Tuesday, 2013-07-16

*** sarob has quit IRC00:00
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting00:03
*** amytron has quit IRC00:06
*** michchap has quit IRC00:06
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting00:11
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC00:12
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting00:12
*** virajh has quit IRC00:13
*** sarob_ has quit IRC00:13
*** michchap has quit IRC00:13
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting00:14
*** fifieldt has quit IRC00:15
*** sarob has quit IRC00:16
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting00:16
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting00:18
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting00:19
*** suo has quit IRC00:21
*** suo has joined #openstack-meeting00:22
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away00:22
*** dosaboy has quit IRC00:25
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC00:26
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul00:27
*** fifieldt has joined #openstack-meeting00:29
*** gyee has quit IRC00:29
*** sdake has quit IRC00:31
*** danwent has quit IRC00:34
*** bdpayne has quit IRC00:34
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting00:35
*** Guest36791 has quit IRC00:37
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom00:37
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC00:42
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC00:42
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting00:42
*** shiv_ has quit IRC00:43
*** sleepsonthefloor has joined #openstack-meeting00:50
*** sthakkar has quit IRC00:51
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting00:51
*** sarob has quit IRC00:52
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away00:52
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting00:52
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC00:53
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net00:54
*** dosaboy has quit IRC00:55
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting00:56
*** sarob has quit IRC00:57
*** gongysh has quit IRC00:57
*** Mandell has quit IRC01:01
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:02
*** amytron has quit IRC01:06
*** dosaboy has quit IRC01:07
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:07
*** sleepsonthefloor has quit IRC01:08
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting01:10
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting01:11
*** suo2 has joined #openstack-meeting01:12
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting01:12
*** suo has quit IRC01:12
*** novel has joined #openstack-meeting01:13
*** neelashah has quit IRC01:13
*** obondarev_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:14
*** mirrorbox has quit IRC01:14
*** plomakin has quit IRC01:14
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting01:14
*** obondarev has quit IRC01:15
*** plomakin has joined #openstack-meeting01:15
*** IlyaE has quit IRC01:17
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting01:17
*** dosaboy has quit IRC01:18
*** suo has joined #openstack-meeting01:18
*** suo2 has quit IRC01:19
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC01:22
*** amytron has quit IRC01:22
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:23
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC01:25
*** amytron has quit IRC01:25
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:26
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting01:26
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting01:27
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** amytron has quit IRC01:29
*** suo2 has joined #openstack-meeting01:29
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:30
*** vkmc has quit IRC01:30
*** suo has quit IRC01:31
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting01:32
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting01:33
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz01:35
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom01:35
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC01:37
*** amytron has quit IRC01:37
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:38
*** matiu has quit IRC01:41
*** amytron has quit IRC01:41
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:43
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC01:43
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting01:44
*** amytron has quit IRC01:44
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:45
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away01:45
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz01:48
*** danwent has quit IRC01:49
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** amytron has quit IRC01:51
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting01:51
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC01:52
*** amytron has quit IRC01:53
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting01:53
*** dosaboy has quit IRC01:56
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting01:57
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting01:58
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom01:59
*** morazi has quit IRC01:59
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC02:01
*** garyk has quit IRC02:02
*** reed has quit IRC02:05
*** dcramer__ has quit IRC02:09
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting02:09
*** dosaboy has quit IRC02:11
*** anteaya has quit IRC02:14
*** jdurgin1 has quit IRC02:16
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting02:20
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting02:23
*** jlucci has quit IRC02:24
*** anniec has quit IRC02:25
*** markwash has quit IRC02:26
*** jlucci has joined #openstack-meeting02:30
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC02:33
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting02:33
*** jlucci has quit IRC02:36
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz02:37
*** amytron has quit IRC02:37
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting02:37
*** same5336 has quit IRC02:41
*** amytron has quit IRC02:41
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting02:41
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting02:42
*** amytron has quit IRC02:44
*** knijn has quit IRC02:55
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC03:01
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net03:02
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting03:02
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom03:02
*** emagana has quit IRC03:03
*** stevemar2 has quit IRC03:05
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting03:09
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC03:10
*** rwsu has quit IRC03:10
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting03:15
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting03:21
*** markmcclain has quit IRC03:21
*** thomasbiege1 has joined #openstack-meeting03:22
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC03:25
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz03:26
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting03:26
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting03:26
*** dosaboy has quit IRC03:30
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting03:32
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom03:34
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting03:36
*** leseb has quit IRC03:40
*** litong has quit IRC03:40
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting03:48
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting03:52
*** kebray has quit IRC03:56
*** dkliban has quit IRC04:00
*** HenryG has quit IRC04:02
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting04:02
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting04:04
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz04:05
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting04:05
*** IlyaE has quit IRC04:05
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting04:06
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC04:12
*** dkliban has joined #openstack-meeting04:13
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting04:14
*** IlyaE has quit IRC04:17
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC04:20
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting04:22
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting04:23
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting04:23
*** dkliban has quit IRC04:24
*** IlyaE has quit IRC04:37
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** suo has joined #openstack-meeting04:41
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting04:42
*** suo2 has quit IRC04:43
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC04:47
*** neelashah has quit IRC04:51
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting04:55
*** IlyaE has quit IRC04:59
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting05:00
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:00
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting05:01
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting05:02
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away05:05
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul05:07
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting05:09
*** timello has quit IRC05:18
*** suo2 has joined #openstack-meeting05:18
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:18
*** vishy has quit IRC05:18
*** suo has quit IRC05:18
*** vishy has joined #openstack-meeting05:19
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting05:20
*** suo has joined #openstack-meeting05:20
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting05:21
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:22
*** suo2 has quit IRC05:22
*** dosaboy has quit IRC05:24
*** lastidiot has quit IRC05:25
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting05:26
*** markpeek has quit IRC05:29
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting05:32
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC05:35
*** bdpayne has quit IRC05:36
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting05:36
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting05:37
*** christophk has quit IRC05:39
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC05:39
*** suo2 has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting05:40
*** leseb has quit IRC05:42
*** vishy has quit IRC05:42
*** suo has quit IRC05:43
*** jdurgin has quit IRC05:43
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC05:43
*** galstrom_zzz has quit IRC05:43
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:43
*** dosaboy has quit IRC05:43
*** cyeoh has quit IRC05:44
*** sdague has quit IRC05:44
*** Tross has quit IRC05:45
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting05:49
*** galstrom_zzz has joined #openstack-meeting05:49
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom05:50
*** vishy has joined #openstack-meeting05:50
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC05:51
*** abaron has joined #openstack-meeting05:52
*** SumitNaiksatam has left #openstack-meeting05:53
*** vishy has quit IRC05:54
*** timello has quit IRC05:54
*** bgmccollum has quit IRC05:54
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** vishy has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** timello has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** bgmccollum has joined #openstack-meeting05:55
*** lloydde has quit IRC05:55
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC05:55
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-meeting05:57
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting05:57
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-meeting05:58
*** cyeoh has joined #openstack-meeting05:58
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:58
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting06:00
*** IlyaE has quit IRC06:03
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC06:04
*** stevemar has quit IRC06:04
*** egallen has quit IRC06:05
*** bdpayne has quit IRC06:07
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting06:09
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC06:10
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:10
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting06:10
*** dosaboy has quit IRC06:14
*** eglynn has quit IRC06:16
*** markwash has quit IRC06:18
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting06:22
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting06:25
*** afazekas_ has quit IRC06:30
*** terriyu has quit IRC06:33
*** lloydde has quit IRC06:35
*** danwent has quit IRC06:35
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting06:42
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting06:43
*** hemna has quit IRC06:44
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC06:46
*** afazekas_ has joined #openstack-meeting06:46
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting06:48
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC06:49
*** IlyaE has quit IRC06:49
*** jhenner has joined #openstack-meeting06:54
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting06:55
*** jcoufal has quit IRC06:57
*** markwash has quit IRC06:58
*** cwolfe__ has quit IRC06:59
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting06:59
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting07:04
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting07:06
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting07:06
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting07:06
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting07:09
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:11
*** dosaboy has quit IRC07:11
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-meeting07:12
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC07:13
*** ttx has quit IRC07:16
*** sushils has quit IRC07:16
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting07:16
*** russellb has quit IRC07:16
*** russellb has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting07:17
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting07:23
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting07:26
*** rpodolyaka has joined #openstack-meeting07:29
*** lloydde has quit IRC07:30
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC07:31
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting07:32
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting07:33
*** haomaiwa_ has quit IRC07:35
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting07:36
*** IlyaE has quit IRC07:37
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting07:38
*** dosaboy has quit IRC07:39
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting07:40
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting07:44
*** anthonysum has joined #openstack-meeting07:47
*** anthonysum has left #openstack-meeting07:49
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting07:55
*** sushils has quit IRC07:58
*** yaguang has quit IRC07:58
*** leseb has quit IRC08:00
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting08:00
*** ndipanov_gone is now known as ndipanov08:00
*** crank has quit IRC08:03
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
*** crank has joined #openstack-meeting08:04
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC08:07
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:08
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting08:11
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC08:12
*** IlyaE has quit IRC08:12
*** leseb has quit IRC08:12
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting08:13
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting08:15
*** yaguang has quit IRC08:16
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting08:17
*** jeblair has quit IRC08:18
*** eglynn is now known as eglynn-afk08:20
*** pnavarro has quit IRC08:21
*** Americangaygoats has joined #openstack-meeting08:23
AmericangaygoatsBitch american gays visit here http://www.ndtv.com/article/world/three-christian-women-allegedly-paraded-naked-in-pakistan-court-orders-probe-391647 you will be fucked naked am an indian we will join pakistan will fuck you down stop spying  planet08:23
*** Americangaygoats has left #openstack-meeting08:23
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting08:24
*** Fdot has quit IRC08:25
*** dosaboy has joined #openstack-meeting08:26
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting08:27
*** yaguang has quit IRC08:27
*** lloydde has quit IRC08:31
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting08:32
*** crank has quit IRC08:36
*** crank has joined #openstack-meeting08:38
*** michchap_ has joined #openstack-meeting08:40
*** michchap has quit IRC08:42
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting08:42
*** crank has quit IRC08:43
*** crank has joined #openstack-meeting08:44
*** yaguang has quit IRC08:48
*** leseb has quit IRC08:49
*** crank has quit IRC08:49
*** crank has joined #openstack-meeting08:49
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting08:53
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC09:02
*** 92AAAD3W2 has joined #openstack-meeting09:03
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting09:03
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC09:04
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting09:04
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting09:05
*** vvechkanov has joined #openstack-meeting09:07
*** dosaboy__ has joined #openstack-meeting09:08
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC09:11
*** boris-42 has quit IRC09:15
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting09:22
*** sushils has quit IRC09:22
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting09:23
*** yaguang has quit IRC09:23
*** egallen has quit IRC09:26
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC09:27
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting09:27
*** jcoufal is now known as jcoufal_lunch09:27
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting09:27
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting09:30
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC09:31
*** lloydde has quit IRC09:32
*** cwolferh has quit IRC09:34
*** sdague has quit IRC09:35
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting09:35
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:39
*** yaguang has joined #openstack-meeting09:43
*** Fdot has quit IRC09:43
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting09:46
*** Yada has joined #openstack-meeting09:46
*** Fdot has joined #openstack-meeting09:47
*** eglynn-afk is now known as eglynn09:53
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting09:54
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC09:59
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:03
*** pcm__ has quit IRC10:06
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:11
*** pcm__ has quit IRC10:13
*** pcm__ has joined #openstack-meeting10:14
*** yaguang has quit IRC10:18
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting10:21
*** jcoufal_lunch is now known as jcoufal10:24
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:25
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:26
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting10:28
*** michchap_ has quit IRC10:29
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting10:29
*** egallen has quit IRC10:31
*** lloydde has quit IRC10:32
*** huats_ is now known as huats10:42
*** gongysh has quit IRC10:43
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC10:54
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez10:57
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC10:59
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting11:00
*** cwolferh has quit IRC11:00
*** abaron has quit IRC11:03
*** rscottcoyle has joined #openstack-meeting11:03
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting11:04
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting11:10
*** cwolferh has joined #openstack-meeting11:11
*** abaron has joined #openstack-meeting11:19
*** shang has quit IRC11:19
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting11:25
*** vkmc has quit IRC11:25
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting11:25
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting11:28
*** rkukura has left #openstack-meeting11:32
*** rkukura has quit IRC11:32
*** lloydde has quit IRC11:33
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting11:34
*** dosaboy__ has quit IRC11:35
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:37
*** suo has joined #openstack-meeting11:38
*** krtaylor_ has joined #openstack-meeting11:38
*** suo2 has quit IRC11:40
*** shang has joined #openstack-meeting11:43
*** dosaboy__ has joined #openstack-meeting11:47
*** dosaboy_ has quit IRC11:49
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC11:51
*** eglynn is now known as eglynn-afk11:52
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting11:53
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting11:56
*** dosaboy__ has quit IRC11:58
*** ayoung has quit IRC12:05
*** dkliban has joined #openstack-meeting12:08
*** suo has quit IRC12:08
*** suo has joined #openstack-meeting12:09
*** tedross has joined #openstack-meeting12:11
*** suo2 has joined #openstack-meeting12:11
*** jcoufal has quit IRC12:12
*** suo has quit IRC12:13
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC12:14
*** dkranz has joined #openstack-meeting12:15
*** boris-42 has quit IRC12:15
*** mikal has quit IRC12:16
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting12:16
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting12:18
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting12:18
*** netapp has quit IRC12:18
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-meeting12:22
*** anniec has quit IRC12:24
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec12:24
*** changbl has quit IRC12:28
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting12:29
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC12:30
*** johnthetubaguy has joined #openstack-meeting12:31
*** lloydde has quit IRC12:33
*** abaron has quit IRC12:39
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting12:40
*** kebray has quit IRC12:46
*** litong has joined #openstack-meeting12:46
*** michchap has quit IRC12:51
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** abaron has joined #openstack-meeting12:52
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz12:53
*** rscottcoyle has quit IRC12:54
*** michchap has quit IRC12:55
*** afazekas_ is now known as afazekas_food12:56
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC12:56
*** suo2 has quit IRC12:59
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting13:01
*** hemanth is now known as Guest7921713:01
*** egallen has quit IRC13:02
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting13:04
*** dkliban has quit IRC13:04
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC13:05
*** 92AAAD3W2 has quit IRC13:05
*** egallen has quit IRC13:06
*** afazekas_food has quit IRC13:06
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting13:06
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting13:08
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting13:09
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting13:11
*** rscottcoyle has joined #openstack-meeting13:11
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann13:11
*** egallen has quit IRC13:16
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting13:17
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC13:17
*** woodspa has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting13:18
*** eglynn-afk is now known as eglynn13:22
*** mestery_ is now known as mestery13:22
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting13:25
*** krtaylor_ has quit IRC13:26
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting13:27
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting13:29
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting13:29
*** lloydde has quit IRC13:34
*** eharney has quit IRC13:34
*** michchap has quit IRC13:35
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting13:35
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting13:38
*** branen has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting13:39
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-meeting13:40
*** branen_ has quit IRC13:42
*** jbrogan has quit IRC13:43
*** kevinconway has left #openstack-meeting13:44
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting13:45
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting13:47
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** hemna has joined #openstack-meeting13:48
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting13:49
*** dkliban has joined #openstack-meeting13:50
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting13:51
*** dosaboy_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:52
*** pentameter has joined #openstack-meeting13:53
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC13:53
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** mtreinish has joined #openstack-meeting13:54
*** terriyu has joined #openstack-meeting13:55
*** burt has joined #openstack-meeting13:56
*** writerDi_ has joined #openstack-meeting13:58
*** writerDi_ has quit IRC13:58
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC13:58
*** writerDiane has joined #openstack-meeting13:59
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting14:01
*** rscottcoyle has quit IRC14:01
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC14:02
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:02
*** haomaiwang has joined #openstack-meeting14:03
*** ivasev has joined #openstack-meeting14:04
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting14:05
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC14:06
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting14:09
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom14:09
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-meeting14:12
*** michchap has quit IRC14:12
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC14:15
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting14:16
*** krtaylor_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** rscottcoyle has joined #openstack-meeting14:17
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** lastidiot has joined #openstack-meeting14:19
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting14:21
*** amytron has quit IRC14:21
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** hemna_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:22
*** hemna has quit IRC14:25
*** jhenner has quit IRC14:26
*** amytron has quit IRC14:28
*** jeblair has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** lpabon has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** gongysh has joined #openstack-meeting14:29
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC14:31
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting14:31
*** lastidiot has quit IRC14:31
*** jculp_ has quit IRC14:32
*** jculp has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** amytron_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:32
*** gongysh_ has joined #openstack-meeting14:35
*** gongysh has quit IRC14:37
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting14:39
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting14:40
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC14:42
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting14:45
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-meeting14:46
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting14:47
*** michchap has quit IRC14:50
*** garyk has quit IRC14:51
*** suo has joined #openstack-meeting14:51
*** amytron_ has quit IRC14:54
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting14:54
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:56
*** stevemar has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting14:57
*** abaron has quit IRC14:58
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting14:59
n0ano#startmeeting scheduler15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 16 15:00:31 2013 UTC.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: scheduler)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'scheduler'15:00
n0anoshow of hands, anyone here for the scheduler?15:00
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** matiu has joined #openstack-meeting15:01
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting15:03
*** sushils has quit IRC15:03
*** haleyb has left #openstack-meeting15:04
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting15:05
*** thomasbiege1 has quit IRC15:06
*** Mr_T has joined #openstack-meeting15:06
*** jecarey has quit IRC15:07
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting15:07
*** mrodden has quit IRC15:08
*** amytron has quit IRC15:08
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
*** jecarey has quit IRC15:08
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting15:08
n0anoSlow week, it's 10 min. after so I'll close for today, we'll try again next week.15:09
n0ano#endmeeting15:09
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting15:09
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:09
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 16 15:09:11 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:09
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2013/scheduler.2013-07-16-15.00.html15:09
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2013/scheduler.2013-07-16-15.00.txt15:09
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/scheduler/2013/scheduler.2013-07-16-15.00.log.html15:09
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting15:09
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting15:11
*** lastidiot has joined #openstack-meeting15:13
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting15:16
*** kebray has quit IRC15:17
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-meeting15:19
*** gongysh_ has quit IRC15:20
*** Mr_T has left #openstack-meeting15:20
*** Tross has quit IRC15:20
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting15:21
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC15:21
*** sudorandom has joined #openstack-meeting15:22
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:22
*** Mandell has quit IRC15:23
*** timoguin_work has joined #openstack-meeting15:25
*** anniec has quit IRC15:26
*** tong|2 has joined #openstack-meeting15:28
*** michchap has quit IRC15:28
*** changbl has quit IRC15:29
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC15:29
*** litong has quit IRC15:31
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting15:33
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting15:35
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting15:37
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting15:40
*** garyk has quit IRC15:41
*** sarob has quit IRC15:41
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting15:42
*** sarob has quit IRC15:46
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting15:46
*** epim has joined #openstack-meeting15:47
*** garyk has joined #openstack-meeting15:50
*** amytron has quit IRC15:54
*** virajh has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** hanrahat has joined #openstack-meeting15:54
*** jtomasek has quit IRC15:55
*** lloydde has quit IRC15:55
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC15:59
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting15:59
*** markwash has quit IRC15:59
*** ociuhandu_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:01
*** ociuhandu_ is now known as ociuhandu16:02
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk16:03
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting16:05
primeministerp#startmeeting hyper-v16:06
*** michchap has quit IRC16:06
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 16 16:06:10 2013 UTC.  The chair is primeministerp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:06
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:06
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:06
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'hyper_v'16:06
primeministerphi everyone16:06
alexpilottihi there!16:06
ociuhanduhi all16:06
primeministerpso I think this might be quick16:07
primeministerpfigure we give some quick updates16:07
primeministerpalexpilotti: I know you are in the process of pushing code16:07
alexpilottiyep16:07
primeministerpalexpilotti: is there anything specific which we should keep our eyes on16:08
alexpilottiWMIV2 and Dynamic memory, as discussed last time16:08
primeministerpalexpilotti: so still no changes16:08
alexpilottiI'm going to send the email with the gerrit review urls as soon as those are up16:08
*** dcramer__ has quit IRC16:08
primeministerpalexpilotti: great16:08
primeministerpI don't see luis around16:08
primeministerpso16:09
primeministerpthat means puppet discussion really isn't worth having w/o out him16:09
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting16:09
primeministerpalexpilotti: any more crowbar related bits that are interesting to note?16:10
ociuhanduprimeministerp: we have started sending the first changes16:10
alexpilottiyes, we started pushing for review the Hyper-V support in Crowbar pebbles16:10
primeministerpociuhandu: execellent16:10
alexpilottiociuhandu: would you like to give some details?16:11
primeministerpno matt ray on the channel right now either16:11
ociuhanduprimeministerp: we had to add support for samba, filter some of the linux-specific bits, so that they will not apply to windows16:11
primeministerpociuhandu: the usual suspects16:12
primeministerpociuhandu: keep up the good work16:12
ociuhanduwe try to keep the nodes as a concept transparent, so that we don't treat differently the windows and the linux nodes16:12
ociuhandubut rather apply only what's supported / required16:12
hanrahatociuhandu: does that require any refactoring of the base code?16:13
ociuhanduthe issues we had were with the ruby version update, as the windows clients were using ruby 1.9 while linux ones are on the 1.816:13
primeministerphanrahat: basically an issue w/ the upstream chef bits for windows being newer than the linux side16:13
ociuhanduand there are syntax changes between them, good thing that 1.8 supports also the 1.9 syntax16:14
ociuhanduhanrahat: if we're talking about the base crowbar code, yes, we need to add in all windows specific parts and make sure that the existing linux-specific ones do not apply on windows nodes16:14
ociuhanduone other reason for not removing part of the roles from the windows clients completely is that in the future those services should be available for windows nodes too16:16
primeministerpociuhandu: thanks16:16
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** geekinutah has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
hanrahatociuhandu: yes, base crowbar code... thanks16:16
*** zehicle_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-meeting16:16
zehicle_sorry, I was late16:17
primeministerphi rob16:17
zehicle_Hey!16:17
ociuhanduzehicle: hi Rob16:17
primeministerpso moving on16:17
primeministerpalexpilotti: there were the new bits you had to share16:17
primeministerpalexpilotti: if you want to mention it, re the runner16:18
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC16:18
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting16:18
primeministerpalexpilotti: the job runner?16:19
primeministerphe must be sleeping16:19
primeministerpociuhandu: do you want to comment on the glance image cleanup processes as well for garbage collection?16:20
primeministerpociuhandu: I know alex wanted to mention it16:20
*** boris-42 has quit IRC16:21
primeministerpso16:21
primeministerpif he's not going to mention it16:21
alexpilottiprimeministerp: I believe ociuhandu got disconencted16:22
primeministerpalexpilotti: you too?16:22
*** emagana has quit IRC16:22
alexpilottiprimeministerp: nope I was around16:22
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting16:22
alexpilottiprimeministerp: unless you pinged me before and I was disconencted as well :-)16:22
alexpilottizehicle: hi!16:23
alexpilottizehicle: ociuhandu was just talking about Crowbar16:23
alexpilottiprimeministerp: should we switch to the next topic?16:23
alexpilottias I don't see any reply from zehicle or ociuhandu16:23
zehicle_I'm here16:24
primeministerpalexpilotti: I was waiting for you16:24
primeministerpalexpilotti: to discuss the glance cleanup16:24
alexpilottizehicle_: I was pinging you on the wrong nick :-)16:24
zehicle_missed the earlier thread on CB -> there are pulls to bring HyperV into CB "pebbles" Grizzly16:24
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting16:24
alexpilottizehicle_: yep, the first batch16:25
ociuhandume too, looks like colloquy came back to life16:25
zehicle_I had a dead IRC client that was holding the nick :(16:25
alexpilottizehicle_: looks like we all have issues today here with IRC except primeministerp :-)16:25
zehicle_We're coordinating w/ SUSE to review and accept.16:25
primeministerphehe16:25
alexpilottizehicle_: cool, let us know if you'd like to meet on IRC / Skype / etc to discuss them16:26
alexpilottizehicle_: there's quite an amount of work out there in those patches :-)16:26
ociuhanduzehicle_:  one quick thing: the reason for not removing part of the roles from the windows clients completely is that in the future those services should be available for windows nodes too16:26
alexpilottizehicle_: e.g. nagios16:27
ociuhanduzehicle_: like ipmi, ganglia, nagios16:27
zehicle_We've got a regular design/plan cadence setup for Crowbar.  Plan is this thursday - would be helpful to include you there16:27
*** mikal has quit IRC16:27
zehicle_+116:27
ociuhanduwe chose to "skip" the recipe until the windows bits get implemented, rather than removing the role and adding it back later on16:27
zehicle_for the broader, OpenStack community - we're trying setup Crowbar as a quick way to do a Grizzly + HyperV  deploy16:28
alexpilottiociuhandu: did you tell zehicle_ about the IPMI chef issue on the crowbar UI?16:28
ociuhanduthat would be great16:28
alexpilotticool, at what hour is the meeting on Thu?16:28
zehicle_8 am central16:29
zehicle_bit.ly/crowbar-calendar16:29
ociuhandualexpilotti: no, but i suggest we talk on that on the crowbar meeting. As a very short note, we do not have DMI info on the windows nodes so web interface is failing16:29
*** mikal has joined #openstack-meeting16:29
*** krtaylor_ has quit IRC16:29
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC16:30
primeministerpok16:30
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting16:30
primeministerpalexpilotti: do you mention the glance cleanup bits?16:31
primeministerper ^want to16:31
alexpilottioki, added16:31
ociuhanduzehicle_: great, we'll be there16:31
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** sleepsonthefloor has joined #openstack-meeting16:32
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting16:33
alexpilottisure16:33
alexpilottiprimeministerp: should we change topic? :-)16:33
primeministerpalexpilotti: i'm waiting on you16:33
primeministerp#glance cleanup scripts16:34
primeministerper16:34
*** spzala has quit IRC16:34
alexpilotti:-)16:34
primeministerp#topic glance cleanup16:34
*** openstack changes topic to "glance cleanup (Meeting topic: hyper-v)"16:34
alexpilottitxc16:34
primeministerpalexpilotti: all you16:34
alexpilottiso we ran into an issue with the image cache16:34
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting16:34
alexpilottion nova compute nodes16:34
alexpilottiwe built a vaildation system that accepts arbitrary images sent in with an HTTP REST API call16:35
alexpilottithat image gets downloaded, included in glance, a new image is spawned, a floating ip attached and the user gets notified of the availability16:35
alexpilottiwe are using it on a variety of images that need to be validated on Hyper-V16:36
alexpilottiThe issue is that the glance image cache used by nova-compute16:36
alexpilottiis not getting "garbage collected"16:36
*** leseb has quit IRC16:36
alexpilottithis is not an issue in a regular environment, where images are relatively static16:36
alexpilottiwhile it's an issue in a case like this one where potentially hundreds of images are getting added on a node every day16:38
alexpilottiteh result as you can image, is that the host runs out of space sooner or later16:38
*** sushils has quit IRC16:38
alexpilottias a workaround, I wrote a powreshell script that checks whicj images are not in glance anymore and deletes the corresponding VHD/VHDX files16:38
alexpilottithis is scheduled as a Windows task every 15'16:39
alexpilottiThe best solution, would be to add this garbage collection in the nova-compute driver16:39
alexpilottiFor Grizzly we can just use the script16:39
alexpilottiwhile for Havana it'd be nice to include it in the official codebase :-)16:40
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting16:40
alexpilotticomments?16:40
primeministerpalexpilotti: o16:40
primeministerpalexpilotti: i'm for it16:40
zehicle_this is an issues for local cache images - not boot from block?16:40
primeministerpzehicle_: correct16:41
alexpilottizehicle_: yes16:41
*** bgorski has joined #openstack-meeting16:41
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC16:42
alexpilottizehicle_: talking about boot from block, what's the status of the EQL driver? :-)16:42
zehicle_it's in the pebbles code base16:42
primeministerpzehicle_: it's not a standalone project?16:42
zehicle_no, it's part of the cinder barclamp16:43
alexpilottizehicle_: don't you plan to add it in Cinder?16:43
zehicle_https://github.com/crowbar/barclamp-cinder/tree/release/mesa-1.6/master/chef/cookbooks/cinder/files/default16:43
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting16:43
*** sushils has quit IRC16:43
*** michchap has quit IRC16:43
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
alexpilottizehicle_: so the only way to use it officially is through Crowbar?16:44
zehicle_that's the plan... would have to be Havana at this point.16:44
primeministerpzehicle_: so the equallogic doesn't connect directly?16:44
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting16:44
primeministerpto cinder16:44
zehicle_*officially* - the code's there16:44
alexpilottizehicle_: got it :-)16:44
primeministerpzehicle_: ok16:44
zehicle_EQL acts just like any cinder plug-in.  it sets up the iSCSI targets for the VMs16:45
primeministerpzehicle_: but it doesn't run on the eql16:45
primeministerpcorrect16:45
primeministerpit's running on the controller/16:45
primeministerp?16:45
zehicle_right, it connects to the SSH interface for the EQL16:46
primeministerpgot it16:46
primeministerpso it's like a technology bridge16:46
*** johnthetubaguy has quit IRC16:46
zehicle_hmmm, I'd say that it's using SSH to access the API16:46
alexpilottizehicle_: we have an EQL 6xxx here, I guess we'll give it a try :-)16:46
primeministerpzehicle_: i just acquired one too, i'm going to give it a try as well16:47
*** smite has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
primeministerpalright anyone have anything addtional to add?16:47
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting16:47
primeministerpalexpilotti: ociuhandu ?16:48
zehicle_I have a question about Tempest runs against the HyperV work16:48
primeministerphaha16:48
primeministerpok16:48
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC16:48
primeministerpzehicle_: shoot16:48
zehicle_is there parity on it?  if not, do you have an idea of the gaps?16:48
primeministerpno idea16:48
primeministerpit's on the list of todos16:49
primeministerpi'm assuming we're going to have to add bits when we get there16:49
zehicle_no prob - it's something we can check when we spin up the CB deploy (since that's part of the CB install)16:49
primeministerpzehicle_: anything else to add?16:50
zehicle_from my work on the Board side, there's going to be more emphasis on status of Tempest tests16:50
alexpilottiprimeministerp, hanrahat: we should IMO consider this as part of the work we have to do ASAP16:50
primeministerpzehicle_: yes we've been following the thread16:50
zehicle_which, IMHO, is a very good thing for the project16:50
primeministerpalexpilotti: yes, indeed16:51
zehicle_We'll need to think if that's a grizzly or havana challenge16:51
primeministerpthere are some changes going on here which will hopefully address this from my perspective16:51
alexpilottizehicle_: we want to get the driver into B category as soon as the CI is ready16:51
hanrahatprimeministerp: agreed... let's discuss among the three of us later this week.  can you set up a meeting?16:51
primeministerphanrahat: i need to wait until hashir is back16:51
primeministerphanrahat: a lot is dependant on changes on our team16:52
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
hanrahatprimeministerp: that's fine16:52
primeministerphanrahat: from my limited knolege16:52
alexpilottiprimeministerp: IMO this is before the CI stuff gets done16:52
*** krtaylor_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:52
alexpilottiprimeministerp: we need to be sure that the tests run fine16:52
primeministerpalexpilotti: definately16:52
alexpilottiprimeministerp: as in no Linux dependencies, etc16:52
primeministerpalexpilotti: agreed16:52
primeministerpalexpilotti: I'll try to schedule soemthing for the end of the week16:53
alexpilottizehicle_: when you refer to tempest, you refer to a gate or just compliance with the tests?16:53
primeministerpalexpilotti: he's referring to tempest as being the scorecard for complaince16:55
zehicle_yy16:55
primeministerpalexpilotti: and that will feed into refstack16:55
primeministerpi'm assuming at some level16:55
alexpilottiprimeministerp: yep, but those are two different stages16:55
primeministerpyes16:56
alexpilottigetting the tests running and "green" is a thing that we can do w/o the CI in place16:56
alexpilottithe gate is the next step that involves the CI16:56
zehicle_ideally both - we'd like to be able to vote on gating based on multi-node & multi-os deploys16:56
primeministerpagreed16:56
*** markwash_ has joined #openstack-meeting16:56
zehicle_but even getting a refstack report would be a good step16:57
alexpilotti+100016:57
primeministerpalexpilotti: if you want to put resources on tempest then feel free16:57
primeministerpalexpilotti: it's on the list of todo's and sooner is always better16:57
alexpilottiyep, I will16:57
primeministerpalexpilotti: excellent16:57
primeministerplooks like we're almost out of time16:57
alexpilottiStarting already from this week16:57
primeministerpalexpilotti: good16:58
primeministerpso additional comments?16:58
primeministerpalrighty then, i'll end it16:58
primeministerpthanks everyone for the time16:58
primeministerp#endmeeting16:58
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:58
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 16 16:58:51 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:58
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-16-16.06.html16:58
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-16-16.06.txt16:58
alexpilottibye!16:58
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/hyper_v/2013/hyper_v.2013-07-16-16.06.log.html16:58
zehicle_bye16:58
ociuhandubye all16:59
*** markwash has quit IRC16:59
*** markwash_ is now known as markwash16:59
*** topol has quit IRC16:59
*** joel-cooklin has quit IRC17:01
*** ndipanov is now known as ndipanov_gone17:03
*** simonjak has joined #openstack-meeting17:03
*** IlyaE has quit IRC17:04
*** simonjak has left #openstack-meeting17:05
*** topol has joined #openstack-meeting17:06
*** eharney has quit IRC17:07
*** rscottcoyle has quit IRC17:07
*** pnavarro has quit IRC17:07
*** crank has quit IRC17:07
*** ttx has quit IRC17:07
*** afazekas has quit IRC17:07
*** dabo has quit IRC17:07
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC17:07
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC17:07
*** tris has quit IRC17:07
*** bfirsh has quit IRC17:07
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC17:07
*** juice has quit IRC17:07
*** rosmaita_ has quit IRC17:07
*** cp16net has quit IRC17:07
*** sileht has quit IRC17:07
*** briancline has quit IRC17:07
*** redthrux has quit IRC17:07
*** samalba has quit IRC17:07
*** dachary has quit IRC17:07
*** Guest76948 has quit IRC17:07
*** EntropyWorks has quit IRC17:07
*** jcooley has quit IRC17:07
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting17:07
*** hanrahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:08
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_17:08
*** samalba has joined #openstack-meeting17:08
*** davidhadas has quit IRC17:09
*** pleia2 has quit IRC17:09
*** davidhadas has joined #openstack-meeting17:09
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** rscottcoyle has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** crank has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** afazekas has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** annegentle_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** tris has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** bfirsh has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** rosmaita_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** cp16net has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** sileht has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** briancline has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** redthrux has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** dachary has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** Guest76948 has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** EntropyWorks has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** jcooley has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting17:10
*** pleia2 has joined #openstack-meeting17:11
*** pleia2 has quit IRC17:11
*** pleia2 has joined #openstack-meeting17:11
*** dosaboy has quit IRC17:11
*** hanrahat has quit IRC17:11
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting17:12
*** kebray has quit IRC17:12
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC17:13
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting17:14
*** mdomsch has quit IRC17:14
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting17:16
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC17:16
*** zehicle_ has quit IRC17:16
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** writerDiane has quit IRC17:19
*** zehicle_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:19
*** michchap has quit IRC17:21
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC17:22
*** haomaiwa_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** kevinconway_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** jpich has joined #openstack-meeting17:25
*** smite has left #openstack-meeting17:25
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:26
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8717:27
*** jculp_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
*** creiht_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:27
*** IlyaE has quit IRC17:29
*** ccorrigan has quit IRC17:29
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting17:30
*** timello_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:31
*** terry7 has joined #openstack-meeting17:32
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-meeting17:33
*** jculp has quit IRC17:34
*** haomaiwang has quit IRC17:34
*** pentameter has quit IRC17:34
*** kevinconway has quit IRC17:34
*** derekh has quit IRC17:34
*** eglynn has quit IRC17:34
*** timello has quit IRC17:34
*** galstrom has quit IRC17:34
*** fifieldt has quit IRC17:34
*** creiht has quit IRC17:34
*** andreaf has quit IRC17:34
*** kevinconway_ is now known as kevinconway17:35
*** david-lyle has quit IRC17:35
*** galstrom has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting17:35
*** ivasev_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:36
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting17:37
*** ivasev has quit IRC17:39
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** pentameter has joined #openstack-meeting17:39
*** hanrahat_ has quit IRC17:45
*** hanrahat_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:45
*** Yada has quit IRC17:48
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting17:48
*** eharney has quit IRC17:49
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting17:49
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC17:51
*** nachi has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** nachi_ has joined #openstack-meeting17:53
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting17:54
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-meeting17:54
*** changbl has joined #openstack-meeting17:55
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away17:56
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC17:57
*** zehicle_ has quit IRC17:57
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net17:59
*** michchap has quit IRC17:59
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting17:59
ayoungKeystoners Untie!18:00
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
ayoung\O\18:00
dolphmo/18:00
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
dolphm#startmeeting keystone18:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 16 18:00:20 2013 UTC.  The chair is dolphm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:00
*** henrynash has joined #openstack-meeting18:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'keystone'18:00
gyee\o18:00
henrynashhi there18:00
lbragstadHey18:00
jamielennoxhello18:00
bknudsonhi18:00
dolphm#topic Havana-m2 milestone-proposed18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Havana-m2 milestone-proposed (Meeting topic: keystone)"18:00
spzalaHi18:00
dolphmis being cut today!18:00
ayoungcoolness18:01
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC18:01
gyeetoday = end of day today? :)18:01
henrynashare we all closed off for submissions?18:01
*** IlyaE has quit IRC18:01
dolphmhenrynash: not yet18:01
henrynash:-)18:01
dolphmgyee: yes18:01
ayoungdolphm, I take it that means token binding is definitely not going to make it?18:01
dolphmi count 3 non-low bp's yet to be completed18:01
gyeenice18:01
*** rscottcoyle has quit IRC18:01
dolphmayoung: very doubtful18:02
jamielennoxdamn18:02
*** [1]fabio has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
*** [1]fabio has left #openstack-meeting18:02
gyeecode review day today18:02
*** tedross has quit IRC18:02
*** [1]fabio has joined #openstack-meeting18:02
henrynashdolphm: so os-inherit is pretty much done, I think, I just code the sqlte migration working in the last 5 mins18:02
bknudsonI thought we didn't support sqlite migration18:03
*** jasondotstar has joined #openstack-meeting18:03
ayoungbknudson, we need to support for the time being18:03
henrynashPITA18:03
dolphmayoung: pluggable remote user probably can18:03
dolphmhenrynash: awesome18:03
dolphmbknudson: there's been more discussion on list18:03
*** [1]fabio is now known as fabiog18:03
ayoungdolphm, so is there any real reason to avoid bind, or is it more a case of "this needs more scruitiny than we can pay it now"?18:04
dolphmhenrynash: morganfainberg has a -1 for you - is that addressed in your latest patch? (i assume you haven't submitted yet)18:04
*** topol_ has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
ayoungdolphm, bind is important enough to get jamielennox out of bed for this meeting.  He is in Australia18:04
topol_Hi18:04
ayoungits like 4 am there or something18:04
henrynashI think his only major point was on "list_projects_for_domain" which I have removed now anyway18:04
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting18:04
*** topol has quit IRC18:05
*** topol_ is now known as topol18:05
dolphmayoung: where is the bp?18:05
gyeewe can make some serious money out of the bind token stuff because it is highly deployment specific :)18:06
*** brich1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:06
gyeeconsulting money I mean18:06
dolphmgreeeeeaaat18:06
ayoung#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/authentication-tied-to-token18:06
ayounggyee, not really, but if it makes you feel better to think so18:06
ayoungreally, for Kerberos it is tied to principal, X509 it is tied to fingerprint18:07
ayoungwe can come up with more in the future, but I suspect we really only will use those two.  Maybe SAML...18:08
*** ccrouch has quit IRC18:08
gyeehell yeah18:08
bknudsonayoung: my question on auth tied to token is how do UUID tokens work?18:08
ayoungjamielennox, can you rebase it18:08
ayoungbknudson, no change18:08
ayoungbknudson, the uuid tokens will also be bound18:08
jamielennoxayoung, yep just doing that now18:08
*** ccrouch1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:08
ayoungjust, the remote system will have to go to keystone to get the bind data18:08
bknudsonwhen you call HEAD xxx how does it know that the token has bind requirements?18:09
jamielennoxbknudson, uuid tokens are retrieved from the server anyway so the bind information is just included in that18:09
dolphmbknudson: ++18:09
ayoungbknudson, you won't.18:09
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting18:09
ayoungbknudson, enforcement is a client side requirement.18:09
bknudsonso how can tokens be validated properly?18:09
ayoungclient will have a graduated approach to validation18:09
ayoungwe can't enforce the bind right out of the box18:09
bknudsonso now you do GET tokens/xxx to validate a token?18:09
ayoungbknudson, yes.  Or use PKI18:10
morganfainberghi sorry, little late. here now.18:10
ayoungbknudson, things that do HEAD are tied to it being a bearer token.18:10
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz18:10
ayoungbknudson, we need the mechanism in place to start changing that.18:10
ayoungIt is going to be a journey.18:10
ayoungTHe etherpad describes the expected enfrocement levels:18:10
gyeeayoung, you can easily enforce bind in a customized token provider18:11
*** timoguin_work has quit IRC18:11
*** Mandell has quit IRC18:11
ayounggyee, bind needs to be enforced client side.  We can add the bind data in a customized token provider, but it will take some reworking of the code18:11
gyeejust have Apache populate the header the same way it populates REMOTE_USer18:11
ayounggyee, for a HEAD call?18:12
gyeeany call18:12
jamielennoxbknudson, auth_token_middleware does a GET because it needs to retrieve roles etc18:12
bknudsonjamielennox: that makes sense18:12
bknudsonso it'll also get the bind stuff?18:13
jamielennoxyep18:13
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
jamielennoxso UUID vs PKI is a GET vs a decrypt but the token format is the same18:13
ayoung+118:13
*** simo has joined #openstack-meeting18:13
*** tedross has joined #openstack-meeting18:14
*** Haneef has joined #openstack-meeting18:14
ayoungso does this sounds like a reasonable approach for H2?18:14
ayoungV2 is in gate, tghen plugabble remote, then token binding?18:15
topolwhen the python based decryption gets efficient it will really payoff :-)18:15
ayounghenry's patch can go in at anypoint18:15
ayounggyee, v2 is once again at the head of the queue....18:16
gyeeayoung, looks like jenkins is holding it up?18:16
ayoungdolphm, so, any firm objection to token binding ?18:17
dolphmayoung: no, just that the other 3 bp's have priority in my headspace18:17
dolphmfabiog: are you rebasing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33188/ ?18:18
topolis the binding mandatory or optional?18:18
ayoungtopol, optional18:18
fabiogdolphm, I am.18:18
*** creiht_ is now known as creiht18:18
*** mdomsch has joined #openstack-meeting18:18
fabiogdolphm, I need to check where the context is now stored in the new code18:19
ayoungtopol, enforcement is laid out in the https://etherpad.openstack.org/link-authentication-tokens  lines 70+18:19
topolayoung, even for PKI tokens it is optional, correct?18:19
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting18:19
fabiogI will check with gyee18:19
dolphmgyee: any help for fabiog ^?18:19
jamielennoxtopol, yes it will be always be optional by default18:19
*** jcoufal has quit IRC18:19
gyeedolphm, yeah, I'll work with him18:19
jamielennoxwell it will be enforced if both sides know what to do about it by default otherwise it will be ignored18:19
jamielennoxso it will roll out with no impact18:20
ayoungjamielennox, people will always be able to request an unbound token, just , in the future some service will be configured not to accept them. Right?18:20
gyeeits only enforceable with Apache front-end anyway18:20
ayounggyee, true18:20
bknudsongyee: why couldn't I write middleware to set it?18:20
jamielennoxgyee, right you've really got to go out of your way to turn it on18:21
gyeebknudson, see if you can get that kerberos principal from middleware :)18:21
topolayoung, so are you going to implement the x509 stuff by calling out from python to commandline operations?18:21
ayoungbknudson, because Kerberos and Client Side certs should not be implemented in Pythion for sanity reasons18:21
*** hemna_ is now known as hemna18:21
topollike you do for PKI?18:21
morganfainbergtopol: isn't that how we do it now w/ PKI signing?18:21
gyee*sanity*18:21
ayoungtopol, yep18:21
*** abaron has joined #openstack-meeting18:21
gyeeayoung, unless some smart guy figure out how to do it with Nginx :)18:22
ayoungtopol, we might be able to get the cert fingerprint from the web server, in which case we can do it with out a shell out, but shell out is always an option18:22
topolK, any ETA on when python will have more efficient crypto libraries????18:22
ayoungtopol, I have someone working on that, NSS based18:22
ayoungicehouse timeframe, maybe earlier as an extension18:22
topolK, excellent.18:22
dolphmtopol: whats the deficiency?18:23
topoldolphm, performance18:23
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC18:24
brich1ayoung: which of the crypto packages will pick up the NSS support?18:24
topoland also the consumability pain of whether it is the gnu crypto or openssl crypto and those not being compatible with eachother18:24
ayoungdolphm, crypto is really a python binding thing.  The algorithms really are CPU intensive, and thus should be in native code.  For correctness reasons, too. Python bindings need to release the GIL.  But with eventlet,because the crypto is so long, it really should give up the CPU from time to time...not gonna happen, though18:24
ayoungbriancline, python-nss to start with18:25
gyeewhat happen to m2crypto?18:25
morganfainberggyee:  defuncty18:25
morganfainbergno one is maintaining it18:25
gyeem2crypto was basically c binding over openssl18:26
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting18:26
ayounglets stay on target.18:26
topolmorganfainberg, aren't you worried about the provenance of the crypto you will be relying on?18:26
topolsorry, off target18:26
ayoungfor now, we'll havea potnetial soltuin using the Popen appraoch for crypto, which seems to be the right approach for eventlet18:26
gyeeayoung, no objection with bind token from me18:27
jamielennoxthe problem with the binding is it can't be done completely from a pluggable remote_user provider because it has to change the token format18:27
gyeehuh?18:28
gyeetoken provider?18:28
ayounggyee, remote_user provider, not token provider18:28
ayoungexternal18:28
jamielennoxso if it misses h2 the only way would be to essentially fork v3 token provider to add just a couple of bind lines18:28
ayounggyee, we really need a hook in the standard token provider for people to add custom data prior to the token signing18:28
gyeeayoung, you can easily do that in token provider18:29
jamielennoxayoung, maybe. do we want to allow custom data in the token?18:29
topolayoung +118:29
gyeethat's what token provider is for, allows you to customize token data18:29
simojamielennox: not really a fan of cutom data in there18:29
ayoungjamielennox, well, extension data is custom data if it is not core.18:29
simojamielennox: but then future-proofing is also good18:30
gyeerole mapping, federation, bind data, whatever18:30
ayoungand bind should be core, but if it isn't...18:30
bknudsonsince bind is optional and no clients are supporting it then I don't see why it needs to be core.18:30
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting18:30
ayoungso, I think the short of it will be we either get binding in core, or we have to put  some hooks into the default token provider18:31
ayoungbknudson, optional but standardized18:31
gyeeayoung, what hook?18:31
ayoungand it needs to be in core in order for clients to be able to consume it in an expected manner18:31
ayounggyee, add bind data to the token, before signing18:31
jamielennoxgyee, if it doesn't become core then the approach would be to have a custom remote_user provider18:32
gyeeayoung, you *can* do that today18:32
*** eglynn_ is now known as eglynn-afk18:32
jamielennoxbut they don't have access to the token itself, just a yes/no on auth18:32
gyeetoken provider formats token data and signs it18:32
ayounggyee, right, and we need bind data in there before signing.  Easier to do in the default provider18:33
gyeeayoung, catch me after the meeting and I'll show you18:33
jamielennoxcreating a new token provider for this is massive overkill, it wants to be at least a new remote_user18:33
dolphmif PKI was an extension then the token could be signed in the response pipeline after other extensions have had their chance to modify the token18:33
ayoungdolphm, yeah, agreed that the token production process can be more of an assembly, with signing being the last step of the pipeline. THat might be a good Icehouse architecture18:34
topolwhats the use case? Is thatw ell documented somewhere?18:34
*** dprince has quit IRC18:34
gyeejamielennox, since this is a *optional* feature, new token provider make sense18:35
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann18:35
ayounggyee, no, it is not an optional feature, it is an optional piece of a token18:35
jamielennoxgyee, the new token provider would be c&p v3 token with about +7 lines that would have to be kept in sync18:35
ayoungif anyone in the system needs it, it has to be there in the registered token provider18:35
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting18:35
topoljamielennox, do you have a use case or stakeholder for this?18:35
gyeeayoung, jamielennox, I would think this is deployment-specific18:36
gyeeif I am not running Apache, no need to have this extra data right?18:36
ayoung#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35093/13/keystone/token/providers/uuid.py18:36
*** michchap has quit IRC18:37
ayounggyee, this is a step by step improvement on the way Keystone secures operations.  Yes, it will require additional changes to be used.  But if it isn ot there, those changes will be impossible18:37
jamielennoxtopol, the point is to remove bearer tokens, there has been plenty of requests and the idea has been generally approved.18:37
topoljamielennox, thanks for helping me to connect the dots!18:38
gyeeayoung, all I am saying is we can and should make it configurable18:38
ayoungIf we delay binding this release, people will wait until icehouse is out before working to integate with binding tokens.  We've seen how long PKI tokens have taken to get integrated into the process.18:39
jamielennoxgyee if you're not using apache then there is no extra data, the 'bind' element is not included in the token if there is no bind information18:39
jamielennoxso if it's off then there is no change to the token format at all18:39
ayounggyee, it is additional data that is only added if the original token request asks for it.18:39
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom18:39
topolwhy can't a hook be provided now that allows this extension to be fully added later?18:40
gyeetopol, the hook is already there, we are debating whether it should be configurable18:40
dolphmtoken provider merged18:40
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC18:40
ayoungdolphm, wow, I just checked seconds ago18:41
jamielennoxgyee, the hook for modifying tokens isn't there18:41
morganfainberggyee: i think that since it is optional in the request, it doesn't require extra configuration options18:41
*** jecarey has quit IRC18:41
gyeejamielennox, just extend uuid provider and V3TokenDataHelper18:42
jamielennoxalso because keystone doesn't use keystoneclient we can't authenticate a bind unless we start hooking the token auth process as well18:42
topolUnless you know now what configuration options you will need, shouldnt you just defer the configuration piece?18:42
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting18:42
ayoungtopol, we don't need configuration on the server side.  Just on the client side, and that is not up for review.  Client goes on its own schedule18:42
topolayoung, are we getting to the point where the client needs to be on the same schedule as the server? Who controls that?18:44
jamielennoxayoung, mostly there is some server side config for enforcement which was copied from client side and there is the config to turn binding on18:44
ayoungjamielennox, for enforcement?18:45
ayoungtopol, no, I think the client needs to lead the server, and then the server needs to always rely on the latest version of the client.18:45
jamielennoxayoung, telling keystone how to deal with tokens it receives with bind information. disable, enforce etc18:46
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
ayoungdolphm gets to say when we release a new verision of the client,  usually on  a month by month basis, right?18:46
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
dolphmhenrynash: can you revise the comment in etc/keystone.conf.sample ?18:46
*** writerDiane has joined #openstack-meeting18:46
dolphmhenrynash: it looks like you copy/pasted from the trust one which is inaccurate for os-inherit18:47
gyeedolphm, you have a PO Box for folks to send money to in case they need the client faster? :)18:47
henrynashdolphmL oops…! :-)18:47
*** writerDiane has quit IRC18:47
dolphmayoung: as needed18:47
henrynashdolphm: will do18:47
morganfainberggyee: lol18:47
dolphmayoung: do we need to do a release?18:47
ayoungdolphm, not yet, not for this.18:47
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away18:47
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul18:47
*** writerDiane has joined #openstack-meeting18:48
ayoungdolphm, just explaining.18:48
topolseems like the current situation my need tighter release synchronization to get things right18:48
dolphmayoung: just poke me anytime18:48
*** mdomsch has quit IRC18:48
dolphmhenrynash: also grep for 'inerit'18:48
bknudsonclients will either get bind in the token or not get bind18:48
bknudsonand they'll either use it or not use it18:48
henrynashdolphm: yep, I can't seem to type that right :-)18:49
ayoungbknudson, yep18:49
ayoungbknudson, and we want this in as an enabling feature.   Other projects need to build on it.18:49
bknudsonI assume the client just ignores bind if it gets it in a token now18:49
ayoungWhich is really the reason we are doing feature freeze in H218:49
morganfainbergayoung: the client throws out unknown data right? e.g. current one sees a bind, it would be ignored?18:49
ayoungmorganfainberg, correct18:49
jamielennoxbknudson, yes - it'd just be random extra data18:50
dolphmwhoa, what did i push to get this modal thing going on? http://i.imgur.com/O1Af1kf.png18:50
ayoungbut we can update the client prior to H3 and allow a service to be able to use it.  So it really should be in H218:50
morganfainbergthen i see no problems with the way it's released now.  server supports everything, we shore up client to match. etc. etc etc.  or even vice-versa18:50
morganfainbergdolphm: where did you click to see that?18:50
*** rods1 has joined #openstack-meeting18:51
dolphmmorganfainberg: that's what i want to know18:51
topoldolphm, doesnt it go away if you move the cursor? I saw that too18:51
bknudsondolphm: probably f18:51
morganfainbergdolphm: "f"18:51
*** dkliban is now known as dkliban_afk18:52
morganfainbergayoung: +1 on that timeline.18:52
ayoung reviews for bind API https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36166/  and server imp https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35093/18:53
ayoungplease lets get this in today18:53
ayoungplugable remote is probably ready to go:18:54
ayoung#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36839/618:54
ayoung#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36166/18:54
morganfainbergoh, i meantt o look that pluggable remote one over this morning.18:54
topolayoung, I will review today18:55
ayounggyee, you are right, plugable is breaking backwards compat.  I will fix that.18:55
gyeeayoung, I am good with the bind token spec, will push a patch for the remote user plugin to show my angle18:56
ayounggyee, sounds good.18:57
*** pabelanger has joined #openstack-meeting18:57
dolphmgyee: ayoung: how is backwards compat broken?18:57
ayounggyee, so external won't be specified in the token request, but instead we will look for the plugin labled "external" in the set of registered plugins?18:58
gyeeayoung, yes18:58
ayoungdolphm, I turned realm into domain name18:58
*** olaph has joined #openstack-meeting18:58
ayoungdolphm, that is the "right" solution, but not what is currently implemented18:58
gyeedolphm, the current impl doesn't allow explicit scope18:58
topolayoung, you will document that, correct?18:58
ayoungdolphm, so I will make it so the default provider does what is now, and leave the other logic as an alternative provider18:58
ayoungtopol, yes,18:59
dolphmayoung: ah, that's exactly what i was just looking at. cool.18:59
dolphmhappy code reviewing!19:00
dolphm#endmeeting19:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 16 19:00:05 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2013/keystone.2013-07-16-18.00.html19:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2013/keystone.2013-07-16-18.00.txt19:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2013/keystone.2013-07-16-18.00.log.html19:00
*** fabiog has quit IRC19:00
*** brich1 has left #openstack-meeting19:00
jeblairhello infra people19:00
clarkbo/19:00
dhellmanno/19:00
fungiheya19:00
pleia2o/19:01
ayounggyee, OK, I can do that19:01
mordredo/19:01
jeblair#startmeeting infra19:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 16 19:01:45 2013 UTC.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: infra)"19:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'infra'19:01
olapho/19:01
jeblair#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/InfraTeamMeeting19:01
jeblairthere's the agenda19:01
jeblairpabelanger, russellb: around?19:02
pabelangerjeblair, 0/19:02
russellbhi19:02
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC19:02
jeblair#topic Asterisk server (jeblair, pabelanger, russelb)19:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Asterisk server (jeblair, pabelanger, russelb) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:02
zaroo/19:02
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away19:02
morganfainbergooh asterisk.19:03
*** arosen has quit IRC19:03
russellbyeah, so, happy to hack out some configs ... could probably use some help getting the server basic setup done though19:03
*** jamielennox has left #openstack-meeting19:03
anteayao/19:03
jeblairso it sounds like we have a plan... i mostly wanted us to get together in real time and make sure we're on the same page..19:03
russellbbasically given a workspace for us to hack out configs19:03
russellbsure19:03
pabelangerI already have a base set of configs we could start with, I use them for all my installation19:04
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting19:04
pabelangergood rounded defaults19:04
russellbk19:04
jeblairrussellb: so we have a base class in puppet for servers, so most of the generic running a server overhead is taken care of19:04
pabelangerleif and I came up with them19:04
russellbjeblair: ok, so the "adding a new server" docs cover it?19:04
*** leseb has quit IRC19:04
fungiso we mainly just need a skeleton for the server (pbx.openstack.org? something else?) and fire up a centos6 machine called that19:04
*** jlk has joined #openstack-meeting19:05
jlko/19:05
russellbpbx.openstack.org sounds good19:05
russellband probably some DNS SRV records19:05
russellbbut we can add that later ...19:05
jeblairrussellb: yeah, and maybe use pleia2's cgit change as an example19:05
jeblairrussellb: it's the first centos server we have19:05
russellbok cool19:05
jeblairpleia2: is that in review?19:05
pleia2yep https://review.openstack.org/3670919:05
clarkbjeblair: russellb pleia2 it is in review19:05
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/3670919:06
pabelangerIs this just for conferencing or are we actually provisioning extensions?19:06
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul19:06
jeblairso even just getting a change in that sets up that server and otherwise doesn't do anything is something we can work with19:06
*** esker has quit IRC19:06
jeblaironce that's merged, we can actually spin it up, and then iterate on it19:06
*** tedross has quit IRC19:06
russellbjeblair: that sounds good19:06
russellbpabelanger: my impression is just a conferencing server, right jeblair ?19:07
jeblairpabelanger, russellb: feel free to also propose a change that adds your ssh keys to that server; as i expect you're going to want root on it to debug, etc19:07
russellbso, public conferencing access, and a SIP provider for inbound access19:07
jeblair(though we're going to want all the actual config in puppet)19:07
russellbyeah, will probably need root.19:07
russellbwell, ability to debug19:07
jeblairrussellb: yes, just a conf server19:07
russellbok cool19:07
russellbso very little in terms of accounts ... just the provider setup19:08
russellbthat lightens up the config quite a bit19:08
morganfainbergrussellb: if you need any help (not that there is a lack of it) I'd be happy to dust off my old asterisk knowledge.19:08
fungiif we decide we want to make use of other features later, we can light those up when the time comes19:08
pabelangerYa, all of the configuration of asterisk is puppet, is going to be tricky.  But we can figure something out19:08
russellbmorganfainberg: cool thing about how infra works is that anyone can contribute, just like you contribute to code :-)19:08
russellbi was hoping we could make it simple, as in, please install these files19:09
morganfainbergrussellb: nod.19:09
russellbwith a bit of the template magic for secret bits19:09
jeblairrussellb: yeah, i think that will work19:09
*** danwent has quit IRC19:09
russellbk19:09
russellbtime for me to figure out how to not be a puppet noob :-)19:09
jeblairwe can also subscribe asterisk to those files so that when they are changed, we run /etc/init.d/asterisk reload automatically19:09
*** bknudson has left #openstack-meeting19:10
pabelangerjeblair, we can actually reload specific modules, it works better19:10
pabelangerless downtime :)19:10
fungifwiw, "please install these files with a bit of the template magic for secret bits" is more or less a description of most of the servers we've puppeted19:10
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting19:10
mordred++19:10
russellbfungi: cool, will look at others then19:10
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting19:10
jeblairpabelanger: i'd imagine so (as long as there's a way to run that from the shell)19:11
pabelangerThere is19:11
*** eharney has quit IRC19:11
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting19:12
*** danwent has quit IRC19:12
russellbok, so, first step, get skeleton server up that does nothing, i can take a stab at that19:12
jeblair#action jeblair look into signing up the foundation with a voip provider19:12
russellband then will work on getting it so it installs the asterisk package19:12
russellband then pabelanger and I can work together on the asterisk config19:12
jeblair#action russelb get skeleton asterisk puppet config19:12
jeblair#action pabelanger work with russelb on asterisk config19:12
russellbpabelanger: sound good?19:13
pabelangeryar19:13
jeblairawesome; anything else on this topic?19:13
* mordred thinks everyone doing this is neat19:13
russellbnot from me ... just need to suck it up and allocate the time to work on it19:14
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC19:14
jeblairyes, pabelanger and russellb, thanks to both of you!19:14
russellbsure, feels good to make use of knowledge from a past life19:14
jeblairrussellb: you don't have anything else going on this week do you? ;)19:14
pabelangerYa, I can wipe up something for puppet pretty quick19:14
russellbjeblair: nothing really19:14
russellbpabelanger: cool19:14
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC19:15
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting19:15
jeblairttx: are you around?19:15
*** michchap has quit IRC19:16
jeblair#topic Eavesdrop (mordred)19:16
*** openstack changes topic to "Eavesdrop (mordred) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:16
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC19:16
mordredwe need to log more channels and stuff, I think19:16
mordredcertainly -infra19:16
mordredpossibly more19:16
*** christophk has joined #openstack-meeting19:16
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC19:16
jeblairi think i agree about infra19:16
clarkbno opposition from me19:16
pleia2+119:16
mordred(partially because -infra might be the most active channel in the project and people are always wanting to look stuff up)19:16
mordredquestion is - should we log the other channels?19:17
fungithe old argument was that it was a focused channel for a small group... 168 people in it now, so it's time19:17
dhellmannis there any reason not to offer and let the channel members decide?19:17
mordredand/or - should we just log every channel that gerrit reports to?19:17
jeblairdhellmann: the only reason i can think of is to manage expectations (so people are not surprised that nova is logged but glance is not)19:18
dhellmannjeblair: good point19:18
pleia2I tend to be pro-log everywhere (would be nice to see in #tripleo too)19:18
jeblairother than that, i don't really care, and it does seem like something that individual groups should decide19:18
mordredand/or - should we inject irc logs into logstash with a special tag to make for easy searching19:18
jeblairhehe19:18
fungias it stands, we get enough people who are surprised that #openstack and #-dev are logged but #-infra is not, so there is principle of least surprise in our case anyay19:19
mordredyah19:19
dhellmannjeblair: my only concern is turning on logging without people knowing could raise privacy hackles19:19
clarkbmordred: I don't think so. google can index that stuff for us and logstash is a busy busy cluster19:19
pleia2dhellmann: +1, it should be communicated19:19
dhellmannadd me to the list of people that didn't know -dev was logged :-)19:19
jeblairwe could mitigate that by ensuring that the bot controls the topic, and that the topic has a prominent eavesdrop link.19:19
mordredI think we can make it opt-in ... if a group decides they want their channel logged, we add it to the list19:19
dhellmannjeblair: wfm19:19
mordredjeblair: hrm. that's a nice idea. isn't eavesdrop meetbot anyway?19:19
jeblairyes19:19
fungiif we're really worried, we can also have chanserv or even meetbot itself warn people via /msg when they join19:20
fungithough the latter is a bit more obnoxious19:20
jeblairi'd really like to have bot-controlled access list before we do things to lots of channels19:20
dhellmannfungi: a /msg feels like overkill, but I do like the idea of setting the topic19:20
mordredI'm not TOO worried about privacy. it's IRC. there is no real privacy19:20
pleia2freenode's guidelines suggest that /topic is sufficient19:20
jeblairif anyone wants to write an irc script, that would be really helpful.  :)19:20
*** tedross has joined #openstack-meeting19:20
*** sushils has quit IRC19:21
fungiand yeah, if it's not an invite-only channel, there's nothing stopping someone at random from logging channel activity and publishing it wherever they like anyway19:21
dhellmann"someone at random" feels different than "the openstack project"19:21
jeblairmordred: so maybe if you want to increase logging, mention something in the team meeting and encourage other teams to opt-in?19:22
dhellmannso I'm not too worried about it either, it just seems "polite" to let people know about the change19:22
dhellmannI don't expect objections19:22
mordredk19:22
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting19:22
* mordred only actively cares about -infra ... thinks that the other channels should have the service available19:22
mordredunless we wanted to go pervasive and asbolute everywhere that we know about19:23
ttxjeblair: around now19:23
anteayaI like opt in19:23
jeblairwfm; sounds like our involvement at this point will just be to make sure that if we enable eavesdrop for a channel, we set the topic appropriately19:23
*** egallen has quit IRC19:23
fungianything beyond logging -infra or other channels where the regulars collectively request it be done should probably be discussed much more widely (ml et cetera)19:23
jeblairyep; we should also probably announce the infra-logging to the ml too.19:24
clarkb++19:24
pleia2I can do that once we approve the change19:24
*** jog0 has quit IRC19:25
jeblairttx: would you like to talk about storyboard?19:25
pleia2should we also mention in said mail that others are welcome to add their channel to logging too?19:25
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting19:25
* mordred would like to talk with ttx about storyboard19:25
ttxjeblair: sure19:25
jeblairpleia2: sure, with a link to mordred's change so they can do it themselves.  :)19:25
pleia2jeblair: great, will do19:25
clarkb++19:25
jeblair#topic Storyboard (ttx)19:26
*** openstack changes topic to "Storyboard (ttx) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:26
mordredttx: a) think we should pull it into openstack-infra/ b) I think we should stand one up and configure the server to update when we land commits19:26
* jeblair thinks we should start using right now, nevermind that comments don't work yet :)19:26
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting19:26
*** eharney has quit IRC19:26
*** eharney has joined #openstack-meeting19:26
mordredttx: c) I think we should use it to track its own development19:26
mordredand as soon as it has enough features for ui/ux, we should let them use it19:26
ttxmordred: openstack-infra makes sense19:27
reedwhat's storyboard?19:27
mordredoh. yeah19:27
* jeblair will hack on it when it's in gerrit19:27
ttxlet me summarize19:27
clarkbya I think most of us will need more background on the thing19:27
mordredttx: perhaps you should give an intro19:27
mordred:)19:27
fungii thought about suggesting the same thing before mordred mentioned it on the e-mail thread, but wasn't sure if it was in good enough shape to track itself yet. if it is, dogfooding it for its own development seems like an awesome idea19:27
ttxSo I was a bit tired with the LP alternatives that mordred was floating in my direction19:27
ttxnot mordred(s fault, they just suck19:27
jeblairit's totally mordred's fault they suck19:28
anteayareed: https://github.com/ttx/storyboard19:28
fungi#link https://github.com/ttx/storyboard19:28
ttxtracking tasks across multiple projects requires a bit more than what your classic per-project solutions propose19:28
ttxso storyboard builds on the same principles as LP bugs, but applies them to blueprints (features) as well19:28
ttxI whipped up a POC on my free time in the last 2 weeks19:29
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
ttxNow the question is... what to do with it. Stop/continue/dive19:29
* fungi has no idea where ttx gets free time19:29
* mordred is strongly voting on dive19:29
*** arosen has joined #openstack-meeting19:29
pleia2neat19:29
ttxI think "dive" may be a bit optimistic/premature19:30
ttxbut19:30
mordredwell, by dive I mean continue19:30
jeblairdive dive dive19:30
* reed bows at ttx19:30
jeblairdown periscope!19:30
fungidam the torpedoes19:30
ttxbut that's mostly due to what *I* can dedicate to it in the next month(s)19:30
mordredand by continue, I mean continue with the intent that we will make it work, rather than continuing to see if we think it's a good idea19:30
dhellmann+119:30
mordredI've asked davidlenwell to start hacking on it19:30
*** simo has left #openstack-meeting19:31
mordredalso, anteaya has been wanting to learn some things about django19:31
ttxdemo at http://storyboard.thyone.net for the next hours19:31
ttxfor those playing at home19:31
mordredand jeblair and I will probably pitch in once we land it in gerrit19:31
jeblairbasically, i know that if it satisfies ttx, it will statisfy everyone else.19:31
anteayawith mordred's hand behind my back19:31
jeblairi will pitch in19:31
reedttx, stories can also be blueprints?19:31
mordredbikeshed: a) we might want to keep calling features blueprints - all the business types aroud openstack seem to have picked up that word19:31
ttxThe trick with spinning one up early is the pain with database schema transitions19:31
ttxreed: yes19:32
jeblairand a django app means likely contributions from other openstack hackers19:32
mordredttx: I hear django is good at those19:32
clarkbany concerns about automatic deployment with django?19:32
*** tanisdl has quit IRC19:32
ttxmordred: I must have been missing something then :)19:32
fungimordred: businessspeak sounds like a themeable option19:32
clarkbwe have had problems with graphite and askbot19:32
jeblairclarkb: we don't deploy askbot19:32
mordredfungi: well, I specifically meant for openstack process19:32
ttxtechnically it's based on django and bootstrap19:32
jeblairclarkb: and we have had no problems with automatic graphite deployment19:32
mordredfungi: all of our language is around "blueprints"19:32
clarkbjeblair: no, but deployment was one of the reasons for that :)19:33
ttxbecause I'm a lazy beast19:33
mordredalso - more importantly - what do we want to call the hostname?19:33
jeblairclarkb: no, askbot was the reason for that19:33
reedmordred, call it storyboard :)19:33
mordredI think if we're going to run something as important like this ourselves, we'll want a rock-solid story on deployment and upgrade19:33
mordredso stubbing our toes on that before it matters19:33
mordredI think is important19:33
mordredreed: storyboard.openstack.org ?19:33
ttxmordred: I think we need slightly more progress before spinning one up19:33
*** jog0 has quit IRC19:34
*** tanisdl has joined #openstack-meeting19:34
pleia2not thrilled with hostnames that are the software name19:34
mordredttx: ok. do you have a sense of how much progress?19:34
reedmordred, why not?19:34
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-meeting19:34
*** dkliban_afk is now known as dkliban19:34
ttxmordred: see the alpha-1 milestone on the github issues19:34
reedpleia2, the software in this case has a very distinctive and meaningful name19:34
mordredttx: great.19:34
ttxmordred: something like 2/3 more weeks19:35
pleia2reed: this is probably a bikeshed anyway :)19:35
reedyeah19:35
fungipleia2: you would prefer something like tasks.openstack.org then?19:35
ttxespecially if after infra-ing it some people take pieces of it19:35
pleia2fungi: yeah19:35
mordredbikeshed bikeshed bikeshed bikeshed19:35
mordredwhee! bikeshed19:35
mordred:)19:35
jeblairbikeshed.openstack.org19:35
fungipink19:35
mordredzomg19:35
*** geekinutah has quit IRC19:35
mordredjeblair has never been more correct19:35
reedah! make sure that pictures can be added in the tasks19:36
ttxnih.openstack.org ?19:36
mordredwe should at least have that as a vhost19:36
jeblairttx: actually, you should consider renaming the project to bikeshed.  :)19:36
mordredttx: hah19:36
mordredor nih19:36
ttxI like storyboard :P19:36
nati_ueno+119:36
fungiit conjures up nice quiet images of story time19:36
fungirather than the harsh reality of what it will eventually contain19:37
ttxit's about cutting a story into tasks after all.19:37
anteayaI like storyboard too19:37
ttxbut then the host can be named whatever, especially if temporary :)19:37
jeblairaction #mordred keep berating ttx until he agrees to start running storyboard in CD immediately19:37
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting19:38
jeblairmordred already has a change in review to import it into gerrit19:38
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC19:39
clarkbI couldn't resist playing with the demo and this is really awesome for just 2 weeks of free time work19:39
clarkb+1 to continue19:39
jeblairttx: anyway, i love it and i'm very excited about it.  thanks for hacking on it.  :)19:39
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting19:39
ttxI'm also more than happy to see people that actually have some experience in Django move in19:39
ttxsince this was also a way for me to play with Django+Bootstrap a bit19:40
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC19:40
ttxjeblair: eof19:40
jeblair#topic Zuul upgrade (jeblair)19:40
*** openstack changes topic to "Zuul upgrade (jeblair) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:40
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
jeblairso i think the next change going into zuul warrants a note to the ML19:41
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting19:41
clarkbdefinitely as I expect it to initially cause some confusion19:41
jeblairwe will start kicking changes out of the queue immediately if they can't merge with the changes ahead of them in the queue19:41
*** abaron has quit IRC19:41
jeblairthis was something we decided to do at the H summit to improve throughput19:41
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting19:42
dhellmannthat's just for the gate, right?19:42
jeblairbut it is potentially confusing to devs (and indeed may occasionally kick a change out that actually could have merged)19:42
jeblairdhellmann: yep19:42
jeblairthe message it leaves in gerrit should be meaningful/useful to devs19:42
dhellmannis there a way to fix a change other than waiting for others to land and rebasing?19:42
fungii think if it's couched that interdependent changes which need one another to merge in order on a particular project should be in gerrit as dependent changes, then it's not terribly confusing19:43
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
jeblairdhellmann: you can rebase before it lands; zuul will tell you which changes are ahead in the queue19:43
dhellmanncool19:43
dhellmann+1 then :-)19:43
*** abaron has joined #openstack-meeting19:43
*** IlyaE has quit IRC19:43
mordredmain thing is - it should shorten, sometimes drastically, response time on changes19:43
jeblairdhellmann: and if you base your change on them and reapprove, it'll merge; though it will require more reviews for your new patchset19:43
dhellmannjeblair: that seems logical19:44
jeblairmordred: yes, and reduce our biggest cause of gate resets (discounting neutron for the moment)19:44
jeblairso i can write up something to send out about it19:44
jeblairwhen should we implement the change?  tomorrow; friday?19:45
mordredttx: ?19:45
* mordred thinks it should go in now - but ttx seems to get unhappy with gate changes around milestones19:45
clarkbFriday seems to be a good day for general gate affecting changes as test load is much lower on friday, but if we can get it in earlier before OSCON that will be helpful19:45
ttxmordred: if it can wait tomorrow I prefer19:46
ttxsince today is gate rush day19:46
clarkb(this might be semi selfish but I think I will be the only core not OSCONing so avoiding breakage is good)19:46
jeblairoh, definitely not before tomorrow!19:46
jeblairclarkb: you should come anyway, it's portland.19:46
fungithere's no such thing as too much portland, right?19:47
jeblairhow about i send the email today and we make the change on friday19:47
clarkbjeblair: wfm19:47
fungisounds good19:47
jeblair#action jeblair send email announcing zuul change on friday19:48
jeblair#topic cgit server status (pleia2)19:48
*** openstack changes topic to "cgit server status (pleia2) (Meeting topic: infra)"19:48
pleia2so, I have this change up: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36709/19:48
pleia2we'll need dns and the centos server spun up19:48
pleia2once this change is in, there are a few more steps:19:48
pleia2git daemon set up (clarkb has a WIP change for this that can be modified for centos)19:48
pleia2git syncing from gerrit server19:49
pleia2jeepyb installed w/ script to create the gitrepos config file from the projects.yaml19:49
*** wkelly has joined #openstack-meeting19:49
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC19:50
pleia2I'd like to see this first change go in though so we can get the server going and fix up anything that needs fixing19:50
clarkb++19:50
mordred++19:50
fungireviewing it this afternoon19:50
clarkbI will rereview it after lunch. definitely agree on the small chunks19:50
pleia2thanks fungi19:50
pleia2that's it :)19:50
fungiexcellent progress!19:51
*** thomasbiege has joined #openstack-meeting19:52
jeblairapparently i thought it was ready 4 patchsets ago.  :)19:52
*** dprince has quit IRC19:52
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC19:52
jeblairpleia2: thanks, and i think those next steps will be very managable.19:53
*** geekinutah has joined #openstack-meeting19:53
pleia2agreed, we're pretty much there :)19:53
*** michchap has quit IRC19:53
jeblair#topic open discussion19:53
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: infra)"19:53
pleia2are we having a meeting next week?19:53
jeblairi finally got around to writing a post about the bootcamp for the openstack blog: http://www.openstack.org/blog/2013/07/infrastructure-bootcamp/19:54
clarkbI am happy to run it if people are interested in having a meeting19:54
jeblairpleia2: that's your picture; i asked claire to update it with a proper caption; should be done soon19:54
jeblairi will probably not be able to attend the meeting19:54
pleia2jeblair: nice! thanks19:55
sarobquestion on publishing "incubated" docs19:55
jeblairpleia2: thank you for taking pictures which i did not bother to do.  :)19:55
clarkbpleia2: why don't we say there will be a meeting in that if enough people show up I can run it19:55
fungii too will be unlikely to make it to next week's meeting, i'm afraid19:56
mordredI will not be able to attend the meeting19:56
mordredjeblair: are you coming to oscon?19:56
jeblairmordred: yes19:56
mordredcool19:56
pleia2also, I'm flying out to Portland Friday afternoon because I'll be attending CLS over the weekend, so leaving here mid-day on Friday19:56
jeblairsarob: what's your question?19:56
clarkbmaybe I should try and do a day trip to portland ...19:56
ttxyeah I'll propose we skip tc/release meetings next week19:56
clarkbbut I have spent far too much time in a car and in portland recently19:56
sarobtraining-manuals are being developed19:56
ttxunless someone really wants them19:56
ttxsarob: fixing the meeting time as we speak19:57
sarobduring development we need various user groups and others to provide feedback on the content19:57
fungiclarkb: you should. also i'll be in seattle the week of the 19th if we want to get any local people together for in-person meeting/lunch/whatever19:57
annegentle_it's incubated content in the sense of "we're going to try to make training manuals piecemeal from the manuals"19:57
sarobsubmit bugs19:57
fungi(week of the 19th of august i mean)19:57
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC19:57
annegentle_and I wanted sarob to get help with builds19:57
sarobannegentle_:"right19:57
annegentle_it's not incubated as in incubated projects19:57
*** zul has quit IRC19:57
* sarob hand quotes19:57
annegentle_you guys up for helping? I think we'd probably just publish to docs.openstack.org/training/ for starters19:58
annegentle_eventually we'd need to evaluate "real" training material distribution19:58
sarobthat would be really helpful19:58
*** markmc has joined #openstack-meeting19:58
jeblairannegentle_: this sounds like it's just another docbook? build/publish job, which are pretty straightforward...?19:58
*** anteaya has quit IRC19:58
annegentle_jeblair: yep, just I am swamped and asking for help19:59
*** gabrielhurley has joined #openstack-meeting19:59
annegentle_Security Guide has my head underwater19:59
annegentle_and I want sarob to learn19:59
*** nachi has quit IRC19:59
*** nachi_ has quit IRC19:59
saroblearn me oh jedi master19:59
clarkbwe are about to run out of time. sarob why don't you join us over in #openstack-infra and we can provide you with our documentation and answer questions on the process to add this stuff20:00
jeblairannegentle_: we can certainly help sarob work through the process (we're swamped too, so be patient :)20:00
annegentle_jeblair: cool20:00
*** markvan has joined #openstack-meeting20:00
annegentle_clarkb: perfect20:00
sarobwill do20:00
jeblairthanks all!20:00
sarobthanks20:00
annegentle_thanks!20:00
jeblair#endmeeting20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 16 20:00:39 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-07-16-19.01.html20:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-07-16-19.01.txt20:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2013/infra.2013-07-16-19.01.log.html20:00
ttxOK, who is around for the TC meeting ?20:00
markwasho/20:00
gabrielhurley\o20:00
notmynamehere20:01
dolphmo/20:01
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-meeting20:01
devananda\o20:01
jgriffitho/20:01
mordredo/20:01
*** topol has quit IRC20:01
annegentle_o/20:01
russellbhi20:01
markwash\o\  |o|  /o/20:01
wkellyo/ <-- for mikal20:01
ttxjd__, markmc, vishy, markmcclain: around ?20:01
* hub_cap notices markwash's excitement20:01
markmchey20:02
markwash:-)20:02
russellbmarkwash: throw your hands in the air like you just don't care20:02
ttx#startmeeting tc20:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 16 20:02:17 2013 UTC.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: tc)"20:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'tc'20:02
mordredrussellb: do you have to cut your hands off first to do that?20:02
ttxwkelly: proxies for mikal20:02
ttxAgenda for today is at:20:02
ttx#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Governance/TechnicalCommittee20:02
*** olaph has left #openstack-meeting20:02
ttx#topic New program application: TripleO20:02
*** openstack changes topic to "New program application: TripleO (Meeting topic: tc)"20:02
ttx#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-July/011605.html20:02
ttxI'd like to separate the discussion in two steps:20:03
ttx(1) Scope, mission statement, how "essential" the effort is to OpenStack20:03
ttx(2) Team/effort/community maturity20:03
ttxlet's discuss the program scope first.20:03
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC20:03
ttxPersonally I think facilitating deployment at scale (and reusing OpenStack while doing so) is an essential effort20:03
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting20:03
ttxAnd I think the current program mission statement captures that well.20:03
russellb+120:04
markmcdefinitely20:04
mordred" by being simple to implement" is from the OpenStack mission statement :)20:04
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting20:04
markmcthis fills a big gap in the project20:04
ttxok, that part sounds like a no-brainer then20:05
ttxnext step, team/effort/community maturity20:05
mordrednod. it's also something we'll need to be able to do larger multi-node gating and stuff20:05
ttxI'm not totally convinced (yet) that this effort has reached enough maturity to be accepted as a program today20:05
ttxthat said it might just be due to my ignorance of the current status and usability of the TripleO stuff...20:05
ttxWhat I've seen so far are clear goal definitions and a team formed mostly around Robert's team within HP20:05
hub_capwe use it right _now_ to deploy our instances in testing20:06
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
mordredwell, we're actually running a rack-sized tripleo install currently20:06
hub_capi find its quite mature in that process20:06
ttxAnd I'd like to set /some/ maturity bar (for the team, for the community that formed around it, for the deliverables it produces) before we turn teams and efforts into programs20:06
mordredand elements of it are being used currently by other projects20:06
ttxbasically I don't want every informal team we have to think that the only way they can "exist" is by being an official program.20:06
stevebakerthere has been some valuable collaboration with the heat project20:06
hub_capill be using it for heat integration too fwiw20:06
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting20:06
*** thomasbiege has quit IRC20:07
mordredso, there's two sets of outputs the tripleo team is working on - tripleo specific code projects, and patches to other openstack projects20:07
markmcI see the community as being pretty mature at this point - good core group of folks, some more folks looking like they're on the path to core, a nice "long tail" of contributors20:07
mordredthe patches are not something that really need any sort of anything from us20:07
jd__o/20:08
mordredthe code projects are things that are picking up usage in places other than just tripleo-specific things20:08
devanandathere's also considerable overlap with the ironic folks20:08
ttxmordred: you know their progress better than I do, do you think "usable by havana" (as promised by lifeless) is likely ?20:08
*** RajeshMohan has quit IRC20:08
mordredttx: 100%20:08
devanandaas, right now, the two practical uses of baremetal/ironic are: private trusted deployments, or tripleo20:08
mordredttx: it's actually usuable today20:08
stevebakerwe're considering adopting os-*-config code projects for heat's in-instance tools20:08
mordredthere's just more steps you have to follow20:08
mordredstevebaker: cool! I hadn't caught that yet20:09
devanandastevebaker: awesome!20:09
*** dkliban has quit IRC20:09
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting20:09
*** yjiang5_away is now known as yjiang520:10
mordredttx: and when I say usable today, I mean being used in a customer facing deployment :)20:10
ttxannegentle_: you raised doc concerns on the original thread, I think that factors into maturity as well... Did you get the answers you wanted ?20:10
mordredttx: pleia2 has also been working on starting to get it integrated with CI20:10
ttxmordred: ok, sounds more than enough for my "maturity" bar20:10
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting20:10
annegentle_ttx: so I am still concerned about doc efforts -- contained in their team, great, but how do they get the word out to openstack consumers?20:10
ttxanyone else has concerns they'd like to voice about tripleO's application ?20:11
annegentle_ttx: it's my own concern about how much can docs take on, while doing release docs, what is the Docs program responsible for? All the programs?20:11
ttxannegentle_: I found them pretty active at various conferences fwiw20:11
markwashI'm a tiny bit concerned that there is a slight conflict in the dual mandate for tripleo20:11
markwashmandate #1: make production deployment much better20:11
ttxannegentle_: that's a good question. Did you write up your mission statement ? :)20:11
devanandamarkwash: can you clarify?20:12
jd__has the potential overlap with ironic been covered/answered?20:12
markwashmandate #2: use openstack wherever possible20:12
annegentle_ttx: working on, but getting stuck on "all the things"20:12
mordredannegentle_: I'll put "getting some doc people" on the todo list20:12
markmcjd__, ironic would be its own program20:12
devanandajd__: tripleo expressly uses ironic (baremetal). it doesn't overlap any more than it overlaps any other openstack program (heat, nova, glance, ...)20:12
markmcjd__, has use cases other than tripleo20:12
ttxannegentle_: markmc, jd__: it already is its own program.20:12
annegentle_I think their expected deliverables should include docs.20:12
devanandai agree that tripleo deliverable should include docs :)20:13
ttxannegentle_: interesting point.20:13
mordredmarkwash: #2 is in part a framing for the how of #1 shuld get accomplished. lifeless actually didn't want to call it out explicitly because he thought it went without saying20:13
devanandabut perhaps i mean someting else by that?20:13
lifelesshi20:13
lifelessoh, I thought this was an hour later. doh.20:13
ttxlifeless: welcome. Talking about you.20:13
* mordred pokes lifeless in the face20:13
annegentle_I guess I would like to understand more about who consumes tripleo now, and who will in the future?20:14
* markmcclain joins late20:14
jd__devananda: ah "triple epxressly uses ironic" was the answer I wanted, thanks :)20:14
lifelessjd__: well it doesn't yet, but it will as ironic matures. It expressly uses nova-bm today.20:14
jd__lifeless: fair enough20:14
markwashmordred: is it ever possible that openstack is not the best tool for deploying openstack? could there be a fundamental conflict between the assumptions made by deployers vs by customers?20:14
ttxlifeless: how about adding docs to your 'expected deliverables' list ?20:14
annegentle_lifeless: are you Clint who answered my question?20:15
lifelessttx: I can, but can you think of a program that shouldn't document things?20:15
ttxannegentle_: he is Robert Collins.20:15
lifelessannegentle_: I am Robert Collins20:15
mordredmarkwash: I absolutely think that other people should 100% be able to do openstack deployments withouth using openstack to do so20:15
annegentle_ah ok20:15
ttxClint is SpamapS.20:15
mordredmarkwash: and I certainly don't want this effort to make that effort not possible20:15
annegentle_thanks20:15
markwashmordred: I guess my issue is, technically, I think "Openstack on Ironic" is a great architecture, but "Openstack on Openstack" maybe isn't so great20:15
devanandaannegentle_: i would say the consumer of tripleo are those who want to deploy an openstack cloud. not the end users of said cloud.20:16
lifelessannegentle_: so right now we have a product in HP that /wants/ to consume it [and should have an edition by the end of the year]. RedHat are developing something built on it. RackSpace want to consume it.20:16
mordredmarkwash: well, it's not just ironic - heat is a major part of the puzzle too20:16
devanandamarkwash: except that, to deploy openstack requires /all/ the bits (image, network, orchestration, etc) -- not just baremetal/ironic20:16
lifelessmarkwash: as mordred says20:16
mordredmarkwash: and then it turns out glance and quantum are essential20:16
devananda:)20:16
annegentle_so would heat and ironic go in this program? Is there a nesting question?20:16
mordredmarkwash: and we have roadmaps around places where cinder is going to be needed20:16
lifelessmarkwash: consider what a deployment needs: hardware, networking, service orchestration.20:16
* markwash just got incepted20:16
mordredmarkwash: haha20:16
lifelessmarkwash: these are all things that OpenStack is actively developing management APIs for20:17
markmcannegentle_, separate programs - tripleo depends on heat, ironic, nova, ceilometer, ...20:17
ttxannegentle_: no. Heat and Ironic would be consumed by TripleO, like Nova.20:17
mordredannegentle_: I don't think so - I think heat and ironic both have lifecycles quite happily outside of deploying openstack20:17
lifelessmarkwash: why would an org want to have expertise on using those APIs and then not leverage that for deploying them, since they solve the same problems20:17
markwashlifeless: I might be out of scope here, but what I'm trying to say is that they're kinda different problems20:17
markwashas a deployer, I pay for it, and I want a lot of placement control20:18
markwashas a customer, I don't expect to have placement control, and the folks on the otherside don't want to let me have it20:18
notmynamemakes sense that tripleo, heat, and ironic all have different scopes (otherwise why have them), but should they be different deliverables part of the same program?20:18
lifelessmarkwash: so thats interesting. We have consumers of clouds [being super generic because it turns up in many places] that care about placement intensely.20:18
lifelessmarkwash: specifically anti-affinity for HA, and proximity-affinity for performance.20:19
ttxnotmyname: their teams are slightly disjoint, so probably not ?20:19
markwashlifeless: that makes sense20:19
lifelessnotmyname: they are quite different problem domains20:19
* devananda deletes his post so as not to be redundant with what lifeless just said20:19
ttxnotmyname: if it's the same team working on it, your question would be relevant though.20:20
mordredlifeless: dont' forget legal-domain affinity20:20
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting20:20
lifelessmordred: godgodgodgodgodno20:20
markwashits probably just my preference to "just assign the placement" manually if I'm the deployer, rather than translating my basic layout into a complex affinity dsl, that the system just tries to translate back to my layout20:20
lifelessmarkwash: so, ignore deployments for a second20:20
notmynamettx: well, I'd argue that relevance has to do with scope, not persons :-) but I've got my answer from ... everyone20:20
lifelessmarkwash: just look at bare metal workloads. Hadoop, DB clusters etc.20:20
*** hanrahat_ has quit IRC20:21
*** RajeshMohan has joined #openstack-meeting20:21
lifelessmarkwash: I think you can see that the folk doing those workloads will have the same care that you do about placement.20:21
lifelessmarkwash: so we (nova/ironic) need to solve the same problems.20:21
ttxnotmyname: it's both. Scope and the team working on it.20:21
lifelessmarkwash: adding deployment into it doesn't (AFAICT) add any scope to their needs20:21
ttxbecause in the end what you want is an efficient team working well together to achieve a common goal20:21
markwashlifeless: I think I'd just be a tiny bit happier if we pulled the "using openstack wherever possible" from the mission, in favor of that being implicit / changeable if the facts on the ground change20:21
devanandamarkwash: also, heat/nova/ironic won't prevent you from assigning the placement manually. just uses a different language for expressing it than, say, your standard CM20:21
*** ladquin has joined #openstack-meeting20:22
ttxmarkwash: actually I like that opiniated part in the statement.20:22
lifelessmarkwash: I have no objection to doing that, because there is such strong community focus around openstack components collaborating.20:22
lifelessmarkwash: mordred felt it was an important thing to highlight how tripleo is different to e.g. crowbar20:22
ttx"openstack on openstack" is really what this team has been working on. Stripping it from the mission statement sounds weird.20:23
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away20:23
devanandamarkwash: if we pull "using openstack wherever possible", the statement becomes far too generic and could refer to existing (politically charged) tools. like crowbar. or commercial tools...20:24
ttxI prefer that they come back to TC to change that mission statement if the facts on the ground end up chaging.20:24
ttxchanging*20:24
markmcsounds sensible to me20:24
markwashttx: that makes sense too20:24
lifeless+120:24
markmc"tripleo without the o"20:24
ttx(rather than use a weak statement that doesn't describe what they do)20:24
markwashhow about make the opinion stronger in the statement then?20:25
ttxok, ready to vote when everyone else is20:25
ttxmarkwash: how so ?20:25
markwashnevermind20:25
* markmc ready20:25
ttxjust yell now if you need more discussion/answers before the vote20:26
* stevebaker proxies for shardy20:26
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting20:26
ttxstevebaker: ack20:26
ttx#startvote Accept TripleO as an official OpenStack program? yes, no, abstain20:26
openstackBegin voting on: Accept TripleO as an official OpenStack program? Valid vote options are yes, no, abstain.20:26
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.20:26
russellb#vote yes20:26
markmc#vote yes20:26
wkelly#vote yes20:26
dolphm#vote yes20:27
mordred#vote yes20:27
stevebaker#vote yes20:27
ttx#vote yes20:27
markmcclain#vote yes20:27
jd__#vote yes20:27
jgriffith#vote yest20:27
openstackjgriffith: yest is not a valid option. Valid options are yes, no, abstain.20:27
jgriffith#vote yes20:27
ttx30 more seconds...20:27
markwash#vote yeast20:27
openstackmarkwash: yeast is not a valid option. Valid options are yes, no, abstain.20:27
annegentle_#vote yes20:27
jgriffithmarkwash: ha!!  even better than mine!20:27
mordredI think yeast should be a valid option20:27
markwash#vote abstain20:27
notmyname#vote abstain20:28
lifelessmarkwash: long as it's been fermented20:28
lifelessbah20:28
lifelessmordred: ^20:28
ttx#endvote20:28
openstackVoted on "Accept TripleO as an official OpenStack program?" Results are20:28
openstackyes (11): markmc, stevebaker, ttx, jd__, russellb, jgriffith, mordred, wkelly, annegentle_, dolphm, markmcclain20:28
openstackabstain (2): notmyname, markwash20:28
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul20:28
ttxcool.20:28
ttx#topic Open discussion20:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: tc)"20:28
lifelessshould there be some minimum things all programs do20:29
lifelesse.g. deliver docs.20:29
ttxI'd like to raise two topics in this section, and more if you have some too20:29
ttxfirst, a preliminary discussion on devstack application as a program20:29
annegentle_lifeless: depends on the audience.20:29
ttx#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-July/011896.html20:29
annegentle_lifeless: if you expect deployers to stand up Tripleo then yes20:29
*** crank has quit IRC20:29
ttxThe fact that devstack should be "official" and under the oversight of the TC is pretty much a no-brainer20:29
lifelessannegentle_: I can't think of a program that doesn't need docs so far20:29
annegentle_lifeless: but. I don't think the Documentation Program can take on the docs for all. the. programs.20:29
ttxsince it was "official" (as a "gating" project) under the old projects taxonomy20:29
annegentle_lifeless: right so far we have audiences for everything20:30
jgriffithttx: +120:30
mordredttx: +120:30
markwash+120:30
*** Tross has joined #openstack-meeting20:30
ttxThe question raised on the ML is... does it need its own program or should it be considered part of QA and/or Infrastructure20:30
annegentle_ttx: right, for devstack it's a nesting question also20:30
ttxOn one hand I think the scope is pretty narrow and definitely overlaps with both QA and Infra goals20:30
lifelessproject or program20:30
ttxOn the other, a program is organized around a single team, and devstack's team is pretty separate from the general QA or Infra teams20:30
*** stevemar has quit IRC20:30
ttxSo if neither team wants it, and the devstack crew doesn't feel like they belong there, maybe a separate program is what makes the most sense20:30
mordredI also think that devstack is focused on dev envs20:31
markmcright, for me - they're very separate teams and only accidentally overlapping scope20:31
mordredas someone said, it's not 'teststack'20:31
mordredeven if we're using it that way right now20:31
*** michchap has quit IRC20:31
*** Tross has quit IRC20:31
russellbwe say that, but it is teststack...20:31
markmcthere could be a time when our deployment for gate testing isn't devstack20:31
jgriffithLike I mentioned I think the interests/goals of devstack are broader than just Q/A infra etc, thus my thought for it being independent20:31
vishyo/20:31
markmcbut devstack would still be essential to developers20:31
russellbbut if the teams are separate, and QA and Infra are saying "it's not ours", then no need to push it there20:31
mordredmarkmc: ++20:31
jgriffithrussellb: a lot of folks do *all* of their development in a devstack env20:32
mordredI think infra and qa like to be involved with it - but to be fair I like to be involved in many things...20:32
russellbsure.20:32
jgriffithrussellb: thus more than "test-stack"20:32
jgriffithIMO20:32
russellbi'm not saying it's not more20:32
jgriffithrussellb: ok, point taken20:32
ttxyeah, I had this view that it didn't "warrant a program" but if you think of the people involved and the history of devstack, it actually makes sense as a separate program imho20:32
*** nachi has joined #openstack-meeting20:32
russellbi'm just saying it turns out that making a super easy dev env also happens to make a super easy test env20:32
russellband it's clearly used for both20:32
markwash+1 to ttx's notion on the ML about following the existing team structure / cohesion20:32
annegentle_devstack is pretty essential for dev/test/doc but it's not the only implementation of such a tool. So it feels like a bake-off to me, a blessed tool, and should we enable more ways of solving a particular problem within a "program"...20:33
annegentle_so I'd say, make a Dev Tool Program20:33
ttxthe overhead in having MOAR PROGRAMS is the extra election to organize for its PTL20:33
markwash#vote dtroyer20:33
ttxso it's an acceptable overhead20:33
annegentle_ttx: and the track at the summit, and the docs, and... and ... and...20:33
sdaguethe team things is where stuff is odd. devstack is basically still me and dean reviewing. the contributors are pretty varied.20:33
markmcclainI thought we added programs to allow us to nest projects20:33
jgriffithsdague: interesting point....20:34
markwashor #vote sdague. . not trying to be divisive!20:34
jgriffithsdague: in your view is there enough "consistent" teamp participation to be a stand-alone program?20:34
sdagueno way, I already have way to many things on my plate, #vote dtroyer :)20:34
ttxannegentle_: well, if I were you I wouldn't sign up to document all the things :) Integrated projects might be enough.20:34
annegentle_ttx: yea. NO. Not.20:35
*** krtaylor_ has quit IRC20:35
*** Haneef has quit IRC20:35
sdaguejgriffith: I guess the team criteria is new to me here. I thought we were doing logical boxes20:35
sdaguewhich is why dtroyer_zz and I agreed grenade (which is also basically he and I) is a QA thing20:35
gabrielhurleyempty boxes are only good for hiding. ;-)20:35
ttxSo we won't be looking into devstack application today because it hasn't baked enough on the ML, but we can probably already tell them that a separate application does make sense.20:36
*** leseb has quit IRC20:36
russellbmeh20:36
mordredI think it's certainly an app that makes sense and a discussion worth having20:36
sdaguethough the contributors on grenade are really just dtroyer_zz, me, and adalbas, which is actually more overlapping with tempest20:36
lifelessso I'm not entirely sure the team thing makes sense20:36
lifelessconsider nova and novaclient20:36
jgriffithsdague: more of a curiousity question than anything else...20:36
jgriffithsdague: thanks20:36
lifelesswhere I recall there being 'hey were are all the reviewers'discussions w.r.t. novaclient20:36
lifelessmaybe in principle they are all shared...20:37
*** pabelanger has left #openstack-meeting20:37
ttxThe other topic I wanted to raise is whether vulnerability handling, common release management and/or stable branch management should be program(s)20:37
ttxPersonally I consider those to be pretty essential to our mission, and quite mature at this point20:37
ttxIt just feels a bit heavy-handed to request 3 new programs to cover for them20:37
markmc"product management" ? :)20:38
mordredI just assume that they're all ttx20:38
ttxBut they are different teams with different goals, so that might just be what makes the most sense20:38
mordredand that ttx will take care of them20:38
annegentle_release management20:38
lifelessisn't there a team doing vun stuff already20:38
lifelessmore than just ttx ?20:38
mordredyes. I'm being flippant20:38
markmcannegentle_, some people see trunk as a "release"20:38
jgriffithteam yes, program no20:38
lifelessmarkmc: +120:38
markmcannegentle_, and object to the term "release" ... hence my "product" vs "release"20:38
annegentle_markmc: oic20:38
ttxthe fact that I'm heading two of those doesn't mean the rest of the teams are shared20:38
*** derekh has quit IRC20:39
markmcclainthey are 3 different teams, but still seems like they can be under one program20:39
ttxI don't really like that idea. How would you select the PTL if there is no single team ?20:39
mordredyeah. it does seem like they are arms of release management20:39
mordredoslo has multiple teams20:39
mordredand markmc is the ptl of the whole thing20:40
ttxmordred: hmm, good point20:40
notmynamettx: because if they are all in the same scope, they are all working to the same goal20:40
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
*** dkliban has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
sdagueyeh, I think oslo is a good model for that. In reality we've got a similar thing on QA, our two git repos have overlapping core groups, but also non overlapping +2 folks20:40
ttxmind you, I'm not trying to be the first to hold TWO PTL positions, quite the opposite :)20:40
*** dcramer__ has joined #openstack-meeting20:40
russellbsdague: sounds like devstack overlaps too :)20:41
markmcttx, e.g. you could totally direct the efforts of release management, vulnerability management, stable branch ... without necessarily being heavily active on all of them20:41
* mordred thinks ttx is making a power grab... quick, someone write a new constitution20:41
*** hanrahat has joined #openstack-meeting20:41
markwashttx: ever notice how vish and waldon were never in the same room at the same time?20:41
mordredmarkwash: wait, they're different people?20:41
ttxmarkwash: yeah.20:41
sdaguerussellb: hey, you don't want to use where I've got +2 as overlap criteria, that gets messy quickly :)20:41
mordredmarkmc: in fact, It hink that all three of them are about curating the releases, just different elements of them that need curating20:42
ttxok, will propose ONE program, looks like a good trade-off.20:42
mordredpatches to existing releases, making releases, managing security for releases20:42
annegentle_I think scale will press the need for one PTL but multiple teams20:42
dolphmttx: be sure to name it 'ttx'20:42
russellbsdague: it sounds like 100% overlap in that case... that's different.20:42
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting20:42
vishymarkwash: ssshhh20:43
ttxdolphm: good point, I wonder what name to give it now20:43
sdaguerussellb: hmm....20:43
ttxmarkwash: the model that vish hired to "impersonate" waldon at conferences wasn't so great. He fooled nobody.20:43
markwashgood ol' bearded man #3. . I miss him20:44
markwashttx: it feels like "release management" could be interpreted broadly enough to encompass the other two20:44
ttxmarkwash: yes. Or "series management"20:44
* vishy applies for asylum in nicaragua20:45
ttxbut everyone has been calling it release management forever now so probably it's there to stick20:45
notmynamea generic "project management" would encompass it. the elected PTL would be the "release manager"20:45
ttxnotmyname: well, tbh it's a bit linked to our development cycles. The three activities are.20:46
lifelessproduct management perhaps ?20:46
markwashdoes anyone want to take up the issue of s/PTL/PL/ again, sometime?20:46
ttx"project" or "product" is a bit wide. Cycle/series/release makes it more... tied to the series concept20:46
ttxmarkwash: god no20:47
* markwash yields20:47
notmynamettx: s/project/<whatever>/ same concept, IMO20:47
ttxnobody knows it stands for Program tech Lead now20:47
markwashhaha20:47
notmynameit's a 6 month thing. "program temporary lead"20:48
markwashhaha20:48
ttxnotmyname: +120:48
dolphmlol20:48
jgriffithnotmyname: ha!!20:48
ttxsounds like a good openstack quiz question. WTF does PTL mean20:48
ttxdepends on when you ask20:48
* jgriffith is updating his "intro to openstack" presentation20:49
*** oubiwann_ has joined #openstack-meeting20:49
* ttx could use a "WTF is a PTL" T-shirt20:49
markwashpraise the lord20:49
mordredpolitical task lackey20:49
mordrednope. markwash wins20:49
notmynamemordred: ++20:49
jgriffith+1 t-shirts!!!!20:49
dolphms/temporary/transient/20:49
*** Fdot has quit IRC20:50
ttxok, anything else on your mind ?20:50
russellbplenty, but not that we need to discuss20:50
ttxanyone up for chairing next week meeting, or should we skip it ?20:50
notmyname#vote skip20:50
ttxi'll be at OSCOn with... a few other people in this room20:50
*** atiwari has quit IRC20:50
ttx#vote skip20:50
russellb#vote abstain20:50
mordredwho in the room is _NOT_ going to be at OSCON20:51
russellbo/20:51
sdagueo/20:51
annegentle_skip20:51
stevebakero/20:51
* markmc raises his hand20:51
jd__o/20:51
* markmcclain is a maybe20:51
jd__+skip20:51
markmchappy to skip next week20:51
* annegentle_ not at OSCON20:51
mordredaw. darn. I like you people20:51
dansmitho/ (sadly)20:51
*** leseb has quit IRC20:51
ttxok, +skip it is20:51
markmcso, yeah - no TC quorum at OSCON :)20:51
markwashportland has asked me not to return20:51
*** medberry is now known as med_20:52
mordredhahaha20:52
vishyo/20:52
hub_capmordred: lies20:52
*** tedross has quit IRC20:52
jgriffitho/20:52
ttxPlease keep your program descriptions coming.20:52
* hub_cap submitted Trove eariler today20:52
vishyThe waldon impersonator isn't available either20:52
annegentle_I do want input/feedback!20:52
annegentle_when I get my program mission done20:53
mordredvishy: dammit20:53
ttxhub_cap: yep, tahnks for that !20:53
ttxthanks even20:53
annegentle_do all projects submit as programs?20:53
hub_capi prefer tahnks20:53
*** lpabon has quit IRC20:54
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting20:54
* annegentle_ is confused20:55
ttxannegentle_: see the wiki. I heard it's a good doc source :)20:55
ttxhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Programs20:56
annegentle_ttx: bah20:56
ttxneed to update that to add tripleO now20:56
notmynamettx: can you remind me the difference in the -ongoing and the -next milestones?20:56
annegentle_ttx: so every one on the bullets has to submit prog. descriptions, got it20:57
ttxnotmyname: -ongoing is for tasks that are never really finished but you still want to track20:57
*** crank has joined #openstack-meeting20:57
ttxlike "database optimization"20:57
notmynamettx: therefore bugs will never get targeted at -ongoing?20:57
ttxnotmyname: probably not20:57
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting20:58
ttx-next is just a way to tag stuff20:58
gabrielhurleyIf somebody opened a bug for "database optimization" I would close it as too vague20:58
notmynamesure. -next makes sense20:58
markwash"Database is *too* optimized"20:58
ttxnotmyname: blame markwash for -ongoing20:58
ttxok, wrapping up20:58
notmynamegabrielhurley: can we target "make it better"?20:59
ttx#endmeeting20:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:59
gabrielhurleyyou know it20:59
notmynamegabrielhurley: like the bug of "it blows up"20:59
dolphmnotmyname: +120:59
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 16 20:59:07 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2013/tc.2013-07-16-20.02.html20:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2013/tc.2013-07-16-20.02.txt20:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2013/tc.2013-07-16-20.02.log.html20:59
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting21:00
ttxmarkmc, dolphm, notmyname, jd__, markwash, jgriffith, russellb, stevebaker, gabrielhurley, markmcclain: still around ?21:00
dolphmeo21:00
markwashugh yes21:00
markmcclaino/21:00
jgriffitho/21:00
russellbo/21:00
jd__o/21:00
notmynamehere21:00
gabrielhurley\o21:00
* markwash tries to act serious again21:01
markmchey21:01
stevebakerboop21:01
hub_capyall should do o/ based on name lenght, to be like synchronisec swimming21:01
*** lastidiot has quit IRC21:01
ttx#startmeeting project21:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 16 21:01:16 2013 UTC.  The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: project)"21:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'project'21:01
* jgriffith changes nic to j21:01
ttx#link http://wiki.openstack.org/Meetings/ProjectMeeting21:01
*** spzala has quit IRC21:01
ttxWe'll cut the havana-2 branch in a few hours, so we'll spend this meeting gathering the neecssary sign-offs and deferrals21:01
ttx#topic General stuff21:02
*** openstack changes topic to "General stuff (Meeting topic: project)"21:02
ttxsdague, annegentle, jeblair/mordred: news from QA/Docs/Infra programs ?21:02
sdaguethe neutron bug - https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1194026 might be solved now21:02
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1194026 in neutron "check_public_network_connectivity fails with timeout" [Critical,Fix committed]21:02
ttxsdague: \o/21:02
sdagueso we're giving it 24 hrs no recurrances then going to turn back on the gate for neutron21:02
ttxsdague: any plan to reenable at the gate ?21:02
ttxo21:02
ttxk21:02
sdagueyeh, 24hrs without seeing it21:03
sdaguewe've got 5 on the clock now21:03
markmccool21:03
jeblairttx: i'm about to send an email describing an upcoming behavioral change in zuul; should be on the -dev list soon21:03
jgriffithnice!!21:03
sdaguealso I think the last issue preventing grenade gating was fixed by jgriffith21:03
annegentle_Working on Doc Boot Camp in CA in Sept, more details will come as we work them out.21:03
* ttx should stop salivate on his keyboard, I blame mordred's links21:03
jeblair(short version, it will be more agressive in dequeuing changes with merge conflicts in the gate)21:03
sdagueso I'm hoping that goes gating this week as well (going to give it a couple more days to make sure that flakey bit doesn't crop up again)21:04
sdagueactually both the cinder fix for grenade, and the neutron one are things we saw before randomly in the gate, just worse now, so overall gate stability should go up from these21:04
sdaguethat's probably the QA highlights for this week21:04
ttxannegentle_: great news21:04
jeblairttx: eot21:04
annegentle_pretty excited21:04
sdagueonly question is if there are concerns turning back on gate things21:04
sdaguewith H221:05
ttxsdague: tomorrow most of the merging will be done21:05
sdagueok, so if we wait until tomorrow afternoon, probably in the clear21:05
*** lastidiot has joined #openstack-meeting21:05
ttxand actually I'd feel better if we reenabled the neutron set BEFORE we finalize the branch21:05
sdagueok, will make that a priority21:06
ttxso sometimes Wed/Thu21:06
sdaguelots of credit to nachi to getting to the bottom of it21:06
ttxyeah, that was pretty impressive21:06
*** pnavarro has quit IRC21:06
ttx#topic Oslo status21:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Oslo status (Meeting topic: project)"21:06
ttxmarkmc: hi!21:07
markmchey hey21:07
*** nachi has left #openstack-meeting21:07
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/oslo/+milestone/havana-221:07
ttxAll set I see ?21:07
markmcI think we're done for h-2, yeah21:07
markmccan I go for a drink now?21:07
markmch-3 is a whole other story21:07
*** krtaylor_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:07
markmcgonna schedule a Oslo IRC meeting for Friday21:08
ttxmarkwell, plenty of code proposed there already, so might not be a disaster21:08
*** michchap has quit IRC21:08
ttxarrh another mark21:08
markmcyeah, some of the h-3 stuff just missed h-221:08
ttxmarkmc: anything you wanted to raise, apart from your glass ?21:08
markmcttx, nope21:08
* markmc clinks glasses with ttx21:09
ttxQuestions about Oslo ?21:09
* ttx saves time for other projects, might need it at the end21:09
ttx#topic Keystone status21:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Keystone status (Meeting topic: project)"21:09
dolphmo/21:09
ttxdolphm: hello!21:09
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/keystone/+milestone/havana-221:09
ttxTwo left in the tracked bps21:10
ttxstill likely to make it today ?21:10
ttxinherited-domain-roles / catalog-optional ?21:10
dolphmyes, bp catalog-optional is experiencing some git-review trouble, and bp inherited-domain-roles is getting some extra review attention & testing21:11
ttxShall I just defer anything that doesn't make it and cut the branch in 10 hours ?21:11
dolphmi don't have any reason to think catalog-optional won't make it, but i'd really like that to be in m221:12
ttxok, so if catalog-optional isn't in for any reason, i'll hold21:12
dolphmappreciated21:12
dolphmi'm working to help get that up for review now21:12
*** pcm__ has quit IRC21:13
ttxsounds good21:13
dolphmother than that, we might actually have an m3-targetted bp land in m221:13
*** oubiwann_ has quit IRC21:13
dolphmhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/keystone/+spec/pluggable-remote-user21:13
hub_capshowoff ;)21:13
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting21:13
ttxdolphm: shit happens :)21:13
dolphmlol21:13
ttxdolphm: if it makes it, just switch the milestone21:14
dolphmwill do21:14
ttxdolphm: Anything more about Keystone ?21:14
dolphmthat's all from me21:14
ttxQuestions anyone ?21:14
ttx#topic Ceilometer status21:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Ceilometer status (Meeting topic: project)"21:15
ttxjd__: hey21:15
*** markmc has quit IRC21:15
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/ceilometer/+milestone/havana-221:15
jd__o/21:15
*** dhellmann is now known as dhellmann_21:15
ttxLooks all set, a few more hours to land that Low otherwise I'll just defer it21:15
jd__ack21:15
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting21:15
ttxAbout bug 1193906, looks like it's not on track to be fixed before Thursday...21:16
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1193906 in ceilometer "Unable to sort data with MongoDB" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/119390621:16
jd__it might get in since it should be ready by now21:16
* ttx refreshes21:16
*** oubiwann_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:16
jd__only needs a +2 on that bug21:16
jd__dhellmann_: might do that soon :)21:16
ttxjd__: if it lands too late we can backport it to the milestone-proposed branch anyway21:16
ttxI'll keep it on the target list21:16
jd__ok21:17
ttxjd__: may I cut the branch early tomorrow morning with what's in ?21:17
jd__ttx: yes21:17
ttxjd__: anything else you wanted to mention ?21:17
jd__nop21:17
ttxYour H3 is large but mostly Low stuff, so ttx.py didn't turn red21:17
ttxQuestions on Ceilometer ?21:18
ttx#topic Swift status21:18
*** openstack changes topic to "Swift status (Meeting topic: project)"21:18
notmynamehi21:18
ttxnotmyname: o/21:18
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/swift/+milestone/1.9.121:18
*** derekh has quit IRC21:18
*** rnirmal has quit IRC21:18
ttxNot a lot on your list yet, but those are the early days :)21:18
ttxnotmyname: anything you wanted to raise ?21:19
notmynameya, not a lot to talk about yet for a release21:19
notmynamewe talked about adding erasure codes to swift: http://swiftstack.com/blog/2013/07/10/erasure-codes-with-openstack-swift/21:19
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting21:19
ttxyes, sounds very interesting21:19
notmynameI'm working on some more technical details that I hope to have ready this week21:19
ttxdo you expect that effort to be completed in that cycle, or rather the next ?21:20
notmynameit will be done when it's done, but that will probably be after havana21:20
ttxright21:20
ttxnotmyname: anything else ?*21:20
notmynamenope21:20
ttxQuestions about Swift ?21:20
ttx#topic Glance status21:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance status (Meeting topic: project)"21:21
ttxmarkwash: o/21:21
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/havana-221:21
markwashhello21:21
markwashjust one wee little bp left, so close!21:21
ttxOne left (glance-cinder-driver), is it likely to make it in the next hours ?21:21
markwashalso, I might have been mistaken about when you wanted to pull the trigger, thinking there was until thursday21:22
markwashttx, I don't want to release without it. . .21:22
markwashwell21:22
ttxyou've been mistaken. We cut the H2 branch at the end of the day21:22
markwashso I gathered21:22
ttxbut then I can wait a few hours if that's what it needs21:22
stevebakerwhat is that in hours?21:23
ttxstevebaker: tomorrow morning my time21:23
*** markpeek has quit IRC21:23
ttx~0900 UTC21:23
stevebakerk21:23
ttxthough.. tomorrow I probably won't be available until 1200 UTC so here you go21:23
ttxmarkwash: how far is it ?21:23
markwashit is very very close21:24
markwashwe noticed one issue that should be an easy fix21:24
ttxok, I'll hold to get that one in21:24
markwashusing cinderclient v1 instead of v221:24
markwashwhich jgriffith says should be a pretty much no-op change21:24
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC21:24
markwashttx <321:25
*** epim has quit IRC21:25
ttxmarkwash: just let me know if I shouldn't wait (i.e. you realize at the end of the day that it's more than a few hours away)21:25
markwashttx sure thing21:25
*** eharney has quit IRC21:25
ttx(or just defer it to H3 yourself)21:25
ttxmarkwash: anything you wanted to mention ?21:25
markwashthanks to everybody for the strong end push21:26
ttxyes, i wouldn't have bet on that result a week ago :P21:26
ttxQuestions on Glance ?21:26
ttx#topic Neutron status21:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Neutron status (Meeting topic: project)"21:27
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting21:27
ttxmarkmcclain: hi!21:27
markmcclainhi21:27
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/havana-221:27
ttxLarge number still under review... and not so much room in H3 for deferring21:27
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting21:27
markmcclainyeah.. also a bad week to have 4 reviewers mostly offline21:27
ttxOK, so is any of those still likely to make it today ?21:28
*** lastidiot has quit IRC21:28
ttxI don't mind giving you a few more hours but i'm not sure that would help in any way21:28
markmcclainthere's a few reviews that may make it today21:29
markmcclainand if they don't, we can defer to H321:29
ttxShall I just defer anything that doesn't make it and cut the branch in 10 hours ?21:29
markmcclainyeah.. there's nothing outstanding that should hold up h221:29
ttx(or i can wait until you get up in case you want to push a last few)21:29
ttx(supposing you get up at your usual time)21:29
*** lastidiot has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting21:30
markmcclainyeah.. let's see where we're at the end of today.. and send you an email, so you won't have to wait for me to wake up21:30
ttxok will cut unless you tell me otherwise21:30
ttxYou also have a few targeted bugs on the list. Anything you can't publish havana-2 with ? Or should I just push all those to h3 ?21:31
ttx(if they are not completed today)21:31
markmcclainI've clear most of them out21:31
markmcclain2 are working through the gate now21:31
*** markvan has quit IRC21:31
ttxi'll defer those which don't make it today21:32
markmcclainthat works21:32
ttxunless your email tells me otherwise.21:32
ttxmarkmcclain: anything you wanted to raise ?21:32
markmcclainthanks to everyone for helping to get the renames through last week21:32
*** epim has joined #openstack-meeting21:32
*** jasondotstar has quit IRC21:32
*** lastidiot has quit IRC21:33
markmcclainheat is the only one outstanding and will be completed early next week21:33
ttxyes, good thing that was completed in time for h221:33
*** kevinconway has quit IRC21:33
ttxQuestions on Neutron ?21:33
ttx#topic Cinder status21:33
*** openstack changes topic to "Cinder status (Meeting topic: project)"21:33
ttxjgriffith: hola!21:33
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/cinder/+milestone/havana-221:34
jgriffithttx: yo21:34
ttxlots of new green, /me likes21:34
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC21:34
jgriffithyay!21:34
jgriffithStill not what I hoped for but our complete rate is getting better21:34
*** neelashah has quit IRC21:34
jgriffithThe remaining 3 should make it21:34
ttxThose last two mediums are still likely to make it ?21:35
ttxok21:35
jgriffithif they're not in by the time you're ready they can be deferred21:35
ttxack21:35
ttxYou have 3 bugs targeted against the milestone... anything that needs to be fixed BEFORE h2 publication ?21:35
jgriffithYeah, just talked to walst21:35
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting21:35
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC21:35
jgriffithThose are in flight as well, but not critical if they don't make it21:35
jgriffithI'll likely adjust the netapp one21:36
jgriffithother two should make it if we get them reviewed and they're clean21:36
ttxAbout bug 119757121:36
*** sushils has quit IRC21:36
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1197571 in cinder "Upper bound on keystone-client in requires causes conflict" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/119757121:36
*** boris-42 has quit IRC21:36
ttxthe review looks abandoned, what's the status ?21:36
jgriffithI'll update, got moved in to the *other* global bug21:37
ttxstill anything to fix in cinder ?21:37
ttxright21:37
jgriffithso no... there is not21:37
jgriffithanything to fix in cinder that is21:37
jgriffithtechnicaly there never was :)21:37
ttxok, just mark it invalid then21:37
jgriffithahh... perfect21:37
*** timello_ is now known as timello21:37
*** sushils has joined #openstack-meeting21:37
jgriffithttx: done21:38
ttxjgriffith: anything else on your mind ?21:38
jgriffithnada, I'll take a nother sweep through these tonight21:38
ttxQuestions on Cinder ?21:38
jgriffithshould be ready for you in the morning21:38
ttx(if not i'll blatantly defer them)21:38
ttx#topic Nova status21:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Nova status (Meeting topic: project)"21:38
ttxrussellb: hey21:38
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting21:38
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/nova/+milestone/havana-221:38
russellbhi!21:39
russellbso 3 blueprints left21:39
ttxYou deferred enough to be in good shape for H2, but H3 will need a serious reality check at the next meeting21:39
russellbthe first 2 should make it21:39
russellb3rd might make it21:39
russellband yes, havana-3 is a disaster21:39
russellbgoing to email the ML about it21:39
ttxok21:39
ttxShall I just defer anything that doesn't make it and cut the branch in 10 hours ?21:39
russellbyes21:40
russellbnothing critical left that i really want to make it21:40
ttxOr is there anything in those last 3 you're particularly attached to ?21:40
russellbwe'll get in what we can21:40
ttxok21:40
russellbso just feel free to branch when ready21:40
russellbactually, i'd really like the shelve-instance bp to make it21:40
russellbi think it's all in the gate now though21:40
russellbso we should be good21:40
ttxhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/nova-v3-api-filter is in h3 but already completed, I'll move it to h2 ?21:40
dansmith6th in line for merge21:40
russellbttx: ah yes21:41
ttxwilldo21:41
ttxOn the bugs side...21:41
ttxhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1195720 is critical but untargeted21:41
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1195720 in nova "response to vm spawn may  contain invalid values" [Critical,Confirmed]21:41
russellbhm, need to look at it21:41
ttxshould we try to fix it in H2 ?21:42
russellbi will review21:42
russellbi suspect we can downgrade it21:42
ttxWhat about the 19 others ? Anything milestone-critical in that ?21:42
ttx(those which are targeted to h2 currently)21:42
ttxor should I defer anythign that doesn't make it ?21:43
russellbdefer anything that doesn't make it21:43
ttxsounds good21:43
ttxrussellb: anything else you wanted to mention ?21:43
russellbnope21:43
*** suo has quit IRC21:43
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
ttxAny question on Nova ?21:44
ttx#topic Heat status21:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Heat status (Meeting topic: project)"21:44
ttxstevebaker: o/21:44
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/havana-221:44
stevebakerhi21:44
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting21:44
ttxSame comment as Nova, in good shape but your H3 will need to be trimmed.21:45
stevebakerlooking ok. that critical is seconds old21:45
*** jecarey has quit IRC21:45
ttxOne blueprint left: gzip-userdata. Still likely to make it ?21:45
stevebakerI don't think so, sdake is travelling21:45
stevebakerand there are objections to the solution21:45
ttxstevebaker: ok, please defer it to h3 then21:45
stevebakerwill do21:46
ttxOn the bugs side you have 2 bugs left. Are they milestone-critical (and worth a backport to MP) or should they be deferred ?21:46
*** michchap has quit IRC21:46
ttxThat recent critical might be a good candidate for a backport after the branch is cut21:46
stevebakerany non-criticals remaining can be deferred21:46
ttx(and before release)21:46
ttxok, sounds good21:46
stevebakerok, I expect that one will have a fix by the cut21:47
*** suo has joined #openstack-meeting21:47
ttxstevebaker: anything else you want to raise ?21:47
stevebakerI don't think so21:47
ttxQuestions about Heat ?21:47
ttxstevebaker: We'll probably skip next week meeting... please have a look at your H3 objectives and maybe reprioritize/defer a bit to make it more realistic21:48
ttxunless you're pretty sure you can deliver everything in there :)21:49
stevebakerok, thanks21:49
ttx#topic Horizon status21:49
*** openstack changes topic to "Horizon status (Meeting topic: project)"21:49
ttxgabrielhurley: o/21:49
gabrielhurley\o21:49
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/havana-221:49
gabrielhurleyDown to the wire here... the keystone v3 auth BP literally *just* became unblocked by openstack-requirements and should hopefully merge into Horizon shortly. the Heat topology BP and the remaining bug are both waiting on Jenkins.21:49
gabrielhurleyI expect everything to land today though21:49
gabrielhurleyAs for H3, I'm gonna start paring down the list with the team in our meeting up next... I know it's way overbooked.21:50
ttxgabrielhurley: if Murphy's law strikes, should I wait or just defer those which didn't make it ?21:50
gabrielhurleyI would *really* like to get these in21:50
gabrielhurleyI'm gonna be watching them closel21:50
gabrielhurleyclosely21:50
ttxgabrielhurley: ok, I will wait if shit happens. just make sure it doesn't :)21:51
gabrielhurleyIf something goes horribly wrong I'll defer myself21:51
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC21:51
gabrielhurleyif you see all green at any point, go ahead and cut the release21:51
ttxgabrielhurley: anything else you wanted to mention ?21:52
gabrielhurleydon't think so21:52
ttxQuestions on Horizon ?21:52
ttxgabrielhurley: same comment as Russell and Steve: H3 will need a bit of a reality check... please work on it next week and we'll discuss the results in the meeting in two weeks21:53
gabrielhurleyyep21:53
ttx#topic Incubated projects21:53
*** openstack changes topic to "Incubated projects (Meeting topic: project)"21:53
ttxhub_cap: around ?21:53
hub_capaye21:53
ttxLooking at trove since we'll be pushing out a H2 there...21:53
ttx#link https://launchpad.net/trove/+milestone/havana-221:53
hub_capwrt my h2, id like to quote the great joe cocker. you are so beautiful h2 me21:53
hub_capget it , get it?21:53
hub_capbut srsly, cut it ttx when yer ready21:53
hub_capits done21:54
*** lbragstad has quit IRC21:54
*** changbl has quit IRC21:54
ttxhub_cap: almost markwashrthy21:54
hub_caplol21:54
hub_capi can aspire21:54
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC21:54
ttxhub_cap: will cut with what's in master in my tomorrow morning while you sleep.21:54
hub_cap<321:54
ttxthen you'll still have the option of backporting critical bugfixes if any to the milestone-proposed branch that will be created21:55
hub_capnothing else to report, h3 looks do-able as of now21:55
*** ivasev_ has quit IRC21:55
hub_capperfect ttx21:55
ttxquick explanation of how this works21:55
ttxwhen I cut branch I set all targeted bugs to fixreleased21:55
ttxif you want to add a bug to the backport list, fix it in master first (it will turn to FixCommitted)21:56
ttxthen target it to h2 and it will appear on the list21:56
*** absubram_ has joined #openstack-meeting21:56
* devananda follows along21:56
ttx(it will be fixcommitted while the others are fixreleased, basically)21:56
hub_capk21:57
ttxallows us to track that the fix is in master but you want it in h221:57
ttxhub_cap: I think we're all set21:57
*** writerDiane has quit IRC21:57
ttxdevananda: quick progress report ?21:57
hub_cap<321:57
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC21:57
devanandattx: nothing release worthy at this point :(21:57
ttxdevananda: sure, but are you making progress ?21:58
devanandayes :)21:58
ttxgood :)21:58
devanandanot as fast as I'd like, but yes :)21:58
ttxAny question ?21:58
devanandanope. that ^ explanation was very helpful21:58
hub_cap+1 devananda21:58
hub_capmy only Q tho ttx on it21:58
ttxI think that explanation is in the wiki somewhere21:58
*** ayoung has quit IRC21:58
hub_capwas once we have a fix commited in h2, how does it get into the h2 backport?21:59
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting21:59
hub_capwe can take offline if needed, dont wanna hog gabrielhurley's meeting time21:59
ttxhttps://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/PTLguide#Backporting_fixes_to_milestone-proposed_.28Wednesday.2FThursday.2921:59
hub_capperfect21:59
ttxpointing to https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/GerritJenkinsGithub#Authoring_Changes_for_milestone-proposed22:00
ttxok, wrapping up22:00
ttxthanks everyone22:00
ttx#endmeeting22:00
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting22:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 16 22:00:28 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2013/project.2013-07-16-21.01.html22:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2013/project.2013-07-16-21.01.txt22:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/project/2013/project.2013-07-16-21.01.log.html22:00
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC22:00
*** SumitNaiksatam has quit IRC22:01
gabrielhurley#startmeeting horizon22:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Jul 16 22:01:46 2013 UTC.  The chair is gabrielhurley. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'horizon'22:01
gabrielhurleyHello folks!22:01
jcoufalhey22:02
*** timductive has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
gabrielhurley#topic overview22:02
*** openstack changes topic to "overview (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:02
david-lyleHello22:02
*** david-lyle_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:02
absubram_hi22:02
timductiveo/22:02
jpichhey22:02
gabrielhurleySo, we're trying to cut H2 in the next 24 hours.22:02
gabrielhurleyI'm watching https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36351/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/35664/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/37335/22:02
vkmcHey o/22:03
gabrielhurleythose are the final three reviews that I'd really like to see in H222:03
*** burt has quit IRC22:03
gabrielhurleyThe keystone auth one is the only one that looks in danger :-/22:03
gabrielhurleystill trying to nail down client version problems apparently22:03
gabrielhurleyit looked promising for a bit, but just failed jenkins again22:03
gabrielhurleylcheng is looking at it22:03
gabrielhurleyIf that can't be fixed in the next few hours we'll have to defer it to H322:04
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away22:04
gabrielhurleyOverall, good job on H2. https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/havana-222:04
gabrielhurley8 pretty sizable blueprints and 50+ bugs22:04
gabrielhurleyThe big one that got bumped was the ceilometer stuff22:05
gabrielhurleybut with Heat generally in great shape now, I may be able to spend more time with the ceilometer stuff in H322:05
*** RajeshMohan has quit IRC22:05
*** RajeshMohan has joined #openstack-meeting22:05
*** afazekas has quit IRC22:05
gabrielhurleyI'd mostly like to spend this meeting looking forward at H3, and then at the end we can do other general questions and the like22:06
david-lyleLooks like 35664 just merged22:06
gabrielhurleyAnybody have any concerns on H2 before we move forward?22:06
gabrielhurleylol, of course that made https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36351/ fail due to a merge conflict22:06
gabrielhurleytimductive: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/36351/ needs a rebase22:06
*** lloydde has quit IRC22:06
gabrielhurleythen we'll push again22:06
timductiveok22:06
* gabrielhurley just loves last minute merge rushes22:07
gabrielhurleyokay then22:07
gabrielhurley#topic blueprints22:07
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprints (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:07
*** marun has quit IRC22:07
gabrielhurleylet's look at H3: https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/havana-322:07
*** SergeyLukjanov has joined #openstack-meeting22:07
gabrielhurleybasically, we've got *way* too many blueprints22:07
gabrielhurleysome of them are smaller ones that'll only take a day or two to knock out, but even still22:08
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting22:08
gabrielhurleyLemme ask this first: does anyone own a blueprint in H3 they don't think they'll finish22:08
gabrielhurley?22:08
gabrielhurleyno worries if you don't think you will, I just want to try and get a baseline22:09
*** oubiwann_ has quit IRC22:09
gabrielhurleyI'll take that silence as a "no" from the people here22:10
gabrielhurleylet's tackle large topic areas22:10
gabrielhurleyI consider ceilometer support a must, but as far as I can tell there's a lack of consensus around how to integrate it currently...22:10
gabrielhurleyI've seen a lot of back-and-forth there22:11
jpichI think we can get the separate panel into something useful during H22:11
jpichI don't know if the ideal, put bits everywhere approach is possible to achieve during this cycle?22:12
*** hanrahat has quit IRC22:12
gabrielhurleyYeah, that seems to be the consensus. Has the UX group weighed in on the separate panel approach?22:12
gabrielhurleyIf we're gonna go that route I want to make sure we're making something that's actually useful there22:12
jpichNot yet, and agreed22:12
david-lyleAnd I still worry about the performance implications of it everywhere unless the calls are asynchronous22:12
gabrielhurleyand I'm nt sold on the utility of just dumping a bunch of data into the dashboard and saying "figure it out yourself"22:13
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting22:13
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting22:13
jpichdavid-lyle: Exactly, that's why the real time stuff should be in first (from my memories of the summit discussion)22:13
gabrielhurleydavid-lyle: yeah, any general integration would need to be async22:13
jpichYes, at the moment it's difficult to read, especially with ids instead of names22:13
gabrielhurleywe had discussed doing it via AJAX for the time being22:13
jcoufaljpich: Was there discussion about separate ceilometer panel in UX group? Havn't noticed that22:13
gabrielhurleybut I could be convinced to wait22:13
gabrielhurleyjcoufal: I don't believe there was22:14
gabrielhurleythere should be if that's the proposal on the table22:14
jpichjcoufal: No, not yet, this needs to be brought up. Soon! :)22:14
jcoufalgabrielhurley: me neither, can someone relevant post it there?22:14
gabrielhurleyjcoufal and jpich: can you two coordinate on getting the UX team to bring some thought to bear on the issue?22:14
david-lyleIf that's in place then I think it's useful asa separate panel, but also integrated into other panels22:15
jcoufaldeffinitely, if someone enlighten to the problem can help to formulate the question22:15
jpichNote the current tables's content is ajaxified, though that may not be enough yet22:15
jpichgabrielhurley, jcoufal: Will do22:15
david-lyleJust status though and it doesn't handle transient objects at all22:15
gabrielhurleyokay. I'll leave it in y'alls hands to get a UX consensus and then get the code in line22:15
jpichCan't wait to have a new place that is not the G+ community to have those discussions...22:15
jcoufaljpich: you are aware of what is going on about ceilometer panel?22:16
* gabrielhurley is staying out of this one and is just happy there *can* be discussions22:16
*** mtreinish has quit IRC22:16
jpichjcoufal: I have been reviewing and testing it so I can post screenshots and my understanding of the background at least22:16
jcoufaljpcih: me too, G+ is being really bad, but at least as gabrielhurley said, we have somwhere to discuss22:16
jcoufaljpich: perfect, sounds great22:17
gabrielhurleycool. let's jump to the next set of BPs22:17
gabrielhurleyThere's a slew of Quantum VPNaaS and FWaaS which I've seen nothing on so far...22:17
gabrielhurleys/Quantum/Neutron22:17
gabrielhurleyI haven't followed what's happening with the development of those in Neutron22:17
gabrielhurleybut I'm inclined to postpone those, especially given what happened with LBaaS last time22:17
gabrielhurleylanding big stuff like that should go in the first or second milestone22:18
gabrielhurleyso I'm gonna bump those unless someone jumps forward with amazing code at some point during the cycle22:18
absubram_:)22:18
david-lyleIf I remember correctly vpnaad is on gerrit as a work in progress at least22:19
david-lylevpnaas22:19
absubram_yes.. it's in progress and there have been plenty of reviews.. its ongoing from what I understand22:20
gabrielhurleyIf it gets proposed all the way in the earlier portion of H3 I'll consider it, but I really don't want to push half-finished features this time around22:20
gabrielhurleywe can always re-target blueprints22:20
david-lyleAgreed22:20
gabrielhurleyso with that said, there's a couple of keystone-related BPs which I understand david-lyle and lcheng are still feeling good about, so I won't question those (for now ;-) )22:21
gabrielhurleythe Nova-related BPs are most of the small ones. I may actually grab some of those 'cuz I know a lot about 'em and they're pretty easy22:22
gabrielhurleyHonestly, the ones I'm questioning the most are the ones that are about Horizon itself22:23
*** SergeyLukjanov has quit IRC22:23
gabrielhurleythings like the "building on OpenStack Dashboard" blueprint https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/building-on-openstack-dashboard22:23
gabrielhurleyand inline editing for data tables https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/inline-table-editing22:23
jcoufalInline editation is in process22:24
*** mrodden has quit IRC22:24
*** michchap has quit IRC22:24
jcoufalcurrently I got feedback on designes22:24
jpichI will likely try and poke people's brains about the messages-on-login-page bp at some point. The approaches I tried so far didn't really work out22:24
*** pentameter has quit IRC22:24
jcoufaland will share result with Ladislav who is asignee and has already some part done22:24
jpichThere's a WIP code review for inline editing I think22:25
gabrielhurleyjcoufal: I realize that, but the technical problems there are pretty significant. I haven't reviewed the code closely, but I know why *i've* been putting it off so long and I'm not sure we'll be able to get it ready in time.22:25
gabrielhurleyagain, it's one that I'd be more favorable to seeing work continue on but target it to land in I1 or some such22:25
jcoufalgabrielhurley: just to be sure, when si H3?22:25
gabrielhurley6 weeks22:25
gabrielhurleyI don't have the date off the top of my head22:26
gabrielhurleyoh22:26
gabrielhurleySept 9th22:26
*** geekinutah has left #openstack-meeting22:26
jcoufalok, based on talks with Ladislav, I am not very optimistic about getting it in time...22:26
gabrielhurleyit's on the launchpad page, duh22:26
jcoufalbut will ask him to make sure22:26
gabrielhurleyI definitely want to see work continue on it22:26
gabrielhurleybut I'd rather make it awesome and land it early in I then rush it for H22:26
jcoufalyup, I will encourage Ladislav in that work, I knwo he was blocked for some time now with other issues22:27
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting22:27
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting22:27
gabrielhurleyI think trying to get the "realtime" work done is a massive project for the Horizon framework as a whole, and will probably eat up a lot of developer attention22:28
gabrielhurleyand I think there's more group excitement around that one than any of the others22:28
gabrielhurleyso let me defer a few of these things we've talked about and see where the list is... one moment22:28
david-lyleI would like to free up the centralized color pallette blueprint.  I have another issue I'd rather tackle after rbac.  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/domain-context-services22:29
david-lyleI don't consider the pallete essential and it would fall in the horizon work22:30
absubram_So umm.. gabriel, can I add a blueprint to the H3 list? If I'm able to get a code review out say end of July or within the first few days of August? :)22:30
gabrielhurleyabsubram_: yep22:31
gabrielhurleydavid-lyle: fine with me, though I'm sure some of the people who want to skin the dashboard will be sad ;-)22:31
gabrielhurleythose people should put their own devs on it.22:32
gabrielhurleyabsubram_: I've added it to the list for H322:32
*** vijendar1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:33
absubram_garielhurley: super! thanks! the neutron plugin for my horizon blueprint should go upstream within the next 10 days or so.. I should be able to push my stuff out soon after.. I need to test it first in Havana as most of my testing has been in grizzly22:33
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
absubram_I did have a quick question about the api-detection blueprint though.. that's no longer in H3? so there's no longer a way to detect which netron plugin is being used?22:34
*** notmyname_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:34
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul22:34
*** notmyname_ has quit IRC22:34
*** timductive1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:35
gabrielhurleyabsubram_: for now just use a setting (you'll see other examples of how this works in the local_conf.py.example file)22:35
gabrielhurleyOkay. We're down to 20 BPs now...22:36
gabrielhurleyI guess that's *less* overkill22:36
gabrielhurleyI think I'll follow up with some of the folks who own blueprints that aren't at this meeting and see what their plans are22:37
david-lylewhat could go wrong?22:37
gabrielhurleyAlso worth knowing is that now the "Low" priority on blueprints won't be tracked by ttx, so those indicate "nice to have" items that we can slip without issue.22:37
gabrielhurleySo you'll see me lower the priority on a number of things in this list22:37
absubram_cool.. I'll check that out22:37
gabrielhurleygreat!22:38
gabrielhurley#topic open discussion22:38
*** s1rp_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:38
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:38
*** sushil_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:38
gabrielhurleynow for everything else! what do people feel like talking about?22:38
absubram_forum for discussion? :p22:38
absubram_if not g+22:38
jcoufalhaha22:39
gabrielhurleythe discussion continues on the ML... are we getting closer to an answer or not?22:39
jcoufalNot very sure22:39
gabrielhurleyAs the OpenStack Dashboard PTL I'm sort of de facto involved, but it's ultimately not my decision, so I'm trying to let the community reach consensus22:39
jcoufalthere was just one acceptable recommendation from infra team for discourse, but not much people look very happy about that22:40
gabrielhurleyNormally I'd say "let's start trying things and if they don't work try another" but I worry that that will frustrate/fragment the community22:40
jcoufalyes, I agree22:40
jcoufalchanging tools all the time is one thing what I don't want to do as well22:40
jcoufalI will leave that for about 1 max 2 weeks and if there is no other proposal, I will go with the suggestion with most plus points22:41
*** colinmcnamara1 has joined #openstack-meeting22:41
gabrielhurleysounds good22:41
absubram_yeah22:41
gabrielhurleymaybe a summary email and ask for people to give a final opinon/vote22:41
gabrielhurleythen we just go with it22:42
jcoufalsounds great22:42
*** egallen has quit IRC22:42
jpichYes22:42
*** s1rp has quit IRC22:42
*** notmyname has quit IRC22:42
*** echohead1 has quit IRC22:42
*** euanh has quit IRC22:42
*** niska has quit IRC22:42
*** Brainspackle has quit IRC22:42
*** agordeev has quit IRC22:42
*** markmcclain has quit IRC22:42
*** blamar has quit IRC22:42
*** radez has quit IRC22:42
*** mordred has quit IRC22:42
*** dragondm has quit IRC22:42
*** e-vad has quit IRC22:42
*** rmk has quit IRC22:42
*** _cerberus_ has quit IRC22:42
*** ttx has quit IRC22:42
*** dabo has quit IRC22:42
*** Adri2000 has quit IRC22:42
*** annegentle_ has quit IRC22:42
*** tris has quit IRC22:42
*** bfirsh has quit IRC22:42
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC22:42
*** wkelly has quit IRC22:42
*** juice has quit IRC22:42
*** rosmaita_ has quit IRC22:42
*** cp16net has quit IRC22:42
*** sileht has quit IRC22:42
*** briancline has quit IRC22:42
*** redthrux has quit IRC22:42
*** dachary has quit IRC22:42
*** Guest76948 has quit IRC22:42
*** EntropyWorks has quit IRC22:42
*** jcooley has quit IRC22:42
*** zul has quit IRC22:42
*** adjohn has quit IRC22:42
*** sushils has quit IRC22:42
*** vijendar has quit IRC22:42
*** anniec has quit IRC22:42
*** leseb has quit IRC22:42
*** timductive has quit IRC22:42
*** galstrom has quit IRC22:42
*** jculp_ has quit IRC22:42
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC22:42
*** pleia2 has quit IRC22:42
*** markwash has quit IRC22:42
*** amytron has quit IRC22:42
*** reed has quit IRC22:42
*** jeblair has quit IRC22:42
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC22:42
*** sdague has quit IRC22:42
*** jdurgin has quit IRC22:42
*** cyeoh has quit IRC22:42
*** morganfainberg has quit IRC22:42
*** rwsu has quit IRC22:42
*** maurosr has quit IRC22:42
*** Guest79217 has quit IRC22:42
*** yuanz has quit IRC22:42
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC22:42
*** abaron has quit IRC22:42
*** danwent has quit IRC22:42
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC22:42
*** dolphm has quit IRC22:42
*** andreaf has quit IRC22:42
*** eglynn-afk has quit IRC22:42
*** gyee has quit IRC22:42
*** bdpayne has quit IRC22:42
*** ladquin has quit IRC22:42
*** murkk has quit IRC22:42
*** beagles has quit IRC22:42
*** dhellmann_ has quit IRC22:42
*** sdake_ has quit IRC22:42
*** uvirtbot has quit IRC22:42
*** IlyaE has quit IRC22:42
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC22:42
*** anteaya has quit IRC22:42
*** Mandell has quit IRC22:42
*** llu has quit IRC22:42
*** torgomatic has quit IRC22:42
*** jang has quit IRC22:42
*** tr3buchet has quit IRC22:42
*** n0ano has quit IRC22:42
*** rdo_ has quit IRC22:42
*** yamahata has quit IRC22:42
*** beyounn has quit IRC22:42
gabrielhurleycool22:42
*** sushil_ is now known as sushils22:42
david-lyleThere's been the beginnings of discussion regarding potential navigation changes in horizon, I haven't seen a lot of input.  Maybe others aren't feeling the pain?22:42
gabrielhurleyI think the pain comes when we try to add more22:42
jcoufalyeah, it also started in ML, just one answer on that22:42
gabrielhurleythat's one that I think we're better off solving via UX group/internally22:43
gabrielhurleythe ML at large doesn't care/isn't gonna be helpful22:43
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-meeting22:43
gabrielhurleybut I would like to continue thinking on/addressing that issue22:43
jcoufaldavid-lyle: I'd leave that 1 week maximum and if nobody replies, just summarize the issues and go for designs22:43
gabrielhurleycreating a better solution would help enable people to add their own dashboard content22:43
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC22:44
*** Brainspa1kle has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** echohead_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** zul has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** ladquin has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** anteaya has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** wkelly has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** abaron has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** danwent has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** galstrom_zzz has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** jculp_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** eglynn-afk has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** pleia2 has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** jcooley has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** EntropyWorks has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** Guest76948 has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** dachary has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** redthrux has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** briancline has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** sileht has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** cp16net has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** rosmaita_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** juice has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** bfirsh has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** tris has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** annegentle_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** Adri2000 has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** ttx has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** reed has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** jeblair has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** sdague has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** cyeoh has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** morganfainberg has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** beyounn has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** llu has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** Guest79217 has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** murkk has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** blamar has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** beagles has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** yuanz has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** uvirtbot has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** jang has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** tr3buchet has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** radez_g0n3 has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** rdo_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** mordred has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** dragondm has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** e-vad has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** rmk has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** _cerberus_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:44
*** sendak.freenode.net changes topic to "blueprints (Meeting topic: horizon)"22:44
gabrielhurleyother items?22:44
jcoufalgabrielhurley: I think david-lyle wanted to point out that there is ongoin discussion and not much people are sharing issues, I think navigation re-design is needed22:45
*** henrynash has quit IRC22:45
*** euanh has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** niska has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** agordeev has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** flaper87 has quit IRC22:45
*** flaper87 has joined #openstack-meeting22:45
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC22:45
david-lyleI hope rbac will enable collapsing some of existing duplication, but the dashboard needs better extensibility regardless22:45
gabrielhurleyagreed22:45
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting22:46
*** uvirtbot has quit IRC22:47
*** eglynn-afk has quit IRC22:47
david-lyleI have one other concern22:47
*** uvirtbot has joined #openstack-meeting22:47
*** eglynn-afk has joined #openstack-meeting22:47
*** anniec has quit IRC22:47
david-lyleA lot of nova functionality is coming which is great, but i think we need a better approach than a new panel per feature22:48
gabrielhurleynot gonna argue with that. did you have a thought on that?22:48
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC22:49
david-lyleProblem is that takes some ux work or discussion22:49
*** andreaf has quit IRC22:49
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting22:49
jcoufaldavid-lyle: why is that a problem? time pressure?22:49
gabrielhurleyI think most of what's in H3 for Nova fits into existing sections, whether as added data in instance tables, extra tabs on instance details, etc.22:50
gabrielhurleyin the longer term I agree that our organizational groupings may warrant reexamination22:50
david-lyleI guess the org is big issue.  But more than just panels22:51
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting22:51
absubram_I've gtg guys.. thanks.. see you tomorrow22:51
*** dolphm has quit IRC22:51
*** absubram_ has quit IRC22:51
*** vipul is now known as vipul-away22:51
gabrielhurleyyep. Let's revisit that at the next meeting22:51
gabrielhurleyI think we should call this one for today, and maybe start discussing design issues again next time.22:52
gabrielhurleysound reasonable?22:52
david-lyleRequiring ux thought is not a problem, just pointing out a work item that's open :)22:52
jcoufalgabrielhurley: sounds good22:52
david-lyleSure22:52
gabrielhurleycool. thanks everyone! this has been a very productive meeting. have a great week!22:52
gabrielhurley#endmeeting22:52
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:52
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jul 16 22:52:45 2013 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:52
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2013/horizon.2013-07-16-22.01.html22:52
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2013/horizon.2013-07-16-22.01.txt22:52
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/horizon/2013/horizon.2013-07-16-22.01.log.html22:52
david-lyleThanks Gabriel22:53
jcoufalthanks, see you folks22:53
*** gabrielhurley has quit IRC22:54
*** epim_ has joined #openstack-meeting22:54
*** markmcclain has quit IRC22:54
*** jcoufal has quit IRC22:55
*** sudorandom has quit IRC22:56
*** epim has quit IRC22:56
*** epim_ is now known as epim22:56
*** david-lyle has quit IRC22:56
*** leseb has quit IRC22:58
*** jpich has left #openstack-meeting22:59
*** timductive1 has left #openstack-meeting23:02
*** michchap has quit IRC23:02
*** markpeek has quit IRC23:02
*** zehicle_at_dell has joined #openstack-meeting23:04
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting23:05
*** anniec has joined #openstack-meeting23:05
*** ccrouch1 has left #openstack-meeting23:06
*** lloydde has quit IRC23:07
*** krtaylor_ has quit IRC23:08
*** woodspa has quit IRC23:09
*** tanisdl has quit IRC23:13
*** zehicle_at_dell has quit IRC23:15
*** markwash has quit IRC23:16
*** lastidiot has joined #openstack-meeting23:18
*** vipul-away is now known as vipul23:19
*** IlyaE has quit IRC23:20
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting23:21
*** vkmc has quit IRC23:22
*** david-lyle_ has quit IRC23:24
*** fnaval_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:27
*** IlyaE has joined #openstack-meeting23:27
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting23:29
*** arosen2 has joined #openstack-meeting23:30
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting23:31
*** adjohn has quit IRC23:32
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting23:32
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting23:32
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting23:33
*** adjohn_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:35
*** adjohn_ has quit IRC23:35
*** adjohn_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:36
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-meeting23:36
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting23:36
*** adjohn has quit IRC23:37
*** jrodom has joined #openstack-meeting23:37
*** danwent has quit IRC23:37
*** arosen2 has quit IRC23:40
*** michchap has quit IRC23:40
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:40
*** adjohn_ has quit IRC23:41
*** vvechkanov has quit IRC23:42
*** amytron has quit IRC23:42
*** vvechkanov has joined #openstack-meeting23:43
*** abaron has quit IRC23:43
*** garyk has quit IRC23:44
*** michchap has joined #openstack-meeting23:45
*** kmartin has quit IRC23:47
*** mrodden has joined #openstack-meeting23:47
*** fnaval_ has quit IRC23:48
*** ctracey has quit IRC23:48
*** markpeek has joined #openstack-meeting23:48
*** lloydde has quit IRC23:48
*** ctracey has joined #openstack-meeting23:48
*** jodom has joined #openstack-meeting23:49
*** anniec has quit IRC23:50
*** dabo has quit IRC23:50
*** dabo has joined #openstack-meeting23:51
*** sudorandom has joined #openstack-meeting23:52
*** jrodom has quit IRC23:53
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-meeting23:56
*** sudorandom has quit IRC23:57
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-meeting23:59
*** sarob_ has joined #openstack-meeting23:59
*** leseb has joined #openstack-meeting23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!