Thursday, 2019-06-13

*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc00:07
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC00:49
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc00:50
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC00:55
*** lbragstad has quit IRC01:10
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc01:20
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc02:14
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC02:15
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc02:15
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC02:18
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc02:20
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC02:27
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC02:33
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc02:33
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:01
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc03:02
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:04
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc03:04
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:43
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc03:43
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc03:50
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC03:58
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC04:23
openstackgerritGhanshyam Mann proposed openstack/governance master: Update the 'stable:follows-policy' tag doc for re-obtaining process  https://review.opendev.org/65598404:33
gmannasettle: evrardjp zaneb ^^ please check if updated content is clear now and make sense.04:34
*** cmurphy is now known as cmurphy_afk05:14
*** Luzi has joined #openstack-tc05:20
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc05:21
*** ricolin has quit IRC05:36
*** jaypipes has quit IRC05:47
*** spsurya has joined #openstack-tc06:07
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-tc06:11
*** zhurong has quit IRC06:14
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-tc06:20
*** e0ne has quit IRC06:24
*** iurygregory has joined #openstack-tc06:44
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-tc07:02
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur07:10
*** tosky has joined #openstack-tc07:13
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc08:11
*** jpich has joined #openstack-tc08:24
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc08:29
asettlegmann, thank you :)09:00
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc09:26
*** gmann has quit IRC09:33
asettleO/10:43
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC10:50
*** jpich has quit IRC10:59
*** jpich has joined #openstack-tc10:59
*** gmann has joined #openstack-tc11:09
*** spsurya has quit IRC12:18
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-tc12:37
*** zhurong has quit IRC13:02
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-tc13:10
*** jaosorior has quit IRC13:11
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc13:43
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc13:45
*** tosky has quit IRC13:48
*** Luzi has quit IRC14:02
*** ricolin has quit IRC14:21
fungilooks like it's office hour once more15:00
jroll'tis \o15:00
fungialso time for the security sig meeting in #openstack-meeting once nova wraps up theirs15:00
fungiso i'll be in and out15:00
lbragstado/15:01
zanebo/15:03
ttxyeah!15:03
ttxWanted to raise attention to http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2019-June/006964.html ICYMI15:04
*** tosky has joined #openstack-tc15:04
ttxBasically if you have strong opinions on the way deployment tools should be better represented, please chime in15:04
mnasero/15:11
asettleo/15:12
ttxmnaser in particular, since you ran that session ^15:12
mnaserttx: it's interesting something i have been thinking in particular is having different levels of supported operating systems15:14
mnaserlike experimental $foo support, production-ready $bar support15:14
mnaseror even for specific services deployed by openstack15:14
ttxOne question I guess is whether we'd want those things in openstack/governance or osf/openstack-map. I'd say the latter as those are more like marketing descriptions, but if you want that controlled by the TC I'm happy to do that in governance too15:15
ttxmnaser: that might be a bit beyond what we can express with those labels. At one point we need to point to further doc15:16
mnaserttx: yeah i agree, it was jsut soemthing that kinda came to mind15:16
ttxI guess we could express that as a table if we expect that to really be critical15:16
dhellmanno/15:17
ttxmnaser: what is your preference in terms of repo to host that (above question) ?15:17
mnaserwho has merge rights to osf/openstack-map ?15:18
mnaseri could answer that question myself but.. yeah :)15:18
ttxosf staff15:18
dhellmannasettle : https://review.openstack.org/664846 can be merged15:18
asettlegracias15:18
fungittx: why not put the deployment project metadata inside their respective (primary?) repositories? similar to the driver support matrix effort?15:19
dhellmannit looks like there are a few others that meet the formal criteria, too. I don't know if we're holding those for any particular reason15:19
fungithat at least puts documenting the state of their featuresets in the hands of those project teams15:20
ttxfungi: hmm, that could work too15:20
dhellmannit can still be their responsibility, even if the content lives in another repo15:20
mnaserdhellmann: those are much more major changes that i asked more folks to review at the time (but i see the nodejs pti might be missed).15:20
ttxwill make collecting all the data necessary to build the pages slightly more complex, but not really15:20
mnaserthe help needed list stuff is all in limbo because patches cant land as they're in a series and i'm holding off on the progress on the goals stuff.15:21
dhellmannmnaser : yeah, I thought that might be the case15:21
ttxfungi: the marketing descriptions live in osf/openstack-map for example, and are owned by the teams15:21
fungithe driver marketplace effort basically showed that if teams are expected to document things in some other location they don't control, they tend not to keep it updated as regularly15:21
mnaserso some can land but the 'item under them' isn't approved and pending the work we talked about15:21
dhellmannttx: would make triggering rebuild of the site a bit more complex, because you would have to do it when patches land in those other repos (or periodically, I guess)15:21
dhellmannmnaser : what do we need to do to unblock the help/goals stuff?15:21
ttxdhellmann: yes15:21
dhellmannttx: do the simplest thing you can, and encourage teams to contribute to the community site15:22
mnaserso https://review.opendev.org/#/c/637025/5 has been sitting waiting for asettle and evrardjp -- as that whole effort is being rebuilt15:22
ttxI mean, the difficult part will be to collect the initial data really15:22
mnaserso all those changes for goals stuff is in a bit of limbo, because it's pending the changes15:22
* mnaser trying hard to keep up with the many conversations15:23
dhellmannmnaser : could we not just move the existing help most wanted items as they are into the new tree structure?15:23
* ttx shuts up15:23
mnaserwell, to put this conversation quickly, i'm waiting on the changes done so we can actually do that15:24
mnaseri cant make people do things :) so we're blocked on all those goal related patches till it happens15:24
ttx(I'll push it to osf/openstack-map and if we decide it's better to decentralize the marketing information for each project, we'll do that from there)15:24
mnaserand i think that one starts here -- https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657447/15:24
dhellmannI guess I don't understand what has to change about the old content?15:25
mnaserperhaps asettle can chime in about 'reviewing' things there15:25
jrollin either case you have to rebase something, the help wanted text updates are ostensibly done, let's get those in and zaneb/asettle can rebase the conversion15:26
dhellmannwe tell teams not to be paralyzed by waiting for perfection, I think we should make sure we're also not doing that15:26
dhellmannmaybe we should just put the new structure in place, retain the old content in that structure, and leave the other updates for when folks have time15:27
mnasertbh, if it was up to me, i'd land those changes (because lbragstad worked really hard on them) and then they can be rewritten and updated then.15:27
dhellmannI have a little time today and could work on that as a follow-up to zaneb's patch https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657447/15:27
dhellmannor that15:27
dhellmannlet's just move on something15:27
mnaserhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/637025/515:27
mnaserthis one dfoesn't have enough votes15:27
dhellmanntc-members: please vote on ^ so we can unblock ourselves15:28
ttxwoohoo, that one I already voted on15:29
mnaserand we also have this where we could land it but there's some disagreements about it. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/643364/15:29
mnaseri'm not sure if that one is really relevant as much with the changes we proposed..15:29
jrollyeah, that drops with the new model15:29
dhellmannI can't tell what's blocking https://review.opendev.org/#/c/645361/4 from merging15:30
asettledhellmann, okay15:30
dhellmannis that stacked on the other one?15:30
mnaserdhellmann: the parent patch15:30
jrolldhellmann: yes15:30
mnaseryes, its a stack15:30
asettledhellmann, I have voted? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/637025/515:30
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Updating the PDF goal for Train  https://review.opendev.org/66484615:30
dhellmannasettle : thank you15:30
asettleNo like, I had previously voted. This isn't blocked on me.15:30
dhellmannasettle : i wasn't saying it was? "tc-members"15:31
asettleoh gosh sorry15:31
fungihrm, 637025 got rebased since the last time i reviewed it. will take time to wade through the interdiff15:31
asettleI can't read15:31
mnaserevrardjp: do we abandon https://review.opendev.org/#/c/643364/ at this point?15:32
evrardjpyup15:33
jrollyes, 643364 should be abandoned, as the new structure proposes no limits15:33
evrardjpit's done15:34
mnaserand for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657141/ -- i wanted to wait and give more time for other tc members to look at because it's a pretty big change, but its' been around enough nowe15:34
mnaserttx: not that i want to sign you up for more work but15:35
evrardjpmnaser: on that one there is no real issue I think15:36
mnaserhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/639376/ really feels pop-up-team-y15:36
evrardjpit's just change of ownership which everyone agrees15:36
evrardjpmnaser: I doubt it can be done with popup teams.15:36
evrardjpThis is why I thought it was a great thing to be blessed by community goals :)15:37
ttxmnaser: it does affect most teams, so goals make it easier?15:37
mnaserit sounds like a group of people who want to implement a few things isnide openstackclient afaik15:37
dhellmannhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/657141/2 might need to be rebased because it's based on an old version of another patch15:37
mnaseror at least in the proposed implementation15:37
ttxmnaser: oh right15:37
evrardjpttx: we discussed this, and afaik ppl rejected it as a goal because it didn't apply15:37
dhellmannmnaser : under the house rules, we can rebase 657141 and then you can approve it without waiting again. I'd be happy to rebase it if you like.15:38
mnaserzaneb, evrardjp: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/653643/ can you drop your -1s now? the content of the repos is gone now15:39
mnaserdhellmann: checking15:39
mnaserdhellmann: ah yes, that was a parent change15:40
mnaserhmm gerrit doesn't let you rebase off master boo15:40
dhellmannI rebased locally, but it pulled in the old bad patch so I think we need a new branch and a cherry-pick15:41
dhellmannI can fix that, give me a sec15:41
mnaserdhellmann: ok thanks, i noticed same, ill let you do it if you're that far15:42
fungigit reset --hard origin/master; git review -x changenum15:42
zanebmnaser: done15:43
mnaserthanks zaneb15:43
dhellmannoh, the parent didn't merge so we have to rebase both anyway15:44
ttxmnaser: I think we can approve https://review.opendev.org/#/c/643603/ ?15:44
mnaserttx: already done :)15:44
fungialternatively if you `git rebase -i origin/master` you can just delete the problem change out of the apply series you're shown15:44
ttxah jines15:44
ttxjinxed15:44
mnaserdhellmann: if you'll rebase locally, i guess it'd be good to reverse the order so we can land that patch15:44
fungior do the branch reset and then a series of review -x commands to stack the latest states of those changes in the order you want them applied15:45
ttx3 more votes on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/656686/ ?15:45
ttxRetire xstatic-vis and xstatic-angular-ui-router projects15:45
mnasereven then it would be too early but yeah :)15:45
mnaser..i think?15:45
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Retire docs-specs  https://review.opendev.org/65714015:45
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Initiate process of migrating Documentation project to a SIG  https://review.opendev.org/65714115:45
ttxmnaser: oh right15:45
ttxgot carried away15:46
mnasercan only land in 2 more days15:46
mnaserhttps://review.opendev.org/#/c/637025/5 just got majority so needs a few more days15:49
mnaserbut its also been sitting around for ages so if someone wanted to review, they.. would have15:49
ttxSo, about that rule15:49
ttx(the cooldown before approval)15:49
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Retire docs-specs  https://review.opendev.org/65714015:49
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Initiate process of migrating Documentation project to a SIG  https://review.opendev.org/65714115:49
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Transition docs team to a SIG  https://review.opendev.org/65714215:49
dhellmannok, I think those 3 are in shape now15:50
ttxThat made sense when we had weekly reports that said "this is about to be merged, speak now of forever hold your peace"15:50
mnaserdhellmann: small oopsies there15:50
dhellmannbah15:50
mnasereither vim or just keyboard rage :)15:50
ttxbut we don't do weekly reports anymore15:50
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Retire docs-specs  https://review.opendev.org/65714015:51
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Initiate process of migrating Documentation project to a SIG  https://review.opendev.org/65714115:51
openstackgerritDoug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Transition docs team to a SIG  https://review.opendev.org/65714215:51
ttxso the cooldown is just more days people can ignore that review15:51
mnaseroh faafo is an actual project15:51
mnaserttx: seems fair.  i think given for how long it's sat around, i'll push that through to get the one stacked on it to land too.15:52
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc15:54
ttxIt's not as if we cannot revert $stuff here15:54
mnaseranyone somewhat involves in the go ecosystem that can help move https://review.opendev.org/#/c/661862/ forwards?15:54
dhellmannmnaser : it might be better to abandon https://review.opendev.org/#/c/657142/3 and ask stephenfin to re-submit it when he's ready. that would clear our review board.15:54
ttxOr W-1 it15:54
dhellmannsure, or that15:55
stephenfinYeah, I'll pick it up again but swamped atm :(15:55
mnaser(and tbh, i dont think its a blocker for making the golang pti change)15:55
stephenfinhappy with either15:55
mnaserstephenfin: wanna just w-1 for now?15:55
stephenfinSure, done15:55
mnaseri tried pinging monty about doign something like https://github.com/golang/go/commit/2ba8fc5b086942dbb23282702f61c813298867f315:57
mnaserfor opendev15:57
mnaserbut i don't think we should necessarily block on it15:57
mnaserthe redirects work15:57
dhellmannhttps://review.opendev.org/665166 update TC dashboard to ignore WIP items15:58
mnaserdhellmann: wanna maybe just add it to foreach = instead?15:59
dhellmannI wanted the "everything" list to include those items15:59
mnaseroh15:59
mnaserright15:59
mnasermakes sense15:59
zanebmnaser: for the golang thing, given that the redirects work, maybe we should tell people to stick to git.openestack.org?16:00
dhellmanndid someone propose the upstream patch to add opendev.org?16:00
zanebI didn't16:01
zanebmnaser: said above that he pinged mordred about it16:01
* dhellmann wonders if the tc needs someone to show them how to open a PR on github16:02
mnaserthey use gerrit to review things afaik16:02
zanebbut now that I think about it, changing it would result in the exact kind of duplication that we were trying to avoid there16:02
mnaserhttps://go-review.googlesource.com/16:02
fungi661862 seems like something anyone in the community with an interest in go could pitch in on too16:03
mnaserbut also it's a bit more than opening a change because getting all of that regex right.16:03
mnaserand getting it tested right16:03
mnaserand tbh, i don't know how to write any go16:03
zaneboh man, I don't wanna have to sign up for that. why can't they just use github? :P16:03
mnaseror i wouldn't know how to run the tests so i feel maybe other members might have felt the same16:04
ttx...16:04
zanebI have several days experience in writing go and could probably manage it but... -ENOTIME16:05
*** iurygregory has quit IRC16:05
*** e0ne has quit IRC16:07
fungii think this is something which folks in our community maintaining go source code, and therefore having a vested interest in it being in the pti, ought to have sufficient incentive to tackle16:09
*** dims has quit IRC16:14
*** jpich has quit IRC16:18
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk16:22
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Describe the business value of using unified limits  https://review.opendev.org/63702516:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Describe the business value of consistent RBAC  https://review.opendev.org/64536116:24
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Retire openstack-ansible unused roles  https://review.opendev.org/65364316:28
*** jamesmcarthur_ has joined #openstack-tc16:29
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC16:32
openstackgerritMerged openstack/governance master: Update nodeJS PTI version for Train  https://review.opendev.org/64360316:34
*** dims has joined #openstack-tc16:35
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-tc16:35
lbragstadwoot16:37
*** jamesmcarthur_ has quit IRC16:57
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc16:58
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc17:05
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:23
*** whoami-rajat has joined #openstack-tc17:38
openstackgerritZane Bitter proposed openstack/governance master: Convert 'Help Most Needed' to 'Upstream Investment Opportunities'  https://review.opendev.org/65744717:41
openstackgerritZane Bitter proposed openstack/governance master: Convert 'Help Most Needed' to 'Upstream Investment Opportunities'  https://review.opendev.org/65744717:50
zanebdhellmann: ^ new structure w/ old content in place17:50
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC17:58
*** ianychoi has quit IRC18:13
*** tosky has quit IRC18:21
dhellmannzaneb : really I would have settled for 1 page but that looks great, thank you18:35
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc18:56
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC19:24
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-tc19:25
*** whoami-rajat has quit IRC19:48
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:04
*** mriedem has quit IRC21:19
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-tc22:18
*** dtroyer has quit IRC22:52
*** dtroyer has joined #openstack-tc22:52
openstackgerritJason E. Rist proposed openstack/governance master: Retiring TripleO-UI and associated projects  https://review.opendev.org/66526423:07
openstackgerritJason E. Rist proposed openstack/governance master: Retiring TripleO-UI and associated projects  https://review.opendev.org/66526423:08
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC23:24

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!