Tuesday, 2014-03-04

*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting00:00
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting00:00
*** zns has quit IRC00:04
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC00:04
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC00:04
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:05
*** mrodden has quit IRC00:05
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC00:08
*** antonym has quit IRC00:10
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting00:13
*** hemanthravi has quit IRC00:13
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC00:13
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** julim has quit IRC00:14
*** sc68cal has quit IRC00:15
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC00:17
*** dvarga has quit IRC00:18
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting00:18
*** caleb_ has quit IRC00:21
*** rossella_s has quit IRC00:21
*** fnaval has quit IRC00:22
*** antonym has joined #openstack-meeting00:24
*** prad has joined #openstack-meeting00:26
*** rmoe has quit IRC00:27
*** rwsu has quit IRC00:27
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting00:28
*** hemanthravi has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
*** jcoufal has quit IRC00:29
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting00:30
*** amotoki has quit IRC00:30
*** andreaf has quit IRC00:31
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC00:31
*** ddutta has joined #openstack-meeting00:32
*** cjellick has quit IRC00:32
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting00:32
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting00:34
*** jdob has quit IRC00:34
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting00:35
*** mrodden1 has joined #openstack-meeting00:35
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting00:38
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez00:38
*** mrodden has quit IRC00:38
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting00:39
*** jdob has quit IRC00:40
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away00:41
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC00:42
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_00:43
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC00:44
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting00:44
*** atiwari has quit IRC00:46
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:46
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting00:47
*** armax has left #openstack-meeting00:49
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC00:49
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman00:50
*** oubiwan__ has quit IRC00:51
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:51
*** Gordonz has quit IRC00:52
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting00:53
*** oubiwan__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:54
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting00:54
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC00:54
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away00:55
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** epico has quit IRC00:57
*** epico has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting00:57
*** thuc_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:58
*** zhikunliu has joined #openstack-meeting00:58
*** thuc_ has quit IRC00:59
*** thuc_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:59
*** thuc_ has quit IRC00:59
*** oubiwan__ has quit IRC00:59
*** xuhanp has quit IRC01:00
*** thuc_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:00
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting01:00
*** thuc_ has quit IRC01:00
*** thuc has quit IRC01:00
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC01:01
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting01:01
*** thuc has quit IRC01:01
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC01:02
*** ddutta has quit IRC01:02
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting01:02
*** MaxV has quit IRC01:02
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting01:02
*** matjazp has quit IRC01:04
*** epim has quit IRC01:05
*** oubiwan__ has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** oubiwan__ has quit IRC01:07
*** oubiwan__ has joined #openstack-meeting01:08
*** rossk has quit IRC01:08
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:09
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:10
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:12
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:12
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC01:13
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting01:14
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting01:14
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:14
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:15
*** cjellick has quit IRC01:15
*** jcoufal has quit IRC01:15
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:16
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:16
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC01:17
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:17
*** bill_az has quit IRC01:17
*** rwsu has quit IRC01:17
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:17
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:18
*** dvarga has quit IRC01:18
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:19
*** slagle has quit IRC01:20
*** oubiwan__ has quit IRC01:21
*** oubiwan__ has joined #openstack-meeting01:21
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:22
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:22
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:23
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:24
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:25
*** dprince has quit IRC01:25
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:26
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:26
*** ArxCruz_ has quit IRC01:26
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:27
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:27
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting01:28
*** alazarev has quit IRC01:28
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC01:28
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting01:30
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:30
*** derekh has quit IRC01:30
*** alazarev has quit IRC01:30
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:30
*** ayoung_afk is now known as ayoung01:30
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:31
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting01:31
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC01:32
*** oubiwan__ has quit IRC01:34
*** hemanthravi has quit IRC01:35
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC01:37
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting01:39
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting01:39
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting01:39
*** bauzas has quit IRC01:41
*** jackychen has joined #openstack-meeting01:41
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC01:44
*** gmurphy is now known as gmurphy_afk01:44
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** jackychen has quit IRC01:45
*** jackychen has joined #openstack-meeting01:45
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting01:47
*** oubiwan__ has joined #openstack-meeting01:48
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC01:49
*** hemanthravi has joined #openstack-meeting01:49
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting01:49
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:49
*** hemanthravi has quit IRC01:50
*** TheWinnerFjk has joined #openstack-meeting01:50
TheWinnerFjkSee this please  http://toomanydownloads.x10host.com/?ref=51101:50
*** TheWinnerFjk has left #openstack-meeting01:50
*** xyhuang has quit IRC01:51
*** gmurphy_afk is now known as gmurphy01:52
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting01:53
*** imsurit has joined #openstack-meeting01:53
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC01:53
*** Yathi has quit IRC01:54
*** amcrn has quit IRC01:55
*** bdpayne has quit IRC01:55
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:56
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting01:59
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting02:01
*** devlaps has quit IRC02:01
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC02:02
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC02:02
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting02:04
*** matjazp has quit IRC02:05
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:07
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC02:08
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC02:10
*** thuc has quit IRC02:12
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** sjing has joined #openstack-meeting02:12
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:13
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC02:13
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting02:14
*** mtanino has quit IRC02:14
*** thuc has quit IRC02:17
*** tsekiyam_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:18
*** dvarga has quit IRC02:19
*** tsekiyama has quit IRC02:20
*** tsekiyam_ has quit IRC02:22
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC02:24
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:26
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC02:26
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting02:28
*** mandeep has left #openstack-meeting02:29
*** gokrokve has quit IRC02:30
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:30
*** shivharis has quit IRC02:31
*** yamahata has quit IRC02:36
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting02:37
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting02:39
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting02:42
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC02:43
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting02:44
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting02:47
*** comay has quit IRC02:47
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting02:48
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting02:49
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC02:49
*** yuanz has quit IRC02:49
*** houming has joined #openstack-meeting02:50
*** rfolco has quit IRC02:50
*** comay has joined #openstack-meeting02:53
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC02:55
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n302:56
*** mandeep has quit IRC02:56
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting02:56
*** krotscheck has quit IRC02:57
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting02:58
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting02:59
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:59
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting03:02
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC03:03
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting03:04
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC03:05
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting03:06
*** matjazp has quit IRC03:06
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting03:08
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC03:10
*** joesavak has quit IRC03:11
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting03:12
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting03:15
*** karthikn has quit IRC03:16
*** yuan has joined #openstack-meeting03:17
*** dvarga has quit IRC03:20
*** spzala has quit IRC03:21
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting03:22
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting03:23
*** pablosan has quit IRC03:25
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting03:27
*** pablosan has joined #openstack-meeting03:27
*** thuc has quit IRC03:28
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC03:31
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** vkozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC03:36
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting03:37
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting03:38
*** dcramer__ has quit IRC03:39
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting03:39
*** annegentle has quit IRC03:42
*** ivar-lazzaro_ has quit IRC03:42
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting03:46
*** Leonr has quit IRC03:52
*** tsekiyama has joined #openstack-meeting03:53
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting04:00
*** arnaud has quit IRC04:01
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting04:02
*** alazarev has quit IRC04:06
*** matjazp has quit IRC04:07
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting04:16
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC04:16
*** sc68cal has quit IRC04:17
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting04:20
*** amandeep has joined #openstack-meeting04:21
*** dvarga has quit IRC04:21
*** amandeep is now known as Guest2126804:21
*** tsekiyama has quit IRC04:23
*** radsy has quit IRC04:25
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting04:26
*** sjing has quit IRC04:26
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting04:26
*** sjing has joined #openstack-meeting04:27
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away04:30
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting04:30
*** thuc has quit IRC04:33
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting04:33
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting04:33
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja04:35
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:37
*** thuc has quit IRC04:37
*** slagle has quit IRC04:38
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting04:40
*** Linz has quit IRC04:44
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting04:44
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC04:45
*** houming- has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** jackychen_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting04:45
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting04:46
*** houming has quit IRC04:48
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting04:49
*** jackychen has quit IRC04:49
*** imsurit has quit IRC04:49
*** gcb has quit IRC04:50
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting04:51
*** banix has quit IRC04:52
*** jecarey has quit IRC04:52
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC04:53
*** jjmb1 has joined #openstack-meeting04:54
*** jjmb has quit IRC04:54
*** slagle has quit IRC04:57
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC04:59
*** thuc_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:01
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting05:01
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC05:01
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC05:02
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting05:03
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting05:03
*** matjazp_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:05
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting05:07
*** matjazp has quit IRC05:07
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting05:08
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting05:09
*** mrda is now known as mrda_away05:09
*** matjazp_ has quit IRC05:09
*** vkozhukalov has quit IRC05:10
*** MaxV has quit IRC05:12
*** envydd has joined #openstack-meeting05:13
*** pablosan has quit IRC05:14
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting05:14
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting05:15
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting05:17
*** crc32 has quit IRC05:19
*** sjing has quit IRC05:20
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC05:21
*** vkozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting05:21
*** dvarga has quit IRC05:21
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC05:29
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting05:29
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting05:30
*** vkozhukalov has quit IRC05:35
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** Linz has quit IRC05:38
*** gokrokve has quit IRC05:38
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting05:39
*** nshaikh has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** banix has quit IRC05:41
*** kmartin has joined #openstack-meeting05:42
*** noslzzp has quit IRC05:43
*** gokrokve has quit IRC05:43
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting05:43
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan05:44
*** stevemar has quit IRC05:46
*** noslzzp has quit IRC05:49
*** jecarey has quit IRC05:52
*** alazarev has quit IRC05:52
*** Mandell has quit IRC05:54
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC05:56
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting05:57
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting06:00
*** topol has quit IRC06:01
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting06:01
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting06:06
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting06:06
*** oubiwan__ has quit IRC06:06
*** oubiwan__ has joined #openstack-meeting06:07
*** Guest21268 has quit IRC06:08
*** matjazp has quit IRC06:10
*** amandeep has joined #openstack-meeting06:12
*** amandeep is now known as jimidara06:12
*** jimidara is now known as jimidar06:13
*** vhoward- has quit IRC06:13
*** amcrn has quit IRC06:13
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting06:14
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away06:16
*** vhoward has joined #openstack-meeting06:16
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:16
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting06:17
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** dburmistrov has joined #openstack-meeting06:21
*** dvarga has quit IRC06:23
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC06:23
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting06:27
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:29
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting06:30
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting06:30
*** gokrokve has quit IRC06:31
*** mandeep has joined #openstack-meeting06:33
*** mandeep has quit IRC06:34
*** gyee has quit IRC06:34
*** matjazp has quit IRC06:35
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting06:37
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC06:38
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting06:41
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting06:46
*** vjay has quit IRC06:49
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting06:49
*** thuc_ has quit IRC06:49
*** bdpayne has quit IRC06:50
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting06:50
*** vjay has quit IRC06:53
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting06:53
*** thuc has quit IRC06:54
*** envydd has quit IRC06:57
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting06:58
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting06:59
*** dburmistrov has quit IRC07:00
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting07:01
*** zhikunliu has quit IRC07:03
*** alazarev has quit IRC07:04
*** weshay has quit IRC07:08
*** kmartin has quit IRC07:10
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting07:12
*** envydd has joined #openstack-meeting07:12
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-ZZzZzzZz_07:12
*** zhikunliu has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting07:18
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting07:21
*** MaxV has quit IRC07:21
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting07:22
*** dvarga has quit IRC07:23
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting07:23
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov07:28
*** nosnos has quit IRC07:31
*** nosnos_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:31
*** slagle has quit IRC07:31
*** MaxV has quit IRC07:31
*** vjay has quit IRC07:34
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting07:34
*** banix has quit IRC07:35
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting07:37
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting07:38
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting07:39
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting07:43
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting07:45
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz07:47
*** amotoki has quit IRC07:47
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting07:49
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting07:50
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting07:52
*** oubiwan__ has quit IRC07:56
*** MaxV has quit IRC07:57
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8707:58
*** thuc has quit IRC07:58
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z08:02
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting08:03
*** nosnos_ has quit IRC08:04
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
*** vjay has quit IRC08:08
*** walterheck has quit IRC08:09
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting08:09
*** gongysh has quit IRC08:12
*** ildikov_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:14
*** matjazp has quit IRC08:15
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting08:18
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting08:19
*** I159 has joined #openstack-meeting08:20
*** I159_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:20
*** walterheck has joined #openstack-meeting08:20
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
*** ndipanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
*** dvarga has quit IRC08:24
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting08:24
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov08:25
*** saju_m has quit IRC08:26
*** julienvey_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:28
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting08:31
*** acoles has joined #openstack-meeting08:32
*** flaper87|afk has joined #openstack-meeting08:35
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting08:37
*** brucer has quit IRC08:39
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting08:39
*** pnavarro has quit IRC08:41
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting08:41
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting08:42
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg08:44
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z08:46
*** imsurit has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting08:46
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC08:47
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting08:49
*** flaper87|afk has quit IRC08:50
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting08:51
*** ygbo has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
*** xianghui has quit IRC08:54
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC08:55
*** zhikunliu has quit IRC08:56
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting08:57
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC08:57
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting09:00
*** jjmb1 has quit IRC09:02
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting09:04
*** whenry has quit IRC09:05
*** arborism is now known as amcrn09:07
*** sballe has quit IRC09:08
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting09:08
*** yassine has joined #openstack-meeting09:09
*** I159 has quit IRC09:09
*** I159_ has quit IRC09:10
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting09:10
*** I159 has joined #openstack-meeting09:10
*** I159_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:10
*** ihrachys|sick is now known as ihrachys|wfh09:11
*** xianghui has quit IRC09:12
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting09:12
*** matjazp has quit IRC09:14
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting09:16
*** sballe has quit IRC09:17
*** keku has joined #openstack-meeting09:17
*** xianghui has quit IRC09:18
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC09:19
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting09:20
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting09:23
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:24
*** dvarga has quit IRC09:25
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting09:26
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting09:28
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC09:28
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting09:28
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC09:30
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting09:30
*** paragan has quit IRC09:32
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting09:33
*** matjazp has quit IRC09:35
*** xuhanp has quit IRC09:39
*** matjazp has joined #openstack-meeting09:39
*** luqas has quit IRC09:40
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting09:42
*** krtaylor has quit IRC09:44
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting09:44
*** fbo_away is now known as fbo09:45
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting09:45
*** paragan has quit IRC09:45
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting09:45
*** vuil has joined #openstack-meeting09:51
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting09:51
*** salv-orlando_ has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting09:52
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC09:55
*** salv-orlando_ is now known as salv-orlando09:55
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC09:56
*** luqas has quit IRC09:58
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting10:05
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC10:05
*** envydd has quit IRC10:07
*** shakayumi has quit IRC10:07
*** aedocw has quit IRC10:09
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC10:12
*** yamahata has quit IRC10:18
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting10:21
*** evgenyf has quit IRC10:23
*** andreaf has quit IRC10:24
*** egallen has quit IRC10:25
*** dvarga has quit IRC10:25
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** matjazp has quit IRC10:28
*** ttrifonov has quit IRC10:30
*** ttrifonov has joined #openstack-meeting10:31
*** ttrifonov has left #openstack-meeting10:34
*** paragan has quit IRC10:34
*** mrmartin has quit IRC10:38
*** ttrifonov_zZzz has joined #openstack-meeting10:38
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg10:39
*** ttrifonov_zZzz has left #openstack-meeting10:39
*** ttrifonov_zZzz has joined #openstack-meeting10:41
*** ttrifonov_zZzz has quit IRC10:41
*** ttrifonov_zZzz has joined #openstack-meeting10:45
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting10:45
*** lxsli0 has joined #openstack-meeting10:46
*** ttrifonov_zZzz has quit IRC10:47
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting10:48
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting10:50
*** lxsli has quit IRC10:54
*** thuc has quit IRC10:55
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:56
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting10:56
*** xianghui has quit IRC10:59
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting11:02
*** ttrifonov_zZzz has joined #openstack-meeting11:02
*** lxsli0 is now known as lxsli11:03
*** lxsli is now known as lxsli111:04
*** lxsli1 is now known as thelexx11:04
*** amcrn has quit IRC11:04
*** ttrifonov_zZzz is now known as ttrifonov11:05
*** thelexx is now known as lxsli11:05
*** jgallard has quit IRC11:05
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC11:07
*** pnavarro has quit IRC11:07
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC11:08
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting11:09
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:09
*** lxsli has quit IRC11:10
*** saschpe has quit IRC11:12
*** egallen has quit IRC11:12
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting11:12
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting11:13
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting11:13
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting11:13
*** samuelbercovici has joined #openstack-meeting11:13
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC11:14
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting11:15
*** saschpe has joined #openstack-meeting11:16
*** morganfainberg is now known as morganfainberg_Z11:16
*** yamahata has quit IRC11:16
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting11:19
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting11:19
*** egallen has quit IRC11:20
*** jjmb has quit IRC11:20
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting11:21
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting11:24
*** lxsli has joined #openstack-meeting11:26
*** dvarga has quit IRC11:26
*** lxsli has quit IRC11:29
*** lxsli has joined #openstack-meeting11:30
*** johnthetubaguy1 has quit IRC11:32
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting11:38
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting11:39
*** pnavarro has quit IRC11:41
*** julienvey_ has quit IRC11:41
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:50
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting11:50
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting11:50
*** yfujioka has quit IRC11:54
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting11:54
*** vkozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting11:55
*** VINOD has joined #openstack-meeting11:55
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:59
*** lxsli has quit IRC12:01
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:04
*** lxsli has joined #openstack-meeting12:05
*** ekarlso has quit IRC12:09
*** aedocw has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting12:10
*** yamahata has quit IRC12:10
*** erlon has joined #openstack-meeting12:12
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting12:14
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting12:15
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting12:18
*** vkmc has quit IRC12:18
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting12:18
*** lukego has quit IRC12:19
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC12:21
*** eharney has quit IRC12:22
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting12:22
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting12:23
*** nshaikh has left #openstack-meeting12:23
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:25
*** luqas has quit IRC12:26
*** dvarga has quit IRC12:27
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC12:31
*** julienvey_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:35
*** miqui has joined #openstack-meeting12:36
*** rdxc has joined #openstack-meeting12:38
*** david-lyle has quit IRC12:39
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting12:39
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting12:40
*** saju_m has quit IRC12:40
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC12:40
*** zhiyan has left #openstack-meeting12:43
*** zhiyan has joined #openstack-meeting12:43
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting12:43
*** lukego has joined #openstack-meeting12:44
*** mfink has quit IRC12:46
*** epico has quit IRC12:49
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:50
*** saju_m has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** sandywalsh_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:55
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** pdmars has quit IRC13:01
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting13:02
*** jhenner1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:02
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC13:02
*** rbrady-bbl is now known as rbrady13:02
*** jhenner has quit IRC13:03
*** vjay has quit IRC13:03
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting13:03
*** afazekas has quit IRC13:03
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** saju_m has quit IRC13:04
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:05
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC13:08
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann13:11
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting13:13
*** paragan has joined #openstack-meeting13:13
*** Fdot has quit IRC13:13
*** miqui_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:15
*** miqui has quit IRC13:15
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** flaper87 has quit IRC13:17
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** ArthurBerezin1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** jhenner1 has quit IRC13:18
*** jhenner1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** baoli has quit IRC13:18
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** eharney has quit IRC13:18
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** gcb has quit IRC13:18
*** ArthurBerezin1 has quit IRC13:18
*** ArthurBerezin1 has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** jimidar has quit IRC13:18
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting13:19
*** ArthurBerezin1 has quit IRC13:23
*** lsmola has quit IRC13:23
*** markmcclain has quit IRC13:23
*** ekarlso has joined #openstack-meeting13:23
*** miqui_ is now known as miqui13:23
*** dcramer__ has quit IRC13:25
*** houming- has quit IRC13:27
*** paragan has quit IRC13:27
*** mfink has joined #openstack-meeting13:30
*** jackychen_ has quit IRC13:31
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting13:31
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting13:33
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_13:36
*** keku has quit IRC13:36
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting13:36
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting13:37
*** thuc has quit IRC13:41
*** nacim_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:43
*** nacim has quit IRC13:44
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting13:44
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting13:47
*** thuc has quit IRC13:48
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** thuc_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC13:52
*** thuc has quit IRC13:53
*** jhenner1 has quit IRC13:55
*** rbowen has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** nosnos has quit IRC13:56
*** rfolco has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
sc68calgood morning, good afternoon, good evening13:57
*** VINOD has quit IRC13:58
*** jecarey has quit IRC13:59
*** ItSANgo has quit IRC13:59
sc68cal#startmeeting neutron_ipv614:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar  4 14:00:04 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_ipv6)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_ipv6'14:00
xuhanphello14:00
sc68calxuhanp: hi, how are you?14:00
xuhanpsc68cal, I am great. How about you?14:00
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC14:00
sc68calHoping for spring - tired of snow :)14:00
baoliHi14:01
xuhanp:-)14:01
sc68calbaoli: good morning14:01
baolisc68cal, good morning to you14:01
sc68cal#info Today is the last day for I-314:02
xuhanpyeah. it's kind of sad considering we have so many patches to be reviewed.14:02
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
sc68calIndeed - at the main meeting, there was a huge amount of blueprints that were targeted to I-314:03
sc68calAt this point, I am just happy that we have a working sub-team, we've got blueprints that everyone is working towards, and some code in review14:04
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting14:04
sc68calThere has been discussion of making a feature freeze exception for IPv6 work14:04
xuhanpsc68cal, that's great! any luck?14:04
baolithat will be a good news14:04
xuhanpI just hope more core members can review them. Since we don't have one in our team.14:05
sc68calYes, so we should make sure that we identify high priority patches for core reviewers14:05
*** shshang has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away14:05
sc68calI think the first two patches are xuhanp's that fixes the RA filtering and allows LLAs for routers14:05
*** BrianB__ has joined #openstack-meeting14:06
xuhanpI kind of hope I can make another patch based on the discussion with baoli and Randy.14:06
xuhanpbut I am not sure if I can make it by today.14:06
xuhanpunit test is killing me14:06
sc68calNo rush - I am not going to try and jam this through14:06
sc68calMore than likely we'd just be scrambling and end up making more mistakes14:07
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga14:07
*** ItSANgo has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
*** jmh_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:07
sc68calIf we can get a FFE - that's fine, but I think it is important for us to get it right the first time, because we won't get another chance to have a clean slate to work on14:07
*** ArthurBerezin has quit IRC14:07
sc68calSo if it slips to J - so be it.14:08
baolixuhanp, thanks for the good discussion and the good work you did14:08
xuhanpbaoli, no problem. your points make a lot of sense to me.14:08
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
*** absubram has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
sc68calI saw that Randy posted a new patchset and blueprint on the ML14:10
sc68cal#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port Allow multiple subnets on gateway port14:10
sc68calI'm going to go ahead and add it to the wiki-  before I forget14:10
sc68calIf everyone could take a moment and update the wiki - that'd be great.14:11
sc68cal#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/IPv6 IPv6 wiki14:11
xuhanpsc68cal, will do! I actually hope I can ask some questions to Randy but not sure if he will join.14:12
baoliwill look at Randy's patch and the wiki sometime this week.14:12
*** stsauer has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
*** rtuttle1015 has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
baolisc68cal, the wiki looks good at first glance14:13
baoliI don't seem to have permissions to open the links14:14
sc68calyeah, I believe that Anthony and others did work on it recently14:14
xuhanpI actually have a question about the external network RA if we can discuss it here.14:14
sc68calsure14:14
xuhanpI am now quite clear about the from openstack dnsmasq and the RA from existing provider network gateway.14:15
xuhanpbut I am confused about RA from external network on the router.14:15
rtuttle1015@xuhan... let's discuss14:15
rtuttle1015we really want RA from external SP router for learning default route. I'm not convinced we want to use it for SLAAC14:15
rtuttle1015I'm open for suggestions on that topic14:16
*** vijendar has quit IRC14:16
xuhanpso what if qg-xxxx device sends RA or another device on external network sends RA?14:16
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC14:17
baoliRA cannot be forwarded, right?14:17
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
xuhanpqr and qg are on the same switch, so qr will get the RA, right?14:17
baolixuhanp, I don't think so14:18
rtuttle1015that's a good point. we might want security to prevent untrusted RAs14:18
rtuttle1015we set qr to ignore RA14:18
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting14:18
rtuttle1015or more specifically, we don't learn default route from RA on qr- interface14:18
xuhanpyeah. I am not sure what rules are there for network node.14:18
rtuttle1015yes... it is coded that way (new code)14:18
rtuttle1015in Shixiong's code, when internal network is added, we set learning default route from RA off14:19
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez14:19
rtuttle1015so default route is only learned from SP on external network14:19
rtuttle1015this is the intent14:20
xuhanprtuttle1015, what is SP ?14:20
rtuttle1015sorry... Service Provider14:20
baolirtuttle1015, my question is that should a router forward a RA received on one link to other links on the same router?14:20
rtuttle1015not sure.... for now, I don't think so14:21
baolithat's right. So a RA received from qgxxx can't be forwarded to qrxxx links14:21
haleybbaoli: RAs are not forwarded by routers14:21
rtuttle1015agreed!!14:21
haleybRAs are generated by routers14:22
baoliwe talked about prefix delegation in the SP case14:22
*** ccorrigan has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** lsmola has quit IRC14:24
rtuttle1015@baoli: so you mean get RA from SP router with prefix, and use that for tenant networks, correct?14:24
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting14:24
sc68cal+1 - PD for tenant networks would be great14:25
rtuttle1015so we'd need to integrate with the dnsmasq efforts for defining internal networks14:25
baolirtutlle1015, yes. the router can delegate prefixes from SP.14:25
rtuttle1015yes14:25
rtuttle1015so we're talking post-I3, right14:25
sc68caldefintely14:25
rtuttle1015:D14:25
rtuttle1015so do we need a new BP for this??14:26
rtuttle1015...or a series of them14:26
sc68calprobably a series14:26
xuhanp+1 for new blueprints14:27
sc68calbut let's just crawl before we start doing marathons :)14:27
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC14:27
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
*** ameade has joined #openstack-meeting14:27
rtuttle1015yup14:27
sc68calWe'll also have to tinker with the API again14:27
baolirtuttle1015: a few weeks back, I asked If I should create one14:27
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC14:27
sc68calsince you currently have to specify a CIDR for a subnet, but for PD, you'd be *requesting* a subnet14:27
rtuttle1015I think one at least for a placeholder14:27
rtuttle1015yes14:28
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting14:28
baolirtuttle1015, I will create one after the meeting14:28
rtuttle1015kewl B-)14:28
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting14:28
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC14:28
*** cgoncalves has joined #openstack-meeting14:28
rtuttle1015so we'd need to be able to specify how large a slice to take from PD when specifying an internal net, no?14:29
*** rissmann has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
rtuttle1015of course, we'd need checks for overlaps, etc.14:29
*** bgorski has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
sc68calProbably lots we'd have to hash out14:30
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
baolifor sure.14:30
*** lblanchard has joined #openstack-meeting14:30
*** ArthurBerezin1 has joined #openstack-meeting14:31
xuhanpso let me double confirm here. For my security group RA patch for icehouse (if we can make it), I only allow RA from qr-xxxx LLA address or subnet's gateway IP (which should also be LLA), right?14:31
*** ArthurBerezin1 has left #openstack-meeting14:31
*** ArthurBerezin has quit IRC14:31
sc68calxuhanp: sounds correct to me - baoli?14:31
*** thuc_ has quit IRC14:31
xuhanpthis is from compute node perspective.14:31
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting14:31
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
xuhanpfor now I plan to just use gateway IP from subnet. and we can figure out how to pass the LLA of gateway later.14:32
baolithe qr-xxx LLA is the subnet's gateway IP14:32
xuhanpmay need a new API for that.14:32
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
xuhanpthis only when qr-xxxx is created.14:33
rtuttle1015can u not just calculate LLA via EIU64 (the same way it's done in the agent)?14:33
xuhanpthere is case this port is not created and the existing gateway is used.14:33
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting14:33
*** lsmola has quit IRC14:33
baoliWhen a subnet is added to a router, the qr-xxx interface will be created14:33
xuhanpbaoli, yes.14:33
sc68calI'm sure we can scrape out the LLA from the qr-xxx post-creation and set it as the subnet's gateway14:34
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting14:34
xuhanpsc68cal, we actually only need the LLA for the security group, right?14:34
*** luqas has quit IRC14:34
baolisc68cal, that's right14:34
sc68calxuhanp: I believe so14:34
xuhanpso I can just do that calculation in my security group code.14:34
haleybxuhanp: have you figured out if the icmp type can be specified already?  (based on sean's email)  i'm wondering if iptables will do the right thing, haven't verified that in devstack myself14:34
xuhanpusing dazhao's code.14:34
sc68calxuhanp: good point14:35
*** changbl has quit IRC14:35
baolixuhanp, you can either calculate it or get it from ip link14:35
xuhanpbaoli, that's right.14:35
xuhanphaleyb, I haven't checked that yet.14:35
xuhanpwill do soon.14:36
sc68calI *think* that the code that creates the subnet's gateway attribute will occur before the security group code we're patching14:36
sc68calbut if not, we can calculate it14:36
sc68calideally you'd create the subnet, create the neutron router, *then* start launching instances14:36
*** thuc has quit IRC14:36
xuhanpsc68cal, great point. I haven't think about this yet.14:37
sc68caland xuhanp's patch happens at the last step, so as long as we're sticking the LLA as the subnet's gateway when we create the neutron router we should be OK14:37
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting14:37
baolixuhanp, do you plan to save the LLA in openstack or get it whenever it's needed?14:37
xuhanpthat's my new blueprint is about but I haven't figure out the details yet.14:38
sc68calI vote for saving it, since we can return it in API calls instead of continually computing14:38
sc68calwhen someone does a GET on their subnet, etc.14:38
*** jjmb has quit IRC14:39
*** bill_az has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
sc68calI'm not sure how we handle that BP for making GUA's for routers though - that may be tricky14:39
baolisc68cal, the qr-xxx port can still get an address from the subnet without any change, right?14:40
sc68calI don't know for certain, I think it's a case of the qr-xxx port having a GUA addr on the subnet, but we'd only be putting the LLA back into Neutron's DB14:41
sc68calah no that's wrong14:41
sc68calbecause the gateway still has ports14:41
xuhanpsc68cal, what if the instance is launching before the router is created?14:41
sc68caland the ports would have the addrs on the subnet14:41
sc68calxuhanp: Probably the same thing that happens today - no networking14:41
sc68calor at least no routing14:41
xuhanpbut we can still get the IP of qr-xxxx although it's not created?14:42
xuhanpif not. we won't have the rule for that IP.14:42
sc68calno, we won't know the mac addr of a non-existent device14:42
sc68calbut that's OK14:43
sc68calif you launch an instance on a net with no neutron router- you're either doing upstream gateway14:43
sc68calor I don't know what you're doing14:43
*** dims has quit IRC14:43
xuhanpso we expect user to add that rule later when router is created?14:43
sc68calwe expect a user to have the gateway already set up14:44
sc68calbe it an external gateway, or a neutron router14:44
sc68calso that when the security group rules are being set up for an instance, it can just pull the gateway IP and add a rule to allow RAs in14:44
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-meeting14:44
sc68calbaoli: check my assumptions14:45
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting14:46
baolisc68cal, yea, the admin can add SG rules whenever it's needed.14:46
*** jjmb has quit IRC14:46
*** huats has quit IRC14:46
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting14:46
sc68calI think we've got this pretty much licked, with the two patches that you've created xuhanp14:47
xuhanpyep. hope so14:47
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** huats has quit IRC14:47
*** huats has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
sc68calwe've got a +2 from mark mcclain on the allow LLAs as router interface of v6 subnet14:48
sc68calso, we're looking pretty good :)14:48
baoliwe are talking about openstack router, I think. So is it possible for the admin to add the router after VMs got launched, or to replace/reconfigure the router, etc.14:49
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting14:49
xuhanpthat's my previous question, baoli :-)14:49
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC14:49
baoliIf it's possible, then it has to be taken care of, I guess14:50
xuhanpthat order will make our security group rule missing14:50
sc68calWe can see if there's a way to refresh the security groups and get xuhanp's code path to fire again14:50
*** lsmola has quit IRC14:50
xuhanpyeah. I can do some check on that.14:51
baoliright14:51
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away14:51
xuhanpfor example, every time the router is created or updated, fire that code again.14:51
xuhanpmay need to move that to another place.14:51
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting14:52
sc68calWe can take a look - but we can always improve it later - my concern is right now we have it a bit too permissive14:52
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting14:52
sc68calI know the RPC for security groups has a way to tell the driver to refresh14:52
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga14:53
xuhanpsc68cal, maybe after my patches get merged, then open another bug to track this.14:53
baoliWe also need to consider the combination of SG rule and the rule that xuhanp's patch will add, I think.14:53
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting14:53
sc68calxuhanp: +1 for another bug to track14:53
sc68calbaoli: +1 - although I *think* if they add another rule to allow in RAs, that .... might? win14:54
sc68calhave to grab my magnifying glass and read the iptables rules that it creates again.14:54
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
sc68calsince the iptables rules it creates are RETURNs, based on the matching criteria14:55
sc68calthe last rule is a DROP14:55
sc68calinside an security group chain14:55
sc68calso if they add a sec group rule to permit RAs from somewhere else in, a new rule is added to the chain that does a RETURN for that address14:55
*** banix has quit IRC14:55
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting14:56
sc68calbefore the DROP statement, if I remember correctly14:56
sc68calso I think we're OK14:56
baoliSo you could create multiple ICMPv6 RA rules in the same time, and the last one in the chain will win?14:56
haleybi'm more worried about the syntax used when adding that rule, since if it's not in iptables-save format things don't always work right on updates14:57
sc68calwhichever one matches the packet will win, make it RETURN from the sec-group chain, into another chain that allows it through14:57
haleybbaoli: the last one DROPs, so anything before it "wins"14:57
baolisc68cal, haleyb, cool.14:58
sc68calhaleyb: is that the "protocol icmpv6" syntax for iptables?14:58
sc68calvs whatever it is currently?14:58
haleybi'd be happy to look at iptables-save before/after output14:58
xuhanphaleyb, I think it's the --icmp-type you are talking about?14:59
xuhanp--icmpv6-type14:59
sc68calwell, looks like we're out of time14:59
*** kgriffs_afk is now known as kgriffs14:59
haleybsc68cal: i don't remember offhand, i'm more thinking of the filters we add today for types, yes, that thing14:59
sc68calLet's get a blueprint or bug for handling router updates for our sg fix, and a bug for the icmp-type for iptables-save14:59
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
baoliIt would be ideal to have consistent icmpv6 RA rules in the chain.15:00
sc68calthen let's add it to the wiki so we don't lose track of them15:00
baoliagreed15:00
sc68calthanks everyone!15:00
sc68cal#endmeeting15:00
xuhanpsc68cal, will do15:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar  4 15:00:36 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-03-04-14.00.html15:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-03-04-14.00.txt15:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_ipv6/2014/neutron_ipv6.2014-03-04-14.00.log.html15:00
*** shshang has quit IRC15:00
*** rtuttle1015 has quit IRC15:00
n0ano#startmeeting gantt15:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar  4 15:01:04 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'gantt'15:01
n0anoanyone here to talk scheduler?15:01
*** stsauer has left #openstack-meeting15:01
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC15:01
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC15:01
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
bauzas\o15:02
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:02
bauzas(left-handed)15:02
n0anoyou and my wife :-)15:02
bauzas:-)15:03
n0anolooks like everyones busy today, maybe you & I can talk a little about the forklift15:04
n0ano#topic scheduler code forklift15:04
*** openstack changes topic to "scheduler code forklift (Meeting topic: gantt)"15:04
*** Tross has quit IRC15:04
bauzassure15:04
n0anoI've been trying to update gantt to match the current nova tree, just to see what interfaces need to be updated, not much progress yet, have you been able to look at anything?15:04
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC15:05
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
bauzashttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/icehouse-external-scheduler15:05
bauzasI looked at the 2nd bp15:05
n0anothe scheduler-lib one?15:05
bauzasyup15:05
*** dkranz has quit IRC15:06
n0anothat would be good, how does it look to do that?15:06
bauzasthe discussion was around where to update metrics15:06
bauzasie. if we say that the scheduler lib should stand by its own, does it mean it could be a different SQL backend ?15:07
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
*** joesavak has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
bauzasatm, johnthetubaguy told me it was not necessary for a first release15:07
n0anogiven it stands alone I'd say yes, it could use a different SQL backend but why would we15:08
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
bauzaswhere the HostState should be placed ?15:09
bauzasI was thinking it should stand by its own as Gantt DB15:09
bauzasso that queries would look in it directly within the filters15:09
n0anomy goal would be to hold the hoststate in scheduler memory, potentially backed up by something like memcached to support multiple schedulers15:09
bauzasn0ano: that's sexy, but that means we should wait for the nodb-schedule to be implemented15:10
n0anonote I said goal, nodb would be `really` good but, while waiting for it, we can just keep the current SQL database15:11
bauzasok15:11
bauzasI agree with the goal15:11
bauzasmy concern is just how we make sure to backport changes to Gantt once forklifted15:11
n0anoI would imagine the first step would be to have the SQL database updated and queried only by the scheduler15:12
bauzas+115:12
bauzaslet's talk baby steps15:12
n0ano+115:12
*** haomaiw__ has joined #openstack-meeting15:12
n0anoI think we're in violent agreement :-)15:12
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting15:12
*** jergerber has joined #openstack-meeting15:12
n0anobackporting of changes is doable I think, just a lot of grunt work on my part15:12
n0anonot that we need to make the scheduler-lib and the SQL accesses in the nova tree first, we'll do a new generation of the gantt tree once plan B is done15:13
*** gilr has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
*** vjay has quit IRC15:13
bauzasok, looking at the resource_tracker, I think the goal would be first to move the conductor calls to compute_nodeupdate() to scheduler lib15:14
n0anosounds good, how does that affect the calls in the compute code to send that info15:15
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC15:16
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
bauzasall the code is factorized15:16
bauzaswithin the _update() method15:16
n0anoso it's well isolated and easy to change15:16
bauzasI think (and hope) so15:16
n0anosounds like a plan, do you think you can work on doing that soon?15:17
bauzasbut my question is, do we consider this call should not use the nova conductor then ?15:17
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting15:17
n0anonot sure what you mean and what's the implication15:17
bauzasgantt currently doesn't have conductors in place15:17
bauzasthe call to update the host is done by self.conductor_api.compute_node_update(15:18
bauzas            context, self.compute_node, values)15:18
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:19
n0anoas long as that compute_node_update method winds up calling an API rather than linking into the scheduler code we should be OK15:19
bauzasthat doesn't use scheduler code15:19
bauzasmaybe I misexplained15:20
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
bauzasresource_tracker is updating stats to ComputeNode table15:20
*** jgrimm has joined #openstack-meeting15:20
bauzasthanks to compute_node_update() which finally goes to update ComputeNode table15:20
bauzasthru the conductor15:20
*** fnaval has quit IRC15:21
bauzasthere is no scheduler code in it15:21
n0anowell, if there's no scheduler code in it then it shouldn't be a problem for the forklift, move the scheduler out to a separate tree and the compute_node_update method should still work fine15:22
bauzasthat's only HostState from the Scheduler which is periodically updating its states from the ComputeNode table15:22
bauzasthe problem is that both projects share same table15:23
bauzasNova and Gantt15:23
n0anosharing the same table is OK for the forklift (maybe an issue for the no-db work but that's boris-4215:23
n0ano) problem.15:23
bauzassee the rationale here https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/scheduler-lib15:24
*** Yathi has quit IRC15:24
*** chandan_kumar has joined #openstack-meeting15:24
n0anoI think there's some confusion between splitting the code out and creating well defined interfaces15:26
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting15:26
n0anothat BP is more about creating interfaces (which is good) but not necessarily necessary to splitting the code out15:27
bauzaswell, I'm ok with it15:27
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
n0anono arguement, clean interfaces are good, personally I'm kind of focused on splitting the code out, I think we can do both in parallel15:28
bauzasthink so too15:28
bauzasbasically the proposal is to wrap up some interfaces within Gantt, that's it15:28
n0anoyep, that's the idea15:29
*** tongli has joined #openstack-meeting15:29
bauzaswe're entering FeatureFreeze15:29
bauzaswhen do you think it's worth working on it ?15:30
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting15:30
*** ayoung-ZZzZzzZz_ is now known as ayoung15:30
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting15:31
n0anowell, we can work on a private tree of course but I don't think we should try to push patches until after the Juno tree opens up, there's too much that needs to done on Icehouse right now15:31
n0anoit would be nice to get as much done as possible early in the Juno cycle, otherwise things will have a tendency to slip a lot15:31
*** lsmola has joined #openstack-meeting15:32
bauzas+115:32
bauzasanyway, i'm new to nova15:32
bauzasI was more focused on other project15:32
bauzasso, I can do some drafts there15:32
bauzasand you would be able to review me15:32
*** dvarga has quit IRC15:32
bauzasand johnthetubaguy as well15:32
bauzasso that once Juno would go live, we could focus on real patchsets15:33
n0anoabsolutely (I consider myself relatively new myself)15:33
bauzasI'm moving from Climate to Nova scheduler things, so I have a little ramp-up for understanding Nova concepts15:33
n0anoI want to keep working until juno goes live so we can immediately push stuff if possible but we do have a little bit of time.15:33
bauzassounds good15:34
n0anowe can learn together :-)15:34
bauzas:)15:34
*** toan-tran has joined #openstack-meeting15:34
bauzasI hope to be present at the Juno summit, that will depend on the Travel Support Program agreement... or not :)15:34
*** absubram has quit IRC15:35
n0anoI'll be there (these conferences are one I can talk my company into), let's hope you can make it too15:35
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC15:35
n0anowhere are you physically located?15:35
bauzasGrenoble, France15:36
n0anoAhh, well, the K summit should be easy for you (Paris), Atlanta I feel your pain15:36
bauzasI was present in KH15:37
bauzasHK15:37
*** dcramer__ has quit IRC15:37
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting15:37
n0anoI was in HK also but I have a tendency to keep a low profile15:37
bauzas:)15:37
bauzasI did a quick nova unconference presentation on Friday about scheduling interactions with Climate15:38
n0anoI'm good for today, unless you have anything else you want to discuss?15:38
bauzasnope, I'm fine too15:38
bauzaslet's back to work15:38
n0anocool, good talking to you and we'll meet again next week.15:38
*** coolsvap has joined #openstack-meeting15:38
bauzassure15:38
n0ano#endmeeting15:38
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:38
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar  4 15:38:53 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:38
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-03-04-15.01.html15:38
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-03-04-15.01.txt15:38
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/gantt/2014/gantt.2014-03-04-15.01.log.html15:38
*** gilr has quit IRC15:39
*** toan-tran has left #openstack-meeting15:43
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC15:44
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:44
*** vkozhukalov has quit IRC15:45
*** ttrifonov is now known as ttrifonov_zZzz15:46
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
*** mrunge has quit IRC15:47
*** dvarga has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** markmcclain has quit IRC15:47
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting15:48
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting15:49
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
*** mrunge has quit IRC15:50
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting15:51
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC15:54
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** johnthetubaguy1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:57
*** coolsvap1 has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** ycombina_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** envydd has joined #openstack-meeting15:58
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC15:58
*** ycombina_ has quit IRC15:58
*** ycombina_ has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** mrunge has joined #openstack-meeting16:00
primeministerp#startmeeting hyper-v16:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar  4 16:00:47 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is primeministerp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'hyper_v'16:00
primeministerphi everyone16:00
*** coolsvap has quit IRC16:00
primeministerpwe'll give a couple minutes for others to join16:01
*** ycombina_ has left #openstack-meeting16:01
*** jjmb has quit IRC16:01
alexpilottihi everybody!16:01
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away16:01
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga16:02
primeministerphi alexpilotti16:02
*** ociuhandu_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:02
primeministerphi ociuhandu_16:04
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting16:04
ociuhandu_hi all16:04
ociuhandu_hey primeministerp16:04
primeministerpwe'll wait another minute or so16:05
primeministerpok guys16:07
primeministerplet's begin16:07
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
primeministerp#topic nova-rdp16:08
*** openstack changes topic to "nova-rdp (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:08
*** ociuhandu_ has quit IRC16:08
*** luqas has quit IRC16:08
*** rissmann1 has joined #openstack-meeting16:08
*** rissmann1 has quit IRC16:08
alexpilottiso, we got the RDP blueprint merged on the Nova side16:08
primeministerpexecellent16:09
alexpilotti#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hyper-v-rdp-console16:10
alexpilottiso from now on, it's possible to deploy a RDP console16:10
*** shshang has joined #openstack-meeting16:10
alexpilotti#link http://wiki.cloudbase.it/nova-rdp16:11
*** devlaps has quit IRC16:11
alexpilottiif somebody wants to deploy, here's the wiki post showing up how to16:11
*** devlaps has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
primeministerpgreat work guys16:11
alexpilottitx!16:11
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting16:11
*** rissmann has quit IRC16:11
*** shshang has quit IRC16:12
primeministerpand the status of the horizon integration?16:12
alexpilottiyep, on the Horizon side, we still have one patch pending16:12
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann16:12
alexpilottiit has a +2, missing a second review16:13
*** shshang has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting16:13
alexpilotti#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/44257/16:14
alexpilottidavid-lyle already reviewed it positevely16:14
*** shshang has quit IRC16:14
primeministerpalso great news16:14
primeministerphopefully we'll get the +2 today16:14
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting16:15
primeministerp#topic horizon encrypted password16:16
*** openstack changes topic to "horizon encrypted password (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:16
primeministerpso i know there was issues w/ the plain txt passwd16:16
*** haomaiw__ has quit IRC16:16
primeministerpalexpilotti: do you want to discuss briefly16:16
primeministerpI know this has been a problem for while16:16
alexpilottiyep, arezmeriza submitted a patch #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61032/16:16
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** I159_ has quit IRC16:17
*** I159 has quit IRC16:17
alexpilottithat matches the nova feature already in Nova since Grizzly16:17
*** luqas has joined #openstack-meeting16:17
alexpilottithe BP was not targetted until yesterday, so it didn't get much attention before16:18
*** shshang has joined #openstack-meeting16:19
primeministerpalexpilotti: and do you expect that it will get some traction prior to the deadline?16:19
alexpilottithe patch is ready, but it most probably will require a FFE16:19
*** alazarev has quit IRC16:20
primeministerphmmm16:20
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting16:20
primeministerpalexpilotti: I know this is more on the critical side for us16:21
*** shshang has quit IRC16:21
primeministerphopefully it will get some attention16:21
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC16:21
*** Gordonz has quit IRC16:21
primeministerp#topic neutron-hyper-v driver16:21
*** openstack changes topic to "neutron-hyper-v driver (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:21
alexpilottiwe have the security groups patch ready to merge: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74199/16:22
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
alexpilottimarkmcclain is helping in reviewing it16:22
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
primeministerpgreat16:24
primeministerpany others that we're missing16:24
primeministerp#topic puppet modules16:24
*** openstack changes topic to "puppet modules (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:24
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
primeministerpso we'll be working in the next few weeks to clean up the existing puppet modules to push everything upstream16:25
primeministerphmm, was hoping to chat w/ luis, but it may have to wait16:25
primeministerp#topic hyper-v ci16:25
*** openstack changes topic to "hyper-v ci (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:25
primeministerpso we doubled our run capicaty16:26
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
primeministerphowever there were some technical issues which caused some problems over the last two weeks16:26
primeministerp2 patches that negatively affected our runs16:26
*** tnurlygayanov has joined #openstack-meeting16:26
ociuhanduprimeministerp: since we're in the beginning, we also have blocking bugs16:27
*** johnthetubaguy1 is now known as johnthetubaguy16:27
primeministerpociuhandu: care to add some info?16:27
ociuhanduprimeministerp: that get merged despite the fact that the hyper-v ci reports them as failed16:27
*** vkmc has quit IRC16:27
primeministerpociuhandu: ahh16:27
*** dkliban has quit IRC16:28
primeministerpociuhandu: we'll have to work on getting some weight behind our test runs16:28
*** pablosan has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
ociuhanduwe had an issue with a patch handling linux-specific signals16:28
*** thuc has joined #openstack-meeting16:28
ociuhanduthat brought down the CI for quite some time16:28
*** vjay has quit IRC16:28
ociuhanduprimeministerp: yes, and at the same time any such failure will affect that wieght :)16:28
alexpilottiNova patch that introcuced the issue: #link https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/cec532848f569afb4832029bce4969578472a57a16:28
*** pablosan is now known as ZZpablosan16:28
primeministerpociuhandu: I fully understand16:29
alexpilottipatch that we commit to fix it: nova #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77351/16:29
alexpilottioslo patch: #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77596/16:30
ociuhanduon the other hand, we had the first patch that was "blocked" until the hyper-v CI is saying it's fine  #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74199/16:30
*** slagle has quit IRC16:31
ociuhanduwhich was a very fair request16:31
*** hemna has quit IRC16:31
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** mrodden1 has quit IRC16:33
primeministerpociuhandu: thanks16:33
*** Macaveli has quit IRC16:33
*** egallen has quit IRC16:34
primeministerpis there anything else we need to address?16:34
alexpilottiI think we are set16:34
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting16:35
ociuhandui think we're set too16:35
*** whenry has joined #openstack-meeting16:35
primeministerpgreat16:35
primeministerpI'll follow up w/ luis16:35
primeministerplater16:35
primeministerp#endmeeting16:36
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:36
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar  4 16:36:00 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:36
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-03-04-16.00.html16:36
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-03-04-16.00.txt16:36
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2014/hyper_v.2014-03-04-16.00.log.html16:36
*** egallen has quit IRC16:37
*** dburmistrov has joined #openstack-meeting16:37
*** julienvey_ has quit IRC16:38
*** vuil has quit IRC16:39
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja16:40
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
*** harlowja has quit IRC16:41
*** envydd has quit IRC16:41
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** alazarev has quit IRC16:41
*** ZZpablosan has quit IRC16:43
*** pablosan has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
*** envydd has joined #openstack-meeting16:45
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away16:47
*** safchain has quit IRC16:47
*** ociuhandu has left #openstack-meeting16:47
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting16:48
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga16:49
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC16:53
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
*** tzabal has joined #openstack-meeting16:57
*** MaxV has quit IRC16:58
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC16:58
*** olkonami has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** vijendar1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:00
*** mrunge has quit IRC17:00
boris-42 #startmeeting Rally17:01
*** vijendar1 has quit IRC17:01
ttxoff by one error17:01
*** vijendar1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:01
boris-42ttx thx17:01
*** evgenyf has quit IRC17:01
boris-42ughsaunders rediskin  shakayumi stannie tnurlygayanov tzabal jroovers|afk akscram amaretskiy stannie olkonami hi17:01
*** egallen has quit IRC17:01
boris-42hughsaunders hi17:02
boris-42Rally meeting time=) anybody here?)17:02
tzabalhere17:02
olkonamihi17:02
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC17:02
*** jhenner has quit IRC17:02
*** vijendar has quit IRC17:02
*** dkliban has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** rmoe has quit IRC17:03
*** rediskin has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
boris-42waiting for others17:04
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
rediskinsup17:04
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting17:04
boris-42rediskin okay as you are here17:04
boris-42rediskin let's start from deploy stuff17:04
boris-42share pls with updates17:04
boris-42and say what you would like to say=)17:04
*** egallen has quit IRC17:04
*** slagle has joined #openstack-meeting17:05
rediskinsomething around 8 patches on review. have some troubles with devstack17:05
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
rediskinso this patches does not work because of devstack bugs17:06
*** moe8113 has quit IRC17:06
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
rediskinthats all17:06
*** vijendar1 has quit IRC17:06
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
rediskinI tell you when it be fixed :)17:07
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away17:07
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga17:07
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC17:07
boris-42rediskin probably we should send some email to mailing list17:07
boris-42rediskin about devstack multinode gate ?17:07
rediskinthere is reported bugs in openstack-dev/devstack17:08
rediskinboris-42: oh, maybe17:08
boris-42rediskin not bug, whole gate17:08
boris-42rediskin that will keep it working17:08
rediskinboris-42: I'm not familiar with gates..17:08
boris-42jaypipes is17:08
rediskinand with all this infra stuff17:08
boris-42jaypipes around?17:08
*** msdubov has joined #openstack-meeting17:08
jaypipesboris-42: yes17:08
boris-42jaypipes we have troubles17:08
boris-42=)17:08
msdubovboris-42 Hi, sorry for being late17:09
boris-42jaypipes DevStack multimode installation doesn't work properly17:09
boris-42jaypipes we would like to help DevStack guys with this part17:09
*** envydd has quit IRC17:09
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
jaypipesboris-42: dtroyer would be a better person to talk to about that. I've never used the devstack muti-node installer17:09
boris-42jaypipes cause we would like to deploy in LXC containers from Rally using DevStack multinode17:09
*** amaretskiy has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
boris-42jaypipes yep but we would like to help with building gate17:09
boris-42jaypipes for that case17:09
*** neelashah has quit IRC17:09
boris-42jaypipes that will keep it working17:09
boris-42jaypipes do you have some idea where to get some manuals?)17:10
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
jaypipesboris-42: good luck with that. you will run into issues with OVS and iscsictl17:10
*** dkliban is now known as dkliban_lunch17:10
boris-42ovs?)17:10
jaypipesboris-42: unfortunately, I do not know where devstack manuals are, if they exist.17:10
jaypipesopenvswitch..17:10
boris-42jaypipes it's actually not that case17:11
boris-42jaypipes we are now speaking just about multimode devstack installation17:11
jaypipesboris-42: there are a number of packages, including iscsid, that will not work with a shared kernel virtualization like LXC.17:11
boris-42jaypipes agree but we don't speak now about LXC at all17:11
*** pablosan has quit IRC17:11
boris-42jaypipes we are speaking just about multimode devstack stuff17:11
jaypipesoh? you wrote above: " cause we would like to deploy in LXC containers from Rally using DevStack multinode"17:12
boris-42jaypipes and building gates for that17:12
rediskinmultinode and vake_virt stuff17:12
boris-42jaypipes yep it's our future step in Rally17:12
*** pablosan has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
*** lukego has quit IRC17:12
boris-42jaypipes but for now we would like to get at least working multimode installation17:12
boris-42jaypipes without any lxc containers17:12
boris-42=)17:12
*** topol has quit IRC17:12
jaypipesboris-42: k. unfortunately, I've never done that :( dtroyer would be the best resource to ask about that.17:12
boris-42okay we will try to ping him =)17:13
boris-42jaypipes thx17:13
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
boris-42jaypipes do you know what is his tz?17:13
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC17:13
jaypipesI *thnk* it is PST.17:13
*** ozstacker has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting17:13
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
boris-42jaypipes okay nice17:14
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** afazekas has quit IRC17:14
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
boris-42rediskin OK I think you should write something about this in mailing list + try to catch dtroyer?17:14
boris-42rediskin agree?17:14
boris-42rediskin we should help devstack guys17:14
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting17:15
boris-42rediskin pls answer something..17:15
*** noslzzp has quit IRC17:16
boris-42okay while rediskin is thinking let's go to the next topic17:16
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting17:16
* boris-42 TEMPEST + RALLY 17:16
boris-42olkonami could you share with current status?17:17
boris-42olkonami what is you current task? and so on?17:17
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting17:18
olkonamicurrent task is make verify run without sudo17:18
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC17:18
olkonamiboris-42, you wrote do "cp base_tempest_repo deploy-id/tempest && cd deploy-id/tempest && git checkout master && git remote update && git pull" for tempest installation17:19
olkonamias I understand, now we don't do pull17:19
olkonamimay be it's better to use some option to specify should we do pull or not17:19
olkonamiwhat do you think?17:19
boris-42olkonami actually yes17:19
*** baoli has quit IRC17:19
boris-42olkonami but it should be a part of rally-manage tempest install17:19
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:20
boris-42olkonami I think that we should do only first time git clone to some common place17:20
boris-42olkonami other time we will use "cp"17:20
*** stevemar has quit IRC17:21
olkonamiok, I understand this17:21
* ozstacker is away: I'm out smoking crack with triplecheesesina. how we roll.17:21
* ozstacker is back (gone 00:00:07)17:21
olkonamiand also I have for loading extra modules on review17:22
boris-42rediskin msdubov take a look pls as well ^17:22
olkonamihttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/72679/17:22
boris-42olkonami could you share url for others17:22
msdubovboris-42 ok17:22
boris-42olkonami thx=)17:22
*** bauzas has quit IRC17:22
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
*** derekh has quit IRC17:23
boris-42Ok let's move to the benchmark part17:23
olkonamiboris-42, I answered on your question there, look please17:23
boris-42olkonami yep I will17:23
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
*** Macaveli has joined #openstack-meeting17:23
boris-42I am currently doing "context" stuff17:23
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting17:24
boris-42marcoemorais hi17:24
boris-42So this context stuff is going to be very useful17:24
boris-42so you will be able to build any openstack environment17:24
*** luqas has quit IRC17:24
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:25
boris-42(e.g. sec group rules, quotas, images, flavors, network, …) before running benchmark17:25
boris-42and then cleanup it17:25
*** egallen has quit IRC17:25
boris-42and this context info will be the same object inside all context classes17:25
boris-42and inside benchmark scnearios17:25
*** jhenner has quit IRC17:26
boris-42So I will publish today patch+)17:26
boris-42This is actually our blocker17:26
boris-42that blocks pre created users + quota setup and other and other17:26
boris-42=)17:26
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
boris-42marcoemorais msdubov do you have anything to share?17:27
marcoemoraisboris-42: I thought the refactoring that you did over the weekend makes the code much cleaner17:27
boris-42marcoemorais not enoguh+)17:27
marcoemoraisboris-42: I still see some cases where we create clients deep in the bowels of code17:28
*** yassine has quit IRC17:28
boris-42marcoemorais yep =(17:28
marcoemoraisboris-42: for example, ResourceCleaner —17:28
boris-42marcoemorais especially benchmarking engine is ugly17:28
msdubovmsdubov well I've been doing mostly code review and also managed trello cards17:28
boris-42marcoemorais I will share today context stuff17:28
*** Mandell has quit IRC17:28
msdubovboris-42 I'm going to write code towards the end of the week =)17:29
boris-42msdubov =)17:29
*** pablosan is now known as ZZpablosan17:29
*** ZZpablosan is now known as pablosan17:29
*** pablosan is now known as ZZpablosan17:29
*** florentflament has joined #openstack-meeting17:29
*** caleb_ has quit IRC17:29
boris-42marcoemorais msdubov olkonami rediskin tzabal okay let's finish meeting17:30
*** ZZpablosan is now known as pablosan17:30
boris-42cause I have to do some stuff =(17:30
*** pablosan is now known as ZZpablosan17:30
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
*** sc68cal has quit IRC17:30
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting17:31
*** ZZpablosan is now known as pablosan17:31
olkonamiok, bye17:31
msdubovboris-42 ok17:32
rediskinboris-42: sorry, I was asking Roman about gate/infra stuff17:32
*** msdubov has quit IRC17:32
*** tzabal has left #openstack-meeting17:32
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
*** olkonami has left #openstack-meeting17:33
*** cody-somerville has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
*** markwash has quit IRC17:33
*** fabiog has joined #openstack-meeting17:36
*** sc68cal has quit IRC17:36
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting17:36
*** rediskin has left #openstack-meeting17:36
*** moe8113 has joined #openstack-meeting17:36
*** jchiu_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:37
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting17:41
*** jchiu_ has quit IRC17:41
*** ygbo has quit IRC17:41
*** terriyu has quit IRC17:42
*** Tross has quit IRC17:42
* ozstacker is away: off to smoke some crack with triplecheesesina17:43
* ozstacker is back (gone 00:00:01)17:43
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting17:44
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman17:44
*** rmoe_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:44
*** rmoe has quit IRC17:44
*** jaypipes has quit IRC17:45
*** jraim_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:45
*** jchiu_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting17:47
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
*** Yathi has quit IRC17:50
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** marekd has joined #openstack-meeting17:51
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** vish1 has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC17:52
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting17:52
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC17:53
*** zns has quit IRC17:53
*** che-arne has quit IRC17:53
*** jraim has quit IRC17:53
*** vishy has quit IRC17:53
*** vish1 is now known as vishy17:53
*** jraim_ is now known as jraim17:53
*** pablosan is now known as ZZpablosan17:54
*** topol has quit IRC17:55
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
*** gokrokve has quit IRC17:55
*** sarob_ has quit IRC17:55
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting17:56
*** Fdot has quit IRC17:56
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting17:58
*** jlibosva has quit IRC17:58
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** dstanek has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
*** Michalik has quit IRC17:59
*** nkinder has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
* ozstacker is away: 17:59
*** ndipanov has quit IRC18:00
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
*** ozstacker has quit IRC18:00
*** gokrokve has quit IRC18:00
*** ozstacker has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
stevemaro/18:01
marekd\o/18:01
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
lbragstadhey18:01
*** Yathi has quit IRC18:01
topolo/18:01
stevemarahoy hoy18:01
gyee\o18:01
dolphmboris-42: o/18:01
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting18:01
dstanekhi18:01
dolphm#endmeeting18:02
boris-42dstanek hi=)18:02
*** jcoufal_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
boris-42dolphm hi18:02
gyeeendmeeting already?18:02
henrynashhi18:02
boris-42dolphm meeting bot doesn't work =(18:02
dolphmboris-42: ah, alrighty then18:02
dolphmboris-42: thanks!18:02
bknudsonhi18:02
boris-42dolphm np18:02
*** ozstacker has quit IRC18:02
stevemargyee, yep meetings over, we can all go home18:02
dolphmmight as well try...18:02
dolphm#startmeeting keystone18:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar  4 18:02:50 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dolphm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:02
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:02
dolphmboris-42: success!18:02
*** Linz has quit IRC18:02
dolphmayoung, bknudson, dstanek, jamielennox, morganfainberg, stevemar, gyee, henrynash, topol, marekd, lbragstad, joesavak, shardy, fabiog, fmarco76: ping18:03
boris-42dolphm ou nice=)18:03
ayoungw00t18:03
gyeedolphm's got the magic command :)18:03
*** Yathi has quit IRC18:03
dolphm#topic Reminder: Icehouse feature freeze today! (features must be merged)18:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Reminder: Icehouse feature freeze today! (features must be merged) (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:03
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
dolphmat this point we've only got one open bp: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55908/18:03
stevemardolphm, i thought it was the 6th :O18:03
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC18:03
dolphmand one high priority bug fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75727/18:04
*** Michalik has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
dolphmstevemar: i3 is cut today18:04
dolphmstevemar: it's released on the 6th18:04
stevemardolphm, ah okay18:04
dolphmstevemar: pretty sure our meeting agenda has said march 4th for a long while :)18:04
stevemari gave topol the wrong info yesterday :)18:04
topoldolphm so after today can there still be bug fixes or no?18:04
*** jcoufal has quit IRC18:05
dolphmtopol: absolutely18:05
*** vkozhukalov has joined #openstack-meeting18:05
dolphmtopol: bug fixes only for the next few weeks18:05
topoldolphm, ok cool18:05
stevemarbug fixing is encouraged18:05
dolphmi've already started laying out our blockers to shipping icehouse:18:05
dolphm#link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/icehouse-rc118:05
bknudsonlooks like march 27 is start of release candidates18:05
dolphmonce we cut an RC1, master will be re-opened for Juno features18:06
ayoung55908 now has the record for the most revisions on a single review.  80 as of now18:06
stevemar81*18:06
dolphmand we'll have a milestone-proposed branch to backport further bug fixes to (RC2 bugs, if any)18:06
ayoungHA!18:06
ayoungstevemar, the thing that scares me is it still hasn't gotten the bknudson treatment.18:07
*** morganfainberg_Z is now known as morganfainberg18:08
stevemarayoung, i always fear the bknudson treatment18:08
*** jgallard has quit IRC18:08
bknudsonit would take me so long to review the change I wouldn't get done until next week18:08
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
morganfainbergbknudson, hehe18:09
bknudsonthe only feedback I could give on it now is that it's too complicated for me to understand it18:09
ayoungWell, it got it back on revision 2318:09
gyeemerge 55908 and call it experimental feature :)18:09
gyeeif we have to do it EOB today that is18:09
ayoungdstanek, did I get your changes?18:10
*** che-arne has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** Yathi has quit IRC18:10
*** rossk has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
dolphmgyee: considering it's a security feature, that's not really acceptable18:10
dstanekayoung: i think so - was going over it before this meeting18:10
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
*** yamahata__ has joined #openstack-meeting18:10
dolphmwe have enough silly vulnerabilities on our track record as it stands18:10
gyeedolphm, but there's a kill switch18:10
ayoungdstanek, yeah...just did the 80-81 diff18:11
gyeeI mean its an extension18:11
ayoungits disabled by default18:11
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
morganfainberggyee, but security extension == scary18:11
stevemaris there a dire need for it?18:11
gyeemorganfainberg, security is a process, software is a tool18:11
*** dkliban_lunch is now known as dkliban18:11
ayoungit means it can be QA'ed before it is tested18:11
dolphmayoung: speaking of, you should definitely add SecurityImpact to the commit message18:11
ayoungI think it needs to be in, experimental18:11
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting18:11
ayoungdolphm, is there one if it in not enabled?18:11
dolphmayoung: ?18:12
morganfainberggyee, if it opens us up to security bugs, it doesn't matter if could cause a lot of headaches.18:12
ayoungI mean, I'll do it, but there should be no impact until we tell people : go ahead an use it18:12
morganfainberggyee, not saying we shouldn't merge it.18:12
morganfainberggyee, just making sure we're aware what we're getting into18:12
ayounglets merge it with an eye to getting tempest support up to speed, the client using it, and a general shake out18:13
gyeemorganfainberg, sure, call it experimental would cover our asses18:13
bknudsonI don't think experimental will mean we don't have to provide security fixes for it.18:13
ayoungI think we need to start doing that for new, big features.  Its part of the reason for doing it as an extension18:13
*** Yathi_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
dolphmayoung: let's focus on *reviewing* it for now, not *merging* it18:13
bknudsoni.e., we will have to fix any security problems found whether it's experimental or not18:13
ayoung++18:13
dolphmbknudson: ++18:13
morganfainbergbknudson, ++18:13
gyeebknudson, that's not what I mean, we'll have to fix whatever that is needed18:13
*** yamahata has quit IRC18:14
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:14
ayoungdolphm, in general, though, we need an "experimental" track.18:14
ayoungespecially when changes need to be made both in server and client, and then tempest tests on top18:14
bknudsonmaybe if we put in a big warning to not use this if you care about security??18:14
dolphmayoung: i've actually prototyped an @experimental decorator to complement the @deprecated one18:14
ayoungephemeral will be in the  same boat18:14
ayoung++18:14
bknudsonsince there's lots of things you could do if you don't care about security18:14
morganfainbergayoung, actually, i hope ephemeral will be J118:15
ayoungmorganfainberg, experimental in J1....18:15
morganfainbergayoung, so more drive time to get things in. last minute on merge day is hard to get in experimental or not18:15
ayoungand GA in Juna GA18:15
ayoungmorganfainberg, you are right, I should have started this earlier.  Like back in Essex18:15
morganfainbergayoung, dolphm, i like the idea we work on reviewing.18:15
morganfainbergif everything is looking good, we can hit +A18:16
morganfainbergif not, we have something that can land J118:16
dolphmmorganfainberg: ++18:16
morganfainbergfirst review (after some sqlalchemy etc administativa if we're doing that)18:16
*** noslzzp has quit IRC18:16
morganfainbergand yes, i would target this as the absolute first feature of J1 if it pushes18:17
dolphmmorganfainberg: we said that about i2 -> i3, but the patchset more than doubled in size since then18:17
*** neelashah has quit IRC18:17
morganfainbergdolphm, it's a big change. no doubt.18:17
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away18:17
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga18:17
morganfainbergdolphm, but i don't see it doubling or even growing much at this point beyond "cleanup"18:18
*** haneef_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
ayoungmorganfainberg, so, I have tested the sql change to do it as an integer instead of a UUID and it looks right18:20
*** egallen has quit IRC18:20
morganfainbergayoung, ++ cool18:20
ayoungdolphm, wanted me to hold of on any more churn on the patch, though18:20
morganfainbergfair enough.18:20
ayoungI could potentially do it as a migration if desired18:20
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting18:20
morganfainbergwe should do that, but no need to lump it in18:20
ayoungI'm going to post it WIP so you guys can see18:21
dolphmi'd like to spend as much time as possible today reviewing code, so going to move on...18:21
morganfainbergayoung, ++18:21
dolphm#topic Fixing multi-backend LDAP with composite user/group IDs18:22
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting18:22
*** openstack changes topic to "Fixing multi-backend LDAP with composite user/group IDs (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:22
dstanekmy biggest concern is that i don't know if i have the whole picture in my head about how this impacts security18:22
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:22
gyeedolphm, beside that one, are there any other review that is high priority for today?18:22
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting18:22
ayounghttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/77954/18:22
ayoung^^ is the WI{P for SQL18:22
dolphmgyee: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/55908/77 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/75727/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77215/18:22
ayoungnot a priority18:22
gyeek18:22
dolphmhenrynash: shall we defer this conversation until we're open for juno?18:23
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting18:23
henrynashdolphm: yes, I think so18:23
dolphmhenrynash: sounds good18:23
henrynashI don't think we should ram this in18:23
dolphm#topic Reconstruction of V3 tokens from API on validate - breaks some operator use-cases18:23
*** openstack changes topic to "Reconstruction of V3 tokens from API on validate - breaks some operator use-cases (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:23
dolphmmorganfainberg: o/18:23
morganfainbergi can follow up w/ henrynash later w/ what i talked w/ ayoung about last night18:23
morganfainbergok18:23
henrynashthx18:23
ayoungsorry henrynash18:24
gyeemorganfainberg, what's the problem? bug?18:24
topolbknudson ++++18:24
henrynashayoung: getting it right is more improtant18:24
morganfainbergso V3 tokens are reconstructed each time we do a validate - this means you must have a full keystone running to get a token validated. V2 uses data in the persistence18:24
gyeeno, its it token data18:24
bknudsonmorganfainberg: v2 did it so v3 can't?18:24
morganfainbergthe issue is something Ryan_lane brought up, some people (g and h) only replicate the token store between sites18:24
*** gokrokve has quit IRC18:25
bknudsonmorganfainberg: uuid tokens?18:25
dolphm(unfortunately Ryan_Lane doesn't seem to be on)18:25
jamielennoxmorganfainberg: i'm not following18:25
gyeewe only reconstruct on mixing use cases, i.e. validating v2 token using v3 API18:25
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting18:25
*** egallen has quit IRC18:25
dolphmwikimedia has a multi-region deployment with a replicated token store across each region ( morganfainberg correct me if i'm wrong )18:25
ayoungmorganfainberg, let him file a bug18:25
ayoungotherwise,  Juno summit fodder18:26
morganfainberggyee, https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/token/providers/common.py#L309 https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/token/providers/common.py#L209 etc18:26
morganfainbergayoung, i brought this up before i asked him to submit a bug.18:26
morganfainberggyee, https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/token/providers/common.py#L20718:26
dolphmayoung: wikimedia's architecture is something we supported in essex, folsom, and grizzly. we broke it in havana18:26
henrynash(My connectivity may go out in a while…if so I'll reconnect later)18:27
morganfainberggyee, we basically need to clean that up and ensure we don't have broken tokens.18:27
bknudsonso if you asked for ?nocatalog before then when you validate you'll get a different catalog?18:27
ayoungephemeral will solve that, too.18:27
morganfainbergbknudson, yep18:27
dolphmbknudson: yes18:27
morganfainbergayoung, correct18:27
morganfainbergayoung, but we may want to clean this up as a bug in I, backport to H18:27
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:27
ayoungthat is fine....and I think we can do that18:28
morganfainbergayoung, i wanted a quick consensus from the core team before i had the bug filed18:28
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC18:28
ayoungespecially now that we support a reddis backend natively, he might be more inclined to participate, too18:28
*** neelashah has quit IRC18:28
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
morganfainbergayoung, and if we think that fixing / backport is good, we'll get the bug filed and tagged18:28
*** Yathi has quit IRC18:28
morganfainbergit's not a lot of cleanup18:28
morganfainbergso i think it's reasonable18:28
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting18:28
dolphmmorganfainberg: my question is whether it should be an RC blocker?18:28
ayoungyeha, reconstitute is wrong.  It means that if we slip and don';t revoke the token when one of the roles or something changem the content of the token is different18:29
dolphmmorganfainberg: given that it's already a bug in havana, i'd think not18:29
*** henrynash has quit IRC18:29
morganfainbergdolphm, i think not18:29
morganfainbergdolphm, i think if we miss RC we will backport to I18:29
gyeemorganfainberg, https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/token/providers/common.py#L63318:29
*** gokrokve has quit IRC18:29
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC18:29
gyeeand my comment above that line18:29
gyeeif token_data is in the ref, we return it as is18:30
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
morganfainberggyee, well, sortof.18:30
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
morganfainberggyee, there are a lot of gaps that could call into keystone18:30
morganfainberggyee, we should remove the reconstruct code completely18:30
morganfainberggyee, make sure we only store valid tokens18:30
gyeemorganfainberg, no, fox mixing use cases18:30
gyeeunless we abstract the token format18:31
morganfainberggyee, that is my plan18:31
ayounggyee, yeah...convert v2 to v3 and vice-versa should be a tool in the provider, but shoud not go to the backend unless absolutelt necessary to fill in attributes18:31
gyeeayoung, problem is that signature18:31
gyeefor PKI tokens, signature is generate on issuance18:32
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC18:32
morganfainberggyee, we can still return the same data we had before18:32
ayounggyee, for revocation I wanted to convert a v2 to v3 and then have a unified logic18:32
gyeesure, if we can do it without breaking the signature, I am all for it18:32
morganfainberggyee, but i expect i can fix the tokens to contain what they need18:32
topolhow do you not break the signature???18:33
morganfainberggyee, ayoung, dolphm, i think the consensus is we can fix this, bug filed, and see what we can do18:33
gyeemorganfainberg, the tricky part is the signature18:33
dolphmmorganfainberg: ++18:33
dolphm#topic open discussion18:33
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:33
*** Yathi has quit IRC18:33
gyeetopol, don't temper that data18:33
bknudsonadd the right random data to the end of the token data and you can get the same signature18:33
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC18:33
morganfainbergbknudson, hehe18:34
morganfainbergI have one more topic!18:34
morganfainberg:)18:34
morganfainbergSQL migrate collapse18:34
bknudsonthere's been some discussion in OSSG about doing a thread analysis...18:34
ayoungbknudson, I think calculating that data is NP Hard18:34
bknudsonoops18:34
bknudsonthreat analysis18:34
morganfainbergI am working on collapsing down migrations to start with havana for icehouse (like how nova does it)18:34
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting18:34
ayoungthe thread of threats?  The threat of threads?18:34
morganfainbergany concerns? i think it's generally a positive move18:35
ayoungmorganfainberg, +++++++++18:35
morganfainbergi expect to have this in before RC, it's not too complex a change18:35
ayoungmorganfainberg, just do it from the bottom up,  and keep the interim tests if possible18:35
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting18:35
bknudsonsee https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1aEVfmQtqnoMmpPZ3hmUHpBa1k/edit for the thread modeling process18:35
bknudsonhere's the a keystone-specific one: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1aEVfmQtqnobzB6M21uMEFXNUE/edit18:36
gyeeand static source code analysis18:36
gyeepen testing18:36
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:36
morganfainbergayoung, i'm working to ensure the schema is the same from 036_havana as 036_token_somethingsomething.py18:36
morganfainbergayoung, if the schema lands the same, i'm happy, if not... ick18:36
*** jaypipes has quit IRC18:36
bknudsonmorganfainberg: collapsing the migrations would be good... I suspect it would speed up the tests significantly18:36
bknudsonalthough there's probably other ways to speed up the tests too.18:36
morganfainbergayoung, testing will be mucked with (sql update) once i'm sure the schema is good18:36
morganfainbergbknudson, i think it's important to make it easier to maintain migrations18:36
ayoungmorganfainberg, we want the interim tests in the migrations that check columns and such...the migrations can probably be dropped18:37
*** neelashah has quit IRC18:37
morganfainbergayoung, ++ yep18:37
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting18:37
*** baoli has quit IRC18:37
morganfainbergayoung, the "has X changed from Y" checks will need to go esp where they check before/after18:37
ayoung++18:37
ayoungsounds like you are on track18:37
morganfainbergayoung, it'll resduce sql upgrade complexity18:37
morganfainbergreduce even18:37
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting18:38
morganfainbergbknudson, a minor speedup will be a side benefit18:38
morganfainbergok thats all from me :)18:38
bknudsonand I just wanted to bring up the threat analysis if anyone was interested.18:38
morganfainbergbknudson, ++18:38
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting18:39
topolI'll just pad a few extra chars to the end of the  threat analysis doc until I decide I like it18:39
gyeebknudson, we've done some threat analysis and pen testing internally18:39
morganfainberggyee, any fuzz testing?18:40
gyeelemme talk to our security folks to see if they want to contribute18:40
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC18:40
gyeeno fuzz testing :)18:40
morganfainberggyee, i'd love to see fuzz testing against our APIs18:40
gyeechoas monkey testing, yes18:40
morganfainbergit might be super interesting results18:40
*** nacim_ has quit IRC18:40
bknudsonI think we know already that keystone does no input validation.18:41
gyeewe also have requirement for FIFS 140-2 certificate, which is insane18:41
bknudsonexcept in the few places we've put it in18:41
lbragstad++18:41
gyeecertification18:41
gyeeI basically had to tell them to back off18:41
bknudsongyee: we've had the same FIPS 140-2 request.18:41
morganfainbergbknudson, sure, but it would be cool to have a definitive "here is what we need to fix" target.18:41
gyeebknudson, don't go FIPS 140-2 yet, your life will be miserable18:41
ayoungI've got a one line change for 55908.  I'm going to post it now18:41
bknudsongyee: it has made me miserable already18:42
ayoungFIPS!18:42
dolphmgyee: have you submitted any vulnerabilities?18:42
dstaneki also want to warn everyone about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/more-code-style-automation18:42
gyeedolphm, one I think, from last release18:42
gyeeactually, ayoung submitted it for me18:43
dstaneki was frustrated over the weekend because it seems like all reviews have a lot of the same problems - no i'm automating some of the common ones18:43
morganfainbergdstanek, btw thanks for fixing the comments on ayoung's review, i was too tired to get those in cleanly last night post review18:43
ayoungYou guys rock...much appreciated18:43
ayoungthis one was really a team effort, to include YorikSar...18:43
dstanekmorganfainberg: automation my friend, automation :-)18:43
gyeedolphm, I am thinking submitting another one for scoping trust to ec2 key18:43
morganfainbergdstanek, ++18:43
gyeethat's a vulnerability in the making18:44
*** bgorski has quit IRC18:44
*** jchiu_ has quit IRC18:44
dolphmdstanek: is your goal to get those into hacking?18:44
*** ycombina_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:44
dstanekdolphm: yes, i'm going to get them running for us first though18:44
bknudsoncan we have keystone-specific hacking?18:45
* lbragstad listens... 18:45
dstanekbknudson: absolutely!18:45
lbragstadgood question.18:45
ayoungcan people get  tox -edocs  to run on their local machines?  Am I the only one that has it broken?18:45
stevemardstanek, i like that, i'm gong to add more18:45
topolwe already have keystone-specific: use single quotes overt double quotes when possible18:45
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away18:45
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga18:46
topolits just small18:46
stevemarayoung, it runs just fine18:46
gyeetopol, that's a keystone thing?18:46
lbragstadi pushed up a hacking check for inline comments, but not sure they agree.18:46
dstanekbknudson: i only have 3 of the check i was working on running against our code - i'll submit a review for those and the checks shortly after the meeting18:46
bknudsonayoung: works for me... might want to rm -r doc/build doc/source/api18:46
*** tchaypo has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
topolit wa sin keystone hacking last time I looked. and not much else18:46
dstanektopol: where is that check?18:46
ayounggit clean -xdf doc/  that was probably it18:46
bknudsontopol: I mean custom automated checks.18:46
topolno its not automated... :-)18:47
lbragstaddstanek: actually, the one I pushed for review is the first one on your list18:47
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting18:47
dstanektopol: oh, you mean documented. i wrote a check for that already too!18:47
*** rbrady is now known as rbrady-brb18:47
dolphmtopol: but it's not automated18:47
bknudsondstanek: you've got one for use ' ?18:47
topolyes, our documented list is quite small18:47
dstanekbknudson: yes, or " if the string contains a '18:47
bknudsondstanek: great!18:48
dstanekthese are all either separate functions or classes (based on the type of check) and as a group we can decide what to keep and where i went overboard18:48
bknudsonI assume it hits a lot of existing code.18:48
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
topolbknudson++18:48
bknudsonwe need a pep8 tool that FIXES the problems, not just complains18:49
*** jlibosva has quit IRC18:49
dstanekbknudson: yeah, yesterday i walked through the code and fixed it for a few of the checks18:49
dstanekthose are the ones i'll submit today18:49
*** amaretskiy has quit IRC18:49
dstaneki'll get to more probably tonight18:49
topoldstanek anything that keeps the code from getting sloppy via automation is very cool18:49
bknudsonI'm not sure that we want to add new pep8 checks now...18:49
bknudsonthat could be a lot of churn18:50
topolbknudson, wait till juno?18:50
ayoungtopol, PyCharm is pretty good for that18:50
bknudsonI'd prefer to wait until juno18:50
topolme too18:50
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting18:50
*** changbl has quit IRC18:50
bknudsondepends on the changes required to add it.18:51
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC18:51
dstanekthe first few there were not a ton of changes...but it'll also make patches failed that are already passing in the review process18:52
gyeeayoung, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77215/4/keystoneclient/middleware/auth_token.py, why are we still using v2.0 to fetch the cert? Didn't jamielennox added the API for v3?18:52
stevemardstanek, i added a few, i really like the idea, and appreciate the effort18:52
*** Linz has quit IRC18:53
ayounggyee, yeah, and we need to update the client18:53
jamielennoxgyee: there is server side support, there isn't client side18:53
ayounggyee, that was just a bug fix change.18:53
dstanekthis all started when i was thinking about creating a project called nit-picker that would use git-review to pull patches locally and run the checks18:53
dolphmbknudson: i'd be happy to see stylistic consistency changes land anytime, even during the push to RC. i'd argue that it will make backporting from master to icehouse later on a bit easier18:53
ayoungjamielennox, he's talking about the atomic write change18:53
gyeeso should we it in the same patch or a separate one?18:53
*** neelashah has quit IRC18:53
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting18:53
ayoungseparate18:53
jamielennoxgyee, ayoung: sorry haven't been watching18:53
morganfainbergdstanek, i think a lot of that can be moved into hacking eventually.18:53
stevemardstanek, some may not be automatable, but i wanted to add stuff i commonly have to mention in reviews18:54
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting18:54
dstanekmorganfainberg: i hope so18:54
gyeeayoung, maybe a separate patch, but enabling an options to store the certs in memcache would be nice too18:54
ayounggyee, this is for writing the file, makes no change to fetching it.  We can do one for using V3 on top of it, but we need to support both v2 and v3 for a while18:54
dstanekstevemar: add whenever you can think of - if we can't automate then at least we have a list to point to for newcomers18:54
stevemardstanek, rgr that18:54
gyeeayoung, k18:54
ayounggyee, memcache does us no good, as we need them in the FS in order to call openssl18:54
bknudsonwe have a review checklist already: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ReviewChecklist18:55
*** balajiiyer1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:55
ayoungbknudson, AH...reminds me18:55
ayoungcan we generate the sample conf using setup.py?18:55
ayoungif it is generated code, it should not really be checked in18:56
gyeeayoung, yeah, need to figure out how to do this in-process, popen is expensive18:56
*** jchiu_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:56
*** thedodd has quit IRC18:56
gyeehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/77215 looks good, I am going to push the button, unless there are objections18:56
bknudsonon a patch earlier today the pep8 check for the sample failed... I think it was because my version of oslo.messaging didn't match the current one18:56
ayounggyee, it may be, but not in the way you think.  popen can be fairly light weight18:56
topolayoung, didnt we have a similar conversation to what gyee suggested at the diner at the hackathon???18:56
bknudsonthey released a new version of the library and that caused the help strings to change!18:57
dolphmtopol: (gyee wasn't at the hackathon)18:57
*** jchiu_ has quit IRC18:57
gyeetopol, must be my evil twin brother18:57
topoldolphm, I know, but ayoung and I disucssed this18:57
dolphmtopol: oh the conversation with ayoung as at the hackathon, got it18:57
dolphmtopol: misread18:57
topol:-)18:57
*** jchiu_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC18:58
dolphmayoung: the goal of checking keystone.conf.sample into the repo is to provide documentation18:58
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC18:58
*** vuil has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
* dolphm 2 minutes, ish18:58
dstanekgyee: it looks ok, i think the comment may in inaccurate though18:58
*** jchiu_ has quit IRC18:59
gyeedstanek, you mean the encoding comment?18:59
morganfainbergdolphm, ayoung , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77789/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77790/18:59
*** imsurit has quit IRC18:59
dstanekgyee: yes, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77215/4/keystoneclient/middleware/auth_token.py19:00
dolphm#endmeeting19:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:00
morganfainbergdolphm, ayoung, sample config will move to a periodic task like translations.19:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar  4 19:00:26 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:00
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-03-04-18.02.html19:00
*** thedodd has joined #openstack-meeting19:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-03-04-18.02.txt19:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2014/keystone.2014-03-04-18.02.log.html19:00
dstaneki put a comment there, but i don't think that needs to hold it up if we already have multiple +2s19:00
dolphmmorganfainberg: ++19:00
morganfainbergwe can move man page stuff to something similar (easily)19:00
jeblairinfra folks?19:00
pleia2o/19:00
fungiwoo!19:01
anteayao/19:01
nibalizero/19:01
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
SergeyLukjanovjeblair, o/19:01
morganfainbergooh infra people!19:01
*** jamielennox has left #openstack-meeting19:01
*** lbragstad has left #openstack-meeting19:01
jeblair#startmeeting infra19:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar  4 19:01:22 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:01
mordredo/19:01
*** jchiu_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)"19:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'infra'19:01
jeblair#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting19:01
jeblairagenda ^19:01
jeblair#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-02-25-19.02.html19:01
jeblairlast meeting ^19:01
*** Linz has joined #openstack-meeting19:01
mordredmorganfainberg: I've got split attention - can you ping me later about whatever you're talking about re: manpage above?19:01
jeblair#topic  Actions from last meeting19:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: infra)"19:02
jeblairmordred send new-project service degredation annoucment19:02
clarkbo/19:02
morganfainbergmordred, absolutely19:02
jeblairi think he did that19:02
anteayaI saw it19:02
mordredI did something19:02
fungimordred: you sent an e-mail19:02
jeblairand i think on friday some projects were created...19:02
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-meeting19:02
jeblairhow did all that work out?19:02
clarkbthey were thanks to fungi and anteaya's hard work19:02
jeblair(a) do we need to alter the process?19:03
anteayaclarkb has a patch19:03
jeblair(b) did we learn anything that will help mordred in his work on manage_projects?19:03
fungispotted some bugs, fixes have been proposed (i don't have links handy)19:03
fungithe process from last time worked well, i think19:03
jeblairfungi: ah cool19:03
anteayathat will be applied next time, that may mean we don't need to change the process, if it works19:03
clarkb#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77314/19:03
fungiwe should repeat, clarkb has a pending patch we didn't test last time because it came moments too late19:03
*** vhoward has left #openstack-meeting19:04
*** bruff has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
clarkband I think it may fix the bulk of the non orchestration related trouble19:04
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
fungithe other proposed patches were hand-applied on review.o.o and worked well19:04
clarkbwe still need some ordering around processes on different nodes, but the bugs outside of that seem to be getting killed \o/19:04
fungii think i +2'd them all with comments if i used them during the run19:04
jeblairawesome!19:04
jeblairsince i think the orchestration bits were what mordred had the most concrete ideas about, this should help a lot19:05
fungiall jeepyb patches19:05
mordredagree19:05
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:05
anteayaI have a request for next round19:05
anteayaif we can start earlier I can be here for it, my taxi picks me up at 6pm on friday EST19:06
fungii have a couple of bugs flagged i need to pick up for initial group members for the projects we created on friday, but those will get wrapped up today19:06
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting19:06
*** nkinder has left #openstack-meeting19:06
fungithe next round will probably go faster. a lot of the time was spent assembling the list and doing last-minute reviewing19:06
*** sivel has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
anteayaagreed19:06
clarkbfungi: I will try to review an dapprove those that were tested19:06
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting19:06
fungiand we had a lot of changes waiting in the queue for that one since we'd put them off for some weeks19:07
anteayado we have an etherpad started for next round?19:07
*** sballe has quit IRC19:07
jeblairzaro: ping19:07
*** ycombina_ has quit IRC19:07
fungiwe should probably copy the "needs work" section from the last one to seed the next19:07
fungi#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/new-projects-2014-02-2819:08
zaroohh yeah.  here19:08
*** rossk has quit IRC19:08
anteayafungi: k19:08
*** dstanek has left #openstack-meeting19:08
anteayaI can mix up a new etherpad19:08
jeblairanteaya, fungi: thanks19:08
jeblairlet's move on...19:08
jeblair#topic  Convert gerrit db tables to UTF8 (zaro)19:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Convert gerrit db tables to UTF8 (zaro) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:08
fungithis time around it will be faster to build the list, since anybody wo isn't on the old etherpad doesn't have an excuse for not setting an appropriate topic19:08
jeblairzaro: what's the latest thinking on this?19:08
zarook.  i think all the info is in the bug19:08
zarolet me find it19:09
zaro#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ci/+bug/97922719:09
zaroso i believe we left off on jeblair wanting some more info on where the dups are in the conversion.19:10
zaro#link https://launchpadlibrarian.net/165584391/case_insensitive_dups.txt19:10
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting19:10
mordredoh - I think those are pretty easy to fix by hand :)19:11
jeblairmordred: how can you fix them?19:11
zarodid you see last sentense? "I'm not sure why line 1590340 is a duplicate because I could not find a duplicate entry for it but there are many more like this one."19:12
mordredthe emails can just be fixed - you're right though - the usernames are a bit ugh19:12
jeblairmordred: the emails can't be fixed, actually -- the localpart in emails is case sensitive19:12
*** fabiog has quit IRC19:12
*** ZZpablosan is now known as pablosan19:12
jeblairit seems that the problem is that utf8 is not case sensitive and there is not a general cs utf8 collation19:12
mordredright. so, the local part is case -sensitive - but I don't believe that gmail behaves that way. that leaves us with just Daviey who might be a problem19:13
jeblairmordred: or others in the future19:13
jeblairthere has to be a right solution to this19:13
jeblairwhat's the deal with the utf8_general_cs collation?  http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=6583019:14
jeblairhow does that manifest in current and next ubuntu lts?19:14
*** balajiiyer1 has left #openstack-meeting19:15
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:15
zarois there a problem with using utf8_bin ?19:15
zaromordred suggested that before19:16
jeblairmordred: what do you think about that?19:16
mordredbin doesn't understand sorting of international characters properly - but it should at least keep the things separate19:16
mordredI don't think username sorting is very important to us19:16
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:17
jeblairmordred: i suspect you are right; i'm finding it difficult to come up with a place in gerrit that could bite us19:17
jeblairzaro: do you want to try that on review-dev and see if any problems manifest?19:17
mordredzaro: (thanks for reminding me)19:18
jeblair(i still think knowing the answer to whether utf8_general_cs will be available in next ubuntu lts would be useful)19:18
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting19:18
jeblairwe might be able to move to it later if it is19:18
mordredwell, Davi Arnaut seems to believe that's it's an experimental collation anyway19:19
zaroi believe that i was testing with review-dev data before testing with review data.19:19
jeblairmordred: oh, so bad idea anyway?19:19
zaroi didn't have a problem with either when using utf8_bin19:19
mordredhttps://github.com/svagner/MM-Percona-Server/blob/master/config/ac-macros/character_sets.m4#L36519:20
zaroi mean no errors poppped up during the conversion.19:20
mordred_cs has troubling comments aroudn it in the build files :)19:21
mordredso I vote for just doing utf8_bin19:21
*** gokrokve has quit IRC19:21
*** andreaf has quit IRC19:21
SergeyLukjanovunfortunately, I don't see any problems with utf8_bin, should I?19:22
jeblairi wonder what gerrit actually expects?19:22
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
jeblairit seems very strange to have case-sensitive usernames.  but it also seems strange to have case-insensitive change messages and emails...19:22
jeblairperhaps there is no coherent intent.  :/19:23
jeblairanyone object to utf8_bin?19:23
fungiseems okay to me19:23
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting19:23
mordredit's really only relevant for sorting and for unique keys19:23
*** [1]evgenyf has quit IRC19:23
fungii suspect they just didn't put much thought into it19:23
mordredutf8-bin will still work for unique keys19:23
*** sweston has quit IRC19:24
mordredsorting might be weird in some edge-case contexts19:24
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
clarkbbut would work in most cases as long as the fields are consistentish?19:24
mordredbecause sorting will be essentially done numerically by underlying hex code19:24
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
clarkbah, so anything ascii would be fine19:24
*** [1]evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting19:24
mordredpretty much19:24
*** evgenyf has quit IRC19:24
*** [1]evgenyf is now known as evgenyf19:24
fungiand non-text fields would still sort normally19:24
*** amcrn has quit IRC19:24
mordredyes19:24
jeblairclarkb: though it's asciibetical not alphabetical19:24
jeblairABC,abc19:24
*** bdpayne has quit IRC19:24
* fungi prefers c sort order anyway ;)19:25
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
mordredyeah19:25
mordredbut19:25
mordredwe don't REALLY show alpha-sorted list19:25
clarkbright most sorts in gerrit are changenumber/changeid or date based19:25
jeblairso it seems like it's worth a try, and if sorting strangely does show up some place, we can consider going back to latin1 or breaking the case-sensitive fields19:25
fungii have to wonder whether any part of gerrit which cares about text sorting actually asks mysql to sort the results and uses that straight in the ui anyway19:26
jeblairclarkb: changeid (eg hexsha) sorts could be affected, but sorting a uuid seems weird.19:26
fungiin all probability they perform their own sorting on the requery results19:26
jeblairfungi: would not suprise me19:26
fungiquery results19:26
jeblair#agreed convert gerrit tables to utf8_bin collation19:27
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:27
jeblair#topic  Upgrade gerrit (zaro)19:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Upgrade gerrit (zaro) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:27
jeblairzaro: i'm guessing you're blocked on the buck stuff, yeah?19:27
zaronope.  although az2 has been a pain in the butt19:27
jeblairno kidding19:28
clarkboh right, I was going to try and look into that more today19:28
zaroanyways, i believe all patches that are required are ready for review and just waiting for you gents to review them19:28
jeblairokay.  nice.19:28
jeblair#topic  Removing openstack-ci-admins ML from LP (fungi)19:29
*** openstack changes topic to "Removing openstack-ci-admins ML from LP (fungi) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:29
fungii've had shell loops running for the past 24 hours trying to get image rebuilds in az2 to stick19:29
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC19:29
zaroonce all patches are merged then we can re-puppet review-dev to see if it all works.19:29
fungii should have more accurately made that "deactivating openstack-ci-admins ml on lp"19:29
*** rbrady-brb is now known as rbrady19:29
*** ycombina_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
fungisince the creation of the openstack-infra list on lists.o.o we have 4 messages in the archive for the openstack-ci-admins list19:30
fungibut we keep getting people caught in moderation e-mailing that about gate failures and requests for assistance on gerrit accounts19:30
fungiso it's an attractive nuisance. i think we should disable it (the archives would still be published for historical purposes)19:30
jeblairwe might have that in some docs somewhere... :/19:30
fungibut wanted to see whether there are objections to that19:30
jeblairthat works for me.  the infra list seems a reasonable place for that now.19:31
fungifair point. i'll search teh wiki and git repos19:31
clarkbI don't object but we should grep for places we may be advertising it19:31
jeblairnibalizer: ping?  (i think you said you had to run...)19:31
fungi#action fungi check for remaining recommendations of openstack-ci-admins19:31
fungi#action fungi disable openstack-ci-admins list19:31
jeblair#topic  Monitoring of Infra Resources / Systems (morganfainberg)19:32
*** openstack changes topic to "Monitoring of Infra Resources / Systems (morganfainberg) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:32
morganfainbergo/19:32
jeblairmorganfainberg: what's on your mind?19:33
nibalizerjeblair: im about19:33
morganfainbergThere was a brief discussion that we might want to start adding monitoring of Infra resources (e.g. bots) and possibly some aggrgation alarms (not page duty, but at-a-glance we've hit a threshold) that takes into account more than the individual cacti graphs19:33
jeblairnibalizer: cool, we'll come back to you in a bit19:34
morganfainbergpleia2 said she had some thoughts on this as well19:34
pleia2nothing has been hashed out yet, but I'm inclined to say we should set up Nagios for some monitoring19:34
morganfainbergthis was added as an introduction to the additional monitoring - unfortunately I don't have much more at this point.19:34
morganfainbergwith the milestone my focus is a little split :)19:34
*** lsmola has quit IRC19:35
clarkbI see this potentially as supplementing the status pages19:35
morganfainbergclarkb, ++19:35
pleia2we don't actually have a bug for setting up monitoring beyond cacti19:35
jeblairokay, let me share my thoughts -- i'm not opposed to monitoring; i think it's very important (i set up cacti and graphite after all)...19:36
clarkbinstead of needing humans to ping us and say is X broken 500 times during an outage. Have auomated checks that update a state page that everyone can check19:36
*** vkozhukalov has quit IRC19:36
fungihowever, i think it would be a pretty significant time sink to tune, groom and polish19:36
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting19:36
morganfainbergi also don't want Pager-duty esqe stuff19:36
morganfainbergwe're volunteers, we don't need that19:36
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:36
jeblairbut i'm a little skeptical about the traditional nagios style monitoring..19:36
jeblairmorganfainberg: agreed about pager duty19:36
morganfainbergfungi, it wont happen overnight. and i wouldn't expect it to19:36
fungia monitoring system which is half red and 95% is from false negative results is of use to noone19:36
pleia2fungi: so I think we start out with a pretty minimal setup, checking disk space and ping kind of thing19:36
jeblairi also just deleted 15,000 emails from our servers that i have not read19:36
pleia2disk space has bitten us more than once19:37
fungisure--we already have all that information published and available, but not enough people to sit and stare at it19:37
pleia2there are some nagios bots for IRC, so instead of email it could alert to IRC19:37
jeblairand my previous experience with things like nagios is that you spend a _lot_ of time adjusting paging thresholds for things like disk space and dealing with false positives..19:37
*** jcoufal_ has quit IRC19:37
* anteaya continues to stare at zuul status19:37
fungii've worked jobs where those sorts of systems were a great advantage. we also had a noc with 50+ people staffed around the clock and a department to keep things from firing incorrectly19:38
pleia2last I used it I was managing over 100 servers, but we don't have that many and we can target specific ones to monitor that we might be concerned about19:38
*** baoli has quit IRC19:38
fungiwell, we actually have way more than 100 servers, but we may not care about much in the way of live metrics on most of them19:39
jeblairheh19:39
pleia2right, well, "static" servers :)19:39
*** ildikov_ has quit IRC19:39
anteayahere is my question, what will change as a result of this info?19:39
pleia2anteaya: we get alerts if a server goes offline, or disk fills up19:40
morganfainbergfungi, i think this is something we start super small with, hit the bigger ticket items and use it in addition to status pages to help us identify issues a bit earlier than "oops" or "hey X is broken" (from 1000 people)19:40
pleia2morganfainberg: yeah, that's what I'm thinking19:40
fungiand yes, we do have actual disk space utilization data, network interface error stats, and so on trended and accessible in raw form from cacti, which could be consumed by anyone wanting to give us a heads up on broken things too, which might be a good place to start19:40
anteayabut if a server goes offline, someone posts in infra19:40
pleia2anteaya: sadly now, we sometimes find out when someone joins channel and complains about something not working :\19:40
anteayaand as a team, we have fairly good channel coverage19:40
jeblairi like monitoring, but i'm not keen on alerting in our environment.  i'd be more happy with status pages that anyone can check.  i'm less keen on email or irc alerts.19:40
pleia2anteaya: that's kind of embarassing19:40
jeblairpleia2: why?  they usually tell us before nagios would anyway19:41
sdagueso the issue is there are some normal fail modes, which mostly I find at 6am over coffee. So sean-nagios is something I'd like to stop doing19:41
anteayaI don't see how that is going to change19:41
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
*** baoli has quit IRC19:41
morganfainbergsdague, ++19:41
jeblairsdague: normal failure modes should be corrected...19:41
anteayasince someone telling us will probably happen at teh same time as the alert anyway19:41
morganfainbergsdague, not that we want you to stop being you...or stop enjoying coffee19:41
jeblairtake the logs as an example19:41
pleia2jeblair: hurts my sysadmin feelings, I should know what my servers are up to, not have users tell me19:41
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
morganfainbergjeblair, i think this can be used to help also identify the normal failmodes over a longer period of time.19:41
fungisdague: you would prefer to find those failures neatly organized on a status page over coffee instead?19:41
morganfainbergjeblair, with the right tool.19:41
jeblairsdague, morganfainberg: we have had the log server fill up on disk space before.  our solution to that is to _stop using the log server and put logs in swift_.19:42
sdaguefungi: yeh, so I don't need to spend brain power deducing them19:42
morganfainberghow many times has X failed?19:42
sdagueor - hey... is my irc bot dead?19:42
jeblairsdague, morganfainberg: that's a big project and is going to take some time, but putting our _very_ limited resources into writing and reviewing and implementing that change is WAY better in my opinion than investing in monitoring it19:42
fungidebug irc bot, apply fixes, repeat19:42
nibalizeran irc bot for alerting could squack in a different channel than the -infra channel19:42
nibalizerthat way its very opt-in19:42
funginibalizer: i especially love the circular meta concept of an irc bot warning you that your irc bots are broken ;)19:43
nibalizeri would be more inclined to check that, especially it being event driven, than a status webpage19:43
*** topol has quit IRC19:43
*** joesavak has quit IRC19:43
pleia2fungi: hehe19:43
nibalizerfungi: no worse than the nagios email to tell you email is down19:43
morganfainbergjeblair, this is why i brought it up. i know we have limited resources, but it's worth considering19:43
morganfainbergjeblair, even if the answer is "not now, maybe later"19:44
funginibalizer: like jeblair, i basically already have no time to read all the e-mails our systems send me. so sure, no worse than that ;)19:44
morganfainbergjeblair, or "lets do something else and see if we need it still down the line"19:44
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
sdaguefungi: honestly, I don't want it as alerts, I want status page19:44
*** stevemar2 has joined #openstack-meeting19:44
morganfainbergsdague, ++ that was my initial thought19:44
pleia2nagios can do a public-ish status page19:44
morganfainbergpleia2, we could use any number of tools for it.19:45
sdaguewe already have all sorts of data we put in zuul status to let us know when things are crazy19:45
*** thomasem_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:45
*** Gordonz_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:45
*** MaxV has joined #openstack-meeting19:45
sdagueand I think there are a class of other things that knowing if something just bust, ends up saving me 2 - 3 hrs debugging before fungi gets up and can check on something19:46
jeblairpleia2: will it offend your inner sysadmin if that page is red all the time?  how much time will you spend adjusting filessystem usage thresholds?19:46
jeblairsdague: let's try to identify what those are and if we can expose them specifically...19:46
pleia2jeblair: I guess I haven't had the same experiences as you, my Nagios is quite green19:46
*** thomasem has quit IRC19:46
fungii think if there are people who want to spear-head adding a nagios server and doing the tuning necessary to get it usable, then i'm not directly opposed... but that's probably lots and lots of little reviews to tweak the configuration accordingly19:46
morganfainbergjeblair, pleia2, i've had both experiences19:46
sdaguejeblair: sure, my instinct would be this is incremental, in the same way that something like er was19:47
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
*** Gordonz_ has quit IRC19:47
*** Gordonz__ has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
morganfainbergjeblair, pleia2, the "everything red" experience is usually because you try and add everything at once and never get any of them right19:47
pleia2morganfainberg: yeah19:47
*** arborism is now known as amcrn19:47
morganfainbergjeblair, or no time to spend on it at all19:47
morganfainbergjeblair, some orgs are like that :P19:47
*** reaperhulk has joined #openstack-meeting19:47
fungimost of the problem is that there are things which are easy to monitor with very low false negative rates, but those are also the things which just about never have a problem. the things which are more useful to find out about are also the things which need a lot of thought around threshholds19:47
*** stevemar has quit IRC19:48
jeblairfungi: agreed (with the last 2 things you said)19:48
sdaguefungi: yeh, I don't care about the easy to monitor things. I care about the things that I bug you about. Like er bot.19:48
*** Gordonz has quit IRC19:48
morganfainbergsdague, ++19:48
*** Gordonz__ has quit IRC19:49
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
jeblairsdague: i suspect what you want to know about er-bot is almost impossible to monitor in nagios...19:49
fungisdague: and i think that's an example of "let's figure out why this is broken" while finding out a little more quickly that it broke isn't quite as beneficial over the long term19:49
sdaguejeblair: out of the box, for sure19:49
pleia2yeah, I have bot monitors but they're all "see if this process is running"19:49
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
jeblairpleia2: they are almost always running.  sometimes they are netsplit, sometimes they are stuck due to an irc library bug.  i just yesterday started upgrading irclib to see if we can fix that...19:50
sdagueyeh, I could write a plugin for this. The biggest thing right now is there was really no infrastructure to register against.19:50
pleia2jeblair: yeah, that's what I was afraid of19:50
jeblairbut all that came from reading log files19:50
* pleia2 nods19:50
jeblairsdague: and the solution to "we hit an irclib bug" isn't to write a nagios plugin19:51
sdaguebut I mostly consider this unit testing for some services19:51
sdaguejeblair: sure19:51
pleia2sdague: maybe we should create a wishlist bug to brainstorm on?19:51
pleia2then we can come back to this and evaluate19:51
*** stevemar2 has quit IRC19:51
morganfainbergpleia2, sdague, i like that.19:52
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC19:52
jeblairokay, i don't think we have consensus, but i think you know the concerns.  and i'd like to move on to the next topic19:52
fungiwell, in some organizations "monitor to let us know every time this fails" is normal operating procedure, which stems from never having time to debug failures and just accepting that things break and you're going to fight fires, bring them back up asap and maybe sometimes discover why they broke in the process19:52
jeblair#topic  Infrastructure Priorities19:53
*** openstack changes topic to "Infrastructure Priorities (Meeting topic: infra)"19:53
sdaguefungi: yeh, I don't think we are that org though19:53
jeblair#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/infrastructure-priorities19:53
jeblairthere are a lot of new people around...19:53
*** jchiu_ has quit IRC19:53
jeblairand when we say things like something is or isn't a priority for our limited resources, it's possible it seems like we're making it up as we go along...19:54
jeblairbut we aren't.  :)19:54
mordred++19:54
jeblairit turns out we set priorities fairly clearly actually at the summits19:54
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting19:54
jeblairbut we're really bad about communicating those between summits19:54
jeblairi'm hoping storyboard will make that better19:54
mordredI was just about to say storyboard19:54
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
*** jchiu_ has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
morganfainbergyay storyboard!19:55
fungimordred: it's there!19:55
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting19:55
jeblairbut for now, here's a list of things based on the last (approximately) 2 summits19:55
* ttx sighs19:55
jeblairso if you're looking for something to work in in infra, check the bugs, but these are our highest priority items19:55
* mordred hands ttx some wine and cheese and a sausage19:55
* mordred agrees19:55
jeblairand if you're looking to prioritize reviews, this same list will help19:55
* mordred supports everyone who is in channel working on the list19:56
*** markmc has joined #openstack-meeting19:56
* mordred will consider kindly anyone who does19:56
*** evgenyf has quit IRC19:56
jeblairand understand that things not on the list may well be good ideas, but i'm personally always thinking about this when i'm writing and reviewing19:56
nibalizerok19:57
jeblairand would love it if we could focus on completing some of these before we get too distracted19:57
nibalizerfwiw puppetboard 1,2 are done and 3 is in review19:57
pleia2\o/19:57
*** stanlagun has joined #openstack-meeting19:57
clarkbjeblair: thank you for the reminder, I need to hunker down on the last backup bits and close that bug19:58
jeblairnibalizer: yeah, i think that's going to unblock a lot of work19:58
*** _dim has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
anteayafungi: did you ever have a patch up on this? Write Jenkins Job which sends the salt command from salt-trigger slave19:58
clarkbfungi: after feature freeze do you think we can sit together and get the sensitive stuff backups sorted?19:58
fungianteaya: that part is a) extremely trivial at this point and b) useless until we can have the reactor-based dependencies implemented19:59
pleia2with FF this week, I'm also hoping we can do another bug day next week - Tuesday March 11th at 17:00 UTC19:59
anteayafungi: k19:59
*** bruff has left #openstack-meeting19:59
fungiclarkb: sure thing19:59
jeblairthanks everyone, sorry we didn't get to nibalizer's thing, but i think that topic will be more relevant next week; hopefully we'll have a puppetboard by then!20:00
jeblair#endmeeting20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar  4 20:00:19 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-03-04-19.01.html20:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-03-04-19.01.txt20:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-03-04-19.01.log.html20:00
anteayamissed the #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/new-projects-2014-03-0720:00
ttxAnyone here for the TC meeting ?20:00
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
jeblairt20:00
markmchey20:00
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
stevebaker\o20:01
lisaclark1\o20:01
SergeyLukjanovo/20:01
*** bauzas has quit IRC20:01
gokrokve_\o20:01
reaperhulko/20:01
ttxrussellb, annegentle, mikal, mordred, jgriffith, vishy, markmcclain, lifeless, sdague, dhellmann : around ?20:01
sdagueo/20:01
stanlagunhi20:01
dhellmanno/20:01
lisaclark1o/20:01
markmcclaino/20:01
igormarnathey20:01
russellbo/20:01
ativelkovo/20:01
annegentleho20:01
* jaypipes watches from sidelines20:01
ttx#startmeeting tc20:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar  4 20:02:03 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)"20:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'20:02
ttxOur agenda for today:20:02
ttx#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee20:02
ttxBeen reordering the topic to account for some people's availability20:02
ttxtopics*20:02
mordredo/20:02
*** tsufiev has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
ttx#topic Murano incubation request20:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Murano incubation request (Meeting topic: tc)"20:02
ttx#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-February/027736.html20:02
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
*** ycombina_ has quit IRC20:02
*** kebray_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:02
*** gyee has quit IRC20:03
ttx#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/murano-incubation-status20:03
ttxI'll kick this off with my feedback from thread20:03
ttxin the thread I said I had two issues with this, both linked to the fact that this is a complete solution built on top of OpenStack20:03
ttx(1) The complete solution (or product) approach make it span multiple programs, as it doesn't match the "basic component" landscape we currently have20:03
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
ttx(2) The "solution built on top of OpenStack" aspect makes me think this should live as an OpenStack consuming application rather than in the integrated release.20:03
*** kebray_ has quit IRC20:04
ttxI mean, I think it's a bit early for us to tackle that space, while we still have large "basic application blocks" functionality uncovered.20:04
ttxSo IMHO it fails the "measured progression for OpenStack as a whole" requirement. As would Solum if they applied right now.20:04
ttxbut maybe that's just me20:04
*** randallburt has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
*** kebray has quit IRC20:05
gokrokve_Thanks for bringing these concerns.20:05
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting20:05
ttxTC members, comments ?20:05
jgriffithttx: I've struggled with some of this myself20:06
russellbyeah20:06
jgriffithttx: ie the same thoughts that you have20:06
jgriffithabout tackling the "new" space so to speak20:06
ttxI think Murano is great and should exist. I'm not convinced it should be made a part of "OpenStack" at this point.20:06
dhellmannthose seem like legit concerns; I've only started looking at the implementation details fairly recently20:06
russellbthere were also comments from the Images and Orchestration programs, and i'd like to see all the relationships clearly worked out20:06
gokrokve_As for 1) we technically can split Murano to have Catalog part and application package processing part.20:06
russellbi didn't get the impression that consensus was reached yet20:06
gokrokve_Murano is mature technology which already can be and already used by the customers.20:07
ttxjgriffith: Basic orchestration of resources (Heat) is as high as I would go up the stack right now20:07
sdagueyeh, that's my bigger concern, how much of this is really efforts that should be part of Images and Orchestration20:07
vishyo/20:07
stevebakerI'd like to see more of the Murano orchestration solutions handled in heat in a declaritive way20:07
ttxjgriffith: at least until we get most basic infrastructure and app building blocks covered20:07
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
*** redrobot has joined #openstack-meeting20:07
russellb^^^ see, if heat PTL has concerns, that's probably a red flag that's it's too early20:07
vishythe workflow portion scares me20:08
zanebit seems to me that the application packaging DSL and the catalog part are quite separable20:08
*** efedorova has joined #openstack-meeting20:08
vishyconsidering we have mistral/heat/taskflow20:08
gokrokve_zaneb: They are.20:08
vishywe have too much workflow related stuff with too much overlap20:08
*** denis_makogon_ is now known as denis_makogon20:09
*** SheenaG__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:09
jgriffithvishy: +120:09
ttxvishy: yes, it seems a bit early to slash the innovation and movement in that space20:09
gokrokve_Actually we want to understand where Murano fits better in OpenStack.20:09
russellbvishy: ttx: +120:09
gokrokve_and integrat it with corresponding OpenStack programs.20:09
vishythat said the application catalog seems useful. It has some overlap with glance/heat20:09
*** chadlung has joined #openstack-meeting20:09
ttxgokrokve_: I could definitely see a cross-project session at the next design summit to clarify that between all the affected projects20:10
gokrokve_ttx: Thanks. That would be helpful.20:10
markwashthe overlap with glance in terms of storing fixed representations of application packages feels quite straightforward to me, FWIW20:11
ttxwe had some of the same problem with clustering between savanna and trove20:11
zanebvishy: agree, I think that you could have a single service as the catalog for both Heat templates and Murano applications20:11
ttxmarkwash: yes, that part was, I think , well clarified in the thread20:11
zaneband the probably belongs in the glance program somehow20:11
russellbmarkwash: yes i like that idea20:11
zanebthat*20:11
randallburtFWIW we had that discussion at the Glance mid-summit and there was consensus that application catalog stuff belongs in Glance.20:11
sdaguemarkwash: +120:11
gokrokve_zaneb: +120:11
* stevebaker looks forward to glance cataloging all the things20:12
vishyso in that case murano could be a kind of a bridge between glance and heat20:12
markwash+1, storing more than just disk images in glance seems straightforward to me at this point, sorry I have been a slacker on updating the mission and program20:12
gokrokve_So we can keep aside the orchestartion part and make Application Catalog as a first step.20:12
ttxgokrokve_: so in summary, i would be -1 for incubating the way it is now, but +1 for actively engaging with other projects in that area and see how you could cooperate20:12
jeblairvishy: ++20:13
vishythe funny thing will be is if we have a DB stack and a hadoop stack in the Application Catalog20:13
vishybecause then what are trove and savanna for?20:13
ttxand I'm willing to help in making sure you have space to discuss that cooperation at the next summit20:13
russellbif the glance part is the most straight forward, maybe starting there this cycle is the best place to start?20:13
vishymaybe for the management features of dbs and data processing?20:13
annegentlevishy: lightbulb moment20:13
zanebvishy: just APIs?20:13
vishythe deployment happens through murano in the future, but runtime mgmt is done by the services?20:14
jaypipesthere is also a UX component to Murano that is quite slick.20:14
gokrokve_ttx: It will be great to have a feedback on where Murano should fit better. We do not consider to be incubated immediately but sometime in Juno release.20:14
zanebrussellb: I'm not sure that the glance component is that useful without the application definition component?20:14
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting20:14
gokrokve_Before Juno we can actively discuss App Catalog with other project to find better aligment.20:14
stevebakerzaneb: unless it starts out being a catalog of heat templates20:15
ttxgokrokve_: we plan to have an avenue for long cross-project sessions at the next Design Summit20:15
SergeyLukjanovvishy, zaneb, in both trove and savanna there a lot of domain ops like db backups, jobs execution management and etc.20:15
randallburtzaneb:  glance would simply be a repository for that definition the same way it will be for heat templates and images20:15
gokrokve_It looks like App Catalog itself is valuable.20:15
zanebstevebaker: +120:15
markwashjaypipes: I think the UX component raises an interesting question about program placement20:15
jaypipesindeed.20:15
zanebbtw I can imagine the application definition part ending up as a project in the orchestration program20:15
markwashit doesn't seem inconceivable to me for the images program to have a UX component20:15
randallburtHorizon == UX?20:15
zanebbut I would like to see closer collaboration with the TOSCA TC20:16
ttxrandallburt: Horizon = Dashboard20:16
jaypipesrandallburt: yes, horizon is one project in the uX program, IIUC20:16
annegentleI'd like to see a UX program where GUIs fit in20:16
randallburtjaypipes:  k20:16
stevebakerI'd like to consider extending the heat HOT spec to support some kind of contract/interface, so a stack can define a component or app20:16
ttxjaypipes: no UX program yet20:16
jaypipesno?20:16
jaypipesok, sorryr.20:16
sdagueUX != UI20:16
jaypipesyes, I was trying to make that point, sdague20:16
annegentlesdague: true dat20:16
sdaguebut I'm not sure what UX means in the murano case, honestly20:16
annegentlesdague: a visual catalog < jaypipes?20:17
sdagueare you talking about the custom user ui20:17
gokrokve_So. do we agree that App Catalog is a right way and it will be valuable for OpenStack?20:17
jaypipessdague: murano has a component that *builds* user interfaces that allow a wizard-like flow for constructing application packages.20:17
*** shakayumi has quit IRC20:17
stevebakergokrokve_: yes, but it may be best to start with a template catalog until we know what an "App" is20:17
randallburtjaypipes:  but its similar/identical to what was added to Horizon for Heat IIRC.20:17
sdaguejaypipes: so that's cool, but I'm not sure I'd say being cool makes it something we wan part of the integrated openstack release that we co-gate on20:18
ttxI'm still not convinced that applications-as-a-service belongs in openstack at this point, at least not until we get better at covering the lower layers20:18
*** wenlock has joined #openstack-meeting20:18
jaypipesrandallburt, sdague: no disagreement. just pointing out that Murano has components that bridge a number of programs (or programs-to-be I guess)20:18
sdagueyeh, gokrokve_ I think I share ttx's point of view20:18
jaypipeswhich makes it difficult to tackle.20:18
annegentlettx: +120:18
gokrokve_stevebaker: We will support heat template use case too. This is a question of application definition format.20:18
sdaguewhich is there is a bunch that murano does that we'd rather have as features in existing openstack components20:18
sdaguelets do that20:18
markwashfwiw I would be interested in incubating the user-facing component of the catalog in a Catalog-nee-Images program20:19
sdaguethen reevaluate what remembes20:19
sdagueremains20:19
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
* jaypipes would like to see the Mistral DSL, Murano DSL, and HOT languages aligned more...20:19
markwashbut perhaps that is overreach20:19
zanebjaypipes: +120:19
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting20:19
gokrokve_ttx: Application Catalog is a logical step after Heat. You need to store application definitions somewhere, so catalog seems pretty good solution for that.20:20
jaypipesBut it's tough to align those things when it's not entirely clear where Murano "belongs" in the integrated program world.20:20
ttxWe should make sure those various projects talk together and prepare a common future... But my understanding of "measured progression" is we should complete the lower levels of the stack before going too far up20:20
jaypipesalso, SOlum's DSL too...20:20
jaypipesttx: ya, no disagreement on that point.20:20
ttxgokrokve_: yes. It's the logical step after Heat. But I just don't think we should go after Heat. Not until we get basic pieces in like a queue service20:21
*** hockeynut has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
jeblairttx: agreed; trove and savannah have both made compelling cases they are building blocks for cloud application developers.  this seems like one more step up20:21
markmcttx, nice, I like that20:21
ttxBasic orchestration of resources (Heat) is as high as I would go up the stack right now20:21
markmcttx, the measure progression == lower levels of the stack first20:21
jeblairdns would be nice...20:21
mordred++20:21
ttxjeblair: yes20:21
sdagueyeh, dns20:21
randallburtjeblair:  +20:21
ttxIt's not as if we were really missing incubation candidates either20:21
tsufievmarkwash: do you mean something like murano dynamic ui feature?20:22
ttxBUT I want to facilitate cooperation in the space Murano is addressing20:22
ttxhence the proposal to have one of our cross-project sessions focused on that space20:22
markwashtsufiev: not necessarily20:23
jeblairttx: yeah, it seems like we have a concrete suggestion to see how much of this can be done with glance and heat, and to support that collaboration at the summit.  that sounds good and constructive.20:23
ttxLooks like TC members are in agreement ?20:23
*** egallen has quit IRC20:24
dhellmann+120:24
markmcclain+120:24
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC20:24
*** jchiu_ has quit IRC20:24
markmcyep20:24
russellb+120:24
vishy+120:24
mordred+120:24
*** woodster1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC20:25
ttx#agreed Murano is slightly too far up the stack at this point to meet the "measured progression of openstack as a whole" requirement. We'll facilitate collaboration in that space by setting up a cross-project session to advance this at the next design summit20:25
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting20:25
ttxgokrokve_: also if you need ATC passes to get the right people in Atlanta, just let me know20:25
gokrokve_ttx: Sure. Thanks!20:26
ttxOK, moving on to next topic...20:26
ttx#topic Barbican final incubation decision20:26
*** openstack changes topic to "Barbican final incubation decision (Meeting topic: tc)"20:26
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting20:26
ttx#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77647/20:26
jraimjust finished my keynote so I'm here for questions20:26
ttxjraim: I'm the king of timing20:26
ttxWe agreed to put final incubation decision on Barbican immediately back on the agenda when the last QA requirements would have been cleared20:27
ttxWith the merging of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74530/ it looks like it's ready now20:27
*** ivasev has quit IRC20:27
*** tsufiev has quit IRC20:27
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-meeting20:27
ttxjraim: you confirm ?20:27
jraimI believe that we've covered everything at this point20:27
markmc#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Barbican/Incubation20:28
jraimdevstack was the last hurdle and I think we got all the patches merged20:28
* russellb has no outstanding concerns on this one20:28
*** dstufft has joined #openstack-meeting20:28
ttxjraim: hgetting a KDS featureset will be instrumental in graduating for the K release20:28
sdaguejraim: where is the job running?20:28
jeblairhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/77689/20:29
jraimthere was some back and forth on whether is was a non-voting job or not. The patch reflected the consensus feedback we got I think20:29
jeblairnot apparently on barbican20:29
jeblairoh, it's a check job20:29
sdaguehttp://logs.openstack.org/89/77689/2/check/gate-barbican-devstack-dsvm/2a0d9f4/console.html#_2014-03-03_23_30_57_33220:29
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC20:30
sdagueso it seems like it doesn't actually work20:30
sdaguethat's the last patch that merged from barbican20:30
*** kebray_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
jeblairsdague: it did hit the local bug20:31
jraimthere was an issue with the new version of the iso lib revving under us20:31
sdagueok, fair, do we have a version that did work?20:31
jraimnot sure if this was related20:32
jraimchadlung: you on? can you talk about the devstack testing you did?20:32
lifelessttx: sorry, EPRINTING20:32
lifelesserm20:32
lifelessESPRINTING20:32
ttxPRINTING?20:32
* dansmith chuckles20:32
ttxheh, that excuse sounds better20:32
jeblairsdague, jraim: i just ran recheck no bug on it20:32
*** markwash has quit IRC20:32
jeblairso we can see if it works now20:32
ttx(suspense)20:32
sdaguettx: well that will be 2hrs at this point20:33
ttxhah20:33
chadlungThe gating is difficult to test as we don't have that infrastructure to directly inspect. However, I'm checking on a VM with DevStack to get more details. Is not a big issue, should be solved soon.20:33
sdagueit looks like only the last 3 changes ran20:33
ttxanyway, the review is up20:33
ttxPlease vote on that review, I'll approve it when it reaches enough +1s20:33
*** kebray has quit IRC20:33
markmcclainso while we're waiting… I do have one question/observation20:33
ttxyou can hold your vote until you're confident the check test exists20:33
jraimmarkmcclain: sure20:33
markmcclainI don't see any entries to aligning with the libraries that other programs use20:34
chadlungThe actual integration with Barbican is working, the sanity check on the API is not working but the service is running and if I ping it it is up. So just need to see what the issue is.20:34
*** onesig has joined #openstack-meeting20:34
jeblairyeah, i for one would like to see a check result where i can interpret whether we're effectively testing what we think we are20:34
sdaguechadlung: yeh, the point was that it demonstrably worked in a gate like env20:36
jraimmarkmcclain: we are using global reqs at this point so I don't think we are using anything that's not being used by other services?20:36
mordredjraim: is there an update on the pecan/falcon thing at all?20:36
sdagueso seeing an actual success on the barbican API is important20:36
jeblairalso, does this work with python 2.6?20:36
markmcclainjraim: the global requirements includes a few libs that grandfathered in20:36
markmcclainjraim: for example falcon20:36
*** roeyc has joined #openstack-meeting20:36
*** topol has quit IRC20:36
*** dburmistrov has quit IRC20:36
jraimmordred markmcclain: right now we use Falcon and we're aren't currently planning any changes. We're open to a discussion about it20:36
*** dvarga is now known as dvarga|away20:36
kgriffsfwiw, I am expecting a report on our Pecan evaluation by the end of the week20:36
kgriffs(marconi)20:36
jraimother projects use falcon and I thought we were waiting on a eval of Pecan20:36
jraimha kgriffs beat me to it :)20:36
kgriffsI asked a new openstack contributor to lead the project to minimize bias20:36
dhellmannno other integrated project uses falcon20:36
*** dvarga|away is now known as dvarga20:36
ttxno integrated project uses falcon.20:36
jraimdhellmann: my understanding is that most other projects don't use pecan either?20:36
markmcjraim, would you like to ultimately be part of convergence on this stuff across openstack?20:36
sdaguedhellmann: correction "no integrated"20:36
dhellmannthe rest of the community is moving to pecan, and I would expect any incubated project to look at that seriously20:36
markmcjraim, even if it means switching from falcon20:37
dhellmannsdague: yes, thank you20:37
jraimmarkmc: yep. I'm certainly willing to make changes as needed20:37
*** alazarev has quit IRC20:37
jraimmarkmc: I have no intrinsic tie to either project, if we need to move, we can do that20:37
dhellmannjraim: the integrated projects that don't use pecan yet are working on it20:37
jraimI would like to see kgriffs study as soon as possible20:37
kgriffswe are looking at it seriously, to be sure, but IMO it is important to allow due diligence when vetting something as a standard20:37
ttxmarkmcclain, markmc: that would be a graduation requirement (alignment on relevant libs)20:37
dhellmannkgriffs: I spent a year doing that vetting20:37
kgriffsjraim: I will ask balaji to post to the ML20:37
jraimkgriffs: great20:38
zanebapropos of nothing, it occurs to me that we should be asking projects applying for incubation to have created Heat resource plugins. This often shows up problems in the API design, and it would be nice to catch them early.20:38
*** noslzzp has quit IRC20:38
sdaguezaneb: I'm only comfortable doing that once heat actually has real gating on it20:38
jraimdhellmann: do you have some docs I could look at? I haven't seen a good study of the two and I would love to have more info20:38
markmczaneb, we settled on that being a post-graduation-before-first-integrated-release thing20:38
markmczaneb, in a review I put up recently20:38
* markmc digs up the link20:39
dhellmannjraim: docs about pecan and falcon?20:39
zanebmarkmc: ok, fair enough20:39
*** _dim has quit IRC20:39
jraimdhellmann: or just a general 'why pecan' would be somewhat helpful, but pecan v falcon would obviously  be ideal since that's the scenario we are in20:39
markmczaneb, https://review.openstack.org/6825820:39
mordredjraim: so - I think the thing here, not to belabor a point20:39
dhellmannjraim: we can discuss some of that after the meeting20:39
zanebsdague: it's not a gating thing, it's a "does this API design work" thing20:40
markmcclainttx: I agree it is a grad requirement, but I do think we should make sure we note when the are library incompatibilities20:40
jraimdhellmann: great20:40
ttxmarkmcclain: I think it's good to set up graduation expectations too20:40
dhellmannjraim: start with https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/havana-common-wsgi which has a link to the grizzly session, too20:40
sdaguezaneb: that's fine, but until heat actually has real gating, I don't feel it's ok to have heat imposed requirements on a lot of other projects20:40
sdagueit goes 2 ways20:40
mordredwe're kinda trying to avoid re-opening the can of worms every time there is a new project20:40
jraimdhellmann: great, I'll do some reading and come bug you with questions :)20:41
mordredjraim: ++20:41
zanebsdague: there's a non-voting gate job now and it passes20:41
dhellmannjraim: cool!20:41
sdaguezaneb: gating == voting, and it didn't as of last time I looked. :) But we can take that offline20:41
*** roeyc has quit IRC20:41
zanebmarkmc: that doesn't mention anything about Heat resources though20:41
markmczaneb, revision 2 - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68258/2/reference/incubation-integration-requirements20:42
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting20:42
zanebah20:42
jraimmordred: I can understand that. When we started barbican, pecan wasn't really a standard20:42
jraimmordred: however, I believe we need to strike a balance between allowing innovation and trying to limit complexity20:43
jraimmordred: which I htink is an ongoing oslo challenge that I'd like to help with20:43
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC20:43
ttxOK, I propose we move on. The review is in gerrit now, the test is supposed to work. barbican knows that graduation expectations will include KDS featureset and potentially convergence to Pecan20:43
chadlungjraim: The testing is identical to what Solum is doing20:43
sdaguejraim: when we are talkign about potentially integrated project #14 - we need to move a lot more towards limit coplexity20:43
markmc#link https://review.openstack.org/77647 <- barbican incubation vote20:44
ttxWe'll vote on it asynchronously20:44
jeblairttx: is "potentially" a problem in that sentence?20:44
ttxthx markmc20:44
jeblairttx: i'd expect it to be a grad requirement20:44
*** jaypipes has quit IRC20:44
zanebsdague: you're correct, but IMO missing the point. the benefit is not to Heat, it's to the prospective project to know that their API design is sound for orchestration ahead of time20:44
ttxjeblair: well, we can set graduation requirements anytime we want20:44
jeblairso i wonder if we need to be more formal about whether we all agree on that and if we need to communicate that to barbican20:44
ttxjeblair: we don't have to set them now, as long as jraim explains he is willing to look into it20:44
jeblairttx: okay, but we've spent a lot of time talking about how we should be nice and try to set the expectations early20:44
jraimjeblair: I'm happy to just assume we need the Heat templates for now and if that changes we can re-evaluate20:45
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting20:45
markmcclainyeah I'd rather set early vs project feeling like we changed the rules mid cycle20:45
jeblairjraim: i'm talking about pecan, actually20:45
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:45
ttxjeblair: sure, it's just not part of the thing we vote on -- we might need another document20:45
jeblairi can put in a signing statement with my vote, i suppose.  :)20:46
ttxas in explicit graduation requirements20:46
jeblairbut i'm a little worried about not voting -1 now on something like that.20:47
jraimjeblair: oh sorry. If it is a requirement, then we'll move. I don't have a strong opinion other than it would require some work on our part to move over20:47
*** Gordonz has quit IRC20:47
jeblairjraim: i think the tc needs to collectively have an opinion on this, and i don't think we've expressed in strongly enough yet.20:48
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
*** esker has quit IRC20:48
mordredjeblair: ++20:48
*** sivel has left #openstack-meeting20:48
ttxjeblair: we need to do a better job at tracking specific graduation requirements, yes20:48
jeblairjraim: i don't want you to be caught up in the middle of that, so i'd like to go aheand and say to you that at least i personally think it should be a req20:48
*** roeyc has joined #openstack-meeting20:48
dhellmannjraim: right, that's why I think bringing it up earlier is better20:48
markmcclainjeblair: +120:48
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC20:49
jraimjeblair: fair enough. I'm certainly going to start looking closer, especially at the work that kgriffs is doing20:49
jeblairjraim: hopefully as a group we'll get make a decision one way or the other more officially soon20:49
*** balajiiyer1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
jraimjeblair: sounds good. If we decide it is a requirement, then we'll change Barbican20:49
*** balajiiyer1 has left #openstack-meeting20:49
ttxOK, we'll comment and vote on the review20:49
*** cdub has quit IRC20:50
ttxand it's good to spell out expected grad requirements early20:50
ttxmoving on to next topic20:50
jraimttx: agreed :)20:50
ttx#topic Integrated projects and new requirements: Neutron20:50
*** openstack changes topic to "Integrated projects and new requirements: Neutron (Meeting topic: tc)"20:50
ttx#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IcehouseProjectReviewNeutron20:50
ttxThis is a the continuation of last week's discussion, as we were short on time20:50
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:50
sdagueum, with 10 minutes left?20:50
*** cody-somerville has quit IRC20:50
ttxand we are again, short in time20:50
russellbmay want to just punt20:50
sdaguecan we push it next week then and make it early20:50
russellbyes20:51
sdaguebecause I feel like this needs to start off on the first slot20:51
sdagueto give it time to breath20:51
*** chadlung has quit IRC20:51
ttxOK then. i'll miss next meeting but you can do that without me20:51
markmcthese reviews are probably low priority anyway20:51
markmcas in, they don't have a deadline20:51
markmcclainsdague: so neutron is like wine now?20:51
ttxthey are lwoer priority yes20:51
*** hockeynut has left #openstack-meeting20:51
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC20:51
ttx#topic Minor governance changes20:51
*** openstack changes topic to "Minor governance changes (Meeting topic: tc)"20:51
sdaguemarkmc: sure, though doing so before summit would be good20:51
sdagueso plans can be made20:51
*** randallburt has left #openstack-meeting20:51
ttx* Add pycadf and oslo-cookiecutter to Oslo Program (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/76602/)20:52
ttxdhellmann approved it, so I'll approve this one unless someone yells about it very soon20:52
*** Gordonz has quit IRC20:52
dhellmannWe missed pycadf when we listed the other adoptions, and the cookiecutter repo is for making new libs.20:52
*** chadlung has joined #openstack-meeting20:52
ttxwill approve as soon as I get a breath from crazyweek20:52
ttx#topic Open discussion20:53
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: tc)"20:53
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting20:53
ttxAnything else, anyone ?20:53
jeblair#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-March/028783.html20:53
russellbi move that we fast forward past feature freeze.  i am tired.20:53
*** rfolco has quit IRC20:53
jeblairjust a heads up that i started a thread about moving from freenode to oftc20:53
markmcclainrussellb: +120:53
jeblairthat will likely result in a tc motion20:53
* dhellmann has registered his nick20:53
ttxrussellb: i move that next week i'm back on snow20:53
russellbttx: jealous20:54
*** dstufft has left #openstack-meeting20:54
jeblairbased on how that thread goes.  so we'll have a chance to vote on the decision and timing20:54
*** MaxV has quit IRC20:54
ttxjeblair: I voiced my very few concerns there20:54
*** reaperhulk has left #openstack-meeting20:54
dansmithI haven't seen the OFTC questions addressed20:54
dansmithabout whether they're a smaller target or better prepared20:54
annegentlettx: I agree with your concerns20:55
sdagueyeh, jeblair do you have an idea about how to get that answer?20:55
*** stanlagun has left #openstack-meeting20:55
jeblairdansmith: yep.  i think it's going to be a hard question to answer due to limited visibility into the operations of both groups.20:55
annegentlejeblair: seems like a reactive rather than proactive plan (reacting to ddos)20:55
*** mattgriffin has joined #openstack-meeting20:55
jeblairannegentle: i'm trying to be proactive, actually...20:56
russellbdon't let the terrorists win20:56
annegentlejeblair: yeah I think your plan is well-laid, but the root motivation seems off20:56
jeblairannegentle: i registered all the channels when freenode was unavailable for an entire day20:56
ttxI fear we are trading our old cadillac that doesn't work that well for a second-hand car that looks like it will be working better.20:56
dansmithyeah20:56
jeblairannegentle: and was considering whether we needed to switch under duress...20:56
jeblairannegentle: but we've been talking about this off and on in infra for a long time20:56
dansmithand many of us will have to straddle both networks for a long time (and some of us have to be on freenode forever anyway)20:57
*** cdub has joined #openstack-meeting20:57
annegentlejeblair: then I think an emergency plan is more what we'd need than a full switch20:57
jeblairand i'd like to have a plan, and possibly execute it, before it becomes even more of an issue20:57
jeblairannegentle: i think an emergency plan carries a very high risk of failure20:57
jeblairwith lots of people left behind20:57
ttxjeblair: +120:57
*** mrda_away is now known as mrda20:57
sdagueso when was freenode unavailable for an entire day?20:57
*** jcoufal has quit IRC20:58
annegentlejeblair: I guess I see it more as a communications outage that you would then route temporarily as your plan20:58
dansmithunavailable doesn't happen, AFAIK, but it is unusable at times :)20:58
jeblairsdague: i think a week ago  saturday?20:58
ttxjeblair: my only gripe is that i'm unsure OFTC won't catastrophically fail the first day it becomes a target. freenode has a lot of experience  handling those situations20:58
mordredthe fact that the oftc admins are actually good to work with would be part of the pro-active part of thigns20:58
jeblairdansmith: _definitely_ completely unavailable.20:58
annegentlejeblair: rather than give up on a working solution20:58
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC20:58
jeblairdansmith: all of the servers in rotation were rejecting connections20:58
dansmithjeblair: heh, okay20:59
jeblairmordred: yes, the admins have been extremely responsive20:59
sdaguemordred: can you reach out about the ddos question?20:59
ttxjeblair: maybe we could get some advice from OFTC people that they are actually routinely working around those too20:59
sdagueif they admins are good to work with20:59
dansmith+1 for OFTC admins over freenode admins, FWIW :)20:59
lifelessmaybe we should just run a freenode node ?20:59
mordredsdague: sure.20:59
lifelesse.g. in racksapce20:59
ttxlifeless: there is actually already one20:59
jeblairlifeless: only freenode runs freenode nodes (they remote admin them)21:00
ttx(freenode node at rax)21:00
ttxanyway, time is up21:00
ttxfollow up on thread !21:00
jeblairsdague, dansmith, mordred: will ask in #oftc21:00
ttx#endmeeting21:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:00
*** tchaypo has left #openstack-meeting21:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar  4 21:00:38 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-03-04-20.02.html21:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-03-04-20.02.txt21:00
sdaguejeblair: thanks!21:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-03-04-20.02.log.html21:00
ttxthanks everyone21:00
*** redrobot has left #openstack-meeting21:01
ttxdhellmann, dolphm, notmyname, jd__, markwash, jgriffith, russellb, stevebaker, david-lyle, markmcclain, slicknik: around ?21:01
russellbo/21:01
jd__o/21:01
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC21:01
dhellmanno/21:01
markmcclaino/21:01
*** wenlock has quit IRC21:01
markwasho/21:01
stevebaker\o21:01
dolphmo/21:01
ttx#startmeeting project21:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Mar  4 21:01:42 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: project)"21:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'project'21:01
ttx#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting21:01
*** cdub has quit IRC21:01
SergeyLukjanovo/21:02
ttx#topic Feature freeze is upon us (or not)21:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Feature freeze is upon us (or not) (Meeting topic: project)"21:02
ttxWinter is coming21:02
ttxFeature freeze shall hit at the end of this day (i.e. tomorrow morning Europe time)21:02
*** stevemar has quit IRC21:02
ttxStill plenty of blueprints in-flight21:02
david-lyleo/21:02
*** SheenaG__ has left #openstack-meeting21:02
ttxI plan to wait a few hours tomorrow morning to let the gate pipe empty a bit21:03
*** crc32 has quit IRC21:03
ttxBut there will be a number of blueprints that will just need a couple extra hours21:03
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting21:03
ttxIt's hard to tell how many of those there will be, though21:03
*** sandywalsh_ has quit IRC21:03
ttxDoes anyone here think that waiting an extra day would significantly change the numbers ?21:04
ttxif it won't change anything, then we should just bite the bullet and cut on time21:04
* dhellmann looks at his open items21:04
ttxand then handle coherence and critical features using the FFE mechanism21:04
*** woodster1 has left #openstack-meeting21:04
ttxDuring the 1:1s nobody asked for a delay21:05
*** egallen has quit IRC21:05
ttxand the gate has held up (congrats jeblair and crew)21:05
dhellmannyeah, kudos to the infra team, very stable21:05
ttxthe bottleneck was not really in the infra21:05
stevebakerttx: so does FFE mean a blueprint gets until rc1 to land?21:05
ttxstevebaker: no21:05
ttxstevebaker: it means it gets until an agreed deadline to land21:06
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting21:06
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:06
ttxususally, you'll hear things like "as long as it merges this week, I'm fine with it"21:06
ttxbecause disruptive stuff has to land ASAP. Close to RC1 you might just introduce regressions, or new critical bugs21:06
stevebakerok21:07
*** codekobe has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
jd__we're pretty good on the Ceilomeer side FWIW, no need for extra delay21:07
ttxRC1 is when you don't have release-critical bugs left. Your features have to land before enough for you to be able to catch the bugs in them if any21:07
ttxOK, I don't hear anyone asking for an extra day, I suspect it wouldn't make that much of a difference21:08
*** kebray_ has quit IRC21:08
markmcclainI'd rather stick to time and deal with exceptions21:08
dhellmann+121:08
david-lyle+121:08
*** efedorova has quit IRC21:09
ttxYou should set things that you preemptively would like to ask a FFE for to "high". I'll push those to RC1 for further discussion, and defer to Juno anything else21:09
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:09
ttxwe can still adjust later21:09
ttxbut that would be the base line21:09
*** sparkycollier has joined #openstack-meeting21:09
ttxI'll cut the branches tomorrow morning Eu time21:09
ttxand then catch up with you about FFEs during the day21:09
ttxanother long day ahead :)21:09
ttxI would like to go through as many of them as possible, since I'm in vacation next week21:10
ttxand I want to facilitate the job of the people who will replace me21:10
ttxwhom I should probably confirm now21:10
ttxerr21:11
ttxOK. any question on that ?21:11
russellbreplace or cover for you?  :-)21:11
ttxcover*21:11
russellbok good21:11
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting21:11
ttxmostly using common sense to discuss FFEs21:11
* russellb nods21:11
ttxsdague volunteered some time ago, I hope he is still up for it :)21:12
sdaguettx: sure21:12
ttxyay21:12
*** Macaveli has quit IRC21:12
ttxsdague: Those weeks sure passed fast21:12
sdagueyeh, no lie21:12
ttx#topic Clean Log enforcement, take 2 (sdague)21:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Clean Log enforcement, take 2 (sdague) (Meeting topic: project)"21:12
ttxsdague: floor is yours21:13
sdaguethanks21:13
sdagueback during i2 we started enforcing no *new* errors in logs21:13
sdaguebecause we spent a month building a whitelist21:13
sdaguethen the giant 2 weeks of gate hell happened21:13
sdagueand we turned it off, because it was add additional races21:14
*** vu_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:14
sdaguehowever, we really do want to figure out a way to make forward progress on this21:14
sdagueso the new proposed idea is to enforce 1 log file at a time21:14
sdagueso if we find a log file is clean, we lock it down21:14
sdaguelike n-cond.txt21:15
sdagueit's clean, lock it down21:15
dhellmannI like the incremental approach21:15
markmcclainthat's sound very manageable21:15
sdagueso a change which causes an ERROR or TRACE on a successful test run, is marked a failure21:15
ttxonce clean, always clean21:15
*** rossk has joined #openstack-meeting21:15
sdaguethen tackle these one at a time21:15
sdagueinstead of the whitelist approach21:15
sdagueand mostly wanted to get buy in from PTLs on the approach21:16
russellbwilling to give it a shot21:16
sdaguebefore we start enforcing21:16
russellbmaybe not this week, heh21:16
russellbbut sounds like a reasonable approach to see how it goes21:16
stevebakerI like this plan21:16
sdagueyeh, probably I'd vote to start it next week21:16
sdagueand figure out what we can safely lock down21:16
dhellmannsdague: we're doing something similar in oslo with python 3 support in modules21:17
dhellmannthe pattern makes me feel good about the approach :-)21:17
*** vu_ has quit IRC21:17
sdaguedhellmann: cool :)21:17
sdagueok, that was it. Mostly open for questions if people had them.21:17
sdagueor see what objections exist21:17
ttxsounds good21:18
*** vu_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:18
ttxlooks like everyone likes it21:18
ttxnext topic ?21:18
ttx#topic Red Flag District / Blocked blueprints21:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Red Flag District / Blocked blueprints (Meeting topic: project)"21:18
ttxmarkmcclain: you mentioned Neutron IPv6 patches state potentially adversely affecting Horizon21:19
markmcclainyes21:19
markmcclainI expect a few the IPv6 patches will land Wed/Thu21:19
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk21:20
markmcclainand amotoki who works on both projects said there were a horizon items waiting on them21:20
ttxmarkmcclain: so that's part of a blueprint that would get an FFE ?21:20
ttxor just bugfixes?21:20
*** marekd is now known as marekd|away21:20
markmcclainyes21:20
ttxdavid-lyle: you have a blocked blueprint on that, right21:20
david-lyleyes, neutron-subnet-mode-support21:20
ttxso this would likely need an FFE as well21:21
*** IlyaE has quit IRC21:21
ttxok, it's High already$21:21
david-lyleyes21:21
*** onesig has quit IRC21:22
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:22
ttxmarkmcclain: you already have 3 blueprints on https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/icehouse-rc121:22
*** esker has quit IRC21:22
ttxmarkmcclain: was wondering if those were abusive placement or preemptive FFE strikes21:22
ttxUkraine-style21:22
markmcclainpre-emptive21:22
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
ttxok21:23
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
ttxmarkmcclain: so we'll review them tomorrow as well21:23
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:23
markmcclainyes21:23
ttxdavid-lyle: I think you can move neutron-subnet-mode-support to icehouse-rc1 at this point, unlikely to be unblocked in time21:24
david-lyleack21:24
ttxAny other inter-project blocked work that this meeting could help unblock ?21:24
ttx#topic Incubated projects21:25
*** openstack changes topic to "Incubated projects (Meeting topic: project)"21:25
SergeyLukjanovttx, o/21:25
ttxkgriffs, SergeyLukjanov, devananda: o/21:25
SergeyLukjanovttx, everything done for i3 https://launchpad.net/savanna/+milestone/icehouse-321:25
kgriffso/21:25
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/savanna/+milestone/icehouse-321:25
ttxSergeyLukjanov: OK, will cut your branch first thing tomorrow21:25
ttxhttps://launchpad.net/marconi/+milestone/icehouse-321:26
kgriffswe have 2-3 patches in flight but they should land shortly21:26
SergeyLukjanovttx, docs/tests are planned for rc1 + several bug fixes and probably several improvements to one of the plugins21:26
SergeyLukjanovttx, thx21:26
ttxSergeyLukjanov: planning to enforce feature freeze ?21:26
*** sarob__ has joined #openstack-meeting21:26
ttxSergeyLukjanov: ok, that answers my question21:26
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting21:26
*** sarob__ has quit IRC21:26
*** chadlung has quit IRC21:26
ttxkgriffs: OK, when the page is all green (implemented / Fix committed) I'll cut21:27
SergeyLukjanovttx, yup, I think that we need only one/several FFEs and we're ok with trying to have FF21:27
kgriffsttx sounds like a plan21:27
SergeyLukjanovttx, the main FFE is for renaming :)21:27
*** esker has quit IRC21:27
ttxSergeyLukjanov: you're the sole decider on your FFEs, fwiw21:27
*** xyhuang has joined #openstack-meeting21:27
ttxI don't really need to be involved, except for friendly advice21:27
SergeyLukjanovttx, ok, great, thx21:27
*** oubiwan__ has joined #openstack-meeting21:27
SergeyLukjanovttx, I think that I'll have some questions :)21:28
ttxkgriffs: just move off to -rc1 the stuff that didn't make it21:28
kgriffsttx: does that mean we can still land more features between i-3 and rc1 ?21:28
SergeyLukjanovttx, heh, I've already -2'd some own patches with comment that it'll be better to postpone to Juno21:29
*** crc32 has quit IRC21:29
ttxkgriffs: yes you can, nobody really depends on you. The earlier you switch to bugfix mode the better the quality of the end release though21:29
*** eharney has quit IRC21:29
kgriffsok, I was planning on just saying the FF for i-3 is FF for rc-1 as well21:29
SergeyLukjanovttx, is it correct that FF starts technically right after the milestone cut?21:30
devanandattx: o/21:30
kgriffsand only allowing critical bug fixes into the branch21:30
ttxkgriffs: yes21:30
ttxSergeyLukjanov: yes21:30
ttxdevananda: https://launchpad.net/ironic/+milestone/icehouse-321:31
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC21:31
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC21:31
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting21:31
devanandattx: last bp up there needs to be bumped (will do in a moment)21:31
ttxdevananda: just move non-completed stuff off i3 to icehouse-rc1 so that the page is all green21:31
devanandattx: ack21:31
ttx (implemented / Fix committed)21:31
ttxdevananda: when it's in that situation I'll cut21:31
ttxthe MP branch21:31
*** julim has quit IRC21:31
devanandawill do right now21:32
ttxthen you may or may not attach feature-freezing semantics to that milestone21:32
devanandawould haev done this morning, but been distracted by the tripleo sprint21:32
ttxenjoy it while you can :)21:32
devanandahehe. we will be feature-freezing as far as major features21:32
devanandabut continuing to iterate on bugs as we add CI and integrate with tripleo21:32
ttxsounds good21:33
ttxany question on that ?21:33
devanandanope21:33
SergeyLukjanovttx, probably, it'll be clearer to move FF to the March 4 in https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Icehouse_Release_Schedule?21:33
SergeyLukjanovttx, I can do it if you ack21:33
ttxisn't it on Match 4 already ?21:33
ttxFeatureFreeze, StringFreeze (Mar 4)21:33
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC21:34
ttxSergeyLukjanov: looks good to me ?21:34
devanandattx: do I need to create the RC1 targets?21:34
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** crc32 has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
*** shshang has joined #openstack-meeting21:34
SergeyLukjanovttx, heh, see it now, 01:34am makes me inattentive21:34
ttxdevananda: ah. Thought I did that.21:34
ttxdevananda: will fix now. Same for Marconi and Savanna21:35
devanandathanks21:35
kgriffsrock on21:35
SergeyLukjanovttx, I've already created rc1 in savanna21:35
ttxSergeyLukjanov: coolthx21:36
ttxdone21:36
ttx#topic Open discussion21:36
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: project)"21:36
*** radsy has joined #openstack-meeting21:37
*** alazarev has quit IRC21:37
ttxAs discusse last week, design summit session suggestion site shall open on Thursday/Friday21:37
*** SlickNik has joined #openstack-meeting21:37
ttxIf there are no other questions or last-minute topic, let's enjoy 22 extra minutes21:38
ttxi can certainly use them21:38
SergeyLukjanovttx, great, thank you21:38
dhellmannsounds good21:38
ttx#endmeeting21:39
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"21:39
openstackMeeting ended Tue Mar  4 21:39:15 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)21:39
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-03-04-21.01.html21:39
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-03-04-21.01.txt21:39
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2014/project.2014-03-04-21.01.log.html21:39
ttxThanks everyone !21:39
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting21:39
*** arunkant has quit IRC21:43
*** alazarev has quit IRC21:44
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
*** dkliban has quit IRC21:49
*** jcoufal has quit IRC21:50
*** alazarev has joined #openstack-meeting21:51
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n321:51
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting21:52
*** zns has quit IRC21:52
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting21:54
*** chadlung has joined #openstack-meeting21:55
*** troytoman is now known as troytoman-away21:55
*** armax has left #openstack-meeting21:56
*** samuelbercovici has quit IRC21:57
*** jcooley_ has quit IRC21:57
*** rossk has quit IRC21:57
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** rossk has joined #openstack-meeting21:58
*** vu_ has quit IRC21:58
*** dcramer__ has quit IRC21:58
*** lblanchard has quit IRC21:58
*** enykeev has quit IRC21:59
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC22:00
*** vuvu has joined #openstack-meeting22:01
*** vu_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:01
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC22:02
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:03
*** mrmartin has quit IRC22:03
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting22:04
*** thomasem_ has quit IRC22:05
*** troytoman-away is now known as troytoman22:06
*** fbo is now known as fbo_away22:09
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:10
*** vuvu has quit IRC22:11
*** vu_ has quit IRC22:11
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting22:12
*** ItSANg___ has joined #openstack-meeting22:13
*** ItSANgo has quit IRC22:13
*** dvarga has quit IRC22:14
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:14
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC22:15
*** pablosan is now known as ZZpablosan22:15
*** BrianB__ has quit IRC22:15
*** termeye is now known as termie22:16
*** termie has quit IRC22:17
*** termie has joined #openstack-meeting22:17
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_22:18
*** ZZpablosan is now known as pablosan22:21
*** Yathi_ has quit IRC22:21
*** arnaud__ has joined #openstack-meeting22:21
*** ameade has quit IRC22:25
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC22:25
*** Yathi has joined #openstack-meeting22:25
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC22:25
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting22:27
*** arnaud__ has quit IRC22:28
*** devlaps1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:28
*** devlaps has quit IRC22:29
*** vu_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:30
*** vuvu has joined #openstack-meeting22:30
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC22:32
*** oubiwan__ has quit IRC22:33
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:37
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:37
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting22:37
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC22:38
*** envydd has joined #openstack-meeting22:38
*** oubiwan__ has joined #openstack-meeting22:38
*** rossella_s has quit IRC22:39
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting22:39
*** vuvu has quit IRC22:39
*** vu_ has quit IRC22:39
*** vuvu has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
*** vu_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
*** vuvu has quit IRC22:40
*** vu_ has quit IRC22:40
*** vuvu has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
*** vu_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:40
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC22:41
*** lisaclark1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** envydd has quit IRC22:44
*** jcooley_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** sweston has joined #openstack-meeting22:46
*** chadlung has quit IRC22:46
*** pdmars has quit IRC22:46
*** Linz_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:48
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting22:48
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting22:49
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC22:51
*** Linz has quit IRC22:51
*** lisaclark2 has joined #openstack-meeting22:52
*** dims has quit IRC22:52
*** lisaclark1 has quit IRC22:53
*** mfink has quit IRC22:53
*** vuvu has quit IRC22:54
*** vu_ has quit IRC22:54
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC22:54
*** vuvu has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** vu_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:55
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting22:56
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting22:56
*** banix has quit IRC22:56
*** lisaclark2 has left #openstack-meeting22:57
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting22:57
*** egallen has quit IRC22:58
*** walterheck has quit IRC22:59
*** vuvu has quit IRC22:59
*** ivasev has quit IRC23:00
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting23:00
*** vu_ has quit IRC23:00
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs_afk23:00
*** kenhui has joined #openstack-meeting23:01
*** caleb_ has quit IRC23:02
*** roeyc has quit IRC23:03
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting23:04
*** RajeshMohan has quit IRC23:05
*** arborism has joined #openstack-meeting23:05
*** amcrn has quit IRC23:06
*** jcoufal has quit IRC23:06
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting23:08
*** Michalik has quit IRC23:08
*** marcoemorais has quit IRC23:09
*** vuvu has joined #openstack-meeting23:09
*** vu_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:09
*** tongli has quit IRC23:10
*** kenhui has quit IRC23:11
*** dkranz has quit IRC23:12
*** marcoemorais has joined #openstack-meeting23:12
*** shakayumi has quit IRC23:14
*** rbrady is now known as rbrady-afk23:15
*** vjay has joined #openstack-meeting23:17
*** zns has quit IRC23:19
*** dprince has quit IRC23:19
*** sparkycollier has quit IRC23:20
*** mkoderer has quit IRC23:21
*** pablosan is now known as ZZpablosan23:23
*** roeyc has joined #openstack-meeting23:23
*** ArthurBerezin has joined #openstack-meeting23:23
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC23:23
*** mattgriffin has quit IRC23:23
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting23:24
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting23:24
*** Michalik has joined #openstack-meeting23:25
*** jergerber has quit IRC23:25
*** mfink has joined #openstack-meeting23:26
*** matiu has quit IRC23:26
*** doug_shelley66 has quit IRC23:28
*** rakhmerov has joined #openstack-meeting23:28
*** doug_shelley66 has joined #openstack-meeting23:29
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting23:30
*** jmh_ has quit IRC23:30
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting23:32
*** ArthurBerezin has left #openstack-meeting23:32
*** rakhmerov has quit IRC23:32
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez23:33
*** kevinconway has quit IRC23:33
*** david-lyle has quit IRC23:34
*** roeyc has quit IRC23:35
*** ZZpablosan is now known as pablosan23:38
*** prad has quit IRC23:38
*** Leonr has quit IRC23:39
*** jcoufal has quit IRC23:39
*** thedodd has quit IRC23:39
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting23:40
*** vuvu has quit IRC23:40
*** vu_ has quit IRC23:40
*** alazarev has quit IRC23:41
*** vijendar has quit IRC23:41
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting23:41
*** neelashah has quit IRC23:41
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC23:43
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC23:44
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC23:44
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting23:44
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting23:44
*** markwash has quit IRC23:45
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting23:45
*** sarob_ has quit IRC23:46
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:46
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** blamar has quit IRC23:48
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting23:49
*** lcheng_ has quit IRC23:52
*** mrodden has quit IRC23:53
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting23:53
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting23:53
*** sweston has quit IRC23:56
*** cjellick has quit IRC23:56
*** kebray has quit IRC23:57
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:58
*** lcheng_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!