Thursday, 2016-08-04

*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox00:01
*** zul has quit IRC00:07
*** chsc has quit IRC00:07
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift00:09
tdasilvaccccccdkkgthehercjehierjuivihjejrkulhkgkctjb00:27
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Add "history" mode to versioned_writes middleware  https://review.openstack.org/21492200:27
timburkekota_: rebased, but i haven't looked at api-reference yet00:27
*** Suyi_ has quit IRC00:31
*** thurloat has quit IRC00:48
*** thurloat has joined #openstack-swift00:50
*** m_kazuhiro has joined #openstack-swift00:55
*** klrmn has quit IRC01:11
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift01:11
zhengyinjrichli:yes, I want to check only for PUT. thank you01:13
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift01:24
m_kazuhirogood morning01:27
*** asettle has quit IRC01:28
* charz morning01:29
zhengyingood morning everyone :)01:32
m_kazuhirocharz, zhengyin: good morning.01:32
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away01:34
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift01:35
*** NM has quit IRC01:36
*** vint_bra has quit IRC01:39
*** tqtran_ has quit IRC01:42
*** trananhkma has joined #openstack-swift01:45
*** dmorita has quit IRC01:48
*** dmellado has quit IRC01:57
*** dmellado has joined #openstack-swift02:02
*** sanchitmalhotra has quit IRC02:06
*** sanchitmalhotra1 has joined #openstack-swift02:07
*** sanchitmalhotra1 is now known as sanchitmalhotra02:09
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift02:09
*** dmorita has quit IRC02:13
openstackgerritJanie Richling proposed openstack/swift: Automatic refresh of memcache config settings  https://review.openstack.org/21849002:19
jrichlijust a rebase ^^02:20
*** takashi has joined #openstack-swift02:22
*** furlongm_ has joined #openstack-swift02:28
*** furlongm has quit IRC02:29
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox02:36
*** itlinux has quit IRC02:54
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-swift02:56
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift03:15
*** takashi has quit IRC03:26
*** _JZ_ has quit IRC03:30
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift03:41
openstackgerritMichael Barton proposed openstack/swift: missing parens in functional test  https://review.openstack.org/35095003:45
mahatic_good morning03:53
janonymous_mahatic: o/03:54
mahatic_janonymous_, o/03:54
mahatic_oh notmyname is still not around, hope he's alright03:54
*** chsc has quit IRC04:00
*** takashi has joined #openstack-swift04:00
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift04:02
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Fix stale docstring in SegmentedIterable.  https://review.openstack.org/35082904:12
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: Fix link to docs from swift-dispersion manpages  https://review.openstack.org/34991504:26
*** links has joined #openstack-swift04:28
*** ppai has quit IRC04:31
*** abhinavtechie has joined #openstack-swift04:31
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift04:38
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift04:42
*** tqtran has quit IRC04:46
*** psachin has joined #openstack-swift04:48
*** SkyRocknRoll has joined #openstack-swift04:48
*** vint_bra has quit IRC04:51
*** flwang2 has joined #openstack-swift04:59
*** flwang1 has quit IRC05:01
*** flwang2 has quit IRC05:03
*** jraju has joined #openstack-swift05:04
*** links has quit IRC05:06
openstackgerritzheng yin proposed openstack/swift: Make log information format  https://review.openstack.org/35098005:07
*** ukaynar has quit IRC05:10
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift05:16
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-swift05:16
*** abhitechie has joined #openstack-swift05:17
openstackgerritKota Tsuyuzaki proposed openstack/swift: Add Pros/Cons docs for global cluster consideration  https://review.openstack.org/30438205:40
*** nadeem has quit IRC05:41
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift05:43
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift05:49
*** maestropandy has joined #openstack-swift05:52
*** mmcardle has quit IRC05:55
*** KriskK has joined #openstack-swift06:05
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift06:09
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-swift06:10
*** asettle has quit IRC06:14
*** trananhkma has quit IRC06:23
*** KriskK has quit IRC06:29
*** KriskK_ has joined #openstack-swift06:29
*** KriskK_ has quit IRC06:31
*** KriskK has joined #openstack-swift06:32
*** janonymous has joined #openstack-swift06:35
*** janonymous_ has quit IRC06:36
*** trananhkma has joined #openstack-swift06:40
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift06:42
mahatic_kota_: hi, are you here?06:43
kota_mahatic_: hi06:43
kota_how's going?06:43
mahatic_kota_: going alright, thanks. just wanted to check in regarding your comment on tombstone patch 21849006:44
patchbotmahatic_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/218490/ - swift - Automatic refresh of memcache config settings06:44
mahatic_kota_: I don't think it is very different from just calling invalidate hash. If I call cleanup_disk to do that and then invalidate hash, it will be similar to calling invalidate_hash directly, right?06:45
kota_patch 346865?06:46
patchbotkota_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/346865/ - swift - Delete old tombstones06:46
mahatic_kota_: ah! sorry, yes that one06:46
mahatic_:)06:46
kota_k, so06:46
*** tqtran has quit IRC06:47
kota_I think we have a couple of solutions and IMO those of them has pros/cons so that I don't have strong opinion06:47
kota_the first is06:47
kota_just calling invalidate_hash06:47
kota_which is so easy way to keep current swift behavior because the tombstone will be reclaimed by replicators.06:48
mahatic_correct06:48
mahatic_I agree06:48
kota_*BUT* as you know, it can make an overhead to recalc hashes.06:48
kota_that is a cons06:48
kota_the second one is06:48
kota_make auditor to call sort of ... diskfile._hash_dir06:49
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift06:49
kota_which can cleanup everything for the suffix dir (including reclaim .ts and rmdir if the suffix dir is empty)06:50
kota_On my first thought, cleanup_ondisk_files is the thing to do that but I noticed recently we need to call something like _hash_dir to remove the suffix dir.06:51
mahatic_yeah, hash_suffix_dir06:51
kota_pros of the secend idea is we don't need extra overhead for invalidate_has and get_hashes in the replicator06:51
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift06:52
*** KriskK has quit IRC06:52
mahatic_but that will also trigger replicator right? at a later point?06:52
kota_but the cons is we need more code change, refactoring the method name becasue underscore means it should not be called from out of the class06:53
kota_no? if we call _hash_suffix_dir directly we don't have to call invalidate_hash anymore06:53
*** tesseract- has joined #openstack-swift06:53
kota_because the suffix hash value should be None which is consistent with hash.pkl06:53
*** dmorita has quit IRC06:54
*** permalac has quit IRC06:54
kota_(we should call invalidate_hash IIF the hash_suffix_dir returns not None value)06:55
*** mmcardle has quit IRC06:56
kota_mahatic_: as you can see https://gist.github.com/bloodeagle40234/b97ccf55f7e6526a646603ba63185f44, get_hashes will return empty hash dict both case of .ts file exists or not.06:57
kota_i meant reclaimable .ts file.06:57
mahatic_yeah, you're right06:58
mahatic_kota_: so yes, the latter means more code refactoring. I'm not sure if that's preferred for this scenario06:59
*** hosanai has joined #openstack-swift06:59
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v hosanai06:59
*** geaaru has joined #openstack-swift06:59
kota_to consider extra overhead, I like later one but the first one is still okay to me so if you don't want to make extra refactoring it's ok to call just invalidate_hash there.07:01
kota_hopefully, we could issue the improvement to launchpad wishllist.07:01
kota_sorry waffling opinion but I also am not sure which is the best one for all because they have pros/cons each other :/07:02
kota_mahatic_: please pick up which you like ;-)07:03
mahatic_kota_: :) I was looking at the code. I don't think refactoring is required. I can call get_hashes07:06
mahatic_hold on07:06
*** cbartz has joined #openstack-swift07:06
mahatic_kota_: https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/obj/diskfile.py#L122307:07
kota_oh, just sort of get_hashes(suffixes=[<the suffix dir to recalc>])?07:11
kota_it might be nice idea, good job.07:11
mahatic_yeah, I could give it a go I guess07:14
mahatic_kota_: thanks for the review!07:17
kota_mahatic_: np, good job :-)07:17
mahatic_:)07:18
*** rledisez has joined #openstack-swift07:30
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC07:33
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift07:33
*** oshritf has joined #openstack-swift07:40
*** ppai has quit IRC07:45
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles07:45
*** _sourpickle_ has joined #openstack-swift07:51
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift07:52
*** mvk has quit IRC07:53
*** furlongm_ has quit IRC07:54
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift07:57
*** mmcardle has quit IRC07:57
openstackgerritDavanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/swift: [WIP] Testing latest u-c  https://review.openstack.org/31844108:10
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-swift08:40
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift08:40
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift08:44
*** _sourpickle_ has quit IRC08:45
*** tqtran has quit IRC08:49
openstackgerritMerged openstack/swift: missing parens in functional test  https://review.openstack.org/35095008:54
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift08:54
zhengyinkota_ : hello kota_ , are you here?08:58
*** mmcardle has quit IRC08:59
kota_hi, zhengyin09:00
zhengyinkot_: do you have a time to help me review a patch ? thank you09:01
kota_which one?09:01
zhengyinhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/350471/09:01
patchbotzhengyin: patch 350471 - swift - Add unit case09:01
kota_looking09:02
zhengyinok, thank you09:03
*** jith_ has joined #openstack-swift09:23
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift09:30
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright09:30
acolescurious - our pep8 job did not catch this too-long line https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348724/4/swift/obj/replicator.py@20509:33
patchbotacoles: patch 348724 - swift - Make log info simple09:33
kota_hi acoles09:41
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift09:45
*** trananhkma has quit IRC09:45
*** permalac has joined #openstack-swift09:49
kota_does someone know swift should use which type of string in py3, bytes vs str?09:54
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift09:54
admin6Hi there, I still have the same problem for weeks around delays for Erasure coding reconstruction. Do you think it’s normal for a full pass to take more than one week? I must have something wrong in my configuration but I don’t see what it is…09:58
*** mmcardle has quit IRC09:59
openstackgerritDavanum Srinivas (dims) proposed openstack/swift: [WIP] Testing latest u-c  https://review.openstack.org/31844110:10
zhengyin kota_ : thank you very much. I will modify it with your advice :)10:10
kota_zhengyin: :-)10:11
*** furlongm_ has joined #openstack-swift10:12
*** chlong has quit IRC10:28
openstackgerritzheng yin proposed openstack/swift: Make log info simple  https://review.openstack.org/34872410:38
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift10:41
*** kei_yama has quit IRC10:47
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift10:55
*** mmcardle has quit IRC10:59
mahatic_kota_: isn't str for string and bytes for binary data? Sorry I don't get the context11:08
kota_mahatic_: partially correct.11:10
kota_because str is also binary in python 211:10
kota_2.x11:10
kota_I was looking at patch 34832211:10
patchbotkota_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348322/ - swift - Py3: Fixes AssertionError11:10
kota_in python3, swift.common.header_key_dict behaves so curious11:11
mahatic_ah I see, looking11:11
kota_https://gist.github.com/bloodeagle40234/e979d74eba4d90d23bc5958ded58f8d811:12
kota_in py3, b'string' means byte type and 'string' (i.e. non prefix with 'b') means str type11:12
kota_if we set a non string type to header key dict value, it will be string type but if we set a string type value, it will be bytes :/11:13
kota_i.e. "header_key_dict['a'] = 1" does not equal "header_key_dict['a'] = '1'"11:15
kota_note that later one has single quote for 111:15
kota_I can fix it to result in being consistent but... I'm wondering which type we should use bytes vs string in py3.11:16
kota_that's what I was.11:16
mahatic_yeah, because that's what we're doing11:18
mahatic_https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/common/header_key_dict.py#L43-L4611:18
kota_yes11:20
openstackgerritzheng yin proposed openstack/swift: Add unit case  https://review.openstack.org/35047111:25
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift11:26
*** chlong has quit IRC11:27
*** NM has quit IRC11:27
*** chlong has joined #openstack-swift11:27
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift11:28
*** NM has quit IRC11:30
zhengyinkota_ : hi, kota. I have modified them.  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350471/11:31
patchbotzhengyin: patch 350471 - swift - Add unit case11:31
kota_zhengyin: thx! will look at tommrow-ish, it's late time for my tz.11:32
kota_actually, not so late but it's time to go dinner.11:32
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift11:32
zhengyinOK,  thank you kota :)11:33
mahatic_kota_: yeah, it does seem weird. I will do some testing on that (not right away though)11:33
mahatic_kota_: good night11:33
kota_mahatic_: thanks! good night!11:33
openstackgerrithouweichao proposed openstack/swift: make  https://review.openstack.org/35113211:35
*** jith_ has quit IRC11:35
*** hosanai has quit IRC11:43
*** NM has quit IRC11:49
*** acoles is now known as acoles_11:49
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift11:54
*** joeljwright has quit IRC11:55
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift11:55
*** asettle has quit IRC11:57
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift11:57
*** m_kazuhiro has quit IRC11:59
*** mmcardle has quit IRC12:00
*** Laines has joined #openstack-swift12:01
*** asettle has quit IRC12:02
LainesHello, I have a question regarding swift and acces files. When i save a file with the replication of 3 and I acces this file a couple of times will it hit always the same replica of the file or will it somehow shuffle the acces between the 3 replications?12:05
LainesSo doeks swift provides an internal load balancing between the replicas?12:06
Lainesdoes12:06
*** zul has quit IRC12:07
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift12:15
*** Laines has quit IRC12:19
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift12:20
*** zhengyin has quit IRC12:20
*** diogogmt has quit IRC12:24
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift12:25
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift12:26
*** CaioBrentano has joined #openstack-swift12:32
*** zhengyin has joined #openstack-swift12:33
*** diogogmt has quit IRC12:35
*** baojg_ has joined #openstack-swift12:44
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift12:45
*** ppai has quit IRC12:49
*** tqtran has quit IRC12:50
*** wanghua has joined #openstack-swift12:53
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift12:56
*** mmcardle has quit IRC13:01
*** abhinavtechie has quit IRC13:03
*** zul has quit IRC13:07
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:11
*** klamath has quit IRC13:11
*** klamath has joined #openstack-swift13:12
*** takashi has quit IRC13:13
*** baojg_ has quit IRC13:17
*** StraubTW has joined #openstack-swift13:21
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift13:22
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles13:22
acolesLaines: by default swift will shuffle between nodes13:32
*** Jeffrey4l_ has quit IRC13:34
tdasilvagood morning13:38
pdardeaugood morning13:43
tdasilvapdardeau: o/13:44
*** acoles is now known as acoles_13:44
pdardeautdasilva: hi!13:45
pdardeautdasilva: thx for participating in tc meeting the other day13:45
*** ametts has joined #openstack-swift13:45
*** jraju has quit IRC13:46
tdasilvapdardeau: :-) not a fun meeting to be in, but I thought it was important to participate13:47
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift13:47
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift13:50
*** cdelatte has joined #openstack-swift13:51
cschwedeHey folks!13:53
*** airdisa has joined #openstack-swift13:54
*** dmorita has quit IRC13:54
pdardeaucschwede: Moin moin13:55
cschwedepdardeau: Moin Paul! :)13:55
tdasilvacschwede: Hello! o/13:57
*** _JZ_ has joined #openstack-swift13:57
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift13:57
jrichlilooks like acoles_ either had a very short day, or is having connection issues13:59
tdasilvaor is having an afternoon tea ;)14:00
jrichlitdasilva: perhaps.  :-)14:00
*** maestropandy has left #openstack-swift14:01
*** mmcardle has quit IRC14:02
jrichliacoles_: I was thinking of removing the doc changes that were made in patch 347545 and instead addressing that documentation in whatever follow-up patch that implements option #214:03
patchbotjrichli: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/347545/ - swift - WIP - Add tests and docs for POST to DLO manifest ...14:03
jrichlibut let me know if I should leave the docs there stating that x_o_m must be provided, and just not mention whether that can be a new x_o_m or not14:04
cschwedetdasilva: Oi Thiago! :)14:04
tdasilvacschwede: Bom dia14:05
jrichliI need to learn some of these greetings :-)  Hello all!14:05
*** zul has quit IRC14:07
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift14:07
*** vinsh has quit IRC14:07
*** SkyRocknRoll has quit IRC14:08
*** NM has quit IRC14:13
*** NM has joined #openstack-swift14:21
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift14:22
*** ukaynar has quit IRC14:24
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift14:24
*** zul has quit IRC14:25
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift14:25
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift14:31
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift14:32
jrichlitdasilva: just fyi that I plan to look at your latest patch in symlinks this weekend (I didn't get that far last weekend)14:36
tdasilvajrichli: awesome, looking forward to your feedback, thanks!14:36
*** joeljwright has joined #openstack-swift14:37
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v joeljwright14:37
*** asettle has quit IRC14:38
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift14:39
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-swift14:39
*** KriskK has joined #openstack-swift14:43
openstackgerritPaul Dardeau proposed openstack/swift: add swift-oldies man page  https://review.openstack.org/34929614:44
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift14:45
*** vint_bra has quit IRC14:46
pdardeauacoles_: thx for reviewing patch 34929614:46
patchbotpdardeau: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349296/ - swift - add swift-oldies man page14:46
*** oshritf has quit IRC14:51
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift14:53
mmotianigood morning14:53
*** KriskK has quit IRC15:01
*** acoles_ is now known as acoles15:04
*** pgbridge has quit IRC15:05
acolesjrichli: connection issues :/ what's a "short day"? :P15:05
acolespdardeau: NP15:05
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:09
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift15:09
acolesjrichli: the docs changes in 347545 aren't correct are they? w.r.t. the way post-as-copy now (mis)behaves?15:10
catintheroofacoles, quick question, what library swift uses to spawn multiple threads of a same pid and use multiple cores ?15:12
*** psachin has quit IRC15:13
*** mmcardle has quit IRC15:13
jrichliacoles: my understanding is that the docs there reflect the behavior under post-as-copy : that you must supply x_o_m, but it has to be the original value.  The docs just dont  say that if you *did* change that value when using fast-post, it would work.15:14
*** vint_bra has quit IRC15:14
jrichliif I am wrong, please let me know15:14
acolescatintheroof: swift uses eventlet green threads15:18
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift15:19
acolesjrichli: um, i was thinking with post-as-copy you don't have to supply x_o_m cos it won't change. but yeah, with fast-post you do.15:19
acolesjrichli: but with fast-post, nothing mandates it must be the same value, right? you can change the value to point at different segments IIRC.15:20
acolesjrichli: maybe its best to update the docs at same time as making the behaviour uniform wrt fast-post.15:21
jrichlithat's what I was wondering too.  but wanted to check with you before removing :-)15:22
jrichliok, i will do that.  and i'll start the other patch soon with included docs15:22
jrichliand yes, i agree with what you said wrt fast-post capabilities.  i just wasnt going to advertise it when you cant do it with post-as-copy as well15:23
acolesjrichli: makes sense15:24
catintheroofacoles, thx !15:25
*** catintheroof has quit IRC15:25
*** diogogmt has quit IRC15:42
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:43
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift15:43
*** admin6 has quit IRC15:43
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift15:43
*** pgbridge has joined #openstack-swift15:45
*** chsc has quit IRC15:51
*** ametts has quit IRC15:57
*** cbartz has quit IRC15:57
*** CaioBrentano has quit IRC16:00
*** ametts has joined #openstack-swift16:04
*** ukaynar has quit IRC16:16
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift16:25
*** nadeem has quit IRC16:26
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift16:26
*** vint_bra has joined #openstack-swift16:29
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift16:30
*** chsc has joined #openstack-swift16:31
*** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift16:35
*** rledisez has quit IRC16:35
*** ukaynar_ has joined #openstack-swift16:38
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-swift16:40
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v notmyname16:40
notmynamegood morning16:41
*** ukaynar has quit IRC16:41
jrichlinotmyname: welcome back!16:42
joeljwrightnotmyname: good morning!16:42
notmynamethank you for your concern yesterday. I got a lot of texts and messages.16:46
notmynameI'm not yet ready to talk about the whole TC situation yet. or rather, there are no conclusions yet or overall direction. still quite a bit to process and I'll probably try to call many of you16:47
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift16:47
*** airdisa has quit IRC16:48
tdasilvanotmyname: hi! good to see you back16:49
notmynametdasilva: I told you I'd come back ;-)16:49
tdasilva:)16:49
mahatic_notmyname: hello! yes good to have you back16:50
tdasilvahttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5b-mlGBB2j816:51
tdasilvarofl16:51
*** tqtran has quit IRC16:51
claygthe delim encryption fix seems like a big deal?  patch 35037816:52
patchbotclayg: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350378/ - swift - Fix encryption-delimiter interaction16:52
claygno closes-bug?16:52
mahatic_tdasilva: lol16:53
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:53
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-swift16:53
jrichlithanks for reminding me, clayg.  i need to review that16:54
mahatic_that's been on my todo list too16:54
*** airdisa has joined #openstack-swift16:55
*** asettle has quit IRC16:55
claygummm... did notmyname go somewhere?  i hope everyone is ok :\16:55
jrichlitimburke had found the bug. I think he fixed it as fast as he found it16:56
*** NM has quit IRC16:56
*** Suyi_ has joined #openstack-swift16:57
claygtimburke: is *super* fast at fixing bugs16:57
jrichliclayg: just showing support for dealing with swift plight with TC and golang16:58
claygoh, sweet - can't wait to read the logs - maybe I'll need to buy notmyname some drinks after work :\16:58
jrichliI'd say so ...  you might want some too ;-)16:59
mahatic_clayg: would appreciate your feedback on patch 33160117:01
patchbotmahatic_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331601/ - swift - remove empty db hash and suffix directories17:01
mahatic_jrichli: thanks for your review on that17:01
jrichlimahatic_: sure, np!  I will take a look at the most recent.17:02
mahatic_thanks17:03
*** mvk has quit IRC17:08
acolesyay notmyname is back17:08
acolesfigured you had taken this to heart: "is this thing clearly more important than learning how to play mario bros with my feet?"17:09
jrichliacoles: lol17:09
jrichliand i do get the ref17:10
*** permalac has quit IRC17:11
timburkefiling bugs take time away from fixing them ;-)17:13
claygtimburke: but it could save us time having to fix them twice?17:14
claygoh dear, we're all going to be man page experts now :'(17:15
notmynameclayg: it's about time ;-)17:20
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift17:28
*** joeljwright has quit IRC17:29
*** zul has quit IRC17:36
*** acoles is now known as acoles_17:41
*** geaaru has quit IRC17:44
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift17:49
*** tesseract- has quit IRC17:53
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Fix encryption-delimiter interaction  https://review.openstack.org/35037817:56
*** mvk has joined #openstack-swift17:56
*** klrmn has quit IRC17:58
*** klrmn has joined #openstack-swift17:58
*** ukaynar_ has quit IRC18:03
mmotianiacoles: In patch 350625, would you suggest to add reference of the ring builder documentation in the CLI usage or to add more info about region and zone there itself ?18:13
patchbotmmotiani: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350625/ - swift - Add regions and zones in ring-builder.py18:13
timburketdasilva: just had a thought on symlinks -- since we're sending Location headers, we should keep bug 1572011 in mind18:14
openstackbug 1572011 in OpenStack Object Storage (swift) "Static web redirect url to http not https" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/157201118:14
timburke(i'm not sure what to *do* about it, but we should at least *think* about it)18:14
*** ndk_ is now known as ndk-afk18:16
*** tqtran has joined #openstack-swift18:17
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift18:41
*** diogogmt has quit IRC18:42
*** diogogmt has joined #openstack-swift18:42
*** brnelson has quit IRC18:43
*** brnelson has joined #openstack-swift18:43
*** ChubYann has joined #openstack-swift18:45
tdasilvatimburke: hi, i'm back, looking at bug...18:46
tdasilvatimburke: yeah, I played around with adding a Location header to the POST response, but was getting some errors, so I need to dig deeper and understand better how things work in the space.18:49
*** daemontool has quit IRC18:51
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-swift18:52
*** ndk-afk is now known as ndk_18:57
ahaleoh i hadnt seen that bug before, i think we kind of rely on the current 301 behaviour19:01
*** fifieldt has quit IRC19:07
*** daemontool_ has joined #openstack-swift19:11
claygtimburke: thanks for the bug report19:13
*** daemontool has quit IRC19:15
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-swift19:18
*** mmcardle has quit IRC19:30
timburkeclayg: np. you and acoles_ are right; since we have a release where it's an issue, better to have a bug we can point at that includes a linked patch19:32
*** nadeem has quit IRC19:55
pdardeauin 'persistently single-vendor projects' thread in ML, Kevin Fox says "Plus you cant have more then one swift endpoint in a cloud". anyone knows what he means by that?19:59
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift20:00
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-swift20:02
*** asettle has quit IRC20:04
*** ametts has quit IRC20:05
*** zul has quit IRC20:05
timburkepdardeau: no idea. i know we've got a keystone setup that returns multiple swift endpoints (completely different clusters, though i'm sure you could do something similar to give endpoints for different regions in the same cluster)20:09
*** ametts has joined #openstack-swift20:10
*** flwang1 has quit IRC20:16
claygtimburke: sorry, i stopped reading after "YOU [blah blah] ARE RIGHT" ;)20:27
claygpdardeau: presumably some sort of limitation in how trove parses the catalog20:27
claygtimburke: yeah lots of people have different swift endpoints in their catalog - but he was talking about "90% working trove" so I assume he must mean something like that20:28
claygwhen doing some integration work with other services i remember having enough knobs to configure "which endpoint" was tricky - so it wouldn't surprise me if not all the knobs are there20:29
clayg... there might even be a bug for it?20:29
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift20:30
*** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC20:34
*** Jeffrey4l_ has joined #openstack-swift20:35
claygmight be related to this one -> https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/1402055 - which is just a general bug about setting region option and using catalog blows up with an unhandled exception?  or maybe this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/trove/+bug/142175820:35
openstackLaunchpad bug 1402055 in puppet-trove "Trove-taskmanager fails to start if urls obtained from Keystone" [Undecided,Triaged]20:35
openstackLaunchpad bug 1421758 in OpenStack DBaaS (Trove) "trove service cannot be configured to talk to https endpoints for other openstack services" [High,Confirmed] - Assigned to Amrith (amrith)20:35
openstackgerritShashirekha Gundur proposed openstack/swift: NIT: fixing inconsistent naming of OpenStack Swift  https://review.openstack.org/35138820:39
*** ukaynar has joined #openstack-swift20:46
openstackgerritShashirekha Gundur proposed openstack/swift: NIT: fixing inconsistent naming of OpenStack Swift  https://review.openstack.org/35138820:50
ntataMSG mattoliverau hi21:07
openstackgerritTim Burke proposed openstack/swift: Add "history" mode to versioned_writes middleware  https://review.openstack.org/21492221:07
mattoliveraumorning21:09
*** nadeem has joined #openstack-swift21:13
*** mariusv has quit IRC21:16
*** ukaynar has quit IRC21:18
*** mariusv has joined #openstack-swift21:18
*** mariusv has quit IRC21:18
*** mariusv has joined #openstack-swift21:18
*** ametts has quit IRC21:26
*** flwang1 has joined #openstack-swift21:37
timburkekota_: sure enough, expiring an object in a versioned container behaves exactly as you thought -- the object is simply deleted, no restoring (under stack mode) or archiving (under history mode)21:39
*** cdelatte has quit IRC21:41
*** bill_az has quit IRC21:55
*** rfinn has joined #openstack-swift22:02
*** vint_bra has quit IRC22:05
*** manous has joined #openstack-swift22:08
*** manous has quit IRC22:12
*** klamath has quit IRC22:19
*** manous has joined #openstack-swift22:25
itlinuxhello all, is there a swift option to set the expiration for the object?22:25
*** nadeem has quit IRC22:26
*** zul has joined #openstack-swift22:28
*** manous has quit IRC22:30
*** furlongm_ has quit IRC22:30
*** furlongm_ has joined #openstack-swift22:31
*** chsc has quit IRC22:34
itlinuxgot it..22:36
*** manous has joined #openstack-swift22:42
itlinuxhi when you set the X-Delete-After will the object be delete since I set it to test it at 360 sec and the object is still there..thanks22:48
*** StraubTW has quit IRC22:54
*** rfinn has quit IRC22:56
*** asettle has joined #openstack-swift23:03
*** asettle has quit IRC23:07
claygit might still be in the listings, but it should 40423:07
claygyou need to make sure you've configured and run the object-expirer23:08
itlinuxit is running thanks..23:12
itlinux+clayg23:12
*** catintheroof has quit IRC23:13
pdardeauclayg: timburke: thx for explanations about ML swift endpoints23:16
*** vinsh has quit IRC23:23
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-swift23:23
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away23:30
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox23:41
*** Jeffrey4l_ has quit IRC23:42
*** Jeffrey4l has joined #openstack-swift23:45
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-swift23:46
*** zul has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!