Tuesday, 2012-02-07

*** littleidea has quit IRC00:01
*** GheRivero has quit IRC00:09
*** bengrue has quit IRC00:13
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** littleidea has quit IRC00:16
*** bengrue has joined #openstack-meeting00:17
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting00:18
*** jakedahn has quit IRC00:54
*** bencherian has quit IRC01:02
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-meeting01:04
*** nati2 has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** bencherian has quit IRC01:12
*** jog0 has quit IRC01:13
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting01:13
*** dwalleck has quit IRC01:18
*** ravi_ has quit IRC01:20
*** oubiwann has quit IRC01:21
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting01:35
*** ohnoimdead has quit IRC02:00
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting02:02
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting02:29
*** littleidea has quit IRC02:38
*** ayoung has quit IRC02:39
*** ravi has joined #openstack-meeting02:42
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting02:44
*** jdurgin has quit IRC03:04
*** jog0 has left #openstack-meeting03:05
*** jog0_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC03:07
*** jog0_ has quit IRC03:10
*** littleidea has quit IRC03:26
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting03:27
*** gyee has quit IRC03:30
*** AlanClark has quit IRC03:33
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting03:33
*** nati2_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:36
*** adjohn has quit IRC03:38
*** nati2 has quit IRC03:38
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting03:40
*** AlanClark has quit IRC03:47
*** dwalleck has quit IRC03:56
*** deshantm has quit IRC04:03
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** Gordonz has quit IRC04:08
*** danwent has quit IRC04:09
*** dwcramer has quit IRC04:18
*** littleidea has quit IRC04:22
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting04:25
*** littleidea has quit IRC04:40
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting04:47
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting04:54
*** dwcramer has quit IRC04:59
*** littleidea has quit IRC05:05
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting05:06
*** Yak-n-Yeti has quit IRC05:13
*** dolphm has quit IRC05:15
*** littleidea has quit IRC05:18
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** dolphm_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:22
*** martine has quit IRC05:23
*** dolphm_ has quit IRC05:27
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC05:28
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting05:29
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting05:29
*** dolphm has quit IRC05:38
*** oubiwann has quit IRC06:08
*** mikal has quit IRC06:28
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting06:38
*** nati2 has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** nati2_ has quit IRC07:20
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC07:24
*** ravi has quit IRC07:34
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting07:35
*** nati2 has quit IRC07:39
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** littleidea has quit IRC08:05
*** danwent_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:56
*** danwent has quit IRC08:56
*** danwent_ is now known as danwent08:56
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting09:02
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC09:24
*** darraghb has quit IRC09:26
*** adjohn has quit IRC10:06
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting10:06
*** adjohn has quit IRC10:07
*** zigo has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC13:35
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates13:36
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** martine has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman13:52
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** dayou has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** hggdh has quit IRC14:05
*** hggdh has joined #openstack-meeting14:08
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk14:18
*** mattray has quit IRC14:19
*** dolphm has quit IRC14:21
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates14:21
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting14:23
*** dwcramer has quit IRC14:32
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
*** mattray has quit IRC14:38
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** littleidea has quit IRC15:03
*** littleidea_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** littleidea_ is now known as littleidea15:03
*** shang_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
*** shang has quit IRC15:04
*** dwalleck_nova has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
*** zigo has quit IRC15:16
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
*** Yak-n-Yeti has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
*** mattray has quit IRC15:22
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk15:24
*** Yak-n-Yeti has quit IRC15:27
*** dwalleck_nova has quit IRC15:35
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away15:38
*** dendro-afk is now known as dendrobates15:49
*** LinuxJedi has quit IRC15:52
*** LinuxJedi has joined #openstack-meeting15:52
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** deshantm has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** danwent has quit IRC16:02
*** ravi has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** dwalleck_nova has joined #openstack-meeting16:07
*** GheRivero has quit IRC16:10
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** littleidea has quit IRC16:15
*** heckj has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
*** dwalleck_nova has quit IRC16:32
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting16:35
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting16:36
*** mancdaz has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** ravi has quit IRC16:47
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** ravi has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** ravi has quit IRC16:51
*** deshantm_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:54
*** darraghb has left #openstack-meeting16:54
*** deshantm has quit IRC16:54
*** deshantm_ is now known as deshantm16:54
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** ghe_ has quit IRC17:06
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** ghe_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
*** nati2 has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting17:15
*** dolphm has quit IRC17:25
*** dwalleck_nova has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
*** derekh has quit IRC17:34
*** patelna has joined #openstack-meeting17:40
*** darraghb has quit IRC17:53
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
*** oubiwann has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
*** ohnoimdead has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
zns#startmeeting Keystone Team Meeting18:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Feb  7 18:01:02 2012 UTC.  The chair is zns. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.18:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Keystone Team Meeting)"18:01
znsHi - who's here for Keystone?18:01
dolphmo/18:01
znsHi Dolph!18:01
dolphmhola18:01
znsLet's wait till 12:05, if nobody joins we'll close the meeting.18:02
znsHow's it going?18:02
dolphmtrying to get my head around ksl18:03
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
znsI've seen a lot of activity on it. And been looking at the code myself, but have not had much time the last couple of weeks. I'll be able to spend some time on it later this week (and in fact plan to do some Active Directory backend work if I can figure it out).18:05
znsDo you feel we'll be able to get the merge done by E4?18:05
dolphmi don't have enough experience with it yet to say, but the list of gaps is shrinking pretty quick18:06
znscool.18:06
znsOK. Past 12:05. I'm closing the meeting. I'll come by in a bit to chat and see how I can help with KSL...18:06
zns#endmeeting18:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Openstack Meetings: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/"18:06
openstackMeeting ended Tue Feb  7 18:06:47 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:06
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-18.01.html18:06
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-18.01.txt18:06
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-18.01.log.html18:06
heckjo/18:07
*** dwalleck_nova has quit IRC18:07
*** littleidea has quit IRC18:08
znsheckj: hi - we closed the meeting since it was dolphm and I only.18:08
znsbut… I'm here.18:08
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
znsI see a lot of activity on ksl. I was saying I have not been available the past week but intend to do some work on it this week. How could I best help? Anything in particular or just pick something and code it?18:09
*** littleidea has left #openstack-meeting18:09
znsI also notice you guys are working off of github still, not gerrit. Is that right?18:09
heckjactually, that changed last night - we got the unit tests all passing on redux, so we're over using gerrit against "redux" now18:10
znscool.18:10
heckjI went through the hitlist of gaps and made them into bugs (tagged "redux") to track it18:10
heckjAnd we're tracking general work on etherpad.openstack.org/ksl (bug links in there too)18:11
znssaw that. so nothing left to track from etherpad?18:11
heckjWe're still tracking things that should ultimately go into blueprints on the Etherpad, and general status of what folks are working on18:11
heckjthere's plenty of low hanging fruit - including some documentation tasks, testing, and a few bugs to smooth with the current keystone command line interface (keystone-manage)18:12
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting18:14
ayoungo/  BTW18:14
ayoungheckj, zns I've been beating on the LDAP code for the past week in "Redux"18:15
heckjayoung - hop on the http://etherpad.openstack.org/ksl page and mark it down (near the bottom)18:16
heckjayoung - I think your drive for an LDAP back-end is a little different from the setup that I made a bug for (https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/928065) - which is specifically expecting to proxy to AD and not have permissions to change passwords or ability to update the LDAP schema18:17
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 928065 in keystone "implement SQL+LDAP backend for Identity" [Medium,Confirmed]18:17
ayoungheckj,   I was going based on the Feature that is already implemented in Keystone.18:18
ayoungObviosuly,  someone in the community felt strongly enough about LDAP support that they wrote it the first time around18:18
ayoungIt really isn't about the updates so much as it is about getting the Schema and the data model correct18:19
heckjayoung: Not saying it's bad, just not what I heard as a specific use case. Were you using that feature the way it was set up? We can easily make a bug to track your work and get it into there - another LDAP implementation against OpenLDAP isn't a bad thing at all!18:19
ayoungheckj, as I said before,  if we just want to proxy Auth,  the PAM approach is better.18:20
ayoungfully ACKing all of the objections  and so forth around PAM18:21
heckjayoung: even if nobody else has the need that I outlined in the bug, I do - but that doesn't obviate other needs. Let's mark up a bug around your work and list it in the hitlist on the etherpad18:23
ayoungheckj, OK18:24
heckjFor the record, I'm using "bugs" a bit inappropriately - much of this should really be in blueprints, but I didn't see a way to "tag" a blueprint to identify it as a part of the redux effort - so I just made everything into bugs for now18:25
ayoungheckj, thing is,  that feature is already implemented in Keystone Heavy.  Are we 100% moving to KSL prior to Essex launch?18:25
heckjayoung: I sure want to18:25
ayoungheckj, why?18:26
ayoungI mean,  I don't have a dog in this race...just heard a lot of "we really need to"18:26
ayoungJust seems like a risky call this close to launch,  and I don't have a firm grasp of the benefits.18:27
heckjayoung: because I view the project as significantly simpler and easier to debug and work with in a deployment context. I'm not screaming "need", but I would prefer to significantly simplified and consistent internal interfaces18:27
*** GheRivero has quit IRC18:28
ayoungheckj, since I only really now know the Backend code,  I can't speak to that.  I do know that the backend seems to be be pretty much defined by SQL Alchemy now,  which I find a little surprising18:29
ayoungIts what is making the LDAP code so tricky,  there is no place where the model is defined in non-SQL terms.18:29
heckjayoung: what's surprising about it? It's the commonly used mechanism in the rest of OpenStack18:29
ayoungheckj, what is surprising is that SQL is not how the world tends to view Identity Management.18:30
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
ayoungIt is one,  and I would say not even the dominant technolog used there.18:30
heckjayoung: ah, yeah. Most of the environments I'm in already have an external system that manages identity18:31
znsheckj: I have come across a few people using the existing LDAP code against LDAP as it is, so my guess is we should port that. Sounds like that's what ayoung is doing...18:31
ayoungSInce the Identity code is written to be pluggable,  I'd at least say that the  domain model should be  non-technology specific.18:31
heckjayound: there is a need for a simple testing/prototype setup, but the system will ideally shim back to other systems (over which we have little control by my experience), not store it locally.18:31
ayoungheckj, yes and no.  The size of an Openstack deployment likely dictates that we are going to want to push data into the IDentity store,  LDAP or otherwise18:32
heckjzns: yeap, which is why I suggested we mark it up as a bug and get it on the hit list on etherpad/KSL18:32
heckjayoung: a very valid use case18:34
znswe prototyped Keystone with SQL ALchemy when we started the project and that model stuck around (warts and all). yoriksar did the LDAP implementation using the model that was there. KSL should help cleanly decouple us form sql alchemy...18:35
znsayoung: yes, size often dictates. But not all large deployments I am familiar with use LDAP. Some use SQL, some even X500!18:36
ayoungheckj, so what I'd like to see laid out is this:  The domain model for IdM  in plain Python.  The Default Schema for SQL and LDAP  checked in as files readable by people with experience in those technologies,  and a clean way to map between them18:36
ayoungzns, right.  And even SQL implementations are likely to stray from the schema we've coded inthe SQL Alchemy code18:36
ayoungpoint is,  for a major deployment,  we should expect the implementor to have to write binding code for their IdM system18:37
znsI know dolphm wrote some doc pages for the schema (but I can't find them…)18:38
heckjayoung: that seems quite reasonable. For the basic implementation that uses some SQL, you get a significant benefit from having a schema that automatically upgrades on installation and update. You miss that with DDL files, but that schema should definitely be clearly laid out.18:38
ayoungheckj, can SQL Alchemy generate those from the code?18:38
heckjayoung: I believe so, yes - although I'm no SQLAlchemy expert18:39
ayoungI guess we can always reverse engineer the sqlite db file  and check those in18:39
znsFound it: http://keystone.openstack.org/backends.html18:39
ayoungheckj, zns, what would the most "pythonic"  way to represent that?18:42
ayoungWe really want is them to be "the super set of keys that the dictionary may contain"18:43
ayoungThe KSL code curently does it like this18:43
ayoungclass User(sql.ModelBase, sql.DictBase):18:43
ayoung    __tablename__ = 'user'18:43
ayoung    id = sql.Column(sql.String(64), primary_key=True)18:43
ayoung    name = sql.Column(sql.String(64), unique=True18:43
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
ayoungwhich gets passed to  sqlalchemy.ext.declarative.declarative_base()18:44
ayoungI'd really rather not refactor  the SQL Alchemy code in order to get the LDAP code in.18:45
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
*** mattray has quit IRC18:58
*** dwalleck_nova has joined #openstack-meeting19:02
mtaylorhey all - who wants to talk about CI19:04
mtaylor#startmeeting19:04
openstackMeeting started Tue Feb  7 19:04:16 2012 UTC.  The chair is mtaylor. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:04
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.19:04
*** dwcramer has quit IRC19:04
* zul watches tumbleweeds19:07
mtaylorwow. yeah. it's exciting19:09
mtaylorwell - just in case anyone who isn't zul is watching ...19:09
mtaylorwe've got paste and planet under control and are working on meetbot from an infrastructure side19:09
mtaylorwe've got several projects doing 2.6 and 2.7 testing via tox and by the end of this week we should have that rolled out to everyone (other than nova and swift)19:10
mtaylorwhich also means all of those build slaves will be oneiric finally (took way too long)19:10
mtaylorwe have someone starting work on finishing the jclouds plugin for jenkins finally19:11
mtaylorand ksl is in gerrit and chugging along19:11
mtaylorI think that's about status on stuff from our end19:11
mtaylornext week jeblair, LinuxJedi and I will be meeting in Boston19:12
*** sleepsonthefloo has joined #openstack-meeting19:12
mtaylorand I'm hoping to get nova and swift on the multi-python testing train as well19:13
*** dwcramer has joined #openstack-meeting19:17
deshantmmtaylor: did you or can you post your slides for your and jeblair's Linux AU conf talk?19:20
sorenmtaylor: What's blocking that?19:21
heckjoal19:21
heckj(er, ola)19:21
mtaylordeshantm: they are already online19:22
mtaylordeshantm: https://github.com/openstack-ci/publications/tree/master/lca19:22
deshantmmtaylor: thanks!19:22
mtaylorsoren: last time I tried running nova tests from within tox something went horribly wrong - I haven't tried again recently ... I think it might have been m2crypto related, which has obviously been sorted now19:23
mtaylormorning heckj !19:23
sorenmtaylor: Oh, has it?19:23
sorenmtaylor: It was busted for me last week.19:23
mtaylorsoren: patch just went in I believe19:23
sorenSo where are we getting m2crypto from now?19:24
sorenOh... You mean we finished the m2cryptosectomy?19:24
mtaylorwe're not19:24
mtayloryeah19:24
sorenAlright.19:24
mtaylorI believe, I haven't verified19:24
mtaylorbut I saw an m2cryptosectomy patch go through19:24
LinuxJedimtaylor: should we remove CI from that bug?19:31
mtaylorLinuxJedi: likely19:33
LinuxJediok19:33
*** mattray has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
mtaylorLinuxJedi: I say that - we should verify that if m2crypto is no longer needed that the crap in instal_venv which sudo apt-get installs it is also removed19:36
LinuxJedimtaylor: ack19:37
mtaylorok. it is19:40
LinuxJedimtaylor: #endmeeting?19:51
* heckj nods19:51
*** ravi has joined #openstack-meeting19:51
mtaylor#endmeeting19:55
*** openstack changes topic to "Openstack Meetings: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/"19:55
openstackMeeting ended Tue Feb  7 19:55:12 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:55
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-19.04.html19:55
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-19.04.txt19:55
mtaylorthanks all19:55
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-19.04.log.html19:55
mtaylorLinuxJedi: so, in the list of meetbot feature requests ...19:55
mtaylorLinuxJedi: those links should automatically be added to an index somewhere19:55
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
ttxmtaylor: you should reconsider the time of this meeting to try to get more people :)19:57
mtaylorttx: I would totally reconsider the time of this meeting19:58
mtaylorwe need folks in pacific time and folks in europe19:58
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
ttxI can do 1600 UTC on Mondays or Fridays... Maybe 1630 if the meeting is not too long.19:59
ttxPacific time and folks in Europe is notoriously difficult.19:59
LinuxJedimtaylor: ok, I really need to gather these on LP :)19:59
mtaylorLinuxJedi: yeah. hehe20:00
*** ravi has quit IRC20:00
mtaylorLinuxJedi: maybe make a meetbot bug tag as well20:00
mtaylorttx: the meeting often takes the full hour20:00
mtaylorttx: 1400 is 5 hours earlier than its current time ... that's 6am us west coast20:01
mtaylordamn20:01
mtaylorI will literally never make that meeting20:01
LinuxJedimtaylor: bug tag ++20:01
ttxWho said 1400?20:02
mtaylorhah. I have no idea20:02
mtaylor8am pacific. I can do 8am I think ... lemme check conflicts20:03
heckjoh… god… 8am?20:03
mtaylorwill we lose heckj?20:03
LinuxJedimtaylor: bug added, meetbot tag added, all assigned to me20:03
mtaylorwoot20:03
heckjthat'll be darned tough - I'm usually in transit (just about done) at that time. I'll likely be regularly late20:03
ttxheckj: how about 1630 ? That would make it 08:30am.20:04
heckjI'm usually in the office by then, so that would work20:04
ttxI can probably make it too, if on Mondays.20:04
LinuxJedisame here if Mondays20:05
mtaylorwell, I have meeting then on mondays - I could see if we could move it20:05
ttxAt least as long as we are not in summer time20:05
mtaylorsummer is coming20:05
LinuxJediah yes, the US has an offset summer time20:05
heckjwe totally fucked with anything like "normal" time.20:05
*** Yak-n-Yeti has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
mtaylorttx: let me ping purrier and jaypipes and see if we can move our monday meeting20:07
ttxmtaylor: no urgency.20:08
*** dcramer_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:09
*** nati2_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:11
*** ravi has joined #openstack-meeting20:11
*** nati2 has quit IRC20:12
*** dwcramer has quit IRC20:13
*** dcramer_ has quit IRC20:14
*** ravi has quit IRC20:17
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman20:21
*** nati2 has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** dwallec__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** dwalleck_nova has quit IRC20:30
*** nati2_ has quit IRC20:31
*** davlap has joined #openstack-meeting20:33
*** littleidea has quit IRC20:36
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting20:37
*** jwalcik has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
*** debo-os has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
*** littleidea has quit IRC20:47
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting20:47
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting20:47
*** thingee has joined #openstack-meeting20:51
termieHEYOOO20:54
heckjola20:54
*** ogelbukh has joined #openstack-meeting20:56
*** anotherjesse has joined #openstack-meeting20:58
*** blamar has quit IRC20:58
*** lzyeval has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** bcwaldon has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
sorenttx: ..21:00
ttxo/21:00
jaypipeso/21:01
znshola21:01
soren\o_21:01
ttxoops. Was contemplating archive lag.21:01
ttxthen I entered a meditative state.21:01
ttxnotmyname, vishy, devcamcar: around ?21:01
vishyo/21:01
vishysoren: you need pom-poms do do that move21:01
*** edconzel has joined #openstack-meeting21:02
ttxOK, let's get started, notmyname and devcamcar will probably catch up21:02
*** blamar has quit IRC21:02
sorenvishy: Nah, it's me falling on an icy sidewalk.21:02
ttx#startmeeting21:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Feb  7 21:03:00 2012 UTC.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.21:03
ttxToday's agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting21:03
*** ravi has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
ttx#topic Actions from last week21:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last week"21:03
*** Yak-n-Yeti has quit IRC21:03
ttx* jaypipes to assign or defer glance-bittorrent-delivery21:04
ttxLooks like that was done21:04
ttxactually, everything was done, so let's talk about something else21:05
ttx#topic Keystone status21:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Keystone status"21:05
ttxzns: o/21:05
termie\o21:05
heckjo/21:05
znsttx: hi. termie also here?21:05
znsyes.21:05
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/essex-421:05
termiewe've got the redux branches for devstack and keystone green in gerrit21:05
ttxdo we have a rough ETA for the merge ?21:06
termieready to merge once we agree upon what we consider "blockers" for merge21:06
ttxLooking at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bugs?field.tag=redux21:06
ttxtermie: What needs to go in *before* we can merge ?21:06
termieright now i think the "ksl" team have a different opinion on that than zns21:06
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
heckjI've got the total list of discussed elements in there, but there's not yet agreement on what's a blocker21:06
heckjtermie: ++21:06
termieso we're planning on finishing that discussion with zns today, assuming he has time21:06
znstermie: I do. I didn't know we had a disconnect on that. I'm available to talk through that.21:07
ttxHow are you marking the blockers ? E4 targeting ? Or Critical/High "redux-tagged" ?21:07
heckjttx: Critical & tagged with redux21:07
ttxheckj: ok, works for me.21:07
termieheckj: made a bunch of launchpad bugs and uglied up our etherpad :p21:07
heckj(the current bug list may need to be updated after the conversation this afternoon)21:07
ttxI'd really prefer to see the redux branch merged ASAP, ideally before next week...21:08
ttx...so that the buglist can be clearly reviewed to only include issues still affecting ksl21:08
termieme also21:08
heckj+10021:08
termiei don't think most of these things are actually blockers, so assuming we can convince zns i think we should be on track21:08
termieand we can be _very_ persuasive21:09
* termie winks21:09
ttx#action zns, heckj and termie to define list of blockers before redux merging21:09
ttxzns: who is working on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/keystone-test-refactor ?21:09
ttx(if it still makes sense)21:09
znsttx: I don't think anyone is. Doesn't make sense if we're merging soon...21:10
*** blamar has quit IRC21:10
heckjzns: retarget or kill?21:10
znskill21:10
ttxzns: OK, we should probably remove it from targets21:10
* heckj (does that)21:10
ttxack21:10
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
ttxAnything else on Keystone ?21:10
termiekeystone is dead, long live keystone!21:11
znsNothing else :-)21:11
ttxnotmyname: is the fire drill over ?21:11
notmynamealmost21:11
notmynamenot yet21:11
ttxwe can do Glance first.21:11
ttx#topic Glance status21:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance status"21:11
ttxjaypipes: yo21:12
*** blamar has quit IRC21:12
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/essex-421:12
*** Yak-n-Yeti has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
ttxjaypipes: around ?21:13
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
jaypipesttx: yup21:14
ttxAbout https://blueprints.launchpad.net/glance/+spec/progressbar-upload-image21:14
ttxjaypipes: the series goal is not set to accepted -- shall I confirm it ?21:14
jaypipesttx: yes, ty21:14
ttxjaypipes: Your medium/low E4-targeted bugs list looks under control21:14
jaypipesttx: ya, nothing too exciting.21:15
ttxAre you reasonably happy with the current state of Glance ? Or do you think the bug list doesn't really reflect reality ?21:15
*** blamar has quit IRC21:15
jaypipesttx: no, I'm happy with it.21:15
ttxjaypipes: Anything else ?21:15
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting21:16
jaypipesttx: nope21:16
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC21:16
ttxQuestions on Glance ?21:16
ttxnotmyname: ready ?21:18
notmynameok21:18
ttx#topic Swift status21:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Swift status"21:18
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.4.621:18
*** debo has joined #openstack-meeting21:18
ttxThanks for filling that up.21:18
*** blamar has quit IRC21:18
notmynamenp21:18
ttxnotmyname: Anything else you still wait on that would not be listed ?21:18
*** debo-os has quit IRC21:19
notmynameno, I'm not aware of any other new features (ie blueprints) that should get added21:19
*** dwallec__ has quit IRC21:19
*** debo is now known as debo-os21:19
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
*** somik has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
ttxnotmyname: When it's ready, push the changelog, then the new version number to master... I'll cut the milestone-proposed branch from the changelog commit.21:19
ttxnotmyname: does that sound like a plan ?21:19
notmynamewill do. the plan is to do that tomorrow21:20
ttxgreat21:20
notmynamethen have it ready by EOD friday21:20
ttxnotmyname: hmm, that's your EOD, right21:20
notmynameyes. I'll let you know (email?) when we're ok with it21:21
ttxI might need to find someone to push it, I'll be busy packing and traveling to my vacation spot by EOD friday21:21
ttxbut that should work.21:21
ttxnotmyname: Anything else ?21:22
*** blamar has quit IRC21:22
notmynameI'll be in santa clara next week at cloud connect. I'm happy to talk to anyone about swift while I'm there21:22
notmynamethat's all21:22
*** dwalleck_nova has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
ttxQuestions on Swift ?21:22
ttx#topic Nova status21:23
*** openstack changes topic to "Nova status"21:23
ttxvishy: hey21:23
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/essex-421:23
ttxLooks like more FFes have been accepted ?21:23
vishyhi21:23
ttxand you play the jaypipes and update the list at the last minute.21:24
vishyttx: I'm not totally sure how to manage covering stuff that is cleanup related21:24
vishyttx: sorry :)21:24
vishyjaypipes has been coaching me21:24
ttxI think it's good to track cleanups as blueprints as well. Leaves a good trace on the milestone page21:24
ttxmost of those last features added are harmless, I suppose...21:25
vishyttx: for example https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/keystone-export-rewrite21:25
ttx... but remember the idea of feature freeze is to focus on testing and bugs, not on adding as many harmless features as we can :)21:25
vishyttx: agreed21:25
ttxvishy: sounds good to me21:26
vishyttx: We have three FFes that haven't submitted code yet21:26
ttxso this is blocked by KSL merge ?21:26
ttx(the two blocked ones)21:26
vishyttx: yes, waiting on the merge21:26
vishyttx: the second one may have to wait for folsom21:26
vishyttx: depending on how the migration script is written21:27
ttxwhat you need from the merge is already in the redux branch ?21:27
*** thingee has quit IRC21:27
vishyttx: true, so perhaps blocked isn't the best description21:27
vishyttx: more like waiting21:27
ttxvishy: I can live with "Blocked"21:27
vishyttx: the people doing the work are focusing on the ksl merge first21:27
ttxfast-cloning-for-xenserver, heterogeneous-tilera-architecture-support look "almost in"21:27
ttxlibvirt-resize and remove-ajaxterm are proposed, need review21:28
vishyall 4 of those are really close21:28
vishyi expect them all in by tomorrow21:28
ttxzeromq-rpc-driver, nexenta-volume-driver, netapp-volume-driver have no code proposed yet21:28
ttxDo we have an ETA for them ?21:28
vishysounds like we will se a prop for zeromq by tomorrowish21:28
ewindischttx: I just completed today21:28
vishynetapp had a prop in but it was missing code, so I assume next day or two there as well21:28
vishynexenta I have no idea21:28
ttxOK, we should reach to them21:29
vishyi will send an email asking for status21:29
ttx#action vishy to reach to Oleg nexenta-volume-driver ETA21:30
ttxI think we should remove https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/consolidate-testing-infrastructure since there is no visible progress on it.21:30
vishythe last one, which I marked deferred, was the one from comstud21:30
vishyalthough, based on the last email, I'd like to at least see the code before we decide yes or no on that one21:30
ttxogelbukh: ETA on  nexenta-volume-driver ?21:30
ogelbukhgoing to get it to review by friday21:31
ttxoubiwann: OK to defer consolidate-testing-infrastructure ?21:31
ttxogelbukh: sounds good21:31
ttxvishy: sounds like we should defer https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/openstack-api-ssl too. Haven't seen much activity there21:32
vishyttx: yeah21:32
vishyttx: although man, it seems like that is kinda vital for some people21:32
vishyttx: so I don't know why we haven't seen a prop.  I guess there is always the nginx in front route21:32
ttxLet's defer both, and see if that triggers something21:33
vishyttx: should i retarget comstud's blueprint to e-4?21:33
ttxvishy: yes, I prefer to have it in scope rather than under the radar line21:33
ttxMaybe marked Blocked until we know if that will be accepted (with a note on the whiteboard saying why it's blocked)21:34
ttxWhat's the state of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-sweep ?21:34
*** salvorlando has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** thingee has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
vishydone21:34
vishyhaven't heard anything on that one21:35
vishymy comment in the whiteboard still applies21:35
vishyas a helper script e-4 is fine, but anything more than that is definitely Folsom21:36
vishylets leave it until friday, and I will defer it if we don't hear anything21:36
ttxok21:36
ttxvishy: Should I mark scaling-zones blocked like proposed above ?21:36
vishyalready did it21:37
ttxrefresh fail21:37
ttxvishy: status on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/optional-host-and-admin-information ? Not started ?21:37
vishyttx: anthony is working on that. Discovered that it really hard for admins via dashboard because ther is no way to find out where an instance is running21:38
vishyI think it is Not Started right now, but it is a pretty small change.21:38
ttxack21:38
ttxAll in all it doesn't look too bad -- critical path goes through redux branch merge, so we need that in ASAP.21:39
vishyttx: agreed. Our whole team is focusing on that for the next 3 days21:39
ttxvishy: Anything else ?21:39
vishyttx: I will be sending out an email update soon21:39
vishyttx: no other notes for the meeting21:39
ttxNova subteam leads: anything on your side ?21:40
ttxAnyone: Questions on Nova ?21:40
deshantmIs xenserver live migration (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/xenapi-live-migration) targeted for essex? I know it depends on host aggregates21:40
ttxdeshantm: no it's not21:40
ttxdefinitely not something I'd add during a feature-frozen period.21:41
vishydeshantm: definitely not essx21:41
vishyI mean it would be cool, it is just pushing it21:41
vishyf1 i think21:41
ttxdevcamcar: around ?21:42
devcamcaro/21:42
ttx#topic Horizon status21:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Horizon status"21:42
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/essex-421:42
*** clayg has left #openstack-meeting21:42
ttxLooking good so far ?21:42
devcamcarwe've been churning through buts quickly21:43
ttxbuts ?21:43
devcamcarmost of the blue prints are very small in scope21:43
ttxdevcamcar: Do you have an ETA for ec2-credentials-download and improve-visual-design ?21:43
devcamcarsome of the ux table changes may not land21:43
devcamcarec2 credentials is in review i believe21:43
devcamcarimprove visual design will be closed soon21:43
ttxok, so before mid-E421:44
ohnoimdeadtable changes are done afaik21:44
ttxsounds good.21:44
devcamcarohnoimdead: things like https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88447321:44
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 884473 in horizon "UX Improvements: Overall Table Changes - Add table menu to add/remove columns" [High,Confirmed]21:44
ttxYour list of 50+ open E4-targeted bugs is a bit scary.21:44
ttxdevcamcar: Do you think you can fix all of them before the end of the month ?21:44
devcamcarwe've been averaging 40-50 fixes per milestone21:45
devcamcarseems doable21:45
*** dolphm has quit IRC21:45
* ttx takes bets21:45
devcamcari do need to go back over the remaining items and ensure priority is still accurate21:45
ttxok21:45
ttxdevcamcar: Anything else ?21:45
devcamcargoal will be for at least everything medium or higher to land21:46
devcamcari see a few mediums that can be lowered21:46
devcamcari'll review with the gang21:46
ohnoimdeaddevcamcar: how do you feel about punting the swift ui improvements out of e4?21:46
devcamcarwould like to see it land but we will do what must be done21:47
ttxQuestions for Horizon ?21:47
ttx#topic Incubated projects and other Team reports21:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Incubated projects and other Team reports"21:48
ttxdanwent, troytoman: yo21:48
troytomano/21:48
danwenthi21:48
danwenttroy, you go first :)21:48
troytomanwith melange we are just focused on bug fixing and finalizing a 1.0 api21:48
troytomanalso working with dan went to improve quantum manager test coverage, etc21:49
ttxtroytoman: do you plan to file for Core inclusion ?21:49
troytomanunder discussion. know we need to make a decision soon21:49
ttxyes, before the end of the month in all cases.21:49
troytomanunderstood21:49
ttxdanwent: what news ?21:50
danwenthttps://launchpad.net/quantum/+milestone/essex-421:50
danwentwe're making a big push around testing.21:50
danwenttrying to get some system/integration tests into devstack repo (debo is leading this)21:50
danwentand drastically improving coverage in Quantum Manager code in nvoa21:51
danwentnova21:51
danwentalso will be welcoming a few new plugins to the server codebase.21:51
*** debo-os has quit IRC21:51
ttxdanwent: I kinda expected you'd file for Core this week ?21:51
danwentworking with horizon team to try and clean things up for essex21:51
danwentI was planning on next tuesday21:51
danwentis there a PPB meeting?21:51
ttxWaiting for me to be in vacation, I see21:51
ttxThere is a PPB meeting if there is something to discuss.21:52
danwentah, sorry.  can wait another week if you prefer.21:52
danwentbut yes, we're planning on applying for inclusion in core.  Plan was to do it next week, but I'm flexible.  ping me if you have suggestions.21:52
ttxcan't hurt to propose early, in case the board asks for some time to review21:52
danwentexactly my thinking21:52
*** bhall has joined #openstack-meeting21:53
*** bhall has quit IRC21:53
*** bhall has joined #openstack-meeting21:53
ttxand I can give my vote by email if needed.21:53
danwentgreat, thanks (i hope) :)21:53
ttxdanwent: anything else ?21:53
danwentthat's really all from my end.21:53
ttxAny other team lead with a status report ? annegentle, mtaylor ?21:53
*** jlm^ has joined #openstack-meeting21:56
ttxhmm, guess not21:56
ttx#topic Open discussion21:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion"21:56
ttxNote that I won't be here next week, so I will ask another release team member to run the show21:57
ttxOpenStack@FOSDEM went well, I think, if you exclude the cold.21:57
*** martine has quit IRC21:57
ttxAnything else, anyone ?21:58
deshantmttx: were any slides or videos related to openstack posted anywhere?21:58
deshantm(for fosem)21:58
ttxdeshantm: my presentation is at http://ubuntuone.com/7gWt56Ue24mpkgIRJbO4gT21:59
annegentlehere, late :) We're working on releasing api.openstack.org, hopefully linking to The FreeCloud.21:59
ttxWill see if we can make presenters upload theirs to the devroom wiki21:59
annegentleThe Free Cloud (freak loud!) should launch soon - hopefully next week.22:00
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
ttxok then.22:01
ttxLet's leave the room to netstackers.22:01
annegentlealso look for a Foundation meet up at Cloud Connect - see http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation, Feb 15th at 4:3022:01
ttx#endmeeting22:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Openstack Meetings: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/"22:01
openstackMeeting ended Tue Feb  7 22:01:47 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-21.03.html22:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-21.03.txt22:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-21.03.log.html22:01
ttxoops22:01
ttxannegentle: cut you in the middle of your talk, sorry :)22:02
*** jwalcik has left #openstack-meeting22:02
annegentlettx: no worries, that was the last "thing"22:02
*** lzyeval has quit IRC22:02
annegentlenetstackers, take it away!22:02
danwentthanks!22:02
danwenthey netstack team!22:02
mesteryHey folks!22:03
davlapo/22:03
markvoelkero/22:03
danwenttough crowd :P22:03
danwent#startmeeting22:03
openstackMeeting started Tue Feb  7 22:03:28 2012 UTC.  The chair is danwent. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic.22:03
danwent#link  agenda: http://wiki.openstack.org/Network/Meetings22:03
salvorlandohello netstackers!22:04
danwent#info just a reminding to everyone that feature freeze/branch point for E-4 will be one week earlier than normal.  Feb 21st.22:04
danwentwe need to avoid last minute merges that take our time away from testing.22:04
danwent#info: curent items for E-4: https://launchpad.net/quantum/+milestone/essex-422:05
danwentbiggest thing that stands out is that v1.1 client is unassigned22:05
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
salvorlandoagreed22:05
danwentSalv, I know you mentioned that you might be able to do that, though at the cost of other API work.  Is that still the case?22:06
salvorlandoI'd be happy to take it,  but I don't feel sure about ability of deliver... not a lot of spare dev cycles.22:06
salvorlandoI have two outstanding work items on API.22:06
danwentsalvorlando: can either of those items drop?22:06
danwentseems like having a client that can leverage 1.1 features is important.22:07
salvorlandomaybe resource links...it does not appear to be a huge amount of requests22:07
salvorlandoof request for it.22:07
salvorlandoagreed.22:07
salvorlandoI can definitely drop resource links (already dropped rate limiting)22:07
danwentyeah, I'm all for pruning to the most important stuff early22:07
salvorlandoas concerns pagination for responses, I'd try to merge it. The code is already there, altough I need to rebase and repush as the review expired22:08
danwentyeah, i remember the code was really close.22:08
salvorlandowe just decided to defer it to make reviews easier.22:08
danwentah, ok.22:09
danwentso it sounds like i have a soft yes on the client work?22:09
salvorlandoIt is a soft yes... right :)22:09
danwentok, thanks :)22:10
salvorlandowill make it either a "hard yes" or a  "no" in the next 36 hours...22:10
danwentok, sounds good.22:10
danwentdebo-os update on merge of system test stuff into devstack?22:10
danwentdo we know who to talk to in order to try and get it running automatically on builds?22:11
danwentcarlp: do you still have that infrastructure available?22:11
*** thingee has left #openstack-meeting22:11
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
danwenthrmm…  we'll try and come back to that topic when the owners aren't asleep :)22:12
carlpYes22:12
*** blamar has quit IRC22:12
danwentah, just in time22:12
carlpSorry, got two things going at once :)22:12
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
carlpYes, the hardware is available and ready for use!22:12
danwent#action #debo-os  contact #carlp with info on how to run quantum excercise.sh within devstack.22:13
danwentthat would be really great to have that going and emailing us if things break22:13
*** nati2 has quit IRC22:13
carlpyes, that was my plan22:13
danwentsweet.  we should have enough to get the whole system up and running end-to-end22:13
danwentI have some additions to the excercise.sh script, but for now I'd just focus on getting the env setup with the initial version of the script.22:14
danwentanything else on system test?22:14
danwentOk, next up in the linux bridge plugin, which is long overdue for merging.  Salv and I have promised reviews today + tomorrow, so hopefully we can iterate quickly and have it in by end of week.22:15
danwentsumit, anything to add?22:15
SumitNaiksatamgreat...thanks.22:15
SumitNaiksatamno nothing to add22:15
SumitNaiksatamwe did some testing22:15
SumitNaiksatamedgar and shweta22:15
SumitNaiksatamso far so good22:15
*** adjohn has quit IRC22:16
SumitNaiksatamShweta found another issue with creating networks for non-admin users22:16
SumitNaiksatamnot linux bridge plugin specific22:16
danwentgreat.  we'll have to figure out the questions of how to handle shared code, but I think merging it and getting it in for E-4 is the key thing to focus on.22:16
SumitNaiksatamwe can take that up later22:16
*** uri-elzur has joined #openstack-meeting22:16
SumitNaiksatamyeah, good point on the shared code22:16
danwentsumit: is this the email she sent out last night?22:16
SumitNaiksatamsaw the emails22:16
SumitNaiksatamyeah, the one she sent yesterday night22:16
*** anotherjesse has quit IRC22:17
*** jlm^ has quit IRC22:17
danwentyeah, would be good to get an exact env. and set of commands to run.  once a bug like that is reproducable, they are usually quite easy to fix.  I  saw a bug like that when working on the unit tests, but it was actually the result of a misconfig.  Would be good to see how to repro.22:17
SumitNaiksatamok, will get back to you on that22:17
*** sleepsonthefloo has quit IRC22:17
danwentWe also need to get reviews in on the Ryu plugin, as that too was deferred from E-322:18
SumitNaiksatamwe just wanted to quickly check if you were also seeing it22:18
danwentSumit:  smart thing to do until we get better test coverage in Nova for Quantum Manager.22:18
danwenton that note:  i sent an email about a patch to improve quantum manger test coverage.22:19
danwenthere's the review: https://review.openstack.org/385822:19
danwentI'd encourage people to review it, and think about additional testing that could be added.22:19
danwentOne huge gap is to improve the melange test coverage.22:19
danwentmy patch does not address it.22:19
danwent(this is melange client code within Quantum Manager that calls melange, not the melange service itself)22:20
*** dcramer__ has quit IRC22:20
danwentis debo-os here?22:20
*** jlm^ has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
danwent#action #debo-os check with vishy to confirm that nova work on VPN means that there is a decent VPN + Quantum optioin for Essex22:21
danwentassuming that is the case, we'll defer further VPN parity work to Folsom (or a separate service… TBD)22:21
danwentanyone here working on the horizon + quantum stuff?22:22
danwentI saw that vishy fixed the vif API bug, which was the main thing breaking quantum + horizon.  But we still need to shift horizon more to a quantum-manager style model, rather than a manual vif-plugging model.22:22
danwent#action #danwent poke ML to see if we need any BPs/bugs targeted for quantum + horizon work.22:23
danwentLast topic on my list is the authz middleware.   I'm hoping someone from Nicira can take this one on in E-4, but its definitely at risk, so if its important to you, I'd speak up.22:23
danwentbtw, got an email update from debo-os via phone22:24
salvorlandoexcuse? email update via phone??22:25
danwenthe's working on modularizing the excersie.sh code, so we can have multiple tests that have a shared "library" of quantum setup logic22:25
danwentyes, he says his phone IRC client isn't working.22:25
danwentwe'll have to figure out an appropriate disciplinary action :)22:25
salvorlando:)22:25
danwentOk, so E-4 is branching Feb 21st, don't forget.22:26
* markvoelker votes that debo must bring us all donuts22:26
danwentdonuts via IRC?? delicious22:26
*** littleidea has quit IRC22:26
bhallmmm.. donuts22:26
danwentand please take some time to contribute to one of the testing efforts, quantum-manager unit tests, quantum unit tests, or quantum + nova system/integration test.22:27
danwentas the system becomes more complex, it will be brittle is we don't have great test coverage, so we need to suck it up and write some tests :)22:27
danwentOk, anything else specific to E-4?22:27
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting22:28
danwent#topic open discussion22:28
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion"22:28
danwentI have a couple things to mention22:28
*** Yak-n-Yeti has quit IRC22:28
danwentas discussed last week, and in the main openstack meeting, we're planning on applying to become a core project for the Folsom release22:29
*** Yak-n-Yeti has joined #openstack-meeting22:29
danwentsome folks from melange have also been talking about whether it makes sense to merge melange into quantum22:29
danwentseparate code for the most part, but a shared API layer, docs, project org, meetings, etc.22:29
danwentprobably a good thing to discuss in detail at the summit (April 16th, save the date!)22:30
danwentbut wanted to let it stew a bit before then.22:30
salvorlandoI think it makes sense to finally have a project called NetStack, as it was meant to be in the beginning!22:30
danwent:)22:30
danwentsalvatore's an originalist.  the one thing people will never agree on is naming :)  probably best discussed over beer22:31
danwentonly other topic was to mention a bay area meeting we were will be talking about quantum: http://www.meetup.com/openstack/events/41485502/22:32
mesteryNote: Most things are best discussed over beer. :)22:32
salvorlandojokes apart, I'm for the merger.22:32
danwentthis thursday22:32
*** joesavak has quit IRC22:32
salvorlandomestery: or over alcoholic beverages in general22:32
danwentok, any other items for open discussion before we adjorn for beverages?22:32
danwentbtw, it was realy exciting to have so many new people participating in the bug squashing22:33
rkukuraanyone object to dropping setup_*.py files?22:33
danwent15+ people, very cool22:33
bhallrkukura: I'm all for it.. nuke 'em!22:34
*** mattray has quit IRC22:34
GheRiveroshoot them all rkukura22:34
danwentrkukura: yeah, really appreciate the work you've been doing22:34
danwentOk folks.  several threads on the ML to follow-up on.  Reviews for linux bridge + ryu plugins, and general dev for E-4.  Sounds like a plan!22:35
danwenthave a good week all22:35
salvorlandoyou too22:35
danwent#endmeeting22:35
*** openstack changes topic to "Openstack Meetings: http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2011/"22:35
openstackMeeting ended Tue Feb  7 22:35:35 2012 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:35
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-22.03.html22:35
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-22.03.txt22:35
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack-meeting/2012/openstack-meeting.2012-02-07-22.03.log.html22:35
salvorlandobye!22:35
*** salvorlando has left #openstack-meeting22:35
carlpdanwent: Got a few?22:35
*** markvoelker has quit IRC22:35
*** uri-elzur has quit IRC22:35
*** somik has quit IRC22:38
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting22:38
*** rkukura has quit IRC22:38
*** jlm^ has left #openstack-meeting22:38
*** littleidea has quit IRC22:38
*** Gordonz has quit IRC22:39
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC22:39
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
*** sleepsonthefloo has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** littleidea has quit IRC22:45
*** edgar__ has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-meeting22:46
*** edgar__ has quit IRC22:47
*** Yak-n-Yeti has quit IRC22:48
*** bhall has quit IRC22:51
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting22:51
*** davlap has quit IRC23:02
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC23:05
*** davlap has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** jog0 has quit IRC23:13
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting23:13
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-afk23:22
*** mdomsch has quit IRC23:24
*** dendrobates is now known as dendro-afk23:28
*** littleidea has quit IRC23:33
*** dwalleck_nova has quit IRC23:34
*** ravi has quit IRC23:43
*** ravi has joined #openstack-meeting23:44
*** zns has quit IRC23:45
*** truzie has joined #openstack-meeting23:46
*** truzie has left #openstack-meeting23:47
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting23:50
*** nati2 has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** Yak-n-Yeti has joined #openstack-meeting23:53
*** davlap has quit IRC23:55
*** ravi_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!