floating ip17:30
*** IlyaE has quit IRC17:30
hartsocksWhat else is out there?17:30
danwenthttps://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/118077917:30
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1180779 in nova "VMwareESXDriver and VMwareVCDriver report incorrect stat" [Undecided,In progress]17:30
danwenttwo things here17:31
danwentthere is a patch referenced in this bug that actually tries to address two things.  I think it should be split, one patch per bug17:31
danwenthttps://review.openstack.org/2955217:31
danwentkirankv: this is your patch, correct?17:31
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC17:32
danwentthe second point on this bug is about how the "Multiple datastores" issue is resolved.17:32
Eustaceyes, it's Kirankv's patch17:32
kirankvyes, but its a little effort to get them seperated since needs changes in the unit tests as well17:32
danwenti think different people have different thoughts on how the datastore issue should be addressed.17:32
danwentkirankv: i'm pretty sure once a nova core dev looks at it, there advice would be to split it17:33
kirankvwell since its a cluster driver, IMHO only shared datastore must be used17:33
hartsocksWe had another developer at vmware who has a patch for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1171930 but is holding on to it because it's obvious HP is working here.17:33
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1171930 in nova "vsphere driver hardcoded to only use first datastore in cluster" [Wishlist,In progress]17:33
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
danwenthartsocks: yeah, that is why i think we need a discussion on the right way to solve the problem.17:33
danwentit seems like the currently proposed patch will not allow the use of local disks ever?17:34
danwentor am i misreading that?17:34
kirankvyes shared datastores for cluster driver, and all datastores for ESX driver17:34
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
hartsocksis the VCDriver to be interpreted as "the cluster driver" ?17:35
*** kchenweijie has left #openstack-meeting17:35
danwenti think cluster will be common, but I wasn't seeing it as required17:35
danwenti know of customers talking about using it in a non-clustered (i.e., one cluster per ESX) model.17:36
danwentnot sure if there are other issues with that model though.17:36
kirankvyes, if its acceptable to add another driver called cluster driver and more all cluster specific changes to this driver, i'd like to go with that approach17:36
hartsocksHmm...17:36
ssshii'm also working on that. when the scheduler received a dict capabalities, it simply make a copy. so i replaced the copy function with a customizable function to process the capabilities.17:36
danwentanyway, we don't need to have the design discussion in this meeting, but my point is that i think there are still design discussions to be had here, and so I think we need to talk about that before this portion of the patch can merge.17:37
*** eharney has quit IRC17:37
hartsocksShall we set up a separate discussion for this design talk?17:37
danwenti'd suggest splitting the two bug fixes, merging the first one, and discussing how to address the datastore issue.17:37
danwenthartsocks: we can do it right after this meeting in openstack-vmware if people like.17:38
*** bdpayne has quit IRC17:38
ssshiagree with danwent17:38
hartsocks#action separate discussion in #openstack-vmware on datastore design issue17:38
hartsocksAny other high-priority bugs?17:39
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** eharney has quit IRC17:39
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
danwentI need to file a bug on this, but the new vif-plugging changes broken quantum integration in nova when the vcdriver is used.17:39
danwentfix should be relatively simple though.17:39
danwentwe REALLY need to be moving toward an automated CI infrastructure to get this working17:40
danwentand keep it working :)17:40
hartsocksdanwent: great! I need a simple bug to onboard some new developers we just hired17:40
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting17:40
*** Tross has quit IRC17:40
danwenthartsocks: ok, sounds good.  will send you a link.17:40
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting17:40
hartsocks#topic bug etiquette17:41
*** openstack changes topic to "bug etiquette (Meeting topic: VMwareAPI)"17:41
hartsocksNot on the official agenda… but… I'd like to just stress that if someone's marked that they are working on a bug….17:41
hartsocksplease don't just take the bug away from them. Perhaps send them an email or make a comment on the bug as to why you are taking the bug from them.17:41
Daviey(danwent: We should talk about CI soonly.)17:41
danwentDaviey: happily!17:42
hartsockswe have some time now.17:42
*** eharney_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
*** eharney is now known as Guest1467517:43
*** eharney_ is now known as eharney17:43
danwentDaviey: i know some HP folks are looking into CI as well, and hopefully mtaylor can help us on that front.17:43
*** eharney has quit IRC17:43
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
hartsocks#topic CI discussion17:43
*** openstack changes topic to "CI discussion (Meeting topic: VMwareAPI)"17:43
Davieydanwent: How happy have openstack-ci been to introduce real vmware testing?17:43
danwentanyone from the HP team able to talk about the status there?  I think the ball was in your court.17:43
EustaceWe are not in the loop on that topic17:44
DavieyI, probably incorrectly, assumed they'd not want to touch non-free components.17:44
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting17:44
*** Guest14675 has quit IRC17:45
danwentDaviey: well, openstack on vSphere is priority for HP, and HP contributes a lot of resources to openstack-ci, including developers, so I think there's plenty of opportunity here.17:45
danwentespecially given that the majority of existing nova devs don't dev-test on vSphere, automated CI tests are all that much more important :)17:45
DavieyI think that is the best direction :)17:45
danwent#action #danwent contact HP contact for CI work again.17:46
hartsocksokay...17:46
hartsocksLast topic on my agenda...17:46
hartsocks#topic group meeting time17:46
*** openstack changes topic to "group meeting time (Meeting topic: VMwareAPI)"17:47
hartsocksI held a vote on the meeting time...17:47
hartsocks#link http://i.imgur.com/u4XyLLL.png17:47
*** changbl has quit IRC17:47
hartsockshere's a screenshot of the votes.17:47
* Daviey has to leave now. Thanks o/17:48
hartsocksIt's pretty clear that this is a good meeting time for most people willing to vote on a survey monkey survey about meeting times.17:48
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
hartsocksI'll hold the voting open one more week17:48
hartsocks#link http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/DN8YFSL17:48
*** colinmcnamara1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
hartsocksBarring any sudden rush of votes I think this is our regular meeting time.17:49
danwentagreed17:49
hartsocksOkay then17:49
hartsocks#topic open discussion17:50
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: VMwareAPI)"17:50
hartsocksAnything else folks need to chat about?17:50
hartsocksalright, see you next week17:51
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:51
hartsocks#endmeeting17:51
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"17:51
openstackMeeting ended Wed May 22 17:51:35 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:51
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/vmwareapi/2013/vmwareapi.2013-05-22-17.01.html17:51
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/vmwareapi/2013/vmwareapi.2013-05-22-17.01.txt17:51
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/vmwareapi/2013/vmwareapi.2013-05-22-17.01.log.html17:51
hartsocksremember #openstack-vmware is open for discussion and I'll be hanging out there regularly.17:52
*** rsacharya has left #openstack-meeting17:54
*** rushi_agr has quit IRC17:54
*** jimfehlig has left #openstack-meeting17:56
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** anniec has quit IRC17:57
*** ijw1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** dontalton has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** Yada has quit IRC18:05
*** hartsocks has left #openstack-meeting18:07
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
*** xyang_ has quit IRC18:09
*** hanney has quit IRC18:10
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** Ankit_ has quit IRC18:11
*** epim has quit IRC18:11
*** Sagar has quit IRC18:12
*** jcru|away is now known as jcru18:14
*** dolphm has quit IRC18:15
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net18:18
*** ijw1 has quit IRC18:20
*** Mandell has quit IRC18:26
*** garyk has quit IRC18:26
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC18:27
mordreddanwent, Daviey aroo?18:28
danwentyes, but on another call right now.18:28
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n318:30
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC18:32
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting18:33
danwentmordred: do you have time to chat about vsphere CI sometime soon?18:33
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting18:33
mordreddanwent: how long of a chat? like a quick IRC one? or a longer thing?18:35
mordred(quick==yes, long==next week)18:35
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC18:37
Davieymordred: here18:37
danwentlet's do quick now.   can you talk in 3 mins?18:37
danwentjust wrapping up a call18:37
*** Eustace has quit IRC18:37
mordredabsolute18:37
mordredabsolutely18:37
*** ssshi has quit IRC18:37
*** kchenweijie has quit IRC18:38
*** dachary has quit IRC18:38
*** dachary1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
danwentok, thanks for waiting18:40
*** sushils has quit IRC18:41
danwentone of our openstack + vsphere devs is also joining18:41
danwentmordred, Daviey: i'm back18:41
mordredhey hey18:41
*** bdpayne has quit IRC18:41
danwentmordred: did nigel talk to you at all about your thoughts on vsphere in openstack-ci?18:41
mordreddanwent: not to my knowledge - but then my brain is rather slippery18:42
*** dachary1 is now known as dachary18:42
danwentanyway, we were talking about how HP + VMware can coordinate around improving vsphere support in openstack and testing is obvious a huge area in need of improvement18:42
mordredI think it's likely going to be similar in form to the chats I've had with primeministerp about hyperv testing though18:42
mordredoh - ah - talk to me with HP hat on18:43
* mordred puts on other hat too18:43
danwentand since HP has a leading role in the in the CI stuff this seemed like a natural fit18:43
danwentwell, both hats actually… a two hatter!18:43
* mordred looks at self in mirror wearing two hats...18:43
danwent:)18:43
mordreddo you happen to know any product folks at HP who have vsphere interest?18:44
mordredhonestly, the physical act of testing is a mostly-known quantity and I could tell you how it would work right now18:44
mordredbut staffing it is going to be the biggest hurdle18:44
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:44
danwentmordred: let me put you in touch with the right HP people.18:45
mordredso if I could find the right product guy to prioritize it, it would help me get a head on it18:45
danwentvmware has folks who can help out as well.18:45
mordredsweet18:45
danwenti think we can tackle the staffing18:45
danwentan of course there's intereste from Daviey's team as well18:45
mordredsweet18:45
mordredso- the 3 second version of how it works technically18:45
danwenthaha, perfect, just what i was about to ask for18:46
mordredis similar to what Daviey and jamespage do for juju/package stuff - although possibly a little different18:46
mordredthat's that there needs to be an env somewhere that's vsphere capable/able to run tests18:46
mordredthen we set up a thing like smokestack, or like the ubuntu jenkins, which receives gerrit events and triggers tests there18:47
Davieyright18:47
mordredthose can then vote back on changes as much as they like18:47
mordredthe tricky bits are often around making sure the test rig can handle the incoming load of changes18:47
Davieymordred: so you don't want this to be a core jenkins ci thing?18:47
danwentmordred: agreed.  we have an internal openstack cloud that will soon be able to run ESX nested.18:48
danwentDaviey: yeah, that was my question as well.18:48
mordrednot at first - we don't really have the place to put it right now18:48
danwentthe tricky thing is that HP/RAX cloud probably can't run ESX nested today.18:48
mordredexactly18:48
Davieydanwent: does ESX nest into kvm?18:49
danwentDaviey: no18:49
mordredso I tihnk the easiest way to get it moving is to do it smokestack style18:49
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting18:49
mordredand then we can make a follow on step for exploring how to 'promote' it once we're all a little bit more fluent in how it all hangs together18:49
Davieywell. jenkins style.18:49
mordredyeah :)18:49
mordredI meant external tool style18:50
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
danwentmordred: do you want me to loop you into the HP thread with your inaugust email, or somethign else?18:50
Davieyyou mean per merge proposal, pre-commit, non-block/binding18:50
mordreddanwent: monty.taylor@hp.com18:50
mordredI do18:50
mordredbecause the technical challenges to solve for per merge proposal, pre-commit, non-block/binding are the same as if it was binding18:51
Davieyright18:51
DavieyI don't think this has to be terribly complex18:51
mordredagree18:51
Davieythe bits are all there.. they just need plumbing together with some glue :)18:52
mordredthat said - forgive my ignorance - when we say "vsphere" are we talking about vmware esx?18:52
*** glikson has quit IRC18:52
Davieydanwent might comment differently, but the test is really just making sure the vsphere operates correctly and can be exercised18:53
*** kirankv has quit IRC18:53
DavieyIt's not about CI'ing vmware :)18:53
danwentmordred: we're talking about vCenter controller ESX.18:53
danwentthe calls go Nova -> vCenter -> ESX Box18:53
danwentyes, all we're looking to test here is the Nova integration, not vCenter or ESX in general18:53
mordredis vCenter open source?18:54
danwentnope :)18:54
danwentbut we can get free licesnses as needed, if we had to run it somewhere else18:54
mordredwell ... that might color the eventual existence of the thing in the upstream gate :)18:54
mordredit's mainly about how we structure this18:54
mordredif it's in the gate, problems it uncovers need to be addressable by developers18:54
mordredwhich doesn't mean we can't test the code paths18:55
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
mordredbut it might mean that we might need to think a little bit more about how its structured18:55
danwentagreeed18:55
sdaguebut smokestack isn't in the gate, it's just in the check path. That's probably the right way to think about this for a while.18:55
mordredI'd say that first step of external testing interface is a clear win18:55
mordredsdague: ++18:55
danwentbut the reality is that we're going to end up gating on stuff that the developer doesn't have in their own dev environment18:56
mordredpeople enjoy the feedback from good installs18:56
DavieyWell.. the debate with HyperV was that developers didn't want to lose velocity making their patchstes work with HyperV.. They wanted it to notify HyperV carers to help fix it.18:56
DavieyI hoped that openstack has matured a little more since then, and people introducing changes should be responsible for not breaking others.18:56
danwentwell, is by "lose velocity" you mean "be a good developer and don't break other peoples" stuff, then I disagree18:56
danwentDaviey: agree :)18:57
mordredright. I think that once we have non-voting gating on both hyperv and/or vsphere, it'll be an easier conversation to have a bout next steps18:57
Daviey+118:57
danwentmordred: ok, sounds like we're all on the same page about next steps18:57
mordredgah18:57
mordrednot-voting jobs18:57
mordrednot non-voting gating. that makes no sense18:57
sdagueheh18:57
mordredyou all know what I mean18:57
*** schwicht has quit IRC18:57
sdagueyeh, just think about the check path18:57
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
danwentok, hartsocks, you around?18:58
mordredand danwent, I'll definitely loop up with hp folks to have a company to company discussion18:58
danwenthartsocks runs the openstack-vsphere meeting.18:58
*** dachary has quit IRC18:58
*** lloydde has quit IRC18:58
sdaguehonestly, having spent as much time staring at check results as anyone, I think plenty will shake out just trying to get the check paths to be consistently passing18:58
danwentmordred: great.  i will send the email to let you know who i've been connected with.18:58
*** dachary has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
*** lindj has quit IRC18:59
Davieydanwent: can i be in the thread please?18:59
danwentok, got to run to another meeting.  sorry.  ttyl18:59
*** timductive has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
danwentDaviey: sure, will pull you in.18:59
*** danwent has quit IRC18:59
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC19:00
*** seanrob_ has quit IRC19:00
*** dontalton has quit IRC19:01
*** lloydde has quit IRC19:01
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** thomasm has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** anniec has quit IRC19:03
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
*** lindj has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
*** seanrob has quit IRC19:05
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC19:07
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando19:07
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
*** hemna is now known as hemnafk19:10
*** dripton has quit IRC19:12
*** cdub has quit IRC19:12
*** ssurana has joined #openstack-meeting19:13
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting19:13
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting19:13
*** colinmcnamara1 has quit IRC19:14
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting19:15
*** hartsocks has left #openstack-meeting19:15
*** dripton has joined #openstack-meeting19:16
*** jcru has left #openstack-meeting19:16
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting19:17
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting19:20
*** noslzzp has quit IRC19:20
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC19:22
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
*** jhenner has quit IRC19:22
*** kchenweijie has left #openstack-meeting19:23
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
*** lindj has quit IRC19:27
*** keith_bray has quit IRC19:30
*** litong has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
*** keith_bray has joined #openstack-meeting19:31
*** joshuamckenty has joined #openstack-meeting19:32
*** lindj has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting19:34
*** obondarev_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:35
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting19:35
*** huats_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
sdakeo/19:36
*** timello has quit IRC19:36
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** pnavarro has quit IRC19:37
*** toanster_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** sivel_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
*** crank_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
*** bradjone1|away has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
*** kiall_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
*** pschaef has quit IRC19:41
*** troytoma` has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** lillie- has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** matiu has quit IRC19:42
*** troytoman-away has quit IRC19:42
*** crank has quit IRC19:42
*** arosen has quit IRC19:42
*** obondarev has quit IRC19:42
*** Guest88081 has quit IRC19:42
*** sivel has quit IRC19:42
*** huats has quit IRC19:42
*** bradjones|away has quit IRC19:42
*** tr3buchet has quit IRC19:42
*** hyakuhei_ has quit IRC19:42
*** toanster has quit IRC19:42
*** lindj has left #openstack-meeting19:43
*** _ozstacker_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** litong has quit IRC19:43
*** woodspa_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
*** litong has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
*** crank_ is now known as crank19:44
*** stevebaker has quit IRC19:45
*** ozstacker has quit IRC19:47
*** woodspa has quit IRC19:47
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
*** sdake_ has quit IRC19:49
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
*** matiu has quit IRC19:49
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
*** tr3buchet has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
*** arosen has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC19:51
*** seanrob has quit IRC19:54
*** roaet has quit IRC19:55
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
*** TravT has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
*** danwent has quit IRC19:56
*** hanney has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
*** Dug1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
*** shardy has joined #openstack-meeting19:59
*** randallburt has joined #openstack-meeting19:59
*** stevemar has quit IRC19:59
*** SpamapS has joined #openstack-meeting19:59
*** mrodden has quit IRC19:59
*** tspatzier has joined #openstack-meeting19:59
shardy#startmeeting heat20:00
openstackMeeting started Wed May 22 20:00:04 2013 UTC.  The chair is shardy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:00
*** seanrob has quit IRC20:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: heat)"20:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'heat'20:00
shardy#topic rollcall20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: heat)"20:00
shardyshardy here20:00
stevebakerhere (mostly)20:00
*** mrutkows has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
hanneyo/20:00
zanebI'm awake20:00
mrutkowshere20:00
randallburthello20:00
TravTTravis Tripp here20:00
asalkeldo/20:00
jpeelerhi20:01
sdake_o/20:01
shardyhi all20:01
shardy#topic Review last week's actions20:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Review last week's actions (Meeting topic: heat)"20:01
sdake_zaneb awake/alive :)20:01
*** m4dcoder has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
shardy#info stevebaker stevebaker to send ML email re backwards-compatibility20:02
zanebsdake_: <zaneb> I'm awake20:02
*** changbl has quit IRC20:02
fsargenthi!20:02
keith_brayhi20:02
m4dcoderhi!20:02
SpamapSo/20:02
shardyI saw this sent today20:02
stevebakersent, haven't checked for replies yet20:02
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
tspatzierhi20:02
shardyplease add replies if you have strong opinions on the subject :)20:02
SpamapSstevebaker: I wonder if you might want to send it to the general openstack ML20:02
sdake_there was one reply stating it will be possible in future versions of openstack to use past versions20:02
SpamapSstevebaker: as that one is full of users, rathe than developers20:02
shardy#info shardy PoC HOT patch20:03
*** jrcookli_ has quit IRC20:03
stevebakertrue20:03
shardySo I started looking at this, but not posted anything yet20:03
shardy#action shardy PoC HOT patch20:03
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:03
shardywas waiting for the converged template, which brings me to..20:03
shardy#info randallburt, tspatzier provide converged DSL/HOT example20:03
randallburtso, we discussed this a bit20:04
* SpamapS starts drum roll20:04
zaneblol20:04
randallburtand I think based on our conversations today, we may want to change tacks and go the zane route of a couple new bps for some specifics20:04
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
randallburtrather than try to get an entire format agreed upon beforehand20:04
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
shardyrandallburt: sounds good, and I'd really like us to start making some progress on the Provides BPs soon20:05
zaneb+1 million20:05
shardyProviders that is20:05
randallburtshardy:  should have some folks starting on that in the next week or so20:05
*** devvesa has joined #openstack-meeting20:05
shardyrandallburt: Do you have resources to look at those, the current assignee has been fairly quiet ;)20:05
stevebakerits all about the journey, not the destination ;)20:05
randallburtactually, next week20:05
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting20:05
tspatzierrandallburt: not sure this depends on zane's proposal. We should be able to agree on a hello world kind of template without that20:05
randallburtshardy:  yes20:05
randallburthe will be less quiet soon20:05
shardyrandallburt: Ok, great, sounds good20:06
tspatzierWould be good to have this PoC HOT patch to be able to start some coding20:06
*** DanD has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
keith_brayshardy I'll back randallburt up.. will get the resources going asap.. we are rolling off or previous comittments.20:06
keith_brays/or/our20:06
TravTSo, should we still be commenting on the template alternatives posted or will there be a new place?20:06
randallburtbased on some discussions today tspatzier, I think the new bps will help there20:06
stevebakerstarting with Providers, then maybe Environments next20:06
shardytspatzier: OK, I'll still post a PoC draft patch, which we can discuss, figure out where the additional template translation may work20:06
*** bdpayne has quit IRC20:07
mrutkowscan you summarize the new BPs?20:07
shardywe already do something somewhat similar with the YAML/CFN reformatting20:07
mrutkowsand when we might see them?20:07
randallburtTravT:  I'll do one more review to gerrit and we can work from bps from there20:07
shardy#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/provider-resource20:07
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
tspatzierTravT: comments would still be welcome20:07
SpamapSso bps are fine, but there is at least a template that is the goal to deploy, right?20:07
randallburtshardy:  will do another push after meeting20:07
tspatzierSpamapS: that was my thinking as well20:08
SpamapSlike, we've settled on one to be 0.1 of the examples?20:08
TravTtspatzier: Ok. Just got back from 3 weeks travel and found them this morning.20:08
shardySpamapS: I personally would prefer initially to focus on adding the missing stuff to the internal model20:08
shardythen polish the syntax later20:08
SpamapSshardy: 100% agree20:08
randallburtshardy:  agreed, afraid we'd get stuck otherwise20:08
asalkeldyea we need provider + env20:08
SpamapSshardy: I suggest that missing stuff be exercised by a "good enough" template that can be improved on as the holes are found.20:09
zanebSpamapS: let's be clear here, design is not only bottom-up or top-down, both must happen _simultaneously_20:09
SpamapSyeah totally20:09
*** danwent has quit IRC20:09
SpamapSLike we know there are things that will need to be done in the core to support things that are not yet done in the interface (templates).20:09
shardyzaneb: yep, but we could test the new bottom-up features via a superset CFN syntax20:09
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away20:09
shardywe don't actually *need* a whole new DSL syntax to test the functionality20:10
shardyalthough I know many people are interested in working towards having one20:10
SpamapS+1 for a superset CFN until there is at least a feature-parity-capable HOT template format settled on.20:10
zaneb+1000 for a superset syntax20:10
SpamapSzaneb: careful, you'll run out of +1's20:10
randallburtshardy:  agreed. the more I work with it, the more I'm convinced we'll get there eventually20:11
shardyOk, sounds like we have agreement, hooray! ;)20:11
* mordred hands zaneb a bucket of +1's20:11
SpamapSthen you become that guy who has to -1 everything just to get back to even. :)20:11
tspatziershardy: agree, but having a picture of how the new features would surface in the DSL would help understanding if we can parse the new format easily in the future and if it looks intuitive20:11
randallburtzaneb:  can use some of mine20:11
shardytspatzier: sure, that discussion should continue, and is valuable20:11
zanebtspatzier: exactly20:11
shardyI just think we should start work on the bottom-up stuff now, before we start running out of time.. :)20:12
zanebwe need the code and the template syntax to co-evolve with feedback from each other20:12
shardyh1 is only a week away..20:12
shardywhich brings me to the next topic..20:12
SpamapSYeah, land what you can when you can. Don't build up all the delta in a massive "early in I cycle" patch bonanza20:12
zanebjust looking at the template syntax won't work; just looking at the code will create a mess20:12
shardyYep, incremental steps towards the end goal20:13
shardy#topic h1 bugs/blueprints20:13
*** openstack changes topic to "h1 bugs/blueprints (Meeting topic: heat)"20:13
*** jasond has joined #openstack-meeting20:13
shardy#link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/havana-120:13
stevebakerI'll be focusing on my quantum/vpc bugs20:13
shardyAnyone got anything they don't think will land in time?20:14
shardyh1 is only a week away20:14
jpeelerafraid so, will adjust everything at the end of this week20:14
shardyjpeeler: no problem, just bump any to h2 which won't get completed20:15
sdake_shardy have some infra patches that haven't passed review yet20:15
sdake_but tested on devstack seem to work20:15
zanebparallel launch is dependent on folks reviewing the patches20:15
SpamapSseems like h1 is looking pretty good really.20:15
shardysdake_: sounds good - do you need reviews from us?20:16
shardyzaneb: Ok, how many more patches in the queue?20:16
sdake_i had to rebase one because of pbr, I may need to rebase others20:16
zanebabout 2020:16
shardyzaneb: Ok, well lets see if we can shorten the review cycle a bit over the next few days20:17
shardy#action everyone to do reviews ;)20:17
zanebthere's 4 up there now if there are any takers :)20:17
sdake_zaneb are they in gerrit, I don't see 20 patches from you20:17
SpamapSmoar +1's and +2's20:17
zanebsdake_: no, I haven't submitted the whole series because rebases make it too difficult to follow20:18
sdake_zaneb makes sense20:18
shardyOk, one other thing re h120:18
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
*** seanrob has quit IRC20:19
shardyCan everyone do a bit of testing next week, try to make sure we have a milestone release which works?20:19
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
stevebakerwe may be close to having some heat tempest gating20:20
asalkeldwell done20:20
*** wirehead_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
shardystevebaker: sounds great! Still be good for us all to do some basic smoke tests tho (ie not just unit tests)20:20
stevebakeryup20:21
shardyanything else on h1 or bugs/bps in general?20:21
asalkeldshould get to ceilometer alarms in h220:21
shardyasalkeld: awesome :)20:21
asalkeldalarming functionality nearly all in ceilometer (eglynn just doing the last bit)20:22
shardyasalkeld: how hard is the migration going to be from the heat perspective?20:22
shardySeems like we'll have to rip out a fair amout of stuff20:22
shardy(or make optional rather)20:23
asalkeldwell thinking on having both in place20:23
shardy+120:23
* SpamapS always tests tip, so far things look great. :)20:23
sdake_+120:23
asalkeldfor people that already have deployments20:23
zanebasalkeld: for how long?20:23
asalkeld1 release?20:23
SpamapSthough I don't test watches or autoscaling :p20:23
m4dcoderasalkeld: i can help with the ceilometer rework20:23
asalkeldthinking of ppetit20:24
asalkeldthanks m4dcoder20:24
zanebasalkeld: I'm thinking of how we do the engine-scaling stuff20:24
shardySpamapS: do you regularly test stack update?20:24
*** dolphm has quit IRC20:24
zanebhaving to support periodic tasks as well makes it far more difficult20:24
asalkeldzaneb, we will get a web hook20:24
*** m4dcoder_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:24
asalkeldthinking of still inserting a watch as a placeholder20:25
mrutkowsI can help with Ceilometer work as well20:25
zanebasalkeld: that's fine for ceilometer, but for supporting the old way?20:25
asalkeldyea, got to keep it there20:25
asalkeldat least optionally20:25
shardyasalkeld: actually zaneb and I discussed the engine-scale-out problem and realized that it gets much simplified without all the engine periodic tasks20:25
asalkeldI'll tread carefully20:25
asalkeldshardy, yea it does20:26
zanebasalkeld: or we could say "no scaling out of heat-engine if you use the old autoscaling"20:26
asalkeldyip20:26
zanebthat works for me20:26
shardyzaneb: that sounds like a pretty reasonable compromise20:26
zanebwon't be pretty, but it is reasonable :D20:26
SpamapS~.20:26
asalkeldyea, don't want to make users pissed off20:27
SpamapSshardy: sorry, coffee shop wifi booted me off20:27
*** gyee has quit IRC20:27
SpamapSshardy: I do test update quite a bit, but only updating metadata and occasionally adding new instance resources20:27
shardySpamapS: Ok, cool - I'm just thinking of test exposure for my now-quite-bug update interface refactor/cleanup20:28
shardyAnything else or shall we move on?20:28
*** m4dcoder has quit IRC20:28
asalkeldall good20:28
SpamapSshardy: hopefully stevebaker's tempest stuff will include updatestack?20:28
* SpamapS still thinks humans are the worst choice for testing things.20:28
stevebakerSpamapS: it will when you write one :P20:28
asalkeldhah20:29
zanebSpamapS: s/testing/checking/20:29
SpamapSstevebaker: sweet, I actually really want to flesh out that testing.20:29
shardyI guess the point is really asking people who actually *use* the features if they're happy that they still work20:29
fsargentOh, BTW, if you want to test Heat on Rackspace hardware, we have $500/mo accounts for you:; iopenedthecloud.com20:29
shardybut yep, automated tests ftw20:29
fsargentUnrelated to topic, please excuse.20:30
asalkeldthanks fsargent20:30
asalkeldalready applied20:30
shardyfsargent: thanks, saw that link earlier20:30
shardy#topic Removal of tools/openstack scripts20:30
*** openstack changes topic to "Removal of tools/openstack scripts (Meeting topic: heat)"20:30
shardySo I've raised a bug to remove tools/openstack*20:30
asalkeldwhat is promting this?20:30
stevebaker\o/20:31
asalkeldI thought you guys used it20:31
SpamapSI suspect what is prompting that is the untenable situation it presents.20:31
stevebakerits a maintenance burden20:31
sdake_wont be using it for long because of lib changes20:31
SpamapSHeat doesn't need to maintain a "deploy openstack" script. :-P20:31
*** therve has joined #openstack-meeting20:31
shardyasalkeld: the reason is we've got lots of users coming in asking for RDO help (having installed via packstack), and their configs are broken because tools/openstack does things slightly differently20:31
shardySo why not just use packstack20:31
zanebI find it tools/openstack unusable already on F1720:31
shardyis my suggestion20:32
SpamapSI'd love to see us maintain a VM image people can boot and try Heat on20:32
asalkeldya20:32
* SpamapS points at diskimage-builder ...20:32
shardyI actually have used the script quite a lot, but it seems like time to kill it IMO (now we have packstack and RDO)20:32
asalkeldis there an ubuntu version of packstack?20:32
shardythat was my next question -20:32
stevebakerjuju ;)20:33
sdake_packstack would likely run on ubuntu20:33
asalkeld(that people use)20:33
shardywhat's "the" way to do all-in-one installs on Ubuntu?20:33
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC20:33
SpamapSapt-get install all-the-things20:33
asalkeldcrickets20:33
shardycan we just link to a procedure someone else publishes?20:33
SpamapSThats what I would recommend.20:34
stevebakeror devstack, which we cover already20:34
shardySpamapS: I'm not an ubuntu user, can you suggest such a link?20:34
shardystevebaker: the idea is instructions for devstack, RDO/packstack, and $ubuntu-packaged-stuff20:35
shardyalthough we're not packaged for ubuntu yet are we?20:35
SpamapSshardy: no, because I use devstack or diskimage-builder's boot-stack20:35
SpamapSwhich both use git20:35
sdake_shardy: the documentation tells how to install openstack on ubuntu20:35
SpamapSand are probably too crazy for most people. :)20:35
SpamapSshardy: the debian packages likely work fine on Ubuntu20:35
SpamapSin fact, heat is in saucy20:36
SpamapShttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heat20:36
sdake_#link http://docs.openstack.org/grizzly/basic-install/apt/content/20:36
asalkeldI can practically hear people googling;)20:37
sdake_shardy ^20:37
sdake_actually I have a bookmark :)20:37
shardysdake_: Ok, I was thinking of a simple, scripted, beginner friendly script or tool20:37
asalkeldshardy, we don't have to find it now20:37
shardyasalkeld: Ok, I just wanted to clarify if such a thing exists before deleting tools/openstack_ubuntu20:38
sdake_shardy: there is no such tool unless the deb/ubuntu community writes one20:38
*** mkollaro has quit IRC20:38
zanebit's fair to say that people have been successfully installing openstack on Ubuntu for quite some time without our help20:38
shardyOk, well are we agreed we should remove the scripts and update the docs then?20:39
asalkeldsure20:39
shardyzaneb: I get the impression almost all of our ubuntu users are on devstack20:39
SpamapSRight, the packages are very good and do a lot of setup for you.20:39
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC20:39
*** Dug1 has quit IRC20:39
shardy#topic Open discussion20:39
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: heat)"20:40
shardyAnyone have anything to discuss?20:40
asalkeldinfrastructure are wanting to use heat againt rackspace and hpcloud20:40
asalkeldthis provider/environment idea is going to really help to abstract the20:40
asalkelddifferences in API/identity20:40
asalkeldclarkb, ...20:40
clarkbo/20:40
asalkeldtell us your wows20:40
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
SpamapSwoes?20:41
asalkeldyip that one20:41
zanebthose too20:41
clarkbthere are a couple places that I think we want to start using Heat. For managing our pool of devstack-gate slaves and to manage an elasticsearch cluster. I think mordred would like to see us use heat for all the things but these are some concrete goals we can focus on20:41
*** jlucci has quit IRC20:41
clarkbthis requires running VMs in rackspace and hpcloud and they provide some restrictions that are fun to work with20:42
*** spzala has quit IRC20:42
clarkbneither provide a way for self service VM image uploads so we can only boot the images they provide or snapshots that we create20:42
keith_brayRackspace also wants to run Heat on Rackspace public cloud… we will be having to work through some of those fun challenges ourselves.20:42
asalkeldthis might make a nice concrete (and productive) goal for the provider stuff20:43
*** BobBall-Away has quit IRC20:43
stevebakerfor one thing, we can develop alternative middleware pipelines for whatever auth weirdness20:43
clarkbboth also have funny keystone. Rackspace has special auth stuff iirc and hpcloud returns extra data20:43
shardyasalkeld: you mean envionments?20:43
asalkeldwell both20:43
randallburtso basically, you'd have a template resource for doing things one way when you run heat in Rackspace, but a different resource template for running heat at HP?20:43
asalkeldenv + provider20:43
clarkband rackspace does not use cloud-init20:43
*** saurabhs has joined #openstack-meeting20:44
shardyasalkeld: ah, k, cool20:44
clarkbfwiw I am not against running two different heats if I need to20:44
stevebakershort term it should be possible to hard-configure a heat to 1 external cloud20:44
*** zzs has joined #openstack-meeting20:44
clarkbone to talk to rackspace and one to talk to hpcloud20:44
clarkbthis may end up being better for sanity20:44
wirehead_Yeah, keith_bray, we were discussing this yesterday evening on #heat.  Hence fsargent offering the hookup20:44
asalkeldhave you guys done anything on this yet?20:45
randallburtyeah, its fun building an image to just install cloud-init only to snapshot it for use on other things20:45
fsargentYeah...20:45
fsargentI'll ask people about cloud-init20:45
fsargentI'm not familiar with it personally20:45
randallburti know there's been talk about it, but not sure where things are or if they are atm20:45
fsargentOK. What are alternatives to cloud-init?20:46
asalkeldcan we run with out cloud-init?20:46
keith_brayfsargent, let's link up efforts.20:46
* stevebaker has to go. kthxbye20:46
randallburtchef20:46
SpamapSWe could add an instance type that pushes heat's stuff in via SSH20:46
randallburtpuppet, salt, etc20:46
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:46
shardyasalkeld: not really20:46
fsargentoh keith_bray you're a racker, got it.20:46
SpamapSsince I assume the SSH key is somehow magically injected to allow users to get into their instance20:46
shardywe could support a mode where cfn-init reads metadata via the API instead of userdata20:46
shardybut then you need something to run cfn-init20:46
randallburtuh, i don't think we have metadata running either20:47
SpamapSbut it seems like not having cloud-init is probably a fairly temporary limitation of Rackspace's cloud20:47
clarkbSpamapS: you would think that but I think we do an initial login with passwords (that doesn't mean ssh with keys isn't possible just not happening today)20:47
SpamapS(though I thought that last summer when it went public...)20:47
SpamapSclarkb: key, passwords, w'ever ;)20:47
randallburtyou can inject keys, though20:47
randallburtas files or personality20:47
SpamapSpoint being, Heat isn't totally helpless here20:47
wirehead_yeah, assuming the config is normalized….  I suspect that cloud-init (or something akin to that) is the 'better' option.  Better is, of course, the enemy of 'done'.20:48
SpamapSAll Heat wants to do after asking nova to boot a server is feed in some JSON to initialize its tools20:48
sdake_and a starting script20:49
fsargentclarkb: remind me where you are?20:49
SpamapSSo, in theory, you can have a custom resource plugin that ssh's in and puts the metadata where you want it, and runs userdata.20:49
shardyatm heat requires cloud-init and nova ec2 metadata to work properly, but we could support some other mode20:49
randallburtso, couldn't you spin a server and install cloud-init and cfn-tools then snapshot it and use that for testing from then on?20:49
clarkbfsargent: I am at HP but spend all my time hacking on the openstack ci/infra stuff20:49
fsargentOk20:49
randallburtoh yeah, metadata.20:49
SpamapSbut spending any time on this is a waste IMO, since RS should just follow the entire rest of the industry and support cloud-init.20:49
shardythe question is, do we really need to?20:50
zanebso how does rackspace handle userdata passed to the nova API at the momemt?20:50
mordred+2 to RS growing cloud-init20:50
fsargentSpamapS: We'll do what we can.20:50
sdake_tend to agree we should avoid special casing the codebase20:50
keith_braySpamapS  RS is working on it.. your point is valid.20:50
asalkeld#link http://www.openlogic.com/wazi/bid/188106/Bootstrapping-an-Ubuntu-Server-on-Rackspace-Using-Cloud-Init-and-Fog20:50
fsargentread that :)20:50
fsargentNot the ideal way to do it.20:50
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:50
randallburtnot a lot of alternatives, though20:51
clarkbhow does that solve the meta data server problem?20:51
randallburtit doesn't. you have to use local "no-cloud" data injected via personality20:51
asalkeldany ways I think we really need to support infra - they would be an awesome user20:51
SpamapSagreed20:51
clarkbasalkeld: obviously I agree but I am also biased :)20:51
asalkeld:)20:52
asalkeldand it is highlighting real problems we need to solve20:52
*** joshuamckenty has quit IRC20:52
shardyagreed, we just need to understand exactly what changes (if any) are needed20:52
asalkeldshardy, we need a wiki/bp20:53
sdake_but if we special case for rs, and hp, and all the other vendors, code base becomes hard to maintain20:53
asalkeldand a plan and people20:53
clarkbsdake_: yeah. I am not sure I would want to special case to do this20:53
shardyasalkeld: care to take an action? ;)20:53
asalkeldsure20:53
shardy#action asalkeld wiki/bp re infra heat usage20:53
clarkbsdake_: I am thinking that if a few things like being able to boot snapshots and some way around cloud-init were possible that would be sufficient20:53
asalkeldsdake_ hopeing for no special casing20:53
sdake_clarkb willing to help with snapshot, think that is a fine feature20:54
sdake_not sure how to get around cloud init - maybe a plugin for bootstrapping20:54
clarkbthat leaves us with figuring out keystone, but it sounds like we can have middleware that handles this20:54
shardyare we saying the images can't have cloud-init, or that the data can't be passed via user/metadata?20:54
asalkeldthere is userdata20:55
clarkbshardy: can't be passed via metadata20:55
sdake_atm images dont have cloud init and can't pass via metadata server20:55
clarkbbooting snapshots allows us to add cloud init20:55
asalkeld(only boot time)20:55
shardysdake_: but we could use some other cloud-init datasource?20:55
asalkeldboot time is how we do it now, so fine20:56
sdake_shardy perhaps a plugin  that the cloud provider could provide - just speculation there  tho20:56
shardyie it doesn't *have* to be Ec2DataSource, we could make that configurable via cloud-config?20:56
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
shardyOk, I guess we need to better understand the limitations and investigate20:56
asalkeldso it has personalities20:56
sdake_shardy I think the way rs cloud works is you have to pass the data prior to boot20:56
asalkeldcan't we have a /etc/rc.init20:57
asalkeldthat installs cloud-init20:57
asalkeldand runs it manually20:57
asalkeld?20:57
asalkeldtechnical details...20:57
shardyYep, we should follow up via bp/wiki I guess20:57
zanebasalkeld: not portably20:58
* SpamapS drops off early20:58
shardynearly out of time20:58
randallburtasalkeld: should work i think20:58
randallburtwould be interesting to try anyway20:58
wirehead_Agreed.  If there's  BP/wiki, that should make it easier for some of us rackers to prod the right people.20:58
randallburtkeith_bray:  ^^20:59
shardyOk, times up, thanks all!20:59
shardy#endmeeting20:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"20:59
openstackMeeting ended Wed May 22 20:59:17 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2013/heat.2013-05-22-20.00.html20:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2013/heat.2013-05-22-20.00.txt20:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/heat/2013/heat.2013-05-22-20.00.log.html20:59
*** therve has left #openstack-meeting20:59
*** sdake_ has quit IRC20:59
*** jasond has left #openstack-meeting20:59
*** dprince has quit IRC20:59
*** wirehead_ has left #openstack-meeting21:00
jd__#startmeeting ceilometer21:00
openstackMeeting started Wed May 22 21:00:03 2013 UTC.  The chair is jd__. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"21:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer'21:00
jd__#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/MeteringAgenda21:00
sandywalsho/21:00
mrutkowso/21:00
dhellmanno/21:00
DanDo/21:00
n0anoo/21:00
jd__hey everybody21:00
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
*** timductive has left #openstack-meeting21:00
m4dcoder_o/21:01
thomasmo/21:01
*** tspatzier has quit IRC21:01
TravTo/21:01
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
*** epende has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
*** TravT has quit IRC21:01
jd__#topic Last week action: jd__ and dhellmann to write formal statement about limiting support for pre-grizzly versions of ceilometer21:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Last week action: jd__ and dhellmann to write formal statement about limiting support for pre-grizzly versions of ceilometer (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"21:02
jd__I plead innocent21:02
*** nealph has joined #openstack-meeting21:02
eglynn_o/21:02
* dhellmann hangs head in shame21:02
terriyuo/21:02
*** devvesa has quit IRC21:03
jd__OTOH more time passes more useless it is :)21:03
jd__shall we re-action, dhellmann ?21:03
dhellmannyes21:03
asalkeldo/21:04
jd__#action jd__ and dhellmann to write formal statement about limiting support for pre-grizzly versions of ceilometer21:04
jd__#topic Review Havana-1 milestone21:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Havana-1 milestone (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"21:04
jd__#link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/havana-121:04
jd__h1 is next week, in 8 days21:04
dragondmo/21:04
asalkeld(I can only stay a couple of minutes)21:04
jd__asalkeld: ack21:04
eglynn_asalkeld: hola!21:05
jd__we're in good shape, we just need to review at this point21:05
jd__so review !21:05
eglynn_are we expecting any dependency changes for h1?21:05
eglynn_(e.g. a new release of WSME before then)21:05
jd__I don't think so21:05
* eglynn_ just thinking about packaging up h121:05
eglynn_cool enough21:06
jd__well, I seem to remember we upgraded our dep on WSME recently if that was the question21:06
*** lillie- is now known as lillie21:06
*** lillie is now known as Guest5641721:07
jd__git diff 2013.1..master -- tools/pip-requires indicates you need wsme 0.5b2 instead of wsme 0.5b121:07
eglynn_I thought there was a further pending issue around status code returning21:07
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
eglynn_e.g s/400/404/ for NotFound21:07
jd__eglynn_: ah maybe, but I don't think it'll be in time for h121:07
* sandywalsh has allocated every friday as full review days21:07
eglynn_jd__: grand so21:08
jd__sandywalsh: good news :)21:08
jd__I'll rework my UDP patch tomorrow FWIW, the test failing is probably trivial so feel free to review even if Jenkins said -121:08
jd__in the case you'd have nothing to do in the next hours :-)21:08
eglynn_jd__: I'll take a look at the UDP patch tmrw also21:09
jd__well, I think that's it for h1, next week you'll be able to flood again21:09
jd__eglynn_: thanks, that'll be helpful :)21:09
jd__also don't hesitate to change milestone on bp or bugs you got merged for h1 and that were not planned for h1 initially, if any21:10
jd__shall we move on or anybody has a question about h1?21:10
dhellmanndo we have any client stuff we need for h1?21:11
dhellmannor, I guess, are we tracking client features with the milestones?21:11
jd__no we are not21:11
jd__clients do not follow this schedule21:11
dhellmannok21:11
jd__so no pressure on this, though it's obviously good that work is done on it21:11
jd__#topic Open discussion21:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"21:12
jd__out of topic21:13
asalkeldwow so fast even I can stay:)21:13
jd__since we don't do this usually, I'd like to mention I've created a bp for ceilometerclient about supporting metadata query for APIv2, since I don't think we have this yet21:13
jd__https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-ceilometerclient/+spec/metadata-query-v221:13
mrutkowswanted to call to everyone's attention a bp Gordon and I submitted today21:13
jd__this is mainly as a tracker for terriyu's job21:14
*** n0ano has quit IRC21:14
mrutkowshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+spec/support-standard-audit-formats21:14
asalkeldjd__, we can pass a generic query21:14
*** zaneb has left #openstack-meeting21:15
jd__asalkeld: but I guess we can still enhance our shell interface, right?21:15
asalkeldhttps://github.com/openstack/python-ceilometerclient/blob/master/ceilometerclient/v2/shell.py#L4821:15
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting21:16
jd__asalkeld: hm.21:17
jd__you're embarassing me21:17
* dhellmann thinks jd__'s memory is getting as bad is mine21:17
asalkeldall good21:18
jd__I was happy I found a good idea to enhance ceilometerclient and now it seems mainly covered by this21:18
jd__asalkeld: any other thing we could tackle on ceilometerclient? I'm trying get terriyu familiar with the API21:18
sandywalshdhellmann, just a heads up, the hp guys should have a proposal for v2 API changes to expose Events coming your way soon.21:18
jd__mrutkows: since you've code, I think I'll take a look at it, though I'm not sure I understand the purpose at first glance :)21:18
asalkeldjd__, I'll have a think (no coffee yet)21:18
jd__asalkeld: thanks21:19
dhellmannsandywalsh: sounds good, I'll keep an eye out for the review21:19
sandywalshdhellmann, it'll likely be a bp spec (elaboration on the existing bp)21:20
asalkeldbtw review client please21:20
dhellmannsandywalsh: or that :-)21:20
asalkeldI have a bunch there21:20
dhellmannasalkeld: I'm going to try to catch up on reviews this evening/tomorrow morning (next 16 hrs or so)21:20
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC21:21
asalkeldthanks21:21
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting21:21
*** sivel_ is now known as sivel21:22
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
* asalkeld heading off - wave21:22
jd__see ya21:22
jd__.blueprint killer21:23
jd__:)21:23
*** EmilienM has quit IRC21:23
eglynn_do we have anything else to discuss?21:24
mordreddo you guys need site-packages = True in python-ceilometerclient tox.ini ?21:24
jd__ahah, I think we don't have the period support in ceilometerclient21:24
jd__mordred: I don't think we should21:25
dhellmannmordred: probably not21:25
dhellmannthat was probably copied from the tox.ini we had in the main repo at one point21:25
mordredcool. I'm going to send in a patch21:26
asalkeldmordred, no need21:26
mordredit's - well - breaking something with teh jinja crap21:27
*** lbragstad has quit IRC21:27
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting21:27
jd__asalkeld: that was fast21:27
asalkeldhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/29876/21:27
mordredasalkeld: whee!21:27
asalkeldjust need to review people21:27
dhellmannapproved21:28
jd__too fast for me21:28
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
mordredyou guys are sexy21:29
*** sdake has quit IRC21:29
dhellmann/me thinks this is getting out of hand21:29
mrutkows\o/21:29
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
*** sdake has quit IRC21:29
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
* jd__ nods21:29
*** sdake has quit IRC21:30
jd__closing in a minute if nobody yells21:30
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
*** sdake has quit IRC21:30
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
dhellmannearly dinner!21:30
eglynn_early to bed! ;)21:30
sandywalshlater kids!21:31
mrutkowsCheers21:31
jd__see you guys, have fun21:32
jd__and happy hacking!21:32
jd__#endmeeting21:32
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"21:32
openstackMeeting ended Wed May 22 21:32:08 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:32
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2013/ceilometer.2013-05-22-21.00.html21:32
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2013/ceilometer.2013-05-22-21.00.txt21:32
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2013/ceilometer.2013-05-22-21.00.log.html21:32
*** mrutkows has quit IRC21:32
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann-away21:33
*** eglynn_ has quit IRC21:34
*** randallburt has quit IRC21:34
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC21:36
*** jamespage_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:37
*** DanD has quit IRC21:38
*** jamespage_ has quit IRC21:41
*** adalbas has quit IRC21:42
*** m4dcoder_ has quit IRC21:45
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting21:45
*** ayurchen has joined #openstack-meeting21:45
*** randallburt has joined #openstack-meeting21:46
*** seanrob has quit IRC21:47
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
*** randallburt has left #openstack-meeting21:47
*** alexheneveld has joined #openstack-meeting21:52
*** seanrob has quit IRC21:52
*** jhenner has quit IRC21:55
*** xbsd has joined #openstack-meeting22:01
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting22:01
*** thomasm has quit IRC22:05
*** Thomas has joined #openstack-meeting22:06
*** Thomas is now known as Guest1114222:06
*** xbsd has quit IRC22:06
*** Guest11142 has quit IRC22:07
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC22:11
*** woodspa_ has quit IRC22:12
*** eharney has quit IRC22:14
*** keith_bray has quit IRC22:17
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:20
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:20
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando22:20
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting22:27
*** egallen has quit IRC22:31
*** boris-42 has quit IRC22:34
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting22:41
*** xbsd has joined #openstack-meeting22:42
*** stevebaker is now known as stevebaker_gone22:44
*** flaper87 has quit IRC22:44
*** mrodden has quit IRC22:46
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting22:53
*** hanney has quit IRC22:56
*** seanrob has quit IRC22:57
*** dachary has quit IRC22:58
*** cdub_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:58
*** dachary has joined #openstack-meeting22:59
*** cdub_ has quit IRC23:02
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC23:04
*** dani4571 has joined #openstack-meeting23:04
*** dani4571 has quit IRC23:06
*** gyee_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting23:11
*** gyee has quit IRC23:11
*** gyee_ has quit IRC23:12
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting23:12
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting23:15
*** amyt has quit IRC23:18
*** ladquin has quit IRC23:19
*** seanrob has quit IRC23:19
*** xbsd has quit IRC23:21
*** ladquin has joined #openstack-meeting23:22
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting23:33
*** ayurchen has quit IRC23:34
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC23:34
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC23:35
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting23:43
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting23:43
*** lloydde has quit IRC23:47
*** markpeek has quit IRC23:48
*** markwash has quit IRC23:49
*** sushils has quit IRC23:49
*** mdenny has quit IRC23:53
*** dwcramer has quit IRC23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!