Wednesday, 2015-09-16

*** dannywilson has quit IRC00:01
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC00:08
*** yamamoto has quit IRC00:09
*** Swami has quit IRC00:11
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC00:15
*** jwang_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:16
*** armax_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:17
*** [Leeloo has joined #openstack-meeting-400:18
*** dims_ has quit IRC00:20
*** bapalm_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:20
*** clayton- has joined #openstack-meeting-400:20
*** jwang has quit IRC00:21
*** nhairston has quit IRC00:21
*** [Leeloo] has quit IRC00:21
*** armax has quit IRC00:21
*** bapalm has quit IRC00:21
*** clayton has quit IRC00:21
*** galstrom_zzz has quit IRC00:21
*** clayton- is now known as clayton00:21
*** armax_ is now known as armax00:21
*** galstrom_zzz has joined #openstack-meeting-400:22
*** SimonChung1 has quit IRC00:22
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC00:22
*** yamahata has quit IRC00:24
*** bradjones has quit IRC00:25
*** xgerman_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:28
*** persia_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:29
*** nhairston has joined #openstack-meeting-400:30
*** rosmaita_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:30
*** nhairston has quit IRC00:31
*** lexholden has joined #openstack-meeting-400:32
*** gabriel-1 has joined #openstack-meeting-400:33
*** JoshNang_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:34
*** rex_lee_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:34
*** patrickeast_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:34
*** sweston_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:35
*** JoshNang has quit IRC00:35
*** rosmaita has quit IRC00:35
*** andymccr has quit IRC00:35
*** gabriel-bezerra has quit IRC00:35
*** persia has quit IRC00:36
*** sweston has quit IRC00:36
*** xgerman has quit IRC00:36
*** rex_lee has quit IRC00:36
*** patrickeast has quit IRC00:36
*** JoshNang_ is now known as JoshNang00:36
*** sweston_ is now known as sweston00:37
*** xgerman_ is now known as xgerman00:37
*** lexholden has quit IRC00:37
*** patrickeast_ is now known as patrickeast00:38
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-400:40
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-400:41
*** andymccr has joined #openstack-meeting-400:42
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-400:45
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:53
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-400:55
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:56
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC00:57
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-401:00
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-401:01
*** banix has quit IRC01:01
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting-401:03
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-401:05
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-401:05
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-401:08
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC01:09
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC01:09
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC01:17
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-401:18
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-meeting-401:18
*** geoffarnold is now known as geoffarnoldX01:20
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-401:27
*** geoffarnoldX is now known as geoffarnold01:28
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-401:29
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC01:30
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-401:30
*** killer_prince has quit IRC01:31
*** dims_ has quit IRC01:34
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-401:36
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-401:37
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa01:43
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-401:43
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC01:46
*** sballe has quit IRC01:46
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC01:47
*** wshao has quit IRC01:51
*** cdelatte has quit IRC01:56
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC02:04
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:06
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC02:10
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-402:11
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-402:11
*** armax has quit IRC02:13
*** harshs has quit IRC02:16
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC02:17
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-402:17
*** xingchao_ has joined #openstack-meeting-402:22
*** xingchao has quit IRC02:22
*** andymccr has quit IRC02:28
*** geoffarnold is now known as geoffarnoldX02:30
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC02:34
*** andymccr has joined #openstack-meeting-402:34
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-402:34
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-402:42
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC02:44
*** bharathm has quit IRC02:47
*** banix has quit IRC02:48
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-402:49
*** geoffarnoldX is now known as geoffarnold02:49
*** geoffarnold is now known as geoffarnoldX02:50
*** puranamr has quit IRC02:50
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC02:51
*** xingchao_ has quit IRC02:57
*** rbak has quit IRC02:59
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-402:59
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-402:59
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-403:01
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-403:01
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-403:11
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC03:12
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC03:14
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-403:14
*** puranamr has quit IRC03:15
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-403:15
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC03:18
*** VW_ has quit IRC03:22
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:22
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-403:22
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-403:23
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-403:23
*** VW_ has quit IRC03:26
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting-403:28
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-meeting-403:31
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-403:31
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:31
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC03:32
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-403:34
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-403:36
*** banix has quit IRC03:37
*** SimonChung has joined #openstack-meeting-403:40
*** rbak has quit IRC03:41
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-403:41
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-403:42
*** SimonChung1 has joined #openstack-meeting-403:48
*** SimonChung has quit IRC03:51
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:51
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC03:51
*** puranamr has quit IRC03:51
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC03:54
*** xingchao has quit IRC03:54
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-403:56
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-403:56
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC03:56
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC03:59
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-403:59
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-404:00
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-404:01
*** Guest79093 has quit IRC04:02
*** Brian has joined #openstack-meeting-404:03
*** Brian is now known as Guest3475604:04
*** Guest34756 has quit IRC04:09
*** baoli has quit IRC04:10
*** ajayaa has joined #openstack-meeting-404:12
*** geoffarnoldX is now known as geoffarnold04:14
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC04:17
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:21
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-404:23
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-404:26
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting-404:29
*** irenab has quit IRC04:30
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-404:33
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-404:34
*** sdake has quit IRC04:38
*** jerryz has quit IRC04:38
*** wshao has joined #openstack-meeting-404:38
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC04:40
*** david-lyle has quit IRC04:42
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-404:45
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-404:46
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC04:48
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC04:49
*** geoffarnold is now known as geoffarnoldX04:54
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-404:55
*** sdake_ has quit IRC04:56
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC04:57
*** Brian has joined #openstack-meeting-404:58
*** Brian is now known as Guest2308704:58
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-404:59
*** amit213 has quit IRC04:59
*** amit213 has joined #openstack-meeting-404:59
*** adduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-405:09
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-405:10
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-405:11
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC05:12
*** sdake has quit IRC05:14
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-405:21
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-405:22
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-405:24
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-405:25
*** tfukushima has quit IRC05:26
*** jpekkari has joined #openstack-meeting-405:27
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC05:38
*** jerryz has joined #openstack-meeting-405:39
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-405:40
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-405:41
*** baoli has quit IRC05:46
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-405:46
*** mmedvede has quit IRC05:46
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-405:52
*** tfukushima has quit IRC05:53
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-405:53
*** KunalGan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-405:54
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC05:55
*** fawadk has joined #openstack-meeting-405:55
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC05:55
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-406:07
*** jwagner is now known as jwagner_away06:08
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-406:15
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:25
*** qwebirc93053 has joined #openstack-meeting-406:32
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-406:34
*** qwebirc93053 has left #openstack-meeting-406:34
*** wshao has quit IRC06:35
*** KunalGan_ has quit IRC06:46
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting-407:00
*** zeih has quit IRC07:00
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC07:04
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC07:11
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-407:12
*** armax has quit IRC07:12
*** yamahata has quit IRC07:14
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-407:16
*** fawadk has quit IRC07:19
*** andymccr has quit IRC07:19
*** Guest23087 has quit IRC07:19
*** Guest23087 has joined #openstack-meeting-407:24
*** fawadk has joined #openstack-meeting-407:25
*** andymccr has joined #openstack-meeting-407:25
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-407:26
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC07:30
*** dannywilson has quit IRC07:30
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:30
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-407:31
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-407:35
*** evgenyf has quit IRC07:38
*** [1]evgenyf is now known as evgenyf07:38
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC07:41
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-407:48
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-407:58
*** fawadk has quit IRC07:59
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC08:02
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-408:11
*** sdake_ has quit IRC08:12
*** kbyrne has joined #openstack-meeting-408:53
*** jerryz has quit IRC08:56
*** zeih has quit IRC08:59
*** chem has quit IRC09:00
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:26
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-409:26
*** B_Smith has quit IRC09:30
*** sdake has quit IRC09:30
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:31
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-409:33
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-409:35
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC09:36
*** B_Smith has joined #openstack-meeting-409:37
*** GB21 has quit IRC09:42
*** bharathm has quit IRC09:50
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-409:59
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC10:04
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-410:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:32
*** Guest23087 has quit IRC10:48
*** Brian has joined #openstack-meeting-410:48
*** Brian is now known as Guest3577010:48
*** chem has joined #openstack-meeting-410:53
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-410:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-411:03
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:03
*** irenab has quit IRC11:05
*** jpekkari has quit IRC11:06
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC11:11
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-411:13
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-meeting-411:15
*** killer_prince has quit IRC11:16
*** Guest35770 has quit IRC11:19
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-411:23
*** banix has quit IRC11:27
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-411:27
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-411:28
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:32
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC11:33
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-meeting-411:34
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-411:34
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC11:38
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-meeting-411:38
*** lexholden has joined #openstack-meeting-411:43
*** Brian has joined #openstack-meeting-411:44
*** Brian is now known as Guest5264811:44
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-411:45
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-411:46
*** jayg|g0n3 is now known as jayg11:53
*** [Leeloo has quit IRC11:54
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-411:57
*** baoli has quit IRC11:57
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-411:58
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-411:59
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC12:01
*** baoli has quit IRC12:03
*** klamath has joined #openstack-meeting-412:04
*** evgenyf has quit IRC12:04
*** klamath has quit IRC12:04
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-412:04
*** klamath has joined #openstack-meeting-412:04
*** jckasper has quit IRC12:05
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-412:09
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:09
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-412:10
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-412:12
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-412:23
*** lexholden has quit IRC12:23
*** ajayaa has quit IRC12:29
*** nikhil_k has quit IRC12:31
*** xingchao has quit IRC12:33
*** woodard has quit IRC12:45
*** dims_ has quit IRC12:47
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC12:48
*** persia_ has quit IRC12:48
*** sarob has quit IRC12:48
*** lbragstad has quit IRC12:49
*** blewis_ has quit IRC12:49
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC12:50
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-412:50
*** blewis has joined #openstack-meeting-412:50
*** blewis is now known as Guest6818712:50
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-412:50
*** persia has joined #openstack-meeting-412:50
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC12:50
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-412:50
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-412:51
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-412:51
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-412:54
*** bharathm has quit IRC12:55
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-412:58
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-413:01
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-413:05
*** sarob has quit IRC13:07
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-413:16
*** pmesserli has joined #openstack-meeting-413:18
*** krtaylor has quit IRC13:20
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:25
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-413:31
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-413:31
*** VW_ has quit IRC13:32
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:32
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC13:33
*** numans has quit IRC13:35
*** VW_ has quit IRC13:37
*** amotoki has quit IRC13:42
*** rosmaita_ is now known as rosmaita13:44
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC13:45
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting-413:46
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2413:47
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa13:48
*** mmedvede has joined #openstack-meeting-413:48
*** mmedvede has quit IRC13:49
*** rbak has quit IRC13:51
*** mmedvede has joined #openstack-meeting-413:54
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-413:55
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-413:58
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:04
*** iurygregory has quit IRC14:04
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-414:08
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-414:09
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2414:11
*** julim has quit IRC14:12
*** SimonChung1 has quit IRC14:14
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC14:17
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC14:19
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC14:19
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-414:20
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-414:22
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-414:25
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting-414:25
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:25
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC14:26
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting-414:26
*** B_Smith has quit IRC14:27
*** sdake_ has quit IRC14:27
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:27
*** sdake has quit IRC14:29
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-414:30
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC14:32
*** nhairston has joined #openstack-meeting-414:33
*** nikhil has quit IRC14:35
*** nikhil has joined #openstack-meeting-414:35
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-414:37
*** david-lyle has quit IRC14:37
*** lexholden has joined #openstack-meeting-414:43
*** geoffarnoldX is now known as geoffarnold14:45
*** SimonChung has joined #openstack-meeting-414:53
*** adduarte has quit IRC14:57
*** dims_ has quit IRC14:58
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-414:58
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-414:58
*** kbaikov has joined #openstack-meeting-415:00
zehicle#startmeeting DefCore Flag.1515:00
openstackMeeting started Wed Sep 16 15:00:27 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is zehicle. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: DefCore Flag.15)"15:00
zehicle#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DefCoreFlag.1515:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'defcore_flag_15'15:00
egluteo/15:00
kbaikovo/15:00
zehicle#chair eglute hogepodge markvoelker15:00
openstackCurrent chairs: eglute hogepodge markvoelker zehicle15:00
zehicleo/15:00
zehicleroll call please15:00
markvoelkero/15:00
zehicleplease review the agenda - we have a lot of patches, so I'd like to make sure we have time for discussion if needed15:01
*** catherine_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:01
hogepodgeo/15:02
hogepodgeHello from Colorado15:02
*** barrett has joined #openstack-meeting-415:02
eglutehello hogepodge!15:02
zehicle:)15:03
eglutezehicle i think agenda looks good, full! first topic?15:03
catherine_o/15:03
barretto/15:03
*** woodard has quit IRC15:03
zehicle#topic scoring weights15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "scoring weights (Meeting topic: DefCore Flag.15)"15:03
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-415:03
zehiclemarkvoelker, I have not done anything.  you?15:03
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting-415:04
markvoelkerzehicle: I have a couple of things brewing.15:04
markvoelkerI haven't put patches up yet b/c I've been spending time on scoring, but will put up a couple of RFC patches this week15:04
zehiclebased on discussions, I think that we'll need to figure out balance w/ future direction weight15:04
zehicleor have a policy for consideration that we can treat objectively15:04
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-415:04
markvoelkerGoing through some of the existing scoring patches has been useful on that front, as it's given me the chance to play with weights and see if they match up with gut feel.15:04
markvoelkerzehicle: Yeah, I'll include some ideas around future direction (forward looking) and widely deployed (backward looking).15:05
markvoelker#action markvoelker to propose some RFC's for changing weights this week15:06
zehicle+115:06
eglute+115:06
markvoelkerzehicle: in the interest of time, move on to next agenda item?15:06
zehicle#meeting year.next.hson15:06
*** catherine__ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:06
zehiclenext.json this makes sense to me.15:07
eglutemarkvoelker made a good point with that i think15:07
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-415:07
eglutei am ok with making that change!15:07
*** catherine_ has quit IRC15:07
markvoelkereglute: please do +1 or +2 it in gerrit then. =)15:07
hogepodgeI'm +2 on it (literally)15:07
egluteso it would be just "next.json" correct?15:07
hogepodgeyes15:08
zehiclethat's my preference15:08
*** jckasper has quit IRC15:08
egluteok, there are several patches that talk about year. which one should go first?15:08
catherine__I have a question related to how we defining capability ..15:08
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC15:09
*** dwalleck has quit IRC15:09
markvoelkereglute: they can both go in.  223243 is against 2015B and will have to get Board approval before we can implement it.15:09
egluteok, thank you markvoelker15:09
markvoelkerSo in the meantime, 223234 sticks with current processes and is safe to land.15:09
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-415:09
* zehicle thinks that hogepodge and I want to skip the require vendors at this point. no action15:09
hogepodgewe can revisit it15:10
markvoelkercatherine__: sure, what's the question?15:10
zehicleI think we can make the name change for now15:10
catherine__so far, we define capabilities based on the tests on tempest ...while working on the Heat scoring , a few members of the Heat core team t15:10
zehicleand update 2015B to reflect it15:10
zehicleit's not a controversial change to the process.  we should be OK15:10
zehiclejust like schema changes15:10
catherine__think that the tests covered are very limited ... so they would like first to define capabilities15:10
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-415:11
catherine__so some of the capabilities may not have tests associaged with it ... how do we deal with this situation?15:11
markvoelkercatherine__: without tests we really couldn't enforce that vendors provide those capabilities in the same way.  They need to add tests.15:11
rockygo/15:11
zehiclemarkvoelker, I think it's ok to jump to next.json if we've got 100% consensus on it.15:11
*** Sam_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:11
dwalleckcatherine__: ++15:11
zehicle#meeting using Designated Sections to enforce API (214756)15:12
zehicle#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214756/15:12
catherine__the team thinks that we should list out the capabilities first and then pull in or create tests for them .. ofcourse we can score them low15:12
catherine__uintil there are tests associated with it15:12
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-415:13
hogepodgemorgan feels very strongly about that patch, that apis are fundamentally important and need to be discoverable, and forcing 403 should be explicit policy15:13
dwalleckI'm always a fan of starting with a spec15:13
hogepodgeI tend to agree with him, and think that enforcing with tests is too easy to slip up on.15:13
markvoelkercatherine__: Without tests I'm not even quite sure what we'd be scoring...e.g. I can't look at a test and see "oh, they're basically saying the XXX API must work".15:13
catherine__but right now the score matrix do have column defining whether tests exist ..15:13
* zehicle sees what markvoelker did w/ 2016.next as bridge until 2015B lands. OK15:13
zehicleI agree with the intent.  just want to make sure that we're using the right mechanism to enforce15:14
markvoelkerwhoa, too many topics at once folks. =)  Could we finish with catherine__'s question for a moment before we go on to the keystone thing?15:14
zehiclesorry, thought we'd jumped15:14
zehiclewhat's catherine__  question?15:15
hogepodgecapability needs a test. If they want the capability, write the test.15:15
markvoelkercatherine__: I think tests are pretty ingrained in all our processes at this point.  For example: https://github.com/openstack/defcore/blob/master/doc/source/process/CoreDefinition.rst15:16
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-415:16
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-415:16
rockygWe have more developers interestd in writing needed tests.  Maybe a way to specify tests that we think are important?15:16
catherine__Like Swift the Heat team thinks they have a rich set of in-tree tests .. but not in Tempest15:17
markvoelkercatherine__: So I think what they want to do is drawn up a spec for what tests they want to add to Tempest rather than try to score something in DefCore for which no tests exist.15:17
dwalleckBut if the tests weren't designed with defining a spec in mind, how can we say for sure it really defines a capability? I like the idea of the Heat team adding some additional tests that they think clearly define their capabilities15:17
markvoelkercatherine__: Ah, so there are in-tree tests?  Ok, slightly different answer then...15:17
Sam_+1 dwalleck15:17
catherine__yes there are in-tree tests ..15:18
markvoelkerThat would put them in the same boat as Swift where we need those tests to be runnable by Tempest via plugin so RefStack can consume them15:18
*** SimonChung has quit IRC15:18
markvoelkercatherine__: make sense?15:18
markvoelker(for those who don't know what I'm talking about, see comments from midcycle in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/164865/ )15:19
catherine__that bring us to another topic ... do we requre all test entry from tempest our RefStack needs a plugin itself?15:19
eglutedoes anyone know what the status of the tempest plugin is?15:19
*** tim_o has joined #openstack-meeting-415:19
hogepodgemtreinish would like to see those tests moved over to tempest where feasible, but it's not a strict requirement now that we can use tempest plugins15:19
hogepodgeeglute: for swift, in progress.15:20
markvoelkercatherine__: My recollection from the midcycle is that we wouldn't necessarily rule out using something other than Tempest as an entry point...15:20
hogepodgeplugins are going to be a big topic in tokyo, so it's something that's moving15:20
markvoelkercatherine__: ...but there weren't really good reasons not do use Tempest15:20
catherine__there is also talk about bringing in the EC2 test by Rsndy Bias team ... would tempest willing to bring those in?15:20
markvoelkercatherine__: ....and it would make refstack a lot more complicated and put a burden on people trying to run tests in lots of different ways15:20
markvoelkercatherine__: So tempest made the most sense.15:21
zehiclemarkvoelker, I remember the opposite.  I thought we'd decided to only consider Tempest runnable15:21
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-415:21
* zehicle looks for reference in doc15:21
hogepodgezehicle: plugins to tempest are loaded when tempest is started, so produce the output in the same run if the plugin is available in the load path15:21
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC15:22
catherine__I prefer the tempest path because it make RefStack easy to consume  ... just want to confirm on our direction going forward ..15:22
zehicle"#DECISION > even if we bringin in "non-Tempest" tests, they MUST still be gate tests"15:22
markvoelkercatherine__: As for EC2, you'd have to ask the Tempest folks.  Personally I guess I don't see why those wouldn't be runnable via plugin too, so could live in-tree for the ec2 api if temepst doesn't want them in tree.15:22
hogepodgezehicle: yes to that also. so swift tests are gate for swift project15:23
zehicleso, plug-ins would work15:23
rockygThe QA team perspctive is they are planning to be the repository for th tests DefCore use.15:23
markvoelkerOk, so sounds like we have an answer here...15:24
markvoelkercatherine__: Anything else, or shall we move on to keystone?15:24
catherine__that is it thx ..15:24
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:24
rockygBut, I think it would be good if DefCore could broadcast intentions for interop by targeting capabilities as prospective core15:24
zehiclerockyg, ??15:25
markvoelkerrockyg: we already do that with advisory status15:25
catherine__could we log our agreement here before go on to the next topic15:25
markvoelkercatherine__: good idea15:25
zehiclewhat's the statement you want us to vote on?15:25
rockygNot really.  We say these are capabilities with tests we want, not capabilitis we want15:26
zehicleah, rockyg.  I'm not sure we're in a position to drive new capabilities.15:26
catherine__That we agree for RefStack not to develop plug-in for tests... it will use tempest as the path for testing15:26
rockygWe only release list of tests.  What we also need are list of capabilities that don't have tests.15:26
*** nkrinner is now known as nkrinner_afk15:26
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:26
rockygLike what catherine__ said.  zzero on tests, but identified as core on scoring.15:27
rockygHow do we let everyone knows it meets our requirements except tests?15:27
markvoelkerzehicle: +1, that TC territory15:27
markvoelkercatherine__: +115:27
zehicleand Product Group15:27
hogepodgecatherine__: I'm not sure that was the agreement. I thought swift as a plugin was a thing we wanted to go forward on. Am I wrong about that?15:28
rockygThe capabilities are already there, just not the tests.15:28
zehiclecatherine__, I'm confused now.  I thought that plug-ins were ok15:28
rockyghogepodge, right, but Refstack doesn't do the dev for plug-ins15:28
catherine__it is not just for swift ...the next one is Heat ...15:28
zehicleas long as the tests could run from the Tempest framework15:28
markvoelkerI'm reading that as "refstack will use tempest, which will have a plugin to run in-tree tests, so refstack doesn't need to develop it's own plugin"15:29
rockygmarkvoelker, ++15:29
markvoelker(which I think is fine)15:29
catherine__matkvoelker: +215:29
zehicleah, it's about Refstack!  ok15:29
hogepodgemarkvoelker: ok, fine with that. I'll take the action to move the plugin code that was submitted there to a more appropriate place15:29
*** jasonsb has joined #openstack-meeting-415:29
zehicle#vote DefCore requires that all considered tests be in-tree and runnable under Tempest (using project developed plug-ins are acceptable)15:30
hogepodgezehicle: amend to add "and gate tests for project"15:30
zehicleI think that is (should be) a Hacking entry15:30
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-415:30
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-415:30
zehicle#endvote15:30
catherine__#vote yes15:30
zehiclehold on... I did not start  vote right15:31
rockygyou need to giv options?15:31
zehicle#startvote DefCore requires that all considered tests be in-tree and runnable under Tempest as gate tests for projects (using project developed plug-ins are acceptable)15:31
openstackUnable to parse vote topic and options.15:31
zehicleI don't know the vote syntax.... hold on15:32
zehiclecan someone phrase the question?  DefCore requires that all considered tests be in-tree and runnable under Tempest (using project developed plug-ins are acceptable)15:32
markvoelkerzehicle: unless somebody objects, could we just use #agree? =)15:32
rockygth options are th yes, no, etc15:32
rockygHow about anyone opposed to the proposal?  If not, then we'll put it in as agreed15:32
hogepodge#startvote DefCore requires that all considered tests be in-tree gate testa and runnable under Tempest (using project developed plug-ins are acceptable)? yes, no15:33
openstackBegin voting on: DefCore requires that all considered tests be in-tree gate testa and runnable under Tempest (using project developed plug-ins are acceptable)? Valid vote options are yes, no.15:33
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.15:33
*** akwasnie has joined #openstack-meeting-415:33
zehiclelol, yes15:33
markvoelker#vote yes15:33
hogepodge#vote yes15:33
rockyg#vote yes15:33
eglute#vote yes15:33
zehicle#vote yes15:33
hogepodgenotification of closing vote15:34
tim_o#vote yes15:34
hogepodge#endvote15:34
openstackVoted on "DefCore requires that all considered tests be in-tree gate testa and runnable under Tempest (using project developed plug-ins are acceptable)?" Results are15:34
openstackyes (6): rockyg, tim_o, markvoelker, eglute, hogepodge, zehicle15:34
*** catherine__ has quit IRC15:35
*** catherineD|2 has joined #openstack-meeting-415:35
*** david-ly_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:35
Sam_#vote yes15:35
rockygcatherineD|2, you missed the vote.  it passed15:35
* markvoelker provides a quick time check: 35 past the hour, 25m remaining15:35
eglutenext topic?15:35
catherineD|2sorry lost connection ...15:35
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-415:35
catherineD|2thank YOU!!!15:35
markvoelkerOn to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214756/ now?15:36
zehicle#topic schema schange15:36
*** openstack changes topic to "schema schange (Meeting topic: DefCore Flag.15)"15:36
zehiclelet's do schema quickly first15:36
eglute#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/223250/15:37
markvoelkersure15:37
markvoelkerSo, the patch is fairly self-explanatory and these changes actually wouldn't break anythign for RefStack that I can tell.15:37
markvoelkerIt's mostly just tidying up15:37
markvoelkerBut if there are any other schema changes people have noticed we need, it would be good to propose those at some point too.  This gets the ball rolling.15:38
zehicleok, we can wait a week for other changes15:38
eglutethank you markvoelker for getting it started15:38
markvoelkerzehicle: I'd actually say let's merge this if people are ok with it and folks can submit further patches to the file.15:38
hogepodgeit lgtm. We can apply to next.json after approval, but it's a good chance to really give the schema some thought, so agree with egle about letting it bake for a week.15:38
markvoelkerAll this does is start a definition, we don't have to move next Guideline to 1.4 immediately15:39
zehicleok15:39
zehicleI'm ok to merge15:39
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-415:39
zehicledone15:40
eglutecool, merging it!15:40
eglutei am too slow!15:40
markvoelkerThat was a speedy topic. =)  Next?15:40
* markvoelker notes 20m remaining15:40
eglute#topic all apis must exist in designated15:41
*** openstack changes topic to "all apis must exist in designated (Meeting topic: DefCore Flag.15)"15:41
eglute#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/214756/15:41
*** david-ly_ is now known as david-lyle15:41
* zehicle notes that our next meeting (!6) is voice interactive and all about capability scoring15:41
*** dwalleck has quit IRC15:41
eglutei agree that apis must exist and be implemented properly, but i dont know that next.json is the right place15:41
markvoelkerSo on this one I think so far everyone agrees with the general intent, but there's a lot of disagreement that designated sections are the right way to accomplish it15:42
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-415:42
rockygSo, this is very interesting.   major influencers in dev are becoming aware of the usefulness of Defcore and this is one of the outcomes of the awareness.15:42
markvoelkerE.g. designated sections are pointers to parts of the OpenStack code rather than a decree about server behavior15:42
zehicledoes anyone want to speak in favor of DS as the approach to enforce?15:42
zehiclerockyg, :)15:42
hogepodgeIt becomes an enforceable part of the standard whether the test exists or not. It sends a clear message about the importance of api discoverability. I understand the dissent on the issue, though.15:43
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-415:43
hogepodgezehicle: me15:43
rockygI think this really is saying that it doesn't matter if you implemented, if you return the interop friendly 40315:43
zehiclecool, I wanted someone to be able to explain the position15:43
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-415:43
hogepodgea few things, the optional apis are never going to have capabilities associated with them, since they are optional.15:43
hogepodgeso tests won't be enforced anyway15:43
zehiclebecause I consider the DS to be difficult to enforce15:43
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC15:44
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-415:44
zehicleshouldn't that be part of technical review?15:44
*** nikhil_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:44
hogepodgezehicle: what do you mean?15:44
zehicleI'd expect that would be a coding issue on how the calls are structure?15:44
rockygThis really is to get all projects and all implementers to use the same code response to non-accessible code within the projects15:44
*** nikhil_ is now known as Guest6328215:45
hogepodgeIt's about discoverability and consistency.15:45
zehicleI think that if we have 100% of the require capabilities doing this in a tested way15:45
markvoelkerhogepodge: Hmm.  Not so sure about that.  If we had a test (or battery of tests) that tested that you got a proper response from the server whether a features was admin-disabled or not, we could require that test as a Capability15:45
zehiclethen the optional ones would be highly motivated to follow suit15:45
rockygThis also means that anyone could write tests to verify behavior whether the api code exists or not15:45
markvoelkerE.g. "keystone-server-correct-response"15:45
zehicledoesn't keystone provide a list of available APIs?15:45
zehiclemarkvoelker, +115:46
hogepodgemarkvoelker: we then expand our capabilities to negative capabilities across the entire api, which adds confusion15:46
catherineD|2for RefStackwill not know t hat there is a 403 returned ... RefStack only notes that it did not pass15:46
zehicleI have a lot of trouble believing something is that important to the API but fundamentally not API testable15:46
*** Guest63282 is now known as nikhil_k15:46
markvoelkerhogepodge: I'm not sure that's any less confusing than making a statement about it in designated sections15:46
markvoelkerLess so, actually15:46
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-415:47
rockygA 403 is a proper response15:47
rockygSo the tst should pass15:47
markvoelkercatherineDl2: refstack wouldn't have to know anything special.  A Tempest test would be ridden that calls API's and checks that it either got a 200-series (it worked, capability supported) or a 403 (administratively disabled).15:47
rockygBut, we might want a way to identify that 403 was the response15:47
markvoelkerIF so, the test passes.  Otherwise it fails.15:48
catherineD|2rockyg: Thx ..  will double check on how subunit process 403 ...15:48
zehicleif 403 response is important to interop then we need a way to validate compliance15:48
markvoelkerSo from RefStack's point of view, it's just another test passing or faiing15:48
egluteso if not implemented, but returns 403, is a pass, then a regular "feature works" pass is also a pass15:48
rockyg403 is very important for interop.  That way, code can be written to deal with any 403 response15:48
catherineD|2markvoelker: RefStack right now take whatever status defined by subunit processing ... we can take a close look on that ...15:48
hogepodgeit's saying that the api properly implements the response codes, not which apis are actually implemented. Only that anything administratively disabled sends the proper response (403) or is enabled.15:49
zehicleso, we are saying that some features can be disabled that that's ok for DefCore interop15:49
egluterockyg i agree that it is important, but 403 is actually different from having that feature available for interop15:49
zehicleif the are not disabled, we expect them to work15:49
hogepodgezehicle: yes, we're trying to say that some features can be disabled, but they need to send a proper response if they are.15:49
zehicleis the problem that we don't want to require the features if the are enabled?15:50
hogepodgezehicle: some clouds use the load balancer to obscure error responses in the name of "security"15:50
zehicleI saw the thread15:50
markvoelkerhogepodge: exactly.  The test passes if it receives either a 200 (feature implemented) or a 403 (admin disabled) but not if, say, it times out or gets back some other response from the vendor's API gateway15:50
rockygeglute, right.  That's why the designated section requirement.  If Defcore requires the capability, but it's turned off, you get the 403, but the code "designated"15:50
eglutei think they mean for all apis to be responsive in some way15:50
hogepodgeeglute: responsive in an actionable way15:51
eglutenot just defcore capability required15:51
rockyghogepodge, +15:51
zehicleusing DS for that is a mess.  since it's pretty easy for people to "have the code"15:51
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-415:51
rockygSo, this review faces both the dev community and defcore15:51
eglutei think this should be listed separetely somewhere15:52
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC15:52
egluteand maybe worded differently15:52
*** nikhil_k has quit IRC15:52
zehicleespecially since you are going to be using an API test to validate it anyway15:52
hogepodgeI'm willing to cede the point. I do want to go on record that APIs need to behave in a predicatable and actionable way to support interoperability. I see the problems with using the designated section.15:53
rockygzehicle, how do we handle inaccessible functionality that is "required" for Defcore, but not available to "user" (it's there for admin)?15:53
zehiclehogepodge, +115:53
zehiclerockyg, we don't require admin functions for that reason15:53
markvoelkerhogepodge: +1, I would love to see this general idea implemented (as tests =p) across all projects15:53
egluteshould it be in https://github.com/openstack/defcore/blob/master/doc/source/process/2015B.rst15:53
eglute?15:53
hogepodgerockyg: it's a fail. defcore tests are required to be non-admin. If there's a policy change to the api by the vendor it's not interoperable.15:53
zehicleI think 403 is a good step15:53
zehicleit allows the technical community to create an option in tests15:54
zehiclefor APIs that are not always enabled.15:54
hogepodgeI'll look at writing a test for it to add as a capability15:54
zehiclethat allows us to bring in new capabilities without forcing everyone to add them15:54
zehiclebut if they DO add them then we can ensure they are consistent15:54
zehiclemy one hope is that we'd have refstack able to tell us if the pass is "PASS worked" or "PASS 403"15:55
zehicleI think that may be too much to ask for now15:55
rockygzehicle, ++15:55
zehiclebecause I really want to know the data of 403 vs enabled15:55
zehiclereally, 403, enabled, not installed, not working.  all four are valid data to collevt15:55
markvoelkerOK, 5 minutes folks...anything else we need to cover today?15:55
rockygThis is an example where IRC is not as effective as voice to get through this discussion...15:55
zehicle#meeting next meeting agenda15:56
zehicle#topic next meeting agenda15:56
*** openstack changes topic to "next meeting agenda (Meeting topic: DefCore Flag.15)"15:56
zehicleAt 14, we talked about making 16 also be interactive for scoring15:56
zehicleI think we should stick w/ that plan15:56
eglute+115:56
catherineD|2+115:56
zehicleI've already setup the meeting invite and call in15:56
markvoelkerworks for me15:56
zehicle#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DefCoreFlag.1615:56
rockyg++15:56
zehicleeveryone should make sure the links and order are up to date15:57
hogepodgeYup.15:57
zehicle#topic open discussion15:57
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: DefCore Flag.15)"15:57
hogepodgeVery good discussions about glance and neuton yesterday.15:57
hogepodgeI'm going to send the scoring to the openstackdev mailing lest for community comment.15:57
hogepodgeIn particular, neutron, keystone, glance, and cinder scoring sheets.15:57
zehicledhellmann, really did a good job w/ Glance issues15:58
hogepodgeI want to take advantage of that conversational momentum.15:58
zehiclehogepodge, thanks +115:58
hogepodgeUnless there are objections.15:58
rockygAnd he's planning to be more Defcore inclusive in Mitaka15:58
zehiclewould be great to have participation15:58
eglute+115:58
rockygLook for major them of Mitaka to be interop15:58
zehicleplease remind everyone that we are in DRAFTING phase15:58
markvoelkerhogepodge: just noticed the network scoring patch needs rebasing thanks to one of those merges.  Will do that now before you send it out15:58
hogepodgeok, it will be later today. it's a travel day, and I need to hit the road as soon as this meeting ends15:59
egluteis networking ready to be merged otherwise?15:59
hogepodgeI'll do it later today from the airport once I have settle time, or on the plane if there's wifi15:59
markvoelkereglute: IMO yes, but as the submitter I can't +1 it. =)  Folks should review it.15:59
eglutethanks markvoelker15:59
*** vinkman has joined #openstack-meeting-416:00
eglutethanks everyone! great discussion today16:00
zehicleeglute, you can merge that one :)16:00
eglutewill do!16:00
zehiclegood meeting!16:00
*** Sam_ has quit IRC16:00
eglute#endmeeting16:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:00
openstackMeeting ended Wed Sep 16 16:00:29 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/defcore_flag_15/2015/defcore_flag_15.2015-09-16-15.00.html16:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/defcore_flag_15/2015/defcore_flag_15.2015-09-16-15.00.txt16:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/defcore_flag_15/2015/defcore_flag_15.2015-09-16-15.00.log.html16:00
zehicleand RIGHT ON TIME eglute16:00
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner16:01
rockygyay \o/16:01
*** evgenyf has quit IRC16:01
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-416:01
eglute:D16:01
*** tim_o has quit IRC16:03
*** kbaikov has left #openstack-meeting-416:03
*** rockyg has quit IRC16:05
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-416:06
*** jasonsb has left #openstack-meeting-416:06
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC16:08
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting-416:09
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC16:09
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting-416:10
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC16:13
*** SimonChung has joined #openstack-meeting-416:17
*** GB21 has quit IRC16:20
*** sdake_ is now known as sdake16:23
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:24
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-416:25
*** mmedvede has quit IRC16:28
*** inc0 has joined #openstack-meeting-416:28
*** B_Smith has joined #openstack-meeting-416:29
*** watanabe_isao has joined #openstack-meeting-416:29
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:29
sdake#startmeeting kolla16:30
openstackMeeting started Wed Sep 16 16:30:10 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sdake. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:30
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:30
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: kolla)"16:30
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'kolla'16:30
sdake#topic rollcall16:30
*** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: kolla)"16:30
akwasniehi:)16:30
*** rhallisey has joined #openstack-meeting-416:30
*** mmedvede has joined #openstack-meeting-416:30
rhalliseyhey16:30
*** jmccarthy has joined #openstack-meeting-416:30
sdakeo/ folks :)16:30
jmccarthyo/16:31
jpeelerhi16:31
*** catherineD|2 has left #openstack-meeting-416:31
*** rfolco has quit IRC16:32
sdake#topic LIberty rc1 planning16:32
*** openstack changes topic to "LIberty rc1 planning (Meeting topic: kolla)"16:32
sdake#link https://launchpad.net/kolla/+milestone/liberty-rc116:33
sdakeif folks pull that up, you will see we have a whole slew of blueprints and bugs for rc116:33
*** watanabe_isao has quit IRC16:33
coolsvaphello16:33
sdakefirst lets go through status reports of the blueprints not in the good progress or higher state16:33
sdake#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/logging-container16:34
sdakeinc0 any update here?16:34
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC16:35
inc0few things to do on this one - optional bindmounting and Sam asked to provide keystone before merging initial patch16:35
inc0I should be done with these 2 this week16:35
inc0(was off for a week, hence time slip)16:35
sdakedo you ahve to modify all the containers to add logging to them?16:35
*** jruano has quit IRC16:36
inc0no, just ansible configs for services16:36
inc0ansible-generated configs16:36
sdakeok i woudl like folks to keep in mind any blueprint not in good progress by the 18th (as defined by will finish by the 25th, our rc1 deadline) will be pushed to mitaka16:36
*** B_Smith has quit IRC16:36
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-416:37
sdake#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/ansible-mongodb16:37
sdakecoolsvap is that + ceilometer going to land for liberty?16:37
sdake#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/ansible-ceilometer16:37
coolsvapsdake, yes16:38
coolsvapon it16:38
sdakecan you push a work in progress review so people can start commenting ?16:38
coolsvapyes will do that tonight or early morning tomorrow16:39
sdakecool16:39
sdake#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/kolla-live-migration16:39
sdakerhallisey any update on this?16:39
sdakeit says started, is it started?16:39
rhalliseyjust focusing on refactor16:39
rhalliseyya I started it a while back16:39
sdakeshould I push this off then to mitaka?16:39
rhalliseyya push it16:40
sdakeSamYaple has about 6 blueprints but he isn't here16:40
sdakeSamYaple if you happen to read later, can you focus on getting ceph in working order :)16:40
sdakeTIA16:40
inc0I'll ask him to review it tomorrow16:40
inc0but knowing him he'll read through logs16:40
sdakebug triage16:41
sdakethe bug tirage has been going well, however the bug fixing hasn't been going as well16:41
sdakeIf folks could assign themselves 1 or 2 bugs from the confirmed bugs, with the idea of fixing in the next 2-3 weeks that would be fantastici :)16:41
sdakewe have 87 bugs targeted for this milestone16:42
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-416:42
sdakethe way i target bugs, is i ipull all bugs in and we work on the ones we can, and push what remains to the next release16:42
sdakewe can't follow that pattern for rc2/rc316:42
sdakewe need to actively fix all the critical/high bugs for rc2/rc316:43
*** mhayden has quit IRC16:43
sdakeany questions ?16:43
rhalliseysounds good16:43
sdake#topic properly scoping work16:43
*** mhayden has joined #openstack-meeting-416:43
*** openstack changes topic to "properly scoping work (Meeting topic: kolla)"16:43
*** pbourke_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:43
sdakefor l1/l2/l3/rc1 we have had many more blueprints then peoples time available16:44
sdakewe were successful in delivering all of our blueprints for l1/l2/l316:44
pbourke_sorry Im late16:44
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC16:44
sdakepbourke_ welcome :)16:44
sdakewe also fixed a mountain of bugs16:44
pbourke_stuck in hell that is keystone logging16:44
pbourke_and forgot16:44
sdakebut rc1 is likely going to see alot less blueprints implemented then were scheduled16:45
sdakesprints are about 1 month in duration16:45
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC16:45
sdakewhat I'd like to see during the Mitaka cycle is that people that commit to delivering a blueprint or two only commit to their capacity16:45
sdakefor an example of this, I have two blueprints:16:45
*** bharathm has quit IRC16:46
sdake#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/upgrade-strategy16:46
sdake#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/rhel-based-image-support16:46
sdakeonly one will finish for rc116:46
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-416:46
sdakeit is hard for me to be inside everyone's head around their own capacity16:46
sdakewhich means its hard to plan the project :)16:46
*** tfukushima has quit IRC16:47
sdakedon't be afraid to say a blueprint isn't going to make it early in the sprint16:47
coolsvapagreed16:48
sdakeI'd like to not operate over capacity for our team as it triggers burnout16:48
sdakeit works for short periods but not long term16:48
sdakeKolla is in fantastic shape heading into Mitaka and we have alot of interest in our project16:48
sdakebut if we become disinterested because of overcommitment, that isn't helpful16:48
*** dannywilson has quit IRC16:49
sdakemarathon, not a race ;)16:49
sdakeany questions ? :)16:49
rhalliseysounds good16:49
coolsvapagreed16:49
sdake#topic announcements16:49
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: kolla)"16:49
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting-416:49
sdakei should have done this first but forgot16:49
sdake1. rdo repos are down for scheduled maintenance as indicated by jpeeler16:50
*** KunalGan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:50
*** KunalGan_ has quit IRC16:50
jpeelerthey sent a follow up about mirroring it while down, but apparently are having problems currently16:50
sdake2. all cores should vote on the proposal to permit or not permit integration with cinder, neutron, and paid distros16:50
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-416:50
sdakeif you dont vote, it is essentially like voting -116:51
sdakesince we require a majority16:51
sdakeif you want to vote -1 do that, but dont not vote :)16:51
sdakeif folks dont vote, I don't know where the project cores stand16:51
sdakesaid proposal is on the mailing list16:51
sdakei need a conclusion to the vote this week because otherwise rhos wont make rc116:52
coolsvap#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-September/074310.html16:52
sdakesome folks had talked about some various points they want enabled to accept stuff in16:53
sdakelets focus on the big picture (do we want to do it or not) first16:53
sdakeand details second16:53
sdakemy position is that I want to  do what is in the best interest of the project, not be high-horsey about open source :)16:53
sdakeplease read the thread16:54
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-416:54
sdakeany annnouncements from the commnity?16:54
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC16:54
pbourke_nope16:54
sdake#topic open discussion16:54
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: kolla)"16:54
sdakeso pretty light agenda for this meeting16:55
coolsvapI think we should also use the review for highlighting the core vote on the rhos16:55
sdakecoolsvap lets just get it on the mailing list16:56
coolsvapfor this particular review we should have all cores vote on the first review16:56
sdakethat is super public16:56
coolsvapin addition to the mailing list16:56
sdakeSamYaple wanted it somewhere more public then the gerrit review16:56
*** B_Smith has joined #openstack-meeting-416:56
sdakehe asked, I delivered :)16:56
coolsvapalright16:57
inc0don't we have session on "What do we support policy"?16:57
inc0in tokyo?16:57
sdakeits a policy decision not a technical matter16:57
sdakeinc0 i dont think so, we dont support anything16:57
inc0also, we did talk about this topic in midcycle a bit16:57
sdakeinc0 we implement, other people support16:57
inc0contrib stuff16:58
jpeelersupport is quite an overloaded term16:58
sdakesup·port16:58
sdakegive assistance to, especially financially; enable to function or act.16:59
inc0someone want's to give us financial assistance?16:59
sdakea support organization takes our implementaiton and enables their customers to act16:59
inc0wants*16:59
*** yamahata has quit IRC17:00
sdakewe have not built a support community17:00
*** VW_ has quit IRC17:00
sdakenot even neutron with over 100 person development team "supports" neutron17:00
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC17:00
sdakeI hope everyone understands this point :)17:01
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:01
*** woodard has quit IRC17:01
sdakepostgresql got killed because they became popular and tried to support their software in the community17:01
sdakeits an anti-pattern for dev teams and support teams to be one in the same IMNSHO17:01
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC17:01
sdakeI know it seems a bit quiet during this period of the dev cycle (between releases)17:02
inc0let's not be popular then - no problem with support;)17:02
sdakeits always like that17:02
sdakeso for folks new to the quietness, don't stress - always happens with openstack projects17:02
sdakewe have over 50 blueprints in our backlog that need prioritization17:03
sdakeso we have plenty of work to do going forward :)17:03
sdakeany other open discussion then?17:03
sdakecool thanks for coming :)17:03
sdake#endmeeting17:03
rhalliseythanks17:03
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:03
openstackMeeting ended Wed Sep 16 17:03:44 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:03
inc0thank you all17:03
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/kolla/2015/kolla.2015-09-16-16.30.html17:03
*** rhallisey has left #openstack-meeting-417:03
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/kolla/2015/kolla.2015-09-16-16.30.txt17:03
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/kolla/2015/kolla.2015-09-16-16.30.log.html17:03
*** jmccarthy has left #openstack-meeting-417:04
*** VW_ has quit IRC17:05
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-417:06
*** inc0 has quit IRC17:08
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-417:08
*** zeih has quit IRC17:08
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-417:08
*** jerryz has joined #openstack-meeting-417:09
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-417:10
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-417:10
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-417:13
*** dzamboni has joined #openstack-meeting-417:14
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC17:17
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-417:22
*** jckasper has quit IRC17:22
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-417:24
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:27
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-417:28
*** geoffarnold has quit IRC17:29
*** geoffarnold has joined #openstack-meeting-417:31
*** lexholden has quit IRC17:34
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:35
*** GB21 has quit IRC17:42
*** vinkman has quit IRC17:44
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-417:48
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-417:50
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-417:50
*** vinkman has joined #openstack-meeting-417:51
*** tfukushima has quit IRC17:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC17:53
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-417:54
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:54
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:55
*** sdake has quit IRC17:58
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC17:59
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-417:59
*** DericHorn-HP has joined #openstack-meeting-417:59
*** setmason has joined #openstack-meeting-418:00
*** geoffarn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-418:04
*** xingchao has quit IRC18:05
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting-418:05
PietWill there be an operator meeting?18:05
*** jwagner is now known as jwagner_away18:06
setmasonIs there an agenda?18:07
*** geoffarnold has quit IRC18:07
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-418:09
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-418:09
PietNot that I know of18:12
PietIt would be interesting to take role to see if anyone is planning to attend18:12
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:14
*** vinkman has left #openstack-meeting-418:15
*** zeih has quit IRC18:15
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-418:16
*** padkrish_ has joined #openstack-meeting-418:18
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-418:18
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-418:22
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-418:22
*** tfukushima has quit IRC18:23
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC18:27
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner18:29
*** david-lyle has quit IRC18:30
*** padkrish_ has quit IRC18:32
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-418:32
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:33
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-418:34
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC18:38
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-418:38
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-418:39
*** dannywilson has quit IRC18:46
*** ashtokolov has joined #openstack-meeting-418:47
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:48
*** pmesserli has quit IRC18:48
*** pmesserl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-418:48
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-418:49
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-418:49
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting-418:50
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:53
*** jmcbride has quit IRC18:56
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-418:58
*** nhairston has quit IRC18:59
*** bharathm has quit IRC19:00
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC19:02
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-419:02
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC19:04
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-419:04
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-419:06
*** woodard has quit IRC19:07
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC19:08
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-419:08
*** akwasnie has quit IRC19:09
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC19:10
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:18
*** DericHorn-HP has quit IRC19:19
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-419:19
*** dwalleck has quit IRC19:20
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-419:22
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:23
*** xingchao has quit IRC19:25
*** padkrish_ has joined #openstack-meeting-419:26
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting-419:30
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-419:36
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-419:39
*** FallenPe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-419:42
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-419:44
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC19:45
*** padkrish_ has quit IRC19:47
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-419:48
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-419:49
*** bharathm has quit IRC19:49
*** sdake_ has quit IRC19:52
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-419:55
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:55
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-419:55
*** FallenPe_ has quit IRC19:56
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:59
Rockygo/20:00
Rockyg#startmeeting log_wg20:00
openstackMeeting started Wed Sep 16 20:00:32 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is Rockyg. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: log_wg)"20:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'log_wg'20:00
jokke_o/20:01
Rockyganybody here for logging?  bknudson jokke_20:01
jokke_I'm here yeah20:01
bknudsonhi20:01
RockygHeh.20:01
jokke_hi bknudson20:01
RockygHi.  Just an FYI.  the reason we haven't seen dhellmann is that he has a conflict at this time.20:02
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC20:02
*** mestery has quit IRC20:02
RockygScheduling meetings going forward: anyone not ok with Friday around utc 1700 or 1800?20:03
jokke_that sounds really stretching it20:03
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting-420:03
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-meeting-420:03
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus20:03
jokke_and I'd say for whole EMEA20:04
RockygYeah, I thought you might have an issue ;-)20:04
*** sambetts has quit IRC20:05
jokke_well, I might be joining from my local over phone irc, but don't expect anything sane or quick coming from that interface ;)20:05
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-420:05
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa20:06
RockygYeah.  I was looking at the calendar and trying to figure out a reasonable day/time.  Hah.20:07
*** bharathm has joined #openstack-meeting-420:07
jokke_is that only slot that does not overlap with anything else where people are tied in?20:07
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2420:08
RockygNot sure.  Can't get the OS calendar on my laptop at the moment, or on my IPad, so can't check.  I'll get back to you guys on that.20:09
jokke_k20:09
Rockyg#topic logging docs20:09
*** openstack changes topic to "logging docs (Meeting topic: log_wg)"20:09
Rockyg#info oslo doc sprint scheduled for 9/24 and 9/2520:09
*** sambetts has joined #openstack-meeting-420:10
RockygI started collecting doc info:  #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oslo.log_config-documentation20:11
RockygBut it's actuall more than just config.  It's stuff to document.20:11
jokke_yeii20:12
RockygI've been going through some of the project docs to see what they have.20:12
*** lexholden has joined #openstack-meeting-420:12
RockygThe projects that have docs up on docs.openstack.org, when they have logging info, it is generally how to configure specific for a project, plus some in troubleshooting20:13
jokke_yep20:13
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC20:13
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-420:14
RockygThe proj specific cong generally point to proj config files and location of proj logs:  /var/[proj]/[proj].og and /etc/[proj]/logging.conf and /etc/[proj]/[proj].conf20:14
RockygBut, we need to verify consistency and ensure that the "correct" locations/info are part of devref, I think.20:16
jokke_hmm-m yeah I saw that ... is there a way to specify the config file for oslo log or is that something that is set?20:16
Rockyggood question.  Some projects have sample files.  But what we *need* is where the global conf is, make that sane defaults and document in *that* file where to do proj specific changes20:17
jokke_does oslo log actually honor any global log file?20:18
RockygI need admin access to a running cloud, or someone who does to do this stuff.  And yes, oslo log has global config settings20:19
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-420:19
jokke_ok, where that config file should be? I'll have a look tomorrow when I'm back in office20:19
Rockygso, Theorectically, all of the projects' long config should be empty20:20
Rockygs/long/log20:20
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-420:20
*** Piet has quit IRC20:20
jokke_yes that tends to be the normal situation20:20
RockygI think the other thing we need is to differentiate between projects using oslo.log and pylog20:21
jokke_or mixture of those20:21
RockygThen figure out what the format for the pylog projects should be that most closely relates to the oslo.log default20:22
RockygI also have the file with the config options open, but haven't really started digging in that too much yet.20:22
jokke_ok ... well this sounds like big improvement if that all gets even documented to easily digested format20:23
*** tfukushima has quit IRC20:24
RockygOK.  I'll keep working on this and prep the etherpad for the docs sprint.  Questions, organization, etc.20:24
Rockyg#topic Tokyo Summit20:24
*** openstack changes topic to "Tokyo Summit (Meeting topic: log_wg)"20:24
*** matrohon has quit IRC20:25
*** dwalleck has quit IRC20:25
RockygWe have a cross-project work session for the summit, and I just expanded some on the ops session.  Do we want a working session?  Could we actually get valuable work done on a/some specs if we had one?20:26
jokke_are you referencing that wed noon sessions as x-project?20:27
Rockygyesa20:27
RockygActually, maybe.  I think so.20:27
RockygDiscussion on TC list.20:28
jokke_I'd assume that and the ops side should be enough ... I have really difficult to believe anything useful getting done over 40min working session20:28
RockygYeah.  So far we haven't.20:28
jokke_rather we could try to communicate around and trying to get folks together just to the lunch room for round table if people has overlapping off time20:29
RockygBut, one of Mitaka's themes seems to be shaping up as "interop"20:29
RockygI think consistent logs fit that theme20:29
jokke_++20:30
RockygIt also looks like req-id is on the verge of merging.  I think once it does, we propose a log header field that takes three ids20:31
RockygOriginating id, prev id, current id20:32
RockygThat would allow full tracing.  The originating is going to be the hard one to get defined.20:32
jokke_that sounds like mile long log line20:32
*** jayg is now known as jayg|g0n320:32
Rockygnope.  log message only as at most 3.  But we need to limit size of req-id to something reasonable20:33
jokke_well I think the current proposal is uuid ... so 3 of those is pretty damn long header20:33
Rockyghmmm.20:33
Rockygwe need that configurable.  uuid takes an integer to say how big it should be.  That should be a config option.  Need a RFE!20:34
jokke_;)20:35
*** jmcbride has quit IRC20:36
RockygI'll go back and reread the spec.  Maybe I can get them to include it, or maybe I can propose a bp for that spec that does it.20:36
RockygToo much to do and not enough me.20:36
jokke_even it's once again one extra config option I think some folks could appreciate that vs. standard uuid20:37
jokke_I know the feeling20:37
bknudsonif you just want a short random string don't use uuid20:37
Rockyg#action propose config option for req-id that allows size of id to be chosen20:38
bknudsonassuming you're fine with a chance of duplicate strings20:38
Rockyg bknudson I think uuid() has a size option.  Also, for tracing, the id+time window will be unique20:38
jokke_bknudson: well the req id was difficult enough to get agreed with uuid ... some people has fancy idea that they need to have id for each request that is unique over months time20:38
bknudsonuuid will be unique20:39
bknudsonhttps://docs.python.org/2/library/uuid.html#uuid.uuid420:39
Rockyghaha.  Actually, not with the size of some clouds...20:39
bknudsondoesn't have a size parameter20:39
*** ajmiller has quit IRC20:39
jokke_that's why I think it was selected at the first place20:39
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-420:40
bknudsonthere's different uuid methods20:40
RockygI think it's in keystone middleware.  A redefine maybe?20:40
jokke_well yeah it's unique up to certain count20:40
RockygBut that middleware already has the id generator, it uses uuid, but it also takes an integer20:41
Rockygmultiple of two, of course20:41
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-420:42
RockygThere is so much freaking cruft in the codebase that's not used, not known about, or used by one small thing.  It would be great to get some interns to clean it up.20:42
jokke_you mean OpenStack in general or some specific part?20:43
RockygIn general.20:43
bknudsonhire some interns20:43
Rockygmaybe less for some of the newer projects;-)20:43
jokke_that Intern would retire and still we would be cursing the crud20:43
RockygOr not.20:43
RockygYup.  Anything we are forgetting for summit?20:44
jokke_do we want to have some more descriptive topic for that Wed noon session20:45
jokke_into the schedule?20:45
Rockygdo you have a link to that page?20:45
RockygLet's look20:45
jokke_the communications are on my work e-mail20:46
jokke_and ofc I forgot to get my laptop ready for this20:47
*** puranamr has quit IRC20:47
RockygWelcome to the club!20:47
RockygWe'll discuss next week, then.20:47
Rockyg#topic Open Discussion20:47
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: log_wg)"20:47
RockygAnything else?20:47
jokke_http://sched.co/4A2Z20:48
jokke_that should be the slot20:48
RockygOh, did anyone review that spec/patch I forwarded?20:48
jokke_it's on my todo list still (open on a tab at office)20:49
RockygAh.  So, the work session.  Yeah. But let's put that on next week's agenda?20:50
jokke_sure20:50
bknudsonwe've got an attendee already!20:50
jokke_so yes it's on work session title20:50
jokke_bknudson: that is placeholder for all 10 parallel worksessions there ;)20:50
RockygOn the spec,, I'm pretty sure that they should be using oslo.log and not syslog, but....who am I to say?20:50
jokke_I'd like to see that happening as well20:52
jokke_(I did eyeball it but didn't dig in enough to comment anything20:52
RockygI think it was this one? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/20:54
jokke_I think it was20:54
jokke_looks vaguely familiar20:55
RockygBut, if it is, the rst file got lot smaller recently20:56
jokke_this seems to have been growing ... was it some other logging api then than that security one?20:58
Rockyg#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/20:58
Rockyghttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/203509/20/specs/liberty/logging-API-for-sg-and-fw-rules.rst20:59
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-420:59
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-421:00
jokke_ok, till next week then ... or just ping me/send an e-mail if something iteresting pops up21:01
RockygOK.  Sorry, I just hit something wierd.  The first time I posted the patch, I was looking at it, copied the url and posted.  The review I was seeing had three files - two json files - example and schema, and a 35 line rst file.  Now, it is what we currently see.21:01
jokke_ah :)21:02
RockygFreaky.21:02
Rockygplus, patch set showed like 8, but comments showed the 20.  Wow.21:03
*** padkrish has quit IRC21:03
jokke_;)21:03
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-421:03
jokke_gerrit doing weird things21:03
jokke_messing with yer mind21:03
RockygOops.  Ran over again.  Please review the spec.  I really think it needs comments from the log wg, but I don't want to jump in until a dev does.21:04
RockygAnd it is time.21:04
Rockyg#endmeeting21:04
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:04
openstackMeeting ended Wed Sep 16 21:04:19 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:04
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/log_wg/2015/log_wg.2015-09-16-20.00.html21:04
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/log_wg/2015/log_wg.2015-09-16-20.00.txt21:04
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/log_wg/2015/log_wg.2015-09-16-20.00.log.html21:04
RockygThanks jokke_ and bknudson21:04
jokke_thanks21:04
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-421:06
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-421:08
*** lexholden has quit IRC21:10
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:14
*** jmcbride has quit IRC21:15
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-421:15
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-421:16
*** Rockyg has quit IRC21:25
*** harshs has quit IRC21:25
*** dwalleck has quit IRC21:26
*** jmckind has quit IRC21:26
*** cdelatte has quit IRC21:27
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-421:27
*** puranamr has quit IRC21:28
*** padkrish has quit IRC21:32
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-421:33
*** julim has quit IRC21:35
*** padkrish_ has joined #openstack-meeting-421:35
*** padkrish has quit IRC21:36
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting-421:45
*** krtaylor has quit IRC21:46
*** jmcbride has quit IRC21:50
*** harshs has quit IRC21:54
*** woodard has quit IRC21:55
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-421:56
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-421:58
*** jmcbride has quit IRC22:00
*** barrett has left #openstack-meeting-422:01
*** setmason has quit IRC22:04
*** setmason has joined #openstack-meeting-422:05
*** klamath has quit IRC22:05
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:09
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-422:12
*** dzamboni has quit IRC22:12
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-422:13
*** zeih has quit IRC22:17
*** xingchao has quit IRC22:17
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-422:20
*** VW__ has joined #openstack-meeting-422:21
*** padkrish_ has quit IRC22:23
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-422:24
*** VW_ has quit IRC22:24
*** tfukushima has quit IRC22:25
*** VW__ has quit IRC22:25
*** padkrish has quit IRC22:28
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC22:28
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:29
*** jruano has quit IRC22:31
*** jpeeler has quit IRC22:32
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-422:32
*** setmason has quit IRC22:34
*** setmason has joined #openstack-meeting-422:38
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-422:40
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-meeting-422:42
*** rbak has quit IRC22:42
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC22:45
*** rfolco has quit IRC22:45
*** dims_ has quit IRC22:48
*** banix has quit IRC22:48
*** balajin has left #openstack-meeting-422:50
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-422:51
*** setmason has quit IRC22:56
*** setmason has joined #openstack-meeting-423:02
*** markvoelker has quit IRC23:05
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC23:15
*** padkrish has quit IRC23:18
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-423:19
*** mmedvede has quit IRC23:21
*** padkrish has quit IRC23:23
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting-423:27
*** setmason has quit IRC23:31
*** setmason has joined #openstack-meeting-423:32
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-423:32
*** baoli_ has quit IRC23:37
*** yamamoto has quit IRC23:39
*** pmesserl_ has quit IRC23:40
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:48
*** Swami has quit IRC23:50
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-423:51
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-423:52
*** jmcbride has joined #openstack-meeting-423:55
*** nhairston has joined #openstack-meeting-423:59
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-423:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!