| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 00:01 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 00:03 | |
| *** aprice_ has joined #openstack-tc | 00:04 | |
| *** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-tc | 00:05 | |
| *** csatari_ has joined #openstack-tc | 00:05 | |
| *** csatari has quit IRC | 00:05 | |
| *** ildikov has quit IRC | 00:05 | |
| *** csatari_ is now known as csatari | 00:05 | |
| *** ildikov_ is now known as ildikov | 00:05 | |
| *** aprice has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
| *** mordred has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
| *** aprice_ is now known as aprice | 00:06 | |
| *** dhellmann has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
| *** melwitt has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
| *** melwitt has joined #openstack-tc | 00:11 | |
| *** dhellmann has joined #openstack-tc | 00:11 | |
| *** ChanServ has quit IRC | 00:12 | |
| *** mordred has joined #openstack-tc | 00:16 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 00:18 | |
| *** ChanServ has joined #openstack-tc | 00:33 | |
| *** barjavel.freenode.net sets mode: +o ChanServ | 00:33 | |
| *** melwitt is now known as Guest48153 | 00:39 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc | 00:40 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 00:48 | |
| fungi | tc-members (and anyone else): since you've had a few hours to fully recover from the summit, i'm sure you now have all manner of things you want to discuss in the 01:00z office hour | 00:59 |
|---|---|---|
| fungi | #startmeeting tc | 01:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Wed May 30 01:00:00 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is fungi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 01:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 01:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)" | 01:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'tc' | 01:00 |
| *** harlowja has quit IRC | 01:00 | |
| fungi | #topic office hour | 01:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "office hour (Meeting topic: tc)" | 01:00 | |
| clarkb | I'd be curioua to hear how the goals session went as I had a conflict | 01:00 |
| * fungi digs up the pads for that | 01:01 | |
| mnaser | o/ | 01:01 |
| mnaser | As fungi mentioned, there was a lot of discussion about prior goals and their success | 01:02 |
| mnaser | I think one of the ideas brought up was that there was some operators mentioning that the goals were not oriented to them but rather to the developers / tech / code, if I understood | 01:02 |
| fungi | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-S-release-goals | 01:03 |
| fungi | part of that was my misunderstanding | 01:03 |
| fungi | mriedem had left comments in the previous session's pad that the cold upgrades goal had gotten backburnered in favor of the mox goal | 01:04 |
| mnaser | ^ yep | 01:06 |
| mnaser | i think that was brought up | 01:07 |
| fungi | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-extended-maintenance | 01:07 |
| fungi | around line 99 i think | 01:07 |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 01:07 | |
| fungi | i mistakenly thought it was input from someone representing operator concerns in the discussion, but turns out to have been mreidem (or i think he said that was him at any rate) | 01:07 |
| mnaser | yep, it was him who brought it up (on behalf of operator feedback) | 01:09 |
| fungi | anyway, i did my best (in both sessions) to explain that we intentionally picked a rocky goal we thought would please operators (dynamic reconfiguration) and one which reduced our tech debt (mox removal) | 01:09 |
| fungi | so it was dynamic reconfig which was picked over cold upgrades, really | 01:10 |
| mnaser | i think the dynamic reconfig was far more popular because it was far easier to implement | 01:12 |
| fungi | but regardless, that's all water under the bridge now | 01:12 |
| fungi | we did pitch some potential stein goals | 01:12 |
| fungi | i did my best to represent the storyboard migration goal as diablo_rojo needed to be elsewhere for the latter half of the session | 01:13 |
| fungi | anyway, the upshot of the session is that the champions for the pitched goals from the backlog would write up specs proposals for review | 01:16 |
| fungi | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goals | 01:16 |
| fungi | #info Champions for goals pitched at the Forum session on Stein Release Goals will write up formal goal proposal changes for review | 01:18 |
| mnaser | i guess there isn't much more to that ;x | 01:23 |
| fungi | #chair mnaser | 01:27 |
| openstack | Current chairs: fungi mnaser | 01:27 |
| fungi | may as well add other tc members present as chairs when we use meetbot for minutes so we can collaborate on chair-only actions | 01:28 |
| clarkb | thank you for the goals summary | 01:28 |
| mnaser | hopefully thursday we can talk about the whole idea of bringing back an actual agenda for meetings | 01:29 |
| fungi | #idea Add other TC members present as chairs when we use meetbot for minutes so we can collaborate on chair-only actions | 01:29 |
| *** mordred has quit IRC | 01:31 | |
| fungi | #info In the Forum session for a TC Retrospective some consensus was expressed to try using meetbot to record relevant minutes during office hours, hence... this! | 01:32 |
| fungi | #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/YVR-tc-retrospective | 01:33 |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 01:37 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 01:42 | |
| *** mordred has joined #openstack-tc | 01:45 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 01:59 | |
| fungi | #endmeeting | 02:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Technical Committee office hours: Tuesdays at 09:00 UTC, Wednesdays at 01:00 UTC, and Thursdays at 15:00 UTC | https://governance.openstack.org/tc/ | channel logs http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/" | 02:00 | |
| fungi | thanks for a far more productive office hour than i anticipated! | 02:00 |
| openstack | Meeting ended Wed May 30 02:00:05 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 02:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2018/tc.2018-05-30-01.00.html | 02:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2018/tc.2018-05-30-01.00.txt | 02:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2018/tc.2018-05-30-01.00.log.html | 02:00 |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 02:40 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 02:54 | |
| *** rosmaita has quit IRC | 02:57 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 02:57 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 03:02 | |
| *** masayuki- is now known as masayukig_ | 03:08 | |
| *** masayukig_ is now known as masayukig | 03:12 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 03:28 | |
| *** harlowja has joined #openstack-tc | 03:29 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 03:36 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 04:06 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
| *** harlowja has quit IRC | 04:14 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 04:37 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 04:42 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 04:48 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 04:52 | |
| *** ricolin has quit IRC | 05:05 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 05:09 | |
| *** eandersson has joined #openstack-tc | 05:10 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 05:14 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 05:46 | |
| *** eandersson has quit IRC | 05:48 | |
| *** eandersson has joined #openstack-tc | 05:49 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 05:51 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 06:07 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 06:12 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 06:22 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 06:26 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 07:00 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 07:04 | |
| *** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc | 07:15 | |
| *** ricolin has joined #openstack-tc | 07:15 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 07:31 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 07:36 | |
| *** jpich has joined #openstack-tc | 07:53 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 08:06 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 08:11 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 09:13 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 09:18 | |
| *** gcb has joined #openstack-tc | 09:19 | |
| *** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 09:38 | |
| *** jaosorior has quit IRC | 10:14 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 10:28 | |
| *** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc | 10:31 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 10:33 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 11:41 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 11:47 | |
| *** rosmaita has joined #openstack-tc | 11:49 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 12:18 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-tc | 12:50 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 12:51 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 12:56 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-tc | 12:59 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 13:10 | |
| mnaser | morning everyone o/ | 13:11 |
| dims | o/ | 13:29 |
| dhellmann | o/ | 13:48 |
| dhellmann | fungi : I like the office hour logs; thanks! | 13:48 |
| fungi | you bet | 13:50 |
| smcginnis | Now we just need to remember to do that each time. :) | 13:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: add python 2 deprecation timeline https://review.openstack.org/571011 | 13:53 |
| *** EmilienM_PTO is now known as EmilienM | 14:08 | |
| *** Guest62139 has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
| *** flaper87 has joined #openstack-tc | 14:20 | |
| dims | big-tent-like-problems at CNCF (and k8s) fyi - https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/114 | 14:20 |
| dims | click bait :) "This is important because we are already reaching the point where the sheer number of CNCF projects is becoming off-putting." | 14:23 |
| cmurphy | lol | 14:26 |
| dims | there is some really good thoughts on current status and governance of k8s too :) | 14:28 |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-tc | 14:33 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 14:33 | |
| dhellmann | thanks, dims | 14:49 |
| ttx | dims: thanks! Looks like they are struggling to represent the various deliverables produced by the Kubernetes community (and whether to represent them as sub-components or full-fledged top-level projects) | 14:55 |
| ttx | and how the CNCF "project" structure is not a perfect fit | 14:56 |
| dims | right ttx | 15:06 |
| aspiers | hi all, before I start politely pestering poor Jimmy about this, please can you confirm I'm barking up the right tree? https://github.com/OpenStack-mobile/summit-app-android/issues/10#issuecomment-256176452 | 15:10 |
| *** Guest48153 is now known as melwitt | 15:25 | |
| zaneb | TheJulia: if summit is in Vancouver again I think we should lobby to hold the PTG on one of those cruise ships that dock alongside | 15:27 |
| cmurphy | +1 | 15:29 |
| TheJulia | zaneb: only if we undock the ship... :) | 15:29 |
| smcginnis | ++ | 15:29 |
| smcginnis | The SS Croke Park | 15:29 |
| TheJulia | ++++ | 15:30 |
| zaneb | TheJulia: obviously :) | 15:30 |
| TheJulia | deva tossed out the idea at one point way back when of seeing if we could do an ironic midcycle up in the mountains where we all fly in via seaplane. Seemed like a great idea collaboration wise. | 15:37 |
| smcginnis | I've seen too many horror movies for that to sound good to me. ;) | 15:38 |
| zaneb | lol | 15:39 |
| dhellmann | as far as I can tell those cruise ships are just vectors for norovirus | 15:47 |
| *** mriedem has left #openstack-tc | 15:56 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-tc | 15:56 | |
| *** ricolin has quit IRC | 16:08 | |
| openstackgerrit | Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/governance master: Add Glance completion artifacts for Pike py35 goal https://review.openstack.org/571244 | 16:08 |
| zaneb | there was an outbreak of norovirus (or the other one, not sure) in my house during the week of the PTG in Dublin | 16:38 |
| fungi | aspiers: it's something we've fought for going back years now. the foundation contracted with a web development company to do most of the www.openstack.org and summit properties, and just convincing them to make the source code public has been a hard-fought win. i get the impression they want to be more open in their development processes but have been told that they feel web (and presumably mobile | 16:38 |
| * zaneb was never so glad to be stranded on an island in ~4in of snow | 16:38 | |
| fungi | device application) development and event deadlines don't mesh well with free software ideals so even this much is a stretch for them apparently | 16:38 |
| zaneb | fungi: I especially like how all the commit message headlines are just the name of the person who committed the change :D | 16:40 |
| fungi | aspiers: in short, the primary feedback loops to that development team involve marketing analysts and event coordinators | 16:40 |
| fungi | zaneb: yes, presumably revision control systems are a bit of a novelty still as well | 16:41 |
| * zaneb searching for a Denny Crane GIF | 16:42 | |
| aspiers | fungi: it's really disappointing to me that we didn't use an open source solution from the beginning and throw money at that instead | 16:42 |
| fungi | aspiers: yep, preaching to the choir i'm afraid | 16:42 |
| *** pabelanger has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| *** pabelanger has joined #openstack-tc | 16:42 | |
| aspiers | I don't understand why we didn't use something like http://osem.io/ | 16:43 |
| aspiers | I did point the foundation at that ~3 years ago | 16:43 |
| fungi | it's one of the up-sides to the infra team switching to a different domain name... at least it'll be more clear what infrastructure is being run in an open fashion and what's being done in a more proprietary/corporate manner (though a few of our whitelabel systems will still likely have something.openstack.org vhosts when they're for openstack-specific content) | 16:44 |
| zaneb | I assume they're using a bridge to git from something hideous (svn? vss?), and not just completely new to version control | 16:44 |
| fungi | i don't know for sure, but i gather they're using github as their primary vcs now. previously i'm not sure if they used local svn or something directly on the servers though much more of the content used to just be stored in some cms databases | 16:46 |
| aspiers | git-svn does a better job of commit messages than that, IIRC | 16:46 |
| fungi | heh, yeah i think you're right about that ;) | 16:46 |
| aspiers | fungi: so when the mobile app has the same problems for several summits in a row, do we have any likely mechanism for getting them fixed? | 16:47 |
| aspiers | I feel inclined to submit issues to that github repo, if there is no better place to track them | 16:47 |
| aspiers | even if they are ignored by the developers, at least the rest of us can collaborate on them | 16:48 |
| aspiers | does that make sense? | 16:48 |
| fungi | they've been taking feedback in the feedback sessions and prioritizing fixes/wishlist additions in with whatever new demands they get from marketing and event coordination | 16:48 |
| fungi | but the biggest hurdle with the mobile app dev i think is getting releases certified by the phone os vendors | 16:49 |
| fungi | apple especially | 16:49 |
| aspiers | 10 mins of feedback twice a year is not ideal :-/ | 16:49 |
| dhellmann | it sounds like there's a bit of a split between the primary customers and primary users for the app | 16:49 |
| aspiers | yeah | 16:50 |
| zaneb | aspiers: I think what it comes down to is that dealing with issues opened by users and actual bugs require two different systems | 16:51 |
| fungi | i do get the impression that they're doing some herculean work given it's software used for events given twice a year by a single organization (at least in terms of the summit schedule app), so not necessarily the same dynamic as developing openstack | 16:51 |
| zaneb | it's actually correct to collect user feedback in a private system like zendesk, because it may contain private information about the user | 16:52 |
| zaneb | but that needs to then be scrubbed and put into a public bug tracker, which is the part that's not happening | 16:52 |
| fungi | i used to be a lot more hard-nosed about the situation, but have come to realize that the most i can hope to do is be available to provide guidance if they ask for it and try to set good examples myself | 16:52 |
| aspiers | zaneb: that should be up to the user to decide. 99% of feedback I give as a user is not confidential and I would *far* prefer that 99% to be done in the open | 16:52 |
| aspiers | zaneb: using zendesk for that reason is optimising for the 1% case | 16:53 |
| fungi | i and others do still regularly put a bug in the ear of the people setting priorities and paying the contracts on that stuff, but it's not something i really have control over | 16:54 |
| * aspiers considers talking to the board members he knows | 16:55 | |
| fungi | though they have picked up some ideas from how the community infrastructure team operates, and one of their projects (openstackid) is not only developed through gerrit (admittedly with the primary contributor self-approving most of their own patches) but also continuously-deployed to infra-managed servers | 16:55 |
| zaneb | aspiers: as a dev, I am with you. as a 'contact' link in a mobile app used by thousands of people who may not have the same background... better to have one place and the developers creating public bugs when appropriate | 16:55 |
| zaneb | (I have opened several tickets about the app, and most of them were about authentication stuff and my foundation account) | 16:56 |
| fungi | yeah, i get the impression that the feedback they receive on the app is (by descending quantity, separated by an order of magnitude) 1. help requests involving account issues, 2. wishlist new feature requests, 3. reports of actual bugs | 16:57 |
| zaneb | that doesn't surprise me | 16:58 |
| fungi | nor i, but does lend some understanding as to whether they might prioritize feedback | 16:59 |
| fungi | er, _where_ they might prioritize handling feedback | 16:59 |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 17:00 | |
| fungi | as for https://github.com/OpenStack-mobile/summit-app-android/issues/10 it's unfortunate that "The apps will be moving to Gerrit shortly after the Barcelona Summit" never happened | 17:00 |
| fungi | no doubt priorities shifted | 17:00 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/governance master: Clean up remaining docs links https://review.openstack.org/570878 | 17:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/governance master: Import ansible-role-tripleo-modify-image https://review.openstack.org/568727 | 17:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/governance master: Note that the old incubation/graduation process is obsolete https://review.openstack.org/569164 | 17:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/governance master: Include a rationale for tracking base services https://review.openstack.org/568941 | 17:08 |
| *** jpich has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| *** mriedem1 has joined #openstack-tc | 18:21 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 18:23 | |
| *** mriedem1 is now known as mriedem | 18:24 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc | 18:48 | |
| dhellmann | tc-members: please review the current contents of the tracker when you have time http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-May/130905.html | 18:49 |
| zaneb | 3rd & 4th item are the same thing | 18:50 |
| dhellmann | ah, thanks | 18:51 |
| dhellmann | zaneb : do you want to fix that? | 18:51 |
| zaneb | can do | 18:51 |
| dhellmann | ty | 18:51 |
| dhellmann | I realized there were 2 other items that were the same and merged those, too | 18:51 |
| dhellmann | about python 2/3 | 18:51 |
| zaneb | done | 18:52 |
| EmilienM | dhellmann: excellent update, I haven't seen missing items | 18:52 |
| dhellmann | 23 different things -- we're doing more than I think a lot of you realized | 18:52 |
| dhellmann | certainly more than I realized :-) | 18:53 |
| zaneb | dhellmann: re 'Trove Project Health'... that may have been me who mentioned in the Forum session that it was unmaintained. and by 'unmaintained' I of course would have meant that it is in maintenance mode with no new development | 18:57 |
| dhellmann | hmm, I thought there was a question from an operator, but maybe it was you | 18:57 |
| dhellmann | my notes on that were thin, and the etherpad doesn't mention it at all | 18:57 |
| zaneb | it may also have come from someone else | 18:57 |
| dhellmann | I figured we could at least look at the recent review activity | 18:58 |
| zaneb | there's probably no reason to think that it's abandoned | 18:58 |
| zaneb | but the fact that we have public cloud operators wanting to use it but nobody to continue to develop it suggests a failure in the marketplace of supply and demand | 18:59 |
| dhellmann | probably not. part of doing this is the exercise of following up on those sorts of questions in a more visible way so that (a) people realize we do that at all and (b) we get into the habit of doing it | 18:59 |
| dhellmann | yes, that's a good point | 18:59 |
| zaneb | ironically I tried to get the Trove and Zaqar developers together in Vancouver in 2015 to talk about that exact feature, and the Trove people made clear in no uncertain terms that they didn't want it | 19:01 |
| zaneb | sigh | 19:01 |
| dhellmann | the feature of publishing events to users? | 19:09 |
| zaneb | dhellmann: the feature of not using a shared rabbitmq that the users' DB servers have access to for messaging between the servers and the control plane | 20:09 |
| dhellmann | ah | 20:09 |
| dhellmann | that's related but different | 20:10 |
| zaneb | https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-publiccloud-wg/+bug/1752103 <- the one that is near the top of the public cloud WG's todo list | 20:11 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1752103 in OpenStack Public Cloud WG "Multi tenant message bus for Trove" [High,New] | 20:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/governance master: Replace deprecated library function os.popen() with subprocess https://review.openstack.org/570093 | 20:25 |
| mnaser | sent the starlingx email and updated the tracker repo | 20:33 |
| dhellmann | mnaser : thanks! | 20:34 |
| EmilienM | mnaser: thanks, I was about to sync with you (back from pto) | 20:35 |
| mnaser | EmilienM: no problem, i guess at this stage we're pending some of the normal infra review here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/569562/ | 20:35 |
| mnaser | that patch imports the non-openstack non-forked stuff, but i had a few things like empty repos and some "this is confidental" contents that should be stripped off | 20:36 |
| EmilienM | mnaser: your email is excellent, nice plan | 20:37 |
| mnaser | i had some help from other tc members :) | 20:37 |
| dhellmann | I'm starting to wonder if that wiki page is the best way to track these things, given the number | 20:37 |
| EmilienM | I thought we used storybard | 20:39 |
| dhellmann | we do have storyboard, too, yes | 20:39 |
| EmilienM | maybe we could convert each point into a story | 20:40 |
| dhellmann | hmm, storyboard is currently showing me a blank page | 20:40 |
| EmilienM | it works for me | 20:41 |
| EmilienM | mnaser: I'm going to add a story in SB | 20:41 |
| dhellmann | safari caching issue again | 20:41 |
| mnaser | EmilienM: i'm okay with that, it would probably be nice that we can post comments that are tracked by time | 20:42 |
| dhellmann | I guess the issue with storyboard is it is hard to see who the drivers are if there are more than 1 | 20:42 |
| dhellmann | maybe we just put that in the description | 20:42 |
| mnaser | tags? | 20:42 |
| mnaser | it's not the prettiest | 20:42 |
| dhellmann | tags are global, so if you want your name to be a tag we could do that, but it seems not ideal | 20:42 |
| mnaser | oh, i thought tags were per project | 20:43 |
| * mnaser has not used storyboard that muc | 20:43 | |
| mnaser | h | 20:43 |
| dhellmann | I don't think so? I certainly see tags that I didn't create | 20:43 |
| EmilienM | mnaser: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2002123 | 20:44 |
| mnaser | thanks EmilienM | 20:45 |
| EmilienM | thanks for kicking this off :D | 20:46 |
| mnaser | :) anyways, i gotta get moving, bbl | 20:50 |
| dtroyer | mnaser: thanks for the review on 569562… I am re-syncing things that changed while I was ignoring the world over the weekend. | 21:14 |
| dhellmann | dtroyer : now that we have that storyboard story (^^), maybe you want to mention that in your commit message to have zuul update storyboard automatically? | 21:25 |
| dhellmann | tc-members: please check out this ML thread from corvus about a new organization for infra and its relationship to openstack and other OSF projects, and of course please provide any input you have: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-May/130896.html | 21:43 |
| dims | dhellmann : y i read that thread, is there anything specific the TC has to vote as a resolution for that? | 21:44 |
| fungi | likely not at this stage | 21:44 |
| fungi | there will ultimately be a proposed change to remove a bunch of infra repos from governance | 21:44 |
| dhellmann | not voting, but the more folks we have thinking about this the better our solution will be | 21:45 |
| dims | ack dhellmann fungi | 21:45 |
| dhellmann | consider it a precursor to other similar sets of relationships with new OSF projects | 21:45 |
| dims | right | 21:46 |
| fungi | though the proposed governance body of the new infra is likely to be a bit unique across osf projects in that it exists mostly to serve the rest so seeks to get more direct involvement/input from them | 21:48 |
| *** harlowja has joined #openstack-tc | 21:52 | |
| dhellmann | true | 22:02 |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 22:14 | |
| dtroyer | dhellmann: will do, thanks. That's the Story: header, right? | 22:16 |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 22:32 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 22:35 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 22:36 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 22:38 | |
| *** mriedem is now known as mriedem_afk | 22:48 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 22:52 | |
| *** edmondsw has joined #openstack-tc | 22:53 | |
| *** edmondsw has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
| dhellmann | dtroyer : yes | 22:58 |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 23:10 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 23:35 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 23:57 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!