Tuesday, 2014-07-22

*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting00:00
*** jckasper has quit IRC00:01
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting00:01
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC00:02
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC00:05
*** jckasper has quit IRC00:08
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting00:09
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting00:09
*** max_lobur has quit IRC00:10
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC00:11
*** patelna has quit IRC00:15
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:16
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting00:16
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC00:16
*** yamamoto has quit IRC00:18
*** Alexandra_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:18
*** Alexandra_ has quit IRC00:18
*** vermarah_ has quit IRC00:20
*** vermarah has quit IRC00:20
*** mtanino has quit IRC00:20
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting00:20
*** tongli has quit IRC00:20
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting00:21
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting00:21
*** gangil has quit IRC00:24
*** annegent_ has quit IRC00:24
*** hrybacki has joined #openstack-meeting00:26
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC00:31
*** tkay has quit IRC00:33
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC00:33
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting00:33
*** rmoe has quit IRC00:33
*** dims has quit IRC00:34
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting00:35
*** kebray has quit IRC00:36
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:37
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting00:37
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC00:38
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC00:39
*** david-lyle has quit IRC00:39
*** emagana has quit IRC00:39
*** banix has quit IRC00:41
*** armax has quit IRC00:41
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting00:45
*** hemna is now known as hemna_00:46
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting00:49
*** armax has quit IRC00:50
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC00:52
*** manishg has left #openstack-meeting00:52
*** jwang_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:53
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting00:54
*** Mandell has quit IRC00:54
*** ddieterly has quit IRC00:55
*** garyk has quit IRC00:56
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting00:56
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC00:57
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting00:58
*** llu has joined #openstack-meeting00:58
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting00:58
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** leeantho has quit IRC00:59
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** yamahata has quit IRC01:00
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting01:00
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting01:01
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting01:01
*** s3wong has quit IRC01:02
*** vkmc has quit IRC01:02
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting01:04
*** Alexandra_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:06
*** Alexandra_ has quit IRC01:06
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** gmurphy has quit IRC01:08
*** gmurphy has joined #openstack-meeting01:08
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC01:10
*** eghobo has quit IRC01:12
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting01:12
*** jcoufal has quit IRC01:13
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting01:13
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:13
*** ivar-lazzaro1 has joined #openstack-meeting01:16
*** hashar has quit IRC01:16
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC01:18
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC01:18
*** mxu has quit IRC01:19
*** Mandell has quit IRC01:19
*** tomoe has joined #openstack-meeting01:20
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC01:20
*** changbl has quit IRC01:20
*** hockeynut has quit IRC01:20
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting01:21
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting01:24
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC01:27
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC01:29
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting01:30
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC01:31
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC01:32
*** ivar-lazzaro1 has quit IRC01:34
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting01:34
*** otter768 has joined #openstack-meeting01:34
*** dims has quit IRC01:34
*** amotoki has quit IRC01:37
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting01:40
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting01:41
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC01:44
*** MaxV has quit IRC01:45
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting01:49
*** mberlin1 has quit IRC01:49
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n301:50
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting01:50
*** mberlin has joined #openstack-meeting01:50
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** brucer_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** slong_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC01:52
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:53
*** brucer has quit IRC01:55
*** slong has quit IRC01:55
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting01:56
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting02:03
*** eguz has quit IRC02:04
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting02:04
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** padkrish has quit IRC02:06
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting02:06
*** eghobo has quit IRC02:07
*** gangil has joined #openstack-meeting02:07
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-meeting02:08
*** marun is now known as marun_afk02:08
*** Swami has quit IRC02:09
*** rainya has quit IRC02:09
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting02:10
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC02:10
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC02:11
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC02:12
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** novas0x2a|lapto1 has quit IRC02:13
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC02:13
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting02:13
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** armax has left #openstack-meeting02:14
*** adalbas has quit IRC02:15
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting02:16
*** MaxV has quit IRC02:20
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting02:22
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting02:26
*** yjiang5 has quit IRC02:26
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting02:28
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting02:29
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-meeting02:29
*** rkukura has quit IRC02:31
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting02:32
*** hashar has quit IRC02:32
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC02:32
*** eguz has quit IRC02:36
*** liusheng has quit IRC02:41
*** epico has quit IRC02:42
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC02:42
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting02:43
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:43
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting02:44
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC02:44
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting02:47
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting02:47
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC02:48
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC02:53
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting02:54
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting02:59
*** xianghui has quit IRC03:00
*** rossk has joined #openstack-meeting03:02
*** tongli has quit IRC03:03
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting03:04
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting03:05
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
*** weshay has quit IRC03:06
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting03:07
*** Guest95342 has quit IRC03:10
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting03:18
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting03:20
*** otter768 has quit IRC03:22
*** epico has quit IRC03:22
*** dims has quit IRC03:25
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting03:25
*** rainya has quit IRC03:34
*** MaxV has quit IRC03:34
*** Poornima|mtg has joined #openstack-meeting03:34
*** Poornima|mtg is now known as Poornima_03:34
*** hrybacki has quit IRC03:36
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:40
*** HenryG is now known as HenryG_afk03:43
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:43
*** rajeshr has joined #openstack-meeting03:44
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:44
*** amcrn has quit IRC03:45
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC03:46
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC03:48
*** slong_ has quit IRC03:53
*** slong has joined #openstack-meeting03:53
*** JRobinson__ is now known as JRobinson__afk03:54
*** eghobo has quit IRC03:55
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting03:55
*** Tross has quit IRC04:00
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC04:01
*** cjellick_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:01
*** yingjun has quit IRC04:02
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting04:02
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting04:03
*** cjellick has quit IRC04:04
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting04:04
*** cjellick_ has quit IRC04:06
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** yingjun has quit IRC04:06
*** slong has quit IRC04:08
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC04:08
*** slong has joined #openstack-meeting04:08
*** brucer__ has joined #openstack-meeting04:08
*** brucer_ has quit IRC04:11
*** jjmb has quit IRC04:12
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting04:13
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting04:18
*** krtaylor has quit IRC04:18
*** Poornima_ has quit IRC04:19
*** dkehn__ has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** arnaud has quit IRC04:25
*** arnaud__ has quit IRC04:25
*** JRobinson__afk is now known as JRobinson__04:26
*** yjiang5 has joined #openstack-meeting04:26
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC04:26
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting04:28
*** ngoswami has joined #openstack-meeting04:28
*** Poornima_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:30
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC04:30
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:31
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting04:31
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting04:32
*** shankar has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
*** neelashah has quit IRC04:36
*** banix has quit IRC04:36
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC04:38
*** Poornima_ has quit IRC04:39
*** garyh has joined #openstack-meeting04:40
*** cjellick has quit IRC04:40
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting04:40
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:43
*** epico has quit IRC04:43
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC04:45
*** yamamot__ has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting04:47
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** yamamot__ has quit IRC04:49
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting04:50
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting04:54
*** vish__ has joined #openstack-meeting04:54
*** vishATbrocade has joined #openstack-meeting04:56
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting04:57
*** shankar has quit IRC04:57
*** ngoswami has quit IRC04:58
*** amcrn has quit IRC04:59
*** dims has quit IRC04:59
*** natarajk has joined #openstack-meeting05:00
yamahatahello05:02
dougwigo/05:02
s3wonghello05:02
vishATbrocadeHello05:03
yamahata#startmeeting servicevm-device-manager05:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 22 05:03:14 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is yamahata. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.05:03
natarajkhi05:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.05:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)"05:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'servicevm_device_manager'05:03
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting05:03
yamahataDo we have Bob? Let's give him minutes05:03
dougwigwhereabouts is everyone on this team?05:05
*** ChristianM_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:06
yamahataTo be honest, I'm not sure. I know it's early morning for Bob.05:06
ChristianM_7 am in Sweeden05:06
*** Poornima|mtg has joined #openstack-meeting05:07
yamahataIt seems he won't attend. let's start05:07
s3wongBob is in Sweden05:07
yamahata#topic Announcement05:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcement (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)"05:07
*** Poornima|mtg is now known as Poornima_05:07
yamahatatwo neutron blueprints for routervm have been approved05:07
yamahatacongrants for bob and natarajk05:08
yamahatawe can make progress05:08
natarajkyamahata: thanks05:08
natarajksure05:08
yamahataI had replied to comments on servicevm api.05:08
yamahataand I pushed new one.05:09
natarajkyamahata: yes, i am planning to review the new patch tomorrow05:09
yamahatanatarajk: thanks,05:09
natarajkyamahata: i hope the ml2 port security extension spec gets approved05:10
yamahatawe can start with it to come up with working reference routervm plugin05:10
yamahatanatarajk: yes, I applied for spec freeze exception of ml2 port security extension05:10
yamahataany other announcements?05:10
yamahata#topic api discussion05:11
*** openstack changes topic to "api discussion (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)"05:11
yamahataokay,do we have any items on api on irc?05:11
yamahataany discussion can be continued at gerrit.05:12
natarajknatarajk: i'll post my comments in gerrit tomorrow05:12
natarajkoops05:12
natarajkyamahata: i'll post my comments in gerrit tomorrow05:13
yamahataNow I'm wondering where router-attach/dettach-interface should be done.05:13
yamahatanatarajk: thanks05:13
yamahataI mean which neutron plugin or servicevm should call nova attach vif.05:13
yamahataThis is just a heads up for future discussion05:14
natarajkyamahata: all the nova api related calls should be handled in service vm05:14
natarajkso that i can be used by other plugin/drivers05:15
yamahatanatarajk: Yes. That's same to my current thinking.05:15
natarajkbut i believe bob's approach has static vifs05:16
natarajkbrocade relies on dynamic attach/detach vifs05:16
yamahatanatarajk: Bob's code has nova-attach/detach calls.05:16
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:16
yamahatawe can be looking at different code base, though.05:16
natarajkin CSR plugin code, i saw that the VM with two vNICs were doing VLAN/VxLAN trunking05:17
yamahatanatarajk: It define plugging driver, the driver handles such stuff.05:18
yamahataUnfortunately We don't have Bob today.05:18
natarajkyamahata: anyway we need to have methods for attach/detach interfaces05:19
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:19
yamahatanatarajk: agreed05:19
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
yamahatalet's move on to the next topic05:19
yamahata#topic l3-routervm-plugin05:20
*** openstack changes topic to "l3-routervm-plugin (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)"05:20
yamahataI'm still working on l3-plugin to consolidate csr and vyatta code. But I haven't have something which can be published yet.05:20
yamahataI guess I need 1 or 2 weeks.05:20
yamahatato publish something05:21
yamahata#topic open discussion05:21
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: servicevm-device-manager)"05:21
yamahataanything to discuss?05:22
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting05:22
natarajkyamahata: do we any requirements from NFV subgroup ?05:22
s3wongyamahata: K-Summit speaker preso submission is three days away - you want to submit something for tacker?05:23
yamahatas3wong: sounds good idea!05:23
yamahataI'll give it a try05:23
yamahata#action yamahata try to apply for K-summit speaker preso submission05:24
natarajks3wong, yamahata: Design summit session or speaker session ?05:24
s3wongyamahata: cool - submission deadline is this Thursday (US time, I believe)05:24
s3wongnatarajk: speaker session05:24
s3wongnatarajk: design summit submission deadline is much much later05:24
*** chandankumar has quit IRC05:25
natarajkMay be we can do combine session05:26
natarajkcombined session05:26
yamahatanatarajk: yeah, joint session05:26
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting05:26
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting05:26
s3wongyamahata: natarajk: probably want to include Bob also05:26
natarajksure05:27
yamahata#action yamahata contact Bob for joint session05:27
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC05:27
*** notmyname has quit IRC05:28
yamahatanatarajk: regarding to requiremnt NFV, I'd like to see that port without subnet will be settled down.05:28
natarajkok05:28
yamahataBut it seems we need to wait for Kilo cycle05:28
natarajkyamahata: Do you how CSR plugin handles ip-spoofing issues ?05:29
s3wongyamahata: a good number of what ijw filed didn't get approved by SAD05:29
natarajkyamahata: Do you know how CSR plugin handles ip-spoofing issues ?05:29
yamahatanatarajk: although I don't know the details05:30
*** vishATbrocade has quit IRC05:30
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-meeting05:30
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC05:30
yamahatanatarajk: I guess they uses their own vif driver or something.05:30
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting05:30
yamahataOr other cisco guy also proposing port security of ML2 plugin.05:30
natarajki'll send an e-mail to Bob to understand the details05:31
yamahatanatarajk: please CC to me.05:31
natarajksure05:31
yamahataany other topics?05:32
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
yamahataokay thank you everyone. See you next week.05:32
natarajkbye05:32
yamahatabye05:32
s3wongthanks!05:32
yamahata#endmeeting05:32
ChristianM_thanks bye05:32
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"05:32
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 22 05:32:56 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)05:32
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/servicevm_device_manager/2014/servicevm_device_manager.2014-07-22-05.03.html05:32
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/servicevm_device_manager/2014/servicevm_device_manager.2014-07-22-05.03.txt05:32
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/servicevm_device_manager/2014/servicevm_device_manager.2014-07-22-05.03.log.html05:33
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC05:33
*** natarajk has left #openstack-meeting05:33
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting05:33
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** vishwanathj has left #openstack-meeting05:35
*** yjiang5_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** ChristianM_ has quit IRC05:37
*** arnaud has quit IRC05:37
*** yjiang5 has quit IRC05:39
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC05:41
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:43
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:43
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:47
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC05:48
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC05:49
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC05:50
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-meeting05:51
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting05:52
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC05:52
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting05:53
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting05:53
*** rcarrill` has quit IRC05:54
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:55
*** haomai___ has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC05:58
*** rakesh_hs has joined #openstack-meeting05:58
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting05:59
*** pradipta_away is now known as pradipta05:59
*** haomai___ has quit IRC06:00
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting06:01
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting06:01
*** soulxu1404_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:02
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-meeting06:02
*** alex_xu has quit IRC06:02
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting06:02
*** ngoswami has joined #openstack-meeting06:02
*** s3wong has quit IRC06:03
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting06:04
*** soulxu1404_ is now known as alex_xu06:05
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC06:05
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC06:14
*** marios has quit IRC06:15
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting06:16
*** gyee has quit IRC06:17
*** marios has quit IRC06:17
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting06:17
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
*** andreaf has quit IRC06:22
*** yjiang5_ has quit IRC06:23
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-meeting06:23
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC06:25
*** elo has quit IRC06:26
*** e0ne has quit IRC06:28
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting06:29
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting06:30
*** mkoderer_bot has joined #openstack-meeting06:31
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting06:32
*** slong has quit IRC06:33
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:33
*** alex_xu has quit IRC06:34
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting06:34
*** eghobo has quit IRC06:36
*** e0ne has quit IRC06:37
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting06:38
*** chandankumar has quit IRC06:39
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC06:39
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:40
*** tomoe has quit IRC06:41
*** shankar has joined #openstack-meeting06:41
*** tomoe has joined #openstack-meeting06:41
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:42
*** vkdrao has joined #openstack-meeting06:42
*** tomoe has quit IRC06:42
*** jjmb has quit IRC06:43
*** tomoe has joined #openstack-meeting06:43
*** tomoe has quit IRC06:43
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:43
*** tomoe has joined #openstack-meeting06:43
*** e0ne has quit IRC06:45
*** vkdrao has quit IRC06:46
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting06:46
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC06:47
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting06:49
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting06:51
*** tomoe has quit IRC06:51
*** arborism has quit IRC06:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:53
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:54
*** mspreitz has quit IRC06:55
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-meeting06:56
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting06:57
*** brucer__ has quit IRC06:57
*** rcarrill` has quit IRC06:57
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:58
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting07:00
*** dims has quit IRC07:02
*** tomoe has joined #openstack-meeting07:02
*** e0ne has quit IRC07:04
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away07:04
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting07:05
*** Sukhdev__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:06
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC07:08
*** ityaptin has joined #openstack-meeting07:08
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting07:08
*** MaxV has quit IRC07:08
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC07:09
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting07:09
*** e0ne has quit IRC07:12
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting07:15
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting07:15
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:16
*** luqas has quit IRC07:16
*** pnavarro has quit IRC07:18
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting07:18
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting07:20
*** e0ne has quit IRC07:20
*** arnaud has quit IRC07:21
*** samuelbercovici has joined #openstack-meeting07:22
*** lvdongbing has joined #openstack-meeting07:27
*** shankarprasad has joined #openstack-meeting07:28
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting07:28
*** shankar has quit IRC07:29
*** Sukhdev__ has quit IRC07:30
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting07:34
*** alex_xu has quit IRC07:34
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:35
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting07:35
*** gangil has quit IRC07:36
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC07:36
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting07:37
*** samuelbercovici1 has joined #openstack-meeting07:39
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC07:42
*** samuelbercovici1 is now known as samuelbercovici07:42
*** vuil has joined #openstack-meeting07:42
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting07:47
*** zns has quit IRC07:48
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC07:48
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-meeting07:50
*** k4n0 has quit IRC07:51
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting07:51
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC07:52
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting07:53
*** zz_johnthetubagu is now known as johnthetubaguy07:54
*** zns has quit IRC07:54
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC07:55
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting07:56
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting07:59
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting08:01
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC08:02
*** Hayim has joined #openstack-meeting08:02
*** dims has quit IRC08:03
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC08:03
*** phil__ has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting08:06
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC08:12
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting08:18
*** alex_xu has quit IRC08:18
*** evgenyf has quit IRC08:26
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-meeting08:26
*** bgorski has joined #openstack-meeting08:26
*** rcarrill` has quit IRC08:27
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting08:30
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting08:30
*** k4n0 has quit IRC08:32
*** acoles_away is now known as acoles08:33
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC08:34
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting08:37
*** baohua has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** elo has quit IRC08:43
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:43
*** e0ne has quit IRC08:47
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting08:47
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC08:48
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting08:49
*** paragan has quit IRC08:49
*** ramishra has quit IRC08:53
*** dbite has quit IRC08:53
*** zns has quit IRC08:54
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting08:56
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting08:58
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting08:59
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-meeting09:01
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC09:03
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting09:03
*** dims has quit IRC09:04
*** luqas has quit IRC09:06
*** pradipta is now known as pradipta_away09:07
*** yingjun has quit IRC09:08
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting09:09
*** alex_xu has quit IRC09:12
*** yingjun has quit IRC09:13
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting09:14
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting09:16
*** k4n0 has quit IRC09:19
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting09:32
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC09:33
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
*** tomoe has quit IRC09:37
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting09:37
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting09:38
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting09:38
*** yaguang has quit IRC09:42
*** cjellick has quit IRC09:42
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting09:42
*** che-arne has joined #openstack-meeting09:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting09:43
*** rcarrill` has quit IRC09:46
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-meeting09:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:48
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-meeting09:49
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting09:50
*** baohua has quit IRC09:51
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:51
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC09:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** mrda is now known as mrda-away09:53
*** Macaveli has quit IRC09:54
*** arosen has quit IRC09:54
*** ahale_ has quit IRC09:54
*** dosaboy has quit IRC09:54
*** NobodyCam has quit IRC09:54
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC09:54
*** mrodden has quit IRC09:54
*** Guest62064 has quit IRC09:54
*** flaper87|afk has quit IRC09:54
*** creiht has quit IRC09:54
*** markvan_ has quit IRC09:54
*** jogo has quit IRC09:54
*** shadower has quit IRC09:54
*** csd has quit IRC09:54
*** boltR has quit IRC09:54
*** anteaya has quit IRC09:54
*** cburgess has quit IRC09:54
*** DuncanT_away has quit IRC09:54
*** yamahata__ has quit IRC09:54
*** jogo has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** creiht has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** csd has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** cburgess has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** flaper87|afk has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** NobodyCam has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** elo1 has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8709:55
*** DuncanT- has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** boltR has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** aaronorosen has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** ahale has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** nosnos has quit IRC09:58
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting09:58
*** oomichi has quit IRC09:59
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting09:59
*** jjmb has quit IRC10:01
*** nosnos has quit IRC10:03
*** dims has quit IRC10:04
*** xuhanp has quit IRC10:08
*** lvdongbing has quit IRC10:11
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting10:12
*** jgallard has quit IRC10:12
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting10:14
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC10:16
*** yingjun has quit IRC10:16
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC10:23
*** yaguang has quit IRC10:31
*** paragan has quit IRC10:33
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:33
*** epico has quit IRC10:35
*** ndipanov has quit IRC10:38
*** Hayim has quit IRC10:45
*** che-arne has quit IRC10:46
*** lukego has quit IRC10:49
*** hashar has quit IRC10:50
*** dbite has joined #openstack-meeting10:52
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting10:52
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting11:06
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting11:13
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC11:24
*** k4n0 has quit IRC11:28
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting11:29
*** rcarrill` is now known as rcarrillocruz11:32
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting11:32
*** MaxV has quit IRC11:34
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting11:35
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting11:37
*** deepakcs has joined #openstack-meeting11:39
*** MaxV has quit IRC11:40
*** nosnos has quit IRC11:40
*** e0ne has quit IRC11:42
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting11:45
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting11:45
*** xianghui has quit IRC11:47
*** ayoung has quit IRC11:47
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting11:48
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting11:48
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC11:48
*** rajeshr has quit IRC11:49
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting11:49
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC11:49
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting11:49
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting11:51
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting11:51
*** jjmb has quit IRC11:53
*** ramishra has quit IRC11:55
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting12:00
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting12:01
*** chuckC has quit IRC12:06
*** banix has quit IRC12:06
*** whenry has quit IRC12:06
*** Poornima_ has quit IRC12:07
*** krtaylor has quit IRC12:08
*** zns has quit IRC12:08
*** IanGovett has joined #openstack-meeting12:08
*** hrybacki has joined #openstack-meeting12:10
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting12:10
*** banix has quit IRC12:12
*** trey_h_ has quit IRC12:14
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting12:15
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting12:19
*** trey_h has quit IRC12:19
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting12:20
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting12:23
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting12:26
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting12:27
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC12:27
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-meeting12:27
*** aysyd has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** hrybacki_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:33
*** dims has quit IRC12:33
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting12:33
*** hrybacki has quit IRC12:36
*** jab has quit IRC12:38
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting12:38
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** baoli has quit IRC12:42
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting12:43
*** vkmc has quit IRC12:43
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting12:43
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting12:46
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** derekh_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:49
*** shankarprasad has quit IRC12:50
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting12:55
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting12:57
*** flaviof is now known as flaviof_zzz12:57
*** matty_dubs|gone is now known as matty_dubs12:59
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC13:01
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting13:02
*** jcoufal has quit IRC13:03
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** ddieterly has quit IRC13:05
*** carlp has joined #openstack-meeting13:07
*** zns has quit IRC13:07
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** deepakcs has quit IRC13:09
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** bknudson has quit IRC13:10
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
*** dkranz has quit IRC13:10
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC13:15
*** luqas has quit IRC13:15
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting13:16
*** HenryG_afk is now known as HenryG13:17
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** jckasper has quit IRC13:21
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez13:22
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting13:23
*** changbl has quit IRC13:23
*** dkehn__ is now known as dkehnx13:27
*** jecarey has quit IRC13:28
*** szecsi has quit IRC13:29
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting13:29
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting13:29
*** ramishra has quit IRC13:29
*** Tross has quit IRC13:30
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** rakesh_hs has quit IRC13:33
*** bklei has quit IRC13:34
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:43
*** matrohon has quit IRC13:43
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
*** zhangleiqiang has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** flaviof_zzz is now known as flaviof13:45
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-meeting13:46
*** prad has joined #openstack-meeting13:47
*** weshay has quit IRC13:47
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC13:51
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** bklei has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** igordcard has quit IRC13:53
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** ddieterly has quit IRC13:55
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting13:57
sc68calWho's ready for the ipv6 subteam meeting?13:58
HenryGo/13:58
*** trey_h_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
sc68cal#startmeeting neutron_ipv613:59
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 22 13:59:53 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:59
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:59
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_ipv6)"13:59
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6'13:59
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** trey_h_ has quit IRC14:00
xuhanphello14:00
*** trey_h_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** matty_dubs has left #openstack-meeting14:00
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC14:00
HenryGHi xuhanp14:00
baoli_Hi14:00
dane_leblanchello14:00
*** trey_h_ has quit IRC14:01
*** trey_h_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
sc68calI think our agenda will be fairly quick today, since the J-2 milestone is this week14:02
*** BrianB__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** trey_h has quit IRC14:02
xuhanpsc68cal, any luck about the dhcpv6 stateful blueprint?  I know the approve date has been passed.14:02
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
sc68calxuhanp: your spec hasn't been -2'd14:03
xuhanpsc68cal, good to know. So still possible to be approved?14:04
HenryGThe only way to get a BP approved now is to send an email to openstack-dev and ask for a Spec Freeze Exception14:04
xuhanpHenryG, I didn't know that. I can certainly do that.14:04
*** trey_h_ has quit IRC14:05
sc68calI agree- this should be an exception, since the code is also in gerrit and ready for review14:05
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
xuhanpby the way, sc68cal, we got the reply from dnsmasq developer about stateless dhcp. I will update the code soon14:05
HenryGxuhanp: It's important to check the Neutron Meeting weekly. It's recorded in eavesdrop.14:06
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
*** drankis has quit IRC14:06
xuhanpHenryG, will do. Thanks!14:06
baoli_xuhanp, can you let us know that's about the stateless dhcp?14:07
baoli_s/that/what14:07
xuhanpbaoli_, we found problem to let dnsmasq only takes care of optional information instead of sending out address in stateless mode.14:07
xuhanpWe didn't know how to configure dnsmasq in the past and asked dnsmasq developers by email.14:08
*** hashar has quit IRC14:08
baoli_xuhanp, I see, thanks.14:08
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting14:08
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** sballe has quit IRC14:11
*** jehb has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
sc68calxuhanp: did they reply on the mailing list or directly to you?14:12
xuhanpsc68cal, they replied the guy in my team who sent out the email at the beginning.14:13
xuhanpWe thought they won't reply so I asked your help. But it turned out they replied.14:13
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
sc68calxuhanp: ah - that's good :)14:13
xuhanp:-)14:13
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
HenryGIs the code review for stateless on gerrit yet?14:15
*** cjellick has quit IRC14:15
xuhanpI am working on the unit test. But should be on in these two days.14:15
HenryGxuhanp: No problem, I thought maybe I missed it.14:15
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting14:15
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
sc68calxuhanp: https://review.openstack.org/106299 ?14:16
xuhanpsc68cal, yes.14:16
HenryGThat's the stateful one.14:16
sc68calcool14:16
xuhanpcurrent it only covers stateful part. The stateless part is coming14:16
xuhanpor do you think they should come in two patches?14:17
sc68calxuhanp: depens on the size of the patches14:17
*** andreaf_ has quit IRC14:17
*** andreaf has quit IRC14:17
HenryGIt's usually better to have smaller change sizes if possible.14:17
*** lcheng has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
HenryGSo best to split them up if it makes sense.14:17
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting14:18
sc68cal^ +114:18
xuhanpOK.14:18
xuhanpwill do.14:18
HenryGYou can make stateless depend on stateful if you rely on code there.14:18
xuhanpyep. That's the plan14:19
HenryGcool14:19
*** e0ne_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
sc68calHenryG: how goes the bug for testing the radvd work14:21
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:21
*** annegent_ is now known as annegentle_14:21
*** e0ne has quit IRC14:21
HenryGSo first, for the record, the RADVD code is upstream. Yay!14:21
sc68cal#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/134534114:22
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1345341 in neutron "radvd needs functional tests" [High,New]14:22
sc68calHenryG: baoli_: Congrats!14:22
HenryGYes, so the functional testing is remaining. I have the very basics ready.14:23
sc68calok - to be clear, these tests are for the neutron test tree, not tempest14:24
*** rainya has quit IRC14:24
*** banix has quit IRC14:24
baoli_we also need to have devstack support for radvd to be approved14:24
* sc68cal gets confused about functional testing vs tempest vs neutron unit tests14:24
HenryGsc68cal: Yes. But I need to get marun to confirm that I am on the right track, and specifically what functionality should be tested there.14:25
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
sc68calHenryG: Cool.14:25
baoli_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107801/14:25
sc68calbaoli_: agree -we also need python-neutronclient changes to be merged14:25
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC14:26
HenryGsc68cal: It is a bit confusing. It is neither unit testing nor tempest tests. It is functional testing. :)14:26
*** Riddhi has quit IRC14:26
HenryGThe twilight zone.14:26
*** Riddhi has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
sc68calhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/75871/14:27
*** andreaf_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:28
HenryGLooks like that ^^ needs a rebase.14:28
*** andreaf_ has quit IRC14:28
baoli_sc68cal, I am actually using the subnet cli for the two modes without using the patch14:28
sc68calHenryG: again? <grumbles>14:28
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting14:28
*** elo has quit IRC14:28
xuhanpsc68cal, will rebase soon14:28
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
sc68calbaoli_: ah - some witchcraft :)14:29
*** matrohon has quit IRC14:29
baoli_sc68cal, I means it works without requiring the python-neutronclietn change14:29
baoli_you just need to append the two modes at the end of the neutron subnet-create command line14:30
sc68calbaoli_: agree - but without xuhanp 's patch it won't show up in --help strings14:30
baoli_sc68cal, that's right14:30
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting14:31
sc68calare there any other topics to discuss today?14:32
*** Mandell_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
sc68calOk everyone - until next week! Keep up the fantastic work, we're getting tons of stuff merged for Juno14:35
sc68cal#endmeeting14:36
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:36
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 22 14:36:25 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:36
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-07-22-13.59.html14:36
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-07-22-13.59.txt14:36
xuhanpgoodbye14:36
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-07-22-13.59.log.html14:36
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC14:36
*** Longgeek_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** Longgeek_ has quit IRC14:37
*** BrianB__ has quit IRC14:37
*** Mandell has quit IRC14:38
*** xuhanp has quit IRC14:38
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
*** Macaveli has quit IRC14:39
*** Longgeek has quit IRC14:39
*** kevinconway has quit IRC14:40
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
*** zns has quit IRC14:41
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC14:42
*** che-arne has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
*** lbragstad has quit IRC14:46
*** chandankumar has quit IRC14:48
*** krotscheck has quit IRC14:50
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-meeting14:52
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting14:52
*** marun_afk is now known as marun14:53
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
*** jgrimm has quit IRC14:56
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC14:58
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:00
n0ano#startmeeting gantt15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 22 15:00:25 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'gantt'15:00
n0anoanyone here to talk about the scheduler?15:00
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
*** Mandell_ has quit IRC15:01
bauzas\o15:01
bauzas(doing different things at the same time is definitely not a good option)15:01
n0anobauzas, but more exciting15:02
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
bauzaswell, concurrency is better than parralelism, eh ?15:02
n0anothere's a difference between the two?15:02
bauzasn0ano: damn!15:02
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
bauzasn0ano: apples are oranges now ? :)15:03
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
n0anomaybe you meant serialism is better than parralelism15:03
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
mspreitzo/15:03
bauzasn0ano: google it ;)15:04
n0anothe fun one is conference calls, you know when someone say `can you repeat that' they were reading their email and not listening15:04
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:04
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
n0anoanyway, let's try and get started15:05
*** gangil has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
n0ano#topic use cases for a separated scheduler15:05
*** openstack changes topic to "use cases for a separated scheduler (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:05
bauzascan you repeat that ?:D15:05
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
n0anobauzas, no :-)15:05
*** rbowen has quit IRC15:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:06
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting15:06
bauzas#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SchedulerUseCases15:06
n0anoI looked over the etherpad and the common thread is there are valid use cases where the scheduler needs to consider info from multiple subsystems15:06
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
johnthetubaguyseems reasonable15:06
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
bauzasping jaypipes, Yathi15:07
n0anoindeed, to me it seems like there are valid use cases that we don't serve now but should serve in the future15:07
johnthetubaguywhat are we trying to decide from the use cases?15:07
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: +115:07
mspreitzthere was also an outstanding challenge from jaypipes about the need for making a simultaneous decision15:07
YathiHi15:07
*** corvus is now known as jeblair15:07
n0anowhat mspreitz said15:07
johnthetubaguysimultaneous, as in multiple service stats all together?15:08
mspreitzsimultaneous is ortho to cross-service, actually15:08
johnthetubaguylive nova, cinder and neutron stats together15:08
YathiAs you may recall from the last meeting, this effort was to show why a separate scheduler?15:08
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: IIRC, the question was "do we need a global scheduler ?"15:08
mspreitzyou can do simutaneous or serial placement even within one service15:08
Yathia separate scheduler will allow for a global scheduling15:08
bauzass/global/cross-services15:09
n0anoYathi, I would phrase it as `more easily allow'15:09
Yathiand also make it 'more' easy for more complex cross-service scenarios15:09
*** nacim has quit IRC15:09
n0anoYathi, but yes, to me there's clear justification for a separate/global scheduler15:09
mspreitzYes, I think the cross-service use cases are the most compelling for separating the scheduler15:09
Yathin0ano +115:09
johnthetubaguymspreitz: you think more about multiple VMs placing together?15:09
bauzasyeah, the alternative would be to hit sequentially each service's scheduler, as are doing filters15:09
johnthetubaguyfrom my point of view, even if we add no features, moving the code out of nova is very useful15:10
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:10
*** hockeynu_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
mspreitzjohnthetubaguy: not sure I understand the sense of your question; if it is which use cases are more important for separation, I answered at the same time you asked15:10
n0anojohnthetubaguy, +115:10
mspreitzOK, not ortho15:10
johnthetubaguymspreitz: sorry, the question was what you mean my simultanious15:10
*** zns has quit IRC15:11
mspreitzBy simultaneous I mean making one decision that covers placing several things.  They might be all in one service, or they might not15:11
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
*** matiu has quit IRC15:11
johnthetubaguymspreitz: cool, thanks15:11
Yathijohnthetubaguy:  moving the code is very useful as a first step I agree.. then I hope we can get more flexibility in allowing complex scenarios for resource placement15:11
johnthetubaguyYathi: the moving code is more about getting better review capacity and things15:11
Yathiagreed that too.15:12
n0anoI think we're all in `violent' agreement here so, absent an opposing view, I'd like to say we agree a split is good and let's move on15:12
bauzasthe rationale was also to correctly define what's a subcomponent is15:12
bauzasn0ano: +115:12
johnthetubaguyn0ano: +115:13
mspreitzn0ano: +115:13
Yathisome of the usecases you see in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SchedulerUseCases - are these future complex scenarios - cross-services, placing group of VMs, etc.15:13
mspreitzthe biggest holdout was jaypipes, if I recall correctly15:13
Yathin0ano +1 on agreement here15:13
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
*** hockeynut has quit IRC15:14
bauzasmspreitz: yeah, that doesn't prevent to rediscuss that later, provided it's non blocking15:14
n0anoOK, I count it as unanimous, we shouldn't forget about future use cases, they are important, but let's move on15:14
n0ano#forklift status15:14
mspreitzyeah, since he's not here, there is nothing productive to do but move on15:14
n0ano#topic forklift status15:14
*** openstack changes topic to "forklift status (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:14
bauzasso15:14
n0anobauzas, looks like progress on the scheduler client library?15:14
bauzasn0ano: indeed15:14
bauzasn0ano: we got one patch merged last week15:15
bauzasn0ano: https://review.openstack.org/10350315:15
bauzasschedulet no longer calls computes15:15
bauzasabout the client, there is also https://review.openstack.org/82778 with a +2 (thanks johnthetubaguy)15:15
bauzaschasing another -core15:16
*** edmund has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
bauzasanyway, other reviews are good, so people can still review that one15:16
n0anothe other big issue is the BP to isolate DB access, johnthetubaguy has graciously agreed to sponsor the exception request, what else do we need to do about that15:17
bauzasstill about client, there is another patch for porting select_destnations15:17
bauzashttps://review.openstack.org/10455615:17
johnthetubaguyn0ano: need another sponsor I think15:17
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: there is already ndipanov who volunteered15:17
johnthetubaguyah, cool15:17
johnthetubaguymikal should then send a mail tomorrow morning saying the exception is granted15:18
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: btw. sounds like the etherpad is not up-to-date15:18
johnthetubaguyso we need to agree what we want to do I guess15:18
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: +215:18
n0anothat's good but it still means we only have this week to finalize the BP15:18
bauzasn0ano: +115:18
johnthetubaguybauzas: correct, mikal is going to do that in the morning, the ML is the definitive place for the decision15:18
johnthetubaguyn0ano: yes, do we agree on the approach15:18
bauzasyeah, the approach is to make use of the client for updating status for aggregates15:19
n0anogood news is I have people who will do the code onece the BP is approved so if we work on that quickly we should be OK15:19
bauzasif s/o disagrees, could he maybe provide an alternative ?15:19
bauzasn0ano: I can volunteer too15:19
johnthetubaguythe problem is how to deal with the aggregate stuff, jay has a nice approach to fix quite a few of the filters15:19
bauzasn0ano: I was quite busy due to sched-lib15:19
johnthetubaguyis the spec ready for review right now?15:20
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: as said in the spec, jay's approach doesn't cover all the things15:20
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: yep15:20
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: I proposed another approach, and gave all details15:20
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: I'm listening to alternatives too15:20
johnthetubaguybauzas: I don't disagree, just wondering if we agree on your current approach, there was some code up, and I didn't really agree with the code15:20
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: yeah, that's why I proposed another way in the spec15:21
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: the spec diverged from the PoC15:21
n0anojohnthetubaguy, I'd like to ignore the code for the moment and get the BP approved, code can come later15:21
bauzasn0ano: +115:21
johnthetubaguyn0ano: but the approach needs to be agreed in the spec, I am more meaning, do we agree on the approach15:21
bauzasn0ano: your comment was about how to notify the scheduler that an aggregate has been deleted15:22
johnthetubaguylike, what extra goes into select_desitnation and what goes into the host stats call15:22
*** zaneb has quit IRC15:22
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting15:22
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: that's in the spec15:22
n0anolet's all review the BP - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89893 and go from there.15:22
bauzasn0ano: let's take the opportunity here to cover the deletion case15:22
johnthetubaguybauzas: n0ano: OK just will will not have another meeting before we miss the BP freeze15:23
bauzasn0ano: I was assuming that updating with None a resource means we can delete the resource15:23
johnthetubaguyI was trying to see if we all agree with the spec15:23
bauzasI'll try to summarize here15:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
n0anobauzas, that might work, as long as the none update is guaranteed to happen15:24
bauzaswe update scheduler with aggregates ids15:24
*** jmontemayor_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
bauzasso the compute knows the list of aggs he's in15:24
bauzaswe also update the list of aggs in the sched thanks to update_resource_stats15:24
bauzaswarning paste bomb15:25
bauzas  - For each aggregate creation/update in the Compute API, calls    scheduler.client.update_resource_stats(name, values) with the name is    a tuple (aggregate, 'id') where id is the id of the aggregate, and where    values is the metadata of the aggregate15:25
johnthetubaguyyeah, still feels like we should get compute to report the AZ zone name, rather than the aggregate id, but not sure15:26
bauzas  - amend scheduler.client.update_resource_stats so if name is (agg, id), do   nothing (will be honored for Gantt, not for Nova)15:26
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: AZs are just aggregate metadata, no ?15:26
bauzasright ?15:26
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:26
*** rbowen has quit IRC15:26
*** emagana has quit IRC15:27
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: the only difference is that an host can only be part of one AZ, while it can be part of multiple aggs15:27
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC15:27
johnthetubaguybauzas: but if you report the id, then the select_destinations needs to give all the aggregate metadata on every call, which is quite wasteful, and not that clean15:27
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: nope, see my proposal15:27
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: I changed that way15:27
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: we update the scheduler view15:27
johnthetubaguybauzas: who updates the scheduler view?15:28
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: probably API15:28
bauzasI mean, nova-api15:28
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: IIRC15:28
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: when creating/updating agg15:28
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: within the handler, to be precise15:28
johnthetubaguybauzas: but how does it get the first bit of information when you switch from nova-scheduler to gantt, for example, its seems a big worring15:29
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: I'm considering an aggregate as another type of resource for the scheduler15:29
*** thedodd has quit IRC15:29
johnthetubaguybauzas: yes, but in that case, you need someone to own the aggregate, and we don't really have an owner of that right now15:29
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: nope, I'm just saying that a call has to be made thru thru the lib15:30
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: with nova, it would be a no-op15:30
johnthetubaguybauzas: if the compute node, just reports its own stats up, you avoid all the confusion15:30
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: including metadata so ?15:30
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: that's another alternative15:30
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: not just the ids15:30
johnthetubaguybauzas: erm, the point is to isolate the DB, so nova will have to start reporting the new stats15:30
johnthetubaguybauzas: then before the split, the filter are no longer access the nova db15:31
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: right, and that's why I'm considering aggregates as another kind of resource15:31
johnthetubaguythey only access the little bit of the nova db they are allowed to, I mean15:31
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: oh, see your worries15:31
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: you missed my last 2 bullets in the spec15:31
bauzas  - modify HostManager so it builds aggregates info in HostState by querying107    all Aggregate objects.15:32
bauzas  - update scheduler filters so that it looks into HostState instead109    of aggregates15:32
bauzas   Later, when Gantt will be created, the sched.client.update will update112   another table in Gantt DB so HostManager will be able to query it instead of113   Aggregate objects.15:32
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
bauzasas I said in the spec, there are also the instancegroups objects to care of15:33
johnthetubaguybauzas: thats worse, if we are not careful, now all deployments have bad performance, not just the ones using bad filters/weighters15:33
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
* jaypipes reads back... sorry for being late :)15:33
*** Mandell has quit IRC15:34
* johnthetubaguy thinks my IRC is running a bit slow, taking a while to see people's comments15:34
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: because Manager will call aggregates each time it needs to be updated ?15:34
*** banix has quit IRC15:34
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: I mean, I can understand we could have some problems, I'm just trying to find the best tradeoff15:35
johnthetubaguybauzas: well, those aggregate calls are expensive, but only happen we required now, at least, just don't want to change that15:35
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: so, we agree that we need to update scheduler15:36
johnthetubaguybauzas: that why I am wondering why the host can't just report the stats, directly, that the scheduler wants to see15:36
johnthetubaguybauzas: except for where it needs user based info, which must come in select_destinations, thats fine15:36
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: so, to be precise, you mean that the periodic task reports all aggregates that the host wants to see ?15:37
bauzass/wants to see/is part of (really tired tonight)15:37
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:37
bauzascan't see the whole story15:37
*** vuil has quit IRC15:37
bauzasbecause we can't pass the full list of aggregates within select_destinations15:37
jaypipesjohnthetubaguy: ++15:38
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: I mean, we need to update the scheduler with aggregates15:38
johnthetubaguybauzas: more that when the aggregate changes, computes are notified, like today, and only then update the local cache of the aggregate state, so the host just reports "az_zone:zoneB" or something like that15:38
bauzashow the scheduler is able to scheduler if there are aggregates with no hosts yet ?15:38
bauzasdammit15:39
bauzasschedule15:39
jaypipesjohnthetubaguy: I would think that when an agg is updated, all things that would be interested in the change would be notified, including a call to a scheduler RPC API.15:39
jaypipesor cast...15:39
bauzasjaypipes: that was the idea of my proposal15:39
jaypipesbauzas: cool.15:39
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting15:39
johnthetubaguyjaypipes: yeah, we have bits of that already today, but yeah, we could just call the scheduler15:39
bauzasjaypipes: but the difference is that it was a no-op thing now15:39
jaypipesbauzas: sure, understood15:40
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
n0anoso, are we arguing architecture or implementation right now?15:40
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
jaypipesimpl15:40
bauzasn0ano: we're arguing spec proposal details :)15:40
johnthetubaguybauzas: confused, I don't get why its no-op now, given we really need this change now, for performance improvements?15:40
bauzasn0ano: because we need to provide those15:40
n0anoOK, I want to keep everyone focused on the `BP` right now, not the path to implement the BP15:40
n0anos/path/patch15:41
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: lemme try to summarize the thing15:41
bauzasn0ano: that's really a design discussion15:41
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: so the proposal would be15:41
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: each time an aggregate is modified (C/U/D), a call is made to the scheduler saying 'eh, I'm an agg with this metadata'15:42
bauzasthe proposal would be to make use of the existing update_resource_stats method15:42
*** vhoward has left #openstack-meeting15:44
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: in the nova world, that would mean that within update_resource_stats, it would update system_metadata15:44
bauzasor I don't know which other one15:44
johnthetubaguybauzas: it just doesn't feel quite right at the moment15:44
johnthetubaguybauzas: in case things get out of sync, no clear "owner" to fix that, but maybe I am over thinking it15:44
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: the real problem is that :15:45
johnthetubaguybauzas: I just like the node being responsible for reporting all its stats15:45
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: yeah, I like it too, but there are cases where aggregates have no hosts15:45
johnthetubaguybauzas: but that does create other issues, but it works nicely for the move from nova-scheduler to gantt, and such like, as compute restart gives you fresh data to start the day with15:45
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: so when filtering on, you wouldn't have a view of all the aggregates15:46
johnthetubaguybauzas: if there are no hosts in an aggregate, the scheduler doesn't need to know about the aggregate15:46
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: nope, I disagree15:46
*** yamahata has quit IRC15:46
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: take the AZ filter15:46
johnthetubaguybauzas: scheduler is picking hosts, just uses extra data from aggregates to filter some out15:46
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: if no hosts are in the aggregate having the AZ wanted, scheduler won't know that this AZ is existing15:46
johnthetubaguybauzas: if you want AZ 7 and there are no hosts in AZ 7, then nothing to pick, doesn't matter if you even know what AZ 7 is15:47
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: I'm sorry, but that's a chicken-and-egg problem :)15:48
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: if I'm creating a new AZ with no hosts, I can possibly still ask nova to boot one host to this AZ15:48
johnthetubaguybauzas: its not though, you are trying to pick a host, if there are none, there are none?15:48
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: oh I see15:48
johnthetubaguybauzas: if all the hosts have a stat saying which AZ they are in, you just filter on that right?15:48
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: right15:49
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: that sounds reasonable15:49
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: that only implies that computes report each aggregate they are in, including metadata15:50
johnthetubaguybauzas: yep, that was my proposal15:50
n0anoI have to say, I'm with johnthetubaguy on this, if there's no hosts in an agg or AZ I don't see why the scheduler would need to know about it.15:50
johnthetubaguybauzas: well, actually not quite15:50
johnthetubaguybauzas: each host reports the AZ zone it thinks its in15:51
bauzasn0ano: yeah, that's logical15:51
johnthetubaguybauzas: it doesn't say about its aggregate, or any metadata, it reports what AZ zone it is in15:51
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: we need to have aggregate metadata for AggregateImagePropertiesIsolation by example15:51
johnthetubaguybauzas: for the tenant filter, the host reports what teants it allows, and what tenants it dis-allows15:51
bauzasor AggregateInstanceExtraSpecsFilter15:52
johnthetubaguybauzas: extra specs filter, you probably what to report the extra specs you allow on each host15:52
n0anosorry guys, we'll have to continue this discussion on the nova channel, there's one more topic we should cover today15:52
bauzasn0ano: right15:52
johnthetubaguybauzas: the nice property is the scheduler view of the world is never ahead of what the compute node things it should be doing15:52
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting15:53
*** Fdot has quit IRC15:53
n0ano#topic mid-cycle meetup15:53
*** openstack changes topic to "mid-cycle meetup (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:53
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: we need to follow-up on that one :)15:53
johnthetubaguybauzas: Ok, will have to be later, I have a meeting straight after this one I am afraid15:53
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: tomorrow morning, you're free ?15:53
johnthetubaguybauzas: OK15:54
n0anoI know we'll talk about forklift status/process, are there other scheduling issue we want to raise at the meetup?15:54
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: cool thnks15:54
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
Yathin0ano: I want to discuss the Solver Scheduler blueprint.. and its request for spec freeze exception15:54
bauzasn0ano: there is the proposal from jaypipes about global claiming15:54
johnthetubaguyn0ano: if we include the resource tracker move to scheduler, along with the current progress, thats probably key15:54
n0anobauzas, BTW, I think we'll be setting up a Google+ conference so you can join in (with difficulty)15:55
*** primeministerp has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
bauzasn0ano: that would be awesome15:55
johnthetubaguywell some of these other things are more like gantt mid cycle things though right?15:55
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: +115:55
johnthetubaguythere might be some time for a gantt session in a break out room I guess15:55
n0anojohnthetubaguy, not sure what you mean by `gantt mid-cycle'15:55
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:55
johnthetubaguywell nova will not let these features in15:55
johnthetubaguyso its quite a quick nova discussion15:55
n0anoahh, gantt specific vs. nova issues15:55
johnthetubaguyyeah15:56
johnthetubaguysorry, I was unclear15:56
jaypipesjohnthetubaguy: nova will not let what faetures in?15:56
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
n0anojohnthetubaguy, NP but that's a good point, we should be focusing on nova issues at the nova meetup15:56
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
*** vermarah_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
*** vermarah has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
n0anoand, fer sur, I can arrange a breakout room for a gantt specific session15:57
Yathin0ano: one topic for midcycle meetup: the scheduler subgroup believes the complex scheduling scenarios as shown in the usecases etherpad.. our solver scheduler BP tries to address that complexity.. and will fit in Gantt..15:57
n0anoYathi, I haven't forgotten you, we can address that but I think that is a scheduler specific topic, not a nova one15:57
bauzasn0ano: +115:58
Yathin0ano: sure I agree.. it is scheduler specific..15:58
bauzasif you want, we can arrange a time for discussing about gantt specifics15:58
bauzasso I could join15:58
n0anoYathi, I'm not against your solver proposal it's just I want to focus on the gantt split for the moment15:58
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC15:58
bauzasthat would allow us to discuss more easily15:58
bauzasif we have a separate room15:59
n0anobauzas, +115:59
bauzasn0ano, you'll be my voice during the split status meeting15:59
Yathin0ano: that's great to know. I can imagine.. the priorities..totally agree.. but just want to get the basic framework code in..15:59
johnthetubaguyjaypipes: we kinda pushed back at the summit, and else where on lots of these, saying please split out gantt first15:59
* n0ano has to work on my french accent15:59
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
bauzasI'm still discussing with russellb to see if he can help too15:59
*** sballe has quit IRC15:59
Yathin0ano: we have been trying to push the basic framework in (non-disruptive to gantt or nova) since HKG.. hence the push now..16:00
* bauzas would love to give his accent for free16:00
*** eghobo has quit IRC16:00
n0anoit's approaching the top of the hour, we'll cancel this meeting next week (for obvious reasons), hope to see most of you in Oregon and we talk here in 2 weeks16:00
*** banix has quit IRC16:00
n0anoYathi, understood16:00
n0ano#endmeeting16:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 22 16:00:56 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-22-15.00.html16:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-22-15.00.txt16:01
bauzasn0ano: sure, enjoy Beaverton beers16:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-07-22-15.00.log.html16:01
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
n0anobauzas, Colorado beers are better :-)16:01
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
Yathin0ano: thanks.. lets chat in Portland too I am coming16:01
n0anoYathi, cool, see you there16:01
jaypipesjohnthetubaguy: well, I think I've been pretty clear on my opinion that we need to stabilize and clean up the resource tracker and scheduler interfaces before a split is worthwhile...16:01
*** phil__ has quit IRC16:03
*** arnaud has quit IRC16:03
johnthetubaguyjaypipes: yes, this was 6 months ago16:03
primeministerp#startmeeting hyper-v16:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 22 16:03:24 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is primeministerp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'hyper_v'16:03
primeministerpwe're going to give some a couple more minutes for others to join16:03
ociuhanduhi all16:04
ociuhanduprimeministerp: good morning16:04
primeministerphey tavi16:04
alexpilottihey there16:04
primeministerpociuhandu: we should catch up later i'm planning on heading to the colo at some point16:04
*** hrybacki_ is now known as hrybacki16:04
primeministerpalexpilotti: hey there16:05
primeministerpis luis around16:05
*** yingjun has quit IRC16:05
primeministerpalexpilotti: start w/ some development updates?16:05
alexpilottisure16:05
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
primeministerp#topic nova blueprints/development16:06
*** openstack changes topic to "nova blueprints/development (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:06
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
primeministerpalexpilotti: I know there was a lot of code submitted for review including the blueprints for this development cycle16:06
alexpilottiso we have a few BPs already approved16:06
primeministerpalexpilotti: great16:06
alexpilottiother BPs on Nova are waiting for exceptions16:07
primeministerpwhat are the critical one's we're waiting on16:07
alexpilottiwe uploaded them in time based on the core team requests16:07
alexpilottibut they didn’t get reviewed16:07
alexpilottiSMB (Nova), x509, nova rescue and host power actions16:08
alexpilottiI sent them as exception request to the ML16:08
alexpilottinow we have to wait16:08
*** shengjiemin has quit IRC16:09
alexpilottithe general problem is that Nova team is swamped16:09
alexpilottiand they have already more BPs than they can handle16:09
alexpilottion the other side, teh SMB Cinber ones got approved w/o problems16:09
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC16:10
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** shengjiemin has joined #openstack-meeting16:12
*** zhangleiqiang has quit IRC16:12
*** elo has quit IRC16:13
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
primeministerpalexpilotti: thanks16:13
*** ildikov has quit IRC16:14
primeministerpalexpilotti: sorry got sidetracked for a moment16:14
*** jab has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** jab has quit IRC16:14
*** jab has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
primeministerpalexpilotti: are there additional things that should be discussed16:15
primeministerpalexpilotti: should we discuss a blueprint for the service bus driver?16:16
*** rmoe has quit IRC16:16
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** rcarrill` has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
alexpilottiyes, we ned to send a BP request on Oslo for it16:18
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
primeministerpalexpilotti: can we get that in just in case16:18
alexpilottithat can be done ASAP targetting K-116:18
primeministerpk16:18
alexpilottiwith maybe some chance to have it by J-316:18
primeministerpok16:19
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC16:19
alexpilottiback to the BPs, all the other ones which jhave been approved have already code under review16:19
primeministerpgreat16:19
*** manishg_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** leeantho has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** xianghui has quit IRC16:20
alexpilottiso the key now is to make sure that Nova core has time to review them. Sensing more code than what the review bandwidth allows is not useful.16:20
primeministerpscale is always an issue16:20
primeministerpalexpilotti: well at least we're moving forward16:20
alexpilottithere are more talsk about subtree +2 rights which is really needed IMO16:21
*** afazekas has quit IRC16:21
primeministerpalexpilotti: alexpilotti: help especially in our case16:21
primeministerpha16:21
primeministerpautocomplete16:21
alexpilottiheh16:21
primeministerpso16:21
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
primeministerpanything more from a development/blueprint perspective16:22
primeministerpalexpilotti: ^16:22
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC16:22
*** manishg has quit IRC16:22
*** manishg_ is now known as manishg16:22
alexpilottino I think for now is enough16:23
*** ygbo has quit IRC16:23
alexpilottiI hope we’ll have more news next week16:23
primeministerpgreat16:24
primeministerpI'll change the topic16:24
primeministerp#topic CI16:24
*** openstack changes topic to "CI (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:24
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
*** celttechie has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
primeministerpso with recent events here we've got some people shuffled who were involved with our HW acquisition16:25
*** samuelbercovici has joined #openstack-meeting16:25
primeministerpas of now we're looking at mid aug for the hardware to be online16:25
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting16:25
*** tsekiyama has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
primeministerpadditionally we're currently rebalancing and cleaning up our current setup to try to stabilize16:26
primeministerpthe existing infrastructure16:26
ociuhanduprimeministerp: we have had a blocking issue on the neutron side, due to the debug level in the CI, that has been fixed yesterday16:26
*** jgallard has quit IRC16:26
primeministerpociuhandu: was this the root of the problems yesterday?16:26
*** annegent_ has quit IRC16:26
ociuhanduyes16:27
primeministerpheh16:27
primeministerpociuhandu: thanks for hunting it down16:27
primeministerpociuhandu: has a patch been committed to fix it yet?16:27
ociuhanduand another pip update failure on hyper-v nodes for sqlalchemy, but we handled that manually16:27
primeministerpok16:28
*** vuil has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
ociuhanduprimeministerp: alexpilotti was helping us in tracking it and the original author commited the fix quite fast16:28
primeministerpo great16:28
ociuhanduprimeministerp: we have also had a communication problem between zuul and jenkins last friday that led to a cascading effect16:28
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
*** viktors has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
ociuhanduprimeministerp: so we had to manually intervene to restabilize the CI on friday night / saturday morning, we have had a few hours of false failures then16:29
primeministerpociuhandu: i'm aware of the zuul issue, we need to move it off of virtual and onto iron immediately16:29
primeministerpI had thought vijay and tim had done that already16:29
ociuhanduprimeministerp: the main problem here is related to jenkins16:30
*** ramishra has quit IRC16:30
primeministerpociuhandu: jenkins scale or load issues?16:30
ociuhanduit’s not the first time when jenkins stops communicating with zuul and only a manual restart will resume that16:30
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
ociuhanduprimeministerp: nope, just lain jenkins bug16:30
ociuhanduerrr, plain16:30
primeministerpdid you have to update the jar?16:31
ociuhanduno16:31
*** hshah has joined #openstack-meeting16:31
primeministerpk16:31
ociuhanduit does not talk to zuul anymore, so zuul will just queue up jobs16:31
ociuhanduonce you do a restart, all is perfect again16:31
ociuhanduwe’re investigating this matter16:31
*** hashar has quit IRC16:31
*** paragan has quit IRC16:33
primeministerphmm16:33
primeministerpi think we have serious network congestion issues16:33
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
ociuhanduprimeministerp: the simple result of this is zuul having queue while on jenkins all executors are idle16:34
primeministerpacross the site link16:34
*** ityaptin has quit IRC16:34
*** ramishra has quit IRC16:34
primeministerpok16:34
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
ociuhanduit’s usually after a network interruption though it should automatically retry16:35
*** lbragstad has quit IRC16:35
primeministerpociuhandu: i'll be heading to the colo after calls this am16:35
*** trey_h has quit IRC16:35
ociuhanduprimeministerp: we should have a sync a bit later on the hardware reallocation, when you have a moment16:35
primeministerpok16:35
*** mpaolino has quit IRC16:35
primeministerpafter this16:35
ociuhandugreat16:36
primeministerpif possible16:36
ociuhanduon the cinder side, we have the images ready, the scripts as well, we’re running now the final tests on them16:36
primeministerpOk let me know when they are finalized16:37
primeministerpI may have some equipment for you to use already16:37
*** rcarrill` is now known as rcarrillocruz16:37
primeministerpociuhandu: that's all I have for now16:37
ociuhanduprimeministerp: it’s going to be also virtualized on top of the undercloud16:37
primeministerpociuhandu:thought we were going to go iron16:38
primeministerpdue to constraints16:38
primeministerpif you think we can handle it given our current ram issue16:38
primeministerpi thought it would be easier to deploy onto iron16:38
*** jab has quit IRC16:38
primeministerpwell maybe not easier but defiantly more performant16:39
primeministerpgiven our "issues"16:39
*** evgenyf has quit IRC16:39
ociuhanduprimeministerp: constraints actually mean we should be able to use that hardware for multiple things, not only cinder, since on cinder the workload is way smaller16:39
primeministerpociuhandu: what's the ram footprint16:39
primeministerpon the windows side16:39
primeministerpso16:39
primeministerpone sec16:39
primeministerpwhen you say image16:39
ociuhanduconsidering the identified nodes that can be repurposed, it should not be a problem16:39
primeministerpare you talking the windows or devstack image?16:39
ociuhandui mean glance image on undercloud for both devstack and windows16:39
primeministerpthat's what I thought16:40
*** rcarrillocruz has left #openstack-meeting16:40
ociuhanduboth get deployed in the undercloud16:40
primeministerpi thought we were going to use the devstack instance and a physical windows node16:40
primeministerpbased on our discussion last week16:40
*** jab has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
primeministerpif you think we can do it virtualized16:41
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
primeministerpthen ok16:41
ociuhanduthe footprint for the windows node should fit in 2 Gb ram16:41
primeministerpok16:41
*** jab has quit IRC16:41
*** jab has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
primeministerpit's going to be tight16:41
primeministerphehe16:41
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
primeministerpociuhandu: I'm going to end it16:41
primeministerpociuhandu: need to make some calls16:41
primeministerp#endmeeting16:42
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:42
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 22 16:42:00 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:42
ociuhanduprimeministerp: nothing else to add16:42
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-07-22-16.03.html16:42
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-07-22-16.03.txt16:42
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-07-22-16.03.log.html16:42
ociuhandubye all16:42
*** ivasev has quit IRC16:44
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** jgrimm has quit IRC16:44
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:46
*** dims has quit IRC16:46
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** thedodd has quit IRC16:48
*** lukego has quit IRC16:48
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** jcoufal has quit IRC16:49
*** acoles is now known as acoles_away16:49
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** shashankhegde has quit IRC16:49
*** hockeynu_ has quit IRC16:50
*** jcoufal has quit IRC16:50
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** pelix has quit IRC16:51
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting16:51
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting16:51
*** yjiang5 has joined #openstack-meeting16:51
*** lbragstad has quit IRC16:52
*** pnavarro has quit IRC16:52
*** safchain has quit IRC16:53
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** andreykurilin1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC16:53
*** aaronorosen is now known as arosen16:55
*** arosen has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** hrybacki has quit IRC16:56
*** MaxV has quit IRC16:56
*** patelna has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** dshurtle has quit IRC16:59
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC17:00
*** bgorski has quit IRC17:00
andreykurilin1#startmeeting Rally17:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 22 17:00:48 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is andreykurilin1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'rally'17:00
coolsvaphello17:01
andreykurilin1hi17:01
*** thedodd has quit IRC17:01
oanufrievhi17:01
andreykurilin1hi!17:01
*** johnthetubaguy is now known as zz_johnthetubagu17:01
*** ociuhandu has left #openstack-meeting17:01
*** MaxV has quit IRC17:01
andreykurilin1let's wait a little bit17:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:02
*** rook has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
marcoemoraishere17:03
andreykurilin1ok, let's start17:03
andreykurilin1hi all! Boris(boris-42) is on vacation, so I'll lead this meeting today. Topics for discussion: news; updates and so on.17:03
*** Gamekiller77 has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
andreykurilin1#topic rally news17:03
*** openstack changes topic to "rally news (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:03
andreykurilin1#topic news17:03
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** openstack changes topic to "news (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:03
andreykurilin1yesterday, Boris sent email to openstack-dev mailing-list with proposition to incubate Rally. I hope you will participate actively in this discussion:)17:04
andreykurilin1http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/040813.html17:04
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
k4n0Hi all  o/17:04
andreykurilin1hi17:05
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
andreykurilin1k4n0, news = http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/040813.html17:05
andreykurilin1I think this is excellent news, so let us believe that community will agree with incubation of Rally.What are your thoughts about this news? :)17:05
Gamekiller77I will for sure17:05
*** RainbowBastion has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
k4n0awesome !17:05
Gamekiller77I will put as much of Cisco weight as i can17:06
Gamekiller77i reach out to my contact internal to Cisco about this so we get it on the map17:06
rookNice!17:06
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77: cool!17:06
andreykurilin1RainbowBastion: news = http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-July/040813.html17:06
k4n0I think Rally + Tools should be the defacto for benchmarking and understanding openstack from inside and outside17:06
Gamekiller77yah Rainbow is with me17:06
RainbowBastionI'm working with Gamekiller7717:06
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
Gamekiller77andreykurilin1, one thing we need clarity is the context info for user data the boris did17:07
Gamekiller77per Cisco we have a Read only LDAP and need to be able to use static users17:07
Gamekiller77if this work we are going full bore with Rally testing17:07
RainbowBastionSpecifically, what format the file he's reading from is in and how it's set up.17:08
*** jjmb has quit IRC17:08
*** e0ne_ has quit IRC17:09
*** ivar-lazzaro1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC17:09
Gamekiller77we reach out to Boris directly but this info is great17:10
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
Gamekiller77i think Rally should be the core test and validation system17:10
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77: agreed17:10
andreykurilin1Since Rally 'on the threshold' to be incubated, imo, our main task is to make Rally more stable, so I propose to focus on test coverage and quality of tests. Any suggestions?17:11
andreykurilin1last week Sergey(rediskin) found that one of the Rally component (`rally verify`) was broken.17:12
k4n0+1 on that, we need stricter coverage requirements on new patchs17:12
rookandreykurilin1 +1 - broader test coverage would be nice.17:13
andreykurilin1We don't know how long it was broken(several fixes already merged). I was one of reviewers at last patch, that changed `rally verify` and I checked only the quality of the code and don&rsquo;t checked how it works. This is wrong way of reviewing patches.:)17:13
coolsvapandreykurilin1, agreed, the unit test coverage is already in progress and we should start with functionality coverage sooner than later17:13
coolsvapk4n0, yup agreed17:13
*** shashankhegde has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
andreykurilin1coolsvap: +117:13
k4n0#action Stricter unit test requirements on patches17:14
andreykurilin1Based on this situation, all of us (core-team and contributors of Rally) should be more attentive to quality and efficiency of patches.17:14
k4n0Agreed17:14
Gamekiller77that my and RainbowBastion main focus17:14
Gamekiller77we ran a test last week and it failed and did not clean up17:14
Gamekiller77per the LDAP problem i stated17:15
coolsvapandreykurilin1, yup, start with functionality testing would help for command line failures due to patches17:15
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77, do you have any bugs about it?17:16
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting17:16
Gamekiller77i do not have a bug but i have RainbowBastion file one17:16
Gamekiller77i figured it should go clean up and projects it created but it did not17:17
*** rudrarugge has joined #openstack-meeting17:17
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting17:17
k4n0Gamekiller77, Please file as many bugs as you want, We will triage them as well.17:17
Gamekiller77RainbowBastion, put that on your list for today todo list ok17:17
RainbowBastionWill do17:17
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77, cleanup is a pain. we should fix it17:17
Gamekiller77yah no we are about to start some large scale testing as soon as we get this ldap work around from boris figured out17:18
Gamekiller77we see the code fix but we not sure how to format the data for ldap static users17:18
Gamekiller77beside that yes we test the hell out of it as RainbowBastion main job this summer as our intern for my department17:18
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja17:19
k4n0Gamekiller77, great news, can you also start triaging new bugs reported in Rally?17:19
Gamekiller77that is key17:19
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77, sorry, I do not know nothing about data for ldap. let's wait boris17:20
Gamekiller77just for simplifylisity can you post the link to the bug system17:20
Gamekiller77andreykurilin1, it is context really how to provide static context for users17:20
Gamekiller77this way rally not trying to create users when it tests17:20
k4n0Gamekiller77, https://bugs.launchpad.net/rally17:21
Gamekiller77RainbowBastion, make sure to get that link17:21
RainbowBastionAlready have it written down17:21
Gamekiller77cool let run that test again and get as much info and open a case ok17:21
Gamekiller77sorry bug17:21
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC17:22
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77, RainbowBastion: it would be great. If you will report bugs, we could work on them together17:23
*** zhangleiqiang has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
*** che-arne has quit IRC17:24
Gamekiller77RainbowBastion, is here to help make this work for Cisco so yah we work on what we can.  I have limited time as i am on fast track to get Icehouse up soon and my PXe system for RHEL7 still down17:24
andreykurilin1cool17:24
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
andreykurilin1Let's change the topic to "updates". no objections?17:25
Gamekiller77not here17:26
andreykurilin1#topic updates17:26
*** openstack changes topic to "updates (Meeting topic: Rally)"17:26
andreykurilin1Rally began to accumulate old patches. Does anyone have updates about old patches? Also interested in status of newest patches:)17:26
*** whenry has quit IRC17:27
andreykurilin1https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:stackforge/rally,n,002e762f000193d117:27
*** zhangleiqiang has quit IRC17:27
coolsvapandreykurilin1, I am & k4n0 working on unit test coverage, have submitted a few patches and will continue working on the same17:28
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:28
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
andreykurilin1coolsvap, ok, thanks. anyone else?17:28
coolsvapalso I have a blueprint for add create cli command which is WIP17:28
k4n0andreykurilin1, I am working on getting more detailed timing data for context creation and teardown along with oanufriev17:29
andreykurilin1coolsvap, could you share link to bp?17:29
k4n0andreykurilin1, will submit patch by end of thursday17:29
*** varora has left #openstack-meeting17:29
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting17:29
k4n0https://blueprints.launchpad.net/rally/+spec/collect-runtime-duration17:29
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting17:29
*** luqas has quit IRC17:30
*** hshah has left #openstack-meeting17:30
rooki submitted a fix for a issue I found yesterday... regarding networks17:30
*** arnaud has quit IRC17:31
andreykurilin1k4n0, thanks17:31
oanufrievand i have few patches.... ['Fix side menu depth', 'Whole scenario time measurement', 'Updated rally gate scenarios', 'Periodic runner refactoring']17:31
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
coolsvapandreykurilin1, just a min17:32
*** markwash has quit IRC17:32
andreykurilin1rook: great!17:33
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
coolsvapandreykurilin1, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack/?searchtext=add-rally-create-cli-command17:33
andreykurilin1oanufriev:  thanks for updates17:34
*** chandankumar has quit IRC17:34
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
andreykurilin1coolsvap, thanks17:34
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
andreykurilin1Does someone has other topics for discussion?17:35
k4n0Nothing from my side today17:35
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
rookso i am new to Rally, but not benchmarking.17:36
rookI am curious the direction of the scenarios - and the best way to extend a scenario to do more than just single service level benchmarking17:36
rookI was talking with yingjun about this17:37
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:37
andreykurilin1rook, and what he said?:)17:37
rook11:44:24 yingjun: rook not now, there is a patch about this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103306/17:38
rookhowever, is a mixed scenario something that Rally should be doing17:38
rookor is it more of a component level benchmark ?17:38
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:39
andreykurilin1rook, i have no answer for you right now, sorry17:39
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC17:40
rookokay17:40
andreykurilin1rook, i'll try to discover this question soon and answer to it in #openstack-rally17:40
rookOne last question ;)17:40
andreykurilin1what is the question?17:41
*** arnaud has quit IRC17:41
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
rookSo, the current scenarios are focused on the messaging/db layer of OpenStack - is there any work to have scenarios where a workload is introduced into the guest, such as netperf between two guests17:42
rookand maybe they already exist and I haven't seen them17:42
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
*** ramashri has quit IRC17:43
andreykurilin1rook, as far as I remember, Rally hasn't such scenarios yet17:43
*** martines_ has quit IRC17:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
rookOkay... double bummer today17:43
*** martines_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
andreykurilin1rook, can you create a blueprint for it?17:44
Gamekiller77rook i am going to need to do this17:44
rookGamekiller77 me too17:44
Gamekiller77too so maybe we should work together17:44
rookandreykurilin1 sure17:44
Gamekiller77RainbowBastion, let work with rook to figure some items out17:45
Gamekiller77rook i looking at l2 to l2 and l2 to l3 work load17:45
andreykurilin1rook, Gamekiller77: it would be great!17:45
Gamekiller77as i use blades some is back plain and some is not17:45
rookGamekiller77 yup - have scripts now that do this, but I wanted a upstream tool for this.17:45
Gamekiller77it could be done with rally with a ssh engine or something ok cool let talk later17:46
*** iyozhikov is now known as IgorYozhikov17:46
andreykurilin1any other questions/topic for discussion?17:47
Gamekiller77yes i have one more17:47
Gamekiller77something that is lacking a test to figure IO load on the storage your using17:47
*** mspreitz has quit IRC17:47
Gamekiller77i have yet to see a metric marker for grabbing that data17:47
*** arnaud has quit IRC17:47
Gamekiller77it would have to be very open17:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:48
Gamekiller77but most storage venders have api for it17:48
Gamekiller77so when you run a test case and spin up what was the load on your storage system or in my case cloud17:48
Gamekiller77as i run Ceph but not limited to Ceph17:48
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
Gamekiller77RainbowBastion, lets talk about this more ok see if we can not come up with a blue print for this idea17:49
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
Gamekiller77i know our bosses are going to ask for this17:49
*** manishg has left #openstack-meeting17:49
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting17:50
*** ivar-lazzaro1 has quit IRC17:50
Gamekiller77did i lose you all17:50
k4n0We are here  Gamekiller77  :)17:50
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77: :)17:50
*** IgorYozhikov is now known as iyozhikov17:51
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
RainbowBastionNo, I'm here, I was trying to recreate the bug we found yesterday.17:51
RainbowBastionSorry for disappearing17:51
Gamekiller77does what i ask sound like something Rally should capture17:52
Gamekiller77be it local lvm17:52
Gamekiller77or a nfs or ceph17:52
Gamekiller77i think a storage load idea would rock17:52
*** lordd has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** arnaud has quit IRC17:53
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting17:54
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77: hm... I think you should create a bp for it.17:54
Gamekiller77i am17:54
Gamekiller77storage is one of my passions17:54
andreykurilin1:)17:54
Gamekiller77my gears are running i have high level contacts at EMC and NetApp if i need help17:54
Gamekiller77also with Ceph17:55
*** neelashah has quit IRC17:55
Gamekiller77RainbowBastion, let have this as our next meeting and whiteboard a bp17:56
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77: it would be great, if you will do it:)17:56
Gamekiller77i want to give back to the community17:56
Gamekiller77and this is something i can do17:56
andreykurilin1:)17:56
*** vuil1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** vuil has quit IRC17:57
andreykurilin1we must finish this meetings.17:57
*** baoli_ has quit IRC17:57
k4n0Thank you all :)17:57
andreykurilin1thank you all for discussion!17:57
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
*** leonchio_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
andreykurilin1Gamekiller77: if you want, we can continue discussion at #openstack-rally17:58
Gamekiller77thanks all i think this was great17:58
Gamekiller77yup17:58
*** AlanClark has quit IRC17:58
*** Gamekiller77 has left #openstack-meeting17:58
andreykurilin1#endmeeting17:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:58
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 22 17:58:46 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:58
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-07-22-17.00.html17:58
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-07-22-17.00.txt17:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/rally/2014/rally.2014-07-22-17.00.log.html17:58
*** RainbowBastion has left #openstack-meeting17:58
*** arnaud has quit IRC17:59
*** k4n0 has quit IRC17:59
*** jcoufal has quit IRC17:59
*** rook has left #openstack-meeting17:59
*** dstanek has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** gokrokve has quit IRC18:00
*** rodrigods has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
stevemarkeeeeeystone jenkins!18:00
bknudsonhi18:00
raildohi \o18:00
marekdhey18:00
dstanekhi18:00
dolphmayoung, bknudson, dstanek, jamielennox, morganfainberg, stevemar, gyee, henrynash, topol, marekd, lbragstad, joesavak, shardy, fabiog, fmarco76, nkinder, lloydm, shrekuma, ksavich, hrybacki: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/KeystoneMeeting18:00
marekddolphm: pong18:01
lbragstaddolphm: hey18:01
stevemaro/18:01
topolo/18:01
ayoungO.o18:01
gyee\o18:01
morganfainbergo\18:01
*** jckasper_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
dolphm#startmeeting keystone18:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 22 18:02:00 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dolphm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:02
*** htruta has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
dolphm#topic Juno milestone 218:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Juno milestone 2 (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:02
*** kwss has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
bknudsonanything that needs to get in for M2?18:02
dstanekdolphm: i added a topic to the end - if we don't get to it i won't be heart broken18:03
dolphm#info Ensure changes targeted at milestone-2 are gating TODAY18:03
bknudsonalso, is there a keystoneclient release at M2 time?18:03
dolphmdstanek: ack18:03
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
dolphmbknudson: no; but i'd like to do a release of keystoneclient and keystonemiddleware both, by coincidence18:03
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC18:03
*** jckasper_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
dolphmif there's any reason to block either of those, target bugs/bp's to the next milestone of those projects and i'll follow up18:04
ayoungLets stagger the client changes after M218:04
*** jckasper has quit IRC18:04
dolphmkeystoneclient 0.10.0 or keystonemiddleware 1.1.018:04
dolphmayoung: why?18:04
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
morganfainbergdolphm, ++ on the release of both of those18:04
ayoungdolphm, one thing at a time...and I'm hoping to still get the revocation events in18:04
ayoungI'd just suggest getting J2 cut first18:05
*** chuckC_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:05
dolphmayoung: that'd be nice, but i'd also pull the trigger on 0.11.0 in a heartbeat to get that out if it was delayed beyond 0.10.018:05
ayoungdolphm, fair enough18:05
morganfainbergayoung, i'd argue that the moment rev. events land we can justify a rlease18:05
dolphmayoung: and yeah, j2 is a bigger deadline for us18:05
*** ngoswami has quit IRC18:06
dolphmlbragstad's api validation patch gated, but there are follow up patches to start utilizing that stuff18:06
*** jlibosva has quit IRC18:06
morganfainbergayoung, this is the reason we split out the middleware :)18:06
*** chuckC_ has quit IRC18:06
dolphmi'd like to have it marked as Implemented today though, so let's get as much as we can in, and then do the rest in j3 as follow up (wishlist bugs to add validation in different places?)18:06
lbragstadthe meat of the following on patches are in the catalog and assignment apis18:06
morganfainbergdolphm, works for me.18:06
morganfainbergthis also means i can use it for validating the token format .. woo18:07
dstaneki think lbragstad's patches will be easy to get into merging shape18:07
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
*** garyduan has quit IRC18:07
dolphmlbragstad: last i looked, it appeared that you could do more parallelization among those patches (they don't need to be deps?) ... is that true?18:07
dolphmdstanek: ++18:07
lbragstadyes18:07
lbragstadthey no longer need to be linear18:07
dolphmlbragstad: can you get them split apart then? we should be able to merge more+faster that way18:07
lbragstadso they can be working in parallel and I don't have to spam the channel every time I change the assignment validation patch :)18:08
lbragstaddolphm: yep, I can do that18:08
morganfainberglbragstad, but... that was fun18:08
morganfainberg:)18:08
dolphmlbragstad: thanks :)18:08
dolphm#topic Renaming the OpenStack Identity program to the OpenStack TripleA program18:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Renaming the OpenStack Identity program to the OpenStack TripleA program (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:08
lbragstadthanks for all the review!18:08
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
dolphmso, i've had smaller conversations on this topic, and i think it's time to bring this to a larger audience18:08
ayoungAAA?  Authentication, Authorization and Audit?\18:08
morganfainbergayoung, yep.18:09
dolphmayoung: ++18:09
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108739/18:09
morganfainbergayoung, which also implies we push for policy (both the rules engine and otherwise)18:09
dolphmthis is a change to the openstack/governance repo to tweak our program's defintition ^18:09
morganfainbergayoung, when / as they graduate.18:09
ayoung'Call AAA.  We'll help when you crash."18:09
gyeerather small A for authorization as it still done at the services18:09
dolphmso there's two meaningful changes proposed there...18:10
topoldolphm, all for it!!!18:10
bknudsonwe're always the first thing to fail so that's how it works18:10
ayounggyee, nope, we'll own that too18:10
dolphmone is renaming the program to TripleA (authentication + authorization + audit)18:10
ayoungpolicy enforcement in keystonemiddleware18:10
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
dolphmwhich i think better reflects the program's maturity and long term scope18:10
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
ayoungWorks for me18:10
dolphmand then there's the move of pycadf from oslo to tripleA18:10
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** annegent_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
morganfainberggood starting place.18:10
* morganfainberg is in support.18:11
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
dolphmis anyone here opposed to either of those changes? concerns?18:11
* topol is also in huge support18:11
gyeeAaA sounds good18:11
ayoungwhat about Congress?  Are we going to break the news to them that they can't have policy?18:11
morganfainberggyee, will be TripleA18:11
gyee:)18:11
dolphmayoung: does that still exist?18:11
morganfainbergayoung, if they get that far, i would make a move to pull them into TripleA18:11
topolare they still in session???18:11
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
dolphmcommit 6 days ago: https://github.com/stackforge/congress18:11
dolphmi basically forgot about it18:11
topolme too. congress has been quiet18:12
morganfainbergayoung, but afaict they are very very much off in the "figuring how things work"18:12
ayoungmorganfainberg, they are looking to do things outside of what we consider policy as well.  I suspect they are looking to be a general "here's how you do Rules based stuff" project.  Half of what we get from oslo, and half stealing from each of the other project;  Firewall rules are policy to Congress as well.18:12
dolphmit should go through a graduation process on it's own; if there's clear demand/support for it, i think it would fall under the tripleA umbrella. but it shouldn't be fast tracked or grandfathered into an 'integrated' status18:13
bknudsonif audit is part of keystone then congress can work on keystone18:13
morganfainbergayoung, that wouldn't be a good service/program on it's own.18:13
*** banix has quit IRC18:13
ayoungWeekly on Tuesdays at 1700 UTC, e.g. Feb 25, 201418:13
*** afaranha has left #openstack-meeting18:13
topolso if someone needs pycadf but doesnt need all of keystone that is still possible correct?18:13
dolphmayoung: that's right after this18:13
morganfainbergayoung, but I still don't see it as being a huge blocker for them joining this program if they figure things out18:13
ayoungtopol, should be.18:13
morganfainbergtopol, correct, it would stay a separate lib18:13
dolphmtopol: pycadf would still stand on it's own18:13
dolphmtopol: it's core team would just change from oslo core to keystone core18:14
topolthats would be the only issue folks might bring up18:14
dolphmso we'd be adopting keystone-specs for pycadf, for example18:14
ayoungactually, according to World Clock it is 1700 UTC right now, I think.18:14
ayoung171518:14
celttechieJust FYI:  Congress just finished up a meeting and they were talking about joining with Tetris too.18:14
dolphmayoung: oh; i'm definitely wrong. but it's 1815utc according to google :P18:15
morganfainbergcelttechie, tetris?18:15
stevemartheres going to be a good amount of confusion about the renaming18:15
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
dolphmcelttechie: tetris?18:15
* jamielennox arrived late and has never heard of half these terms18:15
dolphmstevemar: with tripleO? or just between identity/triplea18:15
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
morganfainbergstevemar, probably not, rename wouldn't affect the code-name, just the program name: OpenStack Identity -> OpenStack Authn/Authz/Audit18:16
stevemardolphm, the latter18:16
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC18:16
stevemarmorganfainberg, ahhh OK18:16
morganfainbergstevemar, and most people know the code name more than anything else18:16
bknudsonwe'll have to change the identity API to tripleA API18:16
dolphmstevemar: anywhere we can solve for? s/identity-api/triplea-api/ ?18:16
stevemarmorganfainberg, thought we were changing the codename to triplea18:16
ayoungbknudson, I think we leave it as the identity API18:16
morganfainbergstevemar, nah.18:16
stevemari caught up with the train now18:17
morganfainbergstevemar, that would be silly18:17
stevemaragreed18:17
*** atiwari has quit IRC18:17
gyeeAAAAPI18:17
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
ayoungbknudson, we might want to cut it into smaller chunks in the future;  each of the A's deserves its own API18:17
morganfainbergayoung, i'd 301 the references18:17
dolphmayoung: that just sounds terrible18:17
morganfainbergayoung, because we are more than just "Identity" api, but something to discuss18:17
dolphmAAAAPI18:18
lbragstadso, we would have and Identity API that is implemented in TripleA?18:18
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
dolphmgyee: i just understood your joke.18:18
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
lbragstadI feel like that would be confusing18:18
bknudsonour meetings will get very noisy as we yell aaapi18:18
dolphmlbragstad: well, it'd be the identity/tripleA API being implemented by Keystone18:18
stevemarbknudson, you missed one aaaapi18:19
*** jgriffit1 is now known as griff18:19
bknudsonaaargh18:19
dstanekwould it be too much if we did have a few different named APIs? identity-api, audit-api, etc18:19
lbragstadthat's an idea18:19
morganfainbergdstanek, no wouldn't be a bad thing18:19
dolphmauthentication-authorization-audit-programming-interface18:19
dolphmthat works too18:19
*** shengjiemin has quit IRC18:19
ayoungDolph, if we split of the IdP, that would be the AuthN  API.  Current Keystone API would be AuthZ.  Audit is its own thing.18:20
dolphmso, i think we have a todo list of action items to produce (possibly renaming repos, etc), i'll start an etherpad...18:20
morganfainbergayoung, sounds right.18:20
bknudsonauthentication-authorization-audit-roles-groups-hierarchy18:20
ayoungcurrent API minus the stuff that went to Idp, like user management18:20
morganfainbergdolphm, repo renames are fairly easy.18:20
jamielennoxdoes this all happen within the standard v3 api?18:20
dstaneka³pi18:21
ayoungThreePI18:21
*** terriyu has quit IRC18:21
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC18:21
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting18:21
*** jjmb has quit IRC18:21
dolphm#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Identity-to-TripleA18:21
morganfainbergayoung, c3po?18:21
ayoungjamielennox, nah, I'd suggest we leave things along until we need to bump a version18:21
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:22
lbragstadmorganfainberg: yeah, that's how I saw it too18:22
*** ngoswami has joined #openstack-meeting18:22
*** annegent_ has quit IRC18:22
ayoungWhen we are ready to split IdP off into its own, we can deal with it then.  I'd aregue that the whole thing stays in the identity API repo, just be 3 "core" apis.  We can even version each of them 4.0  if we need to keep the number straight18:22
gyeeayoung, yeah, we'll have a split repo by then18:23
*** celttechie has quit IRC18:23
morganfainbergayoung, lets not even talk about 4.0 here :P18:23
dolphmalright... let's move on :P18:23
dolphmi added a few things to the etherpad to get started; feel free to add things like repo renames18:24
ayoungmorganfainberg, its OK,  termie started on 5 a while ago18:24
dolphmuhh, there's just a couple blueprints & reviews on the agenda: jamielennox bknudson - did ya'll want those to be #topics?18:24
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting18:25
bknudsonFor mine I just wanted to mention that it's making progress18:25
jamielennoxdolphm: don't mind, just want to get some discussion/general approval of ideas18:25
dolphmjamielennox: bknudson: okay, then let's hit them in order18:25
bknudsonand if you want to see it in action check it out and curl -H "Accept: application/json-home" http://localhost:5000/v3 | python -mjson.tool18:25
dolphm#topic Auth Specific Data18:25
*** openstack changes topic to "Auth Specific Data (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:25
*** bklei has quit IRC18:25
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107325/18:25
jamielennoxThe main thing that's come up for this one is what to do about already scoped tokens18:26
bknudson2 specs for the price of 118:26
gyeejamielennox, horizon folks would love that18:26
jamielennoxi like the idea that if you are already project scoped you shouldn't receive a list of other projects that you can scope to18:26
gyeeright now they are parsing policy files on their own18:26
jamielennoxbut i don't know if it's doable given default_project_ids18:26
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting18:27
*** lbragsta_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:27
*** rainya_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:27
jamielennoxrelated i cleaned up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108071/18:27
jamielennoxbut i don't know if that's a viable alternative18:27
dolphmjamielennox: side note, maybe we need a "scope": null or something in an auth request to explicitly request an unscoped token?18:27
dolphmwould be a separate bp18:27
ayoungI wonder if we really need  those.  What if enumerating projects and domains could only be done with an unscoped token. Like, ever?18:27
*** ngoswami has quit IRC18:27
dolphmthat'd also mean we need to support unscoped tokens forever18:27
dolphmrather than having a higher level of explicit scope18:28
gyeewhy does unscoped token need service catalog?18:28
ayoungIf the token is scoped to a project, then that scoped token can only see that project.18:28
gyeeyou have the identity endpoint to begin with18:28
ayoungUnscoped Tokens Forever!18:28
jamielennoxdolphm: see review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108071/18:28
dolphmgyee: that's the next agenda item; hold up18:28
dolphmjamielennox: ha18:28
*** afaranha has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
jamielennoxunscoped tokens are kind of necessary given that we currently say a token has only one scope18:28
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
jamielennoxi don't know how far we can get away from that with PKI tokens18:29
*** afaranha has left #openstack-meeting18:29
ayoungdolphm, we can replcae "unscoped"  with "scoped to Keystone"  so long as it is considered the root scope, and can only be used with Keystone.18:29
*** afaranha has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
*** afaranha has left #openstack-meeting18:29
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
ayoungJust that we call them unscoped today.  Session tokens are another possibility, and we could lump all of the concepts together18:29
jamielennoxayoung: right, this came up before that an unscoped token was really a keystone scoped token18:29
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:29
jamielennoxand the next blueprint about adding a service catalog is really just a cheap way of handling thta18:30
*** lbragstad has quit IRC18:30
ayoungA token granting Token, if you will.....18:30
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
gyeekerberolize Keystone18:30
dolphmayoung: less lumping please18:30
*** afaranha has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
*** lbragsta_ has quit IRC18:31
morganfainbergdolphm, i like my token texture creamy, not lumpy18:31
gyeeheh18:31
ayoungdolphm, I'm willing to discuss the issues separately, but it might be that we want to have both concepts linked in the same new token format.  Mostly this is to support Horizon and comparable use cases18:31
jamielennoxso if we can get ?unscoped=true into /auth/tokens then it might make sense that /auth/projects will only response to unscoped tokens?18:32
dolphmayoung: i'd rather have a gradual evolution than a "new format"18:32
jamielennox1st step on the path to getting rid of default_project_id18:32
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
bknudsonI'd think the token would have "scope": null18:32
bknudsonor "scope": {}18:33
bknudsonthe auth request18:33
dolphmbknudson: ++18:33
jamielennoxok18:33
*** andreykurilin1 has left #openstack-meeting18:33
*** thangp has quit IRC18:33
dolphmlet's save that for an identity-api discussion; jamielennox / ayoung: cut the API details from the spec :)18:33
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting18:33
dolphmi'm +A on the direction though18:33
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC18:33
dolphm#topic Unscoped catalog18:34
*** openstack changes topic to "Unscoped catalog (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:34
ayoungbknudson, yeah, that sounds right.  And in the future, we could make that scope: {"endpoint": <keystone> }18:34
bknudsonthe problem description makes sense... if you really want an unscoped token you can't get one18:34
*** lbragstad has quit IRC18:34
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107333/18:34
ayoungso I think the unscoped catalog does not need to be in nthe token itslef, just in the response to getting the token18:34
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
*** bhdeeps has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
ayoungthe client will use the result, but only Keystone should be able to validate/accept the token18:34
gyeewhy catalog for unscoped token? use case?18:34
bknudsonseems odd that we were able to survive all this time without a catalog in an unscoped token18:35
dolphmayoung: why not just return a catalog in response to an unscoped token + GET /v3/catalog ?18:35
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC18:35
*** lcheng has quit IRC18:35
jamielennoxgyee: essentially the point is to make the flow the same as regular tokens18:35
topolgood plan18:35
dolphmbknudson: yeah, i'd like to better understand the use case here..18:35
jamielennoxgyee: at the moment you  have to mangle unscoped URLs so that they include the auth_url18:35
*** amotoki has quit IRC18:35
gyeeauth_url is the same regardless18:36
jamielennoxthat becomes somewhat harder with auth plugins where they don't need to provide you the auth_url in the same way18:36
* gyee still confused18:36
bknudsonclients are going to have to handle tokens without catalogs anyways since they have to support old versions of keystone18:36
jamielennoxbknudson: right18:36
dolphmjamielennox: so you basically just want to return the auth_url in something that looks like a catalog because it's too hard to use the auth_url that was originally requested, which you'll have to continue doing anyway for backwards compatibility?18:37
gyeethere's only one auth_url right?18:37
jamielennoxdolphm: ideally i'd return the identity endpoints and let the client do the same discovery on them that it would do for a scoped token talking to keystone18:37
gyeeone that client need to know anyway18:37
jamielennoxbut essentially yes, it's kind of housekeeping in that it's something that i've always found has broken the flow of working with tokens18:38
dolphmjamielennox: but you'll still need to support both flows... forever18:39
*** lbragstad has quit IRC18:39
*** fifieldt has quit IRC18:39
dolphmjamielennox: so you're adding complexity for zero gain18:39
gyeesound like a "zero" gain for me18:39
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting18:40
jamielennoxdolphm: you'd still have to support it, i guess it's just a better feeling workflow18:40
bknudsonFor the server, it sounds like it's easy to implement.18:40
dolphmbknudson: it's easy on both sides... but there's no payoff18:41
jamielennoxespecially because for unscoped tokens the fallback looks like: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104771/9/keystoneclient/v2_0/tokens.py18:41
bknudsonthere's really only a few things you can realistically do with an unscoped token18:41
bknudsonhow about have an "unscoped" client?18:42
jamielennoxessentially let's try to perform this operation in the normal way and if that didn't work it must be because we have an unscoped token so try again with the auth_url18:42
dolphmjamielennox: i don't think your auth.AUTH_INTERFACE is going anywhere healthy either18:42
bknudsonrather than trying to support unscoped tokens in the regular client lib18:42
jamielennoxbknudson: i think that might be what generic was originally for18:42
ayoungjamielennox, the logic could also be "if there is no service catalog, generate one from the auth url"18:43
dolphmjamielennox: it seems the auth plugin should be able to work with an auth_url to generate an unscoped token; it never needs any other endpoint. similarly the session never needs the auth_url, just scoped catalogs18:43
jamielennoxayoung: that's what the AUTH_INTERFACE is18:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting18:43
ayoungwith auth_url becoming an implicit admin interface18:43
dolphmsomething is crossing boundaries here, but i'm lost as to what it is18:43
ayoungjamielennox, I know, I've been using that ccode for the last ...well since you wrote it18:43
dolphmayoung: auth_url is NOT an "admin" interface. at all.18:43
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
ayoungdolphm, once you have an unscoped token, where can you use it?18:44
dolphmayoung: the auth_url18:44
*** arnaud has quit IRC18:44
*** markwash_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
*** markwash has quit IRC18:44
*** markwash_ is now known as markwash18:44
dolphmayoung: you haven't finished the full authN/Z flow yet - so you're still confined to the auth_url.18:44
jamielennoxdolphm: the only way i can see that working is that auth plugins should be different for scoped and unscoped tokens18:44
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting18:45
*** whenry has quit IRC18:45
jamielennoxas in all tokens that accept a credential should only be scoped and then there is only 1 way to rescope18:45
jamielennoxonly be unscoped18:45
dolphmjamielennox: let me back track on myself; i do think the session should be aware of the auth_url so that it can handle rescoping as necessary - agree?18:45
jamielennoxdolphm: no, why would the session want to know auth_url - that's plugin specific18:46
jamielennoxyou can have 1:M session:plugin18:46
dolphmjamielennox: i see the circle we're in now :)18:46
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:47
dolphmjamielennox: can we pick this up after the meeting?18:48
jamielennoxdolphm: sure18:48
dolphm#topic JSON-Home progress18:48
*** openstack changes topic to "JSON-Home progress (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:48
dolphmbknudson: o/18:48
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103983/18:48
bknudsonjust wanted to mention that it essentially works, for v318:48
bknudsonso if you want to try it18:48
dolphmbknudson: this must be your biggest patch ever?18:48
bknudsoncurl -H "Accept: application/json-home" http://localhost:5000/v3 | python -mjson.tool18:49
*** noslzzp has quit IRC18:49
bknudsonit's mostly data18:49
*** rainya has quit IRC18:49
bknudsonalso, there's a lot of duplication18:49
bknudsonremoving the duplication will be quite a bit of work18:49
bknudsonbecause it will essentially mean going up a level of abstraction in the routers...18:49
dolphmif anyone is interested, i just checked it out and called it: http://pasteraw.com/4ozb5otuj2bjf9tcvok9q8uolqa2qhh18:50
* topol pretty sure bknudson can handle refactoring :-)18:50
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
*** celttechie has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
bknudsonwhere the routers are doing mapping.add_route they should be doing some kind of self._add_resource() that has more info.18:50
bknudsonso, that was about it.18:50
bknudsonthinking about how to rewrite the clients to use it...18:51
dolphmbknudson: COOL.18:51
jamielennoxbknudson: yea that's tough18:51
morganfainbergthats cool to see18:51
bknudsonessentially the client would have to fetch the json-home doc, then they'd be able to get the URL from JSON-Home18:51
bknudsonrather than building the URL themselves18:51
dolphmbknudson: i see a couple bugs :P18:51
morganfainbergbknudson, that makes sense from a workflow18:51
morganfainbergbut yeah it's got some oddities18:51
*** tbarron has quit IRC18:52
bknudsonok. early feedback would be nice.18:52
jamielennoxbknudson: can json-home handle the standard /v2 or /v3 discovery we do now?18:52
bknudsonjamielennox: yes...18:52
bknudsonI've only got it for /v318:52
dolphmis /v3/role_assignments/{role_assignment_id}  actually a thing ?!18:52
bknudsonbut essentially GET / would return all v2 and v3 resources18:53
dolphmthat's totally not documented if so, and role_assignments should not have IDs18:53
ayoungbknudson,  V3ExtensionRouter(ExtensionRouter):  should be in keystone/routers, not in common/wsgi.py18:53
*** ianw has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
bknudsonv3 resources are like http://docs.openstack.org/identity/rel/v3/users18:53
bknudsonand v2 resources would be like http://docs.openstack.org/identity/rel/v2.0/users18:53
dolphmbknudson: i don't know that we'd get much payoff from adding this to v218:53
ayoungOr is every router now becoming an V3ExtensionRouter....18:54
jamielennoxdolphm: it's so we would have to do vereion discovery lookup and then json-home lookup as well18:54
bknudsondolphm: y, I think the payoff would be if we wanted to use this for "version discovery"18:54
dolphmayoung: V3ExtensionRouter belongs in wsgi imo18:54
dolphmayoung: it's wsgi framework code18:54
jamielennoxs/would/wouldn't18:54
ayoungI think all of the lookup/discovery stuff is starting to call for some sort of caching/bookmark story18:55
*** elrondvega has quit IRC18:55
dolphmbknudson: +1 for responding to json-home on / but do you need to provide *every* v2 resource there?18:55
jamielennoxit means is it a change to discovery or a change to client18:55
dolphmare we going to bother revving the v2 client to acknowledge all that data?18:55
morganfainbergdolphm, do we need the v2 client to?18:55
jamielennoxayoung: discovery caches on the session and on the auth plugin18:55
bknudsonat least for the public interface there aren't many v2 resources18:56
morganfainbergcan we let the v2 client just kind of... do it's thing?18:56
*** afaranha has left #openstack-meeting18:56
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
ayoungjamielennox, I'm not certain that will work for CLI and Horizon use cases, unless we have "persist and restore session to keyring"18:56
*** thinrichs has quit IRC18:56
jamielennoxyea, i don't mind if json-home doesn't say anything at all about v2 resources18:56
*** Mandell has quit IRC18:56
jamielennoxjust if /v2 and/or /v3 exist18:56
bknudsonwell, it sounds like v2 isn't that interesting to people so I'll focus my time on cleaning up the current change18:57
dolphmmorganfainberg: IncompletePreposition: 'to' (i don't know what you're asking)18:57
*** e0ne has quit IRC18:57
gyeebknudson, does it work with extensions?18:57
gyeenm, I see it18:57
bknudsongyee: yes, it works with extensions (the v3 work does)18:57
jamielennoxayoung: yea CLI is a problem, serializing the session and auth plugins is something i've known about but haven't been asked for yet18:57
morganfainbergdolphm, bother acknowledging the json-home stuff18:57
dolphmbknudson: +++18:57
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
bknudsonok, thanks for the feedback.18:58
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
ayoungjamielennox, I think I am going to be hitting that in Horizon here shortly.  People are using the tokenid as the session persistance.  But if there is discovery that went on, we'll want that remembered, too.  And not every Horizon session should have to do the full discovery dance18:58
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
*** chuckC_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
dolphmhrm we're out of time with two things left on the agenda18:59
*** david-lyle has quit IRC18:59
*** jckasper__ has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
gyeecontinue in #openstack-keystone18:59
dolphmactually, is there an infra meeting today? or can we run long? jeblair? mordred?19:00
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
*** jehb has quit IRC19:00
morganfainbergdolphm, there is also OSCON stuff going on19:00
jeblairdolphm: go for it19:01
topoldo we stay here or hop?19:01
dolphmjeblair: are you having a meeting today?19:01
topolalright. stay until we get bumped and glared at :-)19:01
gyeek :)19:02
dolphmjeblair: if we run long it'll be like 20 minutes19:02
*** jckasper_ has quit IRC19:02
dolphmjeblair: or we can just switch to -keystone19:02
bknudsongyee: would X.509 client cert auth benefit from a mapping?19:02
topolwe have our own channel... why grovel for breadcrumbs??19:02
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:02
gyeebknudson, it could19:02
morganfainberglol19:02
*** elrondvega has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
gyeebut we don't have the plumbing in place for that kind of stuff yet19:03
gyeeideally, everyting should go through mapping19:03
bknudsonI like federation then19:03
topolkeystone is no longer living in a van by the river19:03
morganfainbergtopol, shhh don't tell anyone19:03
dolphm#topic X.509 SSL Client Certificate Authn19:03
*** openstack changes topic to "X.509 SSL Client Certificate Authn (Meeting topic: keystone)"19:03
morganfainberg:P19:03
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
gyeewe'll need to make significant changes to the federation plumbing to make that happen19:03
gyeeright now it only works for saml219:03
jamielennoxsignificant?19:03
*** lbragstad has quit IRC19:03
gyeeyes19:03
bknudsonhopefully those changes to the plumbing will make it more flexible19:04
bknudsonI think this is what we wanted from the beginning.19:04
jamielennoxhow does it change from the current 'map this httpd header to this attribute'19:04
*** jcoufal has quit IRC19:04
jamielennoxand i agree anything it doesn't currently cover it should19:04
dstanekgyee: i think it will be less work than you think and there is already movement toward making it more generic19:05
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
gyeeyes, I think we can make it generic19:05
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
gyeeonly question is time and effort19:05
kwssI'd like to know what is happening towards this :)19:05
*** chuckC_ has quit IRC19:06
bknudsongyee: btw the spec looks great19:06
gyee1) change federation plugin to make it generic19:06
gyeehttps://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/contrib/federation/controllers.py#L24219:06
jamielennoxso i guess the interesting part of this would be how does it fit in with /identity_providers/{idp}/protocols/{protocol} ?19:06
*** thangp has quit IRC19:06
gyee2) change the saml2 plugin to make it generic19:06
gyee3) make token issuance a pipeline19:06
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
gyeejamielennox, it would be an x.509 provider19:07
dstanekthere is a code review somewhere to rename saml2 to something else - it really isn't saml2 specific IIRC19:07
bknudsonif federation was used then would you have to use an apache module?19:07
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC19:07
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC19:07
gyeebknudson, yes19:07
kwsshttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/104301/19:07
jamielennoxgyee: but it doesn't map to an idp id was my though19:07
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
gyeeyou still need apache to do the heavy lifting in validating and parsing the cert19:08
dstanekbknudson: you wouldn't have to because the vars are pulled from the environment19:08
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
*** kebray has quit IRC19:08
bknudsondoes it work through an SSL terminator?19:08
dolphmkwss: can you take the term 'reegineered' out of that spec? it scares people and it's so vague that any spec could be prefixed by 'reegineered-*'19:08
jamielennoxdstanek: apache is still needed to populate those environments though19:08
*** ramashri has quit IRC19:08
kwssdolphm, sure, what do you think it should be changed to?19:09
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting19:09
dstanekjamielennox: using federation does not require it though - you may need an apache module for a specific protocol though19:09
*** tmh_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:09
dolphmkwss: something specific and succinct that describes the problem19:09
morganfainbergbknudson, i don't think it would work through an SSL terminator19:09
gyeebknudson, SSL has to be terminated at Apache19:09
kwssdolphm, something like generic-federation-plugin?19:10
dolphmkwss: that's a step better19:10
jamielennoxstandard-mapping19:10
gyeeso we all agree to kill the x.509 cert auth plugin in favor of a generic federation layer?19:11
gyeeor do the plugin now and then work on generic federation?19:11
bknudsongyee: I prefer federation19:11
dstanekgyee: i think that's the right path19:12
gyeewith federation, we can get rid all the remote user auth plugins too19:12
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting19:12
gyeeexternal auth can also use the same framework19:12
kwssbknudson, I agree, as it then ties in with adding keystone-to-keystone, open idc etc19:12
bknudsongyee: so is there still a "support X.509" or is it just "make federation more generic"19:13
*** hockeynu_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:13
dolphmbknudson: ++19:13
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC19:13
*** jjmb has quit IRC19:13
gyeebknudson, we still need x.50919:13
bknudsonok, just wondering if x.509 needed something in addition to generic federation19:14
gyeebut now it has a dependency on making federation more generic19:14
gyeeinstead of a standalone plugin19:14
*** jehb has joined #openstack-meeting19:14
dolphmgyee: i'm lost on how x509 support is not a plugin either way?19:15
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC19:15
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC19:15
gyeedolphm, with generic federation, it would become an identity provider19:15
*** pberis has quit IRC19:15
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC19:15
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting19:15
gyeesaml2 auth plugin will be part of the token pipeline19:15
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting19:16
*** hockeynut has quit IRC19:16
gyeeonly problem is making generic federation work, we are probably looking at K and beyond19:16
*** fifieldt has quit IRC19:17
dstanekgyee: do you know what doesn't work?19:17
gyeesince the changes are quite significant19:17
bknudsonwe seem to have a lot of people interested in it19:17
dolphmgyee: ^ does a spec exist that describes the gaps your looking at?19:17
dolphmyou're*19:17
gyeedolphm, I think David and kwss have a spec19:18
gyeekwss, you have the url?19:18
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting19:18
*** fifieldt has quit IRC19:18
kwssIt's this one, but I think it still needs work https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104301/19:18
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting19:19
kwssCan I rename a spec or do I need to make a fresh one?19:19
dolphmkwss: iterate on this one19:19
dstanekwhen we talked about this at the hackathon i got the impression that it really wasn't that bad19:19
gyeedstanek, you mean the refactoring part?19:20
dolphmdstanek: kwss's spec is fairly straight forward19:20
dstanekgyee: making the mechanism more generic19:20
kwssdstanek, I thought it was just a case of renaming the saml2 plugin to something generic and calling the correct code to manage extraction of assertion data19:20
dolphmkwss: gyee: but that doesn't describe the relationship between x509, the mythical token pipeline that we've mutilated, and federation19:20
dstanekthe real work would be in whatever other identity providers you have to make19:21
gyeedolphm, lemme work off kwss's spec19:21
*** lcheng has joined #openstack-meeting19:21
gyeea diagram or two probably will make things better19:21
*** elo has quit IRC19:21
dolphmgyee: keeps specs narrow and focused!19:21
gyeebut its a "generic" spec :)19:22
dolphmso anyway19:22
dolphm#topic Python 3 temporary solutions19:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Python 3 temporary solutions (Meeting topic: keystone)"19:22
dolphmdstanek: o/19:22
*** lbragstad has quit IRC19:22
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/95827/11/test-requirements-py3.txt19:22
dstanekso i just wanted to get some feedback on what i was hacking on19:22
*** pberis has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
dstanekwe all know that we can't product a real py3 version any time soon19:22
dstanekbut i really want to get something usable so i can start testing in a real environment and not just unit tests19:23
bknudsonjenkins likes it19:23
dstanekso one of the compromises i decided to make was "temporarily" depend on third party packages that are not approved19:23
bknudsonI think packagers are going to freak out19:24
dolphmbknudson: but no one is packaging for py3 either19:24
dstanekfor example i wanted to hook it into my ldap setup so i needed a version of ldap that actually works in py319:24
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
dstanekbknudson: they can't package it yet19:24
bknudsongate-keystone-python33 SUCCESS in 6m 21s (non-voting)19:24
dstanekup until today or yesterday we have py3 syntax errors19:24
bknudsonif it allows us to turn on gating for py3 then it's probably worth it19:24
dolphmthe patch linked about is also like tenth in a chain of patches19:25
dstanekyes, i would very much like to get that going much faster than it is now19:25
dstanekdolphm: yes, but the only one where i admit to using questionable methods19:25
bknudsonwell, the blueprint isn't approved so nobody's going to review it19:26
dstanekthis also gives us a list of things that need to be fixed before we can have a real release19:26
dolphmbknudson: dstanek: isn't it targeted to ongoing anyway?19:26
dolphmfixed*19:27
stevemarshouldn't we be in -keystone and not in -meeting19:27
dstanekdolphm: yes, but i should probably make a spec anyway? there have already been a tons of patches attributes to py3 and that bp19:27
morganfainbergstevemar, no infra meeting, we're occupying the channel19:27
morganfainbergstevemar had a couple extra topics to cover19:27
bknudsonI don't see the need for a spec19:27
dolphmdstanek: sure, i imagine it'd be short19:27
dstanekif there are no major issues with the dependencies i'll continue down that path19:28
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
dolphmi see the -py3 requirements file as being documentation19:31
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting19:31
dolphmfirst and foremost ^ so i don't have a problem with documenting what it takes to run on py319:31
*** pberis has quit IRC19:31
dolphmbknudson: i saw you reviewed the first patch in the series; fwiw, the first few in the series look really simple19:32
*** pberis has joined #openstack-meeting19:32
*** hashar has quit IRC19:32
bknudsondolphm: y, should be able to approve the others once jenkins oks19:33
bknudsondstanek: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102737/ has comments19:33
dolphmi just +2'd that one regardless19:33
jamielennoxdolphm: keystoneclient release? (when conversation slows)19:33
dolphmjamielennox: i'll prepare one now19:34
dolphmlet's switch back to -keystone19:34
dolphm#endmeeting19:34
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:34
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 22 19:34:13 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:34
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-07-22-18.02.html19:34
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-07-22-18.02.txt19:34
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-07-22-18.02.log.html19:34
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting19:34
*** markwash has quit IRC19:39
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting19:40
*** viktors has quit IRC19:41
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC19:42
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** fifieldt has quit IRC19:43
*** mpaolino has quit IRC19:45
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC19:46
*** pberis has quit IRC19:46
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting19:46
*** padkrish has quit IRC19:48
*** yamamoto has quit IRC19:48
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting19:48
*** lordd has quit IRC19:48
*** pberis has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:50
*** sdake has quit IRC19:51
*** e0ne has quit IRC19:52
*** samuelbercovici1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:52
*** jjmb has quit IRC19:55
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC19:56
*** samuelbercovici1 is now known as samuelbercovici19:56
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
*** jehb has quit IRC19:57
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** trey_h has quit IRC19:59
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:01
*** fnaval has quit IRC20:01
*** jckasper__ has quit IRC20:01
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC20:02
*** Mandell has quit IRC20:03
*** sdake_ has quit IRC20:03
*** AlanClark has quit IRC20:04
*** gduan has quit IRC20:04
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting20:05
*** lbragstad has quit IRC20:06
*** hrybacki has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting20:08
*** jehb has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting20:11
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting20:13
*** samuelbercovici1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:13
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting20:14
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting20:14
*** ociuhandu has left #openstack-meeting20:14
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting20:15
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting20:15
*** trey_h has quit IRC20:15
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting20:15
*** trey_h has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC20:16
*** samuelbercovici1 is now known as samuelbercovici20:16
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:18
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:18
*** lukego has quit IRC20:18
*** trey_h has quit IRC20:20
*** kebray has quit IRC20:21
*** rockyg has quit IRC20:21
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
*** jjmb has quit IRC20:24
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC20:25
*** samuelbercovici1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting20:26
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting20:27
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC20:28
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC20:28
*** samuelbercovici1 is now known as samuelbercovici20:28
*** jjmb has quit IRC20:29
*** emagana has quit IRC20:29
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
*** lcheng has quit IRC20:30
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n320:31
*** mrunge has quit IRC20:31
*** baoli has quit IRC20:32
*** emagana_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting20:33
*** emagana has quit IRC20:34
*** bklei has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting20:35
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting20:36
*** mpaolino has joined #openstack-meeting20:38
*** kwss has quit IRC20:38
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:39
*** lcheng has joined #openstack-meeting20:39
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
*** Yathi has quit IRC20:41
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC20:42
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting20:43
*** tbarron has joined #openstack-meeting20:44
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC20:46
*** ewindisch has quit IRC20:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC20:48
*** vuil1 has quit IRC20:48
*** Mandell has quit IRC20:49
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting20:51
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting20:51
*** ramashri has quit IRC20:51
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting20:53
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting20:53
*** lukego has quit IRC20:53
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting20:53
*** lbragstad has quit IRC20:53
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting20:54
*** jdob has quit IRC20:57
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:00
*** mrda-away is now known as mrda21:00
*** hockeynu_ has quit IRC21:01
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
*** eghobo has quit IRC21:03
*** aysyd has quit IRC21:03
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
*** jckasper has quit IRC21:04
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** comay has quit IRC21:05
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
*** flaviof is now known as flaviof_zzz21:07
*** jecarey has quit IRC21:07
*** lbragstad has quit IRC21:08
*** MaxV has quit IRC21:14
*** vuil has joined #openstack-meeting21:14
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:15
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting21:15
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
*** SlickNik has left #openstack-meeting21:20
*** Mandell has quit IRC21:20
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC21:20
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting21:20
*** ewindisch has quit IRC21:23
*** lukego has quit IRC21:24
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting21:26
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
*** ewindisch has quit IRC21:30
*** yamamoto has quit IRC21:31
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC21:31
*** banix has quit IRC21:31
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting21:33
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC21:34
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** IanGovett has quit IRC21:35
*** dkranz has quit IRC21:37
*** emagana_ has quit IRC21:37
*** markwash has quit IRC21:37
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC21:39
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:40
*** david-lyle has quit IRC21:41
*** emagana has quit IRC21:42
*** yjiang5 has quit IRC21:43
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC21:44
*** neelashah has quit IRC21:44
*** vuil has quit IRC21:46
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting21:46
*** vijendar has quit IRC21:50
*** bnemec has quit IRC21:50
*** bklei has quit IRC21:51
*** mpaolino has quit IRC21:51
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting21:52
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting21:53
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting21:54
*** tbarron has quit IRC21:55
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting21:55
*** rainya has quit IRC21:55
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting21:55
*** vpanizo has quit IRC21:55
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting21:55
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC21:56
*** balajiiyer1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:56
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting21:57
*** gangil has quit IRC21:57
*** topol has quit IRC21:58
*** tongli has quit IRC21:59
*** chuckC has quit IRC21:59
*** esheffield has quit IRC21:59
*** jcoufal has quit IRC21:59
*** dprince has quit IRC21:59
*** derekh_ has quit IRC22:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting22:01
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting22:01
*** leonchio_ has quit IRC22:02
*** ewindisch has quit IRC22:02
*** rwsu has quit IRC22:02
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC22:02
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** armax has quit IRC22:04
*** jehb has quit IRC22:04
*** changbl has quit IRC22:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC22:06
*** ivasev has quit IRC22:07
*** julim has quit IRC22:09
*** ewindisch has quit IRC22:09
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** fifieldt has quit IRC22:13
*** jjmb has quit IRC22:14
*** ewindisch has quit IRC22:15
*** Mandell has quit IRC22:15
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting22:16
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting22:17
*** jgrimm has quit IRC22:17
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting22:18
*** terriyu has quit IRC22:18
*** pberis has quit IRC22:18
*** Leon has joined #openstack-meeting22:19
*** Leon is now known as Guest1129522:20
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** Leonr has quit IRC22:23
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:23
*** kebray has quit IRC22:23
*** Guest11295 has quit IRC22:24
*** dims has quit IRC22:24
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting22:24
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting22:28
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:29
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC22:34
*** ddieterly has quit IRC22:34
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** stevemar has quit IRC22:35
*** ewindisch has quit IRC22:37
*** eghobo has quit IRC22:38
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting22:39
*** hockeynut has quit IRC22:39
*** Tross has quit IRC22:40
*** hrybacki has left #openstack-meeting22:42
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** thedodd has quit IRC22:45
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** huats has quit IRC22:45
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting22:46
*** emagana has quit IRC22:47
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting22:48
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting22:48
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting22:49
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting22:50
*** ayoung has quit IRC22:51
*** huats has quit IRC22:52
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting22:52
*** huats has quit IRC22:52
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting22:52
*** ewindisch has quit IRC22:53
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC22:56
*** celttechie has left #openstack-meeting22:56
*** bknudson has quit IRC22:57
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting22:57
*** kevinconway has quit IRC22:58
*** yamamoto has quit IRC22:59
*** ewindisch has quit IRC23:00
*** eghobo has quit IRC23:02
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting23:02
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting23:03
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC23:03
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting23:05
*** ewindisch has quit IRC23:08
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting23:09
*** shengjiemin has joined #openstack-meeting23:10
*** prad has quit IRC23:12
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting23:15
*** slong has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** rainya has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** fnaval has quit IRC23:19
*** topol has quit IRC23:19
*** emagana has quit IRC23:20
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting23:21
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting23:21
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC23:22
*** elo1 has quit IRC23:22
*** emagana has quit IRC23:25
*** ewindisch has quit IRC23:26
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC23:26
*** brucer has joined #openstack-meeting23:27
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting23:27
*** pdmars has quit IRC23:28
*** dbite has quit IRC23:30
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting23:30
*** xianghui has quit IRC23:30
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting23:33
*** balajiiyer1 has quit IRC23:35
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting23:36
*** ewindisch has quit IRC23:38
*** david-lyle has quit IRC23:38
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting23:39
*** lbragstad has quit IRC23:40
*** eankutse has quit IRC23:40
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting23:43
*** tsekiyam_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:46
*** tsekiyam_ has quit IRC23:47
*** mtanino has quit IRC23:47
*** ewindisch has quit IRC23:48
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting23:49
*** tsekiyam_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:49
*** arnaud has quit IRC23:49
*** tsekiyama has quit IRC23:49
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting23:50
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** xianghuihui has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC23:54
*** tsekiyama has joined #openstack-meeting23:54
*** xianghui has quit IRC23:54
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC23:55
*** tsekiyam_ has quit IRC23:57
*** fifieldt has quit IRC23:57
*** jmontemayor_ has quit IRC23:58
*** amcrn has quit IRC23:58
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting23:58
*** xianghuihui has quit IRC23:59
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting23:59
*** shengjiemin has quit IRC23:59
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!