Tuesday, 2017-05-23

*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:01
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting00:09
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting00:09
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC00:12
*** felipemonteiro has quit IRC00:13
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC00:16
*** gyee has quit IRC00:22
*** hongbin has quit IRC00:22
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC00:25
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting00:25
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting00:25
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC00:25
*** gcb has quit IRC00:26
*** numans has quit IRC00:27
*** ijw has quit IRC00:28
*** esberglu has quit IRC00:30
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting00:30
*** esberglu has quit IRC00:31
*** ekcs_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:31
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting00:32
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting00:32
*** yamahata has quit IRC00:33
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC00:34
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:37
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting00:40
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC00:44
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** markstur has quit IRC00:59
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting01:02
*** kevinz has joined #openstack-meeting01:05
*** kaisers_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck01:09
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** RuiChen has joined #openstack-meeting01:12
*** kaisers_ has quit IRC01:12
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC01:14
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting01:14
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:20
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC01:20
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:20
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting01:21
*** s3wong has quit IRC01:25
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC01:30
*** yolkfull has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC01:32
*** RuiChen has left #openstack-meeting01:33
*** dprince has quit IRC01:39
*** ijw has quit IRC01:41
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting01:42
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** edmondsw has quit IRC01:45
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:46
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC01:50
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC01:55
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC01:55
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck01:56
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting01:57
*** links has joined #openstack-meeting01:58
*** mriedem_afk is now known as mriedem01:59
*** unicell has quit IRC02:00
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting02:01
*** brault has quit IRC02:03
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting02:04
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting02:08
*** rfolco has quit IRC02:08
*** dprince has quit IRC02:09
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting02:15
*** mtanino has quit IRC02:15
*** bobh has quit IRC02:21
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting02:25
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting02:28
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting02:31
*** tovin07__ has joined #openstack-meeting02:34
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting02:34
*** noslzzp has quit IRC02:37
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC02:37
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting02:38
*** diga has joined #openstack-meeting02:39
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting02:45
*** noslzzp has quit IRC02:46
*** hongbin_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:48
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting02:48
*** lamt has quit IRC02:49
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting02:52
*** Shunli has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** longxiongqiu has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** lakerzhou has joined #openstack-meeting02:54
*** hongbin has quit IRC02:55
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:55
*** hongbin_ has quit IRC02:56
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** Namrata has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** pksingh has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** shubhams has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
hongbin#startmeeting zun03:00
openstackMeeting started Tue May 23 03:00:04 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hongbin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.03:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.03:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: zun)"03:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'zun'03:00
hongbin#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zun#Agenda_for_2017-05-23_0300_UTC Today's agenda03:00
hongbin#topic Roll Call03:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: zun)"03:00
pksinghHello03:00
Shunli:)03:00
NamrataNamrata03:00
shubhamsShubham03:00
mkraiMadhuri Kumari03:00
lakerzhoulakerzhou03:00
*** edmondsw has quit IRC03:01
hongbinthanks for joining pksingh Shunli Namrata shubhams mkrai lakerzhou03:01
hongbinbtw, kevin told me that he cannot join today due to a team lunch03:01
hongbinok, let's get started03:01
hongbin#topic Cinder integration03:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Cinder integration (Meeting topic: zun)"03:01
hongbini am splitting this bp into two03:02
hongbin#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zun/+spec/direct-cinder-integration Direct Cinder integration03:02
hongbin#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zun/+spec/cinder-zun-integration Cinder integration via Fuxi03:02
digaDigambar Patil03:02
*** liuyulong has joined #openstack-meeting03:02
hongbinmy thinking is to have two options when integrating with cinder03:02
hongbinhi diga03:02
digahongbin: hello03:02
hongbin1. direct integrate with cinder03:02
hongbin2. integrate with cinder via fuxi03:03
diga+103:03
hongbinboth options have advantage and disadvantage i think, so i propose to support both03:03
hongbinfor implementaiton, there will be two volume driver in parallel03:03
hongbini will update the spec to reflect this change03:04
Shunli@hongbin, could you explain direct integration with cinder.03:04
hongbinShunli: basically, it means integrate with cinder without fuxi03:04
*** litao__ has joined #openstack-meeting03:04
hongbinShunli: for implementation, i will try to por the nova code to zun as a driver03:04
digahongbin: direct integration with cinder, you mean, what fuxi does, we should implement in Zun03:04
Shunlidirect integration is for container in vm?03:05
hongbindiga: direct integration means a light-weight alternative to fuxi03:05
digahongbin: okay03:05
hongbinShunli: for container in vm/baremetal03:05
Shunliok03:06
hongbini propose this mainly for decoupling the hard dependency on fuxi03:06
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
hongbinthese two efforts could be implemented in parallel03:06
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
hongbini will drive the cinder one, i assume diga will still drive the fuxi one?03:07
pksinghhongbin: what do you mean by light weight alternative in detail?03:07
hongbinpksingh: basically, i mean operations can install zun without installing fuxi03:07
pksinghhongbin: so replicating fuxi code in zun?03:08
hongbinpksingh: however, could leverage the built-in cinder driver to get data volume from cinder03:08
hongbinpksingh: there will be some amount of dupication, yes03:08
pksinghhongbin: you are going to run that driver as daemon?03:08
hongbinpksingh: i will make the dupication as minimual as possible03:08
*** diga_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:08
ShunliI guess mainly duplicate on the docker volume driver part03:09
diga_sorry got disconnected03:09
hongbinyes, fuxi has a lot of code, the duplication is the cinder/os-bridge part03:09
hongbinos-brick03:09
hongbinpksingh: don't get your last question03:10
*** diga has quit IRC03:10
pksinghhongbin: how will docker communicate to this driver?03:10
*** bobh has quit IRC03:10
hongbinpksingh: i didn't think of it in details, but i think docker won't talk to anything in that option03:11
*** baoli has quit IRC03:11
pksinghhongbin: ok03:12
hongbinpksingh: not sure if it is possible, but what i think of is directly using os-brick library to mount volume to host, and point docker to use that volume03:12
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting03:12
pksinghhongbin: ok03:12
hongbinpksingh: do you think it is a good idea? or a bad idea?03:13
pksinghhongbin: i need to look into this03:13
diga_but hongbin if there is os-brick integration with fuxi, then we can have those calls implemented in fuxi implementation03:13
hongbinok, i will update hte existing spec for that03:14
hongbindiga_: it is already implemented in fuxi03:14
hongbindiga_: the goal is provide an alternative to fuxi03:14
diga_hongbin: then in that case, its just enablement of it03:14
lakerzhouHongbin, I want to confirm a high-level volume use case for container. Volume attached to container should be ephemeral, right?03:15
diga_hongbin: yeah, I understand, but then in cinder also, we are going to implement os-brick ?03:15
hongbinlakerzhou: i guess it is03:15
lakerzhouhongbin, thanks for clarify.03:17
*** ijw has quit IRC03:17
hongbinok, folks, i will leave further discussion to reviews of the spec that i am going to submit03:17
diga_hongbin: I hv some thoughts on "directly integrating with cinder", will talk to you separately after this call03:18
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting03:18
hongbindiga_: ack03:18
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC03:18
hongbin#topic Introduce container composition03:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Introduce container composition (Meeting topic: zun)"03:18
hongbin#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437759/ The design spec03:18
hongbinkevinz is not here today, i will drive this session03:19
hongbini saw kevinz pushed a spec for review03:19
*** dbecker has quit IRC03:19
hongbinwould love your feedback there :)03:19
hongbini don't have anything else on this topic03:20
hongbinany comment?03:20
*** zsli_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:20
pksinghi will look into it this week, i think most of the comments has been resolved03:20
hongbinpksingh: ack03:20
hongbinok, next topic03:21
hongbin#topic Support floating IP association (pksingh)03:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Support floating IP association (pksingh) (Meeting topic: zun)"03:21
hongbin#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zun/+spec/floating-ip-association03:21
hongbinpksingh: ^^03:21
pksinghhongbin: thanks03:21
*** noslzzp has quit IRC03:21
pksinghactually we want to attach the floating IP to our containers03:22
pksinghi was thinking to implement a REST api for this in zun03:22
*** Shunli has quit IRC03:22
pksinghbut later came to know nova has deprecated such api in their code03:22
pksinghthey are saying to use neutron api for this03:22
zsli_But seems nova's floating ip bind is implemented in neutron.03:23
pksinghbecause nova api is just a proxy to neutron api03:23
pksinghso what do you guys think, should we implement in zun or follow same as nova03:23
mkraiUse neutron API03:23
pksinghzsli_: we are using neutron networking in zun03:24
lakerzhou+1 Use neutron API03:24
*** zsli_ is now known as Shunli03:24
Shunli@pksingh, yes.03:24
pksinghShunli: what do you thunk?03:24
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting03:25
ShunliNot sure neutron api can satisfy zun floating ip binding requirements03:25
pksinghShunli: i was thinking to attach floating ip to fixed address port of the container03:26
*** annabelleB has quit IRC03:26
pksinghShunli: i think nova does the same thing03:26
Shunli@pksingh, not go through the related code in detail. Maybe we can discuss it when code review.03:27
Shunli+1 for use neutron api.03:27
pksinghso according to your views, we should not implement it in zun, instead of this client use neutron api to assign floating IPs03:28
hongbin+103:28
*** julim has quit IRC03:29
mkraiBut we should document it in Zun03:29
pksinghok thanks guys, then we dont need to do anything in this BP03:29
Shunli@pksingh, yes. I guess nova use neutron api has some reason.03:29
hongbinpksingh: i guess the cli still need some work?03:29
pksinghhongbin: so you are saying we need to add cli for this?03:30
hongbinpksingh: in addition, the container has an 'addresses' fields, right now, it only shows the fixed_ip, would be better to show the floating ip as well03:30
pksinghuser->cli->neutron-api?03:30
*** shubhams has quit IRC03:30
hongbinpksingh: if nova does it, then yes, but i haven't gave it more thoughts03:31
*** rbudden has quit IRC03:31
pksinghhongbin: yes, that is a valid point to show the floating IP and store in the database, do we need to add periodic task for this03:31
pksinghhongbin: nova i think has deprecated that from client side too,03:32
*** dbecker has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
hongbinpksingh: i see03:32
pksinghhongbin: ok , i will give it more thoughts, how we can make it better03:33
hongbinpksingh: sorry, i need to leave for about 5 minutes03:33
hongbinpksingh: could you chair this meeting for me?03:33
pksinghnever done this, i think mkrai can do this03:34
hongbinfolks, sorry about that03:34
pksinghmkrai: please go ahead03:34
mkraisure03:35
*** haleyb has quit IRC03:35
mkraipksingh: Do you have anything more to discuss on this?03:35
pksinghmkrai: no03:36
*** csomerville has quit IRC03:36
mkraiok I will move to next topic03:36
mkrai#topic Add Zun Resources to Heat (Namrata)03:36
mkraiNamrata: ^03:36
NamrataHi03:36
Namratahttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/437810/03:37
NamrataI have updated the patch and its up for review03:37
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting03:37
mkraiAre there any remaining patch for this work?03:37
Namrataafter completion of Add container to zun resources heat BP will be completed03:38
Shunlione comments inline. I guess we should wait when containing is running, then the stack create complete.03:38
mkraiGreat. Thanks Namrata for working on this.03:39
hongbinback03:39
NamrataThanks Shunli I will see the inlined comments03:39
mkraiShunli: I think the patch has a check for waiting for container status03:39
mkraito be in one of the completion state i.e Running, failed etc03:39
mkraiBut I need to check more in detail.03:39
Shunli@mkrai, yes. But when container is in creating state03:39
mkraihongbin: Ok chair is your's now :)03:40
Shunlicheck_complete returned True.03:40
hongbinmkrai: ack03:40
mkraiShunli: I see that is an issue03:40
mkraiI will review the patch today03:40
*** lamt has quit IRC03:41
hongbinShunli: sorry , i am catching up your comment03:41
mkraiShunli: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/437810/7/heat/engine/resources/openstack/zun/container.py L14303:41
mkraiIt seems it is returning False in Creating state03:41
mkraiSo it is correct03:41
Shunli@mkrai, sorry. I mean in created state, we still should not return true03:42
*** liuyulong has quit IRC03:42
hongbinShunli: i see03:42
Shunli@mkrai, only when container is running state, we can return true.03:42
hongbinShunli: i think there are some cases that the container might exist right away after03:43
hongbinShunli: for example, if hte command is "echo hello" or something, the contianer will exit right after03:43
hongbinShunli: ok, never mind, in that case, the container will be on stopped state03:44
Shunli@hongin, ah ,you are right. It's a bit complicate.03:44
hongbinShunli: then, i agree with you, it should return false on 'created'03:45
Shunli@hongbin, yeah.03:45
mkraihongbin: Namrata How do you think about adding a doc in Zun about our Heat resource?03:45
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting03:46
hongbinit looks Namrata is away03:47
NamrataI will add the doc for the same03:47
hongbin:)03:47
mkraiWe can use the example for Zun demo in Boston summit :)03:48
hongbinNamrata: do you see the comment from Shunli about the return value on 'Created' ?03:48
Namratasounds good03:48
Namratahongbin Yes I have seen that03:48
hongbinNamrata: ok03:49
NamrataIt should not be true03:49
hongbinok03:50
Namrataok03:50
hongbinthanks Namrata03:50
hongbinnext topic03:50
Namratathanks mkrai hongbin03:50
*** mriedem has quit IRC03:50
hongbin#topic Others03:50
*** openstack changes topic to "Others (Meeting topic: zun)"03:50
Namratathanks shunli03:50
*** wanghao has quit IRC03:50
hongbin#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/zun-nfv-use-cases NFV use cases03:50
hongbini will pause for a few seconds for everyone to review hte etherpad03:51
*** abhishek_k has joined #openstack-meeting03:51
hongbinthis etherpad is based on an initial discussion between me and lakerzhou03:51
hongbinplease feel free to write your inputs to there if any03:52
pksingh'it should return false on 'created'', why it should return False,03:52
hongbinpksingh: because the heat template is actually "run" the container03:54
hongbinpksingh: if the command is run, it will either become "Running" or "Stopped"03:54
hongbinpksingh: if it is "Created", it will be considered as unstable state03:55
pksinghhongbin: its not for create?03:55
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting03:55
hongbinpksingh: if it is created, it will turn to "Running" or "Stopped" later03:55
mkraiFor create also, the final completion state is Stopped or Running03:55
pksinghhongbin: means it is for 'zun run ' but not for 'zun create'03:56
*** samP has joined #openstack-meeting03:56
pksinghmkrai: i think we modified it, 'zun create' moves to 'Created' state, i think?03:56
hongbinpksingh: the heat template will call 'zun run'03:56
pksinghhongbin: ok then no issues03:56
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting03:56
hongbinpksingh: ack03:57
hongbinok, we are almost running out of time03:57
hongbin#topic Open Discussion03:57
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: zun)"03:57
hongbinany last minute question/comment?03:58
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:58
hongbinlakerzhou: i have a question for you (written in the etherpad)03:58
lakerzhouok03:59
lakerzhouI will take a look later03:59
hongbinlakerzhou: thx03:59
lakerzhounp03:59
hongbinok, all, thanks for joining the meeting03:59
*** mickeys has quit IRC03:59
hongbinlet's continue the discussion at hte openstack-zun channel03:59
hongbin#endmeeting03:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"03:59
openstackMeeting ended Tue May 23 03:59:46 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)03:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zun/2017/zun.2017-05-23-03.00.html03:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zun/2017/zun.2017-05-23-03.00.txt03:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zun/2017/zun.2017-05-23-03.00.log.html03:59
*** wanghao has quit IRC03:59
samPThanks Zun team.....:)03:59
samPHi all for Masakari..o/04:00
Dinesh_BhorHI04:00
*** rkmrHonjo has joined #openstack-meeting04:00
samP#startmeeting masakari04:00
openstackMeeting started Tue May 23 04:00:34 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is samP. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.04:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.04:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: masakari)"04:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'masakari'04:00
samPHi all..o/04:00
rkmrHonjohi04:00
Dinesh_BhorHi all04:00
*** tovin07__ has quit IRC04:00
samPDinesh_Bhor: hi04:00
samPrkmrHonjo: hi04:00
abhishek_ko/04:01
samPabhishek_k: hi04:01
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC04:01
abhishek_ksamP: hi04:01
samPLets start with bugs..04:01
*** sagara has joined #openstack-meeting04:01
samP#topic Critical Bugs04:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Critical Bugs (Meeting topic: masakari)"04:01
sagaraHi04:01
abhishek_kjust to inform all Tushar san will not be able to join today's meeting04:01
*** Namrata has quit IRC04:02
samPabhishek_k: thanks...04:02
Dinesh_Bhor#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/masakari/+bug/169076804:02
openstackLaunchpad bug 1690768 in masakari "Notification status will be "error" if recovered instance was "resized"." [High,New] - Assigned to Dinesh Bhor (dinesh-bhor)04:02
samPDinesh_Bhor: yes..04:02
samPthat is one of the bugs..04:02
samPwe have several reports with same topic04:03
samPWhich is, how to rescue VM with state= {'shelved', 'paused' , 'rescued', etc...}04:04
abhishek_ksamP: we can reset them to error state and then they will be evacuated04:04
abhishek_ksamP: but the problem is do we need to maintain it's state when it will be evacuated because it will be overhead04:05
*** caowei has quit IRC04:05
samPabhishek_k: sure, in order to evacuate we have to set the state=error04:05
samPabhishek_k: That is my point, do we hvae to put it back to same state as before...?04:06
abhishek_ksamP: for example if instance is shelved then after evacuating it will be active on target host, then if we need to maintain previous state then we need to make additional call to shelve it again04:06
samP#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/masakari/+bug/1690768/comments/504:06
openstackLaunchpad bug 1690768 in masakari "Notification status will be "error" if recovered instance was "resized"." [High,New] - Assigned to Dinesh Bhor (dinesh-bhor)04:06
*** lakerzhou has quit IRC04:07
abhishek_ksamP: right04:07
samPabhishek_k: in that case, what we want is not to start it after evacaute.04:08
abhishek_ksamP: IMO then for all such cases we can make additional call to stop that instance, is it sounds good?04:08
samPHowever, with current evacuate, error instancess will be active after evacuate.04:08
abhishek_ksamP: right04:09
samPabhishek_k: In that case, instance will be at active state till we make it stop via API, right?04:09
abhishek_ksamP: yesz04:10
abhishek_ks/yesz/yes04:10
*** pksingh has quit IRC04:10
samPfor some apps, that may acceptable. But not all of the04:10
samPs/the/them04:11
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC04:11
abhishek_ksamP: imo if we can set those instances to error state then stop them before evacuating04:12
*** fnaval has quit IRC04:12
samPabhishek_k: can we use reset state API to stop them?04:12
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
abhishek_ksamP: with reset we can only set to error or active04:13
samPabhishek_k: yes, same understanding here04:13
samPso, how can we set it to stop before evacuate?..04:14
abhishek_ksamP: after reseting the instance to error state we can call stop api (need to check though)04:14
*** david-lyle has quit IRC04:14
samPI dont think simply sotp API is gonna work, because nova-compute is not there,...( agree: need to check)04:15
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:15
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting04:15
abhishek_ksamP: you are right04:16
samPrkmrHonjo: You said you have some doc for Masakri recovery patterns?04:16
samPabhishek_k: lets check it and comment to https://bugs.launchpad.net/masakari/+bug/169076804:16
openstackLaunchpad bug 1690768 in masakari "Notification status will be "error" if recovered instance was "resized"." [High,New] - Assigned to Dinesh Bhor (dinesh-bhor)04:16
abhishek_ksamP: may be before disabling the compute node we can do this stuff (it requires rearranging current tasks)04:17
abhishek_ksamP: ok04:17
*** fnaval has quit IRC04:17
samPabhishek_k: the probelm is compute-node is not there, disabling is db thing anb stop is need to done in virt04:17
samPabhishek_k: anyway let check that...04:18
abhishek_ksamP: correct04:18
*** bobh has quit IRC04:18
abhishek_ksamP: instance remains in powering-off state if compute node is not there04:19
samPif Im remember correctly, rkmrHonjo told me that he have some doc about how masakari react to each state of VMs.04:20
samP If rkmrHonjo can contrubute that do to comunity, that would be really nice..04:20
samPabhishek_k: great..04:20
*** hongbin has quit IRC04:20
rkmrHonjosamP: OK, I'll contribute it.04:20
samPrkmrHonjo: thank you.04:20
Dinesh_BhorrkmrHonjo: thanks04:21
rkmrHonjosamP: Can I put it in document directory of masakari repository?04:21
samPabhishek_k: BTW, powering-off is the power state, right?04:21
abhishek_ksamP: yes04:21
abhishek_ksamP: vm state remains as it is04:22
*** Apoorva has quit IRC04:22
Dinesh_Bhorvm_state is previous state, task_state is powering-off, power_state is 104:23
*** fzdarsky_ has quit IRC04:23
*** pksingh has joined #openstack-meeting04:23
*** bobmel has quit IRC04:24
*** bobmel_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:24
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:24
samPrkmrHonjo: sure, you may put them under, doc/masakari_features/ or some suitable name04:25
samPsorry for delay.. cut off from the net...;)04:25
rkmrHonjosamP: thanks. I get it.04:25
*** markstur has quit IRC04:26
samPDinesh_Bhor: abhishek_k , thanks... possiable states are state=error and tast_state=pwertin-off, power_state=1 ?04:27
abhishek_ksamP:need to check what is power_state = 1 means04:28
*** pksingh has quit IRC04:28
samPI think we still have to check whether we can set the ^^above VMs state can set to STOP.04:28
samPabhishek_k: sure, lets check them.04:28
abhishek_ksamP: yes04:28
samPcould some one take a quick check and update the https://bugs.launchpad.net/masakari/+bug/1690768?04:29
openstackLaunchpad bug 1690768 in masakari "Notification status will be "error" if recovered instance was "resized"." [High,New] - Assigned to Dinesh Bhor (dinesh-bhor)04:29
Dinesh_BhorI am working on this04:30
samPDinesh_Bhor: thank you...04:31
Dinesh_Bhorwill push patch soon04:31
rkmrHonjoDinesh_Bhor: Thanks.04:31
samPDinesh_Bhor: thanks...04:31
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting04:31
samPOK then, are there other Bugs to discuss?04:31
Dinesh_BhorOne more question: is the billing happens for 'shelved' instance?04:32
*** pksingh has joined #openstack-meeting04:32
Dinesh_BhorI mean instance releases resources when in 'shelved' state so will user get charged for those resources?04:32
samPDinesh_Bhor: if( shelved_offload_time != 0) causes?04:33
Dinesh_Bhorwhen shelved_offload_time = -104:33
samPDinesh_Bhor: it depends, but normally user will not get charged for shelved VMs.04:34
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting04:34
abhishek_ksamP: hmm, then after evacaution if instance goes to active state then user will be charged in this case04:34
*** LanceHaig has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
samPabhishek_k: yes..04:35
samPthasz why I prefer to error or (stop?) state after rescue04:35
abhishek_ksamP: even instance is stopped, resources will be consumed right?04:36
samPabhishek_k: right04:36
samPabhishek_k: but that depends on how you charge..04:37
abhishek_ksamP: ok04:37
Dinesh_BhorsamP: ok, thanks04:37
abhishek_ksamP: let me see how we can tackle this04:37
samPabhishek_k: sure, let's discuss further on https://bugs.launchpad.net/masakari/+bug/169076804:38
openstackLaunchpad bug 1690768 in masakari "Notification status will be "error" if recovered instance was "resized"." [High,New] - Assigned to Dinesh Bhor (dinesh-bhor)04:38
samPAny other Bugs?04:38
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC04:38
abhishek_ksamP: no04:39
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting04:39
samPabhishek_k: thanks04:39
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting04:39
abhishek_ksamP: I have added on point but we can discuss that after PIKE work items discussion04:40
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC04:40
*** armax has quit IRC04:40
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting04:40
samPabhishek_k: sure.. we will04:40
samP#topic Discussion points04:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Discussion points (Meeting topic: masakari)"04:40
samPI have added some comments for recovery method customization04:41
samPabhishek_k: please check them04:41
abhishek_ksamP: I have checked them, will push new specs soon04:41
abhishek_ksamP: I have added some points in the etherpad which will point out problems in adding mistral driver in masakari04:41
samPabhishek_k: thanks04:41
abhishek_ksamP: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/masakari-recovery-method-customization04:41
abhishek_k#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/masakari-recovery-method-customization04:41
samPabhishek_k: thanks...I will take a look and if it is possible lets put them in the spec.04:43
abhishek_kif anyone has any suggestion for those or identifies anyother problem then please update it in the etherpad04:43
abhishek_ksamP: sure, I will04:43
samP#action ALL review and put your comments for https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/masakari-recovery-method-customization04:44
samPabhishek_k: thank you.04:44
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting04:44
samPUpdate for Pike work Items:04:44
samPwe gonnd skip "Improve the masakari-hostmonitor's implementation about detecting split-brain", because no better idea than current one04:45
rkmrHonjosamP: yes, I'd like to skip it. sorry.04:46
Dinesh_Bhorok,04:46
samPrkmrHonjo: NP, lets skip it in pike04:46
rkmrHonjothanks.04:47
samPOther than that, on much update on pike work items.04:47
samPs/on much/no much/04:47
samPLets move to abhishek_k's item.04:48
abhishek_kyes04:48
samP#topic Host recovery flow, after evacuation instance is deleted then notification will be marked as failure04:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Host recovery flow, after evacuation instance is deleted then notification will be marked as failure (Meeting topic: masakari)"04:48
samPabhishek_k: could you please explain this a bit?04:48
abhishek_ksuppose we are having 1000 instances on host A which is failed04:49
*** edmondsw has quit IRC04:49
abhishek_kand we are evacuating those instances to host B04:49
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
abhishek_kas per current implementation, evacuation task will evacuate all 1000 instances and then pass control to confirm evacuation task04:49
abhishek_kso before confirming the evacuation is done if user deletes or performs any other opertation such as stop, shelved etc then it will fail to confirm that evacuation is done for that instance and it will mark that notification as error04:51
samPabhishek_k: sould we confirm them in more atomic level? or lock the instaces?04:52
abhishek_ksamP: if we lock that instance then till evacuation confirmation user will not be able to perform any action04:53
samPabhishek_k: correct04:53
abhishek_ksamP: in production there might be mre than 10000 of instances so locking will not be efficient04:53
abhishek_ks/mre/more04:54
samPabhishek_k: agree04:54
rkmrHonjoor, should we change notification status to ignore if instance is changed to the status other than expected?04:54
rkmrHonjoI afraid the race condition between masakari's operation and user's operation.04:55
abhishek_krkmrHonjo: there might be the case that while evacuating the instance goes to error state and if we set the notification to ignore then periodic task will not pick that notification for processing04:56
samPabhishek_k: we can break down the confirm evacuateion to per VM and lock it till Masakari confirm ti.04:56
abhishek_kone suggestion is can we cobmine evacuate and confirm evacuate task04:56
abhishek_ksamP: yes, I was saying same thing04:57
samPabhishek_k: yep..04:57
abhishek_ksamP: we will identify pros and cons for this and let you know04:57
samPabhishek_k: sure, please consider the race condition between masakari's operation and user's operation too04:58
samPwe are running out of time...04:58
abhishek_ksamP: yes04:58
rkmrHonjoabhishek_k: thanks.04:58
samPNo update from other topicd04:58
samPs/topicd/topics04:59
samP#topic AOB04:59
*** openstack changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: masakari)"04:59
abhishek_krkmrHonjo: no problem04:59
samPPlease bring other topics to #openstack-masakari or openstack-dev ML with [masakari]04:59
abhishek_kyes04:59
samPlets end the meeting...05:00
abhishek_kthank you05:00
samPthank you all ...05:00
samP#endmeeting05:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"05:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue May 23 05:00:16 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)05:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/masakari/2017/masakari.2017-05-23-04.00.html05:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/masakari/2017/masakari.2017-05-23-04.00.txt05:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/masakari/2017/masakari.2017-05-23-04.00.log.html05:00
sagarathank you05:00
rkmrHonjothank you all, bye.05:01
*** rkmrHonjo has quit IRC05:01
*** diga_ has quit IRC05:02
*** kaisers_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:04
*** caowei has quit IRC05:04
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** sagara has quit IRC05:11
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC05:14
*** pksingh has quit IRC05:19
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting05:20
*** LanceHaig has quit IRC05:21
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting05:21
*** pksingh has joined #openstack-meeting05:28
*** pksingh has quit IRC05:28
*** Altair_Baltair has joined #openstack-meeting05:31
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting05:31
*** ltomasbo|away is now known as ltomasbo05:32
*** gyee has quit IRC05:32
*** bkopilov__ has quit IRC05:34
*** gongysh has quit IRC05:34
*** Altair_Baltair has left #openstack-meeting05:34
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** Shunli has left #openstack-meeting05:35
*** markstur has quit IRC05:35
*** adisky_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** mtreinish has quit IRC05:38
*** mickeys has quit IRC05:40
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting05:47
*** ayogi has joined #openstack-meeting05:51
*** ykatabam has quit IRC05:51
*** ayogi has quit IRC05:52
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:52
*** caowei has quit IRC05:52
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting05:52
*** LanceHaig has joined #openstack-meeting05:53
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting06:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC06:01
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting06:13
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting06:15
*** msimonin has quit IRC06:16
*** fnaval has quit IRC06:17
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting06:18
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC06:18
*** RuiChen has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting06:24
*** emagana has quit IRC06:24
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting06:26
*** rbartal has joined #openstack-meeting06:26
*** ijw has quit IRC06:28
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting06:32
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting06:33
*** samP has quit IRC06:35
*** edmondsw has quit IRC06:37
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-meeting06:39
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting06:41
*** pnavarro has quit IRC06:41
*** dmacpher has quit IRC06:42
*** mickeys has quit IRC06:45
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting06:47
*** lamt has quit IRC06:48
*** arnewiebalck__ has quit IRC06:49
*** abhishek_k has quit IRC06:51
*** arnewiebalck__ has joined #openstack-meeting06:52
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting06:57
*** wanghao has quit IRC07:02
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting07:03
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting07:10
*** rcernin has quit IRC07:16
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** unicell has joined #openstack-meeting07:24
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC07:25
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
*** kevinz has quit IRC07:27
*** kevinz has joined #openstack-meeting07:28
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting07:28
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting07:29
*** clarkb has quit IRC07:30
*** clarkb has joined #openstack-meeting07:30
*** dinghh has joined #openstack-meeting07:32
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC07:34
*** alexyang has joined #openstack-meeting07:35
*** abalutoiu__ has quit IRC07:40
*** ltomasbo is now known as ltomasbo|away07:43
*** prateek_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:46
*** prateek has quit IRC07:48
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting07:53
*** prateek__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:57
*** unicell has quit IRC07:58
*** prateek_ has quit IRC07:59
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
*** mickeys has quit IRC08:04
*** brault has quit IRC08:05
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting08:17
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting08:17
*** fnaval has quit IRC08:19
*** RuiChen has quit IRC08:19
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting08:20
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:21
*** rossella__ has quit IRC08:23
*** edmondsw has quit IRC08:25
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting08:26
*** caowei has quit IRC08:32
*** rossella_ has quit IRC08:32
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC08:35
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting08:36
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting08:36
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC08:37
*** alexyang has quit IRC08:37
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting08:37
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting08:38
*** emagana has quit IRC08:41
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC08:41
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** baoli has quit IRC08:42
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
*** ltomasbo|away is now known as ltomasbo08:44
*** masayukig[m] has quit IRC08:46
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC08:46
*** mkrai has quit IRC08:46
*** voxelblob[m] has quit IRC08:46
*** imcsk8 has quit IRC08:46
*** imcsk8_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC08:47
*** loquacity has quit IRC08:48
*** raj_sing- has quit IRC08:48
*** sambetts|afk has quit IRC08:48
*** NikitaKonovalov has quit IRC08:48
*** amotoki has quit IRC08:49
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting08:49
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** masayukig[m] has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** raj_singh has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
*** NikitaKonovalov has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
*** loquacities has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
*** sambetts_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:52
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC08:55
*** jiaopengju has joined #openstack-meeting08:56
*** Kevin_Zheng has quit IRC08:56
yuval#startmeeting karbor09:00
openstackMeeting started Tue May 23 09:00:13 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yuval. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.09:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.09:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: karbor)"09:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'karbor'09:00
yuvalHello, and welcome to Karbor's weekly meeting!09:00
*** yedongcan has joined #openstack-meeting09:00
chenyinghi09:01
yuvalhey chenying09:01
chenyingyedongcan has a topic about cross sites backup and restores.09:02
zhonghuahi09:02
*** zengchen has joined #openstack-meeting09:02
jiaopengjuhi09:02
yedongcanhi09:02
zengchenhello09:02
yuval#info chenying zhonghua jiaopengju yedongcan zengchen in meeting09:02
yuval#topic Data backup and restore between two region sites09:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Data backup and restore between two region sites (Meeting topic: karbor)"09:02
yuvalyedongcan: ?09:04
chenyingyedongcan  Can you give more detail about this usecase. We discuss it yestoday.09:04
*** electrofelix has joined #openstack-meeting09:04
*** aarefiev_afk is now known as aarefiev09:04
yedongcanok09:04
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
yedongcanwe have a customer, will build two datacenters. Need to implement RD in those datacenters.09:05
*** r-mibu has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
zhonghuaDR?09:06
yedongcansorry, DR.09:06
zhonghua:)09:06
chenyingdisaster recovery09:06
yedongcanwe may use keystone federation09:07
chenyingThere are two openstack cloud in these two datacenters?09:07
yedongcanchenying: yes09:07
yuvalyedongcan: as we spoke in karbor channel, if karbor's bank is shared between the providers in the two datacenters, this is possible09:07
yedongcanyuval: ok, just some question, which data will be backup?09:08
yuvalyedongcan: karbor protect->restore flow: you create a plan, consisting of a pre-configured provider and the list of resources you would like to protect. Then you call protect on the plan, and a checkpoint is created. Then you restore the checkpoint in the second site09:09
*** mickeys_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:09
*** mickeys has quit IRC09:09
yuvalyedongcan: so you can select any resource out of: server, network, volume, image, etc09:10
*** zhangjl has joined #openstack-meeting09:10
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** mkrai has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** voxelblob[m] has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** mickeys_ has quit IRC09:11
chenyingyuval The bank is a concept of karbor. I care about that using the same bank backend (swift or ceph), Can the user access the data in two regions? The ceph or the ceph deployed in two regions(datacenters)09:11
yedongcanyuval: ok, how does the network build in another site?09:12
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting09:13
yuvalyedongcan: networks, subnets, ports are recreated on the target. Restore is parameterized, so addresses can be changed09:13
*** shintaro has joined #openstack-meeting09:13
yedongcanyuval, you mean just rebuild data in db?09:15
yuvalyedongcan: which db?09:15
yedongcanyuval: neutron db09:15
yuvalyedongcan: new network, subnets, and ports are created, so eventually new records enter the neutron db09:16
yedongcanyuval: and then neutron agent will sync data from neutron db, then build the virtual network device, flows and so on?09:16
chenyingyedongcan rebuild new neutron resources in neutron, not only the data in db.09:16
yuvalyedongcan: karbor doesn't care about neutron internal implementation, it uses the neutron api to recreate the resources09:17
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC09:18
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting09:18
yedongcanyuval: ok, If a user have a public ip for business, so the public ip will also changed?09:19
yuvalyedongcan: that's where parameterized restore fits in - you state that information when restoring09:20
chenyingyedongcan It depend on the the  parameter of restore, user can use the some public ip in the backup data, or using a new ip in the new sites.09:23
*** sambetts_ is now known as sambetts09:24
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting09:24
yedongcanyuval, chenying: I'm not sure about it , we map public ip and fixed ip in neutron, fixed ip had changed, so the mapping will invalid.09:24
*** zhangjl has quit IRC09:25
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting09:25
*** zhangjl has joined #openstack-meeting09:26
chenyingIt means that we new build a new mapping about public ip and fixed ip in new site's neutron09:28
chenyings/new/need09:28
yedongcanchenying: yes09:29
chenyingI thenk that this need be considered in restoration of the new site.09:30
yuvalchenying: I agree09:31
chenyingas i talke before, The bank is a concept of karbor. I care about that using the same bank backend (swift or ceph), Can the user access the data in two regions? The ceph or the ceph deployed in two regions(datacenters)09:31
*** powerd has joined #openstack-meeting09:33
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC09:33
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
yedongcanchenying: I'll have a quick confirm09:35
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC09:36
yuvalyedongcan: anything else on this topic?09:37
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting09:37
chenyingping jiaopengju09:37
yedongcanyuval: nothing, thanks.09:38
jiaopengjuhi09:38
yuval#topic Open Discussion09:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: karbor)"09:38
yuvalhey jiaopengju09:38
chenyingyuval Last time, we discuss the solution about file backup in karbor without agent.09:38
chenyingwe are thinking about using rclone in vm to backup the file.09:39
chenyingjiaopengju did a test about rclone.09:40
yuvalchenying: and?09:41
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC09:41
chenyingSo Yuval, Do you think that introduce a new tool like rclone in vm to backup file is a good choice in this use case?09:41
*** yolkfull has quit IRC09:42
*** yolkfull has joined #openstack-meeting09:43
yuvalchenying: I think that file backup is probably not the solution for applications on the cloud09:43
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting09:43
yuvalchenying: specifically rclone - where will rclone copy the data to?09:44
chenyingIt mean that the plugin need a ssh connection to access the vm.09:44
chenyingyuval: reclone the swift or ceph  the bank of karbor.09:44
yuvalchenying: what if the vm doesn't have an ssh service running?09:45
yuvalchenying: but the bank is an abstraction, if you rclone to the bank, you broke the abstraction09:45
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC09:45
chenyingThe original requirement is proposed by jiaopengju. So what's your oppion about this solution using ssh not agent.09:46
*** shintaro has quit IRC09:46
yuvalchenying: It is ok, for some use cases09:46
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting09:46
chenyingyuval: the bank has create a correct section for the file backup, using rclone backup the file section of bank.09:48
jiaopengjuI think we should consider many more scenes, such as users have changed their ssh port, or the vm have no ssh service, etc09:49
yuvalchenying: the bank is an abstraction, it can be swift, ceph, s3, file system, database, or a proprietary data store09:49
yuvalchenying: also, exposing details of the bank to the protection plugin is a leaky abstraction09:49
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC09:50
chenyingyuval So the file backup plugin only need call the cmd in vm, don't need use the bank API?  just pass the backend config of bank to vm using ssh09:51
yuvalchenying: it doesn't have to be a backend config of the bank, but yes09:52
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC09:52
chenyingjiaopengju care about that we may not thinking carefully about this file backup solution.09:54
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC09:55
yuvalUntil now, nobody raised that09:55
*** Cibo_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
yuvaljiaopengju: are you here?09:55
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC09:55
jiaopengjuyes09:56
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
chenyingjiaopengju  Do you want to write this bp about this file backup solution? So we can discuss more detail or scenes in the bp's patch.09:56
yuvalchenying: good idea09:56
jiaopengjuI would like do09:56
chenyingjiaopengju you can propose the scenes you care about.09:57
yuvalgreat09:57
jiaopengjuok09:57
yuvalwith that, I'll end the meeting as we are out of time09:57
chenyingOK09:57
yuvalthanks for attending09:57
yuval#endmeeting09:57
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"09:57
openstackMeeting ended Tue May 23 09:57:55 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:57
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/karbor/2017/karbor.2017-05-23-09.00.html09:57
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/karbor/2017/karbor.2017-05-23-09.00.txt09:57
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/karbor/2017/karbor.2017-05-23-09.00.log.html09:58
jiaopengjuthe network between karbor node and vm node09:58
*** zhangjl has left #openstack-meeting10:01
*** jiaopengju has quit IRC10:01
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting10:01
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting10:03
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting10:03
*** Cibo_ has quit IRC10:04
*** fzdarsky_ is now known as fzdarsky|lunch10:05
*** rossella_ has quit IRC10:05
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting10:09
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC10:10
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting10:11
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC10:11
*** yogesh_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:12
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting10:12
*** edmondsw has quit IRC10:13
*** e0ne has quit IRC10:14
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC10:14
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting10:14
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting10:15
*** mickeys has quit IRC10:18
*** fnaval has quit IRC10:19
*** lpetrut has quit IRC10:22
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting10:22
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting10:25
*** lamt has quit IRC10:25
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:25
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** caowei has quit IRC10:28
*** smili has quit IRC10:29
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting10:32
*** sridharg has quit IRC10:34
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting10:35
*** gongysh has quit IRC10:36
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting10:40
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC10:40
*** kevinz has quit IRC10:40
*** askb has quit IRC10:48
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting10:49
*** epico has quit IRC10:52
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:53
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting10:54
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC10:55
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting10:56
*** brault has quit IRC10:56
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting10:57
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting10:57
*** fzdarsky|lunch is now known as fzdarsky11:03
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting11:05
*** yolkfull has quit IRC11:05
*** rbudden has joined #openstack-meeting11:13
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting11:14
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:17
*** mickeys has quit IRC11:19
*** ralonsoh_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:32
*** ralonsoh_ has quit IRC11:32
*** gouthamr_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:35
*** yedongcan has left #openstack-meeting11:37
*** yogesh_ has quit IRC11:39
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting11:42
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting11:48
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:52
*** litao__ has quit IRC11:53
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC11:59
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:00
*** Kevin_Zheng has joined #openstack-meeting12:01
*** gouthamr_ has quit IRC12:02
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC12:02
*** rossella_ has quit IRC12:02
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:04
*** trinaths has quit IRC12:05
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC12:08
*** masayukig[m] has quit IRC12:09
*** mattoliverau has quit IRC12:09
*** mkrai has quit IRC12:09
*** voxelblob[m] has quit IRC12:09
*** rmk has quit IRC12:11
*** mrunge has quit IRC12:11
*** dgonzalez has quit IRC12:12
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** rmk has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** rmk has quit IRC12:14
*** rmk has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** dgonzalez has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting12:15
*** masayukig[m] has joined #openstack-meeting12:15
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting12:15
*** lamt has quit IRC12:18
*** mickeys has quit IRC12:19
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting12:19
*** fnaval has quit IRC12:20
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting12:21
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting12:23
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** edmondsw_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:27
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC12:27
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting12:28
*** edmondsw has quit IRC12:29
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** mkrai has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** mattoliverau has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** voxelblob[m] has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** edmondsw_ has quit IRC12:31
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:33
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:34
*** longxion_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:37
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting12:37
*** edmondsw has quit IRC12:37
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** longxiongqiu has quit IRC12:40
*** kevinz has joined #openstack-meeting12:40
*** sridhargaddam has joined #openstack-meeting12:41
*** cloudran_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:42
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC12:42
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting12:43
*** edmondsw has quit IRC12:44
*** dinghh has left #openstack-meeting12:44
*** sridharg has quit IRC12:44
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:47
*** kevinz has quit IRC12:47
*** kevinz has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** r-mibu has left #openstack-meeting12:49
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC12:51
*** edmondsw has quit IRC12:51
*** xinhuili has joined #openstack-meeting12:51
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:51
*** elynn has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC12:53
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:53
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC12:55
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:55
*** gcb has quit IRC12:55
*** edmondsw has quit IRC12:55
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** longxion_ has quit IRC12:56
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** longxiongqiu has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** yanyanhu has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting12:59
*** XueFeng has joined #openstack-meeting13:00
*** Ruijie_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-meeting13:02
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** lamt has quit IRC13:04
*** sridhargaddam has quit IRC13:04
*** lamt has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** s0mik has quit IRC13:05
*** m1dev has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC13:07
*** sridhargaddam has joined #openstack-meeting13:07
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** maeca1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:11
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting13:11
*** itamaro has quit IRC13:12
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
*** mickeys has quit IRC13:20
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:20
*** rbowen has quit IRC13:21
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC13:22
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-meeting13:24
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-meeting13:27
*** reedip__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
*** fguillot has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** Ruijie_ has quit IRC13:35
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck13:39
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting13:40
*** kevinz has quit IRC13:42
*** kevinz has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** awaugama has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** awaugama has quit IRC13:44
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** awaugama has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** prateek__ has quit IRC13:45
*** yanyanhu has quit IRC13:46
*** markstur has quit IRC13:46
*** jamesdenton has joined #openstack-meeting13:46
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC13:47
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** ataraday__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC13:52
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** cloudran_ has quit IRC13:52
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** janzian has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom13:53
*** zhonghuali has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** brault has quit IRC13:54
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz13:54
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom13:55
*** links has quit IRC13:57
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** rpi has quit IRC13:59
*** brault has quit IRC13:59
*** zhonghuali has quit IRC13:59
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC13:59
*** rpi has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz14:00
*** andreas_s has quit IRC14:01
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom14:01
*** xinhuili has quit IRC14:01
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC14:02
*** yushiro has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** yushiro has quit IRC14:03
*** yushiro has joined #openstack-meeting14:04
*** mtanino__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:04
*** LanceHaig has quit IRC14:05
*** JoseMello has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** brault has quit IRC14:06
*** tmorin has joined #openstack-meeting14:08
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC14:08
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting14:08
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
*** rossella_ has quit IRC14:09
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** cesar-brasil has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
*** Cibo_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:14
*** trevormc has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
*** LanceHaig has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
*** yushiro has left #openstack-meeting14:16
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck14:17
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** chyka has quit IRC14:18
*** jaugustine has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting14:19
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** mickeys has quit IRC14:21
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting14:23
*** Qiming-mobile has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
*** toscalix has quit IRC14:25
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
*** cleong has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** chyka has quit IRC14:29
*** pchavva has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
*** fnaval has quit IRC14:32
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting14:33
*** LanceHaig has quit IRC14:36
*** LanceHaig has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** bvandenh has quit IRC14:37
*** LanceHaig has quit IRC14:37
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:38
*** eharney has quit IRC14:38
*** Cibo_ has quit IRC14:41
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** pchavva has quit IRC14:42
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz14:45
*** kevinz has quit IRC14:46
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting14:46
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
*** rbartal_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** rbartal_ has quit IRC14:49
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** yushiro has joined #openstack-meeting14:50
*** VW has quit IRC14:51
*** chyka has quit IRC14:52
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting14:52
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting14:52
*** VW_ has quit IRC14:53
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
*** VW has quit IRC14:54
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
*** lpetrut has quit IRC14:57
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** ykatabam has quit IRC14:58
*** pnavarro has quit IRC14:58
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
ralonsohHello15:00
ralonsohlet's start15:00
davidshaHi15:00
ralonsoh#startmeeting neutron_qos15:01
openstackMeeting started Tue May 23 15:01:09 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ralonsoh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_qos'15:01
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom15:01
ralonsoh#topic RFEs15:01
*** openstack changes topic to "RFEs (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)"15:01
*** shintaro has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
ralonsohToday the agenda is pretty full15:01
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/156096115:01
openstackLaunchpad bug 1560961 in neutron "[RFE] Allow instance-ingress bandwidth limiting" [Wishlist,Fix released] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq)15:02
ralonsohThe API code is merged15:02
ralonsohCongrats slaweq !15:02
davidshaCongrats!15:02
ralonsohOVS implementation: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457816/15:02
slaweqhello15:02
slaweqand thx15:02
slaweq:)15:02
*** yushiro has left #openstack-meeting15:02
ralonsohthis patch is going well15:02
ralonsohbut15:02
ralonsoh#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466899/15:02
slaweqyes, but first I need to do one more small patch15:03
ralonsohThis second patch to change the delete handler is kind of rejected15:03
slaweqhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/466899/15:03
ralonsohOk, I don't see Ihar here....15:03
slaweqI talked with ihrahys yesterday night15:03
ralonsohand?15:03
slaweqI know what to do there15:03
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
ralonsohto add several entry points?15:04
slaweqI will add there also calls to "delete_ingress_bandwidth_limit_rule"15:04
slaweqand other such rules15:04
ralonsohpffff I don't like it15:04
slaweqso basically I will do what mlavalle proposed in comment15:04
ralonsohI know15:04
ralonsohbut I prefer to have a unique entry point15:04
*** hoangcx has quit IRC15:05
ralonsohand the backend will accept or not the parameter15:05
ralonsohbut it's not big deal15:05
slaweqI'm also not big fan of this but what I can do :)15:05
ralonsohok, I'll review your following patches15:05
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz15:05
ralonsohno problem, do this way15:05
slaweqthx15:05
ralonsohnext one15:05
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/157898915:05
openstackLaunchpad bug 1578989 in neutron "[RFE] Strict minimum bandwidth support (egress)" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez)15:05
ralonsohI need to talk to Miguel Lavalle15:06
ralonsohI can't see him now15:06
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
ralonsohso i'll postpone this conversation and I'll submit the conversation results15:06
ralonsohnext one15:06
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/159661115:06
openstackLaunchpad bug 1596611 in neutron "[RFE] Create L3 IPs with qos (rate limit)" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to LIU Yulong (dragon889)15:06
ralonsohFirst, the spec15:07
ralonsoh#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374506/15:07
ralonsohIt's almost approved, although there are some gaps in the implementation details15:07
ralonsohbut if cores accept it, that's ok15:07
ralonsohplease, take a final look at the spec15:08
slaweqI will try to look on it today15:08
ralonsohsecond, the TC changes15:08
ralonsoh#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453458/15:08
ralonsohI don't agree with having two TC wrappers15:08
ralonsohI'm against it15:08
ralonsohand I was assertive on this idea15:09
slaweqwhat's the point to have two classes for same puprose?15:09
ralonsohone sec15:09
ralonsoh"l3 tc lib has much differences from original tc_lib. The file is stored separately is more clearly."15:09
ralonsohthe answer from the reviews15:09
slaweqwhat are those differences?15:10
*** LanceHaig has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** LanceHaig has quit IRC15:10
*** LanceHaig has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
ralonsohthe way the qdiscs and the filters are created and filtered15:10
slaweqI will check it today also but I'm not sure if it's good idea15:10
slaweqyes, but can't it be added in separate methods in existing class?15:10
ralonsohI appreciate your reviews15:10
*** mlakat has quit IRC15:11
ralonsohIMO, it's just a matter of merging both wrappers15:11
*** cesar-brasil has quit IRC15:11
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
ralonsohand taking care of the functionalities added by both classes, the current one and the new one15:11
slaweqI agree with You but I will take a look on it tonight15:12
ralonsohperfect15:12
*** fnaval has quit IRC15:12
ralonsohand 3rd, the API15:12
ralonsoh#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424466/15:12
ralonsohIMO, that needs a big refactor15:12
ralonsohthis API is breaking the current QOS API15:12
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom15:13
ralonsohmy comments are in the review15:13
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC15:13
ralonsohbtw15:13
ralonsohit's anyone, apart from slaweq and me here??15:13
ralonsohdavidsha15:13
davidshaSorry was looking at the patches!15:13
ralonsohno problem15:13
ralonsohso, just to recap this RFE: there is a lot of work to be done in the API coding15:14
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting15:14
ralonsohnext one15:14
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/156096115:14
openstackLaunchpad bug 1560961 in neutron "[RFE] Allow instance-ingress bandwidth limiting" [Wishlist,Fix released] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq)15:14
ralonsohcode merged! congrats15:14
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC15:14
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting15:14
ralonsohI'll remove this one from the list15:15
slaweqbut it's only API patch merged :)15:15
ralonsohI know15:15
slaweq:)15:15
* mlavalle got confused with the meeting start time :-(15:15
ralonsohWhich backend are you going to do first15:15
ralonsoh?15:15
slaweqbut as I said before it's moving forward :)15:15
*** hieulq_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
slaweqovs is first one15:15
davidshaHey mlavalle15:15
ralonsohperfect15:15
ralonsohhi mlavalle, no problem15:15
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
slaweqhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/457816/15:16
slaweqthis is patch for ovs ingress bw limit15:16
slaweqfor lb I have something done partially in my local devstack15:16
ralonsohoh, yes! I missed that in the meeting etherpad. One sec....15:16
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC15:16
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
ralonsohok, I had this spec twice!15:17
ralonsohhehehee15:17
ralonsohperfect, next one15:17
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/163922015:17
openstackLaunchpad bug 1639220 in neutron "[RFE] Introduce Network QoS policy "is_default" behaviour" [Low,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez)15:17
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
mlavalleslaweq: should I expect a revision to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/457816/ before reviewing again?15:17
*** LanceHaig has quit IRC15:17
ralonsohyes, there should be a new one15:18
slaweqmlavalle: yes15:18
mlavalle++15:18
ralonsohfirst to remove the delete handling code and more stuff15:18
slaweqI will need to rebase it when https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466899/ will be finished15:18
slaweqmlavalle: I talked with ihrahys yesterday and we deviced to make it as You proposed :)15:19
mlavalleahh, that's the new one, ok, will also take a look15:19
slaweqmlavalle: but this new one is not finished yet15:19
mlavalleslaweq: yeah,m I followed the conversation in channel yesterday15:19
ralonsohok, going to the "is_default" one15:20
slaweqok15:20
ralonsohthe code is waiting....15:20
mlavallereviews, maybe?15:20
ralonsohit has one +2 and one +115:20
ralonsohyes, final ones15:20
ralonsohthat's all15:20
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC15:20
ralonsohok, let's move to the next one15:21
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/150562715:21
openstackLaunchpad bug 1505627 in neutron "[RFE] QoS Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) Support" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Reedip (reedip-banerjee)15:21
mlavalleok, will take a look15:21
*** efried has quit IRC15:21
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC15:21
ralonsohreedip?15:21
ralonsohI'll try to ping reedip latter today. The spec is stopped since march15:22
mlavalleThe comment I have from the drivers meeting is that they want an opinion from the QoS gang as to whether this is something you are going to pursue15:22
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:22
ralonsohwell, at least should be interesting to have a detailed spec to propose15:23
mlavallethat would be a good next step15:23
slaweq++15:23
ralonsohI'll join next drivers meeting to ask this15:23
*** tovin07 has joined #openstack-meeting15:23
ralonsohThis is mainly reedip's work15:24
mlavalleit is very late for you: 2300UTC15:24
ralonsohno, problem15:24
mlavalleok15:24
slaweqmlavalle: I think it's 2200 UTC15:24
ralonsohand the last one15:24
*** tovin07 has left #openstack-meeting15:24
mlavalleyes, slaweq is right15:24
ralonsohyes, it's 2200UTC15:24
ralonsohnext one15:25
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/168603515:25
openstackLaunchpad bug 1686035 in neutron "[RFE] More detailed reporting of available QoS rules" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Slawek Kaplonski (slaweq)15:25
ralonsohI have one concern: ihar's comment15:25
slaweqI wrote some specs for this once https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466500/15:25
mlavalleyeah, same concern here15:25
ralonsohabout doing this feature more generic: (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386555/7/guidelines/capabilities.rst)15:25
slaweqI don't know how to do it more generic in fact15:26
ralonsohYes, but this spec is focused only in QoS15:26
slaweqbut I wanted to be on next drivers meeting to talk about it also15:26
ralonsohI know, it's very difficult to make a generic API for all extensions15:26
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC15:26
ralonsohslaweq: that will be great15:26
*** armax has quit IRC15:27
*** kevinz has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
ralonsohI have some concerns about the differentiation between the admin user and regular user15:27
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
slaweqI even don't know exactly what other resources should be available in same way (backend support details)15:27
ralonsohthe differences in the information sent15:27
ralonsohif you join next day the drivers meeting, can you ask this too?15:28
ralonsohhaving more feedback will be very helpful15:28
slaweqyes, I will ask them15:28
slaweqI wanted to write some first draft of specs to discuss it on drivers meeting15:29
ralonsohyes, I understand, and that's ok. You have smething to present15:29
slaweqexactly :)15:29
ralonsohone more thing before jumping to the other section15:30
mlavalleslaweq: I will try to provide feedback before the drivers meeting15:30
slaweqthx mlavalle15:30
ralonsohmlavalle: after this meeting, do you have time to talk about https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1578989?15:30
openstackLaunchpad bug 1578989 in neutron "[RFE] Strict minimum bandwidth support (egress)" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez)15:30
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
mlavallesure15:31
ralonsohperfect15:31
ralonsohok, let's go to bugs15:31
ralonsoh#topic Bugs15:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)"15:31
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/167687715:31
openstackLaunchpad bug 1676877 in neutron "Increase "TestQosPlugin.test_update_policy_rule" coverage" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Reedip (reedip-banerjee)15:31
*** kevinz has quit IRC15:32
ralonsohreedip has this one on-hold15:32
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
ralonsohas I said, I'll try to ping reedip a bit latter15:32
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:32
ralonsohnext one15:32
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
ralonsohhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/165738115:32
openstackLaunchpad bug 1657381 in neutron "QoS drivers need to implement a precommit for the actions" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Rodolfo Alonso (rodolfo-alonso-hernandez)15:32
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:33
*** janzian has quit IRC15:33
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
ralonsohThe code is delivered and just to be reviewed15:33
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:33
ralonsohPlease, this patch is almost finished15:34
slaweqok, I will check it15:34
ralonsohand the last one15:34
ralonsoh#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/164951715:34
openstackLaunchpad bug 1649517 in neutron "qos policy attached to network, qos_policy_id is reflecting on neutron net-show , but not on the port with neutron port-show" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Reedip (reedip-banerjee)15:34
ralonsohI belongs to reedip15:35
ralonsohI'll ping him15:35
slaweqreedip took this one from me but he didn't do anything there yet15:35
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC15:35
ralonsohI'll try to ping him to know which patches is going to continue15:35
ralonsohif he is overloaded, I'll ask him to transfer some of them15:36
*** fnaval has quit IRC15:36
*** hongbin has quit IRC15:36
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
ralonsohI'll try to have the answer this week15:36
slaweqok15:36
ralonsohand that's all!15:37
*** belmoreira has quit IRC15:37
ralonsohthere are no more topics15:37
ralonsoh#topic Open Discussion15:37
davidshaack, If he needs to offload that work I can take that bug.15:37
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)"15:37
ralonsohdavidsha: that's perfect15:37
ralonsohas I said, I'll try to ping him this week15:38
*** armstron_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
ralonsohdoes anyone any other topic to talk about?15:38
ralonsohor any question?15:38
davidshaI'm good.15:39
mlavalleme too15:39
slaweqme too15:39
mlavalledavidsha: where are you located?15:39
ralonsohperfect15:39
davidshamlavalle: Ireland15:39
mlavalleyeah, with that last name, that's what I thought ;-)15:39
davidsha:P15:39
ralonsohso please, take a look at "L3 IP limit" and "ingress limiting BW"15:40
ralonsohboth RFEs are important15:40
davidshaTo be fair there is more Irish outside of Ireland than in it!15:40
slaweqralonsoh: yes sir! :P15:40
ralonsohhehehe15:40
davidsharalonsoh: Will do!15:40
mlavalledavidsha: yeah, I know, That' why I asked15:40
*** armstrong has quit IRC15:40
slaweqdavidsha: in Ireland there is more poles probably :D15:40
mlavalleLOL15:41
ralonsohhehehehe15:41
ralonsohok, I'm going to end the meeting. See you next week and in IRC15:41
ralonsoh#endmeeting15:42
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:42
openstackMeeting ended Tue May 23 15:42:10 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:42
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2017/neutron_qos.2017-05-23-15.01.html15:42
ralonsohbye!15:42
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2017/neutron_qos.2017-05-23-15.01.txt15:42
slaweqthanks15:42
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2017/neutron_qos.2017-05-23-15.01.log.html15:42
mlavalleo/15:42
slaweqbye15:42
davidshaCya!15:42
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting15:42
*** shintaro has quit IRC15:43
*** rossella_ has quit IRC15:45
*** rbudden has quit IRC15:46
*** pcaruana has quit IRC15:47
*** davidsha has left #openstack-meeting15:49
*** sridhargaddam has quit IRC15:51
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC15:52
*** e0ne has quit IRC15:52
*** slaweq has quit IRC15:52
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting15:53
*** dane_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** XueFeng has quit IRC15:57
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC15:57
*** abalutoiu has quit IRC15:57
*** slaweq has quit IRC15:58
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** Apoorva has quit IRC15:59
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** viks has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** msimonin has quit IRC16:04
*** armstron_ has quit IRC16:04
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC16:04
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC16:05
*** viks has left #openstack-meeting16:06
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** efried has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** emagana has quit IRC16:12
*** tmorin has quit IRC16:13
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:15
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC16:15
*** emagana has quit IRC16:18
*** reedip__ has quit IRC16:19
*** bobh has quit IRC16:19
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** lpetrut has quit IRC16:22
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
*** ricolin has quit IRC16:24
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** ssalagame has quit IRC16:28
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting16:31
*** Qiming-mobile has quit IRC16:34
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:35
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting16:35
*** VW has quit IRC16:36
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:39
*** trinaths has quit IRC16:41
*** pchavva has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** ltomasbo is now known as ltomasbo|away16:44
*** aarefiev is now known as aarefiev_afk16:45
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** pnavarro has quit IRC16:52
*** mpaolino has quit IRC16:52
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** kjw3 has quit IRC16:56
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC16:57
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC16:57
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** toscalix has quit IRC16:58
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** eharney has quit IRC16:59
*** Cibo_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** baoli has quit IRC17:00
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC17:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC17:01
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC17:02
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:03
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz17:03
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
*** Apoorva has quit IRC17:08
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
*** pchavva has quit IRC17:11
*** lhx__ has quit IRC17:13
*** bobh has quit IRC17:14
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:15
*** baoli has quit IRC17:15
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:17
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC17:17
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting17:17
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC17:23
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC17:23
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
*** powerd has quit IRC17:24
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC17:26
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC17:27
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting17:29
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC17:29
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC17:33
*** claudiub has quit IRC17:33
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
*** claudiub has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
*** dimtruck has quit IRC17:36
*** ionutbalutoiu has quit IRC17:36
*** electrofelix has quit IRC17:37
*** Anticimex has quit IRC17:38
*** dimtruck has joined #openstack-meeting17:38
*** electrofelix has joined #openstack-meeting17:38
*** ionutbalutoiu has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** anilvenkata has quit IRC17:39
*** Anticimex has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** annabelleB has left #openstack-meeting17:40
*** fnaval has quit IRC17:40
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
*** dtrainor_ is now known as dtrainor17:43
*** dtrainor has joined #openstack-meeting17:44
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:45
*** spilla has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
*** slaweq has quit IRC17:46
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
*** ataraday__ has quit IRC17:47
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC17:47
*** armstrong has quit IRC17:47
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
*** slaweq has quit IRC17:51
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** markstur has quit IRC17:52
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting17:54
*** spzala has quit IRC17:54
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
*** iyamahat has quit IRC17:55
*** annabelleB has quit IRC17:56
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC17:56
*** Cibo_ has quit IRC17:57
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** brault has quit IRC17:57
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
*** brault has quit IRC17:58
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
*** brault has quit IRC17:59
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** baoli has quit IRC17:59
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
lbragstad#startmeeting keystone18:00
openstackMeeting started Tue May 23 18:00:03 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is lbragstad. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:00
lbragstadping ayoung, breton, cmurphy, dstanek, edmondsw, gagehugo, henrynash, hrybacki, knikolla, lamt, lbragstad, notmorgan, rderose, rodrigods, samueldmq, spilla, aselius18:00
edmondswo/18:00
rodrigodshey18:00
spillao/18:00
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
lbragstad#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-weekly-meeting18:00
hrybackio/18:00
*** gagehugo has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
lbragstado/18:00
gagehugoo/18:01
lamto/18:01
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC18:01
lbragstad#topic Updating keystone's documentation theme18:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Updating keystone's documentation theme (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:01
lbragstadping Samriddhi ?18:02
lbragstadasettle: ^18:02
*** nhelgeson has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** aselius has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
gagehugoI put it on there just in case there is no reason to do this18:02
gagehugoSamriddhi is making the changes18:02
lbragstadgagehugo: ah18:02
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC18:03
lbragstadgagehugo: i haven't seen these changes yet - is this the new theme for all projects to move to?18:03
gagehugoI think so18:03
rodrigodscan I add a doc convo after the theme discussion?18:03
*** brault has quit IRC18:03
lbragstadrodrigods: sure18:03
rodrigodscool18:04
lbragstadrodrigods: we should be able to get through all the topics today18:04
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
lbragstadgagehugo: has the general direction of moving to this new theme be documented somewhere?18:04
*** bobh has quit IRC18:04
gagehugolbragstad no idea :(18:04
knikollao/ i'm late18:04
lbragstadgagehugo: ah - no worries18:04
gagehugoidea was more to just bring this to our attention18:04
lbragstadgagehugo: if it is - it would be nice to track that down so that we can include it in the commit18:05
lbragstadgagehugo: i can leave a comment18:05
gagehugolbragstad sounds good18:05
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
*** lpetrut has quit IRC18:05
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
gagehugothere is a comment saying that the plan is to get all project using this theme on that change18:05
samueldmqhi, sorry I am late18:05
gagehugobut idk where there is documentation for it18:06
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC18:06
rodrigodsthe new theme is much nicer, btw18:06
gagehugorodrigods ++18:06
rodrigodsmaterial design? :) heh18:06
lbragstadsweet - i let a comment18:06
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom18:06
lbragstadwe can iterate on it in review - thanks gagehugo for bringing it up18:06
gagehugosounds good!18:06
samueldmq#thanks https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466066/18:06
samueldmqoops18:06
samueldmq#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/466066/18:06
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
lbragstadrodrigods: do you want to do your topic now?18:07
samueldmqlbragstad ^ I think I added you to the review, but I should have pinged you on IRC18:07
rodrigodslbragstad, sure!18:07
rodrigodsspeaking of docs...18:07
lbragstadrodrigods: sure - go for it18:07
rodrigodsplease take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/keystone+branch:master+topic:tests_development_docs18:07
rodrigodsno reviews for a while18:07
*** dane_ has quit IRC18:08
lbragstad#topic review requests for functional testing documentation18:08
*** openstack changes topic to "review requests for functional testing documentation (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:08
lbragstad#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/keystone+branch:master+topic:tests_development_docs18:08
lbragstadrodrigods: ++18:08
*** VW__ has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
rodrigodsthanks lbragstad18:08
lbragstadrodrigods: thank you for the reminder18:08
lbragstadrodrigods: is there anything else you need on that front besides reviews?18:08
*** VW has quit IRC18:09
rodrigodslbragstad, i think reviews are enough18:09
rodrigodsspecially for those who haven't touched the functional tests18:09
*** VW_ has quit IRC18:09
lbragstadrodrigods: cool - thanks18:09
lbragstad#topic Microversion header bug18:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Microversion header bug (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:09
lbragstad#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/168964418:09
openstackLaunchpad bug 1689644 in OpenStack Identity (keystone) "Keystone does not report microversion headers" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Jaewoo Park (aselius)18:09
lbragstadnhelgeson: o/18:09
aseliuso/18:10
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC18:10
nhelgesono/18:10
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
nhelgesonuh18:10
nhelgesonSo I have been working on finding a way to implement versioning in the header18:11
ayoungI reported that based on the convo at the summit18:11
ayoungI really don't care about it, but wanted to make sure we didn't lose the concept18:11
nhelgesonand I was wondering about where the code should be added18:11
nhelgesonI found a way to add some version info in the header18:11
lbragstadnhelgeson: ayoung ah - this must have been in the microversion session?18:11
nhelgesonso I can leave it at that for now18:11
ayoungnhelgeson, yep18:11
lbragstadnhelgeson: do you have a patch up for review?18:11
nhelgesonnot yet18:12
edmondswI don't know that I really care, but at the PTG all the keystone cores seemed pretty anti-microversions18:12
*** bobh has quit IRC18:12
ayoungwe should probably put it in common/WSGI.py  somewhere, right?18:12
nhelgesonthats where I am looking at the moment18:12
gagehugoedmondsw I think it was more we don't really "need" them atm18:12
*** ataraday__ has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
lbragstadayoung: most likely, or the common controller layer at the very least18:12
ayoungedmondsw, I think the reason they wanted it was so that a common client code could be written for the others and for Keystone18:12
knikollai sent a link on irc the last time this was asked, let me look it up18:13
ayoungprobably the right thing to do, not a burning issue18:13
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
edmondswthere are pretty good arguments that microversions are a mistake and make things more difficult for users rather than less...18:13
lbragstadrobcresswell: has a bunch of opinions on them18:13
nhelgesonright now im looking at adding a few lines to the render_response on line 74618:14
lbragstadwhich he represented at both the PTG and forum18:14
knikolla#link https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/1c44a3a1af5a9e3e48f6799b3006f02dada3341f/keystone/common/wsgi.py#L71018:14
nhelgesonjust figuring out how to include the request version in the header18:14
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
ayoungedmondsw, I'm kindof of the mindset that at least we should be consistent, that there is very little completely right about our APIs anyway18:15
lbragstadnhelgeson: feel free to propose something for review18:15
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
nhelgesonill post a fix by the end of the week18:15
lbragstadbut this doesn't require us to *implement* microversions does it?18:15
robcresswellI *think* dtroyer was working on making some of the code more common.18:16
ayounglbragstad, just "report" I think18:16
robcresswellWhich alleviates one of my issues with the implementation, at least.18:16
lbragstadayoung: ok - good18:16
nhelgesonat this point is is just going to report the current version and let you know if its current or now18:16
knikollano, this is just for returning the version of our api18:16
nhelgesonnot*18:16
ayoungwe can probably manually set a number, and just keep bumping it for now, kindof like what we do elsewhere18:16
lbragstadyeah18:16
knikollaayoung: thats the feel i got too18:17
lbragstadat least until we figure out what our strategy is long term18:17
*** VW__ has quit IRC18:17
nhelgesonI was planning on going a step further and getting the version request from the url and checking to see if its v1 v2 or v318:17
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
nhelgesonand then reporting which one is being used and specifying it as current vs depricated18:18
ayoungnhelgeson, take it as far as you can.  We'll review.18:18
nhelgesonok18:18
lbragstadnhelgeson: we can address those bit in gerrit, too18:18
ayoungall good?18:19
lbragstadnhelgeson: is there anything else outside of that?18:19
knikollanhelgeson: that might be unnecessary given that controllers for v3 subclass v3controller18:19
*** hieulq_ has quit IRC18:19
knikollaso they have a common base class18:19
samueldmqYeah, just returning the version and making cp happy wouldn't hurt18:19
nhelgesonnope18:19
lbragstadcool18:19
nhelgesonill post something in gerrit18:19
samueldmqnhelgeson: ++18:19
lbragstad#topic Project Tag Spec18:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Project Tag Spec (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:19
nhelgesonand we can go from there18:19
lbragstad#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431785/18:20
lbragstadgagehugo: o/18:20
ayoungSo, tags are very like labels in Kubernetes18:20
lbragstadlast i checked cmurphy had a couple comments on that spec18:20
*** powerd has joined #openstack-meeting18:20
lbragstadso did samueldmq18:20
samueldmqwho's looking for that?18:21
samueldmqI guess it's been a while, but if it's something people want and it's the best way I wouldn't be against it18:21
lbragstadsamueldmq: who wants tags?18:21
ayoungI think I am for it18:21
gagehugolbragstad yeah we made some updates, hadn't touched it since before the summit18:21
ayoungit provides users a non-hierarchical way to organize projects, and people have asked for that for a while.18:21
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC18:21
ayoungI did have a suggestion that we call them labels to be consistant with Kubernetes, but since we really are not anywhere else, its a small thing18:22
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:22
lbragstadgagehugo: i'll review it again18:22
edmondswI think other places in OpenStack, e.g. nova, use the "tags" term18:22
samueldmqlbragstad: yes, who wants it18:22
lbragstadsamueldmq: gagehugo has proposed it for a couple releases now18:23
gagehugoedmondsw yeah, this spec closely follows the API-WG one for having resource tags18:23
lbragstadedmondsw: yeah - so does neutron i think18:23
samueldmqfor easing management when you k's of projects correct?18:23
ayoungyep18:23
gagehugosamueldmq yes18:24
samueldmqnice, so perhaps nobody is against it, pretty much a "hey, review it"18:24
ayoungany lessons learned we sould apply here?18:24
lbragstadsamueldmq: yeah - like i could take projects hosting my production app with a 'prod' tag for example18:24
samueldmqlbragstad: that way you could easily create groups of projects18:24
ayoungAh...I remember the trick18:24
lbragstadi found the API-WG guidelines to be really helpful when reviewing gagehugo proposal18:24
ayoung"who owns the label"18:24
*** chyka has quit IRC18:24
samueldmqayoung: the project18:25
samueldmq?18:25
knikollaproject owns the label, applied by admins18:25
knikollai think18:25
samueldmqknikolla: that's how I see it too18:25
lbragstadayoung: last i remember, we wanted that to be owned by the person who has the ability to create and modify projects18:25
ayounglet me try that again.18:25
ayounglets say I have a label called "production"18:25
lbragstadknikolla: only by default18:25
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting18:25
ayoungcan anyone add that label to their project?18:25
*** powerd has quit IRC18:25
lbragstadknikolla: if someone wants to change it they can18:25
lbragstadbut by default, regular users shouldn't have the ability to list tags on a project18:26
lbragstadayoung: no18:26
samueldmqand it only make sense to add tags18:26
samueldmqif you have the rights to list projects18:26
ayoungok, then who?18:26
knikollalbragstad: yes, updating policy they can restrict or open it up as much as they want18:26
samueldmqbecause that's where filtering projects by tags will be useful18:26
gagehugosamueldmq ++18:27
samueldmqayoung: I'd say domain and cloud admins18:27
lbragstadsure - i agree that would be useful18:27
lbragstadbut we don't have that worked into our default policy yet18:27
knikollawe recently found a project from a class project of a year ago just sitting there. tags would have been useful18:27
*** felipemonteiro has joined #openstack-meeting18:27
lbragstadi was thinking that the required role to add and remove tags would be equivalent to the default we use for projects18:28
ayoungI suspect ability to create tags, to add a tag to a project, and to remove tags will all come up in RBAC discussions in the future18:28
edmondswlbragstad i.e. admin, not looking at scope?18:28
gagehugoayoung probably18:28
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
edmondswayoung ++18:28
lbragstadedmondsw: what do you mean?18:29
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
*** electrofelix has quit IRC18:29
ayounglbragstad, global admin18:29
edmondswlbragstad today's policy allows any admin to create/edit/delete projects18:29
ayoungadmin + is_admin_project in newspeak18:29
knikolla++18:29
ayoungshould tags be considered domain-specific?18:30
lbragstadsure - https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/common/policies/project.py#L2018:30
*** baoli has quit IRC18:30
edmondswI don't recall whether there is a scope check in the code yet18:30
ayoungi.e  there may be a prod tag on projects in two different domains, but they don't mean anything?18:30
edmondswthere should be... but probably isn't18:30
ayounger18:30
ayoungthey are not related to each other?18:30
edmondswthen there's the question of whether an admin of a project should be able to change the tag for their project... or only admins of the parent of that project18:31
samueldmqwell just as assignments we may allow project tags to cross domains boundaries?18:31
edmondswI'd probably lean toward the latter18:31
knikollaedmondsw: only admins of the parent i would say18:31
lbragstadinitially18:31
edmondswjust like I'd say that when we get into adding scope checks, you should only be able to create projects under a project/domain that you admin18:31
lbragstadeventually it would be nice if that changed as policy evolves18:31
samueldmqare we talking about rbac for the future? or for now18:31
edmondswnone of that's there today, though18:32
gagehugoedmondsw yes18:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** ijw has quit IRC18:32
ayoungare tags inherited when you make a child project?18:32
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** slaweq has quit IRC18:32
edmondswayoung good question... probably not?18:32
lbragstadi would rather restrict the feature (by default) to global admin usage than open up security issues by allowing it to be used by project level assignment18:32
knikollaayoung: i would lean towards no.18:32
ayoungWill tags be used for quotas?18:32
lbragstadayoung: i wouldn't think so18:32
samueldmqlbragstad: I'd start it simple now and say it's like a project update call/same protection?18:32
lbragstadayoung: no18:32
samueldmqand then we evolve it later as policy keeps improving18:33
*** felipemonteiro has quit IRC18:33
ayoungall those responses are lies.18:33
ayoungof course they will be used for quotas18:33
ayoungwe are going to be burnt by this.18:33
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting18:33
ayoungLets do it!18:33
edmondswayoung how would they be used for quotas?18:33
lbragstadedmondsw: tagging the project with the quota as the tag18:33
ayoungedmondsw, why wouldn't they be used for quotas?  Because we tell people not to?  They will ignore us.18:34
samueldmqper-tag-quota-driver18:34
edmondswI'm not following... what would enforce a tag value as a quota?18:34
knikollaoh god please no. let's just do unified limits already18:34
lbragstadknikolla: right18:34
lbragstadedmondsw: as an admin i could manage tags on a project for `vcpu_limit:50`18:35
samueldmqlet me step a bit back, why is project tags better than organizing projects in a tree?18:35
ayoungHeh.18:35
ayoungsamueldmq, it is in addition to a tree18:35
lbragstadthe dangerous part is if projects build on it to enforce quota in other services18:35
*** krtaylor has quit IRC18:35
ayoungsamueldmq, sometimes you have two different org schemes to follow, and a tree can only follow one of them18:35
samueldmqayoung: that's the answer I think18:36
edmondswsamueldmq e.g.  you could have multiple "production" projects under wildly different places in the tree18:36
ayoungorganize by company structure versus organize dev-staging-prod18:36
samueldmqwe don't enforce same quota to 2 different orgs18:36
samueldmqthat wouldn't make sense to me18:36
samueldmqso quotas on project tags doesn't make sense18:36
ayoungsamueldmq, its not us18:36
edmondswI'm still missing how this has anything to do with quotas18:36
knikollahence we really need to push for unified limits, so the only way they can do limits is the one we validate18:36
ayoungsamueldmq, we can never predict how the things we make will be used18:36
ayoungunified limits are a pipe dream18:37
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC18:37
lbragstadedmondsw: the thing is that it *could be used* to implement quotas based on limits18:37
samueldmqayoung: they'd need to write their per-tag-quota-driver then18:37
ayoungpretty sure they are impossible with the way they've been speced18:37
samueldmqayoung: and we can tell them its not what they're up to, if they do not agree they can do whatever they think is better18:37
ayoungso long as tagging and untagging a project is a separate api call from creating a project, we can RBAC manage them separately18:37
edmondswlbragstad oh, you mean nova/etc. could use it for something we don't intend... not that an operator could?18:37
knikollaedmondsw: yes18:38
lbragstadedmondsw: correct18:38
ayoungstart off with the call very restricted, and then think about if we need an call to create a tag separate from tagging a project18:38
edmondswfinally makes sense18:38
samueldmqI don't think they will implement anything without really understanding what the thing is for18:38
ayoungsamueldmq, they never have before18:38
ayoungwhich leads to the next topic on the agenda...18:38
lbragstadbut... the thing is that we're not going to be validating tags with the tree hierarchy that project limits require (as detailed in the unified limits spec)18:39
edmondswbut I don't think that's likely, unless the quota work that's already in process falls apart... they won't want to switch to something totally different and start over their design work18:39
edmondswand what lbragstad just said18:39
samueldmqedmondsw: ++18:39
samueldmqlets make it happen18:39
samueldmqand document it really well18:39
lbragstadwhile it's entirely possible - i'm not sure it would be a good design decision18:39
lbragstadbut that's totally up to the people consuming this and if that's what they want to do - we can't really stop them18:40
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting18:40
lbragstadwe *can* move forward with unified limits and promote that as the supported way of solving the problem18:40
samueldmqlbragstad: exactly18:40
samueldmqand not hesitate on implementing something we need because people may use it on things we haven't planned it for18:41
samueldmqit's useful for managing projects, lets go for it18:41
samueldmq:-)18:41
knikollai think we need this more than it can hurt us.18:42
lbragstadanyone else have anything on project tags?18:42
ayoung+2 from me18:42
lbragstad#topic super-infamous-bug-that-must-not-be-named-or-cited-by-number18:42
*** openstack changes topic to "super-infamous-bug-that-must-not-be-named-or-cited-by-number (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:42
lbragstad#link http://adam.younglogic.com/2017/05/fixing-bug-96869/18:43
lbragstadayoung: i assume you added this one?18:43
samueldmqwould that be 968696?18:43
ayoungyep18:43
ayoungso...I wrote that up to try and explain to the other projects (namely nova) why they should review our fixes18:43
ayoungI had sdague say that he did not understand the approach18:43
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting18:43
lbragstadayoung: looks like it's hot off the press18:43
gagehugoayoung interesting18:44
ayoungread it, critique, it might be incoherent18:44
ayoungtried to make it as clear and simple as possible18:44
lbragstadayoung: cool18:44
lbragstadayoung: are you planning on presenting this to anyone/18:44
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC18:44
edmondswI'll try to read before our policy mtg tomorrow18:44
ayounglbragstad, nope18:44
edmondswdid you ping johnthetubaguy to point it out?18:44
lbragstadedmondsw: ++18:44
ayounglbragstad, just pointing people at it when I ask them to review18:44
lbragstadayoung: or sdague?18:44
ayoungjust finished it last night.  Did send a link to sdague yes18:45
*** gary-smith_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:45
lbragstadayoung: ok18:45
*** gary-smith_ has left #openstack-meeting18:45
lbragstadI will parse it today18:45
ayoungthanks.  And critique.  It looked right to me, but It was late, and I've been looking at this way too long18:45
lbragstadayoung: i'm not sure it's possible to leave comments18:46
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC18:46
gagehugoayoung I'll read it over today as well18:46
lbragstadayoung: how do you want us to critique it?18:46
ayoungemail or pings in IRC will all work, comments on the blog.  Carrier Pidgeon18:46
lbragstadok18:46
lbragstadAlaskan sled dog is becoming my new favorite way to deliver super important messages18:47
ayoungI'd like to put this to rest. The bug is tagged high or critical everywhere, except nova, that has tagged it as a wishlist item18:47
ayoungI would like to point out that this is their bug.  THis bug is older than Keystone18:47
ayoungit goes back to when identity was in Nova18:47
ayounglbragstad, Malamutes or Huskies are both acceptable. Dog friendly household here.18:48
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC18:48
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
lbragstadfwiw - i started working on OpenStack two months before that bug was opened... not sure how that makes me feel ;)18:48
lbragstad#topic open discussion18:49
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:49
ayounglbragstad, I'm pretty sure I know. Its been assigned to me that whole time, except where people grab it for short spurts18:49
lbragstadthe floor is open if anyone has something18:49
knikollaanybody knows if they're making the ptg yet?18:49
knikollamaking it to*18:49
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
gagehugoknikolla no idea18:50
lbragstadknikolla: not sure yet - planning on it but I hope to know more this week18:50
samueldmqknikolla: I don't, too early yet18:50
edmondswknikolla I expect to be there but not sure yet18:50
samueldmqbut I am working on getting approval already18:50
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
knikollahopefully a lot of us make it18:51
knikollai got approval for it18:51
lbragstadknikolla: sweet18:51
lbragstadfwiw - it's sept 11 - 1518:51
lbragstadanyone have anything else?18:52
lbragstadcool - well thanks for coming!18:53
lbragstad#endmeeting18:53
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:53
openstackMeeting ended Tue May 23 18:53:11 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:53
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-05-23-18.00.html18:53
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-05-23-18.00.txt18:53
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-05-23-18.00.log.html18:53
*** JoseMello has quit IRC18:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
*** VW has quit IRC18:58
*** VW_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
fungiinfra team, rise up!19:00
fungithis week we have action items assigned to and topics proposed by pabelanger, clarkb and jeblair19:00
jeblairo/19:00
fungialso i have one i'll probably squeeze in19:00
ianwmorning!19:00
*** mhayden has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
clarkbhello19:00
*** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
pabelangero/19:01
bkeroo/19:01
*** markstur has quit IRC19:01
fungiokay, added mine to the agenda officially19:02
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC19:02
fungi#startmeeting infra19:02
openstackMeeting started Tue May 23 19:02:50 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is fungi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)"19:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'infra'19:02
fungi#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting19:03
fungi#topic Announcements19:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: infra)"19:03
*** VW_ has quit IRC19:03
fungi#info Many thanks to AJaeger (Andreas Jaeger) for agreeing to take on core reviewer duties for the infra-manual repo!19:03
fungi#info Many thanks to SpamapS (Clint Byrum) for agreeing to take on core reviewer duties for the nodepool and zuul repos!19:03
fungias always, feel free to hit me up with announcements you want included in future meetings19:03
fungi#topic Actions from last meeting19:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: infra)"19:03
fungi#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2017/infra.2017-05-02-19.05.html Minutes from last meeting19:04
fungipabelanger Open an Ubuntu SRU for bug 125149519:04
openstackbug 1251495 in mailman (Ubuntu Trusty) "Lists with topics enabled can throw unexpected keyword argument 'Delete' exception." [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/125149519:04
*** ssalagame has quit IRC19:04
*** Apoorva has quit IRC19:04
fungiguessing this one's still pending, not seeing one there yet19:04
pabelangerfungi: yes, at this point if you want to take it off action list, I am trying to work ubuntu community to get it done19:04
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
pabelangerbut, since layoffs it has been difficult finding people19:04
pabelangerwas going to reach out to a few openstack ubuntu members and see how to best move forward19:05
fungiokay, no sweat. we had a fallback plan for now anyway, i think?19:05
pabelangerI just don't want to update up a SRU bug and leave it to bitrot19:05
pabelangerya, we are running a manual patch to lists.o.o today19:05
pabelangerfallback, we could do our own PPA if needed19:05
pabelangeror move to xenial19:06
jeblairand i think it's fixed in xenial19:06
pabelangeryes, xenial is okay19:06
fungidoes that get reverted if unattended-upgrades updates the mailman package on us (for a security fix or the like)?19:06
pabelangerfungi: I believe so19:06
jeblairyes19:06
*** Shrews has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
fungiokay, so this steps up the priority to update the listserv from trusty to xenial i guess19:06
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC19:06
jeblairfungi: ++19:06
*** adisky_ has quit IRC19:07
jeblairi'm on board to reprise my role from last time19:07
clarkbI guess security fixes bypass the sru process ya?19:07
fungijeblair: want someone else to draft the server upgrade plan this time?19:07
pabelangercool, upgrade to xenial is likely our best option I think19:07
clarkb(eg it is possible for a patch like that to come in that doesn't include pabelanger's patch to fix the bug)19:08
pabelangerclarkb: yes, it looks that way19:08
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
jeblairfungi: either way; given my etherpad from last time, it's probably not too hard for someone else to do it.  if no one else wants to, i can.19:08
fungii'm resisting the temptation to volunteer myself for yet one more thing... any takers?19:09
bkeroI can give the upgrade a shot, although will likely have many questions.19:10
bkeroUnless this would be something better for an infra-core to handle.19:10
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting19:10
fungibkero: want to start by adapting jeblair's previous etherpad contents?19:10
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC19:11
fungi#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lists.o.o-trusty-upgrade19:11
bkerofungi: Sure19:11
clarkbya some things like ext4 upgrade won't be necessary19:11
fungi#action bkero draft an upgrade plan for lists.o.o to xenial19:11
jeblairdo we want to give bkero a snapshot of lists.o.o to work from?19:11
fungii would have no problem snapshotting the current server and adding an account/sshkey for him on that19:12
clarkbwfm19:12
clarkbI can help get a snapshot done since I did that last time19:12
fungiwe'll obviously want to follow our earlier disable/enable steps for stuff around teh snapshot creation so the snapshot isn't booted spewing duplicate e-mails19:13
clarkbjeblair: we want ot doctor the base image before doing that right?19:13
clarkbto disable services?19:13
clarkbya that19:13
jeblair++19:13
clarkbthough likely not today as I am going to try and get shade out the door and nodepool upgraded so that citycloud can run multinode jobs19:13
clarkbbut tomorrow I can likely do this19:13
bkeroSounds good. I'll have time to tackle this tomorrow and Thursday evening.19:14
mordredyes. we're going to get that out the door if it kills me19:14
mordred(we got a bug report this morning that I'm squeezing the fix for in because I'm a bad person)19:14
rockygBad mordred!  Bad dog!19:15
* mordred hides19:15
jeblairmordred: always trying to get the fix in19:15
Shrewsmordred: and just approved the last of those19:16
mordredShrews: thank you19:16
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:16
fungiclarkb to add citycloud to nodepool19:17
fungi#link http://grafana.openstack.org/dashboard/db/nodepool-city-cloud City Cloud nodepool utilization graphs19:17
fungi(and there was much rejoicing)19:17
pabelangerYay19:17
*** annabelleB has left #openstack-meeting19:17
clarkbthere are/were two hiccups with this19:17
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting19:17
fungione minor but annoying issue still outstanding in one of their regions which looks like a bug/misconfiguration at this point i guess19:18
clarkbfirst one was missing flavor in the La1 region which I sent email about and they corrected19:18
clarkbthe second is we sometimes get multiple private IP addrs assigned to isntances which breaks in two different ways. The first is if nodepool writes the non working private ip to the private ip list on the instance then multinode breaks. The shade stuff I mention above should address this by using the private ip address associated with the floating IP address19:19
clarkbthe second way this breaks is if the floating IP address is attached to the non working private IP then nodepool fails to ssh in and deletes the node and tries again19:19
fungiwhich is probably accounting for most of the hits on that error node launch attempts graph too, i would assume19:19
clarkbI've sent email to citycloud with example instances and info on this in hopes they can track down why this is happening19:19
clarkbpabelanger helped track down the second way this breaks so thanks19:19
clarkbfungi: ya19:20
jeblair2.1 and 2.2 both seem like either one or two openstack bugs, yes?  i guess we're expecting them to confirm that?19:20
pabelangerYa, nodepool debug script wins again19:20
clarkbjeblair: I think its the same underlying bug in openstack or their deployment yes. Hoping they can fix/confirm19:20
pabelangerdoes shade pick the private IP to attach the FIP too?19:21
pabelangeror is that openstack19:21
mordredpabelanger: yes19:21
mordredpabelanger: (it depends)19:21
clarkbbeing a private IP though shade has no way of knowing which one is "correct"19:21
pabelangerright19:21
clarkbso there isn't much it can do there other than assume the floating IP one will work19:22
mordredpabelanger: if there is only one fixed ip on a server, openstack picks. if there is more than one, the user (or shade) has to tell openstack which to use19:22
mordredthere are _some_ ways to infer the correct one, which shade does19:22
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC19:22
mordredbut if those don't work there is an occ config option the user can set19:22
mordredor be explicit in the create_server call19:22
clarkbin this case they are  both on the same network though19:22
pabelangerI wonder if it is always the 2nd private IP that ends up working19:22
clarkbso the only thing differentiating is the ip address and thats a toss up without actually see which got dhcped on the VM19:23
clarkbpabelanger: it could be though I don't know how the are ordered if at all19:23
mordredclarkb: but so far the one with the same mac as the fip seems to be correct, right?19:23
clarkbmordred: for the multinode job case yes, because in order to get that far the fip had to work19:23
mordredthe fact that the first one has a different mac from the mac on the server is the thing that makes me think something is extra broke19:23
clarkbmordred: but we have ssh failures in nodepool that pabelanger has tracked back to the fip being attached to the wrong private ip19:24
mordredclarkb: oh - ah - right19:24
*** slaweq has quit IRC19:24
pabelangerclarkb: ya, it seems when FIP attaches to 2nd private IP, it works19:24
clarkbalso we don't get 2 private IPs on every server19:24
mordredsoyah - nothing we can do about that shade-side19:24
pabelangerall the working servers now, are on private IP219:24
clarkbits all very weird, hoping the cloud can clarify19:24
clarkbpabelanger: interesting19:25
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
fungiand it looked like they were always adjacent addresses (at least in the examples i saw)19:25
clarkbanyways we don't have to spend much more time on this. Cloud is in use, once servers boot and nodepool sshes we should be fine (especially after shade is released)19:25
mordred++19:25
jeblairclarkb: thanks, and thanks for the update19:25
fungithanks clarkb, pabelanger!19:25
jeblairpabelanger: ^19:25
fungi#topic Specs approval: PROPOSED Add nodepool drivers spec (jeblair)19:26
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs approval: PROPOSED Add nodepool drivers spec (jeblair) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:26
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/461509 "Nodepool Drivers" spec proposal19:26
jeblairi proposed a thing19:26
jeblairthis is pretty high level19:27
fungilooks like it's gone through some review/iteration at this point19:27
jeblairbasically, some folks showed up and wanted to start working on the static node support in nodepool19:27
jeblairthis spec lays out an approach for doing that as well as laying the groundwork for future expansion for other non-openstack providers19:27
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting19:28
jeblairi think we've circulated it around the folks interested in that area, so i think it's ready for a vote19:28
fungiawesome19:29
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
fungi#info The "Nodepool Drivers" spec is open for Infra Council voting until 19:00 UTC Thursday, May 2519:30
fungithat cool?19:30
clarkbit being that late in the year is not cool19:30
jeblaircool.  cool.19:30
clarkbwhere did the last 5 months go19:30
fungiclarkb: yeah, i don't know where the first half of the year went19:31
fungithanks jeblair! this will be awesome to have working19:31
fungi#topic Priority Efforts19:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Meeting topic: infra)"19:31
funginothing called out specifically here, though the spec above is related to the zuulv3 work19:32
fungi#topic Old general ML archive import (fungi)19:32
*** openstack changes topic to "Old general ML archive import (fungi) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:32
fungi#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lists.o.o-openstack-archive-import Mainte19:32
fungi#undo19:32
openstackRemoving item from minutes: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lists.o.o-openstack-archive-import19:32
fungi#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/lists.o.o-openstack-archive-import Maintenance plan for old general ML archive import19:32
fungi(not sure where that stray newline came from)19:32
fungianyway, repeat from about a month ago when i said i'd punt this maintenance until after the summit19:33
*** armstrong has quit IRC19:34
fungiwe're in the middle of a few dead weeks in the release schedule19:34
jeblairlgtm.  i think this is fine to do either before or after the xenial upgrade.  just not during.  :)19:34
fungi#link https://releases.openstack.org/pike/schedule.html Pike Release Schedule19:34
fungiso, yeah, this seems like a good time to go ahead with it19:34
fungijust means some (brief) downtime for the listserv19:34
jeblaircount me in as standby help.19:35
fungiand to have some volunteers on hand to visually inspect the archive before we start allowing new messages into the list19:35
fungithanks jeblair!19:35
fungii'm probably fine doing it late utc on friday (20:00 utc or later)19:36
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
fungihave an appointment on the mainland earlier in the day so won't be around until then19:36
pabelangershould be able to help also19:36
clarkbok, I'll be around on friday as well19:36
jeblair2000 fri wfm19:36
fungiawesome, i'll send an announcement after the tc meeting19:37
fungi#info The mailman services on lists.openstack.org will be offline for about an hour on Friday, May 26 starting at 20:00 UTC19:37
*** powerd has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
fungirefreshing the agenda and seeing no other last-minute additions...19:38
fungi#topic Open discussion19:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: infra)"19:38
*** priteau has quit IRC19:39
fungidon't all talk at once now ;)19:39
pabelangernb03.o.o is online (and xenial). However, we are at volume quota for vexxhost, waiting for feedback on how to proceed from vexxhost19:39
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC19:39
clarkbosic is running at max servers of zero right now19:39
clarkbwe are told that we should get access to the cloud once dns and ssl are sorted19:39
jeblairfolks should expect to see another zuulv3 email update soon19:39
jeblairpabelanger: how is volume quota related?19:40
jeblairpabelanger: (did you mean image quota?)19:40
fungiwe have a 1tb cinder volume attached to nb01 and nb0219:40
pabelangerwe only have 200GB HDD for server, we usually mount a 1TB for diskimage builder19:41
fungiat /opt19:41
jeblairooooh got it19:41
clarkbsince we have multiple copies of images and multiple images and multiple formats that all adds up19:41
clarkbalso the scratch space and cache for dib19:41
fungiwe could _probably_ get by with 0.5tb in there... nb01 is using 261gb and nb02 185gb19:41
pabelangerya, since feature/zuulv3 branch, the storage has been much lower19:42
pabelangermostly because we are not leaking things :)19:42
clarkband we've split the image storage across multiple nodes19:42
pabelangerthat too19:42
clarkbalso we stopped rawing19:43
clarkbso lots of good improvements19:43
fungiso maybe 0.5tb is plenty, but regardless we have little/no volume quota in that tenant currently?19:43
pabelangerya, we are over quota atm19:44
fungiwhat else do we have in there besides planet01?19:44
pabelangerold mirror19:45
pabelangerfor nodepool19:45
fungi(which isn't using cinder afaict)19:45
clarkbit may actually be using it19:45
clarkbits possible you could remove the mirror and its volume to reclaim that quota19:45
fungii meant planet01 isn't19:45
fungibut yeah, we can delete that mirror server19:45
fungisince we stopped trying to use vexxhost for nodepool nodes19:46
*** eharney has quit IRC19:46
pabelangerk19:46
pabelangerI was using it to debug some apache proxy caching stuff19:46
fungiand hopefully that frees you up to push forward on the nb03 build19:46
fungioh, well you could also just unmount and detach the cinder volume in that case19:46
clarkbpabelanger: we can always redeploy one without a volume for that sort of testing19:46
clarkbor that19:46
pabelangerthe issue is plant is using 200GB volume19:46
fungiand then just delete the volume not the server19:46
pabelangerand our quota is 100GB19:47
pabelangersorry, have to run openstack commands again to confirm19:47
pabelangerVolumeSizeExceedsAvailableQuota: Requested volume or snapshot exceeds allowed gigabytes quota. Requested 1024G, quota is 1000G and 200G has been consumed. (HTTP 413) (Request-ID: req-2ea6e088-f9cd-4e71-b635-901ee212f7f8)19:47
*** clenimar has quit IRC19:47
fungiyeah, that's a 200gb volume on the mirror server19:47
pabelangersorry, I am not sure what our quota is19:49
pabelanger /faceplam19:49
pabelanger100GB :)19:49
pabelangerso, we could do 500GB volume19:49
pabelanger1000*19:49
pabelangerI am going to stop typing now19:49
fungiyeah, that ought to be plenty for now19:49
clarkbyup 500GB seems fine.19:50
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
pabelangerk, I'll do 500GB19:51
fungiand as for the other 200gb, confirmed as suspected:19:51
fungi| 17eeb39d-c6de-4e32-8c08-26cf3592a22c | mirror.ca-ymq-1.vexxhost.openstack.org/main02 | in-use    |  200 | Attached to mirror.ca-ymq-1.vexxhost.openstack.org on /dev/vdc  |19:51
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting19:51
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting19:52
*** spilla has left #openstack-meeting19:55
fungiokay, well if there's nothing else, that concludes this week's installment!19:55
fungithanks everyone19:55
fungi#endmeeting19:55
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:55
openstackMeeting ended Tue May 23 19:55:46 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:55
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2017/infra.2017-05-23-19.02.html19:55
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2017/infra.2017-05-23-19.02.txt19:55
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2017/infra.2017-05-23-19.02.log.html19:55
jeblair5 minutes to spend deciding what to do in the next 5 minutes!19:56
clarkbI need to make a sandwich19:56
funginext up, technical committee... a five-part indulgence in song and dance19:56
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
* fungi has had meetings about meetings before, but these meetings about not meeting are a new twist19:57
*** Shrews has left #openstack-meeting19:57
*** mickeys has quit IRC19:58
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
*** gagehugo has left #openstack-meeting20:02
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky|afk20:05
*** gordc has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk20:08
*** trevormc has quit IRC20:09
*** gordc has left #openstack-meeting20:10
*** numans has quit IRC20:10
*** boris-42_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:11
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting20:12
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:18
*** spzala has quit IRC20:19
*** askb has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** julim has quit IRC20:21
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC20:22
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting20:24
*** cleong has quit IRC20:25
*** numans has quit IRC20:26
*** Cioran89 has joined #openstack-meeting20:26
*** annabelleB has quit IRC20:27
*** slaweq has quit IRC20:28
*** armstrong has quit IRC20:29
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
*** emagana has quit IRC20:31
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** harlowja_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** harlowja has quit IRC20:33
*** emagana has quit IRC20:36
*** Apoorva has quit IRC20:36
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting20:37
*** rockyg has quit IRC20:37
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
*** iyamahat has quit IRC20:41
*** pnavarro has quit IRC20:43
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC20:45
*** yamahata has quit IRC20:45
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** annegentle has quit IRC20:50
*** cdub has quit IRC20:53
*** fguillot has quit IRC20:53
*** slaweq has quit IRC20:54
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting20:54
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting20:54
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC20:56
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting20:57
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** bobh has quit IRC21:01
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting21:02
*** mickeys has quit IRC21:03
*** emagana has quit IRC21:03
*** dprince has quit IRC21:04
*** harlowja_ has quit IRC21:05
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** gouthamr has quit IRC21:05
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC21:06
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC21:06
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
*** jamesdenton has quit IRC21:08
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting21:08
*** annabelleB has quit IRC21:08
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:10
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
*** dbecker has quit IRC21:13
*** armax has quit IRC21:14
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting21:15
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC21:16
*** eharney has quit IRC21:16
*** emagana has quit IRC21:17
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting21:20
*** VW has quit IRC21:22
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting21:24
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC21:27
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC21:27
*** slaweq has quit IRC21:30
*** jamesmca_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck21:33
*** spzala has quit IRC21:34
*** slaweq has quit IRC21:35
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC21:40
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting21:40
*** krtaylor has quit IRC21:41
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting21:41
*** fzdarsky|afk has quit IRC21:42
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
*** brault has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
*** priteau has quit IRC21:45
*** spzala has quit IRC21:46
*** jroll has quit IRC21:47
*** jroll has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting21:48
*** edmondsw has quit IRC21:48
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting21:48
*** jroll has quit IRC21:49
*** brault has quit IRC21:49
*** xyang1 has quit IRC21:49
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:50
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
*** lamt has quit IRC21:51
*** edmondsw has quit IRC21:53
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck21:53
*** jroll has joined #openstack-meeting21:53
*** iyamahat has quit IRC21:53
*** jamesmca_ has quit IRC21:54
*** ssalagame has joined #openstack-meeting21:54
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** esberglu has quit IRC21:59
*** efried has quit IRC21:59
*** thorst_afk has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:01
*** jaugustine has quit IRC22:01
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** awaugama has quit IRC22:04
*** esberglu has quit IRC22:04
*** spzala has quit IRC22:06
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:08
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting22:08
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:09
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting22:09
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:10
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
*** kylek3h has quit IRC22:10
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:10
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:11
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** rbudden has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:12
*** baoli has quit IRC22:13
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting22:13
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting22:16
*** esberglu has quit IRC22:18
*** emagana has quit IRC22:20
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC22:22
*** sdague has quit IRC22:24
*** mickeys has quit IRC22:25
*** emagana has quit IRC22:25
*** thorst_afk has quit IRC22:29
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting22:32
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
*** abalutoiu has quit IRC22:33
*** dasanind has quit IRC22:34
*** karlamrhein has quit IRC22:34
*** dasanind has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
*** karlamrhein has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
*** coreycb has quit IRC22:37
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:38
*** spzala has quit IRC22:38
*** coreycb has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
*** baoli has quit IRC22:41
*** sshank has joined #openstack-meeting22:42
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting22:43
*** Cibo_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:48
*** chyka has quit IRC22:52
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting22:53
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting22:54
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting22:54
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** ykatabam has quit IRC22:58
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:58
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting22:59
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting23:03
*** s3wong has quit IRC23:04
*** edmondsw has quit IRC23:04
*** annabelleB has quit IRC23:05
*** bobh has quit IRC23:07
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** esberglu has quit IRC23:07
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** slaweq has joined #openstack-meeting23:09
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting23:10
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC23:15
*** slaweq has quit IRC23:15
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting23:16
*** powerd has quit IRC23:16
*** emagana has quit IRC23:20
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting23:22
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC23:26
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting23:26
*** emagana has quit IRC23:27
*** mtanino__ has quit IRC23:30
*** Swami has quit IRC23:34
*** ykatabam has quit IRC23:39
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting23:41
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting23:42
*** chyka has quit IRC23:44
*** hongbin has quit IRC23:45
*** priteau has quit IRC23:45
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC23:46
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck23:48
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC23:49
*** iyamahat has quit IRC23:49
*** yamahata has quit IRC23:50
*** spzala has quit IRC23:50
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck23:51
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** sshank has quit IRC23:55
*** aeng has quit IRC23:59
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting23:59
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!