Monday, 2016-12-12

*** markvoelker has quit IRC00:02
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:04
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC00:09
*** dtrainor has quit IRC00:13
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:14
*** dsariel has quit IRC00:15
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:21
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:21
*** StanLagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:32
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:35
*** mickeys has quit IRC00:37
*** tuanluong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:39
*** ijw has quit IRC00:40
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:41
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC00:43
*** ansmith has quit IRC00:46
*** trinaths has quit IRC00:47
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
*** tovin07 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:51
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC00:52
*** tovin07 has quit IRC00:56
*** tovin07 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:57
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:58
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:03
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:08
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:10
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC01:15
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:18
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:27
*** ricolin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:29
*** vijendar has quit IRC01:32
*** saisrikiran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:34
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:35
*** saisrikiran has quit IRC01:42
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:47
*** mtanino has quit IRC01:50
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:51
*** sdake has quit IRC01:53
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:54
*** sdake_ has quit IRC01:54
*** sdake has quit IRC01:54
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:55
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC02:00
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:06
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:06
*** armax has quit IRC02:08
*** amotoki has quit IRC02:11
*** kevo has quit IRC02:13
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC02:14
*** yatin_on_leave has quit IRC02:16
*** yatin_on_leave has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:27
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:30
*** spzala has quit IRC02:35
*** StanLagu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:41
*** StanLagun has quit IRC02:42
*** tuanluong has quit IRC02:44
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:44
*** cknight has quit IRC02:48
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:48
*** yuanying has quit IRC02:49
*** cknight1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:52
*** sdake_ has quit IRC02:53
*** cknight has quit IRC02:55
*** dtrainor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:58
*** knangia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:59
*** tuanluong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:59
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:00
*** georgelorch has quit IRC03:03
*** markvoelker has quit IRC03:05
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:09
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:12
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:13
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:13
*** georgelorch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:16
*** sdake has quit IRC03:17
*** yatin_on_leave has quit IRC03:18
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:24
*** vijendar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:28
*** ijw has quit IRC03:28
*** yatin_on_leave has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:31
*** clopez has quit IRC03:33
*** clopez has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:36
*** vijendar_ has quit IRC03:40
*** r-mibu has quit IRC03:42
*** georgelorch has quit IRC03:44
*** georgelorch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:44
*** trinaths has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:44
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:45
*** sdake_ has quit IRC03:48
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:49
*** r-mibu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:52
*** cknight1 has quit IRC03:54
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:01
*** markvoelker has quit IRC04:05
*** tuanluong has quit IRC04:10
*** noslzzp has quit IRC04:15
*** JRobinson__ is now known as JRobinson__afk04:16
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:19
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax04:23
*** vijendar has quit IRC04:24
*** ricolin has quit IRC04:24
*** georgelorch has quit IRC04:24
*** baoli has quit IRC04:24
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:32
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC04:36
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:39
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC04:53
*** JRobinson__afk is now known as JRobinson__04:54
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan04:55
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:55
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:57
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:58
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:02
*** ircuser-1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:04
*** markvoelker has quit IRC05:07
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC05:08
*** dtrainor has quit IRC05:08
*** chhavi has quit IRC05:09
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:10
*** knangia has quit IRC05:14
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:19
*** cknight has quit IRC05:24
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:25
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:25
*** dtrainor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:27
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:28
*** numans has quit IRC05:31
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:32
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:33
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC05:37
*** sankarshan has quit IRC05:41
*** sankarshan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:41
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:45
*** cknight has quit IRC05:45
*** tuanluong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:46
*** sridharg has quit IRC05:48
*** sridharg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:48
*** dtrainor has quit IRC05:51
*** reedip has quit IRC05:53
*** nkrinner_afk has quit IRC05:54
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:55
*** baoli has quit IRC05:57
*** skramaja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:59
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:02
*** lifeless_ has quit IRC06:02
*** reedip has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:03
*** lifeless has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:03
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:06
*** markvoelker has quit IRC06:07
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:07
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:16
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:20
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:24
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:24
*** vijendar has quit IRC06:25
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:31
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:33
*** spzala has quit IRC06:36
*** ijw has quit IRC06:37
*** chhavi has quit IRC06:38
*** JRobinson__ has quit IRC06:44
*** nkrinner is now known as nkrinner_afk06:53
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:57
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:01
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:03
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:04
*** baoli has quit IRC07:07
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:08
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:21
*** nkrinner_afk is now known as nkrinner07:22
*** kevo has quit IRC07:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC07:26
*** lpetrut has quit IRC07:27
*** lennyb has quit IRC07:33
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:33
*** andreas_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:39
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:41
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:42
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:43
*** lennyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:44
*** georgelorch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:44
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:54
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:54
*** msimonin has quit IRC07:57
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:57
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** gouthamr has quit IRC08:00
*** tremble has quit IRC08:03
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:04
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:04
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC08:04
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:06
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:09
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:09
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC08:10
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:10
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:11
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC08:12
*** sshnaidm|away is now known as sshnaidm08:13
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:13
*** ralonsoh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:16
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:18
*** fzdarsky has quit IRC08:18
*** baoli has quit IRC08:20
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC08:20
*** StanLagu_ has quit IRC08:23
*** dsariel has quit IRC08:23
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:24
*** yamamoto has quit IRC08:34
*** vds has left #openstack-meeting-alt08:36
*** tremble has quit IRC08:40
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:41
*** iberezovskiy|off is now known as iberezovskiy08:43
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** kalyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:45
*** kalyan has left #openstack-meeting-alt08:46
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:47
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:47
*** vijendar has quit IRC08:52
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC08:53
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:55
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off08:56
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:00
*** janki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:00
*** dtardivel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:01
*** chhavi has quit IRC09:03
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC09:04
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena09:05
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:09
*** ircuser-1 has quit IRC09:13
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:14
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:15
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:16
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:17
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:18
*** d0ugal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:19
*** tremble has quit IRC09:23
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:24
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:24
*** numans has quit IRC09:25
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:26
*** eliqiao has quit IRC09:28
*** eliqiao has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:30
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:31
*** tpsilva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:32
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:33
*** spzala has quit IRC09:36
*** bfernando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:38
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away09:38
*** tremble has quit IRC09:38
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan09:38
*** baoli has quit IRC09:41
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:41
*** yuanying has quit IRC09:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:48
*** yamamoto has quit IRC09:49
*** strigazi_AFK is now known as strigazi09:49
*** jtomasek has quit IRC09:52
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:54
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:55
*** tremble has quit IRC10:00
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:01
*** zhurong has quit IRC10:02
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:04
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC10:05
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:06
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:06
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:08
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC10:09
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:10
*** ganso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:14
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC10:21
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:27
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:30
*** panda|pto is now known as panda10:31
*** igordcard has quit IRC10:36
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:36
*** igordcard has quit IRC10:36
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:43
*** baoli has quit IRC10:45
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:48
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:50
*** tuanluong has quit IRC10:50
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:51
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:52
*** vijendar has quit IRC10:53
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:56
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:01
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:03
*** chhavi has quit IRC11:05
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC11:06
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:06
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:07
*** notmyname has quit IRC11:07
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:08
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:09
*** notmyname has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:11
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:11
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:12
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:12
*** sridharg has quit IRC11:23
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:23
*** sdague_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:24
*** tremble has quit IRC11:26
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:28
*** tremble has quit IRC11:28
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:28
*** priteau has quit IRC11:29
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:30
*** sdague_ is now known as sdague11:31
*** priteau has quit IRC11:34
*** trinaths1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:34
*** trinaths has quit IRC11:37
*** baoli has quit IRC11:48
*** trinaths1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt11:49
*** priteau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:50
*** tellesnobrega has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:52
*** thrash|wknd has left #openstack-meeting-alt11:52
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:54
*** sshnaidm has quit IRC12:00
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:02
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:04
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:04
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:05
*** zhurong has quit IRC12:06
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:07
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC12:07
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:07
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:07
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:09
*** lhinds has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:12
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:12
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC12:14
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:14
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:14
*** sshnaidm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:15
*** zhurong has quit IRC12:19
*** Worry has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:19
*** Worry has quit IRC12:20
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:23
*** tremble has quit IRC12:26
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:31
*** sshnaidm has quit IRC12:32
*** florianf has quit IRC12:33
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:33
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK12:33
*** pgadiya has quit IRC12:35
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC12:35
*** baoli has quit IRC12:37
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:39
*** tremble has quit IRC12:39
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:39
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:43
*** erlon-airlong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:47
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:49
*** sshnaidm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:51
*** tremble has quit IRC12:52
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:53
*** fzdarsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:53
*** vijendar has quit IRC12:54
*** tremble has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:55
*** chhavi has quit IRC12:55
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:57
*** karthiks has quit IRC13:00
*** gcb has quit IRC13:01
*** bauwser is now known as bauzas13:01
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC13:06
*** juzuluag has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:08
*** juzuluag has quit IRC13:10
*** zhurong has quit IRC13:11
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:12
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:12
*** dirk has quit IRC13:12
*** dirk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:13
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:15
*** msimonin has quit IRC13:15
*** karthiks has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC13:17
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:19
*** chhavi has quit IRC13:21
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:24
*** zhurong has quit IRC13:26
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:28
*** xgerman has quit IRC13:28
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC13:28
*** xgerman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:29
*** florianf has quit IRC13:32
*** ansmith has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:32
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:32
*** tovin07_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:32
*** figleaf is now known as edleafe13:33
*** prateek has quit IRC13:34
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:36
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:39
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:40
*** baoli has quit IRC13:40
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:41
*** briancurtin has quit IRC13:42
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:42
*** briancurtin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:42
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
*** neilus has quit IRC13:45
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC13:45
*** akiskourtis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:46
*** noslzzp has quit IRC13:46
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:47
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch13:48
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:50
*** karthiks has quit IRC13:51
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
*** neilus has quit IRC13:51
*** Akis_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:52
*** bauzas has quit IRC13:53
*** bauzas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** zhurong has quit IRC13:53
*** akiskourtis has quit IRC13:55
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
edleafe#startmeeting nova_scheduler14:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Dec 12 14:00:02 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is edleafe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova_scheduler)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova_scheduler'14:00
* edleafe yawns14:00
edleafeWho's here?14:00
macsz\o14:00
jaypipeso/14:00
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** amotoki has quit IRC14:01
*** msimonin has quit IRC14:01
cdento/14:01
edleafeMondays are always slow...14:02
alex_xuo/14:02
edleafeWell, maybe we can make this quick14:02
*** sdake has quit IRC14:02
cdentdid I remember to put "let's move the meeting" on the agenda?14:02
bauzas\o14:02
edleafe#topic Reviews14:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Reviews (Meeting topic: nova_scheduler)"14:02
edleafecdent: I did14:02
cdentyou star14:02
edleafeWe have several patches/series in progress14:03
edleafeThey were summed up nicely in cdent's email14:03
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
jaypipes#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398469/14:03
edleafeIs there anything about any of them to discuss?14:03
jaypipeswould be awesome to get eyeballs on the above patch series.14:03
edleafejaypipes: yes, the RT cleanup series14:03
edleafejaypipes: any problems, other than lack of eyeballs?14:04
jaypipesedleafe: the reason that one is important is so we can avoid having lots of scheduler report client objects in memory on nova-compute's that handle Ironic requests.14:04
*** karthiks has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
jaypipesedleafe: no, no problems, just needs reviews.14:05
edleafejaypipes: cool14:05
*** diga has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
jaypipesedleafe: from cores. I believe you and cdent have already reviewed them.14:05
bauzasroger.14:06
edleafe#action edleafe to add the RT cleanup series to the etherpad for "ready for general review"14:06
*** neilus_ has quit IRC14:06
edleafeI'd like to clarify the model for the Ironic inventory14:06
edleafe#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/404472/14:06
*** electrocucaracha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:06
electrocucarachao/14:07
edleafeI had been under the impression that this was a classic use of nested RPs14:07
edleafejaypipes: can you clarify the model?14:07
jaypipesedleafe: sure14:08
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC14:08
jaypipesedleafe: each Ironic baremetal node is itself a separate resource provider.14:08
jaypipesedleafe: each of those resource providers will have a single record for its inventory.14:08
jaypipesedleafe: having a quantity of 1 for a resource class that matches the Ironic node.resource_class attribute (supplied from the Ironic API)14:09
jaypipesedleafe: no nesting.14:09
edleafeok, thanks14:09
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:09
edleafeI remembered you saying that each of those ironic RPs would be a child of a compute RP14:09
edleafeBut alzheimer's a bitch14:10
*** florianf has quit IRC14:10
*** yuanying has quit IRC14:10
jaypipesedleafe: :)14:10
edleafeOK, so anything else to discuss regarding reviews?14:10
cdentjaypipes, edleafe: I guess that means the area with lack of clarity is how any given compute node knows which baremetals it "cares for"?14:11
*** msimonin has quit IRC14:11
jaypipesjust that I rebased and fixed review comments on bauzas' patch for the GET /resource_providers?resources=XXX14:11
jaypipespushed it and needs follow up reviews.14:11
* cdent enqueues14:12
edleafecdent: or whether a compute node cares at all anymore?14:12
jaypipes#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/392569/14:12
jaypipes^^ bauzas patch14:12
bauzasjaypipes: thanks for that14:12
jaypipesnp14:12
cdentedleafe: well presumably if the resource tracker does, then a compute node does?14:12
jaypipescdent: to answer your question, nothing about how that is *currently* handled is changing.14:13
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax14:13
* cdent nods14:13
cdentthat's what I figured, I just wanted to make sure it was aired, as that seemed a gap in the above14:13
jaypipescdent: the compute_nodes table will still be storing the hypervisor_hostname field which is the mechanism used to do that association currently.14:13
*** rarcea has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:14
*** diga has quit IRC14:15
jaypipescdent: eventually it would be great to have that "resource_provider_queue_mapping" table we discussed back in Portland. but that's a ways off.14:15
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC14:15
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:15
edleafewhat I remembered from our discussion was that nested RPs would provide that mapping14:15
cdent14:15
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:15
*** jheroux has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
*** lkoranda has quit IRC14:16
*** ddmitriev has quit IRC14:17
edleafeWell, let's move on14:17
edleafe#topic Opens14:17
*** openstack changes topic to "Opens (Meeting topic: nova_scheduler)"14:17
edleafeTwo items on the agenda14:17
edleafeFirst, should this be the last meeting for 2016?14:17
cdent+114:17
edleafeI.e., skip the 19th?14:18
*** jianghuaw has quit IRC14:18
jaypipesedleafe: no, nested providers relates two resource providers to each other. what we're referring to there is not a relationship between a resource provider and another resource provider but instead a resource provider and the *nova-compute* service worker that handles control plane requests.14:18
bauzasI will probably be on PTO next week (ski season has begun)14:18
bauzasI mean, only on Monday14:19
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:19
jaypipesbauzas: enjoy :)14:19
*** sshnaidm has quit IRC14:19
edleafebauzas: I might be forced to be on PTO, due to company policy of not carrying over time off14:19
edleafestill figuring that out14:19
jaypipesedleafe: I'll be working next Monday. so if we want to do a little quick status update, I'm game.14:19
*** yuanying has quit IRC14:19
bauzasjaypipes: already did :) https://twitter.com/sylvainbauza/status/80677738456522752014:19
jaypipesbauzas: tres bien.14:20
cdenti'll be around on monday too, but don't reckon we need an official meeting14:20
edleafebauzas: sweet14:20
jaypipesedleafe: yeah, go ahead and cancel it for Monday. we can always do an informal catchup if folks are around.14:20
edleafeOK, let's cancel the meeting, and if need be, get a hold of one another in -nova.14:20
edleafeSound good?14:20
cdentaye14:21
*** egallen has quit IRC14:22
edleafe#agreed No meeting on December 1914:22
edleafeOK, next up: Should we move the meeting time?14:22
edleafegiven bauzas school responsibilities, and the sleepiness of those in CST14:23
cdentThis was my suggestion, since it seems like it is inconvenient for bauzas.14:23
cdentjinx14:23
* bauzas shrgus14:23
* cdent writes jinx as a service14:23
* bauzas shrugs even14:23
edleafeyeah, it was hard to find this time where we were all available14:23
*** jianghuaw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:23
*** msimonin has quit IRC14:23
edleafemainly due to a certain someone always being in meetings <cough>jaypipes<cough>14:24
bauzasI mean, don't feel constrainted by me14:24
bauzasconstrained even14:24
edleafeI like 'constrainted' better :)14:24
*** ddmitriev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:24
* bauzas is not on a ski slope but looks like he's still wearing gloves14:24
cdentI think if we're going to bother to have meetings at all then it is best that we have a time when both sylvain and jaypipes can be there with whatever most available attention happens to be.14:25
*** florianf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:25
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away14:25
bauzasthe problem is that my Monday afternoons are always pretty busy14:25
bauzasI have an internal meeting right after that one14:26
bauzaswell, actually depending on the time shift, but even14:26
bauzasbut the point is, I feel a bit ashamed if you feel you would move the meeting just because 2 of us14:26
edleafebauzas: well, we moved the meeting to this time because of 1 of you :)14:27
bauzasI certainly understand how my French prose and my arguments can be missed by you guys14:27
bauzasbut I hopefully think some people are reading us without contributing to the discussion14:27
bauzaseither way14:28
edleafeWell, it seems that it isn't a pressing need at the moment14:28
bauzasif you feel you wanna move, okaty14:28
cdentwell, I guess we just leave it as is for now then, and visit it in the new year14:28
bauzasagreed14:28
edleafeLet's at least keep in mind that we can be flexible in the future if it becomes a problem14:28
bauzasand the problem would be solved by the next timeshift14:28
bauzasI mean, the DST14:28
*** lkoranda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:29
bauzasit's really a 6-month problem because school doesn't work UTC time weirdly14:29
*** nadya has quit IRC14:29
edleafe#agreed No immediate need to move the meeting time. Will revisit if necessary14:29
edleafeThat's all that was on the agenda. Anything else for Opens?14:30
cdentI'd like a pony for christmas14:30
edleafe#agreed cdent to get a pony for christmas14:30
cdent\o/14:30
edleafe...and with that, I think we're done14:31
edleafe#endmeeting14:31
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:31
openstackMeeting ended Mon Dec 12 14:31:13 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:31
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_scheduler/2016/nova_scheduler.2016-12-12-14.00.html14:31
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_scheduler/2016/nova_scheduler.2016-12-12-14.00.txt14:31
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_scheduler/2016/nova_scheduler.2016-12-12-14.00.log.html14:31
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
*** sshnaidm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:32
*** cdent has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:33
*** julim has quit IRC14:34
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:35
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away14:38
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox14:45
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:46
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:46
*** prateek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:47
*** jheroux has quit IRC14:47
*** spzala has quit IRC14:48
*** ewilson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena14:52
*** watanabe_isao has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:56
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:56
*** vijendar has quit IRC14:57
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** baoli has quit IRC14:58
*** korzen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:59
ihrachys#startmeeting neutron_upgrades15:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Dec 12 15:00:37 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ihrachys. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:00
ihrachyso/ everyone15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_upgrades'15:00
electrocucarachahowdy15:00
korzenhello15:00
sshankHi15:00
ihrachys#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-Upgrades-Subteam Agenda15:00
sindhuHi15:00
dasanind_hi15:00
*** StanLagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
ihrachysbtw folks it would be nice if whenever you have a question for the team, you update the agenda page ^ so that we can prepare for potential discussion15:01
ihrachys#topic Announcements15:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:01
*** jheroux has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
ihrachysOcata-2 is happening this week15:01
*** watanabe_isao has quit IRC15:01
ihrachysPTG registration is ongoing15:02
ihrachysnothing else of interest that I know15:02
ihrachys#topic Partial Multinode Grenade15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Partial Multinode Grenade (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:02
ihrachysthere was some progress made I believe15:03
ihrachysthe jschwarz's devstack patch that broke the gate was reverted, but then Armando re-proposed it with the issue fixed15:03
ihrachys#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/I292ff0dc080fb84b5f879ba2f00f03eff295b55b,n,z15:03
ihrachysthat now landed into newton and ocata, so it should be enough to make next steps15:04
korzenany update on how to test zero-downtime in gate?15:04
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:05
ihrachysthat being said, we still see 3 tempest tests failing as in http://logs.openstack.org/59/396659/3/experimental/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-linuxbridge-multinode-ubuntu-xenial-nv/684b940/logs/grenade.sh.txt.gz#_2016-12-09_10_11_59_31415:05
ihrachyskorzen: no, that was on my plate, but then I was (obviously) distracted by some local weekly event. I should get back to it this week.15:05
korzenok15:06
ihrachysjschwarz: do you have capacity to help with debugging those 3 tempest failures in partial grenade linuxbridge job?15:06
*** manjeets has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
jschwarzihrachys, not currently, sorry :<15:06
manjeetso/15:06
ihrachysok. I will need to check if it's some MTU issue again, we had something similar before for ovs job.15:07
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
ihrachysmaybe I should try with I53c0eb57da956b36f09731d25db989719e9bc9dc that reverts an MTU hack inside linuxbridge agent15:08
*** vijendar has quit IRC15:08
ihrachysok, updated the testing patch to include it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396659/ and triggered experimental.15:08
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK15:08
ihrachyswe'll see how it goes15:08
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
*** janki has quit IRC15:08
ihrachyskorzen: since you've asked, do you have capacity to take over that task from me? :)15:09
ihrachysI mean, the no-downtime gating testing investigation15:09
korzenihrachys, I can aks around this week15:09
korzenask*15:10
ihrachysok, if I get to it in time, I will update you, and vice versa.15:10
korzenye15:10
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung_afk15:11
ihrachys#topic Object implementation15:11
*** openstack changes topic to "Object implementation (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:11
ihrachys#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/adopt-oslo-versioned-objects-for-db15:11
ihrachyswe have some patches that I believe are ready to go: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/neutron+branch:master+topic:bp/adopt-oslo-versioned-objects-for-db+label:Code-Review%252B215:11
electrocucarachaihrachys: I made a exhaustive check on the spreadsheet15:11
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
ihrachyselectrocucaracha: link to the sheet?15:12
*** msimonin has quit IRC15:12
electrocucaracha#link https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FeeQlQITsZSj_wpOXiLbS36dirb_arX0XEWBdFVPMB8/edit#gid=143417011215:12
electrocucarachaihrachys: we included a columns for lever of confidence and tentative release target15:13
*** vijendar has quit IRC15:13
*** jprovazn has quit IRC15:13
electrocucarachahopefully, that helps to get an idea of the patches that are almost ready15:13
ihrachysthat's enormous tracking effort I admit, thanks for doing that15:13
electrocucarachaany time15:14
*** pkholkin has quit IRC15:15
korzenhmm we are now at ocata-215:15
*** pkholkin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
korzenand the progress is not so advanced15:15
korzenwhen is ocata-3?15:15
*** ganso has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
ihrachysend of Jan15:16
ihrachyshttps://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html#o-315:16
ihrachysso we have roughly a month15:16
korzenwell, until some resource is not changed, the OVO does not impact zero-downtime15:17
*** saisrikiran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
ihrachysyeah, the only thing we absolutely must deliver is port binding since it's needed for live migration rework15:17
korzenso the priority should have the port binding15:17
ihrachysI see it's sched to Pike in the doc. electrocucaracha, any reason for that?15:17
korzen#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407868/15:18
electrocucarachanot really, It's because I haven't seen progress on that15:18
electrocucarachabut it's just my limited perception15:18
*** ccamacho has quit IRC15:18
ihrachysI see. we may actually need to bump it in priority.15:19
korzen#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/404293/ Port Binding extension with PK and 'status' field15:19
korzenso the links are very important15:20
ihrachyskorzen: thanks for sharing the latter, I was not aware15:20
korzennp15:20
korzenreturning to zero-downtime testing, is some working on setting it up for manual tests?15:21
korzenit would be nice to see how the port binding is influencing the zero-downtime15:22
*** hongbin has quit IRC15:22
korzenbefore we have gate15:22
*** rarcea has quit IRC15:22
korzenI guess that no...15:23
korzen:(15:23
ihrachysI guess so15:23
ihrachysdo I hear someone volunteering? :)15:24
*** bnemec has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
korzenihrachys, if you mean me, then not this month :P15:25
manjeetswhen you said port binding is influencing 0 downtime ? which way can you explain bit more15:25
manjeetskorzen,15:25
ihrachyshaha. gotcha. I would start with checking with infra on setting the gate; and if we are not close to it, then consider falling back to manual.15:25
manjeetsyou mean with or without ovo ?15:25
ihrachysmanjeets: there are changes in the pipeline to modify port binding resource15:26
ihrachysadding a new status field, and expanding primary key15:26
korzenmanjeets, the OVO is a requirement15:26
ihrachyswe will need OVO object for it in and integrated to make it work flawlessly15:26
manjeetsok got it15:26
manjeetsthanks15:26
*** margaret has quit IRC15:27
*** margaret has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC15:27
korzenfrom other news, I have restored my subnet integration patch and need to check how to overcome the db_obj detached15:28
electrocucarachathat is for improving live migration effort right?15:28
ihrachyskorzen: I see you talked to ataraday in another channel on the matter. any brief conclusions?15:28
ihrachyselectrocucaracha: yes, port binding work is for live migration15:28
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
korzenso the db_obj needs to be added to working session before any extension is going to use the extra relationships defined in DB15:29
korzenthis is also problematic when transition to new enginefacade15:29
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
ihrachyskorzen: meaning that we will need to have the db_obj not detached?15:30
korzenthe solution I'm thinking is to create new session and add db_obj to it before calling _apply_dict_extend_functions15:30
korzenfor starter, it seems like a workaround15:31
*** arxcruz has quit IRC15:31
*** arxcruz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
korzenI'm not sure if we can drop the detaching15:31
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz15:31
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC15:31
ihrachysyeah, there were some issues with it I believe. like session caching values between fetches, or something.15:32
*** Leo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:32
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax15:32
korzenyes, so for started I would not go into removing the detaching15:32
ihrachysack. ok, let's see what you will craft. :)15:32
korzenunless ataray or kevinbenton would make something smarter15:32
ihrachysI assume as long as it's good with Anna, it's good with me :)15:33
* ihrachys loves to be lazy15:33
korzen:)15:33
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
sshankihrachys, Any leads on the segment_id issue in port binding level patch? Should we add it to pass tests?15:33
ihrachyssshank: yeah, I need to look at that, haven't done it yet. I will do it asap. I hope we will be able to overcome it without duplicating the field, but I need to play with it.15:34
ihrachysbtw on related news, I will join the late neutron meeting today to update the broader team about our progress and will raise some patches that should be ready to go there.15:35
ihrachyshopefully it will help get them in the queue :)15:35
ihrachysok let's move on to the next topic which is ...15:35
ihrachys#topic Other patches on review15:35
*** openstack changes topic to "Other patches on review (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:35
korzenihrachys, I have updated a little last week15:35
korzenon tuesday's meeting15:36
ihrachyskorzen: thanks!15:36
electrocucarachawell, I'm a little lost about some comments for Router OVO15:36
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC15:37
ihrachysthere is a policy proposal that expands the list of cases where UpgradeImpact tag is to be used: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/402004/15:37
ihrachyselectrocucaracha: the latest PS or PS30?15:37
*** dprince has quit IRC15:38
electrocucarachaihrachys: I don't remember the PS but it was your comment about how to address attached_ports15:38
electrocucarachahttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/307964/34/neutron/objects/router.py@13915:38
manjeetsI am having a issue in implementing port_ovo https://github.com/openstack/neutron/blob/master/neutron/db/securitygroups_db.py#L64515:39
electrocucarachaPS3015:40
manjeetsI changed port_db.security_groups to port_db.security_group_ids which is a coerced set of ids15:40
manjeetslist() or set() seems like not working on that15:41
ihrachyselectrocucaracha: I think korzen had a comment there that may have helped you?15:41
ihrachysin PS3015:41
ihrachys"You were missing router_id=self.id in reload_attached_ports() ..."15:41
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** lpetrut has quit IRC15:42
electrocucarachammm ok maybe I didn't see it, sorry korzen15:42
ihrachysmanjeets: can't you extract the IDs from security-group objects?15:42
korzenelectrocucaracha, np, I also forget what I have reviewed15:42
ihrachyskorzen: :) true story15:43
manjeetsI guess I can i'll try ihrachys15:44
*** StanLagun has quit IRC15:44
ihrachysin related news, no-downtime spec/write-up seems to be ready to land: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386685/15:44
ihrachyswe have +2 from armax, and more +1s15:45
*** iphutch has quit IRC15:45
*** iphutch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
*** ozamiatin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
manjeetsyes ihrachys do we have patch up for forbiding contract migrations in code as well ?15:46
ihrachysok seems rather calm, let's move on15:46
ihrachysmanjeets: we have a functional test15:46
ihrachysmanjeets: is it not enough?15:46
manjeetsit is enough15:46
ihrachysyeah, so it was landed some time ago15:46
manjeetsi would be I belive15:46
ihrachyshttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/400239/15:47
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
ihrachysthat's the contract forbidding patch15:47
manjeetsthanks15:47
ihrachysok15:47
ihrachys#topic Open discussion15:47
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:47
korzenhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/400412/ one word about that patch15:47
ihrachyswe have nothing on the wiki page in the section15:47
ihrachysI suggest to fill it in for next times, so that we know that there is a topic to discuss15:48
ihrachyskorzen: looking15:48
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
korzenwhen someone will try to create object passing stardard_attr_id, the object creating will fail15:48
korzenthis was why UTs in QoS were failing15:48
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:48
ihrachyswhich makes sense since the object does not have such field15:49
ihrachyscorrect?15:49
korzentrue15:49
electrocucarachafyi: ndahiwade has reported a bug in oslo.versioned-objects  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408739/15:49
korzenis it allowed to implicitly set the standard_attr-id?15:50
korzenit is rather created while object creation15:50
ihrachyskorzen: right. I wouldn't think it's to support.15:50
*** harlowja_at_home has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:52
ihrachyselectrocucaracha: looking15:52
ndahiwadehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/370452/ This is the patch where the problem was encountered.15:52
*** neilus has quit IRC15:52
ndahiwadehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/370452/32/neutron/objects/common_types.py, Temporary solution for neutron until it is accepted in Oslo15:53
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:53
*** prateek has quit IRC15:54
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
ihrachysnot sure I follow. why should oslo.versionedobjects dict-of-strings type access non-strings for values?15:54
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
*** armax has quit IRC15:54
electrocucarachaapparently the configurations field is not accepting dict as valid type15:55
ihrachysseems like instead we may need to define a new type that would allow any values15:55
ndahiwadehttp://paste.openstack.org/show/592124/15:55
ihrachyselectrocucaracha: it's not configurations field issue, but the fact that in your dict, one of key values is not a string but another dict15:55
ihrachysthat's bridge_mappings15:55
ihrachysso you have two levels of dicts15:55
ihrachyswhile the type from the library is for a single layer dict15:56
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
ndahiwadehttp://paste.openstack.org/show/591831/15:56
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
ndahiwadeihrachys^^ this is the error for list type not accepted15:56
* electrocucaracha doesn't want to be the bad of the movie, but we have less than 3 minutes15:57
*** dasanind_ has quit IRC15:57
*** dasanind_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
ihrachysndahiwade: right, that's because your tunnel_types key has a list value while type allows for strings only15:57
ihrachyswe need to define new less-strict type I believe15:58
ihrachysso I probably agree with the direction for the neutron patch but I don't believe it's oslo issue.15:58
ihrachysmaybe we just use wrong type15:58
manjeets115:59
ndahiwadeihrachys: Okay,thanks15:59
ihrachysmanjeets: plus or minus? :)15:59
manjeets1 minute left ....lol15:59
ihrachysok :)15:59
ihrachysthanks guys!15:59
ihrachys#endmeeting15:59
korzenthanks15:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:59
openstackMeeting ended Mon Dec 12 15:59:48 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_upgrades/2016/neutron_upgrades.2016-12-12-15.00.html15:59
manjeetsthanks15:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_upgrades/2016/neutron_upgrades.2016-12-12-15.00.txt15:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_upgrades/2016/neutron_upgrades.2016-12-12-15.00.log.html15:59
ndahiwadethanks:)15:59
harlowja_at_home#startmeeting oslo16:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Dec 12 16:00:09 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is harlowja_at_home. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'oslo'16:00
*** rloo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
harlowja_at_homecourtesy ping for amotoki, amrith, bknudson, bnemec, dansmith, dhellmann, dims16:00
harlowja_at_homecourtesy ping for dougwig, e0ne, electrocucaracha, flaper87, garyk, gcb, GheRivero16:00
harlowja_at_homecourtesy ping for haypo, jd__, jecarey, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti, kragniz16:00
harlowja_at_homecourtesy ping for lifeless, lxsli, Nakato, ozamiatin, rbradfor, redrobot, rloo16:00
harlowja_at_homecourtesy ping for rpodolyaka, sergmelikyan, sileht, spamaps, sreshetnyak, sreshetnyak, stevemar16:00
harlowja_at_homecourtesy ping for therve, thinrichs, toabctl, viktors, zhiyan, zzzeek16:00
rpodolyakao/16:00
electrocucarachahowdy16:00
johnsomo/16:00
harlowja_at_homehi there :)16:00
kgiustio/16:00
gcbo/16:00
tovin07_o/16:00
rlooo/16:00
ozamiatin_o/16:00
bknudsonhi16:00
harlowja_at_homehi hi16:01
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK16:01
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
harlowja_at_homelet's get this show on the road :-P16:01
harlowja_at_home#topic Red flags for/from liaisons16:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Red flags for/from liaisons (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:01
bknudsonNothing for keystone that I know of.16:02
harlowja_at_homesweet16:02
gcbnothing from Nova,  and Glance seems don't claim support python 3,  its py27 period task works well16:02
johnsomNothing from Octavia16:02
toabctlhi16:02
rlooironic sees green for the upcoming holidays16:02
harlowja_at_homelol16:02
*** tremble has quit IRC16:02
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
johnsomYeah, our biggest issue right now is the diskimage-builder breakages, so oslo is off the hook16:03
harlowja_at_homecool cool, only thing that i see going on is http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/g/build_name/periodic-cinder-py27-with-oslo-master which I am thinking is due to a tooz change that got merged recently16:03
* harlowja_at_home is poking jd to see if he knows anything about that 16:03
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:04
*** vijendar has quit IRC16:04
amrith./16:04
amrithsorry I'm late; no red flags from trove.16:05
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:05
harlowja_at_homeamrith, cool thanks :)16:05
harlowja_at_home#topic Releases for ocata16:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Releases for ocata (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:05
harlowja_at_homeanyone need a specific library release? :)16:06
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
*** iberezovskiy is now known as iberezovskiy|off16:06
harlowja_at_home(tooz i'm going to have to look into before that goes out)16:06
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
*** neilus has quit IRC16:07
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC16:07
harlowja_at_homeok, assuming I will just release all of them then (once I figure out tooz fix)16:08
harlowja_at_home#link https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/schedule.html16:08
*** dasanind has quit IRC16:08
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC16:08
harlowja_at_homejust a reminder for releases 'Jan 16-20 Final release for non-client libraries'16:08
*** dasanind_ is now known as dasanind16:08
harlowja_at_homethat may only be a couple more releases (due to people, including me being out)16:09
harlowja_at_home#topic The holidays16:09
*** openstack changes topic to "The holidays (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:09
harlowja_at_homewhich dove tails nicely into the next topic :)16:10
*** singlethink has quit IRC16:10
harlowja_at_homei am thinking that we cancel the next 2 meetings, i at least will be out and my guess is most people will be also :)16:10
harlowja_at_homesound ok to folks?16:11
tovin07_you guys away from irc too?16:11
electrocucarachaif not they should be out hehehe16:11
johnsomSounds good to me16:11
kgiusti+116:11
harlowja_at_hometovin07, probably :)16:11
electrocucaracha+116:11
rloo++16:11
harlowja_at_homei'll be in missouri then in upstate NY; so may or may not have internet at the right times, ha16:12
tovin07_harlowja_at_home, +116:12
ozamiatin_harlowja_at_home +116:12
*** egallen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
harlowja_at_homeokie dokie, cool16:12
gcb+116:12
harlowja_at_homemight actually be the next 3 meetings but let's wait and see on that16:13
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:13
harlowja_at_homecause the last meeting is jan 216:13
harlowja_at_homebut let's wait and see about that one :)16:14
*** singlethink has quit IRC16:14
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:15
harlowja_at_home#topic Reviews needing review16:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Reviews needing review (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:15
harlowja_at_homeany reviews people want to bring up :)16:15
harlowja_at_homebring your review, any review, ha16:15
*** mariannelm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** saneax-_-|AFK is now known as saneax16:16
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC16:16
*** dimtruck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
gcbhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/390875/16:17
harlowja_at_homeok, nobody has any reviews, ha16:17
harlowja_at_homeah, phew16:17
harlowja_at_homelol16:17
*** ccamacho has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
*** vijendar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:18
gcbI want to discuss if we can accept that code ?  I'm concern about involving more dependencies16:18
*** vijendar has quit IRC16:18
harlowja_at_homeright right16:19
harlowja_at_homehttps://github.com/openstack/oslo.utils/blob/master/oslo_utils/netutils.py#L101-L113 seems pretty dinky16:20
harlowja_at_homeso ya, i agree, not sure that all of oslo.utils is needed for 2 lines :-P16:20
*** hongbin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
* harlowja_at_home will add a comment to the review now that I understand better, thanks gcb :)16:21
*** vijendar_ has quit IRC16:21
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
gcbyeah, thanks harlowja_at_home16:21
* rloo doesn't know what gcb & harlowja_at_home are talking about but has faith they know what they are talking about16:21
*** vijendar has quit IRC16:21
harlowja_at_home:-P16:22
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:22
tovin07_lol16:22
gcbrloo, just about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/390875/ how to trade off :-)16:22
* johnsom Adds a note to switch our method and move over the is ipv6_lla method.16:23
harlowja_at_homeeck16:23
rloogcb: ah, thx for the link16:23
harlowja_at_homejohnsom need more things up in netaddr, not in oslo.utils, ha16:24
johnsomYeah, well this is just a wrapper on a few netaddr calls16:24
*** dtrainor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:24
johnsomProbably a good point16:24
harlowja_at_homemust not turn oslo.utils into oslo-incubator v2, lol16:25
gcblol16:25
*** Alex_Stef has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:25
bknudsonpretty much everything depends on oslo.utils.16:26
*** sajeesh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:26
bknudsonits oslo.utils that should have fewer dependencies.16:26
*** vijendar has quit IRC16:26
harlowja_at_homeagreed, we need to figure out how to do that eventually :)16:27
harlowja_at_home#topic Open discussion16:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:27
harlowja_at_homesounds like a good topic for next PTG or summit (or both, ha)16:27
*** pradk- has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:28
*** pradk- has quit IRC16:28
*** StanLagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
*** pradk- has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
harlowja_at_homeanything else anyone wants to bring up for this week?? :)16:29
*** pradk- has quit IRC16:29
*** pradk- has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
*** pradk- has quit IRC16:30
*** pradk has quit IRC16:31
gcbnothing  now , boss :-)16:31
electrocucarachaharlowja_at_home: I saw some progress on the python-kafka change, it's something that we have to be aware16:31
harlowja_at_homeelectrocucaracha, agreed16:32
*** pradk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
*** timsim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
*** nkrinner is now known as nkrinner_afk16:32
* electrocucaracha shouldn't be kafka-python?16:32
harlowja_at_homeseems like sileht has been busy with https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/oslo.messaging+branch:master+topic:sileht/kafka-fix16:33
harlowja_at_homethe monsaca changes or analysis though hasn't happened yet right?16:34
harlowja_at_home(performance analysis)16:34
*** andreas_s has quit IRC16:34
* kgiusti needs to goto school - pickup sick daughter 2.0. ttyl....16:35
harlowja_at_home:)16:35
harlowja_at_homegood luck16:35
kgiustity16:35
*** kgiusti has quit IRC16:35
harlowja_at_homei'll poke the email thread around kafka and oslo.messaging electrocucaracha ; there was some discussion from what i remember still going on about the versions16:35
electrocucarachathanks harlowja_at_home16:37
harlowja_at_homenp16:37
silehtharlowja_at_home, it seems to work, but I can't get functional tests pass16:37
silehtharlowja_at_home, something due to the way kafka process messages (async/batch)16:38
silehtIf I put sleep(100) before the listener startup and notification sent they passed :p16:39
harlowja_at_homeinteresting :)16:39
sileht(I means between the listener startup and notification sent)16:39
harlowja_at_homeright16:39
harlowja_at_homei wonder why16:39
silehtI'm guissing to many times to elect a leader16:40
silehtbut I don't see this lag when I use the simulator16:40
silehtharlowja_at_home, also gordc is working of fixing kombu 4 breakage16:41
harlowja_at_homeya, kombu 4 seemed to bust alot of things, ha16:41
harlowja_at_homethanks sileht (i'll see if i can get a coworker to look into the kafka reviews as well, maybe he can help out a little bit)16:41
silehtcool :)16:42
harlowja_at_homethanks btw for helping get that fixed up16:42
harlowja_at_homealright anything else anyone wants to bring up?16:44
silehtI wonder how to update the requirement for kombu416:44
silehtoslo.messaging now uses constraints16:44
harlowja_at_homehmmm16:44
silehtchanging the req to >4.0 will force to change upper-constraints16:44
silehtchaning upper-constraints means break everything ....16:45
harlowja_at_homelol16:45
harlowja_at_homeya16:45
*** egallen has quit IRC16:45
silehtwe can't change only oslo.messaging since we gate on upper-constraints16:45
silehtENOENDLOOP16:45
harlowja_at_homeya, i wonder if dhellmann has any brilliant ideas here :)16:45
harlowja_at_homeseems like https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt#L86 just blocks kombu416:46
silehtyeah but the API change a bit16:46
silehtAnd I don't talk about project than usess directly kombu<416:46
harlowja_at_homeya, seems like we'll have to approach this one carefully16:48
harlowja_at_homeperhaps when https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409294/ is ready we can start a ML thread asking about how to merge that and how to lift the version16:48
harlowja_at_homeand who that might affect16:49
* harlowja_at_home isn't sure who is using kombu directly vs using it through oslo.messaging anymore16:49
harlowja_at_homei know there are a few16:49
*** gcb has quit IRC16:49
harlowja_at_homesileht, i'll see if i can find doug a little bit later, and perhaps get a strategy for this16:50
silehtyep16:51
silehtthat's all I have16:51
*** msimonin has quit IRC16:51
harlowja_at_homecool16:51
harlowja_at_homealright folks, guess we will see everyone back in here in a few weeks :)16:52
harlowja_at_homehave a great holiday(s), vacation, whatever else u are doing :-P16:52
tovin07_+116:53
electrocucarachathanks you too16:54
harlowja_at_home:)16:54
*** weshay is now known as weshay_brb16:54
harlowja_at_homealright, off into #openstack-oslo if anyone needs me (or others)16:54
harlowja_at_homethanks folks for showing up :)16:54
harlowja_at_home#endmeeting16:54
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:54
openstackMeeting ended Mon Dec 12 16:54:51 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:54
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2016/oslo.2016-12-12-16.00.html16:54
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2016/oslo.2016-12-12-16.00.txt16:54
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2016/oslo.2016-12-12-16.00.log.html16:54
*** rloo has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
harlowja_at_homebbiab (heading into work)16:55
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:55
*** harlowja_at_home has quit IRC16:55
*** tovin07_ has quit IRC16:57
*** vijendar has quit IRC16:59
*** annegentle has quit IRC17:00
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
*** saneax is now known as saneax-_-|AFK17:06
*** ircuser-1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:08
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:09
*** ozamiatin_ has quit IRC17:10
*** matrohon has quit IRC17:11
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:15
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC17:16
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:17
*** panda is now known as panda|afk17:18
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:23
*** knangia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC17:26
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC17:29
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC17:29
*** bfernando has quit IRC17:31
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC17:36
*** saisrikiran has quit IRC17:36
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
*** neilus has quit IRC17:39
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
*** weshay_brb is now known as weshay17:43
*** piet has quit IRC17:45
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
*** gouthamr has quit IRC17:50
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC17:52
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
*** gouthamr has quit IRC17:52
*** stanchan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** nadya has quit IRC17:56
*** julen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:59
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack17:59
*** korzen has quit IRC18:00
*** piet has quit IRC18:01
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** derekh is now known as derekh_afk18:02
*** ralonsoh has quit IRC18:04
*** ozamiatin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
*** jpena is now known as jpena|away18:09
*** matrohon has quit IRC18:09
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC18:10
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:11
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:14
*** fzdarsky is now known as fzdarsky|afk18:17
*** ihrachys has quit IRC18:18
*** neilus has quit IRC18:18
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
*** derekh_afk is now known as derekh18:22
*** yamahata has quit IRC18:23
*** iyamahat has quit IRC18:23
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC18:28
*** beslemon has quit IRC18:28
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
*** reedip has quit IRC18:32
*** yatin_on_leave has quit IRC18:32
*** ayoung_afk is now known as ayoung18:32
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:35
*** kgiusti has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:35
*** dprince has quit IRC18:36
*** reedip has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** yatin_on_leave has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:45
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:47
*** yatin_on_leave has quit IRC18:50
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
*** neilus has quit IRC18:51
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:51
*** pnavarro has quit IRC18:52
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
*** Rockyg has quit IRC18:54
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
*** derekh is now known as derekh_afk18:56
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
*** julen has quit IRC18:59
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
*** lpetrut has quit IRC19:00
*** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:01
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC19:02
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC19:03
*** tonanhngo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
*** matrohon has quit IRC19:03
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
*** yatin_on_leave has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
*** tonanhngo has quit IRC19:06
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** jprovazn has quit IRC19:13
*** tonytan_brb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:19
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC19:19
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:20
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:22
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:24
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:26
*** yuanying has quit IRC19:27
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC19:28
*** florianf has quit IRC19:31
*** dsariel has quit IRC19:31
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
*** Alex_Stef has quit IRC19:41
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC19:45
*** jamielennox is now known as jamielennox|away19:46
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:46
*** beslemon has quit IRC19:47
*** shashank_hegde has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:50
*** kevo has quit IRC19:51
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:52
*** jamielennox|away is now known as jamielennox19:53
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:54
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:55
*** tonytan_brb has quit IRC19:58
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
*** kevo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:58
redrobot#startmeeting barbican20:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Dec 12 20:00:21 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'barbican'20:00
redrobot#topic Roll Call20:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:00
redroboto/20:00
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
* redrobot waves at woodster_20:01
woodster_hello!20:01
woodster_o/20:01
redrobotmaybe a short meeting if it's just me and woodster_20:02
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck20:03
woodster_oh wow, not a lot of Barbicaneers today20:03
redrobothehe yeah20:03
woodster_I figured I missed everyone else's o/ or \o20:03
woodster_are you still doing barbican work then?20:03
woodster_full time that is20:03
*** kfarr has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
kfarro/20:04
redrobotkfarr \o/20:04
woodster_afternoon kfarr20:04
redrobotas usual the agenda can be found here:20:04
redrobot#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Barbican#Agenda20:04
*** arunkant has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:04
redrobotokay, let's get started20:04
redrobot#topic Ocata Work Items20:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Ocata Work Items (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:05
redrobot#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-tracker-ocata20:05
redrobotlooks like we have an etherpad for tracking the ocata work20:05
* redrobot bookmarks the etherpad20:05
redrobotmilestone 2 is coming up this week20:06
redrobotis there something pending that needs to be reviewed/landed before m2?20:06
*** mtanin___ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:07
kfarrfor barbican or python-barbicanclient or both?20:07
redrobotkfarr just barbican20:08
kfarrok, then no :)20:08
redrobotcool deal20:08
*** mtanino has quit IRC20:09
redrobot#info dmccowan will release m2 Tuesday Dec 1320:09
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC20:09
redrobot#topic Rescheduling the weekly IRC meeting20:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Rescheduling the weekly IRC meeting (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:09
redrobotWe have an etherpad poll to find a new time slot that is more convenient for contributors outside the US20:10
redrobot#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-irc-meeting-time20:10
*** saisrikiran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:10
redrobotplease take some time to fill out so we can find a time slot that works for more folks20:11
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:11
redrobotnew time will be used starting in 201720:12
redrobotI'm sure dmccowan will send out an email to the dev list once we pick the new slot20:12
jmckindo/20:13
redrobotany questions/comments about picking a new meeting time for next year?20:13
* redrobot waves at jmckind 20:13
redrobotok moving on20:13
redrobot#topic Project Team Gathering (PTG)20:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Project Team Gathering (PTG) (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:14
redrobotPlease RSVP if you'll be able to make it20:14
redrobotwe have an etherpad to track who's going and what topics we should talk about20:14
redrobot#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ptg-barbican-pike20:14
*** ianychoi has quit IRC20:15
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC20:15
redrobotI've got my fingers crossed I'll get to go.20:15
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
*** ijw has quit IRC20:15
*** nadya has quit IRC20:16
redrobotok, moving on20:16
redrobot#topic Tempest Testing20:16
*** openstack changes topic to "Tempest Testing (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:16
redrobotI haven't been following this super closely20:17
redrobotlet's see20:17
redrobotwe have a new repo for tempest tests20:17
redrobot#link http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin/20:17
*** mariannelm has quit IRC20:17
redrobotwe also have an etherpad to track the work being done20:17
redrobot#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican_tempest_plugin20:17
*** msimonin has quit IRC20:18
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:18
*** mariannelm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:18
redrobotI think the goal for this plugin repo is to be able to test barbican integration with other projects20:18
redrobotlike nova, cinder, swift, etc.20:18
redrobotright?20:18
kfarrredrobot, yup!20:19
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
redrobotkfarr awesome!  definitely a good thing to have20:19
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:20
redrobotnot sure if I'm supposed to talk about anything specific about this20:21
redrobotso let's move on!20:21
redrobot#topic Adding ID field to all entities20:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Adding ID field to all entities (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:21
redrobotwe talked about this at the last summit20:21
redrobotbasically we're weird for using URIs instead of UUIDs20:22
redrobotlooks like mkoderer agrees with us and wants to help with adding UUIDs to API responses20:22
*** saisrikiran has quit IRC20:22
redrobotone of my goals was to get this to happen for Ocata20:22
redrobotbecause it would help fix an annoying bug in python-openstacksdk20:23
*** ankur-gupta-f1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:24
woodster_so no more HATEAOS urls?20:24
woodster_doesn't require v2 bump?20:25
*** beslemon has quit IRC20:25
redrobotwoodster_ I think that the idea is to keep the HATEOAS links, but also add a new field that has only the UUID20:25
woodster_ah got it, makes sense20:26
redrobotIt should fall under "acceptable when conditionally added as a new API extension" thus no version bump20:26
*** derekh_afk is now known as derekh20:26
redrobot#link https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/evaluating_api_changes.html#guidance20:26
redrobotI'll try to catch mkoderer on the barbican channel at some point to coordinate20:28
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:29
redrobotok, moving on20:30
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:30
redrobot#topic Code review requests20:30
*** openstack changes topic to "Code review requests (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:30
redrobotlink away, friends!20:30
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:30
*** ijw has quit IRC20:32
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck20:32
*** vijendar has quit IRC20:33
redrobotone at a time, please! not all at once! ;)20:33
redrobotThe new repo looks like it has a couple of pending patches:20:33
redrobot#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/barbican-tempest-plugin20:33
redrobotdon't forget to add it to your favorite repos on gerrit20:34
*** lbeliveau has quit IRC20:34
woodster_no big feature CRs lurking out there?20:34
*** dtardivel has quit IRC20:34
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:34
kfarrI have one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/400370/20:34
kfarrnot sure why my test is failing though20:34
redrobotkfarr added to my review queue20:38
redrobotalrighty y'all20:38
redrobotany last minute topics before we call it a day?20:38
*** s3wong has quit IRC20:39
*** electrocucaracha has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:40
*** spzala has quit IRC20:40
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:40
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:41
*** beslemon has quit IRC20:42
*** mtanin___ has quit IRC20:42
*** lbeliveau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:43
redrobotcool deal, thanks for coming everyone!20:43
redrobot#endmeeting20:43
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:43
openstackMeeting ended Mon Dec 12 20:43:21 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:43
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2016/barbican.2016-12-12-20.00.html20:43
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2016/barbican.2016-12-12-20.00.txt20:43
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2016/barbican.2016-12-12-20.00.log.html20:43
*** spzala_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:43
*** spzala has quit IRC20:45
*** dsariel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** spzala_ has quit IRC20:48
*** gouthamr has quit IRC20:48
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
*** arunkant has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:49
*** ijw_ has quit IRC20:49
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:50
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:52
*** CarolBarrett has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:54
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:56
*** mtanin___ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** mtanino has quit IRC20:59
*** leong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:00
CarolBarrett#startmeeting product_working_group21:01
openstackMeeting started Mon Dec 12 21:01:22 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is CarolBarrett. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: product_working_group)"21:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'product_working_group'21:01
CarolBarrettHi Folks - Who's here for the Product WG Meeting?21:01
pieto/21:01
MeganRo/21:01
leongo/21:01
*** Arkady_Kanevsky has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:02
*** shamail has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:02
CarolBarrett#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/product-team21:02
shamailhi everyone21:02
CarolBarrettHere's where you can find the agenda for today21:02
kencjohnstono/21:03
CarolBarrettHi Shamail21:03
iphutcho/21:03
*** dprince has quit IRC21:03
CarolBarrettLet's get going21:03
Arkady_Kanevskyhello21:04
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:04
CarolBarrett#topic US Project Update & DIscussion21:04
*** openstack changes topic to "US Project Update & DIscussion (Meeting topic: product_working_group)"21:04
CarolBarrettPiet: Can you start this one?21:04
leongu mean UX...21:04
pietSure21:04
pietWhere to start...21:04
pietSo, Friday will be my last day with Intel21:04
pietWe should probably talk about the future of the UX within OpenStack21:04
*** GeraldK has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:05
pietI doubt that someone will pick-up the project21:05
GeraldKhi21:05
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
pietCarol and I did have a conversation with the foundation about having a UXer join the foundation staff, but skeptical21:06
GeraldKsorry to hear that.21:06
CarolBarrettIf there is an interest in continuing this Project in the Community, a new PTL will be needed....21:06
shamailPiet: What are the activities being led by UX currently?21:07
pietAny thoughts? There will not be anyone conducting formal user studies on behalf of the community21:07
leongand who are the active UX contributors?21:07
pietshamail we just completed a study with operators to discuss deployment21:08
pietleong About a month ago It was Danielle and I21:08
pietleong Now it's just me21:08
shamailThanks piet, so nothing is in the pipeline?  I was hoping we could have some activities to list that will no longer happen.21:09
pietWe're also doing work for the docs team on a page redesign21:09
*** beslemon has quit IRC21:09
pietI can check21:09
GeraldKthere is a long list of UX cores. no one active anymore?21:09
shamailThanks, I think we should compile that list and then send an email to the openstack mailing lists to gauge overall interest/support and build a plan from there21:10
pietNaw..we transitioned to research activities, so needed more specialization21:10
shamailNot doing any work for Horizon anymore?21:10
*** jamielennox has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
pietOur burn rate was about one study per month.  And there werre also activities around personas and patterns libraries21:11
iphutchWhat other means/groups do we have reaching out to receive feedback from users?21:11
*** cknight has quit IRC21:11
*** leong_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
leong_sorry.. got kicked out by my vpn just now21:11
*** AndyU_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
pietiphutch user committee, but the data is a bit different.  OpenStack UX tended to do deep dives on specific tops such as deplpyment21:12
pietQuotas was another are of focus.21:12
Arkady_Kanevskycan foundation help with surveys?21:12
*** leong has quit IRC21:12
*** ansmith has quit IRC21:12
pietPotentially, but they're kind of strapped for time21:13
shamailPersonas, Quotas, User Journey, OSClient Usability, etc. are some of the contributions I can recall over the last year.21:13
Arkady_KanevskyI am thinking about heidi?21:13
*** leong_ is now known as leong21:13
pietWe were also asked to create a research framework for the hackathons so they could collect data on the efficacy of the training21:13
shamailArkady_Kanevsky: Different scope, they could but the current foundation-led surveys focus on the aggregate community whereas UX would hold research studies with specific target audiences on more detailed topics (such as how do orgs use quotas, what is the common deployment model and associated challenges, etc.)21:14
mrhillsmani found benefit in the recent operator survey conducted by ux team21:14
CarolBarrettI like Shamail's suggestion to create a list of activities - both completed in 2016 and underway or anticipated21:14
iphutcha list of areas for deep dives21:15
pietArkady_Kanevsky Heidi could do they work, but she's a bit overwhelmed21:15
*** jpena|away is now known as jpena|off21:15
Arkady_Kanevskythanks for clarity21:15
shamailI think that would help showcase the value provided by the UX team as well as what will be missed if it doesn’t move forward into 201721:15
mrhillsmanand can see a space for ux team assisting in gathering same type of feedback from or helping to frame gathering feedback from operators of the many working groups21:15
pietThere is value in both operator and application developer studies because the current user survey is very general21:15
mrhillsmanin light of the way it has been discussed an increase in app/end-user/operator feedback for openstack at large21:16
CarolBarrettPiet: Will you take the AR to create a summary of the 2016 project deliverables, current projects and plans?21:16
pietmrhillsman I think there are a ton of things that UX could drive within the foundation, but I think they maybe concerned that more projects will ask to be added to the staff21:17
iphutchThere is absolutely value added with this type of research, it should be showcased21:17
pietCarolBarrett Sure21:17
leong+1 to shamail and carolbarrett comments about UX past deliverables and future plans21:17
CarolBarrettThanks21:17
CarolBarrett#action Piet create a summary of the 2016 project deliverables, current projects and plans21:18
pietiphutch I've kind of felt that we really don't have deep information for our users21:18
CarolBarrettPiet: Do you want to get feedback from this group 1st or just send the Summary on the Dev and UC mailists?21:18
pietCarolBarrett I'll send to you first21:19
pietOr, rather, PWG21:19
CarolBarrett#action Piet to send Summary to PWG Mail list, to gather feedback then to Dev and UC mail lists21:19
CarolBarrettThanks Piet.21:19
pietNote that I only have so much time left21:20
CarolBarrettOther ideas on actions that should be taken?21:20
pietcarol User Stories?21:20
*** sdake has quit IRC21:20
CarolBarrettPiet: Have you thought about asking for time on Tomorrow's TC meeting to discuss?21:20
pietYeah, I would really like ideas on how to keep UX around21:20
RockygSORRY i'M LATE21:21
Rockygsoory for capslock21:21
pietCarolBarrett Sure, as long as it doesn't overlap with my interview with AWS (just kidding...)21:21
*** derekh is now known as derekh_afk21:21
CarolBarrettPiet: LOL21:21
pietSorry...Azure21:21
*** mrhillsman has quit IRC21:22
pietCarolBarrett User Stories?21:22
CarolBarrettPiet: If you're interested in that, suggest you reach out to Thierry ASAP - he has published the agenda for tomorrow.21:22
CarolBarrettYes, let's move on to User stories21:22
pietCarolBarrett Kk21:22
pietI've added four user stories thanks to the repo21:23
pietNeed some feedback21:23
*** manjeets has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:23
pietAlso, wanting to add a few more, but wanted feedback from the team21:23
pietTo avoid overlap21:23
CarolBarrettPiet: Can you post the review links here?21:24
pietSure21:24
piethttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/409878/21:24
*** AndyU_ is now known as AndyU21:24
piethttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/407735/21:24
piethttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/409873/21:25
CarolBarrettThanks - can you be more specific on the type of feedback you're looking for?21:25
piethttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/409877/21:25
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC21:25
*** lpetrut has quit IRC21:25
pietCarolBarrett What needs clarification and whether there is perceived overlap with other user stories21:25
Arkady_Kanevskypiet, I will review them tonight21:26
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:26
pietHave a few ore I want to post, but want to make sure there is goodness before I take the time to write them21:26
CarolBarrettGot it - Can everyone look at these in the next 24 hrs to give Piet feedback?21:26
kencjohnstonpiet: I'll review them today as well.21:26
pietHAs anyone created a story around the project owner role?21:26
leongquick questions: who will be the "user story owner" to drive those new user story submitted by Piet?21:27
CarolBarrett#action All review Piet's need User Stories and provide feedback by Noon on Tuesday.21:27
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
*** s3wong has quit IRC21:27
CarolBarrettleong: Good question!21:27
*** fzdarsky|afk has quit IRC21:27
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:27
pietCan I transfer them to leong?21:27
leongi don't have the extra capacity to drive more user story at current stage, given my current workloads21:28
*** GeraldK has quit IRC21:28
*** codebauss has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:28
pietleong worth a shot21:28
*** codebauss is now known as mrhillsman21:28
CarolBarrett:)21:28
*** Shrews has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:28
pietAny thoughts on how to transfer?21:29
*** GeraldK has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
RockygLet's get the stories in the repo then we can do more recruiting.21:30
pietKk It'll be under my name for the near future21:30
CarolBarrettI think we'll need to find someone who has a common interest21:30
RockygBut, yeah, project owner would be a good persona21:30
CarolBarrettRockyg: Would you be interested in leading the Logging one?21:30
iphutch I can assist sed person21:30
*** ccamacho has quit IRC21:30
pietCarolBarrett Should we discuss stories that I would like to add?21:31
jamemccFYi - Jamey here from LCOO -21:31
jamemccWe'll look deeper into Logging User Story - but the area in general is one we are interested in21:31
GeraldKI will review them tomorrow.21:31
RockygI need to figure out how much bandwidth I have.  I overstretched and started getting nothing but meetings done.  But, I might have someone who could own it21:31
CarolBarrettiphutch: Were you raising your hand for the Logging User Story?21:32
CarolBarrettPiet: Sure21:32
iphutchI don't have enough background to own but can help21:32
Rockygjamemcc, LCOO?21:32
CarolBarrettiphutch: Thanks21:32
pietCarolBarrett For the record, logging is a big problem. Has been mentioned across studies unprompted21:33
Arkady_Kanevskypiet, are you responsible for CPL for any projects?21:33
CarolBarrettPiet: What are the other stories you are working on?21:33
piet"As a project owner, I would like to add and remove users from my project"21:33
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:33
AndyULCOO is a new working group. Good potential synergies with this one.21:33
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC21:33
RockygYeah.  NEC is also interested.  A bunch of others.  I want to get the log wg kicked off again, but....time21:34
MeganRLCOO was formalized as a new WG in Barcelona21:34
leongLCOO = Large Contributing OpenStack Operators21:34
*** mtanin___ has quit IRC21:34
pietLCOO?21:34
CarolBarrettWe need to wrap this topic up21:34
CarolBarrettPiet: what are the actions we need taken?21:34
RockygAh.  Thanks.  Yeah.  I'd love to make my info more available to folks.  Maybe we could have a focused m eeting21:35
pietI just need approval from the team to submit21:35
pietCarolBarrett If the team sees value in "As a project owner, I would like to add and remove users from my project"21:35
CarolBarrettPiet: Is the project owner and OpenStack PTL or ?21:35
pietIt's a proposed role21:36
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:36
RockygCarolBarrett, I suspect piet means the tenant project owner.  So cloud owner within a larger cloud21:36
pietThe idea is take the burden off of operators and allow a project owner to add/remove users21:36
CarolBarrettPiet: Go ahead and submit it and we'll use the review process to clarify and decide if we want to advance it.21:37
CarolBarrettOK?21:37
RockygShould also set quotas for their owned space, etc.  Like a mini dev op21:37
pietRockyg Tenant = domain? Or tenant = project?21:37
Rockygtenant=project21:37
Rockygor domain.21:38
leongcarolbarrett.. next topic :-)21:38
RockygBoth are similar.21:38
pietRockyg yep21:38
CarolBarrettYup, let's move on...21:38
RockygChanges by type of root cloud21:38
CarolBarrett#topic Midcycle Location Update21:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Midcycle Location Update (Meeting topic: product_working_group)"21:38
*** sdake has quit IRC21:38
CarolBarrettPete, Leong, Shamail, Rocky..and anyone else - any news on potential locations for our midcycle in Milan?21:39
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:39
RockygDang.  Forgot to ask Anni about office in Milan.  She's been traveling crazy21:39
RockygSo, I'll talk with her today/tomorrow.21:39
shamailI am working with the team at the IBM Client Center in Milan, so far I am sharing details of what we would need… waiting to hear back… most likely in January21:39
RockygWe also maybe could sponsor a room in a hotel for a couple days.21:39
Arkady_Kanevskyhttps://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-meetup-venue-discuss-spring-201721:39
mrhillsmani had a question around this, would pwg spend like an extra day or two or work in like the evening or off-ops-midcycle hours?21:40
Arkady_Kanevsky, via Stefanardo da Vimercate 28, 20128 Milano (Mi) Italy21:40
shamailThe IBM Client Center is a little outside the city but transportation could be provided to the nearest train station21:40
leongi just drop email to Tom this morning... but when i googling around.. looks like at the ops location, the price is around 200-300 euro per room per day21:40
Rockygmrhillsman, two days before or after.  No time during21:40
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
leongfor a room of 15 people21:41
Rockygleong, That's not bad.21:41
mrhillsmanthx21:41
CarolBarrettLeong: That's not too bad21:41
RockygDoes that include coffee?21:41
mrhillsmanhehe21:41
shamailThat’s not bad at all21:41
mrhillsmanif not, it is a rip off21:41
leongi also realized that Intel has a sales/marketing office at Milan?21:41
kencjohnstonmrhillsman: +121:41
shamailThat would allow us to stay in the same area21:41
leongi estimate we will not exceed 20 people?21:42
CarolBarrettLeong: Really? I didn't find anything when I looked. Let's chat about this!21:42
kencjohnstonshamail: +121:42
shamailmrhillsman: 2 days after would be great21:42
shamailI’ll know more about the IBM options soon21:42
Arkady_Kanevskyare we before or after 15-16?21:42
shamailafte21:42
shamailr21:42
Arkady_KanevskyThat will be Fr and Saturday21:42
leongyes CarolBarrett, i can book a meeting room at Milan office :-)21:42
CarolBarrettleong: Interesting21:42
leongbut just need to find out where the exact location is21:42
CarolBarrettarkady_Kanevsky: We are planning on Wed/Thurs after Ops21:43
leongcarol, i think u mean before ops21:43
CarolBarrettThanks for the Updates, we'll revisit this after the holidays.21:43
leongops is Wed and Thur21:43
CarolBarrettLeong: Thanks!21:43
shamailI thought ops is on 14, 15… etherpad says 15-16?21:43
CarolBarrettLet's move to the next topic21:43
shamailerr 13, 14 but etherpad is 15, 16..21:44
shamailk, thanks CarolBarrett21:44
CarolBarrett#topic Work Group Name21:44
*** openstack changes topic to "Work Group Name (Meeting topic: product_working_group)"21:44
Arkady_KanevskyMarch 15-16 2017 is Wed & Th - proposed days for Ops21:44
mrhillsman15-1621:44
CarolBarrettkencjohnston: Can you lead this?21:44
shamail#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/product-wg/2016-December/001345.html21:44
*** sdake has quit IRC21:44
kencjohnstonCarolBarrett: Sure one sec21:44
kencjohnstonTL;DR - I  suggested we rename to "User Story Team" for three reasons. 1) We are more of a team than a working group (if you define working group as something short lived) 2) We might scare people off who don't consider themselves "Product people" 3) We need to focus on reviewing, refining and promoting User Stories21:45
kencjohnstonThe feedback I heard was: 1) We do more than just publish user stories (roadmap being the primary example) 2) People are already familiar with our  name so no need to change it21:45
kencjohnstonI'll rescind my proposal to rename. But I do want to bring up the fact that we need to provide more focus to the core component of our mission, creating, reviewing, publishing and promoting user stories to the technical community. May I suggest we have a permanent part at the start of our weekly agenda to review all open User Story reviews? Thoughts?21:45
pietkencjohnston agreed21:45
CarolBarrettkencjohnston: I think that's a good idea!21:45
Arkady_Kanevsky+121:46
leong+1 to add User story as weekly agenda21:46
CarolBarrett#action Carol add a standing agenda item to review Open User Story reviews in our weekly team meetings21:46
kencjohnston+1 Cool, thanks team!21:47
CarolBarrettAnything else on this?21:47
shamailkencjohnston: +1 on that21:47
kencjohnstonerrr... workign group :)21:47
AndyUThis group does seem to better meet the definition of "team" than "working group"21:47
CarolBarrettIf not, we'll move on to....Review Open User Story reviews....21:47
Rockyg++ on agenda having weekly review of stories21:47
MeganRDo we want to split the so to speak difference and become the "Product Team"?21:47
shamailCarolBarrett: Please add this link to weekly agendas https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/openstack-user-stories21:47
shamailThis will show all open changes21:48
RockygI like "team"21:48
CarolBarrettshamail: Will do!21:48
shamailI like staying as Product but impartial to Team or WG honestly.21:48
RockygExcellent.21:48
*** ewilson has quit IRC21:48
shamailWiki is “Product Team”, mailing list and meeting is “product wg”21:48
shamailcurrently21:48
*** beslemon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:48
Arkady_KanevskyI am with shamail on name21:48
RockygThe way dev does review is high priority then ones that people need help on.  Like reviews21:49
pietAren't working groups supposed to temporary?  I would tend to assume that the product folks are going to be around for a while, so better to move away from "working group"21:49
Arkady_Kanevskywhat are other teams in openstack?21:49
*** ozamiatin_ has quit IRC21:49
RockygThe thing about staying with wg at least for meetings is that all the logs are under product_wg21:49
*** sdake_ is now known as sdake21:49
shamailpiet: It is written that way in the charter but, in reality, the name (WG or Team) doesn’t put a group in WG or Functional Team category…its mission does.21:49
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:50
pietshamail Kk21:50
kencjohnstonRockyg: How do we determine/define priority?21:50
GeraldK+1 to keep PWG name. people know about it.21:50
leong#link UC definition of team/wg: https://github.com/openstack/governance-uc/blob/master/reference/charter.rst#structure---functional-teams21:50
shamailAs kencjohnston suggested, let’s drop the rename for now.  We can revisit at midcycle once the new UC is well underway?21:50
kencjohnstonshamail: +121:50
leong+121:51
Arkady_Kanevsky+121:51
Rockygthat's a discussion we should have.  But, the ones scheduled for  this cycle....21:51
MeganR+121:51
CarolBarrettshamail: +121:51
CarolBarrettWe have 10 mins left - Can we look at the review summary at the link Shamail gave above?21:51
kencjohnstonCarolBarrett: +121:51
kencjohnstonshamail: Do you know how we should interpret the CR, V and W columns?21:51
shamailkencjohnston: I commented on your user story updates and I saw that you added the reference to HACKING.RST for personas.  Are you going to drop the reference from the individual updates?21:51
RockygSo, review all actively targeted for current cycle, then one people want eyse on for reviews or discussion21:52
* kencjohnston hovers and realizes exactly how to interpret them...21:52
leongV verified W workflow21:52
kencjohnstonshamail: I wasn't planning on it. The link is in the user story template at this point21:52
shamailyes kencjohnston: CR = Code Review, V = Jenkins gate verified, W = workflow21:52
shamailkencjohnston: okay, if its there then its +2 from me21:53
shamailthat was going to be my next Q21:53
Arkady_Kanevskyall -1 need to be updated21:53
Arkady_KanevskyKen arre oyu handling W?21:53
shamailDid we decide whether we are just implementing personas for now or also model companies?21:53
GeraldKI plan to submit a patch to add UX persona to the capacity mgmt user story.21:53
* shamail asks to determine whether he should approve now or wait for a company be to associated21:54
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC21:54
Arkady_KanevskyI also have 1 more persona UX chnage in progress21:54
shamailArkady_Kanevsky: Most Workflow -1s are from the author… meaning they aren’t ready for review yet21:54
CarolBarrettshamail: I think we decided yes on Persona's...but there was more discussion required on model companies21:54
shamailCarolBarrett: Thanks21:54
kencjohnstonshamail: The company was tricky for me, and suggest we postpone adding them.21:54
shamailkencjohnston: +121:54
kencjohnstonCarolBarrett: +121:54
piet+121:54
*** yuanying has quit IRC21:54
GeraldK+1 to approve personas without companies21:55
pietImportant, though21:55
Arkady_Kanevskycan oyu define what is proposed for company?21:55
* shamail thinks sneaky piet isn’t so sneaky when his reviews are at the top of the list21:55
kencjohnstonIt seems like some of the discussion on those reviews is around, "How should we reference UX Personas here."21:55
kencjohnstonCan we all agree on the following model21:55
pietshamail People call me "sweet  Piet" which I don't like...21:55
shamail:)21:55
shamailI’ll review the open (WF > -1) changes in the next couple of days21:56
kencjohnston1) Reference the fact that all use cases will utilize the UX personas21:56
kencjohnston2) Link to the individual personas on first usage21:56
kencjohnstonThat's how i structured the User Story Template and the changes I submitted21:56
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:56
shamailkencjohnston: +1, that is great guidance21:56
kencjohnstonSince the User STory template merged I didn't think it would be controversial21:56
*** pabelanger_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:57
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:57
CarolBarrett#agree All use cases will utilize the UX personas; Link to the individual personas on first usage21:57
Arkady_Kanevsky+1 - that is the model I followed21:58
kencjohnstonCarolBarrett: +1 thanks21:58
leonglet's get all the changes to UX personas done first for this week.. then next meeting we can review other story21:58
CarolBarrett2 mins left - we all have the action to review Piet's user stories in the next day, and others as time permots.21:58
CarolBarrettleong: +121:58
Arkady_Kanevsky+121:58
CarolBarrettBefore we run out of time - any opens?21:59
shamailMeeting next wwek?21:59
shamailweek*21:59
leongvacation plan...?21:59
shamailI will be out of office so won’t be here.21:59
pietCarolBarrett More stories to come, but will be a bit lite on content until I receive feedback21:59
leongnext meeting agenda.21:59
GeraldKI may not be able to attend next week21:59
Arkady_KanevskyI will be away for next 2 weeks and Jan 2 - vacation21:59
MeganRI may also be out.21:59
pietCarolBarrett Deployment Study results presentation on Friday21:59
leongi will be out next 2 weeks as well21:59
CarolBarrettSounds like we should cancel the meeting on the 19th, 26th and 2nd - yes?22:00
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
leonglooks like it22:00
Arkady_Kanevskylets cancel call22:00
kencjohnstonCarolBarrett: +122:00
shamailCarolBarrett: +122:00
CarolBarrettPiet: Can you send the details of the meeting on the ML?22:00
pietYeah22:00
leonghappy holiday everyone then! :)22:00
mrhillsman^22:00
MeganRHappy New Year!22:00
CarolBarrettThanks everyone - have a great holiday and we'll type again in 2017!22:00
pietDarft Deck here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/14UerMR4HrXKP_0NE_C-WJ16YQFzgetL1Tmym9FNFzpY/edit?usp=sharing22:00
Arkady_Kanevskyhappy holidays22:00
shamail‘Appy ‘Appy Holidays22:00
pietComment, but don't edit22:00
pietcheers22:00
CarolBarrettPiet: Thanks22:00
CarolBarrett#endmeeting22:00
leongpiet, u can restrict the type of access22:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:00
openstackMeeting ended Mon Dec 12 22:00:58 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2016/product_working_group.2016-12-12-21.01.html22:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2016/product_working_group.2016-12-12-21.01.txt22:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2016/product_working_group.2016-12-12-21.01.log.html22:01
*** shamail has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
*** Arkady_Kanevsky has quit IRC22:01
RockygEnjoythe time off!22:01
*** jamielennox has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
pietleong I have team members editing22:01
leongif all using google account, u can restrict access to certain people only :)22:01
jeblairgreetings minions of gozer the destructor22:01
clarkbohai22:02
rcarrillocruzo/22:02
jamielennoxo/22:02
*** leong has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:02
*** auggy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:02
adam_gheyo22:02
auggyo/22:02
jheskethMorning22:02
jeblair#startmeeting zuul22:03
openstackMeeting started Mon Dec 12 22:03:07 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is jeblair. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:03
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:03
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'zuul'22:03
jeblair#link agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Zuul#Agenda_for_next_meeting22:03
*** jlk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:03
pabelanger_o/22:03
jlko/22:03
jeblair#link previous meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zuul/2016/zuul.2016-12-05-22.02.html22:03
jeblair#topic  Actions from last meeting22:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Actions from last meeting (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:04
jeblairjeblair update nodepool system-config docs with zk info22:04
* jesusaur lurks22:04
jeblairi think that merged?22:04
clarkbI +2'd it iirc22:04
fungii believe i did too22:04
jeblairyep22:04
clarkbso it shoudl eb close to merging if not merged22:04
jeblair#link http://docs.openstack.org/infra/system-config/nodepool.html22:04
jeblairit's published even!22:04
fungimarvellous!22:04
fungisometimes this stuff works22:05
jeblairjeblair merge https://review.openstack.org/40634222:05
jeblairjeblair merge https://review.openstack.org/40641122:05
jeblairthose were merged22:05
jeblairpabelanger test zk disaster scenarios with nodepool-builder22:05
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena22:05
jeblairpabelanger did that and i think was happy with the result22:05
jeblairpabelanger launch nb0222:05
jeblairpabelanger: did that as well and i think was happy with that result as well :)22:06
funginothing's come crashing down around our ears, so i call that success22:06
jeblairall things done!22:06
clarkbwhats our oldest image?22:07
jeblair#topic Status updates: Nodepool Zookeeper work22:07
clarkbor how old is the oldest image22:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Status updates: Nodepool Zookeeper work (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:07
clarkb(mostly just curious)22:07
fungiclarkb: built or uploaded?22:07
clarkbuploaded22:07
clarkbsince its uploading where we have struggled the most in the past and having multiple uploaders should help22:07
*** iyamahat has quit IRC22:07
fungi01:23:03:5822:08
fungismells like success to me22:08
pabelanger_yes, happy here22:08
fungi<222:08
jeblairthat's right on the nose22:08
jeblairthe oldest built image is from around then too22:09
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:09
*** MeganR has quit IRC22:09
*** Leo_ has quit IRC22:09
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:09
fungiyeah, so barring deeper wrongness, the new process doesn't seem out-and-out broken anyway22:09
clarkbya thats a good indicator of general working22:09
*** Leom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:10
jeblairthose action items were all the pre-production blockers; which of course is why we switched it into production on friday22:10
*** amotoki has quit IRC22:10
jeblairi think the next thing was "i send out an email" then merge the branch, then switch prod to master, then start using the v3 branch for the next phase of work22:10
fungialso gave us an opportunity to make sure it's all working before we get too far into milestone week22:10
jeblair(the spec for the next phase landed last week)22:10
morgano/22:11
jeblairso how about i send out the email today, merge the branch and switch prod tomorrow?22:11
fungiwfm22:11
jeblair(and we'll also make a release from master sometime in the near future, timing isn't important)22:11
clarkbby switch prod you mean back to master right?22:11
jeblairclarkb: yep22:11
clarkbya that sounds good22:12
jeblair#action jeblair send email announcing impending merge and release22:12
jeblair#action jeblair switch production to run from master after merge22:12
jlkexciting22:12
jlkwe should switch over too22:12
jeblairwhee!22:12
jeblairanything else nodepool related?22:13
*** haleyb_ has quit IRC22:14
jeblair#topic Status updates: Devstack-gate roles refactoring22:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Status updates: Devstack-gate roles refactoring (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:14
jeblairi just put this on the agenda, but did not give rcarrillocruz a heads up about it :)22:14
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:14
clarkbthe base three changes of the stack are ready for review and have my +2 on them22:15
rcarrillocruzah nice22:15
jeblairbut i wanted to start calling attention to it, we should probably start thinking about this in parallel with the other efforts22:15
*** amotoki has quit IRC22:15
rcarrillocruzalso, if folks are ok with it, i'm more than happy to continue refactoring other stuff than setup_host22:15
mordredit's worth noting something clarkb said in channel about those last week or the week before ...22:15
clarkbrcarrillocruz: my only concern is that we have already had a hard time just with logistics around setup host that if we add more stuff it might be harder not easier22:16
rcarrillocruzunless dmsimard or others have started doing so?22:16
mordredwhich is that given the functinality they touch - being thorough/careful on reviews of them is extra important22:16
jeblair(it's kind of our "premier" job, so it'll be good to have this ready as a demonstration of what v3 can do when we roll it out)22:16
rcarrillocruzyeah, not doing in parallel, just continue afterwards22:16
clarkbmordred: yup specifically make sure that we don't introduce new behavior that could be a regression22:16
*** annegentle has quit IRC22:17
morganclarkb: ++22:17
jeblairalso, d-g is very self testing, so make sure to check out the logs and see what the result looks like (it's important that the logs be easy to follow)22:18
rcarrillocruzalong with that, i'd vote on just have feature parity to what we have now and leave optimizations later22:18
mordred++22:18
mordred(to both things)22:18
jeblairrcarrillocruz: yes, incremental changes are good here22:18
jeblairat any rate, anyone who knows anything about either openstack or ansible can make a contribution by reviewing these :)22:19
jeblairi dunno if that's anyone here22:20
rcarrillocruz++, the replacements are easy enough22:20
jlkjeblair: I'd like to give it a look22:20
rcarrillocruznot really openstack knowledge required, just replacing bash with ansible22:20
jeblairdoes anyone really know bash?22:20
fungithough it at least helps having seen devstack-gate run before and knowing what it is/does ;)22:21
jeblairtopic:zuulv3 project:openstack-infra/devstack-gate22:21
jlkis there a link to the topic of the PRs?22:21
*** baoli has quit IRC22:21
fungi#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:open+topic:zuulv3+project:openstack-infra/devstack-gate22:22
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:22
rcarrillocruzhttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack-infra/devstack-gate+branch:master+topic:zuulv322:22
rcarrillocruzy that22:22
morganjeblair: lol. "knowing bash" oy22:22
rcarrillocruzi know some bash, but don't know d-g bash, it's a variant on its own :D22:22
morganrcarrillocruz: i concur with that assessment22:22
jeblairtrue -- as the author of the "bash unit tests" in devstack-gate, i will be happy to see them go.  :)22:23
jamielennoxjeblair, clarkb: can you either tag or branch the current master before the production merge?22:23
*** GeraldK has quit IRC22:23
fungihow to know when you should rewrite your shell scripts in another language: you invent shell-based unit testing for them22:23
clarkbjamielennox: there should be a tag already from before the zuulv3 work started22:23
clarkbfungi: I mean ksh has a debugger even22:23
fungiph33r22:24
*** matrohon has quit IRC22:24
*** myoung is now known as myoung|bbl22:24
* fungi has some not-so-great memories of debugging the ksh-based userland most of sco was implemented in22:24
jeblair#topic Status updates: Zuul test enablement22:24
*** openstack changes topic to "Status updates: Zuul test enablement (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:24
jamielennoxclarkb: yea, but master has moved since then22:25
mordredclarkb: I do think we merged some things into master between the tag and the zuulv3 stuff - might not be _terrible_ to do 2 back to back "here is the thing that is before zk - here is the thing that is after"22:25
mordredtags are cheap, after all22:25
clarkbya no objection from me22:25
jeblair#topic Status updates: Nodepool Zookeeper work22:25
jlkthanks!22:25
*** openstack changes topic to "Status updates: Nodepool Zookeeper work (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:25
morganmordred: it never hurts to tag pre-big change22:25
*** lbeliveau_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:25
clarkb(though I am likely not going to be doing that tagging/merging)22:25
*** lbeliveau has quit IRC22:26
jeblairyeah, i think we can tag a 0.3.122:27
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:27
jeblairbefore performing the merge22:27
*** sdake_ has quit IRC22:27
*** timsim has quit IRC22:27
jeblairmordred: i'm not planning on tagging after the merge until we're ready for a release of the zk stuff22:28
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:28
mordredjeblair: works for me22:28
jeblairmordred: i don't know what else we might want to do before such a release, but i figure we should take stock before doing it22:28
jeblairso will probably ask folks about that next week22:28
mordred++22:28
jeblair#topic Status updates: Zuul test enablement22:28
*** openstack changes topic to "Status updates: Zuul test enablement (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:28
jeblairjamielennox came to me with a question recently that i had difficulty answering22:29
*** sdake has quit IRC22:30
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC22:31
jeblairit was related to the zuul trigger, and interacted with the tenants v3 change and some of the reorganization i did earlier in v3 around connections.  but also, i've been trying to think about how we want to present an api for extensions to support other systems (eg, github, etc)22:31
* jlk perks up22:32
jeblairi had an idea to slightly reorganize the connections/sources/triggers/reporters under a driver22:32
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:32
jamielennoxjeblair: unless you have come up with something i'd vote to drop zuul triggers for v3 release. My understanding is we don't need them for openstack-infra and i'd prefer to drop non-required things in the breaking change and reintroduce them with more design later wehen required22:33
*** kevo has quit IRC22:33
jeblairi'm partway through a change implementing this; it's not ready for real review yet, but you can see where i'm starting to go if you look at https://review.openstack.org/408849 in zuul/driver/__init__.py22:33
*** beslemon has quit IRC22:33
fungiwell, if we know it's something we're going to want to support later, reorganizing now to make that easier still seems like a sane choice22:34
mordredI think that's going to make the interface much nicerer22:34
fungithe nicerer the betterer22:34
jeblairjamielennox: yeah, i was leaning that way, however, i'm almost certain they'd end up back in sooner rather than later, and i think my change will make it easy to keep them and support drivers with similar needs -- as i was thinking about it, i realized that the 'timer' system shares quite a bit of the same issues22:34
*** priteau has quit IRC22:34
jeblairanyway, i think what i want to do is finish getting that into a workable state, and then see if folks like the general direction.22:35
jamielennoxjeblair: i've only looked at that review a little and i think the idea of a driver interface is a nice idea, just thinking it shouldn't be driven by zuultrigger22:35
*** Swami has quit IRC22:36
jeblairi think once that's there, we might have some conversations about if that's exactly the right approach, or if we want to do more things with different interface classes, or abstract base classes, etc.22:36
jamielennoxanyway, +1 WFM22:36
jeblair(i can see a couple of different ways of actually specifying the API, all of which still match the general outline i'm drawing up)22:36
jeblairjamielennox: yeah, that's a good point.  i've been trying to think about it holistically, considering all of the uses i know about22:37
jeblair(and can imagine)22:37
mordredlike yolanda's url trigger desire22:37
jeblairfundamentally, this lets us have global state, tenant state, and pipeline state, so it's very flexible.22:38
*** jmckind_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:39
jeblairanyway, just wanted to let people know about that since it might affect other trigger/reporter/etc work (though the actual migration is pretty simple and mechanical)22:39
SpamapSon the "might affect other stuff" train, I started trying to re-enable the swift tests22:39
jeblairand once it's generally ready, we will want to put some polish on it as it's going to be an externally facing api surface22:39
SpamapSand found that auth plumbing isn't quite written yet, nor is swift connection plumbing22:39
rcarrillocruzyep22:40
rcarrillocruzi'm back on business from vaca22:40
rcarrillocruzi will get back to it this week SpamapS22:40
rcarrillocruzfor the auth stuff, not swift tho22:40
*** jmckind has quit IRC22:40
SpamapSrcarrillocruz: cool, I will probably move that to blocked and pick it back up when you finish.22:40
rcarrillocruz++22:40
jeblairSpamapS: yeah, though we do have the swift code from v2, so there may be some pieces that need connecting up22:40
jeblairblocking on the auth/secrets stuff makes sense to me22:41
SpamapSjeblair: seems like rcarrillocruz is more familiar with those pieces, so I may be more productive with something else.22:41
fungithough the swift authentication is a lot more fine-grained than the general auth provisions in the v3 spec22:42
SpamapSindeed, but one needs a base on which to stand.22:42
fungisince it's zuul handing out per-build credentials for specific subtrees in a container22:42
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:43
SpamapSThere's also a question of whether there should be per-tenant swift connections.22:43
SpamapSlots of stuff that I just don't have in my head yet22:43
SpamapSso having any of it filled in first should help get it done.22:43
SpamapSfeels a bit like the tests that I find still skipped are more in-depth and require code inside zuul now vs. just reworking of tests.22:44
jeblairwe also have an opportunity in v3 we didn't have in v2, of having *trusted* swift creds22:44
rcarrillocruzi wip'd some auth stuff already before going vaca, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406382/ , when i get that sorted i'll work on getting the pipeline allow-secrets flag, followed bu the actual job auth code handling22:44
SpamapSwhich is a good thing.. getting to the meat of it.22:44
jeblair++22:44
jeblair#topic Progress summary22:45
*** openstack changes topic to "Progress summary (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:45
* jeblair waits for SpamapS to post link22:45
* SpamapS resists link paste finally22:45
SpamapS:)22:45
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:45
jeblairSpamapS: please, the floor is yours :)22:46
SpamapSoh haha22:46
SpamapS#link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/board/4122:46
SpamapSSo we have _a ton_ in flight.22:46
SpamapSAnd a ton of "new" tasks, which are tasks we haven't evaluated yet for one of the other lanes.22:46
SpamapSBut the backlog and Todo is already long enough, I"m not worried about people not being able to find more work to do.22:47
*** lbeliveau_ has quit IRC22:47
SpamapSI would like to see more tasks in Todo.. Right now it is all stories.22:47
*** jmckind_ has quit IRC22:47
*** CarolBarrett has quit IRC22:47
Shrewsnot really sure why https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2000767 is still "in progress". the 3304 task in that doesn't seem related to the builder, IMO22:48
jeblairSpamapS: i'll take a pass at updating those22:48
SpamapSjeblair: also your script has been working well, so thank you. :)22:48
jeblair\o/22:48
rcarrillocruzi'm happy to take ansible-based deployment, since i've battled that a bit in the past22:48
rcarrillocruzand happy to leverage pabelanger_ roles for it22:48
SpamapSShrews: 3305 is still marked as in progress22:48
rcarrillocruzunless pabelanger_ has interest on taking it ?22:48
rcarrillocruzi.e. https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/200079122:48
SpamapS"re-enable nodepool builder and devstack tests   "22:49
ShrewsSpamapS: it's in production. tests are re-enabled, so it's done22:49
pabelanger_rcarrillocruz: sure, I can show you what I've been working on.22:49
SpamapSShrews: well then let's mark 3305 as merged. :)22:49
*** vijendar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:49
Shrewscould've swore we moved this to Done label last week22:50
rcarrillocruzk, i'll pick up assignment then22:50
fungi[and there was much rejoicing]22:50
rcarrillocruzSpamapS: ^ , taking https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/200079122:50
SpamapSShrews: Notice there's no Done lane anymore. Just mark the task as Merged and it will disappear.22:50
jeblairShrews: we might have moved the card, but my auto-script might have moved it back because it has an in-progress task; updating the task to 'merged' will cause to be auto-removed from the board22:50
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:51
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz22:51
* Shrews just avoids SB until the weekly meetings22:51
Shrews:)22:51
SpamapSI updated the description of the board, but maybe we weren't clear enough in here. :-P22:51
SpamapSThe board is now mostly a reflection of SB task status, except we are the lanes to break out some statuses into finer grained status so people can find appropriate tasks to work on.22:51
SpamapS(and so we can see how busy / not busy things are)22:52
SpamapSright now I'd say our WIP is a bit high, and we should make sure cores double down on reviewing to keep the in progress list manageable.22:52
SpamapSI also don't think we have enough in Todo.22:53
SpamapSfine to grab things off backlog, but todo is where we should drop things that feel like they're "ready to go next"22:53
jeblairand i want to say a big chunk of the wip are the devstack-gate changes22:53
*** lbeliveau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:53
SpamapSjeblair: any thoughts on ansible deployment or any other tasks/stories moving to Todo?22:53
*** pabelanger_ has quit IRC22:54
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC22:54
*** msimonin has quit IRC22:54
SpamapSBTW, I'm removing 2000767 (the story) from the board. Stories (not tasks) are managed manually.22:54
SpamapS(woot again? ;)22:54
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off22:55
jeblairSpamapS: i think there's nothing blocking the ansible deployment, however, it's not a blocker itself for us getting into production.  so we should move it to todo if we've run out of higher-priority things22:55
*** vijendar has quit IRC22:55
SpamapSjeblair: ACK, I'll leave the story in Backlog22:55
jeblairokay, one more quick topic:22:56
jeblair#topic Zuul v3: update with Ansible role information22:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Zuul v3: update with Ansible role information (Meeting topic: zuul)"22:56
SpamapSjeblair: what about "make change a subclass of ref" ? Isn't that kind of a big refactor that we want to get in there soon?22:56
jeblair#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/381329/22:56
*** msimonin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:56
jeblairSpamapS: yes, that's probably a good one22:57
jeblairSpamapS: i'm hopeful it won't actually be too intrusive22:57
SpamapSACK, ok, carry on :)22:57
jeblairthis is, i think, the last outstanding spec update22:57
jeblairit adds some detail around how we expect roles to work22:57
jeblairi think with that in place, we'll be ready to actually write the "really run an ansible-based job for real" code, as i like to think of it.  :)22:58
fungiand looks like it's getting proposed tomorrow for an infra council vote22:58
jeblairfungi: indeed!22:58
jeblairi gave a heads-up about this last week, but no time like the present to take a look at it22:59
*** jmckind has quit IRC22:59
jeblairand that's all we have time for23:00
jeblairthanks everyone!23:00
jeblair#endmeeting23:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"23:00
openstackMeeting ended Mon Dec 12 23:00:09 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)23:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zuul/2016/zuul.2016-12-12-22.03.html23:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zuul/2016/zuul.2016-12-12-22.03.txt23:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/zuul/2016/zuul.2016-12-12-22.03.log.html23:00
jamielennoxthanks23:00
*** Shrews has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:00
*** jheroux has quit IRC23:01
*** annegentle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:02
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC23:05
*** haleyb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:10
*** annegentle has quit IRC23:12
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:13
*** msimonin has quit IRC23:15
*** yuanying has quit IRC23:20
*** rcarrillocruz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:20
*** tommylikehu_ has quit IRC23:23
*** tommylikehu_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:23
*** yuanying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:25
*** jamielennox has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:27
*** Leom has quit IRC23:27
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:28
*** mariannelm has quit IRC23:33
*** mkoderer has quit IRC23:36
*** rcarrillocruz has quit IRC23:38
*** reedip has quit IRC23:39
*** yatin_on_leave has quit IRC23:39
*** singlethink has quit IRC23:40
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:40
*** pradk has quit IRC23:40
*** JRobinson__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:42
*** spzala has quit IRC23:44
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:44
*** derekh_afk has quit IRC23:45
*** stingaci has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:46
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:50
*** yatin_on_leave has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:51
*** singlethink has quit IRC23:52
*** fnaval has quit IRC23:52
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:52
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC23:52
*** reedip has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:52
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC23:53
*** snackewm has quit IRC23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!