Thursday, 2013-05-23

*** ewindisch has quit IRC00:01
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting00:05
*** pleia2 has quit IRC00:06
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC00:09
*** pleia2 has joined #openstack-meeting00:10
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting00:12
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** gyee has quit IRC00:29
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting00:41
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:48
*** Tross has quit IRC00:54
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:02
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC01:02
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** Mandell has quit IRC01:20
*** anniec has quit IRC01:21
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting01:25
*** zzs has quit IRC01:38
*** Tross has quit IRC01:39
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting01:45
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting01:48
*** stevebaker has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** Tross has quit IRC02:02
*** danwent has quit IRC02:04
*** amyt has quit IRC02:04
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC02:06
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting02:08
*** alexheneveld has quit IRC02:12
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting02:18
*** saurabhs has quit IRC02:19
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting02:20
*** stevebaker has quit IRC02:22
*** keith_bray has joined #openstack-meeting02:35
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting02:40
*** keith_bray has quit IRC02:44
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting02:44
*** dachary has quit IRC02:46
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** vkmc has quit IRC02:47
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** dperaza has quit IRC03:01
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting03:05
*** matiu has quit IRC03:10
*** harlowja has quit IRC03:14
*** ladquin is now known as ladquin_away03:14
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting03:15
*** zyluo has joined #openstack-meeting03:22
*** anniecheng has quit IRC03:23
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:23
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting03:27
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC03:27
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:29
*** bdpayne has quit IRC03:31
*** litong has quit IRC03:32
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:39
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:39
*** Tross has quit IRC03:40
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting03:42
*** noslzzp has quit IRC03:44
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting03:44
*** stevemar has quit IRC03:46
*** neelashah has quit IRC03:46
*** jrodom has quit IRC03:49
*** gongysh has quit IRC04:02
*** noslzzp has quit IRC04:08
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** n0ano has quit IRC04:12
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting04:14
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting04:17
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC04:26
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** martine has quit IRC04:27
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting04:29
*** keith_bray has joined #openstack-meeting04:30
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting04:34
*** jhenner has quit IRC04:38
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting04:48
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting04:58
*** markpeek has quit IRC05:05
*** dwcramer has quit IRC05:16
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC05:17
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting05:27
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting05:31
*** terriyu has quit IRC05:34
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:36
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** n0ano has quit IRC05:39
*** yuanz has quit IRC05:43
*** boris-42 has quit IRC05:54
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting05:56
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC05:59
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting06:03
*** egallen has quit IRC06:04
*** brucer has joined #openstack-meeting06:05
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:14
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting06:17
*** xbsd has joined #openstack-meeting06:20
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC06:20
*** psedlak has joined #openstack-meeting06:25
*** ayurchen has joined #openstack-meeting06:33
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting06:37
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting06:49
*** reed has quit IRC06:52
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC06:56
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting07:00
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC07:02
*** Yada has joined #openstack-meeting07:07
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting07:08
*** glikson has quit IRC07:21
*** jcoufal has quit IRC07:24
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting07:29
*** ayurchen has quit IRC07:33
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting07:37
*** glikson has quit IRC07:41
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting07:46
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting07:48
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting08:05
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting08:05
*** jhenner has quit IRC08:06
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting08:06
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** yuanz has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
*** Mandell has quit IRC08:29
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting08:31
*** zyluo has quit IRC08:33
*** mrunge has quit IRC08:35
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC08:40
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC08:41
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** jhenner has quit IRC08:48
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting08:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting08:55
*** ayurchen has joined #openstack-meeting09:09
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:10
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:10
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando09:10
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:11
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando09:11
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC09:16
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC09:21
*** flaper87 has quit IRC09:29
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting09:30
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting09:30
*** sushils has quit IRC09:43
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting09:44
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC09:48
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC09:50
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting10:08
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:08
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:10
*** xbsd has quit IRC10:17
*** dguitarbite has left #openstack-meeting10:20
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting10:21
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:25
*** egallen has quit IRC10:25
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:25
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:25
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting10:29
*** yaguang has quit IRC10:30
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting10:30
*** xbsd has joined #openstack-meeting10:31
*** xbsd has quit IRC10:36
*** derekh has quit IRC10:37
*** ayurchen has quit IRC10:39
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC10:48
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting10:52
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting10:59
*** sushils has quit IRC11:02
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:07
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:07
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando11:07
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC11:09
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-meeting11:09
*** noslzzp has quit IRC11:19
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting11:20
*** mrunge has quit IRC11:21
*** ayoung has quit IRC11:38
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:45
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:45
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando11:45
*** Thomas has joined #openstack-meeting11:50
*** Thomas is now known as Guest9333611:50
*** jhenner has quit IRC11:55
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** ndipanov_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:01
*** ndipanov has quit IRC12:01
*** sushils has quit IRC12:02
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting12:03
*** xbsd has joined #openstack-meeting12:03
*** ndipanov_ has quit IRC12:09
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting12:12
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting12:12
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting12:13
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting12:13
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez12:15
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting12:17
*** vkmc has quit IRC12:18
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting12:19
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting12:19
*** dhellmann-away is now known as dhellmann12:21
*** blamar has quit IRC12:37
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting12:38
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting12:38
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting12:42
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC12:53
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann-away13:04
*** litong has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:11
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting13:13
*** afazekas has quit IRC13:13
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting13:16
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** mkollaro has quit IRC13:18
*** ndipanov has quit IRC13:18
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** jhenner1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** jhenner has quit IRC13:19
*** glikson has quit IRC13:22
*** dwcramer has quit IRC13:22
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting13:23
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:24
*** eharney has quit IRC13:24
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:24
*** dperaza has joined #openstack-meeting13:25
*** sushils has quit IRC13:27
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-meeting13:27
*** changbl has quit IRC13:29
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** liuxpei has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting13:34
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC13:38
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting13:41
hartsocksGood morning!13:42
*** hartsocks has left #openstack-meeting13:42
*** Guest93336 has left #openstack-meeting13:43
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** hartsocks has left #openstack-meeting13:45
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** hartsocks has left #openstack-meeting13:45
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting13:47
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:47
*** dhellmann-away is now known as dhellmann13:50
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
*** dolphm has quit IRC14:02
*** matiu has quit IRC14:02
*** manip has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC14:03
*** nealph has quit IRC14:03
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting14:04
*** eharney has quit IRC14:06
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting14:08
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** Sam___ has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** Sam___ has quit IRC14:12
*** manip has quit IRC14:14
*** garyk has quit IRC14:14
*** manip has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
*** Pattabi has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** manip has quit IRC14:22
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** amyt has quit IRC14:22
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting14:23
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
*** keith_bray has quit IRC14:25
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
*** xbsd has quit IRC14:26
*** NobodyCam has quit IRC14:28
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC14:33
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
*** lloydde_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:36
*** lloydde has quit IRC14:36
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
*** boris-42 has quit IRC14:46
*** mkollaro has quit IRC14:46
*** keith_bray has joined #openstack-meeting14:46
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:48
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
*** Yada has quit IRC14:49
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting14:50
*** kchenweijie has left #openstack-meeting14:50
*** shardy is now known as shardy_afk14:52
*** lbragstad has quit IRC14:53
*** derekh has quit IRC14:53
*** afazekas has quit IRC14:53
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC14:56
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** jcoufal has quit IRC14:58
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net15:00
*** mkollaro has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** metral has quit IRC15:02
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
*** eharney has quit IRC15:02
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
*** lloydde_ has quit IRC15:05
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
*** Pattabi has quit IRC15:07
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC15:09
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC15:12
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
*** ndipanov has quit IRC15:13
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
*** jhenner1 has quit IRC15:22
*** Yada has joined #openstack-meeting15:23
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
*** krtaylor has quit IRC15:29
*** martines has quit IRC15:30
*** adalbas has quit IRC15:30
*** martines has joined #openstack-meeting15:31
*** martines has quit IRC15:32
*** martines has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting15:34
*** lloydde has quit IRC15:35
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** ladquin_away is now known as ladquin15:36
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting15:42
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** reed has quit IRC15:47
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
*** benonsoftware has quit IRC15:56
*** mpavlase has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** Tross has quit IRC15:59
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
*** cdub has quit IRC16:06
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
*** NobodyCam has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** mrodden has quit IRC16:08
*** lbragstad has quit IRC16:08
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** mrodden1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** liuxpei has quit IRC16:12
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away16:12
*** gongysh has quit IRC16:15
*** mrodden has quit IRC16:16
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
*** cdub has quit IRC16:20
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** Yada has quit IRC16:21
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net16:22
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** seanrob has quit IRC16:25
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting16:25
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
*** glikson has quit IRC16:29
*** dwcramer has quit IRC16:31
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting16:33
*** afazekas has quit IRC16:37
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:40
*** dolphm has quit IRC16:40
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
*** Leon has joined #openstack-meeting16:43
*** Leon is now known as Guest3659416:44
*** garyk has quit IRC16:44
*** yaguang has quit IRC16:46
*** seanrob has quit IRC16:46
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** ravikumar_hp has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** Guest36594 has left #openstack-meeting16:50
*** Guest36594 has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** Guest36594 has quit IRC16:50
*** jcoufal has quit IRC16:50
*** giulivo has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** danwent has quit IRC16:54
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC16:55
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** martine has quit IRC16:56
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** martine has quit IRC16:58
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
sdaguewho's around for the QA meeting?16:59
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting16:59
*** terry7 has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
mlavalleI am17:00
sdaguecoolio, anyone else?17:00
sdaguemake sure we have a useful quorum, which I know is tough with mtreinish and davidkranz being out atm17:00
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
mlavallesdague: while we wait we can talk about the Quantum BP's17:01
sdagueso I say again... who's around for the QA meeting? :)17:01
ravikumar_hphi17:01
*** ijw has quit IRC17:01
sdaguemlavalle: actually what don't I start the meeting, and we start there17:01
sdague#startmeeting qa17:01
openstackMeeting started Thu May 23 17:01:42 2013 UTC.  The chair is sdague. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:01
mlavallecool17:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: qa)"17:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'17:01
*** egallen has quit IRC17:01
sdague#topic Blueprints17:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprints (Meeting topic: qa)"17:01
sdagueok, lets specifically start with the quantum blueprints17:02
sdaguemlavalle the floor is yours17:02
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
mlavallesdague: Last week I volunteered to consolidate the Quantum BP's17:02
mlavalleThe vast majority are from Bagshree17:02
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC17:03
mlavalleso I sent gel an email proposing group her BP's in 3 groups17:03
mlavallesent her an email17:03
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
ravikumar_hpmlavalle: we are prioritizing . Looks like we will deliver some in havava-217:03
ravikumar_hpand some in Havav-317:03
ravikumar_hpI will update milestone...17:04
sdagueravikumar_hp: so I'd still like to see them consolidated a bit17:04
ravikumar_hpsure17:04
sdagueright now they are at the single test level, and I think mlavalle has some good thinking on consolidation17:04
mlavalleravilumar-hp: I know, I will forward you the email I sent her. I prose to align 3 groups by the milestones17:04
mlavallethe same milestones she proposed17:04
ravikumar_hpmlavalle: Thanks . will discuss with Shree17:05
mlavallesdague: I forwarded you and Jay the email this morning17:05
sdaguemlavalle: yes, I saw, I think it was in a very good direction17:05
mlavallethat's the progress in this front so far. I will follow up with ravikumar_hp17:06
psedlakhi ... sorry for being late17:06
sdaguegreat17:06
sdague#action mlavalle to follow up with ravikumar_hp on quantum blueprint consolidation - due by next tempest meeting17:06
sdagueravikumar_hp: also, I really want the owner of the blueprint to be the implementer17:07
sdagueso please correct those as well, so we can ask folks directly who are doing them17:07
ravikumar_hpsdague: okay17:07
sdagueok, so I think we are good on those17:08
sdagueother blueprint status? please use #info so it shows up in minutes17:08
sdague#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest17:08
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
sdague#info tempest-repo-restructure completed17:09
ravikumar_hp#info - Keystone tests - good progress. Pending BPs will be completed by Havava-217:09
sdague#info cleanup-launchpad completed (all untouched blueprints purged on monday)17:09
sdague#info flake8-extensions - in review, good chance for H1 (lauria has code for review)17:10
sdague#info nightly-upgrade-testing - making progress, but will probably slip past H1 (will determine tomorrow)17:11
sdagueany other blueprint updates?17:11
afazekasI will create a wiki about heat  and I will try to put together the info I know about the speed-up-tempest project, I will be on trip so +2 week17:11
giulivoafazekas, what is the wiki about heat needed for>17:11
giulivo?17:11
afazekasgiulivo: test plans17:12
sdagueafazekas: ok, cool, by then mtreinish should be back and digging into it as well17:12
afazekasinfra requirements17:12
giulivodo we have wikis for the other components ?17:12
sdague#action afazekas to create a wiki about heat requirements in testing17:12
afazekasgiulivo: no, but we should have for bigger projects17:13
giulivocause I'm following the heat updates too but maybe can also do something good for cinder17:13
giulivoso heat is the first we'll have a wiki about?17:13
sdagueheat is kind of special too17:13
sdaguebecause it's going to push a lot of stuff, and we might need to handle it a little different than the other projects17:13
sdagueso ++ to afazekas pulling together info there17:14
sdaguei think it will help a lot17:14
giulivosure, i'm trying to figure out what17:14
giulivoand with which purpose17:14
*** malini is now known as malini_17:14
*** malini_ is now known as malini_away17:15
sdagueok, so next week we'll bump things to H2 that don't make it, but a push for getting things in for H1 would be good17:15
giulivoI think it'd be nice to share some documentation aroun the tests17:15
sdagueyep, lets get to docs in a minute17:15
sdaguepeople ok to move on from blueprints to reviews?17:15
* kashyap in17:15
sdague#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting - agenda17:15
psedlaksdague: wrong date there ;)17:16
sdagueyeh, I know, want to fix it? :)17:16
sdaguesorry it was early this morning when I updated17:16
psedlaknext time ;)17:16
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC17:16
sdague#topic Critical reviews tied to blueprints17:16
*** openstack changes topic to "Critical reviews tied to blueprints (Meeting topic: qa)"17:16
sdagueok, anyone want to pimp reviews they need eyes on?17:17
*** malini_away is now known as malini_17:17
*** anniec has quit IRC17:17
giulivoI have the snapshot thing which was approved but needs +2 again17:17
giulivocause the automerge failed after restructuring the directory17:17
sdaguegiulivo: can you provide #link?17:17
giulivohttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/28480/17:17
*** krtaylor has quit IRC17:17
*** malini_ is now known as malini17:17
sdague#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28480/ - needs additional +2 after rebase17:18
sdagueok, I'll take a look after the meeting17:18
sdagueany other reviews people are blocked on?17:18
*** nikhil__ is now known as nikhil17:18
sdaguegoing once...17:18
sdaguegoing twice...17:18
sdagueok, I'll try to go through everything this afternoon, but then it's a long holiday weekend in the us17:19
sdagueso I expect things to be slow until mid next week17:19
sdague#topic QA Docs17:19
*** openstack changes topic to "QA Docs (Meeting topic: qa)"17:19
sdagueok, so as part of the tempest-repo-restructure blueprint I created all these readmes17:20
kashyapsdague, Can you post the URL here please17:20
sdaguekashyap: url of?17:20
psedlakkashyap: check the rsts in the tempest repo17:20
kashyapreview request17:21
kashyapChecking..17:21
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting17:21
sdaguekashyap: yeh, there is no outstanding review here17:21
kashyapAh, ok.17:21
sdaguehowever, we do have a new docs-job in our check (and soon to be gate)17:21
sdaguethat will create the tempest doc website from the docs in the tree17:21
kashyapQuestion: Will it be rST continuing or asciidoc is being considered ?17:21
sdaguekashyap: rst is currently what we have, and unless there is a compelling reason to change, I'd rather keep it17:22
sdaguewe have tooling that works well with it17:22
sdagueis there a reason you think we should switch?17:22
kashyapSure. I mentioned asciidoc, as Anne Gentle brought it up on the list17:22
afazekaskashyap: is the git hub parses the asciidoc ?17:22
kashyapafazekas, Yes, I confirmed github supports asciidoc markup17:23
sdagueI did rst because that's what we already had in tree.17:23
kashyap" and asciidoc is a clear winner from the OpenStack docs perspective due to our existing build tools being able to handle it. It converts to docbook easily."17:23
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
sdagueok, well CI uses rst :)17:23
kashyapACK.17:23
sdagueAs I don't think we're building a manual, I think for web workflow rst is fine17:24
kashyapTrue.17:24
*** dontalton has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
kashyapandreaf, asciidoc requires some extra 'packages' to be in.17:24
psedlaksdague: how does the doc building and that venv in tox ini? and is there described step/cmd how to build them manualy? (don't know much about sphinx)17:24
kashyaprST has less dependencies.17:24
sdaguepsedlak: right, yes, let me explain17:24
kashyap(Pops, didn't mean to prompt him.)17:25
sdagueso there is now a doc/source directory17:25
sdagueyou can either17:25
sdaguetox -evenv -- python setup.py build_sphinx17:25
sdaguewhich is what the gate does17:25
sdagueor just17:25
sdaguepython setup.py build_sphinx17:25
sdagueif you have it installed locally17:25
sdagueand it will create a doc/build directory17:26
sdaguewith html, man format, maybe something else17:26
sdaguethat html will be pushed live on build as soon as this lands - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30199/17:26
sdague#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30199/ - review to publish tempest docs on merge17:26
*** Yada has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
sdagueto handle the README.rst files in the tree, I've done it with symlinks, because of sphinx security things17:27
sdagueall these docs could be made much better, contributions welcomed and encouraged!17:27
sdaguebut at least we've got a workflow now that will get them out to the web17:28
sdagueok, I'm done talking on that. Other questions or comments or offers to help?17:28
psedlakwould it be ok to put there also distro specific steps to get tempest runnable?17:29
sdaguepsedlak: yes, absolutely17:29
psedlakcool17:29
giulivoone more thing, do we plan to use those to document the actual tests?17:29
sdagueI think anything that makes it easier to use or develop for tempest is fair game17:29
sdaguegiulivo: I think that's totatlly possible17:30
sdaguewe probably want to structure it in such a way that it's kind of it's own base page17:30
sdaguebut I like the idea of having that in there, especially if we can pull it from the tests themselves in some way17:30
giulivoyeah I was thinking about docstrings too17:31
sdagueit just needs a volunteer17:31
sdaguegiulivo: ok, you up for building some kind of proof of concept with a few tests to come up with a model that might work for all of it?17:31
giulivocan't in short timew17:31
sdagueno worries17:31
giulivobut I was going to propose that for heat, to afazekas17:32
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:32
sdaguewell, if anyone wants to prototype something, it's encouraged17:32
sdagueah, yeh, that might be a good idea17:32
kashyapAs an example, I did something for nested vmx testing -- https://github.com/kashyapc/nvmx-haswell/blob/master/SETUP-nVMX.rst17:32
psedlakwell for this we will first have to solve the 'docstrings' issue with nose/testr17:33
kashyap#link https://raw.github.com/kashyapc/nvmx-haswell/master/SETUP-nVMX.rst17:33
sdagueI don't know about other people, but I kind of like using gerrit for doc review, as it gives you commenting and voting17:33
giulivo+1 from me17:33
sdaguepsedlak: true, that would be part of the prototype for anyone proposing to sort out17:33
sdagueok, other thoughts on docs?17:34
kashyapsdague, Was that info pointed at me ? If so - that's not entirely related OpenStack yet. It's mostly lower layers.17:34
psedlakand what that 'prototype' should look like? as it would require changes to gate scripts etc ... so probably not a posted review ...17:34
sdaguepsedlak: why would it require a change to gate scripts?17:34
sdaguekashyap: not really, just gerrit vs. wiki17:35
psedlakto let nosetest/testr skip using docstrings as 'test names'17:35
kashyapsdague, Ok, just clarifying. Thanks.17:35
sdaguepsedlak: so actual nose invocation in the gate now is controlled in our tox.ini17:35
sdagueso we'd be able to control it without a gate repo change17:35
psedlakfor nose there is plugin which does it ... so yeah in test-requires + tox ... ok17:36
sdagueyeh, so it could all be self contained in a review, and we'd know it passes the gate17:36
sdaguewhich is goodness17:36
psedlakok17:36
sdagueok, so the next thing I had on the agenda was to discuss tags, but I feel like we're missing most of the core folks becauses me and afazekas, so maybe we postpone. Especially given holiday weekend here.17:37
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting17:38
sdagueor we just take that to the list, which has been working well recently17:38
sdague+1 to everyone participating there so actively :)17:38
sdague#topic Bug Day?17:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Bug Day? (Meeting topic: qa)"17:38
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting17:38
afazekas#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugTriage17:39
sdagueso afazekas, where do we stand on organizing a bug day?17:39
afazekasWe have an open supervisor group17:39
sdague#info tempest now has open supervisor group for bugs, anyone can triage17:39
sdaguenice17:39
afazekas#link https://launchpad.net/~tempest-bug-team17:39
sdaguegreat17:40
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC17:40
kashyap#info - #openstack-bugday is the IRC channel17:40
afazekasThe main issue we need to made progress in Task 1, ie. confirming the bugs before we can triage them17:40
kashyap# info - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/BugFilingRecommendations17:41
sdagueafazekas: ok, so were you going to organize a bug day, and drum up interest on the mailing list?17:41
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting17:42
afazekasI will17:42
sdagueok, great. Have you picked a day for it?17:42
kashyapTBH, Yesterday was nova bug-day, I saw absolutely no word there. MStill is the only person appears to be interested17:42
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting17:42
sdaguewell, I think instead of using #openstack-bugday, we should use #openstack-qa17:42
afazekasNot yet17:42
sdaguewhen we do ours17:42
sdaguejust to drive traffic to a place we normally are17:42
sdaguethey are sometimes tough to get folks into, but at least for the first one if we can get all the normally active people into them, it will help17:43
kashyap+117:43
sdagueit's a lot nicer to work on bug triage with others around doing it at the same time17:43
sdagueotherwise you go crazy17:43
afazekas:)17:43
kashyapIndeed. I'm around during CET zone17:43
sdagueso we'll at least have 1/2 day overlap :) (/me in US EST)17:44
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC17:44
sdagueafazekas: ok, will you have picked a day by next week's meeting, or are you off for a bit now?17:44
mlavalleI'll be covering US Central ;-)17:44
kashyapWell, I'm in IST, but mostly work w/ folks in CET, so just noting it here :)17:44
sdaguewould be nice to get it sooner rather than later, but still give folks a few days warning so they can try to clear up time for it17:45
afazekasI will not be here on the next meeting :(17:45
kashyapNo worries, not everyone can make all IRC meetings.17:45
afazekasI will be on vacation17:45
afazekasfar far :)17:46
kashyapIf you have specific things to cover, just maybe post on the list.17:46
sdagueafazekas: vacation is good :)17:46
sdagueok, is there another volunteer that wants to take up organizing the first bug day?17:46
jhennernot in the time of meetings, right afazekas?17:46
sdaguewould be nice to have a couple between now and H317:46
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
kashyapI could let a more tempest familiar person take charge the first one, then I could lend a hand for the next one17:47
sdague#help need volunteer to organize first tempest bug day17:47
*** maoy has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
sdaguekashyap: well really the organize is just picking a day, and sending some emails :)17:47
kashyapI don't actively work on tempest (I work on lower layers), so I'm not technically right to take charge right away17:48
kashyapsdague, Sure. I could do that17:48
sdaguekashyap: cool thanks17:48
kashyapUnless someone wants to beat me to it.17:48
afazekaskashyap: thank you17:48
sdagueyeh, it's not so much a tempest specific thing, as an organizing thing. I'm just trying to spread the work around otherwise I forget to do things :)17:48
sdagueafazekas: +117:49
*** garyTh has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
sdague#action kashyap to organize first tempest bug day, all tempest members greatly thank him for it17:49
sdagueok, let's go to open discussion17:50
kashyap:) You're exaggerating the effect. Maybe I could send an email right away, asking for convenient time zone?17:50
sdague#topic Open Discussion17:50
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: qa)"17:50
kashyaps/time zone/day17:50
sdaguekashyap: typically we just declare a "day"17:50
sdaguekashyap: yeh, sure17:50
kashyapYep, typo :)17:50
sdaguethanks again17:50
sdagueok, other topics that people want to bring up?17:51
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
psedlakcopyright lines?17:51
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC17:51
psedlakhow did it ended ... is there final decision/guideline?17:51
psedlaki saw a lot of email but at the end i was even more confused :]17:51
afazekaspsedlak: do not read them :)17:52
sdagueheh17:52
sdagueyeh, the TC discussion really didn't seem to have a resolution17:52
sdaguemaybe I'll go ask ttx on what he finally thought17:52
afazekaspsedlak: I mean do not read the licenses :)17:53
*** mrodden1 is now known as mrodden17:53
sdaguewe might have a small enough number of contributors we could do it anyway, I know in nova it's a lot17:53
giulivoa couple more things from me: 1. I think is is all sorted now and can be closed? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/set-gate-attribute 2. maybe we should get the infra setup changed to test at least the cinder multibackend feature in gate? probably using either lvm/nfs?17:53
*** Shree-HP has joined #openstack-meeting17:54
psedlaksdague: if you will learn/get final desicions please update https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/LegalIssuesFAQ or maybe hacking or something like that and anounce it please :)17:55
sdaguegiulivo: on point 1, are all the reviews through?17:55
sdaguepsedlak: will do17:55
sdaguegiulivo: on point 2, we definitely need to bring back periodic jobs17:55
giulivothe last one I was looking for is related to "compute" and has been approved; is there anything out of /api/ which need the tag to be set?17:56
sdaguegiulivo: so you think we need a blueprint for multi cinder backend?17:56
kashyapsdague, Also, good to CC Richard Fontana (legal) on that discussion of copyright lines.  (/me hasn't read the threads, so not sure, if he's on it.)17:56
giulivonot necessarily a blueprint, but maybe it's worth gating it, probably with two different backend types17:56
sdaguegiulivo: probably not17:56
*** viktors has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
sdaguegiulivo: ok, at least a blueprint would keep track of the fact that it might be an infrastructure change17:56
giulivoso regarding the gate attribute I'll double check that and eventually close the blueprint17:57
psedlakhm probably cli should get attrs too17:57
psedlak?17:57
giulivopsedlak, good hint, will look into that and submit changes where needed17:57
*** garyk has quit IRC17:57
psedlakor do we want to keep it running completely?17:57
sdaguepsedlak: we trigger the cli tests directly17:57
sdagueso maybe we don't need it outside of api17:58
*** viktors has left #openstack-meeting17:58
psedlakyeah i know, but not sure if it would not be easier to move everything to gate/smoke tags now17:58
sdagueI'm sure we'll figure out a few other fixes down the road, but lets just make sure all the reviews landed first17:58
psedlakso we would not have to touch the gates later again ...17:58
*** viktors has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** Leon has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
sdagueyeh, though again, because we control things now in tox.ini... it's *so* much easier17:59
*** Leon is now known as Guest6072817:59
psedlakheh, i'm still not used to it sorry :)17:59
sdagueyep, no worries :)17:59
sdagueok, I've got to run here in a minute. Any last things from folks?17:59
sdagueok, we're at top of the hour18:00
sdague#endmeeting18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"18:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 23 18:00:39 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2013/qa.2013-05-23-17.01.html18:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2013/qa.2013-05-23-17.01.txt18:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2013/qa.2013-05-23-17.01.log.html18:00
bdpayne#startmeeting OpenStack Security Group18:00
psedlakbye18:00
sdaguethanks everyone18:00
openstackMeeting started Thu May 23 18:00:48 2013 UTC.  The chair is bdpayne. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: OpenStack Security Group)"18:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_security_group'18:00
mlavalleenjoy the long weekend (those in the US)18:00
hyakuheiMorning/Evening all.18:01
bdpaynelet's roll into the OSSG meeting now18:01
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
bdpaynemorning/evening :-)18:01
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting18:01
bdpayneI'd like to start with an OSSG roll call...18:01
bdpayneBryan Payne from Nebula here18:01
*** mdomsch has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
hyakuheiI'm kind of half here right now, working on something else that needs a lot of attention so call me out by highlighting my nick if you need me.18:02
hyakuheiRob - HP18:02
bdpaynesounds good18:02
boris-42hmm18:02
boris-42it should be DB meeting now18:02
*** mpavlase has left #openstack-meeting18:02
*** giulivo has left #openstack-meeting18:02
bdpayne1800 UTC, I believe it is OSSG time18:02
hyakuhei1800 UTC Thursday is normally OSSG18:02
bdpaynehttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/OpenStackSecurity18:02
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
boris-42hmm but now is 19 UTC18:02
hyakuheiNo it's not18:02
hyakuheiIt's 1800 UTC, GMT +1 is 190018:03
boris-42oh sory=)18:03
boris-42sorry=)18:03
hyakuheiI think you're an hour late for your meeting boris ;)18:03
*** psedlak has quit IRC18:03
*** Guest60728 has quit IRC18:03
bdpaynehttp://www.worldtimeserver.com/current_time_in_UTC.aspx18:03
bdpayne:-)18:03
bdpayneok, anyone else here for OSSG?18:03
hyakuheiLooks like Boris could have had his DB meeting anyway!18:03
bdpaynelol18:04
*** timello has quit IRC18:04
hyakuheiwell fwiw I've requested my flights and will book the hotel for the hardening guide tomorrow.18:05
bdpayneexcellent18:05
bdpayneyeah, I'm all booked18:05
bdpaynelooks like it's coming together18:05
hyakuheiI'm flying in on Sunday and back out on the Friday eve.18:05
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
bdpaynesounds good18:05
bdpaynealso, some nice results at a conference this week related to cloud security… http://www.ieee-security.org/TC/SP2013/papers/program2013.html18:06
bdpaynesee first two papers in Session 618:06
*** jhenner has quit IRC18:06
bdpaynebeyond that, I won't keep chatting without others here to listen / participate18:07
hyakuheiIndeed, close it out, I'll go walk the dog ;)18:07
bdpaynehyakuhei sounds good18:07
bdpaynecya18:07
hyakuheibye!18:07
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
bdpayne#endmeeting18:09
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"18:09
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 23 18:09:21 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:09
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_security_group/2013/openstack_security_group.2013-05-23-18.00.html18:09
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_security_group/2013/openstack_security_group.2013-05-23-18.00.txt18:09
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_security_group/2013/openstack_security_group.2013-05-23-18.00.log.html18:09
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:10
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:11
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
*** mkollaro has quit IRC18:13
*** stevemar has quit IRC18:13
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:13
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:14
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting18:14
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
*** Mandell has quit IRC18:22
*** viktors has quit IRC18:26
*** viktors has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
*** afazekas has quit IRC18:30
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting18:35
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting18:37
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:40
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:40
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting18:41
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC18:41
*** AlanClark has quit IRC18:41
*** natsirt has joined #openstack-meeting18:42
*** gyee has quit IRC18:43
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC18:43
*** natsirt has left #openstack-meeting18:51
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting18:52
*** rpodolyaka has joined #openstack-meeting18:52
*** mdomsch has quit IRC18:53
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC18:53
*** mrodden1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
driptonDB meeting starting in about a minute18:59
*** Yada has quit IRC18:59
driptonIs anyone here for the DB meeting?19:00
viktorsyes19:00
rpodolyakaHello, guys!19:00
*** eyerediskin has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
boris-42heey19:00
boris-42=)19:00
viktorsHi all19:00
eyerediskinsup19:00
boris-42mirantis lol=)19:00
driptonI guess we have a quorum19:00
*** mrodden has quit IRC19:00
dripton#startmeeting db19:00
openstackMeeting started Thu May 23 19:00:55 2013 UTC.  The chair is dripton. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:00
*** malini has left #openstack-meeting19:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:00
boris-42probably we should call devananda19:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: db)"19:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'db'19:01
boris-42devananda ping19:01
devanandapong19:01
boris-42hi how are you?) have you a little bit time to discuss work around db?)19:01
devanandaah! right. yes, sure :)19:01
boris-42nice19:01
dripton#topic havana-119:01
*** openstack changes topic to "havana-1 (Meeting topic: db)"19:01
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
driptonAnyone have anything they're trying to get in for havana-1 that needs more eyes?19:01
boris-42I would like to finish db-improve-archiving in H119:02
*** viktors has quit IRC19:02
boris-42so devananda could you take a look at it pls?)19:02
*** markpeek has quit IRC19:02
driptonboris-42: Are you just waiting for approvals?19:02
boris-42yes=)19:02
boris-42I fixed bug around indexes19:02
devanandaboris-42: it seemed (perhaps mistakenly) that the fix-old-migrations migrations went through several revisions19:03
devanandai didn't follow too closely. was much being changed?19:03
boris-42yes19:03
boris-42there was a lot of changes19:03
*** ayoung has quit IRC19:04
boris-42and I have copy pasted some of it19:04
devanandak. action me to go review those pls :)19:04
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
driptonreviews from others are helpful too even without +2 powers.  Some of the core reviewers wait until they see several +1s before they bring in their +2s19:05
*** viktors has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
devanandaindeed19:05
*** mrodden1 has quit IRC19:05
boris-42yeah=)19:05
dripton#action devananda to review db-improve-archiving patches.19:05
dripton#topic bugs19:06
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: db)"19:06
boris-42Btw there are some new guys in our db team probably they also would like to say something19:06
dripton#topic new people19:06
*** openstack changes topic to "new people (Meeting topic: db)"19:06
boris-42yeah19:06
boris-42hey guys are you here?)19:07
rpodolyakayep, Boris19:07
viktorshere19:07
devanandao/19:07
rpodolyakaI've been recently working on getting common Oslo DB code into Cinder19:07
*** Shree-HP has quit IRC19:07
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
rpodolyakaand helping Boris with testing for db-improve-archiving19:08
rpodolyakaI hope we can use this in other projects too when it's ready19:08
rpodolyakaI have a few ideas to work in Nova and Quantum as well19:08
viktorsat the moment I'm working om rename all unique consraints in Nova database19:09
rpodolyakafor Nova I would really like us to switch to Alembic, which seems to be quite superior tools comparing to SQLAlchemy-Migrate19:09
rpodolyakaespecially for maintaining of stable branchaes19:09
driptonrpodolyaka: +1 on alembic, I tried fighting that fight in Grizzly.  But it's a huge disruptive change.19:09
*** sushils has quit IRC19:09
rpodolyakadripton:  indeed19:10
devanandaif some of these things (oslo-db, alembic) will make Ironic development easier19:10
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting19:10
devanandai'm happy to accept folks' patches to start making it happen from the ground up19:10
driptonrpdolyaka: I have some code to 90% convert migrate migrations to alembic migrations, but the transition from one to the other is painful.19:10
driptondevananda: so you're not doing db migrations in ironic at first.  How are you populating the DB?19:11
devanandadripton: eh, i copied the existing migration code from nova. that said, i am not doing any _data_ migrations in ironic19:11
devanandauntil we approach an RC19:11
driptondevananda: ok, now I understand.  Seems reasonable since nobody needs to upgrade from 0.0001 to 0.000219:12
devanandaright19:12
devanandaonce we have an RC, we'll need a nova_bm -> ironic ETL tol19:12
devanandatool19:12
devanandaand then have to worry about data19:12
driptonviktors: Are you finding problems with the unique constraints as you go through them?19:12
boris-42victors could you give us link to patch in oslo19:13
viktors1 min please19:13
*** jtomasek has quit IRC19:14
viktorsIt's path to Oslo to proceed error messages from db to human-readable view https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29888/19:14
viktorsIt's migration to nova database https://review.openstack.org/#/c/30108/19:15
driptonviktors: I will take a look at both.19:16
viktorsthanks )19:16
driptonAre any of the new people PostgreSQL people?19:16
rpodolyakadripton: on transition to Alembic. It probably sounds crazy. But maybe it makes sense to maintain both Alembic and SQLAlchemy-Migrate migrations till we release Havana (thus providing a way for users to upgrade to it) and then drop SQLAlchemy-Migrate support?19:16
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting19:17
driptonrpodolyaka: I think there would be resistance to the double maintainence, unless we could automate converting one to the other.  But that might work.19:17
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC19:17
eyerediskinsome db-api-tests waiting for +2 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/db-api-tests,n,z19:17
driptoneyerediskin: awesome.  If we can pile some more +1s on them then the +2s will follow.19:18
* dripton heard crickets in response to postgres.19:19
dripton#topic bugs19:19
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: db)"19:19
driptonNova had a bug day yesterday.  Did anyone find/fix any nasty DB bugs?19:19
boris-42my migrations fix=))19:20
driptonboris-42 wins.19:20
boris-42^_^19:20
uvirtbotboris-42: Error: "_^" is not a valid command.19:20
driptonI'm chasing a bug in db-archiving where the instances table doesn't all get archived, I think due to FK constraints.19:21
driptonAnd trying to fix the postgres tempest gate which has been broken for a couple of weeks.19:21
devanandaare FKs enabled by default in production?19:21
*** ryanpetr_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:21
devanandai thought we had disabled them last year ...19:21
driptondevananda: good question.  They're enable on the QA box that found this bug, but maybe that's not a real production config.19:21
devanandak. either way, archiving shouldn't break because FK are on :)19:22
eyerediskindefault production config != real prioduction config19:22
driptondevananda: right, and in my tests it doesn't break, but QA people can break anything.19:22
driptonNo other bugs that anyone needs help with?19:23
dripton#topic blueprints19:23
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprints (Meeting topic: db)"19:23
*** dwcramer has quit IRC19:23
driptonboris-42 did you want to talk about other blueprints for havana?19:24
eyerediskinhow about to move @require_context/@require_admin_context from db/sqlalchemy/api.py to db/api.py?19:24
boris-42yeah eyerediskin +119:24
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC19:24
boris-42 eyerediskin could you pls describe why it is so important19:24
driptonDoes that help reduce code for the mysql fast path?19:25
eyerediskinthat help reduce code for other backends19:25
eyerediskina little)19:25
driptonIs there a blueprint for it?  Or a patch?19:26
eyerediskinnope19:26
driptonIf you do a blueprint then that'll smooth getting the patch approved.  It can be a very short one since it's such a simple change.  Or I guess it can be part of the existing bp for an alternate backend.19:27
boris-42no dripton19:27
dripton?19:27
boris-42I would like to explain a little bit more19:27
boris-42comstud is working on mysql-db-impl19:28
comstudmysqldb-db-impl19:28
comstud(to clarify)19:28
boris-42yeah=)19:28
boris-42so we would like to remove contex from db.sqlalchemy.api layer to db.api layer19:29
boris-42so we will avoid copy paste of tons of context19:29
boris-42I mean @require_context and @require_admin_context..19:29
driptonmakes sense to me19:30
dripton#topic open discussion19:30
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: db)"19:30
driptonanyone have anything else?19:30
boris-42comstud what do you think about it ^19:31
comstudSay again?19:31
comstudOh yeah...19:31
*** vkmc_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:31
comstudi moved some things already19:31
comstudThe problem with those decorators are...19:31
comstudthey assume model level API calls19:32
comstudmysqldb stuff is all OOP, so they don't work19:32
comstudbecause there's the extra 'self' argument.19:32
comstudbtw... I'm also in the process of splitting up sqlalchemy/models.py to support objects.19:32
comstudI dunno how that affects the other work.. or if I'm duplicating effort.19:32
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC19:33
comstudie models.py -> models/base.py (or __init__.py)19:33
comstudand then models/instance.py etc19:33
boris-42ooO19:33
boris-42=)19:33
devanandacomstud: i'm interested to see how you're doing that19:33
devanandaand see if i can use that in ironic19:33
devanandarather than add it on later19:33
comstudCools19:33
comstudI really just started this work today...19:34
boris-42could I ask why do you that comstud?)19:34
comstudI have a patch to remove module imports from models.py that I can throw up anytime19:34
comstudboris-42: Sure19:34
comstudI thought this layout would be clean:19:34
comstudinstance.py contains:19:34
comstudthe sqlalchemy model19:34
comstudthe Instance internal object19:34
comstudthat Instance internal object will have:19:34
comstud@classmethod19:34
comstuddef get_by_uuid()19:34
comstudthis will break up that huge mess in api.py19:35
comstudand separating it into separate files seemed like a good thing19:35
*** seanrob has quit IRC19:35
boris-42so we will move from facade pattern to teach models=)19:35
comstudThat make sense?  Might be more clear when I get some WIP patches up :)19:35
boris-42reach*19:35
driptonlooking forward to seeing the patches19:36
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
boris-42so we will have in all models, methods that works with this model?19:36
boris-42instead of one file with tons of methods?19:36
boris-42comstud ^19:36
comstudyeah19:37
*** krtaylor has quit IRC19:37
comstudmethods will be on the object classes instead19:37
*** danwent has quit IRC19:37
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
boris-42so we will be able to switch models and use different backends?19:37
devanandaand for methods that interact with multiple models?19:37
boris-42we will chose one=)19:37
comstudright19:38
comstudwell19:38
boris-42math.random(l)19:38
comstudswitch objects19:38
comstudif I understand what you're saying19:38
boris-42some other backend implement19:38
comstudright19:38
comstudthat's what I'm trying to figure out right now with objects...19:38
boris-42by the way we have to do something with tests..19:38
driptonhow do we ensure that all backends implement the same methods?19:38
boris-42tests19:38
boris-42tons of tests..19:39
comstuddripton: tests that compare the backends19:39
comstud:)19:39
driptonthat is the Pythonic answer19:39
boris-42we have already tons of tests in test_db_api19:39
boris-42oh they all should be then rewritten… to provide your changes comstud..19:39
boris-42one more ton of code..19:40
*** markmcclain has quit IRC19:40
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
*** seanrob has quit IRC19:40
driptonAnyone have anything else?19:41
driptonThanks everyone, and remember to review patches!19:41
dripton#endmeeting19:41
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"19:41
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 23 19:41:31 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:41
boris-42thanks)19:41
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/db/2013/db.2013-05-23-19.00.html19:41
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/db/2013/db.2013-05-23-19.00.txt19:41
boris-42bye19:41
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/db/2013/db.2013-05-23-19.00.log.html19:41
viktorsbye19:41
driptono/19:41
*** IlyaE has quit IRC19:41
devananda\o19:42
rpodolyakasee you19:42
*** rpodolyaka has left #openstack-meeting19:42
*** viktors has quit IRC19:42
*** eyerediskin has left #openstack-meeting19:42
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
*** woodspa_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
*** woodspa has quit IRC19:46
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
*** seanrob has joined #openstack-meeting19:48
*** dwcramer has quit IRC19:48
*** IlyaE has quit IRC19:52
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
*** ehudtr has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** dperaza has left #openstack-meeting19:59
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
harlowja#startmeeting state-management20:01
openstackMeeting started Thu May 23 20:01:12 2013 UTC.  The chair is harlowja. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: state-management)"20:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'state_management'20:01
harlowjahi everyone! :)20:01
adrian_ottohi20:01
harlowjahowdy20:01
*** jasond has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
jluccihola20:01
harlowjaoops, forgot to send out an agenda, well we can make one up20:02
*** ehudtr has quit IRC20:02
harlowjalets wait a few for others20:02
harlowjajlucci i think i can mesh the rollbackaccumulator into our stuff20:02
harlowjathat way everyone will be happy20:02
jlucciSounds good (:20:02
maoyhave a conflict. will check the log later. have fun guys.20:03
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
harlowjasounds good, thx maoy20:03
*** ehudtr has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
harlowja#topic status20:03
*** openstack changes topic to "status (Meeting topic: state-management)"20:03
harlowjaso if we have people working on taskflow (or integrating it) we can use this little topic for any kind of status on what u are doing, i can go first20:04
harlowjai've been just working on the library structure, and impls, and have been experimenting with how cinder might change to use said library20:04
harlowja#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29862/20:05
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away20:05
harlowjaalso been helping jlucci get her db/celery stuff in20:05
harlowjaand trying to see how we can get more nova usage and adjusting to see how we can make that happen in a simple (not major restructure way)20:05
harlowjathats it for me :)20:06
jlucciShweet. Guess I'll go next20:06
harlowjasureeee20:06
jlucciSo, spent a lot of time getting a database backend setup20:07
jlucciAll of that seems to be working appropriate (currently only implementation is sql)20:07
harlowjasweet!20:07
jlucciand kchenweijie is working on some unit tests for all of that20:07
harlowja*oh ya, i've been doing unit tests this week also20:07
jlucciSo, that along with some basic config stuff got pulled into the code20:08
jlucci:P yay unit tests20:08
harlowjahow's the stackforge move going?20:08
jlucciI'm obviously a gerrit-noob20:08
jlucciha20:08
harlowjanp :)20:08
harlowja#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29981/20:08
jlucciAccidentally put in two requests, went back, squashed my previous commit into the first one, and pushed that back up for review20:08
harlowjai put up a small comment, the infra people probably want it squashed20:08
harlowja*so that it doesn't have 2 change-ids20:09
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC20:09
harlowjachange-ids are how gerrit associates commits so 2 might confuse it20:09
jlucciOh, well I abandoned the first commit/review20:10
*** dprince has quit IRC20:10
jluccihttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/29981/ Has all the commits that need to be merged into the stackforge stuff20:10
harlowjaya, that one looks ok, just might want to remove one of the 'Change-Id: ' lines20:10
jlucciOh, snap. Didn't see the second one20:11
jlucciOh, gerrit20:11
harlowja:)20:11
jlucciSo, will fix that shortly. haha20:11
harlowjacool20:11
harlowjasounds good20:11
harlowjaanyone else want to report any kind of useful status info :)20:11
jlucciAs for the celery stuff, after a talk I had today, I actually think I'm going to go back and re-implement it in a different way. Something more distributed, less workflow-oriented20:12
harlowjaok20:12
jlucciYeah, and that covers my stuffs20:12
harlowjasweet20:12
harlowja#topic use-cases20:12
*** openstack changes topic to "use-cases (Meeting topic: state-management)"20:12
harlowjaif devananda is around, his baremetal stuff might have a new use-case we can get involved in20:13
harlowjanot sure if he is, but anyone something to think about20:13
harlowja#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29804/20:13
harlowjahe's the first that i think is trying to do locking20:14
devananda\o20:14
harlowjahi devananda !20:14
harlowjajust was mentioning your review, and how taskflow pep's can think about how to provide that use-case20:14
devanandacool :)20:14
devanandawant meto say anything about what we're doing?20:15
harlowjasure20:15
jlucciplease (:20:15
devanandak20:15
harlowjaacquiring locks on stuff, haha20:15
devanandato support having multiple manager services in one ironic deployment20:15
devanandaneed to coordinate which one is acting on what physical resource20:16
devanandaeg, who's talking to the BMC20:16
devanandaso there are 2 levels of locks20:16
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
harlowjaBMC == bare metal controller?20:16
devanandaya20:16
devanandaIPMI card or what ever20:16
harlowjak, thx20:16
devanandaone lock in the db, to prevent another manager process from doing _anything_ with that BMC20:17
devanandaand then a semaphore inside the manager process20:17
devanandaso only one thread can do things that require exclusive access20:17
devanandalike writes20:17
devanandabut other threads can still do reads to the BMC20:17
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting20:17
devananda[eol]20:17
*** vkmc_ has quit IRC20:17
harlowjainteresting20:17
jlucciWe could definitely carry over the blocking manager processes20:18
adrian_ottoI'd like to suggest that there is no such thing as a lock in the DB, unless all access to the db is limited to a single thread in a single process.20:18
harlowjawhats an example of something that would happen simulatenously (by different threads)20:18
*** spzala has quit IRC20:18
harlowjaadrian_otto yes, its a very good point20:19
adrian_ottootherwise you get race conditions with the MVCC implementations of all popular databases20:19
devanandaharlowja: 1 thd doing a deployment. 1 thd polling power state20:19
harlowjadevananda thanks20:20
adrian_ottostate machines and MVCC systems are fundamentally incompatible, such that MVCC must not be a component of a state machine.20:20
*** Kharec has quit IRC20:20
devanandaadrian_otto: update .. set col=X where col=Null and id=123;20:20
devanandaadrian_otto: at least with innodb's mvcc, i believe that will work20:21
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net20:21
devanandabut, in principle, i agree :)20:21
*** IlyaE has quit IRC20:21
adrian_ottothat will work if there is no concurrency at the time of the update.20:21
*** Kharec has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
devanandaeven if there is. only one writer will succeed20:22
devanandaothers will timeout or fail20:22
adrian_ottoyes20:22
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
adrian_ottoyou will get different transaction commit results from SQLite and InnoDB for example20:22
devanandayep20:23
devanandaand fwiw, i have no idea how postgres will behave :(20:23
harlowjaya, which is where using sqlalchemy will bite us20:23
devanandaso, if there is another / better solution, i'm all ears :)20:23
adrian_ottoso if the idea is to make a db implementation that lets you put arbitrary databases behind it… then this is going to flop.20:23
adrian_ottoI'm saying go ahead and use the DB for persistence of state transitions20:23
harlowjaright, so far jlucci  is working on that20:23
adrian_ottobut you need an abstraction on top of the persistence layer that manages locks and eliminates the concurrency edge cases.20:24
harlowjathe locking part we have somewhat (basically job ownership should be atomic), but we do not have this type of locking yet20:24
adrian_ottoright, that's the root of my concern.20:24
harlowjasure20:25
harlowjaunderstandable20:25
adrian_ottoso if the goal is to start with something simple, and iterate, then funnel all state transitions through an intentional bottleneck where you manage the concurrency.20:25
adrian_ottoone such approach is to expose an API that serializes access to the database without relying on the database for the locking20:26
adrian_ottoand all concurrent clients use that API20:26
harlowjalike a DB proxy :(20:26
adrian_ottothere are other solutions as well, but that one is not complicated20:26
adrian_ottoyes, you can think of it that way.20:27
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting20:27
devanandaa separate special db proxy20:27
devanandajust used for lock mgmt20:27
harlowjacould be20:27
devanandasince it would probably make everything else really slow :)20:27
adrian_ottoyes20:27
*** glikson has quit IRC20:28
adrian_ottowell, if it has a reader/writer lock implementation it would not necessarily be slow20:28
harlowjalike something like zookeeper, haha20:28
adrian_ottobut if there are lots of concurrent writers, then by definition it would slow it down.20:28
adrian_ottoand I'd argue that's the desired outcome20:28
harlowjaya, i wonder if time should be spent inventing said service (which is like a mini-serializing-ZK), or just recommend people use ZK, idk20:29
devanandamy point is, some db traffic doesn't need write locks around it. it's really only the _establishing_ of a lock that requires it20:29
devanandaeg, in my use case20:30
devanandaonce a given process has that lock, it should be free to write until it releases the lock20:30
devanandasince no one else will touch that resource20:30
devanandathe same model probably works in nova and elsewhere20:30
devananda"lock instance" should be non-concurrent. "write stuff" could be parallel after that.20:31
*** eharney has quit IRC20:31
adrian_ottosure, and we could implement that simply by having a single manager process that handles issuing you the lock.20:31
devanandaright20:31
*** markpeek has quit IRC20:32
adrian_ottobut that at no time shall any two manager processes try to use the same lock table in the db20:32
adrian_ottoyou also need to require that any readers also get a lock from the same authority that the writer's lock came from20:33
adrian_ottothey can't just expect to look in the db, and if the lock is in the table, then enter a polling loop20:33
adrian_ottosee what I mean?20:33
harlowjayup, seems like a weird scaling bottleck :(20:33
adrian_ottodefinitely, it is.20:33
devanandayep20:34
adrian_ottobut properly implemented you should be able to handle thousands of locks per second with that design20:34
harlowja*and with a correct backing database*20:34
adrian_ottowhich should work fine for a control plane like this one, even if there were a very large number of cloud resources under management.20:34
devanandaCAP theorem at work20:34
harlowjadevananda def, lock reclaimation, who is the right manager and so on worries me, haha20:35
adrian_ottoand yes, it does make the system more brittle. It's the Consistency vs. Availability tradeoff in CAP.20:35
devanandai feel like this discussion has turned from C to P20:35
devanandaheh20:36
devanandaat least we all share the same concerns :)20:36
harlowjaagreed20:36
*** IlyaE has quit IRC20:37
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting20:37
adrian_ottowhat's the objection to just taking a hard dependency on ZK? I know there is a reluctance around that, but I missed whomever expressed it.20:37
harlowjai haven't quite figured that out yet either20:37
harlowjai'd almost rather recommend ZK instead of trying to build mini-ZK+db wrongly ;)20:37
harlowjai think the main objections were that its a new thing to manage20:38
adrian_ottois it the fact that people want a library to use within a single thread of an app, and don't want the overhead of a ZK unless they are dealing with distributed state?20:38
harlowjai think we can handle that problem with filelocks20:38
harlowjai think ZK is just a new service that people don't have operational experience with20:38
adrian_ottoyeah, I raised that suggestion before.20:39
devanandai'm concerned also with cross-host locks20:39
devanandaeg, HA for the ironic manager service20:39
harlowjadevananda me to :(20:39
devanandaso filelocks are no use20:39
adrian_otto…unless…20:39
adrian_ottoyou basically re-implement what ZK does...20:40
harlowjaand publish papers!20:40
devanandaalso, i need to go read up on ZK :)20:40
adrian_ottowith what amounts to a 2PC of data between a quorum of nodes.20:40
devanandahmm. 2PC again depends on the db backend20:40
adrian_ottodon't think DB20:40
harlowjaand 1+ years of work ;)20:40
adrian_ottojust think how you commit state20:41
adrian_ottoregardless of that the persistence layer is.20:41
devanandayeh. that's really tricky :)20:41
adrian_ottoright.20:41
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
*** eharney has quit IRC20:41
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
adrian_ottoso maybe we could think about ways to make ZK brain dead simple to use for this.20:41
adrian_ottoand overcome the management objection20:42
harlowjathats easy i think, kazoo makes it pretty braindead20:42
harlowja#link https://github.com/python-zk/kazoo/tree/master/kazoo/recipe20:42
harlowjaadrian_otto that could work, i think that most companies are running ZK anyway, i just don't know if we can convince other devs that its required so easily20:43
*** dwcramer has quit IRC20:43
harlowja*thats the hardier part* since it requires u to bend your mind (in a way)20:43
adrian_ottothe current plan is to have pluggable backends20:44
adrian_ottoif you plug in "db" then it should use a single (centralized) lock service, and the bottleneck and HA characteristic that comes with20:44
adrian_ottoif you plug in "zk" then you get HA20:44
harlowjasure, but said 'single (centralized) lock service' doesn't seem like it should be provided by this library20:44
harlowjaand i don't think it exists anywhere right?20:45
harlowjaso then there would be a ZK backend, and a phantom backend?20:45
adrian_ottoright, it does not yet exist20:45
*** boris-42 has quit IRC20:46
harlowjasure, i wonder who would desire to make it then, since ZK does it without developing a new backend20:46
adrian_ottobut I'm suggesting that it's not hard to offer one for those that want to use the db backend simply need to run the lock service somewhere, and specify a configuration attribute to the taskflow library that indicates the host:port where it is running20:46
adrian_ottoin all honesty I think this could be done in about 100 lines of C++20:47
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting20:47
adrian_ottoor maybe less of python code20:48
harlowjasure, the part that worries me is that providing that means that we have to support it and then can't use more advanced features of ZK later due to this db-backend20:48
harlowjabut maybe i'm thinking to much, ha20:48
adrian_ottois there such a thing as a single node ZK?20:48
harlowjarun it on 1 computer :-P20:49
harlowjaits just a java program20:49
adrian_ottooh, a bell just went off in my head.20:49
harlowja?20:49
adrian_ottoI think that's the reluctance to work with ZK20:49
adrian_ottoJava.20:49
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
harlowjathe underlying linux is written in c, we should not use it either ;)20:50
harlowjaand that libvirt thing, ha20:50
devanandahah20:50
adrian_ottoLOL20:50
devanandaadrian_otto: flashing red lights.20:50
*** gyee has quit IRC20:50
devanandaharlowja: so that's probably the source of the reluctance. Java :)20:51
harlowjaya, that mindsets messed up :-P20:51
devanandait certainly turns me off of it ...20:51
adrian_ottothat's a theme that keeps cropping up20:51
harlowjaits a service that provides apis, so u don't have to know its running java, lol20:52
*** markpeek has quit IRC20:52
harlowjajust somewhere it will be20:52
devanandaexcept we do to deploy it20:52
harlowjahave someone else deploy it, lol20:52
devanandaand make openstack depend on java? hrm...20:52
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting20:52
devanandaif there were a non-java alternative, that'd probably fly20:52
harlowjai saw one in go, lol20:52
devananda:)20:52
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n320:52
adrian_ottolet's table this for now20:52
harlowjagoogle likely has one internally in c++/c20:53
harlowjabut good luck getting it out of google20:53
*** lpabon has quit IRC20:53
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting20:53
adrian_ottoevery distributed filesystem has solved this issue.20:53
harlowjawell alot of opensource projects use zookeeper, so i don't think its anything new20:53
jlucciSo, i'm coming halfway through this, but I don't think using zk will necessarily be an issue20:54
*** IlyaE has quit IRC20:54
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting20:54
harlowjait depends on what lock features we want20:54
jlucciAll we need is some sort of abstraction that provides the same functionality as zookeeper, right?20:54
adrian_ottojlucci: there you are, thinking rationally.20:54
jlucciThen tell the user to throw whatever they want want behind that abstraction/api/whatever20:55
adrian_ottojlucci: yes20:55
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
adrian_ottoa get_lock() call is really not taht hard to back-end with Py20:55
harlowjawell release is though, especially if the backend goes away :-P20:56
harlowjabut maybe jlucci  is right and we just make some simple backends, idk20:56
adrian_ottothat would need to be something you accept when you decide not to use the HA option backed by ZK20:56
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting20:57
harlowjaagreed20:57
*** garyk has quit IRC20:57
adrian_ottoit would be reliable as long as the backend remained running20:57
adrian_ottowhich moves distributed risk to centralized risk20:58
harlowjasure, so another idea is that redis/memcache provide these semantics20:58
adrian_ottowhich is a design pattern that IT managers are very familiar with handling20:58
adrian_ottoharlowja: you can actually use memcache as a backing store for locks20:59
harlowjaok, so lets see what we can develop for this20:59
harlowjaya, i think it has basic semantics for this20:59
harlowjanothing special20:59
harlowjaand might be more 'acceptable' that ZK20:59
harlowjasince its in C ;)20:59
adrian_ottojust put a thin api on the front of it to make it more usable20:59
*** senhuang has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
harlowjaya20:59
harlowjathat could be the default impl20:59
jlucciWhelp - we're almost at time21:00
harlowjaok, we can chat more on the mailing list, sound good?21:00
adrian_ottoyep21:00
harlowjagood discussion :)21:00
jlucciYup21:00
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:00
harlowja#endmeeting21:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"21:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 23 21:00:24 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/state_management/2013/state_management.2013-05-23-20.01.html21:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/state_management/2013/state_management.2013-05-23-20.01.txt21:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/state_management/2013/state_management.2013-05-23-20.01.log.html21:00
harlowjaor in #openstack-state-management21:00
*** tpatil has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
russellbnova meeting starting in a minute or so21:01
russellb#startmeeting nova21:02
openstackMeeting started Thu May 23 21:02:25 2013 UTC.  The chair is russellb. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"21:02
russellbhello, everyone21:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'21:02
devananda\o21:02
russellbwho's around?21:02
alaskio/21:02
cyeohhi!21:02
morganfainbergoh hi!21:02
mriedemhi21:02
russellb#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova21:02
n0anoo/21:02
beagles.o/21:02
*** ehudtr has quit IRC21:02
*** melwitt has joined #openstack-meeting21:02
senhuango.21:03
russellb#topic havana-121:03
*** openstack changes topic to "havana-1 (Meeting topic: nova)"21:03
harlowjayo21:03
russellb#link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/havana-121:03
dansmitho/21:03
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
russellbsoooo, havana-1 is a week from today21:03
russellbthe feature merge deadline is Tuesday21:03
mikalYay!21:03
russellband there are a bunch of things needing review to make that happen21:03
dansmiththe apiv3 stuff needs major review21:04
russellbso, let's try to make the things on this list a priority with your review time21:04
russellb#help APIv3 work needs reviews: http://goo.gl/5kChi21:04
*** kchenweijie1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
russellb#help Please use havana-1 blueprints to prioritize your review time in the next few days21:04
*** kchenweijie1 has quit IRC21:05
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
russellbany other comments or questions about the push toward havana-1?21:05
russellbalso a bunch of bugs targeted at havana-1, but all in progress (presumably under review)21:05
dansmithobjects!21:06
mikalDon't forget h-1 targetted bugs either21:06
russellbmikal: :-)21:06
morganfainbergdansmith: objects!21:06
mriedemhow does one get a bug targeted for h-1?21:06
mikal(Curse my slow typing)21:06
russellbdansmith: orly?  would you like to say more?  :-)21:06
russellbmriedem: not sure everyone has permissions to do it21:06
dansmithrussellb: I'm on a call and trying to make points of things to review.. apiv3 and objects, both targetted for h121:06
russellbmriedem: you can ask nicely :-)21:06
russellbah21:07
*** elo has quit IRC21:07
russellb#help please help review dansmith's objects patches, too21:07
mriedemrussellb: ok, i'll remember in open topics, thanks21:07
russellbalright, so yeah, let's get this stuff up21:07
russellbwe have 3 dev milestones to get features in21:07
russellband right now the havana-1 list is about 1/3 of what we have on the full havana list21:07
russellbso we really do need to get these done to stay on track21:07
devanandaboris is asking for reviews on the bp/db-improve-archiving reviews, too21:08
*** kchenweijie has quit IRC21:08
russellb#help please help review db-improve-archiving patches21:08
russellbk, on to some bug discussion21:08
russellb#topic bugs21:08
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: nova)"21:08
russellbwe had a bug day yesterday ... good news and bad news21:08
russellbgood news: a bunch of bugs got triaged21:08
russellbbad news: it was basically all by one person21:08
russellbhuge gold star for mikal  :-)21:08
russellbso, mikal got a thread going on the mailing list trying to discuss new ideas for handling our triage workload21:09
russellbmy favorite idea so far is something quantum is doing, which is tagging21:09
mikalSo, having now read that thread... I like the tagging idea. Let's try it.21:09
russellband then having people focused on triaging bugs with a given tag that they know well enough21:09
russellbmikal: cool21:09
*** jasond has left #openstack-meeting21:09
mikalIt becomes a nice way of getting a subteam's attention as well21:10
russellbso, i started documenting this to get us going21:10
mriedemrussellb: mikal: would work well for the virt drivers, they already have tags21:10
russellb#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage21:10
russellbmriedem: yeah21:10
* mikal wonders if we need a catchall tag as well?21:10
russellbso, take a look at that wiki page ... we need to flesh out our tag list, and start getting people assigned to each tag21:10
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:10
devanandai haevn't read the thread, but, tagging bugs eg "db", "vmware", etc seems really helpful to me21:10
mriedemright, i try to tag all powervm bugs and triage them (if not already), but i've noticed it doesn't happen often21:10
russellbmikal: "core stuff"  ?  heh21:10
mriedemagreed21:10
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
mikalrussellb: "unknown"?21:10
mikalFor "I'm not sure WTF this is, but it sure is a thing"21:10
russellbthe other thing is we need some canned queries so people can quickly pull up the list applicable to them21:11
devanandais there a good way to encourage bug submitters to add tags?21:11
russellbtagged with db and in the new state, or whatever21:11
* comstud is here now21:11
russellbdevananda: i don't know of a way to have a blatantly obvious bug guidelines thing21:11
mikalCould we use triaged and confirmed here?21:11
mikalMark things triaged when tags added / verified21:11
* johnthetubaguy is here now too21:11
mikalMark with confirmed when someone on that subteam has evaluated the bug?21:11
mriedemrussellb: the hypervisor support matrix wiki has queries for known virt driver bugs21:11
russellbmikal: if needed ... seems like the lack of a tag or has a tag is enough21:12
mriedemhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/HypervisorSupportMatrix#Known_bugs.2C_by_hypervisor21:12
russellbmriedem: indeed ... just need to refine the queries to show you the tagged bugs that are untriaged21:12
mriedemyeah21:12
mikalrussellb: well, wont the lack of a tag keep the bug stuck in triage hell?21:12
russellband then get those on the new bug triage page21:12
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:12
russellbmikal: i was hoping we'd have another query for untriaged bugs that are untagged21:12
russellbmikal: and people looking at that list, as well21:12
johnthetubaguyI tend to google xen in the bugs and tag a few21:12
johnthetubaguy(and triage them)21:12
mriedemjohnthetubaguy: that's what i did for powervm the other night21:13
russellbjohnthetubaguy: awesome, so basically already doing this :-)21:13
devanandamikal: that's my concern. i've spotted several baremetal bugs come in w/o a tag21:13
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
russellbyeah, so we need to formalize this, and do it consistently, make it easy, etc21:13
devanandafound them by actually using search21:13
johnthetubaguyrussellb: +121:13
mikalWe can always iterate21:13
russellbdevananda: yep, so i'm proposing we have a first step of triage that is just tagging, before the "real" triage happens21:13
mikalLet's give it a try and see what happens21:13
johnthetubaguydevanada: yes, theres always a few that don't get the tag, users probably don't know the tags, and thats fine21:14
mikalIt can't be worse than now21:14
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC21:14
russellbso take a look at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage and help fill it in :-)21:14
johnthetubaguysounds like a good plan, I am happy to take XenAPI stuff21:14
russellbjohnthetubaguy: perfect21:14
mikalI'll add myself to the list of people dumb enough to tag things21:14
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC21:15
russellbmikal: cool :-) ... i added myself because i thought it'd be a good spot in the process to quickly see what bugs are coming in, but without having the full responsibility of full triage anymore21:15
russellbmikal: a  nice breakdown, i think21:15
mikalrussellb: yeah, there's also a big backlog of untagged bugs, so we might have to grind through them for a bit21:15
*** kchenweijie has quit IRC21:15
cyeohis there a way to show bugs that don't have a tag at all?21:16
russellbmikal: indeed ... if we do it in the triage part, everything new will always be tagged ... but would be good to fix the older stuff over time21:16
cyeoh(and I'm happy to triage bugs that are REST API related)21:16
russellbcyeoh: don't know, i was hoping we could have a query for that21:16
russellbi'd like to query for new bugs without a tag, that'd be the query used for step 1 on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage21:16
russellbcyeoh: consider yourself signed up :-)21:16
russellbi don't know if you can do a query for that ... but i haven't tried yet21:17
russellband i think we're a pretty smart group, so i bet we can figure something out.21:17
russellbeven if we script it.21:17
russellbcool ... so at least we have a plan for a next thing to try on bug triage21:18
russellbso hopefully we won't make mikal sad again21:18
mikalOh, I am sure we will21:18
russellb:-)21:18
mikalJust in new and exciting ways21:18
mikal:P21:18
russellbyep21:19
russellbbut at least not in the same way21:19
*** amyt has quit IRC21:19
russellbsee, that's progress21:19
*** yuanz has quit IRC21:19
*** amyt has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
*** yonglihe_ has quit IRC21:19
russellbanything else on bugs?21:19
*** yonglihe_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
cyeohah, apparently searching for '-*' in the tags field searches for bugs without tags21:19
*** llu has quit IRC21:19
*** yuanz has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
russellbcyeoh: nice :-)21:19
russellb#topic sub-team reports21:20
*** openstack changes topic to "sub-team reports (Meeting topic: nova)"21:20
russellbwho's around to give a subteam report?  raise your virtual hand and we'll go one by one21:20
* johnthetubaguy waves21:20
russellbdevananda: want to start?21:20
n0anoscheduler o/21:20
*** llu has joined #openstack-meeting21:20
*** ravikumar_hp has quit IRC21:20
russellbok, will come back to devananda21:21
russellbjohnthetubaguy: xen!21:21
johnthetubaguyhey21:21
johnthetubaguymajor news, smokestack is getting closer mate and dan price are working on it21:21
russellbgreat to hear21:21
johnthetubaguyon latest XenServer 6.1 rather than 5.621:21
johnthetubaguythanks to Ant from Rax for that21:21
johnthetubaguyother stuff is boring really, so that everything21:21
russellbk, thanks :-)21:22
devanandaback now. also, dripton, are you around?21:22
driptonhi21:22
russellbdevananda: alright, go ahead :-)21:22
antonymjohnthetubaguy: no prob :P21:22
driptonI can give one for db though we're not strictly a nova team21:22
* devananda passes the db-mic to dripton 21:22
russellbdripton: that's fine, other teams are like that too21:22
harlowjai can give something to21:22
* dripton takes mic21:22
russellbharlowja: ack, you're in the queue21:22
driptonSo boris-42 did a whole bunch of patches for the improve-db-archiving blueprint, which are in good shape but several await +2s21:23
driptonWe'll be nagging reviewers before the havana-1 deadline to get those in.21:23
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC21:23
driptonAlso comstud is making a big change for the mysqldb backend, but that won't be ready for a bit longer.21:23
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
driptonAnd various small fixes.21:23
driptonThat's it.21:24
russellbcool, thanks!21:24
russellbdevananda: Ironic?21:24
devanandasure21:24
devanandafirst, quick note about nova-baremetal21:24
devanandathere are two bugs tagged critical21:24
devanandalooks like one is being worked in (i need to review after this)21:24
devanandathis one may need some love21:24
devanandahttps://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/117809221:24
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1178092 in nova "second boot during baremetal deploy does not configure netboot : will hang unless the machine attempts PXE automatically" [Critical,Triaged]21:24
devanandaunless someone else gets to it first, i will try this weekend21:24
devanandaironic ...21:25
*** yuanz has quit IRC21:25
*** yuanz has joined #openstack-meeting21:25
devanandalots of people came out of the wood work and we've divvied up tasks21:25
devanandaso it's moving :)21:25
devanandanothing for h1 tho21:25
devananda[eol]21:25
russellboh cool, was hoping people would step up21:25
russellbglad to hear21:25
devanandaah, i suppose this is helpful too21:25
russellbdevananda: thanks!21:25
devananda#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic21:26
devananda:)21:26
russellbnice21:26
russellbgetting all official21:26
devanandahehe21:26
*** Tross has quit IRC21:26
harlowjawow, i need that, lol21:26
russellbk, couple more teams21:26
russellbn0ano: scheduler!21:26
n0anoGot through two items, network bandwidht scheduling & group/ensembles, mostly discussion over mechanics of how to make the changes.21:26
n0anosenhuang, was there the whole time, maybe he can add more21:26
n0anootherwise that's about it, go through the log for the gory details21:27
senhuangYep. there were a lot of discussions on both subjects21:27
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting21:27
n0ano#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler_sub_group/2013/scheduler_sub_group.2013-05-21-15.00.log.html21:27
senhuangat the end of the meeting, people also discussed the multi-scheduling21:27
russellbi'm pretty sure i had a dream this week involving multi-scheduling, it was really bizarre.21:28
senhuangwe are making progresses towards the instance group api extension implementation21:28
*** stevemar has quit IRC21:28
senhuangdb part of work is done21:28
russellbso, I put a -2 on the db part, but just because i'd like to see more of the code that uses it before it goes in21:28
senhuangnow the api part of work is submitted, but there is still some work on the REST part to submit21:29
russellboh, didn't see the next update, then21:29
senhuangthis work uses the db part of work21:29
russellbcool21:29
senhuangi hope i can finish it this week21:29
senhuangokay. done21:30
russellbthanks!21:30
russellbharlowja: you're up21:30
harlowjasweet!21:30
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:30
harlowjaso library is still being worked on, lots of good work there, forming up quite nicely21:30
*** dolphm has quit IRC21:30
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
harlowjaworking with johnthetubaguy  and devananda  and others on various pieces of it21:31
harlowjadiscussing how lock ownership/service might work21:31
harlowjaprototyping how cinder might use it21:31
harlowjadatabase tracking backend got hooked in, so good progress going21:31
harlowja*moving to stackforge shortly*21:31
harlowja#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29981/21:32
harlowjathats about it :)21:32
russellbcool, thanks!21:32
harlowjanp21:32
russellbhartsocks: hi!  what's up in vmware land21:32
*** marun has quit IRC21:32
hartsockshey21:32
hartsocks#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/vmwareapi/2013/vmwareapi.2013-05-22-17.01.html21:32
hartsocksSo we met this week with 11 participants.21:32
hartsocksWe're targeting H-2 for two of our blueprints.21:32
hartsocksAnd we identified 4 "blocker bugs" that need to get fixed ASAP21:33
*** maoy has quit IRC21:33
hartsocksWe have folks working on all 4 of these.21:33
hartsocksSo I'd say things are starting to really get rolling for us.21:33
russellbk, ping me if you think any can get merged in the next few days21:33
hartsocksI think we need to get some more disucussion, but thanks.21:33
russellbi meant those blocker bugs21:34
hartsocksRight.21:34
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** dwcramer has quit IRC21:34
russellbbut cool, i think i owe you guys blueprint review on the havana-2 blueprints21:34
russellbhaven't gone back to look to see if they've been updated21:34
*** stevebaker_gone is now known as stevebaker21:34
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
hartsocksWe'll ping you when things move then.21:35
russellbk21:35
russellbanything else?21:35
hartsocksThat's about all.21:35
russellbany questions on any sub-team stuff?21:35
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:35
harlowjanot currently, likely will be after i start jumping back into nova code :)21:35
* russellb nods21:36
russellb#topic open discussion21:36
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"21:36
russellbmriedem: you had a bug?21:36
mriedemyeah, i'm looking to get some reviews on this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29005/21:36
mriedemthe changes are pervasive but not that bad, the size is mostly in tests21:37
russellbyeah, diffstat looks scary21:37
mriedemdansmith and comstud handled a lot of the low hanging review early21:37
russellb(touching all the drivers)21:37
mriedemyup21:37
mriedemlatent bug21:37
mriedemi was also hoping to get this marked for h-1, i think it's pretty much ready to go: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/27534/21:38
mriedemmikal: ^21:38
*** stevebaker is now known as stevebaker_gone21:38
russellbon the first one, based on the commit message, it makes sense to me21:38
* mikal looks21:38
russellbjust needs careful review21:38
mikalOh yeah, that's the one where I was being a grumpy old man21:38
russellbmikal: that's different?21:38
mikalHerh21:39
* russellb snickers21:39
mriedemmikal: i think he took care of what you wanted, i.e. opening the perf bug21:39
mikalYeah he did21:39
mikalThen I got distracted by a shiney object21:39
mikalReviewing it now21:39
mriedemthat will happen :)21:39
mriedemthanks21:39
*** martine has quit IRC21:40
russellboh, so random thing ... i was playing with stats earlier.  We've had 137 people participate in nova code reviews in the last 30 days21:40
russellbi think that's pretty amazing.21:40
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting21:40
harlowjadef, where are all these people ;021:40
dansmithnot as amazing as 138 would be, but definitely awesome :)21:40
mikalLOL21:40
russellbharlowja: scattered around the globe, i suspect21:40
mikaldansmith: you're so upbeat21:40
dansmithheh21:41
russellbdansmith: ha, so hard to please21:41
driptonyou mean you don't each have a couple of sockpuppet to give your patches +1s?21:41
mikalI'd like more code review friends in the southern hemisphere21:41
mikalWe might upduct dansmith and bring him down here21:41
harlowjadripton, hahaha21:41
dansmithheh21:41
mikals/upduct/abduct/21:41
russellbmikal: you should just move this way21:42
russellbmikal: i can offer you sweet potato casserole as a relocation bonus21:42
mikalrussellb: but the bread is weird in 'merica21:43
mikalrussellb: you made that up. That's not a thing!21:43
russellbmikal: with marshmallow.21:43
dansmithmmmm, reminds me of home in the south21:43
mikalDoes arguing about food indicate that this meeting is kindof over?21:43
russellbmikal: yes21:43
russellbanything else?21:44
mikalThat sweet potatoe marshmallow thing is awesome though21:44
mikalWe should have a meetup in Hawaii21:44
russellbalrighty then ... #openstack-nova is open 24/7 for other spontaneous discussion throughout the week21:44
cyeoh+1 for Hawaii meetup!21:44
russellbthanks all!21:44
russellbcyeoh: mikal +10021:44
mikalLaters!21:44
russellb#endmeeting21:44
*** mriedem has left #openstack-meeting21:44
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings"21:44
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 23 21:44:52 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:44
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2013/nova.2013-05-23-21.02.html21:44
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2013/nova.2013-05-23-21.02.txt21:44
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2013/nova.2013-05-23-21.02.log.html21:44
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:45
*** tpatil has quit IRC21:45
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC21:45
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
*** glikson has quit IRC21:47
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
*** IlyaE_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
*** hartsocks has left #openstack-meeting21:52
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting21:56
*** kchenweijie has quit IRC21:56
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting21:57
*** changbl has quit IRC21:57
*** IlyaE_ has quit IRC21:59
*** jlucci has quit IRC21:59
*** newgnus has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** senhuang has quit IRC22:00
*** lbragstad has quit IRC22:00
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC22:03
*** newgnus has left #openstack-meeting22:03
*** mrwacky42 has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC22:06
*** anniec has quit IRC22:07
*** IlyaE_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
*** IlyaE has quit IRC22:16
*** eharney has quit IRC22:16
*** IlyaE_ has quit IRC22:17
*** ryanpetr_ has quit IRC22:18
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:22
*** shardy_afk is now known as shardy22:27
*** kchenweijie has quit IRC22:28
*** kchenweijie has joined #openstack-meeting22:29
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting22:29
*** dolphm has quit IRC22:30
*** IlyaE has quit IRC22:32
*** mrwacky42 has quit IRC22:33
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting22:37
*** esker has quit IRC22:38
*** mlavalle has quit IRC22:48
*** kchenweijie has quit IRC22:49
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting22:51
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:56
*** stevebaker_gone is now known as stevebaker22:57
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC22:58
*** melwitt has left #openstack-meeting23:00
*** bdpayne has quit IRC23:00
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:01
*** ijw has quit IRC23:01
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC23:02
*** flaper87 has quit IRC23:06
*** dontalton has quit IRC23:08
*** woodspa_ has quit IRC23:10
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC23:12
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting23:13
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC23:14
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:22
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC23:26
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting23:30
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting23:36
*** NobodyCam has quit IRC23:38
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting23:48
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC23:49
*** ijw1 has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** ijw has quit IRC23:52
*** brucer has quit IRC23:52
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:52
*** garyTh has quit IRC23:55
*** seanrob_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:55
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting23:57
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting23:57
*** ijw1 has quit IRC23:57
*** seanrob has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!