Friday, 2016-05-20

dims_good one tonyb01:11
tonybdims_: Thanks01:16
openstackgerritTony Breeds proposed openstack/requirements: Check that the argument is in fact a directory  https://review.openstack.org/31901301:34
* tonyb got caught by "tox -eupdate -- ./nova" vs tox -eupdate -- ../nova" Rats :(01:48
openstackgerritliusheng proposed openstack/requirements: Bump aodhclient to 0.5.0  https://review.openstack.org/31901801:56
*** dims_ has quit IRC02:55
*** dims has joined #openstack-requirements03:00
*** masayukig has joined #openstack-requirements03:45
openstackgerritMerged openstack/requirements: Updated from generate-constraints  https://review.openstack.org/31785405:55
*** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-requirements06:26
*** david-lyle has quit IRC06:28
openstackgerritOpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/requirements: Updated from generate-constraints  https://review.openstack.org/31906906:35
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena07:37
openstackgerritSwapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) proposed openstack/requirements: Updated from generate-constraints  https://review.openstack.org/31906909:19
coolsvapdims, hi09:54
openstackgerritSwapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) proposed openstack/requirements: Updated from generate-constraints  https://review.openstack.org/31906909:59
dimscoolsvap10:20
dimshi10:20
coolsvapdims, i updated the commit message in the review10:20
dimscoolsvap : we should avoid doing that. whichever merges first is the winner and the rest can be rebased or abandoned10:22
coolsvapdims, okay10:22
dimscoolsvap : if we can totally avoid touching the bot proposed review, that would work the best10:22
coolsvapdims, sure I was not sure how to deal with that10:23
dimscoolsvap : do you mind switching it back to PS1? then i can run the cron jobs again. looks like my sniff jobs went bad10:23
dimscoolsvap : good thought :)10:23
coolsvapdims sure i will do that give me a min10:24
openstackgerritSwapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap) proposed openstack/requirements: Updated from generate-constraints  https://review.openstack.org/31906910:26
dimsthanks coolsvap10:27
coolsvapdims, sorry for the trouble10:28
dimsno worries at all. it was definitely a good thought.10:28
dimsand i had not doc'ced it anywhere :)10:28
coolsvapnp, actually i followed what you did yesterday10:29
coolsvapwhen i asked you about two reviews10:29
dimscoolsvap : which one, i can try to explain10:33
coolsvap<coolsvap> dims_, i was looking at the requirements reviews and had a query10:35
coolsvap<dims_> shoot coolsvap10:35
coolsvap<coolsvap> there is a review to update the ryu version https://review.openstack.org/#/c/31844210:35
coolsvap<coolsvap> and there is an automated review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/31785410:35
coolsvap<dims_> yes coolsvap10:35
coolsvap<coolsvap> the automated review does the same thing of updating the upper-constraints10:35
coolsvap<dims_> coolsvap : yes, since i know ryu is a problem i adjusted the bot proposed review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/31785410:35
dimscoolsvap : so for ryu, we know that there's a problem.10:35
dimsso we kept ryu out of the bot proposed update10:36
coolsvapdims, understood10:36
dimscool. thanks10:36
coolsvapso dims now we have these 6 patchsets if the bigger one proposed by bot is merged first we abandon others?10:40
coolsvaphow do we decide which one to merge first10:40
coolsvapgate results?10:40
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith10:48
dimscoolsvap : i tend to start with gate as it's a bulk operation10:51
dimsi mean bot proposed review10:51
dimscoolsvap : also because the sniff tests are not run on the individually filed ones10:52
dimsso we have better coverage10:52
coolsvapdims, hmm i was pretty much sure about the answer but wanted to confirm :)10:53
dims:) please write this down in the etherpad if you don't mind!10:58
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch12:48
amrithdims, is there a weekly meeting for the requirements team? I looked for one in the list of meetings but couldn't find one.13:28
dimsamrith : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/318043/13:29
amriththx13:30
amrithI'm having some issues with git13:30
dimsamrith : don't we all :)13:30
amrithonce I do a git reset --soft to some commit id13:30
amrithI can't seem to get back to the real HEAD on master13:30
amrithsorry, I do a git checkout origin/stable/...13:30
amriththen git reset --soft ...13:30
amrithafter that I'm pretty much screwed13:30
amrithok, got it ... 1200 utc on wednesdays13:31
dimsgit fetch origin;git reset --hard origin/master;git clean -f -x -d;13:31
dimsthat's what i usually use13:31
* amrith bows to the git master13:32
amrithdims doesn't commit to master, master commits to dims13:32
dimsone of these days i'll try to understand what they do13:32
openstackgerritxiangxinyong proposed openstack/requirements: Bump python-smaugclient to 0.0.4  https://review.openstack.org/31925713:50
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena13:58
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2414:09
sigmavirus24Thanks for that tonyb I didn't realize that. Now I know :)14:10
openstackgerritIhar Hrachyshka proposed openstack/requirements: Bump oslo.versionedobjects to >= 1.9.1  https://review.openstack.org/31933816:21
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off17:14
*** david-lyle_ is now known as david-lyle17:22
openstackgerritIvan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/requirements: Block python-cinderclient v1.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/31943119:58
openstackgerritIvan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/requirements: Block python-cinderclient v1.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/31943120:03
openstackgerritIvan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/requirements: Block python-cinderclient v1.7.0  https://review.openstack.org/31943120:07
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa22:01
openstackgerritMorgan Fainberg proposed openstack/requirements: Drop python-ldap from global requirements  https://review.openstack.org/31949023:15
*** notmorgan has joined #openstack-requirements23:15

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!