Friday, 2016-08-05

*** manous has quit IRC00:00
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift00:08
*** ukaynar has quit IRC00:14
*** hosanai has joined #openstack-swift00:19
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v hosanai00:19
*** dmorita has quit IRC00:23
*** airdisa has quit IRC00:23
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift00:24
*** tqtran has quit IRC00:25
*** dmorita has quit IRC00:26
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift00:31
*** chlong has quit IRC00:32
*** dmorita has quit IRC00:34
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift00:34
*** Suyi_ has quit IRC00:37
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift00:37
*** dmorita has quit IRC00:42
*** diogogmt has quit IRC00:46
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift00:46
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift00:47
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift00:54
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away00:55
openstackgerritShashirekha Gundur proposed openstack/swift: NIT: fixing inconsistent naming of OpenStack Swift  https://review.openstack.org/35138800:57
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox00:57
kota_good morning00:58
kota_glad to hear, notmyname you've been back :-)00:59
*** mmcardle has quit IRC00:59
kota_timburke: ok, so it's a bug (or design?) for both mode. thanks!00:59
timburkekota_: "bug" seems appropriate, though there may have been a conscious design decision at some point01:02
kota_timburke: exactly, and thanks for updating api-ref. will look at again :-)01:04
kota_clayg: still here?01:04
*** ukaynar has quit IRC01:04
timburkei know he went home at any rate, not sure if he'll be online01:05
kota_timburke: ah, ok.01:05
kota_timburke: hmm... i thought I'd like to ping him for my review before I'm going to be in vacation :/01:06
timburkewhich review?01:07
kota_timburke: patch 219165 :-)01:07
patchbotkota_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/219165/ - swift - EC Fragment Duplication - Foundational Global EC C...01:07
timburkekota_: i'll make sure he sees it :-)01:08
kota_timburke: you can do that too though ;-)01:08
timburkeindeed01:08
kota_small notice, clayg has reviewd it once, and i addressed his comments in the newest patch set.01:09
kota_so now i'm waiting him again, or other reviewers :-)01:09
*** dmorita has quit IRC01:22
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift01:28
openstackgerrithouweichao proposed openstack/swift: make the logger information format  https://review.openstack.org/35113201:33
* charz morning01:39
zhengyingood morning everyone01:39
zhengyinkota_ : good morning, kota01:40
kota_good morning charz and zhengyin01:40
*** dmorita has quit IRC01:45
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift01:46
*** klrmn has quit IRC02:01
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift02:04
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away02:12
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift02:17
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift02:17
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift02:19
*** dmorita has quit IRC02:19
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift02:26
*** chsc has quit IRC02:30
*** daemontool_ has quit IRC02:31
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift02:35
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift02:43
openstackgerritJiong Liu proposed openstack/swift: make the logger information format  https://review.openstack.org/35113202:44
*** ukaynar has quit IRC02:47
openstackgerritJiong Liu proposed openstack/swift: make the logger information format  https://review.openstack.org/35113202:48
*** mmcardle has quit IRC02:49
openstackgerritJiong Liu proposed openstack/swift: make the logger information format  https://review.openstack.org/35113202:51
*** dmorita has quit IRC02:53
openstackgerritJiong Liu proposed openstack/swift: Make the logger information format  https://review.openstack.org/35113202:54
openstackgerritJiong Liu proposed openstack/swift: Make the logger information format  https://review.openstack.org/35113202:55
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift02:56
*** dmorita has quit IRC02:59
*** _JZ_ has quit IRC03:20
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift03:32
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox03:35
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift03:42
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift03:49
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift03:52
*** chsc has quit IRC03:57
kota_mahatic_: on patch 346865, I noticed some concerns in the last night and now I'm making sure the get_hashes and invalidate_hash behaviors.04:04
patchbotkota_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/346865/ - swift - Delete old tombstones04:04
kota_mahatic_: my test at gist might be wrong. I will notify you when I can get sure for it sorry.04:05
*** klrmn has quit IRC04:33
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away04:43
mahatic_kota_: sure, np. I will look into it too today. thanks04:47
*** flwang1 has quit IRC04:51
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift04:54
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift05:00
*** zaitcev has quit IRC05:01
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift05:03
*** dmorita has quit IRC05:04
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift05:12
*** abhitechie has quit IRC05:25
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift05:31
openstackgerritJanie Richling proposed openstack/swift: Automatic refresh of memcache config settings  https://review.openstack.org/21849005:33
*** ppai has quit IRC05:35
*** links has joined #openstack-swift05:36
kota_I finally got it!05:39
kota_mahatic_: still here?05:39
kota_mahatic: new tests for your, here https://gist.github.com/bloodeagle40234/3224f3ccb7d78862cb35dec856c263bb05:40
mahatic_kota_: yup. but I'm afraid, I haven't looked into it after yesterday05:40
mahatic_ah okay, looking05:40
kota_mahatic_: i think you're correct calling get_hashes(<snip>, suffixes=['the dir to recalculate']) can force to reclaim.05:41
kota_what I checked in the test above is get_hashes behaviors AFTER invalidate_hash.05:42
kota_amazingly, get_hashes may not reclaim the .ts if the suffix is in invalidate file entry.05:43
kota_that happen if the suffix dir is already empty (or no meaningful .data file exists in)05:44
kota_https://gist.github.com/bloodeagle40234/3224f3ccb7d78862cb35dec856c263bb#file-invalidate_hash_and_get_hashes_test-diff-L51-L5505:44
mahatic_kota_: it does check the reclaim age and manages to reclaim (since it calls hash_suffix_dir->cleanup_disk)05:45
kota_however, as you suggested yesterday, if we call get_hashes directly, it can force to update hash.pkl, https://gist.github.com/bloodeagle40234/3224f3ccb7d78862cb35dec856c263bb#file-invalidate_hash_and_get_hashes_test-diff-L57-L6305:45
kota_mahatic_: yes05:45
kota_and set suffix arg is needed to force it.05:45
mahatic_yeah, suffix arg and a few more - https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/obj/diskfile.py#L122305:47
kota_"suffixes" for get_hashes arg, "recalculate" for _get_hashes05:48
kota_a bit complicated :P05:48
mahatic_heh05:48
kota_so the difference from my first thought is invalidate_hash can always reclaim the .ts but it was not true.05:48
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift05:49
kota_ok, mahatic_ probably knows how we can progress this :-)05:49
kota_some imporovments for this seems to call get_hashes for each suffix dir (i mean, not only each time when finding reclaimable .ts file)05:50
kota_anyway05:51
mahatic_wouldn't it be similar to making a call to invalidate_hash (like the prev solution)05:51
mahatic_kota_: we will have that overhead of doing it for all the directories, right?05:52
kota_maybe, no?05:53
*** ChubYann has quit IRC05:55
kota_need to make sure but, with quick looking of code, the calculateion targets are entries in hash.pkl unless we set do_listdir=True05:55
mahatic_okay I will look at tha05:55
mahatic_that05:56
*** ekarlso has quit IRC05:58
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift06:02
*** chlong has quit IRC06:08
*** kei_yama has quit IRC06:10
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift06:10
*** hosanai has quit IRC06:27
*** KriskK has joined #openstack-swift06:31
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift06:35
openstackgerritJiong Liu proposed openstack/swift: Make the logger information format  https://review.openstack.org/35113206:35
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift06:40
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift06:40
*** kei_yama has quit IRC06:43
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift06:44
*** KriskK has quit IRC06:44
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Remove unnecessary open call and related vars in unit tests  https://review.openstack.org/35151506:45
*** KriskK has joined #openstack-swift06:51
*** KriskK has quit IRC06:52
*** chlong has quit IRC06:52
*** ppai has quit IRC07:09
*** kei_yama has quit IRC07:11
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift07:16
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift07:22
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC07:24
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift07:25
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift07:28
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Add allowed mode info to versioned_writes swift info  https://review.openstack.org/35154007:34
*** geaaru has quit IRC07:58
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC08:03
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift08:03
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift08:11
*** tesseract- has joined #openstack-swift08:16
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift08:21
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/pyeclib: DON'T MERGE: test new python-job gate  https://review.openstack.org/35156408:23
*** d0ugal has quit IRC08:32
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift08:33
*** d0ugal has quit IRC08:33
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift08:33
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift08:34
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright08:34
*** joeljwright1 has joined #openstack-swift08:37
*** joeljwright1 has quit IRC08:37
*** joeljwright has quit IRC08:40
*** tanee is now known as tanee_away08:49
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles08:52
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-swift08:53
acoleskota_: when are you away for vacation?08:58
kota_acoles: near place from tokyo. just a couple of hours driving.08:58
kota_ah sorry08:59
kota_I misread, when/where.08:59
kota_acoles: I am going to be in vacation in this weekend and take rest for a week.09:00
acoleskota_: sounds good, enjoy the rest!09:01
kota_acoles: thanks :-)09:01
acoleskota_: I have you global EC patch on my list to review. problem is my list is too long, and keeps getting longer :( but I'll try to look soon.09:02
kota_acoles: awesome! glad to hear! I also wants to try your optimistic GET again.09:03
kota_probably, it's high priority to me after my vacation :P09:03
*** ouchkernel has quit IRC09:04
acoleskota_: yep I think I should probably also review my optimistic GETs patch - it has been so long it may need some updating, idk.09:04
kota_indeed09:04
acolesmaybe I should be more optimistic about optimistic GETS :)09:05
kota_acoles: lol09:05
*** ouchkernel has joined #openstack-swift09:10
acoleskota_: in San Antonio I mentioned that maybe we could remove the requirement for at least one *durable* fragment in the set, and simply require a set of fragments at same timestamp for a GET to succeed. I also suggested we could try to re-use the same code for the reconstructor. Afterwards I realised that for reconstructor we probably want to require at least one single durable. So I think I should leave the patch the way09:10
acoles it is. It is still a lot better than the current "all fragments must be durable" strategy.09:10
kota_acoles: yes, i remember that.09:12
kota_acoles: on your thought, does it happen soon. I thought it will be after optimistic GETs09:13
kota_soon?09:13
kota_so we have a bunch of ideas to make EC better :/09:14
kota_sounds like, optimistic GETs saves current all fragments must be durable strategy  and expanding them to reconstuctor (it needs to make generic helpers which can be used both proxy and reconstructor)09:16
kota_that's the order I've been thinking of.09:16
kota_used by09:17
acoleskota_: yes: land optimistic GETs for proxy first, later refactor to share code with reconstructor.09:17
acolesis that what you think ^^ ?09:17
kota_acoles: I'm with :-)09:18
mahatic_acoles: kota_ is there a patch for optimistic gets? Can I have the patch number please?09:19
acoleskota_: hmmm, I guess we could maybe choose to reconstruct an object even if we do not get any durable fragments, because the fragment we reconstruct *will* be durable. I need to consider that some more.09:19
kota_mahatic_: patch 21527609:20
patchbotkota_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215276/ - swift - Enable object server to return non-durable data09:20
mahatic_thanks kota_ !09:20
acolesah kota_ beat me to it :)09:20
mahatic_:)09:21
kota_acoles: yeah, just we need ec_k fragments to reconstruct.09:21
acoleskota_: yes. we do not want to waste effort reconstructing an object that is not marked as durable anywhere, but what I have just realised is that the act of reconstructing will make the object durable. interesting.09:23
acoleskota_: thing is, IIRC the optimistic GETs patch would be simpler if we did not require a single durable. IIRC in particular the tests got simpler. So if we *do* think that is a good strategy for proxy and reconstructor then it may be worth changing now (in proxy patch).09:26
acoleskota_: I'll try to get some more opinions e.g clayg09:26
acolestimburke: can this condition ever be True: "clayg: ... you and acoles_ are right" :P09:29
acoleskota_: k. have a great vacation!09:29
kota_interesting, I'm looking forward to the progress :-)09:31
kota_thanks09:32
mahatic_acoles: kota_ I've marked it and would like look at it. Is there any other etherpad or some notes that I should also be looking at?09:32
mahatic_ok, the bugs have enough discussion on them09:35
kota_mahatic_: well, idk right now if we had some docs about it.09:35
acolesmahatic_: I don't think so.09:35
acolesthere is a whiteboard in jrichli's office :P09:35
acolesmaybe I took a photo09:36
mahatic_lol09:36
mahatic_oh cool, if there is info that could be deciphered from the photo09:36
acolesmahatic_: now that ^^ would be a stretch goal :)09:37
mahatic_:) I thought so09:37
* kota_ is heading home. maybe absent the next irc meeting in a vacation week.09:41
acolesmahatic_: kota_ https://1drv.ms/i/s!ArjPoCii0PZIhP9Mab8KuZztITcz7A09:41
kota_woops09:41
kota_acoles: that's the picture!09:42
mahatic_acoles: thanks09:42
mahatic_kota_: enjoy your vacation!09:42
kota_mahatic_: thank you09:43
acoleskota_: have fun!09:43
kota_acoles: ^^09:43
acolesmahatic_: the design changed from that picture but you can at least see the word "optimistic" :P09:44
mahatic_acoles: lol yes that's what I first noticed09:44
mahatic_acoles: the design changed and is that in the patch?09:44
mahatic_I believe it's from the hackathon in IBM austin09:45
mahatic_looks like it, the latest patch is this Feb09:47
acolesmahatic_: Yes the initial discussion was at the Austin hackathon, but after that I worked on it some more and it evolved. The commit message summarizes the goals.09:47
mahatic_acoles: yup, thanks09:48
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift10:00
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC10:03
*** dmorita has quit IRC10:05
openstackgerritJiong Liu proposed openstack/swift: Make the logger information format  https://review.openstack.org/35113210:15
acolesmmotiani: hi, I left a comment on the patch you asked about.10:32
*** arcimboldo has joined #openstack-swift10:34
arcimboldohi all, is there a way to know (via API possibly) which objects have been created by a specific user? (liberty w/ keystone authentication)10:35
*** sheel has joined #openstack-swift10:35
acolesarcimboldo: objects are stored in accounts which have a 1:1 mapping to keystone *tenants* but the keystone *user* id is not saved with the object10:41
acolesarcimboldo: sorry, I should say "projects" rather than "tenants".10:42
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift11:01
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright11:01
arcimboldoacoles, thank you, this is what I assumed but I wasn't sure11:28
arcimboldofor the tenant-project debate, I really whish they would stop renaming stuff :)11:28
acolesarcimboldo: +111:29
*** kei_yama has quit IRC11:35
*** asettle has quit IRC11:45
openstackgerritzheng yin proposed openstack/swift: Make log information format  https://review.openstack.org/35098011:49
*** arcimboldo has quit IRC11:57
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift11:58
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC12:02
*** airdisa has joined #openstack-swift12:08
*** asettle has quit IRC12:17
*** ppai has quit IRC12:18
*** zhengyin has quit IRC12:39
*** catintheroof has quit IRC12:53
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift13:05
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift13:07
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift13:13
*** _JZ_ has joined #openstack-swift13:14
*** StraubTW has joined #openstack-swift13:22
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-swift13:30
openstackgerritAlistair Coles proposed openstack/swift: Tighten up direct client unit tests  https://review.openstack.org/35173913:31
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift13:32
*** ametts has joined #openstack-swift13:42
*** ma91 has joined #openstack-swift13:42
ma91Hi, I would like to have a Swift user who has readonly access to a container, that's it. Does he need to belong to a role listed under operator_roles ?13:42
*** abhitechie has quit IRC13:45
*** sheel has quit IRC13:46
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:58
openstackgerritShashirekha Gundur proposed openstack/swift: NIT: fixing inconsistent naming of OpenStack Swift  https://review.openstack.org/35138813:58
*** catintheroof has quit IRC14:00
ma91found, nevermind.14:01
*** ma91 has left #openstack-swift14:01
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift14:02
*** foexle has quit IRC14:03
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC14:03
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift14:03
*** dmorita has quit IRC14:07
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift14:07
*** cdelatte has quit IRC14:16
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift14:19
*** diogogmt has quit IRC14:23
*** dmorita has quit IRC14:24
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift14:26
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC14:29
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift14:29
mmotianiacoles: Thank you :-)14:30
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift14:35
*** cbartz has quit IRC14:40
*** zhengyin has joined #openstack-swift14:41
*** diogogmt has quit IRC14:48
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift14:52
*** zhengyin has quit IRC14:53
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Add end_marker and reverse options to direct_client  https://review.openstack.org/32622614:55
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: check _last_part_moves when pretend_min_part_hours_passed  https://review.openstack.org/34680614:56
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC14:57
*** d0ugal has quit IRC15:05
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-swift15:09
*** jistr is now known as jistr|mtg15:14
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift15:18
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:18
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:18
*** tesseract- has quit IRC15:21
*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift15:23
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:26
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift15:30
*** links has quit IRC15:33
*** HenryG has quit IRC15:43
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-swift15:43
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift15:48
*** psachin has quit IRC16:02
*** pcaruana has quit IRC16:05
*** rledisez has quit IRC16:10
*** foexle has quit IRC16:11
*** Suyi_ has joined #openstack-swift16:15
*** klrmn has quit IRC16:21
*** asettle has quit IRC16:22
jlvillalnotmyname: I think there is an NFC Yubikey, that could work with a phone. Not 100% sure on that, but I believe so.16:23
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift16:23
* jlvillal was randomly reading the backscroll...16:24
*** rfinn has joined #openstack-swift16:26
*** asettle has quit IRC16:27
*** nadeem has quit IRC16:34
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift16:37
timburkeacoles: arcimboldo: now that we've got object sysmeta, it's certainly a thing that could be done in middleware, though16:39
*** dmorita has quit IRC16:42
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift16:42
*** d0ugal has quit IRC16:44
claygtimburke: good point!16:55
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift16:58
acolesclayg: hi. kota and I were chatting about optimistic gets earlier...I think we agreed in San Antonio that for a GET through the proxy we don't require any fragment to be durable, as long as we get a consistent set. right?16:59
acolestimburke: true16:59
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift17:02
*** vint_bra has quit IRC17:07
*** diogogmt has quit IRC17:11
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-swift17:12
*** daemontool_ has joined #openstack-swift17:13
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift17:14
*** itlinux has quit IRC17:15
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift17:16
*** daemontool has quit IRC17:16
*** diogogmt has quit IRC17:23
tdasilvaclayg, timburke: in fact, i believe the ibm team working on swiftonfile has a middleware to send user information as headers to the object server17:28
tdasilvasorry, not clayg, acoles^^^17:29
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift17:30
*** nadeem has quit IRC17:54
*** geaaru has quit IRC17:57
acolestdasilva: timburke it would be as imple change to keystoneauth if we thought it worth being a default behaviour18:08
acolessimple*18:08
acolesor an option18:08
*** acoles is now known as acoles_18:11
*** klamath has quit IRC18:20
*** adu has joined #openstack-swift18:21
openstackgerritThiago da Silva proposed openstack/swift: add reminder how to run debug func tests  https://review.openstack.org/35187318:23
*** daemontool_ has quit IRC18:23
openstackgerritThiago da Silva proposed openstack/swift: add reminder how to run debug func tests  https://review.openstack.org/35187318:27
*** tongli has quit IRC18:51
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift18:56
*** catintheroof has quit IRC19:00
*** fifieldt has quit IRC19:02
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift19:18
*** vint_bra has quit IRC19:19
*** joeljwright has quit IRC19:21
jrichliacoles_: thanks for looking at patch 32690319:25
patchbotjrichli: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/326903/ - swift - Raise 412 response on expirer19:25
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift19:26
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift19:30
*** natarej has joined #openstack-swift19:32
*** rfinn has quit IRC19:32
*** oshritf has quit IRC19:33
claygacoles_: yes RE optomistic GETs - it's like you said about replicated objects a 200 doesn't mean it won't 400 later if enough data is lost - we should be optomistic that the durable is durable even if not available19:52
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift19:52
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift19:58
*** adu has quit IRC20:12
*** ametts has quit IRC20:26
*** dmorita has quit IRC20:28
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift20:28
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/8873620:29
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC20:35
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift20:36
*** dmorita has quit IRC20:43
*** nadeem has quit IRC20:49
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift20:50
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift20:51
*** dfg_ has joined #openstack-swift20:57
*** flwang1 has quit IRC21:08
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-swift21:09
*** dmorita has quit IRC21:18
*** dfg_ has quit IRC21:18
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift21:20
*** dmorita has quit IRC21:36
openstackgerritMohit Motiani proposed openstack/swift: Add a try block in __init__.py  https://review.openstack.org/35193421:39
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift21:53
*** tdasilva has quit IRC21:59
*** nadeem has quit IRC22:11
*** dmorita has quit IRC22:16
*** StraubTW has quit IRC22:23
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift22:27
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift22:27
*** adu has joined #openstack-swift22:30
*** dmorita has quit IRC22:47
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift22:48
*** adu has quit IRC22:51
*** dmorita has quit IRC22:57
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift22:58
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift23:02
*** asettle has quit IRC23:06
*** chsc has quit IRC23:16
*** manous has joined #openstack-swift23:40

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!