Thursday, 2012-10-04

*** colinmcnamara has left #openstack-meeting00:01
*** ehm1 has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** ehm has quit IRC00:06
*** rhagarty has quit IRC00:06
*** PotHix has quit IRC00:07
*** anniec has quit IRC00:08
*** jakedahn is now known as jakedahn_zz00:15
*** jog0_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:16
*** sdake has quit IRC00:19
*** jog0 has quit IRC00:20
*** jog0_ is now known as jog000:20
*** dhellmann has quit IRC00:23
*** lloydde has quit IRC00:23
*** hemna has quit IRC00:25
*** lifeless has quit IRC00:27
*** jog0 has quit IRC00:28
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting00:31
*** adjohn has quit IRC00:40
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting00:44
*** colinmcnamara has left #openstack-meeting00:44
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting00:56
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting01:00
*** littleidea has quit IRC01:09
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away01:11
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net01:11
*** Mandell has quit IRC01:27
*** lloydde has quit IRC01:28
*** danwent has quit IRC01:31
*** jbrogan has quit IRC01:36
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting01:40
*** waa has joined #openstack-meeting01:42
*** littleidea has quit IRC01:52
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting01:53
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting01:54
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting01:58
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away02:14
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting02:18
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting02:19
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC02:30
*** lifeless has quit IRC02:30
*** Guest40726 has quit IRC02:31
*** hemna has quit IRC02:32
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting02:36
*** shang has quit IRC02:37
*** markmcclain has quit IRC02:39
*** lloydde has quit IRC02:40
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting02:40
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net02:44
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC02:50
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting03:04
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting03:04
*** ijw1 has joined #openstack-meeting03:05
*** ijw has quit IRC03:05
*** Mandell has quit IRC03:06
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting03:08
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting03:08
*** jakedahn_zz is now known as jakedahn03:08
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting03:08
*** jdurgin has quit IRC03:12
*** Mandell has quit IRC03:15
*** dwcramer has quit IRC03:23
*** jakedahn is now known as jakedahn_zz03:24
*** metral has joined #openstack-meeting03:29
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting03:33
*** reed has quit IRC03:34
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting03:55
*** littleidea has quit IRC04:00
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting04:01
*** jakedahn_zz is now known as jakedahn04:02
*** littleidea has quit IRC04:26
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:37
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:40
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC04:42
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting04:42
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** hemna has quit IRC04:59
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC05:06
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk05:16
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** fishing has joined #openstack-meeting05:23
fishingi'm curious, any ron paul supporters here? if so i gotta ask why?05:24
fishingromney / obama bots need not apply05:25
fishingi don't know what kind of room this is, i just know that i'm a former ron paul supporter...and i don't support him any more, nor some of his message...and i was wondering if there are any supporters05:26
fishingwaste of time, good luck yall05:27
*** fishing has quit IRC05:27
*** littleidea has quit IRC05:30
*** lloydde has quit IRC05:32
*** markmcclain has quit IRC05:42
*** danwent has quit IRC05:59
*** jakedahn is now known as jakedahn_zz06:07
*** shang has joined #openstack-meeting06:08
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting06:18
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:39
*** markmcclain has quit IRC06:40
*** anniec has quit IRC06:41
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec06:41
*** rafaduran has joined #openstack-meeting06:53
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting07:00
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting07:01
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting07:51
*** lifeless has quit IRC07:54
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting07:54
*** waa has quit IRC07:54
*** EmilienM has quit IRC07:58
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting08:02
*** ijw1 has quit IRC08:02
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting08:05
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** jgriffith has quit IRC08:14
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting08:16
*** lifeless has quit IRC08:24
*** EmilienM has quit IRC08:28
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting08:28
*** EmilienM has quit IRC08:41
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** danwent has quit IRC09:02
*** EmilienM has quit IRC09:03
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting09:03
*** EmilienM has quit IRC09:05
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting09:08
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting09:08
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-meeting09:13
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting09:21
*** stevebake has quit IRC09:21
*** EmilienM has quit IRC09:23
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting09:27
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-meeting09:28
*** EmilienM has quit IRC09:28
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting09:43
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** ijw has quit IRC10:27
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting10:27
*** stevebake has quit IRC10:28
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting10:31
*** stevebake has quit IRC10:35
*** sandywalsh_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:38
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC10:39
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting10:41
*** garyk has quit IRC10:46
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting10:50
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting11:01
*** sandywalsh_ has quit IRC11:07
*** sdake has quit IRC11:27
*** thinrhino has quit IRC11:35
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting11:42
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates12:18
*** stevebake has joined #openstack-meeting12:22
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting12:24
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting12:41
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting12:41
*** sandywalsh_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:57
*** stevebake has quit IRC12:58
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC12:58
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting13:05
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting13:11
*** M0lt3n has quit IRC13:13
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting13:20
*** thinrhino has quit IRC13:21
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting13:22
*** littleidea has quit IRC13:24
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
*** thinrhino has quit IRC13:36
*** sandywalsh_ has quit IRC13:43
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** jaypipes has quit IRC13:44
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting13:46
*** thinrhino has quit IRC13:46
*** ttrifonov has quit IRC13:49
*** ttrifonov_zZzz has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** markmcclain has quit IRC13:55
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** thinrhino has quit IRC14:04
*** ewindisch has quit IRC14:04
*** maoy has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
*** thinrhino has quit IRC14:07
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
*** journeeman has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
*** markmcclain has quit IRC14:18
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** ayoung has quit IRC14:29
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** journeeman has quit IRC14:35
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** thinrhino has quit IRC14:40
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC14:41
*** dhellmann has quit IRC14:41
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann14:41
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
*** markmcclain has quit IRC14:43
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
*** DanD has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** journeeman has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** dhellmann has quit IRC14:46
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann14:46
*** hggdh has quit IRC14:48
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting14:50
*** thinrhino has quit IRC14:51
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting14:52
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away14:54
nijaba#startmeeting Ceilometer15:00
nijaba#meetingtopic Ceilometer15:00
nijaba#chair nijaba15:00
nijaba#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/MeteringAgenda15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Oct  4 15:00:01 2012 UTC.  The chair is nijaba. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer'15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:00
openstackCurrent chairs: nijaba15:00
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net15:00
nijabaHello everyone! Show of hands, who is around for the ceilometer meeting?15:00
nijabao/15:00
spno/15:00
eglynno/15:00
russellbo/15:00
cp16neto/15:00
nijabanice!15:00
nijaba#topic actions from previous meeting15:00
nijaba#topic nijaba to share a first version of the slides with dhellmann15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "actions from previous meeting (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "nijaba to share a first version of the slides with dhellmann (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:00
nijabaWe've been working well together and I think we almost have a final version15:01
nijabaabout 20 slides for 40 minutes15:01
spncool15:01
dhellmanno/15:01
nijabavolunteers to review?15:01
journeemano/15:02
nijabaplease pm me your google enabled address if you want to give us your feedback15:02
nijaba#topic dhellmann to provide some bullet points on DH use case15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "dhellmann to provide some bullet points on DH use case (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:02
*** gmb has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
nijabathat was done too as part of the slides15:02
DanDo/15:02
nijaba#topic dhellmann update status on http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering/RoadMap15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "dhellmann update status on http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering/RoadMap (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:02
nijabadhellmann: ?15:03
dhellmannI did update it, but it is not entirely up to date15:03
jd__lo15:03
dhellmannI completed a review of all of the meters we're collecting earlier today, so I have enough info to finish that now15:03
*** ewindisch has quit IRC15:03
nijabanice!15:04
nijaba#topic gmb to email the list with a summary of how things stand for the release15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "gmb to email the list with a summary of how things stand for the release (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:04
nijabagmb is busy, but he will be sending the email before the eod15:04
*** gmb has left #openstack-meeting15:04
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
nijaba#topic Release status15:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Release status (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:05
*** srini_g has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
nijabaso, while gmb is out, I think we need to drive this forward15:05
nijabaI think we are past our feature freeze date15:05
nijababut are still accepting features15:05
nijabaso when should we be cutting off?15:05
* dhellmann hangs head in shame15:06
* jd__ votes $RANDOM15:06
nijabawhat feature are on the verge of delivery that we would like to have?15:06
dhellmannthere are 2 things I'd like to include15:07
dhellmann1. option to disable meters through configuration15:07
nijabaI think it would be nice to have release on the 14th latest, so we can say it is done at the summit15:07
dhellmann2. review and standardize the meter names15:07
dhellmann#1 isn't a requirement for a 0.1 release, but would be nice15:07
nijabadhellmann: do you think this can be completed before the end of this week?15:07
dhellmann#2 will be more difficult to change later, I think, after people start depending on the current names15:07
nijabaso that next week can be dedicated to test and release?15:08
dhellmannI think so. jd__ what do you think?15:08
jd__hum15:08
* dhellmann just noticed a bunch of related code reviews from jd__ 15:09
jd__i think both requirement makes sense15:09
jd__I've started #2 a bit actually as you just noticed15:09
dhellmannI'll take #115:09
dhellmannI know how I want that done, and Justin started the code already15:09
jd__we have a start for #1 I think, right?15:09
jd__ok :)15:09
jd__that's what I though15:09
jd__+t15:09
jd__I think it'll be enough for a first release15:10
nijabaso, feature free on saturday?15:10
jd__we can call this "technical preview" or something like that15:10
jd__i'm sure there's a good marketing name :)15:10
dhellmannlet's say sunday since I may not actually get to work on it until then15:10
nijaba0.1 carrues that very well, I think :)15:10
jd__nijaba: indeed :)15:10
dhellmann0.1 should be marked an alpha, right?15:10
nijaba#agreed feature freeze push to sunday15:10
jd__one day I'll write a book on software version numbers15:11
spn;)15:11
dhellmann:-)15:11
nijabadhellmann: call it what you want, I know crazy guys will be usingit in prod regardless ;)15:11
dhellmannheh15:11
cp16netnijaba: yeah i was wondering is anyone running this ina  prod env?15:12
nijabaok, then what do we need to do then to have a release?15:12
dhellmanncp16net: we will be soon at DreamHost15:12
cp16netor just dev or local env15:12
dhellmannbut so far only dev15:12
cp16netok cool15:12
nijabawe need to open a new dev branch and gate the existing one to bug fix only.  Who can do that on monday15:13
nijabaI have no idea how to do this with git15:14
nijabavolunteers?15:14
jd__I can try15:14
spndo we need to have special access on github to do that?15:14
jd__OTOH I think we need to adapt to something like other projects, we continue to commit in master but create stable branch15:14
dhellmann+1 to stable branch15:15
nijabajd__: ok that works too15:15
jd__spn: not sure, I think i'll poke the -infra guys15:15
eglynnalso a milestone-proposed branch?15:15
dhellmannthe guys in openstack-infra should be able to explain how15:15
nijaba#action jd__ to create a stable branch on monday15:15
spncool15:15
dhellmanneglynn: we would need to define some milestones first, no? :-)15:15
jd__I think just a folsom/stable branch would be enough for now15:16
srini_g0/15:16
jd__it's not like we are expected to release real working stuff15:16
jd__:->15:16
eglynndhellmann: the milestone-proposed branch is usually used for pre-release fixes15:16
srini_go/15:16
dhellmannnijaba: we should, after (or at?) the summit put together a set of milestones for grizzly15:16
nijabadhellmann: +115:16
jd__roooaaarr (grizzly)15:16
cp16netand tag master as well15:16
eglynnalso shouldn't the stable/folsom only be cut once the release is done?15:16
dhellmanneglynn: cutting after the release makes sense15:16
jd__eglynn: we release on sunday and makes the branch on monday?15:17
nijabanext week is QA week, we release the weekend after15:17
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
dhellmannnijaba: that makes sense15:17
eglynnjd__ we feature freeze on Sunday, but release later in the week?15:17
nijabaso we should work on bug fixes on the stabel branch, new features land on master15:17
eglynnso fixes next week go on master first, then cherry picked onto miletsone-proposed15:17
dhellmanneglynn: the milestone-proposed branch may make more sense after we have our first release then? I'm not sure what it buys us now15:18
dhellmannah15:18
eglynnmilestone-proposed for pre-relase fixes, stable/folsom for post-relase fixes15:18
eglynns/relase/release/15:18
dhellmannI see15:18
nijabaeglynn: ah, that makes sense15:18
* nijaba wonder if ttx is lurking15:19
eglynnFYI some more detail on the process: http://wiki.openstack.org/GerritJenkinsGithub#Authoring_Changes_for_milestone-proposed15:19
nijabathanks eglynn15:19
*** salmon_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
jd__http://wiki.openstack.org/BranchModel worth reading too15:19
*** salmon_ has left #openstack-meeting15:19
ttxnijaba: no15:19
*** salmon_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
*** garyk has quit IRC15:20
ttxneed help ?15:20
nijabattx: if you have best practices for handling our release15:20
jd__we're discussing how to copy branching model for stable and milestone from other project15:20
nijabaright now we are on:15:20
eglynnttx: just clarifying the use fo miletsone-proposed versus stable branch15:20
nijabamilestone-proposed for pre-relase fixes on monday15:20
eglynnagreed15:21
nijabastable/folsom for post-relase fixes next weekend when we release15:21
nijabawe tag master15:21
nijabaeach time15:21
*** jaypipes has quit IRC15:21
nijabattx: makes sense to you?15:21
ttxhmm, how is the version generated right now ?15:21
ttxwhat tarballs are you producing currently ?15:22
* jd__ whispers15:22
jd__none I think?15:22
nijabaI don't think we produce any15:22
nijabayet15:22
dhellmannI think we just have the version # hard-coded in setup.py15:22
ttxok15:22
ttxlet me think15:22
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting15:23
ttxif you don't have automatic tarball generation, that simplifies15:23
ttxyou can probably create milestone-proposed on top of master, then stable/folsom on top of milestone-proposed (after release)15:23
ttxif you want to mimick how iot's done for core15:24
nijabaI think this is what eglynnwas proposing15:24
jd__ttx: that's the point, thanks15:24
nijabaand yes, we want15:24
jd__we'll do that :)15:24
ttxBeen working on rewriting http://wiki.openstack.org/ReleaseTeam/HowToRelease15:24
dhellmannhow do we get the branches pushed to github?15:24
nijabathanks a lot ttx15:24
ttxwhich is the complete process I use, but you need nothing of that complexity15:24
ttxsince you have nothing like milestone codes or pre-generated tarballs15:25
nijabaok, so the next question is weather we are missing anything for a release?15:25
nijabarelease notes maybe?15:25
nijabaalso, do we need to produce a tarball?15:26
dhellmannwe could add those to our docs15:26
spndhllemann: git remote add github git@github.com:user_name/my_app.git  and git push -u github master15:26
dhellmannspn: I don't know if any of us have permission to push directly to github because of the way the repo was created. maybe nijaba has admin rights?15:27
spnagreed.15:27
nijaba#action nijaba to prime release notes in the docs15:27
nijabadhellmann: can I grant those rights to someone else?15:28
spnmay be adding other users as collaborators15:28
dhellmannnijaba: if you have admin rights, I think you can15:28
dhellmannnijaba: do you have admin?15:28
* jd__ does not have admin15:29
nijabadhellmann: I have no idea.  Dachary did the initial setup of the repo IIRC15:29
* dhellmann does not have admin15:29
nijabahow do I check?15:29
spnadmin page ( https://github.com/user/repo/admin ) and in the Collaborators tab15:29
dhellmanngo to https://github.com/stackforge/ceilometer and look for the "admin" tab15:29
spnsee if you can add users15:29
dhellmannthe admin tab should be on the right end after "graphs" etc.15:30
jd__anyway someone from openstack-infra has admin so don't bother I'll deal with them15:30
nijabadhellmann: no admin tab for me.  I'll speak with dachary15:30
dhellmannok15:30
dhellmannwe should probably add you, me, and jd__15:30
dhellmannat least15:30
nijaba#action nick to find a way to give admin right to jd__ for github15:31
jd__https://github.com/stackforge?tab=members -> Monty  :)15:31
nijaba#action nick to find a way to give admin right to jd__ and dhellmann for github15:31
nijaba#action nijaba to find a way to give admin right to jd__ and dhellmann for github15:31
nijabaI think I have the action right this time!15:31
jd__we hope so :)15:32
nijabaso, do we need to produce a tarball?15:32
dhellmannnijaba: that may be something we can have the infra team turn on for the project15:32
dhellmannlike they do for nova, etc.15:32
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
nijabaok, I'll check into it at the same time then15:32
nijaba#action nijaba to check if infrateam can generate a tarball for us15:33
jd__are you sure? that may overlap with my #action about putting the branches in place15:33
jd__not that it's a big problem :)15:33
nijabajd__: you want to cover it then?15:33
jd__as you wish, but I can handle all this at once I imagine15:34
nijabaok, sounds good15:34
nijaba#action jd__ to check if infrateam can generate a tarball for us15:34
nijabaanything else we might be missing for a release?15:34
jd__once I have kidnapped an -infra guy, I can do whatever is needed15:34
jd__i think it'll be a good start :)15:35
dhellmann:-)15:35
* nijaba wonders if jd__ is really jack dauer15:35
nijabaok, next topic then15:35
nijaba#topic Motion to review incubation request at the next TC meeting15:35
*** openstack changes topic to "Motion to review incubation request at the next TC meeting (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:36
nijabaWe need to trigger the new TC to decide if we are worth being incubated.  I think it would be nice if we ensured this would happen at their next meeting, which will be face to face in san diego.  Are you ok with me sending them an email on that subject. If they give us a green light, according to the by-laws, the board of director will then have to confirm.15:36
dhellmann+115:36
jd__+1, face to face is always easier to kidnap15:37
eglynndumb question: what's the timeline for incubation?15:37
jd__(what is wrong with me!)15:37
nijabaeglynn: one cycle15:37
eglynn(i.e. how long of a prior track-record is required?)15:37
eglynna-ha ok, cool15:37
*** anniec has quit IRC15:37
dhellmanneglynn: prior track-record is unspecified, afaik15:37
nijabaone cycle in incubation, at least, before being core15:37
eglynncool, thanks for the info15:38
* dhellmann thought eglynn meant prior to incubation15:38
eglynndhellmann: I did :)15:38
spndumb q?:   being in incubation and core are same?15:38
nijabaspn: in terms of duties, yes15:38
eglynnone preceeds the other15:38
nijabado we need to vote on my proposal or should I just mark that as agreed?15:39
dhellmannI sense agreement15:39
eglynna yea by acclamation I think15:39
dhellmannis anyone opposed?15:40
spnno15:40
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk15:40
nijaba#agreed nijaba to send an email to the tc to ask for a motion to put ceilometer in incubation15:40
nijabathis bring us to the next topic15:40
nijaba#topic ODS Grizzly15:40
*** openstack changes topic to "ODS Grizzly (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:40
jd__roooaaarr15:41
nijabashow of hands, who is going to be there in person?15:41
eglynnhow many slots at teh ODS does ceilometer have?15:41
nijabajust so that I can plan for cash to buy beers ;)15:41
dhellmanno/15:41
nijabao/15:41
* eglynn just heard he'll probably be able to attend :)15:41
nijabaeglynn: \o/15:41
dhellmannwait, beer? o///15:41
eglynn:)15:41
dhellmanneglynn: :)15:42
spnI think we have webex option this time15:42
dhellmannspn: yes, that was mentioned on the mailing list15:42
nijabaand long nights for you then...15:42
spnhihi..15:42
spnnot sure whether we are allowed to interact on webex15:43
dhellmannspn: I'm not sure whether it's supported, but if not we could have someone in the room on irc relay questions and comments15:43
nijabano one else is going to be there?15:44
DanDo/15:44
spndhellmann: that would be great15:44
nijabaah!15:44
nijabaI am sure jaypipes will be too15:44
nijabawhat about jtran?15:44
ttxabout design summit: I'll need your session descriptions for inclusion in the final schedule Monday15:44
nijabattx: http://wiki.openstack.org/EfficientMetering/GrizzlySummit15:44
nijabaso here you are15:45
* jaypipes will be there Monday around noon15:45
ttxnijaba: i'll try to remember that15:45
nijabattx: do you want an email?15:45
ttxnijaba: nah15:45
nijabak15:45
nijabajaypipes: will jtran be there?15:45
dhellmannttx, do you have other questions about the metering integration sessions?15:46
nijabattx: you wanted to talk about "the multiplication of metring integration sessions"15:46
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
jaypipesnijaba: yes15:46
nijabacool.  and I know enovance is sending a few people too15:47
ttxnijaba: yes, Would like to reduce the duplication asap15:47
ttxnijaba: so that you don't end up with all of them refused15:47
nijabaI think we all agreed to merge 3 of them into one last night by email15:47
ttxindependently by the separate topic leads making independent decisions15:47
nijaba115,116 and 118 IIRC15:47
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
nijaba115,117 and 118  actually15:49
dhellmannyes, the latter15:49
nijabattx:  would this be good enough for you?15:49
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
ttxlet me check which topic they were proposed under15:50
dhellmannI just talked to Mark about the quantum session (110) and he wants to keep that focused on quantum because it will cover more than ceilometer15:50
cp16neti will be there.15:51
nijabaso, I hope you have all noted that ceilometer 3 sessions will happen on moday morning15:51
ttxOK, let's merge 117-11815:51
ttxyou can keep 115 since Horizon is missing stuff anyway15:51
ttxand it wil give you a late session (Thursday afternoon) on the subject to wrap it up15:52
nijabattx: sounds good15:52
ttxdhellmann: can you make one out of two ? 117-118 ?15:52
ttxdhellmann: and let me know which one to remove15:53
ttxwill be simpler than communicating the merge to markmc, isn't around15:53
dhellmannttx: yes, I'll do that after lunch and email you the results15:53
dhellmann(in a couple of hours)15:53
ttxok, just let me know which to remove.15:53
nijabaok, let's move to our final topic then15:54
nijaba#topic open discussion15:54
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: Ceilometer)"15:54
dhellmannttx, delete 11815:54
ttxon it15:54
nijaba5 minutes, any topics...15:55
spnhttp://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/Ceilometer15:55
spnThis page has incubator details15:55
spnat the bottom15:55
nijabaspn: yes, that was our proposal 3 mo ago15:55
spnwe have integration status15:55
spnI guess it is 3mon old status then15:55
ttxdhellmann: nuked.15:55
nijabaI'll need to refresh that before sending my email15:55
dhellmannttx: thanks!15:55
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
nijaba#action nijaba to resfresh http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Proposed/Ceilometer before sending email to the tc15:56
nijabaanything else?15:57
* dhellmann has nothing to add15:57
spnnothing from me15:57
nijabathat was a full meeting!  thanks a lot everyone!15:57
dhellmannthanks!15:58
nijabanext week, same place, same time15:58
spnthanks15:58
nijaba#endmeeting15:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"15:58
openstackMeeting ended Thu Oct  4 15:58:16 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:58
spnsee you all15:58
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2012/ceilometer.2012-10-04-15.00.html15:58
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2012/ceilometer.2012-10-04-15.00.txt15:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2012/ceilometer.2012-10-04-15.00.log.html15:58
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC15:59
*** Mandell has quit IRC15:59
*** rafaduran has quit IRC16:00
*** dkehn has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann-afk16:00
*** dhellmann-afk has quit IRC16:01
*** garyk has quit IRC16:01
*** journeeman has left #openstack-meeting16:02
*** journeeman has quit IRC16:02
*** danwent has quit IRC16:04
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:06
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
*** salmon_ has left #openstack-meeting16:07
*** hemna has quit IRC16:17
*** littleidea has quit IRC16:17
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates16:20
*** dwcramer has quit IRC16:20
*** eglynn has quit IRC16:26
*** colinmcnamara has left #openstack-meeting16:26
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting16:31
*** littleidea has quit IRC16:31
*** colinmcnamara has left #openstack-meeting16:32
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting16:33
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting16:43
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting16:48
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** donaldngo has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:50
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting16:51
*** anniec has quit IRC16:51
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec16:51
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** ayoung has quit IRC17:00
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
dwalleckAny QA folks around?17:03
*** garyk has quit IRC17:04
jaypipesdwalleck: yup17:04
jaypipesdwalleck: actually just finishing up work on the remaining failure/bug in Tempest to get the gate going again...17:04
jaypipeshttps://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/106173817:04
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1061738 in keystone "create_service() returns 500 Internal Server Error when bad keyword arg (XML only)" [Undecided,New]17:04
jaypipeshttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tempest/+bug/106174017:04
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1061740 in tempest "tests.identity.admin.test_services:ServicesTestBase.test_create_get_delete_service() fails due to incorrect parameter" [Critical,In progress]17:04
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
jaypipesannegentle: is http://docs.rackspace.com/openstack-extensions/auth/OS-KSADM-admin-devguide/content/Admin_API_Service_Developer_Operations-d1e1357.html the only documentation on the Keystone Admin API?17:06
jaypipesannegentle: nm... found http://docs.rackspace.com/openstack-extensions/auth/OS-KSADM-admin-devguide/content/POST_addService_v2.0_OS-KSADM_services_Admin_API_Service_Developer_Operations-d1e1357.html#d463e233617:06
dwalleckSpeaking of admin APIs, I'm hoping to get my Nova admin API tests in after this swift branch17:07
jaypipesw00t.17:07
*** PotHix has joined #openstack-meeting17:08
dwalleckAnd then maybe push a branch I need some opinions on...I put a hold on a lot of my server instance verification tests as I realized they were a bit too tied to the images we use at Rack17:09
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-meeting17:10
dwalleckI want to make sure they're smart enough to figure out how to find things regardless of distro/config. I think the best I can do is get something out and let people play with it other environments17:10
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** dhellmann has quit IRC17:10
*** eglynn has quit IRC17:10
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting17:11
*** dhellmann has quit IRC17:12
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC17:12
davidkranzjaypipes: Sorry, lost track of time.17:12
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
*** markmcclain has quit IRC17:13
*** dhellmann_ has quit IRC17:13
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
jaypipesdavidkranz: no worries man17:14
jaypipes#startmeeting qa17:14
openstackMeeting started Thu Oct  4 17:14:37 2012 UTC.  The chair is jaypipes. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:14
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:14
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'17:14
davidkranzjaypipes, dwalleck : Last chance to add something to the QA summit agenda...?17:14
davidkranzjaypipes, dwalleck : I am going to leave one slot open.17:15
dwalleckdavidkranz: I'd like to, but I'm not exactly sure what would make the most sense17:15
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting17:15
davidkranzdwalleck: Just let me know your thoughts and I'll figure out how to fit it in.17:15
dwalleckAlot of the things I wanted to discuss are already in a few people's talks17:15
dwallecksure, I can do that17:15
davidkranzdwalleck: Remember, there are no talks. It is all discussion.17:16
dwalleckRight. Bad wording on my part17:16
davidkranzdwalleck: It's more than wording. We can move discussions to different topics as needed.17:17
davidkranzdwalleck: Some will need more than 40 minutes, some less.17:17
jaypipesdavidkranz, dwalleck: the following gets our gate working again: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/14049/17:17
davidkranzjaypipes: Great! Will check it out as soon as we're done.17:17
dwallecksame here17:17
jaypipesit builds on torandu's patches.17:17
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting17:18
*** torandu has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
toranduGood morning. sorry for running late today17:20
jaypipesno worries17:20
dwalleckno problem17:20
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
toranduis there an agenda for the meeting?17:21
davidkranzI don't have much more to report. I've been fighting to upgrade a live cluster to Folsom.17:21
davidkranzThere is a session on this and we (openstack) really need to do better.17:22
dwalleckdavidkranz: I know. We were doing well for awhile, but then I know I slacked pretty bad17:23
davidkranzdwalleck: What did you have to do with the current situation?17:23
dwalleckRight now my priorities are swift branch -> nova admin api tests -> instance verification additions17:24
*** darraghb has quit IRC17:24
davidkranzdwalleck: I think the problem is that openstack upstream is not doing a good enough job of describing how a live cluster could be upgraded.17:24
davidkranzAnd then each distro introduces its own complications.17:25
*** gatuus has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
dwalleckdavidkranz: Maybe I misunderstood. I thought you were referring to better planning, and I was referring to the fact that I know I wasn't able to fufil my meeting captain responsibilities for a few months17:25
davidkranzBut we can discuss this at the summit.17:25
davidkranzdwalleck: No, I was referring to the upgrade issue.17:26
dwalleckahh, ignore me then17:26
*** KurtMartin has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
davidkranzdwalleck: I think the best thing we can do at the summit is to get blueprints for what we decide needs to get done and really try to17:27
davidkranzget more people involved.17:27
dwalleckagreed17:27
*** danwent has quit IRC17:28
jaypipes++17:28
toranduis there a list of QA/ test pain points that need to be addressed? or is that the summit topic list?17:28
davidkranzdwalleck: For the "bringing QA into the open session", I am going to try to get QA people from the major players to show up.17:28
davidkranztorandu: These should be covered by the summit session. If there is something you think is missing, please let me know.17:29
jaypipestorandu: pretty much the same as last summit... a) parallel execution/speeding up test runs, b) monitoring skips over time, c) overcoming limits of nose, d) automating the collection of coverage stats for non-unit tests17:30
davidkranzWe have 6 hours of scheduled time.17:30
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
davidkranzAnything else?17:33
dwalleckNo, just going to review and code17:33
davidkranzdwalleck: OK, review and debug for me :)17:34
dwalleckcan do17:34
torandunothing from me at this time. I got the feedback re review 14030. I'll make the changes asap & continue w/ tempest wrk17:34
toranduhas anyone taken a look at the grenade code? any initial thoughts on that?17:37
*** anniec has quit IRC17:37
dwalleckI saw the name in the schedule, but I don't think I've seen the purpose or project code17:38
toranduhttps://github.com/nebula/grenade17:38
davidkranztorandu: I looked a little. It should solve the upstream part of the upgrade issue.17:38
davidkranztorandu: But not, I think, the rolling upgrade issue which is critical.17:39
toranduok. is the summit list "the list" or still under review as proposals?17:39
davidkranztorandu: Still under review until tomorrow.17:39
davidkranzI have to step out for three minutes.17:40
toranduah. ok. presumably, we'll solicit or add more detail once finalized. y/n?17:40
dwalleckAnd I didn't notice if we them this time around, but last time we free-formed an unconference to go through things not on the schedule17:41
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
toranduanything else for now?17:45
davidkranzdwalleck: We can do that again.17:45
davidkranzdwalleck: I will leave the last Wed session open and we can unconference on Wed afternoon and/or Thur.17:46
toranduthat sounds great. I haven't been before, so don't know what to expect. how did you make ppl aware of the unconference topics?17:46
davidkranztorandu: I don't think we did but we should this year. There is a "board" to write them.17:47
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
torandudavidkranz: ok. sounds good. I don't want to miss anything. :)17:47
davidkranztorandu: No worries. You are guaranteed to miss things with so much going on at once.17:48
*** thinrhino has quit IRC17:49
*** anniec has quit IRC17:50
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec17:50
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away17:51
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
jaypipes#endmeeting17:55
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"17:55
openstackMeeting ended Thu Oct  4 17:55:38 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:55
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2012/qa.2012-10-04-17.14.html17:55
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2012/qa.2012-10-04-17.14.txt17:55
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2012/qa.2012-10-04-17.14.log.html17:55
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC17:58
*** gyee has quit IRC18:00
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net18:11
*** thinrhino has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting18:23
*** littleidea has quit IRC18:25
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC18:31
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting18:43
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away18:55
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC18:55
*** thinrhino has quit IRC18:57
*** dwalleck has quit IRC18:59
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** anderstj has quit IRC19:03
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC19:03
*** joearnold has quit IRC19:03
*** swifterdarrell has quit IRC19:03
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
*** swifterdarrell has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
*** joearnold has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net19:08
*** dwcramer has quit IRC19:08
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk19:10
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC19:17
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting19:20
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates19:25
*** torandu has quit IRC19:36
*** markmcclain has quit IRC19:51
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting19:51
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
*** anniec has quit IRC19:56
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
*** Gordonz has quit IRC20:00
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
*** fungi has left #openstack-meeting20:04
*** maurosr has quit IRC20:06
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
*** reed has quit IRC20:11
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting20:12
*** littleidea has quit IRC20:13
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting20:14
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
*** reed has quit IRC20:16
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting20:18
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** Mandell has quit IRC20:25
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC20:25
*** reed has quit IRC20:45
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:49
*** littleidea has quit IRC20:50
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting20:52
*** Vek has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
ttxo/21:00
vishy#startmeeting nova21:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Oct  4 21:02:10 2012 UTC.  The chair is vishy. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'21:02
* Vek yawns21:02
vishywho is here?21:02
ttxo/21:02
Veko/21:02
sdagueo/21:02
mtreinisho/21:02
*** dhellmann has quit IRC21:02
vishy#topic Agenda21:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda"21:02
jog0o/21:03
ttxif we could start with the design summit sessions...21:03
vishy#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/Nova21:04
vishysure21:04
vishyI was going to ask for people to help review them21:04
zykes-vishy: hey!21:04
zykes-can you help me in getting vnc to work ? :)21:04
*** markvoelker has quit IRC21:04
ttxvishy: do you think all the topics are now covered, and you just need to review the existing proposals for inclusion ?21:04
vishyzykes-: not during the meeting no21:05
ttxin which case no need t obe too strict, you have extra room21:05
ttxvishy: I see some potential for merging...21:05
*** maurosr has quit IRC21:05
vishy#topic Summit Session Review21:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Summit Session Review"21:05
vishyttx I don't see anything missing yet21:05
ttx"Nova database archiving strategy" & "Improving Nova's database consistency"21:06
ttxsound like they could fit a single 40min slot21:06
*** p4tux has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
ttxsame for "Scheduler for HPC with OpenStack" and "HPC for OpenStack"21:06
ttxotherwise all the others made sense when I read them21:07
ttxexcept maybe "Network Application Rate-limiting" but you have more room fr it than Quantum has21:07
vishythe db ones aren't really related, but you might be right that they don't both need 40 min21:07
vishythe HPC ones should be combined i think21:08
sdaguevishy: I was surprised in not seeing a service group submission from yun mao, is he not going to be there?21:08
maoyi'm here..21:08
maoy:)21:08
vishysdague: interesting yeah that should be a session21:08
sdaguemaoy: there you are :)21:08
vishymaoy: do you have a session for that?21:08
ttxvishy: you can do that at scheduling time, just accept them both and put a note about the future merging in the reviewers comments21:08
maoyvishy: yeah. distracted from proposing21:09
ttx(merging the two HPC sessions)21:09
ttxnote: I'll remove the suggest session button at the end of the day21:09
ttxso better submit now21:09
vishyhehe21:09
vishymaoy: gogogo21:09
vishymaoy: also this seems like it is up your alley; http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/edit/321:10
ttxhttp://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/321:10
ttxedit/3 is 403 for non topic-leads21:10
vishysorry thx :)21:10
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
maoyttx: i'll submit soon21:11
ttxvishy: looks like you have most bases covered. and a few extra sessions you can use as empty slots to facilitate scheduling21:11
vishyso if anyone else has input on the sessions I  could use help21:12
sdaguevishy: the other question would be on some of the API consistency discussions, which I know is a can of worms.21:12
ttxvishy: I'll talk to you tomorrow to help you with final approval/scheduling21:12
ttxsdague: we have one api consustency discussion in the process track already21:12
vishyttx: cool21:12
maoyvishy: reading #3.. sounds like orchestration21:12
sdaguettx: ok cool21:12
sdaguethat's probably a better place for it then21:13
vishysdague: oh we should have a session about that, can you propose21:13
maoyvishy: i won't be there for the entire summit though. only mon - wed.21:13
vishymaoy: exactly21:13
*** hggdh has quit IRC21:13
sdaguevishy: sure, you want another one for nova beyond the process track?21:13
ttxsdague: see http://summit.openstack.org/cfp/details/5321:13
ttxvishy: we don't have any session on openstack API anymore21:13
ttxvishy: deprecation, future, integration of extensions...21:14
ttxused to have one in the Process track but has been abandoned21:14
vishyrussellb: are you here?21:14
ttxvishy: redhatters are in some kind of sprint this week21:15
maoyvishy: i think #3 is probably good to cover orchestration. I'll make sure to be there and talk a lot. :)21:15
vishymaoy: great21:16
vishyok lets move on21:16
sdaguettx: I could see that going either way. I think gabe's session is more cross project, we've got plenty of rough cases within nova. so I'm happy to either propose something if we want a more nova focussed session, or pile in on gabe's session21:16
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting21:16
maoyvishy: could you schedule #3 and service group (soon to be proposed) mon - wed..21:16
vishysdague: we should have a nova session21:16
*** dwcramer has quit IRC21:16
vishyto discuss 2.1 vs 3 and timing21:16
sdaguevishy: ok, I'll put something in after the meeting21:16
vishymaoy: yes21:16
ttxsdague: I thoini we can use a nova-specific session21:16
ttxthink*21:17
maoyvishy: thx21:17
vishy#topic DB migration bug21:17
ttxsdague: gabe's session will be crowded and more orietned twoards consistency21:17
*** openstack changes topic to "DB migration bug"21:17
vishy#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/106116621:17
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1061166 in nova "ec2 instance IDs are broken after folsom upgrade" [High,New]21:17
sdaguettx: agreed21:17
* ttx disappears21:17
vishyso this is a pretty nasty bug and the real fix requires a db migration21:17
vishybut we don't have a good way to backport db migrations21:18
vishydan prince has a session about it21:18
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC21:18
ttxvishy: I think the fix-in-code is better here21:18
vishyso the issue seems to be that the migration does not set deleted=021:18
vishyso as a workaround we are thinking just remove the deleted=0 check when returning values in the db layer21:19
vishymy thought is a) remove the check (backport this one)21:19
adam_gjust submited this oneliner to fix that: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/14063/21:19
vishyb) add a migration to fix the NULLs (don't backport this one)21:19
vishyc) remove the workaround21:20
vishyadam_g: that makes sense to me21:20
vishyI guess we can discuss on the review. When I added it to the agenda, I thought we were going to actually have to do a db migration21:20
adam_gim not certain those unpopulated columns are really even necessary, but if they are (or will be) they should probably be populated via a new migration21:21
*** reed has quit IRC21:21
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC21:22
vishyadam_g: i guess there is a small issue of having duplicates right?21:22
vishyif you were running folsom without the patch it would create a second copy of the migration21:23
vishy* of the mapping21:23
adam_gi think if you're already running folsom, the mapping is already broken and you've probably worked around it on your own21:24
vishyadam_g: ok21:24
vishy#topic Bare Metal Discussion21:24
*** openstack changes topic to "Bare Metal Discussion"21:24
vishyso I don't know if we have enough core members here to discuss this21:24
vishybut we promised the bm folks that we would be quick to review when they reproposed21:25
VekWell, I'll just say I've been skipping those patches, largely because of the size and my unfamiliarity...21:25
*** gyee has quit IRC21:25
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-meeting21:25
vishyand there are things to discuss. I was hoping to discuss it before the summit but maybe it will have to wait21:25
sdaguevishy: I think it would be helpful to wait for the summit session, as I think there is a lot to digest there21:26
vishyso it appears that there is only one change needed to the db to support one nova-compute supporting multiple nodes/hypervisors21:26
vishywhich is to add a column to the instances table21:26
vishythe main question that needs to be determined is what to do about the bare metal database21:26
jog0sdague: +121:26
vishywell i guess the best plan is just for people to familiarize themselves with the code in advance of the summit then21:27
vishymainly we need to make a decision about how integrated the bare metal stuff should be with nova21:27
sdaguevishy: agreed, I'll carve out a piece of tomorrow afternoon to dive through them personally21:27
vishythis includes the db and the new binaries, whether it should be done with a new api extension, new database, new binaries, using host aggregates, etc.21:28
vishysdague: great21:28
vishyhopefully we can make some concrete decisions at the summit21:28
*** littleidea has quit IRC21:30
*** rnirmal_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
*** rnirmal has quit IRC21:31
*** rnirmal_ is now known as rnirmal21:31
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
vishy#action nova-core to review bare metal code for decisions at the summit21:32
vishy#topic Open Discussion21:32
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion"21:32
Vekare we going to reinstate review days at some point?  Also, we need more people to keep an eye on novaclient reviews21:32
vishyanyone have anything?21:32
sdaguequestion on nova-manage, and what we should be doing with that going forward21:33
vishygoing forward we should get rid of it21:33
sdagueI am correct in understanding everything except the db-sync import/export should go away?21:33
sdagueok :)21:33
adam_gNoVNC question. exactly what is this package supposed to provide? it no longer starts a service, as thats handled by nova-novncproxy now. is this correct?21:33
jog0vishy: any comments on the database soft-delete conversation?21:33
vishyi was actually considering working on a hack project to remove the db-sync as well21:33
vishyadam_g: it provides the html21:33
vishyi think21:33
vishyjog0: i'm for removing it if we have good workarounds21:34
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
Vekhaving a proper audit infrastructure would also be nice on that...21:34
vishyjog0: simple_tenant_usage will break for example21:34
sdaguevishy: ok, good. we'll start proposing patches to make it go away. chris yeoh on our team who knows michael still pretty well was going to tackle that.21:34
jog0vishy:  can we assume nova doesn't have to directly take care of keeping record around?21:34
vishyjog0: "keeping record" ?21:35
VekQ: are we going to reinstate review days at some point?21:35
vishyVek: wasn't planning on it. Do you think we need it?21:35
VekAlso, we need more people to keep an eye on novaclient reviews; seems like right now these are being handled by vish, jk0, and myself alone...21:35
Vekvishy: I was just wondering.  I found it helpful to ensure I did a review day frequently enough to stay core :)21:36
sdagueVek: oh, yeh, I always miss the clients. I'll start trying to remember to look :)21:36
Vekand not being scheduled for a review day is why Dragon was dropped from core.21:36
jog0vishy: yeah, can it rely on shadow tables or notifications/celimeter?21:37
jog0vishy:  can we rely on ^ for long term record keeping*21:37
vishyjog0: sure21:37
Vekone more note on the soft-deletes issue; I remember someone having a problem due to a flavor that had been hard-deleted from the database--they couldn't get information for making the correct charges for an instance on an old flavor.21:38
vishyVek: I see.21:38
vishyVek: that is another thing that needs to be worked around21:38
Vek*nod*21:38
vishydata from flavors needs to be copied into the instances table21:38
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting21:39
jog0vishy:  right21:40
vishybut if we have good solutions for the workaround I'm ok with removing the soft-delete stuff21:40
vishy* for the issues21:40
jog0vishy: great21:41
Vekand let me just say that having the devstack tests fail so frequently is starting to get somewhat annoying...21:41
vishyVek: I don't really see the need to add review days back honestly. If people aren't self-motivated to review, then they don't need +2 rights. If someone can't remember, they can set their own review day.21:41
vishyVek: I agree on devstack gate, we shoud spend some time trying to fix that21:41
VekOK, good to know (re review days)21:42
vishycool i think we are done21:43
vishy#endmeeting21:45
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || Development in #openstack-dev || Help in #openstack"21:45
openstackMeeting ended Thu Oct  4 21:45:16 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:45
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2012/nova.2012-10-04-21.02.html21:45
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2012/nova.2012-10-04-21.02.txt21:45
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2012/nova.2012-10-04-21.02.log.html21:45
*** Vek has left #openstack-meeting21:45
*** maoy has left #openstack-meeting21:45
*** mtreinish has quit IRC21:45
*** danwent has quit IRC21:54
*** spn has quit IRC21:57
*** srini_g has quit IRC21:57
*** spn has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** srini_g has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC22:06
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** anniec has quit IRC22:16
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** lloydde has quit IRC22:31
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC22:31
*** danwent has quit IRC22:45
*** markmcclain has quit IRC22:46
*** mattray has quit IRC22:55
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** gatuus has quit IRC23:00
*** reed has quit IRC23:02
*** adjohn has quit IRC23:05
*** danwent has quit IRC23:06
*** mnewby has quit IRC23:08
*** littleidea has quit IRC23:10
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting23:10
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-meeting23:15
*** dkehn is now known as dkehn_away23:16
*** donaldngo has quit IRC23:19
*** mnewby has quit IRC23:28
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting23:36
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting23:39
*** gyee has quit IRC23:39
*** rnirmal has quit IRC23:41
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-meeting23:48
*** lifeless has quit IRC23:50
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** eglynn has quit IRC23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!