Thursday, 2014-05-22

*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting00:01
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting00:01
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz00:01
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC00:03
*** Guest13177 has quit IRC00:03
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** vivek has joined #openstack-meeting00:04
*** vivek is now known as Guest6546700:04
*** kayaliu__ has quit IRC00:04
*** markmcclain has quit IRC00:05
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC00:08
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting00:10
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC00:13
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** ramashri has quit IRC00:14
*** chuckC has quit IRC00:14
*** tappel has quit IRC00:14
*** Guest65467 has quit IRC00:16
*** keyvan is now known as zz_keyvan00:16
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC00:22
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting00:22
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC00:26
*** sarob has quit IRC00:27
*** jjmb has quit IRC00:27
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting00:28
*** matsuhashi has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
*** vivek has joined #openstack-meeting00:30
*** vivek is now known as Guest6162700:31
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC00:33
*** Guest61627 has quit IRC00:33
*** kayaliu__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:33
*** marun has quit IRC00:37
*** devlaps has quit IRC00:38
*** zhithuang has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** tris has joined #openstack-meeting00:39
*** saurabhs has left #openstack-meeting00:42
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting00:43
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting00:43
*** cjellick has quit IRC00:47
*** kayaliu__ has quit IRC00:47
*** gokrokve has quit IRC00:48
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting00:49
*** trey has quit IRC00:50
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:50
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting00:50
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting00:51
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting00:52
*** AntL has quit IRC00:52
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:52
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting00:54
*** vkmc has quit IRC00:54
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC00:56
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** assef has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** kayaliu__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** jang has joined #openstack-meeting01:00
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:01
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC01:01
*** zul has quit IRC01:03
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting01:03
*** assef has left #openstack-meeting01:05
*** crc32 has quit IRC01:05
*** zns has quit IRC01:07
*** zns_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** jang has quit IRC01:07
*** xianghui has quit IRC01:09
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** neelashah has quit IRC01:10
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** tappel has quit IRC01:15
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC01:16
*** caleb_ has quit IRC01:17
*** zz_keyvan is now known as keyvan01:18
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting01:21
*** jang has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** yaguang has quit IRC01:25
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting01:27
*** zhithuang has left #openstack-meeting01:27
*** mrunge_away has quit IRC01:28
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting01:30
*** foliveira has joined #openstack-meeting01:30
*** foliveira has left #openstack-meeting01:31
*** vpanizo has quit IRC01:31
*** gyee has quit IRC01:32
*** foliveira has joined #openstack-meeting01:34
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:34
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC01:34
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting01:35
*** Mandell has quit IRC01:36
*** jang has quit IRC01:36
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting01:37
*** kayaliu__ has quit IRC01:39
*** foliveira has quit IRC01:40
*** zhikunliu has joined #openstack-meeting01:42
*** armax has quit IRC01:43
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting01:43
*** neelashah has quit IRC01:43
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC01:44
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** IlyaE has quit IRC01:47
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-meeting01:47
*** gokrokve has quit IRC01:48
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC01:49
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC01:50
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting01:50
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC01:50
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC01:52
*** IlyaE_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:53
*** IlyaE has quit IRC01:53
*** zul has quit IRC01:54
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting01:56
*** amcrn has quit IRC01:57
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting01:57
*** saschpe has quit IRC02:00
*** saschpe has joined #openstack-meeting02:01
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting02:05
*** mengxd has joined #openstack-meeting02:07
*** mrunge has quit IRC02:08
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting02:08
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting02:11
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting02:11
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** tappel has quit IRC02:15
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting02:16
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:17
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:18
*** gokrokve has quit IRC02:18
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting02:19
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting02:20
*** bgorski has quit IRC02:20
*** zul has quit IRC02:22
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:24
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC02:25
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-meeting02:26
*** dkehnx has quit IRC02:27
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting02:27
*** networkstatic_ is now known as networkstatic02:28
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting02:29
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away02:32
*** xdmeng has joined #openstack-meeting02:35
*** dkehn_ is now known as dkehnx02:35
*** mengxd has quit IRC02:36
*** networkstatic_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:42
*** mberlin1 has joined #openstack-meeting02:43
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting02:43
*** networkstatic has quit IRC02:43
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z02:43
*** mberlin has quit IRC02:44
*** kenhui has quit IRC02:46
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:48
*** mengxd has joined #openstack-meeting02:48
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n302:49
*** edmund has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** xdmeng has quit IRC02:50
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting02:52
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting02:52
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting02:54
*** crandquist has quit IRC02:54
*** Youcef_ has quit IRC02:54
*** matsuhas_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:55
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** cvbock1 has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** fbo_away has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** peopleme1ge has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** mattgrif_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** nosnos_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
*** GheRiver1 has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
*** rossk_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
*** brucer_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:57
*** ilyashakhat_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
*** christop1eraedo has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC02:59
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting02:59
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting02:59
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting03:00
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:00
*** banix_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:00
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan03:01
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC03:03
*** fbo has quit IRC03:03
*** cvbock has quit IRC03:03
*** peoplemerge has quit IRC03:03
*** blamar has quit IRC03:03
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC03:03
*** matsuhashi has quit IRC03:03
*** jeblair has quit IRC03:03
*** GheRivero has quit IRC03:03
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo03:03
*** xianghui has quit IRC03:03
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:03
*** anteaya has quit IRC03:03
*** markvan_ has quit IRC03:03
*** sdake has quit IRC03:03
*** christopheraedo has quit IRC03:03
*** edhall has quit IRC03:03
*** bdperkin has quit IRC03:03
*** russell_h has quit IRC03:03
*** dansmith has quit IRC03:03
*** comay has quit IRC03:03
*** rossk has quit IRC03:03
*** ilyashakhat has quit IRC03:03
*** jgriffith has quit IRC03:03
*** russell_h has joined #openstack-meeting03:03
*** russell_h has quit IRC03:03
*** dansmith has joined #openstack-meeting03:03
*** edhall has joined #openstack-meeting03:03
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting03:03
*** russell_h has joined #openstack-meeting03:04
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-meeting03:04
*** bdperkin has joined #openstack-meeting03:04
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting03:05
*** saschpe- has joined #openstack-meeting03:05
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting03:05
*** russell_h has quit IRC03:05
*** russell_h has joined #openstack-meeting03:05
*** uberj has quit IRC03:05
*** yamamoto has quit IRC03:05
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
*** uberj_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov03:06
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting03:07
*** yamahata_ has quit IRC03:07
*** mrodden has quit IRC03:08
*** gokrokve has quit IRC03:09
*** saschpe has quit IRC03:09
*** banix has quit IRC03:09
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC03:09
*** brucer has quit IRC03:09
*** KurtMartin has quit IRC03:09
*** gholt has quit IRC03:09
*** banix_ is now known as banix03:09
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting03:09
*** jeblair has joined #openstack-meeting03:09
*** zhhuabj has joined #openstack-meeting03:09
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting03:11
*** fnaval has quit IRC03:11
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting03:11
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting03:12
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting03:12
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting03:13
*** crandquist has quit IRC03:13
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting03:13
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** gholt has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC03:14
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** Shaan7 has quit IRC03:14
*** Shaan7 has joined #openstack-meeting03:14
*** jmh__ro has quit IRC03:15
*** eharney has quit IRC03:15
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC03:15
*** tappel has quit IRC03:16
*** ramishra has quit IRC03:17
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC03:21
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting03:22
*** boris-42 has quit IRC03:23
*** msdubov has quit IRC03:25
*** banix has quit IRC03:27
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz03:29
*** msdubov has joined #openstack-meeting03:29
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek03:29
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting03:29
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting03:31
*** armax has quit IRC03:32
*** Mikhail_D_ltp has joined #openstack-meeting03:34
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting03:35
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting03:35
*** neelashah has quit IRC03:35
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting03:36
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC03:36
*** Mandell has quit IRC03:39
*** TravT has quit IRC03:39
*** marun has quit IRC03:39
*** mrodden has quit IRC03:40
*** jjmb has quit IRC03:41
*** baoli has quit IRC03:45
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:47
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap03:49
*** jecarey has quit IRC03:49
*** prad_ has quit IRC03:50
*** Mikhail_D_ltp has quit IRC03:52
*** prad has joined #openstack-meeting03:52
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting03:52
*** nosnos_ has quit IRC03:52
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting03:53
*** yingjun has quit IRC03:53
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:56
*** jmh__ro has joined #openstack-meeting03:57
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting03:57
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC04:06
*** jang has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** vpanizo has quit IRC04:09
*** crandquist has quit IRC04:11
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC04:12
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting04:12
*** stevemar has quit IRC04:15
*** yaguang has quit IRC04:16
*** tappel has quit IRC04:16
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting04:20
*** mattgrif_ has quit IRC04:20
*** jang has quit IRC04:20
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting04:21
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** eghobo has quit IRC04:25
*** markvoelker1 has joined #openstack-meeting04:28
*** yamamoto has quit IRC04:29
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC04:30
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting04:31
*** marcoemorais1 has joined #openstack-meeting04:32
*** comay has quit IRC04:33
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:34
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC04:34
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting04:35
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting04:36
*** ayoung has quit IRC04:36
*** pablosan_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:38
*** gokrokve has quit IRC04:38
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC04:40
*** pablosan has quit IRC04:41
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC04:41
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:44
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting04:44
*** zns_ has quit IRC04:45
*** IlyaE_ has quit IRC04:46
*** gokrokve has quit IRC04:47
*** erlon has quit IRC04:49
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting04:50
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting04:50
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting04:52
*** ramashri has quit IRC04:52
*** terryw has joined #openstack-meeting04:53
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting04:53
*** reed has quit IRC04:54
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC04:56
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC04:57
*** Mandell has quit IRC04:59
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting04:59
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:59
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:59
*** arnaud has quit IRC05:01
*** igor__ has quit IRC05:02
*** jmh__ro has quit IRC05:05
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC05:05
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting05:05
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting05:06
*** marun has quit IRC05:07
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting05:10
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting05:10
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting05:10
*** crandquist has quit IRC05:12
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting05:13
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting05:14
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting05:16
*** harlowja_ is now known as harlowja_away05:17
*** tappel has quit IRC05:17
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting05:18
*** cvbock1 has quit IRC05:18
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** comay has quit IRC05:19
*** ArthurBerezin1 has joined #openstack-meeting05:21
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting05:22
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz05:23
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC05:25
*** ArthurBerezin1 has left #openstack-meeting05:25
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC05:30
*** vkdrao has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC05:32
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
*** Longgeek has quit IRC05:32
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting05:33
*** Longgeek has quit IRC05:33
*** enikanorov has joined #openstack-meeting05:34
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz05:34
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting05:35
*** enikanorov has quit IRC05:37
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** vivek has joined #openstack-meeting05:38
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC05:38
*** vivek has quit IRC05:38
*** rbowen has quit IRC05:38
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC05:40
*** epico has quit IRC05:41
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:45
*** Mandell has quit IRC05:47
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting05:48
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:51
*** Longgeek has quit IRC05:51
*** gcb has quit IRC05:51
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting05:54
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** mengxd has quit IRC05:57
*** sankarshan has quit IRC05:59
*** sankarshan has joined #openstack-meeting05:59
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC06:01
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:03
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting06:04
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting06:06
*** terryw has quit IRC06:06
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away06:06
*** eghobo has quit IRC06:06
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting06:07
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC06:08
*** arnaud has quit IRC06:08
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting06:08
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting06:09
*** SridharG has quit IRC06:09
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan06:10
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting06:11
*** ramishra has quit IRC06:12
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting06:12
*** yaguang has quit IRC06:13
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC06:13
*** crandquist has quit IRC06:14
*** doron_afk has joined #openstack-meeting06:14
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek06:14
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting06:14
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting06:15
*** jmh__ro has joined #openstack-meeting06:19
*** crandquist has quit IRC06:19
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** thomasbiege has left #openstack-meeting06:22
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting06:24
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away06:24
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz06:24
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan06:25
*** Longgeek has quit IRC06:26
*** kayaliu_ has quit IRC06:26
*** amandeep has joined #openstack-meeting06:28
*** amandeep is now known as Guest4659206:28
*** yogeshme_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:29
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting06:30
*** noslzzp has quit IRC06:30
*** gokrokve has quit IRC06:31
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting06:33
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting06:35
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting06:36
*** yaguang has quit IRC06:38
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting06:39
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC06:42
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC06:42
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:42
*** markvoelker1 has quit IRC06:43
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting06:44
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting06:44
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting06:45
*** edmund has quit IRC06:45
*** jecarey has quit IRC06:45
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting06:46
*** yamahata has quit IRC06:48
*** brucer_ has quit IRC06:48
*** bnemec has quit IRC06:48
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting06:49
*** IlyaE has quit IRC06:50
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting06:53
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:53
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting06:55
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC06:56
*** cfriesen__ has quit IRC06:57
*** paragan has quit IRC06:57
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting06:58
*** jecarey has quit IRC06:59
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting06:59
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting07:00
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting07:01
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting07:02
*** bnemec has quit IRC07:02
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting07:02
*** gcb has quit IRC07:02
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting07:04
*** yaguang has quit IRC07:08
*** rossk_ has quit IRC07:12
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting07:13
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting07:14
*** yogeshme_ has quit IRC07:14
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting07:15
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek07:15
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting07:15
*** crandquist has quit IRC07:20
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting07:23
*** vkdrao has quit IRC07:23
*** luqas has quit IRC07:23
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting07:23
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz07:25
*** I159 has joined #openstack-meeting07:31
*** I159_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:31
*** tappel has quit IRC07:38
*** vpanizo_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:38
*** vpanizo has quit IRC07:40
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting07:41
*** ominakov has joined #openstack-meeting07:41
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** jgallard has quit IRC07:45
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting07:46
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting07:50
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting07:50
*** Rikkol has joined #openstack-meeting07:51
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek07:54
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting07:56
*** Rikkol has left #openstack-meeting07:56
*** vkdrao has joined #openstack-meeting07:58
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** mrda is now known as mrda_away08:03
*** vkdrao has quit IRC08:03
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz08:04
*** vkdrao has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
*** yaguang has quit IRC08:06
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek08:07
*** paragan has quit IRC08:07
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting08:09
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting08:13
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** pelix has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
*** derekh_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting08:16
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz08:17
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting08:20
*** crandquist has quit IRC08:21
*** afazekas_wfp has joined #openstack-meeting08:22
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
*** Mandell has quit IRC08:25
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting08:27
*** Longgeek has quit IRC08:28
*** d0ugal_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:29
*** imsurit has joined #openstack-meeting08:29
*** ygbo has quit IRC08:31
*** Mandell has quit IRC08:31
*** ramishra has quit IRC08:33
*** GheRiver1 is now known as GheRivero08:34
*** che-arne has joined #openstack-meeting08:36
*** oomichi has quit IRC08:36
*** d0ugal_ has quit IRC08:39
*** henrynash has quit IRC08:42
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away08:44
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC08:45
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** d0ugal_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC08:47
*** Guest46592 has quit IRC08:49
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting08:54
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting08:55
*** jtomasek has quit IRC08:56
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting08:57
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting08:58
*** Mandell has quit IRC09:00
*** marcoemorais1 has quit IRC09:03
*** d0ugal_ has quit IRC09:05
*** yaguang has quit IRC09:07
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek09:08
*** afazekas_wfp is now known as afazekas09:11
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting09:11
*** ygbo has quit IRC09:12
*** Longgeek has quit IRC09:13
*** mrunge is now known as mrunge_afk09:13
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting09:13
*** d0ugal_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:14
*** d0ugal_ has quit IRC09:17
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz09:18
ArthurBerezin85043309:18
ArthurBerezin39002009:18
ArthurBerezin77083609:18
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting09:18
*** kobier has joined #openstack-meeting09:19
*** d0ugal_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:22
*** crandquist has quit IRC09:22
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:22
*** d0ugal_ is now known as d0ugal09:22
*** evgenyf has quit IRC09:22
*** kobier has quit IRC09:23
*** keyvan is now known as zz_keyvan09:23
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting09:24
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:25
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting09:25
*** doron_afk is now known as doron09:27
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC09:27
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:33
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting09:33
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting09:34
*** vkdrao has quit IRC09:39
*** henrynash_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:41
*** henrynash has quit IRC09:43
*** henrynash_ is now known as henrynash09:43
*** epico has quit IRC09:45
*** julienvey is now known as zz_julien09:45
*** Longgeek has quit IRC09:56
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting09:56
*** Longgeek has quit IRC09:59
*** jgallard has quit IRC10:00
*** Longgeek has joined #openstack-meeting10:01
*** lxsli has joined #openstack-meeting10:07
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek10:08
*** xuhanp has quit IRC10:10
*** ygbo has quit IRC10:10
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz10:18
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting10:19
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC10:23
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting10:23
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting10:24
*** crandquist has quit IRC10:24
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting10:26
*** doron is now known as doron_afk10:27
*** sld has quit IRC10:30
*** ygbo has quit IRC10:31
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting10:31
*** paragan has quit IRC10:34
*** sld has joined #openstack-meeting10:34
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting10:35
*** evgenyf has quit IRC10:37
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting10:38
*** SridharG has quit IRC10:39
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting10:40
*** mrunge_afk is now known as mrunge10:44
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting10:45
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk10:51
*** imsurit has quit IRC10:59
*** vpanizo_ has quit IRC11:00
*** fnaval has quit IRC11:00
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC11:01
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek11:04
*** blamar has quit IRC11:04
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8711:05
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan11:08
*** luis_fdez has quit IRC11:11
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting11:18
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting11:20
*** miqui has quit IRC11:20
*** vkdrao has joined #openstack-meeting11:21
*** xianghui has quit IRC11:21
*** vkdrao has quit IRC11:21
*** crandquist has quit IRC11:25
*** SridharG has quit IRC11:25
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting11:25
*** matsuhas_ has quit IRC11:27
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk11:27
*** prad has quit IRC11:28
*** luqas has quit IRC11:34
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:34
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting11:42
*** ygbo has quit IRC11:42
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting11:42
*** fnaval has quit IRC11:43
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez11:44
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n311:44
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez11:44
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting11:53
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC11:54
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting11:54
*** erecio has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** cdub has quit IRC11:58
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting11:58
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting11:59
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting12:03
*** jecarey has quit IRC12:06
*** eharney has quit IRC12:06
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting12:06
*** mrunge has quit IRC12:06
*** nacim has quit IRC12:07
*** bnemec has quit IRC12:09
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** jgriffith has quit IRC12:16
*** acoles is now known as acoles_away12:16
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting12:17
*** jgriffith has joined #openstack-meeting12:17
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8712:18
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting12:20
*** aysyd has joined #openstack-meeting12:21
*** crandquist has joined #openstack-meeting12:23
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting12:23
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:23
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** nshaikh has quit IRC12:26
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:27
*** cgoncalv1s is now known as cgoncalves12:28
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting12:28
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz12:30
*** nosnos has quit IRC12:31
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting12:32
*** crandquist has quit IRC12:33
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:36
*** acoles_away is now known as acoles12:37
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:37
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting12:41
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting12:41
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting12:42
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek12:45
*** hdd_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:46
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting12:46
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting12:54
*** oomichi has quit IRC12:54
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting12:56
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting12:57
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** doron_afk is now known as doron12:58
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting12:58
*** chuck__ has joined #openstack-meeting12:59
*** afazekas is now known as afazekas_mtg12:59
*** afazekas_mtg has quit IRC13:04
*** cfriesen__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:07
*** casanch1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting13:10
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC13:10
*** nacim has quit IRC13:11
*** changbl has quit IRC13:11
*** doron is now known as doron_afk13:11
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
*** bknudson has left #openstack-meeting13:16
*** afazekas_mtg has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** thedodd has quit IRC13:19
*** fnaval has quit IRC13:20
*** uaberme has joined #openstack-meeting13:21
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting13:21
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting13:22
*** ArxCruz has quit IRC13:24
*** bauzas has quit IRC13:25
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting13:25
*** b3nt_pin is now known as beagles13:26
*** ArxCruz has joined #openstack-meeting13:27
*** fnaval has quit IRC13:30
*** sandywalsh_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:32
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:32
*** markmcclain2 has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** markmcclain2 has quit IRC13:33
*** markmcclain has quit IRC13:33
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:34
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC13:36
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC13:37
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC13:38
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** rods1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** neelashah has quit IRC13:40
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting13:41
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting13:41
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting13:41
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting13:42
*** sld has quit IRC13:47
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting13:50
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-meeting13:50
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting13:50
*** edmund1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** nshaikh has quit IRC13:54
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC13:56
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** prad has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** ramishra has quit IRC13:58
*** elambert has quit IRC13:58
*** blamar has quit IRC13:58
mesteryHi14:00
sbalukoffHello!14:00
s3wonghello14:00
sballemorning14:00
rm_worko/14:00
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:00
dougwigmorning14:00
mestery#startmeeting neutron_lbaas14:00
openstackMeeting started Thu May 22 14:00:48 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mestery. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_lbaas)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_lbaas'14:00
mesteryDoes anyone know if blogan will be joining soon? A lot of the agenda came from him. :)14:01
*** TravT has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
dougwighe's probably hunting down caffeine.14:01
mestery#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Network/LBaaS#Meeting_22.05.2014 Agenda14:01
s3wongenikanorov not here?14:01
ptoohillHe should be jumping in here shortly14:01
ptoohillblogan that is14:01
rm_workenikanorov is on vacation still14:01
mesteryptoohill: dougwig: Thanks!14:01
mesteryYes, enikanorov is still on vacation this week.14:02
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
mesteryOK, lets get started here then while we wait for blogan to join.14:02
*** MaxV_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** sandywalsh_ has quit IRC14:02
*** hvprash has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
mestery#topic Updated Object Model Blueprint14:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Updated Object Model Blueprint (Meeting topic: neutron_lbaas)"14:03
*** avishayb has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
mestery#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89903/14:03
mesteryblogan has updated enikanorov's BP, I encourage everyone to review this.14:03
*** xgerman_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
mesteryGetting this reviewed and approved will be good to have done by early next week.14:03
mesteryThe changes should reflect the discussions we had last week in Atlanta as well, along with all the emails and documents shared over the past few months.14:04
mesteryI encourage folks to read that offline and discuss in the review itself.14:04
*** egallen has quit IRC14:04
sbalukoffOkeedokee14:05
*** TrevorV has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** blogan has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
mesteryblogan: Welcome!14:05
bloganmestery: thanks14:05
mesteryblogan: I just pointed folks to your spec.14:05
*** m-krishna has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting14:05
*** samuelbercovici has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
mesteryblogan: Encouraged discussion on the spec itself.14:05
*** devvesa has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
mesterysamuelbercovici: Howdy!14:06
mesteryFor those who just joined:14:06
mestery#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89903/14:06
bloganah great, yeah i'm sure i got some things wrong so please comment on it14:06
*** MaxV_ has quit IRC14:06
*** bbaby has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
sballeblogan, Is it totally up to date will at the latest changes?14:06
samuelbercovicihello eveyone...14:06
sballehi sam14:06
* mestery waves at samuelbercovici14:06
*** murphi has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
xgerman_hi14:07
samuelbercoviciwas the group photo published anywhere?14:07
* mestery waits for blogan to answer sballe.14:07
rm_workoh yeah! I wanted that :)14:07
*** venkatesh has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
bloganyou mean the 500 group photos?14:07
sballenot yet. Julian is working on it14:07
blogansballe: sorry, it is14:08
blogansballe: actually it does not contain the API changes, just the object model14:08
sballeblogan, thx. I will take a look and comment.14:08
blogansballe: I've left that to be done in another blueprint so this one can focus on getting the object model correct and making sure the existing API works with it14:08
mesteryblogan: +1 to that14:09
sballeblogan, 100% agree14:09
mesteryOK, should we move on to the next agenda item?14:09
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
blogansure since people will need tiem to look over that blueprint and comment14:09
mesteryAgreed blogan14:10
mestery#topic Creation Workflow with new API14:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Creation Workflow with new API (Meeting topic: neutron_lbaas)"14:10
sballebefore we do can we get commitement form at least one person from each company/group to review the bp?14:10
mestery#undo14:10
openstackRemoving item from minutes: <ircmeeting.items.Topic object at 0x3a1e4d0>14:10
mesterysballe: I think that's fair.14:10
samuelbercovicisballe: I will review next week14:10
sballeI would like to set a date and say after that date you have lost your vote14:10
sballeif you haven't reviewed14:11
sbalukoffI'll review early next week as well.14:11
dougwigi'll look this week.14:11
xgerman_me too14:11
sballeok so a deadline of May 29?14:11
mesterysballe: How about by next Thursday?14:11
sballeMay 28? +114:11
blogansballe: i think the core reviewers will need to look at it as well and be sure there aren't any major issues with it from their perspective14:11
rm_workwill enikanorov be back and able to review by then too?14:12
mestery#action LBaaS team to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/89903/ by May 28.14:12
mesteryblogan: Yes, that will happen in parallel.14:12
bloganmestery: ok great14:12
*** pablosan_ is now known as pablosan14:12
sballemestery, please add core reviewers to thta as well14:12
mesteryrm_work: I'll talk to him early next week to confirm.14:12
mesterysballe: Yes, I will do that.14:12
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
mesteryThe sooner people review, the faster blogan can iterate on this. :)14:12
sballemestery, blogan +114:13
*** varora has left #openstack-meeting14:13
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting14:13
mesteryOK, lets move on to the next topic then.14:13
*** pablosan has quit IRC14:13
sballeok14:13
crc32ok14:13
mestery#topic Creation Workflow with new API14:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Creation Workflow with new API (Meeting topic: neutron_lbaas)"14:13
mesteryPlease see the agenda, but blogan has proposed some changes here.14:13
*** pablosan has joined #openstack-meeting14:14
mesteryblogan: Can you explain to the group briefly?14:14
bloganwell its more of a discussion on this and it comes down to what is considered the root object14:14
bloganso in the new API I've always considered the root object to be the load balancer14:14
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC14:15
bloganbut I'm not sure if others think the root object should be created first, and with the new API I don't think it makes sense to have the load balancer created first, it should be created last14:15
sbalukoffI don't see why either order wouldn't be valid.14:15
samuelbercoviciwhy do we need an order?14:15
crc32no single call?14:15
samuelbercovicisbalukoff:+114:15
rm_workit comes down to what triggers actual provisioning, right?14:15
sbalukoffIn my mind, a user should be able to create the individual objects in whatever order they want.14:15
bloganwell maybe we don't but at the summit meeting, soemoen asked the order and no one could really answer it14:16
dougwigdifferent vendors may require different orders.  as long as the objects hang together at the end, what is the issue?14:16
sbalukoffcrc32: Single call should still happen through 'loadbalancer'14:16
rm_workcrc32: i think the plan is to do that as a second step, after we get the individual stuff working14:16
mesterySo the consensus appears to be order doesn't matter here, right?14:16
blogansingle call should happen in another blue print after this is locked down14:16
samuelbercovici+114:16
mesteryblogan: +114:16
rm_workso, if order doesn't matter, what triggers a "GO" for provisioning?14:17
dougwigit'd be safer to say that order matters to a given implementation, and it's not an interface/model question.14:17
samuelbercovicithe driver should decide when it has enough information to GO14:17
*** rolledback has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
sbalukoffrm_work: Once you have a loadbalancer and an associated listener, that's "GO"14:17
rm_workI had assumed it would be: create all sub-objects and link them up, and when you're ready, create the LB object14:17
rm_worksbalukoff: yeah, that makes sense14:17
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC14:17
samuelbercovicisbalukoff: that should be fine for now14:17
*** amalagon__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
samuelbercovicibut this is still a diver decision14:17
crc32ok but when some one says the loadbalancer is not creted first and if loadbalancer is root object then via implication single calls break.14:18
rm_workso then, you create the LB with no listener associated, then update it to link one when you're ready?14:18
bloganso is my understanding of other people's understanding of what a root object wrong here?14:18
rm_workcrc32: i'm not sure why that'd be the case14:18
xgerman_I like things to be explicit so the user gets an error message, e.g. no listener14:18
mesteryrm_work: That was blogan's first propsal in the agenda, yes.14:18
rm_workalright, i guess that works14:18
dougwigis the single create something new for juno?  because right now, you have to create a pool before associating a vip, e.g.14:18
sballexgerman_, +114:18
rm_workdougwig: yes14:19
mesterydougwig: yes14:19
*** caleb_ has quit IRC14:19
sbalukoffI'm not sure I like that:  You're essentially saying a loadbalancer must always have a listener associated with it.14:19
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
rm_worksbalukoff: which makes sense if it is created last always, but not otherwise <_<14:19
rm_workso yeah14:19
sbalukoffSo that having at least one listener is a non-optional attribute in the loadbalancer create call?14:19
dougwigis there a bp for the goal that we're trying to achieve here?14:20
crc32rm_work: A single call create would create a loadbalancer but others are saying a loadbalancer is not created first therefor the load balancer create is at least the second call or greater. Do you understand that?14:20
*** clev has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** jjmb has quit IRC14:20
rm_workcrc32: i see no hard technical reason that'd be the casse, no14:20
rm_work*case14:20
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting14:20
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC14:21
blogani would say leave the single call out of this right now and just talk about the granular calls14:21
mesterydougwig: We're starting with the object model BP referenced earlier. The team has generated lots of google docs over the past few months, I'd encourage catching up on the mailing list archives.14:21
ptoohillcrc32 I believe this is talks without the single call at this point14:21
rm_worksingle call could essentially create all sub-objects first in the background then create the LB with them attached, same as the singular workflow -- difference being, it is internal to the service so there is not multiple round-trips necessary :)14:21
bloganthe single call should be easy enough to accomplish14:21
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
*** xianghui has quit IRC14:21
mesteryblogan: +114:21
crc32yea I'll explain that "2" comes after 1 to adam later.14:22
rm_workwe're leaving it till later, yes -- but crc32 has a point in that if he was right, it would affect single-call design14:22
bloganso what are yall advocating?14:22
rm_workfortunately he's not right14:22
dougwigi'm guessing you have to send extra info to the api for the single call, which implies you'd also need to send extra info to the driver, at which point order becomes moot, doesn't it?  it's the driver's call how to order it.14:22
rm_workso it's fine14:22
rm_workdougwig: right14:23
sbalukoffI've yet to hear a reason why we shouldn't support a load balancer object existing independent of any associated listeners.14:23
rm_worksbalukoff: no real hard technical reason, correct14:23
mesteryI think we're all in violent agreement here. :)14:23
xgerman_+114:23
sbalukoffSo, if there's no technical reason, why enforce this restriction?  Let the driver decide when to schedule actually deployment of services.14:23
blogansbalukoff: there isn't other than the minor issue of when to actually provision the load balancer, but thats trivial to overcome14:23
sbalukoffHaha!14:24
rm_worksbalukoff: i agree, it's fine. +114:24
*** rhochmuth has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
xgerman_by making provisioning explicit you make it easier for the user to figure out what he missed14:24
*** afazekas_mtg has quit IRC14:24
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
xgerman_otherwise he creates stuff and wonders why no lb appears14:24
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
mesteryxgerman_: That's true, it's a user experience thing.14:24
bloganyeah i could see how a user would wonder why after creating a load balancer through the API, they don't actually have a load balancer14:25
samuelbercoviciif there was an implicit action on the lb named "provision"14:25
rm_workI mean, if i were doing a multi-call create, *I* would still do the LB last and explicitly link the listener there, definitely14:25
samuelbercovici?14:25
*** ashepelev has left #openstack-meeting14:25
rm_worksamuelbercovici: interesting, though I could see THAT breaking single-call :)14:25
rm_worksince it would be inconsistent then to provision instantly14:26
*** ashepelev has joined #openstack-meeting14:26
samuelbercovicirm_work: actualy single call would populate the database object in whatever order and do provision14:26
sbalukoffSo, the problem I have with creating the load balancer last (and enforcing this behavior) is because you will defintiely be following a different work flow when adding a second listener to an existing load balancer.14:26
rm_workright, but that'd be inconsistent, no?14:26
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting14:26
*** matrohon_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:26
mesteryOK, I'm wondering if we're wandering a bit here. The main focus was on creation order, and I think we've all agreed on that particular point, right?14:26
*** m-krishna has quit IRC14:27
xgerman_yep14:27
rm_workin the multi-call case, you would have a fully fleshed out LB and it would not be provisioned until you said to provision it, but with single call you'd have the same thing and it would auto-provision14:27
sbalukoffmestery: If "It doesn't matter" is the agreement, then I agree. :)14:27
sballemestery, please summarize what are in agremment on14:27
bloganmestery: as long as people are willing to accept that the user experience may not be as good as possible and allowing any order is fine, then we are all in agreement14:27
mesterysbalukoff: I was under the impression that was the agreement, but I may be confused.14:27
xgerman_+1 rm_work14:27
sballeblogan, Hey lets' stop here. The reason we are redoing the API etc is becasue of the user experience14:28
mesteryrm_work: If that's the main difference, I think it satisfies everyone's requirements here.14:28
sballeso I am not willing to say " to accept that the user experience may not be as good as possible "14:28
mesteryblogan sballe: Can you elaborate on the degregated user epxerience?14:29
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
samuelbercoviciif there is an explicit command to provision than you will get the most predicatable user experience14:29
blogansballe: i don't like that either, but is enforcing the load balancer creating last a better user experience?14:29
sbalukoffI prefer an implicit provisioning step, because I think this better reflects what will need to happen if certain objects are re-used.14:29
*** uaberme has quit IRC14:29
sbalukoffFor example, if I have a pool that's shared among 5 different listeners...14:29
sbalukoffAnd I update that pool.14:29
sbalukoffShould I, as a user, have to go and "provision" all the listeners afterward?14:30
bloganmestery: what german said before, in that the user may expect a load balancer if they only do the POST to the /loadbalancers resource, but the load balancer isn't actually there until they link up the listener14:30
rm_workah, true sbalukoff14:30
sbalukoffI think it should be implied that the listeners get updated when a pool they depend on gets updated.14:30
xgerman_and also we cam throw meaningful error messages14:30
xgerman_and not wait for an object the user might not know he has to create14:30
mesteryblogan xgerman_: That makes sense to me.14:31
bloganso in the neutron API, you can't create a subnet or port without first having a network right?14:31
bloganso in that case the network was created first, or am I wrong14:31
rm_workyeah, order mattering is not a new concept :P14:31
bloganim not even sure this analogy is relevant14:31
mesteryblogan: +114:32
rm_workblogan: that's what you are saying, right?14:32
bloganrm_work: yeah but I've also been under the opinion that load balancers API doesn't have to work like neutron's14:32
bloganor else we wouldn't be allowing a single create call14:33
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting14:33
*** jason__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:33
bloganso basically I'm on the fence on this one, I have no good alternative at this point14:33
blogananyone else have any other alternatives?14:33
mesteryLets try to do the right thing from a user experience thing with this API. sballe, what are your thoughts here?14:33
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC14:34
* sballe thinking14:34
dougwigit might be useful to consider this in the context of horizon/ui versus cli.  it's possible to do a single create/provision wizard with either scheme in a ui, and for the cli, i'm not sure either behavior is clearly more intuitive than the other.14:34
dougwig(i.e. the ui need not directly expose a 'provision' action.  or it could equally as easily fake one, if that was the preference.)14:35
crc32I say do it in  single api call but leave provision creation order with LB last internally.14:35
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
sballemestery, I agree with xgerman_  and blogan  that we definetly need t make sure we have meaningful Warnings and error messages when thngs aren't intiuitive14:35
*** rolledback has left #openstack-meeting14:35
ptoohillI thought it would make sense to be implicit here. So if the user creates all the other sub-objects but no loadbalancer object nothing would be provisioned to the back end. Then if the user attaches these objects to a load balancer the provisioning would happen. This doesnt mean to enforce this order because the user could potentially create only a pool and attach to a load balancer. I think validation should happen here to let them know that14:36
ptoohill other 'required' objects are needed before provisioning. Am i thinking about this wrong?14:36
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting14:36
*** noslzzp has quit IRC14:36
bloganptoohill: in that scenarios what happens when a user creates a load balancer first and nothing else?14:36
rm_workhmm that is a point i guess, if the Listener might not be fully populated when attached to the LB, if it tried to provision it would break14:36
ptoohillvalidation?14:37
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
mesteryblogan ptoohill: It would fail and generate an appropriate error back?14:37
ptoohillI would assume that would be the case14:37
rm_workyeah i assume so as well14:37
bloganmestery: that is one option, but I believe sbalukoff had objections to enforcing an order14:37
crc32blogan:  A fault message telling the user they have an empty loadbalancer is returned14:37
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
mesterysbalukoff: Opinions on this?14:38
*** jjmb has quit IRC14:38
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting14:38
*** bswartz has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
crc32blogan: Kinda of like what our(Rackspace CLB1.0) API does untill the nodeless loadbalancer feature cruft came out.14:39
sbalukoffI'm trying to understand any specific scenario that actually qualifies as a "partially populated" listener, or some other object layout which would be erroneous, and how this differs from just "incomplete"14:39
*** jjmb has quit IRC14:39
blogancrc32: oh i get how it would work, but that is enforcing a creation order14:39
sbalukoffI mean, a load balancer without a listener isn't something that makes sense.14:39
rm_workcrc32: technically it provisions a working LB according to backend spec :P14:39
sbalukoffBut a listener without a pool does make sense14:39
*** fabiog has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting14:40
crc32rm_work: Cruft the way I see it. Synactic sugar at best. :P14:40
sbalukoffSo, I guess I'm trying to understand what y'all are anticipating as a user's understanding of a layout if it's missing some necessary object to be functional.14:40
rm_workyeah, it's cruft… but it's technically correct, which is the best kind of correct14:40
rm_work^_^14:40
bloganso another question, it may be a dumb one, but if a load balancer is created last, and a load balancer can have many listeners, how do we specify that relationship on the load balancer call?14:40
rm_workanyway, that's off topic14:40
rm_worki assumed Listeners would be a list?14:41
rm_workor is that not how we wanted to represent it14:41
sballeblogan, Why would we not ask the user to create an "empty" LB first and then attach listeners, etc?14:41
crc32blogan: with a PUT?14:41
blogansballe: isn't creating an empty LB a bad user experience though?14:42
ptoohillnot really14:42
ptoohilli can see a use case i think14:42
rm_work"loadbalancer" { "listeners": [ a, b, c ]  }14:42
rm_workno?14:42
sballenot if we have the adequate warnings to tell them that more is needed14:42
rm_workerr,forgot a colon >_>14:42
crc32rm_work: Via a PUT right?14:42
rm_workPUT or POST14:42
samuelbercoviciblogan: you can specify a list of listener ids14:42
ptoohillIf the user wants to spin up just the load balancer object then build his pools, listeners etc then attach to the created load balancer as he goes, is this not acceptable?14:42
sbalukoffSo I guess, if you're after meaningful error messages, the whole explicit "provisioning" step doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. If a load balancer layout is incomplete it isn't in error, it's just incomplete.14:42
rm_workcould be like that in the original POST for the create of the LB, i don't see why noy14:43
rm_work*not14:43
blogansam, rm_work: i'm fine with that, I was just throwing that out there14:43
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
rm_workthough that then begs, on a PUT to the listeners object, does it do a replace? <_<14:43
*** ramishra_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:43
bloganrm_work: one thing at a time14:44
rm_workah actually sorry, would it be a PUT/DELETE to add/remove via /loadbalancers/<id>/listeners/14:44
rm_worklol yeah sorry, getting ahead of things a bit14:44
blogansbalukoff: if create a load balancer is left as the last step, and it is automatically provisioned on that step, would that be fine with you?14:44
*** phschwartz has left #openstack-meeting14:44
xgerman_or validated...14:44
sbalukoffblogan: No. Because, again, this is a work-flow that doesn't work if you're trying to add a second listener to an existing load balancer14:45
rm_workblogan: i think that's full circle to what he didn't like to begin with14:45
sbalukoffI want the user to be able to create a loadbalancer object that is not attached to any listener.14:45
blogansbalukoff: i think there will be a add listener call to existing load balancer14:45
crc32sbalukoff: I think we need to specify required attributes on our objects and call it an error if those attributes aren't defined in the POST call for the given object. That way we can be sure of what an Error is. Now the question is is a listener a required attribute or not.14:45
rm_workcrc32: +114:46
dougwigthat's implying an order, which i'm not sure is valid for all backends.  if you're doing it all in one go, then pass the entire LB/listener config in one go, and it should be up to the driver to figure out order and return meaningful errors (that's the naive user case, that would be surprised at an incomplete config).   if not, then it's just creating14:46
dougwigprimitives, and it's up to the user to create them all to hang together properly.  i'm not sure hand holding is as necessary in the second case.14:46
rm_workdougwig: also +114:46
sbalukoffdougwig: +114:46
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting14:46
mesteryOK, we have 14 minutes left.14:46
mesteryIs it possible to continue this discussion in the BP blogan has filed?14:46
sbalukoffcrc32: I would say that 'listener_ids' should not be a required attribute when creating a loadbalancer14:46
rm_workblogan / sballe: i think multi-call can be less polished, as it is designed for advanced users anyway? single-call is supposed to be the user-friendly one anyway <_<14:47
mesteryI wanted to cover at least one of the last two items on the agenda.14:47
mestery:)14:47
*** ramishra has quit IRC14:47
samuelbercoviciplease note that all calls are a-sync so many errors might be due to the provisioning process itslef14:47
sbalukoffmestery: Sure.14:47
sballerm_work, +114:47
bloganmestery: i think that discussion will belong in the second BP that actually implements the API, it might be better to do it on the ML for now until that BP gets put up14:47
mesteryblogan: Fair point, actually. And that brings up another point, we need someone to write the second BP covering the API as well.14:47
rm_workso i am willing to go with sbalukoff's option :P14:47
sballerm_work, please summarize that option14:48
*** andrew_plunk has joined #openstack-meeting14:48
rm_worksballe: we'll do it on the ML it looks like14:48
crc32dougwig: The public facing API should have required attributes and optional attributes. I think pushing that off to the driver is a bad idea.14:48
mesteryrm_work: MAybe a quick summary here?14:48
bloganmestery: obviously I or someone at rackspace can do it, but if someone wants to get in on the process by all means go for it14:48
mesteryThanks blogan!14:48
crc32or rather pushing off to the driver to define whats required or not is a bad idea.14:48
rm_workby sbalukoff's option, i just meant "order doesn't matter, and LB can be created by itself".14:49
mesteryrm_work: That's a good summary. :)14:49
samuelbercoviciwhich I also like14:49
sballerm_work, +1 I like sbalukoff option too ;-)14:49
dougwigcrc32: agreed.  it's just order that's problematic to hardcode, and that can be gotten around by thinking of it as two modes.14:49
mesteryYay! I think we're all in agreement on that one?14:49
rm_worksince what we really care about for "user experience" is single call, and it won't have these problems :)14:49
rm_workand will have it's own validation14:49
sballeagreed14:50
sbalukoffYep.14:50
*** oomichi has quit IRC14:50
bloganawesome we have consensus!14:50
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting14:50
mesteryOK, moving on for the last 10 minutes.14:50
dougwigwhich of the last two topics is more contentious?  (the statement that all we need to change in the driver is renaming vip is dead wrong, but i can take that to the bp review if we run out of time.)14:51
mesterydougwig: I think the last one, though the subnet_id one was also contentious.14:51
mesteryLEts take the subnet_id one to the BP maybe.14:51
blogandougwig: please do I didn't give a lot of thought to it so maybe it should go in the ML because I'm not sure when that 2nd BP will be up14:51
mesteryI think it makes sense for folks to comment there.14:51
*** tappel has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
dougwigthe subnet one took a lot of time at the summit.14:51
mesterydougwig: Yes. :)14:51
mesteryDo people want to flesh taht out here for 9 minutes?14:52
bloganmestery: the subnet_id location?14:52
mesteryblogan: Yes, per the agenda.14:52
sbalukoffsubnet_id should be an attribute of the member.  Done. ;)14:52
rm_worksummarizing options: subnet_id per poolMember, subnet_id per pool, subnet_id_list on LB?14:53
bloganwell to me I've come around on the idea that the subnet_id should be on the pool member, but I obviously am not set in stone on this14:53
mesterysbalukoff: :P14:53
crc32blogan: I'm on my way in now but I'm talking with sam about some SSL terminology when I get in too so we can work on the BP after that.14:53
rm_worki am for subnet_id on pool member14:53
blogancrc32: okay, unless someone else in this room not from rackspace wants to get in on the process14:53
samuelbercovicii am for subnet_id on lb14:53
crc32oh ok sorry.14:53
blogansamuelbercovici: do you have strong issues against it being on the pool member?14:54
crc32heading out now. ETA 20 minutes14:54
*** crc32 has quit IRC14:54
samuelbercoviciyes14:54
sbalukoffsamuelbercovici: I think your concerns about this have to do with the idea that when provisining an appliance in nova, there isn't a way to add a new neutron_port to it afterward, right?14:54
rm_workenumerate your issues?14:54
sbalukoffYes, sorry-- don't mean to put words in your mouth.14:54
samuelbercovicisbalukoff: not only this14:55
*** llu-laptop has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
rm_worksbalukoff: is that a limitation? I know there is a way to get around that in Rackspace's implementation, but i guess maybe not in stock Neutron/Nova?14:55
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
*** mberlin1 is now known as mberlin14:55
*** geekinutah has joined #openstack-meeting14:55
s3wongsbalukoff: I think we are definitely trying to fix that in ServiceVM14:55
samuelbercovicipool is a logical constructs of ser of memebers14:55
*** rudrarugge has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
sbalukoffs3wong: That's good to hear!14:56
samuelbercoviciso you should be able to specify memebrs that reside on deifferent subnets14:56
sballes3wong, any ETA for when this will be fixed?14:56
blogansamuelbercovici: puttin the subnet_id on the pool member allows this14:56
sbalukoffsamuelbercovici: True, but you can do this if subnet_id is an attribute of Member.14:56
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
rm_worki thought that was *specifically* why we wanted it on poolMembers :P14:57
samuelbercovicisbalukoff: correct but then you need to do this for all memebrs14:57
sbalukoffYes. Yes you do.14:57
sbalukoffWell...14:57
samuelbercovicithe canonical place is the lb14:57
sbalukoffOk, so actually no...14:57
rm_workso the objection is that if all members are on the same subnet, it is a lot of redundancy?14:57
s3wongsballe: well, TBH, us in ServiceVM team is still trying to come up with a list of requirements on what makes ServiceVM different from regular VM, and will file bps accordingly14:57
*** dkliban1 has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
sbalukoffMy thought was that you could have subnet_id be an optional attribute of the member.14:58
vivek-eb_members in different network is a important requirement for us at ebay too14:58
samuelbercovicialso if you use multiple pools for l7, there is redundency there14:58
sbalukoffHaving a specified subnet_id implies that the loadbalancer appliance needs layer-2 connectivity to that subnet to talk to the given member.14:58
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC14:58
sbalukoffWhich won't be the case if the member is routed.14:58
*** terryw has joined #openstack-meeting14:58
*** dkranz has quit IRC14:58
rm_worksbalukoff: though if it's optional, and we DO compile a list of subnets dynamically to use for the LB, and the user puts NO subnets… it might be non-intuitive that it doesn't work? dunno14:58
*** vivek-eb_ is now known as ebay14:58
*** ebay is now known as vivek14:59
mesteryOK, we have < 2 minutes left now.14:59
mesteryI propose we take this subnet discussion to the BP and/or ML.14:59
sbalukoffrm_work: No subnets specified means that all members are routed. :)14:59
rm_workyeah, probably ML14:59
mesteryThe focus this week is reviewing the BP from blogan.14:59
rm_worksbalukoff: theoretically :P but maybe not? :P14:59
sbalukoffYeah, ML makes sense14:59
mesteryLets all make sure we do that before the meeting next week.14:59
*** vivek is now known as Guest5427814:59
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
*** baoli has quit IRC14:59
xgerman_mestery +114:59
mesteryThanks for attending this week everyone!14:59
*** Fdot has quit IRC14:59
xgerman_thanks14:59
*** geekinutah has left #openstack-meeting14:59
s3wongthanks14:59
sballebye15:00
mesteryOne last thing: I should be sending out notes on the LBaaS mid-cycle today.15:00
sballeand thanks15:00
mesteryLook for that on the ML.15:00
mestery#endmeeting15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 22 15:00:12 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_lbaas/2014/neutron_lbaas.2014-05-22-14.00.html15:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_lbaas/2014/neutron_lbaas.2014-05-22-14.00.txt15:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_lbaas/2014/neutron_lbaas.2014-05-22-14.00.log.html15:00
samuelbercovicibye15:00
bloganthanks mestery!15:00
sbalukoffThanks!15:00
eglynn#startmeeting ceilometer15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu May 22 15:00:27 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is eglynn. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'ceilometer'15:00
jd__o/15:00
llu-laptopo/15:00
DinaBelovao/15:00
*** xgerman_ has left #openstack-meeting15:00
*** robbybb111 has joined #openstack-meeting15:00
nsajeo/15:00
devlapso/15:00
_nadya_o/15:00
rhochmutho/15:00
fabiogo/15:00
murphio/15:00
eglynnhey folks, welcome back to reality :)15:00
prado/15:00
ityaptino/15:00
*** pcm__ has left #openstack-meeting15:01
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** pcm__ has left #openstack-meeting15:01
*** bbaby has left #openstack-meeting15:01
*** gordc has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
silehto/15:01
gordco/15:01
deklano/15:01
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC15:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
eglynnI trust y'all are nearly over the jet-lag?15:01
eglynn... and the liver-damage ;)15:02
DinaBelovaeglynn, I guess so))15:02
*** jprovazn is now known as jprovazn_afk15:02
llu-laptopwake up 3am this morning15:02
nsajegetting there15:02
eglynnllu-laptop: I know the feeling :)15:02
eglynn#topic summit round-up and Juno planning15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "summit round-up and Juno planning (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"15:02
eglynnthanks folks for a very productive summit :)15:02
*** geekinutah has joined #openstack-meeting15:02
eglynnwhat was the general thought on the project pod idea - useful, or?15:02
*** idegtiarov has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
llu-laptopvery useful15:03
jd__yes15:03
nsajevery useful15:03
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
DinaBelovareally cool15:03
*** Guest54278 has quit IRC15:03
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC15:03
eglynnttx was asking all the projects if they wanted a pod again for Paris15:03
eglynnthat would be a yes?15:03
jd__yes sir15:03
fabiogyes15:03
silehtyes15:03
murphisometimes too noisy, but in general useful15:03
gordcyep15:03
murphi+15:03
DinaBelovadefinitely +115:03
llu-laptop+115:03
eglynnBTW if anyone has anything they haven't captured yet in the session etherpads15:03
pradvery useful15:04
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:04
eglynn#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Summit/Juno/Etherpads#Ceilometer15:04
*** otoolee has left #openstack-meeting15:04
eglynnprolly good idea to do so before the memory fades too much15:04
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
*** caleb_ has quit IRC15:04
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting15:04
eglynnso, cold light of day ... here's the Juno release schedule15:05
eglynn#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule15:05
*** markvan has quit IRC15:05
eglynnnote the 4-6-6 week cadence for the milestones15:05
eglynnjd__: was that the same last time?15:05
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
* dhellmann slides in late15:05
eglynni.e. the shorter lead-in to miletsone-1?15:05
eglynndhellmann: welcome :)15:06
murphieglynn: IIRC, then yes15:06
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
jd__eglynn: IIRC yes15:06
eglynncool, I guess icehouse had the complication of Winterval also15:06
*** zz_julien has left #openstack-meeting15:06
dhellmannyeah, I remember i1 being very very close to the summit, almost a "things you didn't finish for havana" milestone15:06
*** Macaveli has quit IRC15:06
jd__i1 was very short15:07
*** geekinutah has left #openstack-meeting15:07
jd__we basically merged nothing for i1 :)15:07
murphieglynn: there were only a few things fixed in the first milestone as the time was too short15:07
jd__+almost15:07
*** igor_ has quit IRC15:07
eglynnyeah j1 will be tight also15:07
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
DinaBelovaeglynn - https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Icehouse_Release_Schedule :)15:07
DinaBelovalooks pretty like current one)15:07
eglynnDinaBelova: thx!15:07
murphijd__: was it an opinion about i1? ;)15:07
eglynncopy'n'paste :)15:07
fabiogeglynn: is there a API changes freeze or it is part of the Feature freeze?15:07
*** igor has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC15:07
*** venkatesh has quit IRC15:07
eglynnfabiog: let's talk about freezes in a sec (in relation to j3)15:08
*** devvesa has quit IRC15:08
eglynnfirst, I was hoping we could coalesce behind a couple of themes for j1 ...15:08
eglynn1. front-loading some progress on the TC mandated gap-closing actions15:08
eglynn#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ceilometer-integration-gap-analysis-coverage-plan15:08
eglynnnot much choice there, we gotta do it15:09
eglynnthen also ...15:09
*** Fdot has quit IRC15:09
eglynn2. subset of the team working in parallel on paying down the "architectural debt"15:09
eglynngnocchi is the silver bullet! :)15:09
eglynnthoughts?15:09
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting15:09
*** jmh has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** jmh is now known as Guest8616115:10
*** nealph has quit IRC15:10
*** dripton_ is now known as dripton15:10
_nadya_what is the plan about gnocchi? poc?15:10
murphieglynn: the doc part did not seem to be that bad according to the docco session on the summit, at least one easy point on the list15:10
*** hemna_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting15:10
_nadya_I mean estimates15:10
DinaBelovawell as for the TC reqs - #1 on review now, #2 - will be done as discussed on summit, #3 blocked :( #4 - connected with the #3 (in some way), #5 - ?15:10
gordceglynn: sounds good. i have a patch up that should hopefully get sqlbackend working with multi workers. if it works we can get back to tempest tests.15:10
eglynngordc: excellent15:11
DinaBelovagordc, eglynn and use testing plan from the etherpad)))15:11
eglynnDinaBelova: cdent (welcome!) a new contributor from Red Hat will be working on #515:11
lsmolao/15:11
eglynn_nadya_: do you mean timelines etc.?15:11
* cdent waves15:11
DinaBelovaeglynn, oh, cool15:11
DinaBelovacdent, o/15:11
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
_nadya_eglynn: yep. What do we want to have in j release?15:12
*** igor has quit IRC15:12
_nadya_eglynn: POC or some finished part that works?15:12
*** mrodden has quit IRC15:12
*** terriyu has quit IRC15:12
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC15:12
murphi_nady_: everything that fits, so most probably the migration for instance will not be supported by the end of this cycle15:12
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting15:12
eglynn_nadya_: yes I hoping it'll be in J, at least usable for *new* deployments15:12
silehtDinaBelova, eglynn #5 base code for ceilometer/grenade-> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94468/15:12
DinaBelova_nadya_, I guess we'll have v3 api (not stable, probably, not default one - but still) - already tested at least on some of the labs15:13
eglynn_nadya_: i.e. where migration isn't an issue15:13
_nadya_hmm, great plans :)15:13
DinaBelova_nadya_, heh, yep15:13
eglynnsileht: excellent!15:13
jd__re15:13
*** TrevorV has left #openstack-meeting15:14
*** andrew_plunk has quit IRC15:14
_nadya_and what the status of tempest+Mongo? does anyone know?15:14
murphi_nadya_: we have big dreams and then we will see ;)15:14
jd__(sorry I got interrupted by a phone call, reading backlog)15:14
_nadya_I mean status on Mongo 2.4 on gating15:14
*** mestery has quit IRC15:14
*** andrew_plunk has joined #openstack-meeting15:15
eglynn_nadya_: I spoke to sdague about enabling f20 gating15:15
*** tappel has quit IRC15:15
eglynn_nadya_: he's hopeful it'll be available soon15:15
*** hvprash has quit IRC15:15
DinaBelovaeglynn, did he say about some estimations?15:15
eglynn_nadya_: according to jogo at summit tho', the trusty switchover will be slower than planned15:15
jd__eglynn: gnocchi is getting good progress on a daily basis for now, I think by next week somebody could start taking a look at how to integrate it with ceilometer data publisher15:15
jd__we need to work on a lot of detail, but the basics are there now15:16
eglynnDinaBelova: ... no, but he reckoned he was almost ready to +2 ianw's patch to enable the f20 in the nodepool15:16
DinaBelovajd__, I think I may take a look there)15:16
_nadya_eglynn: ok, I see15:16
llu-laptopjd__: great15:16
murphijd__: cool, that sound really good :)15:16
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
eglynnDinaBelova: ... he's got a workaround for the image redundancy issue that'll allow non-voting jobs to run on f20 initially15:16
eglynnDinaBelova: ... even tho' the image isn't available yet in both CI clouds, so non-redundant15:17
eglynnjd__: excellent!15:17
*** egallen has quit IRC15:17
*** nealph has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
DinaBelovasileht - did you decide what you'll work on speaking about apiv315:18
DinaBelova?15:18
eglynnjd__: what do you thing of the goal being: gnocchi usuable in prod for j3, but only for new deploys (i.e. no migration support)15:18
jd__eglynn: sounds good to me15:18
silehtDinaBelova, not yet15:19
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:19
*** tomoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
_nadya_jd__: is gnocchi under development?15:19
_nadya_jd__: is it used somewhere :)?15:19
eglynn#info over-arching series goal: gnocchi usuable in prod for j3, but only for new deploys (i.e. no migration support)15:19
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
jd___nadya_: it's under development, not used yet15:19
eglynn_nadya_: still in prototype form15:19
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:20
eglynnat summit we spoke about a 2nd focussed weekly meeting concentrating on gnocchi15:20
DinaBelovaeglynn, jd__ - great plans, but I guess it might be difficult a little bit))) I mean production ready ceilo deployment))) so more performance testing will be need here anyway, I guess)))15:20
DinaBelovaand some benchmarking))15:20
llu-laptopjd__: so the j3 gnocchi will still based on swift?15:20
jd__any help appreciated as the project is becoming big enough to not step on each others foot/feet15:20
jd__DinaBelova: you need to believe!15:20
eglynnjd__, DinaBelova, sileht: would a 2nd weekly make sense, d'ye think?15:20
DinaBelovajd__ :D:D:D15:21
DinaBelovayes, sir!15:21
silehteglynn, ok15:21
eglynnDinaBelova: drink the koolaid, pronto!15:21
DinaBelova:D15:21
jd__second meeting or recurring topic in this meeting is good ot me15:21
DinaBelovaeglynn, jd__ - yes, +1 to separated meeting for this15:21
eglynncool, I'm happy to go with either15:21
jd__I'd say let's start in this meeting and if we need more time, split it?15:22
eglynnjd__: cool enough, lets go with that15:22
cdentjd__++15:22
murphido we need all the meeting topics on this meeting?15:22
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:22
murphijd__: +115:22
cdentIt's something that we probably all wanna know about.15:22
eglynnmurphi: yeah I think we can drop ceilo client as a recurring topic15:22
eglynncdent: +115:23
murphieglynn: yes, and also we can talk about tempest, when we really have something to talk about in that topic15:23
eglynnmurphi: yep, agree15:23
eglynnmurphi: we do today (I think)15:23
DinaBelovamurphi ++15:23
eglynnone other thing on gnocchi ...15:23
silehteglynn, for #4, APIv1 is already dropped, and the gordc patch seems almost finished, I have a great hope to have ceilometer working correctly in gate very soon.15:24
eglynnamalagon__ (welcome!) has started as the OPW intern this week15:24
eglynnsileht: excellent! :) \o/15:24
amalagon__hi all!15:24
DinaBelovasileht, gordc - when we'll have sql backend completely cleaned up it might work, yes)15:24
murphiamalagon__: welcome :)15:25
llu-laptopamalagon__: welcome15:25
jd__"Ceilometer: a new hope" http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2013/057/3/8/star_wars_iv___a_new_hope___movie_poster_by_nei1b-d5t3cw9.jpg thanks sileht :D15:25
eglynnAna will first be re-imaginging how the period-spanning-stats BP intended for v2 will map onto the brave new world of gnocchi15:25
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting15:25
* gordc never seen star wars.15:25
jd__hey amalagon__15:25
silehtahah15:25
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:25
eglynnwho gonna be Luke? ;)15:25
DinaBelovaamalagon__, o/15:25
jd__oh… #topic Removing gordc from ceilometer-core15:25
gordclol15:25
DinaBelovagordc 0_015:25
murphijd__: and now everyone should pick a character? :)15:25
*** jjmb1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
DinaBelovafolks, let's move on)))15:26
*** asselin2 has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
murphigordc: REALLY? :)15:26
DinaBelovatoo many things to discuss)))15:26
*** jjmb1 has quit IRC15:26
jd__cool, who's gonna be Chewbacca?15:26
eglynnjd__: me, Me, ME!15:26
*** asselin2 has quit IRC15:26
jd__:D15:26
gordcmurphi: it's on my list... maybe next year...15:27
eglynnjust one last thing on the Juno schedule ...15:27
murphieglynn: well, you have enough hair already ;)15:27
eglynn... well, one other bit of new-ness that I wanted to run by you guys15:27
eglynnmurphi: LOL :)15:27
*** markmcclain has quit IRC15:27
murphigordc: okok, no offence, I just asked :)15:27
*** zns has quit IRC15:27
eglynnfollowing the nova lead, more & more projects are aiming to follow the FPF this time round15:27
eglynnhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/FeatureProposalFreeze15:27
gordcmurphi: :)15:28
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
eglynn... i.e. a deadline for (non-final) patch proposal circa 2 weeks before j315:28
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
eglynnit just recognizes the reality that shepharding a major feature patch through gerrit cannot be done the day before milestone is cut15:28
* eglynn took several cycles to learn that lesson ;)15:29
dhellmannthat deadline means if we haven't even seen a patch for a feature by then, it won't be accepted, right?15:29
murphieglynn: I guess it can be useful for us, at least there is no last hours patches anymore15:29
eglynndhellmann: exactly15:29
DinaBelovaeglynn, well, it's logical15:29
gordceglynn: works for me. i thought we were already doing that but good to have it in writing.15:29
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:29
llu-laptopmurphi: agreed15:30
DinaBelovadhellmann - well, as for the changes on review - they'll be continued to be viewed15:30
DinaBelova?15:30
*** tteggel has quit IRC15:30
DinaBelovaeglynn?15:30
dhellmannDinaBelova: yes, that's right15:30
eglynnso I gotta put my hand up, I was the worst offender for last-minute proposals in previous cycles15:30
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
DinaBelovaok, cool15:30
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:30
murphigordc: eglynn has never ever followed this unwritten rule :)15:30
dhellmannso you have to at least submit a patch by the proposal deadline, and it as to land by feature freeze15:30
gordcmurphi: lol no comment.15:30
DinaBelovadhellmann, cool, thanks15:30
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
eglynndhellmann: exactly!15:30
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:31
dhellmannI like having the separate earlier deadline, since it spreads out the review load and helps us focus near the end of a cycle15:31
DinaBelovaeglynn, dhellmann - just to be sure :)15:31
eglynnDinaBelova: I missed your question15:31
murphimy vote is on doing this, it worth a try at least15:31
_nadya_looks good... but we should grow up to follow this rule:)15:31
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting15:31
DinaBelovaeglynn, np)15:31
*** jjmb has quit IRC15:31
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC15:31
DinaBelova_nadya_, hehe :) we'll try to)15:31
eglynncool sounds like a rough consensus15:31
DinaBelova+115:31
fabiog+115:31
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC15:31
eglynnk, let's do it!15:32
eglynnanything else on Juno schedule?15:32
murphi_nadya_: we only need a kindergarden teacher, a tough one ;)15:32
*** samuelbercovici has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
_nadya_what about events?15:32
*** chuck__ has quit IRC15:32
*** igor_ has quit IRC15:32
eglynn_nadya_: the events API?15:32
DinaBelova_nadya_ - it was decided during one of the pod sessions to impl it not only for the sql - so change for the hbase looks really consistent)15:33
_nadya_eglynn: are we gonna proceed to support it?15:33
*** tteggel has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
*** s3wong has quit IRC15:33
eglynn_nadya_: I'm hoping to talk to mdragon and sandy some more about that15:33
eglynn_nadya_: ... I'll report back, hopefully next week15:33
*** AntL has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
_nadya_eglynn: ok, it's interesting15:33
DinaBelovaeglynn - as far as I remember during tdaas discussion it was an idea to continue this idea15:34
murphi_nadya_: the plan is to keep it on board, so I'm really hoping15:34
DinaBelovaprobably in some of the etherpads we may found it15:34
eglynnDinaBelova: yeah we're gonna need it to reconstruct the resource state timeline15:34
_nadya_eglynn: is there any intersections with gnocchi?15:34
*** cmart has joined #openstack-meeting15:34
eglynn_nadya_: gnocchi kinda assumes the persistence of events15:34
eglynn_nadya_: as the resource metadata is no longer snap-shotted15:35
*** deklan is now known as ddieterly15:35
*** matiu has quit IRC15:35
eglynn_nadya_: (for every sample)15:35
jd__clearly we need workforce in this area at some point15:35
*** ominakov has quit IRC15:35
jd__I don't think I will be able to help for this cycle15:35
jd__so if nobody steps in, it will stay as it is for this cycle…15:35
_nadya_eglynn: ok, I just wanted to know, how much we need to rework Event model to work with gnocchi15:35
jd___nadya_: we don't15:36
*** rbak has quit IRC15:36
eglynnjd__: yep I agree, but won't hurt to reach out and explain the new relevance of events15:36
*** jecarey has quit IRC15:36
DinaBelovajd__, well, during next 2-3 weeks it'll be really clear who and what will be doing15:36
jd__eglynn: oh sure15:36
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting15:36
jd__DinaBelova: I hope so :)15:36
DinaBelovajd__ - after the summit there are a lot of different things to coordinate usually15:36
DinaBelovait'll be better soon)15:36
DinaBelovaso possibly there will be free people for this)15:37
eglynnDinaBelova: yep, I'll have a list of uncovered areas by next week15:37
*** blogan has left #openstack-meeting15:38
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
eglynn"uncovered" == "without an explicit owner who has bandwidth available"15:38
murphiI think that we should also keep some focus, and track the status of the other areas to still see the big picture15:38
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
*** uberj_ is now known as uberj15:38
*** stevemar has quit IRC15:38
DinaBelovaeglynn, sure)15:38
eglynnbetter move on, time is a-ticking!15:39
murphieglynn: what about moving to the next topic?15:39
eglynn#topic new BP review process15:39
*** openstack changes topic to "new BP review process (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"15:39
murphieglynn: :)15:39
eglynnthe telemtry-specs repo has landed :)15:39
eglynn*telemetry15:39
murphieglynn: \o/ :)15:39
eglynnhttps://github.com/openstack/telemetry-specs15:39
eglynninfra guys wanted {program}-specs as opposed to {project}-specs15:39
*** igor__ has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
eglynnhat-tip to jd__ for cleaning up after eglynn's sloppiness15:40
llu-laptopeglynn: so they will rename the nova-specs?15:40
eglynnllu-laptop: eventually yes15:40
jd__:)15:40
eglynnllu-laptop: long, long debate about this in the project/release status meeting on Tuesday15:40
murphieglynn: until we have one repo for the specs, I do not think that the naming is that important...15:40
eglynnllu-laptop: ... went to a vote in the end15:40
eglynnmurphi: the issue was where a single program maps onto multiple projects15:41
eglynnmurphi: ... as in the tripleo case in particular15:41
gordceglynn: we decide how we want to handle all existing bps? anything not started, should be rewritten for telemetry-specs?15:41
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk15:41
eglynngordc: my thought exactly!15:42
DinaBelovagordc, I really think it's a good idea!15:42
murphieglynn: sure, I just wanted t say that I like Telemetry as much as Ceilometer :)15:42
gordceglynn: DinaBelova: cool cool. makes sense to me.15:42
eglynnso quick overview of the proposed workflow ...15:42
murphigordc: not started and/or not approved I guess15:42
*** terriyu has quit IRC15:42
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:42
DinaBelovaeven more - there are some started ones (as you remember my black list :) ) - without real activity - I guess the same process might be used there15:42
eglynn1. propose a detail spec first on gerrit, based on https://github.com/openstack/telemetry-specs/blob/master/specs/template.rst15:43
DinaBelovamurphi +115:43
*** igor_ has quit IRC15:43
eglynn2. discussion leads to rough consensus with core team, avoid nitpicking and bikeshedding if poss ;)15:43
llu-laptopeglynn: should first step be register it in launchpad, for tracking?15:44
eglynn3. if not pre-existing, a launchpad BP is filed by PTL with spec URL linked to telemetry-specs repo15:44
eglynni.e. http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/telemetry-specs/tree/specs/juno/my-awesome-idea.rst15:44
*** igor__ has quit IRC15:44
eglynnllu-laptop: well part of the idea is to stop the accumulation of unapproved/unworked-on BPs on launchpad15:44
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting15:45
_nadya_sounds awesome15:45
murphieglynn: can LP be automatically updated from gerrit?15:45
*** zhikunliu has quit IRC15:45
eglynnllu-laptop: ... so ttx suggest punting automatically on any *new* BP that hasn't gone thru' specs review first15:45
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting15:45
murphieglynn: it was just a question, I totally agree with _nadya_ :)15:45
eglynnmurphi: yep jd__ suggested such automation on the channel earlier15:46
*** dkehnx has quit IRC15:46
DinaBelovaeglynn - i guess special job will be cool for the automatical generation of the bp15:46
*** AntL has quit IRC15:46
* eglynn doesn't know enough about the LP REST API, but sounds plausible15:46
DinaBelovaanyway, core team will need to go and approve it15:46
murphieglynn: ok, cool, I'm not the only lazy developer around :)15:46
DinaBelovaas only you folks have rights to do it on lp)15:46
*** belmoreira has quit IRC15:46
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz15:47
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** vkmc has quit IRC15:47
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
eglynnDinaBelova: core team for spec review doesn't necessarily have to equate to core on core reviews15:47
eglynnDinaBelova: ... we've just done it that way15:48
*** paragan has quit IRC15:48
eglynnDinaBelova: ... but nova have different teams15:48
DinaBelovaeglynn - nah, sorry - drivers group on the lp15:48
*** AntL has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
eglynnDinaBelova: nova-drivers is a rough subset of nova-core IIRC15:48
DinaBelovaeglynn, yes, for sure15:48
DinaBelovaI simply think that if it should be done in the most useful way) if you folks think about two people, for instance, for lp housekeeping, it's ok)))15:49
eglynnDinaBelova: ... we could change that if folks think its a good idea for slightly groups, but simpler I think to keep it the same15:49
DinaBelovaif no - well, it's also ok)15:49
DinaBelovaeglynn, ++15:49
pradeglynn: if we already have a bp we discussed at the summit session and started working on the implementation, we still have to refile the specs i guess?15:49
DinaBelovaas well - we don't have so many people now)15:49
eglynnDinaBelova: slightly groups? I mean differing groups15:49
murphitwo people are not enough in the opensource world I think15:50
eglynnprad: yep15:50
DinaBelovaeglynn - sorry, auto dictionary15:50
DinaBelovait was smth else15:50
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
DinaBelova"several" i guess15:50
DinaBelovawith typos15:50
eglynnDinaBelova: ... "slightly groups" was my typo, dunno what I was thinking15:51
eglynnanyhoo15:51
DinaBelovaheh, I though it was mine)15:51
murphialso, if we have a clear process, then the only thing to do is to follow it and I think the specs repo is a really good start in that way15:51
eglynnone last point as discussed with jd__ earlier on the channel15:51
eglynn... let's not make this into the governance repo15:51
eglynn... i.e. lots of nitpicking on language, word-smithing etc.15:52
llu-laptopeglynn: agreed, as a non-native speaker15:52
DinaBelovaeglynn - I guess typos fixing will be the only thing there15:52
eglynn... so in general I'd like to see spelling errors etc. not be a -1 issue in specs reviews, unless it really obscures the meaning15:52
*** tmcpeak has joined #openstack-meeting15:52
*** cvbock has joined #openstack-meeting15:52
eglynn... let's just concentrate on the idea/concept/design etc.15:53
*** tmcpeak has quit IRC15:53
gordceglynn: +115:53
fabiogeglynn +1, we can just review with 0 and comment where the typo/fixes should be15:53
cdentyou happy for corrections alongside +1 reviews?15:53
murphieglynn: I agree, the only case when the language can be commented, if that sentence/paragraph is not understandable15:53
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
eglynncdent, fabiog: yep absolutely to both15:54
eglynnmurphi: agree when the meaning is really obscured15:54
DinaBelovaeglynn, fabiog well - I possibly it might be a good idea to add new patch set with typos fixing by the reviewer - without any additional meaning, etc...15:54
DinaBelovaas this it minor thing15:54
DinaBelovabut possibly needed to be fixed15:54
* eglynn can't spell, or puncuate, so has a vested interest ;)15:54
DinaBelovaeglynn - as ironic folks do sometimes)15:54
murphieglynn: if the spell checking gate job will work out, than no more typo problems ;)15:54
eglynnDinaBelova: agree, if a new patchset is gonna be needed anyway fix, otherwise not a blocker15:55
pradeglynn: is there a dependency on getting the spec approved before pushing code for review? as in if i already have some code i want to start getting eyes on?15:55
eglynnprad: WIP patches *always* welcome15:55
pradcool15:55
eglynnprad: in fact a really good practice to get early eyes if poss ... IMO15:55
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting15:55
murphiprad: I think it would not worth pushing 1000 lines of code before getting approval for the base idea15:55
pradeglynn: agreed15:55
*** dkehn_ is now known as dkehnx15:55
eglynnup against the shot here, better move on15:55
*** mestery has quit IRC15:56
eglynn#topic coresec cleanup15:56
*** openstack changes topic to "coresec cleanup (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"15:56
eglynnanyone object to me cleaning up ... https://launchpad.net/~ceilometer-coresec/+members#active15:56
pradmurphi: hehe sure, i meant ideas we already discussed at the summit sessions and got some nods15:56
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting15:56
murphiprad, but if you have something that already works or the base idea is not something you expect to be rejected, then go for a WIP patch15:56
*** hdd_ has quit IRC15:56
eglynna few old names there15:56
DinaBelovaeglynn, heh)15:56
murphiprad: a-ha, ok I thought you aks it in general, that one should be ok15:57
DinaBelovaeglynn you need to be admin here too))15:57
gordcinteresting... jd__ already called for my removal earlier.. :)15:57
eglynncore-coresec should equate to ceilo-core?15:57
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
llu-laptopeglynn: oops, never be aware of this group15:57
DinaBelovaeglynn - well - it's usually so if core-team is all active enough15:57
*** gduan has quit IRC15:57
_nadya_llu-laptop: +115:57
DinaBelovaif no there are two variants15:57
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:57
eglynnDinaBelova: ... k, lets go with that so15:57
murphillu-laptop: +115:58
DinaBelova1/ remove inactive people from the core-reviewers15:58
eglynnllu-laptop: ... for interaction with the vulnerability mgmt ninjas15:58
DinaBelova2/ remove them at least from the lp15:58
*** jpeeler has quit IRC15:58
DinaBelovaeglynn - both variants are popular afair :)15:58
eglynnDinaBelova: cool15:59
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
eglynnone minute left15:59
eglynn#topic tempest15:59
*** openstack changes topic to "tempest (Meeting topic: ceilometer)"15:59
*** caleb_ has quit IRC15:59
eglynn_nadya_: any news?15:59
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
_nadya_no major updates, only summit-news15:59
DinaBelovaeglynn, _nadya_ - as I remember we still have pack of good changes and we're blocked)15:59
DinaBelovawe'll see what we'll be sooner16:00
DinaBelovaworking sql16:00
DinaBelovaor new nodes)16:00
*** evgenyf has quit IRC16:00
_nadya_gordc: one quick question16:00
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
gordcDinaBelova: _nadya_: give https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94483/ a try... it should help16:00
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
DinaBelovagordc - for sure!16:00
*** bknudson has quit IRC16:00
_nadya_gordc: ok, so we need several collectors, right?16:00
*** pberis has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
*** hashar has quit IRC16:01
gordc_nadya_: for sql probably. haven't verified how much faster it is yet.16:01
_nadya_gordc: in this case we need to change default parameter on gating16:01
DinaBelova_nadya_, gordc - I may try to test it using tempest ;-\16:01
gordc_nadya_: want to continue conversation in openstack-ceilometer?16:01
*** vjay has quit IRC16:01
DinaBelovathis change16:01
gordcout of time here.16:01
DinaBelovayes, let's finish16:01
DinaBelovaeglynn?16:01
*** garyduan has quit IRC16:02
_nadya_gordc: I will ping you16:02
eglynnyep we're outta time16:02
eglynnlet's continue on the channel16:02
eglynnthanks as always for a very productive meeting16:02
eglynn#endmeeting ceilometer16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:02
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 22 16:02:37 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:02
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2014/ceilometer.2014-05-22-15.00.html16:02
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2014/ceilometer.2014-05-22-15.00.txt16:02
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ceilometer/2014/ceilometer.2014-05-22-15.00.log.html16:02
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
*** jpeeler has quit IRC16:02
*** jpeeler has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
*** gordc has left #openstack-meeting16:03
*** amalagon__ has quit IRC16:03
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC16:03
*** murphi is now known as ildikov16:04
*** llu-laptop has left #openstack-meeting16:04
*** otoolee has joined #openstack-meeting16:04
*** otoolee has left #openstack-meeting16:04
*** fnaval has quit IRC16:04
*** sushils has quit IRC16:05
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
*** jecarey has quit IRC16:05
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting16:06
*** fabiog has quit IRC16:07
*** ddieterly has quit IRC16:07
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** baoli has quit IRC16:08
*** ArthurBerezin has quit IRC16:08
*** ramishra_ has quit IRC16:08
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** idegtiarov has quit IRC16:10
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:10
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
*** jgallard has quit IRC16:10
*** cmart has quit IRC16:11
*** I159 has quit IRC16:11
*** I159_ has quit IRC16:11
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting16:12
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:12
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** matrohon_ has quit IRC16:13
*** robbybb111 has left #openstack-meeting16:13
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** rhochmuth has quit IRC16:13
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting16:14
*** zns has quit IRC16:14
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting16:15
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek16:16
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** dkehnx has quit IRC16:16
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** dkehn_ is now known as dkehnx16:16
*** avishayb has quit IRC16:17
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting16:17
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
*** zns has quit IRC16:20
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting16:21
*** tango|2 has quit IRC16:22
*** afazekas has quit IRC16:22
*** hemna_ has quit IRC16:23
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:24
*** henrynash has quit IRC16:25
*** AntL has quit IRC16:25
*** SridharG has quit IRC16:25
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC16:26
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting16:27
*** mestery has quit IRC16:27
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC16:28
*** edmund1 has quit IRC16:29
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting16:29
*** ndipanov has quit IRC16:29
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** ddieterly has quit IRC16:30
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC16:31
*** fnaval has quit IRC16:33
*** elambert has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting16:35
*** bauzas has quit IRC16:37
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting16:38
*** zns has quit IRC16:38
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** nacim has quit IRC16:39
*** edmund has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-meeting16:39
*** blamar has quit IRC16:40
*** igor__ has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** doron_afk has quit IRC16:42
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC16:43
*** arnaud has quit IRC16:43
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting16:43
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** gduan has quit IRC16:44
*** rudrarugge has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** mestery has quit IRC16:45
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:45
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap16:45
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting16:45
*** igor__ has quit IRC16:45
*** Macaveli has quit IRC16:45
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC16:46
*** ildikov has quit IRC16:46
*** esker has quit IRC16:46
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** safchain has quit IRC16:48
*** hdd has joined #openstack-meeting16:49
*** zns has quit IRC16:50
*** ddieterly has quit IRC16:50
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting16:50
*** garyduan has quit IRC16:50
*** manisht has left #openstack-meeting16:51
*** luqas has quit IRC16:51
*** esker has quit IRC16:51
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz16:53
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja_16:54
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:54
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC16:54
*** markmcclain1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:54
*** varora has joined #openstack-meeting16:55
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** ylobankov has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** giulivo has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:57
*** ddieterly has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** sarob has quit IRC16:57
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting16:58
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:59
*** rudrarug_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:59
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek17:00
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC17:01
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
mtreinish#startmeeting qa17:01
openstackMeeting started Thu May 22 17:01:49 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mtreinish. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: qa)"17:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'qa'17:01
mtreinishhi, who's here today?17:02
mkodererHi17:02
giulivohi17:02
andreafhi17:02
ylobankovhi17:02
mtreinish#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/QATeamMeeting#Proposed_Agenda_for_May_22_2014_.281700_UTC.2917:02
*** AntL has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
mtreinish^^^ Today's agenda17:02
*** sarob has quit IRC17:02
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-meeting17:02
mtreinishit's a pretty light one this week17:02
*** sarob_ has quit IRC17:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
mtreinishok, lets get started17:03
mtreinish#topic Blueprint Purge (mtreinish)17:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprint Purge (mtreinish) (Meeting topic: qa)"17:04
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:04
*** baoli has quit IRC17:04
mtreinishSo I put this on the agenda just to let everyone know that after next weeks meeting I'm going to purge the bps without a spec at least proposed17:04
mtreinishI'm going to send a note to the list too17:04
*** pablosan has quit IRC17:05
*** vjay has quit IRC17:05
mkodererall right.. I need to write some spec's then17:05
mtreinishbut we've got a lot of bps listed on lp but very few specs proposed right now17:05
mkoderer;)17:05
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC17:05
*** caleb_ has quit IRC17:05
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
mtreinishmkoderer: do you have a bp without a spec?17:05
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
mkoderermtreinish: dkranz has one about porting negative tests17:05
rockygspecs are not code, so they're hard for developers ;-)17:05
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
*** rudrarug_ has quit IRC17:06
mkodererI will add some specs next week17:06
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:06
mtreinishrockyg: it's more about cleaning up dead bps from the list17:06
andreafmtreinish: for the purge do you care about the status of the bp in lp as well, or the spec only?17:06
mtreinishit's just a filter, there is nothing stopping someone from coming back and restoring it with a spec later17:06
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** derekh_ is now known as derekh_afk17:06
rockygAgreed.  I've got a BP that I'll abandon, even thought it's really needed.  The docs.  I can write the spec if you ever think someone will pick it up.17:07
mtreinishandreaf: it's everything that currently with an undefined priority17:07
mtreinishwithout a spec in review17:07
*** eglynn has quit IRC17:07
mtreinishandreaf: I think all of yours have specs already :)17:07
*** jlibosva has quit IRC17:08
*** pablosan has joined #openstack-meeting17:08
mtreinish#action mtreinish to send a email to list about bp cleanup17:08
mtreinishok does anyone have anything else they'd like to talk about on this topic?17:09
*** baoli has quit IRC17:09
mtreinishok, then let's move on to the next topic17:09
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC17:10
mtreinish#topic Specs Review17:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs Review (Meeting topic: qa)"17:10
mtreinishdoes anyone have an open specs reviews they'd like to bring up17:10
mtreinishor to discuss in more depth17:10
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
andreafmtreinish: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94741/17:10
andreafmtreinish: not to discuss I think, it just needs review17:11
*** jcoufal has quit IRC17:11
andreafmtreinish: it's the ssh-auth-strategy afazekas has been working on17:11
mkodererandreaf: I promise to do it tomorrow :)17:11
mtreinishandreaf: ok, cool thanks. I'll try to take a look at it soon.17:12
andreafmkoderer: thanks17:12
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
andreafmtreinish: also #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92804/17:12
*** rods1 has quit IRC17:12
*** rods2 has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
andreafclient manager refactor17:12
mtreinishbut I've been reluctant to review ones without a +2 already, because I have to look at every spec to +A it...17:12
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC17:13
andreafI'd love to get any kind of feedback on this one to see if there is interest in it17:13
andreafmtreinish: fair enough17:13
mtreinishandreaf: that one looks like it will have a lot of review overhead (when/if you implement it)17:14
mtreinishanother giant patch series :)17:14
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** ityaptin has quit IRC17:14
mtreinishthe question I think is are the benefits worth the overhead17:14
andreafthe overhead of coding time you mean?17:15
mtreinishand review time17:15
*** ujuc has quit IRC17:15
andreafI think this may help a lot with micro version in nova17:16
mtreinishthe coding should be pretty simple once you do the initial refactor. It's more taking the time for everyone to look at it.17:16
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting17:16
mtreinishandreaf: you should explicitly outline the benefits of having the refactor done then17:16
andreafthe current approach is not very scalable you get one new attribute for every new combination of api / version17:16
andreafquote: "Another issue with the current structure is that new API versions lead to17:17
andreafproliferation of client attributes in the client manager classes."17:17
mtreinishandreaf: fair enough, I think on something like this the why is more important than the what17:17
*** Longgeek has quit IRC17:17
andreafmtreinish: ok thanks I'll try to get more detail on the why17:18
mtreinishok cool17:18
*** smurashov_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:18
mtreinishdoes anyone else have any specs reviews to bring up?17:18
*** kenhui has quit IRC17:19
mtreinishok then let's move on17:19
mtreinish#topic Blueprints17:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Blueprints (Meeting topic: qa)"17:19
mtreinishdoes anyone have any in progress bps that they'd like to discuss17:19
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
andreafmtreinish: on the ssh-auth-strategy, NithyaG has been working on it (she could not attend today)17:20
*** esker has quit IRC17:20
sdaguewe did find the first actual instance of needing the next level of feature grid earlier this week (re: branchless tempest)17:20
mtreinishsdague: cool17:21
sdagueturns out grenade config was wrong and let a break slip through. I'm going to circle around on that once I get grenade enforcing resources spanning the gap from old to new17:21
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting17:21
sdaguewhich apparently we lost at some point17:21
mtreinishoh that was the keystone cert test thing right?17:21
sdagueyep17:21
sdaguewe just reverted it17:21
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting17:21
*** vhoward has left #openstack-meeting17:22
sdagueand the grenade config fix looks right now, as the revert^2 now fails17:22
mtreinishI thought that there was something else that someone brought up at summit too17:22
sdaguethere is also some ipv6 neutron bits that need it17:22
mtreinishthis will be a good first test of the process17:22
*** acoles is now known as acoles_away17:22
sdaguebut I think that's slightly more complex17:22
sdagueI'm going to get together with sc68cal next friday and figure out some of that17:23
mtreinishok, yeah I imagine ipv6 makes things more complex :)17:23
sdagueso I'll tenatively say 3 - 4 weeks hopefully to get that all landed17:23
* sdague done on branchless tempest updates17:24
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
andreafmtreinish: re ssh-auth-strategy, the server rebuild test is failing when ssh check is enabled, but only when it's run in combination with other tests17:24
*** yamahata has quit IRC17:24
mtreinishsdague: ok cool17:24
*** dims has quit IRC17:24
andreafmtreinish: NithyaG is working on it17:24
mtreinishandreaf: is there something outside a tenant scope being used there?17:25
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** rakhmero_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
andreafthere is a single server reused by all tests in the class17:25
mtreinishyeah that always causes problems...17:26
*** rods2 has quit IRC17:26
afazekasmtreinish: but we want to catch those, and test17:26
andreafe.g. reboot test waits for VM to go to ACTIVE, and then rebuild kicks in17:26
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
sdagueandreaf: is it only those classes that reuse servers a ton where this breaks?17:27
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
sdaguebecause if so, we could annotate them to not do it and get the other 150 servers17:27
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
andreafsdague: atm it's only that class with ssh enabled17:27
sdagueok17:27
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC17:27
*** ygbo has quit IRC17:28
mtreinishafazekas: honestly I feel like that workflow is more for scenario tests17:28
andreafsdague: creating a new server may be an option but I'd like to understand my it breajs17:28
sdagueso, honestly, I'd like to include sshing into every server as part of the validation of compute creation17:28
mtreinishthese reuse classes always have problems because of leftover state in the api tests17:28
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting17:28
sdaguemtreinish: agreed17:28
andreafmtreinish, afazekas, sdague: some API tests cannot test much without ssh17:29
sdaguehow much time hit will we take on getting read of them17:29
* mtreinish watches run time skyrocket with ssh everywhere17:29
andreaffor instance attaching a config drive17:29
sdagueandreaf: agreed17:29
*** crc32 has quit IRC17:29
afazekassdague: It would increase the test time, unless we increase the number of subunit process17:29
sdagueafazekas: by how much?17:29
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:30
andreafI think if we start by getting the existing ssh working it's a first good step17:30
afazekassdague: good question, butwe have two worker at the moment it is too few17:30
sdagueandreaf: I think we're on the same page. I honestly want create_server(wait='ACTIVE') to actually not only wait for active, but also make sure the guest is sshable17:30
andreafthan we can see what's the impact of getting more ssh tests in17:30
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
*** rakhmero_ has quit IRC17:30
sdagueandreaf: sure, I just wonder if we'll find it easier to debug when things go wrong if we make it a base validation case for every server create17:31
*** chuckC has quit IRC17:31
andreafsdague: sure that would help17:31
sdagueafazekas: we're mostly 4 workers now, all our nodes are going to 8 core17:31
*** rakhmero_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:31
afazekassdague: :)17:32
andreafsdague: also getting things like console log printed in case of error and other debugging may help17:32
mtreinishandreaf: we can do that now though through the api we don't need ssh to do that17:32
sdagueandreaf: yep. I think this would help even in getting ssh to work in the tricky cases though. So could be an immediate patch17:32
mtreinishthe heat tests do that already17:32
andreafsdague: on the same like of wait for active you could say for attaching a volume that you need to ssh and fdisk to confirm17:33
afazekassdague, andreaf: What is your onion about making the current debug strategy more intelligent ?17:33
sdagueafazekas: I'm for it, especially a plugable way to go collect that, but we need to talk it through. Can you propose a qa-spec on it?17:34
afazekasNow it just prints everything, for a human takes a long time  to understand  the log17:34
afazekassdague: yes17:34
andreafafazekas, sdague: are these the debug options from the conf?17:34
afazekassdague: Do we want to support multnode , other things than neutron ml2 ovs ?17:34
afazekasandreaf: yes17:35
sdagueandreaf: yeh.17:35
sdagueI think we've gotten pretty far from the blueprints at hand though17:35
sdagueafazekas: can you please write down some of the ideas about enhancing debug in a spec?17:35
afazekassdague: ok17:36
andreafI would keep the scope of the ssh-auth-strategy bp fixed now, and handle other improvements in separate specs17:36
sdagueandreaf: ok, that's fair17:36
sdagueandreaf: I'll try to review it today17:36
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting17:36
andreafsdague: thanks17:36
andreafwe have a lot of ideas again for the todo.rst17:37
andreaf^_^17:37
mtreinishoh, thanks for the reminder Ive got to add that soon...17:37
mtreinishok does anyone have any other bps to discuss17:38
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:38
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting17:38
sdaguenot i17:38
mtreinishok then let's move on17:38
mtreinish#topic Neutron testing17:39
*** openstack changes topic to "Neutron testing (Meeting topic: qa)"17:39
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
mtreinishmlavalle: are you around?17:39
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
mlavallemtreinish: Yes17:39
mtreinishany update on neutron testing?17:39
mlavallemtreinish: since our last meting, we have merged another 5 api tests17:39
mlavalleso of the original 28 we were tracking, we have merged 2517:39
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC17:39
mtreinishcool17:40
*** Fdot has quit IRC17:40
mlavalleI have added a couple of tests for ipv6, so we have another 5 to go17:40
mlavallebut the progress keeps steady17:40
mlavalleI have a couple of questions17:40
afazekasI have question  related to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/83627/ 'I still have a question, does your work cooperate with Mh Raies as you have the same changes with him https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47816/25/tempest/api/network/base.py and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/47816/25/tempest/services/network/network_client_base.py ?'17:41
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
mlavallefor the scenario test tutorial / dcoumentation I am assuming you want me to add to http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/field_guide/scenario.html, corrrect?17:41
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:42
mtreinishmlavalle: maybe, it might warrant another section17:42
mtreinishbut we can always move things around later17:42
mlavalleafazekas: yeah, i need to follow up with him and coordinate the patchsets17:42
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC17:42
mlavallemtreinish: how do I get to edit that? does anyone has to give access?17:42
mtreinishmlavalle: it gets auto published by the readme.rst in tempest/scenario17:43
mlavalleah, ok17:43
mlavallewill work on that17:43
mlavallemtreainish: second question: where do you want me to document the new Neutron scenario tests blueprints?17:43
mtreinishmlavalle: for tracking progress17:44
mtreinishlike what you did with an etherpad for the api tests17:44
mtreinishor just in general?17:44
mlavalleprevious cycle we were using https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tempest/+spec/neutron-advanced-scenarios17:44
mtreinishoh, you just mean having a bp17:45
mlavalleI can use an etherpad, though. I know how to do it :-)17:45
mtreinishyeah I'd throw up a quick spec to qa-specs outlining the total scope of goals for the work17:45
mtreinishand link to an etherpad or something else17:45
mtreinishto track the progress more granuarly17:45
mlavallecool, i'll start it this coming long weekend17:45
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting17:46
mlavallethat's all I have17:46
mtreinishthe spec doesn't have to be too involved this one is pretty self explanatory17:46
*** igor_ has quit IRC17:46
mlavalleok17:46
mtreinishok does anyone else have anything to discuss on neutron testing?17:46
mlavallecan I get a core review for this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/9243617:47
mlavalle?17:47
mtreinishmlavalle: sure17:47
mtreinishok, then let's move on to the next topic17:47
mtreinish#topic Heat testing17:48
*** openstack changes topic to "Heat testing (Meeting topic: qa)"17:48
sdagueI'm not sure we have a rep for this today17:48
mtreinishsdague: you were the one who made this a sticky agenda item so I'm looking to you...17:48
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
sdagueI've not been poking it, as I need to dive down the grenade hole17:48
sdagueso I'd say we pull it off standing agenda for now17:48
andreafjust one not17:49
andreafnote17:49
andreafthe non-voting slow heat tests were failing because of a change in python-novaclient, which is now fixed in heat17:49
sdagueandreaf: ok, that's not the only fail reason17:49
*** bauzas has quit IRC17:50
sdaguewe were having boot stability issues with the fedora image as well, which I don't think are resolved yet17:50
andreafsdague: probably at least that one cause consistent failure :)17:50
sdaguethere is a patch series up that brings in disk image builder17:50
sdagueto maybe get around that17:50
sdaguebut it's going to be a bit, because we need to start also running tempest on dib then17:51
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
mtreinishok well let's move on to critical reviews because we're <10 min left17:52
mtreinish#topic Critical Reviews17:52
*** openstack changes topic to "Critical Reviews (Meeting topic: qa)"17:52
sdagueone last thing, tempest release?17:52
mtreinishsdague: oh17:52
mtreinishyeah I'll do that today17:52
sdagueI think we committed to making one at summit17:52
sdagueok, cool.17:52
sdaguenaming conventions?17:52
mtreinishI'll pick a sha1 before andreaf's refactor I think17:52
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:52
mtreinish2014.1 ?17:52
sdagueso we'll have a 2014.2 which in no way relates to OS 2014.2?17:53
*** gyee has quit IRC17:53
sdaguethat's part of my concern on that naming convention, because we said 4 times a year17:53
*** rudrarugge has joined #openstack-meeting17:54
*** beagles is now known as beagles_brb17:54
mtreinishhow do the clients do it?17:54
mtreinishwe could just do the same17:54
mtreinishoh maybe 1.017:54
mtreinishfor 201417:54
mtreinishand increment the minor for each release17:55
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
mtreinishnah that won't work the major version should mean something other than chronology17:55
sdaguewe can figure that offline17:55
mtreinishyeah17:55
mtreinishok does anyone have any reviews to bring up?17:56
afazekashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/94203/17:56
mtreinish#link  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94203/17:57
*** Mandell has quit IRC17:57
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC17:57
*** paulmo has joined #openstack-meeting17:57
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC17:57
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC17:57
mtreinishafazekas: ok I'll take a look soon17:57
mtreinishare there any other reviews?17:57
ylobankovhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/93301/17:58
*** peopleme1ge is now known as peoplemerge17:58
*** nkinder has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
mtreinish#link  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93301/17:58
*** Michalik| has quit IRC17:58
mtreinishok well with 2 mins let's go to the last topic :)17:58
mtreinish#topic Summit follow-up (andreaf)17:58
*** openstack changes topic to "Summit follow-up (andreaf) (Meeting topic: qa)"17:58
mtreinishandreaf: we can start off next weeks with this if you'd prefer17:59
andreafI just wanted to ask if have a place to track any action / follow-up from the summit17:59
andreafother than the etherpads which is not very consolidated17:59
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
mtreinishno the etherpads were about it18:00
andreafthings like releases, the todo.rst, the specs we need to create (tempest as a service) and so18:00
sdagueandreaf: honestly, I'd suggest building a summary etherpad that we can work through18:00
*** KurtMartin has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
*** tomoe_ has quit IRC18:00
sdagueI was going to do that personally for all the things I committed to (have been doing it locally, but only about 25% of the way through collecting it)18:00
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
hyakuheiI'll give you guys a second or two to wrap up before we start the OSSG meeting :)18:01
*** cdent has quit IRC18:01
mtreinishok well we're at time18:01
*** tmcpeak has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
mtreinishandreaf: we can follow up on -qa18:01
*** rockyg has left #openstack-meeting18:01
andreafok18:01
mtreinish#endmeeting18:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:01
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 22 18:01:26 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:01
mtreinishthanks everyone18:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2014/qa.2014-05-22-17.01.html18:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2014/qa.2014-05-22-17.01.txt18:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/qa/2014/qa.2014-05-22-17.01.log.html18:01
*** giulivo has left #openstack-meeting18:01
hyakuheiThanks guys :)18:01
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz18:01
hyakuhei#startmeeting OpenStack Security Group18:01
openstackMeeting started Thu May 22 18:01:47 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is hyakuhei. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: OpenStack Security Group)"18:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_security_group'18:01
*** vkmc has quit IRC18:01
*** pelix has quit IRC18:02
bknudsonhi18:02
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg18:02
hyakuheiHi bknudson18:02
tmcpeakhow it goes?18:02
*** ramishra has quit IRC18:02
hyakuheiLets go ahead and do a roll-call to get us started18:02
nkindero/18:02
* hyakuhei is Rob from HP18:02
hyakuheiHey nkinder18:02
paulmoHey all18:03
*** mlavalle has left #openstack-meeting18:03
hyakuheitmcpeak: welcome.18:03
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek18:03
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
tmcpeakthank you!18:03
* tmcpeak is Travis McPeak from Symantec18:03
nkindertmcpeak: hey Travis!18:03
bknudsonbknudson is Brant Knudson from IBM18:03
*** ylobankov has left #openstack-meeting18:03
hyakuheiOk, so, agenda items for today?18:03
tmcpeakhey Nathan, how it goes?18:04
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** sarob has quit IRC18:04
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** pcm__ has left #openstack-meeting18:04
*** drakehenderson has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** erecio_1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
nkindertmcpeak: slowly digging myself out of post-summit backlog :)18:04
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
hyakuheiHah, I know that feeling ^18:04
*** rakhmero_ has quit IRC18:04
bknudsonthere was a post to mailing list about meeting w/ barbican / keystone at hackerdom18:04
hyakuheiSo I've got a bunch of stuff to discuss, including the OSSG meetup :)18:04
bknudsonthat would potentially include ossg18:04
*** casanch1_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** Priti has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
hyakuheiLets make than an agenda item18:05
hyakuheiSo I'd like to talk about:18:05
hyakuheiOSSG Meetup18:05
hyakuheiTasks from the last summit18:05
hyakuheiThe possibility of expanding our scope18:05
hyakuheiOSSG Core Reviewers for _other_ projects18:05
hyakuheiA few other little bits18:05
hyakuheibknudson: Do you have anything to bring up around TA?18:06
nkindersounds like a full agenda18:06
bknudsonhyakuhei: no, still recovering from summit18:06
hyakuheiYea, so we can breeze through it but you've prompted me to add one more nkinder18:06
hyakuheiPotentially expanding the meeting18:06
hyakuheiOk.18:06
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:06
*** erecio has quit IRC18:06
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC18:06
hyakuhei#topic OSSG Meetup18:06
*** openstack changes topic to "OSSG Meetup (Meeting topic: OpenStack Security Group)"18:06
malini1Greetings18:07
*** casanch1 has quit IRC18:07
hyakuheiAt the summit I floated the idea of the OSSG piggy-backing off the Barbican mid-cycle meetup18:07
hyakuheiIt would be a good opportunity to partake in Barbican design sessions as well as work on small sprints for TA, the book and other projects18:07
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting18:07
tmcpeaksounds like a good idea18:07
hyakuheiBarbican liked the idea, turns out they are piggybacking off Keystone as well, so all the security/IAM/key mgmt people will be in the same place. That seems like a good thing18:08
hyakuheiOk, theres' more info on the ML if people are interested18:08
*** bauzas has quit IRC18:08
malini1where will the meeting be?18:08
nkinderSan Antonio18:08
nkinderTX18:08
PritiHi Team, this is Priti from Symantec, joining IRC for the first time, looking forward to be working with you18:08
hyakuheiGeekdom in San Antonio18:08
*** Igrsrolqak has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
hyakuheiPriti: Welcome :)18:09
nkinderHi Priti18:09
malini1welcome Priti18:09
PritiThank you !!!18:09
hyakuheiOk, lots to get through so I'll move onto the next point, very excited about this though, there's an interesting opportunity to get a lot done.18:09
nkinderI can't make the proposed week for the hackfest, but I can make the week after.  I've let the Keystone and Barbican devs know just in case they are OK switching it.18:09
hyakuhei#topic OSSG Tasks18:10
*** openstack changes topic to "OSSG Tasks (Meeting topic: OpenStack Security Group)"18:10
*** drakehenderson has quit IRC18:10
hyakuheiThe summit was great, it's taken a long time but we have the legitimacy we've been seeking. It was the first summit where we had lots of developers coming to us for help18:10
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:10
*** pablosan is now known as zz_pablosan18:10
hyakuheiThere's been suggestions for adding gate jobs, code scanning etc coming from the outside for once18:11
hyakuheiNow most of you know we have lots going on but three 'main' projects, TA, OSSN and the Guide18:11
tmcpeakwhat's TA?18:12
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
nkinderthreat analysis18:12
tmcpeakahh18:12
hyakuheiEach with their own leadership. My question for you all to ponder (email to follow) is if any of you have the time and inclination to step up and take one of our smaller projects (security guidelines, vulnerability feeds etc) and drive it to be another 'big' project18:12
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:12
hyakuheiAgain, I'll followup by email.18:12
hyakuheiMainly I'm excited about how much traction we got at this summit and how many people were talking about security in general18:12
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:12
nkindertmcpeak is getting involved with the security/crypto audit18:12
*** arnaud has quit IRC18:13
nkinder...starting with glance18:13
hyakuheinkinder: that's great!18:13
tmcpeakyep!  I'm excited :)18:13
hyakuheithanks tmcpeak18:13
*** andreaf has quit IRC18:13
tmcpeakthank you18:13
paulmonkinder, professional security recruiter :)18:13
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
hyakuheiLet me know how that goes and what help is required from the OSSG to make it easier :)18:13
hyakuhei#topic VMT Metrics18:13
*** openstack changes topic to "VMT Metrics (Meeting topic: OpenStack Security Group)"18:14
*** Igrsrolqak has left #openstack-meeting18:14
hyakuheiWe've been asked to help the VMT come up with a sensible set of metrics for demonstrating the impact of a vulnerability in OpenStack18:14
*** esker has quit IRC18:14
tmcpeakwhat's VMT?18:14
hyakuheiAround Essex they stopped mentioning impact in OSSAs at all18:14
hyakuheiVulnerability Management Team18:14
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting18:14
tmcpeakahh ok18:14
hyakuheiThey're like a CERT for OpenStack, receiving and triaging bugs18:15
tmcpeakcool, thank you18:15
*** sushils has quit IRC18:15
hyakuheiSo if anyone has a favorite vulnerabilty impact rating system (no points for CVSSv2) that doesn't fall on it's ass when applied to virtualized environments, please let me know!18:15
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting18:15
hyakuhei#Topic Low hanging fruit18:16
*** openstack changes topic to "Low hanging fruit (Meeting topic: OpenStack Security Group)"18:16
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting18:16
paulmoOWASP might be an interesting rating system to look at: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/OWASP_Risk_Rating_Methodology18:16
hyakuheiTY paulmo18:16
hyakuheiWhat basic checks, greps, investigations can we perform to find errors in OpenStack?18:17
hyakuheiI know chair6 has been looking at some interesting stuff using the Python AST library18:17
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting18:17
paulmo… as part of the gate or standalone tools or both?18:17
hyakuheiGrepping for 'cPickle' and 'shell=True' comes to mind18:17
hyakuheiBoth18:17
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:17
*** terryw has quit IRC18:17
bknudsonwe could look for calls to eval18:18
hyakuheiOpenStack is so immature I'm willing to bet there's a good effort:reward ratio right now for even basic checks18:18
paulmoLook for imports of risky crypto libraries perhaps18:18
tmcpeakon that line, I'm working on a little script to automate imports and crypto calls in Python code18:18
hyakuheiOk, so I'd like it if someone took an action to collect these suggestions on the wiki and badger people on the ML for more content18:18
nkinderpaulmo: tmcpeak has started working on a crypto search tool to help with the audit effort18:18
tmcpeakbasically a glorified grep against a dictionary file18:18
hyakuheitmcpeak: That sounds incredibly useful.18:19
tmcpeak^ what nkinder said :)18:19
paulmo+1 tmcpeak!18:19
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
hyakuheiOk, so does anyone want to volunteer for this?18:19
tmcpeakvery basic but it's here in case anybody wants to take a look at it18:19
tmcpeakhttps://github.com/tmcpeak/cryptoAuditor18:19
hyakuheior should we assign it to bdpayne because he's not here ? :D18:19
tmcpeakI'd love feedback/suggestions18:19
hyakuhei#link https://github.com/tmcpeak/cryptoAuditor Comments and suggestions welcome18:20
malini1i volunteer18:20
*** ujuc has quit IRC18:20
hyakuheiAwesome! Thanks malini118:20
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting18:20
hyakuhei#action malini1 To document the various things we can identify in OpenStack code that could have security impact using only basic tooling. To compile a simle list on the wiki and encourage contributions from other members18:21
*** smurashov_ has quit IRC18:21
hyakuhei#topic Developer Security Guidelines18:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Developer Security Guidelines (Meeting topic: OpenStack Security Group)"18:21
*** markvan has quit IRC18:21
hyakuheiThe security guidelines really need to be completed so we can use them18:22
hyakuheiCore dev's have also asked for a top-10 style checklist they can keep in mind when reviewing commits.18:22
nkinder#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security/Guidelines18:22
paulmoDoes everyone in OSSG agree with the high level list?  (if this is the one I'm thinking of)18:22
hyakuheipaulmo: For the most part yes :)18:23
*** vkmc has quit IRC18:23
paulmoIf we can get consensus in OSSG with the list, then the drilldown pages can be filled in relatively quickly I bet18:23
hyakuheiI'd like to split out design decisions from implementation ones but largely it's good18:23
paulmoLet's remove or mark any contentious items then18:23
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting18:23
hyakuheiIt's been outstanding for a while, maybe it'd be better done in a sprint18:23
nkinderhyakuhei: yes, a sprint might work well for it18:24
hyakuhei#Topic AOB18:24
*** openstack changes topic to "AOB (Meeting topic: OpenStack Security Group)"18:24
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC18:24
tmcpeaksorry, but what's AOB?18:24
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting18:24
hyakuheiAny other business :)18:24
tmcpeakahh :)18:24
nkindermalini1 is close to wrapping the one outstanding OSSN18:25
hyakuheiOSSG meeting length :: Does anyone want to extend the meeting?18:25
hyakuheiyes! excellent work malini1 ! _Not_ an easy one to write up!18:25
hyakuheiThe process put in place by nkinder is paying dividends in this case18:25
*** baoli_ has quit IRC18:26
paulmoOne item on logging… what is the general consensus of this group about asking developers to mark confidential data up front in the code to prevent admins from trying to filter out passwords and such on the backend log databases and such?18:26
nkindermalini1: just a few more minor suggestions in there, then it's ready IMHO18:26
nkinderhyakuhei: extending the meeting to 1h would be useful I think18:26
malini1malini1 -- :-( major goof up on that OSSN .. hopefully I improve on next one18:26
hyakuheipaulmo: The earlier confidential data can be identified the better imho18:27
paulmo(sorry, to prevent admins from having to continuously hunt down log data that shouldn't be in plain text or logged at all)18:27
nkinderhyakuhei: we would then have time to hash out things like the security guidelines right here18:27
hyakuheiIt then becomes a matter of policy18:27
hyakuheinkinder: +118:27
*** zns has quit IRC18:27
hyakuheiIt does mean that's an 8pm finish for me (worlds smallest violin)18:27
bknudsonpaulmo: if the logs contain passwords / auth tokens somebody here will likely open a bug and we'll have to fix it18:28
paulmoWe created a class in Solum to identify confidentiality of pieces of log information… perhaps this group could look at it and give input.18:28
nkinderhyakuhei: we can find a different timeslot too18:28
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
paulmoIt ties into oslo log and everything.18:28
nkinderhyakuhei: oh, one other topic that was brought up at the summit was creating our own IRC channel18:28
hyakuheiTrue, there are more official meeting channels now so that could work18:28
*** sarob has quit IRC18:28
hyakuheinkinder: Yes - I have no opposition to trying that18:28
hyakuheiThoughts @all?18:29
malini1+1 to move timeslot to make it convenient18:29
tmcpeakyeah, why not?18:29
hyakuhei#action hyakuhei to look at moving to a 1 hour meeting and finding a better meeting slot18:29
*** jcoufal has quit IRC18:29
*** zns has quit IRC18:29
tmcpeakI like the own IRC channel idea too18:30
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
malini1i like the 30 min but 1 hr is fine with out-of-school if we have less any day18:30
*** amalagon_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
paulmo#ossg is available :)18:30
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC18:30
nkinderpaulmo: I think we should prefix it with "openstack-" to be in line with the other channels18:30
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC18:31
paulmoAh, not sure about policy… whatever is fine with me :)18:31
hyakuheiOk I'll follow up on  the ML regarding an IRC channel I guess.18:31
hyakuheiThat's time people - any last minute emergencies to bring up?18:31
paulmoI'm hanging in #openstack-ossg just in case18:31
bknudsonthanks!18:31
hyakuheiThanks everyone!18:31
hyakuhei#endmeeting18:31
tmcpeakgood stuff!18:31
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:31
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 22 18:31:47 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:31
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_security_group/2014/openstack_security_group.2014-05-22-18.01.html18:31
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_security_group/2014/openstack_security_group.2014-05-22-18.01.txt18:31
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_security_group/2014/openstack_security_group.2014-05-22-18.01.log.html18:31
*** paulmo has left #openstack-meeting18:31
*** tmcpeak has quit IRC18:32
hyakuheibknudson: Lets go for openstack-security instead18:32
nkinderthanks all!18:32
bknudsonopenstack-security works for me18:32
*** rudrarugge has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting18:32
nkinderbknudson: yep, I'm in there and it's empty18:33
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz18:33
*** nkinder has left #openstack-meeting18:34
*** amcrn_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
*** amcrn has quit IRC18:35
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
*** erecio_1 has quit IRC18:38
*** cdub has quit IRC18:39
*** erecio_1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:39
*** chuckC has quit IRC18:40
*** erecio_1 has quit IRC18:40
*** eglynn has quit IRC18:40
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting18:40
*** erecio_1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:41
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting18:41
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC18:42
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:42
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting18:42
*** arnaud___ has joined #openstack-meeting18:43
*** arnaud___ has quit IRC18:44
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting18:45
*** chuckC has quit IRC18:45
*** spzala has quit IRC18:46
*** igor_ has quit IRC18:47
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC18:47
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
*** eddie_ has quit IRC18:49
*** malini1 has quit IRC18:50
*** Priti has quit IRC18:50
*** jprovazn_afk is now known as jprovazn18:51
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC18:51
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
*** Mandell has quit IRC18:53
*** coreywright is now known as coreywright_18:54
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
*** jcoufal has quit IRC18:55
*** eddie_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
*** beagles_brb is now known as beagles18:57
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** gduan has quit IRC19:02
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting19:02
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting19:02
*** che-arne has quit IRC19:03
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC19:03
*** Michalik- has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
*** zz_pablosan is now known as pablosan19:05
*** Macaveli has quit IRC19:06
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting19:07
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting19:08
*** sarob has quit IRC19:08
pcm__mestery: ping19:09
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting19:09
pcm__Is this the right time for State Mgmt meeting?19:09
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting19:10
*** shakayumi has quit IRC19:10
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:10
*** sarob has quit IRC19:13
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting19:16
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting19:17
*** igordcard has quit IRC19:19
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting19:20
*** ujuc has quit IRC19:21
*** vkmc has quit IRC19:23
*** GheRivero has quit IRC19:23
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
*** jang has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
*** vkmc has quit IRC19:24
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC19:24
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC19:24
*** IlyaE has quit IRC19:24
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek19:24
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC19:27
*** zns has quit IRC19:29
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting19:30
*** s3wong has quit IRC19:31
*** KurtMartin has quit IRC19:31
*** eglynn has quit IRC19:32
*** sushils has quit IRC19:32
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting19:33
*** TravT has quit IRC19:36
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting19:37
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting19:37
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting19:39
*** dprince has quit IRC19:40
*** garyduan has quit IRC19:41
*** bauzas has quit IRC19:41
*** gduan has quit IRC19:42
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8719:42
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** amalagon_ has left #openstack-meeting19:43
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** IlyaE has quit IRC19:44
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
*** amalagon____ has joined #openstack-meeting19:45
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting19:46
*** eglynn has quit IRC19:47
*** igor_ has quit IRC19:47
*** hashar has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting19:48
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting19:48
*** zns has quit IRC19:49
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
*** garyduan has quit IRC19:49
*** ujuc has quit IRC19:51
*** jprovazn has quit IRC19:51
*** Guest86161 has quit IRC19:52
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting19:53
*** TravT has joined #openstack-meeting19:53
*** zz_keyvan is now known as keyvan19:54
*** gduan has quit IRC19:54
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
*** SridharG has quit IRC19:58
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC19:59
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC19:59
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC20:02
*** tjones has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
*** yjiang5_away has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
*** erlon has quit IRC20:04
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC20:06
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting20:08
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
*** andreaf has quit IRC20:11
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:11
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting20:13
*** esker has quit IRC20:13
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:13
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting20:16
*** dims has quit IRC20:16
*** jdurgin has quit IRC20:16
*** garyduan has quit IRC20:18
*** esker has quit IRC20:18
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting20:18
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
*** yjiang5_away is now known as yjiang520:21
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
*** malini1 has quit IRC20:26
*** igor__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:27
*** amalagon____ has left #openstack-meeting20:28
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting20:29
*** igor_ has quit IRC20:30
*** SridharG has quit IRC20:31
*** esker has quit IRC20:32
*** igor__ has quit IRC20:32
*** amcrn_ has quit IRC20:32
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** vivek-___ has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** vivek-e__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
*** asselin has quit IRC20:32
*** sarob has quit IRC20:32
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting20:33
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting20:33
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC20:33
*** ivasev has quit IRC20:33
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
*** vivek-e__ has quit IRC20:34
*** vivek-___ has quit IRC20:34
*** vivek-___ has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
*** vivek-e__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC20:35
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC20:35
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting20:36
*** esker has quit IRC20:37
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting20:37
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting20:38
*** Mandell has quit IRC20:40
*** coreywright_ is now known as coreywright20:41
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
*** baoli has quit IRC20:43
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:43
*** andrew_plunk has left #openstack-meeting20:44
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting20:44
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
*** jecarey has quit IRC20:46
*** vivek-e__ has quit IRC20:46
*** vivek-___ has quit IRC20:46
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:46
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting20:46
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting20:46
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting20:47
*** fnaval has quit IRC20:48
*** derekh_afk has quit IRC20:48
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** derekh_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
*** s3wong has quit IRC20:50
*** ujuc has quit IRC20:51
*** joesavak has quit IRC20:52
*** fnaval has quit IRC20:53
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:54
*** mordred_ is now known as mordred_phone20:55
*** spzala has quit IRC20:58
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting20:58
*** zns has quit IRC20:59
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-meeting20:59
*** sgordon has joined #openstack-meeting21:01
*** sarob has quit IRC21:01
mriedemmikal: ?21:01
*** jtomasek has quit IRC21:01
mikalHello21:02
mikalJust getting my coffee21:02
mikal#startmeeting nova21:02
openstackMeeting started Thu May 22 21:02:24 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mikal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova)"21:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova'21:02
mikalWho is here for the nova meeting?21:02
dansmitho/21:02
mriedemhi21:02
leifzo/21:02
tjoneshi21:02
*** yamahata has quit IRC21:02
alaskihi21:02
yjiang5o/21:02
mikalCool21:03
*** jdob has quit IRC21:03
mikal#topic IRC nick ping service21:03
*** openstack changes topic to "IRC nick ping service (Meeting topic: nova)"21:03
mikalSo, first off a quick announcement21:03
mikalStealing an idea from Keystone, if you add your IRC nick to the list on https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova21:03
cburgesspresent21:03
mikalThen I will ping that list at the start of meetings21:03
mikalWhich might help people remember to appear here21:03
*** directxman12 has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
mikalI wont bother this week because I'd just be pinging myself...21:04
*** baoli has quit IRC21:04
mikalOk, moving on21:04
mikal#topic Juno mid-cycle meetup date and location21:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Juno mid-cycle meetup date and location (Meeting topic: nova)"21:04
*** yogeshme_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:04
mikaldevananda and I talked about this a fair bit during the summit21:05
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC21:05
*** msdubov has quit IRC21:05
mikalI was talking to him because I'd like to see the ironic guys more in attendance at the meetup than last time21:05
mikalThe suggestion we've come up with is the week of 14 July, which is the week before OSCON21:05
mikalIntel has offered their Portland campus if we want it, which I think makes sense for all the people who are likely to be going on to OSCON21:05
mikalI'm hoping co-locating with OSCON will make it easier for some people to get travel approval21:06
dansmithportland where?21:06
dansmithhillsboro?21:06
mikalBeaverton IIRC21:06
mikalWhich I am told is about 20 miles out of Portland21:06
*** boris-42 has quit IRC21:06
mikalBut I've never been there21:06
dansmithyeah, it's definitely a relocation form OSCON21:06
dansmithlike, you'd want to move hotels for sure21:06
mikalYeah, I think that's ok though21:06
tjonesi think the train goes to beaverton doesn't it?21:07
mikalFor people flying in though, it makes the flights free for the meetup if they're doing both21:07
dansmithwell, it'll be really annoying for me, but alas :)21:07
tjonesor subway or whatever it is called21:07
dansmithtjones: it does, but it isn't really walkable from there to the campus, depending on which campus it is21:07
leifzHey, no connections dansmith.21:07
mikalNo connections?21:07
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk21:08
leifzdan has no connecting flights. right?21:08
*** msdubov has joined #openstack-meeting21:08
mikalOh, I see21:08
dansmithit's going to be seriously inconvenient for me for a different reason, but not much we can do about that21:08
dansmithor are we voting?21:08
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting21:09
mikalThe current proposal is that the ironic people have a room, we have a room, and when we feel we need to talk we all pile into one of the rooms.21:09
dansmithcould it be the week after oscon/21:09
mikalHmmm, one sec21:09
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting21:09
mikalLet me check the etherpad of doom21:09
mikalhttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-midcycle-options was the original brainstorming etherpad21:09
*** yogeshme_ has quit IRC21:10
*** rudrarugge has quit IRC21:10
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC21:10
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
*** kenhui has quit IRC21:10
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
*** geekinutah has joined #openstack-meeting21:10
* mikal is now finding the juno release dates21:10
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
mikalThere's a deadline in there somewhere too21:11
*** SridharG has quit IRC21:11
*** jjmb has quit IRC21:11
cburgessmikal: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule21:12
leifzJuno FPF is August 21st.21:12
mikalcburgess: thanks21:12
mikalSo... juno-2 is the week of OSCON21:12
cburgessYou wil be close to the j2 date.21:12
mikalSo the week after SOCON is the first week of juno-3, instead of the last week of juno-221:12
mikals/SOCON/OSCON/21:12
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC21:12
mikalI think we could make that work though21:13
mikalDo other people have an opinion?21:13
*** Mandell has quit IRC21:13
*** aysyd has quit IRC21:13
*** Mandell_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
mikal...silence...?21:14
dansmithweek after oscon it is! :)21:14
mikalHeh21:14
mikalWell, let me see if the venue / ironic people are avaialble21:14
mikalBut it sounds like an option21:14
alaskiI have no opinion either way atm21:14
mikalIt would mean a three day meetup instead of something longer though, because I'd have to leave on the Wednesday to get to AU in time for pyconau21:15
mikal(Or you have a hackfest without me)21:15
dansmiththree days is okay, right?21:15
mriedemyes21:15
mikalYeah, that was the plan21:15
dansmithwe almost ran out of stuff on the third day last time21:15
mriedemyup21:15
mikalWith a possible hang around hackfest for people who wanted one21:15
dansmiththat's fine21:15
mikalOk, I will investigate21:15
dansmiththanks21:15
mikal#action mikal to find out of if the week of 28 July is available instead21:16
*** varora has left #openstack-meeting21:16
cburgessNot bad having it short for folks who are also at OSCON, means we aren't gone for 2 full weeks.21:16
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz21:16
mikalcburgess: this is true, especially for people doing CLS as well21:16
mikalcburgess: which I think devananda wanted to do21:16
*** hashar has quit IRC21:16
geekinutahmikal: did we talk about benue?21:16
geekinutahvenue even21:16
mikalgeekinutah: yeah, Intel in Portland21:16
geekinutahokay, I missed that part21:17
mikalNP21:17
mikalAnything else on midcycle meetup?21:17
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting21:17
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC21:17
mikalOk, moving on21:17
mikal#topic Post summit spec status21:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Post summit spec status (Meeting topic: nova)"21:17
mikalI have an etherpad for this at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-summit-specs21:18
mriedemyou want us to update status?21:18
mikalBasically I spent some time yesterday trying to work out which specs tied to thigns we'd decided at the summit21:18
*** bswartz has quit IRC21:18
mikalI think the spec reviewers should be giving priority to those specs to unblock things we now have concensus on21:18
sgordonwould this be better reflected by updating the status/targets on http://blueprints.launchpad.net/ ?21:18
*** mrda_away is now known as mrda21:19
mikalsgordon: well, that happens after we've approved the spec21:19
sgordonnot really21:19
mikal?21:19
sgordonit has statuses for in discussion, review, etc21:19
sgordonand targeting happens before approval21:19
mikalOh, I see21:19
mikalWell, step 1 is I am sure that this etherpad list is wrong21:19
sgordonyeah21:19
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC21:19
sgordonthat's mainly what i am getting at i guess :)21:19
mikalSo, for people who presented something at the summit, can you please make sure your spec is in this list?21:20
mikalWe can then review those / tweak LP statuses21:20
mikalI suspect many of them also need edits based on the outcome of the summit, so marking that would be helpful too21:20
directxman12question: what about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86947/ (Use libvirt storage pools)?  It's been going on since before summit, but we discussed it at summit, and I'd like to get some reviews in21:20
mikal#action mikalt o email openstack-dev and say these things there as well21:20
mikaldirectxman12: yep, you should add that to the etherpad please, presumably under "needs review"21:21
mikalI think as we get more practise at specs we can be a bit more organized with this21:21
mikalPerhaps next time we should _require_ a spec proposal in gerrit before we accept the session at the summit for example21:22
geekinutahthat sound like a worthy goal21:22
mikal#action Specs reviewers, please be paying attention to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-nova-summit-specs21:22
yjiang5mikal: +121:22
*** casanch1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
mikalSo, I guess this part of the meeting is mostly just a call to action, unless anyone has any specs they feel we need to discuss right now?21:23
mikalI'd prefer just summit specs21:23
mikalWe can do others at the end21:23
*** pdmars has quit IRC21:23
mikalNothing else?21:24
mikalOk, moving on21:24
mikal#topic Bugs21:24
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: nova)"21:24
mikaltjones has kindly agreed to stay on as bug triage leader person21:24
mikalI've asked her if she can do an update in each of our meetings about the current state of bugs21:24
mikaltjones: have you managed to get one for this week, or do you need more prep time?21:25
tjonesnope - im ready21:25
mikalGo for it!21:25
tjonesmikal: and i talked about having a top ten bug list to review at this meeting each week.21:25
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek21:25
tjonessince i don't have enough visibility into every subteam - i am going to need to depend on the subteam leaders to help me out with this21:26
tjonesi've created an etherpad for tracking each week, i'd like you guys to help out by putting bugs on this and i can help push them if needed21:26
tjoneshttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/NovaTopTenBugs21:26
tjonescurrently there are only 2 - the 1 critical bug and something that is blocking minesweeper (since i am the subteam lead for vmwareapi too)21:27
*** casanch1_ has quit IRC21:27
mikalIs someone assigned to those bugs at the moment?21:27
tjonesnext week - i'd like to see more.  comments or concerns with this?21:27
*** casanch1 has quit IRC21:27
tjonesfor the 2nd yes.  for the 1st no21:27
tjonesbut it may have disappeared21:28
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:28
tjonesmriedem:  was looking into it21:28
mriedemwhy is that tempest timeout one a top ten?21:28
mriedemwe have A LOT of tempest timeout bugs21:28
mriedemthey are all intermittent21:28
tjonesso it is being cared for,  is is the only bug marked ciritical21:28
mriedemdue to load on the single node host when running tempest21:28
mriedemit probably shouldn't be critical21:28
mriedemit's been around since at least february21:29
tjonesi'm assuming a critical bug always should be here21:29
mriedemlet's drop the severity21:29
tjonesok sure.21:29
mikaltjones: you're right that we should be tracking critical bugs21:29
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
*** Leonr has quit IRC21:29
mriedemhttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-May/035253.html21:29
mikalBut it sounds like we can just tweak the severity on this one21:29
mriedemif anyone has ideas21:29
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting21:29
tjonesalso during triage i've noticed we have a number of issues with resize - several new bugs on it.  I don't have the #s handy but this is something to look out for21:29
mriedemtjones: yeah, fixing a few resize/migration issues this week21:30
mriedemat least i've seen a few bug fixes related to that this week21:30
*** esker has quit IRC21:30
* devananda catches up on scrollback21:31
mriedemwe need multi-node tempest to flush those out21:31
mikalYeah, there's also heaps of older live migration bugs is someone is playing in that area21:31
mikalmriedem: agreed21:31
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
mikal#action mikal to ping on multinode devstack status21:31
tjonesthat's all i wanted to say today.  we'll see if this etherpad idea works and if not we can change things21:31
mikaltjones: thanks!21:31
mikaltjones and I also talked about having a bug day sometime in a couple of weeks, we'll lt people know when we have a more specific plan21:32
tjonesi'll send something out on the ML too about this21:32
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
tjonesah yes - and that too.21:32
mikalAnything else on bugs anyone?21:32
*** igor_ has quit IRC21:32
tjonesi was hoping next week - but maybe the week after on wednesday.  i'll send out info on the ML21:32
mikalSounds like a plan21:33
mikalMoving on21:33
mikal#topic Subteam reports21:33
*** openstack changes topic to "Subteam reports (Meeting topic: nova)"21:33
mikalWe seem to be growing subteams quite a bit at the moment21:33
mikalThere's now a NFV team, and a libvirt team21:34
mikalHave I missed any other new subteams?21:34
*** Leonr has quit IRC21:34
*** gokrokve has quit IRC21:34
ewindischthere is a containers team which would like to register.21:34
*** sarob has quit IRC21:34
mikalOh yeah, I saw an email about that one too21:34
sgordonthe NFV one is a bit...different21:34
ewindischadrian_otto is leading that charge, although I don’t see him present21:34
sgordonin that it's cross project21:34
mikalsgordon: agreed, but I think we should ask to be kept informed because it will affect us21:34
sgordonthough reporting into the impacted projects is expected21:35
mikalsgordon: which I am sure russellb will do anyways21:35
sgordonatm i think that would be nova/neutron/heat21:35
sgordonprobably others down the line21:35
ewindischmikal: I was going to ask if we can/should make the docker driver a subteam as well… in order to report status and keep everyone else in the loop — or if we should just stay quiet over in stackforge? ;-)21:35
mikalewindisch: I have no problem with docker being a subteam if they'd like to be21:36
*** esker has quit IRC21:36
ewindischmikal: +121:36
mikalewindisch: I think being quiet over on stackforge is a poor way to kept us aware of what's happening21:36
mikalSo yeah, let's do that21:36
ewindischmikal: precisely.21:36
mikalAlthough I don't know how that's different from a containers subteam?21:36
*** pcm__ has left #openstack-meeting21:36
mikalUnless the containers subteam is about a new service, and docker is about a driver21:37
mikalWhich is possible21:37
ewindischmikal: docker subteam == driver; containers subteam == api, service, and a bit of shared-code-DRY21:37
mikalOk, well as long as you don't think you're doubling up21:37
ewindischnot at all.21:38
mikalCool21:38
mikalSo, who wants to do a subteam report?21:38
*** armax has left #openstack-meeting21:38
*** vijendar has quit IRC21:38
mikal...sound of crickets...21:38
tjonesok i'll go21:39
mikalHeh21:39
mikalGo!21:39
tjonesvmwareapi - just recovering from the summit.  updating specs based on discussions there.  spawn refactor moviing along - 2 more to go with phase 1 (1 has a +2 hint, hint)21:39
tjonesand done21:39
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting21:40
mikaltjones: what's the review number for the first unmerged one in the chain?21:40
tjoneshttps://review.openstack.org/8644321:40
tjonesthanks for asking :-)21:40
mikalOk, I will take a look after this meeting unless someone beats me to it21:40
tjonesmriedem: gave the 1st +221:41
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC21:41
mikalAlthough, this one has only had 59 revisions, is it ready yet?!?21:41
tjones- many many many are rebases21:41
mriedemmikal: you had a +2 one so get it again21:41
mikaltjones: I know, but its still pretty impressive21:41
mriedemcosmetic change so re-+W21:41
tjonesyea - i21:41
mikalmriedem: cool21:41
tjonesit has been a journey21:41
mikalOk, any other subteams? Scheduler is the most obvious one I think.21:42
mriedemfwiw, i think the hyper-v driver is going to be going in the same direction soon with how the unit tests are structured21:42
mriedemfrom what i was looking at today21:42
mriedemsame issues with testing driver/vmops/utils from the top level21:42
mikalmriedem: as in a big refactoring?21:42
mriedemhyper-v has far fewer patches, but when there is one i have the same concerns about how the UT is designed21:42
*** vpanizo has joined #openstack-meeting21:42
mikalFair enough21:42
*** vkmc has quit IRC21:43
mikalBut it sounds like they already agree?21:43
devanandamikal: not that it's a subteam, but i'll be posting two specs for ironic by EOD21:43
mriedemno idea21:43
mikalmriedem: should we talk to them about it?21:43
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting21:43
mriedemhyper-v guys were refactoring tests to use mock in icehouse i thought but not sure what happened with that21:43
mikaldevananda: cool, let me know the review numbers when you do21:43
mriedemno one wants to review mox->mock refactoring21:43
ewindischcontainers subteam - just figuring out what we are / what our mission is… all kittens and self-loathing from there. Should have more next week.21:44
mikalOk, it sounds like we're done with subteam reports21:44
mikalGoing...21:44
ewindischdocker subteam - rampaging through bugfiling…21:44
ewindischand investigating cinder support21:44
mikalgoing...21:44
ewindischbig blocker there, actually, is that most of the useful code is in libvirt/volume.py21:44
mikalewindisch: you're allowed to refactor21:45
ewindischand that’s it.21:45
ewindischmikal: yeah, I think I’ll need to - and I’m planning a spec for that refactor21:45
mikalewindisch: sounds like a plan to me21:45
ewindischbug we might need to discuss if it’s better to put that stuff into oslo or cinder itself at this point?21:45
mikalAnything else on subteams?21:45
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung_afk21:45
ewindisch^- done21:45
mikalewindisch: well, I guess it depends on what stuff. Let's wait for the spec and then discuss.21:46
ewindischagreed21:46
mikal#topic Open Discussion21:46
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: nova)"21:46
mikalOk, so what else do people want to cover?21:46
geekinutahsooooo, about the no-db-scheduler stuff21:47
mikalIs there a spec?21:47
geekinutahthere is, I stuck it on the etherpad under contentious21:47
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
yjiang5I have a question to server state/status and get no response from ML/IRC, just asking here. Currently the server API will present both state and status, what's exact difference of these two?21:48
geekinutahis it fair to say we came out of that session mostly concluding that work can go on, but it needs to be optional?21:48
mikalyjiang5: hang ten a sec21:48
mikalgeekinutah: definitely optional21:48
directxman12mikal: are we surfing?21:48
mikalgeekinutah: there also seemed to be a fair bit of concern about the table design in memcache21:48
mikalgeekinutah: i.e. there might be existing design patterns which could be reused21:48
mikalgeekinutah: is boris-42 the one working on this, or is it someone else at Mirantis?21:49
geekinutahmikal: yah, but at least we can take the big -2 off the spec and start arguing about implementation21:49
geekinutahmikal: it's boris-42's baby, but I want to help it along a bit21:49
mikalI feel like arguing in a spec about that bit is going to be long and painful21:49
mikalWould it be possible to try and get the people who had concerns to chat to boris-42 and you more directly?21:50
mikalJust to speed the process up21:50
devanandai had a lot of concern about the proposed way to maintain distributed state21:50
geekinutahyeah, that sounds doable21:50
devanandahappy to chat with folks -- also, boris-42 is going to be in seattle next week IIRC21:51
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting21:51
mikaldevananda: would you be willing to do an IRC chat with the Mirantis guys to try and address those concerns?21:51
mikalI know jaypipes was concerned too21:51
devanandahe and I were planning to meet up while he's here, so we can work on that too21:51
*** erecio_1 has quit IRC21:51
mikalOk, cool21:51
alaskiI have concerns about requiring a full host state to be sent every time, but I can detail that on the spec21:51
mikalSo yeah, let's try and get some agreement on that before we worry too much about the spec21:51
mikalalaski: sounds good to me21:51
geekinutahdo you want to revisit the results in next meeting or keep it offline till we have something simpler to propose?21:52
mikalgeekinutah: and maybe we can aim for a status update in the next meeting?21:52
mikalHeh21:52
geekinutahsounds good :-)21:52
mikalgeekinutah: so, a quick status update sounds like a good plan21:52
mikal#action geekinutah to try and get people talking about the design of the no db scheduler data store and report back next week21:52
*** ujuc has quit IRC21:53
mikalAnything else on no db scheduler?21:53
*** devlaps has quit IRC21:53
geekinutahlet's move on, that's good for now21:53
mikalyjiang5: back to you21:53
yjiang5mikal: sure21:53
mikalyjiang5: can you repost your question?21:54
yjiang5I have a question to server state/status and get no response from ML/IRC, just asking here. Currently the server API will present both state and status, what's exact difference of these two?21:54
mikalWhat was the email subject line?21:54
yjiang5sorry, I mean service state/status21:54
yjiang5I sent it before the summit, let me try to find it.21:55
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting21:55
dansmithyjiang5: you mean "nova service-list"21:55
dansmith?21:55
yjiang5dansmith: yes21:55
dansmithyjiang5: and do you mean state/reason?21:55
yjiang5dansmith: no, I mean the "status" and "state" of the nova service-list.21:56
dansmithoh, the smiley face21:56
dansmithstatus is the admin status enabled/disabled,21:56
dansmiththe state is :-) if the node has checked in in the last 60 seconds or whatever, and :-( if not21:56
dansmithyou can disable a service in :-) state so that it won't be scheduled to21:57
dansmithit's an admin state, whereas the smiley tells you if the service appears to be alive/online21:57
yjiang5dansmith: got it. So a service disabled can still be :-) , right?21:57
mikalI'm trying to find a good reference to this in the docs, but not succeeding21:58
dansmithyes21:58
yjiang5dansmith: frankly speaking, it's really ......... not clear. I know the underlying code implemenation, but IMHO, it's confusing.21:58
yjiang5dansmith: thanks for clarification.21:58
dansmithyjiang5: on the other hand, it seems so self-explanatory to me, I've never even thought about it needing to be documented :)21:58
*** directxman12 has quit IRC21:59
mikalGiven I can't find anything in the docs, I think it could certainly be documented better21:59
yjiang5mikal: thanks.21:59
*** malini1 has quit IRC21:59
mikal#action mikal to chase better documentation for "nova service-list"21:59
mikalWhich probably means I file a docs bug21:59
mikalSo, we're out of time21:59
mikalAnything else super urgent which can't be done in email?21:59
yjiang5mikal: thanks.21:59
mikalOk, thanks for your time peoples22:00
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
mikal#endmeeting22:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu May 22 22:00:30 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:00
*** devlaps1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** tjones has left #openstack-meeting22:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-05-22-21.02.html22:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-05-22-21.02.txt22:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2014/nova.2014-05-22-21.02.log.html22:00
*** Penick has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** reed has quit IRC22:01
*** ramashri has quit IRC22:01
*** devlaps has quit IRC22:01
*** devlaps1 has quit IRC22:02
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** mkoderer has quit IRC22:02
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** sarob has quit IRC22:03
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:03
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting22:03
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** sarob_ has quit IRC22:04
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC22:06
*** geekinutah has left #openstack-meeting22:06
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting22:07
*** Leonr has quit IRC22:07
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting22:07
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting22:07
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC22:07
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting22:08
*** sarob has quit IRC22:08
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:08
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC22:08
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC22:09
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting22:09
*** ravikumar_hp has joined #openstack-meeting22:11
*** eharney has quit IRC22:11
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
*** andreaf has quit IRC22:12
*** caleb_ has quit IRC22:15
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting22:15
*** esker has quit IRC22:15
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:15
*** boris-42 has quit IRC22:17
*** gduan has quit IRC22:18
*** msdubov has quit IRC22:18
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:18
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting22:18
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:19
*** caleb_ has quit IRC22:19
*** msdubov has joined #openstack-meeting22:19
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC22:21
*** Mandell_ has quit IRC22:24
*** joesavak has quit IRC22:24
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:24
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk22:24
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC22:25
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
*** chuckC has quit IRC22:27
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:28
*** esker has quit IRC22:30
*** jergerber has quit IRC22:32
*** changbl has quit IRC22:33
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC22:33
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC22:33
*** vivek-___ has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
*** vivek-e__ has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
*** igor_ has quit IRC22:33
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
*** tvoran has quit IRC22:34
*** thedodd has quit IRC22:36
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC22:37
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting22:37
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting22:37
*** Penick has quit IRC22:39
*** vivek-___ has quit IRC22:39
*** vivek-e__ has quit IRC22:39
*** keyvan is now known as zz_keyvan22:40
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting22:42
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz22:42
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting22:43
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:43
*** bknudson has quit IRC22:44
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC22:48
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting22:48
*** zz_keyvan is now known as keyvan22:49
*** ddieterly has quit IRC22:49
*** mrodden has quit IRC22:52
*** ujuc has quit IRC22:53
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:56
*** Youcef has joined #openstack-meeting22:56
*** fnaval has quit IRC22:57
*** rbak has quit IRC22:58
*** blamar has quit IRC22:58
*** esker has quit IRC22:59
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting22:59
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC23:04
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:04
*** dstanek_zzz is now known as dstanek23:04
*** AntL has quit IRC23:04
*** esker has quit IRC23:04
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting23:06
*** baoli has quit IRC23:07
*** malini has quit IRC23:08
*** ayoung_afk is now known as ayoung23:08
*** malini has joined #openstack-meeting23:09
*** cdub has quit IRC23:09
*** derekh_ has quit IRC23:12
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting23:12
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting23:13
*** Mandell has quit IRC23:13
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting23:13
*** Mandell has quit IRC23:14
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting23:16
*** dstanek is now known as dstanek_zzz23:16
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting23:20
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting23:20
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting23:20
*** eguz has quit IRC23:20
*** banix has quit IRC23:21
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC23:23
*** eghobo has quit IRC23:24
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting23:26
*** atiwari has quit IRC23:26
*** markmcclain1 has quit IRC23:29
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting23:29
*** igor_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:29
*** sarob_ has quit IRC23:29
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:32
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting23:32
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:33
*** igor_ has quit IRC23:34
*** Youcef has quit IRC23:34
*** spzala has quit IRC23:39
*** elambert has quit IRC23:39
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting23:41
*** sushils has quit IRC23:43
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:44
*** vivek-eb_ has quit IRC23:44
*** vivek-ebay has quit IRC23:44
*** vivek-ebay has joined #openstack-meeting23:45
*** vivek-eb_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:45
*** esker has quit IRC23:46
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC23:46
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting23:46
*** Mandell has quit IRC23:46
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** devlaps has quit IRC23:48
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting23:49
*** brucer has joined #openstack-meeting23:49
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC23:49
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting23:50
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC23:50
*** shakayumi has quit IRC23:50
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting23:50
*** john3213 has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** esker has quit IRC23:51
*** ujuc has quit IRC23:54
*** kayaliu_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:55
*** john3213 has left #openstack-meeting23:56
*** jgrimm has quit IRC23:56
*** sarob has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!