| *** reed_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 02:34 | |
| *** reed_ has quit IRC | 02:36 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 02:39 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 03:55 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 04:33 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 04:39 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 05:28 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 05:33 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 06:22 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 06:26 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 07:16 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-defcore | 07:21 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 07:21 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 08:10 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 08:14 | |
| *** amitkqed has quit IRC | 09:04 | |
| *** amitkqed has joined #openstack-defcore | 09:04 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 09:04 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 09:09 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 09:58 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 10:04 | |
| *** amit213 has quit IRC | 10:10 | |
| *** amit213 has joined #openstack-defcore | 10:12 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 11:52 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-defcore | 12:19 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 13:19 | |
| *** skazi_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:21 | |
| *** skazi_ is now known as skazi | 13:22 | |
| *** topol has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:23 | |
| *** hj-hpe has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:39 | |
| *** jokoester has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:43 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:46 | |
| *** rarcea has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:50 | |
| *** Kenji_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:51 | |
| topol | catehrineD you here? | 13:55 |
|---|---|---|
| topol | catherineD ^ | 13:56 |
| markvoelker | topol: She's here in the room in San Antonio. I'll ping her for you. | 13:56 |
| *** shamail has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:56 | |
| catherineD | topol hello | 13:56 |
| topol | markvoelker, Yay I'm in the right place | 13:56 |
| *** rohit404 has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:57 | |
| *** woodburn has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:57 | |
| *** rockyg has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:57 | |
| *** brunssen has joined #openstack-defcore | 13:59 | |
| brunssen | o/ | 13:59 |
| catherineD | o/ | 13:59 |
| markvoelker | o/ | 13:59 |
| jokoester | Link to etherpad - https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2016-08-03 | 13:59 |
| rohit404 | o/ | 13:59 |
| shamail | #startmeeting interop_challenge | 14:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Wed Aug 3 14:00:10 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is shamail. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'interop_challenge' | 14:00 |
| shamail | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2016-08-03 | 14:00 |
| catherineD | o/ | 14:00 |
| shamail | #chair topol | 14:00 |
| brunssen | o/ | 14:00 |
| openstack | Current chairs: shamail topol | 14:00 |
| *** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:00 | |
| rohit404 | o/ | 14:00 |
| gema | o/ | 14:00 |
| rockyg | o/ | 14:00 |
| eglute | eglute o/ | 14:00 |
| *** jkomg has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:00 | |
| MarkBaker | o/ | 14:00 |
| topol | o/ | 14:01 |
| hj-hpe | o/ | 14:01 |
| *** lizdurst has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:01 | |
| topol | So we have the conf call open to see if folks need help getting on the irc channel | 14:01 |
| *** leong has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:01 | |
| topol | we have an agenda at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2016-08-03 | 14:01 |
| *** esker has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:01 | |
| leong | o/ | 14:02 |
| hj-hpe | Greetings, my name is Hank Janssen and I work for Hewlett Packard Enterprises. I have been asked to join/lurk. I am on IRC (as you can see) do I need the cons call as well? | 14:02 |
| *** tong_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:02 | |
| *** zhipeng has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:02 | |
| *** Kenji_ has quit IRC | 14:02 | |
| topol | meeting will be on IRC. conf call just to help new folks onto irc | 14:02 |
| hj-hpe | Than I am in business. Thank you | 14:03 |
| esker | interop discussion here or on openstack-meeting / openstack-meeting-alt ? | 14:03 |
| *** markvoelker_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:04 | |
| shamail | Hi esker, it is here. | 14:04 |
| hogepodge | O/ | 14:04 |
| *** markvoelker_ has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
| *** Kenji_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:04 | |
| esker | shamail: thx | 14:04 |
| *** tongli has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:05 | |
| shamail | np | 14:05 |
| tongli | it worked now. | 14:05 |
| tongli | had to quit limechat , then come back in. | 14:05 |
| topol | lets get started | 14:05 |
| eeiden | o/ | 14:06 |
| topol | shamail you want to do the meeting commands for us | 14:06 |
| topol | first topic on the agenda | 14:06 |
| *** brunssen_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:06 | |
| *** zhipeng has quit IRC | 14:06 | |
| shamail | topol: sure | 14:06 |
| topol | #topic other tools | 14:06 |
| *** tong_ has quit IRC | 14:07 | |
| *** zhipeng has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:07 | |
| *** wendar has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:07 | |
| topol | I dont think I have authority on this channel to set the topic | 14:07 |
| shamail | #topic other tools | 14:07 |
| shamail | You are chair | 14:07 |
| *** Daisuke has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:07 | |
| shamail | it just isn’t showing it | 14:07 |
| MarkBaker | use a / | 14:07 |
| *** brunssen has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
| *** brunssen_ has quit IRC | 14:08 | |
| topol | did anyone want to propose other tools for running the workloads | 14:08 |
| *** brunssen has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:08 | |
| brunssen | o/ | 14:09 |
| topol | my view is if you have these tools so that everyone can try them I think thats what's necessary | 14:09 |
| leong | have u run the "startmeeting" command? | 14:09 |
| shamail | Can we start with a brief overview of which tools have been submitted thus far? | 14:09 |
| topol | agreed | 14:09 |
| shamail | hi leong: started it already as ‘interop_challenge’ | 14:10 |
| topol | so far all we have is an example using terraform | 14:10 |
| rockyg | Do we want to include the tools that the app group is using, such as libcloud, etc? | 14:10 |
| topol | MarkBaker were you the one that mentioned this topic? | 14:10 |
| shamail | We have also discussed the possibility of using the Heat templates created as a part of the Reference Architecture for EWG | 14:11 |
| MarkBaker | topol - I raised this agenda item. So I wanted to know if Red hat folks want to propose Ansible, or Ubuntu folks want to propose Juju, what is the process? | 14:11 |
| leong | ok shamail | 14:11 |
| MarkBaker | AFAIk terraform is not common to all distributions | 14:11 |
| *** GUEST_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:11 | |
| topol | MarkBaker I think the process is code talks. submit it for all of us to try? | 14:11 |
| markvoelker | My thinking is that any commonly-used tool with running code that's reasonably easy for folks to run should be fine...Heat, Terraform, Ansible, Fog all seem like reasonable candidates | 14:11 |
| hogepodge | +1 | 14:12 |
| topol | markvoelker +1 | 14:12 |
| *** GUEST_ has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
| markvoelker | As topol notes, I think it's mostly a matter of "if we have a [terraform|heat|etc] workload, how do we submit it for the group to consider?" | 14:12 |
| MarkBaker | markvoelker, agreed | 14:13 |
| tongli | hi brad. | 14:13 |
| markvoelker | E.g. are we just putting them in an etherpad somewhere? | 14:13 |
| shamail | markvoelker: +1. The requirements should be commonly-used tool, easily accessible by all, and documented instructions on how to use/deploy | 14:13 |
| *** Tetsuo has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:13 | |
| topol | so we have tongli to help try anything that anyone submits | 14:13 |
| rockyg | Apps ecosystem have the "first app" running in shade and fog. | 14:14 |
| markvoelker | topol: So if I have a workload I think we might want to use for the challenge, just email it to tongli? | 14:14 |
| rockyg | I think they also have heat. | 14:14 |
| tongli | https://github.com/kennjason/osops-tools-contrib | 14:14 |
| tongli | are we using this repository? | 14:14 |
| shamail | I thought we were going to use the OpenStack repo: https://github.com/openstack/osops-tools-contrib? | 14:14 |
| leong | the EWG is working on a series of Workload Reference Architecture, with Heat as a sample code to bootstrap the "workload" | 14:14 |
| markvoelker | Ok, so submit a pull request to the osops-tools-contrib repo then? | 14:15 |
| topol | shamail +1 | 14:15 |
| topol | leong that sounds cool | 14:15 |
| leong | can we collaborate together and use those workload/heat template | 14:15 |
| topol | leong that sounds good to me | 14:15 |
| leong | so far we have 3-tier LAMP web app, ecommerce, big-data (hadoop) and media transcoding | 14:15 |
| rockyg | I think the osops-tools-contrib has a lower bar for getting through the review process. | 14:15 |
| leong | the 3-tier lamp is ready for testing | 14:15 |
| shamail | tongli: can you please type here so people on IRC are participating as well? | 14:16 |
| shamail | We are having two conversations (one on IRC and one on phone) | 14:16 |
| markvoelker | Or rather in gerrit: https://review.openstack.org/gitweb?p=openstack/osops-tools-contrib.git;a=summary | 14:16 |
| topol | so action item document how folks can submit a workload | 14:16 |
| markvoelker | topol: yes please. =) | 14:17 |
| tongli | ok this is the url | 14:17 |
| tongli | https://github.com/openstack/osops-tools-contrib | 14:17 |
| wendar | The phone conversation is about who has +2 and +A on the repo. | 14:17 |
| shamail | #action Document how to submit requests for new tools (markvoelker, shamail) | 14:17 |
| topol | Ok action item captured. Lets see those new workloads flow in | 14:18 |
| *** dwalleck has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:18 | |
| shamail | #info Disconnecting from the phone bridge and moving to IRC only | 14:18 |
| topol | shamail Yay! | 14:19 |
| topol | will be irc only for all meetings after this | 14:19 |
| gema | where are the objectives for this work? | 14:19 |
| tongli | @topol, +1 | 14:19 |
| gema | feeling a bit confused and out of context | 14:19 |
| topol | gema, we have a background deck we can send you. But in a nutsheel its showing all the OpenStack Clouds can run the same workloads. so its demonstrating portable workloads | 14:20 |
| topol | #topic clouds readily available | 14:21 |
| gema | topol: ack, a link to the deck in this meeting log would be good | 14:21 |
| hj-hpe | Being the newbie here, the intent is to show workload interoperability, not cloud interoperability? | 14:21 |
| MarkBaker | gema, https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9udXv_O5_TsaktrSm5uNlAtVFZZWTZkck8xZ0ItcEprMlBj | 14:21 |
| gema | MarkBaker: thanks! | 14:21 |
| shamail | #link https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B9udXv_O5_TsaktrSm5uNlAtVFZZWTZkck8xZ0ItcEprMlBj | 14:21 |
| * markvoelker adds that to the etherpad too | 14:22 | |
| tongli | hmmm, I thought this is very much about interoperability. | 14:22 |
| catherineD | so as of right now one workload fromalready exists in this repository (teraform/docker swarm) | 14:22 |
| topol | tongli baby steps | 14:22 |
| zhipeng | so the outputs would be test scripts ? | 14:22 |
| shamail | #link https://github.com/openstack/osops-tools-contrib/tree/master/terraform | 14:22 |
| topol | so please sets get those other workloads added and available for all to test | 14:22 |
| zhipeng | or only showing test results would be fine ? | 14:22 |
| *** TKFJT has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:23 | |
| catherineD | To me this project is about cloud interop at the workload level ... | 14:23 |
| topol | catherineD agreed | 14:23 |
| brunssen | @catherineD +1 | 14:23 |
| topol | okay if we go on to second topic? | 14:23 |
| dwalleck | hj-hpe: My understanding is that this is interop at a user level (workload) vs API level | 14:23 |
| markvoelker | topol: ++, next topic | 14:23 |
| catherineD | cloud interop would include API, Image,workload ... levels ..but this project's focus is for workload interop | 14:24 |
| topol | we were asked if folks had public facing clouds that folks could use to test on | 14:24 |
| topol | in our last meeting the assumption was everyone tested on their clouds whether they had an on-prem or public | 14:24 |
| hj-hpe | That helps Dwalleck, thank you! | 14:24 |
| tongli | can someone explain workload level a bit, please? | 14:24 |
| shamail | catherineD: +1, this efforts focuses on workload mobility/portability using tools that leverage OpenStack-Powered clouds (e.g. passed DefCore) | 14:24 |
| rockyg | Isn't it workload portability rather than workload interop? | 14:24 |
| markvoelker | topol: Yeah, I was planning on running the tests myself on our internal lab gear | 14:25 |
| zhipeng | tongli ++ | 14:25 |
| shamail | topol: +1 | 14:25 |
| MarkBaker | rockyg, +1 | 14:25 |
| topol | rockyg +1 | 14:25 |
| shamail | We should still set #topic even if its not working :) | 14:25 |
| topol | #topic public cloud avail | 14:26 |
| brunssen | rockyg +1 | 14:26 |
| tongli | @catherineD, can you tell a bit more about workload level, I do not really get what that means. | 14:26 |
| rockyg | Ok. So, to zhipeng's question. Once we have the worloads/apps, do we also come up with some scenario tests to demonstrate they work? | 14:26 |
| topol | So I dont believe we have public clouds for folks to use and everyone should test on their own infrastructures unless someone volunteeers that they have this availabke | 14:26 |
| rockyg | can we ask OSIC for some resources? | 14:27 |
| leong | you can put in the request to OSIC | 14:27 |
| leong | but access to OSIC requires VPN | 14:27 |
| topol | leong, very cool. thats good to know | 14:27 |
| leong | https://osic.org/clusters | 14:27 |
| markvoelker | rockyg: do we actually need them? I was sort of under the impression that participants would run the tests on their own and report back... | 14:28 |
| topol | shamail can you record that on the etherpad | 14:28 |
| leong | #link OSIC Request Form https://osic.org/clusters | 14:28 |
| topol | markvoelker your assumption is correct. | 14:28 |
| shamail | Sure | 14:28 |
| jkomg | The objective is to run this on multiple clouds, showing interop | 14:28 |
| rockyg | I think we need a "neutral body" for the basic check | 14:28 |
| topol | Its not required but the canonical folks asked if the option was available | 14:28 |
| leong | +1 markvoelker | 14:28 |
| *** brunssen has quit IRC | 14:29 | |
| catherineD | markvoelker: for testing .. as understand from the last meeting , hogepodge: suggested that every clouds participated in this project should first run a complete RefStack API tests then run the tests in the interop workload (the only one exists today is teraform/docker swarm ..) | 14:29 |
| jkomg | I'm willing to allow users to hit one of my test clusters if they want to run it as a "neutral body" | 14:29 |
| dwalleck | (works on OSIC) So would the task be for testing the scripts used to create the workloads? Or to test portability/iterop with one of the OSIC clusters? | 14:29 |
| topol | So for Barcelona and being able to show demos of the workloads running on the different clouds was what we were shooting for | 14:29 |
| topol | so new topic | 14:30 |
| shamail | dwalleck: I would think it would be the former (testing scripts) since the goal would be to eventually run the scripts on your own clouds/deployments | 14:30 |
| markvoelker | topol: +1, I think showing the same workload running on multiple clouds is where the value is here | 14:30 |
| topol | we okay to move on to which openstack versions people are using? | 14:30 |
| topol | markvoelker exactly | 14:31 |
| shamail | markvoelker: +1 | 14:31 |
| tongli | should we collect the run results. | 14:31 |
| tongli | that will be kind nice if we collect these over time. | 14:31 |
| topol | tongli if the worklods have those, sure | 14:31 |
| topol | new topic | 14:32 |
| leong | we need a place for people to download the workload scripts, and share/report back the results in a centralised place | 14:32 |
| * markvoelker glances at the clock | 14:32 | |
| tongli | Not this ? https://github.com/openstack/osops-tools-contrib | 14:32 |
| topol | leong, any suggestions on what that should be? could we use the same repository? | 14:32 |
| markvoelker | I agree we need some way to collect results, so how about if I volunteer to work with tongli/topol offline to come up with a plan and we'll present it next meeting? | 14:32 |
| shamail | leong: the plan is to submit all scripts to https://github.com/openstack/osops-tools-contrib (we should submit the EWG RA templates here too) | 14:33 |
| *** brunssen has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:33 | |
| topol | #topic OpenStack Version | 14:33 |
| leong | then what bout the results? | 14:33 |
| tongli | markcoelker ++ | 14:33 |
| jkomg | can we just open issues against that repo for results? | 14:33 |
| shamail | markvoelker: +1 | 14:33 |
| shamail | #action Determine where to share results (markvoelker, topol, tongli) | 14:33 |
| topol | So far I have seen folks saying they are using the Mitaka version of OpenStack. Anyone planning to use a different version? | 14:33 |
| leong | and maybe want to define a "result template" so that people know what to fill in | 14:34 |
| tongli | Mitaka, please | 14:34 |
| markvoelker | topol: I think we'll probably do Mitaka and Kilo | 14:34 |
| shamail | leong: +1 | 14:34 |
| markvoelker | But here again, I think there's actually value in showing the same workload running on multiple versions | 14:34 |
| shamail | Does it make sense to standardize on a base submission (e.g. Mitaka) and then let everyone submit other results too? | 14:34 |
| shamail | Or is the goal for everyone to run against all of the agreed upon versions? | 14:35 |
| tongli | ok with mitaka (optional kilo) | 14:35 |
| rohit404 | topol: atleast be Liberty | 14:35 |
| topol | K, so action item. folks should record which version they plan to use. | 14:35 |
| markvoelker | shamail: I'd argue there's more value in showing a workload running on multiple clouds, multiple versions | 14:35 |
| leong | the "result repo" can include multiple "folder" with different version? | 14:35 |
| leong | that's probably part of the "result template" | 14:35 |
| topol | markvoelker +1 | 14:35 |
| shamail | markvoelker: +1, the only concern is the amount of time before the summit but this would be a more robust outcome (multiple clouds, multiple versions) | 14:35 |
| tongli | seems we are asking for a new project. | 14:36 |
| topol | so lets see what everyone can get running. Ideally try and do Mitaka? | 14:36 |
| tongli | multiple clouds, multiple versions can all be added over the time. | 14:36 |
| tongli | starts with Mitaka. | 14:36 |
| markvoelker | shamail: I think it probably works in our favor to use the products people have on the market right now (and probably also have in their labs) | 14:36 |
| shamail | #action Please add which OpenStack versions you plan to run interop challenge tests against (everyone) | 14:36 |
| shamail | missed “in the etherpad” in the action :) | 14:37 |
| topol | K, lets see what folks decide to use | 14:37 |
| zhipeng | should we only test against openstack powered platforms ? | 14:37 |
| rockyg | I think for each workload, we need to create/provide a demo script. Every cloud runs through the demo and *those* results are what we use to show interop | 14:37 |
| dwalleck | fyi, the OSIC cluster is running Liberty at the moment | 14:37 |
| topol | dwalleck. good to know | 14:37 |
| shamail | zhipeng: +1 imo | 14:37 |
| topol | My thought is we are flexible on this so its easier for folks to be successful | 14:37 |
| markvoelker | topol: ++ | 14:37 |
| leong | +1 topol | 14:38 |
| tongli | @topol, + + | 14:38 |
| catherineD | markvoelker: +1 with the short time that we have ... the workloads should what exists today ... and submit to the interop repository | 14:38 |
| tongli | get started and then expand. | 14:38 |
| Kenji_ | topol: +1 | 14:38 |
| topol | yep. ok topic change | 14:38 |
| tongli | can we talk about tools for this? | 14:38 |
| rarcea | topol: +1 | 14:38 |
| shamail | topol: -1 just to go rogue | 14:38 |
| shamail | jk :) | 14:39 |
| topol | #topic openstack SV presentation, listing of partiicpants | 14:39 |
| shamail | topol: Is there a version of this presentation that will be shared with those attending the meeting for feedback? | 14:39 |
| topol | any concern from anyone if I have a chart in my deck that lists all the folks participating in the interop challenge? | 14:39 |
| rockyg | shamail, +1, oh and -2 just for the heck of it. | 14:39 |
| * markvoelker puts corporate hat on | 14:40 | |
| jkomg | there's an openstack sv presentation on this? | 14:40 |
| markvoelker | topol: No concerns from me. VMware would be happy to be included. | 14:40 |
| MarkBaker | topol, fine by me | 14:40 |
| topol | jkomg. no. I have a presnetation and was just going to include about 3 charts on this | 14:40 |
| * shamail just saw markvoelker put away the hat again | 14:40 | |
| jkomg | kk | 14:41 |
| topol | the charts I will use will be a subset of the deck we sent all of you for the kickoff meeting | 14:41 |
| topol | so no new material | 14:41 |
| topol | I just did not want to surprise anyone | 14:41 |
| topol | only action item is to update the existing chart with the new participants | 14:42 |
| topol | unless someone had an objection | 14:42 |
| *** zhipeng has quit IRC | 14:42 | |
| topol | okay. topic change | 14:42 |
| rockyg | ++ But you might want to keep that slide open until right before the summit | 14:43 |
| *** zhipeng has joined #openstack-defcore | 14:43 | |
| catherineD | topol: do we have a deadline for folk to submit workload for this project? | 14:43 |
| topol | rockyg, will do. especially with how slow my co-presenters are at getting their charts done.. | 14:43 |
| * topol topol throws some shade | 14:43 | |
| topol | #topic workload testing. | 14:44 |
| topol | Has anyone tried the docker swarm workload. we have tongli to help folks if running into issues. | 14:44 |
| markvoelker | topol: I haven't yet...been traveling the past couple of weeks. =) | 14:44 |
| markvoelker | Will hopefully get to it next week | 14:45 |
| topol | catehrD, ideally lets get workloads available for everyone to try by August 8 | 14:45 |
| shamail | (15 minutes left) | 14:45 |
| shamail | #action Submit new workload scripts by August 8th (process TBD)… (everyone) | 14:45 |
| topol | no hard deadline but everyone needs time to try and get things working | 14:45 |
| topol | tongli is our roving assistance/coach/mentor | 14:46 |
| rockyg | We should probably get the app ecosystem to toss in First App, also. | 14:46 |
| tongli | so we are going to use terraform, is that all agreed? | 14:46 |
| catherineD | Hard deadline is for submitting the worload ... | 14:46 |
| topol | reach out if you are getting stuck (thanks tongli) | 14:46 |
| topol | tongli if other folks have other tools that are commonly used we are okay with thise | 14:46 |
| topol | those | 14:46 |
| shamail | rockyg: Marcela (mbonnell) from App Eco will be contacting topol | 14:47 |
| tongli | @topol, ok. | 14:47 |
| topol | let's see what comes in | 14:47 |
| leong | we have "heat" template ready but not terraform | 14:47 |
| rockyg | Tongli, it will need to auto install with the app.... | 14:47 |
| topol | leong heat should be fine | 14:47 |
| shamail | leong: I think we would want to submit heat templates from EWG not terraform scripts | 14:47 |
| topol | at this point the requirements is can everyone run it | 14:48 |
| shamail | This will allow our tool-base to expand to include Heat | 14:48 |
| topol | any concerns with heat? | 14:48 |
| catherineD | leong: +1 ...please submit the code ... | 14:48 |
| tongli | @rockyg, terraform can install stuff onto the VM just gets created. | 14:48 |
| topol | yes, code talks | 14:48 |
| shamail | EWG = enterprise WG (for reference) | 14:48 |
| rockyg | shamail, tongli I think the apps other than docker swarm that is already terraform would use what they already have. | 14:48 |
| shamail | rockyg: +1 | 14:48 |
| topol | rockyg +1 | 14:48 |
| topol | use what you have | 14:48 |
| topol | lets see if we run into issues | 14:49 |
| rockyg | ++ | 14:49 |
| topol | so rockyg it sounds like you have an enterprise app and tongli wont have to build one? | 14:49 |
| leong | also fyi apps.openstack.org also has a list of templates (heat, murano) that we can try/test, if we want to | 14:49 |
| topol | rockyg what was your app again? | 14:49 |
| shamail | leong: great idea | 14:50 |
| rohit404 | tongli: is this the workload that's all good to be tested ? https://github.com/openstack/osops-tools-contrib/tree/master/terraform/dockerswarm-coreos | 14:50 |
| shamail | topol: 10 minutes left | 14:50 |
| topol | shamail, thanks | 14:50 |
| tongli | @rohit404, yes | 14:50 |
| rockyg | I'm just thinking the EWG ref arch. stuff and the app ecosystem stuff. | 14:50 |
| topol | so actions item for us to try the EWG app as our nterprise app | 14:50 |
| tongli | @shamail, link to the code? | 14:51 |
| topol | on the etherpad it looks like AT&T is trying to get us all an NFV app | 14:51 |
| topol | so apps are looking like they are rolling in | 14:51 |
| topol | I think I covered all the agenda items. did I miss any? | 14:51 |
| topol | Otherwise the floor is open for any questions | 14:52 |
| shamail | #topic Open | 14:52 |
| shamail | Who plans to submit new workload scripts (just curious)? | 14:52 |
| leong | from EWG, i will get our team to submit the 3-tier LAMP Heat template to the osops-tools-contrib repo | 14:52 |
| topol | leong AWESOME!!! | 14:53 |
| shamail | MarkBaker: will you be submitting a request for another tool? | 14:53 |
| shamail | additional* | 14:53 |
| topol | one question I have is during next weeks meeting is OpenStack SV Summit. I will not be able to attend due to that. should we cancel or should someone lead in my absence? | 14:54 |
| MarkBaker | shamail, yes I will - just need to complete testing on other OpenStacks | 14:54 |
| shamail | awesome | 14:54 |
| markvoelker | shamail: I'll see if I can round some up. We've got some internally that was use for testing, just need to find out if they're ok to publicize. | 14:54 |
| MarkBaker | shamail, hence my quesiton about testing resources | 14:54 |
| topol | MarkBaker, excellent | 14:54 |
| shamail | Awesome! Thanks leong, MarkBaker, markvoelker | 14:55 |
| topol | 5 minutes left. any other questions or concerns? | 14:55 |
| topol | and does someone want to lead the meeting next week or just cancel ? | 14:56 |
| shamail | I can do it topol | 14:56 |
| rockyg | If we have the deadline for apps on 8/8, we should have a meeting | 14:56 |
| luzC | shamail +1 | 14:57 |
| topol | shamail THANKS | 14:57 |
| topol | rockyg +1 | 14:57 |
| topol | ok. we made great progress in this meeting. Im glad we identified more workloads. anything else before I end the meeting? | 14:57 |
| topol | everyone know how to reach tongli if they run into issues? | 14:58 |
| *** woodburn has left #openstack-defcore | 14:58 | |
| topol | tongli post your email | 14:58 |
| topol | THANKS everyone for participating today!!! | 14:59 |
| tongli | ahhhhhhh, ok. litong01@us.ibm.com | 14:59 |
| hj-hpe | thanks all, till next time | 14:59 |
| topol | and we have jkomg too | 14:59 |
| tongli | thanks. | 14:59 |
| topol | if you have questions | 14:59 |
| topol | Thanks | 14:59 |
| catherineD | so I put the current test candidates in the etherpad line 14 - 16 ... new candidates should be add there and code should be submitted to the repository | 14:59 |
| topol | #endmetting | 15:00 |
| *** esker has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| topol | #endmeeting | 15:00 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed Aug 3 15:00:16 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2016/interop_challenge.2016-08-03-14.00.html | 15:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2016/interop_challenge.2016-08-03-14.00.txt | 15:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2016/interop_challenge.2016-08-03-14.00.log.html | 15:00 |
| *** Daisuke has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| *** leong has left #openstack-defcore | 15:01 | |
| shamail | yay! it worked even though we couldn’t tell: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2016/interop_challenge.2016-08-03-14.00.html | 15:01 |
| *** TKFJT has quit IRC | 15:01 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gema Gomez-Solano proposed openstack/defcore: DefCore test specification proposal. https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 15:03 |
| markvoelker | The DefCore midcycle sprint will continue in 10 minutes | 15:05 |
| markvoelker | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DefCoreSummer2016Sprint | 15:05 |
| markvoelker | vidyo auido/video conference: https://vc.rackspace.com/flex.html?roomdirect.html&key=E7Sg8R7vsO8YBjiNy9nwx2qJcQ0 | 15:05 |
| *** dwalleck has quit IRC | 15:07 | |
| *** rohit404 has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
| *** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom | 15:08 | |
| *** Kenji_ has quit IRC | 15:15 | |
| markvoelker | Ok folks, ready to go? | 15:16 |
| nikhil | joining in | 15:17 |
| nikhil | thanks markvoelker | 15:17 |
| markvoelker | Topic: Discussion of Interoperability in the Future (performance, discovery, etc) | 15:18 |
| markvoelker | nikhil: let us know if you can't hear us | 15:19 |
| markvoelker | we're in a different room today, audio will hopefully cooperate better | 15:19 |
| nikhil | markvoelker: thanks! it's much better today | 15:19 |
| nikhil | markvoelker: I hope the phone line to connect is same? | 15:20 |
| eglute | yes it is | 15:20 |
| markvoelker | yep | 15:20 |
| nikhil | thanks | 15:20 |
| eglute | is it not working? | 15:20 |
| nikhil | I am trying about now | 15:20 |
| eglute | cool | 15:20 |
| nikhil | eglute: thanks, phone line is way better | 15:21 |
| nikhil | I will let vidyo open in case someone shared screen | 15:21 |
| nikhil | shares* | 15:22 |
| eglute | cool! we are in a smaller room too, so hopefully audio works well. yes, we are planning on using vidyo for screen sharing. right now nothing to share :) | 15:22 |
| openstackgerrit | Gema Gomez-Solano proposed openstack/defcore: DefCore test specification proposal. https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 15:28 |
| shamail | http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/defcore/2016/defcore.2016-06-08-16.01.log.html | 15:29 |
| shamail | performance testing conversation starts at 16:40:38 | 15:30 |
| nikhil | Thanks guys :) | 15:33 |
| gema | shamail: corrected the name :D | 15:33 |
| shamail | gema: ^5 | 15:34 |
| *** Tetsuo has quit IRC | 15:45 | |
| *** dwalleck has joined #openstack-defcore | 15:59 | |
| markvoelker | http://refstack.mybluemix.net/#/community_results | 16:01 |
| eglute | https://github.com/rcbops?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query=heat | 16:19 |
| shamail | https://github.com/openstack/openstack-user-stories/blob/master/user-stories/proposed/refstack_config_info.rst | 16:20 |
| shamail | What we have today: http://www.openstack.org/software/sample-configs/ | 16:25 |
| nikhil | markvoelker: eglute: I moved my meeting which was at 2-3CT to 12-1CT. So, I will hop off now and join you all after lunch. | 16:26 |
| markvoelker | thanks nikhil, see you then | 16:26 |
| nikhil | cya | 16:26 |
| *** zhipeng has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| shamail | cya nikhil | 16:28 |
| *** zhipeng has joined #openstack-defcore | 16:28 | |
| shamail | https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 16:29 |
| shamail | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317531/4..6/working_materials/DefCoreSpec.rst to compare changes | 16:30 |
| *** dwalleck has quit IRC | 16:41 | |
| *** jkomg has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gema Gomez-Solano proposed openstack/defcore: DefCore test specification proposal. https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 16:57 |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gema Gomez-Solano proposed openstack/defcore: DefCore test specification proposal. https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 17:00 |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 17:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gema Gomez-Solano proposed openstack/defcore: DefCore test specification proposal. https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 17:07 |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has quit IRC | 17:08 | |
| *** rockyg has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| *** zhipeng has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
| *** lizdurst has quit IRC | 17:51 | |
| nikhil | markvoelker: eglute shamail : guys, I am caught up with personal stuff so will only be able to join in an hour or so. but I will be there before my session at 3.15. | 18:00 |
| openstackgerrit | Gema Gomez-Solano proposed openstack/defcore: DefCore test specification proposal. https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 18:03 |
| markvoelker | thanks nikhil | 18:04 |
| *** dwalleck has joined #openstack-defcore | 18:05 | |
| *** rockyg has joined #openstack-defcore | 18:05 | |
| markvoelker | Foundation folks have arrived, we'll be starting shortly | 18:06 |
| *** eeiden_ has joined #openstack-defcore | 18:10 | |
| *** eeiden has quit IRC | 18:13 | |
| markvoelker | Ok, let's roll | 18:14 |
| markvoelker | Expanding the trademark program to capture non-core projects and Foundation updates | 18:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Gema Gomez-Solano proposed openstack/defcore: DefCore test specification proposal. https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 18:14 |
| eglute | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DefCoreProposed2017Expansion | 18:28 |
| *** dwalleck has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| *** ametts has joined #openstack-defcore | 18:45 | |
| *** jokoester has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| shamail | Checked status on the gate and the job seems queued (for 27 min) | 18:51 |
| gema | shall I hit recheck | 19:11 |
| gema | ? | 19:11 |
| eglute | nikhil we will enable audio here in a couple minutes | 19:22 |
| nikhil | thanks eglute | 19:22 |
| shamail | gema: No, it is moving now | 19:23 |
| shamail | 3 out of 4 tests have completed | 19:23 |
| shamail | 1 queued atm | 19:23 |
| nikhil | eglute: can hear now, thanks! | 19:23 |
| eglute | perfect! | 19:24 |
| *** ametts has quit IRC | 19:32 | |
| *** rockyg has quit IRC | 19:33 | |
| *** eeiden_ has quit IRC | 19:39 | |
| *** ametts has joined #openstack-defcore | 19:45 | |
| *** rockyg has joined #openstack-defcore | 19:46 | |
| markvoelker | We'll be starting in 10 minutes folks. | 20:05 |
| markvoelker | next topic: DefCore, Interop, End Users, and OpenStack Images (nikhil) | 20:06 |
| nikhil | thanks markvoelker | 20:06 |
| *** rosmaita has joined #openstack-defcore | 20:09 | |
| shamail | hi rosmaita | 20:14 |
| rosmaita | hey | 20:14 |
| *** dwalleck has joined #openstack-defcore | 20:15 | |
| nikhil | etherpad for Images topic above: | 20:15 |
| nikhil | https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DefCoreSummer2016Sprint-ImagesAPI | 20:15 |
| *** dims has joined #openstack-defcore | 20:16 | |
| *** eeiden has joined #openstack-defcore | 20:26 | |
| shamail | Criteria for accepting a capability: https://github.com/openstack/defcore/blob/master/doc/source/process/CoreCriteria.rst (posted by markvoelker in the etherpad) | 20:44 |
| *** ametts has quit IRC | 20:52 | |
| nikhil | eglute: can anyone switch the camera from the room on? | 21:00 |
| eglute | sorry, we do not have a big camera. i will turn my laptop's on | 21:01 |
| *** dwalleck has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
| shamail | thanks nikhil, dims, rosmaita! | 21:44 |
| nikhil | thanks shamail markvoelker rockyg hogepodge catherineD dims rosmaita | 21:45 |
| markvoelker | thanks again nikhil. We appreciate the engagement. | 21:45 |
| rosmaita | thank you, i appreciate the thorough discussion | 21:45 |
| nikhil | :) | 21:48 |
| *** shamail has quit IRC | 21:49 | |
| *** rockyg has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-defcore | 21:59 | |
| *** brunssen has quit IRC | 22:00 | |
| *** brunssen has joined #openstack-defcore | 22:01 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
| *** brunssen has quit IRC | 22:05 | |
| *** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz | 22:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/defcore: DefCore test specification proposal. https://review.openstack.org/317531 | 23:02 |
| *** brunssen has joined #openstack-defcore | 23:08 | |
| *** brunssen has quit IRC | 23:09 | |
| *** brunssen has joined #openstack-defcore | 23:10 | |
| nikhil | woot! | 23:20 |
| nikhil | eglute: I think I may not be joining to the midcycle tomorrow as I have a few other meetings that I can't miss. Thanks for helping me connect yesterday and today! | 23:47 |
| nikhil | logistical support, discussions with the team and feedback much appreciated! | 23:47 |
| nikhil | have a good one all. | 23:47 |
| *** jkomg has joined #openstack-defcore | 23:55 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!