| notmyname | mattoliverau: so I don't think your patch is bad at all. I was just wondering what I was missing when looking at it | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| mattoliverau | notmyname: Lol, your weren't missing much, I'm just working through old bugs :) Feel free to -2 any that you don't think needs to be solved and we can just close the bug :) | 00:03 |
| notmyname | it does seem interesting that there isn't an explicit test for DiskFileWriter.write() anywhere. actually, the only 3 lines not tested are in that method | 00:03 |
| notmyname | seems it's just indirectly tested | 00:03 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: so based on this, do you plan on doing anything with that patch? eg you might look at the test_short_body() test | 00:04 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: and thanks for going through old bugs! | 00:05 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: how about I take a look at the short body test, and see if I can add some more DiskFile.write tests (though the latter might need to be in another change). | 00:06 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: ok, sounds good. and I agree about a different patch set | 00:06 |
| notmyname | mattoliverau: were you looking in to doing the http method calls to keystone in python-swiftclient so that we don't have to use keystone client? | 00:08 |
| notmyname | I don't remember who was looking in to that | 00:08 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: that wasn't me, I was around when your were talking about it, was it goodes or someone else. I can't quite remember.. happy to take a look though, but wont step on someone elses toes, so if we can't find out who it was I'll take a look :) | 00:10 |
| notmyname | heh, ok | 00:11 |
| notmyname | I haven't heard anything or seen anything. just curious. IMO it should be done before the juno release | 00:12 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: yeah, the keystone requirement in swiftclient caused some issues in the infra sprint. Specifically in regards to a keystone and gnome-keyring issue Ubuntu precise. | 00:14 |
| mattoliverau | or something like that.. keystone related, but was causing log hosting in swift to fail regularly. until the work around of removing a python keyring package was found. | 00:17 |
| notmyname | hmm..interesting. I hadn't heard that | 00:18 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: well we only found it out last week when implementing the moving of the logsto swift :) | 00:20 |
| openstackgerrit | A change was merged to openstack/swift: lock_file race fixes https://review.openstack.org/108309 | 00:23 |
| mattoliverau | notmyname: sdague has already submitted a fix to keystone for it (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107719/) . | 00:24 |
| *** dmorita has joined #openstack-swift | 00:25 | |
| *** ho has joined #openstack-swift | 00:45 | |
| *** shri has left #openstack-swift | 00:45 | |
| *** mwstorer has quit IRC | 00:52 | |
| thurloat | omg logs are just spam | 01:24 |
| thurloat | hah, sorry about that. wrong window | 01:30 |
| thurloat | question relating to spam logs though, tried cranking the loglevel down for swiftproxy server, and we're still getting thousands of lines of Jul 22 06:48:28 swproxy03 proxy-server: Handoff requested (2) (txn: txXXXXX) (client_ip: 10.100.51.254) | 01:31 |
| *** AbyssOne has quit IRC | 01:33 | |
| *** AbyssOne has joined #openstack-swift | 01:36 | |
| *** nexusz99 has joined #openstack-swift | 01:45 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 01:50 | |
| *** nexusz99 has quit IRC | 01:53 | |
| *** haomaiw__ has quit IRC | 02:23 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift | 02:25 | |
| *** sungju has joined #openstack-swift | 02:26 | |
| *** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift | 02:38 | |
| *** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC | 02:41 | |
| *** gyee has quit IRC | 03:02 | |
| torgomatic | yeah, someone should probably fix that log message at some point | 03:07 |
| torgomatic | ever since the proxy started looking at handoffs on 404, that message has been nothing more than spam | 03:08 |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 03:29 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 03:29 | |
| *** haomaiw__ has quit IRC | 03:32 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 03:33 | |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 03:33 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 04:14 | |
| *** stevemac has joined #openstack-swift | 04:19 | |
| *** stevemac is now known as stevetan_ | 04:20 | |
| *** bszabo has joined #openstack-swift | 04:26 | |
| openstackgerrit | Tushar Gohad proposed a change to openstack/swift: EC: Add support for policy types, 'erasure_coding' policy https://review.openstack.org/103644 | 04:29 |
| *** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:29 | |
| *** ho has quit IRC | 04:30 | |
| *** bszabo has quit IRC | 04:30 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 04:32 | |
| *** mrmoje has quit IRC | 04:37 | |
| *** sumit_ has joined #openstack-swift | 04:39 | |
| sumit_ | Hi, how to generate token when using swift with keystone? | 04:39 |
| *** stevetan_ has quit IRC | 04:40 | |
| *** stevetan has joined #openstack-swift | 04:42 | |
| *** stevetan has quit IRC | 04:43 | |
| *** anand_ts has joined #openstack-swift | 04:55 | |
| zaitcev | it's the same token... so just something like | 04:59 |
| zaitcev | curl -v -d '{"auth": {"passwordCredentials": {"username": "admin", "password": "passw0rd"}, "tenantName": "admin"}}' -H "Content-type: application/json" http://localhost:5000/v2.0/tokens | 05:00 |
| zaitcev | it shold puke back the token with id: and serviceCatalog with endpoints[ {'publicURL': ... ] | 05:01 |
| zaitcev | Same as any other OpenStack service | 05:01 |
| *** mrsnivvel has quit IRC | 05:03 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 05:04 | |
| *** mrmoje has joined #openstack-swift | 05:09 | |
| sumit_ | I'm facing this error: {"error": {"message": "Unable to sign token. (Disable debug mode to suppress these details.)", "code": 500, "title": "Internal Server Error"}} | 05:15 |
| sumit_ | logs are at location: http://paste.openstack.org/show/87693/ | 05:15 |
| *** mrsnivvel has joined #openstack-swift | 05:16 | |
| *** chandankumar has joined #openstack-swift | 05:18 | |
| zaitcev | just go back to bearer tokens for now | 05:18 |
| zaitcev | looks like your openssl is underrev for PKI tokens | 05:19 |
| zaitcev | er | 05:19 |
| zaitcev | they both are bearer tokens, I meant go back to uuid tokens | 05:19 |
| *** chandankumar_ has joined #openstack-swift | 05:20 | |
| sumit_ | Thanks, it worked. for uuid token | 05:22 |
| sumit_ | but we need pki token | 05:22 |
| *** chandankumar has quit IRC | 05:22 | |
| sumit_ | can you tell us how we can rev up the ssl for pki token | 05:22 |
| zaitcev | Sorry, I'm not an expert on that. I just update my openssl with yum and that's it. | 05:25 |
| sumit_ | ok thanks, | 05:26 |
| sumit_ | we will try to solve the prolem, since we have come to know the cause | 05:27 |
| sumit_ | :0 | 05:27 |
| *** ciypro|afk has quit IRC | 05:28 | |
| *** chandankumar_ is now known as chandankumar | 05:28 | |
| *** zaitcev has quit IRC | 05:31 | |
| *** k4n0 has joined #openstack-swift | 05:33 | |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 05:35 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 05:36 | |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 05:41 | |
| *** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift | 05:59 | |
| *** els13 has joined #openstack-swift | 06:03 | |
| *** sumit_ has quit IRC | 06:05 | |
| *** nexusz99 has joined #openstack-swift | 06:05 | |
| *** psharma has joined #openstack-swift | 06:06 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 06:11 | |
| nexusz99 | Hi. Can i ask you a question? . In 'swift/common/storage_policy.py' , why 'StoragePolicySingleton' class wraps _POLICIES. I think it is unnecessary. | 06:13 |
| *** sungju has quit IRC | 06:25 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 06:28 | |
| *** zslot has joined #openstack-swift | 07:26 | |
| *** mrsnivvel has quit IRC | 07:35 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 07:39 | |
| *** minisot has quit IRC | 07:44 | |
| *** mrsnivvel has joined #openstack-swift | 07:51 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 07:53 | |
| *** mrmoje has quit IRC | 07:55 | |
| *** bszabo has joined #openstack-swift | 08:03 | |
| *** nacim has joined #openstack-swift | 08:05 | |
| *** bszabo has quit IRC | 08:07 | |
| *** acoles_away is now known as acoles | 08:12 | |
| *** openstackgerrit_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:15 | |
| *** foexle has joined #openstack-swift | 08:15 | |
| *** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 08:18 | |
| *** bszabo_ has joined #openstack-swift | 08:29 | |
| *** mrmoje has joined #openstack-swift | 08:30 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 08:35 | |
| *** mmcardle has quit IRC | 08:41 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 08:49 | |
| *** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 08:50 | |
| *** acoles is now known as acoles_away | 08:55 | |
| *** bszabo_ has quit IRC | 09:00 | |
| *** bszabo has joined #openstack-swift | 09:01 | |
| *** bszabo has quit IRC | 09:05 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 09:07 | |
| *** haomaiw__ has quit IRC | 09:11 | |
| *** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift | 09:11 | |
| *** anand_ts has quit IRC | 09:13 | |
| *** haomai___ has joined #openstack-swift | 09:15 | |
| *** acoles_away is now known as acoles | 09:16 | |
| *** haomaiwang has quit IRC | 09:18 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 09:20 | |
| *** mmcardle has quit IRC | 09:24 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 09:25 | |
| *** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 09:27 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 09:39 | |
| *** mmcardle has quit IRC | 09:55 | |
| *** nexusz99 has quit IRC | 09:57 | |
| *** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 10:01 | |
| *** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 10:02 | |
| openstackgerrit | Lin Yang proposed a change to openstack/swift: Remove duplicate conditional statement https://review.openstack.org/108940 | 10:03 |
| *** nosnos has quit IRC | 10:09 | |
| *** mmcardle has quit IRC | 10:17 | |
| *** acoles is now known as acoles_away | 10:18 | |
| *** acoles_away is now known as acoles | 10:25 | |
| *** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 10:36 | |
| *** nsaje has left #openstack-swift | 10:41 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 10:43 | |
| *** bszabo_ has joined #openstack-swift | 10:43 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 10:56 | |
| *** foexle has quit IRC | 11:01 | |
| *** psharma has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 11:05 | |
| *** psharma has joined #openstack-swift | 11:17 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 11:22 | |
| *** kopparam has quit IRC | 11:24 | |
| *** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 11:27 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 11:31 | |
| *** psharma has quit IRC | 11:33 | |
| *** kopparam has quit IRC | 11:42 | |
| *** ppai has joined #openstack-swift | 11:43 | |
| *** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 11:43 | |
| *** mkollaro has joined #openstack-swift | 11:45 | |
| *** chandankumar has quit IRC | 11:47 | |
| *** kopparam has quit IRC | 11:47 | |
| *** chandankumar has joined #openstack-swift | 11:49 | |
| *** psharma has joined #openstack-swift | 11:50 | |
| *** k4n0 has quit IRC | 12:05 | |
| *** mmcardle has quit IRC | 12:09 | |
| *** ppai has quit IRC | 12:11 | |
| *** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 12:13 | |
| *** nexusz99 has joined #openstack-swift | 12:17 | |
| *** kopparam has quit IRC | 12:20 | |
| peluse_ | nexusz99: StoragePolicySingleton wrapes _POLICIES to enable unit test code that imports POLICIES to patch them via the decorator @patch_policies. Take a closer look there (or try running the unit tests without the wrapper) and see if that doesn't help with your understanding of why its needed | 12:34 |
| nexusz99 | peluse_: Thanks! | 12:40 |
| *** psharma has quit IRC | 12:40 | |
| *** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift | 12:41 | |
| *** dmorita has quit IRC | 12:43 | |
| *** dmsimard_away is now known as dmsimard | 12:44 | |
| *** bszabo_ has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
| *** bszabo_ has joined #openstack-swift | 13:01 | |
| *** bvandenh has quit IRC | 13:02 | |
| *** pberis has joined #openstack-swift | 13:04 | |
| *** zslot has quit IRC | 13:05 | |
| *** zslot has joined #openstack-swift | 13:06 | |
| *** nexusz99 has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
| *** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 13:25 | |
| *** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 13:28 | |
| *** kopparam has quit IRC | 13:31 | |
| peluse_ | nexusz99: no problem, if you see an alternate solution or simplification please feel free to suggest, would be great to hear other ideas! | 13:34 |
| acoles | portante: did you have any success setting up keystone? let me know if you need more help | 13:37 |
| portante | not yet | 13:37 |
| *** mkollaro has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
| *** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift | 13:49 | |
| pconstantine | peluse_: looks like PatchPolicies uses setUp(self) instead of setUpClass(cls), that's why it's patched in the wrong time | 13:55 |
| *** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 13:56 | |
| *** chandankumar_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:01 | |
| *** chandankumar has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
| *** chandankumar_ has quit IRC | 14:04 | |
| *** chandankumar has joined #openstack-swift | 14:06 | |
| *** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift | 14:07 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev | 14:07 | |
| *** kopparam has quit IRC | 14:13 | |
| *** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift | 14:14 | |
| *** kopparam has quit IRC | 14:18 | |
| *** bszabo_ has quit IRC | 14:23 | |
| *** bszabo_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:24 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed a change to openstack/swift: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/88736 | 14:25 |
| *** bszabo_ has quit IRC | 14:28 | |
| *** chandankumar_ has joined #openstack-swift | 14:51 | |
| *** chandankumar has quit IRC | 14:55 | |
| *** nacim has quit IRC | 15:05 | |
| *** els13 has quit IRC | 15:17 | |
| *** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 15:21 | |
| *** bszabo_ has joined #openstack-swift | 15:24 | |
| *** bszabo_ has quit IRC | 15:25 | |
| peluse_ | clayg: see note from pconstantine above wrt PatchPolicies ^^ | 15:43 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed a change to openstack/swift: Enable object system metadata on PUTs https://review.openstack.org/79991 | 15:44 |
| pconstantine | torgomatic, creiht, portante: friendly ping about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72157/ | 15:48 |
| *** marcusvrn has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
| *** mwstorer has joined #openstack-swift | 15:54 | |
| notmyname | peluse_: FWIW, clayg is out today and until the end of next week on vacation | 15:55 |
| notmyname | good morning, world | 15:55 |
| openstackgerrit | Alistair Coles proposed a change to openstack/python-swiftclient: Add keystone v3 auth support https://review.openstack.org/91788 | 15:56 |
| peluse_ | notmyname: OK, thanks. pconstantine, the comment you are referring to (I assume you mean the one about patching at the wrong time) was claygs so he'd be the best one to address. I'll ping him about it next week if I don't see you ask later on... | 15:56 |
| notmyname | peluse_: pconstantine: where is that call? | 15:57 |
| pconstantine | notmyname: which one? | 15:57 |
| notmyname | PatchPolicies | 15:58 |
| pconstantine | notmyname: test.unit.__init__.pt | 15:58 |
| pconstantine | notmyname: test.unit.__init__.py | 15:58 |
| *** stevemac has joined #openstack-swift | 15:58 | |
| *** gyee has joined #openstack-swift | 15:58 | |
| peluse_ | in the comment block for the class definition is what I had assumed | 15:59 |
| *** stevemac is now known as stevetan | 15:59 | |
| pconstantine | notmyname: https://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/test/unit/__init__.py#L67 | 16:00 |
| peluse_ | and clayg spent a decent amount of time getting policy patching to work, correctly reload from .conf versus per unit test patching/resotring so there could very well be more here than meets the eye... | 16:00 |
| notmyname | pconstantine: I feel like I missed something. you said "that's why it's patched at the wrong time". did you see an error? | 16:00 |
| pconstantine | notmyname: read the comments in the PatchPolicy class :) | 16:01 |
| pconstantine | PatchPolicies | 16:01 |
| notmyname | pconstantine: ah ok. you're jsut answering the question in the docstring | 16:01 |
| pconstantine | notmyname: yep, there was some sort of discussion earlier on why the patch_policies decorator exists | 16:02 |
| notmyname | gotcha. do the tests still pass when you change it to setUpClass? | 16:02 |
| pconstantine | notmyname: I think they should, but it should be simplified more, not just changing the setUp into stUpClass | 16:04 |
| peluse_ | pconstantine: that code does take some serious pythonese to follow, any simplication that preserves the functionality would be fantastic (pathced policies override swift.conf and individual unit tests patched policies revert to what they were before the test, policies can be reloaded, etc) | 16:12 |
| *** chandankumar_ has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
| pconstantine | peluse_ notmyname: using something like this: https://gist.github.com/pkit/7e80f0b749468ad869c4 | 16:18 |
| pconstantine | peluse_ notmyname: tests pass | 16:19 |
| notmyname | :-) | 16:19 |
| notmyname | I need to step out for a bit. thanks, pconstantine | 16:19 |
| pconstantine | notmyname: but that's just a simple 2 minute change, probably can be simplified much more | 16:20 |
| *** zslot has quit IRC | 16:25 | |
| *** jdag has joined #openstack-swift | 16:27 | |
| *** mmcardle has quit IRC | 16:44 | |
| torgomatic | pconstantine: do you remember what creiht's issue was with cross account copy and security? I forget, but i remember it seemed important. | 16:45 |
| peluse_ | pconstantine: nice... sounds like the start of a nice patch | 16:46 |
| *** shri has joined #openstack-swift | 16:46 | |
| pconstantine | pconstantine: it was just issue with 'AUTH_foo' being not the same as tenant name | 16:46 |
| pconstantine | torgomatic: which means that the header should be `X-Copy-From-Account: AUTH_test` | 16:47 |
| torgomatic | so if X-Copy-From-Account matches the actual Swift account name, there's no security issue? | 16:48 |
| pconstantine | torgomatic: it just denies response if it's not account name | 16:49 |
| torgomatic | That seems reasonable enough. | 16:49 |
| *** stevetan has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
| pconstantine | torgomatic: the main security issue, that was fixed in much earlier patch sets is that __call__() removes authorize() function too early | 16:49 |
| *** stevemac has joined #openstack-swift | 16:50 | |
| *** stevemac is now known as stevetan | 16:50 | |
| pconstantine | torgomatic: then creiht said that he get access denied to anything | 16:50 |
| pconstantine | torgomatic: and then I found out that he used the tenant name and not account name | 16:50 |
| torgomatic | pconstantine: got it. Okay, I'll give that one a look once I get off this train and into my office. | 16:51 |
| pconstantine | torgomatic: cool, it's documented in the comments there :) | 16:51 |
| *** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-swift | 16:59 | |
| *** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift | 17:10 | |
| *** pberis has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
| *** stevetan has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
| *** pberis has joined #openstack-swift | 17:15 | |
| openstackgerrit | guang-yee proposed a change to openstack/swift: Use auth_token from keystonemiddleware https://review.openstack.org/109047 | 17:28 |
| *** mmcardle has quit IRC | 17:29 | |
| *** tongli has joined #openstack-swift | 17:34 | |
| *** acoles is now known as acoles_away | 17:35 | |
| * notmyname is back | 17:46 | |
| notmyname | reminder that there is a swift team meeting in a little over an hour in #openstack-meeting | 17:47 |
| notmyname | anyone familiar with the keystone repo changes? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109047/ | 17:55 |
| notmyname | for others looking for it: https://github.com/openstack/keystonemiddleware | 17:58 |
| openstackgerrit | Samuel Merritt proposed a change to openstack/swift: Use auth_token from keystonemiddleware https://review.openstack.org/109047 | 17:59 |
| notmyname | wait, keystonemiddleware still requires python-keystoneclient? | 17:59 |
| notmyname | I guess packaging one repo was too simple. now we call all package two of them | 18:00 |
| portante | pconstantine: ack, will look at it after the V3 keystone review that I have open | 18:02 |
| zaitcev | madness | 18:06 |
| zaitcev | I wonder if all the naysayers were right about OpenStack's amateurism. | 18:06 |
| zaitcev | Keystone is not even the worst of our projects, it's just insular and must be used by every other project in an install. | 18:07 |
| zaitcev | Not that I am likely to do better in place of Dolph, Adam, et al | 18:08 |
| *** portante has quit IRC | 18:10 | |
| *** portante has joined #openstack-swift | 18:13 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v portante | 18:13 | |
| pconstantine | zaitcev: what's keystone? never heard of it :) | 18:16 |
| notmyname | pconstantine: bad beer | 18:16 |
| zaitcev | Really? Wow. | 18:17 |
| pconstantine | zaitcev: nah, I'm just always in denial of its existence | 18:18 |
| *** tdasilva_ has joined #openstack-swift | 18:18 | |
| peluse_ | hey keystone light is pretty good! when to school in Colorado and that was the beer of choice for years.. until we could afford Coors Light :) | 18:18 |
| *** lpabon has quit IRC | 18:18 | |
| zaitcev | I mean that the beer connection goes further back than PBR | 18:18 |
| pconstantine | peluse_: US beers are all bad, dunno why | 18:19 |
| zaitcev | It's decided. I'm starting a storage orchestration project "Baltika". | 18:19 |
| notmyname | pconstantine: that isn't true. but the good ones aren't normally made by the major companies (but there are some exceptions) | 18:19 |
| pconstantine | peluse_: there were a lot of Germans somewhere South, why didn't they bring their good beer with them? | 18:19 |
| peluse_ | pconstantine: because you're not drinking them in large enough volume I suspect :) | 18:19 |
| peluse_ | pconstantine: but I did live in Germany for a while and must say.. yeah, no arugment there! | 18:20 |
| *** portante has quit IRC | 18:20 | |
| *** tdasilva has quit IRC | 18:21 | |
| *** lpabon has joined #openstack-swift | 18:23 | |
| *** portante has joined #openstack-swift | 18:24 | |
| *** ChanServ sets mode: +v portante | 18:24 | |
| *** mrmoje has quit IRC | 18:34 | |
| *** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift | 18:48 | |
| notmyname | meeting time | 19:00 |
| *** acoles_away is now known as acoles | 19:01 | |
| *** tsg has joined #openstack-swift | 19:06 | |
| *** fausto has joined #openstack-swift | 19:33 | |
| *** NM has joined #openstack-swift | 19:53 | |
| NM | Hi everyone :) | 20:00 |
| notmyname | I feel the meeting are going more smoothly these days. thanks everyone for coming and participating | 20:00 |
| NM | Does anyone knows if swift supports keystone v3? I was looking for informations and just found this: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/keystone-v3-support | 20:00 |
| notmyname | NM: see the bullets under Keystone v3 on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/PriorityReviews | 20:01 |
| notmyname | NM: short answer: we're working on it | 20:01 |
| mattoliverau | k, I'm going to back to bed. Cya all in a few hours. | 20:01 |
| *** gvernik has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
| NM | notmyname: thank you so much. I'm really enjoying this project and I'm trying to learn how to follow all good work you're doing. | 20:05 |
| notmyname | NM: it's a whole-team effort. I'm glad you're looking in to things. please feel free to ask when you have questions | 20:06 |
| *** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
| *** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 20:18 | |
| *** acoles is now known as acoles_away | 20:24 | |
| *** dmsimard is now known as dmsimard_away | 20:28 | |
| *** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 20:29 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: nodepool is unable to build test nodes so check and gate tests are delayed | 20:42 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "nodepool is unable to build test nodes so check and gate tests are delayed" | 20:42 | |
| *** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 21:09 | |
| *** tdasilva_ has quit IRC | 21:21 | |
| *** fausto has quit IRC | 21:28 | |
| *** tongli has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
| *** kevinc_ has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
| *** NM has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: zuul is working through a backlog of jobs due to an earlier problem with nodepool | 22:07 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "zuul is working through a backlog of jobs due to an earlier problem with nodepool" | 22:07 | |
| mattoliverau | Morning all | 22:08 |
| *** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift | 22:08 | |
| *** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-swift | 22:10 | |
| *** shakamunyi has quit IRC | 22:15 | |
| peluse_ | mattoliverau: didn't you just go to bed? :) | 22:26 |
| *** petek has joined #openstack-swift | 22:28 | |
| mattoliverau | peluse_: yes and no, I just went back to bed.. but now am up again.. yay its morning already :) | 22:31 |
| *** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-swift | 22:33 | |
| mattoliverau | here's a question, in the abandon search filter I'm adding to the dash, do we want WIP changes to appear if they have also been untouched for 4 weeks and have a -1 score. Or should WIP be omitted from the search? | 23:37 |
| peluse_ | my take would be WIP should not be included as they're set conciously by the owner | 23:41 |
| mattoliverau | peluse_: I was leading that way too, but at what point are WIP patches abandoned.. I guess I could just to a periodic autid of WIP patches (as they are already in the dashboard) and if they get too old poke owners. | 23:43 |
| mattoliverau | and by audit, I might automate some report :P | 23:45 |
| *** shakamunyi has quit IRC | 23:56 | |
| *** flwang has joined #openstack-swift | 23:56 | |
| *** tusharsg has joined #openstack-swift | 23:59 | |
| *** tsg has quit IRC | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!