Monday, 2014-07-14

*** foexle has joined #openstack-swift00:03
*** foexle_ has joined #openstack-swift01:10
*** foexle has quit IRC01:13
*** ho has joined #openstack-swift01:24
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift01:49
*** nosnos has quit IRC02:09
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC02:27
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift02:27
*** foexle_ has quit IRC02:28
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift02:42
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC02:44
*** bkopilov has quit IRC02:46
*** yuan has joined #openstack-swift03:31
*** notsogentle is now known as annegentle03:45
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC04:14
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift04:14
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift04:19
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift04:26
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift04:30
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC04:32
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift05:07
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-swift05:13
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift05:37
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC05:41
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift05:41
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift05:47
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC05:51
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift06:07
*** nosnos has quit IRC06:20
openstackgerritZhang Hua proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add distributed tracing capablities in logging.  https://review.openstack.org/9367706:30
*** kype has joined #openstack-swift06:43
kypeHi anyone here?06:43
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift06:53
*** Shivani has joined #openstack-swift06:57
Shivanihugokuo: Hi , are you there??06:58
hugokuoShivani: yup... how are you07:01
Shivanim gud... i have some query regarding functional tests for swift.07:03
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC07:03
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift07:04
hugokuoShivani: k...07:07
*** mariusv_ is now known as mariusv07:07
Shivanihugokuo: I have to write my own to upload a set of file with content length>0, should I modiy setup() for this?07:07
Shivanihugokuo: My own test07:08
*** kopparam has quit IRC07:11
hugokuoShivani: ahm.... sorry about that. I don't know the answer for this query :S07:12
Shivaniokkk. Thanks.. I'll lookout mysel..07:14
*** gvernik has quit IRC07:14
Shivanihugokuo: Can you please tell me the person's name who can answer it?07:14
ShivaniI have been looking for the answer since last 2 days07:15
charzShivani: Would you want to write test suite or cases for swift? right?07:17
ShivaniYes, I want to write test cases for swift?07:19
charzShivani: and then contribute to swift? or you want to test it on your environment?07:21
Shivanifor both07:21
Shivanicharz: I am new to swift and I want to contibute, so just had a thought to write this type of test as currently there's no such test..07:22
charzShivani: ok, got it. so you need a example for how to write test suite/cases for swfit?07:23
ShivaniYes, but specifically I want to write a test to put object with content length>007:24
*** kype has quit IRC07:28
charzShivani: functional test in 'swift/test/functional' and unit tests in 'swift/test/unit'.07:36
*** bvandenh has quit IRC07:37
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift07:37
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift07:54
*** [1]gvernik has joined #openstack-swift08:00
*** gvernik has quit IRC08:02
*** [1]gvernik is now known as gvernik08:02
*** gvernik has left #openstack-swift08:03
*** gvernik has joined #openstack-swift08:04
*** bvandenh has joined #openstack-swift08:04
*** andyandy has joined #openstack-swift08:05
*** haomai___ has joined #openstack-swift08:23
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC08:27
openstackgerritZhang Hua proposed a change to openstack/swift: Add distributed tracing capablities in logging.  https://review.openstack.org/9367708:31
openstackgerritZhang Hua proposed a change to openstack/swift: Fix test_last_modified_date_to_timestamp unware of timezone  https://review.openstack.org/10670908:50
*** kopparam has quit IRC08:52
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift08:52
*** Dafna has joined #openstack-swift08:56
*** kopparam has quit IRC08:56
*** [1]gvernik has joined #openstack-swift09:05
*** haomai___ has quit IRC09:08
*** gvernik has quit IRC09:08
*** [1]gvernik is now known as gvernik09:08
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-swift09:08
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift09:09
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC09:13
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift09:18
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC09:19
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC09:19
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-swift09:19
*** madhuri has joined #openstack-swift09:22
*** bszabo has joined #openstack-swift09:24
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift09:29
*** kopparam has quit IRC09:30
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift09:36
*** mariusv has quit IRC09:49
*** mariusv has joined #openstack-swift09:49
madhuriHi can anyone tell me why this error occurs "Object PUT returning 503, 0/1 required connections " during object PUT?09:49
ahalemeans the storage server had an error and proxy couldn't complete put - check the storage nodes error log, will probably have more info09:50
madhuriI haven't configured that log. I am having just the all.log09:54
madhuriand it doesn't have any log other than this09:55
*** k4n0 has quit IRC09:57
madhuriahale: Isn't that log enough?09:58
ahaleor i guess, if the obj server proxy needs to talk to isn't there then it could just log that09:59
ahalethat line just says it couldnt achieve as many writes as it needed and failed09:59
ahalei'd look at swift-get-nodes on the file you were going to write, then check out the storage servers it should have written to to see whats up - if theres no other loglines around10:00
*** kopparam has quit IRC10:00
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift10:01
*** kopparam has quit IRC10:02
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift10:03
madhuriahale: http://pastebin.com/pZLTKrxW10:03
madhurihere is the output10:03
*** kopparam has quit IRC10:04
madhuriAnd the object server is running at same port10:04
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift10:04
ahaleso you can make reqs to http://127.0.0.1:6010 ok? not sure what it could be then..10:05
madhuriIs there any direct backend API using which i can make direct request to object server?10:10
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-swift10:10
ahaleyeah, the curl line in that output will do direct eq10:11
ahalereq*10:11
ahalethat would head though, the file that failed to upload, but you could do a get-nodes with a file you know is there to see how it works10:12
ahaleif you have swiftly installed on a machine in the cluster you can use its --direct mode as well to avoid proxies and talk direct10:13
*** mahati has joined #openstack-swift10:16
madhuriThe --direct option in curl request to proxy?10:17
ahale--direct in swiftly app options10:17
ahalethe curl line is in the get-nodes output10:17
madhuriahale: Sorry but what's this swiftly app options?10:19
ahaleswiftly - https://github.com/gholt/swiftly10:20
*** omame has quit IRC10:21
madhuriOk. Thanks ahale :)10:21
ahaleno worries, sorry cant help much more...10:22
madhuriNp :)10:22
madhuriahale: But the HEAD in output will return 'Not Found'. Right?10:23
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-swift10:23
ahaleyep but it'll at least confirm you can hit that service ok10:23
madhuriYeah, I can hit it.10:24
madhuriThanks anyways. I really helped10:24
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC10:25
ahaleso, i guess now you need to work out why the proxy-server didn't think it could10:26
madhuriYes. I am on it.10:27
ahalecool :)10:28
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift10:29
*** k4n0 has quit IRC10:35
*** ppai has quit IRC10:40
*** ho has quit IRC10:40
*** pconstantine has quit IRC10:47
*** ppai has joined #openstack-swift10:57
*** Dafna is now known as Dafna_away11:01
*** omame has joined #openstack-swift11:01
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift11:02
*** kopparam has quit IRC11:03
*** mahati has quit IRC11:03
*** omame has quit IRC11:05
*** pconstantine has quit IRC11:08
*** mahati has joined #openstack-swift11:25
*** pconstantine has joined #openstack-swift11:26
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift11:48
*** anonitus has joined #openstack-swift11:59
*** anonitus has quit IRC12:00
*** denca has joined #openstack-swift12:02
*** Dafna_away is now known as Dafna12:06
*** kopparam has quit IRC12:13
*** mmcardle has quit IRC12:24
*** ppai has quit IRC12:26
*** [1]gvernik has joined #openstack-swift12:33
openstackgerritpaul luse proposed a change to openstack/swift: Initial Erasure Code Docs  https://review.openstack.org/10471312:33
*** gvernik has quit IRC12:35
*** [1]gvernik is now known as gvernik12:35
*** ryao has quit IRC12:41
*** ryao has joined #openstack-swift12:41
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed a change to openstack/swift: Use venv in .functests  https://review.openstack.org/10675212:46
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-swift12:48
*** bszabo has quit IRC12:50
*** bszabo_ has joined #openstack-swift12:50
*** bszabo_ has quit IRC12:55
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift12:56
*** miqui has joined #openstack-swift13:01
*** bszabo_ has joined #openstack-swift13:03
*** [1]gvernik has joined #openstack-swift13:03
*** bkopilov has quit IRC13:03
*** gvernik has quit IRC13:06
*** [1]gvernik is now known as gvernik13:06
*** gvernik has quit IRC13:15
*** chandankumar has quit IRC13:18
*** chandankumar has joined #openstack-swift13:18
*** judd7 has joined #openstack-swift13:19
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-swift13:40
*** nshaikh has quit IRC13:45
*** fifieldt has quit IRC13:45
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift13:58
*** kopparam_ has joined #openstack-swift14:02
*** kopparam has quit IRC14:04
*** minnear is now known as bobby_14:06
*** kopparam_ has quit IRC14:13
*** kopparam has joined #openstack-swift14:14
*** nsaje has joined #openstack-swift14:14
nsajehey guys, swift-dsvm-functional jenkins job is failing, anyone knows what to do?14:16
nsajestarted this morning http://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJcIkltcG9ydEVycm9yOiBObyBtb2R1bGUgbmFtZWQgbW9ja1wiIiwiZmllbGRzIjpbXSwib2Zmc2V0IjowLCJ0aW1lZnJhbWUiOiI4NjQwMCIsImdyYXBobW9kZSI6ImNvdW50IiwidGltZSI6eyJ1c2VyX2ludGVydmFsIjowfSwic3RhbXAiOjE0MDUzNDcxNzE2ODZ914:16
*** tdasilva has joined #openstack-swift14:17
*** kopparam has quit IRC14:19
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed a change to openstack/swift: Use venv in .functests  https://review.openstack.org/10675214:34
notmynamensaje: I don't have time to dig further now (I hope someone else can), but from a quick check, the offending lines were added in January (funtional/__init.py:39) and April (unit/__init__.py:42), so I have no idea why something would start breaking today14:42
notmynameto confirm that it's just happening today (beyond the logstash query above), see the 2nd graph on http://not.mn/swift_gate_status.html14:44
notmynamensaje: nothing has changed in those requirements/import lines in the last few days (please check me on this!) so my guess is that something has changed in the test environment14:45
notmynameinteresting. only one place where it's failed and not been in the swift job (but there is one place, and it looks like the first)14:55
notmynamehttp://logstash.openstack.org/#eyJzZWFyY2giOiJcIkltcG9ydEVycm9yOiBObyBtb2R1bGUgbmFtZWQgbW9ja1wiIEFORCBOT1QgYnVpbGRfbmFtZTpcImNoZWNrLXN3aWZ0LWRzdm0tZnVuY3Rpb25hbFwiIEFORCBOT1QgYnVpbGRfbmFtZTpcImdhdGUtc3dpZnQtZHN2bS1mdW5jdGlvbmFsXCIiLCJmaWVsZHMiOltdLCJvZmZzZXQiOjAsInRpbWVmcmFtZSI6Ijg2NDAwIiwiZ3JhcGhtb2RlIjoiY291bnQiLCJ0aW1lIjp7InVzZXJfaW50ZXJ2YWwiOjB9LCJzdGFtcCI6MTQwNTM0NzE3MTY4NiwibW9kZSI6IiIsImFuYWx5emVfZmllbGQiOiIifQ==14:55
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift14:55
notmynameok, really gotta run for a bit now14:56
nsajenotmyname: interesting14:56
*** bkopilov has joined #openstack-swift15:02
*** angelastreeter has joined #openstack-swift15:21
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift15:33
notmynamethe LP bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/134150715:35
notmyname^^ this could use some eyes this morning. it's stopping a lot of other projects too15:36
*** BobBall has joined #openstack-swift15:36
*** angelastreeter has quit IRC15:39
*** bsdkurt has joined #openstack-swift15:39
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-swift15:48
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v zaitcev15:48
*** bszabo_ has quit IRC16:02
*** elambert has joined #openstack-swift16:04
*** andyandy has quit IRC16:18
*** andyandy has joined #openstack-swift16:25
openstackgerritSamuel Merritt proposed a change to openstack/swift: Allow HEAD for POST tempurls  https://review.openstack.org/10647116:29
*** andyandy has quit IRC16:31
*** mmcardle has quit IRC16:33
*** mwstorer has joined #openstack-swift16:33
*** pberis has joined #openstack-swift16:40
notmynamegood morning16:43
notmynamehas anyone looked into the fucntional test failures?16:43
nsajensaje: I'm in the EU tz so good luck solving this guys, I hope I wake up to a working gate :-)16:44
nsaje*notmyname16:44
notmynamensaje: ok. have you found anything in the last hour or so?16:45
nsajenotmyname: nope, haven't really had time to look, sorry16:45
notmynameok16:46
*** shri has joined #openstack-swift17:00
openstackgerritJohn Dickinson proposed a change to openstack/swift: Merge branch 'master' into feature/ec  https://review.openstack.org/10681517:04
*** chandankumar has quit IRC17:05
notmynametsg: peluse_: ^^17:05
tsgnotmyname: thanks.  will rebase now17:05
tsgerr .. after merge :)17:05
notmyname:-)17:06
notmynametsg: well, next up is figuring out the weird new import error thing. so I don't know how long the merge will take17:06
notmynamensaje: did you see the conversation in -qa?17:13
notmynameseems dtroyer found the root cause (nova moved oslotest from requirements to test-requirements, and that pulled in mock)17:13
notmynameand it seems that test-requirements.txt aren't installed in devstack test runs (eg the swift functional tests)17:14
*** IRTermite has quit IRC17:20
*** IRTermite has joined #openstack-swift17:23
acolestorgomatic: thanks for looking at the -spec. agree re ephemeral content-type changes. not good.17:36
torgomaticacoles: yeah, it gets tricky in a hurry; I've been thinking about it some, but I don't have anything useful (yet)17:36
acolestorgomatic: more head scratching here...just need to solve the mutable sysmeta and it'll be a breeze :)17:38
torgomatic:)17:38
*** mwstorer has quit IRC17:39
*** acoles is now known as acoles_away17:40
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC17:50
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift17:52
*** mmcardle has joined #openstack-swift17:54
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-swift17:57
*** mmcardle has quit IRC18:05
notmynamere the swift functional tests problem, there are 2 patches proposed right now that should fix it. the solution is to tell the test environment to actually install the test-requirments18:07
notmynamehttps://review.openstack.org/106831 (for knowing when to install test-requirements) and https://review.openstack.org/106828 (for the job definition)18:08
notmynamensaje: ^18:08
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed a change to openstack/swift: Use venv in .functests  https://review.openstack.org/10675218:16
*** shakamunyi has joined #openstack-swift18:20
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC18:31
tsgclayg, torgomatic:  wrt https://review.openstack.org/103644/, what are your thoughts on the default storage policy class name?18:31
tsgclayg, torgomatic:  at the moment, I am proposing "ReplicationStoragePolicy" - not sure if should be "LegacyStoragePolicy" or something similar.  Thoughts?18:32
peluse_tsg:  I'm not real fond of Legacy in this context - there's nothing legacy about replication :)18:33
tsgpeluse_: ack :)  and "Default" in the name might be confusing as well18:33
peluse_tsg:  yup, that's why I kinda like what you have proposed now...18:34
tsgpeluse_: with global StoragePolicy -> ReplicationStoragePolicy replacement across tests etc, the patch is becoming rather large .. so I thought this might be the right time to hash this out :)18:34
* peluse_ wonders what clayg and torgomatic think though...18:34
*** miqui has quit IRC18:40
*** miqui has joined #openstack-swift18:47
*** miqui has quit IRC18:48
*** miqui has joined #openstack-swift18:48
*** miqui has quit IRC18:48
*** miqui has joined #openstack-swift18:49
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift18:49
torgomatictsg: peluse_: ReplicationStoragePolicy and ECStoragePolicy sound good to me as class names18:52
openstackgerritTushar Gohad proposed a change to openstack/swift: EC: Add support for policy types, 'erasure_coding' policy  https://review.openstack.org/10364418:54
tsgtorgomatic:  thanks.  for unit tests, we are using ReplicationStoragePolicy in most places, except for a couple of places (such as to test for valid types) where I have created an ExampleStoragePolicy class18:56
tsgtorgomatic: hope that's reasonable18:56
torgomatictsg: could be... I'm working up some comments on the patch atm; they'll be posted in the next few mintues18:57
torgomatic*mimnutes18:57
torgomaticffs, you know what I mean :)18:57
tsgtorgomatic: thanks! for the review18:58
* tsg looking forward18:58
*** occupwnt has quit IRC18:58
creihtnotmyname: first policies upgrade bug18:59
creihthttps://bugs.launchpad.net/swift/+bug/134170518:59
creihtclayg, peluse_ -^18:59
creihteasy fix though, would one of you guys mind taking a look?19:00
torgomaticcreiht: I thought there was a commit to put a default in there... that looks really familiar19:00
torgomaticso container_info() would always return a policy... I could be wrong though19:00
notmynamecommit bfa9139649c0ac7f75e8c9503cb04d06f7bae0b919:01
*** occupant has joined #openstack-swift19:01
notmynamecreiht: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104441/19:01
notmynamewell,not that one19:01
notmynamecreiht: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104442/19:02
*** mwstorer has joined #openstack-swift19:02
notmynamethat one19:02
creihthttps://github.com/openstack/swift/blob/master/swift/proxy/controllers/obj.py#L46019:02
notmynamecreiht: yup. that commit fixed it by updating container_info to ensure the key is always there19:03
creihtahh19:03
creihtok then19:03
notmynamecreiht: and the root cause is that the key isn't in the cached values. that's the hole that had to be fixed19:03
notmynamecreiht: glad you caught it though :-)19:04
creihtnotmyname: well I understand that part19:04
creiht:)19:04
creihtjust didn't realize there were major bugs after rc-1 ;P19:04
notmynamecreiht: just adding commentary for those playing along at home :-)19:04
creihthehe19:04
ahalethose deploying along at home.. :)19:04
creihtlol19:05
glangefor all the housewives that watch this irc channel instead of daytime soaps?19:05
*** mitz_ has quit IRC19:06
creihtheh... but either way I should have paid closer attention to the last bugs that were found19:06
notmynamecreiht: ya, there were 3 patches backported. all of which were deemed to be important enough to backport but not invalidating existing testing. one you found now, and the other 2 have to do with container sync and the reconciler19:08
notmynamealso, you might not have seen it since I think it took 3 days to land because of jenkins issues19:08
creihtheh19:08
notmynamewow. and we thought we had a problem in swift.  in cinder "...patch-set 1 was 28924 line code dump"19:09
ahalewhat does 'backport but not invalidating existing testing' mean ?19:09
notmynameahale: not that the patches shouldn't be tested, but that if you know that storage policies work, that isn't invalidated by finding an issue in when the reconciler deletes things from it's queue or in container sync or, in this case, the upgrade.19:11
notmynameahale: the patches were tested before it was released19:11
ahaleoh yeah not whining or anything, was just a confusing phrase :)19:12
notmynameahale: ya, sorry. not trying to release untested code. just answering the "why didn't we extend the RC period another week or two after rc2" question :-)19:12
*** judd7 has quit IRC19:13
ahaleyeah understood notmyname - our fault for not paying closer attention and using rc - but big impact on prod system too :)19:15
ahaleyay for swift behaving well in mixed versions though :)19:15
notmynameahale: please let me know how we can make that information sharing better19:16
ahalewell normally its pretty easy to see stuff - maybe it was the dragged outness with jenkins..19:17
*** markd has joined #openstack-swift19:18
*** miqui has quit IRC19:18
ahaleI don't know how many people update their swifts as close to releases as we do, not sure its many.. see people with old diablo and essex versions sometimes19:18
notmynameheh. we do. I just updated the swiftstack releases last week (well, made it available for other devs while we add functionality to the product)19:19
ahaleso bound to get bitten occasionally19:19
notmyname:-)19:19
ahaleyeah but theres a lot of people who don't I think ? maybe thats wrong impression19:19
notmynameit is true that a lot of the external use of swift is largely grouped into (1) people who use distro packages, and therefore only get the openstack integrated releases and (2) people who consume swift but let someone else manage it (eg swiftstack and rackspace customers, albeit from different perspectives)19:21
ahalei guess it would be nice from ops pov if its in RC phase of release to clearly outline breaking fixes in each rc and before the final? it seems that the announcements on releases are more "heres something shiny!"19:21
notmynameahale: here's one completely on me for not mentioning it: the proxy logging setting reveal_sensitive_prefix default changed from 8192 to 16. this will limit the logged length of auth token, which is crucial for keystone tokens (and also requested from people at the summit for sec purposes)19:24
ahalehehe, that one I caught19:25
notmynameahale: whew, ok :-)19:25
*** mahati has quit IRC19:25
ahalenoticed it earlier as well so can confirm it works :)19:25
openstackgerritSergey Skripnick proposed a change to openstack/swift: Use venv in .functests  https://review.openstack.org/10675219:33
*** tsg has quit IRC19:36
*** kevinc_ has quit IRC19:48
*** tsg has joined #openstack-swift19:55
peluse_creiht:  just reading the scrollback here - let me know if you use the latest and still have that issue.19:59
*** nacim has joined #openstack-swift20:00
*** pberis has quit IRC20:04
*** tusharsg has joined #openstack-swift20:07
*** nacim has quit IRC20:08
*** tsg has quit IRC20:09
*** tusharsg is now known as tsg20:10
creihtpeluse_: will do20:11
*** tdasilva has quit IRC20:14
*** miqui has joined #openstack-swift20:22
*** kevinc_ has joined #openstack-swift20:29
*** mwstorer has quit IRC20:41
mattoliverau.20:44
*** mwstorer has joined #openstack-swift20:48
notmynamemattoliverau: uh oh. you didn't give us your normal "good morning". just "." ;-)21:05
mattoliverauLol, cause I don't know what time it is, its morning in Oz but late in Germany, so think a little jet lagged :p21:08
peluse_"good something" :)21:09
creihttop of the interwebz to ya21:10
mattoliverauLol, . was my brain loading, 5 dots and I'm ready for coding :p21:11
notmynamehow was the infra meetup?21:11
notmynamemattoliverau: ^21:12
mattoliverauSo far so good, today and tomorrow are talks and QA sessions, the real design stuff happens Wednesday - Friday (excluding all the work that "gets" done in the German beer gardens of course )21:13
mattoliverauToday the German telecom (hosts) showed us around there facility and showed us how they use OpenStack. Had intro sessions for people new to OpenStack and open stack development and argued about how to use git :p21:16
mattoliverauWas a lighter on day as most people are either jet lagged or tired because of the world cup final last night ;p21:17
mattoliverauAnyway, I should at least try to sleep or I'll never get over jet lag :) just wanted to say hi (note if I'm online again in an hour or so then I've obviously failed :p21:21
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC21:31
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-swift21:31
notmyname:-)21:32
*** shakamunyi has quit IRC21:40
*** bvandenh has quit IRC21:41
peluse_something funny going on with my SAIO that has something to do with recent upadtes.  Anyone else running into a 400!=503 assert in test_proxy() of test_internal_client.py?  No biggy, I can hunt it down but if someone else has already...21:54
notmynamepeluse_: master as of this morning passed all tests for me21:58
peluse_notmyname:  yeah, I think its in my config somewhere but didn't show up until today..22:00
peluse_notmyname: what do you think of the word 'RUGGEDIZE'?22:03
notmynamepeluse_: maybe something weird you set up when figuring out the "tests fail with more than 2 policies" patch22:03
peluse_notmyname:  could be... thanks22:04
notmynamepeluse_: umm...I thin ruggedize sounds very american, very texan, and very much like a big truck with a tool box on it (especially one with a diamond plate pattern)22:04
notmyname;-)22:04
peluse_ha!22:05
peluse_Looking for a very that means "to make durable" and that game up in a few dictionaries22:05
notmynamepeluse_: depends on the context, I guess. I think "ruggedize" is really great (and used often) when talking about physical things (eg electronics, kids toys, stuff that can fall in water, etc). I think it's kinda odd to use it in context with software22:14
*** kenhui has quit IRC22:33
*** bkopilov has quit IRC23:12
peluse_notmyname:  yeah, we can decide at any point.  You'll see how I used it here when I push the early rpelicator framework to feature/ec later tonight (maybe)23:25
peluse_tried pushing it just now and git review told me I was an invalid committer :)23:25
* peluse_ hits the road, back a bit later23:26
*** elambert has quit IRC23:48
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-swift23:50

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!