| *** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-swift | 00:46 | |
| *** klrmn has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
| *** nikivi has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
| *** nikivi has joined #openstack-swift | 01:33 | |
| *** psachin has joined #openstack-swift | 01:49 | |
| *** Shatadru|Gone is now known as Shatadru|coffee| | 02:16 | |
| * kota_ is back | 02:52 | |
| *** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 02:55 | |
| *** mtreinish has quit IRC | 03:02 | |
| *** mtreinish has joined #openstack-swift | 03:07 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:11 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:12 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:12 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:13 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:13 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:13 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:14 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:14 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:14 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:15 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:15 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:16 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:17 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:17 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:17 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:18 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:18 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:18 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:20 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:20 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:22 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:22 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:22 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:22 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:23 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:24 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:24 | |
| *** links has joined #openstack-swift | 03:24 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 03:25 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 03:25 | |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 04:09 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift | 04:21 | |
| *** klrmn has quit IRC | 04:30 | |
| *** hoonetorg has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
| *** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift | 04:50 | |
| *** jarbod has quit IRC | 04:57 | |
| *** jarbod has joined #openstack-swift | 04:58 | |
| *** ChubYann has quit IRC | 05:28 | |
| *** HCLTech-SSW has joined #openstack-swift | 05:32 | |
| HCLTech-SSW | <Clay Gerrard>: Hi | 05:34 |
|---|---|---|
| *** gkadam_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:38 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 05:40 | |
| *** gkadam__ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:40 | |
| *** gkadam__ has quit IRC | 05:42 | |
| *** gkadam_ has quit IRC | 05:43 | |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 05:43 | |
| *** Shatadru|coffee| is now known as Shatadru|brb | 05:45 | |
| *** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift | 05:45 | |
| kota_ | timburke: hmm... odd. I couldn't reproduce what I did, on the patch 345739.s3.amazonaws.com also work the patch expected. | 05:49 |
| patchbot | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/345739/ - swift3 - Add support for more characters in header keys | 05:49 |
| kota_ | maybe i was dreaming... ? | 05:49 |
| kota_ | timburke: gaah! I noticed my mistake. The hint is in my comment at the gerrit. I was using both x-amz-meta-foo and x-amz-meta_foo but actually s3 requiers 'x-amz-meta-' prefix (not that the dash after "meta") | 06:00 |
| kota_ | and only one correct header (i.e. x-amz-meta-foo) was remained in the object metadata. whooa, sorry :( | 06:01 |
| *** Shatadru|brb is now known as Shatadru | 06:35 | |
| *** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift | 06:35 | |
| *** HCLTech-SSW has quit IRC | 06:37 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 06:40 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift feature/deep: Replicate deleted shard ranges https://review.openstack.org/511282 | 06:41 |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 06:42 | |
| *** Dinesh_Bhor has quit IRC | 07:01 | |
| *** Dinesh_Bhor has joined #openstack-swift | 07:07 | |
| *** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift | 07:08 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift | 07:17 | |
| *** gkadam is now known as gkadam-afk | 07:24 | |
| *** Shatadru is now known as Shatadru|food | 07:27 | |
| *** tesseract has joined #openstack-swift | 07:32 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 07:40 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 07:48 | |
| *** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift | 08:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/510000 | 08:12 |
| openstackgerrit | Tovin Seven proposed openstack/swift master: OSprofiler in OpenStack Swift https://review.openstack.org/468316 | 08:15 |
| acoles | good morning | 08:20 |
| *** gkadam-afk has quit IRC | 08:28 | |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-swift | 08:31 | |
| *** kei_yama has quit IRC | 08:38 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift master: WIP: Move swift-drive-audit code to swift/cli/drive_audit https://review.openstack.org/511205 | 08:40 |
| *** spectr has quit IRC | 08:49 | |
| *** Shatadru|food is now known as Shatadru | 08:53 | |
| mattoliverau | acoles: morning | 09:11 |
| acoles | mattoliverau: o/ | 09:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: Add helper methods to assert shard range equality https://review.openstack.org/511437 | 09:18 |
| *** spectr has joined #openstack-swift | 09:19 | |
| tdasilva | good morning | 09:19 |
| acoles | tdasilva: ? you're early | 09:19 |
| tdasilva | just a bit :) | 09:20 |
| tdasilva | wanted to catch up with kota_ and m_kazuhiro | 09:20 |
| tdasilva | reading scrollback | 09:20 |
| *** gkadam_ has joined #openstack-swift | 09:36 | |
| *** mvk has quit IRC | 09:37 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 09:38 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: Merge put_shard_range and delete_shard_range to one update method https://review.openstack.org/511446 | 09:46 |
| *** tovin07_ has quit IRC | 10:00 | |
| *** Shatadru is now known as Shatadru|Gone | 10:06 | |
| *** spectr has quit IRC | 10:12 | |
| *** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift | 10:14 | |
| m_kazuhiro | good morning. | 10:14 |
| kota_ | tdasilva: hello | 10:15 |
| kota_ | tdasilva: sorry, I have to leave here now, m_kazuhiro will be able to continue to discuss something | 10:15 |
| tdasilva | hello | 10:15 |
| tdasilva | no problem | 10:15 |
| kota_ | I'll also catch up with reading the irc log ;) | 10:16 |
| tdasilva | ok :) | 10:16 |
| kota_ | see you | 10:16 |
| tdasilva | m_kazuhiro: just wanted to catch up on the issue #2 | 10:16 |
| m_kazuhiro | tdasilva: On my etherpad page? | 10:16 |
| tdasilva | yeah | 10:16 |
| tdasilva | so I'm not against adding the automatic content type, but was just trying to understand the use case/motivation for doing so | 10:18 |
| m_kazuhiro | In my understanding, there are no use case for auto insertion of content-type. | 10:19 |
| m_kazuhiro | This topic is come from ``application/symlink`` is recommended in comment of symlink middleware. | 10:20 |
| tdasilva | ah ok...so we might as well add it if users doesn't send a content-type? | 10:22 |
| m_kazuhiro | So my opinion is that if there is recommended content-type, the content-type should be inserted automatically. But I don't have motivation for recommended content-type. | 10:22 |
| m_kazuhiro | Yes auto insertion is topic when user doesn't send content-type. | 10:23 |
| m_kazuhiro | Before start discussion, I want to ask one question. | 10:24 |
| m_kazuhiro | Are there any reason why you wrote about "recommended content-type"? I think you wrote the comment. | 10:25 |
| *** spectr has joined #openstack-swift | 10:25 | |
| m_kazuhiro | Comment is at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/232162/59/swift/common/middleware/symlink.py@34 | 10:25 |
| patchbot | patch 232162 - swift - Symlink implementation. | 10:25 |
| tdasilva | m_kazuhiro: i'm trying to remember the reason for that TBH. I think it is basically another way to distinguish the object. Can be useful for the app devs. | 10:27 |
| tdasilva | m_kazuhiro: ok, I started on a patch based on kota's comments and will try to send an update today | 10:28 |
| m_kazuhiro | tdasilva: Will you update symlink patch? I think you are busy for swift3 work. So if you say OK, I will update it. | 10:31 |
| tdasilva | m_kazuhiro: i got started on the symlink patch yesterday, so I think I should be able to send a quick update... | 10:32 |
| m_kazuhiro | tdasilva: Sounds great. OK, I will review updated symlink patch after your update. | 10:34 |
| *** Shatadru|Gone has quit IRC | 10:34 | |
| tdasilva | m_kazuhiro: ok. | 10:36 |
| tdasilva | i'm going to go get ready to drive to the office, thanks for sticking around :) | 10:36 |
| m_kazuhiro | tdasilva: You're welcome. I'm looking forward to patch update :) | 10:37 |
| *** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC | 10:52 | |
| *** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift | 11:08 | |
| *** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 11:08 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 11:14 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift feature/deep: Shard ranges don't need storage policies https://review.openstack.org/511310 | 11:16 |
| *** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift | 11:57 | |
| *** cbartz has quit IRC | 12:01 | |
| *** Shatadru|Gone has joined #openstack-swift | 12:14 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 12:14 | |
| *** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift | 12:18 | |
| *** Shatadru|Gone has quit IRC | 12:20 | |
| *** lifeless has quit IRC | 12:24 | |
| *** lifeless has joined #openstack-swift | 12:31 | |
| *** Shatadru has joined #openstack-swift | 12:40 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 12:41 | |
| *** gkadam_ has quit IRC | 12:46 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift | 13:06 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift | 13:06 | |
| *** mat128 has joined #openstack-swift | 13:13 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 13:13 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift | 13:14 | |
| *** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 13:24 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 13:25 | |
| *** cshastri has quit IRC | 13:27 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: clean up _one_shard_cycle state machine https://review.openstack.org/511482 | 13:38 |
| *** cshastri has joined #openstack-swift | 13:43 | |
| *** Shatadru has quit IRC | 13:51 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 13:58 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 14:10 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 14:12 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 14:18 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 14:24 | |
| *** cshastri has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
| *** psachin has quit IRC | 14:28 | |
| *** Shatadru has joined #openstack-swift | 14:30 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 14:32 | |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 14:36 | |
| *** links has joined #openstack-swift | 14:39 | |
| *** rcernin has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Job log uploads are failing due to lack of inodes. Jobs also fail due to mismatches in gnutls packages. Workarounds for both in progress with proper fixes to follow. | 14:55 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "Job log uploads are failing due to lack of inodes. Jobs also fail due to mismatches in gnutls packages. Workarounds for both in progress with proper fixes to follow." | 14:56 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
| *** mjturek has joined #openstack-swift | 15:06 | |
| mjturek | hey - I'm running tempest against a non-devstack environment and I was wondering if the tempest tests expect a certain auth type to be used? I'm getting a lot of "Forbidden" responses ie - http://paste.openstack.org/show/623463/ | 15:11 |
| *** chlong has joined #openstack-swift | 15:15 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
| *** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift | 15:30 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: make root_account, root_container properties of broker https://review.openstack.org/511508 | 15:38 |
| timburke | good morning | 15:41 |
| *** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift | 15:42 | |
| timburke | kota_: no worries on the metadata patch. you just had me doubting myself :-) | 15:43 |
| *** links has quit IRC | 15:47 | |
| timburke | mjturek: i'd expect that tempest wants some flavor of keystone auth, but i don't really know for sure. assuming that you've already got that covered, my best guess for where to start looking would be to compare the roles for your test user and the operator_roles in the proxy-server's [filter:keystoneauth] section -- might be worth looking at https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/2.15.1/etc/proxy-server.conf-sample#L410 too | 15:55 |
| notmyname | good morning | 16:00 |
| *** links has joined #openstack-swift | 16:00 | |
| *** chlong has quit IRC | 16:03 | |
| mjturek | awesoome, thanks timburke! | 16:09 |
| *** cbartz has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
| *** hseipp has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** pdardeau has joined #openstack-swift | 16:30 | |
| *** itlinux has quit IRC | 16:32 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 16:41 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 16:44 | |
| *** geaaru has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
| *** mvk has quit IRC | 17:07 | |
| *** tesseract has quit IRC | 17:11 | |
| *** not_me has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
| *** silor has joined #openstack-swift | 17:18 | |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 17:19 | |
| *** Shatadru has quit IRC | 17:25 | |
| *** links has quit IRC | 17:27 | |
| *** silor has quit IRC | 17:38 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: Add helper methods to assert shard range equality https://review.openstack.org/511437 | 17:58 |
| *** shaner has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| clayg | ohai!? | 18:03 |
| *** shaner has joined #openstack-swift | 18:06 | |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed openstack/swift feature/deep: actually use the assertShardRangesNotEqual helper method https://review.openstack.org/511544 | 18:07 |
| acoles | timburke: thanks for all your careful review! | 18:08 |
| timburke | np | 18:08 |
| acoles | timburke: mattoliverau I've noticed that the sharder probe tests seem to rely on timely calls to container list in order to pass... I think maybe because calls to the container server API (including shard range updates) land in a X.db.pending file even when the container has sharded to X_shard.db ! And it takes an API call to have that pending file emptied. https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/b48a8f634d2539d7eb0ac51b2 | 18:18 |
| acoles | ed2afc6ffc79c29/swift/container/server.py#L142-L158 | 18:18 |
| acoles | In the sharder, whenever we do get_info() on a sharded broker hoping it will persist all pending updates, it looks for *X_shard.db.pending* | 18:20 |
| timburke | eep | 18:20 |
| acoles | timburke: I've been going nuts trying to debug the shrinking probe test, I *hope* this might be hallelujah moment | 18:21 |
| acoles | but I have to stop for today! so, thoughts...should we always use one pending file with one name? or is there a reason to switch to X_shard.db.pending once sharded? I am thinking one file, same name, always, makes sense?? | 18:23 |
| acoles | mattoliverau: timburke: ^^ any opinions? | 18:23 |
| acoles | good night | 18:23 |
| *** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift | 18:29 | |
| timburke | goo night acoles! single name seems pretty sane to me, but i haven't thought through it much yet | 18:31 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift feature/deep: Merge put_shard_range and delete_shard_range to one update method https://review.openstack.org/511446 | 18:34 |
| mattoliverau | acoles: oops, yeah should be 1 file. Because there should always only be 1 db to update in all states. | 18:37 |
| *** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 18:38 | |
| *** joeljwright has quit IRC | 18:39 | |
| *** hseipp has joined #openstack-swift | 18:40 | |
| *** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift | 18:41 | |
| *** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift | 18:41 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright | 18:41 | |
| openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift master: Use "poll" or "selects" Eventlet hub for all Swift daemons. https://review.openstack.org/511550 | 18:42 |
| torgomatic | timur: notmyname: ^^ | 18:42 |
| *** vint_bra has quit IRC | 18:45 | |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 18:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift feature/deep: clean up _one_shard_cycle state machine https://review.openstack.org/511482 | 18:50 |
| *** hseipp has quit IRC | 18:52 | |
| timburke | mattoliverau? isn't it like 6am for you? get back in bed! | 19:06 |
| clayg | torgomatic: I'm acctually pretty confused by https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/obj/updater.py#L89 | 19:19 |
| clayg | IME forking after the eventlet hub has "started" is just *always* bad juju - worse so if the eventlet threadpool think has started! | 19:19 |
| torgomatic | clayg: in this case, we've only got our one greenthread, and we're not using the tpool, so it's not terrible | 19:20 |
| clayg | I guess *maybe* somehow the parent process run_forever isn't *really* touching eventlet? I see a time.sleep at the bottom... so maybe it's just super careful? | 19:20 |
| mattoliverau | Yeah it is, and yes I should :p | 19:20 |
| torgomatic | but yes, fork + eventlet really needs a lot of careful thought | 19:20 |
| mattoliverau | But now I'm reading about MAMR, thanks notmyname :p | 19:21 |
| *** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 19:28 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tim Burke proposed openstack/swift master: Add Preamble and Postamble to SLO and SegmentedIterable https://review.openstack.org/365371 | 19:49 |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 19:58 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
| timburke | torgomatic: thinking a bit about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510716/ -- what's your opinion on SLOs with *no* segments? | 20:26 |
| patchbot | patch 510716 - swift - Allow SLOs to have zero-byte last segments. | 20:26 |
| timburke | `curl http://saio:8090/v1/AUTH_test/c/slo?multipart-manifest=put -X PUT -d '[]'` currently works... so i guess we should never break that? do we have tests for it? | 20:27 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift feature/deep: Add helper methods to assert shard range equality https://review.openstack.org/511437 | 20:34 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift feature/deep: actually use the assertShardRangesNotEqual helper method https://review.openstack.org/511544 | 20:34 |
| torgomatic | timburke: sounds stupid but not worth specifying IMO | 20:35 |
| *** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift | 20:35 | |
| torgomatic | I can easily see how zero-byte final segments would come about, but an empty SLO seems harder to do. At worst, a SLO with a single, zero-byte segment would be created by a naive uploader | 20:36 |
| *** oshritf has quit IRC | 20:37 | |
| *** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift | 20:42 | |
| timburke | but i'm right to think that it's a bit late to try *enforcing* that there's at least one segment, yeah? | 20:43 |
| torgomatic | yeah, that ship has sailed | 20:46 |
| *** vint_bra has quit IRC | 20:57 | |
| *** chetna has joined #openstack-swift | 21:08 | |
| chetna | Hi, I wanted to check on GET object API, when we give in valid prefix and valid marker in request we get 204 (curl -i -H "X-Auth-Token: $TOKEN" $STORAGE_URL/container?"prefix=invalid&marker=valid) should we not throw Bad request error code? | 21:11 |
| torgomatic | chetna: what constitutes an invalid prefix? can you give an example of one? | 21:13 |
| chetna | @torgomatic : Anything that does not match any object prefix | 21:17 |
| torgomatic | chetna: that's not really "invalid", it just doesn't match any object right now. One could upload an object starting with that prefix at any time. | 21:18 |
| torgomatic | You're asking for a set of objects starting with some prefix P; at this time, that set is empty, so the result you receive from Swift is empty. Should that change in the future, you'd receive a non-empty result. | 21:19 |
| chetna | makes sense. | 21:19 |
| chetna | Thanks for clarifying | 21:19 |
| torgomatic | You're welcome | 21:19 |
| *** joeljwright has quit IRC | 21:21 | |
| *** mat128 has quit IRC | 21:25 | |
| torgomatic | notmyname: we're gonna want a backport of patch 511550, assuming it lands | 21:32 |
| patchbot | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511550/ - swift - Use "poll" or "selects" Eventlet hub for all Swift... | 21:32 |
| notmyname | yeah | 21:32 |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 21:34 | |
| *** lifeless has quit IRC | 21:37 | |
| timburke | torgomatic: "the old behavior is just so bizarre that I can't imagine anyone wanting it" -- that's *exactly* why i structured that change that way :) | 21:48 |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 21:53 | |
| *** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift | 21:53 | |
| *** catintheroof has quit IRC | 21:55 | |
| *** lifeless has joined #openstack-swift | 22:00 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 22:05 |
| openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift master: Shorten typical proxy pipeline. https://review.openstack.org/504472 | 22:26 |
| *** mvk has quit IRC | 22:30 | |
| openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift master: Move all monkey patching to one function https://review.openstack.org/306612 | 22:42 |
| *** mvk has joined #openstack-swift | 22:47 | |
| *** chetna has quit IRC | 22:57 | |
| *** chetna has joined #openstack-swift | 22:57 | |
| mattoliverau | morning, again.. | 22:58 |
| timburke | better :-) | 23:00 |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "https://bugs.not.mn/project/Swift | Logs: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-swift/ | Meetings: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Swift | Review Dashboard: http://not.mn/reviews.html" | 23:05 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Workarounds are in place for libcurl and similar dependency errors due to stale ubuntu mirroring, and for POST_FAILURE results stemming from runaway inode utilization on the logs site; feel free to recheck failing changes for either of these problems now | 23:05 | |
| openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed openstack/swift master: Remove some leftover threadpool cruft. https://review.openstack.org/511644 | 23:13 |
| *** mjturek has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has quit IRC | 23:29 | |
| *** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift | 23:31 | |
| *** chetna has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
| *** mvk has quit IRC | 23:36 | |
| *** wes_dillingham has joined #openstack-swift | 23:37 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift feature/deep: make root_account, root_container properties of broker https://review.openstack.org/511508 | 23:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift master: domain_remap: stop mangling client-provided paths https://review.openstack.org/464217 | 23:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift master: add mangle_client_paths to example config https://review.openstack.org/510990 | 23:42 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/swift master: Imported Translations from Zanata https://review.openstack.org/510000 | 23:42 |
| *** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift | 23:47 | |
| *** vint_bra has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
| *** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift | 23:53 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!