Tuesday, 2013-08-13

*** eharney has quit IRC00:01
*** rdxc has quit IRC00:02
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** yuan has joined #openstack-meeting00:06
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC00:14
*** sarob has quit IRC00:17
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:18
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC00:19
*** wolfdreamer has quit IRC00:22
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting00:23
*** emagana has quit IRC00:25
*** IlyaE has quit IRC00:25
*** dscannell has joined #openstack-meeting00:26
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting00:26
*** rongze has quit IRC00:28
*** rongze has joined #openstack-meeting00:30
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting00:30
*** sacharya has quit IRC00:31
*** lexinator has quit IRC00:31
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:37
*** edmund has quit IRC00:37
*** lexinator has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** zigo has quit IRC00:40
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:40
*** pcm__ has quit IRC00:41
*** zigo has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** rwsu is now known as rwsu-away00:45
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting00:46
*** bdpayne has quit IRC00:48
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:48
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:49
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:51
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC00:53
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting00:53
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:53
*** rongze has quit IRC00:55
*** rongze has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting01:01
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting01:06
*** Guest3077 has quit IRC01:07
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting01:08
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting01:08
*** armax has left #openstack-meeting01:12
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting01:16
*** lpabon has quit IRC01:16
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away01:26
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC01:26
*** tanisdl has quit IRC01:26
*** armax has quit IRC01:29
*** dscannell has quit IRC01:30
*** lexinator has quit IRC01:30
*** lexinator has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting01:35
*** yaguang has quit IRC01:35
*** gongysh has quit IRC01:36
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting01:40
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul01:41
*** lexinator has quit IRC01:43
*** markmcclain has quit IRC01:48
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC01:52
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting01:54
*** IlyaE has quit IRC01:54
*** mrodden1 has quit IRC01:55
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting01:56
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting01:57
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting01:59
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting02:00
*** adalbas has quit IRC02:02
*** anteaya has quit IRC02:03
*** IlyaE has quit IRC02:03
*** lexinator has joined #openstack-meeting02:04
*** haleyb has quit IRC02:06
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC02:08
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC02:09
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC02:11
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting02:13
*** anniec has quit IRC02:18
*** jlucci has quit IRC02:20
*** sthakkar has quit IRC02:21
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC02:25
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:26
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC02:27
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:27
*** yaguang has quit IRC02:40
*** rohitk has joined #openstack-meeting02:46
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting02:51
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** rongze_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
*** rongze has quit IRC02:59
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC02:59
*** gongysh has quit IRC03:00
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting03:00
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
*** SridarK has quit IRC03:08
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting03:10
*** matiu has quit IRC03:24
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting03:25
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting03:25
*** comay has quit IRC03:28
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC03:45
*** noslzzp_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:03
*** noslzzp has quit IRC04:03
*** noslzzp_ is now known as noslzzp04:03
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** mberwanger has quit IRC04:05
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** changbl has quit IRC04:05
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** zbitter has quit IRC04:08
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC04:09
*** bdpayne has quit IRC04:11
*** zaneb has quit IRC04:16
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting04:21
*** garyk has quit IRC04:31
*** rohitk_alt has joined #openstack-meeting04:42
*** neelashah has quit IRC04:43
*** rohitk has quit IRC04:43
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** herndon has joined #openstack-meeting04:51
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting04:52
*** rohitk_alt has quit IRC04:55
*** egallen has quit IRC04:56
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting04:59
*** kebray has quit IRC05:00
*** egallen has quit IRC05:02
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:02
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting05:02
*** jecarey_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:03
*** jecarey has quit IRC05:06
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** markpeek has quit IRC05:11
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting05:13
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting05:14
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting05:16
*** rohitk has joined #openstack-meeting05:16
*** kebray has quit IRC05:17
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC05:18
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:27
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting05:30
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC05:31
*** Guest73648 has quit IRC05:36
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting05:39
*** noslzzp has quit IRC05:39
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** herndon has quit IRC05:42
*** mrunge has quit IRC05:44
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting05:44
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting05:46
*** terriyu has quit IRC05:47
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:50
*** adjohn has quit IRC05:52
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:54
*** rohitk has quit IRC05:55
*** rohitk_alt has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** bdpayne has quit IRC06:02
*** sarob has quit IRC06:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting06:03
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_a06:04
*** sarob has quit IRC06:07
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-meeting06:11
*** ruhe has quit IRC06:12
*** dcaro has joined #openstack-meeting06:13
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting06:14
*** ruhe has quit IRC06:18
*** jlucci has quit IRC06:19
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting06:20
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting06:30
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:30
*** jhenner has quit IRC06:33
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting06:34
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting06:34
*** adjohn has quit IRC06:37
*** Mikhail has joined #openstack-meeting06:38
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8706:40
*** mrunge_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:43
*** mrunge has quit IRC06:43
*** brucer has quit IRC06:44
*** asalkeld is now known as asalkeld_food06:45
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting06:52
*** adjohn has quit IRC06:52
*** lexinator has quit IRC06:57
*** Guest6179 is now known as ohadlevy06:59
*** ohadlevy has joined #openstack-meeting06:59
*** mrunge_ is now known as mrunge07:03
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC07:03
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting07:04
*** morganfainberg_a is now known as morganfainberg07:07
*** rongze has joined #openstack-meeting07:13
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting07:13
*** adjohn has quit IRC07:13
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting07:14
*** rongze_ has quit IRC07:15
*** ndipanov_gone is now known as ndipanov07:18
*** sarob has quit IRC07:18
*** xBsd has joined #openstack-meeting07:21
*** dosaboy is now known as dosaboy__07:22
*** jaimegil has joined #openstack-meeting07:23
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting07:24
*** adjohn has quit IRC07:25
*** alexb_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:34
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting07:35
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting07:35
*** psedlak has joined #openstack-meeting07:37
*** shang has joined #openstack-meeting07:39
*** Mikhail has quit IRC07:39
*** rohitk has joined #openstack-meeting07:41
*** rohitk_alt has quit IRC07:42
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away07:49
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting07:49
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:52
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC07:55
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** afazekas has quit IRC07:55
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** zaneb has quit IRC07:58
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting07:59
*** zbitter has quit IRC08:00
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
*** zaneb has quit IRC08:05
*** adjohn has quit IRC08:05
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting08:07
*** zbitter has quit IRC08:08
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting08:08
*** asalkeld_food is now known as asalkeld_eaten08:12
*** asalkeld_eaten is now known as asalkeld08:12
*** zul has quit IRC08:13
*** oNeToWn has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
*** yaguang has quit IRC08:16
*** zhongwenjia has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting08:25
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting08:28
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC08:29
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting08:34
*** ravikumar_hp has quit IRC08:43
*** ravikumar_hp has joined #openstack-meeting08:43
*** zehicle has quit IRC08:45
*** lexinator has joined #openstack-meeting09:00
*** yaguang has quit IRC09:00
*** lexinator has quit IRC09:05
*** xBsd has quit IRC09:05
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** adjohn has quit IRC09:21
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting09:24
*** zaneb has quit IRC09:25
*** zbitter is now known as zaneb09:31
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting09:31
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting09:49
*** obondarev has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** ravikumar_hp has quit IRC09:55
*** ravikumar_hp has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** adjohn has quit IRC09:56
*** ruhe has quit IRC10:01
*** annashen has quit IRC10:07
*** koolhead11 has quit IRC10:08
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting10:15
*** adjohn has quit IRC10:20
*** annashen has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** jaimegil has quit IRC10:26
*** jaimegil has joined #openstack-meeting10:27
*** mrodden1 has joined #openstack-meeting10:31
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting10:32
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting10:32
*** rongze_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:32
*** zaneb has quit IRC10:33
*** cp16net_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:33
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting10:34
*** tianst20 has joined #openstack-meeting10:34
*** comstud_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:35
*** zbitter has quit IRC10:35
*** slagle_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:35
*** lifeless_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:36
*** kashyap` has joined #openstack-meeting10:38
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting10:39
*** _cerberu` has joined #openstack-meeting10:39
*** samalba_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:39
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:40
*** dosaboy has quit IRC10:40
*** oNeToWn has quit IRC10:40
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC10:40
*** rohitk has quit IRC10:40
*** rongze has quit IRC10:40
*** mrunge has quit IRC10:40
*** tkammer has quit IRC10:40
*** mrodden has quit IRC10:40
*** lifeless has quit IRC10:40
*** whenry has quit IRC10:40
*** ayoung has quit IRC10:40
*** slagle has quit IRC10:40
*** sdake_ has quit IRC10:40
*** tian has quit IRC10:40
*** llu has quit IRC10:40
*** cp16net has quit IRC10:40
*** yamahata has quit IRC10:40
*** dansmith has quit IRC10:40
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC10:40
*** harlowja has quit IRC10:40
*** Vivek has quit IRC10:40
*** samalba has quit IRC10:40
*** akscram has quit IRC10:40
*** maurosr has quit IRC10:40
*** comstud has quit IRC10:40
*** kashyap has quit IRC10:40
*** _cerberus_ has quit IRC10:40
*** _jmp_ has quit IRC10:40
*** uvirtbot has quit IRC10:40
*** cp16net_ is now known as cp16net10:40
*** samalba_ is now known as samalba10:40
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting10:41
*** slong has joined #openstack-meeting10:41
*** slong is now known as slong-afk10:43
*** zaneb has quit IRC10:43
*** slong-afk has quit IRC10:43
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting10:44
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting10:45
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:45
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting10:45
*** zbitter has quit IRC10:46
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** oNeToWn has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** rohitk has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** Vivek has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** akscram has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** _jmp_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** tkammer has quit IRC10:46
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** uvirtbot has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting10:47
*** oNeToWn has quit IRC10:47
*** adjohn has quit IRC10:50
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC10:51
*** jackmccann has quit IRC10:51
*** yaguang has quit IRC10:52
*** ruhe has quit IRC10:53
*** annashen has quit IRC10:54
*** zehicle has joined #openstack-meeting10:57
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting10:58
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez10:58
*** annashen has joined #openstack-meeting10:59
*** pcm_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:00
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:02
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC11:02
*** anniec has quit IRC11:02
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec11:02
*** rdxc has joined #openstack-meeting11:03
*** zbitter is now known as zaneb11:11
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting11:25
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-meeting11:25
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting11:26
*** slagle_ has quit IRC11:28
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting11:28
*** tkammer has quit IRC11:31
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting11:31
*** zaneb has quit IRC11:32
*** zbitter is now known as zaneb11:32
*** lpabon has quit IRC11:35
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting11:37
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting11:46
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting11:47
*** shang has quit IRC11:47
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting11:50
*** adjohn has quit IRC11:51
*** steveg_afk has joined #openstack-meeting11:57
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting11:59
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-meeting12:03
*** sjing has joined #openstack-meeting12:04
*** branen_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:05
*** branen has quit IRC12:08
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** ayoung has quit IRC12:10
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting12:11
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting12:12
*** zaneb has quit IRC12:12
*** jmh_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** zbitter has quit IRC12:15
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting12:16
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting12:17
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting12:19
*** martine is now known as Guest895612:19
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman12:19
*** mberwanger has joined #openstack-meeting12:20
*** adjohn has quit IRC12:21
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting12:22
*** ruhe has quit IRC12:22
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC12:25
*** zaneb has quit IRC12:27
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n312:29
*** herndon has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting12:31
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting12:33
*** psedlak has quit IRC12:35
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC12:35
*** dvarga has quit IRC12:36
*** zul has quit IRC12:37
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting12:40
*** afazekas has quit IRC12:41
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting12:44
*** mrunge has quit IRC12:44
*** Guest8956 is now known as martine_12:45
*** dnavale has joined #openstack-meeting12:46
*** slong-afk has joined #openstack-meeting12:47
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting12:48
*** lbragstad has quit IRC12:49
*** fifieldt_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:51
*** adjohn has quit IRC12:52
fifieldt_hello annegentle!12:52
*** slong-afk is now known as slong12:54
fifieldt_hi slong12:57
steveg_afkare we there ye12:57
steveg_afkt12:57
*** steveg_afk is now known as sgordon12:57
*** jaimegil has quit IRC12:57
fifieldt_so very close :)12:57
slonghi there12:58
* fifieldt_ gets pumped up12:58
fifieldt_doc meetings are great :)12:58
fifieldt_https://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting12:58
slong:)12:59
*** zul has quit IRC13:02
fifieldt_8am in Austin, it's earlly :)13:02
* fifieldt_ prods annegentle awake13:02
fifieldt_anyone else here for the meeting?13:03
*** mberwanger has quit IRC13:03
fifieldt_EmilienM might be13:03
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting13:03
EmilienMo/13:03
* koolhead17 is here13:03
fifieldt_koolhead17 is indeed here13:04
*** roadnick has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
roadnickmorning, all13:04
* dnavale is here13:04
fifieldt_hi roadnick, dnavale13:04
EmilienMhello guys13:04
sgordonfifieldt, i sent a message in the main channel and pinged some peeps13:04
sgordonlet's see13:04
koolhead17sgordon, thank you sir!! :)13:05
dnavalehello fifieldt_13:05
koolhead17roadnick, EmilienM dnavale hi13:05
fifieldt_if anyone wants to read the minutes while waiting, they're at http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/doc_team_meeting/2013/doc_team_meeting.2013-07-09-13.01.html13:05
fifieldt_I'm not sure what's happened to annegentle :)13:05
*** shaunm has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
fifieldt_probably just finishing up a quick few thousand words before breakfast13:06
fifieldt_Let's wait until 1310 UTC in case she appears13:06
* fifieldt_ nods to shaunm13:06
fifieldt_cyeoh, are you around to answer for your docs action items in a few minutes?13:07
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting13:07
fifieldt_I'm counting roadnick, koolhead17, dnavale, sgordon, EmilienM, slong and shaunm - good turnout :) Do you all know each other?13:08
EmilienMo/13:09
* fifieldt_ is Tom Fifield - Community Manager @ OpenStack Foundation13:09
cyeohfifieldt: hi13:09
fifieldt_hi cyeoh13:09
roadnickI don't know dnavale, but I've seen everyone else13:10
sgordonfifieldt, dnavale and slong work with me at RH13:10
roadnickah13:10
fifieldt_ok, it's 1310 UTC - let's start hte meeting and hope annegentle joins us later13:10
roadnickhi! :)13:10
fifieldt_#startmeeting Doc Team Meeting13:10
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 13 13:10:32 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is fifieldt_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:10
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
sgordonyeah13:10
koolhead17ah. good to see RH putting folks for doc too :)13:10
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:10
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Doc Team Meeting)"13:10
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'doc_team_meeting'13:10
fifieldt_yes, koolhead17 it's super awesome13:10
fifieldt_hi also to dcramer_13:10
*** tkammer has quit IRC13:10
fifieldt_#topic Action Items from the last meeting13:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Items from the last meeting (Meeting topic: Doc Team Meeting)"13:11
fifieldt_let's get the boring stuff out of the way13:11
*** leif has joined #openstack-meeting13:11
fifieldt_these can be found at13:11
fifieldt_#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/doc_team_meeting/2013/doc_team_meeting.2013-07-09-13.01.html13:11
fifieldt_#1    cyeoh to study openstack/compute-api for the v2 docs13:11
*** leif is now known as Guest9501413:11
fifieldt_cyeoh, did you have a chance to look into that?13:11
cyeohcyeoh: so Kersten Richter has been looking at what is needed13:12
cyeohI've been spending some time trying to work out how we can automate the process from test_api_samples in nova13:12
*** psedlak has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
fifieldt_#info  Kersten Richter has been looking into api v2 docs13:12
cyeohto produce enough information so we can generate what is needed for openstack/compute-api through a script (mostly)13:12
fifieldt_#info cyeoh is still looking at automatically generating openstack/compute-api through a script13:13
roadnickceyoh, I didn't have a chance to get with you before I went out for shoulder surgery, do you still need to get with me for WADL help on that?13:13
fifieldt_cool, that's great13:13
cyeohroadnick: I think Kersten could probably do with a hand getting up to speed with things13:13
annegentlehey sorry I'm late!13:14
fifieldt_#action roadnick to meet with Kersten to help through the WADL journey13:14
cyeohThe nova side review is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40169/13:14
fifieldt_hi annegentle13:14
koolhead17annegentle, np :)13:14
fifieldt_we're just looking at action items13:14
fifieldt_'just at number 113:14
roadnickHi, annegentle13:14
fifieldt_you have the con!13:14
slonghi annegentle :)13:14
annegentleha13:14
annegentlehad to call for a dr appt for a kiddo, online now13:14
roadnickCeyoh, can you have her email me to set up a meeting, and do you have my email?13:14
cyeohroadnick: still at the stage of trying to work out if we can do it, but in the meantime generating api samples anyway for V3 as we'll need them in the end.13:14
EmilienMannegentle: good morning :)13:14
annegentleroadnick: how's your shoulder?13:15
cyeohroadnick: no, what's your email address? I'll forward it on to her13:15
*** zul has quit IRC13:15
roadnicknchase@mirantis.com13:15
annegentle#topic Action items from last meeting13:15
cyeohroadnick: thx!13:15
roadnickpainful, thanks, annegentle; at the "sick of being sick, have to be careful not to overdo it" stage :(13:16
annegentleroadnick: oh I bet!13:16
annegentleOk, cyeoh to study openstack/compute-api for the v2 docs was from last month, how'd that go?13:16
cyeohannegentle: I've passed most of it off to Kersten13:16
annegentleheh ok old news, reading scrollback more carefully13:17
cyeohI'm doing a bit on the Nova side to generate the api samples, and experimenting with also generating some metadata files which is (hopefully) enough to get a script to generate most of the doc13:17
annegentlesarob's not around I guess? He was going to get cyeoh in touch with someone13:17
*** tedross has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
annegentleI had asked Kersten to come to a Monday office hours and/or the boot camp, haven't heard from her though.13:18
*** burt has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
cyeohannegentle: unfortunately I think it's pretty unlikely she'd be able to get travel approval for the boot camp :-( But she is trying13:18
annegentlecyeoh: does it make sense for her to work with someone else or continue to work with me?13:18
annegentlecyeoh: ok, good to know13:18
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
cyeohannegentle: she's still getting up to speed with it all. I'm meeting with her in a couple of days so will get an update then13:19
annegentlecyeoh: ok13:19
annegentlecyeoh: it's kind of a steep onramp13:19
annegentlecyeoh: so I'm happy to help, and Diane's emailed her too13:20
annegentlecyeoh: just don't want her to get mixed messaging from a bunch of us13:20
cyeohThanks for all the help! yea, I very much doubt we're going to make Havana, but hopefully not too long after...13:20
annegentlecyeoh: well, I think the doc should come as soon as possible13:20
cyeohannegentle: yea, its definitely a priority for us. Getting everything merged on the Nova side (api samples) is already looking pretty tight though13:21
*** dscannell has joined #openstack-meeting13:21
annegentlecyeoh: okay, good. Just didn't want to de-emphasize it even if v3 is "experimental" folks will be trying it out. It's what they do. :)13:22
annegentleok, next action was for me to find if maven plugin supports sets. It "Just Works" (tm) so that's good.13:22
fifieldt_:D13:22
roadnickgreat news13:22
annegentleanother action was anne to draft a Mission Statement for Documentation and send to docs mailing list. Done.13:22
annegentleI haven't yet floated the Project Doc Lead idea... I have identified some people though so I might just reach out to individuals. Thoughts?13:23
* fifieldt_ would like to see what that is written down :)13:23
koolhead17:P13:23
annegentlefifieldt_: yeah we need a matrix of projects and peeps13:23
*** adjohn has quit IRC13:23
*** ladquin has joined #openstack-meeting13:23
roadnickagreed13:24
annegentlekoolhead17: you up for starting a wiki page with candidates for doc leads?13:24
slongthat would be good.13:24
fifieldt_annegentle, as in what a "project doc lead" is13:24
koolhead17annegentle, sure. do we have many candidates in race? :)13:24
annegentlefifieldt_: it was sarob's idea, let me dig up13:24
koolhead17i thougth we already selected you for that :D13:24
roadnickThe project doc lead was ...13:25
roadnickthe idea that each project will have one person who's a "liasion" for the docs for that project13:25
annegentle#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/ProjectDocLeads13:25
roadnickfor example we'd have one person at Mirantis who's the "go-to" person for info on Savanna docs13:25
koolhead17roadnick, ahaan. makes sense13:25
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting13:25
koolhead17happy to see its happening13:25
koolhead17annegentle, hi513:25
annegentleI like the liaison idea for bug triage etc13:26
koolhead17was asking the same longtime back if you remember :D13:26
fifieldt_I think that page needs a bunch more clarity before titles are handed out13:26
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting13:26
fifieldt_I'm all for the idea, just don't want to see it fall down due to a lack of planning/definition13:27
koolhead17+113:27
annegentlefifieldt_: yeah I'm with you. the projects are quite disparate so I want some sort of matrix for more analysis13:27
fifieldt_matrix still sounds like the line of thinking is more about people than what they do :)13:27
koolhead17haha13:28
*** AJaeger has joined #openstack-meeting13:28
fifieldt_hi AJaeger :)13:28
*** ruhe has quit IRC13:28
*** litong has joined #openstack-meeting13:28
annegentlemostly I've told Sean that I'd rather we have overarching book owners13:28
sgordon+113:28
fifieldt_sure13:28
annegentlethat's the direction we're taking the openstack-manuals repo too13:28
AJaegerHi everyone, sorry for beeing late. Only just say the note on -doc.13:28
annegentleAJaeger: welcome13:28
fifieldt_but what does that 'mean' :)13:28
*** ladquin has left #openstack-meeting13:28
fifieldt_don't feel the need to answer in this meeting (time is short)13:29
fifieldt_but that's just where I'm thinking13:29
annegentleso, you can see why I haven't finished this action item13:29
annegentleright13:29
*** boris-42 has quit IRC13:29
fifieldt_indeed13:29
annegentlelast action: fifieldt to see design resources for the docs.openstack.org landing page for 1. translation 2. releases13:29
annegentlefifieldt_: I talked to Todd Morey last week, he doesn't have a redesign though for us13:29
fifieldt_I believe you made more progress with this than I did annegentle13:29
annegentlefifieldt_: he has one for www though13:29
fifieldt_yeah, I grabbed him on skype too ... same result13:29
fifieldt_it's unlikely to happen within the "soon" timeframe :)13:30
annegentleso I'll call this in progress, and necessary before Oct 17, but ongoing13:30
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
annegentle#topic Docs Boot Camp - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Docs_Bootcamp_201313:30
annegentlewelcome boris-4213:30
boris-42annegetnle HI13:30
annegentleBoot camp is shaping up, thanks fifieldt_ roadnick and shaunm for the help13:30
annegentle:)13:30
roadnickHello, boris-4213:30
annegentleany questions about boot camp? roadnick needs to sign up :)13:31
koolhead17annegentle, i will be there too.13:31
roadnickHa!  Yes, I will. :)13:31
roadnickI also need to book travel, I realized yesterday13:31
annegentlekoolhead17: yeah I saw you signed up, woo13:31
roadnickMe and Nermina13:31
boris-42Could somebody say about what we are speaking now?)13:31
boris-42sorry=)13:31
sgordoni added some info to the wiki about obtaining/installing Publican13:31
annegentle#topic Boot Camp13:31
annegentleboris-42: sure, sorry forgot to change the topic13:31
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
koolhead17annegentle, thanks to my employer for this :)13:31
sgordonim planning a pretty basic overview/tutorial though as it's not really an openstack-manuals tool13:31
annegentlewe're talking about boot camp, going through https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/DocTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting13:32
sgordonmore of a "this is some other docbook stuff that is out there" exercise13:32
annegentlesgordon: I think that's helpful13:32
annegentlethe idea is to share as much info to spread the knowledge13:32
roadnickI also need to know if I'm speaking and on what; do you want me to do up a version of the "how to contribute" doc I'm finishing as a presentation?13:33
annegentleand get to know each other13:33
boris-42annegentle Ah nice13:33
*** tkammer has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
annegentleWe've got 18 signed up so far with four more expected (like roadnick and Nermina who haven't signed up yet) :)13:33
* slong is envious13:33
annegentlewe'll record sessions (with speaker's permissions)13:34
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC13:34
boris-42annegentle so and todays goal is?)13:34
*** changbl has quit IRC13:34
annegentleslong: if your employer would give you the time, we can ask the Foundation for funding for you13:34
annegentleboris-42: this is our usual monthly doc team meeting13:34
annegentleboris-42: we go through the agenda13:34
slongseriously?13:34
annegentleslong: yes13:34
koolhead17slong, :)13:34
slongI wil ask!13:34
fifieldt_:)13:34
annegentlefifieldt_: you want to help slong with that?13:35
slongYou do realise I'm in Australia??13:35
*** pentameter has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
annegentleslong: yeah13:35
annegentle:)13:35
slong:)13:35
annegentlefor Monday's nights outing, what are people interested in?13:35
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
fifieldt_annegentle, let's smash some email back and forth13:35
annegentlefifieldt_: sounds good, thanks13:35
boris-42annegentle And as I know I wasn't member of this team, so I am glad to help, but at this moment it is not so clear for me how can I help?) could you explain?)13:35
annegentleboris-42: ah you can just listen in then, sorry I thought you were another boris I guess13:36
annegentleideas for Monday: computer museum is close by, go to the Village, go to the Academy of Science, or Exploratorium13:36
boris-42annegentle I am Boris Pavlovic from Mirantis13:36
koolhead17annegentle, me2 :D13:36
roadnickHi, Boris, this is Nick. :)13:37
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** jpeeler has quit IRC13:37
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
koolhead17boris-42, i thought the other Boris from mirantis :) you are close13:37
annegentleboris-42: ok, I thought you were from Mirantis. If you work in the Mountain View office you might have ideas for us for an outing13:37
annegentleI also like this old book store in old Mountain View.13:38
roadnicklet me see if I can get some quick ideas from David, he's online13:38
annegentleso, book stores? museums? video games?13:38
annegentleroadnick: I've been emailing him and Anne Friend13:38
annegentleroadnick: with the ideas I'm listing13:38
roadnickah, ok13:38
annegentlewant to get input13:38
annegentlethe computer museum is about 2 miles from where we'll be13:38
shaunmannegentle: how many are we expecting?13:39
annegentlethe book store is less than 5 miles13:39
roadnickUnfortunately I'm on the other end of the country, so I have no idea.13:39
annegentleshaunm: 20+13:39
sgordoni would be +1 on the computer museum but i have never been to san fran13:39
sgordonso anywhere is new13:39
annegentlesgordon: yeah I've never been to that computer museum but I hear its cool13:39
shaunmcomputer museum sounds fun13:39
annegentleok I'll work on transportation and dinner plans13:39
roadnickit does sound fun, but will it be open in the evening?13:39
shaunmit's hard to keep a group of more than about a dozen together13:39
shaunmbut it's probably no big deal if people split into some smaller groups13:40
annegentleshaunm: ok that makes sense13:40
koolhead17annegentle, pleia2 will be our local guide. I remember she did that for us last time in UDS :)13:41
annegentleok any more questions on boot camp?13:41
roadnickthe museum is closed monday and tuesday13:41
roadnick:(13:41
*** anteaya has quit IRC13:41
annegentleroadnick: NOooo...13:41
annegentlebummer13:41
annegentlewell that's good to find out now :)13:41
annegentlekoolhead17: I'll reach out to pleia213:41
roadnickyep, bummer13:41
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting13:41
koolhead17annegentle, i have not received any ack for my participation13:41
roadnickwe should set up a separate meeting to plan the presos13:41
annegentlekoolhead17: you're signed up.13:41
annegentlekoolhead17: there you go :)13:41
koolhead17cool. thanks :D13:42
annegentleroadnick: yeah good idea13:42
*** zhongwenjia has quit IRC13:42
annegentleroadnick: you want to do that? You have emails for all the speakers right13:42
koolhead17annegentle, speakers? o.013:42
annegentleok we already talked about the v3 Compute API doc plan so let's go on to13:42
annegentle#topic Bug report, DocImpact state13:42
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
annegentlefifieldt_: you have any comments?13:43
fifieldt_just the stuff from the recent email13:43
fifieldt_progress is being made13:43
annegentleOkay. Automation is working great for DocImpact, I have to say!13:43
fifieldt_indeed13:43
fifieldt_noticable in: http://webnumbr.com/untouched-bugs-in-openstack-manuals-13:43
koolhead17shaunm, how are we doing with the deployment guide13:44
annegentle#link https://launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+milestone/havana13:44
fifieldt_api is basically waiting for the nova v3 things for a lot of the bugs13:44
fifieldt_manuals - managed to tick off a lot of them thanks to openstack-config ref :)13:44
annegentlefifieldt_: did the Xen doc bugs get targeted or collected? That would help the numbers13:44
shaunmkoolhead17: progress is slow at the moment, unfortunately13:44
fifieldt_the blueprint links all the bugs13:45
koolhead17shaunm, we are meeting next month right?13:45
fifieldt_xen blueprint that is13:45
fifieldt_moment13:45
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC13:45
fifieldt_#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+spec/redocument-xen13:45
annegentlefifieldt_: okay so it gathers them, that's good.13:45
fifieldt_also went through a bunch of blueprints that had been sitting there13:46
fifieldt_and triaged them13:46
fifieldt_so check that out if you get a moment13:46
roadnickI did notice that you changed the Admin Manual Modularization from "new" to "discuss"13:46
fifieldt_indeed13:46
fifieldt_well I just tried to make the virtual world reflect reality13:46
roadnickWe had kind of stalled on that dicussion trying to decide whether to move foreward13:47
roadnickforward*13:47
shaunmkoolhead17: at the boot camp you mean?13:47
annegentleDiane knocked out 20 bugs in a few weeks, at least 24 went in with the autodoc patch, are we just not keeping up with coders?13:47
annegentlewhat's your sense of it?13:47
koolhead17shaunm, ya13:47
shaunmyup13:47
koolhead17cool.13:47
annegentleroadnick: yeah I think we are still discussing admin manuals13:47
fifieldt_annegentle, we're doing better than we ever have :)13:47
annegentlefifieldt_: for SURE!13:48
slongfifieldt, did you do work on the config ref blueprint?13:48
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
fifieldt_slong, I put in a patch for the neutrons13:48
fifieldt_to show the kind of breakdown we were talking about13:48
sgordonoh got there are multiple neutrons?13:48
sgordon;p13:48
fifieldt_and tried to look at the filenames13:48
koolhead17annegentle, do you want me to shoot a mail to the dev list regarding this https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/ProjectDocLeads13:48
annegentleroadnick: did you follow the -dev list post for the havana doc plan?13:48
koolhead17ask the PTL to get us some one from there team13:48
slongnice, fifieldt13:49
fifieldt_take a look at http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-config/content/networking-options-reference.html13:49
annegentlekoolhead17: it probably has to come from me? What do others think? I'm not a huge fan of the idea in the current form, instead I want book owners. But I would like liaisons and some PTLs have identified those.13:49
roadnickannegentle: peripherally; I need to go back and review now that I'm more conscious :)13:49
fifieldt_just stub sections13:49
fifieldt_but with a paragraph in there for each block13:49
annegentleroadnick: conciousness is good :)13:49
fifieldt_could become something good13:49
fifieldt_but yeah, still got the filename problem13:49
koolhead17annegentle, sounds good. lets modify it & then reach out to the PTL13:50
annegentlekoolhead17: add candidate people to the wiki page but I will communicate13:50
sgordonannegentle, my concern is it probably needs to be driven via the TC13:50
fifieldt_by the way - we have an icehouse series and milestone13:50
annegentlesgordon: I'm on the TC so that's why I should communicate the idea.13:50
sgordon(and/or the PTLs obviously)13:50
fifieldt_so feel free to target blueprints into the future :)13:50
sgordonright13:50
annegentlesgordon: exactly13:50
koolhead17:)13:50
annegentleok, let's move to open discussion13:51
annegentle#topic Open Discussion13:51
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
EmilienMannegentle: hey13:51
annegentleI think I should have had fifieldt_ do the topic changes13:51
annegentleoh well13:51
EmilienMhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+spec/improve-high-availability-support13:51
annegentleEmilienM: hey13:51
fifieldt_sorry annegentle13:51
fifieldt_#topic open discussion13:51
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: Doc Team Meeting)"13:51
annegentleI want to know who's going to HK?13:51
EmilienMo/13:51
* fifieldt_ is :D13:51
fifieldt_I'd like to call attention to this review, for slong and sgordon: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41623/ :)13:52
koolhead17fifieldt_, :P13:52
*** edmund has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
EmilienMroadnick and I still work on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+spec/improve-high-availability-support13:52
roadnickNOT me13:52
roadnick(for HK, that is)13:52
sgordonannegentle, i am actually just reworking our travel request13:52
fifieldt_awww man13:52
*** zbitter is now known as zaneb13:52
sgordonso at the moment cant really confirm13:52
slongright on, fifieldt!13:53
annegentlesgordon: cool13:53
annegentleif it helps with travel plans, it looks like docs will be afternoon Tues.13:53
annegentlefour slots, same as Portland13:54
EmilienMroadnick: do you want to talk about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+spec/improve-high-availability-support ?13:54
AJaegerfifieldt, I have no problems with the current state. What caused me mild frustration was the patch going in since it touched so many files.13:54
annegentleI am still noodling on whether to get rid of Admin Guides13:54
annegentleI've been doing some Google Analytics work.13:54
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
fifieldt_ooh :D13:54
koolhead17annegentle, i think admin guide is needed :)13:54
annegentleFor sure the analytics back up the idea that we CAN go to continuous publishing for many many guides.13:54
annegentlekoolhead17: there will be a new Admin User Guide.13:55
annegentlekoolhead17: so it's possible to get rid of the Compute Admin Manual for example.13:55
koolhead17annegentle, ooh okey13:55
annegentlekoolhead17: and possibly the Object Storage Admin guide, by moving the config info out, such as S313:55
annegentleI think we could do a lot of purging safely13:55
annegentleso I wanted to give a heads up that's a possiblity13:55
koolhead17annegentle, will talk in few weeks on the same.13:56
annegentleI still don't know where to put Block Storage other than in the Config Guide (since it's mostly about configuring different storage backends)13:56
annegentleand the Networking Admin Guide, just makes me worry.13:56
sgordonannegentle, i have verbal approval for at least one of us im just updating the costs13:56
annegentleshaunm: I also worry a lot about the install guide13:56
sgordonplan is for attendance at all 4 days13:56
fifieldt_a worried annegentle is not a good thing :(13:56
koolhead17sgordon, coool13:56
annegentlesgordon: yeah if you can get there go all the time! :)13:56
annegentlefifieldt_: oh it's all the time :)13:56
koolhead17fifieldt_, :)13:56
roadnickemilienm: since I've been out, why don't you take that for today; you have a better handle right now.13:56
EmilienMok13:57
EmilienMwe still have some work to do.13:57
shaunmannegentle: well, I do too13:57
EmilienMwhat I would like first, is to finish main sections13:57
annegentleshaunm: oh yes not saying otherwise :) Just sharing concerns13:57
EmilienMand then fix subsections with more precisions13:57
annegentleI also wanted to say something about review policies --13:58
EmilienM#link http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-ha/content/ha-using-active-active.html13:58
annegentleI know it has been hard to get stuff merged lately with all the markup changes, sorry about that.13:58
annegentlebut we're getting into a good state13:58
shaunmannegentle: next release is in october?13:58
annegentlefor welcoming all the contributors :)13:58
annegentleshaunm: Oct 17 is go live13:58
shaunmthat's feeling less and less like plenty of time13:58
annegentleshaunm: feature freeze is coming up a month sooner13:58
annegentleshaunm: yes13:58
annegentle#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Havana_Release_Schedule13:59
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
AJaegerannashen, regarding markup changes: Let's keep in mind to record our policies on the conventions page.13:59
annegentleI expect we'll see lots of doc interest come Setp. 5th13:59
annegentleAJaeger: yes, good idea.13:59
* AJaeger was surprised what he learned from (great!) reviews that wasn't really codified and where I had to guess what it means...14:00
annegentleSo here's a draft policy - get at least one +2 before merging when 2 or more files are changed, but if it's small changes, a core can just push it through.14:00
annegentleAJaeger: yeah I was thinking the same thing about new people wondering "well what do I have to do to get this merged?" :)14:00
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
annegentlefifieldt_: can you record an action for me to codify our reviewing policies14:00
annegentleand we're on the hour, again I apologize for being late14:00
fifieldt_#action annegentle  codify our reviewing policies14:00
AJaegerannegentle, or: If it touches more than one book?14:01
annegentlefifieldt_: oh anyone can do actions :) sorry14:01
fifieldt_no worries :)14:01
annegentleAJaeger: yeah if it touches more than one book definitely want 2 cores to look14:01
*** topol has quit IRC14:01
*** anniec has quit IRC14:01
annegentleAJaeger: but if I want to get patches moving I'll +2 on my own if I'm confident14:01
annegentleAJaeger: so that's sort of out of policy I suppose :)14:01
annegentleAJaeger: though I do want other cores to have that same confidence and push14:02
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
annegentleAJaeger: we're a small enough team that we can move things through as needed without waiting for others14:02
fifieldt_I take it everyone has also seen14:02
fifieldt_#link http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/docs-openreviews.html14:02
AJaegerannegentle, let's not be too strict...14:02
annegentlesgordon: fifieldt_: does that sound about right?14:02
fifieldt_aye, annegentle14:02
annegentlefifieldt_: ohhh that's handy14:02
fifieldt_Longest waiting reviews (based on latest revision):14:03
fifieldt_    74 days, 17 hours, 33 minutes https://review.openstack.org/31119 (Add os-instance_usage_log_audit extension)14:03
fifieldt_:D14:03
annegentlefifieldt_: LOL wow14:03
fifieldt_the page helps me remember to check not just openstack-manuals14:03
annegentleOk, let's end it and always feel free to talk on openstack-doc all!14:03
fifieldt_but also places like operations-guide14:03
annegentleGotta get a kiddo to the docs14:03
sgordonannegentle, i am a little hesitant at the moment but yes with time14:03
fifieldt_cool14:03
fifieldt_I might sleep instead14:03
annegentlesgordon: sure14:03
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC14:03
sgordoni had one more thing actually14:03
annegentlesgordon: sure14:04
fifieldt_ya?14:04
AJaegerAnybody wants to ask Diane what to do with 31119?14:04
sgordoni was wondering if people think meeting monthly is enough, or perhaps we could move to fortnightly14:04
sgordonjust a though14:04
fifieldt_AJaeger, it needs samples14:04
fifieldt_which may not be in the code14:04
sgordonmy feeling is that touching base like this 6 times a release may be underdoing it14:04
sgordonjust my 2c though14:04
annegentlesgordon: hehe I had to look up forthnightly14:04
sgordonwondering what others think14:04
*** ruhe has quit IRC14:04
annegentlesgordon: yeah I'm with you14:04
roadnick+114:04
sgordonsorry, despite my geographic disposition i still speak 'strayan14:04
fifieldt_+114:04
annegentleWe can go to weekly even14:04
*** lblanchard has quit IRC14:04
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
koolhead17hehe14:05
annegentleweekly? Every other? twice a month?14:05
EmilienM=114:05
slong+1 for fortnightly14:05
sgordoni would move to every other to start with imo14:05
annegentlesgordon: wanna propose it to the mailing list?14:05
sgordonsure14:05
annegentle#action sgordon propose more often meetings on -docs Mailing List14:05
EmilienMI agree14:05
annegentlesgordon: yeah every other for starters sounds good14:05
sgordoni think the fact the last couple we have run the full hour and then some14:06
*** markvan has quit IRC14:06
sgordonis an indication we could meet more often :)14:06
annegentleheh yeah14:06
koolhead17sgordon, thanks for reminding us about meetup today :)14:06
annegentleok let's end it14:06
sgordonyup14:06
fifieldt_yay14:06
annegentlethanks all!14:06
fifieldt_#endmeeting Doc Team Meeting14:06
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:06
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 13 14:06:39 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:06
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/doc_team_meeting/2013/doc_team_meeting.2013-08-13-13.10.html14:06
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/doc_team_meeting/2013/doc_team_meeting.2013-08-13-13.10.txt14:06
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/doc_team_meeting/2013/doc_team_meeting.2013-08-13-13.10.log.html14:06
fifieldt_night!14:06
EmilienMfifieldt: good night14:06
roadnick'night, fifieldt_14:06
roadnickbye, all14:07
AJaegernight!14:07
slongnight14:07
*** fifieldt_ has quit IRC14:07
*** dnavale has left #openstack-meeting14:07
*** roadnick has quit IRC14:07
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:08
*** fifieldt has quit IRC14:08
*** slong has left #openstack-meeting14:09
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting14:11
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
*** AJaeger has left #openstack-meeting14:13
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** sgordon has left #openstack-meeting14:18
*** IlyaE has quit IRC14:18
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez14:19
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** zaneb has quit IRC14:20
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC14:24
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
*** alexb_ has quit IRC14:25
*** jlucci1 has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
*** jlucci has quit IRC14:27
*** rohitk has quit IRC14:29
*** sjing has quit IRC14:32
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:33
*** alexb_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
*** lexinator has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom14:36
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC14:37
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting14:40
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting14:40
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** MIDENN_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
*** wolfdreamer has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** mdenny has quit IRC14:45
*** ruhe has quit IRC14:47
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting14:50
*** carl_baldwin has left #openstack-meeting14:52
*** egallen has quit IRC14:54
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
*** PhilDay has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** hartsocks has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
*** mrodden1 has quit IRC14:59
n0ano#startmeeting scheduling15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 13 15:00:31 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: scheduling)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'scheduling'15:00
n0ano#endmeeting15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 13 15:00:53 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduling/2013/scheduling.2013-08-13-15.00.html15:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduling/2013/scheduling.2013-08-13-15.00.txt15:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduling/2013/scheduling.2013-08-13-15.00.log.html15:00
n0ano#startmeeting scheduler15:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 13 15:01:05 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: scheduler)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'scheduler'15:01
n0anoanyone here for the scheduler meeting?15:01
PhilDayYep (but I have to drop at half past)15:01
*** edmund has quit IRC15:01
*** jlucci1 has quit IRC15:02
jog0o/15:02
*** mdenny has quit IRC15:02
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
n0anolet's wait a minute or two and then go...15:03
jgallardhi all15:03
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
n0ano#topic Perspective for nova scheduler15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Perspective for nova scheduler (Meeting topic: scheduler)"15:04
*** hartsocks has left #openstack-meeting15:04
n0anoI hope eveyone has had a chance to look at Bors' paper15:04
n0ano#link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_DRv7it_mwalEZzLy5WO92TJcummpmWL4NWsWf0UWiQ/edit#heading=h.6ixj0ctv4rwu15:04
*** doron_afk has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
*** lexinator has quit IRC15:05
garykhi guys15:05
n0anomy read is that basically he is saying update state info through the DB is a scaling problem, doing RPC calls to the scheduler would solve this problem15:05
*** tianst has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
n0anomy intuition is to agree with that but I believe there is a significant group the feels the DB is a more scalable solution15:06
n0anohow to we resolve this dichotomy15:06
*** noslzzp is now known as noslzzp_lunch15:06
PhilDayI think there were also some open questions on how does a newly started scheduler get a full set of state15:07
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
jog0wasn't a great deal of this hashed out on the ML?15:07
*** noslzzp_lunch has quit IRC15:08
PhilDayAnd is all of this is now held just in memory by the scheduler(s) how do we get visibility into that state15:08
*** tianst has left #openstack-meeting15:08
n0anojog0, discussed on the ML -yes, resolved -I don't think so15:08
PhilDayCould be that I missed that mlist discussion (had way to much in my inbox when I came back - must stop taking holidays)15:09
n0anoPhilDay, good points but are those implementation details or architectural problems15:09
*** sushils has quit IRC15:09
jog0PhilDay: here is the thread http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-July/012221.html15:10
*** jecarey_ has quit IRC15:10
PhilDayIf we're moving to a model of not persisting the scheduling related state in the DB, then I'd say they are architectural15:10
PhilDay@jog0 - thanks15:10
*** liuxpei has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** liuxpei_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
*** markwash has quit IRC15:11
*** tianst has joined #openstack-meeting15:12
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting15:12
PhilDayI guess what I'm thinking is that in addition to "time to scheudule a new VM" I'd like to see "time for a new scheduler to retrieve its state" as an explicit metric15:12
n0anoPhilDay, would providing an API to the scheduler to access this info be sufficient or would somehow periodically syncing to the DB work15:12
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
jog0there was some good ideas at the end ofthat thread15:13
PhilDayI guess either15:13
PhilDayOk - sounds like i have some more reading to do before I can contribute intellegently ;-)15:13
PhilDay<lurk mode on>15:14
jog0also boris-42's paper didn't clearly show the actual issue (IE not sure how to reproduce there results)15:15
*** jlucci has quit IRC15:15
boris-42jog0 hi15:15
boris-42jog0 whatsup?15:15
jog0I think we all agree the current scheduler has limitiations the questions are at what point exactly and are there any good short term fixes we can do for now, until Icehouse dev is open15:15
jog0boris-42: see backlog15:16
boris-42jog0 yeah you are doing great work15:16
boris-42jog0 around removing fanout]15:16
*** hughsaunders has quit IRC15:16
*** slagle has quit IRC15:17
boris-42n0ano hi15:17
n0anoboris-42, welcome15:17
*** troytoman has quit IRC15:17
boris-42n0ano we updated today our document15:17
boris-42n0ano so we are not doing fanout call to scheduler15:17
PhilDayAs I understood last weeks discussion, any short term fix would keep the DB in place but the path for updates would change from "comp->conductor->DB" to "comp->Sched->DB"15:18
n0anomust read new doc15:18
boris-42n0ano there is not so much change15:18
boris-42PhilDay not only this change15:18
PhilDayDo we really think there is time to move to a non-DB model still in Havana ?15:18
boris-42PhilDay no15:19
boris-42PhilDay this should be done in I cycle15:19
jog0PhilDay: things like more optimized DB queries or caching are options right now15:19
PhilDayOk, so if its all to be done in I - shouldn't this be a topic to be bottomed out in HK ?15:19
boris-42PhilDay yes15:19
n0anoPhilDay, absolutly, but doing some prep work before hand is good15:20
boris-42PhilDay yeah we would like to prapaer 1) all code 2) benchmark results on real deployments before summit15:20
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
*** vkmc has quit IRC15:20
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
PhilDayOK - sorry I got the wrong end of the stick from the start of this then.  I thought you were trying to drive to a conclusion on the architecture in here15:20
boris-42nonon15:21
boris-42=)15:21
jog0PhilDay: thats what I thought too15:21
n0anoboris-42, have you considered PhilDay concern that you need a way to look at the compute node states, moving from the DB makes that hard15:21
jog0so I liked some of Clint's ideas for scheduling15:21
boris-42n0ano we will put all data about HOST into DB15:21
boris-42scheduler DB15:22
boris-42not only compute_node table15:22
boris-42but also data from compute_node_stats and probably from cinder15:22
boris-42to be able to use different data from different project in our scheduler15:22
PhilDayJust to be clear I want any  query on data to be behind an API - so I'n not wedded to it being in the DB, I just want to be sure I don't lose any visbility15:22
boris-42PhilDay visibility about what?15:23
PhilDayThe data the scheduler is using (i.e host states, etc_15:23
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting15:23
boris-42PhilDay and?15:23
jog0boris-42: any cross project DB stuff makes things much harder15:23
boris-42jog0 no15:23
boris-42jog0 it don't make15:23
jog0politically15:23
boris-42jog0 our goal is to have one scheduler15:24
boris-42that keeps all data about hosts15:24
n0anopersonally, I like an API and a back channel (for debugging when the API server fails)15:24
jog0it becomes a nother contractual API  to maintain15:24
boris-42jog0 it will be much easier15:24
PhilDayA single scheduler that can also know about Network locatilty (from Quantum) and Volume locality (from Cinder) ?15:24
boris-42yeah15:24
boris-42PhilDay yes15:24
boris-42philDay and is actually scalable15:24
boris-42PhilDay it is very useful in a lot of cases15:25
boris-42PhilDay for example you are runing cinder and nova on each host15:25
boris-42PhilDay and would like to schedule you instance with block device with size of 200GB and ensure that on that host you have enough of free disk in cinder=)15:26
*** liuxpei_ has quit IRC15:26
*** liuxpei has quit IRC15:26
jog0boris-42: I like the idea too, but doing it requires careful consideration to make sure it doesn't couple the assorted projects too much.15:26
jog0also is this in the new document?15:26
boris-42jog0 sorry not ready yet15:26
PhilDayOne other thing that's at the back of my mind (but I haven't done much thinking about it) is what it would take to plug in a third party scheduler (like say MOAB)  - having only an RPC interface might make that simpler I guess15:27
boris-42jog0 but iour goal is to finish all this things before summit and doc also15:27
*** debo_os has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
n0anoPhilDay, is a 3rd party scheduler really that necessary?15:27
jog0PhilDay: that is a good question, most of this discussion is around we only have one scheduler15:27
boris-42jog0 PhilDay it is really huge change (not in lines) but in approach. So I agree that we should really carefully discuss all this things15:28
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
jog0n0ano: some people may want to use other information to schedule on, and simpler scheduler etc15:28
*** alexb_ has quit IRC15:28
boris-42PhilDay nano I don't see very is complexity of our approach?15:29
n0anojog0, I would hope that the extensibility we've already built into the scheduler is sufficient for 99% of the users15:29
PhilDayNot necessary, and I wouldn't do that in favour of having all of these features in Openstack - but it is something that comes up from time to time in conversation with customers wanting to build thier own clouds.15:29
boris-42PhilDay one simple scheduler that have small amount of methods (run_instance, migrate, cinder scheduler methods)15:29
boris-42and one another method15:29
boris-42that update host_state15:30
boris-42and could be called from different serviesec15:30
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
*** vijendar has quit IRC15:30
*** jtomasek has quit IRC15:30
PhilDayGot to dive for another call - sorry15:30
boris-42PhilDay good luck15:30
jog0PhilDay: bye15:30
*** PhilDay has quit IRC15:30
jog0boris-42: in short this is a big change, huge infact15:30
n0anoall ARs to to PhilDay :-)15:30
debo_ossorry for joining late but just like we decided to do a separate network service, I dont see why we cant have a plugabble scheduler service15:31
n0anoit already is, you can select from multiple scheduler right now15:31
boris-42jog0 I agree that it is big change in approach, but small in LOCs=)15:31
boris-42jog0 and could be done step by step15:31
jog0LOCs don't matter in this15:31
boris-42jog0 but first step should be done only in I cycle15:31
boris-42jog0 I find your current job great15:32
boris-42jog0 for H cycle15:32
jog0there was a BP to do this a while backbut it got stalled15:32
debo_osn0ano: however the state management is not pluggable yet15:32
jog0boris-42: I do like this proposal, I am just saying it is tricky15:32
n0anodebo_os, hence the discussion here15:32
jog0I would recomend drafting up an early idea and putting it to the ML along with an outline of what you think15:32
debo_osn0ano: apologies for joining late hence might sound repetitive :)15:32
jog0along with any history of why tried it before15:32
boris-42jog0 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/no-db-scheduler15:33
n0anodebo_os, NP15:33
boris-42jog0 Ok will be done soon15:33
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
debo_osin addition to the discussion ... one of my colleagues had written up a doc for the last summit and socialized it .. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cR3Fw9QPDVnqp4pMSusMwqNuB_6t-t_neFqgXA98-Ls/edit#15:33
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
n0anoboris-42, looks like your BP is mainly just a link to your doc15:34
debo_osthere was some good feedback and folks told him to get back a little later15:34
jog0the main question is the mechanics of adding a new contracttual API for all projects that wires to the scheduler15:34
*** hughsaunders has joined #openstack-meeting15:34
boris-42n0ano yes15:34
debo_osits a little like boris's doc15:34
boris-42n0ano because in doc is described a lot of15:34
debo_osboris-42: should we try to merge the 2 proposals15:34
boris-42debo_os as I say in email yes of course15:35
boris-42debo_os they are really close15:35
*** zaneb has quit IRC15:35
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
jog0debo_os: don't use the word orchestrator in your proposal its an overloaded word15:36
boris-42=))15:36
jgallardsorry for joining the conversation late, but, I like the idea of having a kind of Scheduler as a Service15:36
*** doron_afk is now known as doron15:37
jog0debo_os: also the doc needs an abstract/summery15:37
debo_osjog0: agreed. I need to clean it up since my colleague wrote most of it and now left the OS world ...15:37
jog0its TL;DR for me, skimming hte slides15:37
n0anoignoring current proposals I still don't see how to resolve the question - which is more scalable DB vs. RPM?15:37
debo_osgr8 feedback15:37
boris-42n0ano RPM15:37
n0anos/RPM/RPC15:37
*** Mandell has quit IRC15:37
boris-42rpc*15:37
boris-42for example15:38
boris-42we have 10k nodes15:38
boris-42we need to produce only 150req/sec15:38
boris-42to all schedulers15:38
*** zbitter has quit IRC15:38
boris-42so 150/SCHEDULER_AMOUNT15:38
boris-42in sec15:38
*** troytoman-away has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
jog0n0ano: IMHO neither15:38
boris-42even if you have only 3 schedulers for 10k nodes15:39
debo_osboris-4215:39
boris-42you will have to process only 50 req/sec15:39
boris-42and it is nothing15:39
jog0but then again we don't need to hash this out right now15:39
debo_osboris-42: lets work to merge the 2 proposals. For starters we can add this doc for reference too15:39
boris-42debo_os Ok it will be easier to merge it through emails then IRC chat =)15:40
n0anowe don't have to answer now but I would like to know `how` to come to an answer, right now we're kind of in a `he said, she said' situation15:40
debo_osboris-42: agreed! lets work to merge the 2 proposals over emails15:40
boris-42n0ano we will make real benchmarks15:40
boris-42n0ano on real deplyouments15:40
boris-42n0ano will be it enough for you?15:40
boris-42debo_os As I said "nods"15:41
n0anoboris-42, I think we need that, measureable and reproducible would be great15:41
jog0n0ano: ++ and any proposed idea has to show its better then the existing and why its better then other options15:41
boris-42n0ano yes we are going to create some new project so everybody will be able to reproduce these things15:41
n0anoWell, I'm hearing some actions out of all of this:15:42
n0ano#action boris-42 & debo_os to merge proposals15:42
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC15:42
n0ano#action come up with benchmark to measure DB vs. RPC scalability15:42
boris-42yeha15:42
boris-42n0ano15:42
boris-42no15:42
boris-42we are building whole system15:42
boris-42to test real openstack15:43
boris-42not just this case15:43
doronguys, if I may jump in for a sec. Is there a reason to rule out an in-memory solution?15:43
n0anohmmm, notic `reproducible', if not then we're just providing anecdotal input15:43
debo_osdoron: not at all15:44
doronie- I agree db is problematic, but RPM will have it's price.15:44
debo_osthats why we need to define APIs 1st instead of implementation15:44
doron(RPC)15:44
debo_oshence boris-42 and I need to merge the proposals ....15:44
boris-42doron didn't understood question15:44
*** tianst has quit IRC15:44
debo_osdoron: ideally if you run the scheuler as a service you could swap out the implementation and have an in memory solution for the state management15:45
doronboris-42: did you consider of storing the needed data in-memory instead of a DB?15:45
boris-42doron we will use in memory key-value storage15:45
boris-42doron to avoid scheduler fanout15:45
doronboris-42: gr8. this is what I had in mind15:45
boris-42doron so each request to update host state will be processed only by one scheuler15:46
boris-42doron this allows us to solve problem with too much for one scheduler rpc =)15:46
boris-42just adding another schedulers in system15:46
doronmakes sense. I'll go over your merged doc15:46
debo_osboris-42: I guess if we define the crisp update APIs etc ... the implementation could be separated and we will have all teh scaling featuers you want to do .....15:46
*** tianst has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
boris-42debo_os>15:47
boris-42debo_os we already implemented this part of our scheduler15:47
boris-42debo_os switch from Nova.DB to scheduler.DB15:47
doronI'll take a look. sorry for the noise.15:48
boris-42doron ok I think we will publish soon code15:48
boris-42so I will add you as reviews15:48
doronthanks!15:48
debo_osboris-42: gr815:48
n0anoboris-42, now I'm confused, are you proposing that the scheduler implement it's own private DB15:49
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
boris-42n0ano yes15:49
n0anoI thought it was just maintaing state in it's memory15:49
boris-42n0ano that produce fanout15:49
boris-42n0ano and we spoke with Mike from BlueHost15:50
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
boris-42n0ano and he said that it will be better to use fast key-value storage such as memcached15:50
n0anothen it's not really a DB, it's just a backup for the internal memory storage15:51
*** ruhe has quit IRC15:51
boris-42n0ano as I said we haven't enough time to update our docs, and they are updated today15:51
boris-42n0ano we don't need "real" DB15:51
boris-42n0ano for temp data15:51
doronboris-42: +1 on no need for real db.15:51
jog0if this isn't ready for review/discussion why are we here?15:51
boris-42jog0 I am just answering on question15:52
boris-42s/question/questions15:52
n0anojog0, I thought we were farther along and I wanted the answer to how do we decide DB vs. RPC15:52
boris-42=)15:53
*** xyang_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:53
boris-42sorry guys for misunderstanding =)15:53
*** doron is now known as doron_afk15:53
n0anoso, it's getting late, looks like boris-42 & debo_os need to update the doc, when that is done we can re-visit this15:53
*** doron_afk is now known as doron15:53
boris-42n0ano it is already updated15:54
n0anoboris-42, what about merge with debo_os ?15:54
*** luis_fdez has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
boris-42n0ano I mean about using DB in scheduler15:54
boris-42n0ano sorry=)15:54
boris-42n0ano ok due next session we will update new combined doc15:54
n0anoboris-42, NP15:54
boris-42And I agree with jog0 that we should discuss in this moment about Havana15:55
boris-42work15:55
boris-42not I15:55
n0anolet's see where we are next week, especially with an eye to what do we need/want to do for Havana15:55
n0ano#topic opens15:55
*** openstack changes topic to "opens (Meeting topic: scheduler)"15:55
n0anoany opens in the remaining few minutes?15:56
*** doron has quit IRC15:56
n0anohearing silence, I'll thank everyone15:57
n0ano#endmeeting15:57
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:57
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 13 15:57:20 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:57
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2013/scheduler.2013-08-13-15.01.html15:57
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2013/scheduler.2013-08-13-15.01.txt15:57
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2013/scheduler.2013-08-13-15.01.log.html15:57
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman15:57
*** doron has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** jgallard has quit IRC15:58
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** hanrahat has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** lexinator has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** iben has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
ibenGood Morning Stackers!15:59
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
debo_osn0ano: by merge docs ... [#openstack-meeting] boris-42, what about merge with debo_os ? this was the older proposal https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cR3Fw9QPDVnqp4pMSusMwqNuB_6t-t_neFqgXA98-Ls/edit#heading=h.sxmednu8fdh516:00
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** tianst has quit IRC16:01
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
primeministerp#startmeeting #hyper-v16:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 13 16:02:32 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is primeministerp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: #hyper-v)"16:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to '_hyper_v'16:02
zehicle_at_dellHello16:02
primeministerphi everyone16:02
ibenhola16:02
luis_fdezhi16:02
primeministerp#topic blueprint review16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprint review (Meeting topic: #hyper-v)"16:02
ibenHi ROb!16:02
ociuhanduHi all16:03
*** tkammer has quit IRC16:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
primeministerp#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack?searchtext=hyper-v16:03
*** whenry has quit IRC16:03
ibenthanks for link - I was just gonna ask...16:03
zehicle_at_dellHey Iben :)16:03
primeministerpso everyone I'd like to start by doing a review of the proposed blueprints and seeing where we currently stand16:03
primeministerpalexpilotti: ready?16:04
alexpilottiyep16:04
primeministerppnavarro: do you also have blueprints for cinder?16:04
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away16:04
alexpilottihi guys16:04
pnavarro#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/windows-storage-driver-extended16:05
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** colinmcnamara has left #openstack-meeting16:05
primeministerpgreat16:05
primeministerplet's start w/ nova bits first16:05
alexpilotticool16:05
*** doron is now known as doron_afk16:05
alexpilottiso we have a bunch of bps out for review16:05
*** dripton_ is now known as dripton16:06
primeministerpalexpilotti: let's start w/ wmiv216:06
alexpilotti#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38160/16:06
primeministerpalexpilotti: thank you16:06
alexpilotti#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39195/16:06
alexpilottiand #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39194/16:06
alexpilottiit was a big one, so I had to split in in 316:07
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
primeministerpso basically those are waiting for core reviewers to look at them16:07
alexpilottiwhat's not so good, is that those patches are standing there since a long time waiting for review16:07
primeministerpyep16:07
pnavarroyeah16:07
alexpilottionly the first one (last link) got in16:07
primeministerpi see16:07
primeministerpthat's a problem16:08
alexpilottithe others have some +1, but no additional review love :-)16:08
pnavarroalexpilotti, do you think I should wait for these ones to be aproved before starting the ephemeral one?16:08
primeministerppnavarro: no16:08
alexpilottipnavarro: no16:08
alexpilottiwe have to put them on cascade, which is a PINTA16:08
primeministerppnavarro: work off of those patches if possible16:08
*** mrodden has quit IRC16:09
alexpilottiwe have already another 2 out there, which depend on the WMI ones16:09
ibenlast patch change was 3 days ago?16:09
ibenor is that just last comment?16:09
primeministerpiben: which are you looking at16:09
ibenit says updated aug 9th16:10
alexpilottiiben: yeah, Pedro put a +116:10
*** iben has quit IRC16:10
*** iben has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** psedlak has quit IRC16:10
alexpilottithis one: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39195/16:10
alexpilottiwas uploaded on July 30th16:11
alexpilottionly a couple of small nits changed in the meantime16:11
*** lpabon has quit IRC16:11
ibeni see - when it says updated that's due to the build status and other comments.16:11
alexpilottithis one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38160/16:11
alexpilottiAug 1st16:11
primeministerpdansmith: ping16:11
dansmithprimeministerp: ack16:12
primeministerphey dan16:12
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting16:12
primeministerpquestion about the queue on reviews16:12
primeministerpwe have some pretty critical bits waiting in the pipeline for some time now16:12
primeministerpdansmith: is the general delay due to just backlog and volume?16:12
alexpilottidansmith: hi!16:12
dansmithprimeministerp: yes, and priorities16:13
alexpilottidansmith: as you know we have a bunch of patches out there since some time, even > 10 days16:13
primeministerpdansmith: is there any way to get some help with adding some priority to those mentioned above16:14
alexpilottidansmith: do think we can have a rough idea about when you guys will have time to review?16:14
dansmithalexpilotti: yep, lots of people do.. core reviewers are doing a whole lot of things, reviewing tons of changes and, of course, working on blueprints of their own16:14
primeministerpdansmith: we fully understand16:14
dansmithare these bugs?16:14
alexpilottidansmith: I know that you are swamped, so I don't bug you too much :-)16:14
alexpilottidansmith: nope, bps16:15
dansmithoh, the namespace thing16:15
alexpilottiyep, splitter in 3 patches as you requested, etc etc16:15
dansmithI'm not keen on rewarding this behavior, but I'll try to take another pass through those today16:15
alexpilotti*splitted16:15
primeministerpdansmith: thank you16:15
alexpilottidansmith: tx!16:16
primeministerpdansmith: if there's a better method of "behavior" you prefer going forward we'll make note16:16
*** comstud_ is now known as comstud16:16
primeministerpdansmith: we appreciate the help everyone has given to this point16:17
dansmithprimeministerp: well, I think getting pinged for reviews is getting old for a lot of folks, but you have been fairly patient, so .. :)16:17
primeministerpdansmith: you're very gracious sir16:17
primeministerpok16:17
primeministerpthanks again dansmith16:17
dansmithyep16:17
primeministerpalexpilotti: can we move on to the next?16:18
alexpilottisure16:18
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
alexpilottiVHDX16:18
alexpilotti#Link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40076/16:18
alexpilottisame story16:18
*** rwsu-away is now known as rwsu16:18
primeministerpalexpilotti: yep, no need to beat it in16:19
alexpilottisure16:19
primeministerpalexpilotti: we've got dansmith attention, we'll take it as such16:19
alexpilottiI'm not complaining, just pointing it out :-)16:19
primeministerpalexpilotti: yep16:19
alexpilottiand also:16:19
alexpilotti#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38791/16:19
ibenso - all these blueprints are supposed to show delivery status of "needs code review" for Dan Smith to look at it?16:19
*** blamar has quit IRC16:20
*** garyk has quit IRC16:20
alexpilottiiben for anybody16:20
primeministerpiben: not necessarily dan16:20
ibensure16:20
*** hughsaunders has left #openstack-meeting16:20
ibenabout the satus - wmi-v2 shows "good progress"16:20
alexpilottiiben: but core reviewers are the ones which are needed to get it merged16:20
ibendoes that mean it's not ready for code review yet?16:20
alexpilottiare you sure it's not the Neutron one?16:21
ibenyes16:21
ibenI'16:21
alexpilottiyep, I still have to send that one in16:21
ibenI'm looking here:16:21
iben#link - https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack?searchtext=hyper-v16:21
*** sarob has quit IRC16:21
primeministerpiben: those are the active blueprints16:21
primeministerpiben: not all has been submitted yet16:21
alexpilottithis is the nova one: #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hyper-v-wmi-v216:21
primeministerpiben: we're trying to go through the list to see what still needs to be completed for our H3 milestone16:22
ibenso behind each blueprint are one or more changes that need to be approved.16:22
ibengot it!  THanks!16:22
primeministerpok let's continue16:22
*** shaunm has left #openstack-meeting16:22
primeministerpobvioulsy same for dynamic memory16:23
alexpilottiyep16:23
primeministerprdp console16:23
alexpilottiwhich by the way got committed by Robert, one of the new Cloudbase guys16:23
primeministerpalexpilotti: great, is here in the meeting?16:23
alexpilottinope16:23
primeministerper is he16:23
primeministerpo16:23
alexpilottiociuhandu: is he still @ the office?16:24
alexpilottiit's 7.24 PM here16:24
primeministerpalexpilotti: i understand16:24
ociuhandualexpilotti: yes16:24
ociuhandugoing to make sure he's in16:24
ibenprobably just out at lunch now...16:24
primeministerpso in terms of the remaining that are labled "not started"16:24
alexpilottisome of them have to be move to Havana, as the review process is slowing everything down16:25
primeministerpalexpilotti: ok16:25
alexpilottiand everything needs to be done by Sept 4th16:25
primeministerpof those remaining are we capible of delivering for that deadline?16:26
alexpilottilol16:26
primeministerpfair enough16:26
primeministerp;)16:26
primeministerpalexpilotti: then let's talk which don't make it16:26
alexpilottiit really depends on the review process16:27
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman16:27
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting16:27
alexpilottifor example now I'm on the RDP one16:27
primeministerpalexpilotti: ok, then let' postpone this discussion until next week to see how the rest of the week pans out16:27
alexpilottiwith the first one blocked due to an API that still has to be contributed :-(16:27
primeministerpalexpilotti: hopefully we'll make some progress through the review pipeline16:28
primeministerppnavarro: ok let's talk cinder16:28
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
pnavarrook16:28
primeministerpI saw there was progress over the weekend16:29
*** Robert_Tingirica has joined #openstack-meeting16:29
pnavarrofortunately my blueprint is High priority16:29
alexpilottisorry, I got pinged about the same topic on the Nova list :-)16:29
primeministerppnavarro: how far along are you now?16:29
alexpilottipnavarro: except the ephemeral storage one :-)16:29
pnavarrothe bp is in review16:29
primeministerpI saw there was patch you submitted16:29
alexpilottithat's also low priority, assigned to you16:29
*** lexinator1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
alexpilottisorry guys, let's finish the previous topic first, if you don't mind16:30
pnavarrothe thing is I'll be on vacation next week16:30
primeministerpalexpilotti: sorry16:30
primeministerppnavarro: let's hold this for a sec16:30
primeministerpalexpilotti: continue please16:30
pnavarrook16:30
alexpilottiwe got out on Nova: AMI, Rescue,16:30
alexpilottiProgress update16:31
alexpilottiand phemeral16:31
alexpilotti*ephemeral16:31
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk16:31
alexpilottiIMO AMI, rescue and progress update are totally secondary16:31
primeministerpalexpilotti: I agree16:31
*** lexinator has quit IRC16:32
alexpilottiephemeral needs to get in16:32
*** dcaro has quit IRC16:32
alexpilottiit depends on VHDX16:32
alexpilottiwhich in turn depends on WMIV216:32
primeministerpalexpilotti: right, which is why i said let's see how the week progresses in terms of the review process16:32
primeministerpalexpilotti: that is unless you have code ready to submit for those as well?16:33
alexpilottirussellb just pinged me to make sure we decide what to do with the ones which are not started :-)16:33
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n316:33
alexpilottiwell, it really depends on the RDP console one16:33
*** sarob has quit IRC16:34
primeministerpalexpilotti: in terms of review time?16:34
alexpilottiyep, as I expect a bit of ping-pong there, to say so :-)16:34
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** stevemar has quit IRC16:34
primeministerpalexpilotti: so priority then should the rdp console  pass quickly, would be ephemeral16:35
alexpilottiso my opinion is to focus 100% on what we need absolutely to get in in this release16:35
alexpilottiephemeral can be done in parallel, it's an easy one16:35
alexpilottibut it depends on VHDX16:35
*** doron_afk has quit IRC16:35
primeministerpright vhdx is waiting in the queue16:35
alexpilottiso, if VHDX gets in w/o substantial changes (I don't expect any, frankly) we can get ephemeral done in a breeze16:36
primeministerpi would assume the rescue is a push16:36
alexpilottiI just marked it as started16:36
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
primeministerpalexpilotti: that last comment was more of question16:37
iben-1 on rescue - why do we need that? is it a core feature?16:37
alexpilottirescue is also depending on all of the above. A fairly easy one, but I don't want to overlay too many things16:37
primeministerpalexpilotti: and progress update?16:37
pnavarroguys, about ephemeral I won't be able to work on it before 26/08 - > too late?16:37
alexpilottiiben: it's just used to rescue images, KVM, XCP, have it16:37
ibenokay - thanks16:37
alexpilottipnavarro: on 26/8 it should be in16:38
alexpilottiwith the code freeze on the 4th...16:38
*** psedlak has joined #openstack-meeting16:38
primeministerppnavarro: we'll have to get it in prior16:38
pnavarroso, maybe it's better to be reassigned to other person, it's my vacation week16:39
alexpilottipnavarro: lucky you :-)16:39
primeministerppnavarro: enjoy your holiday please16:39
*** ader has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
primeministerpso given that pnavarro is unavailable do we need to push it or can you absorb it?16:40
alexpilottipnavarro: we'll assign to assign internally16:40
alexpilottiagh16:40
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
alexpilottiwe'll have to assign it internally16:40
alexpilottipage fault :-)16:40
primeministerphehe16:40
*** rwsu has quit IRC16:41
pnavarroas you said it's not difficult16:41
*** ruhe has quit IRC16:41
alexpilottiit's not, luckily, couple of days should be done16:41
*** jlucci has quit IRC16:41
primeministerpok16:41
primeministerpso we all agree16:41
alexpilottipnavarro: it's way more useful if you can help us on the Cinder bits16:41
alexpilottias you are already doing :-)16:42
pnavarroperfect then16:42
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
*** debo_os has quit IRC16:42
primeministerpok let's continue because we have a lot more to get to16:43
primeministerpalexpilotti: of the remaining what is a definate push16:43
alexpilotticool16:43
primeministerphyper-v-agent16:43
alexpilottithat's it IMO16:43
alexpilottifor Nova16:43
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting16:43
primeministerphyper-v-ami16:43
alexpilottiyep, hyper-v-agent for ceilometer (WIP)16:43
primeministerpand what about remotefx16:43
alexpilottiAs I was saying IMO AMI is almost useless at this stage16:44
primeministerpalexpilotti: then let's push that to I16:44
alexpilottiremotefx is basically done, I'm waiting for some hardware to test it16:44
pnavarrowow remotefx !16:44
*** yaguang has quit IRC16:44
*** HenryG_ has quit IRC16:44
alexpilottiyeah, it's very cool16:45
primeministerpok then we are clear on what need to be done16:45
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting16:45
alexpilottiI need to put a couple of DX11 cards on a server and make sure it works :-)16:45
*** ader_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:45
*** ader has quit IRC16:45
primeministerpalexpilotti: can we move on to the next topic?16:46
alexpilottiso to recap, my non-wish-list is:16:46
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting16:46
primeministerphyper-v-ami, hyper-v-agent16:46
alexpilottiAMI, progress update, rescue16:46
primeministerpyou're not including hyper-v-agent?16:47
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
alexpilottino, I'd like to get that done :-)16:47
primeministerpok16:48
primeministerpthen I'm good with that as well16:48
primeministerppnavarro: sound good?16:48
primeministerpwe'll move those 3 to I16:48
pnavarroit's ok for me16:48
primeministerpgreat16:48
primeministerplet's move on then16:49
primeministerp#puppet-openstack_hyper_v16:49
primeministerp#topic puppet-openstack_hyper_v16:49
*** openstack changes topic to "puppet-openstack_hyper_v (Meeting topic: #hyper-v)"16:49
primeministerpluis_fdez: ping16:49
luis_fdezuey16:49
primeministerpluis_fdez: where does your refactor stand16:49
primeministerpi've been waiting to merge the last request16:49
primeministerpluis_fdez: per your comments asking not to16:49
luis_fdezyou can merge it with the last commit I pushed the last day16:50
luis_fdezthe additional improvements are not yet ready16:50
*** amir1 is now known as asadoughi16:50
*** mrodden has quit IRC16:50
*** mrodden1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
primeministerpluis_fdez: ok, i'll do that after the meeting16:50
luis_fdeznow I'm alswo working on integrating the registry module16:50
luis_fdezfor creating the nova-compute service16:50
luis_fdezand call nova compute16:51
primeministerpluis_fdez: btw I've added a puppetfile w/ the pprerequests16:51
luis_fdezah ok, I'll rebase it16:51
luis_fdezI want to find the best way of calling the python nova-compute from the windows service16:51
primeministerpluis_fdez: can you also put an example node config in tests16:51
luis_fdezok16:51
primeministerpluis_fdez: I still need to try, and now the format has changed dramatically16:51
primeministerpluis_fdez: i'll be in a position to test hopefully tomorrow16:52
*** ruhe has quit IRC16:52
luis_fdezok, I think this week I'll be able to work hard on the puppet side16:52
*** glikson has quit IRC16:52
luis_fdezlast week I took it off16:52
primeministerpluis_fdez: no worries, we're making progress16:52
luis_fdezalso the vcs module is pending16:53
primeministerpluis_fdez: i've been dealing w/ all the other puppet bits for the infra here, working my way to the hyper-v nodes16:53
primeministerpluis_fdez: are you modifying upstream I assume16:53
luis_fdezvcs? I didn't touch it yet16:53
primeministerpluis_fdez: is that next?16:54
luis_fdezi think so... suggestions?16:54
primeministerpluis_fdez: well if we're going to do a from source install it's necesary16:54
primeministerpluis_fdez: and i'd rather just add windows support to the upstream modules16:54
*** lcheng has quit IRC16:54
luis_fdezi agree16:54
primeministerpluis_fdez: this does mean that I'll have to break out additional modules16:54
primeministerpluis_fdez: and our dependancy list is going to be massive16:55
*** sarob has quit IRC16:55
*** lcheng has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** mdenny has quit IRC16:55
*** MIDENN_ has quit IRC16:55
primeministerpluis_fdez: however we knew it would eventually be necessary16:55
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
luis_fdezI'll try to make the current version as stable as possible and then jump to the next approach from source16:56
*** MIDENN_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
primeministerpluis_fdez: I have some comments on that16:56
primeministerpluis_fdez: under the next topic16:56
luis_fdezok16:56
luis_fdez:)16:56
luis_fdezwe can move if you want16:56
primeministerp#topic hyper-v ci16:56
*** openstack changes topic to "hyper-v ci (Meeting topic: #hyper-v)"16:56
primeministerpso in regards to that piece16:57
primeministerpfrom source16:57
primeministerpas well as other pertaining to ci16:57
*** lexinator1 has quit IRC16:57
primeministerpthere is additional help currently ramping up16:57
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
ibenyeah - more resources!16:57
primeministerpto assist with the puppet work16:57
primeministerpyes16:57
*** kebray has quit IRC16:57
luis_fdezperfect :)16:58
primeministerpI spent the last week giving them an overview16:58
primeministerpthere will be more to come, as it's going to take time for the others to get ramped up16:58
primeministerpbut eventually you'll see them here and on the other channels as well16:58
luis_fdezok16:59
primeministerpour goal is to have everything up and fully funtionaly before the april timeframe16:59
primeministerphowever there will be substancial rampup in the immediate weeks17:00
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC17:00
*** lexinator has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
primeministerpthat's about all I have17:00
luis_fdezhelp is welcomed17:00
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away17:00
primeministerpfor now17:00
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
primeministerpdoes anyone have anything else to add17:01
primeministerpso we can end it17:01
primeministerpwe're already running over17:01
ibenjust thanks for all the hard work17:01
ibenthis is gonna be great!17:01
primeministerpif not i'm ending the meeting, we can continue on the hyper-v channel17:01
alexpilottitx!17:01
primeministerp#endmeeting17:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:01
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 13 17:01:42 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/_hyper_v/2013/_hyper_v.2013-08-13-16.02.html17:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/_hyper_v/2013/_hyper_v.2013-08-13-16.02.txt17:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/_hyper_v/2013/_hyper_v.2013-08-13-16.02.log.html17:01
ibenThat's irc://irc.freenode.net:6667/#openstack-hyper-v for you noobs like me...17:03
iben #openstack-hyper-v17:03
*** dosaboy has quit IRC17:04
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** IlyaE has quit IRC17:07
*** mrodden1 has quit IRC17:07
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
*** Robert_Tingirica has quit IRC17:09
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:12
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
*** afazekas has quit IRC17:16
*** slagle has quit IRC17:17
*** alexb_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting17:22
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting17:22
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away17:25
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul17:27
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:30
*** neelashah has quit IRC17:30
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
*** Guest95014 has quit IRC17:33
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting17:34
*** cyeoh has quit IRC17:35
*** cyeoh has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting17:37
*** xyang_ has quit IRC17:39
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting17:40
*** ader_ has quit IRC17:41
*** mrunge has quit IRC17:44
*** sarob has quit IRC17:46
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away17:46
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC17:47
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:48
*** trobert2 has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC17:52
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** jpich has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** trobert2 has quit IRC17:52
*** zul has quit IRC17:55
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** zbitter has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul17:59
dolphmo/17:59
ayoungKeystone!17:59
bknudsonhi17:59
lbragstadhey17:59
stevemaro/17:59
*** zaneb has quit IRC18:00
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
henrynashhowdy18:00
*** [1]fabio has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
*** leif has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
*** [1]fabio is now known as fabiog18:01
ayoungAnyone know how to find aababilov?  Would be good to get him in here18:01
*** tiamar has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
dolphmayoung: for which topic?18:01
*** leif is now known as Guest228118:01
morganfainbergmornin18:01
stevemarprobably Common Client Authentication18:02
*** boris-42 has quit IRC18:02
dolphmah18:02
ayoungdolphm, client stuff.  Been a lot going on there.18:02
ayoungYeah18:02
dolphm#startmeeting keystone18:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 13 18:02:20 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dolphm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:02
dolphm#topic FeatureProposalFreeze18:02
ayoungI sent him email, but he is in the Ukraine, so it is pretty late in the day for him18:02
*** openstack changes topic to "FeatureProposalFreeze (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:02
dolphm#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/013278.html18:02
dolphm#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureProposalFreeze18:02
*** jsavak has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
dolphmhopefully this isn't a surprise because i already spammed everyone about this, but read the above if you haven't ^18:03
ayoungLooks good here.18:03
topolhi18:03
morganfainbergmakes sense to me18:03
ayoungdolphm, format date is...?18:03
*** spzala has quit IRC18:03
fabioghi18:03
ayoungformal18:03
dolphmi don't expect any surprises, but wanted to bring everyone's attention to it again anyway :)18:03
stevemardolphm: i think the people who need to know about it, know about it18:03
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
bknudsonwe're already drowned in code reviews18:04
dolphmbknudson: ++18:04
dolphm#topic morganfainberg18:04
*** openstack changes topic to "morganfainberg (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:04
dolphmthankfully we have a new core reviewer to help with that :)18:04
morganfainbergyay!18:04
bknudsonawesome!18:04
lbragstad+118:04
dolphmofficial welcome to morganfainberg :)18:04
henrynashcongrats!18:04
morganfainbergi've been trying. :)18:04
stevemar+118:04
morganfainbergthanks18:04
fabiogcongrats!18:04
ayoungdolphm, is there some other launchpad setting he needs in order to assign bugs to people?18:04
*** zbitter is now known as zaneb18:04
topolcongrats!!! Very wel deserved18:05
gyeemorganfainberg, you are buying beer on the next summit?18:05
dolphmmorganfainberg: ayoung: not sure, poke me after the meeting if something is wrong with lp18:05
morganfainberggyee… hrmm… we shall see.18:05
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
dolphmyay18:05
dolphm#action morganfainberg to buy everyone beer18:05
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
gyeeha18:05
dolphm#topic critical issues18:05
*** openstack changes topic to "critical issues (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:05
*** neelashah has quit IRC18:05
dolphm#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/121059018:05
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1210590 in keystone "Split backend crashes with AttributeError" [Critical,Confirmed]18:05
dolphm#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/121144518:06
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1211445 in keystone "deleting an unassigned role causes 500" [Critical,Confirmed]18:06
dolphmthese are two nasty ones on v3 that i've seen reported a couple times18:06
henrynashdolphmL I can't seem to reproduce…tried what you di and it worked18:06
*** Guest2281 has quit IRC18:06
*** alexb_ has quit IRC18:06
henrynashdolphm: at least could not reproduce #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/121059018:07
dolphmhenrynash: hmm... i'll try to reproduce once more18:07
*** leif_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1210590 in keystone "Split backend crashes with AttributeError" [Critical,Confirmed]18:07
henrynashdolphm: is you db migrated or new?18:07
dolphmhenrynash: brand new18:07
henrynashdolphm: hmmm18:08
ayounghenrynash, let me know if you want a hand with either18:08
dolphmhenrynash: i have the steps to repro mostly scripted for a different bug18:08
henrynashdollphm: and we unit test exactly the url you tried18:08
henrynashdolphm: ok…if you can shed any more light…I'll get in and debug18:08
dolphmhenrynash: will do18:08
bknudsonthe role exists but it's not assigned?18:09
*** martine_ has quit IRC18:09
ayoungdolphm, suspect that the differenc might be the LDAP backend.  THe unicode thing leads me to think it might be a Directory server issue18:09
*** mdurnosvistov has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
*** martine is now known as martine_18:09
dolphmbknudson: yeah, new user, new project, new role ... and create a role assignment of the three -> 50018:09
*** divyeshk_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
morganfainbergdolphm ayoung: wasn't there a recent unicode relate ldap thing?18:09
*** mdurnosvistov_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
*** mdurnosvistov has quit IRC18:09
dolphmmorganfainberg: i'm not aware of one?18:09
morganfainbergdolphm: i might be thinking internal code18:10
henrynashbknduson: so I made a change where the list of roles for a user/probject pair became a list of dicts instead18:10
morganfainbergdolphm: i'll check18:10
bknudsonspzala had a work in progress for unicode18:10
*** rcrit has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
morganfainbergbknudson: ah that might be what i saw.18:10
henrynashmy guess is that I missed something somewhere and something is still returning an old style list18:10
ayoungmorganfainberg, yes, there is a well known issue.18:10
ayounghttps://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/117210618:10
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1172106 in keystone "Live LDAP tests fail on unicode names" [Medium,In progress]18:10
dolphmcould use some LDAP-expert feedback on bug 121164318:10
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1211643 in keystone "Update user name failed with LDAP back end by CLI" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121164318:10
dolphmmaybe that needs to be configurable18:11
spzalayep, it's specific to the LDAP though18:11
bknudsonit's strange we don't allow change name in ldap backend.18:11
spzalaayoung: thanks for the bug link18:11
bknudsonsince it's not like you can't change the name attribute in an entry.18:11
ayoungdolphm, assign any ldap bugs to me18:12
gyeeyou should be able to update user name18:13
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez18:13
gyeesounds like a bug in the code18:13
gyeeunless your LDAP ACL is configure to have it read only18:13
bknudsonlet them try to change the name and if the ldap server doesn't like it it can reject the request.18:13
dolphmgyee: it was expected behavior when it was implemented18:14
dolphmgyee: i'd be careful about suddenly allowing it18:14
*** sushils has quit IRC18:14
dolphmbknudson: hmm... that's probably a safe approach18:14
bknudsonsql could do the same thing18:15
*** leif__ has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
gyeedolphm, you mean we don't allow updating user name?18:15
bknudsonmaybe ldap doesn't check for duplicates?18:15
ayoungusername is typically modifiable, so long as the userid is immutable.  Should be enforced by ACLs.18:15
dolphmgyee: historically, no18:15
ayoungso, yeah, lets allow it.18:15
*** leif_ has quit IRC18:15
morganfainbergbknudson: depends on schema18:15
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC18:15
morganfainbergbknudson: and acls18:15
ayoungdolphm, is that a general rule across all backends?  If so, then the bug can be closed notabug18:16
dolphmcontinue this discussion in the bug / review?18:16
gyeeok then, we need to distinguished what we can do versus what LDAP can do18:16
ayoungdolphm, agreed18:16
dolphmthis isn't high priority, just wanted to bring some attention to it18:16
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41603/18:16
dolphm#topic pagination18:17
*** openstack changes topic to "pagination (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:17
gyee:)18:17
dolphm#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-August/013493.html18:17
henrynashok, so quite lively ML discussion going on18:17
*** ruhe has quit IRC18:17
ayoungSo I think we need pagination short term, but we should be wary of depending on it over the long.  LDAP and pagination is a bad mix18:17
ayounglisting all users is also a bad practice.18:17
morganfainbergayoung: +118:17
gyeelets pass the query parameters into the drivers and let the drivers optimize18:18
henrynashso it's worth reading the ML trail18:18
ayoungdolphm, I opened a handful of related wishlist items  yesterdat.18:18
gyeewould be hard to standardize if drivers don't speak the same language18:19
dolphmayoung: use google as an example :) you can't go to google.com and see "all search results" with a blank query string18:19
henrynashJay certainly advocating we support the same thing that other projects do, i.e. limit/marker18:19
ayoungdolphm, good point18:19
*** lpabon has quit IRC18:19
bknudsonI think it would be best if we followed what other OS projects are doing.18:19
henrynashIs there a reason we WOULDN'T do what the other projects have done?18:19
morganfainbergbknudson: at the very least it makes it easier for developers to interact with keystone then18:20
*** glikson has quit IRC18:20
ayounghttp://bit.ly/168qd2d18:20
bknudsonshould be able to use shared code to do paging.18:20
ayoungthose are new and wishlist bugs18:20
*** glikson has joined #openstack-meeting18:20
dolphmsort key and sort order are particularly important to have consistent, even if we don't expose that to the api yet18:20
*** alexb_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:20
gyeebknudson, we don't follow, we lead :)18:20
henrynashHere's my most recent ML post:18:20
ayounghttps://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/121158218:20
henrynash1) Support 'limit' and 'marker' (as opposed to 'page', 'page_szie', or anything else).  These would be standard, independent of what backing store keystone was using.  If neither are included in the url, then we return the first N entires, where N is defined by the cloud provider.  This ensures that for at least smaller deployments, non-pagination aware clients still work.  If either 'limit' or 'marker' are specified, then we pagi18:20
henrynashdown into the driver layer wherever possible to ensure efficiency (some drivers may not be able to support pagination, hence we will do this, inefficiently, at a higher layer)18:20
henrynash2) If we are paginating at the driver level, we must, by definition, be doing all the filtering down there as well (otherwise it all gets mucked)18:20
henrynash3) We should look at supporting the other standard options (sort order etc.), but irrespective of that, by definition, we must ensure that we any driver that is paginating must be getting is entries back in a consistent order (otherwise, again, pagination doesn't work reliably)18:20
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1211582 in keystone "Filter user list by partial attributes" [Wishlist,New]18:20
*** Mandell has quit IRC18:21
bknudsonbtw - the identity API spec doesn't have page / page_size anymore... I submitted a change to remove them since they weren't implemented.18:21
bknudsoncan always add them back in again.18:21
henrynashbknudson…has that gone in…I checked earlier today and they were still there...18:21
morganfainbergyeah, better to add them when we have support.18:22
ayounglet me, once again, reiterate the LDAP specific concerns,  1)  limit the number of entries returnsed.  2) LDAP does not guarantee order, which means paging requires a cursor.  3) Cursors don't scale18:22
bknudsonhttps://github.com/openstack/identity-api/blob/master/openstack-identity-api/v3/src/markdown/identity-api-v3.md doesn't have them18:22
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting18:22
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39828/18:22
*** mdurnosvistov_ has quit IRC18:22
bknudsonldap servers can have their own limit on results anyways18:22
*** mdurnosvistov has joined #openstack-meeting18:22
henrynashayoung: so that's fine, we just return N items as I describe18:22
bknudsonI think Active Directory has paging of member attribute.18:23
ayoungbknudson, yeah, but we should also allow Keystone to specify the limit.  See the problem with the HP ED taking an hour+ to return18:23
*** vijendar has quit IRC18:23
henrynashayoung: agreed, we should have a keystone limit18:24
gyeeayoung, that's because HP ED is miss configured :)18:24
gyeemisconfigured18:24
ayoung--sizeLimit 20018:24
ayoungoption value for all LDAP queries, I think?18:24
dolphmlol18:24
morganfainberggyee: right, but regardless, we should limit (or optionally be able to provide a limit) to solve that.18:24
gyeesure, I am fine with having limit on the client-side18:25
morganfainbergs/solve/make keystone better regardless of misconfiguration18:25
morganfainbergof the server18:25
gyeeLDAP servers usually don't take hours and return you thousands of entries18:25
gyeeif configured correctly18:25
henrynashso are there any objections to my most recent proposal…it does seem to cover all the above issues?18:25
ayoungon paging, there was some question about the implementation.  Are we just punting on it?18:25
gyeeLDAP, by design, is for *fast lookup*18:25
rcritshould there be a knob for ldap search time limit though?18:26
ayoungrcrit, it can be optional, too18:26
rcritat least with 389-ds there is one, even if the user doesn't set it themself18:26
ayoungrcrit, file that as a wishlist bug18:26
rcritI don't wish it, just asking :-)18:27
ayoungor tag it on to the limit18:27
ayoungrcrit, I know better than that....18:27
bknudsonwhy just ldap search? can't sql query take a long time, too?18:27
ayoungbknudson, I think because timeout is a standard part of an ldap query18:27
gyeebknudson, if an LDAP query takes a long time, something is misconfigured18:28
ayoungpretty sure SQL has not such standard18:28
rcritit's a server-side thing.18:28
rcritI think, anyway18:28
ayoungldapsearch --hostname localhost -p 1389 --baseDn 'uid=user.0,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com' \18:28
ayoung     --searchScope base --sizeLimit 1 --timeLimit 1 '(&)' @inetOrgPerson18:28
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC18:28
bknudsonkeystone doesn't have any control over the ldap server settings.18:28
ayoungbknudson, no, but it can chose to use server side controls if they are available18:29
dolphmbknudson: but we should totally change that18:29
dolphmbknudson: keystone-manage configure_ldap_correctly18:29
henrynashproposal: I'll create an etherpad that contains my most recent proposal from the ML (that is essentially to do things the way other projects do), link it to the bp and let others comment?18:29
gyeedamn straight18:29
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC18:29
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
topolhenrynash +118:29
*** ruhe has quit IRC18:29
ayoungbknudson, there is already something like that for AD, where it can make use of a control if the server supports it.  I'd have to dig up the commit.  Was probably done by CERN18:29
dolphmhenrynash: the way other projects do it is a great approach for SQL18:30
ayounghenrynash, blueprint, link to the wishlist bugs18:30
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
henrynashdolphm: I believe that my proposal at least ensures that we don't get long delays from LDAP18:30
henrynashayoung: this isn't a wishlst, we are implementing  a solution for H318:31
bknudsonldap.search_ext_s has a timeout= parameter.18:31
ayounghenrynash, then up the priority of the bug18:31
bknudsonand can pass server and client controls if that's an option.18:31
ayoungOK, I think we have an approach.Just please add me as a review on any LDAP changes.  I'll try to keep an eye out for them.  make sure LDAP is in the patch description18:32
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
gyeemeee 218:32
henrynashayoung, gyee: ok!18:33
henrynashdolphm: probably time for a new topic18:33
bknudsonwhat's the marker parameter? a value from the next entry?18:33
*** kebray has quit IRC18:33
gyeemarker is suppose to be the last entry from the previous batch18:33
dolphmhenrynash: ++18:33
topolhenrynash I will be happy to review as well18:34
bknudsonso like uid?18:34
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
henrynashbknudson: yep18:34
dolphmayoung: skip common client auth?18:34
ayoungdolphm, no18:34
*** jmh_ has quit IRC18:34
dolphm#topic common client auth18:34
ayoungjust want people to know:18:34
*** openstack changes topic to "common client auth (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:34
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/28043/18:34
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
henrynash(ok, I have to duck out….sorry folks…., be back on later)18:34
ayoungI submite a revert review for the osl change to auth client18:34
dolphmgiant patch18:34
ayounghttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/41578/18:34
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC18:34
bknudsonwho reviewed the original patch in oslo-incubator?18:35
ayoungand I talked with aababilov18:35
ayoungwe are going to work to get this integrated directly into the keystone client18:35
ayoungjamielennox is aware and has responded to him as well.  This should be a good approach18:35
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting18:35
*** svarnau has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
bknudsonI guess we can move it oslo-incubator after it's been used in keystoneclient if that's necessary18:36
dolphmayoung: i'm in favor of the notion... if absolutely nothing else, it's more likely we'll have more security-sensitive eyes on the code that way18:36
ayoungbknudson, doesn't really matter.  I don't think they were aware that this was supposed to be a Keystone thing, too18:36
bknudsonbut other clients should be able to import keystoneclient?18:36
ayoungbknudson, no18:36
ayoungbknudson, other clients should pull in keystone client as a library18:36
ayoungwon't go into oslo18:36
*** edmund has joined #openstack-meeting18:37
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting18:37
ayoungbknudson, "but other clients should be able to import keystoneclient?" yes18:37
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC18:37
morganfainbergmuch easier to keep it "correct" if keystoneclient owns it and it's not in oslo18:37
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting18:37
dolphm++18:38
morganfainbergit means we wont run into projects lagging in sync18:38
morganfainbergand causing auth issues.18:38
lbragstadmorganfainberg: +118:38
ayoungwe may decide we want to break up keystone client over time.  I could easily see it as:  command line, keystone common library, keystone client library, and middleware.18:38
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC18:38
dolphmmorganfainberg: we need to make it stupid easy for other projects to consume us, which is NOT the case today :(18:38
morganfainbergdolphm: yes, that is related to the topic.18:38
bknudsondifferent installs might have different levels of the client, and now we have to be very careful of backwards compatibility.18:38
morganfainbergdolphm: and ++18:38
dolphmeverything from auth options -> client side token management -> authenticating requests to other services18:39
morganfainbergbknudson: i think we are already having to watch closely on that wrt auth_token.18:39
ayoungit would be nice if we could build that out of a single git repo.18:39
gyeedolphm, like secured by default? which does nothing :)18:39
cody-somervilleDoes shared common client auth also include the service catalog stuff?18:39
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting18:39
ayoungcody-somerville, yes18:39
*** kebray has quit IRC18:40
ayoungcody-somerville, it is implicit that when you get a token you get the service catalog with it.18:40
cody-somervillebecause it's broken in keystoneclient trunk currently - region_name get passed to AccessInfo (which would pass it on to ServiceCatalog if it was) and thus region_name is ignored.18:41
cody-somervilleand everyone seems to do things like url_for differently.18:41
ayoungcody-somerville, file it in launchpad, or if it is filed, please link the bug18:41
cody-somervilleI haven't filed it yet but will be doing so today.18:41
gyeeservice catalog needs a bit more work18:41
dolphmthe way we expose the service catalog is sad18:42
ayoungcody-somerville, there was an expired review for region work,  which jaypipes is planing on resubmitting as an extension.18:42
cody-somervilleoops, I typoed: region_name *does not* get passed to AccessInfo18:42
ayoungcody-somerville, thanks18:42
cody-somerville+118:42
gyeedolphm, yeah, we need to go back to the drawing board on this one18:42
gyeelike how to facilitate API versioned urls18:42
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting18:43
cody-somervilleI'll note that it would probably be much appreciated if you guys kept the heat people appraised of any changes here18:43
ayoungcody-somerville, will do18:43
bknudsoneventually we want all clients to use the common auth stuff18:44
dolphm#topic open discussion18:44
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:44
bknudsonwhich means someone has to go through all the other clients and update them to use common auth18:44
dolphmthere's some high priority code reviews on the agenda --18:44
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39530/18:44
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38308/18:45
dolphm#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40692/518:45
morganfainbergAhh good, KDS has a new patchset.18:45
JoeHazzersalso, is there anything happening regarding external authentication methods?18:45
*** alexb_ has quit IRC18:45
stevemar#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/29130/ dolphm, this one too :)18:45
ayoungmorganfainberg, the API does, yeah.  simo will  sync the code to API once it is clear there is not too much churn18:46
morganfainbergayoung: yep, that was what i meant18:46
gyeecode reviews from here on out18:46
ayoungstevemar, I think oauth is close18:47
stevemarayoung, yay18:47
morganfainbergstevemar: yeah, it's looking really good.18:47
gyeeJoeHazzers, what do you have in mind?18:47
topolstevemar +118:47
ayoungI'll give it another look.  I assume no major changes since last I looked.  I withdraw the requests for making access tokensi nto Keystone tokens....although it might be worth revisint that in the future.18:47
ayoungrevisiting18:48
gyeeoauth ftw18:48
dolphmayoung: that reminds me... https://gist.github.com/dolph/619852918:48
JoeHazzersgyee: i know someone who wants to integrate kerberos, x509 and other authentication methods with keystone, such that the client and server (if running under say apache) can negotiate and authenticate via other methods than a simple username and password18:48
ayoungdolphm, neat18:48
dolphmayoung: my first pass was with PKI-based oauth access_keys ... i switched to AES in the current gist, but will be switching back18:48
morganfainbergdolphm: thats cool.18:48
ayoungJoeHazzers, already done in Apache HTTPD18:48
*** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting18:49
ayoungJoeHazzers, would not recommend trying to do it in Eventlet18:49
dolphmbasically the oauth secret is encrypted into the access key along with basic authz attributes18:49
JoeHazzersyes, but how does client discovery or knowledge of these methods work?18:49
dolphmproject_id, role_names, secret = verify_access_key(access_key)18:50
ayoungJoeHazzers, we are working on an extension for that.  THe kent federation review is going to split that off into its own extension18:50
JoeHazzersokay!18:50
ayoungJoeHazzers, the review is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39499/ see the first two items on the list:  listing IdPs and listing protocols supported.18:51
ayoungdolphm, should that piece end up part of keystone client?18:52
ayoungOne other review:   https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41471/18:52
morganfainbergayoung: i am checking on that FK constraint right now18:53
morganfainbergI don't see it in the DB, but I'm going to 2x check to see what is going on.18:53
morganfainbergtrying it from a clean slate.18:54
dolphmayoung: yeah, parts of it18:54
dolphmayoung: keystoneclient doesn't have any business creating access tokens, but keystoneclient should be able to verify them (a la keystoneclient.common.cms.verify_token())18:54
ayoungdolphm, yeah, that is what I was thinking18:55
*** olaph has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
dolphmayoung: keystoneclient.contrib.oauth.verify_access_token() or something?18:55
dolphmoauth1*18:55
*** burt has left #openstack-meeting18:55
*** burt has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
ayoung4 minutes.  Any last burning topics?18:56
gyeewho's going to IceHouse summit?18:58
morganfainbergI'll be there18:58
topolI plan on being there18:58
ayoungI'll be there.18:58
gyeesame here18:58
stevemargyee: hopefully!18:58
ayoungjamielennox and simo from RH as well representing IdM18:58
dolphmgyee: o/18:58
*** noslzzp has quit IRC18:58
topolayoung, a much better answer than last time18:58
ayoungtopol, I even have a book on Cantonese18:59
topolayoung, wow18:59
gyeeayoung, I can teach the good stuff :)18:59
morganfainbergayoung: hehe18:59
ayoung我迷路了,請幫我18:59
topolIm just gonna follow gyee everywhere18:59
stevemarhehe18:59
stevemarnice one ayoung18:59
morganfainbergtopol: that is a good idea18:59
topolgyee, where we going to dinner. gyee what is this on the menu18:59
gyeetopol, I'll let you know what I ordered, after dinner :)19:00
ayoung我的氣墊船​​鰻魚19:00
topolgyee, I've fallen for that before19:00
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
dolphm#endmeeting19:00
ayoungtimes up\19:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 13 19:00:55 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2013/keystone.2013-08-13-18.02.html19:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2013/keystone.2013-08-13-18.02.txt19:01
lbragstadthanks all19:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2013/keystone.2013-08-13-18.02.log.html19:01
morganfainbergthanks!19:01
jeblairci/infra folks around?19:01
ttxo/19:01
clarkbo/19:01
fungiho19:01
pleia2o/19:01
jeblairmordred: ping19:01
zaroo/19:02
olapho/19:02
jeblair#startmeeting infra19:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 13 19:02:44 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)"19:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'infra'19:02
jeblair#topic Backups (jeblair)19:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Backups (jeblair) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:02
jeblairclarkb and mordred were working on getting us an account in hpcloud we could use for backups19:03
jeblairclarkb, mordred: do you know the current status of that?19:03
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting19:03
clarkbthe account is there, mordred has apparently requested that it be comped, but I haven't heard if that has actually been done yet19:04
*** edmund has quit IRC19:04
clarkbmordred: have you gotten a response on that request yet?19:04
jeblairclarkb: any way you can find out?19:04
jeblairit's starting to seem like mordred won't be here.19:04
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman19:04
clarkbI don't think I have direct access to the things that will tell me, but I can ask around today to see if anyone else can dig it up19:05
clarkb#action clarkb look into new hpcloud account status19:05
jeblairso the other thing is that mordred was supposed to write a database backup script19:05
jeblairhas anyone seen anything come out of that?19:06
clarkbI haven't19:06
*** zaneb has quit IRC19:06
fungii haven't noticed a review for that yet, no19:06
clarkbI know pcrews attached an example script to the bug, but I don't think mordred built on that19:06
*** fabiog has quit IRC19:07
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
jeblairyeah, that's not at all what we need19:07
jeblairwe basically just need "mysqldump > file"19:07
clarkboh in that case we can just copy pasta the equivalent in the etherpad module out into its own thing and use it where necessary19:07
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC19:08
ttxcopy pasta. hmmmm.19:08
clarkbI wrote the one in etherpad and can split it out if that is what we think we want to do19:08
jeblairclarkb: that would be great.19:08
clarkbok I will put that at the top of this afternoons list to avoid it lagging any further19:08
jeblairclarkb: with that, we should be able to just "include bup" and "include mysql_backup" or something in the manifest of any host we want to backup.19:09
clarkbyup19:09
clarkb#action clarkb split etherpad mysql backup out into distinct puppet module19:09
fungiclarkb: i also have one i use on my personal servers i can send you, for alternative perspective19:09
jeblairo i forgot to:19:09
jeblair#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting19:09
jeblair#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-08-06-19.01.html19:09
*** divyeshk_ has left #openstack-meeting19:10
jeblair#topic Project renames (jeblair)19:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Project renames (jeblair) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:10
jeblairthis is another mordred topic really...19:10
jeblairistr that mordred said he could do the project names this weekend.19:10
fungitripleo project renames?19:10
jeblairthey've been languishing a while...19:10
fungii cannot, likely, as i'll be flying cross-country a good chunk of the weekend19:11
jeblairso i think our options are: punt another week, schedule them and do them ourselves, or schedule them on mordred's behalf.19:11
ttxnote that even week-ends will start getting busy starting next week19:11
ttxapproaching the freezes19:11
clarkbI can assist if we decide to go with this weekend. But will be driving to and from portalnd saturday mroning and sunday afternoon so something in the middle is easiest for me19:11
*** bknudson has left #openstack-meeting19:12
jeblairyeah.  i don't have the bandwidth to manage these myself at the moment.19:12
*** zaneb has quit IRC19:12
clarkbyay summer19:12
jeblairi believe the list is: tripleo, pypi-mirror (delete), and puppet-quantum19:12
clarkbalso mordred will be AFK beginning next week19:12
*** martine_ has quit IRC19:12
*** zaneb has joined #openstack-meeting19:13
fungiburning the man, yes19:13
ttxI'm already burning here fwiw19:13
ttxcountries on the equatorian line do that to you19:13
clarkbjeblair: and pyghmi19:13
clarkbor is triplie == pyghmi ?19:13
jeblairso it doesn't sound like any of us can be primary on this one, so i think we should not schedule anything ourselves, give mordred the list, and hopefully he can schedule and do the work soon.19:14
jeblairclarkb: no, tripleo is an org move19:14
jeblairclarkb: of os-* and such19:14
jeblairclarkb: pyghmi is python-ipmi -> pyghmi (both in stackforge)19:14
clarkbjeblair: gotcha and I agree with giving mordred the list19:14
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC19:15
fungiyes, sadly19:15
jeblair#action mordred schedule project renames: tripleo, python-ipmi, puppet-quantum, pypi-mirror(delete)19:15
jeblair#topic Tarballs move (jeblair)19:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Tarballs move (jeblair) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:15
jeblairwe need to move tarballs to static.o.o19:16
jeblairbecause they are still on old-wiki19:16
jeblairi think that's a dns change, plus rsync.  probably best done with jenkins.o.o offline (to prevent new uploads during the move)19:16
ttxjeblair: there was a recent bug about making their refresh atomic, in case you want to handle both a tthe same time19:16
fungibug 121171719:17
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1211717 in openstack-ci "master tarballs publication is non atomic " [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121171719:17
fungii suspect that will take some development work19:17
*** adalbas has quit IRC19:17
ttxfungi: yes, if it's just dns + rsync probably best fixed independently19:17
jeblairi think the solution to that is the artifact upload script we've talked about19:18
jeblair(also relates to logs)19:18
fungiyeah, i suggested it in the bug19:18
jeblairbasically instead of using scp module in jenkins, we have a script upload artifacts to a web service19:18
jeblairwhich can then put them (somewhere: filesystem, swift, doesn't matter), and then we have another web service serve them19:19
jeblairi think the log htmlifier is the first part of the second service19:19
fungiagreed19:19
jeblairi wonder if we could modify the scp plugin to fix bug 121171719:20
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1211717 in openstack-ci "master tarballs publication is non atomic " [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/121171719:20
jeblairperhaps it could upload to a tempfile and then ssh mv the result19:20
clarkbjeblair: I think that would be one alternative19:21
jeblair(thinking short-term here, because obviously the other thing is very long-term)19:21
ttxjeblair: shouldn't affect the move to static.o.o though19:21
clarkbttx: correct19:21
fungiyeah, i described that as an alternative (though didn't specifically mention the development would need to take place in the jenkins-scp plugin, it was implied)19:22
fungii guess i said "script" in the bug, but was trying not to get to too far into jenkins detail weeds there if it was a non-optimal path19:23
jeblairi'd like to stay focused on getting jenkins/devstack-gate scaled out in anticipation of the increased load around the freeze19:23
fungidefinitely19:24
jeblairfungi, clarkb: so unless you want to volunteer to lead the move very soon, i'd probably defer it until after the freeze19:24
*** gyee has quit IRC19:25
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
jeblairthere are a lot of freezes19:25
fungii don't think it's urgent, and would rather not risk impact to release activities19:25
jeblair19:25
clarkbfungi: ++19:26
jeblairso let's leave that on the agenda to schedule when we have bandwidth and have a better handle on how to fit it into release activities.19:26
jeblairthe actual downtime shouldn't be too long though; we just need some prep time and a good window to fix problems.19:27
jeblair#topi Asterisk server (jeblair, pabelanger, russelb)19:27
jeblair#topic Asterisk server (jeblair, pabelanger, russelb)19:27
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away19:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Asterisk server (jeblair, pabelanger, russelb) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:27
*** linggao has joined #openstack-meeting19:27
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC19:27
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting19:28
jeblairpabelanger, russellb: do you want to do more 'internal' testing of asterisk, or should we get some other folks using it (reed + user groups, foundation staff, ...?) to widen testing a bit?19:28
clarkbnote cacti is currently off for security reasons which may make looking at numbers slightly difficult19:29
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
fungiit's still collecting stats, just not viewable at the moment19:29
*** chuckieb has quit IRC19:30
fungibut we're not losing historical trending data afaik19:30
jeblairif we really needed a graph, we could create one too19:30
* fungi didn't comment out the snmp cron jobs19:30
pabelangerjeblair, ya, a load test would be good to doo19:30
pabelangerdo*19:30
pabelangerthat way we can see how well the server will hold up19:30
*** xBsd has joined #openstack-meeting19:31
jeblairpabelanger: ok, so we should schedule a time where we can all try to call in19:31
pabelangerjeblair, yes, I think that will work19:31
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting19:32
jeblairhow about this friday?19:32
clarkbFriday works for me. anytime but around lunch pacific19:32
pleia2wfm19:32
fungii'm cool with any time friday19:33
pabelangerworks here19:33
zarozaro: wfm19:33
ttxjeblair: post the precise time on the infra list and I'll call if I'm around19:33
jeblair#action jeblair send announcement to infra list for call at 10am pacific friday19:34
jeblairthat's uh, 1700 utc i think19:35
fungiyep19:35
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting19:35
jeblair#topic cgit server status (pleia2)19:36
*** openstack changes topic to "cgit server status (pleia2) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:36
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
jeblairpleia2: you're up!19:36
pleia2mordred's patch to create the repos on git.o.o was merged earlier, but the script won't trigger automatically until projects.yaml is updated again19:36
pleia2do we want to help it along?19:36
fungipleia2: i ran the updated create-cgitrepos script on git.o.o just a few minutes ago, but it didn't chown the repos to the cgit user19:37
fungiso they're still root:root owned19:37
pleia2ah right, that script runs from root, not cgit user19:37
pleia2I'll write a chown patch19:37
fungii'll clear those out and we can try again when that merges19:37
pleia2thanks19:37
pleia2once that's done, replication should start working and we should be good19:38
jeblairwe can probably merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41643/ soon, which is a projects.yaml update19:38
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
jeblair(if we want to use that to test the git work)19:38
fungithat would be preferable to me manually triggering the script, definitely19:39
fungiexercises more of the automation19:39
jeblairpleia2: so close!  :)19:39
pleia2yes, this week, for real this time!19:39
jeblair#topic OpenPGP workflow (fungi)19:39
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenPGP workflow (fungi) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:39
*** tiamar has left #openstack-meeting19:39
*** linggao has left #openstack-meeting19:40
fungithis was more of just a general heads up that with the formation of the new release program, i'm pushing to start a strong openpgp web of trust for the project19:40
*** sarob has quit IRC19:40
jeblair++19:40
fungiwe're a bit behind the curve there given our size, but the speed at which the project grew makes that understandable19:40
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
fungii'm putting together some recommendations in a wiki article this week for general workflow around key validation and signing19:41
pleia2great19:41
clarkbsounds good19:41
fungiand then we'll probably aim to start doing organized key signing parties a la debian/ubuntu as of the j summit19:41
pleia2jeblair: we're having ubuntu hour + debian dinner wednesday, sign keys? ;)19:41
clarkbfungi: do you intend on trying to have the jenkins jobs check the keys as part of the release process too?19:41
fungiclarkb: that is a goal19:42
fungiclarkb: more than that, i've been playing with ways to validate our tarballs on a trusted slave prior to signing them with a release key too19:42
jeblairfungi: would the release team still sign the final releases personally, or with a key that is not owned by a bot?19:42
fungia release automation key would be signed at a minimum by the release team members and so on19:42
fungijeblair: we could certainly have a mechanism to take individual detached signatures in the process, sure19:43
fungiso release team members could still sign them directly, though it would add an additional delay into things like client uploads to pypi19:44
jeblairfungi: ok.  having things automatically signed by jenkins is good -- but in my mind all it means is "this thing was signed by jenkins"19:44
fungiyep19:44
jeblairfungi: which i don't trust _nearly_ as much as "this thing was signed by thierry"19:44
clarkb++19:44
fungiit's something we'll want to discuss the pros and cons of when we get closer to making it work19:44
jeblair*nod*19:44
fungianyway, i'll give you all a heads up when i've got some initial documentation up, and i look forward to signing your keys in hk perhaps19:45
jeblairfungi: cool :)19:45
jeblairand thanks!19:46
fungimy pleasure19:46
jeblair#topic Open discussion19:46
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: infra)"19:46
clarkbthe log htmlifier should be working on logs.o.o now19:46
clarkband logstash is only indexing non debug screen log lines now and is much happier as a result19:47
zarocool!19:47
clarkbwhen sdague gets back I intend to start hitting that system with actualy work19:47
clarkb*actual19:47
jeblairthe devstack-gate node pooling code is going to become its own project called 'nodepool'19:47
ttxfungi: I saw signs that you might be working on capping stable/folsom reqs ?19:48
ttxfungi: or does it have nothing to do with it ?19:48
fungittx: yes, i'm seeing what needs to happen to backport the requirements enforcement to grizzly and maybe also folsom19:48
clarkbwe will drop folsom support/testing after the icehouse summit right?19:49
ttxfungi: err.. I was talking about introducing caps to stable/folsom to prevent it from breaking while nobody looks after it19:49
clarkbor when havana releases? is it worth putting effort into it?19:49
jeblairclarkb: hrm.  this is blank for me: http://logs.openstack.org/59/38259/9/check/gate-tempest-devstack-vm-testr-full/23210d1/logs/screen-n-net.txt.gz19:49
clarkbjeblair: :( looks like something broke19:49
clarkb500 internal server error, I will poke at it when I get a chance.19:50
fungittx: oh, just for folsom? yeah i started figuring out how to identify the transitive dependencies of each project so we can actually cap them, and i think we decided that it was fine not to care about supporting dependencies which have security fix releases except on a case-by-case basis (in other words, cap to today's version number exactly)?19:50
clarkbif necessary we can revert the apache change that enabled it on logs.o.o19:50
mordredo/19:50
ttxfungi: that would work for me. We can still bump manually19:50
mordredhey all19:50
ttxfungi: keep me posted if you make progress on that. Scripting it would be nice since we'll need to do that every 6 months19:51
fungittx: it will be different for grizzly i think since we'll want to integrate it into openstack/requirements enforcement tooling19:52
ttx(we need to do folsom yesterday and grizzly some time after yje icehouse summit)19:52
jeblairmordred: just in time.  :)19:52
*** lifeless_ is now known as lifeless19:52
*** xBsd has quit IRC19:52
mordredwoot :)19:52
fungittx: whereas folsom i think we can just do by hand as a proof of concept for figuring out what actually works19:52
* mordred apparently had to go to a bank in a cellar in the middle of brasilia19:52
ttxfungi: +119:52
ttxmordred: to find wifi ?19:52
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting19:53
*** topol has quit IRC19:53
fungimordred: is that where you keep your offshore funds and casks of amontillado19:53
mordredttx: yes19:53
mordredfungi: yes19:53
*** pcm_ has quit IRC19:53
mordredany way I can be useful to anyone?19:53
*** lexinator1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
jeblairmordred: we made a list of project renames, but none of us can take the lead on it this week, so it's up to you to schedule/do them.19:54
jeblairmordred: clarkb and i may be able to pitch in in a supporting role.19:54
mordredjeblair: great. I will do that19:54
ttx<ttx> mordred: all clear to play with merge-milestone-proposed-back-to-master on swift 1.9.119:54
ttx<ttx> I'm holding on removing the branch19:54
mordredttx: awesome. thank you19:54
zaroi had two patches for gerrit WIP votes.  One got accepted, https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/48255 :)  The other one didn't, https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/48254  :(19:54
mordredttx: I think I want to do it manually a couple of times before automating it - just to make sure I grok all the things - is that ok with you?19:54
*** mdenny has quit IRC19:55
ttxmordred: sure. We'll have havana-3 to play with too19:55
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
mordredawesome19:55
*** MIDENN_ has quit IRC19:55
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
fungizaro: looks like it's still collecting suggestions at least, so they haven't vetoed it19:55
*** lexinator has quit IRC19:56
*** mdenny has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
*** MIDENN_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
zarofungi: yeah, i think it's pretty much dead19:56
*** shardy has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
jeblairzaro: you don't think you can implement their suggestions?19:57
zarojeblair: ohh, i just got the feedback, so that's what i plan to do next.19:57
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
zarofungi: i just meant that patch was dead. need to redo.19:57
jeblairoh, ok.  patch - yes, idea - no.  :)19:58
*** adjohn has quit IRC19:58
fungizaro: ahh, okay. yeah minor stumbling block on the road to acceptance there, from the looks of it. none of the comments seemed to say "nah, we don't want the feature"19:58
jeblairthanks everyone!19:59
jeblair#endmeeting19:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:59
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 13 19:59:57 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-08-13-19.02.html20:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-08-13-19.02.txt20:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-08-13-19.02.log.html20:00
*** jhenner has quit IRC20:00
ttx(not tc meeting this week)20:00
*** neelashah has quit IRC20:00
ttxcoming up next: release/status meeting in one hour20:01
jgriffithstay tuned :)20:01
hub_caplol exactly20:01
*** jmh_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC20:01
*** olaph has left #openstack-meeting20:02
*** whenry has quit IRC20:04
*** zul has quit IRC20:04
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
*** spzala has quit IRC20:07
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting20:11
*** venkatesh has quit IRC20:11
*** dprince has quit IRC20:12
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting20:13
*** dolphm has quit IRC20:13
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away20:13
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul20:14
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
*** vkmc has quit IRC20:16
primeministerpls20:19
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC20:20
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:24
*** jkyle has quit IRC20:25
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting20:33
*** woodspa has quit IRC20:35
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away20:39
*** ruhe has quit IRC20:41
*** adjohn has quit IRC20:43
*** ruhe has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
*** mrunge has quit IRC20:45
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul20:45
*** adalbas has quit IRC20:45
*** ruhe has quit IRC20:46
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman20:49
*** lpabon has quit IRC20:59
ttxmarkmc, dolphm, notmyname, jd__, markwash, jgriffith, russellb, shardy, gabrielhurley, markmcclain: around ?21:00
*** boris-42 has quit IRC21:00
russellbo/21:00
*** vijendar has quit IRC21:00
*** vkmc has quit IRC21:00
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:00
*** markmc has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away21:00
markmcclaino/21:00
shardyo/21:00
dolphmo/21:00
*** sacharya has quit IRC21:00
markwasho/21:00
markmchey21:01
lifelesso/21:01
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
jd__o/21:02
ttxmissing notmyname, jgriffith, gabrielhurley21:02
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away21:02
ttx#startmeeting project21:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 13 21:02:12 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: project)"21:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'project'21:02
ttx#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting21:02
ttxUsual agenda, Cinder may go first since John has a conflict21:02
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting21:02
ttx(if he arrives)21:02
jgriffith0/21:02
ttx#topic General stuff21:02
*** openstack changes topic to "General stuff (Meeting topic: project)"21:02
ttxUpcoming deadlines are FeatureProposalFreeze for some projects:21:02
ttxNova and Cinder on Aug 21, Neutron on Aug 2321:03
ttxdolphm: did you settle on August 28 for Keystone ?21:03
*** gabrielhurley has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
dolphmttx: yes, haven't heard any complaints21:03
ttxdolphm: ok, will add it to the release schedule for info21:03
dolphmttx: thank you!21:03
ttxFor the projects which enforce it, all feature code shall be *proposed* by FPF21:03
shardyttx: we decided on August 23rd for Heat21:03
ttxshardy: ah. good news21:03
ttx#action ttx to update release schedule to include Heat (Aug 23) and keystone (Aug 28)21:04
ttxThis should let you have an easy hard rule about rejecting random stuff that would suddenly appear one week before FeatureFreeze21:04
ttxsdague, annegentle, jeblair/mordred: news from QA/Docs/Infra programs ?21:04
annegentleo/21:04
ttxannegentle: shoot21:05
annegentleWe had our monthly meeting this morning, are looking at going to weekly or every other week21:05
annegentle#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/MeetingLogs#2013-08-1321:05
annegentleWant to be sure the PTLs are good with continuous publishing for some docs, I think I should ask individuals though.21:06
jeblairttx: nak21:06
ttxannegentle: that may be more successful21:06
annegentlettx: yep. That's all I've got21:06
ttxI usually go after people and point them to the thread. You can't rely on everyone reading everything21:06
*** boris-42 has quit IRC21:07
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
lifelessannegentle: we're good with continuous publishing21:07
ttxok, let's go project-specific21:07
ttx#topic Cinder status21:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Cinder status (Meeting topic: project)"21:07
*** jsavak has quit IRC21:07
jgriffithttx: hey there21:07
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/havana-321:08
* ttx refreshes21:08
jgriffithone undefined still21:08
jgriffithI need an update if it's still moving forward "optional iscsi support"21:08
jgriffithshould have it set or deferred tomorrow21:08
ttxI wonder if refactor-lvm-and-iscsi-driver and vmware-vmdk-cinder-driver should not be considered "Needs code review" now21:09
ttx26% done, 13% under review, 46% in progress, 13% not started21:09
jgriffithyes to all of the above21:09
*** jhenner has quit IRC21:09
ttxOK, please update as soon as you get a chance21:09
ttxso you're probably not really behind21:09
jgriffithttx: doing it now21:09
ttxYou've got 2 "not started" still: add-export-import-volumes and db-migration-tests... Is it reasonable to keep them in the roadmap ?21:10
jgriffithwe'll see, think there are some things that are going to get added the next few days21:10
ttxi.e. are they easy and fast ?21:10
ttxMove to Low or 'next' ?21:10
jgriffithI need to get ahold of the Mirantis guys, they're tough to communicate with at times21:10
jgriffithI'm leaning towards next21:10
jgriffithbut I was scolded for not targetting those in the first place21:11
jgriffithso I'm being overly generous in giving them chances21:11
ttxyou can send a mail with a deadline and move them if you don't get evidence it may make it21:11
jgriffithwill do21:11
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
ttxor you can keep them "Low" priority and not care if it makes it or not21:11
ttxjgriffith: anything else on your mind ?21:12
jgriffithttx: personally I really don't :)21:12
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting21:12
jgriffithjust the brick effort, but I should link up with russellb outside of meeting on that21:12
ttxok21:12
ttxQuestions on Cinder ?21:12
jgriffiththanks everyone for letting me jump ahead this week21:12
ttx#topic Oslo status21:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Oslo status (Meeting topic: project)"21:13
markmchey21:13
ttxmarkmc: hi!21:13
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/havana-321:13
ttx83% done, 16% under review, 0% in progress, 0% not started21:13
markmcbig one is obviously https://blueprints.launchpad.net/oslo/+spec/trusted-messaging21:13
markmcthe main part of the oslo work for that has actually merged21:13
markmcbut we're still waiting on the kds side21:13
markmcthere's an API spec for the kds stuff under review here: https://review.openstack.org/4069221:14
ttxso we may end wit hthe feature in oslo but unusable for the lack of a KDS, right ?21:14
markmcI take it keystone folks still think it has a chance to make it21:14
markmcwell, yeah21:14
ttxbut then who is lined up to make use of it ? Ceilometer maybe ?21:14
markmcthe code in oslo is currently just infrastructure which isn't integrated with the main rpc code21:14
*** jpich has quit IRC21:14
markmcso, it doesn't risk anything by being there either21:15
markmce.g. it doesn't have to be copied into projects21:15
ttxPersonally I'm a bit worried to ship late code with such security implications as a KDS21:15
ttx(with my VMT hat on)21:15
jd__(Ceilometer would like to use it indeed)21:15
markmcI'd expect nova would use it if it landed in oslo-incubator and keystone21:15
markmcyeah, it's definitely very late at this stage21:16
markmccan't speak to what keystone folks feel about it at this stage21:16
ttxdolphm: ?21:16
dolphmttx: assuming the implementation lands in time, it would be disabled out of the box in keystone21:16
ttxdolphm: that doesn't prevent us from having to security-support it21:17
dolphmttx: now that the api review is up, there's a bunch of eyes suddenly on it21:17
dolphmttx: agree21:17
ttxThat's the sort of thing I'd definitely prefer to postpone...21:17
ttxjd__: how badly do you need it ?21:17
jd__ttx: we already have our own signing mechanism, so we don't need it for say21:18
jd__we'd just prefer to drop our own mechanism to use the common one.21:18
ttxwe've been bitten in the past with late security-sensitive stuff21:18
dolphmand there's https://github.com/stackforge/barbican21:19
ttxdolphm: could you reach the various stakeholders and see how much they would like to be postponed to icehouse on this ? I'd welcome more baking time and discussion around this21:19
dolphmttx: sure21:19
ttxmarkmc: anything you wanted to raise about oslo?21:19
markmcdolphm, ttx, let's have a discussion on the mailing list about it21:19
ttxmarkmc: +121:20
markmcdolphm, ttx, there hasn't been a discussion about it there for some months21:20
dolphm++21:20
ttxI'll let you guys start it and chime in21:20
markmcapart from that, I'm mostly heads-down on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/oslo-messaging21:20
ttxack21:20
markmci.e. porting nova to oslo.messaging21:20
ttxright21:20
markmcreleased oslo.messaging-1.2.0a3 today, consider it pretty much feature complete21:20
ttxQuestions about Oslo ?21:21
markmcI figure if the nova port isn't looking in reasonable shape by next week, punt to icehouse21:21
*** adjohn has quit IRC21:21
markmc#info oslo meeting this friday https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo21:21
ttxmarkmc: yes, that's another thing that's risky to touch at the end of a cycle21:21
markmcttx, what is?21:21
markmcnova? :)21:21
*** lblanchard has quit IRC21:21
ttxmessaging in nova :)21:21
ttx#topic Keystone status21:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Keystone status (Meeting topic: project)"21:22
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/havana-321:22
ttx0% done, 44% under review, 55% in progress, 0% not started21:22
*** galstrom has quit IRC21:22
ttxMore code needs to be proposed now!21:23
dolphmagree!21:23
*** markmc has quit IRC21:23
ttxdolphm: should unified-logging-in-keystone could be considered 'Implemented' now that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39934/ is merged21:23
dolphmseveral of those are pending a second +221:23
dolphmttx: no, that's just a sync; there's another patch in review to consume logging from oslo21:24
ttxdolphm: ok21:24
ttxthen yes. Propose and land :)21:24
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC21:24
*** jkyle has joined #openstack-meeting21:24
ttxdolphm: anything you wanted to raise ?21:24
dolphmttx: yes... i did defer a bp today21:24
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul21:25
dolphmthere were two different quota storage efforts started during havana21:25
dolphmthis one has gained the most traction https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/store-quota-data21:25
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting21:25
dolphmat this point, the second is simply a new use case on top of the above bp: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/domain-quota-management-and-enforcement21:25
*** xBsd has joined #openstack-meeting21:25
ttxok21:26
ttxthe other key question is around the maturity of the KDS security-wise and the potential benefit of more baking / discussoin, see previous topic21:26
ttxwe'll discuss that on the ml21:26
dolphm++21:26
ttxdolphm: anything else ?21:26
dolphmthat is all21:26
dolphmhopefully next week we'll have > 0% done :)21:26
ttxQuestions anyone ?21:26
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC21:26
ttx#topic Ceilometer status21:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Ceilometer status (Meeting topic: project)"21:27
ttxjd__: hey21:27
jd__o/21:27
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/havana-321:27
* ttx refreshes21:27
jd__:-)21:27
ttx15% done, 7% under review, 69% in progress, 7% not started21:28
ttxOK.. unless you have an ace up your sleeve...21:28
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting21:28
ttx...I think it's time to make some dramatic changes because this is going into the wall by chasing too many things at the same time21:28
ttxI'd suggest moving more things to Low priority (or to the 'next' milestone)21:28
ttxIn particular stuff not started yet like nova-cell-support21:28
ttxjd__: or maybe you have better suggestions ? or a surprise for us :)21:29
jd__agreed21:29
ttxTip: you should never bet on the gate being extremely fluid around FeatureFreeze.21:29
ttxLand early what you can :)21:29
jd__same thing for the RPC signing, I think we know it'll be for 'next'21:29
ttx#action jd__ to use the chainsaw on the h3 roadmap and cut it21:29
jd__:-)21:30
ttxjd__: when is the ceilometer meeting ?21:30
jd__ttx: tomorrow 2100 UTC21:30
*** galstrom has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
ttxwill see if I can make it to push21:30
ttxjd__: anything you wanted to mention ?21:31
jd__nop21:31
*** simo has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
ttxQuestions on Ceilometer ?21:31
ttx#topic Swift status21:31
*** openstack changes topic to "Swift status (Meeting topic: project)"21:31
ttxnotmyname: around ?21:31
*** ItSANgo___ has quit IRC21:31
ttxI have a canned update21:32
ttx<notmyname> ttx: although I'll try, if I'm not in the meeting tomorrow, that's the status update: 1.9.1 release21:32
*** cp16net has left #openstack-meeting21:32
ttxSo 1.9.1 was released earlier today21:32
ttxmostly a security update21:32
ttxNext release is likely to be synced with the coordinated havana release21:32
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
ttxQuestions about Swift that I may not be able to answer ?21:32
*** vijendar has quit IRC21:32
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting21:33
*** neelashah has quit IRC21:33
ttx#topic Glance status21:33
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance status (Meeting topic: project)"21:33
markwashme me me!21:33
ttxmarkwash: o/21:33
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/havana-321:33
ttx40% done, 20% under review, 40% in progress, 0% not started21:33
ttxrecent progress I see21:34
markwashsome, and some bumping21:34
markwashone is about to go from review to done21:34
ttxStill no code proposed for api-v2-property-protection ?21:34
markwashnot on gerrit, but I have seen some on github21:35
markwashprogress is being made21:35
*** simo has left #openstack-meeting21:35
ttxand you don't have a FPF s oyou might jus tmake it21:35
ttxmarkwash: anything you wanted to mention ?21:36
markwashwell. . not having an advertised feature freeze doesn't mean new proposals for h3 won't be outright rejected21:36
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-meeting21:36
markwashand a new glance client went out!21:36
markwashbut probably another will come soon, now with PBR21:36
ttxsure, but you can have late code proposed on that feature without appearing to play favorites :)21:36
ttxQuestions on Glance ?21:36
markwashright21:36
ttx#topic Neutron status21:37
*** openstack changes topic to "Neutron status (Meeting topic: project)"21:37
ttxmarkmcclain: hi!21:37
markmcclainhi21:38
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/havana-321:38
ttxA few questions while I update the status...21:38
ttxWhat's the status of configurable-ip-allocation ?21:38
ttx39% done, 46% under review, 14% in progress, 0% not started21:39
ttxThe train is still on the rails!21:39
markmcclainthe code be in gerrit tomorrow21:39
ttxWhat about hyper-v-wmi-v2 ?21:39
*** lbragstad has quit IRC21:39
markmcclainI spoken with alessandro and expected by now, I'll ping him again21:39
ttxand.. how is ipv6-feature-parity doing ?21:40
*** elo has joined #openstack-meeting21:40
markmcclainit's the one I'm worried the most about21:40
markmcclainwe've got 10 days right :)21:40
*** litong has quit IRC21:40
ttx10 days to propose code, by your own terms21:41
ttxthen another 10 days to merge it21:41
markmcclainit's the 2nd 10 day period I expect to be tougher part21:41
ttxwell, if that's the only FAIL in that list I'll call it a miracle nevertheless21:42
ttxmarkmcclain: anything you wanted to raise ?21:42
markmcclainnothing new from me21:42
ttxQuestions on Neutron ?21:42
ttx#topic Nova status21:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Nova status (Meeting topic: project)"21:42
russellbo/21:42
ttxrussellb: hey21:42
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/havana-321:42
*** armax has left #openstack-meeting21:42
ttx21% done, 47% under review, 31% in progress, 0% not started21:43
russellbbeen updating, so refresh21:43
ttxNot too bad!21:43
ttxrefreshed 20 seconds ago21:43
russellbl21:43
russellberr, k21:43
*** stevemar has quit IRC21:43
russellbyeah, been trying to aggressively update things (move to next, or change priority to Low)21:43
russellbwill keep pushing on it21:43
russellbneed to start landing more of this stuff under review ...21:43
ttxyou pushed some of cyeoh gazillion blueprints to low/next ?21:44
russellbyes, mostly to next21:44
ttxok21:44
russellbthing is ... we decided we're not going to finish the v3 API in havana21:44
russellband all of those covered aspects of that, so doesn't matter if they finish in havana or not at this point21:44
russellbIMO21:44
*** mdurnosvistov has quit IRC21:45
ttxWondering if glusterfs-native-support is actually not 'Implemented' yet (with merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/39498/)21:45
russellboh  nice, that went in today21:45
russellbyep implemented21:45
* russellb updates21:45
ttxrussellb: anything else you wanted to mention ?21:45
russellbdon't think so ... i' think i got 7-10 new blueprints trying to be added to havana-3 in the last week21:46
russellbsheesh21:46
russellbhaving to start swinging the hammer around :)21:46
russellbanyway, that's it, thanks!21:46
ttxyou can't wait until you have that FPF sign on the door :)21:46
* hub_cap ducks21:46
ttxAny question on Nova ?21:46
russellbttx: yes21:46
* markwash quacks21:47
* russellb gooses21:47
* hub_cap mallards21:47
russellbi think you can safely move on now, heh.21:47
ttx#topic Heat status21:47
*** openstack changes topic to "Heat status (Meeting topic: project)"21:47
shardyo/21:47
ttxshardy: o/21:47
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/havana-321:47
ttx48% done, 14% under review, 37% in progress, 0% not started21:47
ttxLooks on track to me21:47
shardyYep, quite a lot of stuff landing, bumped anything not started21:48
*** gokrokve has quit IRC21:48
ttxIs hot-parameters completed with the merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/38921/ ?21:48
ttxoh https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41691/21:48
ttxigore me21:49
ttxor ignore21:49
shardyYeah, there were several parts to that one up for review IIRC21:49
ttxAnything more needed to be done with exception-formatting ?21:49
*** ItSANgo has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
shardyIt looks complete, but I'll check at our meeting tomorrow to be certain21:50
*** kspear has joined #openstack-meeting21:50
*** vasiliy has joined #openstack-meeting21:51
ttxHow is heat-trusts doing this week ?21:51
shardyI'm working on it now, slow progress but I'm still hoping it will land in time21:51
ttxok21:51
ttxWhat about native-nova-instance ?21:51
shardyAgain, I know sdake is making progress on that so should land, but I'll ask for confirmation on that at tomorrows meeting21:52
ttxshardy: anything else you want to raise ?21:52
shardyNot atm, no, thanks21:52
ttxQuestions about Heat ?21:52
ttxshardy: thx!21:52
ttx#topic Horizon status21:52
*** openstack changes topic to "Horizon status (Meeting topic: project)"21:52
ttxgabrielhurley: around ?21:52
gabrielhurleyyep yep21:53
*** rcrit has left #openstack-meeting21:53
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/havana-321:53
ttx33% done, 33% under review, 25% in progress, 8% not started21:53
ttxNot too bad21:53
gabrielhurleydarn, if that 8% were in progress it would've been even thirds21:53
ttxnetwork-quotas is marked 'not started' -- I think it would make a good target for a 'Low' priority at this point (or just deferred to 'next')21:53
gabrielhurleyI reached out to the assignee for that one today, I will probably bump it to "next" as soon as I hear back.21:54
ttxack21:54
gabrielhurleythe other which may slip is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/improved-boot-from-volume21:54
gabrielhurleythere are a couple people working on competing implementations and I'm not sure they're gonna come together in time21:54
ttxYou moved realtime-spec out ?21:54
gabrielhurleyThe notable thing I bumped out today was the realtime stuff21:54
gabrielhurleylol21:54
gabrielhurleyyes21:54
ttxhaha21:54
gabrielhurleyI would rather land it in I1 than H321:55
gabrielhurleyit's gonna be one of those "lots of kinks to work out" features21:55
ttxsoon we'll operate like a hive21:55
gabrielhurleyhaha21:55
ttxgabrielhurley: anything you wanted to mention ?21:55
* gabrielhurley envisions ttx as the queen of the OpenStack hive21:55
gabrielhurleyuh, no21:55
gabrielhurleynothing else21:55
gabrielhurleylol21:55
ttxfat and lying at the bottom21:55
ttxQuestions on Horizon ?21:55
vasiliyhi gabrielhurley. I have update about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/improved-boot-from-volume21:56
ttxvasiliy: tell us21:56
gabrielhurleyvasiliy: awesome, the horizon meeting is in 5 minutes, tell me then21:56
vasiliytoday was publishe first patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41728/21:56
gabrielhurleyor now, if ttx has time21:56
vasiliyIt's in-progress now, but we've already started working on testing the patch and preparation of unit-tests.21:56
ttxI have one minute21:56
vasiliyThe main goal of patch is to reflect new functionality "clone image" in Nova.21:56
gabrielhurleyawesome21:56
gabrielhurleyyep21:56
ttxvasiliy: thx21:57
ttx#topic Incubated projects21:57
*** openstack changes topic to "Incubated projects (Meeting topic: project)"21:57
ttxdevananda, hub_cap: howdy21:57
vasiliyttx - you are welcome21:57
*** ayoung has quit IRC21:57
ttxAny question ?21:57
hub_caphowdy howdy21:57
ttxAny update ?21:57
hub_capchugging away at heat integration starting um, yesterday :)21:57
hub_capptl is short for code at night i think21:57
vasiliygabrielhurley - the blueprint was assigned to Sam, but he hasn't spare time now - therefore we desided to help him - because worked on related blueprints on Nova21:58
hub_capshould be in by end of month tho21:58
hub_capand then we talk incubation status :)21:58
hub_capother than that things r goin well.21:58
ttxhub_cap: code at night, yes21:59
ttxAnything else to mention in the last minute, anyone ?21:59
hub_cap<321:59
*** rnirmal has quit IRC21:59
ttx#endmeeting22:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 13 22:00:04 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2013/project.2013-08-13-21.02.html22:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2013/project.2013-08-13-21.02.txt22:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2013/project.2013-08-13-21.02.log.html22:00
ttxthx everyone!22:00
gabrielhurley#startmeeting horizon22:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Aug 13 22:00:44 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is gabrielhurley. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'horizon'22:00
gabrielhurley#topic overview22:00
*** openstack changes topic to "overview (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:00
gabrielhurleyhello hello!22:00
*** ivasev has quit IRC22:00
cody-somerville\o_22:01
david-lyleHello22:01
kspearhowdy22:01
lchenghello!22:01
vasiliyhi everybody!22:01
gabrielhurleyokee doke, let's do this22:01
*** beagles has quit IRC22:01
gabrielhurleyon the projet-wide level, we're a few weeks out from H322:02
gabrielhurleyI've pared down the blueprint list a good deal the last two days22:02
gabrielhurleyI reached out to several of the assignees of BPs that hadn't been updated for a while and had no code22:02
gabrielhurleythey almost all responded to say they would like to defer22:02
gabrielhurleyI also made one unilateral call about the realtime spec stuff22:02
gabrielhurleyGiven the scope of that change I think we'd be much wiser to land it in I1 instead of H322:03
gabrielhurleythat gives us the entire I cycle to polish it and build on it22:03
*** tedross has quit IRC22:03
gabrielhurleyI still intend to spend some time with the patch prior to opening up I, but landing it now seems... inadvisable22:03
gabrielhurleyI know that's a little disappointing22:03
gabrielhurleybut it's the smart thing to do for the project22:03
*** burt has quit IRC22:04
gabrielhurleyalso, we can focus on getting ceilometer and keystone work really nailed down for this release.22:04
gabrielhurleySo, with that set of deferrals we're in good shape for H322:04
*** SergeyLu_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** luis_fdez has quit IRC22:04
kspeargabrielhurley: agree about the realtime stuff. it will give us a chance to actually implement useful bits on top too22:04
*** glikson has quit IRC22:04
gabrielhurley:-)22:04
gabrielhurleyOn another general note, a very interesting discussion has started on the mailing list about the purpose and necessity of pagination22:05
gabrielhurleyI don't have the link handy, sorry22:05
gabrielhurleybut I weighed in today, and I'm thinking that we could all move forward together to do away with pagination entirely. If that's not enough to get you interested, I don't know what is. ;-)22:05
gabrielhurleyI encourage participation in that discussion22:05
*** timductive1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
gabrielhurleylet's move on to blueprint updates22:06
gabrielhurley#topic blueprints22:06
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprints (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:06
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC22:06
*** beagles has joined #openstack-meeting22:06
timductive1o/ hi all22:06
gabrielhurleyI'll go quickly. I posted reviews for adding more Hypervisor stats: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41193/ and availability zone info: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41550/ to take care of two of the BPs assigned to me22:07
gabrielhurleythanks for the feedback on those so far, fresh patchsets are up on both22:07
gabrielhurleywith the deferrals those are now the only two assigned to me22:07
gabrielhurleyI'm going to spend the rest of my focus for the next few weeks on ceilometer22:07
gabrielhurleyI wanna make sure we get that in and make it as good as possible.22:07
gabrielhurleywho else has updates?22:08
david-lyleworking away on rbac support, hopefully I will have code up for review later this week22:08
david-lyleprimary focus is a keystone based policy file for this first pass22:08
vasiliygabrielhurley: I have an update on blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/boot-from-volume-type-imageu22:08
vasiliycould you please review and write some comments for patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/41728/ It's in-progress and was specially pubished today to ask your to add comments on it. We are working on testing the patch and preparation of unit-tests now.22:08
*** SergeyLu_ has quit IRC22:09
gabrielhurleydavid-lyle: sounds good. will definitely review when you get that up.22:09
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:09
lchengI have the Project Role assignment to Group ready for review https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/group-role-assignment, after that get merged I plan to continue with the Domain role assignment to Group: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/group-domain-role-assignment.22:10
gabrielhurleyvasiliy: did you mean this blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/improved-boot-from-volume ?22:10
vasiliysorry - the correct blueprint is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/improved-boot-from-volume for our patch22:10
vasiliygabrielhurley - yes22:10
gabrielhurleylcheng: I started looking at that code, I still need to pull it down and run it. I can probably do so this week.22:10
gabrielhurleyvasiliy: great. can I reassign that BP to you? what's your LP username?22:10
lchenggarbrielhurley: thanks!22:11
gabrielhurleyanyone else have updates they'd like to give?22:11
*** pentameter has quit IRC22:11
*** sarob has quit IRC22:12
*** adjohn has quit IRC22:12
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
lchenggabrielhurley: I registered a couple of swift related blueprints: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/swift-display-metadata22:13
lchenghttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/swift-container-public-access22:13
lchenghttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/swift-download-tempurl22:13
vasiliygabrielhurley: please assign blueprint to author of patch - "vzhelezniakov"22:13
gabrielhurleylcheng: I'm in favor for all of those in I22:13
*** sacharya has quit IRC22:14
gabrielhurleyvasiliy: you got it22:14
vasiliygabrielhurley: ok - good - thanks22:14
gabrielhurley#topic open discussion22:14
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:14
gabrielhurleyI swear I had something I was thinking about, and now I've forgotten what it was22:14
lchenggabrielhurley: I might be able to have some bandwidth to work on it for H3, but if you prefer it for I, no problem. :-)22:14
gabrielhurleyoh, one thing I've got22:15
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting22:15
gabrielhurleythe organizer for the OpenStack on Ales conference is interested in having someone from the Horizon team at the conference and asked me who he might contact since I can't make it: http://openstack.onales.com/22:15
gabrielhurleyif anyone's interested I can put you in touch22:15
gabrielhurleyjust ping me or email me22:16
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting22:16
david-lylejust got an email regarding that, do you have any idea what the open space involves?22:16
gabrielhurleynot really, sorry22:16
david-lyleno worries22:17
gabrielhurleyIt sounds like a fun conference though22:17
gabrielhurleya couple of other folks from nebula are planning to go22:17
*** pnavarro has quit IRC22:17
david-lyleregarding the network quotas question from the last meeting.  I'm fairly sure that API is not implemented yet22:17
*** sarob has quit IRC22:17
david-lyleon the neutron side22:18
gabrielhurleyyeah, like I said I'm pretty sure I'm gonna bump it in the next day or two, I just wanted to get confirmation ;-)22:18
gabrielhurleyI don't like arbitrarily bumping people's blueprints without giving them a chance for a last-minute miracle22:18
gabrielhurleybut most likely it'll be in I somewhere22:19
gabrielhurleyon a different note, I believe the voting for the new UX tool ended last week, but if the winner was announced I missed it. I don't see jcoufal here, anyone else know what happened that?22:19
gabrielhurleya/that/there22:19
david-lyleaskbot22:19
gabrielhurleyah22:19
gabrielhurleycool22:19
david-lylehe's out this week22:19
gabrielhurleygreat, well I'm excited to start using that. I actually got a useful answer out of the openstack askbot today about ATC status. good times.22:20
*** galstrom has quit IRC22:21
gabrielhurleyjust for the record, I consider myself only nominally in charge of the design/UX community in openstack. I fully expect that community to develop on its own and for it to lead and guide itself. I will drive other projects (especially Horizon) to turn to that community, but if I seem aloof from these decisions, it's only 'cuz I don't feel they're mine to make any more than any other community member.22:22
david-lylejust nice to have a community to pose these questions to22:23
*** mrodden has quit IRC22:23
gabrielhurleyIt's likely that the UX group will (at some point) grow into its own team or sub-team under one of the existing programs with its own leadership of some sort and its own deliverables.22:23
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC22:24
david-lylea better tool will improve the experience, but just identifying the community was a big first step22:24
gabrielhurleyabsolutely22:24
gabrielhurley+100022:24
*** galstrom has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
david-lylewhen do the design session suggestions open up for the summit?22:25
gabrielhurleygood question, and I don't have an answer for that22:25
gabrielhurleysend a message to the ML, maybe?22:26
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC22:26
gabrielhurleyactually, ttx you still around? can you answer that?22:26
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting22:26
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting22:26
david-lyleok, didn't know if the allotment process of sessions was still in the works22:26
*** adjohn has quit IRC22:26
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting22:26
gabrielhurleythe allottment of which programs get how much time on what days is just now wrapped up.22:27
gabrielhurleyI expect the proposal phase to open soon22:27
david-lyleok, I'm not in a hurry, I'll look for the announcement22:27
gabrielhurleyfor sure. It'll be open for a couple weeks and I will definitely announce it when it happens.22:28
gabrielhurleyanybody else got things on their minds?22:28
gabrielhurleycool then22:30
gabrielhurleygood meeting folks22:30
gabrielhurleyhave a great week!22:30
gabrielhurley#endmeeting22:31
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:31
openstackMeeting ended Tue Aug 13 22:31:02 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:31
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2013/horizon.2013-08-13-22.00.html22:31
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2013/horizon.2013-08-13-22.00.txt22:31
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2013/horizon.2013-08-13-22.00.log.html22:31
*** changbl has quit IRC22:31
david-lyleThanks!22:31
*** gabrielhurley has quit IRC22:31
*** dripton has quit IRC22:31
*** vasiliy has quit IRC22:32
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** dripton has joined #openstack-meeting22:35
*** xBsd has quit IRC22:35
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:36
*** beagles has quit IRC22:36
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting22:38
*** beagles has joined #openstack-meeting22:42
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman22:42
*** AlanClark has quit IRC22:43
*** svarnau has left #openstack-meeting22:43
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away22:47
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman22:57
*** timductive1 has quit IRC22:57
*** wolfdreamer has quit IRC22:58
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC23:01
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting23:04
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC23:07
*** vaml has joined #openstack-meeting23:08
*** markpeek has quit IRC23:08
*** xBsd has joined #openstack-meeting23:10
*** _cerberu` is now known as _cerberus_23:11
*** sdague has quit IRC23:13
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC23:16
*** xBsd has quit IRC23:16
*** blamar has quit IRC23:18
*** kspear has quit IRC23:23
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC23:23
*** kebray has quit IRC23:24
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting23:26
*** nachi has joined #openstack-meeting23:26
*** nachi has left #openstack-meeting23:26
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC23:32
*** vaml1 has joined #openstack-meeting23:33
*** rdxc has quit IRC23:33
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** markwash has quit IRC23:40
*** sacharya has joined #openstack-meeting23:40
*** adjohn has quit IRC23:42
*** herndon has quit IRC23:43
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:49
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting23:58
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!