Tuesday, 2014-12-09

*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting00:02
*** bknudson has quit IRC00:02
*** dims has quit IRC00:02
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting00:02
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC00:02
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** ddieterly has quit IRC00:04
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:06
*** e0ne has quit IRC00:07
*** alex_xu has quit IRC00:07
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting00:08
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting00:11
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC00:11
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting00:11
*** boris-42 has quit IRC00:12
*** annegent_ has quit IRC00:13
*** armax has quit IRC00:13
*** sarob has quit IRC00:16
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting00:17
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting00:18
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:18
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:19
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC00:19
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting00:19
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:20
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC00:21
*** daneyon_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:21
*** Mandell has quit IRC00:22
*** otter768 has quit IRC00:22
*** daneyon has quit IRC00:23
*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:24
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC00:27
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:28
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting00:28
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:28
*** tsekiyam_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
*** mudassirlatif has quit IRC00:30
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting00:31
*** armax has quit IRC00:31
*** tsekiyama has quit IRC00:32
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting00:33
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting00:34
*** sarob has quit IRC00:34
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:34
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting00:35
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC00:35
*** stannie1 has quit IRC00:35
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC00:36
*** stevemar has quit IRC00:36
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:36
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:36
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting00:37
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-meeting00:39
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting00:40
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** Masahiro has quit IRC00:43
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC00:43
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:43
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting00:44
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC00:44
*** eghobo has quit IRC00:45
*** js1123 has quit IRC00:46
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC00:46
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting00:47
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting00:47
*** eghobo has quit IRC00:49
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting00:50
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC00:51
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC00:51
*** annegent_ has quit IRC00:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting00:52
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:52
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting00:52
*** rmoe has quit IRC00:53
*** jaypipes has quit IRC00:55
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC00:56
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting00:56
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting00:58
*** crc32 has quit IRC00:58
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting00:58
*** Riddhi has quit IRC00:58
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** armax has quit IRC01:00
*** e0ne has quit IRC01:02
*** eghobo has quit IRC01:02
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting01:02
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting01:03
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:03
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting01:03
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC01:04
*** eghobo has quit IRC01:04
*** yaguang_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:04
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting01:05
*** tbarron has quit IRC01:06
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting01:06
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC01:06
*** avozza is now known as zz_avozza01:06
*** sunrenjie has quit IRC01:06
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting01:06
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** yaguang has quit IRC01:08
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:08
*** yaguang_ has quit IRC01:08
*** dboik has quit IRC01:09
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC01:11
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC01:15
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting01:16
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting01:16
*** mestery has quit IRC01:18
*** gyee has quit IRC01:19
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC01:20
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting01:20
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:20
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting01:20
*** mestery has quit IRC01:23
*** obondarev has quit IRC01:25
*** tsekiyam_ has quit IRC01:25
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince01:26
*** padkrish has quit IRC01:26
*** tsekiyama has joined #openstack-meeting01:26
*** marun has quit IRC01:27
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC01:28
*** markmcclain has quit IRC01:28
*** andreaf has quit IRC01:28
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC01:28
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC01:30
*** haleyb has quit IRC01:30
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC01:30
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting01:30
*** tsekiyama has quit IRC01:31
*** dpaterson has quit IRC01:33
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting01:33
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting01:34
*** padkrish has quit IRC01:34
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:37
*** e0ne has quit IRC01:37
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:38
*** emagana has quit IRC01:40
*** banix has quit IRC01:40
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting01:40
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC01:40
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting01:41
*** sarob has quit IRC01:41
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting01:41
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting01:43
*** rwsu has quit IRC01:43
*** ChuckC has quit IRC01:50
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting01:55
*** leeantho has quit IRC01:59
*** dsetia has quit IRC02:01
*** bill_az has quit IRC02:01
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC02:06
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting02:07
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting02:08
*** dims has quit IRC02:08
*** ebalduf has quit IRC02:08
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC02:10
*** ajo has quit IRC02:10
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting02:11
*** ChuckC has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** noelbk has joined #openstack-meeting02:13
*** ChuckC has quit IRC02:16
*** ChuckC has joined #openstack-meeting02:16
*** noelbk has quit IRC02:17
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC02:17
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting02:17
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC02:20
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:20
*** e0ne has quit IRC02:20
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting02:22
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:23
*** markvoelker has quit IRC02:23
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:25
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting02:26
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting02:27
*** julim has quit IRC02:27
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC02:27
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting02:28
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting02:28
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting02:30
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting02:30
*** fnaval has quit IRC02:30
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC02:31
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting02:31
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC02:31
*** Masahiro has quit IRC02:31
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting02:31
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting02:31
*** Riddhi has quit IRC02:32
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting02:33
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince02:33
*** stevemar has quit IRC02:33
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting02:36
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:36
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting02:37
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC02:39
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:39
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-meeting02:40
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting02:43
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC02:44
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:45
*** ptoohill_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:45
*** ptoohill_ has quit IRC02:46
*** s3wong has quit IRC02:46
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** ptoohill_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting02:48
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC02:48
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC02:49
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting02:51
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC02:52
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting02:52
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting02:52
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting02:54
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting02:55
*** alex_xu_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting02:55
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
*** alex_xu has quit IRC02:57
*** Lily_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
*** ebalduf has quit IRC03:02
*** vijendar has quit IRC03:03
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting03:05
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting03:11
*** suro_ has quit IRC03:11
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:12
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC03:12
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting03:12
*** dims has quit IRC03:13
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** banix has quit IRC03:14
*** dims has quit IRC03:18
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting03:19
*** dave-mccowan_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:19
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC03:21
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC03:22
*** dave-mccowan_ is now known as dave-mccowan03:22
*** david-lyle is now known as david-lyle_afk03:24
*** saloa has joined #openstack-meeting03:25
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting03:25
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** mtanino has quit IRC03:39
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting03:41
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting03:42
*** ebalduf has quit IRC03:42
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC03:43
*** shankar has joined #openstack-meeting03:46
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:46
*** Masahiro has quit IRC03:47
*** annegent_ has quit IRC03:48
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:48
*** dave-mccowan_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:48
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC03:50
*** dave-mccowan_ is now known as dave-mccowan03:50
*** erlon has quit IRC03:50
*** kebray has quit IRC03:51
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting03:51
*** bradjones has quit IRC03:51
*** Swanson has quit IRC03:51
*** Swanson has joined #openstack-meeting03:51
*** armax has quit IRC03:58
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting03:59
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting03:59
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:00
*** mestery has quit IRC04:00
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting04:00
*** kebray has quit IRC04:00
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting04:01
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC04:01
*** markmcclain has quit IRC04:02
*** baoli has quit IRC04:03
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:05
*** spzala has quit IRC04:08
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** ddieterly has quit IRC04:14
*** kebray has quit IRC04:16
*** achanda has quit IRC04:17
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting04:17
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting04:18
*** kebray has quit IRC04:18
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting04:20
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting04:21
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC04:22
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** achanda has quit IRC04:22
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** dboik has quit IRC04:25
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting04:25
*** rajeshr has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:28
*** tkay has quit IRC04:33
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr04:34
*** alex_xu_ has quit IRC04:35
*** saloa has quit IRC04:35
*** saloa has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting04:37
*** otter768 has quit IRC04:39
*** saloa has quit IRC04:40
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-meeting04:40
*** achanda has quit IRC04:40
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting04:43
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC04:45
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:46
*** armax has quit IRC04:47
*** Masahiro has quit IRC04:47
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting04:48
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** ddieterly has quit IRC04:49
*** rajeshr has quit IRC04:50
*** ebalduf has quit IRC04:54
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting04:57
*** saloa has joined #openstack-meeting04:57
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC04:58
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC04:59
*** saloa has quit IRC05:00
*** saloa has joined #openstack-meeting05:01
*** sirushti has joined #openstack-meeting05:01
*** sirushti has left #openstack-meeting05:02
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting05:02
*** rwsu has quit IRC05:02
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting05:03
*** saloa has quit IRC05:05
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC05:07
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away05:09
*** anish__ has joined #openstack-meeting05:10
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting05:11
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting05:13
*** ddieterly has quit IRC05:16
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away05:16
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-meeting05:18
*** sarob has quit IRC05:18
*** alop has quit IRC05:23
*** yapeng has quit IRC05:25
*** imsurit has joined #openstack-meeting05:28
*** Mandell has quit IRC05:28
*** sun99 has joined #openstack-meeting05:29
*** kopparam has quit IRC05:31
*** kopparam_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:31
*** bdperkin is now known as bdperkin_gone05:31
*** bdperkin_gone is now known as bdperkin05:33
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** alex_xu_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC05:37
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:37
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** pballand has quit IRC05:38
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** alex_xu has quit IRC05:41
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC05:44
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting05:44
*** rakesh_hs has joined #openstack-meeting05:45
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting05:45
*** noslzzp has quit IRC05:47
*** Masahiro has quit IRC05:48
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting05:50
*** ebalduf has quit IRC05:55
*** fnaval has quit IRC05:55
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting05:56
*** Mandell has quit IRC05:56
*** mestery has quit IRC05:57
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:58
*** armax has quit IRC05:58
*** sun99 has left #openstack-meeting05:58
*** fnaval has quit IRC06:00
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting06:01
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting06:03
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:06
*** suro_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:09
*** lpeer__ has joined #openstack-meeting06:09
*** adahms has quit IRC06:10
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting06:11
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC06:11
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting06:11
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting06:12
*** cdub has quit IRC06:12
*** d34dh0r53 has quit IRC06:12
*** fungi has quit IRC06:12
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting06:13
*** d34dh0r53 has joined #openstack-meeting06:13
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC06:13
*** fungi has joined #openstack-meeting06:14
*** sgordon_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:14
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr06:14
*** markmcclain has quit IRC06:15
*** ddieterly has quit IRC06:16
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting06:17
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC06:20
*** rondotcom has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting06:23
*** SridharG has quit IRC06:23
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting06:24
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-meeting06:24
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting06:25
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince06:25
*** kopparam_ has quit IRC06:26
*** SridharG1 has joined #openstack-meeting06:27
*** ildikov_ is now known as ildikov_afk06:28
*** annegent_ has quit IRC06:28
*** SridharG has quit IRC06:28
*** sun99 has joined #openstack-meeting06:30
*** hemna has quit IRC06:31
*** suro_ has quit IRC06:34
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting06:40
*** suro_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:40
*** Murali_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:41
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-meeting06:42
*** russellb has quit IRC06:43
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC06:44
*** kopparam has quit IRC06:44
*** russellb has joined #openstack-meeting06:44
*** otter768 has quit IRC06:44
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting06:45
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-meeting06:45
*** doron_afk has joined #openstack-meeting06:45
*** cdub has quit IRC06:45
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC06:46
*** yalie__ has quit IRC06:47
*** yalie__ has joined #openstack-meeting06:48
*** reed has quit IRC06:56
*** armax has quit IRC06:56
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting06:56
*** xianghui has quit IRC06:57
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting06:57
*** marcoemorais1 has joined #openstack-meeting06:58
*** mrmartin has quit IRC06:59
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC07:01
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting07:02
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting07:03
*** kopparam has quit IRC07:03
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-meeting07:03
*** ptoohill_ has quit IRC07:04
*** shwetaap1 has joined #openstack-meeting07:05
*** shwetaap has quit IRC07:07
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC07:07
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting07:07
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:09
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting07:11
*** pberis has quit IRC07:14
*** pberis has joined #openstack-meeting07:14
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting07:15
*** ddieterly has quit IRC07:16
*** suro_1 has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** suro_ has quit IRC07:18
*** dulek has joined #openstack-meeting07:22
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-meeting07:23
*** Murali_ has quit IRC07:23
*** ChrisPriceAB has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting07:27
*** nuritv__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:28
*** nellysmitt has quit IRC07:28
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:28
*** jyuso has joined #openstack-meeting07:30
*** Murad has joined #openstack-meeting07:31
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting07:33
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting07:33
*** annegent_ has quit IRC07:33
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting07:36
*** shankar has quit IRC07:37
*** Masahiro has quit IRC07:37
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting07:38
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting07:38
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting07:39
*** SridharG1 has quit IRC07:39
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting07:40
*** matiu has quit IRC07:40
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-meeting07:42
*** itzikb_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:44
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC07:44
*** aepifanov has quit IRC07:45
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** moha_hunt has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** rajeshr has joined #openstack-meeting07:46
*** topol has quit IRC07:48
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting07:48
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting07:52
*** dulek has quit IRC07:52
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting07:53
*** suro_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** js1123 has joined #openstack-meeting07:59
*** suro_1 has quit IRC07:59
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting07:59
*** omrim_ has left #openstack-meeting07:59
anteaya#startmeeting third-party08:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  9 08:00:02 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is anteaya. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.08:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.08:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: third-party)"08:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'third_party'08:00
anteayaand we're off08:00
*** omrim_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
anteayaanyone in addition to me around for the third-party meeting?08:00
heyonglianteaya,  hi08:00
*** topol has quit IRC08:00
anteayahey heyongli08:00
heyongliand hello everyone,08:00
MuradHello08:01
anteayahello Murad08:01
*** garyk has quit IRC08:01
heyongliMurad, hi08:01
anteayaMurad: do you have a running ci at the moment?08:01
MuradHi everybody08:01
nuritv__Hello08:01
anteayahello nuritv__08:02
Muradyes, but still in testing things08:02
anteayaMurad: which one is it?08:02
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting08:02
jyusoHi,everyone08:02
omrim_Hello, good morning..08:02
anteayahello omrim_08:02
*** suro_ has quit IRC08:02
swestonhello everyone08:03
anteayaomrim_: remind me which ci is yours08:03
anteayahello sweston08:03
omrim_anteaya: I am from Mellanox CI :)08:03
*** vigneshvar has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
anteayaomrim_: ah terrific, so you are with nuritv__08:03
heyonglihi, omrim_ ,08:04
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:04
MuradI am from Mellanox CI as well08:04
anteayaoh terrific08:04
omrim_anteaya: Yes With Nuritv and Murad08:04
anteayamellanox is well represented then08:04
*** ToMiles has quit IRC08:04
anteayawonderful08:04
anteayaI thought mellanox was already working08:04
anteayaam I mistaken?08:04
omrim_heyongli: Hello08:04
heyonglijyuso and is from Intel Ci08:05
anteayaheyongli: ah wonderful08:05
anteayajyuso had a question we are going to try to answer for him08:05
omrim_anteaya: Mellanox is do working in Neutron project.08:05
anteayaomrim_: ah, okay thanks08:06
*** shankar has joined #openstack-meeting08:06
anteayaso for this first meeting mostly I wanted a chance for everyone to get to know each other08:06
*** nuritv__ has quit IRC08:06
anteayathen we can discuss what people want to accomplish08:06
anteayaand how best we can use this time08:06
omrim_anteaya: So everyone should say his name and his favorite color..:)08:07
anteayahis or her08:07
*** mrda is now known as mrda-away08:07
anteayaand sure, that might be a nice way to begin08:07
anteayaomrim_: would you like to go first?08:07
omrim_anteaya: Sure his or her..sorry08:08
*** aepifanov has quit IRC08:08
anteayano problem08:08
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting08:08
omrim_anteaya: My name is Omri I am from Mellanox and My best color is Red!08:08
anteayagreat thanks omrim08:08
anteayaanyone else want to take turn?08:08
heyonglii'm Yongli He, from intel CI,  also fans red, hope you guy say to me on irc, then i got many many line red!08:08
anteayaglad you like red then, you see a lot of it :D08:09
*** wuhg has joined #openstack-meeting08:09
MuradMy name is Murad from Mellanox CI, my favorite color is blue08:09
*** AJaeger has joined #openstack-meeting08:09
anteayathank you murad08:09
anteayawho is next?08:10
*** doron_afk is now known as doron_08:10
swestonMy name is Steve, from Triniplex, and my favorite color is green (especially when Jenkins reports success) :-)08:10
jheskethHowdy08:10
* jhesketh will be watching not very closely but can be pinged08:10
anteayathanks jhesketh08:11
anteayathanks steve08:11
jyusoMy name is Jiang Yu,come from Intel CI,I like blue. Nice to meet you,guys:)08:11
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting08:11
anteayawonderful thank you Jiang08:11
trinathsHi08:11
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting08:11
anteayawould I say Jiang or would I say Yu?08:11
jyusoYu is better:)08:11
anteayajyuso: thank you, I learned something new08:11
anteayajyuso: thank you Yu08:12
anteayahello trinaths08:12
anteayaomrim_: are you able to tell trinaths what we are doing?08:12
trinathsHi anteaya, and all08:12
omrim_Sure08:12
trinathsI'm  late to the meeting..08:13
omrim_trinaths: The purpose of this meeting is to discuss issue and new features in Openstack CI and infrastructure08:14
*** ddieterly has quit IRC08:14
anteayaomrim_: and what are we doing right now?08:15
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
trinathsokay.08:15
anteayaso that trinaths can participate08:15
heyongliwe are introduce to each other , trinaths . -:)08:15
trinathsOkay,08:16
anteayaomrim_ | anteaya: So everyone should say his name and his favorite color..:)08:16
anteayatrinaths: do you want to take a turn?08:16
trinathsyes08:16
trinathsMy Name is Trinath Somanchi, from Freescale. Maintainer of Freescale CI from Juno. My favourite color white. Excited to meet you all. :)08:17
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting08:17
anteayawonderful thank you trinaths08:17
anteayamy name is Anita, I work with the OpenStack infra team, my favourite colour is purple08:18
anteayaanyone else?08:18
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting08:18
itzikb_Hi, I'm Itzik from Redhat. Color can't be other than red..08:18
anteayaitzikb_: ha ha ha08:18
trinathsitzikb_: :)08:18
anteayaitzikb_: hello and glad to have you here08:18
itzikb_anteaya: tnx ;-008:18
itzikb_:-)08:19
anteaya:D08:19
anteayaanyone else?08:19
omrim_itzikb_: :)08:19
*** ddieterly has quit IRC08:19
*** henrynash has quit IRC08:19
anteayaokays so let's move on08:19
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
anteayait is nice to meet you all08:19
anteayathanks for suggesting a good icebreaker omrim_08:20
anteayaso we will meet together for a bit08:20
anteayaand gradually we will come up with a structure for meetings08:20
anteayaand a sense of purpose for them08:20
anteayapart of it will be getting news from other programs08:21
anteayaand part of it will be for all of you to help each other08:21
anteayaso in the interest of helping each other08:21
*** imsurit has quit IRC08:21
SergeyLukjanovo/08:21
* SergeyLukjanov lurking08:21
anteayajyuso had a question he asked earlier in the -infra channel08:21
anteayahello SergeyLukjanov and welcome08:21
anteayaSergeyLukjanov: did you want to introduce yourself and share your favourite colour?08:22
SergeyLukjanovanteaya, sure08:22
*** andreaf has quit IRC08:23
SergeyLukjanovSergey Lukjanov, Sahara CI, ???08:23
anteayano favourite colour?08:23
* SergeyLukjanov not sure about colour08:23
SergeyLukjanovmost probably it's red08:23
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
anteayared seems to be a popular choice with this group08:23
anteaya:D08:23
anteayathanks SergeyLukjanov08:24
anteayaso let's get to jyuso's question08:24
anteayajyuso: I know you already got one answer in -infra08:24
jyusoanteaya: yes08:24
anteayajyuso: do you mind sharing your question08:24
*** js1123 has quit IRC08:24
anteayaso that others can know what you asked?08:24
*** nellysmitt has joined #openstack-meeting08:24
anteayajyuso: do you remember what you asked?08:26
jyusoYes.I'm confused about why the content of compressed logs("xxx.txt.gz") couldn't be previewed on my browser.It will be downloaded after clicked.I want to know how to configure Apache server if I want to preview compressed logs.That's my question.08:26
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:26
anteayagreat thank you jyuso08:26
anteayathis is a very common question08:26
*** phil___ has joined #openstack-meeting08:26
anteayanow jyuso did get a reply in the -infra channel08:26
anteayaand I would like common type questions like this to be brought and addressed in third-party meetings08:27
*** js1123 has joined #openstack-meeting08:27
anteayawe have two a week now, so there are more opportunites for people to get answers to common questions08:27
*** mpaolino has quit IRC08:27
anteayahow would others in the meeting answer this question?08:27
*** doron_ is now known as doron_afk08:27
omrim_anteaya: Maybe we should create a FAQ page for a common questions/issues08:28
anteayaomrim_: that is a good idea08:28
anteayaomrim_: would you like to offer a patch to the third_party.rst file?08:29
*** ndipanov_gone is now known as ndipanov08:29
anteaya#link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/system-config/tree/doc/source/third_party.rst08:29
anteayaomrim_: you can start a section and provide a response to jyuso's question08:30
anteayaomrim_: does that sound like something you would be willing to offer a patch for?08:31
omrim_anteaya: Sure08:31
anteayathank you08:31
jyusoomrim_: Thank you08:31
anteayain the meantime, how would you reply to jyuso's question?08:31
anteayaopen question to anyone08:31
omrim_anteaya: I sorry for the question the "third_party.rst" file is a spec file that for such an idea like FAQ page?08:31
*** trinaths has quit IRC08:32
omrim_**that is used for08:32
anteayaomrim_: no we do'nt need a spec file, just offer a patch and it will be reviewed08:32
anteayajyuso: okay so noone else has a reply08:32
anteayajyuso: would you care to share the reply you got in the -infra channel?08:33
*** asettle has quit IRC08:33
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting08:33
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting08:33
jyusoanteaya: OK08:33
anteayathank you08:33
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting08:33
*** zz_avozza is now known as avozza08:33
jyusoanteaya: It is a Apache conf file from dougwig.URL:https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/t1Yx0e8y08:34
anteayagreat08:34
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting08:34
heyonglijyuso,  is it verified?08:34
anteayafrom a quick glance I would say this is the important part:  <FilesMatch ".*\.gz$">08:35
anteayaForceType text/plain08:35
anteaya</FilesMatch>08:35
jyusoheyongli: not working yet.08:35
anteayaheyongli: this was a conf file from someone else who solved the problem with this file08:35
heyonglijyuso, anteaya, cool.08:36
anteayaand this is a problem every new ci operator encounters08:36
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting08:36
anteayaso omrim_'s idea is a good one, capturing a response in a section of frequently asked questions will be helpful08:36
*** avozza is now known as zz_avozza08:36
anteayaat the very least when people ask this question in meetings or on the mailing list, you can provide a link to the file that contains a useful reply08:37
anteayaso this is wonderful thank you08:37
anteayadoes anyone else have any questions about the operation of their ci system right now?08:37
heyongliit's great.08:37
anteaya:D08:38
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:38
*** Masahiro has quit IRC08:38
anteayaokay so I'm going to move on then08:39
trinathsdo we  need to upgrade Zuul upon its new releases?08:39
anteayasome things to be aware of08:39
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC08:39
anteayatrinaths: that is a good question08:39
*** sun99 has quit IRC08:39
anteayalet's see if SergeyLukjanov or jhesketh are available to share their thoughts on that question08:39
* SergeyLukjanov reading the log08:39
anteayathe question was trinaths about zuul upgrades08:40
anteayawhen zuul has a new release08:40
anteayawhat are the recommendations about upgrading?08:40
SergeyLukjanovwe have no releases for zuul08:40
anteayathat makes that easy08:40
SergeyLukjanovpuppet updates the code after each commit08:40
SergeyLukjanovmerged08:40
anteayatrinaths: does that help?08:41
trinathsSergeyLukjanov: okay.08:41
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
trinathsanteaya: yes.08:41
anteayagreat08:41
anteayatrinaths: thanks for the question and thank you SergeyLukjanov for the reply08:41
anteayaany other questions right now?08:41
SergeyLukjanovanteaya, np08:41
jheskethAll changes to zuul are backwards compatible. We will do a release if we need to break something in the future08:41
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
anteayathanks jhesketh08:42
omrim_I have an update08:42
swestonI have another suggestion for jyuso08:42
anteayaomrim_: please go ahead08:42
anteayaokay thanks sweston let's let omrim_ go first you can be next08:42
swestonof course, omrim_ you have the floor :-)08:43
omrim_If someone try to install devstack with the nova master branch08:43
*** doude has joined #openstack-meeting08:43
jyusoHi.sweston.Thank you for your suggestion:)08:43
omrim_He could see that the nova api would not be start...08:43
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
omrim_In oreder to fix that all you have to do is to update the python: retrying package08:44
*** vigneshvar_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
omrim_So the version should be: 1.3.2:08:44
omrim_>>> pkg_resources.get_distribution('retrying').version '1.3.2'08:44
omrim_The Devstack error is:014-12-09 08:04:59.729 | + echo 'Waiting for nova-api to start...' 2014-12-09 08:04:59.729 | Waiting for nova-api to start... 2014-12-09 08:04:59.729 | + wait_for_service 60 http://10.209.32.236:8774 2014-12-09 08:04:59.729 | + local timeout=60 2014-12-09 08:04:59.729 | + local url=http://10.209.32.236:8774 2014-12-09 08:04:59.729 | + timeout 60 sh -c 'while ! curl -k --noproxy '\''*'\'' -s http://10.08:45
anteayaokay so this is a great reminder of when to use paste.openstack.org08:45
*** otter768 has quit IRC08:45
anteayaso for code that is more than 2 lines long, please use paste.openstack.org to share code samples08:46
anteayaokay thank you omrim_08:46
omrim_Sure, Next time..Thanks08:46
anteayaomrim_: thank you08:46
anteayaanyone with any questions or comments for omrim_ on this example?08:46
heyongliomrim_,  great to know , thank you.08:47
anteayaokay great, thank you omrim_08:47
anteayasweston: you're up08:47
swestonok, so if that code snipped you already have doesn't work for the log server, please try this one: http://paste.openstack.org/show/147724/08:48
*** vigneshvar has quit IRC08:48
*** berendt has joined #openstack-meeting08:49
anteayasweston: can you share how yours is different?08:49
swestonthe output filter needs to be there, I believe08:49
jyusosweston: Thanks.It looks like a ".htaccess" conf file.was it?08:50
omrim_sweston: Where this code should be snipped?08:50
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting08:50
*** doron_afk is now known as doron_08:50
swestonjyuso: omrim_ good question, so this would go into the apache config file in between the document root tags08:50
omrim_sweston: Thanks08:51
anteayathanks sweston08:52
itzikb_I want to ask which tests are running in third party testing? API ?08:52
swestonomrim_: anteaya you're welcome08:52
anteayaitzikb_: let's just finish sweston's item and then we can address your question08:52
*** sergef has joined #openstack-meeting08:52
jyusosweston: thanks08:52
anteayajyuso: so when you have an apache conf file that works for you08:52
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting08:52
swestonjyuso: you're welcome08:53
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:53
anteayajyuso: can you review omrim_'s patch so that you can share your experience in your review?08:53
jyusoanteaya: OK,no problem.08:53
anteayajyuso: thank you08:53
anteayaso omrim_ when you have a patch, ping jyuso with the url please08:54
anteayaokay so itzikb_'s question08:54
anteayawhich tests are running is the question I believe08:54
itzikb_anteaya: yes08:54
anteayaand the answer depends on which repo you are testing08:54
anteayawhich repo or repos do you want to test?08:55
*** zz_avozza is now known as avozza08:55
*** jcoufal_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:55
itzikb_anteaya: I'm talking about checking basic connectivity08:55
anteayadoes anyone have a reply to itzikb_'s question?08:56
omrim_jyuso: In which IRC channel can I found you? (Sorry for the interupt)08:56
trinathsitzikb_: can you be clear on basic connectivity?08:57
jyusoomrim_: openstack-infra is OK.:)08:57
omrim_itzikb_: Are you talking about Scenarios?08:57
itzikb_omrim_: yes08:57
*** ebalduf has quit IRC08:58
omrim_itzikb_: So has anteaya mentiond it's depend in which job and infrastucture (SRIOV, OVS etc..)08:58
itzikb_omrim_: ok So i'll be more specific - SR-IOV08:58
*** jcoufal has quit IRC08:59
anteayawe are almost at time08:59
anteayaitzikb_: SR-IOV is fairly specific08:59
anteayaand we are just getting things in place to test that08:59
heyongliitzikb_,  the testcases for SRIOV/pci is under discuss. i think.08:59
anteayaitzikb_: can you follow the mailing list thread with the [telcos] filter09:00
omrim_itzikb_: There should be some basic senario for connectiviy (Broders\Non Broders connectivity)09:00
anteayaand I believe sgordon chairs a meeting on SR-IOV as well, it might be a good idea to attend that09:00
anteayaand we are at time09:00
anteayathis was a very productive meeting09:00
anteayaI would like to thank everyone for attending09:01
anteayathanks so much for sharing09:01
heyonglithanks anteaya .09:01
anteayawe have to end here09:01
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting09:01
trinathsthanks anteaya09:01
anteayasee you next week09:01
heyonglithen, see you09:01
omrim_Thank you!09:01
anteayathank you09:01
swestonthanks everyone09:01
anteaya#endmeeting09:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"09:01
*** mpaolino has quit IRC09:01
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  9 09:01:30 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)09:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2014/third_party.2014-12-09-08.00.html09:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2014/third_party.2014-12-09-08.00.txt09:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/third_party/2014/third_party.2014-12-09-08.00.log.html09:01
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting09:04
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:06
*** jwang has quit IRC09:06
*** AJaeger has left #openstack-meeting09:07
*** xuhanp has quit IRC09:08
*** luqas has quit IRC09:11
*** BharatK has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** trinaths has left #openstack-meeting09:11
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting09:12
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting09:12
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting09:15
*** avozza is now known as zz_avozza09:15
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting09:16
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting09:16
*** zz_avozza is now known as avozza09:16
*** BharatK has quit IRC09:16
*** henrynash has quit IRC09:21
*** doron_ is now known as doron_afk09:22
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting09:24
*** dulek has joined #openstack-meeting09:28
*** kopparam has quit IRC09:31
*** kopparam_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:31
*** BharatK has joined #openstack-meeting09:31
*** Longgeek has quit IRC09:32
*** marrusl has quit IRC09:33
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting09:35
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting09:35
*** paragan has quit IRC09:37
*** Mandell has quit IRC09:38
*** isviridov_away is now known as isviridov09:41
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:42
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting09:44
*** berendt has quit IRC09:44
*** doron_afk is now known as doron_09:45
*** luqas has quit IRC09:46
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting09:46
*** lazy_prince is now known as killer_prince09:46
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting09:47
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:48
*** pelix has joined #openstack-meeting09:48
*** Murad has quit IRC09:48
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC09:49
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:49
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince09:49
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC09:54
*** imsurit has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** xek has joined #openstack-meeting09:57
*** doron_ is now known as doron_afk09:59
*** andreykurilin__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:00
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC10:00
*** alex_xu_ has quit IRC10:01
*** Fdot has quit IRC10:03
*** stevemar has quit IRC10:04
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting10:04
*** lazy_prince is now known as killer_prince10:07
*** xek has quit IRC10:10
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:18
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting10:22
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting10:23
*** scinawa has joined #openstack-meeting10:23
*** mpaolino has quit IRC10:24
*** nshaikh has quit IRC10:24
*** MaxV has quit IRC10:26
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** Masahiro has quit IRC10:27
*** epico has quit IRC10:27
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting10:29
*** MaxV has quit IRC10:33
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting10:33
*** MaxV has quit IRC10:33
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting10:33
*** alex7376 has joined #openstack-meeting10:35
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting10:39
*** marcoemorais1 has quit IRC10:40
*** killer_prince is now known as lazy_prince10:41
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting10:42
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting10:45
*** otter768 has quit IRC10:46
*** mrmartin has quit IRC10:46
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting10:47
*** mrmartin has quit IRC10:47
*** andreykurilin__ has quit IRC10:48
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:48
*** DinaBelova has quit IRC10:48
*** NikitaKonovalov has quit IRC10:48
*** aignatov has quit IRC10:48
*** DinaBelova has joined #openstack-meeting10:48
*** aignatov has joined #openstack-meeting10:49
*** NikitaKonovalov has joined #openstack-meeting10:49
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:50
*** shwetaap1 has quit IRC10:51
*** niclem has quit IRC10:51
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:54
*** luqas has quit IRC10:54
*** Longgeek has quit IRC10:54
*** xuhanp has quit IRC10:54
*** nshaikh has quit IRC10:55
*** luqas__ has quit IRC10:55
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting10:56
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:56
*** jgallard has quit IRC10:57
*** luqas___ has joined #openstack-meeting10:58
*** luqas__ has quit IRC10:58
*** kopparam_ has quit IRC10:58
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-meeting10:59
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting11:00
*** luqas___ has quit IRC11:01
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting11:03
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:04
*** luqas__ has quit IRC11:04
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting11:04
*** luqas has quit IRC11:05
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:05
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:08
*** luqas has quit IRC11:09
*** adahms has joined #openstack-meeting11:09
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:09
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:09
*** MaxV has quit IRC11:10
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** luqas has quit IRC11:11
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:12
*** sergef has quit IRC11:13
*** luqas has quit IRC11:14
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting11:14
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting11:15
*** luqas__ has quit IRC11:16
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:16
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting11:17
*** luqas has quit IRC11:17
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:18
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:18
*** luqas has quit IRC11:20
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:20
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting11:22
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC11:22
*** luqas has quit IRC11:23
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:23
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting11:26
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting11:26
*** luqas has quit IRC11:27
*** garyk has quit IRC11:27
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting11:27
*** luqas___ has joined #openstack-meeting11:28
*** luqas__ has quit IRC11:29
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting11:31
*** luqas___ has quit IRC11:31
*** pradipta_away is now known as pradipta11:32
*** bvandenh has quit IRC11:33
*** luqas__ has quit IRC11:33
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting11:33
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-meeting11:35
*** luqas__ has quit IRC11:36
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting11:36
*** pradipta is now known as pradipta_away11:38
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting11:39
*** luqas__ has quit IRC11:40
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting11:42
*** aysyd has joined #openstack-meeting11:43
*** MaxV has quit IRC11:44
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting11:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:49
*** fwdit has quit IRC11:50
*** hashar has quit IRC11:53
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting11:53
*** jtomasek has quit IRC11:54
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting11:55
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting12:00
*** adalbas has quit IRC12:01
*** luqas has quit IRC12:02
*** js1123 has quit IRC12:02
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting12:02
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting12:04
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting12:04
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting12:05
*** adalbas has quit IRC12:06
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting12:07
*** noelbk has joined #openstack-meeting12:08
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:08
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting12:12
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting12:12
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** baoli has quit IRC12:15
*** Masahiro has quit IRC12:15
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting12:16
*** irenab has quit IRC12:19
*** shankar has quit IRC12:19
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting12:20
*** nshaikh has quit IRC12:21
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting12:21
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting12:22
*** sergef has joined #openstack-meeting12:24
*** luqas has quit IRC12:24
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting12:24
*** chandankumar has quit IRC12:25
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC12:25
*** luqas has quit IRC12:26
*** rajeshr has quit IRC12:26
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting12:27
*** luqas has quit IRC12:29
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** e0ne has quit IRC12:31
*** luqas has quit IRC12:31
*** cbouch has quit IRC12:31
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting12:32
*** luqas has quit IRC12:34
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting12:34
*** oomichi has quit IRC12:36
*** luqas has quit IRC12:36
*** shankar has joined #openstack-meeting12:36
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting12:36
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting12:38
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting12:38
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** luqas has quit IRC12:40
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting12:40
*** xianghui has quit IRC12:41
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting12:41
*** anish__ has quit IRC12:42
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting12:42
*** kopparam has quit IRC12:45
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting12:45
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC12:46
*** erikmoe has joined #openstack-meeting12:47
*** otter768 has quit IRC12:47
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting12:50
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC12:51
*** imsurit has quit IRC12:51
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting12:53
*** IanGovett has joined #openstack-meeting12:54
*** hashar has quit IRC12:56
*** js1123 has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** Longgeek has quit IRC12:58
*** dpaterson has joined #openstack-meeting12:59
*** pberis has quit IRC13:00
*** nirupma__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:00
*** xuhanp has quit IRC13:00
*** nirupma__ has quit IRC13:00
*** rakesh_hs has quit IRC13:02
*** mpaolino has quit IRC13:03
*** imsurit has joined #openstack-meeting13:03
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** niclem has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** jtomasek has quit IRC13:10
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting13:11
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:11
*** shankar has quit IRC13:11
*** xianghui has quit IRC13:14
*** obondarev has quit IRC13:14
*** itzikb_ has left #openstack-meeting13:16
*** aepifanov has quit IRC13:17
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC13:17
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** enikanorov__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez13:18
*** tnurlygayanov has quit IRC13:18
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC13:18
*** vvechkanov has quit IRC13:18
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** vvechkanov has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** tnurlygayanov has joined #openstack-meeting13:20
*** erikmoe has quit IRC13:22
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting13:23
*** erikmoe has joined #openstack-meeting13:24
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting13:25
*** shwetaap has quit IRC13:26
*** jecarey has quit IRC13:31
*** vigneshvar_ has quit IRC13:31
*** xek has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC13:36
*** juzuluag has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** bknudson has quit IRC13:37
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
*** vvechkanov has quit IRC13:43
*** Mandell has quit IRC13:43
*** vigneshvar_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away13:44
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting13:46
*** ddieterly has quit IRC13:46
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting13:47
*** vigneshvar_ has quit IRC13:49
*** Longgeek_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** Longgeek has quit IRC13:52
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC13:52
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** FJB has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** Masahiro has quit IRC14:04
*** baoli has quit IRC14:05
*** annegent_ has quit IRC14:06
*** shwetaap has quit IRC14:07
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** luqas__ has quit IRC14:10
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** BharatK has quit IRC14:11
*** saloa has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** luqas__ has quit IRC14:12
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
*** beagles has quit IRC14:14
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC14:14
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
*** luqas has quit IRC14:15
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
*** luqas has quit IRC14:17
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** jckasper has quit IRC14:19
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** luqas has quit IRC14:19
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** changbl has quit IRC14:20
*** k4n0 has quit IRC14:21
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
*** luqas has quit IRC14:22
*** Longgeek_ has quit IRC14:22
*** dave-mccowan_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:23
*** BharatK has joined #openstack-meeting14:23
*** luqas has quit IRC14:24
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC14:25
*** dave-mccowan_ is now known as dave-mccowan14:25
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting14:26
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
*** niclem has quit IRC14:28
*** luqas has quit IRC14:28
*** whenry has quit IRC14:29
*** KanagarajM has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** luqas__ has quit IRC14:29
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** mestery has quit IRC14:29
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** markmcclain has quit IRC14:31
*** avozza is now known as zz_avozza14:31
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** luqas has quit IRC14:33
*** shwetaap has quit IRC14:33
*** sergef has quit IRC14:34
*** luqas__ has quit IRC14:34
*** luqas___ has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
*** nshaikh has quit IRC14:36
*** zz_avozza is now known as avozza14:36
*** luqas___ has quit IRC14:37
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
*** pnavarro has quit IRC14:38
*** luqas has quit IRC14:39
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
*** Longgeek has quit IRC14:39
*** jtomasek has quit IRC14:41
*** b3nt_pin has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
*** bvandenh has quit IRC14:45
*** jtomasek has quit IRC14:46
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting14:46
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** otter768 has quit IRC14:48
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr14:48
*** erikmoe has quit IRC14:49
*** erikmoe has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** erikmoe has left #openstack-meeting14:49
*** e0ne has quit IRC14:49
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
*** yapeng_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
*** alexpilotti_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** b3nt_pin has quit IRC14:54
*** Fdot has quit IRC14:54
*** b3nt_pin has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** jckasper_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** b3nt_pin is now known as Guest4835514:55
*** Guest48355 has quit IRC14:56
*** vitreous_oculi has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
*** vitreous_oculi is now known as beagles14:56
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC14:57
*** alexpilotti_ is now known as alexpilotti14:57
*** beagles has quit IRC14:58
*** adahms has quit IRC14:58
*** vitreous_oculi has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC14:59
*** ndipanov has quit IRC14:59
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
n0anobummer, Neutron must not have met today so I don't get to kick anyone out :-)14:59
n0ano#startmeeting gantt15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  9 15:00:03 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:00
bauzas\o/15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'gantt'15:00
n0anoanyone here to talk about the scheduler15:00
*** eharney has quit IRC15:00
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away15:00
bauzas\o15:00
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
*** sergef has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
*** luqas has quit IRC15:00
alex_xuhello, all, first time join this meeting :)15:00
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
n0anoalex_xu, welcome15:00
edleafe\o15:00
alex_xun0ano, thanks! :)15:00
bauzasalex_xu: welcome on board15:00
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
alex_xubauzas, thanks!15:01
*** zz_jgrimm is now known as jgrimm15:01
bauzasalex_xu: isn't quite an awful time for you ?15:01
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
alex_xubauzas, it's fine, just late sleep time about one hour15:01
bauzasalex_xu: GMT+8 ?15:01
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
alex_xubauzas, yes, now it's 11pm15:02
*** luqas has quit IRC15:02
bauzasah15:02
n0anobauzas, should be 11PM his time (I don't even go to bed then)15:02
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
n0anowow, my timezone is correct, that's a first :-)15:02
n0anoanyway, let15:02
n0anoanyway, let's start15:02
bauzasn0ano: hell, I know how it's cool to attend 11pm's meetings, so I truly appreciate his presence :)15:02
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** obondarev has quit IRC15:03
n0ano#topic forklift status15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "forklift status (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:03
bauzasI guess it's the only topic we have to cover ?15:03
n0anobauzas, I see you got another spec approved, congratulation15:03
n0anobauzas, that & opens15:03
bauzasn0ano: yeah that's cool15:03
bauzasn0ano: the one dependent is having one +215:04
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
*** ian_ott has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
bauzasmaybe some pointers could be useful actually15:04
*** sgordon_ has quit IRC15:04
bauzas#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gantt/kilo#Tasks15:04
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC15:04
bauzas#info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127610/ has been approved15:05
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
bauzashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/127612/ is having one +215:05
*** avozza is now known as zz_avozza15:05
bauzasso we're in a good shape for both acceptance by K215:05
*** zz_avozza is now known as avozza15:05
n0anobauzas, 127612 is rather critical, do you see a problem with getting the second +215:06
bauzaseven if we can't make the second for spec freeze, I think we have good chances to get an exception15:06
bauzasn0ano: nope, not really, maybe the filt_props merge with req_spec could be debatable15:06
bauzasn0ano: but nothing really needing a -215:06
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
n0anosounds cautiously optimistic then15:07
bauzasn0ano: eh15:07
n0anoI prefer to let that work it's way through15:07
bauzasn0ano: sounds pragmaticly optimistic :)15:07
n0anoabout the others15:07
n0ano#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/127609/15:07
bauzasn0ano: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89893/ is having a -2 from johnthetubaguy15:07
bauzasjaypipes: around ?15:08
bauzasjaypipes: Gantt meeting eh ;)15:08
*** jgrimm is now known as zz_jgrimm15:08
*** pberis has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
bauzasn0ano: I can see some implementation proposal which seems good to me15:08
bauzasn0ano: this spec is having -1 tho15:08
bauzasn0ano: but it seems it's a nitpikc15:09
bauzasn0ano: so I'm still confident15:09
n0anowe still on 89893, the only thing I see is an x from garbutt15:09
bauzasn0ano: if you see the -1, it comes from something missing15:09
bauzasn0ano: yeah, so 8989315:09
bauzasn0ano: so, I had a crossbar from him because he was not liking my former proposal15:09
bauzasn0ano: so we google hangouted 2 weeks ago15:10
n0anoyeah, his comment was like the approach, issues with the implementation, those should be resolvable15:10
bauzasn0ano: and the new PS is based on our discussions15:10
*** vijendar has quit IRC15:10
*** nellysmitt has left #openstack-meeting15:10
bauzasn0ano: unfortunately, john is on travel these days, so that's hard to get him15:10
bauzasn0ano: in order to ask him to remove his now procedural -215:11
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
n0anomy concern is the spec freeze next week, are we at risk of missing that?15:11
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
bauzasn0ano: that said, still on the spec, I'm really interested in getting feedback from you and the team15:11
bauzasn0ano: I don't think so15:11
*** lazy_prince is now known as killer_prince15:11
bauzasn0ano: by discussing with john, I've been told that priorities are in good shape for asking exceptions15:12
edleafeAnd 138444 will follow the same pattern as 89893, so that should be done right after15:12
bauzasn0ano: and both missing approvals are quite having consensus now15:12
bauzasedleafe: yeah, that sounds feasible15:12
bauzasn0ano: to be clear, K1 is not the spec freeze15:12
n0anobauzas, edleafe cool, so the table looks iffy but the reality is we're in reasonable shape15:13
bauzasn0ano: that's somewhere in between K1 and K215:13
n0anobauzas, that's not my understanding, I thought from the Nova meeting last week 12/18 was the spec freeze date15:13
bauzasn0ano: but I will chase this up in the next Nova meeting on Thurs15:13
bauzasn0ano: I hope to see a spec "proposal" freeze15:13
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr15:14
n0anobauzas, good to confirm that but I think we're in good shape either way15:14
bauzasn0ano: as I said, things are different if you're working on a priority thing15:14
n0anobauzas, +115:14
bauzasn0ano: agreed15:14
bauzasn0ano: so, in front of implementation patches15:14
bauzasn0ano: I have one small tactical victory15:15
*** ChuckC_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
bauzasthat's fresh news15:15
bauzashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/126372/1915:15
bauzasis merged15:15
*** MeganR has quit IRC15:15
*** ChuckC has quit IRC15:15
n0anoI remember that, good news15:15
*** bobmel_ has quit IRC15:15
bauzasthat's the first patch of the bp/detach-service-from-computenode series15:15
bauzasthe next 3 ones are also in a good shape15:16
bauzas*but*15:16
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
bauzassomewhere in the series, I'm objectifying calls to compute_nodes table15:16
*** yapeng_ is now known as yapeng15:16
bauzasI can try to delay this patch the farest I can15:16
bauzasbecause that's blocked due to pci_stats missing15:17
bauzasin the ComputeNode Object15:17
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
n0anobauzas, is that blocked on jay's resource object model changes?15:17
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
*** luqas has quit IRC15:18
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting15:18
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting15:18
bauzasn0ano: not at all15:18
bauzasn0ano: this patch is independent15:18
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
n0anowell that's good, I worry when both you and jay are talking about objects in different areas15:19
bauzasn0ano: basically, I'm changing how scheduler, cells and API are accessing compute_nodes table15:19
bauzasn0ano: all the calls will be done using the ComputeNodeList.get_all() object method15:19
bauzasjaypipes was also working on the same thing in the HostManager15:19
n0anobut you both have to deal with the PCI info15:20
bauzas*but* both of us are blocked because we can't yet use the ComputeNode object as it's missing the pci_stats thing15:20
bauzasn0ano: exactly15:20
bauzashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/137847/15:20
*** luqas has quit IRC15:20
bauzasn0ano: ^ is the patch fixing that15:20
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
bauzasn0ano: led by Paul Murray15:20
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
bauzasn0ano: but some details need to be fixed15:20
bauzasn0ano: so as I'm blocked, I'm leaving this bp/detach-service-from-computenode series15:21
n0anoI trust paul but it looks like he's got some issues to resolve, might take  a little work15:21
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
bauzasn0ano: exactly15:21
*** ChuckC_ has quit IRC15:21
bauzasn0ano: so my strategy is to descope from this blueprint (which was targeted for K1) and work on the request-spec-object BP which was targeted for K2 - in advance15:22
jaypipeshey guys, sorry... stepped away for a bit.15:22
*** MeganR has left #openstack-meeting15:22
bauzasn0ano: and leave the good bits from detach-service to be merged when possible - until the object patch15:22
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC15:22
n0anobauzas, sounds like a plan15:22
*** shwetaap has quit IRC15:23
bauzasn0ano: so I actually provided a first patch for request-spec-object15:23
bauzashttps://review.openstack.org/13968415:23
bauzasthat's not that important but it was left in the spec to upgrade the RPC API version15:23
jaypipesyeah, guys, I was at an offsit all last part of last week so still playing catchup on reviews and emails. :(15:23
bauzasso did I15:23
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting15:23
bauzasjaypipes: no worries, feel free to rewind the backlog ;)15:24
n0anojaypipes, no excuses, the internet is everywhere :-)15:24
* bauzas can see the difference of hospitality in between bauzas and n0ano15:24
* n0ano has a tendency to crack the whip a bit :-)15:24
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC15:25
bauzas:)15:25
n0anojaypipes, summary, yet another spec approved, cautiosly optimistic, lots of reviews needed15:25
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting15:25
bauzaseh, we're working ;)15:25
n0anos/cautiosly/cautiously15:25
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC15:25
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:26
*** avozza is now known as zz_avozza15:26
*** scinawa has quit IRC15:26
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC15:26
*** obondarev has quit IRC15:26
n0anojaypipes, anyway, the big one for you is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/resource-objects any update on that15:26
jaypipesn0ano: waiting on follow up round of reviews from folks, including danpb. But it's generally waiting for the work from ptm and bauzas, so I've been focusing on reviewing those patch series.15:27
jaypipesalong with all the nUMA objects stuff, which was a crap-ton of work.15:27
*** zz_avozza is now known as avozza15:27
n0anosounds like there's no major problem, `just do it`15:28
*** kebray has quit IRC15:28
bauzasjaypipes: are you blocked on me ?15:28
bauzasjaypipes: orly ?15:29
bauzasjaypipes: how can I help you then ?15:29
*** lpeer__ has quit IRC15:29
jaypipesbauzas: nope, not blocked on you... just need to wait for your objects changes to land before I continue with more work on the resourc eobjects.15:29
bauzasjaypipes: you mean the RequestSpec object ?15:31
bauzasjaypipes: or the objectification of calls to compute_nodes table ?15:31
* bauzas thinks the word "object" is definitely too wide now :)15:31
*** zz_jgrimm is now known as jgrimm15:32
n0anobauzas, not too wide, we just have a lot of work related to objects15:32
jaypipesbauzas: the objectification of calls to the compute_nodes table.15:32
bauzasjaypipes: oh ok15:32
*** gokrokve has quit IRC15:32
*** n0ano has quit IRC15:32
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
bauzasjaypipes: as I said previously, I'm not targeting to work on this until paul's patch merges15:33
*** ndipanov_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
jaypipesbauzas: yes, understood.15:33
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
bauzasjaypipes: so https://review.openstack.org/137847 is the top priority then :)15:33
jaypipesyes15:33
bauzasn0ano: ^15:33
*** mpaolino has quit IRC15:33
n0anosigh, xchat just crashed, I'm back now, what did I miss?15:33
*** wuhg has quit IRC15:33
bauzaswe were just asking you to work15:34
bauzas:)15:34
bauzasn0ano: https://review.openstack.org/137847 is top prio15:34
*** ndipanov has quit IRC15:34
n0anoyou can ask, whether you can get me to do it is a different thing15:34
bauzasn0ano: so reviews are welcome15:34
n0anoOK, good to know, as always - review, review, review15:34
bauzasn0ano: I'll ask paul if he has time for fixing the comments before I'm putting this patch on the magical etherpad15:35
bauzasthe magical etherpad being the one figuring all the patches related to the priorities15:35
n0anobauzas, OK, let me know how that turns out, I don't want all of us beating up on paul, one is enough15:35
bauzasthe ones we want to have core coverage15:35
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** BharatK has quit IRC15:36
bauzasn0ano: eh he's English, I'm French, I'm fine if we're beating him :)15:36
n0anobauzas, +1 (good one)15:36
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
*** afazekas has quit IRC15:36
n0anoI think I'll add a footnote to our task table point out this dependency, it's important15:37
jaypipesbauzas: I'm British too :)15:37
bauzasjaypipes: we all do errors15:37
jaypipesha!15:37
*** ptoohill_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:37
*** ptoohill_ has quit IRC15:37
n0anohah, my ancestry is English/German, bauzas `really` hates me :-)15:37
bauzasthat's really sad to talk about paul and not even lt him15:37
jaypipesok, time to wrap up this meeting :)15:38
n0anojaypipes, not quite...15:38
*** sdake has quit IRC15:38
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
n0ano#topic opens15:38
*** openstack changes topic to "opens (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:38
*** ptoohill_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
n0anoanyone have anything new for today?15:38
*** luqas has quit IRC15:39
* n0ano listens to the crickets15:39
bauzaseh15:39
bauzaswe're in winter15:39
alex_xuI'm try to add rescheduling and fix race of instance group https://review.openstack.org/139843, welcome review15:39
n0anoOK, we can close but remember - reviews15:39
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting15:39
bauzasalex_xu: yeah I reviewed your series15:39
jaypipesalex_xu: will do. thx for letting us nkow!15:40
alex_xubauzas, thanks for your comment!15:40
alex_xujaypipes, thanks15:40
n0anoOK, tnx everyone, talk next week15:40
n0ano#endmeeting15:40
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:40
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  9 15:40:28 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:40
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-12-09-15.00.html15:40
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-12-09-15.00.txt15:40
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-12-09-15.00.log.html15:40
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting15:41
*** sdake has quit IRC15:41
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting15:41
alex_xuiit's not urgent, the cleanup work is more important15:41
*** dboik has quit IRC15:41
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting15:42
*** baoli has quit IRC15:42
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting15:42
*** FJB has quit IRC15:43
*** rmoe has quit IRC15:45
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** fnaval has quit IRC15:48
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting15:51
*** vitreous_oculi is now known as b3nt_pin15:53
*** fnaval has quit IRC15:53
*** sergef has quit IRC15:53
*** Masahiro has quit IRC15:53
*** armax has quit IRC15:54
*** ChuckC_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
*** yaguang has quit IRC15:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
*** sergef has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
*** kebray has quit IRC15:56
*** vjay7 has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** SridharG has left #openstack-meeting15:58
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** barclaac has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** ChuckC_ has quit IRC15:59
*** ndipanov_ has quit IRC16:01
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** sergef has quit IRC16:02
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
*** alex_xu has quit IRC16:02
*** jcoufal_ has quit IRC16:02
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
*** Riddhi has quit IRC16:04
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting16:04
*** jdurgin has quit IRC16:04
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** mjturek has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** ian_ott has quit IRC16:07
*** ian_ott has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** ian_ott_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** ian_ott has quit IRC16:09
*** ociuhandu has left #openstack-meeting16:09
*** doron_afk is now known as doron_16:09
*** ChuckC_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:12
*** dulek_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** ChuckC_ is now known as ChuckC16:13
*** ttrifonow is now known as zz_ttrifonow16:13
*** ndipanov_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** dulek has quit IRC16:13
*** daneyon_ has left #openstack-meeting16:13
*** aepifanov has quit IRC16:14
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** tsekiyama has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** dulek_ has quit IRC16:17
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting16:17
*** msdubov_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
*** chandankumar has quit IRC16:18
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:20
*** sgordon_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** lpeer__ has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** doron_ is now known as doron_afk16:22
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting16:27
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC16:28
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting16:29
*** vjay7 has quit IRC16:29
*** enikanorov has quit IRC16:30
*** enikanorov has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** jdurgin1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:31
*** msdubov_ has quit IRC16:31
*** yamamoto has quit IRC16:31
*** msdubov_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** subscope has quit IRC16:32
*** vjay7 has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC16:33
*** msdubov_ has quit IRC16:33
*** Riddhi has quit IRC16:33
*** k4n0 has quit IRC16:34
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** olkonami has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** esker has quit IRC16:34
*** sweston1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:35
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:36
*** stannie has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** vjay7 has quit IRC16:40
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
*** madskier has joined #openstack-meeting16:43
*** ayoung has quit IRC16:44
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** vjay7 has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** noslzzp has quit IRC16:45
*** saloa has quit IRC16:45
*** rrrobbb has joined #openstack-meeting16:45
*** rromans has quit IRC16:45
*** krtaylor has quit IRC16:46
*** ebalduf has quit IRC16:47
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** xek has quit IRC16:48
*** otter768 has quit IRC16:49
*** jlibosva has quit IRC16:50
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting16:51
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:52
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
*** AndChat|58025 has joined #openstack-meeting16:54
*** barclaac has quit IRC16:56
*** alop has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** akscram has quit IRC16:57
*** andreykurilin has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** xingchao has quit IRC16:59
*** akscram has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** pnavarro has quit IRC17:00
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** _sunil has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** rromans has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** sajeesh has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** sajeesh has quit IRC17:01
*** alop has quit IRC17:01
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** achanda has quit IRC17:01
*** ian_ott_ has quit IRC17:02
*** ian_ott has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
*** amaretskiy1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov_away17:03
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** alop has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** luqas has quit IRC17:03
*** redixin has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
*** bobmel has quit IRC17:04
*** rrrobbb has quit IRC17:04
*** luqas__ has quit IRC17:05
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** safchain has quit IRC17:05
*** esker has quit IRC17:05
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** shwetaap has quit IRC17:05
*** afazekas has quit IRC17:05
*** baoli has quit IRC17:05
*** bobmel has quit IRC17:05
*** markstur_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** sajeesh has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** msdubov_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
msdubov_#startmeeting Rally17:06
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  9 17:06:56 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is msdubov_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:06
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:06
*** ian_ott has quit IRC17:06
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:07
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'rally'17:07
*** rvasilets has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
msdubov_rvasilets Hi :)17:07
rvasiletsHi17:07
*** luqas__ has quit IRC17:07
redixinsup17:07
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
msdubov_amaretskiy1, redixin, hi!17:07
amaretskiy1hi17:07
msdubov_andreykurilin, hi!17:07
andreykurilino/17:07
msdubov_olkonami hi :)17:08
olkonamihi17:08
*** KanagarajM has quit IRC17:08
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting17:08
msdubov_Okay let's start!17:08
msdubov_#topic NetworkContext17:08
*** openstack changes topic to "NetworkContext (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:08
msdubov_amaretskiy What was your progress with this during the past week?17:09
msdubov_amaretskiy1, Is it ready to use?17:09
*** MaxV_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
*** MaxV has quit IRC17:09
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
amaretskiy1https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306/ is usable17:09
*** luqas___ has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
amaretskiy1but tests are incomplete17:09
*** luqas__ has quit IRC17:09
*** haleyb has quit IRC17:09
amaretskiy1so I'm going to submit final patch set in next 2 hours17:10
amaretskiy1and the patch will be ready to final review17:10
andreykurilingreat!17:10
amaretskiy1I believe we will merge it soon17:10
*** dboik has quit IRC17:10
amaretskiy1eom17:11
msdubov_amaretskiy1 Great! Have you done some testing on it? Because there are guys out there interested in this, so it is important to be sure it works when we are giving them a link to this patchset17:11
amaretskiy1I have local fuel on VirtualBox17:11
andreykurilinamaretskiy1, what about add more scenarios to gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally job? This can help be sure that network context works correctly17:11
amaretskiy1with two small clusters17:11
redixinit would be nice to get feedback from that guys if something is broken17:12
amaretskiy1one with nova-network and another is with neutron17:12
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
amaretskiy1so everything is working for me17:12
amaretskiy1eom17:12
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
*** garyk has quit IRC17:12
msdubov_amaretskiy1, Okay, thanks!17:13
amaretskiy1there is a scenario added within the patch17:13
*** luqas___ has quit IRC17:13
amaretskiy1single scenario17:13
*** paragan has quit IRC17:13
amaretskiy1eom17:13
msdubov_amaretskiy1:Well tell a bit about this scenario, please :)17:13
*** vishwana_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
amaretskiy1https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306/87/rally-jobs/rally.yaml,cm17:13
amaretskiy1take a look at context: network: { ... }17:14
*** luqas__ has quit IRC17:14
amaretskiy1here we have a scenario with network context enabled17:14
*** luqas__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
msdubov_amaretskiy1:I see17:14
msdubov_andreykurilin, Do you think this is enough?17:14
*** avozza is now known as zz_avozza17:15
andreykurilinmsdubov_: hm17:15
andreykurilinmsdubov_: this is new scenario for gate-rally-dsvm-rally, but i want new scenarios for gate-rally-dsvm-neutron-rally :)17:15
msdubov_amaretskiy1 ^17:16
*** luqas__ has quit IRC17:16
amaretskiy1yep, I will add one17:16
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting17:16
msdubov_Okay17:16
*** christopheraedo has joined #openstack-meeting17:17
*** esker has quit IRC17:17
msdubov_#topic gate-rally-dsvm-verify gate job17:17
*** openstack changes topic to "gate-rally-dsvm-verify gate job (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:17
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting17:17
msdubov_So we have a new job for everything tempest-related17:17
andreykurilin\o/17:17
msdubov_like launching verification tests via Tempest17:18
msdubov_or functional testing for the verification part17:18
msdubov_So andreykurilin, could you please tell us a bit about the progress here?17:18
andreykurilinmsdubov_: sure17:18
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:18
*** luqas has quit IRC17:18
andreykurilinthe patch, whcih configure this job, is ready for review17:19
andreykurilin#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139262/17:19
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
andreykurilinthe results page of this job looks like other rally jobs17:19
*** phil___ has quit IRC17:19
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
andreykurilin#link http://logs.openstack.org/62/139262/30/check/gate-rally-dsvm-verify/d21e464/17:19
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
andreykurilinthis job runs two verifications, display the results in different formats and finally compare them17:20
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
*** ddecapit has joined #openstack-meeting17:21
andreykurilinrecently, "compute" set is used for testng verification, but in future I wants to add random selecter for set name17:21
andreykurilinthis will have to increse coverage17:21
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:21
msdubov_andreykurilin, Nice! One more thing to clafiry: are you going to add some functional tests like those you removed from tests/functional/test_cli_verify.py, or will you leave it as is?17:22
andreykurilinalso, "rally task " command will be added for tempest tasks17:22
andreykurilinmsdubov_: I don't want to add any functional tests in tests/functional/test_cli_verify.py17:23
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
andreykurilinmsdubov_: I prefer to delete this module in near future17:23
msdubov_andreykurili Okay, and what about that "rally task" command? What will it look like?17:23
*** anderstj has quit IRC17:23
*** otherjon has quit IRC17:23
*** alpha_ori has quit IRC17:23
*** hugokuo has quit IRC17:23
*** joearnold has quit IRC17:23
redixinwhy not just remove test_cli_verfy.py just now?17:24
*** evgenyf has quit IRC17:24
*** dsetia has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
andreykurilinmsdubov_: "rally task" contains scenarios related to tempest. https://github.com/stackforge/rally/tree/master/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/tempest17:24
andreykurilinmsdubov_: I want to test it in this job too17:24
*** barclaac has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
andreykurilinmsdubov_: for example, launch singel tempest test https://github.com/stackforge/rally/blob/master/doc/samples/tasks/scenarios/tempest/single_test.json17:25
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** alpha_ori has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
andreykurilinredixin: I leave this module, because I want to share imformation about new job17:26
*** otherjon has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
*** MaxV_ has quit IRC17:26
*** MeganR has quit IRC17:26
*** MeganR1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
*** MeganR1 has quit IRC17:26
*** AndChat|58025 has quit IRC17:26
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
andreykurilinredixin: when all become accustomed to the new job, this module should be removed17:27
andreykurilineom17:27
*** eharney has quit IRC17:27
msdubov_andreykurilin, Okay, let it be so17:27
msdubov_#topic General Rally code improvement17:27
*** openstack changes topic to "General Rally code improvement (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:27
*** MaxV has quit IRC17:27
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
msdubov_Okay this is quite a broad topic. Since we are moving towards our first release, we are doing our best to make the Rally code more neat17:28
msdubov_E.g. there is a patch that covers all benchmark scenarios with docstrings and unifies their style: https://review.openstack.org/12719217:28
msdubov_This is very important for the "rally info" command as well to be more informative17:28
msdubov_And rvasilets is currently working on 100% functional test coverage for CLI17:29
msdubov_rvasilets, Seems like you are almost done with that?17:29
rvasiletsYes17:30
*** MaxV has quit IRC17:30
*** tkay has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
*** anderstj has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
rvasiletsDuring the last week I have wrote the code for the 100% coverage functional tests. There are a couple of issues with this patch but I hope they would be solved soon. You can look at patch here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138134/ and I need you help with this17:30
*** ygbo has quit IRC17:31
msdubov_andreykurilin, amaretskiy1, redixin Any new ideas why those tests fail in such a weird way? :)17:31
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:31
*** hareeshp has joined #openstack-meeting17:31
rvasiletsI have only one suspicion that fails all tests in patch where is in string like17:31
andreykurilinlooking17:31
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:31
*** eharney has quit IRC17:31
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:31
rvasiletsself.rally = utils.Rally() in setUp17:31
rvasiletsfunction17:31
*** _sunil has quit IRC17:32
*** MeganR has left #openstack-meeting17:32
*** sergef has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
*** jdurgin1 has quit IRC17:32
rvasiletsIt's only onlу dependence that I found17:32
*** penick has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
msdubov_rvasilets, Well, as far as I know, setUp() is launched prior to EACH test method17:32
rvasiletsBut I have no  clue why it so17:33
msdubov_rvasilets, So this shouldn't be the problem...17:33
*** rromans has quit IRC17:33
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
*** rromans has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
rvasiletsIF we look at test that pass jenkins, for example test_cli_task17:34
*** ChuckC has quit IRC17:34
rvasiletsthere is now such line in this module17:34
*** hugokuo has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
*** joearnold has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
redixinsomething wrong with config file. seems like file /tmp/.rd.json is rewritten somehow during tests17:35
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-lunch17:35
redixinanyway it is not best time to dive into code and logs =)17:36
rvasiletsMow? I found that my theory wrong? never mind. It's wrong for test_cli_show17:36
msdubov_redixin, Agree, let's move further17:36
andreykurilinredixin: maybe we should use different names for separate tests?17:36
*** hareeshp has quit IRC17:37
rvasiletsAlso I have made bug ticket on launchpad  and fix it https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally/+bug/1399675 . It was about incorrect output of rally info find for SLA. Thx, EOM.17:37
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1399675 in rally "Incorrect work rally info find for SLA" [Low,Fix released]17:37
*** vigneshvar has joined #openstack-meeting17:37
redixinandreykurilin, maybe17:37
*** afaranha has joined #openstack-meeting17:37
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting17:37
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting17:38
msdubov_So one more thing to make our code more neat is to use the decorator syntax to mark deprecated things.17:38
msdubov_olkonami, That's what you are currently working on, how are the things going?17:38
*** armax has quit IRC17:38
olkonamideprecated decorator takes more time than I planned :(17:38
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** hemna has quit IRC17:39
olkonamithe first idea was to check scenarios, runners, contexts and slas for deprecation in it's base class, but than it becomes clear that this way we should have multi checks for one type if it presents in config several times17:39
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting17:40
olkonamiso now I collect all checks in one method into the benchmark engine class17:40
olkonamiI think it's better to check all benchmark components for deprecation in one place17:40
olkonamibut this method looks ugly :(17:40
olkonamihttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/138489/4/rally/benchmark/engine.py17:40
olkonamimayby someone will have any ideas how to improve it17:41
msdubov_olkonami, We'll review it, thanks!17:41
olkonamiand I am still in process of writing unit tests for it17:41
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
*** jgallard_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
*** Masahiro has quit IRC17:42
*** rromans has quit IRC17:42
olkonamieom17:42
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting17:42
*** rromans has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
*** jgallard has quit IRC17:43
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
msdubov_olkonami, thanks17:44
msdubov_#topic Rally roadmap17:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Rally roadmap (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:44
msdubov_boris-42 was very kind to prepare a roadmap doc during his vacation https://docs.google.com/a/mirantis.com/spreadsheets/d/16DXpfbqvlzMFaqaXAcJsBzzpowb_XpymaK2aFY2gA2g/edit#gid=017:45
msdubov_this will hopefully make our work more transparent for the community17:45
*** bobt has joined #openstack-meeting17:45
*** jgallard_ has quit IRC17:46
*** rromans has quit IRC17:46
*** doron_afk has quit IRC17:46
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC17:46
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
*** esker has quit IRC17:46
msdubov_It can be seen from this doc for example that a couple important tasks like multi-scenario load support are currently blocked by the ongoing refactoring17:47
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** ChuckC has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
msdubov_let's keep that in mind17:47
msdubov_#topic Free discussion17:47
*** openstack changes topic to "Free discussion (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:47
*** rromans has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
msdubov_amaretskiy1, andreykurilin, redixin, olkonami, rvasilets Any other things we haven't covered yet?17:48
amaretskiy1none from me17:48
andreykurilinhm...17:48
rvasiletsno17:48
*** garyk has quit IRC17:48
redixin-_-17:48
olkonamino17:48
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
andreykurilinI have no ideas about what we missed:)17:48
msdubov_Okay, thanks for participation then!17:49
msdubov_#endmeeting17:49
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:49
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  9 17:49:26 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:49
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-12-09-17.06.html17:49
*** rvasilets has left #openstack-meeting17:49
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-12-09-17.06.txt17:49
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-12-09-17.06.log.html17:49
andreykurilinbye!17:49
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
*** suro_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
*** markmcclain has quit IRC17:49
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:50
*** msdubov_ has quit IRC17:51
*** leeantho has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** ignacio-scopett1 has quit IRC17:51
*** shwetaap has quit IRC17:51
*** ignacio-scopetta has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** dboik has quit IRC17:52
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:52
*** sarob__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** sarob_ has quit IRC17:53
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** sarob__ has quit IRC17:53
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** amaretskiy1 has left #openstack-meeting17:53
*** olkonami has left #openstack-meeting17:54
*** jlk has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
*** samuelms has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
*** igordcard has quit IRC17:57
*** david-lyle_afk is now known as david-lyle17:58
*** jmontemayor_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** luqas has quit IRC18:00
*** derekh has quit IRC18:00
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
*** sarob has quit IRC18:01
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC18:01
*** sergef has quit IRC18:01
*** ian_ott has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC18:03
*** jmontemayor_ has quit IRC18:04
*** armax has quit IRC18:04
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
*** lhcheng has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
*** shwetaap1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
*** htruta has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** bdpayne has quit IRC18:11
*** shwetaap has quit IRC18:11
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away18:12
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
*** mhanif has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
*** jwang has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
*** markstur_ has quit IRC18:14
*** ddieterly has quit IRC18:15
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away18:16
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
*** hashar has quit IRC18:17
*** cknight has quit IRC18:17
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
*** leonchio_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
alopWho owns the gcal for the meeting schedule?18:19
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC18:19
*** Fdot has quit IRC18:23
*** ndipanov_ is now known as ndipanov_gone18:23
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n318:24
*** oanufriev has joined #openstack-meeting18:24
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting18:24
*** martines_ has quit IRC18:25
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
*** jlibosva has quit IRC18:30
*** esker has quit IRC18:30
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja18:30
*** imsurit has quit IRC18:31
*** dims has quit IRC18:31
*** mrunge has quit IRC18:31
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** garyk has quit IRC18:33
*** VW has quit IRC18:34
*** achanda has quit IRC18:34
*** jlk has left #openstack-meeting18:34
*** sajeesh has quit IRC18:35
*** martines_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:35
*** tkay has left #openstack-meeting18:36
*** noslzzp has quit IRC18:36
*** fwdit has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting18:37
*** baoli has quit IRC18:38
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting18:39
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC18:39
*** marun has quit IRC18:39
*** jehb_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:39
*** Haneef_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:40
*** ignacio-scopett1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:42
*** ignacio-scopetta has quit IRC18:42
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting18:43
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
*** martinl has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting18:45
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
*** wznoinsk has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
*** Mandell has quit IRC18:46
*** AJaeger_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
*** martinl has quit IRC18:47
*** jedimike has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** mhanif has quit IRC18:48
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting18:49
*** baoli has quit IRC18:50
*** otter768 has quit IRC18:50
anteayaalop: well tony breed, annegentle and ttx all have admin rights on it18:52
alopcool, where'd you find that?18:52
anteayaI don't know tony's nick18:52
anteayamemory and tony posted to the -dev mailing list within the last month18:52
*** pelix has quit IRC18:53
alopcool, I'll reach out18:53
*** esker has quit IRC18:53
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting18:54
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC18:55
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
*** yolanda has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
*** yapeng is now known as yapeng_18:58
*** jdandrea has quit IRC18:59
*** noelbk has quit IRC18:59
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr18:59
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
anteayao/19:00
pleia2o/19:01
AJaeger_o/19:01
cody-somerville\o19:01
yolandahi19:01
jedimikeo/19:01
mmedvedeo/19:01
*** riwinters has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
jeblairasselin: ping19:01
*** vijendar has quit IRC19:01
clarkbo/19:01
zaroo/19:02
jeblairasselin: let me know when you are here19:02
jeblair#startmeeting infra19:02
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  9 19:02:10 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)"19:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'infra'19:02
ianwo/ (despite thunderstorms and my isp doing their best to keep me away)19:02
asselinI'm here19:02
cody-somerville\o19:02
*** bobt has quit IRC19:02
*** mdenny has quit IRC19:02
jeblairoh yay19:02
jheskethMorning19:02
krtayloro/19:02
jesusauruso/19:02
fungiyo19:02
jeblairasselin has a time constraint today, so we'll take his topic first19:03
asselinjeblair, thanks.19:03
asselinI'm proposing an in-tree 3rd party ci solution.19:03
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
jeblair#topic in-tree 3rd party ci solution (asselin)19:03
*** openstack changes topic to "in-tree 3rd party ci solution (asselin) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:03
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez19:03
asselinI have a spec written. looking for link...19:03
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139745/19:04
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
mordredo/19:04
*** mdenny has quit IRC19:04
*** leonchio_ has quit IRC19:04
jeblaircool, i think this sounds like a good idea19:04
nibalizero/19:04
asselinthanks. I've been discussing it in 3rd party meeting and with others, and generally lots of support with the idea19:04
jeblairand a logical next step after the puppet module breakup19:04
nibalizer(i have to leave at quarter-till tho)19:04
fungiasselin: flagged that to read soon. i had similar thoughts a while back19:05
clarkbjeblair: right I don't think having a new independent repo helps much if we do that before we have the module split done19:05
asselinI was hoping to start looking at the possible solutions and get somethign proposed by end of K1.19:05
fungihogepodge: you may also be interested in that spec19:05
asselinI took an initial look at what it would take to set up a log server.19:06
jeblairclarkb: yeah, i'm assuming this depends on finishing the module split19:06
jeblairand it's going to uncover alot of other gotchas too19:06
jeblairbut it should help us start to nail down our interfaces19:06
mordred++19:06
asselingot good feedback, and looking at starting to19:06
jeblairsince having >1 consumer is really helpful for that sort of thing :)19:06
clarkb+119:07
asselinjeblair, right, exactly :)19:07
SergeyLukjanovo/19:07
*** bdpayne has quit IRC19:07
jeblairalso, we might be able to do better testing for this limited part of our system19:07
fungiasselin: logserver is likely to be the hardest part, since setting up a public-facing webserver is often a clash with corporate network admins' firewall policies and needs extra deployment considerations19:07
fungibut definitely still worth covering the simple case19:07
asselinjeblair, +1 can add that to the spec19:08
*** moha_hunt has quit IRC19:08
jeblairanyway, so it sounds like next steps are for us to try to find some time to review the spec, and if we find any contentious/complicated bits, come back here and hash them out?19:08
*** jprovazn has quit IRC19:08
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC19:08
asselinfungi, the assumption is to setup the log server in public place, and the rest can operate behind the firewall19:08
mordredasselin: also, offline from this meeting, I'd like to sync up with you on the rework-launch-node things I've been poking at and haven't written up19:08
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting19:08
asselinmordred, ok sure19:08
asselinjeblair, yes19:09
asselin#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:thirdpartyci,n,z19:09
*** banix has quit IRC19:09
asselinI created a topic to track the spec and initial attempt at the log server ^19:09
*** armax has quit IRC19:09
asselinso that's it, just wanted to get awareness and support19:10
jeblairasselin: cool, thanks very much!19:10
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting19:10
anteayaasselin: nice work19:10
fungia worthwhile endeavor19:10
asselinthanks19:10
jeblair#topic  Actions from last meeting19:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: infra)"19:10
timrco/19:10
jeblairoh, forgot my links19:10
jeblair#link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting19:11
jeblair#link previous meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-02-19.01.html19:11
jeblairanteaya draft messaging to communicate the new third-party account process19:11
anteayathat happened19:11
fungishe even sent it out19:11
anteayaI did19:11
jeblairabove and beyond!19:11
anteayaheh19:11
clarkband we are mostly transitioned off of the old stuff.19:11
anteayayay19:12
jeblairso that seems to be going well, aside from apparently we had a way to block gerrit emails being sent on behalf of 3p systems19:12
fungi#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/third-party-announce/2014-December/000130.html19:12
clarkbthe old groups still exist but are owned by administrators and are not visible19:12
jeblairwhich we lost19:12
anteayapleia2: has a system-config patch up to remove the old ml from puppet19:12
anteayawe have planes to archive it19:12
anteayathe third-party requests ml19:12
jeblairwhat should we do about the email functionality?19:12
jeblairdrop the "feature", try to get people to manage a non-voting-ci group, exim rules?19:13
anteayaI like not manageing this group19:13
anteayacan we filter on IC19:14
anteayaCI19:14
anteayalaggy wifi19:14
fungicreate a "don't send e-mail" group in gerrit and have a lot of people who can drop accounts in there for well-defined reasons?19:14
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting19:14
anteayaohhh, I like that19:14
fungidoesn't necessarily have to be ci-specific, but likely would be anyway19:14
jeblairanteaya: yes, we could filter outgoing mail with exim based on having "CI" in the name19:14
anteayawho can add to that group?19:14
clarkbI strongly feel this should be managed in clients. Similar to filtering noise in irc channels19:14
*** afaranha has left #openstack-meeting19:14
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting19:15
clarkbnot everyone will agree on how to filter a thing and thankfully for email there are lots of tools available to do this independent of gerrit19:15
anteayaclarkb: except it isn't happening19:15
clarkbanteaya: why not? anyone can do it19:15
anteayaand folks make noise in -infra19:15
anteayabased on the number of questions so far it isn;t happening19:15
clarkbif I had to pick a way to go back to sort of what we had before I would create some Central CI group that has a pretty large management group to add/remove members19:15
anteayaI like fungi's no email group19:16
fungii think some of the complaint is devs using muas they can't or don't know how to configure to filter this (which should be a lot easier now that we have naming consistency)19:16
clarkbwe could reuse the existing Third-Party CI group19:16
clarkbwhich is preseeded with a number of ci users19:16
jeblairand anyone who complains gets added to the management group for that group ;)19:16
anteayaha ha ha19:16
clarkbjeblair: +1 :)19:16
anteayayes!19:16
nibalizerhahaha19:16
*** bradjones has quit IRC19:16
fungii'm on board. if we do implement a no-emails group, infra core shouldn't add anyone to it, we should only add coordinators and make them take responsibility19:17
* anteaya touches her nose19:17
clarkbso I can make this change. Should I go ahead and remake Third-Party CI a thing and give Third-Party Coordinators ownership and pressed that group with people to manage it?19:17
fungiunfortunately, there's no real audit trail on group membership management, so the larger the list of coordinators the less likely you'll be able to figure out when, why and by whom a member was added/removed19:18
jeblaireveryone attending the third-party ci meetings should be in the management group, i think19:18
clarkbfungi: so you wouldn't start with the preexisting list of accounts?19:18
anteayaterrific19:18
jeblairfungi: isn't there such a thing in the db?19:18
jeblairfungi: just not exposed?19:18
fungiclarkb: yeah, whether or not the group is pre-seeded doesn't change the future accountability problem potential though19:18
jeblairclarkb: i think we should start with the current list.  just not add any more :)19:18
anteayathen folks can complain at the meetings not infra channel19:19
clarkbjeblair: ya that is what I was going with19:19
fungijeblair: i don't think there is, unless you cound the mysql journal in trove19:19
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting19:19
jeblairfungi: hrm,  there's an audit table for groups, but we can dig into that later19:19
fungioh, indeed. i'll double-check it19:19
*** Longgeek has quit IRC19:20
clarkb#action clarkb add DENY Email Third-Party CI rule to gerrit ACLs, giev Third-Party Coordinators ownership of Third-Party CI, seed Third-Party Coordinators with third party meeting attendees19:20
*** sweston1 has quit IRC19:20
clarkbis that what we have agreed on?19:20
jeblairi think so19:20
anteayaI like it19:20
fungiyep, i'm on board19:20
jeblairalso, we should make it clear that jenkins and anything not a third-party ci is off-limits :)19:20
clarkbjeblair: ya I can put that in the description of the group too19:21
jeblairback to actions...19:21
jeblairfungi nibalizer get pip and github modules split out19:21
fungiaccording to nibalizer that was already done last week19:21
nibalizeryup19:21
jeblairoh neato19:21
fungiand so i readded it to the actions list in error19:21
*** jlibosva has quit IRC19:22
jeblairclarkb script new gerrit group creation for self service third party accounts19:22
jeblairalso done :)19:22
jeblairfungi close openstack-ci and add openstack-gate to e-r bugs19:22
fungidone19:22
*** maishsk has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
fungiwe haven't needed the hat of shame at all this week19:22
anteaya:D19:22
* mordred is the hat of shame19:22
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (swift logs)19:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (swift logs) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:22
fungihaz19:23
*** pnavarro has quit IRC19:23
nibalizeri have the hat of shame, i didn't make the docker thing i was supposed to do19:23
jheskethOkay, so zuul-swift-upload now works as a publisher so we can get logs on failed tests19:23
mordredWOOT19:23
anteayayay19:23
jeblairthose are the best kind to have :)19:23
jheskethThe experimental job (as seen here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133179/) has disk log storage turned off.19:23
clarkbfor the most recent run19:24
jheskethSo everything should be in place now to switch jobs over. Some of the project-config jobs are logging to swift. The next step is to turn off disk logging for infra to be the guinnepigs19:24
fungiand no more races with getting the end of the console log? or is that still sometimes an issue?19:24
jheskethWhat do people think?19:24
*** dane_leblanc_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
mordredjhesketh: I support this19:24
clarkbfungi: none issue with swift19:24
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
anteayajhesketh: progress progress progress let's make some19:25
clarkbyes I think I am ready to dogfood. I did have some ideas that came up looking at the index page for the above job. It would be nice if we had timestamps and file size there but I think we can add that later19:25
jeblair#agreed start infra dogfooding logs in swift19:25
jheskethfungi : do you mean that we miss the end due to fetching? We kinda do in that we cut off the wget stuff19:25
mordredI'm excited that 4 years in we may be about to use swift19:25
fungilooks good. our publisher is still a little noisy with certificate warnings when grabbing the console from jenkins19:25
fungijhesketh: right19:25
mordredfungi: is that because of the RFC deprecation thing?19:25
fungimordred: nope, it's because it's self-signed19:26
mordredah19:26
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting19:26
fungialso we still need index page text besides the links themselves19:26
jheskethWe could try and silence wget19:26
mordredor we could just get 8 real certs19:26
jeblairmordred: --19:27
jheskethfungi:?19:27
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting19:27
jheskethDo you mean the returned links?19:27
fungijhesketh: the readme we embed in on-disk apache autoindexes19:27
jheskethAh, right, yes19:28
clarkbfungi: not for our dogfooding though19:28
*** ZiGMaX has joined #openstack-meeting19:28
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC19:28
clarkbhrm except for d-g I guess19:28
clarkbbut d-g is the interesting one19:28
*** cknight has quit IRC19:28
jheskethI guess each job can do their own index somehow19:28
clarkbwhat if we just put that tempate in a known location and link to it in every index?19:28
fungiwe could add generate-index macro in jjb maybe19:28
jheskethEither that or we make os-loganalyze smarter19:28
*** s3wong_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
clarkbwhere link is something different than a hyperlink so thatit renders nicely19:29
fungii think os-loganalyze seems like a better place to fix that19:29
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
fungisince that will allow us to alter readmes over time rather than having them stuck in whatever the state was at the time the logs were uploaded19:29
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC19:29
*** s3wong has quit IRC19:30
jeblairthe opposite approach has advantages too -- as things evolve, the readmes can co-evolve19:30
jheskethExcept the readme might not match the old logs, so storing it with the job may make more sense19:30
fungitrue19:30
jeblair(if, say, devstack-gate wrote its own readme)19:30
jheskethDoing it as a macro adds the greatest flexibility to the jobs19:30
*** Masahiro has quit IRC19:30
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away19:31
*** zul has quit IRC19:31
jeblairwhat writes the index right now?19:31
fungiyeah, and i guess the inefficiency of having hundreds of thousands of copies isn't terrible since that'll be a small bit of text in teh end19:31
*** jjmb has quit IRC19:31
jheskethThis shouldn't affect the project-config jobs we want to dogfood, so maybe we tackle it when we move the other jobs over19:31
jeblairbtw, logs.openstack.org/79/133179/1/experimental/experimental-swift-logs-system-config-pep8-centos6/cc75c20 is really slow to load for me19:32
jheskethjeblair: the upload script can generate an index.html which is just a list of files it uploaded19:32
fungion performance, yes it does seem that the index page generation is slow. requesting specific files is very quick by comparison19:33
clarkbfungi: the index.html isn't generated and is also a specific file. So Ithink any file may have that problem19:33
fungihuh... suddenly it sped up for me19:33
jeblairjhesketh: so we could add times/sizes to that, and have it insert the text of a readme if one exists19:33
jheskethYes so indexes suck in that the object in the url is first attempted to fetch and failing that it appends index.html and tries again19:33
jheskethSo it needs to make a few calls to swift19:34
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:34
jheskethjeblair: yep19:34
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting19:34
jeblairjhesketh: can we have os-log-analyze append 'index.html' if the uri terminates with a '/'?19:34
*** Mandell has quit IRC19:34
*** dprince has quit IRC19:34
jeblair(which it should anyway, and then we can go update zuul, etc, to leave the proper / terminated link)19:34
jheskethfungi: the speed will depend if there is an established connection with swift available in the pool19:35
fungiahh19:35
*** zul has quit IRC19:35
*** ddecapit has quit IRC19:35
jheskethjeblair: that seems reasonable (so we assume object names never end in a trailing slash)19:35
*** ddecapit has joined #openstack-meeting19:35
jeblairi _think_ for our pseudo-filesystem case we can make that assumption19:36
jheskethYep, good idea19:36
fungiafter all, that's basically how it's working with apache and a real filesystem19:36
clarkbI like that idea19:36
*** breton has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
jheskethAlso swift apparently have a plan to not be terrible at threads that'll help our connection pool management and stop so much lag (hopefully)19:36
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** yapeng has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
jeblaircool, agreement to dogfood and some next steps... anything else?19:37
jheskethOkay so it sounds like we're ready to dog food and will make some tweaks to the index loading and then documentation as we go19:37
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
jeblairjhesketh: thanks!19:38
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (Puppet module split)19:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Puppet module split) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:38
ianwjhesketh: couldn't the output page be cached by osloganalyze?19:38
jeblairasselin is probably gone by now...19:38
jeblairnibalizer: anything related to this we should chat about?  anything blocking?19:39
*** breton has left #openstack-meeting19:39
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting19:39
ianwfairly related to this, i have two changed for httpd puppet module that need final reviews19:39
jheskethianw: hmm, with something like memcache it might not be a bad idea. Let's take that as an offline improvement19:39
ianwhttps://review.openstack.org/136959 (update rakefile)19:39
ianwhttps://review.openstack.org/136962 (adding the module)19:39
mmedvedethere are couple of things that can be merged19:39
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/13695919:39
mmedvede#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open++topic:module-split%29,n,z19:39
nibalizerjeblair: i think we're swell19:39
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC19:39
jeblairmmedvede: ah thanks19:40
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
nibalizeri think things have been sorta slow lately, but i attribuet that to infra-manual sprint and thanksgiving so im not worried19:40
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC19:40
jeblairso we should consider those priority reviews19:40
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC19:41
mmedvedeThere was also some movement towards more automation on splits19:41
jeblairianw: maybe you should change your topics to 'module-split' ?19:41
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC19:41
jeblairi mean, it's split out, but it still seems related to the effort :)19:42
anteayammedvede: can you exapnd on the automation19:42
anteayaI have some questions19:42
jeblairi think there's a pending change to add a script to system-config19:43
anteayacool19:43
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/137991/19:43
*** eharney has quit IRC19:43
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
mmedvedeanteaya: we are trying to maintain all the splits automatically, before they are pulled in19:44
anteayagreat19:44
mmedvedeasselin and sweston were who worked on it19:44
nibalizerI have to step out, thanks everyone!19:44
*** dane_leblanc__ has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
anteayaand asselins says that the script updates sweston's github repo19:44
anteayawas is the trigger for the update?19:44
mmedvedeanteaya: correct19:44
anteayamy concern is extra overhead having source under sweston's control and asselin's patch19:45
*** barclaac has quit IRC19:45
anteayain case the seed repo needs to be respun19:45
ianwjeblair: the important one, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/136962/ , has had two +2's and 4 +1's ... so it's been seen ... but we can't use the module until it's in19:45
anteayawhich can happen19:45
*** barclaac has joined #openstack-meeting19:45
mmedvedeanteaya: I see. There could be another step added, that actually would validate19:46
mmedvedei.e. run a simple diff with their upstream vs system-config19:46
*** jmontemayor_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:46
anteayammedvede: if we can have anyone trigger a respin of the repo, especially a patch owner that is all I am looking for19:46
*** dane_leblanc_ has quit IRC19:47
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC19:47
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (Nodepool DIB)19:47
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (Nodepool DIB) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:47
mordreddib images work in rackspace now19:47
yolandacongrats!19:48
mordredI have repeatable scripts to make them work and whatnot19:48
yolandamordred, using glance import and siwft?19:48
mordredyolanda: yes19:48
mordredit turns out that in rax we need to use glance v2 and swift, and in HP we need to use glance v119:48
mordredjroll also got rax to put info we need into config-drive19:48
jeblairthe trusty nodepool server is not working at scale, and we're digging into why.19:48
mordredso I think before we roll this out, we want to wait for that change to go live so that we can drop nova-agent19:49
*** adahms has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
mordredhowever, nova-agent does work19:49
mordredand we have dib elements for it19:49
jeblairmordred: ++19:49
mordredmy next step is to turn the shell scripts I have into python19:49
mordredat which point I'm probably going to want to have a conversation about nodepool+shade19:49
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
mordredbecause "I want to upload an image" having two completely different paths per cloud is not really nodepool specific logic19:50
fungialso we seem to possibly be overloading our git server farm during snapshot image updates, and switching to dib will reduce that a whole bunch19:50
clarkbmordred: and everyone else really. I would really appreciate it if we stopped pushing so many new features to nodepool until we get the current ones working :)19:50
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
clarkbits great that people are excited about nodepool but there are a few things currently wrong with it and I don't think they are getting much attention19:50
*** penick has quit IRC19:50
mordredin any case, if people want to look at the elements, they're up for review against system-config19:50
mordredI'll move them to project-config and repropose soon19:51
jeblairmordred: i'm probably going to want to have a conversation about shade's project hosting and maintenance situation :)19:51
mordredjeblair: me too :)19:51
mordredjeblair: I imagine that will be part of that conversation19:51
mordredALSO - I'd like to suggest that we move nodepool/elements to just elements/ - because I think we're going to wind up with non-nodepool elements too (see sane base images for infra servers)19:51
mordredbut that's not urgent19:52
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC19:52
*** rushiagr_away is now known as rushiagr19:52
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting19:52
jeblair*nod*19:52
clarkbmordred: they are in different repos though19:52
mordredclarkb: idea is to not propose the elements I've been working on to system-config19:52
mordredbut to project-config19:52
mordredand have one set of elements and have it be tehre19:52
fungielements for non-nodepool things would live in project-config?19:53
jeblairi feel like we're getting really close to a chicken and egg problem19:53
fungiwhat non-nodepool elements would be likely to get used for project-specific stuff?19:53
*** changbl has quit IRC19:53
jeblairprobably we should start with duplication and see what we end up with and if it makes sense to de-dup?19:54
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
jeblairthis might be a bit hard to reason about at the current level of abstraction/understanding :)19:54
clarkbya I think that is something to revisit when dib is a bit more concrete for us19:55
clarkbright now its very much hand wavy19:55
*** vijendar has quit IRC19:55
fungicart before the horse then19:55
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
jeblair#topic Priority Efforts (jobs on trusty)19:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Priority Efforts (jobs on trusty) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:56
fungii prodded bug 1348954, bug 1367907 and bug 1382607 again a couple weeks ago, but no response from anyone in ubuntu/canonical on having a less-bug-ridden py3k in trusty19:56
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC19:56
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1348954 in python3.4 "update Python3 for trusty" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/134895419:56
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1367907 in python3.4 "Segfault in gc with cyclic trash" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/136790719:56
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1382607 in python3.4 "[SRU] Backport python3.4 logging module backward incompatibility fix." [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/138260719:56
fungii'm open to suggestions on how to raise the visibility of those19:56
*** baoli has quit IRC19:56
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:56
fungizul asked me for the bug numbers again last week, but not sure if he was looking into them now too19:56
jeblairswitch to an os that supports python3.4?19:57
fungithere's an alternative19:57
fungior build our own real python interpreters for tests rather than using distro-provided python ;)19:57
clarkbor use the ones they pushed into that other repo19:57
fungi(which come with who-knows-what features back/forwardported into them)19:58
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
fungithat other repo?19:58
zuli could look at pushing it to a ppa again as well19:58
clarkbfungi: py3.4 is fixed in one of the package maintainers repos iirc19:58
clarkbfungi: which you tested to confirm that the new package fixed our problem19:58
fungiclarkb: yeah19:59
jeblairzul: can you just yell at them to release it already? :)19:59
fungiclarkb: at least fixed for that one patch19:59
zuljeblair:  ive done that19:59
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
jeblairthanks everyone20:00
pleia2we skipped over them, but core eyeballs on the priority specs would be much appreciated20:00
fungianyway, that's the current state. patched python 3.4 in trusty is the current only blocker to moving our py3k jobs to 3.4/trusty20:00
jeblairpleia2: ++20:00
jeblairand gerrit topics are up next time20:00
jeblair#endmeeting20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  9 20:00:38 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-09-19.02.html20:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-09-19.02.txt20:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-12-09-19.02.log.html20:00
*** ayoung-lunch is now known as ayoung20:00
*** AJaeger_ has left #openstack-meeting20:00
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
*** yolanda has left #openstack-meeting20:01
ttxo/20:01
dhellmanno/20:01
mikalHeya20:01
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
timrccore eyeballs is the name of your new kickball team20:01
devananda\o20:01
ttxrussellb, jgriffith, annegentle, mordred, vishy, markmcclain, jeblair, jaypipes, sdague : around ?20:01
jeblairayep20:01
sdagueo/20:01
russellbo/20:01
markmcclaino/20:01
vishyo/20:01
ttx#startmeeting tc20:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  9 20:02:02 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)"20:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'20:02
ttxHi everyone20:02
mikalHeya20:02
ttxOur agenda for today:20:02
*** jedimike has left #openstack-meeting20:02
ttx#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/TechnicalCommittee20:02
ttxFWIW I transitioned the wiki pages so that they now reference governance.openstack.org20:02
ttxrather than duplicate info20:03
russellbneat20:03
ttx#topic Project structure reform spec20:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Project structure reform spec (Meeting topic: tc)"20:03
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/13850420:03
ttxThat was posted last week, I want to collect as much feedback as possible before pushing another version of the draft (probably tomorrow)20:03
ttxThere was some very recent TC member feedback I haven't had time to fully parse yet20:03
mikalI have to say its very well written20:03
ttxbut so far I see no comment I can't address in a new draft20:04
mikalIts the best explaination of the problem we're trying to address that I've seen so far20:04
jaypipeso/20:04
ttxThere is an open question about the missing "impact for incubated projects" section that I wanted to discuss20:04
jeblairyes, i don't see any major problems with it, and it's really clear20:04
mikalttx: what do you see being the path for that document?20:04
mikalttx: do we approve it and then show the community?20:04
mikalttx: or do we want them to see it before we approve it?20:04
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting20:05
ttxnew patchset, vote, then implementation using further changes20:05
mikalttx: so, shouldn't there be a "explain" phase before implementation?20:05
mikalttx: so that the community isn't surprised?20:05
dhellmann+120:05
ttxwell, we would socialize the spec for sure20:05
ttxfor incubated projects, Solution 1 is to create an "incubated" tag in the original transitional taxonomy to reflect the current process. That's what earlier drafts proposed but I left it out of patchset 120:05
ttxSolution 2 is to drop the incubation concept at the same time we introduce the new structure, and just consider all currently-incubated projects "openstack projects"20:05
mikalI think we should actually pause20:05
*** vigneshvar has quit IRC20:06
jeblairi think implementation comes with explanation (like code should come with docs :)20:06
mikalStop and tell people what we decided, why, and talk it through if needed20:06
mikalBefore doing any implementation20:06
*** gyee has quit IRC20:06
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:06
dhellmann+120:06
mikaljeblair: people wont notice implementation until its done and then they'll feel rolled20:06
*** VW has quit IRC20:06
ttxmikal: sure, we should explain. I kind of wanty jay to start working on the code backend for the project taxonomy though :)20:06
mikaljeblair: given implementation is mostly in a repo people don't watch closely20:06
ttxOn incuabted projects: For sake of seamless transition and baby steps, I think I'm leaning towards solution 1, and get rid of incubation as a second step -- but I'm fine with solution 2 too.20:06
mikalttx: oh, yeah, I'm fine with that20:06
jeblairmikal: i think actual implementation is not a patch20:07
*** riwinters has quit IRC20:07
jeblairgrr20:07
mikalttx: we just shouldn't announce that Nova is the only OpenStack project until we've explained20:07
*** changbl has quit IRC20:07
mikalttx: I am fine with Jay coding the backend for that while we explain20:07
ttxmikal: heh20:07
jaypipesttx: add it to my todo list20:07
jeblairis not just a patch to the repo, it's a plan for how to actually do all that, including announcements, timetables, etc20:07
jeblairanyway, we're probably violently agreeing20:07
mikalSo, a silly question as well...20:08
ttxyes, implementation is more than just repo changes20:08
mikalDoes "gets a room at the dsign summit" become a tag as well?20:08
ttxthere will be ML posts and all20:08
mikalOr how to we allocate the somewhat limited space at the summit in the new world order?20:08
ttxmikal: so that's a good question. I'm working on the Vancouver summit20:08
ttxtrying to secure more space20:08
jeblairttx: can you get 450 rooms?20:08
*** vjay7 has quit IRC20:09
ttxI was leaning toward 500.20:09
mikalYeah, you'll never have enough space20:09
jeblairsome of them can be really small20:09
mikalWe need some other way of working out who gets one20:09
mikalThere will always be smaller projects who have to miss out20:09
ttxbut there may be some prioritization in order. the Foundation organizes the event, so maybe it can prioritize20:09
jaypipesI think that is a technical problem to solve external to the debate about project structure reform.20:09
ttxor we could defer to TC to prioritize20:09
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:09
ttxI want to have an idea of how much space we have and draft ideas first20:10
*** noslzzp has quit IRC20:10
ttxjaypipes: yes20:10
jeblairthere's subjective criteria (tc/foundation prioritizes), but there's also some objective things we can do20:10
mikaljaypipes: probably, but it is a question a lot of people will immediately ask, so if we can address it before its asked that makes us look thinky20:10
jeblairttx: you already do prioritization of the time slots we have; i wonder what happens if you extend those ideas out to more projects?20:10
ttxAs far as the spec goes, I'll push a new patchset tomorrow, hopefully we'll be able to vote on it this week and close it next week20:10
mikalFor example we talked about a "widely deployed" tag. Perhaps we ask the Foundation to prioritize widely deployed projects for summit space.20:11
jaypipesmikal: thinky or not, it's a problem that can derail this entire discussion20:11
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting20:11
* markmcclain first thought was the openstack room lottery20:11
ttxjeblair: Another idea is to limit the number of sessions in "large rooms" and favor smaller groups in parallel.20:11
vishywhat about a size requirement for room20:12
sdagueso I do think that exact room segmentation is going to be massively driven by venue20:12
vishyand stick everyone else into a shared space20:12
devanandaI suspect that a discussion of how we allocate time slots to projects as the list of projects grows will indirectly also lead to a discussion around mid cycles if we start splitting the summit time up between more projects20:12
sdagueand it seems weird to come up with all those fine grain rules ahead of time when our current model is basically to come up with a split plan about 3 weeks before the summit20:12
ttxsdague: yes, that's why I want to have venue details first20:12
vishyrank projects by number of active contributors, more contributors == more space20:12
devanandavishy: ++20:12
ttxvishy: I actually used patchset proposed as a metric last time20:13
ttxas a measure of collaboration needs20:13
sdagueI personally don't think there is a math formula here either that solves this20:13
ttxbut then I also used "historic" values20:13
sdaguethis is actually going to be able talking with projects and figuring out their needs during the summit20:13
devanandattx: do/can we have a count of ATCs attending the event, not just total count per project?20:13
*** cdub has quit IRC20:13
jaypipeslike I said... derail the discussion.20:13
sdaguejaypipes: ++20:14
sdagueI think this can go offline20:14
ttxyes, this is not really the topic for today20:14
mikaljaypipes: sorry20:14
mikaljaypipes: all I was saying is we should think about it20:14
mikalLet's stop trying to fix it now20:14
devanandasdague: ++ to tabling this for now20:14
*** jrist has quit IRC20:14
sdagueI also think the tags work item should probably be a subgroup20:14
mikalAnd let ttx come back with a proposal20:14
ttxmikal: it's very much on my mind. There is a venue visit this week20:14
dhellmannsdague: ++ to talking to projects about needs20:14
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting20:14
ttxi should have space constraints in 10 days.20:14
ttxetc.20:14
*** Mandell has quit IRC20:15
*** MaxV has quit IRC20:15
ttxOnce the spec is approved that doesn't mean our job is over. It's actually just starting20:15
sdagueso back to mikal's other point, of socialization time20:15
ttxsince it's more a framework for change than a change in itself.20:16
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
sdaguewhat kind of time frame do people feel comfortable with there?20:16
ttxI'll probably turn the second draft in to a blog post for larger communication20:16
ttxapproval next week, pause until new year ?20:16
jaypipesmikal: no need to apologize :)20:16
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
mikalNew year at the least20:17
mikalWe shouldn't make large governance changes over the holiday season20:17
dhellmannyeah, several weeks20:17
* jaypipes would love to see a vote next week.20:17
mikal(as a general rule)20:17
ttxmikal: which of those is a large change ?20:17
mikaljaypipes: a vote on any topic, or just this one?20:17
mikalttx: changing from an integrated release to somehting else seems like a large change to me...20:17
ttxmikal: we don't change that.20:17
jaypipesmikal: this one in particular -- i.e. ttx's second draft of this proposal20:17
mikalttx: we can vote on it, but then we should start the "explain" phase in the new year20:18
ttxmikal: the integrated release will still very much survive until end of Kilo.20:18
*** vigneshvar has joined #openstack-meeting20:18
sdaguemaybe that's what this needs20:18
ttxany change to the integrated release would come in a subsequently proposed change20:18
sdaguea view of the timeline of how this would evolve20:18
ttxbut not affect kilo20:18
mikalYes20:18
ttxsdague: the "impact" section touches on that20:18
mikalClearly I have misunderstood the plan20:18
jaypipeshonestly, I don't really see a reason to not allow votes on new project inclusion pretty much right away.20:18
ttxjaypipes: yes, I don't think there is anythign warranting a long pause in there.20:19
mikalttx: I just re-read that section20:19
jaypipesI mean, the holidays and all are going to be pretty light anways, so I suppose waiting until the start of the year is Ok, too20:19
ttxmikal: the change sets up a framework to describe something more complex20:19
*** aysyd has quit IRC20:19
mikalttx: I think it wouldn't hurt to have more of a proposed timeline there20:19
ttxmikal: but we still import the "integrated release" concept in it20:19
mikalttx: yeah, I get that integrated release becomes a tag20:20
ttxbefore we deconstruct it, but that's a larger change that we'll discuss afterwards20:20
sdaguejaypipes: by votes on new projects, you mean provide the objective project criteria, right?20:20
dhellmannttx: but it's *clear* that we intend to change that, and so I think having everyone understand the whole process for that change will make things go more smoothly20:20
sdagueor did I miss something20:20
mikalttx: I still think that people will immediately want their project included in openstack/ etc etc20:20
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
jeblairmikal: i think if people do, we need to wait until we've hashed out the details20:20
*** andreykurilin_ has quit IRC20:20
mikalAnyways, we can take that discussion to a review of this proposal I think20:21
ttxmikal: sure. Not saying we'll rush anything. Just saying that the larger changes are actually still ahead of us20:21
mikalttx: agreed20:21
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
ttxand will likely result in more heated discussions20:21
mikalttx: all I'm saying is that we should accept that the Holiday period is going to be quieter20:21
jeblairi think we should vote on the spec next week, start implementing it in the new year, but until we've actually implemented it, we should not rush to pretend that we have :)20:21
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
jeblairotherwise we will just be very confused20:21
sdaguejeblair: that seems sane20:21
ttxthe trick here is to set the framework up first, so that those discussions don't end up slowing us down in other directions20:21
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC20:22
sdagueI think it does make sense to create things as milestones with guessed on months when we want to have them done by20:22
sdagueinstead of just todos20:22
*** markmcclain has quit IRC20:22
ttxi.e. we can start describing openstack projects better, even if agreeing on a compute base (or absence thereof) will take us a long time20:22
*** noslzzp has quit IRC20:22
sdaguemaybe that would make it more clear to folks on sequencing or the like20:22
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC20:23
ttxsdague: I can add a timeframe aspect to the implementation part20:23
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting20:23
sdaguebecause I expect that will be a point of confusion, and we do have a history in our community of thundering herds once an idea sparks20:23
sdaguesee: specs repos20:23
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:23
sdaguettx: great20:23
ttxsdague: just add a comment about that so that I remember to add it20:23
sdagueyep20:24
* ttx doesn't trust his memory after 9pm20:24
mikalCool20:24
markmcclain1cool20:24
ttxmy question on incubation still stands though20:24
ttxshould we import initially the "incubation" concept20:24
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
ttxor just drop the incubation concept at the same time we introduce the new structure, and just consider all currently-incubated projects "openstack projects" ?20:25
*** praneshp has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
jeblair#220:25
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
*** eharney has quit IRC20:25
mikalHerm20:25
markmcclain1220:25
vishykill incubation imo20:25
dhellmannyeah, I don't see any reason to carry it over artificially if we're not going to actually incubate any projects20:25
mikalI need to think more about that one I think20:25
ttxit's arguably more of an active change to pick #220:25
sdagueyeh, I'd just drop it20:25
ttxbut then the writing is on the wall20:25
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
russellb+1 to just dropping it, unless it still has some kind of real meaning20:26
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting20:26
ttxrussellb: it would be the first one we drop. Can be same change, or subsequent change20:26
*** Longgeek has quit IRC20:26
jeblairheh, i don't think we'd ever have time to implement the rest if we kept it :)20:26
russellbok, sure20:26
zanebwould it make sense to wait until we have some other tags in place?20:26
*** rushiagr is now known as rushiagr_away20:27
zaneband prioritise reviewing incubated projects for whether they can have those tags applied20:27
*** Anne has joined #openstack-meeting20:27
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
devanandawhat would it mean to retain that tag, when we've stated an intent to remove it?20:28
zaneb(just concerned that there will be a temporary vacuum for incubated projects in which they're not receiving guidance about how to move forward)20:28
ttxretain it means we need to define it20:28
devanandazaneb: a fair point, but I feel like that's actually where we're at20:28
ttxand apart from "legacy procedure artifact in becoming integrated" I don't know what we can put there20:28
devanandazaneb: cross-project teams are in the process of defining/communicating/creating those tools for projects which they don't directly support20:29
devanandauntil that work is done, there *is* a vacuum20:29
jeblairi think the guidance to new projects is: go be part of the community and make some good software :)  [which is really the point of doing all this, i think]20:29
devanandaat least, that's my perception20:29
*** eharney has quit IRC20:29
sdaguejeblair: yeh, that's my pov20:30
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
*** eharney has quit IRC20:30
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
ttxdevananda: yes, and this is nothing new20:30
dhellmannyes, I don't think it's likely we're going to be holding any incubation reviews while also trying to rewrite this process20:30
devanandajeblair: is that any different for currently-incubated projects, vs. non-incubated projects?20:30
devanandadhellmann: exactly20:30
ttxmost horizontal teams have been reinventing themselves over those last cycles20:30
ttxbecause there was just no other way20:30
sdaguedevananda: no, and I think that's kind of the point20:30
devanandajeblair: (that's a rhetorical question, if it wasnt' obvious :) )20:30
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC20:31
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting20:31
ttxOK, so you guys seem to lean towards #2.20:31
ttxI'll draft a "impact for incubated projects" in the rev220:32
anteayattx women too20:32
ttxto spell the consequances out.20:32
ttxwell, our female member is not present, and I was addressing TC members20:32
anteayasorry20:32
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** s3wong_ has quit IRC20:32
AnneHere but on my phone just to make sure you use gender correct pronouns :)20:33
ttxdamn20:33
ttxguys and gals maybe20:33
devanandaheh20:33
devanandattx: may I suggest "ya'll" :)20:33
sdaguefolks20:33
mikalI think gals requires a certain hair style doesn't it?20:33
*** ian_ott has quit IRC20:33
sdaguefolks is always good20:33
mikalY'all is safer20:33
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting20:33
russellby'all20:33
* ttx just finished Ancillary Justice, for those interested in pronouns20:33
jaypipessdague: sorry, yes, that's what I meant.20:33
markmcclain1+1 to y'all20:33
jeblairor even just "you" :)20:34
ttxy'all it is20:34
russellbprogress20:34
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC20:34
sdagueanyway, the only other thing is I think the work items should probably have a point person assigned to each one20:34
dhellmannthis meeting is starting to feel like an ent moot20:34
sdagueso they aren't nebulous20:34
sdagueand get lost20:34
zaneb+1 y'all. none of this ya'll business ;)20:34
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC20:35
ttxsdague: ok. I own most of them, except the taxonomy website which is jay's20:35
devanandadhellmann: LOL20:35
ttxI suspect TC members will start proposing tags though20:35
ttxand own them to completion20:35
sdaguettx: ok, so lets be explicit about it then20:35
mikalI want the "funniest project" tag. I will administer that one20:35
ttxAnything else missing ?20:36
russellbmikal: i support your candidacy to administer that tag.20:36
sdagueI also left a comment on that :)20:36
*** kebray has quit IRC20:36
mikalI also want to put in a bid for "most hygenic project"20:36
ttxOK, let's move on to next topic then. I have a surprise topic for open discussion too20:36
mikalBut anyways...20:36
ttx#topic Housekeeping changes20:36
*** openstack changes topic to "Housekeeping changes (Meeting topic: tc)"20:36
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting20:37
ttx* Add new advanced services repositories for neutron (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138479/)20:37
ttxThat is supporting the advanced services split in Neutron, acked by PTL. Will approve tomorrow morning unless someone opposes it20:37
ttx* Move hacking under the QA program (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138499/)20:37
ttxThis one has all the approvals lined up, will approve it now20:37
ttx* Add Castellan project to Barbican program (https://review.openstack.org/138875)20:37
ttxThis one is proposed by the PTL. I'll approved it tomorrow morning unless someone opposes it20:38
ttx* Completed the gerrit-powered-agenda project split (https://review.openstack.org/139944)20:38
ttxThis one is just reflecting a project split and rename that has already occurred. Now has jeblair's +1 as Infra PTL... Will approve if I get that and nobody complained before tomorrow morning20:38
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:38
ttx#topic Open discussion20:39
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: tc)"20:39
ttxEarly look at potential L names: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming#L_naming20:39
russellbhttp://peakery.com/lemming-peak-canada/20:39
russellbBOOM20:39
markmcclain1+120:39
marun:D20:39
* mikal votes for Lemming as well20:39
russellbcredit to marun for finding that20:39
jeblairrussellb: nicely played20:39
ttxhow come wikipedia doesn't know about it20:40
ttxthough I guess that can be fixed too20:40
mikalrussellb: you need to add that to the wiki page me thinks20:40
anteayattx sorry I tipped your hand, sitting in the same room as these folks20:40
mestery+1 for Lemming20:40
* dhellmann imagines the fun we could have if we call it Limerick20:40
* dtroyer likes the four letter name trend we have going…20:40
*** Mandell_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
jeblairlemming is even in BC20:40
russellbjeblair: yes!20:40
* ttx checks that this thing actually exists20:40
mikalLangley should be quietly dropped as well20:41
mikalI don't think a CIA themed release is in our marketting best interests20:41
ttx<redacted>20:41
dhellmannmikal: ++20:41
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
salv-orlandoI still think Loonie should be listed in "Other symbols"20:41
jgriffithlemming, lemming, lemming20:41
mikalHeh20:41
devananda++lemming20:41
russellbalternative google maps link: http://goo.gl/7uZ49O20:41
ttxI must admit that Lemming is even a BC landmark20:41
ttxwhich makes it a strong contender20:42
sdague:)20:42
anteayamikal: now you have to find a munchkin in tokyo20:42
jaypipesperhaps we can take a day trip up there and throw ourselves off.20:42
ttxBut then we had "Lizard" which is cool too !20:42
mikalanteaya: I am asking the city to rename something right now...20:42
jeblairtake a moment and imagine the universe where we release "OpenStack Love".20:42
vishylemming!20:42
ttxit's cold bloodeed and... ok.ok.20:42
mikaljaypipes: ummm, no roads that I can see20:42
anteayamikal: that will work20:42
ttxOpenStack Liberty!20:42
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting20:42
ttxnow we need to be dropped on Lemming Peak by helicopter20:43
mikalMirantis do good parties20:43
mikalI'm sure they're up to helicoptering the TC around20:43
jgriffithmikal: LMAO20:43
ttxcan't cost much that then TC dinner20:43
ttxmore*20:43
mikalttx: LOL20:43
jgriffithha!20:43
jgriffithtrue statement20:44
*** vishwana_ has quit IRC20:44
mikalOMG20:44
mesteryjeblair: lol20:44
mikalWe have to argue about mountains for the next 15 minutes?20:44
ttxno20:44
jeblairmikal: it's in the charter20:45
ttxcan someone edit https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Naming to add lemming20:45
mikalttx: you accept the wisdom of the peanut gallery then?20:45
russellbsure, i can20:45
ttxwhat other names would you like as backup ? We need to do some namecheck trademark thing20:45
* russellb takes the wiki page lock20:45
ttxso better include 3 names20:45
anteayalaurentian20:45
ttxlizard20:45
anteayalaurier20:45
ttxlizard20:46
ttxspock20:46
markmcclain1so we want to pick the 3 worst names right?20:46
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting20:46
jeblairlizard, lulu, love20:46
markmcclain1Longueuil, Lasqueti, Llangorse20:46
anteayaspock five: http://ibackpackcanada.com/spock-five-the-new-canadian-currency/20:46
fungieek, that last one is a little too welsh20:46
mikalMy wife suggests "Lemon"20:47
ttxmarkmcclain1: trouble is, the namecheck on lemming might just return 120:47
ttxso we need a decent backup20:47
mikalI like lightning from the wiki list...20:47
kevinbentonLawn20:47
russellbLove isn't bad20:47
marun+1 for love20:47
dhellmannLondon would be in keeping with our "not where you think it is" theme20:48
ttxmikal, kevinbenton: needs to at least pretend to be in BC20:48
mikalttx: lightning is on your wiki list20:48
markmcclain1dhellmann: ++20:48
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
mikalLightning (Peak)20:48
ttxyes, but not lemon ?20:48
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
mikalOh, yeah20:48
*** cknight1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
mikalWe can ignore my wife there20:48
ttxlightning is neat, A bit too neat20:48
russellblightning sounds so cheesy, but i kinda like it too20:48
dhellmann+1 for Love; +1 for Lolo20:48
mesteryStill +1 for Lemming, but +1 for Love as well20:49
mikalLipton is a brand of tea...20:49
markmcclain1+1 for Lanz20:49
mesteryHow can you not be +1 for Love?20:49
ttxunlikely to pass, yes20:49
ttxSpread the OpenStack Love!20:49
*** cknight1 has quit IRC20:49
russellbin all seriousness, not sure about the negative connotations of lemming, but it's just so funny because it's been used so much already20:49
mikalLove is going to be so cheesy20:49
*** cknight1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
mesteryImagine the parties for OpenStack Love!20:49
russellbmestery: yes!20:49
mikalYeah, lawsuit right there20:49
* fungi can see the complaints already20:50
jeblairmikal: you are such a cynic, but i love you anyway20:50
* dhellmann imagines hippies20:50
mikaljeblair: we can hug it out later20:50
anteayathere be hippies in bc20:50
ttxOK, I guess I can compile this to a list of candidates for our staff to check20:50
*** thingee has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
ttxAnything else ?20:50
mikalLongview has some ok connotations20:50
marunLeather20:50
marunThere's ahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leather_Peak20:50
russellboh dear.20:50
mikalSigh20:50
ttxmarun: yes, it's on the list20:51
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting20:51
*** otter768 has quit IRC20:51
kevinbentonLower Post20:51
ttxerr or at least it was.20:51
ttxmay have removed it because it's not BC20:51
marunalso, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lynx_Mountain20:51
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting20:51
anteayaLynx20:51
ttxLucid Lynx?20:51
mikalanteaya: you clearly havne't seen the creepy lynx ads in australia20:51
*** mrda-away is now known as mrda20:51
anteayaI have not20:51
anteayajust seen Canadian lynx20:51
ttxmikal: youtube20:51
marunttx: 'leather peak' is on the border of alberta and bc20:52
ttxmarun: I blame Google20:52
*** cknight has quit IRC20:52
*** bradjones has quit IRC20:52
*** Anne has quit IRC20:53
mikalanteaya: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LAx-NP4T9CY (I do not endorse this product)20:53
*** haleyb has quit IRC20:53
jeblairi do also like london to go along with juno and havana20:53
clarkbLanz20:53
clarkbit has a Z therefore it is cool20:54
*** obondarev has quit IRC20:54
*** alex7376 is now known as asettle20:54
dhellmannjeblair: ++20:54
ttxOther topic: we'll discuss joehuang's cascading at next week cross-project meeting -- I wasn't at that cascading/cells cross-project session in Paris. Who was ?20:54
russellbseems we have several decent options, so that's cool20:54
mikalttx: I wasn't I had a clash20:54
russellbi was20:54
mikalttx: I thnk John / Dan Smith were though20:54
russellbyep, would be good to invite them20:54
ttxso is that getting any traction is the real world ?20:54
mikalI certainly understood that Cells v2 was the Way Forward though20:55
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
russellbttx: not afaict, no20:55
russellbmikal: their proposal aims to address some stuff cells doesn't20:55
russellbbut it was still far from clear to anyone in the room20:55
ttxfeels like joehuang didn't get a strong enough "no" answer and is pushing for a cross-project effort yo adopt cascading all over20:55
mesteryBold move for sure :)20:55
*** mrmartin has quit IRC20:56
ttxwell, I just don't see it happening if it's in parallel without strong support from everyone20:56
mesteryAgreed20:56
russellbi didn't really pick up *any* support in that room, honestly20:56
ttxbut then I guess it's a topic for next week, just wanted to see who had an opinion and could help drive that discussion to some conclusion20:56
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
russellba big part of it is just approach to the whole thing20:56
dhellmannshould we address it on the mailing list thread before the meeting?20:57
*** manishg has quit IRC20:57
ttxwell, that would help20:57
markmcclain1dhellmann: ++20:57
russellbdhellmann: we could, they did post a follow up on there20:57
russellbi was so caught off guard by their post though20:57
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting20:57
ttxI can't really oppose his claims of support as I wasn't in that room20:57
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC20:57
russellbit was so far off from the conclusion i got from the meeting20:57
*** subscope has joined #openstack-meeting20:57
dhellmannit would be best coming from someone who was there -- the best I could do is ask about the outcome of the meeting20:57
mikalYeah, I feel a bit like ttx20:57
mikalI wasn't there, so I don't really know what people concluded20:57
mikalThere was an etherpad though, right?20:57
russellbwell, i guess i can take an action to respond sometime this week20:58
ttxbut that definitely doesn't match what people told me happened there20:58
sdagueI also wasn't there, I just heard 2nd hand that there was a lot of confusion20:58
ttx"polite listening" was more it20:58
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting20:58
russellbright20:58
russellbpolite listening and lots of "i don't get it"20:58
ttxOK, so yes, if we could try to start the discussion on the ML before next week...20:58
edleafeI was there, and no, there wasn't any support I heard20:58
*** jlk has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
ttxthat would make next week meeting easier20:59
mikalhttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-scale-out-openstack20:59
ttxAlso if someone wants to chair that one, they can20:59
mikalIf that helps...20:59
ttx:)20:59
*** madskier has quit IRC20:59
russellbttx: won't be around?  or?20:59
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox20:59
russellbjust saying, chair the topic?20:59
ttxi'll be around :)20:59
ttxNo, I anticipate a painful "get real" discussion21:00
sdagueso johnthetubaguy, dansmith, alaski would all be good to invite there21:00
fungiwe wanted to start sharing around the meeting chair duty for the cross-project meeting21:00
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC21:00
*** ebalduf has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
*** jamespage_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
ttxfungi: unfortuinately I also signed up for until new year21:00
dhellmannsdague:  johnthetubaguy is the one who keeps putting it on our agenda and then not showing up to talk about it21:00
*** Anne has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
fungittx: lack of foresight?21:00
ttxok, time is out21:00
*** topol has quit IRC21:01
ttxthx everyone21:01
ttx#endmeeting21:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:01
* jeblair has added ancillary justice to his suggestions list21:01
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  9 21:01:09 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-12-09-20.02.html21:01
*** Anne has quit IRC21:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-12-09-20.02.txt21:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-12-09-20.02.log.html21:01
dhellmannjeblair: I endorse it21:01
*** changbl has quit IRC21:01
ttxyep, pretty good one21:01
*** matrohon has quit IRC21:01
*** jokke_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
jokke_o/21:02
ttxcourtesy PTL ping for next meeting: dhellmann, morganfainberg, notmyname, eglynn, nikhil_k, thingee, asalkeld, david-lyle, mestery, SlickNik, SergeyLukjanov21:02
asalkeldo/21:02
eglynno/21:02
dhellmanno/21:02
mesteryo/21:02
thingeeo/21:02
david-lyleo/21:02
mikalHello21:02
mikalEven though I didn't get a ping21:02
ttxzz_johnthetubagu: o/21:02
*** jlk has left #openstack-meeting21:02
ttxmikal: why are you not in my script21:02
SergeyLukjanovo/21:02
anteayamikal: ping21:03
dstaneko/21:03
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
mikalttx: perhaps I'm not a real PTL?21:03
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
mikalttx: that would mean I could sleep in more...21:03
ttx#startmeeting crossproject21:03
*** dims has quit IRC21:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Dec  9 21:03:23 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: crossproject)"21:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'crossproject'21:03
morganfainbergo/21:03
kragnizo/21:03
ttxI might need you to do John hot spare again21:03
*** aimon has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
ttxmikal: ^21:03
ttxOur agenda for today:21:03
ttx#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/CrossProjectMeeting21:03
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
mikalttx: sure21:03
ttx#topic Convergence on specs process21:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Convergence on specs process (Meeting topic: crossproject)"21:04
mikal(Although I have to duck out a littler early)21:04
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away21:04
ttxSo this was put on the agenda by johnthetubaguy but he is not around21:04
jungleboyjo/21:04
maishskttx: again....21:04
ttxI'll try my best to drive the discussion anyway21:04
mikalI can help too21:04
ttxso that we don't postpone it twice21:04
ttxSo the idea is to continue the cross-project session on specs we had in Paris21:05
bknudsonis there an etherpad? I didn't make it21:05
ttxand see which practices may be interesting to apply to everyone21:05
asalkeldis there a link to a suggestion to what we are converging to21:05
ttx(if any)21:05
eglynnttx: can you tl;dr the outcome of the session in Paris21:05
SlickNiko/21:05
russellbIIRC, first step was get Blueprints wiki page up to date for all projects21:05
*** eharney has quit IRC21:05
dhellmann#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-crossproject-specs21:05
russellband then see if there were actually differences to deal with and discuss21:05
ttxalso which differences are useful and which is just superfluous21:06
russellbyeah21:06
* ttx tries to find the etherpad from that session21:06
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
dhellmannttx: ^^21:06
mikalI'd be interested in if other projects have soemthing better than procedural -2's as well21:06
ttxdhellmann: thx!21:06
notmynamehere21:07
ttxMaybe first step is to look at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints21:07
ttx"Spec + Blueprints lifecycle" chapter21:07
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC21:07
ttxand see who actually follows that, if anyone21:07
ttx'Upload a design specification in the "specs/<release>" folder in $PROJECT-specs'21:08
*** dims has quit IRC21:08
mikalttx: there are minor diffs for nova in that21:08
ttx-> nova uses approved/ implemented/21:08
mikalttx: things like paths being wrong in those instructions21:08
mikalttx: we also have a per-release template21:08
mikalttx: we also don't remove non-completed specs21:08
devanandattx: we have been mostly following it, though mistakes are getting made (even by me)21:08
jungleboyjThat looks like the lifecycle that is used by Cinder21:08
mikalttx: we instead move implemetned specs to that different directory21:08
dhellmannmikal: why do you track the implementation status in 2 places?21:08
ttxmikal: I can see a few drawbacks in switching spec location at implementation time21:08
mikaldhellmann: as in the directory move?21:09
dhellmannmikal: yes21:09
SlickNikttx: we've been following it for Trove as well.21:09
dhellmannmikal: why not just use the blueprint for that?21:09
mikaldhellmann: because it was felt that it would be confusing to operators and other non-dev consumers if leave the specs repo in an inconsistent state21:09
dhellmannok21:09
mikaldhellmann: we actively push operators to the specs repo21:09
notmynameat the summit swift proposed a change in flow for specs https://github.com/openstack/swift-specs/blob/master/README.rst21:09
mikaldhellmann: but then don't explain that it might be a pack of lies21:09
devanandattx: ironic also has a /backlog/ directory now, for things we know we won't do this cycle, but want to record21:09
mikalThat wiki page also doens't mention backlog specs, which we stole from Keystone21:10
morganfainbergi personally do not like the "move" the spec when implemented.  - i would, if anything, update incomplete specs with a "incomplete" status?21:10
dhellmannmikal: yeah, ok, that does make some sense. I'd almost drop blueprints at that point.21:10
morganfainbergin the spec.21:10
mikaldhellmann: we need bps for mechanical release reasons though21:10
mikaldhellmann: I agree this isn't perfect21:10
dhellmannmorganfainberg: in oslo we just delete them if they aren't done, but we haven't had any "half done" ones yet21:10
thingeettx: cinder just removes the specs that weren't completed in the release.21:10
dhellmannmikal: yeah, true21:10
jokke_quick comment based on the discussion on the etherpad. One thing I really like about the specs is that as it's just another git repo you can propose changes. I think it would benefit all to have the spec approved on principal quite early and redefined based on the implementation on the way21:10
ttxOK, let's focus on that particular bit, the use of a specific "implemented" directory21:11
morganfainbergdhellmann, we have had a couple half-done and we just proposed a <next release>/<same spec> highlighting what was done and what wasn't21:11
devanandaI don't know if it would work for larger projects, but in Ironic we're not approving specs until they are very likely to be landable in the cycle21:11
*** kebray has quit IRC21:11
ttxwho else uses that ? just nova ?21:11
morganfainbergif it wasn't touched at all, i'd delete it/move it back to backlog21:11
dhellmannmorganfainberg: that makes sense21:11
eglynnmorganfainberg: agree on not moving, surely that breaks the specification URL field in LP?21:11
dhellmanndevananda: ++21:11
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
morganfainbergdevananda, that is the goal for keystone as well.21:11
*** juzuluag has quit IRC21:11
devanandaas a result, we haven't had to look at a separate /implemented/ dir21:11
notmynamettx: we have "done" and "in_progress" in swift21:11
morganfainbergdevananda, unless it's proposed to backlog21:11
devanandamorganfainberg: right - backlog is not release specific21:11
morganfainberg(nothing proposed there yet for us, but planned this cycle)21:11
*** matrohon has quit IRC21:11
devanandaspecs/[backlog, juno, kilo]21:11
asalkeldi think it's dumb using the spec repo to store state when lp is doing that21:11
*** jamespage_ has quit IRC21:12
notmynamettx: implemented is something specifically didn't want because we didn't want to confuse specs with docs21:12
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja21:12
jokke_asalkeld: +121:12
eglynnasalkeld: +121:12
asalkeldmaybe just remove the kilo/juno folder too21:12
ttxspecs is just that.. a spec. Not a feature list21:12
mikalasalkeld: I think that's an overly emotive way of putting it21:12
asalkeldmaybe21:12
devanandaI find it helpful to break specs down by cycle21:12
notmynamettx: and "done" in swift-specs is basically "we're not looking at this any more so it's an effective trash can but kept for history"21:12
ttxBut I can see how people may confuse the two21:12
mikalSo, we have ops people deep linking to specs21:12
mikalWe're just going to delete stuff and let them get a 404?21:12
morganfainbergasalkeld, i wouldn't remove the history, we make previous releases appear differently via sphinx magic21:13
asalkeldsorry, just seems like trying to mirror stuff unnecessary21:13
*** juzuluag has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
ttxmikal: how does that deeplink survive the move to "implemented/" ?21:13
mikalttx: we have a sphinx plugin which creates redirects21:13
devanandattx: this does raise a question for me. I see some blueprints "specification URL" pointing to gerrit reviews21:13
mikalttx: its not very good, but it works21:13
morganfainbergasalkeld, previous releases and implemented specs (keystoneclient does move spec to "implemented" because they are not the same as the named releases) we do: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/keystone-specs/implemented.html21:13
devanandattx: but I dont know where that practice came from21:14
ttxdevananda: spec2bp.py should overwrite that :)21:14
morganfainbergimplemented/previous releases21:14
devanandattx: i actually find it very helpful21:14
asalkeldalso any reason the specs have to be in a seperate repo? it would make it easier to keep uptodate if they were in-tree21:14
dhellmannmikal: that's actually a very good point. maybe this cycle I'll move all of the incomplete ones over to an "incomplete" folder21:14
ttxmikal: not askign anyone to drop anything yet. Just trying to see if there can be more common practices.21:14
devanandattx: for not-yet-approved blueprints to have a URL pointing to the spec review21:14
mikalasalkeld: we have different core groups for specs21:14
ttxops don't look at nova's specs in a vacuum21:14
SlickNikdevananda: +121:14
devanandaasalkeld: separate core group21:14
ttxso they try to make sense of specs.o.o ovberall and can't21:14
devanandaironic has spec-cores who are not ironic-cores21:15
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting21:15
asalkeldso just permissions issue?21:15
mtreinishasalkeld: also some spec repos cover more than one project21:15
devanandabecause there are operational stake-holders who grok the architecture but don't neceessarily write or review code on a daily basis21:15
morganfainbergdevananda, i expect keystone to also have that. and we also have our API spec in the -specs repo. That does not belong in-tree for the code21:15
ttxdevananda: the whiteboard should get autopopulated by Gerrit with review links as long as you reference the BP in the commit message21:16
morganfainbergdevananda, that wasn't meant to be directed to you ^ just to the channel in general21:16
devanandattx: for --blocked specs, could spec2bp set the URL to the review?21:16
mikalI'd be interested in how (if at all) other PTLs are encouraging operators to come on in-review specs21:16
thingeedhellmann: if a spec isn't going to happened because it's abandoned, does it make sense just to delete it? It's in git history, you can retrieve it back. I guess you don't have the convenience of searching through a directory for keywords if something was discussed before.21:16
mikals/come/comment/21:16
ttxdevananda: oh, you mean the spec review ?21:16
devanandattx: yes21:16
*** MaxV has quit IRC21:16
ttxdevananda: that.. kind of makes sense21:16
dhellmannthingee: yeah, I was thinking of mikal's point about people having links pointing to them21:16
morganfainbergmikal, we haven't had a large issues convincing operators to do so for keystone. but we started with operators helping us with the spec process (UofKent, etc)21:17
ttxdevananda: maybe add it as comment to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108041/21:17
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting21:17
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting21:17
dhellmannmikal: I talked it up with some folks at the summit, especially about the work on oslo.log. Not takers, yet.21:17
*** jehb_ has quit IRC21:17
mikalmorganfainberg: we have a few faithful operators, but not a lot of smaller deploys are commenting21:17
mikalPeople do tell me they like the blog posts, but then don't actually comment on reviews21:18
mikalAnd they're a fair bit of work to write21:18
*** julim has quit IRC21:18
thingeeI have not had any help on cinder specs from operators. mostly just other vendors making sense of an interface that works for everyone. I would love operators feedback though.21:18
morganfainbergmikal, it might also be the blog posts are sufficient - the specs are less important in direciton because they are smaller they can be nimble about working around / incorporating the spec.21:18
morganfainbergmikal, that is just wild supposition on my part though21:19
ttxOK, what about specs.o.o TOC differences between projects ? Those seem more gratuitous (cc maishsk)21:19
devanandattx: posted21:19
mikalmorganfainberg: yeah, it might also be that they're completely happy21:19
mikalIts hard to tell from the outside21:19
mikalttx: define TOC differences?21:19
maishskttx: the formatting is different - which is confusing21:19
mikalttx: as in the number of headins displayed?21:19
*** Masahiro has quit IRC21:19
ttxhttp://specs.openstack.org/openstack/heat-specs/21:19
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
morganfainbergmikal, ask cburgess next time as well, he's a good voice for the smaller (until recently) deployer groups.21:19
ttxhttp://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/21:19
Rockygdhellmann:  working on logging-->you'll see start this week21:19
dhellmannRockyg: cool21:19
ttxmikal: confusing differences in navigation21:20
morganfainbergmikal even though he contributes code as well21:20
ttxreported by maishsk21:20
devanandamikal: to your question, I'm not sure what to suggest. I have a small set of involved operators, so I poke them directly when I see things that affect them. Also, they have an engaged dev team ...21:20
jungleboyjthingee: +121:20
cburgessDid someone say my name?21:20
mikalcburgess: no21:20
mikal:P21:20
cburgessFine :P21:20
dhellmannttx: yeah, I think someone should just submit formatting changes to fix those. Maybe maishsk can do that?21:20
mikalmaishsk: so, you're confused because the indx pages look different?21:20
mikalmaishsk: isn't that a largely cosmetic problem?21:20
maishskmikal: not only me21:21
jokke_~/msg Rockyg hey there! Erno here, do you have a moment after the meeting to sync up?21:21
asalkeldi like the flat layout21:21
morganfainbergmaishsk, what specifically is confusing? mor than "there are differences"21:21
maishskmikal: essentially yes cosmetic21:21
jokke_darn21:21
asalkeldfirst world problems :-O21:21
maishskmorganfainberg: the format of the page, why are some of the projects different - layout is different.21:21
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
mikalSo, bigger projects are always going to want to split per release I would think21:22
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
mikalWe had nearly 100 specs in Juno for Nova21:22
ttxI think per-cycle split is something we can standardize on21:22
maishskIf the purpose was to make it easier for people to read, I would have to say we are missing the point21:22
ttxeven if you have 5 it still makes sense21:22
morganfainbergttx, ++21:22
*** grue_pm has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
ttxto at least question if you should copy them over21:22
thingeettx: +121:22
maishskttx: ++21:22
SlickNikmikal / ttx +1 to per cycle split.21:22
notmynamettx: can we not be prescriptive yet? specs is still something very new, and it's a learning process21:22
notmyname-- to per cycle split21:22
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
asalkeldnotmyname, +121:23
mikalTo be honest I am not sure if I see a lot of value in being proscriptive21:23
ttxnotmyname: I would only prescribe consensual things at this point. Can you explain your -- ?21:23
maishskdhellmann: If you are willing to hold my hand (at least in the beginning) - and not have you all bash me on reviews - I would be happy to give it a shot21:23
mikalThe templates are differnt as well21:23
mikalAre we goign to force all projects to use the same template21:23
mikal?21:23
maishskmikal: Why not?21:23
devananda++ to per-cycle split in the TOC. I dont care so much if it's in the file layout21:24
maishskstandardization.....21:24
dhellmannmaishsk: I can help you with the oslo-specs change, if one is needed.21:24
notmynamemaking every project use the same structure means that there are less ways that are being experimented. and certainly all projects aren't going to fit the same mold as to what works best (different review loads, different level of activity, etc)21:24
mikalmaishsk: because different projects have different things to be concerned about21:24
ttxmikal: I think they may end up sharing best practices by copying themselves a bit more21:24
devanandabut also, I don't think it matters enough yet to proscribe it to other projects21:24
ttxbut i would let them evolve separately21:24
dhellmannyeah, oslo has very different concerns for graduating a library than nova does when adding a feature21:24
devanandamikal: definitely not the same template across projects21:24
mikalExactly21:24
*** ItSANgo has quit IRC21:24
maishskmikal: are the format of blueprints submitted across projects different - or do they all have the same base structure?21:25
devanandathere are certain things some projects care about uniquely, because they are unique21:25
mikalFrankly, I'm very disinterested in being told I can't have a "project priority" heading because its not in the global template (for example)21:25
ttxnotmyname: on the other hand, we don't want people to learn 15 different ways of posting a spec21:25
mikalmaishsk: blueprints are often a single sentence. They have no format.21:25
ttx15 different templates is ~ok21:25
ttx15 different processes... not so much I think21:25
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC21:25
dtroyerThe entire community is traditionally cargo-cultish (see *client).  Having at least a default starting point is of value here21:25
devanandattx: ++21:25
asalkeldttx there is a template in each project21:25
maishskmikal: I am not saying the same information has to be the same - just presented 'cosmetically' the same way21:25
jokke_maishsk: is there a reason we wanted to step out of the scope of blueprint ;)21:26
dhellmanndtroyer: we do have a cookiecutter template for new specs repositories21:26
ttxasalkeld: that's fine. Instructions can be "copy and edit template21:26
asalkeldyou grab the template and fill it in21:26
ttx"21:26
fungithink infra specs... they span countless infra projects none of which participate in the integrated release cadence21:26
ttxbut if they can't tell where to get the template... less fun21:26
devanandasame formatting guidelines, same proposal and review process for specs, but variation in templated sections and guidelines therein21:26
*** Longgeek has quit IRC21:26
*** juzuluag has quit IRC21:26
devanandais what seems to make sense to me21:26
mtreinishdtroyer: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-dev/specs-cookiecutter/21:26
maishskdevananda: exactly - format should be the same across the board21:26
bknudsonhave there been complaints from people submitting specs to 15 projects?21:27
notmynamettx: specs are a way to do communication. not a box to check off. we're _really_ early as a community figuring out if specs are good and how to do them better. I'm asking that we let the specs experiment continue to run before formallizing a process21:27
bknudsonthose are probably the folks who it would be interesting to hear from21:27
dhellmannbknudson: the complaints are coming from people trying to read them21:27
devanandabknudson: only one that I know of (osprofiler)21:27
dhellmannnotmyname: ++21:27
ttxnotmyname: I'd agree with that.21:27
mikalI think annegentle had a spec in every repo as well?21:27
dtroyernotmyname: ++  â€¦ I understood this to be a search for commonality in what we have so far21:27
dstanekwhat are the complaints exactly? can people not find what they are looking for?21:27
dhellmannas another experiment, I put together a sphinx extension to ensure that the spec name matches a blueprint name in launchpad. I'm adding it to oslosphinx to make it easy for projects to adopt - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140362/621:28
devanandanotmyname: ++21:28
ttxnotmyname: Iat this point I just want to reduce accidental / gratuitous changes that are not there for a good reason and hurt navigability by people outside of projects, like what maishsk reported with index pages all looking different21:28
devanandadhellmann: oh, neat. that'll solve an issue I've bumped into this week :)21:28
Rockygso, basic outline and minimum contents across all projects, then notmyname can experiment on top of it21:28
ttxWe are not done with experimenting yet21:28
thingeedhellmann: thank you21:29
*** mdomsch has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
dhellmanndevananda, thingee : I'll try to get that merged soon and cut a release so you can try it out21:29
SlickNikdhellmann: That's pretty neat. Will take a closer look, thanks!21:29
notmynamettx: actually, isn't it an important question as to who specs are for? arent' they for the contributing community? isnt' that what we're optimizing for (instead of "external" communication)? maybe that's still part of the expirament21:30
jungleboyjdhellmann: +1  Cool21:30
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
jokke_notmyname: +121:30
mikalnotmyname: I think both audiences are important to be honest.21:31
ttxnotmyname: I think the concern is about ops getting involved in specs21:31
*** hemna has quit IRC21:31
Rockygspecs make it easier for the non coding community to participate21:31
ttxthey are typically going cross-project21:31
maishskttx: notmyname why is that a concern?21:31
mikalnotmyname: I very much want ops to tell us we're on the wrong track before we get too far into implementation of a feature21:31
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC21:31
Rockygttx: ++21:31
ttxand differences are hurtign their experience. Not fatal, I agree, just creating some friction21:31
maishskmikal: +++++21:31
mikalttx: I disagree there21:31
*** esker has quit IRC21:32
asalkeldtho' i don't think i have seen any ops folks reviewing heat specs21:32
mikalttx: ops don't care about proposal processes, as they're not proposing21:32
mikalttx: they just care about publication and open review21:32
bknudsonif you're an op looking at spec reviews you're not worrying about how the toc output looks.21:32
ttxmikal: they still need to figure out the various sites under specs.o.o21:32
notmynamemikal: ya. I was considering ops (deployers) to be part of the contributors. external as in the people looking at openstack externally from a project management perspective21:32
mikalttx: I actually disagree there too21:32
mikal(sorry)21:32
ttxmikal: that's fine :)21:32
mikalttx: ops reading specs.o.o is too late21:32
*** haleyb has quit IRC21:32
mikalttx: the spec is approved at that point21:32
maishskmikal: unless something rages a huge red flag21:33
dhellmannmaishsk: are you aware of anyone using the new rss feeds?21:33
mikalttx: hence the blog post -- to drive them to gerrit to comment on the review _before_ approval21:33
ttxmikal: you can tell I haven't prepared this topic since I expecetd someone else to drive it :)21:33
*** pberis has quit IRC21:33
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC21:33
mikaldhellmann: someone blog about them the other day on planet.o.o21:33
ttxhmmm, ok21:33
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting21:33
asalkeldwhat we need is an rss of specs in review21:33
dhellmannmikal: yeah,  I saw that and encouraged them to add their opml file to the specs page21:33
maishskaccording the number people that have hit the page - I would assume so21:33
fungispecs _are_ just files in a git repo, under code review, and can be revised through the same review process if needed21:33
notmynamemikal: actually, that's why we decided to merge specs early and often. as soon as we agree on something, merge it. therefore you have a living document until the implementation is finished21:33
mikalasalkeld: that would be nice. I hand produce that at the moment.21:34
mikalasalkeld: it would be a flood of data though21:34
ttxI guess I'll circle back to john, but it looks like there isn't that much convergence to drive right now21:34
mikalasalkeld: we have 150 proposals for Kilo Nova21:34
maishskdhellmann: I am trying to get the patches up21:34
asalkeldyeah21:34
fungiasalkeld: mikal: we have a script that publishes arbitrary review info for projects as an rss feed in a swift container. it could be adapted pretty easily21:34
ttxI wanted to touch briefly on procedural -2s21:34
ttxjeblair: is there any plan to support that ? ^21:34
mikalttx: yes, that's much more interesting to me21:34
* maishsk is not strong enough yet in the ways of OpenStack code submissions. (padawan)21:34
dhellmannmaishsk: oh, that was you!?sorry!21:34
*** ddecapit has quit IRC21:34
notmynamettx: what is a procedural -2?21:34
mikalnotmyname: I -2 code proposals wehere the spec hasn't been approved yet21:35
mikalnotmyname: to stop accidental merge21:35
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC21:35
mikalnotmyname: it is horrible21:35
notmynamemikal: ah ok. so on the code side, not specs side21:35
* dhellmann needs to start doing that21:35
morganfainbergmikal, we do the same in keystone - especially around FF.21:35
ttxor when we are under some kind of freeze. Not a judgment on the proposal itself, just the wrong moment21:35
notmynamemikal: ya, I've done that (rarely)21:35
jeblairttx, mikal: i have not forgotten about that21:35
mikalnotmyname: yeah, its a process thing. Hence "procedural"21:35
morganfainbergbut in specs i don't think we have (though with a hard submit deadline we might this time)21:35
ttxprevents other people from reviewing21:35
notmynamettx: ok, so that's orthogonal to specs, right?21:35
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:35
jeblairttx, mikal: i plan on looking into that soon, but it has been holidays + firefighting since summit :(21:36
*** igormarnat has joined #openstack-meeting21:36
ttxit's sometimes part of the spec approval process. And one of the discussions there was in that session in Paris21:36
mikalnotmyname: closely related, but we'd do it even without specs at freeze etc21:36
bknudsonmaybe there's a unicode symbol that could be used in place of -221:36
notmynameor, one procedural reason might be related to a spec. but that's not the only reason21:36
notmynamemikal: right. with you.21:36
ttxnotmyname: but yes, overlapping21:36
mikalThe biggest issue is that they can't be removed by the PTL if the core isn't around21:36
notmynameso what's the question about it? finding a different way to do that?21:36
asalkeldmikal, why do you care that a spec is approved21:36
mikalasalkeld: because we're not landing the code until the spec is approved21:36
mikalasalkeld: that's the point of the spec21:36
ttxjeblair: ok, so too early to put it back on the table21:37
jeblairttx, mikal: i believe i fully understand the use case and agree that it's important to try to address21:37
notmynamemikal: PTL needs super-core privileges ;-)21:37
morganfainbergmikal, this might be a case where another column that is sticky and PTL/project release group only - that blocks merging?21:37
morganfainbergjeblair, cc ^21:37
*** dane_leblanc_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:37
asalkeldfor me approving a spec is "we approve of the design"21:37
mikalmorganfainberg: I don't want to define implementation21:37
fungiprobably best not to bikeshed on gerrit implementation details at this stage21:37
morganfainbergmikal, sure21:37
*** mestery_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:37
ttxAlright, last words on that topic before we switch ?21:37
mikalI want to remind jeblair that we want _something_21:37
mikalAnd then let infra do their thing21:37
asalkeldand use lp for milestones etc..21:37
jeblairyep, that's what i signed up for21:37
morganfainbergjeblair, ++21:37
SlickNikjeblair: thanks!21:38
notmynamehmm...like a -2 workflow21:38
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC21:38
*** carl_baldwin_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
notmynameor something. cool. looking forward to see what happens21:38
ttxI'll circle back to johnthetubaguy because I'm not sure we coverted all he had in mind, but it looks like there isn't that much convergence to drive right now21:38
ttxlet's move on21:38
jeblair(for anyone wondering why i haven't just done it -- it may involve prolog) :)21:38
mikaljeblair: ewww21:38
morganfainbergjeblair, hehe21:38
*** mestery has quit IRC21:38
jeblairhopefulyl that ends the bikeshedding for now21:38
* SlickNik pretends he didn't hear that21:39
ttx#topic osprofiler options naming (kragniz)21:39
*** openstack changes topic to "osprofiler options naming (kragniz) (Meeting topic: crossproject)"21:39
morganfainbergjeblair, can you paint the prolog red?21:39
ttxkragniz: you around ?21:39
kragnizokay, this should be fairly quick21:39
kragnizso let's talk about the option for enabling/disabling osprofiler21:39
* mikal departs21:39
*** dane_leblanc__ has quit IRC21:39
kragnizin glance, we have an option named '[profiler]/enabled' and all other projects use'[profiler]/profiler_enabled'21:39
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:39
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting21:39
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC21:39
kragnizcinder guys requested 'profiler_enabled' rather than 'enabled'21:39
eglynn[profiler]/profiler_enabled seems superfluous21:40
bknudsonI thought this is why we have oslo-incubator and config options in oslo libs?21:40
kragnizand so other projects used that name afterwards21:40
kragnizcan we decide on a common name and standardize it across projects?21:40
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting21:40
dhellmannbknudson: yes, that's right21:40
eglynnno need for both the prefix and section, surely?21:40
jokke_eglynn: +121:40
dhellmanneglynn: ++21:40
*** bobmel_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:41
Rockygeglynn:  +121:41
bknudsonfor some reason we don't have it in keystone.21:41
* ttx has no opinion, but I suspect our ops would appreciate some consistency there21:41
morganfainbergeglynn, ++21:41
kragnizthingee: do you know the reasons cinder wanted the other name?21:41
*** ChrisPriceAB has quit IRC21:41
morganfainbergbknudson, we haven't merged osprofiler21:41
kragnizttx: that's what I want21:41
maishskttx: Hell yeah!21:41
kragnizI don't actually mind one way or the other21:41
dhellmannfor anyone still interested in spec reviews, sdague built a nice dashboard for all the spec repositories: http://bit.ly/1wdmq0m21:41
*** ajo has quit IRC21:41
*** subscope has quit IRC21:42
*** ajo has joined #openstack-meeting21:42
kragnizbut having the same option have the same name across projects makes sense to me21:42
ttxkragniz: if only Glance has a different name, minimal disruption rule would lead us to the other name that everyone else uses. Unelss it sucks really badly21:42
jokke_ttx: but it does suck really badly21:42
kragnizttx: yes, so I'm proposing we deprecate 'enabled' in glance and replace it with 'profiler_enabled'21:42
notmynamethis is what's put into the config file right?21:42
Rockygreasoning behind Profileer_enable as that enable is in other parts of code.  Reasoning not needed is it's always prefixed with [Profiler}21:42
kragniznotmyname: yup21:42
jokke_notmyname: correct21:42
*** ItSANgo has joined #openstack-meeting21:42
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting21:43
notmynameya, what Rockyg just said. "enabled" isn't unique21:43
jungleboyjYeah, wondering why cinder is pointed out as the requester when Glance is the outlyer.21:43
jungleboyjWhat am I missing?21:43
jokke_jungleboyj: Glance were first implementer and cinder was the second one and they wanted it differently :P21:43
jungleboyjjokke_: Ooops21:44
kragnizjungleboyj: osprofiler support was added to glance first, and used the original config name boris-42 wanted21:44
ttxand then everyone else followed Cinder ? Who is everyone else ?21:44
jungleboyjjokke_: Then everyon else followed us?21:44
*** bobmel has quit IRC21:44
kragnizjungleboyj: yup21:44
*** dave-mccowan_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
*** padkrish has quit IRC21:44
jokke_jungleboyj: that's it21:44
ttxI think I read "everyone else" doesn't include keystone21:44
* jungleboyj looks sheepish 21:44
jokke_ttx: yet21:44
thingeekragniz: no idea, but I know who would be behind it.21:44
jungleboyjRuh roh21:45
*** baoli has quit IRC21:45
*** neelashah has quit IRC21:45
jokke_jungleboyj: I'm not sure if it was everyone else followed or boris implemented with that to everywhere else21:45
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting21:46
*** dboik has quit IRC21:46
bknudsonI wonder how many examples of this kind of thing there are... e.g., different SSL config options21:46
ttxso how many projects are using [profiler]/profiler_enabled at this point ?21:46
kragnizttx: uuh21:46
jungleboyjjokke_: Understood.  So, it seems like it is down to do we change just Glance or get those who used profiler_enabled to change.21:46
kragnizttx: I had a list somewhere21:46
*** noslzzp has quit IRC21:47
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC21:47
kragnizI know heat does21:47
*** dave-mccowan_ is now known as dave-mccowan21:47
Rockygbknudson:  too many.  but we can fix over time.  Gives ops a headache21:47
ttxbknudson: cargoculting  means not so many. The problem with osprofiler is atht it was added after the copy21:47
morganfainbergi'd be inclined to say [profiler]/profiler_enabled really isn't that burdonsome or odd or bad21:47
morganfainbergit's just not that awful. this whole discussion feels alot like bikeshed21:47
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
* maishsk wonders what is a bikeshed21:47
kragnizmorganfainberg: I just wanted my review to be accepted!21:47
ttxMy personal preference (not that it matters) would be to limit disruption and option rename21:48
morganfainbergmaishsk, bikeshed.org21:48
morganfainbergttx, i agree.21:48
jungleboyjmorganfainberg: +121:48
*** ajo has quit IRC21:48
bknudsonit's not that disruptive since the old name can work too21:48
Rockygttx, ++21:48
ttxkragniz: but then if glance-core doesn't want to renazme, i can't force them21:48
devanandamaishsk: http://bikeshed.com/21:48
kragnizttx: ptl doesn't mind one way or the other21:49
*** resker has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
dhellmannttx: according to the code I have checked out, only cinder, glance, and heat are using osprofiler right now and cinder and heat are the only projects other than the docs that mention profiler_enabled21:49
*** noelbk has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
ttxhmm, so there is room for converging the other direction21:49
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting21:49
asalkeldi don't mind a backwards compatible name change (if needed)21:50
ttxif cinder and heat agree their option naming sucks21:50
*** esker_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
dhellmannyeah, this feels like a big kerfuffle over what should be a small change in 1-2 projects21:50
devanandaso i'm curious, other than keystone, are there other projects which haven't implemented osprofiler yet?21:50
dhellmanndevananda: only 3 projects *have* adopted it so far21:50
kragnizdhellmann: +121:50
ttxthingee: do you mind the rename ?21:50
devanandadhellmann: oh. i totally misread that, then. thankjs21:50
dhellmannhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/148174/21:50
dhellmannhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/148180/21:51
jungleboyjttx: I am thinking we don'tcare.21:51
asalkeldmanuals21:51
*** mestery_ is now known as mestery21:51
dhellmannasalkeld: yes, but the manuals will have to be updated either way21:51
ttxkragniz: so... maybe submit changes in the other two. and see which one wins21:51
* jungleboyj != thingee though21:51
kragnizttx: hmm, okay21:52
jungleboyjttx: Ooooh.21:52
thingeettx: no21:52
ttxagree that it's less of an issue than I thought if only t3 projects impacted21:52
*** esker has quit IRC21:52
ttx3*21:52
ttxok, let's move on21:52
morganfainbergmore importantly, this sounds like an option that should be owned by osprofiler not each-and-every-project-to-implement0differently, but that is differnt color to paint the bikeshed...21:52
morganfainbergi agree move on21:52
ttx#topic Open discussion & announcements21:53
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion & announcements (Meeting topic: crossproject)"21:53
ttxWe had release 1:1 syncs today, full speed ahead with kilo-1 next week. Logs at:21:53
*** manishg has left #openstack-meeting21:53
ttx#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ptl_sync/2014/ptl_sync.2014-12-09-08.49.html21:53
* jokke_ hand morganfainberg bucket of pink paint :P21:53
ttxAnything else, anyone ?21:53
*** resker has quit IRC21:53
*** dave-mccowan_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:54
*** esker_ has quit IRC21:54
*** jrist is now known as knowncitizen21:54
dhellmannmorganfainberg: ++21:54
ttxNeutron is in the middle of its advanced serviuce split process21:54
*** knowncitizen is now known as jrist21:55
ttxIf nobody else has anything, I suggest we close early21:55
jokke_sounds good21:56
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC21:56
*** dave-mccowan_ is now known as dave-mccowan21:56
ttxAlright then. Thanks for coming!21:56
kragnizthanks all, sorry for the bikeshed21:56
ttx#endmeeting21:56
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:56
openstackMeeting ended Tue Dec  9 21:56:32 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:56
jokke_thanks21:56
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/crossproject/2014/crossproject.2014-12-09-21.03.html21:56
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/crossproject/2014/crossproject.2014-12-09-21.03.txt21:56
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/crossproject/2014/crossproject.2014-12-09-21.03.log.html21:56
*** jokke_ has left #openstack-meeting21:56
*** vigneshvar has quit IRC21:57
*** jungleboyj has left #openstack-meeting21:57
*** xgerman_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** thingee has left #openstack-meeting21:58
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** esker has quit IRC21:59
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
*** pberis has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
*** joesavak has quit IRC22:00
*** padkrish has quit IRC22:00
*** Mandell_ has quit IRC22:01
*** esker has quit IRC22:01
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** harlowja has quit IRC22:02
*** bswartz has quit IRC22:03
*** cdub has quit IRC22:04
*** thangp has quit IRC22:04
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC22:04
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** freemabr_ has quit IRC22:05
*** n0ano has quit IRC22:06
*** zz_avozza is now known as avozza22:07
*** maishsk has left #openstack-meeting22:08
*** andreykurilin_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:09
*** eglynn has quit IRC22:10
*** ddecapit has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
*** aepifanov has quit IRC22:11
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** esker has quit IRC22:11
*** grue_pm has left #openstack-meeting22:12
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
*** dboik has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
*** tbarron has quit IRC22:13
*** dboik_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:14
*** ddecapit has quit IRC22:15
*** noslzzp has quit IRC22:16
*** dboik has quit IRC22:16
*** KurtMartin is now known as kmartin22:17
*** esker has quit IRC22:17
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting22:18
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** mdomsch has quit IRC22:21
*** aepifanov has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** banix has quit IRC22:22
*** changbl has quit IRC22:23
*** henrynash has quit IRC22:24
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
*** shwetaap1 has quit IRC22:25
*** noelbk has quit IRC22:33
*** noelbk has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
*** dprince has quit IRC22:33
*** esker has quit IRC22:33
*** adahms has quit IRC22:34
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
*** stannie1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:36
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC22:37
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC22:37
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting22:37
*** esker has quit IRC22:37
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:37
*** sballe is now known as sballe_mobile22:38
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:38
*** sballe_mobile is now known as sballe22:38
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting22:39
*** VW has quit IRC22:39
*** Mandell has quit IRC22:41
*** IanGovett has quit IRC22:41
*** pradk has quit IRC22:41
*** krtaylor has quit IRC22:42
*** brnelson has quit IRC22:43
*** asalkeld_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** changbl has quit IRC22:45
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting22:46
*** barclaac has quit IRC22:46
*** asalkeld has quit IRC22:46
*** Riddhi has quit IRC22:46
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting22:47
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting22:48
*** mudassirlatif has joined #openstack-meeting22:50
*** markmcclain has quit IRC22:50
*** mjturek has quit IRC22:52
*** otter768 has quit IRC22:52
*** igormarnat has left #openstack-meeting22:54
*** marekd is now known as marekd|away22:54
*** marun has quit IRC22:54
*** obondarev has quit IRC22:54
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting22:56
*** IlyaE has quit IRC22:56
*** cknight1 has quit IRC22:56
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting22:57
*** ZiGMaX has quit IRC22:57
*** VW has quit IRC22:57
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting22:57
*** devlaps has quit IRC22:58
*** noelbk has quit IRC22:58
*** gokrokve has quit IRC22:58
*** jgrimm is now known as zz_jgrimm22:59
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting22:59
*** mudassirlatif has quit IRC23:00
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC23:00
*** mudassirlatif has joined #openstack-meeting23:00
*** armax has quit IRC23:01
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC23:01
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting23:01
*** jaypipes has quit IRC23:01
*** VW has quit IRC23:02
*** lhcheng has quit IRC23:02
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC23:02
*** bknudson has quit IRC23:03
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting23:03
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting23:04
*** Masahiro has joined #openstack-meeting23:04
*** Rockyg has quit IRC23:04
*** mudassirlatif has quit IRC23:04
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting23:04
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting23:05
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC23:05
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away23:05
*** neelashah has quit IRC23:06
*** mudassirlatif has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** asalkeld_ is now known as asalkeld23:07
*** Masahiro has quit IRC23:08
*** jlk has joined #openstack-meeting23:08
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting23:10
*** jmontemayor_ has quit IRC23:12
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:14
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC23:14
*** e0ne has quit IRC23:14
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting23:15
*** Longgeek has quit IRC23:15
*** mikedillion has joined #openstack-meeting23:16
*** mudassirlatif has quit IRC23:16
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC23:17
*** jecarey has quit IRC23:18
*** eharney has quit IRC23:18
*** esker has quit IRC23:18
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting23:20
*** baoli has quit IRC23:21
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting23:22
*** esker has quit IRC23:22
*** mikedillion has quit IRC23:23
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox23:24
*** mikedillion has joined #openstack-meeting23:24
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting23:24
*** ddieterly has quit IRC23:25
*** esker has quit IRC23:25
*** e0ne has quit IRC23:26
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting23:29
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting23:33
*** mudassirlatif has joined #openstack-meeting23:34
*** mudassirlatif has quit IRC23:35
*** tochi has joined #openstack-meeting23:35
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC23:39
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC23:39
*** stannie1 has quit IRC23:40
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:40
*** adahms has joined #openstack-meeting23:41
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting23:43
*** dboik_ has quit IRC23:43
*** js1123 has quit IRC23:44
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting23:45
*** dsetia has quit IRC23:46
*** mudassirlatif has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** MaxV has quit IRC23:47
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting23:48
*** jrist is now known as knowncitizen23:48
*** knowncitizen is now known as jrist_23:49
*** mestery has quit IRC23:50
*** jrist_ is now known as jrist23:50
*** jrist is now known as jrist_23:50
*** jrist_ is now known as jrist23:51
*** ptoohill_ has quit IRC23:52
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC23:54
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** harlowja has quit IRC23:56
*** rbak has quit IRC23:57
*** rudrarugge has joined #openstack-meeting23:57
*** ItSANgo has quit IRC23:57
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting23:57
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting23:57
*** ptoohill_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:57
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC23:57
*** Mandell has quit IRC23:59
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:59
*** esker has quit IRC23:59
*** crc32 has quit IRC23:59
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!