| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 01:42 | |
| *** zhipeng has joined #openstack-tc | 02:34 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 02:44 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 02:45 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 02:49 | |
| *** zhipeng has quit IRC | 02:53 | |
| *** ricolin_ has joined #openstack-tc | 03:13 | |
| *** zhipeng has joined #openstack-tc | 03:44 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 03:57 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 03:57 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 03:58 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 03:59 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 04:00 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 04:00 | |
| *** zhipeng has quit IRC | 04:01 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 04:50 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 04:54 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 04:54 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 04:55 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 04:55 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 05:00 | |
| *** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 08:17 | |
| *** alex_xu has quit IRC | 08:32 | |
| *** alex_xu has joined #openstack-tc | 08:33 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-tc | 08:37 | |
| cdent | ttx, mugsie, cmurphy : any of you recall the subject or sender of the post-ptg email that included summit codes? | 08:45 |
|---|---|---|
| ttx | no... but maybe fungi does as he was involved | 08:48 |
| ttx | dhellmann: re Arch WG vs. championing change: I agree that most of the time we are missing people willing to push the change through, more than we miss up-front design or gap analysis. That said I don;' think it's either/or: I think we need both. You need to paint a direction and you need people willing to push such change through. | 08:51 |
| ttx | The Arch WG discussion *were* useful. It just came at a time of resource constriction when everyone was trying to do the same with less. So there was limited participation and limited follow-up | 08:53 |
| ttx | So we need to balance the two. Do *some* top architecture design, but not too much. I see the goals stuff as a tactical way to do that balance. Now we need to build a more strategic equivalent | 08:56 |
| cdent | I sympathize with doug's comments at [t 4jba] but I think it leaves out a critical aspect of things: we need to make it easier for people to stop doing the (potentially less useful) stuff they are already doing so they can do this other thing | 09:00 |
| cdent | purplerbot sad? | 09:01 |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 09:01 | |
| *** purplerbot has quit IRC | 09:02 | |
| *** purplerbot_ has joined #openstack-tc | 09:02 | |
| *** purplerbot_ is now known as purplerbot__ | 09:02 | |
| *** purplerbot__ is now known as purplerbot | 09:02 | |
| cdent | [t 4jba] | 09:02 |
| purplerbot | <dhellmann> I think some of the frustration that I have with talking about this topic is that folks are focused on adding a layer of formality around a practice that ultimately comes down to an individual or small group picking an important topic, mustering support in a sufficient portion of the community, and then driving the work to completion. [2018-05-11 23:42:51.693008] [n 4jba] | 09:02 |
| cdent | Individuals or small groups can't pick up additional work unless they can give some away | 09:02 |
| cdent | we consistently fail to recognize this when we talk about contribution, making assumptions that there's either an endless supply of time or people | 09:03 |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 09:07 | |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|brb | 09:08 | |
| *** jaosorior has joined #openstack-tc | 09:56 | |
| ttx | cdent: right, our culture is built on an abundance model, and that is what we need to transition off from | 09:59 |
| *** rosmaita has joined #openstack-tc | 10:00 | |
| cdent | well, it's not only that (although that's a big part of it). There are still quite a lot of people, but they are not well equipped/empowered to choose the right stuff to dismiss | 10:01 |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 10:02 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 10:06 | |
| *** dtantsur|brb is now known as dtantsur | 10:38 | |
| dims | cdent : because the agenda is set by their employer? | 11:00 |
| dims | o/ | 11:00 |
| cdent | dims: no, I don't think so, or at least that's not all of it, I think because we get habituated to styles of doing stuff | 11:03 |
| smcginnis | It is a factor though I think. Most of us our paid by employers who would like us focusing on certain areas. There are not a lot of people with the leeway to decided to ignore some of that stuff and work on other things. | 11:04 |
| cdent | And a bad info economy. It's not easy to determine or point to artifacts which say what matters | 11:04 |
| cdent | smcginnis: sure, it's factor | 11:04 |
| cdent | but if we had more artifacts that says what's important it would be easier to say "I ought to be working on this instead" | 11:05 |
| smcginnis | That's true. | 11:05 |
| cdent | of course the flip side of the coin, at least based on my experience, is that there are plenty of managers who say "it would be great if we could work on this $general improvement, but openstack won't allow it" | 11:05 |
| cdent | that's probably more common in the nova-related universe. in this case I'm think of my recent tweet about an extracted nova-compute | 11:06 |
| cdent | various folk at various employers have said that would be keen | 11:06 |
| cdent | but feel like openstack itself is the roadblock | 11:06 |
| cdent | there are (and always will be) many factors | 11:06 |
| cdent | but by having artifacts (rather than talking about it) we can help the discussion move forward, I expect | 11:07 |
| cdent | (and we're getting better about that) | 11:07 |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 11:08 | |
| *** needsleep is now known as TheJulia | 11:25 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 11:31 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 12:02 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 12:11 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 12:11 | |
| fungi | cdent: ttx: no idea what the subject line for those e-mails was since i neither sent them no received any. i can ask around and find out if you're still having trouble | 12:45 |
| mnaser | o/ | 12:53 |
| dhellmann | tc-members: we have 2 open reviews waiting to set up the new constellations repository. Please take a moment to look at them; all of you have +2 on the repo. https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/constellations | 12:53 |
| fungi | ooh, thanks for reminding me to subscribe to that one | 12:54 |
| dhellmann | cdent: your point about visibility of priorities is good. The release team used to encourage using blueprints, but I'm not sure how much anyone actually looked at those. Maybe with the move to storyboard we can come up with a new pattern of building priority lists or status boards or some combination thereof. | 12:56 |
| dhellmann | although I'm not sure what kinds of things you're thinking of when you say we're doing lots of things we could drop | 12:56 |
| *** dmsimard is now known as dmsimard|off | 12:58 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 13:02 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 13:03 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
| *** mriedem has joined #openstack-tc | 13:06 | |
| *** zaneb has joined #openstack-tc | 13:09 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 13:12 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-tc | 13:18 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/constellations master: initial repository setup https://review.openstack.org/566169 | 13:28 |
| dhellmann | fungi : thanks | 13:30 |
| fungi | yw. do we have docs jobs pending for that repo too? | 13:31 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/constellations master: clean up sphinx settings https://review.openstack.org/566915 | 13:32 |
| *** superdan is now known as dansmith | 13:33 | |
| dims | looks like both merged! | 13:33 |
| dhellmann | fungi : I thought the jobs patch was approved, but let me check | 13:33 |
| dhellmann | yeah, I don't see it on my open list any more | 13:34 |
| fungi | okay, cool. maybe i should have rechecked that second one | 13:34 |
| fungi | built in the gate though http://logs.openstack.org/15/566915/2/gate/build-openstack-sphinx-docs/e778ea0/html/ | 13:35 |
| *** annabelleB has joined #openstack-tc | 13:36 | |
| cdent | fungi: yeah, I'm still interested in those emails, if you're able to find someone who knows that would be great | 13:37 |
| cdent | dhellmann: on the "things we could drop" it's more that any to do list cannot be infiniely long. If we want to do other things, we must drop something | 13:38 |
| cdent | and in order to drop things we need visibility | 13:39 |
| smcginnis | And prioritization. | 13:39 |
| dhellmann | cdent : ok, that makes sense | 13:39 |
| *** jgwentworth is now known as melwitt | 13:57 | |
| fungi | i'm still curious which classes of "things" you would propose we drop | 13:58 |
| fungi | hard for me to wrap my head around the nebulous argument, need some specific examples | 13:59 |
| cdent | if there's capacity to do 4 things and the list is already 10 long and we want to make it bigger, two things (at best) need to happen: we need to remove some things, we need to order things by importance | 14:00 |
| cdent | there is nothing revolutionary or extraordinary about that. it's simple resource management | 14:01 |
| fungi | e.g., a lot of teams have been dropping extra "paperwork" like tracking implementation detail minutiae in specs, requiring blueprints for any feature no matter how tiny, requiring a "bug report" for every fix or even sometimes for non-fixes/features, strict adherence to 2x +2 rules for obvious or trivial changes or where one of the authors is already a core reviewer... | 14:01 |
| cdent | which things get removed is the result of agreement amongst the participants | 14:01 |
| fungi | so looking for what you mean by "thnigs" | 14:01 |
| cdent | features | 14:01 |
| cdent | code that is being written | 14:01 |
| cdent | goals that are trying to be reached | 14:01 |
| cdent | getting rid of some of those | 14:02 |
| fungi | oh! actually dropping features from the services/software, not just tropping tasks | 14:02 |
| cdent | dropping features which are under development | 14:02 |
| cdent | but dropping some that already exist is a good idea too | 14:02 |
| fungi | yeah, i've long felt that we've fallen into a trap of making the software too "featureful" by including rarely-used options et cetera. the more of those you accumulate the more you're stuck supporting, plus it adds to the overall cognitive load | 14:03 |
| fungi | the "simplification" focus we came up with in our pow-wow with the bod and uc back in boston touched on some of that | 14:03 |
| cdent | over in #openstack-placement we're currently discussing that when the todo list is a year long, there's no point talking about new things | 14:03 |
| cdent | but I'm losing that discussion | 14:03 |
| fungi | but the initial gains were mostly realized in dropping entire projects which were seen as dead weight or confusing the scope of openstack as a whole | 14:04 |
| fungi | and then the effort petered out due to lack of drivers | 14:04 |
| cdent | because all the drivers were already busy driving <- and that's exactly my point | 14:05 |
| cdent | nice wrapup | 14:05 |
| fungi | yup | 14:05 |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-tc | 14:05 | |
| fungi | "it's okay to drop some of these in-flight things on the floor, or even declare roadmap bankruptcy and start over"? | 14:05 |
| fungi | go back to the beginning, redefine the problem, determine your minimal featureset for viability, et cetera | 14:06 |
| smcginnis | This is the hard part I think with project leadership. | 14:08 |
| smcginnis | Even if the roadmap is already over a year out, you do need to at least discuss new features. | 14:09 |
| smcginnis | At least to see if a new direction impacts the current plan or to make sure things done now don't make future needs hard/impossible to meet. | 14:09 |
| smcginnis | But saying no is probably the hardest part. | 14:09 |
| smcginnis | No, or "not right now"/ | 14:09 |
| cdent | that long term planning is especially true with "older" projects. In the case of the placement discussion mentioned above, we still to haven't any real data on it being used to its full capacity (that is, with nested and shared working) and I suspect things are going to change, a _lot_, when we do. So trying to plan is ... distracting. | 14:10 |
| smcginnis | Fair point. If it's early in its evolution, long term planning can definitely become a distraction if it's so far down a road that you won't be following. | 14:12 |
| *** annabelleB has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
| jroll | dhellmann: I agree with you re: centralized design groups and such. thanks for those twitter links. I made some effort around dropping old microversions a while ago that would be helpful there, I honestly haven't checked back in on it much since my hiatus and don't really have time to drive that now :( | 14:15 |
| *** cdent_ has joined #openstack-tc | 14:16 | |
| jroll | cdent: in case you haven't found it yet, "Your Vancouver Summit Code: OpenStack PTG" from OpenStack Foundation <summit@openstack.org> via e2ma.net | 14:16 |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
| *** cdent_ is now known as cdent | 14:17 | |
| cdent | jroll: yeah, mugsie's bottomless email archive provided. but thanks. turns out it is likely a spam problem | 14:18 |
| jroll | ah | 14:19 |
| jroll | cdent: re: placement usage data, just wait a couple years for people to actually go deploy it :) :( :( :( | 14:22 |
| jroll | that's one of the harder parts in openstack leadership to me, knowing if you're doing the right thing when almost nobody is running the code for a year or two | 14:22 |
| cdent | true | 14:23 |
| cdent | but it's not as bad as all that if we check with academia: a friend of mine runs a (big) openstack install at the university we both went to and they are upgrading to queens after summit | 14:23 |
| cdent | (the ptg code stuff is not for me, btw, colleague having issues) | 14:24 |
| cdent | and by usage of placement, I don't really even mean big installs, more "us". most of the code hasn't even merged yet | 14:25 |
| jroll | fair enough | 14:29 |
| * jroll wonders if the uni is doing all the craziness NFV has driven into placement | 14:29 | |
| cdent | that's the craziness that's not done yet | 14:30 |
| cdent | and you have to be an optimistic think it will be "done" for rocky | 14:30 |
| jroll | s/rocky/a long long time/ | 14:32 |
| jroll | (nothing against the people working on it, just seems like the target changes daily) | 14:33 |
| cdent | thus my desire to stop adding things to the list. the constant context and target switching means nothing happens | 14:34 |
| cdent | finish a small piece, release it, see what happens. amazing, it's open source in action! | 14:34 |
| jroll | ++ | 14:34 |
| * dhellmann looks forward to seeing the placement API using the cycle-with-intermediary release model for frequent releases | 14:37 | |
| cdent | dhellmann: if we ever get it extracted I would _love_ to do that | 14:38 |
| cdent | but there are currentyl no other resources besides me on that task | 14:39 |
| *** annabelleB has joined #openstack-tc | 14:42 | |
| mnaser | jroll: re: nobody is running the code for a year or two -- i get so excited when i hear about a customer who "needs queens" | 14:45 |
| jroll | heh | 14:45 |
| jroll | everybody needs queens, only a select few will do it soon :P | 14:46 |
| mnaser | so i guess tech people don't really care as much as marketing, but we're pretty much running queens except for keystone (i have a few customers moving off v2 right now) | 14:47 |
| cdent | mnaser: you are a credit to the industry :) | 14:48 |
| jroll | that's awesome | 14:48 |
| mnaser | that's supposed to be announced next week (queens).. but it's pretty interesting that there are people who are actually looking for *latest releases* | 14:48 |
| * jroll cares greatly and is decidedly not a marketing person | 14:48 | |
| mnaser | and it's an enterprise customer so i'm about to hop on a call to know what features they need | 14:48 |
| mnaser | super useful insight and i'd love to bring it back here to find out reasons we can get people to run newer code | 14:49 |
| mnaser | jroll: yeah, but the fact we're running queens is "embargo'd" by marketing but /me shrugs | 14:49 |
| jroll | heh | 14:49 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: move the team badge generation to the end of the build https://review.openstack.org/568309 | 14:52 |
| openstackgerrit | Doug Hellmann proposed openstack/governance master: Add os_blazar to OpenStack-Ansible https://review.openstack.org/566541 | 14:57 |
| *** gcb has joined #openstack-tc | 15:01 | |
| fungi | cdent: your placement todo backlog is sounding similar to what we went through with zuul v3... it was in the works for so long with a fairly specific scope of target features/tasks that we had an increasing number of people already asking for features which would need to come after the release; at one point we basically just said to come back to us after the release to discuss them because trying to | 15:09 |
| fungi | plan for the next version while the current version wasn't even done yet was more of a distraction than anything | 15:09 |
| cdent | yeah | 15:09 |
| cdent | sounds very familiar | 15:09 |
| fungi | and i personally think that's fine | 15:10 |
| cdent | me too, but there's not agreement within the group (which is also fine, but a pita) | 15:10 |
| fungi | you have only so much time and energy to invest in it. you can get the current stuff done, but discussing what comes next can get kicked down the road as long as you at least do what's necessary to try and avoid painting yourself into a corner (know vaguely what you might be thinking about beyond that event horizon) | 15:11 |
| fungi | too much time spent designing what comes next will simply delay what you need to do now | 15:11 |
| fungi | it's an all too easy trap to fall into though. excessive planning can be a way to procrastinate on what you already know needs doing while rationalizing it away as productive | 15:13 |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 15:14 | |
| * cdent nods | 15:14 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 15:22 | |
| *** gcb has quit IRC | 15:22 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 15:43 | |
| *** annabelleB has quit IRC | 16:55 | |
| *** annabelleB has joined #openstack-tc | 17:00 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 17:01 | |
| *** mugsie has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
| *** mugsie has joined #openstack-tc | 17:06 | |
| *** mugsie has quit IRC | 17:06 | |
| *** mugsie has joined #openstack-tc | 17:06 | |
| *** mugsie has quit IRC | 17:08 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 17:10 | |
| *** mugsie has joined #openstack-tc | 17:12 | |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 17:14 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 17:14 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 17:19 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 17:19 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
| mordred | tc-members: over the weekend we surfaced a desire to have a discussion at the forum about moving our APIs forward, bumping microversion mins and adding new major versions | 17:27 |
| mugsie | yeah - I have some thoughts on that :) | 17:27 |
| mordred | a) are people cool with adding such a topic and b) how does wednesday at 16:40 sound? | 17:27 |
| mordred | mugsie: me too :) | 17:27 |
| dhellmann | mordred : yes, let's get together | 17:28 |
| dhellmann | that's a good time fo rme | 17:28 |
| mugsie | that works for me as well | 17:28 |
| fungi | mordred: the opendev ci/cd join session overlaps that, as does the session on requirements for contributing organizations (i'll likely be in the latter), but i suppose conflicts are likely to abound. i doubt i'm needed in the api discussion anyway | 17:29 |
| mordred | fungi: yah - missing the opendev ci/cd joint session was the 'best' conflict I had - and I figure we'll have coverage in that one anyway | 17:29 |
| *** ricolin_ has quit IRC | 17:32 | |
| jroll | mordred: glad to see y'all working on that :) | 17:35 |
| *** cdent has joined #openstack-tc | 17:48 | |
| *** annabelleB has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
| *** annabelleB has joined #openstack-tc | 18:00 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 18:04 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 18:09 | |
| *** harlowja has joined #openstack-tc | 18:12 | |
| TheJulia | mordred: that time also works for me, sounds like a good topic imho | 18:12 |
| mordred | jroll: ++ | 18:15 |
| mordred | TheJulia: \o/ | 18:15 |
| jroll | mordred: I won't be there but I fully support being able to kill a microversion | 18:16 |
| jroll | bonus points if you can kill the "micro" in the word "microversion" | 18:16 |
| mordred | jroll: oh - well ... I'm not sure that's *exactly* the stance I'll be advocating for, but having argued with you on the topic before I believe I can represent your point of view as well :) | 18:17 |
| mordred | jroll: (also, yeah - the name microversion is really unfortunate) | 18:17 |
| mugsie | jroll: my view is going to be, if we do a global major version cut, lets forget microversions ever existed, and say if OpenAPI cannot model it, its not an OpenStack API | 18:18 |
| cdent | mugsie: gee, I dunno, that's too small a step ;) | 18:19 |
| cdent | what's 16:40 vancouver in utc? | 18:20 |
| jroll | heh | 18:20 |
| mugsie | one small step for mugsie, a giant leap for OpenStack? | 18:20 |
| clarkb | cdent: 2340 | 18:20 |
| clarkb | or is it 0040 now | 18:20 |
| clarkb | one of the two | 18:20 |
| cdent | thanks clarkb, wasn't sure of the offset | 18:20 |
| cdent | ha! | 18:20 |
| clarkb | 2340 | 18:21 |
| cdent | yeah, figured it out too | 18:21 |
| cdent | mordred: can you assign me a roll or position for this conversation. I no longer know how I really feel | 18:23 |
| jroll | cdent: rabble-rouser work for you? | 18:23 |
| mordred | cdent: totally | 18:24 |
| mordred | cdent: you wanna be jroll? | 18:24 |
| cdent | well that's the thing. usually it would, but these days, I dunno. I'm tired. | 18:24 |
| mordred | fair point | 18:24 |
| jroll | I like the idea of cdent being me for vancouver | 18:24 |
| mordred | mugsie: I'm going to disagree with you about that - but I think it'll be more fun to disagree with you on that in person in vancouver | 18:24 |
| mugsie | mordred: I figured, and yes, in person will be more fun :) | 18:25 |
| cdent | I'm thinking maybe I'll take the position of "whatever, but let's do _something_" | 18:25 |
| TheJulia | jroll: but if cdent is you for vancouver, that means he might be able to claim your beers | 18:25 |
| cdent | \o/ | 18:25 |
| jroll | that is fine | 18:25 |
| mordred | mugsie: although maybe we should find some beers before wednesday and disagree with each other over alcohol first | 18:25 |
| cdent | double \o/ | 18:25 |
| mugsie | mordred: ++ | 18:25 |
| jroll | I'll have 3 months before PTG to build up my beer IOUs again | 18:25 |
| * cdent is looking forward to being as young and attractive as jroll | 18:25 | |
| cdent | and hopefully as capable of handling beer | 18:25 |
| cdent | If I do anything stupid it's jroll's fault | 18:25 |
| * jroll :o | 18:26 | |
| mordred | mugsie: I guess we could just sit next to each other at whatever mixer happens after the board/tc/uc meeting - abuse the foundation's alcohol for the purposes | 18:26 |
| mugsie | cdent: "jroll" can be your alterego | 18:26 |
| cdent | Hello stackers, I'll be your jroll today. | 18:26 |
| TheJulia | mordred: this sounds acceptable ;) | 18:26 |
| mugsie | "what did jroll do last night?" | 18:26 |
| mugsie | mordred: yeah - I think that is a fine way to abuse the foundations alchohol :) | 18:27 |
| jroll | what have I done | 18:27 |
| cdent | worse: what will you do? | 18:27 |
| * jroll starts writing his apology letters | 18:27 | |
| TheJulia | lol | 18:27 |
| *** annabelleB has quit IRC | 18:28 | |
| TheJulia | jroll: in the words of jayf, 'doooooommm' | 18:28 |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-tc | 18:29 | |
| *** annabelleB has joined #openstack-tc | 18:30 | |
| cdent | Okay, I've adjusted my schedule so that both jroll and cdent will be present at an api bump session at 16:40 on wednesday | 18:31 |
| TheJulia | cdent: wait... both?!? | 18:32 |
| mugsie | cdent: the balmer peak? | 18:32 |
| cdent | I'm a complicated communicator | 18:32 |
| *** Guest16323 is now known as mgagne | 18:40 | |
| *** mgagne has joined #openstack-tc | 18:40 | |
| *** annabelleB has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 18:49 | |
| *** annabelleB has joined #openstack-tc | 18:52 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc | 18:57 | |
| *** annabelleB has quit IRC | 19:00 | |
| smcginnis | TheJulia: That was you wondering about Sunday registration, right? | 19:06 |
| smcginnis | Just saw the checklist email "Registration is open on Sunday 1-6pm" | 19:06 |
| TheJulia | smcginnis: I suspect you might have me mixed up with someone else | 19:07 |
| smcginnis | TheJulia: Ah, OK. Sorry. :) | 19:07 |
| smcginnis | Someone was in here wondering about Sunday registration last week I thought. | 19:07 |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 19:12 | |
| *** annabelleB has joined #openstack-tc | 19:17 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
| *** guvnah has joined #openstack-tc | 19:22 | |
| *** guvnah has quit IRC | 19:22 | |
| *** cdent has quit IRC | 20:26 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 20:27 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 20:31 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 20:32 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 21:03 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 21:06 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 21:08 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc | 21:21 | |
| *** annabelleB has quit IRC | 21:27 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 21:30 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has quit IRC | 21:32 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 21:34 | |
| *** annabelleB has joined #openstack-tc | 21:39 | |
| *** harlowja has quit IRC | 21:56 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 21:59 | |
| *** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-tc | 22:00 | |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 22:08 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 22:14 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 22:19 | |
| *** mriedem has quit IRC | 22:22 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 22:40 | |
| dhellmann | they usually have our badges and swag ready at the board meeting | 22:43 |
| dhellmann | s/board/joint leadership/ | 22:43 |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 22:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/governance master: move the team badge generation to the end of the build https://review.openstack.org/568309 | 22:56 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/governance master: Add os_blazar to OpenStack-Ansible https://review.openstack.org/566541 | 22:56 |
| *** dklyle has quit IRC | 22:56 | |
| *** kumarmn has joined #openstack-tc | 23:23 | |
| *** kumarmn has quit IRC | 23:28 | |
| *** dklyle has joined #openstack-tc | 23:35 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!