Thursday, 2017-07-20

*** zhhuabj has quit IRC00:00
*** ttrifonov has joined #openstack-meeting00:00
ekcstime for congress meeting thinrichs masahito ramineni00:01
ekcs#startmeeting congressteammeeting00:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Jul 20 00:01:19 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ekcs. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.00:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.00:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'congressteammeeting'00:01
ekcshi all! happy wednesday/thursday!00:01
ekcsas usual, topics are collected here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/congress-meeting-topics00:02
*** hoppalm has quit IRC00:02
*** ramineni_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:02
ekcsplease read/comment/add =)00:02
ramineni_ekcs: hi00:02
ekcshi ramineni_ !00:02
thinrichsHi all00:02
ekcshi thinrichs !00:03
ramineni_thinrichs: hi00:03
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:03
qiangcaohi00:03
ekcshi qiangcao !00:04
qiangcaohi ekcs!00:04
ekcsqiangcao: not sure if we’ve connected before. sorry if I forget =p00:04
qiangcaoI’ve joined a few weeks ago.00:04
*** torgomatic has left #openstack-meeting00:05
qiangcaowatching from far :)00:05
ekcsqiangcao: Oh well great meeting you. would you like to introduce briefly introduce yourself?00:05
qiangcaoalright. I’m Qiang (Chang) Cao, based in Durham, NC.00:06
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting00:06
qiangcaoI’m a postdoc researcher at Duke university, especially interested in policies in the cloud.00:06
ekcsqiangcao: oh sorry you already did introduce yourself a few weeks ago. sorry didn’t put the name together. well welcome again!00:07
qiangcaoI’ve watching and reading congress dicussion and docs for a while.00:07
qiangcaoYeah, it’s ok.00:07
thinrichsqiangcao: is there something specific you're working on?00:08
thinrichsAnd welcome!00:08
qiangcaoI’m working on authorization in multi-domain systems.00:08
qiangcaofor example, naming, access control, etc.00:09
*** askb has joined #openstack-meeting00:09
ekcscool! does multi-domain mean authority is decentralized?00:10
qiangcaoRight, we’re working on a system to do fully decentralized trust managment for authorization.00:10
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting00:10
ekcsvery cool!00:11
qiangcaoWe are specially interested in systems across domains.00:11
qiangcaoI’ve looked at the congress docs.00:11
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting00:12
qiangcaoHere at duke, we also use datalog to represent security assertion and trust relationships.00:12
qiangcaoCongress is great. we should keep up the great work.00:12
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** gmann has quit IRC00:13
*** wxy- has quit IRC00:13
*** gmann has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** emagana has quit IRC00:13
*** ykatabam1 has quit IRC00:13
qiangcaoif time is allowed today, it’ll be great if you can talk about the multi-tenancy in congress.00:14
ekcsGreat! Would definitely love to connect more on common interests and hear any feedback you may have for congress. Always eager for feedback from a new perspective.00:15
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC00:15
thinrichs+100:15
*** esberglu has quit IRC00:15
ekcsok well let’s move along then.00:15
ekcsadminitrative stuff to get through =p00:16
ekcs#topic announcements00:16
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:16
ekcsas annouced before, PTG is coming up in sep.00:16
ekcsPTG00:16
ekcshttps://www.openstack.org/ptg/00:16
ekcsMonday - Friday, September 11-15, 201700:16
ekcsCongress sessions: Wed-Thu00:16
ekcsNow is a good time to make travel plans if you plan to be there. We’re also going to do our best to get a good way for remote participants to join.00:17
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting00:17
*** hoppalm has joined #openstack-meeting00:17
ekcsPTL nomination opens 7/3100:18
ekcs#link https://governance.openstack.org/election/#ptl-details00:18
ekcsif you’re interested in running for PTL I’d be happy to give more info. I’m sure thinrichs would too.00:18
ekcsany other announcements before we move on?00:19
*** thorst has quit IRC00:19
ekcsok moving on then.00:20
ekcs#topic congress client final release00:20
*** openstack changes topic to "congress client final release (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:20
ekcsfinal release is due next week.00:20
ekcsHere are the open patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/python-congressclient+status:open00:20
ekcshopefully we can merge them very soon and use the rest of the time for testing.00:21
ekcsand of course if there’s anything else that needs to go into the pike release for congress client please do bring it up =)00:22
ekcsOn this patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483132/00:22
thinrichsLooks like both those have gone thru several rounds of review.  Doesn't seem like there are any blockers.00:23
ekcsthe main discussion seems to be whether we’re okay with the client command not supporting multiple YAML docs per file.00:23
thinrichsEither way seems fine to me.00:24
thinrichsI think for the use case we're targeting, the file would always have 100:25
thinrichsright?00:25
ramineni_ekcs: seems fine ..just got confused ..why server supporting and client doesn't support ..00:25
thinrichsIf server supports N, it seems simple enough to hand over the N to the server.00:26
thinrichsIs the client code any different to handle N?00:26
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting00:26
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting00:26
ekcspolicy library service will accept a file with multiple policies and write it to DB as multiple rows.00:27
thinrichsOh I see—it would take N calls to create_policy00:27
ekcsyes exactly.00:27
ekcsshouldn’t be too hard I just haven’t had time to think through how best to do that interaction on client.00:27
ramineni_Why Not calls to create policy00:28
thinrichsSimplest code would be just: for body in policies: client.create_policy(body)00:28
ramineni_Why N calls00:28
ekcsbecause each call to agnostic:create_policy creates one policy.00:28
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
ekcsit’s not difficult I’m sure just a matter of figuring out how to pack up all the outputs from each call and give back to openstack client the way it expects.00:29
thinrichsHow does the server API call handle N policies?  Did we add one?  I thought we just modified the 1 API call to accept (optionally) a list of rules as a field.00:30
thinrichsDo we have a server-side API call where you can stuff in N policies?00:30
*** frank_young has quit IRC00:31
ekcsthinrichs: no there is no API call for creating N policies.00:31
thinrichsThen it seems the client shouldn't permit it.00:32
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting00:32
ekcsthe only thing is when server loads files to library at startup, it’ll make N calls to load N policies in a single yaml file. I could just as well disable that too. But it doesn’t seem to hurt.00:32
thinrichsI wouldn't disable it.00:33
ramineni_ekcs: seems fine ..I'll update my vote00:33
thinrichsThe downside to putting N API calls into a single client call is that if the 5th one fails, the client isn't going to roll-back the first 4 that succeeded.00:34
*** armax has quit IRC00:35
thinrichsA server-script that we use to load stuff into Congress at startup is different.  We know what we're doing.00:35
thinrichs(BTW, I've got to leave in 10min)00:35
ekcsthinrichs, ramineni_ ok.00:35
ekcsok yea taking a fair bit of time on a small issue here but need to get it done for deadline.00:35
ekcslet’s move on then?00:35
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting00:37
ekcsqiangcao: are you still around?00:37
qiangcaoyes.00:37
ekcswe could talk more about multi tenancy now while thinrichs is here.00:37
ekcsthe rest of the topics are not super urgent.00:37
qiangcaogreat.00:37
ekcs#topic multi-tenancy00:37
*** openstack changes topic to "multi-tenancy (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:37
qiangcaoI read through the doc. It uses statements from nova, neutron, idap, etc.00:39
ekcsSo I’m not too familiar with the efforts for multi-tenancy in congress. But some people have thought about it and sketched out working toward it i think.00:39
ekcsqiangcao:  yup.00:39
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting00:40
qiangcaocan we also take statements/assertions made by tenents for policy compliance or enforcement?00:40
*** frank_young has quit IRC00:40
thinrichsqiangcao: we don't have multiple tenants today.00:40
thinrichsBut we do have multiple policies00:40
thinrichsSo you could have alice write policyA00:40
thinrichsand bob write policyB00:40
thinrichsand admin write policyC00:40
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting00:41
thinrichs(That's not true multi-tenancy b/c alice can see/change all of policyA, policyB, and policyC)00:41
thinrichsThen admin's policyC can reference alice's policyA and bob's policyB00:41
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:41
thinrichsSyntax is basically the same…00:41
thinrichspolicyC:   error(x) :- policyA:error(x), policyB:error(x)00:42
thinrichs(Where I've chosen 'error' here arbitrarily.)00:42
qiangcaoright. so we’ll going to make separate tables to store the statements by tenants?00:42
thinrichsYes.00:42
thinrichsAnd each tenant could have a collection of tables that they write (all the tables defined in their policy).00:43
qiangcaohow can we refer to a policy?00:43
thinrichsSame way you refer to nova/neutron00:44
qiangcaoshould the policy name be globally unique?00:44
thinrichsExample is above00:44
thinrichsYes—all policy names are globally unique00:44
thinrichsNo hierarchy for policy names00:44
thinrichsIn fact, the datasource names and the policy names must all be (jointly) unique00:44
thinrichsMeaning you can't name a datasource the same as a policy00:44
thinrichsAnd you can't name 2 pollicies the same thing.  And you can't name 2 datasources the same thing.00:45
qiangcaoyeah, then Alice, Bob, and Cindy need to coordinate on names?00:45
thinrichsYep—that's why we don't have true multitenancy yet00:46
qiangcaoI see.00:46
thinrichs(One of the reasons anyway)00:46
ekcsso from what I’m hearng so far here are a few gaps to multi-tenancy.00:46
ekcsa. globally unique policy name00:46
ekcsb. all users can see/edit policies00:46
ekcsc. all user policies can refer to all state00:46
ekcsc) may be addressable by query rewriting techniques00:46
ekcsb) can be addressed by ownership.00:47
ekcsany other big gaps?00:47
qiangcaohow about the efficiency?00:47
*** wxy- has joined #openstack-meeting00:47
qiangcaoif the alice makes a lot of policies about many things?00:47
thinrichsMany policies doesn't make the evaluation any slower00:48
qiangcaoin your terminology, policy alice includes a lot of statements/assertions00:48
*** masahito has joined #openstack-meeting00:48
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting00:48
masahitohi, so sorry to be late...00:48
ekcshi masahito00:48
thinrichsOh—right if there are many statements then that will impact performance for sure.00:48
thinrichsJust like a database or really any system.00:49
qiangcaofor exmple, nova makes assertions for every vm.00:49
ekcswe’ve done some benchmarks on how far we can push, but I don’t think we’ve been very comprehensive about it so far.00:49
thinrichsPerformance depends entirely on the structure of the policy.00:49
ekcsqiangcao: are you wondering more about scalability or isolation/security/dos right now?00:50
qiangcaoyeah, it depends on the size of the inference context.00:50
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting00:50
thinrichsIf you write a policy that requires analyzing every VM, and every network connection to every VM, and every pair of VMs connected via the network, and all the storage devices connected to any of those VMs (for example), then it'll take a while to evaluate00:50
*** thorst has quit IRC00:50
qiangcaoby a inference context, I mean the set of statements one need to consider for making a decision.00:50
thinrichsSize of the data and size/complexity of the rules gives you performance.00:51
thinrichsRight—inference context00:51
thinrichsWe're using standard datalog, so all the performance characteristics are the usual ones.00:51
thinrichsWe do top-down evaluation today without caching.00:51
qiangcaoyeah, here we’re exploring a way to make the inference context compact, only including all relevant statements.00:51
thinrichsNo recursion00:51
*** wxy- has quit IRC00:52
thinrichsIf you wanted to experiment with performance within Congress, that'd be great!00:52
qiangcaoI’ll definitly looks into that.00:52
thinrichsThere are a few performance benchmarks in the test suite00:52
thinrichsThere's a blogpost too.00:53
qiangcaocan you send me a point?00:53
qiangcao*pointer00:53
thinrichshttp://ruleyourcloud.com/2015/03/12/scaling-up-congress.html00:53
thinrichsGot to run00:53
ekcssee you thinrichs00:54
thinrichsFeel free to send email to the openstack-dev mailing list.  Just include [Congress] in the subject line00:54
qiangcaothanks00:54
thinrichsTalk to you all later!00:54
qiangcaosure, ttyl00:54
*** thinrichs has quit IRC00:54
*** Nel1x has joined #openstack-meeting00:54
ekcsok let’s go to open discussion for the last few minutes then.00:54
ekcs#topic open discussion00:55
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: congressteammeeting)"00:55
ekcsfeel free to jump in with anything.00:55
ekcsjust wanna also mention it’s feature freeze for congress server and dashboard next week.00:55
ekcsserver: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/congress+status:open+branch:master00:55
ekcsdashboard: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/congress-dashboard+status:open00:55
ekcsI think most of the dashboard patches are ready.00:56
ekcsserver too.00:56
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting00:56
*** hoppalm has quit IRC00:57
*** litao__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** wanghao has quit IRC00:58
ekcslast two minutes if anyone’s got something to say =p00:58
*** ansmith has quit IRC00:58
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting00:58
ekcsalright then! fun discussions today. see you all next time!01:00
ekcs#endmeeting01:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"01:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jul 20 01:00:15 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)01:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2017/congressteammeeting.2017-07-20-00.01.html01:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2017/congressteammeeting.2017-07-20-00.01.txt01:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/congressteammeeting/2017/congressteammeeting.2017-07-20-00.01.log.html01:00
qiangcaosee you next week, ekcs!01:00
masahitothanks, bye!01:00
ekcssee you qiangcao !01:00
*** makowals has quit IRC01:00
*** masahito has quit IRC01:02
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC01:04
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting01:04
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:05
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting01:06
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting01:08
*** kjw3 has joined #openstack-meeting01:08
*** chyka has quit IRC01:09
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC01:09
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC01:11
*** xyang1 has quit IRC01:12
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting01:13
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting01:15
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting01:16
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting01:17
*** kevzha01 has joined #openstack-meeting01:17
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting01:17
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC01:18
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:18
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting01:19
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:24
*** bobh has quit IRC01:25
*** kiennt has joined #openstack-meeting01:25
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC01:26
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC01:27
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom01:27
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC01:31
*** harlowja has quit IRC01:32
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting01:32
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:32
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:34
*** edmondsw has quit IRC01:35
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:35
*** Apoorva has quit IRC01:36
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting01:37
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC01:37
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting01:41
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting01:41
*** dongfeng has left #openstack-meeting01:42
*** myoung has quit IRC01:42
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:44
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** fzdarsky_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:45
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC01:45
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting01:45
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:46
*** fzdarsky|afk has quit IRC01:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:47
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC01:48
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting01:49
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting01:50
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC01:50
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:50
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting01:52
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:54
*** edmondsw has quit IRC01:56
*** qiangcao has quit IRC01:59
zhenguo#startmeeting mogan02:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Jul 20 02:01:33 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is zhenguo. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.02:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.02:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: mogan)"02:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'mogan'02:01
liushengo/02:01
zhenguoo/02:01
zhangyango/02:01
*** bobh has quit IRC02:02
Xinrano/02:02
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:02
zhenguoshaohe_feng, wanghao: are you around?02:03
zhenguook, seems they will come later02:03
zhenguoas always, the agenda:02:03
zhenguo#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Mogan#Agenda_for_next_meeting02:03
zhenguolet's jump in02:03
zhenguo#topic announcements and reminders02:04
*** openstack changes topic to "announcements and reminders (Meeting topic: mogan)"02:04
zhenguoOpenStack Days China will happen in 4 days, we got a presentation for Mogan there.02:04
zhenguowho will attend the event?02:04
shaohe_fengzhenguo: morning02:04
zhenguoshaohe_feng: o/02:04
zhangyang🙋02:05
zhenguozhangyang: lol02:05
zhenguoshaohe_feng, luyao, Xinran: how about you?02:05
shaohe_fengzhenguo:  IMHO, every one in Beijing can attend the meeting.02:06
shaohe_fengzhenguo: I will02:06
shaohe_fengzhenguo: and others not in beijing, maybe need buget02:06
XinranI will :)02:06
zhenguoshaohe_feng: hah, that's true02:06
luyaozhenguo, :D02:06
zhenguook, see you all then :D02:06
shaohe_fengzhenguo: yes. seen you in the next week.02:07
zhenguook, let's move on02:07
zhenguoPike release is comming, instead of adding more features, I would like to make it more stable02:07
zhenguoPlease all help to test it, especially the APi02:07
liushenghah, that is ture02:08
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting02:08
zhenguoWe can still backport bug after released, but API changes need a microversion :D02:08
zhenguoso at least we should make API forming good02:09
liushengso we are 1.0 now ?02:09
zhenguoin two weeks?02:10
zhenguoliusheng: after Pke02:10
zhenguo*Pike02:10
liushengzhenguo: ok02:10
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting02:10
zhenguoliusheng: btw, please take care of the client02:11
liushengzhenguo: ok, sure02:11
zhenguook, thanks02:11
shaohe_fengnice, 1.0 will be avaliable ASAP02:12
zhenguoI don't plan to relase the mogan-ui as it's breaked by the recently changed02:12
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC02:12
shaohe_fengThen when will we release the UI?02:12
zhenguomaybe need to find some JS guys to rewrite it.02:13
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting02:13
zhenguoshaohe_feng: it doesn't work now02:13
*** makowals has quit IRC02:13
*** VW has quit IRC02:13
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz02:13
*** andreas-f has joined #openstack-meeting02:13
*** yamamoto has quit IRC02:13
liushengzhenguo: we'd better to also release mogan-1.0 in pypi02:13
zhenguoliusheng: sure02:14
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** annabelleB has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
zhenguozhangyang: you will use Pike release, right?02:14
zhenguowe can discuss later02:16
zhenguoContribution into mogan for the last 30 days02:16
zhenguo#link http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/mogan/3002:16
*** bkopilov has quit IRC02:16
*** edmondsw has quit IRC02:16
zhenguothanks everyone for the hard work02:17
*** iyamahat has quit IRC02:17
zhenguoalso, please do more reviews :D02:17
zhenguonot much of announcement, anyone else have a thing here?02:17
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC02:17
*** yamahata has quit IRC02:17
zhenguo#topic task tracking02:18
*** openstack changes topic to "task tracking (Meeting topic: mogan)"02:18
zhenguo#links https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/MoganWhiteBoard02:18
*** mtanino_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:18
zhenguoplease remember to update it to help wanghao collect the weekly report02:19
*** elynn has joined #openstack-meeting02:19
*** ekcs has quit IRC02:20
*** baoli has quit IRC02:20
* zhenguo gives folks a few minutes to review02:22
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC02:22
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting02:22
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting02:23
zhenguoliusheng: do you have some idea about the server group one?02:24
liushengzhenguo: not yet :(02:24
liushengzhenguo: do we need to land that before Pike ?02:25
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom02:25
zhenguoliusheng: maybe we can just support rack affinity02:25
liushengzhenguo: the rack info can be set in aggregate metadata ?02:25
zhenguoliusheng: yes02:25
zhenguoliusheng: az is a special metadata of aggregate02:26
liushengzhenguo: ok, if so, it is not hard to implement02:26
zhenguoliusheng: so rack can also be a special one02:26
liushengzhenguo: will re-pick my schedule_hint patch02:26
zhenguoliusheng; hah02:26
zhenguoI almost finish the aggregate things on mogan side, will focus on the placement aggregates interaction part next02:27
*** chyka has quit IRC02:28
zhenguoliusheng: maybe we need to add scheduler fitlers back :D02:28
*** yamamoto has quit IRC02:29
liushengzhenguo: ... alright02:29
zhenguoliusheng: we still need some filters before placement mature02:29
liushengzhenguo: ok02:30
zhenguovalence integration will move to next release02:31
zhenguoso we only have aggregates, server groups. adopt servers ...02:31
zhenguobut time is tight, hope all could be landed before Pike02:32
shaohe_fengzhenguo: I will check with yanglin the valence status.02:33
shaohe_fengzhenguo: To see it is ready.02:33
zhenguoshaohe_feng: ok, thanks, but we don't have time to work on that part during Pke :(02:34
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting02:34
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz02:35
shaohe_fengzhenguo: Yes, we can do it after Pke.02:35
zhenguoshaohe_feng: ok02:36
*** yamamoto has quit IRC02:36
zhenguoany other things want to be done before Pike?02:36
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting02:36
zhenguoliusheng: how's the rp and aggregates cache?02:39
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting02:40
liushengzhenguo: didn't check yet, sorry :(02:40
*** yamamoto has quit IRC02:41
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting02:41
zhenguoliusheng: np02:42
liushengzhenguo: will check later02:42
shaohe_fengzhenguo: what's rp?02:42
liushengzhenguo: yestoday is a meeting day02:42
zhenguoshaohe_feng: resource providers02:42
zhenguoliusheng: hah02:42
shaohe_fengzhenguo: got02:43
zhenguoliusheng, shaohe_feng: I added some patches for aggregates and metadata on mogan side, please help to test it02:43
shaohe_fengOK.02:44
zhenguowe may need to check the releasenodes02:45
zhenguobefore Pike02:45
zhenguozhangyang: if you still want to add cloudboot driver before Pike, please be quick, not much time left02:47
zhenguook, anything else?02:47
zhangyangzhenguo: yeah, i see.02:47
*** annabelleB has quit IRC02:48
zhenguozhangyang: ok02:48
zhenguolet's move on02:48
zhenguo#topic open discussion02:48
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: mogan)"02:48
zhenguowho's got a thing :)02:48
zhenguozhangyang: btw, does rack affinity and anti-affinity meet your requirements02:49
zhenguoI talked to our product team about that, seems they also have such requirement02:50
zhenguoanyway, we can just add Rack support02:50
zhangyangzhenguo: they designed some scheduling methods on their own, so i should check it with them...02:51
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting02:51
zhenguozhangyang: okay02:51
zhenguoIt's almost time, thanks everyone for joining the meeting!02:52
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting02:52
zhenguo#endmeeting02:53
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"02:53
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jul 20 02:53:19 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)02:53
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mogan/2017/mogan.2017-07-20-02.01.html02:53
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mogan/2017/mogan.2017-07-20-02.01.txt02:53
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/mogan/2017/mogan.2017-07-20-02.01.log.html02:53
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting02:54
*** thorst has quit IRC02:56
*** edmondsw has quit IRC02:58
*** Sukhdev_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:00
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC03:01
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting03:08
*** markvoelker has quit IRC03:09
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting03:10
*** edmondsw has quit IRC03:14
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting03:15
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC03:15
*** caowei has quit IRC03:16
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting03:16
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting03:19
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC03:21
*** myoung has joined #openstack-meeting03:22
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC03:24
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting03:25
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC03:29
*** edmondsw has quit IRC03:30
*** Nel1x has quit IRC03:33
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting03:41
*** amrith has quit IRC03:45
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting03:46
*** myoung has quit IRC03:51
*** rossella__ has quit IRC03:51
*** dbecker has quit IRC03:51
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC03:52
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting03:52
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting03:54
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC03:55
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:56
*** XueFeng has left #openstack-meeting03:57
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting03:57
*** thorst has quit IRC03:58
*** Guest85080 has joined #openstack-meeting04:02
*** ramineni_ has quit IRC04:02
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting04:07
*** dbecker has joined #openstack-meeting04:08
*** edmondsw has quit IRC04:09
*** elynn has quit IRC04:11
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC04:11
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC04:12
*** amrith is now known as Guest7583404:12
*** Guest85080 is now known as amrith04:12
*** mtanino_ has quit IRC04:12
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** amrith- has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting04:13
*** amrith has quit IRC04:13
*** amrith- is now known as amrith04:13
*** amrith- has joined #openstack-meeting04:13
*** amrith is now known as Guest3066404:13
*** Guest30664 has quit IRC04:13
*** anilvenkata has joined #openstack-meeting04:13
*** amrith- is now known as amrith04:13
*** amrith- has joined #openstack-meeting04:14
*** mriedem has quit IRC04:14
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting04:14
*** amrith has quit IRC04:15
*** amrith- is now known as amrith04:16
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC04:17
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting04:17
*** chyka has quit IRC04:17
*** harlowja has quit IRC04:18
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting04:20
*** frank_young has quit IRC04:21
*** gyee has quit IRC04:21
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC04:21
*** edmondsw has quit IRC04:25
*** lbragstad has quit IRC04:25
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC04:26
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:28
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting04:30
*** epico has quit IRC04:30
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting04:31
*** adisky__ has joined #openstack-meeting04:33
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting04:34
*** frank_young has quit IRC04:36
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting04:36
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:40
*** edmondsw has quit IRC04:40
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting04:47
*** kjw3 has quit IRC04:47
*** marios has quit IRC04:49
*** kjw3 has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** ekcs has joined #openstack-meeting04:50
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC04:50
*** wxy- has joined #openstack-meeting04:51
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting04:52
*** amrith has quit IRC04:52
*** amrith has joined #openstack-meeting04:53
*** wxy- has quit IRC04:56
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting04:59
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting05:10
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting05:13
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting05:16
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting05:16
*** radeks has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC05:21
*** yamamoto has quit IRC05:31
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
*** harlowja has quit IRC05:33
*** armax has quit IRC05:34
*** rcernin has quit IRC05:36
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** frank_young has quit IRC05:37
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC05:40
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting05:43
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting05:43
*** gouthamr has quit IRC05:43
*** kiennt has quit IRC05:44
*** markvoelker has quit IRC05:44
*** edmondsw has quit IRC05:47
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC05:48
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:48
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC05:48
*** rossella__ has quit IRC05:50
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting05:53
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC05:53
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting05:53
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting05:53
*** Alex_Staf has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** Sukhdev_ has quit IRC05:56
*** psachin has joined #openstack-meeting05:57
*** frank_young has quit IRC05:58
*** thorst has quit IRC05:58
*** kiennt has joined #openstack-meeting05:58
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting05:59
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting05:59
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting06:01
*** ykatabam has quit IRC06:02
*** edmondsw has quit IRC06:03
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting06:05
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:05
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:06
*** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC06:07
*** dbecker has quit IRC06:07
*** dmacpher has quit IRC06:10
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting06:10
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting06:12
*** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:13
*** chyka has quit IRC06:14
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting06:14
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting06:15
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC06:16
*** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC06:16
*** lpetrut_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:18
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting06:20
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** rbartal has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
*** yamamoto has quit IRC06:23
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC06:27
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting06:30
*** shu-mutou has joined #openstack-meeting06:34
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting06:42
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting06:46
*** kaisers has quit IRC06:46
*** andreas-f has quit IRC06:46
*** edmondsw has quit IRC06:51
*** kaisers has joined #openstack-meeting06:52
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting06:52
*** Daisy__ has joined #openstack-meeting06:52
*** chenying_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:53
*** ykatabam has quit IRC06:53
*** Daisy___ has joined #openstack-meeting06:54
*** Daisy__ has quit IRC06:54
*** aeng has quit IRC06:54
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC06:55
*** chenying has quit IRC06:57
*** jbadiapa has joined #openstack-meeting06:59
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:00
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC07:00
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:01
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting07:02
*** Daisy___ has quit IRC07:03
*** oidgar has joined #openstack-meeting07:05
*** Daisy__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:05
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC07:07
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting07:08
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC07:08
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC07:10
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** dbecker has joined #openstack-meeting07:18
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting07:19
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC07:20
*** Alex_Staf has quit IRC07:22
*** Douhet has quit IRC07:23
*** Douhet has joined #openstack-meeting07:23
*** ykatabam has quit IRC07:24
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting07:24
*** Rockyg has quit IRC07:24
*** yamamoto has quit IRC07:25
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting07:25
*** chenying__ has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
*** zhonghua has quit IRC07:27
*** zhonghua has joined #openstack-meeting07:27
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting07:27
*** Douhet has quit IRC07:28
*** chenying_ has quit IRC07:29
*** Douhet has joined #openstack-meeting07:29
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting07:30
*** snuffkin has quit IRC07:31
*** cschwede_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:33
*** edmondsw has quit IRC07:34
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:36
*** lpetrut_ has quit IRC07:37
*** snuffkin has joined #openstack-meeting07:37
*** alexchadin has joined #openstack-meeting07:40
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting07:41
*** aarefiev_afk is now known as aarefiev07:43
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting07:50
*** radeks has quit IRC07:53
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting07:54
*** edmondsw has quit IRC07:55
*** thorst has quit IRC07:58
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting07:59
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC08:01
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
*** chyka has quit IRC08:04
*** clarkb has quit IRC08:04
*** radeks has joined #openstack-meeting08:05
*** clarkb has joined #openstack-meeting08:05
*** edmondsw has quit IRC08:07
*** kevzha01 is now known as kevinz08:08
*** dpertin has joined #openstack-meeting08:12
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting08:21
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting08:21
*** lpetrut_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:25
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting08:25
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC08:29
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:30
*** priteau has quit IRC08:31
*** Daisy___ has joined #openstack-meeting08:33
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting08:33
*** Daisy__ has quit IRC08:34
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC08:36
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting08:39
*** lpetrut_ has quit IRC08:40
*** mathiasb has quit IRC08:41
*** mathiasb has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** edmondsw has quit IRC08:43
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:47
*** Alex_Staf has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
*** Daisy___ has quit IRC08:51
*** alexchadin has quit IRC08:52
*** electrofelix has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
*** edmondsw has quit IRC08:55
*** neiljerram has quit IRC09:00
*** dbecker has quit IRC09:03
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:07
*** sambetts|afk is now known as sambetts09:16
*** imcsk8_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:23
*** imcsk8 has quit IRC09:23
*** denaitre has quit IRC09:28
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting09:30
*** wanghao has quit IRC09:35
*** fzdarsky_ is now known as fzdarsky09:36
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-meeting09:45
*** dbecker has joined #openstack-meeting09:47
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC09:47
*** ad_rien_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:51
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:51
*** ad_rien_ has quit IRC09:51
*** wanghao has quit IRC09:51
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** bzhao has joined #openstack-meeting09:55
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** iyamahat has quit IRC09:56
*** toscalix has quit IRC09:59
*** rossella__ has quit IRC10:00
*** kevinz has quit IRC10:02
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting10:03
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:04
*** caowei has joined #openstack-meeting10:05
*** shu-mutou is now known as shu-mutou-AWAY10:06
*** thorst has quit IRC10:12
*** rossella__ has quit IRC10:14
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:16
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting10:24
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC10:25
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting10:25
*** edmondsw has quit IRC10:28
*** kiennt has quit IRC10:30
*** ad_rien_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:30
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky|lunch10:30
*** ociuhandu_ has quit IRC10:31
*** rossella__ has quit IRC10:32
*** frank_young has quit IRC10:32
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting10:34
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:35
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:37
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting10:42
*** frank_young has quit IRC10:48
*** rossella__ has quit IRC10:50
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting10:52
*** ociuhandu_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:53
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:53
*** edmondsw has quit IRC10:56
*** jbadiapa is now known as jbadiapa|lunch11:01
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting11:02
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting11:03
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting11:04
*** ad_rien_1 has joined #openstack-meeting11:04
*** ad_rien_ has quit IRC11:05
*** edmondsw has quit IRC11:09
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting11:12
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting11:13
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC11:16
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC11:18
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting11:24
*** edmondsw has quit IRC11:28
*** epico has quit IRC11:34
*** wxy- has joined #openstack-meeting11:42
*** abishop has joined #openstack-meeting11:48
*** askb has quit IRC11:49
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC11:50
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting11:50
*** adisky__ has quit IRC11:50
*** fzdarsky|lunch is now known as fzdarsky11:51
*** rbudden has joined #openstack-meeting11:54
*** raildo has joined #openstack-meeting11:56
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting11:56
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:57
*** thorst has quit IRC12:01
*** litao__ has quit IRC12:04
*** ykatabam has quit IRC12:07
*** thorst_ has quit IRC12:11
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC12:11
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting12:11
*** thorst has quit IRC12:12
*** rossella__ has quit IRC12:12
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting12:15
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting12:15
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting12:21
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting12:22
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** thorst has quit IRC12:26
*** JoseMello has joined #openstack-meeting12:26
*** rossella__ has quit IRC12:26
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting12:26
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-meeting12:30
*** ad_rien_1 has quit IRC12:31
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC12:34
*** myoung has joined #openstack-meeting12:36
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** alexchadin has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:40
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting12:44
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting12:47
*** thorst has quit IRC12:49
*** rossella__ has quit IRC12:50
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting12:50
*** kylek3h has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** rossella__ has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** bobh has quit IRC12:52
*** jbadiapa|lunch is now known as jbadiapa12:54
*** thorst has quit IRC12:56
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** trinaths has quit IRC12:58
*** eumel8 has joined #openstack-meeting12:59
eumel8hello12:59
ianychoieumel8, hi :)12:59
ianychoiAnyone for I18n meeting today?12:59
ianychoi#startmeeting OpenStack I18n Meeting13:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jul 20 13:00:58 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ianychoi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: OpenStack I18n Meeting)"13:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_i18n_meeting'13:01
*** julim has quit IRC13:01
eumel8here we are13:01
ianychoiI have heard that eumel8 is in parallel meeting.13:01
eumel8already, but with a low prio13:01
ianychoieumel8, oh I see :)13:01
eumel8normaly it's finished since 1 min13:02
*** jftalta has joined #openstack-meeting13:02
ianychoijftalta, hello!13:02
*** thorst has quit IRC13:02
eumel8hi jftalta13:02
jftaltaianychoi, Hi !13:02
*** gcb has quit IRC13:02
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting13:03
jftaltahi eumel8 ! It's been a long time !13:03
eumel8true13:03
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting13:03
ianychoi:) jftalta: Were u on vacation? Or when is your vacation?13:03
jftaltaFirst two weeks of august13:04
ianychoijftalta, aha I see - so great!13:04
eumel8save the holiday for Australia :)13:04
ianychoiHaha :)13:04
ianychoiLet me proceed today agenda first..13:05
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC13:05
ianychoi#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/I18nTeamMeeting#Agenda_for_next_meeting13:05
ianychoi#topic Changes on Docs team - how it affects to I18n team13:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Changes on Docs team - how it affects to I18n team (Meeting topic: OpenStack I18n Meeting)"13:05
ianychoi#link http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/docs-specs/specs/pike/os-manuals-migration.html13:05
jftaltawe have plenty of holydays in France, so I'm saving a couple of weeks for Australia ;)13:05
ianychoijftalta, great!13:06
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
ianychoiThis is a spec for migration of openstack-manuals documents in Docs team13:06
ianychoiThere are lots of details and now I recognize recent two changes13:06
ianychoiOne is URL schema change for documentation. For example, docs.openstack.org/developer/i18n URL was changed to https://docs.openstack.org/i18n/latest/13:07
eumel8yeah, lots of text13:07
ianychoiThe other is that Operators guide has been deleted13:08
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
ianychoi#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483937/13:08
ianychoiIt means that some translated documents also need to be deleted13:09
eumel8is the user-guide also deleted? This site seems a little broken: https://docs.openstack.org/user-guide/13:09
ianychoiFor example, https://docs.openstack.org/ja/ has https://docs.openstack.org/ja/ops-guide/ link but it needs to be deleted (I will propose the patch)13:09
eumel8ok13:09
ianychoiI think the URL scheme is changed to https://docs.openstack.org/user/13:09
eumel8but there is a lower content13:10
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
eumel8lot's of google search matches are empty13:10
ianychoiYep it might be that user guides are being moved to project repositories13:10
*** ociuhandu_ has quit IRC13:11
ianychoiSince I am now too busy, I could not figure out the details of documentation status and asettle would be the best PTL who manages it but I think she is also busy on tracking and managing :) - It is so great job and now what I want to do is that I18n team at least needs to follow changes from Docs team13:11
asettleSorry sorry what?13:12
asettleHere I am!13:12
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting13:12
eumel8hi asettle ;)13:12
asettleo/ hello13:12
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC13:12
ianychoiasettle, I have just shared that some Docs urls are already changed and we are noticing that user-guide has less content and I said that it might be because the content is moving to actual project repositories13:13
ianychoiSorry for calling u :)13:13
asettleIt is indeed moving :)13:13
asettleNot at all!13:13
asettle:)13:13
asettleIf you guys have any questions, please do not hesitate to ping :)13:13
ianychoi:)13:13
jftaltaSorry, I have been disturbed by colleagues who suddenly shown up in my office...13:14
eumel8:)13:14
jftaltaasettle, Hi !13:14
*** tono has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
asettleHi jftalta :)13:15
*** oidgar has quit IRC13:15
asettledamn those colleagues :P13:16
ianychoiNow I also notice that https://docs.openstack.org/ja/user-guide/ is not working13:16
ianychoiI will propose to delete such links in https://docs.openstack.org/ja/ and add Japanease team as reviewers13:16
eumel8+113:17
ianychoi#action ianychoi will investigate in some missing links in https://docs.openstack.org/ja/13:17
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
ianychoiNote that I mainly first track Japanese team landing page since the page has the largest number of translated documents :)13:17
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
ianychoi#topic String Freeze periods are coming13:18
*** openstack changes topic to "String Freeze periods are coming (Meeting topic: OpenStack I18n Meeting)"13:18
ianychoi#link https://releases.openstack.org/pike/schedule.html13:18
ianychoiNext week (Jul 24 - Jul 28) is for Soft StringFreeze in Pike cycle13:19
*** zhurong has quit IRC13:19
*** pchavva has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
ianychoiI have not found string freeze managers in I18n team unfortunately.13:19
ianychoiIf we do not find relevant string freeze managers, then I think I need to do some minimal notice & actions for String Freezes...13:20
jftaltawould be a good thing, if you can13:21
ianychoijftalta, I am unfortunately too busy now...13:21
ianychoiBut thanks :)13:22
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:22
jftaltaIanychoi, I know, I know13:22
ianychoijftalta, :)13:22
ianychoi#topic extra ATC status for I18n team13:22
*** openstack changes topic to "extra ATC status for I18n team (Meeting topic: OpenStack I18n Meeting)"13:22
ianychoiLast weekdays were for extra ATC proposing deadline and I safely proposed extra ATCs for I18n team13:23
ianychoi#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483452/13:23
*** alexchadin has quit IRC13:23
jftaltabtw, there is a new translator in the french team since last tuesday. Seems to be a cool and keen guy :)13:24
ianychoijftalta, great!13:24
ianychoiHope that it will be merged soon13:24
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting13:24
ianychoiIn the review, I communicated with fungi and found that having openstackid does not guarantee that the guy is a Foundation member13:25
tonoam I in the extra ATC ?13:25
ianychoiFor extra ATCs, being Foundation member is important13:25
ianychoitono, hi:) Suhartono?13:25
tonoYap, I am13:26
fungiright, anyone can have an openstackid for purposes of logging into things like the speaker support system or external resources like translate.o.o13:26
ianychoitono, sure - please find your name in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483452/2/reference/projects.yaml :)13:26
fungibut to be able to vote you also have to join the foundation as an individual member13:26
tonoThank you13:26
ianychoiYep :) Fortunately, openstackid resources API helped me to see whether the member is Foundation member or not13:27
fungi(and make sure the email address in your extra-atc record is added to at least one of the email address fields in your foundation member profile on www.openstack.org)13:27
jftaltafungi, actually. Have a look at this paper written by Jeremy Stanley13:27
ianychoifungi, thanks a lot for kind explanation!13:27
jftaltaBetter with the link : http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-July/119786.html13:28
ianychoijftalta, fungi == Jeremy :)13:28
jftalta:(13:28
fungijftalta: i wrote it, but that doesn't mean i won't benefit from rereading it ;)13:28
*** wxy- has quit IRC13:28
jftaltaha ha13:28
ianychoihaha13:28
ianychoi#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/I18nTeam/ATC_statistics#Pike_cycle_.282017-01-06_to_2017-06-30.2913:28
ianychoiI will revise the script http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/i18n/tree/tools/zanata/zanata_stats.py to also check Foundation member status later13:29
ianychoiAnd two additional things are needed13:29
*** julim_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
ianychoi1) Language coordinators need to acknowledge that being Foundation member is important and it needs to be more advertised to translators13:30
fungiianychoi: i think your patch to add the extra-atcs for this cycle is due to merge today, if ttx gets time to hit the button13:30
ianychoi2) If users change their e-mail addresses in www.openstack.org, then the change is not reflected to translate.o.o => This might have problems, fungi: would it be solution for this problem?13:31
*** mtanino__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC13:31
fungiianychoi: yes, just like if contributors change their e-mail address in gerrit and forget to update their foundation member profile13:31
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting13:32
fungialso, if you fail to vote in at least one of two consecutive elections for the foundation board of directors, your foundation membership lapses and you need to re-join13:32
*** baoli has quit IRC13:33
ianychoifungi, then changing e-mail address in translate.o.o is also needed. Hmm, now I can do now is that updating e-mail address in translate.o.o is also needed in I18n contributur guide13:33
ianychoi(I meant documentation)13:33
*** abishop has left #openstack-meeting13:34
ianychoifungi, yep - thanks for the important info also :)13:34
*** frank_young has quit IRC13:35
fungimy pleasure13:36
*** myoung has quit IRC13:36
ianychoifungi, and a little bit sorry for not accomplishing auto syncing ATC status for I18n team. AFAIK newer version of Zanata can retrieve translator lists but unfortunately I18n relys on crawling approach on translate.o.o web site: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/i18n/tree/tools/zanata/zanata_users.py13:36
ianychoifungi, I think such crawling method is not appropriate to use auto sync of I18n ATC status. I would like to postpone with Zanata upgrade consideration13:37
fungiianychoi: that sounds fine. there's no rush, but once we get on that version of zanata with proper lookup capabilities it shouldn't be too hard13:38
ianychoifungi, yep :) Thanks a lot!13:38
fungiyou're welcome, as always13:38
ianychoi:)13:38
*** lhx_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
ianychoi#action ianychoi will more document Foundation member status information with changing e-mail address in Zanata in I18n contributor guide13:39
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
tono+113:39
ianychoitono, thank u :)13:39
ianychoi#topic PTL nomination & election13:39
*** openstack changes topic to "PTL nomination & election (Meeting topic: OpenStack I18n Meeting)"13:39
*** wxy- has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
ianychoi#link https://governance.openstack.org/election/13:40
ianychoiQueens PTL nomination is from Jul 31, 2017 23:59 UTC to Aug 09, 2017 23:45 UTC13:40
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting13:40
ianychoiIf there is no PTL nomination from I18n team, then TC (Technical Committee) will consider what TC can do13:41
jftaltait's a topic with a big "T"...13:41
jftaltaHow much time does it remain to find candidates ?13:42
*** electrofelix has quit IRC13:43
eumel8at least one week, I guess13:43
*** felipemonteiro has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
ianychoijftalta, ? Jul 31, 2017 23:59 UTC to Aug 09, 2017 23:45 UTC is PTL election nomination - candidates need to submit candidacy to openstack/election repository13:43
*** electrofelix has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** wxy- has quit IRC13:44
*** electrofelix has quit IRC13:44
jftaltaok, 2 weeks13:44
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom13:44
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
fungiyes, we appoint a willing ptl after the nomination period if we can (assuming one appears after the nomination period, which sometimes happens) or we look into ways to reorganize by either folding the leaderless team into another team willing to provide leadership, converting it into a workgroup/sig, or remove its official team status (which doesn't prevent the team from still doing their work13:45
fungiunofficially if they want)13:45
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** bknudson has quit IRC13:46
ianychoiYep :) http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-January/109622.html would be one example13:46
fungibut it's a far better situation if someone volunteers before the tc needs to step in and take one of those actions13:46
ianychoiI sent an e-mail titled "Asking opinions with team direction" to I18n current cores and sent a reminder e-mail about a week ago13:48
jftaltait would be too bad to watch the team disappearing cause the lack of ptl :(13:48
*** dpertin has quit IRC13:48
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
eumel8I answered the email already, ianychoi :)13:48
ianychoieumel8, yep :) Thanks again!13:48
*** felipemonteiro has quit IRC13:49
eumel8thx for the options, fungi. I think we will found a solution.13:49
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:50
ianychoieumel8, yep writing what I18n PTL did at least would be helpful to all :)13:50
jftaltaianychoi, yes it would !13:51
ianychoiIt is high priority in my to-do list but unfortunately there are too much in my to-do list with higher priorities :(13:51
eumel8ianychoi: send me the time and I will set my alarm clock for a meeting :)13:52
jftaltaJust add an eighteenth day to your weeks ;)13:52
ianychoieumel8, yep or having another discussion time with u might be so helpful to me13:52
*** genek has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
ianychoi#topic Open discussion13:53
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: OpenStack I18n Meeting)"13:53
eumel8We can also continue as a working group but this needs also a leadership in the future (from my experience in other OpenStack working groups)13:53
jftaltasorry, I meant an eighth ;)13:53
genekAm I too late to the meeting? Just missed my alarm13:53
ianychoijftalta, :) eumel8, I am not too much familiar with working groups but yep.. I agree with u13:54
ianychoigenek, hi!13:54
eumel8hi genek13:54
jftaltagenek, hi13:54
*** makowals has quit IRC13:54
genekHi all, sorry for being late13:54
ianychoieumel8, I think translation checksite needs to be more discussed with infra teams.13:54
fungii was hoping we'd see more replies on that thread13:55
ianychoieumel8, maybe we can attend to infra team IRC meeting and share the details - which things are needed from infra team13:55
genekianychoi, that will be a great idea13:55
eumel8ianychoi: true. Didn't understood Andy's last message about zuul configuration13:55
fungii'm trying not to always be the volunteer of last resort on the infra team, but we're stretched pretty thin so apologies if we seem to not reply to messages like that quickly13:56
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
ianychoieumel8, lots of translate checksite was under public but it is so nice idea to discuss in mailing lists13:56
fungiglad to see the ansible team stepping in and giving suggestions though13:56
genekyeah, just heard this week at OpenStack Day Taiwan that the infra team is lacking new contributors13:57
ianychoifungi, I totally understand infra team situation and I am always thankful to infra team - very supportive and kind replies and suggestions :)13:57
fungii just wish we had more bandwidth to tackle stuff in a timely fashion, but it is what it is13:58
*** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC13:58
ianychoigenek, IMHO participating in infra team needs lots of background and knowledge but I suggest people to stay in #openstack-infra IRC channel and try to follow what people are discussing13:59
fungiwe rely on people figuring things out for themselves as much as possible13:59
eumel8fungi: We are all overclocked. Let me know if you need some kind of support.13:59
ianychoiTime is up13:59
fungieumel8: thanks, will do13:59
ianychoiIf you have more discussions, please come to #openstack-i18n channel13:59
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
*** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
ianychoiThanks a lot for today IRC meeting - eumel8 jftalta tono fungi asettle and genek !14:00
eumel8ianychoi: I will contact Andy again and ask for his opinions.14:00
ianychoi#endmeeting14:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jul 20 14:00:24 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/2017/openstack_i18n_meeting.2017-07-20-13.00.html14:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/2017/openstack_i18n_meeting.2017-07-20-13.00.txt14:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_i18n_meeting/2017/openstack_i18n_meeting.2017-07-20-13.00.log.html14:00
eumel8thx ianychoi for the host14:00
jftaltagoodbye all14:01
*** jftalta has quit IRC14:01
tonobye14:01
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
ianychoitono bye!14:02
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
*** eumel8 has left #openstack-meeting14:03
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz14:04
*** genek has quit IRC14:04
*** prateek has quit IRC14:05
*** awaugama has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC14:08
*** tono has quit IRC14:09
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** manjeets_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** hoppalm has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** armstrong has quit IRC14:10
*** julim has quit IRC14:10
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting14:10
*** frank_young has quit IRC14:12
*** julim_ has quit IRC14:13
*** oidgar has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom14:22
*** dpertin has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC14:24
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz14:24
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting14:25
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom14:26
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz14:27
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting14:33
*** Alex_Staf has quit IRC14:35
*** VW has quit IRC14:37
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
*** toscalix has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
*** donghao has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
*** marst has joined #openstack-meeting14:41
*** dmacpher has joined #openstack-meeting14:42
*** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC14:43
*** hoppalm has quit IRC14:43
*** janki has quit IRC14:45
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** rbartal has quit IRC14:46
*** janki has quit IRC14:47
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** bbzhao has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC14:49
*** bzhao has quit IRC14:51
*** dpertin has quit IRC14:51
*** manjeets_ has quit IRC14:54
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC14:55
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:55
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** vkmc_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** rbudden has quit IRC15:01
*** yamamoto has quit IRC15:03
*** dmacpher has quit IRC15:05
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:05
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:07
*** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC15:07
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:08
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting15:09
*** frank_young has quit IRC15:09
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC15:11
*** thorst has quit IRC15:11
*** jamesmcarthur has joined #openstack-meeting15:12
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
*** jamesmcarthur has quit IRC15:17
*** maeca has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
*** maeca has quit IRC15:19
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:19
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC15:20
*** maeca has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:21
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:21
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting15:22
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:22
*** Julien-zte has joined #openstack-meeting15:23
*** Julien-zte has quit IRC15:23
*** maeca has quit IRC15:24
*** annegentle has quit IRC15:25
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:25
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting15:27
*** armax has quit IRC15:27
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
*** markstur has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
*** designbybeck has quit IRC15:33
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** chyka has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
*** Apoorva has quit IRC15:39
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC15:39
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting15:39
*** andreas_s has quit IRC15:39
*** psachin has quit IRC15:41
*** felipemonteiro has joined #openstack-meeting15:43
*** Apoorva has quit IRC15:44
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** apetrich has quit IRC15:45
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** hoppalm has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
*** felipemonteiro has quit IRC15:48
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting15:53
*** coolsvap has quit IRC15:54
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** SerenaFeng has quit IRC16:00
*** gman-tx has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** annegentle has quit IRC16:01
*** gman-tx has quit IRC16:01
*** toscalix has quit IRC16:02
*** Apoorva has quit IRC16:02
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting16:03
*** rlpple has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
*** neiljerram has quit IRC16:07
*** rlpple has quit IRC16:10
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting16:15
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC16:18
*** dbecker has quit IRC16:19
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC16:22
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom16:23
*** fnaval has quit IRC16:23
*** hoppalm has quit IRC16:24
*** lhx_ has quit IRC16:26
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting16:27
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** frank_young has quit IRC16:31
*** tesseract has quit IRC16:32
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting16:33
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting16:33
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC16:37
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz16:40
*** armstrong has joined #openstack-meeting16:42
*** lwanderley has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** sshank has joined #openstack-meeting16:48
*** Patifa has quit IRC16:48
*** Apoorva has quit IRC16:50
*** hoppalm has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** dprince has quit IRC16:51
*** thorst has quit IRC16:52
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:52
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
*** lpetrut has quit IRC16:53
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting16:53
*** oidgar has quit IRC16:55
*** lhinds_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** blancos has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** davidsha has quit IRC16:58
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
andreaf#startmeeting qa17:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jul 20 17:00:15 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is andreaf. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: qa)"17:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'17:00
andreafhello folks17:00
jlvillalo/17:00
andreaf#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Agenda_for_July_20th_2017_.281700_UTC.29 today's agenda17:00
*** baoli has quit IRC17:01
*** ekcs has quit IRC17:01
*** mguiney has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
andreafo/17:01
andreafwho else is here for the meeting today?17:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
mguineyo/17:01
*** baoli has quit IRC17:01
*** dustins has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
jlvillalme :)17:01
dustins\o17:01
andreafoomichi, mtreinish, afazekas: around?17:01
afazekas\o17:02
blancoso/17:02
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC17:02
*** trinaths1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
*** hashar has quit IRC17:03
andreafok let's start - welcome everyone17:03
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts|afk17:03
andreafThere are no action items from last meeting to be reviewed17:03
andreaf#topic PTG17:03
*** openstack changes topic to "PTG (Meeting topic: qa)"17:03
andreafI just wanted to mention that I set-up an etherpad to start collecting ideas about how to best spend out face to face time at the PTG17:04
andreaf#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/qa-queens-ptg PTG etherpad17:04
andreafif you think you are going to be there and/or have a topic to be discussed please enter it in there17:04
andreafeven if you're not sure you're going to be in Denver17:04
andreafalso I'm looking for volunteers for the QA help ours17:05
*** trinaths has quit IRC17:05
*** alex_xu has quit IRC17:05
afazekasandreaf, What exactly these help ours means ?17:06
andreafafazekas17:06
*** bobh has quit IRC17:06
andreafafazekas: the proposal is that during the first two days WG will hold their sessions and in parallel horizontal teams will be available in a room to answer questions / solve problems for people from other teams17:07
andreafafazekas: there was a thread in the ML17:07
*** marios has quit IRC17:07
felipemonteiro_o/17:07
andreafafazekas: my plan is to rotate our presence in the room so that we can join WG (or SIG?) sessions when relevant17:08
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting17:08
andreafafazekas: since we have a community goal in queens specific to tempest plugins it would be good to provide help to whoever needs it on that17:08
afazekasandreaf, ok, If I am going I can help17:09
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC17:09
*** Swami has quit IRC17:09
andreafafazekas: cool, thanks!17:09
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
andreafafazekas: I hope you can be there17:09
andreafok anything else on PTG?17:10
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
andreaf#topic Gate statbility17:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Gate statbility (Meeting topic: qa)"17:11
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:11
andreafthis week chandakumar was signed up for https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-gate-issue-categotisation - but he's not around17:11
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC17:12
*** felipemonteiro has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
andreafI don't have anything special to mention on stability today17:12
*** alex_xu has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
andreafJust one note about the puppet jobs in Tempest - they are non-voting but we should check them on a regularly17:13
andreafAnd not break them like I did with the orchestration client patch17:13
andreafEmilienM was kind enough to add the testr_html report to the test results, so they test results are easier to get as well now17:14
EmilienMo/17:14
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
EmilienMandreaf: not merged yet17:14
EmilienMbut merged very soon if not this week17:14
*** thorst has quit IRC17:15
andreafthanks for that, it is helpful17:15
EmilienMit was good feedback, thank *you* for the idea17:16
andreafok - anything else on gate stability?17:16
*** thorst_ has quit IRC17:17
andreaf#topic Spec reviews17:17
andreaf#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/qa-specs,n,z17:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Spec reviews (Meeting topic: qa)"17:17
andreafI don't have anything today on spec reviews17:17
felipemonteiroandreaf: i reviewed your spec as best i understood it17:18
andreafBut we will probably want to discuss some of them at the PTG, so it would be good to review them in advance17:18
andreaffelipemonteiro: cool - the resources one?17:18
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-meeting17:18
felipemonteiroyes17:18
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
felipemonteirothe multiple rbac policy i wrote still hasn't been reviewed and i probably won't attend the ptg, so would be nice to get some feedback on it before queens17:19
andreafoomichi took over that spec about a cycle ago, so it has been a bit out of my radar17:19
*** Apoorva has quit IRC17:19
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
andreaffelipemonteiro: right, I didn't get around reviewing it yet, I will try to do so tomorrow17:20
felipemonteiroandreaf: thanks, it's fairly straightforward, nothing revolutionary17:20
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC17:20
andreaffelipemonteiro: ok17:21
*** sridharg has quit IRC17:21
*** donghao has quit IRC17:21
andreafanything else on spec reviews?17:21
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting17:22
*** hoppalm has quit IRC17:22
andreaf#topic Tempest17:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Tempest (Meeting topic: qa)"17:22
*** hoppalm has joined #openstack-meeting17:22
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:22
*** kjw3 has quit IRC17:22
*** prateek has quit IRC17:22
andreafprateek around?17:23
andreaflooking for update on bug triage...17:23
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
andreafon Tempest side mtreinish is working on cred providers as stable interfaces, I'm working on test.py , clients.py and others as stable interfaces, gmann is working on swift client as stable interface17:24
andreaf#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tempest-test-module-stable some of the stable interface work17:24
andreafI would really like to close that work during Pike so comments and reviews on any of that would be very welcome17:25
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:26
andreafthis is marked as top priority for Pike in our prio list, and it has high impact on the community since if we have more stable interfaces we are less likely to break the gate for folks17:26
andreafanything else on Tempest?17:26
*** felipemonteiro has quit IRC17:26
andreaf#topic Patrole17:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Patrole (Meeting topic: qa)"17:27
andreafAnything on Patrole?17:27
*** harlowja has quit IRC17:27
*** shaohe_feng has quit IRC17:28
felipemonteiro_just updating documentation, striving to make some interfaces stable17:28
*** shaohe_feng has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
andreaffelipemonteiro_ : nice17:29
andreafthe policy in code goal for queens will have impact on Patrole - is that something we can address after the PTG ?17:29
felipemonteiro_we already support policy in code. there's an intermittent period between the time when it's in policy.json and in code where the policies won't be discoverably by patrole, that's it to my knowledge17:30
*** vkmc_ has quit IRC17:30
felipemonteiro_because requires updating setup.cfg with the appropriate entry point for oslo policy generator (and patrole) to discover policies17:30
felipemonteiro_we don't support policy.yaml though...patrole actually needs more work in supporting custom policy files17:31
andreaffelipemonteiro_: updating setup.cfg on patrole requires all services to have policy in code?17:33
felipemonteiro_er, here's an example: #link https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/79f6920eac135ab67476f75cc1d281e295cf0c84/setup.cfg#L3917:34
felipemonteiro_keystone does the same, and murano17:34
felipemonteiro_so if glance is making the transition to policy in code, they usually update their setup.cfg as the last step of the transition. until that's done though, patrole won't find the policies because they're not in the policy.json and not yet discoverable in the setup.cfg.17:35
andreaffelipemonteiro_: heh ok so the change is on the service side, fine17:35
andreaffelipemonteiro_: I see - so how do you deal with that for patrole CI? do you disable tests until the work is done?17:37
felipemonteiro_we skip them to avoid breaking the gate. it's very unfortunate (we skip ~15 tests right now) but when keystone was doing the transition in p-1 we were skipping like 80. then as soon as the setup.cfg change was done in keystone, we went back to our normal # of skips... we have a CONF opt to make it fail the test though which is false in the gates.17:38
*** mriedem is now known as mriedem_afk17:39
andreaffelipemonteiro_: got it - thanks for bearing with my questions :)17:39
felipemonteiro_np, ptl has to know these things :)17:40
andreafanything else on Patrole?17:40
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
felipemonteiro_not from me17:41
andreaf#topic Critical Reviews17:41
*** openstack changes topic to "Critical Reviews (Meeting topic: qa)"17:41
andreafAny review that requires urgent attention?17:41
*** breton has quit IRC17:42
andreaf#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:cred_providers_clients17:42
felipemonteiro_does that include one that affects tempest.lib?17:42
*** breton has joined #openstack-meeting17:43
andreaffelipemonteiro_: yes17:43
andreafit's the migration of credential providers to tempest.lib17:43
felipemonteiro_#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483115/17:43
felipemonteiro_^ i had in mind that, not sure if it's "critical" though17:43
andreafthanks17:45
andreafanything else?17:45
andreaf#topic Open Discussion17:45
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: qa)"17:45
lwanderleyHey, I'm just using moment to ask for some review, I'm intern in the Outreachy program and I've submitted  this patch #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472482/ fixing the ldap plugin on devstack and creating a ldap domain, could someone who understand devstack take a look at it?17:46
jlvillalWhat happened to my topic???17:46
jlvillalRemoval of core reviewers from openstack-dev/hacking (jlvillal)17:47
andreaf#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472482/17:47
andreaflwanderley: thanks I will have a look17:47
andreafjlvillal: doh sorry refresh problem - I see it now17:47
jlvillalheh :)17:48
andreaf#topic Removal of core reviewers from openstack-dev/hacking17:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Removal of core reviewers from openstack-dev/hacking (Meeting topic: qa)"17:48
andreafjlvillal: the floor is yours17:48
jlvillalWell I think we should remove those two core reviewers.17:48
jlvillalNo reviews in over a year for one and almost a year for the other17:48
jlvillalAnd it would be nice if more cores were added or current cores reviewed more.17:49
andreafjlvillal: I have no objection to removing those two since they are not active anymore17:49
felipemonteiro_speaking of which, there's a patrole core that can be removed too, david purcell17:50
jlvillalMore reviewers would be nice. I haven't had any reviews on my patch from a core: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447252/17:50
*** bollig has quit IRC17:50
andreafjlvillal: what's the amount of traffic on the project? do we have many open reviews?17:50
*** bollig has joined #openstack-meeting17:50
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting17:50
jlvillalFairly low I think17:50
jlvillalhttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack-dev/hacking+status:open17:51
jlvillalFive open reviews. So very small :)17:51
andreafjlvillal: I think we can handle this load on demand - i.e. if there is a patch that needs reviews ping in the QA room / ask for reviews in the meeting17:52
jlvillalandreaf: Okay. Thanks17:53
jlvillalReviews please for: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447252/  :)17:53
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
andreafjlvillal: more core reviewers are always welcome of course17:53
andreafjlvillal: are you volunteering to ramp up on it?17:53
andreaf#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447252/17:54
jlvillalandreaf: Uh... Maybe. Ironic core is keeping me pretty busy.17:54
jlvillalandreaf: But I'll try to review more of the patches. I see a couple which I haven't reviewed yet.17:54
*** rbudden has joined #openstack-meeting17:54
andreafjlvillal: heh I bet it does keep you busy :)17:55
jlvillalandreaf: Yep. Especially since we lost four cores in the last six months :(17:55
jlvillalI'm done and happy to move to Open Discussion17:56
*** krtaylor has quit IRC17:56
andreafok17:56
andreaf#topic Open Discussion17:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: qa)"17:56
andreaf3 minutes left17:56
andreafI was wondering if anyone had negative / positive stories to share about office hours in other projects17:57
andreafbut I guess there's little time left now17:57
andreafI'm starting to looking into those as a potential alternative to meetings for QA but I have no direct experience with them yet17:58
*** vishnoianil has quit IRC17:59
raildoandreaf, I suggest talk with the Keystone team, they are doing office hours for a while17:59
*** radeks has quit IRC17:59
andreafraildo: will do, thank you!17:59
raildoandreaf, yw17:59
andreafthanks everyone for joining today17:59
andreaf#endmeeting18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jul 20 18:00:04 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2017/qa.2017-07-20-17.00.html18:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2017/qa.2017-07-20-17.00.txt18:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2017/qa.2017-07-20-17.00.log.html18:00
*** blancos has quit IRC18:00
*** dustins has left #openstack-meeting18:00
*** rbudden has quit IRC18:02
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** dbecker has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting18:06
*** hoppalm_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
*** hoppalm has quit IRC18:08
*** yamahata has quit IRC18:11
*** makowals has quit IRC18:12
*** Rockyg has quit IRC18:12
*** eharney has quit IRC18:13
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
*** thorst has quit IRC18:16
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
*** frank_young has quit IRC18:19
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC18:22
*** bobh has quit IRC18:25
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting18:29
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom18:31
*** rbudden has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** pchavva has quit IRC18:37
*** dbecker has quit IRC18:43
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky|afk18:45
*** rtjure has quit IRC18:47
*** rtjure has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
*** lwanderley has quit IRC18:48
*** vishnoianil has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
*** baoli has quit IRC18:52
*** arnewiebalck_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:52
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
*** boris-42____ has joined #openstack-meeting18:54
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting18:54
*** baoli has quit IRC18:54
*** armstrong has quit IRC18:57
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC18:57
*** frank_young has quit IRC18:58
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting18:59
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** mriedem_afk is now known as mriedem19:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
*** baoli has quit IRC19:04
*** sshank has quit IRC19:06
dtroyerAnyone here for OSC meeting?19:07
*** thorst_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:11
*** thorst has quit IRC19:12
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting19:14
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting19:19
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC19:24
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** dprince has quit IRC19:39
*** andreas-f has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC19:41
*** awaugama has quit IRC19:41
*** rbudden has quit IRC19:42
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz19:48
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom19:50
*** _pewp_ has quit IRC19:51
*** rwsu has quit IRC19:52
*** lhinds_ has quit IRC19:55
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack19:57
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
*** ykatabam has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
*** Patifa has quit IRC20:02
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
*** _pewp_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
*** jkilpatr has quit IRC20:05
*** jprovazn has quit IRC20:06
*** Apoorva has quit IRC20:06
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
*** raildo has quit IRC20:07
*** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:09
*** sshank has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
*** iyamahat has quit IRC20:11
*** makowals has joined #openstack-meeting20:12
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz20:12
*** gouthamr has quit IRC20:14
*** armax has quit IRC20:15
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting20:15
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
*** qiangcao has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
*** andreas-f has quit IRC20:22
*** csomerville has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting20:23
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC20:24
*** X-dark_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:24
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
*** X-dark has quit IRC20:25
*** X-dark_ is now known as X-dark20:25
*** markstur has quit IRC20:25
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC20:26
*** frank_young has quit IRC20:27
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** andreas-f has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** _pewp_ has quit IRC20:31
*** eharney has quit IRC20:38
*** jangutter has joined #openstack-meeting20:42
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:42
*** ansmith has quit IRC20:43
*** mjturek2 has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC20:47
*** nic has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:53
*** takashin has joined #openstack-meeting20:53
*** mjturek2 has quit IRC20:53
*** dbecker has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
*** arnewiebalck_ has quit IRC20:59
*** dprince has quit IRC21:00
mriedem#startmeeting nova21:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jul 20 21:00:15 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mriedem. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"21:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'21:00
dansmithohai21:00
takashino/21:00
efried\o21:00
melwitto/21:00
TheJuliao/21:01
nic\m/21:01
mriedemok let's get started21:01
mriedem#link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting21:01
jaypipeso/21:01
mriedem#topic release news21:01
*** openstack changes topic to "release news (Meeting topic: nova)"21:02
mriedemso i heard there is a release around the corner21:02
mriedem#link Pike release schedule: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Pike_Release_Schedule21:02
mriedem#info July 27 is feature freeze (1 week away)21:02
mriedem#info July 20 (today) is the release freeze for non-client libraries (oslo, os-vif, os-traits, os-brick): https://releases.openstack.org/pike/schedule.html#p-final-lib21:02
* bauzas waves late21:02
mriedemwe've done the final os-vif and os-traits releases already21:02
*** pchavva has joined #openstack-meeting21:02
mriedemif you needed something from oslo or keystoneauth, you'd better get cracking on it before dims passes out21:02
* dims waves21:03
mriedem#info Blueprints: 65 targeted, 64 approved, 33 completed (+4 from last week)21:03
*** makowals has quit IRC21:03
mriedemyay we officially made it over the 50% mark21:03
mriedemwhich i think is a passing grade in the US now21:03
cburgesslol21:04
cburgessand... sad....21:04
mriedemthank you21:04
mriedemi'll be here all week21:04
mriedem#link Pike feature freeze blueprint tracker etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-pike-feature-freeze-status21:04
mriedemi'm keeping ^ up to date throughout the day21:04
mriedemtrying to focus reviews a bit21:04
mriedemany questions about the release?21:04
mriedemok moving on21:05
mriedem#topic bugs21:05
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: nova)"21:05
mriedemnothing is listed as critical21:05
mriedem#help Need help with bug triage; there are 123 (+8 from last week) new untriaged bugs as of today (July 20).21:05
*** thorst_ has quit IRC21:05
mriedemjust a note, after the FF, we have 2 weeks until the rc121:05
mriedemso we'll have to start going through those untriaged bugs here at some point to see if there are stop ship rc candidates21:05
mriedem"rc candidates" is redundant21:06
mriedemi know21:06
mriedemspeaking of21:06
mriedem#info Starting to tag bugs for pike-rc-potential: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=pike-rc-potential21:06
mriedemso if you spot a bug that looks like a major regression or upgrade issue, please tag it21:06
mriedemgate status21:06
mriedem#link check queue gate status http://status.openstack.org/elastic-recheck/index.html21:06
mriedemwell, we know the functional tests have been wonky21:07
mriedemsomething to do with lock timeouts21:07
*** krtaylor has quit IRC21:07
mriedemi started playing with that here but it went badly https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485335/21:07
melwittheh21:07
mriedemturns out that if you don't set the external lock fixture,21:07
mriedemwe're still starting services, like the network service, which has code that uses external locks,21:08
mriedemand if you don't have the lock_path configured, it blows up21:08
mriedemso maybe we can stub that out, i haven't had time to dig into it21:08
mriedemoslo.concurrency does have some fixtures for this though21:08
mriedem#link 3rd party CI status http://ci-watch.tintri.com/project?project=nova&time=7+days21:09
mriedemi noticed the xenserver ci was busted the other night21:09
mriedemi don't know if that's been fixed21:09
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting21:09
mriedemquestions about bugs?21:09
mriedemok moving on21:09
mriedem#topic reminders21:09
*** openstack changes topic to "reminders (Meeting topic: nova)"21:09
mriedem#link Pike Review Priorities etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-nova-priorities-tracking21:09
mriedem^ is probably stale, and i'm personally focusing on the FF etherpad above21:10
mriedem#link Consider signing up for the Queens PTG which is the week of September 11 in Denver, CO, USA: https://www.openstack.org/ptg21:10
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC21:10
mriedem#topic stable branch status21:10
*** openstack changes topic to "stable branch status (Meeting topic: nova)"21:10
mriedemthere isn't really any news here21:10
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
mriedemwe have some things to review,21:10
mriedemand i'll probably do stable branch releases around rc121:11
mriedem#topic subteam highlights21:11
*** openstack changes topic to "subteam highlights (Meeting topic: nova)"21:11
mriedemdansmith: things for cells v2?21:11
dansmithno meeting this week,21:11
dansmithmade some progress on the quotas set, which is our highest priority21:11
dansmithneed more tho21:11
dansmiththat is all.21:11
mriedemright so quotas are now at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/410945/21:12
*** bknudson has quit IRC21:12
mriedemwhich is moving quotas into the api db21:12
mriedemit's 2 changes21:12
mriedemthe counting quotas stuff is all approved though21:12
*** Patifa has quit IRC21:12
dansmithaye21:12
mriedemand the external-server-events thing is approved21:12
mriedemit just doesn't want to merge21:12
dansmithnor do lots of things21:12
dansmithit's in the gate right no though21:13
dansmith*now21:13
mriedembeyond tha twe have some docs and bugs to fix21:13
mriedemtracking those here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-pike-cells-v2-todos21:13
* dansmith nods21:13
mriedem#help cells v2 TODOs https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-pike-cells-v2-todos21:13
*** thorst has quit IRC21:13
mriedemok scheduler stuff21:13
mriedemedleafe: ?21:13
jaypipesI'll fill in for ed21:13
jaypipeshe's out21:13
*** julim has quit IRC21:13
mriedemok21:14
jaypipesmriedem: basically, thanks to cdent and gibi we identified a nasty little bug in the placement shared resource providers SQL code.21:14
mriedemand...21:15
dansmithjaypipes is a master of suspense21:15
* jaypipes looking for link21:15
bauzasThe secret of the universe is...21:15
* dansmith is on the edge of his seat21:16
cburgess4221:16
jaypipeshttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/485088/21:16
jaypipes#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485088/21:16
jaypipesthat is the cause of the transient NoValidHosts functional test failures we were seeing21:16
mriedemoh nice21:16
jaypipesmy bad for not notifying you and dansmith sooner.21:16
efriedmriedem is clearly spoiled by edleafe's prepared copy/paste reports21:16
mriedemi saw the talk21:17
jaypipesfor some reason I thought I did but no.21:17
mriedemi mean,21:17
jaypipesefried: no, I'm just an idiot.21:17
mriedempeople been talkin'21:17
mriedemtalkin' about patches21:17
dansmithmriedem: talkin bout talkin?21:17
mriedemi like to do the bonnie rait joke once per year21:17
jaypipesmriedem: outside of that major bug fix, there is the placement-claims work21:17
melwittI got it :)21:17
jaypipeswhich has gotten reviews and is slowly being merged.21:18
mriedemyeah so claims https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483566/21:18
mriedemjaypipes: you see the bug in there?21:18
mriedemlike, you don't have to understand it right now21:18
mriedembut there is a bug in there, found by gib21:18
mriedem*gibi21:18
mriedem#info gibi is finding lots of placement bugs - yay gibi21:19
jaypipesmriedem: yeah, sorry, I dropped the ball on that. will address shortly after meeting.21:19
mriedemwe also need to talk about alternatives at some point21:19
mriedembut can do that later21:19
mriedemi'd like to rap about contingency plans, mkay?21:19
* mriedem turns his chair around21:19
jaypipesgo for it.21:19
mriedemwell, later21:19
mriedemwell, or now21:20
mriedemmain question is, if we don't get alternatives sorted out going to the computes, what breaks or do we lose?21:20
jaypipesthere's some outstanding traits-related things that are also in-flight from alex_xu21:20
jaypipesincluding a bug fix that is important. I need to finish the review on that one.21:20
jaypipesre-review..21:20
mriedemwe lose the separate conductors21:20
dansmithwe lose separate conductors for retries21:20
mriedemright21:21
mriedemasking from another pov,21:21
jaypipeswell, yeah, we can't fulfill our promise of retaining retries in cellsv221:21
dansmithcould be worse,21:21
bauzasWhat Dan said21:21
mriedemif we land the claims in the scheduler, but not alternatives going to computes, is that ok?21:21
dansmithone of the first people that should be doing things with cellsv2 and pike don't care about retries anyway21:21
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting21:21
dansmithmriedem: if we haven't removed the regular retry mechanism it should still work the same way it does now, right?21:21
melwittwho is that? CERN?21:21
dansmithmelwitt: yeah21:21
mriedemdansmith: yes,21:22
mriedemi just want to make sure we're not missing something,21:22
mriedemor that once we claim in the scheduler we lose something or break something else21:22
mriedembut i think that if you're single level conductor it's business as usual,21:22
dansmithyep21:22
mriedembut you get the up-front claim protection which should mitigate some of the claim race failures in the computes21:22
mriedemso we're making progress still21:22
bauzasI don't think we would have other problems21:22
mriedemand we'll still retry alternatives if the allocation request in the scheduler fails21:23
mriedemdue to a race21:23
bauzasCorrect21:23
*** dsanders has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
jaypipesright21:24
mriedemis the retry happening in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483566/ yet?21:24
jaypipesmriedem: oh yes.21:24
bauzasYup21:24
jaypipesmriedem: line 189 in filter_scheduler.py21:24
mriedemok i was looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/483566/4/nova/scheduler/filter_scheduler.py@20321:25
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC21:25
jaypipesmriedem: that's after all retries.21:25
mriedemok and the number of hosts is limited by the number of retries?21:25
jaypipesmriedem: no21:25
dansmiththere's no retries in this code right?21:26
mriedemso we could retry 1000 times?21:26
mriedemthe retry is the for loop over hosts on L18921:26
jaypipesdansmith: yes, there is. line 189-20021:26
jaypipesmriedem: yes, we can retry 1000 times.21:26
mriedembut we don't limit that by the configurable retry option21:26
dansmithuh21:26
*** gouthamr has quit IRC21:26
dansmithso wait, this is a loop over all the hosts we got back from placement,21:27
jaypipesdansmith: correct.21:27
mriedemand filtered/weighed21:27
dansmithand we try to claim one until we run out of hosts or get one?21:27
jaypipesyes21:27
*** andreas-f has quit IRC21:27
dansmithokay, I hadn't noticed that the first time around, but I see now21:28
mriedemso is there a reason we don't limit by the config?21:28
dansmithto be clear, this is just retries in the claiming sense,21:28
dansmithnot the *reschedule* that won't work without the alternatives stuff21:28
jaypipesmriedem: no reason really...21:28
mriedemdansmith: yeah i get that21:28
bauzasHonestly its just for a race21:28
mriedemso retrying here 1000 times is better than retrying compute > conductor > scheduler * 100021:28
dansmithI feel like we should limit here, but I'm not sure why to be honest21:28
mriedemi feel like we should limit too,21:29
dansmithbecause as bauzas says, this should only be a race between placement saying something is good and us trying it21:29
bauzasIn case two concurrent requests get the same destination21:29
mriedembut only because if we goofed something up and are going to retry 1000 times on a set of hosts that won't ever match21:29
dansmithyou'd need a lot of concurrent schedulers to race through 1000 of them21:29
bauzasYup21:29
dansmithso, I'm tempted to leave it as is and backport an emergency fix if we find people are hitting it in some way21:30
bauzasLooks a minor issue for me IMHO21:30
jaypipesand a lot of luck. remember there's the randomization of the host subset as well21:30
mriedemrelease note?21:30
dansmithin reality, we probably have to fix whatever is causing them to hit it and not just the limit21:30
dansmithjaypipes: aye21:30
mriedemdansmith: yeah agreed21:30
mriedemthe retry is papering over a bigger problem21:30
dansmithmriedem: sure, reno for the warning perhaps21:30
mriedemok21:30
jaypipeshappy to do that.21:30
mriedemlet's continue that fun in the review21:30
jaypipesk21:30
bauzasReno FTW21:30
mriedemremember, reno is the way we can always say "we told you so" :)21:31
mriedem"we told you it was going to break!"21:31
dansmithwe're making a lot of people watch a small conversation, fwiw21:31
mriedemgood21:31
mriedemwe're a family here21:31
mriedemok moving on then21:31
mriedemthanks for the discussion21:31
*** esberglu has quit IRC21:32
mriedemthe api meeting, i don't think i was tehre21:32
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
mriedemsdague: were you?21:32
mriedemthe no more api extensions stuff is working its way through https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/api-no-more-extensions-pike+status:open21:32
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
mriedemthe service/hypervisor uuids apis landed for 2.5321:32
mriedemi'm working on the novaclient changes for that one now21:32
mriedemnotification meeting was relatively short,21:33
mriedemgibi and i talked about the last remaining change for the searchlight notifications series21:33
mriedemwhich is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459493/21:33
mriedemand we talked about the updated_at bug fix from takashin21:33
mriedemthis https://review.openstack.org/#/c/475276/21:34
mriedemthere is something weird going on in there where the updated_at field isn't set on the instance record even after we've updated the vm/task state in there21:34
mriedemand updated_at should be set anytime there is an ONUPDATE triggered by a db record update21:34
mriedemso it's weird21:34
mriedemthat's the only thing i'm holding my +2 for21:35
mriedemok cinder stuff21:35
mriedemmaking progress, the swap volume change merged21:35
mriedemopen reviews are now https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+topic:bp/cinder-new-attach-apis+branch:master21:35
mriedemthe check_detach one is close21:35
mriedemstvnoyes found a problem in the live migration one and is fixing it up21:35
mriedemand we need a cinderclient release21:35
mriedembut it's really down to like mainly 2 changes21:35
mriedemso any help there on reviews would be appreciated21:36
*** JoseMello has quit IRC21:36
*** aeng has joined #openstack-meeting21:36
mriedem#topic stuck reviews21:36
*** openstack changes topic to "stuck reviews (Meeting topic: nova)"21:36
mriedemthere was nothing in the agenda, so does anyone have something to mention here?21:36
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC21:36
mriedemalright then21:36
mriedem#topic open discussion21:36
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"21:36
nicSo I made a thing: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-virtio-set-queue-sizes21:37
nicI can't see this landing in Pike, seeing as it exposes functionality in libvirt that hasn't even merged yet, and therefore technically doesn't exist21:37
nicBut it's been a while since I've done any Nova work, and I could use some expert eyes on it to make sure I'm not crazy, and that my approach makes some sense21:37
nicAnd I could use some help getting it prioritized somewhere, obviously21:37
mriedemnic: i'll target the bp to queens so we can discuss it after the pike release21:37
nic\o/21:37
cburgessI will be in Denever and nic might be so we could discuss it there as well?21:38
cburgessDenver even...21:38
mriedemsure21:38
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
dansmithI like how that was "de never"21:38
cburgessIn the meantime I think what nic was asking is.. are we even headed in the right direction or is it omg abort?21:38
mriedemtalk to sean-k-mooney21:38
mriedemor vladikr maybe?21:38
jangutternic: I'm also interested. For the NFV case with low drops, you sometimes need larger queues.21:39
cburgessjangutter Thats what its for...21:39
mriedemi've added people to the review21:39
nicExcellent21:39
cburgessjangutter We hit it with NFV work loads under NFV. We carry a local set of patches for now to work around this but obviously want to get it into upstream.21:40
cburgessNFV workloads under VPP even21:40
cburgessI can't type today... or ever.21:40
janguttercburgess: Yep, and partly QEMU's also to blame :-(21:40
cburgessjangutter yeah21:40
mriedemalright, anything else?21:40
mriedemi'll take that as a no21:41
mriedem1 week left21:41
mriedemthanks everyone21:41
mriedem#endmeeting21:41
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:41
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jul 20 21:41:23 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:41
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2017/nova.2017-07-20-21.00.html21:41
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2017/nova.2017-07-20-21.00.txt21:41
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2017/nova.2017-07-20-21.00.log.html21:41
*** nic has left #openstack-meeting21:41
*** takashin has left #openstack-meeting21:41
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting21:42
*** thorst has quit IRC21:42
*** frank_young has quit IRC21:46
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting21:51
*** esberglu has quit IRC21:56
*** xyang1 has quit IRC21:56
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting21:57
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
*** esberglu has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** yamamoto has quit IRC22:00
kevinbentonhello!22:00
kevinbenton#startmeeting neutron_drivers22:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Jul 20 22:00:30 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kevinbenton. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_drivers)"22:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_drivers'22:00
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
ihrachyso/22:00
kevinbentonarmax, mlavalle, amotoki: ping22:01
armaxpong22:01
mlavalleo/22:01
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC22:01
kevinbentonbefore we start with RFEs, i need to bring up an issue i ran into with making it possible to expose 'router:external' subnets22:02
*** iyamahat__ has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
kevinbentonin order to allow the policy engine to permit subnets to be visible22:02
kevinbenton(context is #link https://launchpad.net/bugs/1653932)22:03
openstackLaunchpad bug 1653932 in neutron "[rfe] network router:external field not exported" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Kevin Benton (kevinbenton)22:03
kevinbentoni have to add a DB hook that makes the user subnet query actually return the external subnets as well22:03
*** baoli has quit IRC22:03
kevinbentonhowever, if we don't make external subnets visible by default in policy.json22:04
*** iyamahat_ has quit IRC22:04
kevinbentonthere is a mismatch between what the DB returns and what is filtered out by policy22:04
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
kevinbentonthis becomes a problem in pagination22:04
kevinbentonbecause pagination asks for X records22:04
*** baoli has quit IRC22:05
kevinbentonbut then policy engine filters out some and we end up with a shortage22:05
kevinbentonhttp://logs.openstack.org/94/476094/4/check/gate-neutron-dsvm-api-ubuntu-xenial/a42d8fe/testr_results.html.gz22:05
ihrachys(I knew those tests will trigger one day lol!)22:05
*** rwsu has quit IRC22:05
kevinbentonso the question is, do we adjust the pagination tests to expect sometimes fewer records than asked for?22:05
ihrachysI don't think so, that would be a weird api behaviour22:06
ihrachyshorizon will be all over us22:06
kevinbentondo we attempt to have the policy engine inform the DB query builder (quite difficult)22:06
*** kylek3h has quit IRC22:06
kevinbentonor do we just adjust our default policy to now expose external subnets?22:06
ihrachysthey complained about inconsistent/broken behavior of pagination in different projects before. we will add more to the grief. ;)22:06
kevinbentonihrachys: yeah, i can see that22:07
*** jkilpatr has joined #openstack-meeting22:07
kevinbentoni've outlined it in this email thread http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-July/119863.html22:07
armaxnot sure I fully grasp why now pagination tests fail22:07
kevinbentonarmax: db hook makes the query return external subnets22:07
kevinbentonarmax: so you have a mix of your own and external subnets22:08
ihrachysarmax, native pagination enabled for the plugin22:08
armaxbut changing tests or policy.json seems like masking a breaking change22:08
kevinbentonarmax: but policy engine by default filters that out22:08
armaxkevinbenton: so the pagination tests break because now there’s more subnets?22:08
ihrachysI think we will need to pass those filters from policy engine into plugin somehow22:08
ihrachysnot sure how though22:08
kevinbentonarmax: yeah, the pagination tests will break whenever there is a mismatch between policy and db result22:08
*** sshank has quit IRC22:08
armaxI see22:09
kevinbentonany time the policy engine filters out entire records22:09
armaxbut shouldn’t pagination come after policy filtering?22:09
armaxin the pipeline I mean22:09
ihrachysarmax, pagination is implemented in sqlalchemy code22:09
ihrachysif plugin supports 'native' pagination22:09
ihrachyswhich is the case for ml222:10
armaxi see22:10
kevinbentonright22:10
armaxok now I get it22:10
kevinbentonas ihrachys highlighted, the correct fix is to somehow have the policy engine policies build the queries used22:10
kevinbentonthis has been on my wishlist for a long time because the policy engine is actually a lot less flexible than it appears22:10
kevinbenton(the DB queries filter out any non-default access)22:11
kevinbentonbut it's going to be a significant effort i think to have something that translates policy entries into column filters22:11
kevinbentonfor SQLA22:12
armaxyeah22:12
armaxthat sounds messy22:12
ihrachyskevinbenton, can we pass policy info via context?22:12
armaxunless this was special cased just to deal with subnets for external networks22:12
kevinbentonihrachys: yeah, i think we can do the work to get policies attached to context22:12
ihrachysthen deep in db code, we would extract that and build accordingly22:12
ihrachysok22:13
ihrachysat least no need for a new plugin entry point :p22:13
kevinbentonihrachys: yeah, i think the 'build accordingly' bit is where it gets messy22:13
ihrachysand it sounds like this work better go to oslo.policy/oslo.context?22:13
armaxI suppose another crazy idea would be to turn external networks into regular networks22:13
ihrachyskevinbenton, if it's a special case that we know about, it's not that bad22:13
armaxwith an extra column ‘external'?22:13
armaxand kill the external table?22:14
*** tobberydberg has joined #openstack-meeting22:14
kevinbentonarmax: i don't think that helps. this is for subnets22:14
armaxbut then the query may turn less ugly22:14
kevinbentonarmax: the query itself isn't terrible. it's knowing when to use it22:15
kevinbentonihrachys: so are you thinking maybe just special case this one query?22:15
ihrachysyeah. I would refrain from generalizing if it's complex and we don't have another use case for that22:16
kevinbentonok, well i'll start by looking into getting the policies visible on the context or somewhere where the query builder will have access to them22:17
kevinbenton#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bugs?field.status%3Alist=Triaged&field.tag=rfe22:17
armaxso to recap22:18
armaxbefore we go in the rfe list22:18
kevinbentonpolicy mismatch with db hooks == broken pagination22:18
*** tobberydberg has quit IRC22:18
armaxchanging the policy.json file to expose the list of subnets for external network will make the pagination tests pass?22:18
kevinbentonarmax: yes22:18
kevinbentonbut then we have the issue of exposing something we didn't previously22:19
kevinbentonon upgrade22:19
armaxwhat if we add a shim extension to that?22:19
armax:)22:19
*** marst has quit IRC22:19
kevinbentonwell we could have an extension to indicate the behavior22:19
armaxit’s definitely a side effect22:19
kevinbentonbut inevitably some tempest test or something will explode somewhere22:19
armaxbut what could go wrong if more subnets are exposed to a tenant now during subnet-list?22:19
kevinbentonwhere it assumes if a tenant can see a subnet and it's not shared, the tenant owns it22:20
armaxyeah, that’s the danger, but aside that side effect22:20
armaxwhat else could go wrong?22:20
kevinbentonwe also need to verify that things like router interface add22:21
kevinbentonverify ownership by tenant matching22:21
kevinbentonthere could be places where we attach by subnet like that which depend on the DB not returning anything to verify if a user has access to it22:21
armaxsure, same problem arises when the operator does enable this via policy though22:22
armaxcorrect?22:22
kevinbentonarmax: yep22:23
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting22:23
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting22:23
*** sshank has joined #openstack-meeting22:23
armaxso chance is that exposing subnets for an external network will still create issues we haven’t thought of22:24
armaxand I wonder if by enabling this by default will allow us to root them out faster22:24
kevinbentonarmax: yep22:24
kevinbentonif only a few operators use the non-default policy we probably won't hear about it until pike is EOL22:24
mlavalleand that fixes the tests, right?22:24
kevinbentonmlavalle: yep22:25
armaxso that’s why I am bit nervours22:25
armaxI mean if the one certainty we have is that this change will cause more 'bugs'22:25
armaxI wonder if we’re better off biting the bullet sooner rather than later22:25
armaxor we forget about it and not proceed altogether22:25
kevinbentonit would also enable us to make the router operations more consistent from the user perspective22:26
armaxjust a though22:26
armaxt22:26
kevinbentongateway attach could take a subnet22:26
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC22:26
armaxwell, now you’re going down the path of changing API22:26
*** Daisy_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:26
armaxwhich shouldn’t be necessary22:26
armaxI mean, yeah, I can see that this change opens up the possibility22:26
*** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-meeting22:26
kevinbentonyeah, that's just a potential thing22:26
kevinbentonnot required at all22:27
*** mtanino__ has quit IRC22:27
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC22:27
*** fnaval has quit IRC22:27
armaxis subnets for external networks something sensitive?22:27
*** bobh has quit IRC22:28
kevinbentoni'm not sure22:28
armaxis there anything in the response payload that could be considered too infra specific?22:28
kevinbentoni haven't been able to think of case where it would be a problem22:28
kevinbentonmaybe the operator stored their root password to the gateway in the subnet description22:28
armaxyeah22:29
armax:)22:29
mlavallebut that's bad aoperator practice, LOL22:29
kevinbentonone possible thing is the subnet service types feature22:29
armaxwhat about it?22:29
armaxyou mean that gets exposed?22:29
kevinbentonthere might be a subnet meant just for DVR ports that users never really see22:29
kevinbentonyeah22:29
armaxright22:29
kevinbentonso they will see the floating IP subnet22:29
armaxI was thinking about that22:30
armaxor segment ID?22:30
kevinbentonand a 'internal' subnet22:30
*** pchavva has quit IRC22:30
armaxis that on subnets? I can’t remember22:30
kevinbentonwell segment_id isn't a huge issue22:30
kevinbentonjust a UUID22:30
kevinbentonhttps://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/etc/policy.json#L2122:30
kevinbentonit's admin-only anyway22:30
kevinbentonso they wouldn't be able to see segment_id or service_types22:31
armaxso are service types22:31
mlavallewe already have a service type network:floatingip22:31
armaxexcept on the GET22:31
*** Daisy_ has quit IRC22:31
kevinbentonbut they would still be able to see the subnets themselves22:31
mlavallesee example 2 in https://docs.openstack.org/neutron/latest/admin/config-service-subnets.html22:32
kevinbentonso if you have a weird subnet just for DVR interfaces on non-routable addresses you might get questions about it showing up in users subnet lists22:32
*** vishwana_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:32
kevinbentonmlavalle: yeah22:32
kevinbentonso would normal users seeing all of those subnets show up be okay?22:33
mlavallein principle, I don't think so22:33
armaxit feels wrong22:34
kevinbentonyeah, it feels like exposing infra stuff22:34
armaxeven if the operator changed the policy.json  from defeault22:34
*** vishwanathj has quit IRC22:34
armaxso on the RFE22:35
armaxwhat was the exact use case?22:35
kevinbentonarmax: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/165393222:35
openstackLaunchpad bug 1653932 in neutron "[rfe] network router:external field not exported" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Kevin Benton (kevinbenton)22:35
armaxI wonder if it’s something PaaS related?22:35
armaxwhat comment #?22:35
kevinbentonit's actually about IP visibility for allocating floating IPs22:35
kevinbentonthe description22:35
kevinbentonusers don't know which subnet to pick from22:36
armaxright, but why wouldn’t a random IP not be enough?22:36
kevinbentonsome IPs have access to one thing and others to something else22:36
armaxlike if there’s some sorth of IP whitelist somewhere?22:37
armaxor even routing wise?22:37
kevinbentonyeah22:37
ihrachyswhy not creating two networks?22:37
armax...right22:37
armaxI was gonna say the same22:37
*** tesseract has quit IRC22:37
armaxthough now the choice is not based on IP address but 'label'22:38
ihrachyswell it's even better to my taste22:38
ihrachysyou can tag the network, put a nice name and even a description, whatever22:38
armaxnetwork pistacho or network strawberry22:38
armaxyum22:38
ihrachysok so how about clarifying use case again before doing coding?22:39
mlavalleso maybe go back to the rfe and have a dialog with the submitter to dig in the use case?22:39
armaxI suppose we had done that, but it looks like we did not22:40
mlavallewell, now we have a set of consequences that we can discuss with submitter22:40
kevinbentonarmax: can you ask for clarification>?22:41
armaxsure22:41
armaxcan do22:41
kevinbentonthis does seem like a request for generic policy support without a very clear use case22:41
kevinbentonhe does mention that floating IP is just an example22:42
*** iyamahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:42
mlavallere-reading the rfe, he actually mentions that fip is just an example22:42
mlavallecomment #422:42
kevinbentonyeah22:42
armaxtrue22:42
kevinbentonmaybe it's actually something service_types can help with22:43
armaxbut since we have now understood the implications22:43
mlavalleand we decided to approach the solution from that perspective22:43
kevinbentonmaybe one of the subnets is private and useless22:43
kevinbentonfor floating IPs22:43
armaxmuch more than we had at the beginning22:43
armaxand the code doesn’t look pretty and risk of errors is high22:43
mlavalleand yes, now we know the implications22:43
armaxlet’s go back and fully understand what we need22:43
kevinbentonok22:43
armaxkevinbenton: service types need to have subnets exposed nonetheless no?22:43
kevinbentontrue22:44
armaxOk22:44
armaxI think we beat this horse hard enough22:44
armaxlet’s move on22:44
armaxI’d say22:44
kevinbentoni want to discuss https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1604222 right away22:44
openstackLaunchpad bug 1604222 in neutron "[RFE] Implement vlan transparent for openvswitch ML2 driver" [Wishlist,Triaged] - Assigned to Trevor McCasland (twm2016)22:44
*** iyamahat__ has quit IRC22:44
mlavalleLOL, it must be dead now22:44
armaxthat’s rude22:44
kevinbenton:)22:44
armaxkevinbenton: please?22:44
kevinbentonarmax: please what?22:44
armaxi want to discuss https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1604222 right away22:45
armaxwhere are your manners?22:45
kevinbentonrather than going to the list i mean22:45
armaxstill22:45
armaxbe polite22:45
armax:P22:45
kevinbenton(even though I think this was at the top)22:45
ihrachysit was22:45
kevinbentonthere is some mixup here between two things22:45
armaxdo we have full support in OVS?22:45
armaxnowadays?22:45
kevinbenton2.8 will have it it sounds like22:46
armaxg22:46
ihrachys"this will be released in ovs 2.8 in august prior to the release of pike"22:46
armaxfinally22:46
ihrachysthere is no official release yet, but people can always backport/pull master22:46
kevinbentonhowever, what Trevor discussed is not related to vlan transparency22:46
kevinbentonhe is working on a QinQ network type driver22:46
kevinbentonwhich will also depend on QinQ support in OVS for an OVS implementation22:47
armaxnot sure I understand the need for a new type drivers22:47
armaxdriver*22:47
kevinbentonbut they are orthoganal and i don't want the QinQ type driver to get mixed up with vlan transparency22:47
armaxa type driver goes and in hand with a ml2 driver, no?22:47
kevinbentonarmax: the QinQ driver is to allow double-encapped packets to hit the wire22:47
kevinbentondouble-tagged*22:48
ihrachyshow do drivers that implement vlan transparency do it?22:48
mlavalleand he is sub-classing the vlan type to do that22:48
armaxoh so you’re saying it’s a way for OVS agent to understand that it needs to do pushd/popd?22:48
armaxrather than strip/replace?22:49
kevinbentonsee this is the problem :)22:49
kevinbentonthe qinq type driver has nothing to do with vlan transparency22:49
armaxthen I still don’t understant22:49
kevinbentonthe qinq type driver is just like the vlan driver22:49
armaxright22:49
*** Patifa has joined #openstack-meeting22:49
mlavallewith more tags22:49
kevinbentonexcept it tells to place two tags in the header22:49
armaxso if it’s yet another tunnelling driver22:49
mlavalleinside22:49
kevinbentonyep22:49
armaxit does have no reason to exist in the repo22:50
armaxwhat’s the use case?22:50
armaxI mean22:50
armaxI have no reason against it22:50
kevinbentongeneve has no reason to exist in the repo22:50
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting22:50
armaxI wasn’t PTL when that merged ;)22:50
armaxI don’t think22:50
kevinbentonit's not vendor specific22:50
armaxbut my question is what’s it for?22:50
armaxif it’s not going to be used in vlan transparency?22:51
armaxdo we know?22:51
kevinbentonif you have infra expecting qinq frames22:51
armaxI can see what geneve is going to be used for22:51
armaxOVN22:51
kevinbentonit lets you scale way beyond 4096 vlans22:51
armaxqinq typo driver22:51
armaxdo we know the mech driver that will leverage it?22:51
armaxdude22:51
armaxstop lecturing us on QinQ22:51
kevinbentonSR-IOV22:51
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:51
kevinbentonarmax: then don't ask questions22:51
armaxwe all get it, I think :P22:51
armaxyou’re answering the questions I am asking22:52
kevinbentonthen we're in agreement?22:52
armaxI think so22:52
kevinbentonok, qinq is fine22:52
kevinbenton:)22:52
armaxso you’re saying that hte sriov driver will use this type driver?22:52
kevinbentonbut it needs a separate RFE22:52
kevinbentonarmax: yes, the SR-IOV folks were requesting this at PTG and summit22:52
kevinbentoni need to talk to trevor to have him file a separate RFE22:52
armaxOK22:53
armaxso there’s work on the sriov driver to stitch things together?22:53
kevinbentonbecause the VLAN transparency is going to be completely different work on the OVS agent openflow pipeline22:53
kevinbentonarmax: yep, just to configure the tagging like it does for vlans22:53
armaxso long as the relationship is properly documented in the process of contributing this, then I think this is fine22:54
armaxdo we need model changes you reckon?22:54
kevinbentonno, i don't think so, but that will leave this VLAN transparency RFE open to be implemented by someone else22:54
kevinbentonso if anyone's company is depending on OVS transparency support, find some contributors :)22:55
ihrachysI think we may be interested, I think the topic flew around, but maybe it was for ovs, I will check :)22:55
armaxit would be nice to finally close the circle about VLAN management and OVS22:56
kevinbentonihrachys: sounds good, we might as well :)22:56
ihrachyskevinbenton, noted22:57
armaxOK22:57
armax3 mins to the top of the hour22:57
kevinbentonok, sorry22:58
kevinbentonwas commenting on RFE22:58
armaxno need to be sorry22:58
armaxjust did your job for once22:58
kevinbentonanyone have any last minute announcements?22:58
armax:P22:58
ihrachysno22:58
armaxnone from em22:58
armaxme22:58
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting22:58
mlavalleno22:58
kevinbentonok, then i'll give you a bunch of free time back :)22:58
kevinbenton#endmeeting22:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:58
openstackMeeting ended Thu Jul 20 22:58:53 2017 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:58
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-07-20-22.00.html22:58
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-07-20-22.00.txt22:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_drivers/2017/neutron_drivers.2017-07-20-22.00.log.html22:58
mlavallethanks o/22:59
armaxI’ll use it preciously22:59
ihrachysciao22:59
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting23:00
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting23:00
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting23:01
*** edmondsw has quit IRC23:04
*** frank_young has quit IRC23:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC23:07
*** edmondsw_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:07
*** bknudson has quit IRC23:07
*** davidsha has quit IRC23:08
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting23:08
*** baoli has quit IRC23:09
*** ihrachys has quit IRC23:10
*** edmondsw_ has quit IRC23:11
*** askb has joined #openstack-meeting23:14
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting23:15
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:15
*** esberglu has quit IRC23:16
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting23:16
*** myoung|remote has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** csomerville has quit IRC23:23
*** Manuel_112 has joined #openstack-meeting23:24
*** jaypipes has quit IRC23:25
*** Manuel_112 has quit IRC23:28
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-meeting23:29
*** armax has quit IRC23:33
*** edmondsw has quit IRC23:33
*** thorst has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** Swami has quit IRC23:37
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** thorst has quit IRC23:38
*** chyka has quit IRC23:39
*** sshank has quit IRC23:41
*** Apoorva has quit IRC23:41
*** annegentle has quit IRC23:48
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:48
*** frank_young has joined #openstack-meeting23:50
*** david-lyle has quit IRC23:54
*** frank_young has quit IRC23:54
*** oomichi has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!