Thursday, 2017-07-13

*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift00:15
timburke:-( why do our unit tests take a config option, and why do they *fail* when i twiddle it?00:36
claygtimburke: our unit tests?  Swiftclient?  Something out of functest config?00:40
timburkeclayg: i'm looking at `fake_syslog` (see https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/f7fdb9c) and have `./.unittests common/test_daemon.py:TestRunDaemon.test_run_daemon common/test_utils.py:TestUtils.test_get_logger_sysloghandler_plumbing` failing while either of those two run independently succeeds00:41
claygPoor dan. I'm sure it looked like the most obvious thing on his computer 5 years ago :,(00:45
*** kiennt has joined #openstack-swift00:47
timburkei'm not really blaming him; i'm sure it worked at the time. but i don't think unit tests should take config -- the fact that it no longer works is proof that *we haven't been testing that config*00:47
claygJust rip it all out if it's in the way. If needed importing test unit is free imho to globally break stdlib syslog handler. Esp if doing so would guarantee all tests to use debug_logger helper.00:47
claygYup 100% agree. Nice find.00:48
clayglow-hanging-fruit wishlist?  Or is it in your way? Sounds super annoying.00:50
timburkefor context i'm looking at https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1249727 which mentioned seeing "Unable to read test config /etc/swift/test.conf - file not found" in test output, which seems like a legit complaint. the rest of it sounds like "you didn't install xattr, which *is* needed and as such was listed in requirements.txt"00:52
openstackLaunchpad bug 1249727 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "testsuite config needs fixing along with test_wsgi.py" [Undecided,New]00:52
timburkemaybe the Esperanto complaint is legit, too? idk -- i don't know that i've ever seen it...00:53
timburkenope; looks like that got fixed in https://github.com/openstack/swift/commit/62b87fc01:00
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift01:02
*** klrmn has quit IRC01:11
*** saint_ has joined #openstack-swift01:26
*** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift01:29
* kota_ is back to online at office01:30
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift01:43
*** saint_ has quit IRC01:47
*** saint_ has joined #openstack-swift01:52
*** gyee has quit IRC02:02
timburkeok, here's an open question: should swift's unit tests require that swift be installed? in particular, should we go digging for things like swift entrypoints in unit tests? i wonder whether test_wsgi may have started failing with "DistributionNotFound: swift" in https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1249727 even if xattr *were* installed02:02
openstackLaunchpad bug 1249727 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "testsuite config needs fixing along with test_wsgi.py" [Undecided,New]02:02
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift02:10
*** bkopilov has quit IRC02:12
*** JimCheung has quit IRC02:15
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift02:22
*** pdardeau has quit IRC02:37
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift02:40
*** JimCheung has quit IRC02:44
*** abhitechie has quit IRC03:03
*** OrionX has joined #openstack-swift03:06
*** two_tired has joined #openstack-swift03:14
*** kei_yama has quit IRC03:34
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift03:37
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift03:59
*** links has joined #openstack-swift04:02
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift04:02
OrionXnotmyname: i figured out my problem (based on the input you gave earlier).  i was making a pretty dumb mistake.  i had a few issues: 1) i was thinking that i was passing a keystone auth'ed session object to SwiftClient (which i wasn't), 2) based on #1, I was sending 'os_project_id' of the project of the containers I wanted to list (which isn't correct... this should the project id of the user i'm authenticating to keystone with), and th04:25
OrionXen 3) based on #2 i wasn't specifying 'os_storage_url' because i thought i swift was going to figure out the project i was interested in based on 'os_project_id'.  so, once i realized that i needed to send proper keystone auth credentials to SwiftClient *and also* a proper 'os_storage_url', things fell into place.  thx again for your pointers earlier!04:25
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift04:31
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift04:32
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC04:40
*** vint_bra has quit IRC04:52
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift04:53
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift04:54
*** abhitechie has quit IRC04:59
*** two_tired has quit IRC05:08
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift05:12
*** psachin has quit IRC05:12
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift05:15
notmynameOrionX: glad you figured it out05:16
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift05:40
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC05:44
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC05:45
*** hieulq has quit IRC05:45
*** tovin07 has quit IRC05:45
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift05:46
*** tovin07 has joined #openstack-swift05:46
*** hieulq has joined #openstack-swift05:46
*** kiennt has quit IRC05:50
*** swamireddy1 has joined #openstack-swift05:53
*** swamireddy1 has left #openstack-swift05:54
*** kiennt has joined #openstack-swift05:58
*** OrionX has quit IRC06:00
*** ChubYann has quit IRC06:02
*** abhitechie has quit IRC06:25
*** d0ugal has quit IRC06:33
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift06:52
*** klrmn has quit IRC06:53
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift06:56
*** cschwede has joined #openstack-swift06:57
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v cschwede06:57
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift07:10
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift07:12
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift07:16
*** d0ugal has quit IRC07:18
*** saint_ has quit IRC07:29
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift07:39
*** itlinux has quit IRC07:47
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift07:49
*** xrb has joined #openstack-swift07:50
*** ^andrea^ has joined #openstack-swift07:50
*** oshritf has quit IRC08:00
*** OrionX has joined #openstack-swift08:00
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift08:01
*** OrionX has quit IRC08:04
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift08:41
*** RayLei has joined #openstack-swift08:48
RayLeihi08:48
RayLei我遇到了一个很奇怪的问题关于swift,https://i.loli.net/2017/07/13/59673503dee14.jpg08:54
RayLeiI encountered a very strange question about swift, https: //i.loli.net/2017/07/13/59673503dee14.jpg08:55
RayLeiSwift using curl to upload objects need to try twice to succeed08:56
*** oshritf has quit IRC09:05
acolestimburke: mattoliverau: agree re https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1231396 . In my experience, not having glance images in the user account was preferred, so Service tokens was more about preventing mass deletion of all users' images from the glance account with single glance token, by requiring second per user token.09:06
openstackLaunchpad bug 1231396 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "allow admin user to list services container" [Undecided,Invalid]09:06
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC09:11
*** sanchitmalhotra has joined #openstack-swift09:11
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:15
RayLeiI use swauth, is it also the case?09:21
*** winggundamth has joined #openstack-swift09:22
*** mvk has quit IRC09:28
*** xrb has quit IRC09:49
*** xrb has joined #openstack-swift09:51
*** xrb has quit IRC09:51
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift09:55
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift10:03
*** kiennt has quit IRC10:09
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift10:12
*** noxdafox_ has quit IRC10:12
*** oshritf has quit IRC10:12
*** noxdafox has joined #openstack-swift10:17
*** tovin07 has quit IRC10:23
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC10:24
*** mvk has quit IRC10:34
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift10:34
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift10:50
openstackgerritbhavani proposed openstack/swift master: Stop using deprecated 'message' attribute in Exception  https://review.openstack.org/48330010:52
*** abhitechie has quit IRC10:54
*** bkopilov has quit IRC10:57
RayLeiWill swauth's token be kept into memcache?10:58
*** oshritf has quit IRC11:04
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift11:05
cbartzRayLei: Seems so: https://github.com/openstack/swauth/blob/master/swauth/middleware.py#L30411:09
*** winggundamth has quit IRC11:09
RayLeiI encountered a problem, if the use of swift upload command upload object is successful, but the use of curl upload object first certification will fail, the second time to succeed11:13
*** mvk has quit IRC11:13
RayLeihere is  curl upload https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20849756/28164023-fc9b7b64-67ff-11e7-8d02-1aafba54cb2a.jpg11:21
RayLeihere is swift upload https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/20849756/28164135-803f0170-6800-11e7-8ba8-ed70c92f25ac.jpg11:24
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift11:26
RayLei curl first failed,second succeed,swift upload one time succeed11:26
RayLeiThis happens for the time being only in an account11:29
RayLeiIs there any problem with this account?11:30
*** RayLei has quit IRC11:35
*** RayLei has joined #openstack-swift11:37
RayLeiDoes anyone have good advice?11:38
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift11:42
*** oshritf has quit IRC11:42
*** d0ugal has quit IRC11:47
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift11:48
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift12:24
*** saint_ has joined #openstack-swift12:26
*** cshastri has quit IRC12:34
*** oshritf has quit IRC12:35
*** deep-book-gk_ has joined #openstack-swift12:41
*** deep-book-gk_ has left #openstack-swift12:43
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift12:55
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift12:56
*** links has quit IRC12:57
*** kei_yama has quit IRC12:57
*** OrionX has joined #openstack-swift13:01
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift13:01
*** winggundamth has joined #openstack-swift13:02
*** oshritf has quit IRC13:02
*** OrionX has quit IRC13:05
*** MVenesio has joined #openstack-swift13:06
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift13:06
*** d0ugal has quit IRC13:07
*** gkadam has quit IRC13:08
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift13:17
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift13:18
*** d0ugal has quit IRC13:18
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift13:18
*** d0ugal has quit IRC13:20
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift13:20
*** JimCheung has quit IRC13:22
*** gabor_antal_ is now known as gabor_antal13:28
*** d0ugal has quit IRC13:29
*** mat128 has quit IRC13:30
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift13:30
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:42
*** klamath has quit IRC13:42
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:43
*** neonpastor has quit IRC13:53
*** neonpastor has joined #openstack-swift14:04
*** RayLei has quit IRC14:14
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift14:19
*** psachin has quit IRC14:22
*** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-swift14:22
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift14:25
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright14:25
*** OrionX has joined #openstack-swift14:40
*** itlinux_ has quit IRC14:42
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift14:46
*** lucasxu has quit IRC15:09
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift15:11
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:27
joeljwrighttimburke: you about?15:32
*** winggundamth has quit IRC15:33
*** pcaruana has quit IRC15:38
*** MVenesio has quit IRC15:38
*** MVenesio has joined #openstack-swift15:39
claygtimburke: yeah timburke you around!?  Did you file a bug for the "unittests shouldn't take config" part of lp bug #124972715:47
openstackLaunchpad bug 1249727 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "testsuite config needs fixing along with test_wsgi.py" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124972715:47
claygif so I think we can mark that bug as basically "fix released" (2 of 4 are fixed, 1 is probably just PEBCAK, and then we can open an independent bug for fixing/removing the benign warning that started some of the confusion!)15:49
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift15:49
*** mat128 has quit IRC15:50
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift15:50
*** abhitechie has quit IRC15:52
*** aagrawal has joined #openstack-swift15:53
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC15:56
*** cbartz has left #openstack-swift16:01
*** lucasxu has quit IRC16:04
*** gyee has joined #openstack-swift16:09
*** silor has quit IRC16:18
*** tesseract has quit IRC16:19
*** jamielennox has quit IRC16:19
*** aagrawal has quit IRC16:21
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-swift16:21
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift16:22
*** aagrawal has joined #openstack-swift16:24
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift16:26
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC16:27
*** aagrawal has quit IRC16:28
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift16:30
*** chlong has quit IRC16:32
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift16:33
*** abhitechie has quit IRC16:33
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift16:34
timburkegood morning16:34
timburkejoeljwright: i'm kinda siding with zaitcev on the constant in swiftclient -- i included it so consumers would have a nice thing they could monkeypatch if they wanted, say, 1MB buffers, but tests seem like they shouldn't use it16:36
EmilienMnotmyname: do you remember where is the doc with matrix of coverage swiftclient/openstackclient?16:37
timburkeunless we wanted to go mocking it out with some *different* value, then test for *that*? idk that it's really worth the effort though16:37
timburkeclayg: i've not written up that other bug yet. part of why i left the original open for now16:38
joeljwrighttimburke: I don't really mind - just seemed like a lot of tests to change if we want to make the buffers bigger :)16:38
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift16:39
joeljwrighttimburke: I also need to apologise for the -2 earlier - I fat fingered the +workflow button and needed to stop it merging :)16:40
joeljwrighttimburke: if you think the 65536 values in the tests are okay I'll just +2+1 now16:41
timburkeno worries. yeah, i think it's probably fine -- only like 10 lines16:44
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift16:45
joeljwrighttimburke: merged16:46
notmynamegood morning16:46
notmynameEmilienM: no, I don't remember16:46
timburkethanks16:46
EmilienMnotmyname: ok, thx for checking16:47
notmynamecschwede: did you get a chance to build the bug etherpad today?16:52
*** abhitechie has quit IRC17:08
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift17:10
*** abhitechie has quit IRC17:11
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift17:20
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift17:21
claygi sorta saw SIG something something on the ML - and *totally* meant to understand it - but didn't make the effort - now it keeps come up and I'm paralyzed by FOMO - does anyone have the tl;dr on WTF SIG?17:22
claygmaybe I should cross post in #openstack-dev17:22
*** joeljwright has quit IRC17:27
notmynamefrom what I can tell a SIG is to a working group or committee the way a greenlet is to a thread or fork17:29
notmynameat a high level, basically the same thing, but supposed to be a lot easier to set up and tear down and more ephemeral17:29
notmynamenow there's a SIG for SIGs (http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-sigs/2017-July/000000.html)17:32
notmynamefor the practical "what do I do with this on monday morning?", I don't see how this is any different than existing groups in openstack set up to address a particular topic (api wg, security wg, etc). I guess those will be SIGs now17:33
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-swift17:36
claygok, if you are either 1) special 2) interested 3) english royalty or suffering from multiple personality  disorder (i.e. consider yourself a "we" or "group") then you should *totally* sign up for http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-sigs17:38
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift17:42
*** mat128 has quit IRC17:43
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC17:56
*** mvk has quit IRC18:01
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift18:03
*** mat128 has quit IRC18:05
*** Renich has joined #openstack-swift18:08
*** neonpastor has quit IRC18:08
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift18:09
*** JimCheung has quit IRC18:13
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift18:14
*** JimCheung has quit IRC18:18
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift18:25
notmynamethurloat: are you working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1521351 ?18:28
openstackLaunchpad bug 1521351 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "undelete accounts" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Adam Thurlow (thurloat)18:28
*** mat128 has quit IRC18:30
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift18:35
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-swift18:37
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift18:38
claygtimburke: killer18:41
timburkeclayg: ?18:43
claygsorry, just saw the bug splitting email thing about the screwed up unit test config silliness we chatted about yesterday18:44
claygkiller ~= "nice work" in this case???18:44
timburkeah. and here i was about to make a joke like "who have you been talking to? do i need to ... clean up ... some 'loose ends'?"18:45
thurloatnotmyname haven't looked at it in quite a long time, currently caught up doing some infra upgrades19:04
clayglol19:08
claygupgrade that infra!19:08
claygif they didn't want all of their data deleted they would have sent a DELETE request (that's what I always say)!?19:09
thurloatoh golly, clayg19:17
thurloathad a customer mis-configure their cyberduck? (iirc) client and it sent a delete request to their account URL19:18
thurloatthey didn't even know19:18
thurloatluckily we have dem logs tho, were able to stop the reaper from completely wiping everything which was nice19:19
timburkenotmyname: should we close https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1521359 (and probably also https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/1467668)? i feel like we discussed how the multi-range-COPY-results-in-MIME-doc thing is a wart to live with (in http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift/2016/swift.2016-01-06-21.00.log.html, maybe? or http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/swift/2016/swift.2016-06-01-21.00.log.html?) or do we want to19:19
openstackLaunchpad bug 1521359 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "COPY with ranges" [Wishlist,New]19:19
timburke keep it open to remind us to document the existing behavior (since i didn't really see anything about multi-range in particular in api-ref)? there's also a related (closed) bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/153212619:19
openstackLaunchpad bug 1467668 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Multi Range Read with with server side copy results in a MIME" [Undecided,Confirmed]19:19
openstackLaunchpad bug 1532126 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "PUT X-Copy-From with Range violates RFC7233" [Low,Fix released]19:19
openstackgerritMerged openstack/python-swiftclient master: Buffer reads from disk  https://review.openstack.org/44977119:24
*** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift19:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/liberasurecode master: Stop pretending to support SSE4-optimized CRC-32C  https://review.openstack.org/48077619:28
openstackgerritMerged openstack/liberasurecode master: Use zlib for CRC-32  https://review.openstack.org/45902319:28
*** silor has joined #openstack-swift19:38
claygeverytime I want to write a unittest that rolls over a run_forever method I feel like I have to re-invent a pattern for how to trigger a stop condition... i don't know why after all these years i still don't have an obvious pattern for the "correct" way to test this method...19:42
*** silor has quit IRC19:43
*** silor1 has joined #openstack-swift19:43
claygyeah!  test_auditor does the same thing I was thinking about - raise a "Stop" exception from the sleep call for the run_pause!19:45
*** silor1 is now known as silor19:45
claygok, at least I'm not crazy19:45
claygunless I wrote that test too :\19:45
claygredbo: tell dfg thanks!19:46
timburketdasilva: mind looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459028/ too? may as well fix that compile error!19:47
patchbotpatch 459028 - liberasurecode - Un-inline get/set_metatdata_chksum19:47
redbok19:48
*** silor has quit IRC19:49
*** lucasxu has quit IRC19:50
*** pcaruana has quit IRC19:52
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC19:54
*** xrb has joined #openstack-swift20:06
*** mat128 has quit IRC20:18
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Remove testcase.skip support  https://review.openstack.org/47235120:24
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Use more backends in existing tests  https://review.openstack.org/43821520:24
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Make test format strings consistent with test function names  https://review.openstack.org/43821420:24
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Use preprocessor to build test suites  https://review.openstack.org/43179420:24
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Print test that's going to run *before* running test  https://review.openstack.org/47235220:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift master: Misc doc cleanup  https://review.openstack.org/48307520:27
timburketdasilva: thanks!20:40
tdasilvatimburke: np, great work20:40
openstackgerritMerged openstack/liberasurecode master: Un-inline get/set_metatdata_chksum  https://review.openstack.org/45902820:48
*** MVenesio has quit IRC20:51
*** chlong has quit IRC20:52
timburkewhoo! one giant patch chain down! at least one more to go :-)20:52
notmynameif we want a new version of libec to depend on in swift, we should probably tag it by next week20:57
tdasilvanotmyname: we tagged 1.5.0 couple of weeks ago20:58
notmynameack20:58
tdasilvazaitcev has been working to get rpms built, but i'm not sure about deb packages20:59
notmynamewith the patches landing, I remembered the ML post from earlier today about non-client library releases20:59
tdasilvaonovy: ??? ^^^20:59
timburkenotmyname: idk; i'm not super concerned about it since we haven't heard any rumblings that sound like https://bugs.launchpad.net/liberasurecode/+bug/1666320 -- but at the same time, maybe it'd be better to try to stay ahead of it?20:59
openstackLaunchpad bug 1666320 in liberasurecode "crc32 implementation is schizophrenic" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to Tim Burke (1-tim-z)20:59
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: Add dl to pkg-config metadata  https://review.openstack.org/45898721:05
timburkebetween ^^ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472394/ i think https://github.com/tipabu/erasurecode may actually start to be kinda usable...21:05
patchbotpatch 472394 - liberasurecode - Negative data or parity args are invalid21:05
*** OrionX has quit IRC21:09
*** xrb has quit IRC21:14
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift21:22
claygthis... feels... wrong...21:22
clayg        with mock.patch('swift.obj.reconstructor.time.time',21:22
clayg                        side_effect=[now, later, later]), \21:22
clayg                mock.patch('swift.obj.reconstructor.os.getpid',21:22
clayg                           return_value='pid-2'), \21:22
clayg                mock.patch('swift.obj.reconstructor.sleep',21:22
clayg                           side_effect=[StopForever]), \21:22
clayg                Timeout(.3), quiet_eventlet_exceptions(), \21:22
clayg                self.assertRaises(StopForever):21:22
claygidk21:23
*** oshritf has quit IRC21:29
timburkehmmm... pyeclib is more opinionated about number of parity frags allowed (in particular, requiring >0 instead of just >=0 in https://github.com/openstack/pyeclib/blob/master/pyeclib/ec_iface.py#L167-L171) than libec21:45
timburkeapparently *some* backends support m=0? isa-l is perfectly happy21:45
timburkethe builtin rs-vand segfaults21:45
timburkejerasure either raises an error (for rs vand) or hangs (!?) for rs cauchy21:46
timburkei would've expected an error for our builtin rs vand in https://github.com/openstack/liberasurecode/blob/master/src/erasurecode.c#L266 or around https://github.com/openstack/liberasurecode/blob/master/src/backends/rs_vand/liberasurecode_rs_vand.c#L162-L169 or even way down in https://github.com/openstack/liberasurecode/blob/master/src/builtin/rs_vand/liberasurecode_rs_vand.c#L13521:47
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift22:01
*** klamath has quit IRC22:52
*** itlinux has quit IRC22:58
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift22:59
*** OrionX has joined #openstack-swift23:01
*** JimCheung has quit IRC23:01
*** JimCheung has joined #openstack-swift23:02
*** catintheroof has quit IRC23:03
*** OrionX has quit IRC23:05
*** OrionX has joined #openstack-swift23:16
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:33
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/liberasurecode master: flat_xor_hd: better validate args  https://review.openstack.org/48361023:54
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift23:56
*** OrionX_ has joined #openstack-swift23:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!