Monday, 2016-02-08

*** bsilverman has quit IRC00:00
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC00:10
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:11
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega00:11
*** sdake has quit IRC00:12
*** tellesnobrega is now known as tellesnobrega_af00:12
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:16
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:18
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC00:19
*** davideagnello has quit IRC00:23
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:25
*** FallenPe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC00:33
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:35
*** FallenPe_ has quit IRC00:37
*** neilus has quit IRC00:40
*** mikal is now known as chair_occupier_t00:41
*** chair_occupier_t is now known as chair_occupier_300:41
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:44
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:45
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:48
*** davideagnello has quit IRC00:50
*** edwardb has quit IRC00:50
*** banix has quit IRC00:56
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:00
*** dims has quit IRC01:01
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC01:03
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC01:04
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_01:09
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:12
*** davideagnello has quit IRC01:17
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:19
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:24
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:36
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:40
*** davideagnello has quit IRC01:44
*** dims has quit IRC01:46
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:46
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:48
*** katyafervent_awa has quit IRC01:50
*** shwetaap has quit IRC01:50
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC01:50
*** katyafervent_awa has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:53
*** tfukushima has quit IRC02:01
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:04
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:06
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:07
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC02:07
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:08
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC02:10
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:10
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC02:10
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:10
*** sdake has quit IRC02:11
*** davideagnello has quit IRC02:11
*** daemontool has quit IRC02:12
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:13
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:20
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:22
*** neilus has quit IRC02:27
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC02:29
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:32
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:34
*** davideagnello has quit IRC02:38
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:40
*** oomichi has quit IRC02:43
*** daemontool has quit IRC02:47
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:56
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:58
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:01
*** reedip_away is now known as reedip03:03
*** davideagnello has quit IRC03:06
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:10
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC03:13
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:13
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC03:28
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC03:32
*** chair_occupier_3 is now known as mikal03:34
*** dims has quit IRC03:35
*** IlyaG has quit IRC03:35
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:38
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:42
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:42
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:43
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:45
*** davideagnello has quit IRC03:46
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:05
*** dims has quit IRC04:08
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:11
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:13
*** neilus has quit IRC04:15
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:15
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:17
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:18
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:18
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:23
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:27
*** davideagnello has quit IRC04:27
*** david-lyle has quit IRC04:30
*** dstanek has quit IRC04:31
*** dstanek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:33
*** eliqiao_ has quit IRC04:38
*** EmilDi_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:38
*** EmilDi has quit IRC04:38
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:39
*** eliqiao_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:40
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:40
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:44
*** achanda has quit IRC04:45
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:45
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:47
*** tfukushima has quit IRC04:47
*** baoli has quit IRC04:48
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:50
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck04:50
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:50
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:50
*** baoli has quit IRC04:51
*** shwetaap has quit IRC04:52
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:52
*** davideagnello has quit IRC04:54
*** neelashah has quit IRC04:55
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:56
*** shwetaap has quit IRC04:56
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:56
*** shashank_hegde has quit IRC04:57
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:00
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC05:01
*** eliqiao_ has quit IRC05:06
*** eliqiao_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:08
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:11
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC05:17
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:17
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:18
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:21
*** davideagnello has quit IRC05:22
*** tfukushima has quit IRC05:22
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:23
*** zhhuabj has quit IRC05:24
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC05:31
*** dfflanders has quit IRC05:40
*** banix has quit IRC05:42
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:44
*** IlyaG has quit IRC05:48
*** davideagnello has quit IRC05:49
*** yfujioka has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:54
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:59
*** neilus has quit IRC06:03
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:08
*** amotoki has quit IRC06:11
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:11
*** tfukushima has quit IRC06:12
*** irenab has quit IRC06:14
*** davideagnello has quit IRC06:16
*** sgotliv has quit IRC06:28
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:28
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:29
*** baoli has quit IRC06:33
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:34
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:39
*** davideagnello has quit IRC06:43
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:48
*** obondarev_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:49
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:49
*** obondarev has quit IRC06:49
*** tfukushima has quit IRC06:52
*** daemontool has quit IRC06:53
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:53
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:54
*** IlyaG has quit IRC06:54
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:55
*** daemontool has quit IRC06:58
*** j___ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:03
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:04
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:06
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC07:08
*** davideagnello has quit IRC07:10
*** oomichi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:12
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:13
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:14
*** jtomasek__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:15
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:15
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:15
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:22
*** vahidh has quit IRC07:23
*** jtomasek_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:25
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC07:32
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:33
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:37
*** davideagnello has quit IRC07:38
*** pbelamge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:46
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:46
*** pbelamge has quit IRC07:46
*** pbelamge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:47
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:47
*** zeih_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:48
*** tfukushima has quit IRC07:50
*** neilus has quit IRC07:51
*** korzen has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:59
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:00
*** davideagnello has quit IRC08:05
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:07
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:07
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:09
*** scheuran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:09
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC08:09
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:12
*** samuelBartel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:13
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC08:13
*** shwetaap1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:19
*** jjmb has quit IRC08:20
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:20
*** marios has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:22
*** shwetaap has quit IRC08:23
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC08:25
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:27
*** achanda has quit IRC08:31
*** davideagnello has quit IRC08:32
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:32
*** shwetaap1 has quit IRC08:38
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:38
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:38
*** edwardb has quit IRC08:38
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:39
*** neiljerram has quit IRC08:39
*** shwetaap has quit IRC08:43
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:44
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:47
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:53
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:55
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:55
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC08:55
*** skolekonov has left #openstack-meeting-alt08:59
*** davideagnello has quit IRC08:59
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:08
*** achanda has quit IRC09:08
*** zeih_ has quit IRC09:13
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:14
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:17
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC09:17
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:19
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:21
*** shohel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:21
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz09:21
*** shohel has left #openstack-meeting-alt09:22
*** reedip is now known as outofmemory09:24
*** davideagnello has quit IRC09:26
*** zeih_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:27
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:31
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:32
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:33
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:35
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:38
*** tfukushima has quit IRC09:39
*** neilus has quit IRC09:39
*** shwetaap has quit IRC09:43
*** apetrich_ has quit IRC09:47
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:48
*** kertis1 has quit IRC09:50
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC09:50
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:51
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:51
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:00
*** rossella_s has quit IRC10:03
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:03
*** vahidh has quit IRC10:05
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:05
*** kertis has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:06
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:06
*** mhickey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:08
*** tfukushima has quit IRC10:10
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:15
*** n0ano has quit IRC10:15
*** macsz has quit IRC10:21
*** macsz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:22
*** _degorenko|afk is now known as degorenko10:23
*** isq_ has quit IRC10:30
*** isq_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:31
*** rvyalov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:33
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:39
*** SridharG has quit IRC10:39
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:40
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC10:41
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC10:43
*** shwetaap has quit IRC10:44
*** tpsilva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:49
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:53
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:57
*** kei_yama has quit IRC10:58
*** sdake has quit IRC11:00
*** davideagnello has quit IRC11:02
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:06
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC11:15
*** pnavarro has quit IRC11:17
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:18
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:18
*** rcernin has quit IRC11:19
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC11:20
*** derekh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:20
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:21
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:22
*** pnavarro has quit IRC11:22
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:23
*** rcernin has quit IRC11:25
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:25
*** neiljerram has quit IRC11:26
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:26
*** neilus has quit IRC11:27
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC11:27
*** zeih_ has quit IRC11:36
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:37
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:38
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:39
*** tellesnobrega_af is now known as tellesnobrega11:40
*** zeih_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:42
*** davideagnello has quit IRC11:42
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC11:43
*** shwetaap has quit IRC11:43
*** neiljerram has quit IRC11:43
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:46
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:48
*** baoli has quit IRC11:49
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:55
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:56
*** ganso has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:58
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:00
*** numans has quit IRC12:03
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:05
*** vgridnev has quit IRC12:07
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:07
*** davideagnello has quit IRC12:10
*** weshay_xchat has quit IRC12:10
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:13
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:13
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC12:18
*** dims has quit IRC12:20
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:21
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:22
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:32
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:35
*** davideagnello has quit IRC12:37
*** miqui has quit IRC12:39
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:39
*** krotscheck_dcm is now known as krotscheck12:39
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:41
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:42
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:42
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:43
*** SridharG has quit IRC12:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:43
*** weshay_xchat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:43
*** shwetaap has quit IRC12:44
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz12:45
*** vahidh has quit IRC12:47
*** yamamoto has quit IRC12:48
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:52
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:58
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:58
*** sdake has quit IRC12:58
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC12:59
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC13:01
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:01
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:02
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:02
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:02
*** krotscheck has quit IRC13:06
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:06
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:06
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:07
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC13:10
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC13:10
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:12
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:13
*** baoli has quit IRC13:14
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:14
*** nadya is now known as Guest1382613:15
*** amotoki has quit IRC13:15
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
*** pbelamge has quit IRC13:17
*** davideagnello has quit IRC13:18
*** krotscheck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:18
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:20
*** jprovazn has quit IRC13:23
*** yamamoto has quit IRC13:27
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:30
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed13:30
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:33
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:36
*** sdake has quit IRC13:36
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:40
*** ninag has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:41
*** shwetaap has quit IRC13:44
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC13:44
*** sgotliv has quit IRC13:45
*** apetrich has quit IRC13:48
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:49
*** macsz has quit IRC13:51
*** weshay_xchat has quit IRC13:52
*** shadower19 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:52
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** baoli has quit IRC13:53
*** shadower19 has quit IRC13:53
*** cdent has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** shadower92 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:55
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:55
*** shadower92 has quit IRC13:55
*** _gryf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:56
*** sdake_ has quit IRC13:57
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** weshay_xchat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** weshay_xchat is now known as weshay13:58
*** davideagnello has quit IRC13:58
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
*** sdake has quit IRC13:59
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
n0ano#startmeeting nova-scheduler14:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Feb  8 14:00:23 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is n0ano. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
*** baoli has quit IRC14:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: nova-scheduler)"14:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'nova_scheduler'14:00
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
n0anoanyone here to talk about the scheduler?14:00
cdento/14:00
_gryf\o14:00
* cdent was hoping for a dance chain14:01
edleafe\o14:01
Yingxino/ happy chinese new year14:01
edleafecdent: too early on a MOnday for that!14:01
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
* cdent dances anway14:01
cdentanyway!14:01
n0anowho cares about new years, local team won the super bowl :-)14:01
edleafeYingxin: happy chinese new year to you! Why are you at work? ")14:02
jaypipeso/14:02
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:02
*** rossella_s has quit IRC14:02
*** pbelamge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
Yingxinedleafe: it is always not my work time :P14:03
*** rossella_s has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
* bauzas waves 14:03
n0anolooks like we have approximate quorum, let's start14:03
n0ano#topic  Patches/Reviews – https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-nova-priorities-tracking14:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Patches/Reviews – https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-nova-priorities-tracking (Meeting topic: nova-scheduler)"14:04
n0anoaccording to the tracking page we only have 4 reviews outstanding, is that correct or are we missing some from the page?14:04
* cdent adds a couple things14:04
* n0ano says as more are being added realtime14:04
bauzasn0ano: I'm about to add https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273104/214:05
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:05
cdentand I have another one in progress but not submitted yet (all resource-provider related)14:05
bauzasn0ano: once I fix my stupid miss14:05
n0anojaypipes, I was going to point out the resource provider, looks like those will be added soon14:06
johnthetubaguycdent: how is that generic pools spec coming along?14:06
* cdent looks at jaypipes 14:06
jaypipesjohnthetubaguy: will try to get the next rev up today. sorry for delay.14:07
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC14:07
johnthetubaguyjust feels very very late for mitaka now, but lets see14:07
bauzaswe can target to land the respective implementations for the 2 first specs14:08
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
johnthetubaguybauzas: yep, no need to stop the first two14:10
johnthetubaguythey should be all set for mitaka now14:10
johnthetubaguy#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/resource-classes14:10
johnthetubaguy#link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/resource-providers14:11
johnthetubaguyI think those are the ones that are good to go right now14:11
cdentI expect to have the implementations for those first two in the first half of this week, although I expect there will need some change in review.14:11
bauzas+14:11
bauzas++ even14:11
johnthetubaguycdent: sounds good14:11
cdentAlthough I'm going to need to bother someone for a bit of advice on some of the details about versioned objects which are composed of others14:11
n0anocdent, that'd be great, just be sure to update the etherpad appropriately14:12
cdentroger that, n0ano14:12
johnthetubaguycdent: you mean the object fields in an object?14:12
cdentjohnthetubaguy: yeah14:12
*** neiljerram has quit IRC14:12
johnthetubaguycdent: cools, can ask questions in channel, thats stuff did get simpler quite recently14:13
* cdent nods okay14:13
*** shadower47 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:13
n0anoare there any specific reviews people want to discuss right now?14:13
bauzasn0ano: yup14:13
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC14:13
bauzaslike I said14:13
bauzashttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/273104/14:13
bauzasgiven that's also something the live-migrate team wants14:14
bauzaswell, once I'll provide the respective live-migrate patch14:14
bauzasI'd love to get subteam reviews for that one + the ones I'll do for live-migrate and unshelve14:14
bauzaswhich are the 3 conductor methods calling the scheduler by dumbly mocking out a fresh new request spec14:15
edleafebauzas: added to my queue14:15
johnthetubaguybauzas: we totally need to fix up that scheduler_utils stuff at some point, is that in the works already?14:15
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: that will be the last patch of the series I guess14:15
johnthetubaguybauzas: would it not be cleaner as the first patch?14:16
*** shadower47 has quit IRC14:16
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: not really, it would add lots of modifications for something not that clear yet14:16
*** Guest13826 has quit IRC14:16
johnthetubaguybauzas: OK14:16
*** shadower47 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:16
*** slunkad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: but we can discuss that in the review for sure14:17
*** shadower47 has quit IRC14:17
edleafeis there a list of scheduler_utils changes that you are looking to make?14:17
*** irenab has quit IRC14:18
johnthetubaguyedleafe: basically, return spec_obj is what I am expecting to see, at some point14:18
bauzasedleafe: I was thinking of build_request_spec and set_vm_notif14:18
johnthetubaguyrather than the legacy dict thing14:18
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:18
bauzasbut since there are lots of callers, that's a pretty hairy change :/14:18
edleafebauzas: yep14:18
*** nadya is now known as Guest5691014:18
bauzashence my point above14:19
edleafeok - I could base it on the last of your series, and aim for integrating in newton14:19
bauzasand once all the conductor methods would be using the spec obj, it should be far easier to remove all the conditionals I was about to write eg. in _schedule_destination()14:19
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
johnthetubaguybauzas: I guess we need to think about bumping the major RPC version just after mitaka-314:20
johnthetubaguybauzas: so we can do that tidy up next cycle14:20
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:21
bauzasjohnthetubaguy: speaking of the conductor RPC API, sorry ?14:21
*** shadower47 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:22
*** shadower47 has quit IRC14:22
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:22
bauzas(uploading the latest PS by the time I type)14:23
bauzasanyway14:23
bauzaslet's discuss that in the review, I'm all up for comments :)14:23
n0anobauzas, comments in reviews are good :-)14:23
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:23
bauzasn0ano: moving on ? you probably had hard time yesterday with broncos, so I don't want to make you asleep14:23
n0anobauzas, tnx for your concern, I just went home tobed, no hard partying :-)14:24
n0anoanyway14:24
n0ano#topic Bugs - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=scheduler14:24
*** openstack changes topic to "Bugs - https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=scheduler (Meeting topic: nova-scheduler)"14:24
n0anoI got commitment for our Texas group to look into sched bugs but doesn't look like any progress yet, hopefully soon14:25
n0anoI bug count is sticking at ~38, it would be nice to get that count to decrease as some point14:25
*** myoung|mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:26
*** davideagnello has quit IRC14:26
johnthetubaguybauzas: yes, possibly also the scheduler one, would have to go did14:26
johnthetubaguyn0ano: is that the OSIC team?14:26
n0anojohnthetubaguy, maybe, I don't do acronyms well, it's the joint RackSpace/Intel lab in San Antonio14:27
*** yamamoto has quit IRC14:28
n0anomoving on14:28
n0ano#topic opens14:28
*** openstack changes topic to "opens (Meeting topic: nova-scheduler)"14:28
johnthetubaguyn0ano: yeah, thats them, its just they are focusing on live-migrate bugs right now, although having a good fully triaged list of bugs for folks to work on is no bad thing14:28
cdentI've got this non-priority doc-only change that's been pending for a while: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/262561/ would be nice to dispense with it14:29
n0anojohnthetubaguy, that's reasonable, I did get a commitment that they would look into sched bugs but that the sched would be a secondary priority, better than nothing14:29
johnthetubaguyn0ano : +114:29
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:30
johnthetubaguycdent: I wonder if we do want a patch that tries to talk about the overall picture post mid-cycle?14:30
johnthetubaguycdent: seem like most of the path is defined now14:30
johnthetubaguyyou know, from 10k feet14:31
*** jungleboyj has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
*** esker has quit IRC14:31
cdentjohnthetubaguy: I think that's a fine idea, but I wasn't sure if/when/who time for that, and I started this one when I was considerably less well informed than I am now (which is not to say that I'm well informed now...). So I figured as a stop gap...14:32
johnthetubaguycdent: thats cool14:32
bauzasyeah, providing the epic would be cool14:32
bauzasI second that14:32
johnthetubaguyI might attempt something, if nothing happens soon, but would love it if someone else gets there first14:33
n0anocdent, trying to write it up would be a great way to become more informed, I'd encourage you to try, we'll all help with reviews14:33
johnthetubaguyneed it merged well before the summit, ideally14:33
cdentn0ano: I'm currently _very_ booked on priority patches...14:33
n0anocdent, understood14:33
johnthetubaguycdent: yeah, the patches are key right now, this is probably for post mikta-3 when all those have to have merged14:34
* cdent nods14:34
*** dane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
n0anoanyone have anything else new?14:34
n0anohearing crickets14:35
*** yamahata has quit IRC14:35
n0anoOK, tnx everyone and keep those reviews coming14:36
n0ano#endmeeting14:36
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:36
openstackMeeting ended Mon Feb  8 14:36:05 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:36
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_scheduler/2016/nova_scheduler.2016-02-08-14.00.html14:36
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_scheduler/2016/nova_scheduler.2016-02-08-14.00.txt14:36
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova_scheduler/2016/nova_scheduler.2016-02-08-14.00.log.html14:36
*** dane has quit IRC14:40
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
*** dane has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
*** shadower47 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC14:41
*** shwetaap has quit IRC14:44
*** superdan is now known as dansmith14:45
*** sc68cal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:47
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:48
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:49
*** pbelamge has quit IRC14:50
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC14:50
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:51
*** sdake has quit IRC14:52
*** davideagnello has quit IRC14:53
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** amitgandhinz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** jschwarz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** vgridnev has quit IRC14:59
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** TrevorV has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
ihrachyshi all upgrade guardians. we'll start in a min.15:00
slunkadhi15:01
mhickeyHi15:01
*** cdent has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
jschwarzo/15:01
jschwarz\o/15:01
rossella_shi :)15:01
*** pc_m has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** fouxm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2415:01
ihrachys#startmeeting neutron_upgrades15:01
openstackMeeting started Mon Feb  8 15:01:51 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ihrachys. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_upgrades'15:01
ihrachysok let's get it rolling15:01
ihrachyshi all. I am back with you. thanks rossella_s for running the previous meeting!15:02
korzenhello15:02
mhickeyrossella_s: ++15:02
sc68calo/15:02
ihrachys#topic Announcements15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:02
rossella_sihrachys, my pleasure :) glad to have you back!15:02
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC15:02
ihrachyspc_m was wondering why we don't have a bug to track our OVO work. so here you go:15:02
ihrachys#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/154192815:02
openstackLaunchpad bug 1541928 in neutron "Adopt oslo.versionedobjects for core resources (ports, networks, subnets, ...)" [Medium,Confirmed] - Assigned to Ihar Hrachyshka (ihar-hrachyshka)15:02
*** ankurgupta has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
pc_mihrachys: Thanks!15:03
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC15:03
rossella_stime to update our patches to use that bug id15:03
ihrachysplease mention the bug in all your patches for objectification. it should answer some concerns of people outside of the team.15:03
* njohnston is listening in from the back row15:03
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
ihrachysnext thing is sprint...15:03
ihrachys#topic March code sprint15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "March code sprint (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:03
ihrachysso as you all know, we have a code sprint in Brno in the middle of March15:03
ihrachys#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-January/085328.html15:03
ihrachys(in case you wonder, it's in Europe)15:04
ihrachyswe have a nearly empty etherpad for now15:04
ihrachys#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/code-sprint-neutron-objects-brno15:04
ihrachysbut it already contains some travel related tips15:04
ihrachysplease add your nickname in the list of attendees if you plan to go15:04
ihrachysI hope to see you all there ;)15:04
*** TrevorV has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
mhickeyihrachsy: good to see connections from other big hub airports in Europe! :)15:04
*** jlibosva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
mhickeyihrachys:^15:05
ihrachysmhickey: you are free to update the etherpad :)15:05
ihrachysanother thing worth mentioning is that we are almost at M3 stage (that will occur end of Feb), and the release is middle of March I guess15:05
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
ihrachysjust so everyone is aware that some patches may be blocked for a bit because of core team struggling to push scheduled deliverables. but I hope it won't happened much.15:06
ihrachysok, now to actual business15:06
ihrachys#topic Partial Multinode Grenade15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Partial Multinode Grenade (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:06
ihrachyssc68cal: do you have an update?15:07
sc68calWe're going through Neutron and trying to get the MTU issue fixed15:07
ihrachysI *presume* not much changed since recently, but maybe I miss smth15:07
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:07
sc68calI have a suspicion that the last 3 errors we see with floating IPs is because of an MTU mismatch between router interfaces that Sam-I-Am has discovered - possibly.15:07
ihrachyssc68cal: yeah. I see Sam-I-Am testing different scenarios for MTU in his local setup.15:08
sc68calalthough we should be setting the correct MTU to the guests. So, it's still a mystery really.15:08
ihrachysI actually checked that assumption in gate, I am not sure it's the case.15:08
ihrachysspecifically, I pushed a testing patch https://review.openstack.org/274358 to dump interfaces inside network namespaces15:09
*** jaypipes has quit IRC15:09
ihrachysand checked what's there on internal router legs15:09
sc68calooooh15:09
ihrachysit's the same 1450 (assuming you set 1450 for network_device_mtu)15:09
sc68calGotcha. Yeah I don't like how we have path_mtu, segment_mtu and network_device_mtu15:10
sc68callots of opportunity for error15:10
ihrachyssee here: http://logs.openstack.org/59/265759/20/experimental/gate-grenade-dsvm-neutron-multinode/d64a6e6/logs/worlddump-2016-01-30-164508.txt.gz15:10
ihrachysI actually planned to set a devstack setup with 1450 mtu to see whether it experiences the failure then15:10
ihrachysbut was traveling for the whole week and hence did not have a chance.15:11
*** esheffield has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
ihrachysif that's a local mtu issue when using 1450 mtu for network_device_mtu and is not related to internode connectivity, then I could reproduce it I guess with all-in-one15:11
ihrachysanyhow, need to poke that a bit more15:12
sc68calyup15:12
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:13
ihrachysnevertheless, it's great we take MTU thing seriously: for most setups, it's not a realistic case to run with underlying infrastructure that does not support usual 1500 size for frames.15:13
ihrachysok, next... the biggest topic to cover...15:13
*** shadower47 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:13
ihrachys#topic Object implementation15:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Object implementation (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:13
ihrachysI guess rossella_s is in better position to update than me. rossella_s, your stage :)15:13
rossella_sso as you might see from the list of the patches, there's been a lot of progress15:14
ihrachysyeah, FYI the list is somewhere here:15:14
ihrachys#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Neutron-Upgrades-Subteam15:14
rossella_smhickey, helped a lot in get the tests passing for the port ovo and 2 of the extensions, thanks!15:14
ihrachysa lot of patches in flight. not many merged yet, but that will roll quicker, we just set the stage for now :)15:15
ihrachysmhickey++15:15
mhickeynp15:15
rossella_skorzen, also did a great job with the subnet ovo and with handling composite keys15:15
ihrachysyeah, composite key patch is magic15:16
ihrachys#link https://review.openstack.org/275790 the magic15:16
* ajo reads magic :)15:16
rossella_sslunkad, is working on security group extension, it's still WIP #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275664/15:16
rossella_sI am working at handling synthetic fields in a base neutron object, will send a patch tomorrow probably15:17
*** spotz_zzz is now known as spotz15:17
*** zeih_ has quit IRC15:17
rossella_sother people joined our efforts but I don't see them in the meeting..electrocucaracha, dguitarbite, saisriki15:18
ihrachysa lot of work is still ongoing in base class. apparently we haven't covered all use cases when we did qos. :)15:18
saisrikiHi rossella_s15:19
ihrachysthat's an impressive list already. seems like we'll be in good position to make progress on the sprint.15:19
rossella_syep15:19
rossella_ssaisriki, do you have an update?15:19
rossella_ssaisriki, I don't see any link for a patch in the team page, do you have one?15:19
saisrikiNot much. I will update the wiki page. I started working on creating DB fields for Neutron similar to that of Nova15:20
rossella_ssaisriki, great! if you need any help please reach out15:21
ihrachyssaisriki: thanks. I am not sure what's the scope. Can you describe which fields do you mean?15:21
saisrikiok, will do15:21
ihrachyslike... custom types?15:21
saisrikiI have identified IPAddress and CIDR fields for now. I am not sure if I need to add more types15:21
saisrikiihrachys: yes, custom types15:21
ihrachysoh ok. I thought that CIDR is already supported by OVO library. but if not, yes, we need those.15:22
korzenihrachys, it was raised by rossella_s on the privious meeting, we need SQL alchemy decorator15:22
*** sgotliv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:22
ihrachysnote that korzen has the first custom field in review: https://review.openstack.org/27351715:22
saisrikiOh, if it is already supported, I will re-check.15:22
rossella_sihrachys those fields are supported by OVO but not by sqlalchemy15:22
ihrachysok, I guess I need to educate myself. will wait for the patches.15:22
rossella_sihrachys, we need a translator...look at nova/db/sqlalchemy/types15:23
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
ihrachysrossella_s: oh interesting. ok, let's discuss it in gerrit once patches are up.15:23
korzenthe decorator is needed to insert IPAddress and IPNetwork OVO fields to DB15:23
rossella_sihrachys, ok15:23
ihrachysanything else object-y worth notion?15:23
mhickeyyes..15:23
ihrachysshoot15:23
korzenI have one15:23
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
mhickeyI need some love for following patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273072/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/268274/15:24
ihrachysmhickey: yeah right. we'll get to them. I was not in position to review till today.15:24
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
mhickeyI understand; just putting it out there. thanks.15:24
ihrachyskorzen: what's up?15:24
korzencan I modify the db_api methods to remove the ID param? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275790/3/neutron/db/api.py15:25
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
ihrachyskorzen: well, till now we tried to avoid that. but if that hugely simplifies our lives, we could reconsider it. OR have new functions with proper signature and deprecate old ones.15:26
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:26
rossella_sorry I've just got disconnected for few minutes15:26
korzenihrachys I guess that it would look cleaner if the ID would be removed15:27
mhickey++15:27
ihrachyskorzen: if we can go with deprecation, I would take the path.15:27
korzenok, sounds good to me15:27
*** rossella_s has quit IRC15:28
*** electrocucaracha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
ihrachysok I also encourage folks to check the patch that adds a generic RBAC capability for objects: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/250081/15:28
ihrachysit's very magic and metaclass-y, but gives a promise of easy RBAC integration in the future.15:28
ihrachysand we'll need it when we get to porting networks to objects.15:29
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
korzenfrom software developer ro magician, need to update my CV15:29
ihrachysDistinguished Alchemist15:29
jschwarzaye, Haim is working very hard to get the RBAC patch for M-315:29
korzens/ro/to15:29
*** vahidh has quit IRC15:29
jschwarzreviews will be appreciated for that patch15:30
mhickeyjschwarz: ack15:30
ihrachysoh yeah indeed. it's not much time left to get it in, so we should push. :)15:30
ihrachysthere are also two patches for rpc callbacks rolling upgrades: https://review.openstack.org/265347 and https://review.openstack.org/268040 from ajo15:30
ihrachysthe 1st one should be ready for review15:30
ihrachysalso quite tight on time and it blocks some other initiatives like qos dscp.15:31
ihrachysmhickey: you also have the test-only patch: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/270309/15:31
ihrachysmhickey: do we still wait for new OVO release?15:31
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck15:31
mhickeyihrachys: yes15:32
ihrachysmhickey: ok I gotta request a new release today on oslo meeting15:32
mhickeyihrachys: I would be grateful! :)15:32
ihrachysand that's about it for objects, I guess.15:32
ihrachys#topic Open discussion15:32
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: neutron_upgrades)"15:33
ihrachysanything we have not covered?15:33
*** achanda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
korzenmy open would be about copying test case from OVO15:33
*** shadower72 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:33
korzenrossella_ ihrachys are we on the same page?15:34
*** davideagnello has quit IRC15:34
ihrachyskorzen: right. we cannot rely on non-public code from oslo libraries.15:34
ihrachysI hate duplication mysefl15:34
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:34
*** j___ has quit IRC15:34
ihrachysmaybe we could talk to oslo folks to get the test declared public15:34
ihrachysI think we already have cases like that15:34
rossella_ihrachys, good idea15:34
ihrachysf.e. oslo.db provides some test class for migrations15:35
ihrachysand we inherit from it in neutron15:35
*** shadower72 has quit IRC15:35
ihrachysok let me talk to oslo folks today on the matter and we'll see what they thing15:35
ihrachys*think15:35
rossella_ihrachys, thanks!15:35
korzenok, thx ihrachys15:35
mhickeyrossella_s: Is there a backlog of objects to be done or is it clear at the moment?15:35
rossella_mhickey, thanks for asking...well there's a WIP patch for sec group and I haven't see any patch for port security yet15:37
rossella_mhickey, if you have spare cycles I guess we can ask people directly if they need help...it that's something that might interest you15:37
ihrachysI think we took on ports and subnets and networks and that's already more than we can manage right now. I suggest we collaborate on existing patches to get them merged.15:37
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:37
slunkadrossella_: I should be able to complete the sec group one this week..15:37
rossella_slunkad, great15:38
mhickeyrossella_: ok. ihrachys: agree. I will probably have less time this week with the bug deputy work! :)15:38
slunkadat least good enough for review ;)15:38
*** davidsha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:38
rossella_mhickey, right! thanks for that too! we are here if you need help15:38
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:38
ihrachysslunkad: no one expects it to shine on first iteration15:38
korzenmhickey, I'm busy with subnet, so maybe you can look at network OVO, if interested?15:38
slunkadihrachys: right!15:39
*** fouxm has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:39
*** esker has quit IRC15:39
mhickeyrossella_: thanks for offering. I may come asking! :)15:39
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:39
ihrachysgreat. I guess we can make the meeting shorter and spend the next 20 mins to review patches. :)15:39
mhickeykorzen: I will get back to you. Maybe maxed as have patches to drive through myself.15:39
ihrachysthanks all and keep up the good work15:40
ihrachys#endmeeting15:40
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:40
openstackMeeting ended Mon Feb  8 15:40:06 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:40
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_upgrades/2016/neutron_upgrades.2016-02-08-15.01.html15:40
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_upgrades/2016/neutron_upgrades.2016-02-08-15.01.txt15:40
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_upgrades/2016/neutron_upgrades.2016-02-08-15.01.log.html15:40
rossella_thanks, bye!!15:40
mhickeyThanks and bye15:40
korzenok, thx, bye15:40
jschwarzbb15:40
pc_mbye15:40
slunkadthanks, bye@15:40
slunkad!*15:40
openstackslunkad: Error: "*" is not a valid command.15:40
*** pc_m has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
*** rcernin has quit IRC15:42
*** ddecapit has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
*** ddecapit is now known as DuaneDeC715:42
*** ankurgupta has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:43
*** achanda has quit IRC15:43
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:44
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
*** amotoki has quit IRC15:46
*** cbouch has quit IRC15:46
*** cbouch has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:47
*** mikelk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
*** Ravikiran_K has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:50
*** johnsom has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:55
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:56
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
*** kgiusti has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** hyamauchi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** vgridnev has quit IRC15:59
*** EricGonc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
*** harlowja_at_home has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
dims#startmeeting oslo16:01
dimscourtesy ping for GheRivero, amotoki, amrith, bknudson, bnemec, dansmith, dhellmann, dougwig, e0ne, flaper87, garyk, harlowja, haypo,16:01
*** davideagnello has quit IRC16:01
openstackMeeting started Mon Feb  8 16:01:13 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is dims. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:01
*** rcernin has quit IRC16:01
dimscourtesy ping for ihrachyshka, jd__, jecarey, johnsom, jungleboyj, kgiusti, kragniz, lifeless, lintan, ozamiatin, redrobot, rpodolyaka, spamaps16:01
dimscourtesy ping for sergmelikyan, sreshetnyak, sileht, sreshetnyak, stevemar, therve, thinrichs, toabctl, viktors, zhiyan, zzzeek, gcb16:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:01
dimscourtesy ping for dukhlov, lxsli, rbradfor, mikal, nakato, tcammann1, browne,16:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:01
e0nehi16:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'oslo'16:01
ozamiatino/16:01
johnsomo/16:01
harlowja_at_homeyo yo16:01
stevemaro/16:01
kgiustio/16:01
ihrachyso/16:01
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC16:01
jecareyo/16:01
rbradforo/16:01
rpodolyakao/16:01
*** haypo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
dimshi e0ne johnsom harlowja_at_home stevemar kgiusti ihrachys jecarey rbradfor rpodolyaka16:01
harlowja_at_homehowdy16:02
dhellmanno/16:02
kgiustihey there!16:02
*** Prem_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
dimslet's get started :)16:02
toabctlhi16:02
dims#topic Red flags for/from liaisons16:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Red flags for/from liaisons (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:02
dukhlovhi16:02
johnsomNothing much.   We would like to get the taskflow version bumped: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276549/216:02
*** jlibosva has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
harlowja_at_home+1 :)16:03
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
ihrachysneutron here: we may need new oslo.versionedobjects library with a new registry fixture so that we can remove some code that accesses internal attributes from the library.16:03
dimsjohnsom : ack16:03
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC16:03
ihrachysalso, we have a question on the library testing interface, but I guess we better leave it to open discussion16:04
dimsihrachys : code is already in?16:04
ihrachysdims: yes16:04
dimsihrachys ok16:04
stevemardims: nothing from keystone (where's bknudson_?)16:04
dimsthanks stevemar16:04
dims#topic Releases for Mitaka16:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Releases for Mitaka (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:04
dims#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277212/ - Mega Release16:04
dims#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277203/ - Oslo privsep 1.0.016:04
dims#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274746/ - Oslo Config16:04
jungleboyjo/16:04
dimsneed reviews on those please. specifically look at the list-changes job16:04
dimsam holding back the oslo.db - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277222/16:05
dimsas we saw some breaks with InvalidSortKey that rpodolyaka helped fix16:05
stevemar\o/ for oslo.config release that has the generator fix16:05
harlowja_at_home#link http://logs.openstack.org/12/277212/4/check/gate-releases-tox-list-changes/386a7b5/console.html16:05
jungleboyjdims: No red flags from Cinder right now, btw.16:05
*** ajmiller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:05
dimsstevemar : thanks for your patience, we were waiting on a bug that cropped up for that release16:06
dimsjungleboyj : thanks16:06
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
stevemardims: np, it wasn't super critical, just for the sample config16:06
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
jungleboyjdims: Welcome.16:06
haypofor oslo.db, the regression is fixed by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277328/16:06
dimsstevemar : i pointed out the keystone proposed update setup to Nova, they may want to do the same16:06
haypodims: oh, you didn't approve the change?16:06
stevemardims: oh nice16:06
jungleboyjstevemar: What was the generator fix?16:07
haypodims: i can approve it if you want (we know have a fix for heat)16:07
dimshaypo : done16:07
stevemardims: it acts funny sometimes, but it does the job16:07
stevemarjungleboyj: options were out of order16:07
dimsso for others, the idea is that keystone team does check in their sample keystone.conf and they have a bot that generates a fresh keystone.conf and compares it and proposes reviews16:07
dimsnova does not have a sample config checked in16:08
jungleboyjstevemar: Ah, good.16:08
dimsso the bot essentially goes berserk :)16:08
dimswith the new oslo.config hopefully it will not keep proposing updates because things go out of order16:08
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
dimsi'd recommend this setup for other projects as well16:08
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
rbradfordims, I second that16:09
dimsas it helps when libraries that you use change their config options16:09
dimsyou get an immediate feedback16:09
*** ajmiller has quit IRC16:09
stevemardims and others, there were a few reasons why we did it in the first place: 1) different ptaches would propose changes to the sample config and break each other, and 2) or they would forget and someone would eventually have to propose this patch (catch new oslo config options)16:09
dhellmannstevemar : you could also use http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.config/sphinxconfiggen.html to generate the sample as you build your docs16:10
*** IlyaG has quit IRC16:10
dimsdhellmann : others, example proposal from bot - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269479/16:10
dhellmannyeah, the next release of the lib should fix the ordering issue for them, thanks to rbradfor's patch16:11
dimsthanks rbradfor16:11
stevemardims: yeah, that's the one that shows it all out of whack16:11
jungleboyjdims: I have a team member that was hoping to talk about all the different ways that configs are being handled.16:11
stevemarrbradfor: thanks! :D16:11
rbradforstevemar, np16:11
jungleboyjdims: Hopefully in Austin and try to bring some sanity to everything.16:11
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
dimsjungleboyj : do we need to wait till austin? :)16:12
*** belmoreira has quit IRC16:12
dimsi'd prefer to do prep work before if possible16:12
*** diablo_rojo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
jungleboyjdims: Well, don't have to but it would be nice to get together and talk about it.16:12
jungleboyjspeaking of the devil, here is diablo_rojo now.16:13
dhellmannjungleboyj : is this the person who proposed a panel session for the summit on the ML a while back?16:13
dimsdiablo_rojo : will you be around for open discussion in a few mins?16:13
* dhellmann can't remember the name16:13
jungleboyjdhellmann: Yes.16:13
harlowja_at_homeliterally might be the devil, lol16:13
dhellmannjungleboyj : ok, good, I was worried we had 2 sets of ideas floating around :-)16:14
dimsk let's hold on to that till open discussion :)16:14
dims#topic Using our CI instead of travis16:14
dims#link http://logs.openstack.org/74/277074/1/experimental/periodic-nova-py27-with-oslo-master/f291087/16:14
*** openstack changes topic to "Using our CI instead of travis (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:14
dims#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277086/16:14
jungleboyjdhellmann: No, diablo_rojo is Kendall Nelson on my team.  Can tlak later.16:14
dhellmannjungleboyj : ++16:14
diablo_rojodims:  Yes I will be around16:14
dimsso the idea here is for me/us to stop using the https://travis-ci.org/dims/ setup for identifying py27/py34 unit tests breaks16:15
diablo_rojodhellmann: Yep thats me :)16:15
dimsturn those into periodic jobs which anyone can look at16:15
dimsif you see the links above, there are project-config reviews16:15
harlowja_at_homeya!16:15
dhellmanndims : where does the output of the jobs go?16:15
bknudson_what are the options for jobs? Is periodic the only option?16:15
dimsanyone from neutron here? need your blessing on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277086/16:15
dhellmannhow would I find the logs?16:15
bknudson_maybe experimental job16:15
dimsdhellmann : we'll get emails16:15
dhellmannok16:16
dimsbknudson_ : currently they are setup as experimental so i can kick tires, but will be pure periodic jobs16:16
*** Guest56910 has quit IRC16:16
dimsbknudson_ : till next rev of gerrit API where a trigger will be available for periodic jobs16:16
bknudson_ok16:16
*** kencjohnston has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
*** ccneill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:17
dimsi've talked to jeblair, fungi and others about needing a way to run these especially to see if we fixed a problem after we identify one16:17
*** hyamauchi has quit IRC16:18
fungithere are other systems which could benefit from using this as an example too16:18
*** DuaneDeC7 has quit IRC16:18
*** vahidh has quit IRC16:18
dimsyes, thanks fungi16:18
fungii know we've been wanting for a while to be able to run equivalents of various projects' jobs for constraints update proposals, for example16:19
*** DuaneDeC7 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
dimsany concerns here? on anteaya 's suggestion, i'll drop an email to -dev as well16:19
dhellmannthis is a huge improvement over running the tests by hand16:19
fungiand teh challenge around that is basically the same16:19
bknudson_maybe we could use it for keystone so we stop breaking things16:19
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
* fungi loves it when people stop breaking things16:20
dhellmannbknudson_ : yep, eventually it would be good to have this in all libraries16:20
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
dimsanother problem here is where to go look for the results (aggregate), so will setup some logstash/grafana/graphite queries/links16:20
dimsfungi : right? ^^16:20
dhellmannI thought we might want to look at triggering similar jobs when a release is requested16:20
*** ccneill has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
*** pbelamge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
dimsbknudson_ : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277086/ has keystone listed16:20
bknudson_we'd like to know before the release16:20
fungidims: yeah, you can use those various systems for short or long term trending depending on what you're looking for16:21
dhellmannbknudson_ : right, they would run in the check queue for the release request patch16:21
*** [HeOS] has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
dimscool, anyone interested, please help me move this forward :)16:22
fungidims: though the discoverability issue we have is mostly on periodic and post jobs. for check/gate jobs we report onto gerrit changes16:22
*** HeOS has quit IRC16:22
dimsfungi : right16:22
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:22
dims#topic ihrachys -  library testing interface16:22
*** openstack changes topic to "ihrachys - library testing interface (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:22
dimsihrachys : all yours16:22
dimswhat's up?16:22
*** kebray_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
dimsok let's open it up then :)16:23
dims#topic Open discussion16:23
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: oslo)"16:23
ihrachysmm, sorry16:23
ihrachysso in neutron, we started to implement some custom oslo.versionedobjects fields16:24
ihrachys#link https://review.openstack.org/27351716:24
bknudson_why not put them in oslo.versionedobjects?16:24
ihrachysand obviously we want to test them16:24
*** kebray has quit IRC16:24
ihrachysbknudson_: it's neutron only16:24
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC16:24
dimsbknudson_ : hang on till we get a full problem statement :)16:25
ihrachysinitial version of the patch was basing the test class on test_fields from oslo library16:25
ihrachys#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273517/2/neutron/tests/unit/objects/test_common_types.py16:25
ihrachysbut I expressed concern that the test class is not part of library interface16:25
dhellmannyeah, the tests subpackage is not part of the API most of the time16:25
ihrachysand hence we need to duplicate it in our tree16:25
bknudson_move it to the public interface16:25
ihrachysand that's what we have in latest version16:25
dhellmannthe usual thing to do is create a fixtures module that is part of the public API16:25
ihrachysbut we were wondering whether it may be useful to have some test class like that as public16:26
ihrachyslike oslo.db provides some test classes for projects16:26
dhellmannso you'd update oslo.vo to use the fixtures, and then on the next release you could use them16:26
*** pbelamge has quit IRC16:26
dimsdansmith, around?16:26
dims+1 to dhellmann 's suggestion16:26
dhellmannihrachys : fixtures are ok, but not test base classes16:26
ihrachysdhellmann: I think we are also interested in test cases from the class16:26
dhellmannwe have a policy for this: http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/policy/test-tools.html16:27
ihrachysok, in oslo.db we have that http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.db/api/oslo_db.sqlalchemy.test_migrations.html16:27
*** kebray_ has quit IRC16:27
dhellmannyeah, I think that existed before the policy16:28
bknudson_is there some concern about making functionality for tests part of the public api?16:28
ihrachysok, got it. we'll see whether there is anything worth a fixture beyond test cases then16:28
dhellmannbasically, it becomes extremely messy to debug multiple inheritance in test classes16:28
dhellmannthat's why fixtures work out better16:28
dhellmannbut if you can't convert what you have into a proper fixture, we should revisit16:29
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
bknudson_what's the oslo code that's being made public?16:29
ihrachysthanks. we'll take it from here.16:29
dhellmannbknudson_ : I interpreted the question as "how should we handle this"16:29
dimssounds like a good plan of action16:29
dimsbknudson_ : test_fields from o.vo16:29
*** tcammann has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:30
dimsdhellmann : can you please remind us about the library freeze dates?16:30
harlowja_at_home#link https://github.com/openstack/oslo.versionedobjects/blob/master/oslo_versionedobjects/tests/test_fields.py16:30
*** vgridnev has quit IRC16:31
dhellmann#link the schedule http://releases.openstack.org/mitaka/schedule.html16:31
dhellmannfinal releases for non-client libraries is R-6, which is Feb 22-2616:31
dimsemail http://markmail.org/message/3feg5oajsg3q6rmk16:31
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
*** vgridnev has quit IRC16:31
*** browne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
*** tcammann_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:31
dhellmannspeaking of, I have some enhancements and fixes for oslo.config's sphinx integration that I would like to get into the release: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.config+topic:unique-config-section-headers16:31
*** pnavarro has quit IRC16:32
dimsso, please look at reviews in progress, global requirement minimums and upper constraints things you need16:32
dhellmannsome of those are needed for the glance docs16:32
dimsdhellmann : ack. will review16:32
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:32
dimsany other things to discuss from any one?16:33
*** snackewm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
dimsgoing once16:33
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
jungleboyjdiablo_rojo: ^^^16:34
dimsdiablo_rojo : ping :)16:34
diablo_rojodims:  Hello :)16:34
dimsthe floor is yours :)16:34
diablo_rojoSo I missed the first part of the conversation but jungleboyj filled me in a bit about options changes16:34
diablo_rojo?16:34
dimsdiablo_rojo : y we were talking about how keystone maintains a keystone.conf.sample in its tree by using a bot16:35
jungleboyjSorry, also in another conference call.16:35
diablo_rojoI just was wondering what that entailed and if that may be a good thing to add to the design summit talk about the generation of sample conf files for all projects.16:35
*** tcammann has quit IRC16:36
harlowja_at_homeseems like a good thing to ad16:36
harlowja_at_home*add16:36
diablo_rojodims:  I had talked to Morgain Fainberg and he said he would talk a bit about keystones approach if my proposed session gets accepted.16:36
dimsdiablo_rojo : just an entry in a project-config repo. quite easy, it's all setup. only project using it is keystone, so just need to enable for other projects16:36
*** tcammann_ has quit IRC16:36
dimsdiablo_rojo : it will work just like the bot that proposes requirements changes16:37
*** kebray has quit IRC16:37
diablo_rojodims: That sounds wonderful :)16:37
stevemardims: glad you like it :)16:37
dhellmanndims : I guess that means we've given up on encouraging projects to generate those files rather than checking them in?16:37
diablo_rojodhellmann: checking them in was hard for Cinder with all the drivers in tree adding options and never updating the file :/16:37
jungleboyjstevemar: So instead of failing check runs it just proposes updates ?16:37
dimsdhellmann : i think of it as keeping a well known blessed master version16:38
stevemardhellmann: the checked in versions are really handy to show people options :\16:38
stevemarjungleboyj: yep, same as the requirements bot16:38
dimsjungleboyj : diablo_rojo : example https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269479/16:38
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:38
jungleboyjstevemar: Interesting.16:38
diablo_rojodims: Thanks :)16:38
*** korzen has quit IRC16:38
diablo_rojoCOOL16:38
dhellmannstevemar : do you just want a link to a file to share? http://docs.openstack.org/developer/oslo.config/sphinxconfiggen.html16:38
diablo_rojojungleboyj: I think Cinder needs this :)16:39
stevemardhellmann: haven't looked into that yet, is it new?16:39
*** pballand has quit IRC16:39
dimsdiablo_rojo : jungleboyj : http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=propose-config-updates16:39
dhellmannstevemar : we added that for this purpose in liberty, and didn't advertise it well16:39
stevemardhellmann: what was the issue with having the sample checked in?16:39
jungleboyjdiablo_rojo: Interesting.  We will need to look at that and see what the rest of the team things.16:39
jungleboyj*thinks16:39
dhellmannstevemar : your "master" file is out of date as soon as anyone changes options in a library16:40
diablo_rojojungleboyj: I can put it on the weekly agenda if you'd like16:40
jungleboyjdiablo_rojo: ++16:40
dimsdhellmann : hence the daily update from the bot16:40
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:40
*** rvyalov has quit IRC16:40
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC16:40
dimsso at least you know that the rug was pulled from under you16:40
* dhellmann shrugs16:40
diablo_rojodhellmann: So a while back in the ML, you had made comments about the way Cinder was setting up entry_points? I put a patch up to try to address one of them and I was wondering if you could take a look?16:40
stevemardhellmann: that's why the proposal bot type job was created16:41
dhellmanndiablo_rojo : link?16:41
diablo_rojodhellmann: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274810/16:41
dhellmannstevemar : if you want to check compiled files into the repo, I can't stop you. I just think it's a bad idea.16:41
dhellmanndiablo_rojo : it's on my queue16:41
*** bogdando has quit IRC16:41
stevemardhellmann: i think we're trying to solve the problem?16:41
diablo_rojodhellmann: It just removes the keystonemiddleware endpoint we had in setup.cfg. Thanks.16:42
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:42
rbradfordiablo_rojo, there are also some other inconsistencies in the entry points,  _ and . syntax in oslo's. I recall I had issues using these namespaces.16:42
dhellmannstevemar : as long as you're not blocking other patches because a validator doesn't pass when the file is out of date, doing it won't make development more difficult. I just thought we all agreed to stop doing it entirely, so I'm surprised to learn about this new bot thing.16:42
stevemardhellmann: i'l look at sphinxconfgen soon, you've yet to steer me wrong :)16:42
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC16:43
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:43
rbradforstevemar, we have started to try and use both the config file to generate docs of all options on one page, and then also have a sample config in the docs to reference that matches16:44
diablo_rojorbradfor: Oh yeah? Everything seems to work currently- better than it did even than before when we used oslo-incubator for this stuff. I could be missing something though.16:44
*** pbelamge has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:45
*** vahidh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:45
*** jecarey has quit IRC16:45
stevemarrbradfor: dhellmann is there a project that is currently using this?16:45
diablo_rojostevemar: Keystone is16:45
rbradforstevemar, glance I believe16:45
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:45
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:45
stevemardiablo_rojo: i meant sphinxconfiggen16:45
dhellmannstevemar : glance is using the other form of sphinx integration, with pretty output instead of a sample file16:46
*** armax has quit IRC16:46
dhellmannhttp://docs.openstack.org/developer/glance/opts.html16:46
diablo_rojostevemar: Oh. My mistake. Sorry!16:46
stevemardhellmann: arright, i'll take a look, i'd prefer it in docs over checked in, didn't know this existed16:46
dhellmannI have a patch up to improve on that, but it depends on some of the unreleased and unmerged changes I mentioned earlier: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276931/16:46
dhellmannI can update that to also use the sample file generator16:47
bknudson_http://docs.openstack.org/developer/glance/opts.html belongs in end-user docs16:47
dhellmannstevemar : yeah, like I said, we didn't do a great job of advertising it16:47
dhellmannbknudson_ : it will, eventually16:47
dhellmannI also need to talk to the docs team about using this for the config guide16:47
*** jschwarz has quit IRC16:47
dimscool. so we all have things to look over :)16:47
dhellmannthat build will be interesting, since the inputs come from source files in a lot of other projects16:48
dhellmannat this point it's something for next cycle16:48
stevemardhellmann: alright, i'll poke around at this then16:48
bknudson_http://docs.openstack.org/liberty/config-reference/content/keystone-configuration-file.html -- not pretty16:48
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
stevemarbknudson_: yeah :\16:48
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
dhellmannbknudson_ : yeah, now that they've converted the new guides to rst they'll be able to use these extensions16:48
bknudson_great16:49
rbradforbknudson_, definitely not when also looking at for other projects in the same doc16:49
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC16:49
* SpamapS is here now16:49
dimsHey SpamapS16:49
SpamapSsorry I've been so absent. How are the tooz drivers going?16:49
stevemardhellmann: looks like we were trying to solve the same issue, and didn't know each other mechanism existed :)16:49
* dims pokes harlowja_at_home 16:50
harlowja_at_homepokes back16:50
*** mhickey has quit IRC16:50
stevemarhmm, that definitely isn't openstack-like16:50
dimsjd__ : harlowja_at_home : what's up with tooz ( SpamapS is asking )16:50
dimsstevemar : haha16:50
harlowja_at_homeSpamapS, vilobh been busy with internal stuff, but consul almost there @ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245362/16:50
jd__it's cool!16:50
SpamapSharlowja_at_home: sweet. We're using consul heavily in the cloud that has distracted me from tooz, and I was like "oh snap I want that driver now" ;-)16:51
harlowja_at_homehttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/266015/ also makes etcd use compare-and-delete16:51
harlowja_at_homeSpamapS, i'll bug vilobh when i see him today :-P16:51
dhellmannstevemar : yeah16:51
jd__i'm working on test setup simplification with overtest too https://github.com/jd/overtest16:52
harlowja_at_homeSpamapS, what are u using consul heavily for?16:52
SpamapSharlowja_at_home: service discovery16:52
* dims we have 8 mins left - warning16:52
SpamapShealthchecks -> DNS -> loadbalancer/mysql/rabbitmq16:52
harlowja_at_homek16:52
*** DuaneDeC7 has quit IRC16:52
SpamapSIt's quite nice for that.16:52
harlowja_at_homeright16:52
*** pnavarro has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:53
harlowja_at_homeIBM ok with all that go code?? ;)16:53
SpamapSwe're not writing it. ;)16:53
*** matrohon has quit IRC16:53
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
SpamapSand I mean, I find any language decision hard to criticise whenever I see import eventlet ... ;)16:54
harlowja_at_homebut its green, green must be good, lol16:54
*** nadya is now known as Guest5544716:54
harlowja_at_home*makes things green, lol16:54
dims:)16:54
harlowja_at_homeeventlet_organics16:54
*** ashleighfarnham has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:54
harlowja_at_homeha16:54
*** mikelk has quit IRC16:54
dimsso let's wrap up for today then. thanks a lot everyone16:55
SpamapSeventlet is definitely GMO threading16:55
harlowja_at_homelol16:55
dimshaha16:55
SpamapSharlowja_at_home: ty for the update16:55
harlowja_at_homenp16:55
dims#endmeeting16:55
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:55
openstackMeeting ended Mon Feb  8 16:55:43 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:55
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2016/oslo.2016-02-08-16.01.html16:55
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2016/oslo.2016-02-08-16.01.txt16:55
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/oslo/2016/oslo.2016-02-08-16.01.log.html16:55
*** browne has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:55
*** harlowja_at_home has quit IRC16:56
*** johnsom has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:56
*** xyang1 has quit IRC16:57
*** DuaneDeC7 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:59
*** reed_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away17:02
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed17:02
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:02
*** DuaneDeC7 has quit IRC17:02
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:03
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC17:05
*** pbelamge has quit IRC17:05
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
*** baoli has quit IRC17:07
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
*** reed_ has quit IRC17:07
*** ashleighfarnham has quit IRC17:08
*** hyamauchi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:11
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:11
*** esker has quit IRC17:11
*** scheuran has quit IRC17:12
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC17:13
*** samuelBartel has quit IRC17:13
*** dims has quit IRC17:14
*** edtubill has quit IRC17:14
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away17:15
*** ihrachys has quit IRC17:16
*** kebray has quit IRC17:16
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:16
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:16
*** Aish has quit IRC17:18
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed17:19
*** marios_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
*** marios_ has quit IRC17:20
*** marios_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
*** kertis has quit IRC17:20
*** edwardb has quit IRC17:20
*** marios has quit IRC17:21
*** dshakhray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:21
*** marios_ is now known as marios17:21
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:21
*** yamamoto has quit IRC17:22
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:23
*** mfedosin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:25
*** apetrich has quit IRC17:25
*** sudipto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
mfedosinCourtesy meeting reminder: nikhil_k, ativelkov, mfedosin, docaedo, dshakhray, kfox111, kairat, nikhil, sudipto17:29
*** kairat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
*** davideagnello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
*** clopez has quit IRC17:30
mfedosinlet's begin?17:30
kairato/17:30
dshakhrayo/17:30
mfedosin#startmeeting glance_artifacts_sub_team17:30
openstackMeeting started Mon Feb  8 17:30:57 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mfedosin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:30
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:30
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: glance_artifacts_sub_team)"17:30
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance_artifacts_sub_team'17:31
mfedosino/17:31
mfedosin#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-artifacts-sub-team-meeting-agenda17:31
*** haypo has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
* mfedosin waits for Nikhil to start17:31
mfedosinsudipto: thank you for join us!17:32
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:32
docaedoo/17:32
sudiptomfedosin, happy to join! :)17:32
*** banix has quit IRC17:32
mfedosinokay, I think we can start with midcycle updates17:32
mfedosinit was last week and we discussed things about Glare17:33
mfedosin#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-mitaka-virtual-mid-cycle17:33
mfedosinsection Glare17:33
mfedosin1. We all agree that separation to public and private apis are bad17:34
*** Aish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
nikhilhi17:34
nikhilmy previous meeting overrun, sorry about delay here17:34
mfedosin2. To satisfy DefCore we make Images plugin and OpenStack Image API obligaatory for all Glare deployments17:34
mfedosinnikhil: HI!!!!17:35
mfedosinwelcome17:35
*** vgridnev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:35
mfedosinwe're talking about updates from midcycle17:35
nikhilthank you :)17:35
nikhilah cool, I guess it was a healthy and productive discussion17:35
mfedosinnikhil: I just copy here the decisions we made17:36
mfedosin3. We will use oslo.vo as a standard declarative framework to define Glare plugins17:37
mfedosinand finally we decided not to merge current glare client for v0.117:37
*** clopez has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:37
mfedosin#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255220/17:38
mfedosinbecause only Murano uses v0.1 and they have client merged in their muranoclient17:38
*** rellerreller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:40
mfedosinso, we confirmed everything that we already knew.17:40
*** IlyaG has quit IRC17:40
mfedosinnext thing, as I promised I wrote a Glare FAQ17:40
mfedosin#link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D4Hik0-XNqwi43gxtybCs9-fMqh5IAIu8CHB33e46OQ/edit17:41
*** sgotliv has quit IRC17:41
mfedosindoes this link work for you?17:41
nikhilworks for me17:41
mfedosinit's very initial draft with terrible English17:41
mfedosinOlena didn't have a chance to look there17:42
docaedolink works for me too17:42
nikhilso, iiuc it's open for collaboration right and not something you are planning to evolve yourself and publish new draft there?17:42
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:42
mfedosin(Olena is a Glance technical writer)17:42
mfedosinmy idea is to publish it in OpenStack wiki17:43
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:43
*** baoli has quit IRC17:43
mfedosinand update it from time to time17:43
mfedosinwhen new information appears17:43
*** boris-42 has quit IRC17:43
*** pvaneck has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:44
mfedosinfeel free to live comments there, maybe you want to see other answers there17:44
kairatso it looks like an intro to the project17:44
*** shwetaap has quit IRC17:44
mfedosinso you can leave your questions17:44
mfedosinkairat is right17:44
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
mfedosinI made it to help newcomers17:45
*** SridharG has quit IRC17:45
*** shwetaap has quit IRC17:45
nikhilso, searchlight has this information in the source tree17:45
mfedosinlast week we discussed this service with sudipto17:45
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
mfedosinand I tried to put the answers to the questions he asked me.17:46
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:46
*** shwetaap has quit IRC17:46
mfedosinmaybe we can merge it in glance repo17:46
*** neilus has quit IRC17:46
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
mfedosinI just want the community be okay with it17:46
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:46
nikhil++17:47
*** shwetaap has quit IRC17:47
sudiptomfedosin, nikhil is it possible to play around with some bit of the prototype in some way?17:47
*** edtubill has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:47
mfedosinbut anyway it's a draft and you can add your comment there till the next week17:47
mfedosinsudipto: v1 is under discussion17:48
mfedosinand currently there is no prototype17:48
mfedosinbut we have unstable v0.1 api17:48
sudiptook17:48
nikhilI guess the question is which prototype and the one which we want to work isn't ready yet :)17:48
mfedosinand you can play with it to see how things work17:48
docaedoI believe kzaitsev_mb is working on a prototype for the app catalog, he might have something people can poke at this week17:48
*** _gryf has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:48
mfedosinkzaitsev_mb works on the adapter between Glare and app catalog17:49
mfedosinas I mentioned v0.1 is merged and ready for usage17:50
mfedosinbut we're going to evolve it to v117:50
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:50
sudiptook17:50
mfedosinwhich doesn't affect app catalog17:50
*** Guest55447 has quit IRC17:51
*** baoli has quit IRC17:51
kairatI guess latest bugs from kzaitsev_mb are related to trhis prototype17:51
mfedosinso, please leave your questions there17:51
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC17:51
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC17:51
mfedosinkairat: I'll ask him tomorrow17:51
mfedosinnext thing - I made an etherpad with Glare stable api draft17:52
*** banix has quit IRC17:52
mfedosin#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glare-v1-api17:52
mfedosinit's a generalization of glance v2 api17:53
mfedosinand glance v2 api included there17:53
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:53
*** phil_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:53
mfedosinbut there is only one special moment - in v2 api image becomes active right after file upload17:54
mfedosinwe can't do it in Glare, because we support several blobs per artifact17:54
mfedosinthat's why I suggest you a trick...17:54
*** kszukielojc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:55
*** evgenyf has quit IRC17:55
mfedosinin Images plugin there will be an option 'activate_on_upload' True by default17:55
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** shashank_hegde has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:56
mfedosinif file was successfully uploaded then it immediately transfers status to 'active' for image17:56
mfedosinin other cases uses must explicitly call /actions/activate to make an artifact active17:57
mfedosinif this set of calls is okay for you then I'll start to write a full spec about Glare api17:58
*** daemontool has quit IRC17:58
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
docaedowhat's the difference between activate and reactivate?17:58
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:58
mfedosinactivate transfers artifact from queued to active17:59
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa17:59
*** kebray has quit IRC17:59
mfedosinand it's available for every user17:59
mfedosinreactivate may be available for admin only17:59
*** agireud has quit IRC18:00
mfedosinfor example if someone publish malicoius artifact admin may want to deactivate it18:00
docaedoI guess I was thinking would only need deactivate and activate?18:00
mfedosin(remove from public)18:00
mfedosinI want that reactivate may be availabe for admin only18:00
docaedobut I guess in this case reactivate is the opposite of deactivate, and "activate" as you said is more about moving from queued to active18:00
docaedomakes sense to me18:01
docaedothanks18:01
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC18:01
mfedosinI'll describe it in FAQ18:01
*** degorenko is now known as _degorenko|afk18:01
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
mfedosinokay, we are out of time18:01
*** davidsha has quit IRC18:01
mfedosinthank you all for joining18:01
docaedothank you!18:02
nikhilthanks18:02
kairatThanks18:02
sudiptothanks!18:02
mfedosin#endmeeting18:02
*** agireud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:02
openstackMeeting ended Mon Feb  8 18:02:16 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:02
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance_artifacts_sub_team/2016/glance_artifacts_sub_team.2016-02-08-17.30.html18:02
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance_artifacts_sub_team/2016/glance_artifacts_sub_team.2016-02-08-17.30.txt18:02
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance_artifacts_sub_team/2016/glance_artifacts_sub_team.2016-02-08-17.30.log.html18:02
*** kairat has quit IRC18:02
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
*** rossella_ has quit IRC18:02
*** iyamahat has quit IRC18:03
*** rossella_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** fitodua93 has quit IRC18:05
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:06
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC18:06
*** dshakhray has quit IRC18:06
*** rellerreller has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:07
*** armax has quit IRC18:07
*** derekh is now known as derekh_afk18:07
*** daemontool has quit IRC18:09
*** daemontool_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
*** SridharG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:09
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC18:11
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC18:12
*** jwang_ has quit IRC18:17
*** [HeOS] is now known as HeOS18:18
*** jwang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC18:21
*** sudipto has quit IRC18:23
*** neiljerram has quit IRC18:23
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:24
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:24
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:25
*** paul-carlton1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:25
*** dkalleg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:25
*** shwetaap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:26
*** yamamoto has quit IRC18:26
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:27
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC18:27
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** nadya is now known as Guest4490118:28
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:28
*** armax has quit IRC18:31
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC18:32
*** Guest44901 has quit IRC18:32
*** pnavarro has quit IRC18:33
*** baoli_ has quit IRC18:34
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:34
*** hyamauchi has quit IRC18:35
*** baoli has quit IRC18:36
*** matrohon has quit IRC18:37
*** kebray has quit IRC18:38
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:38
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC18:39
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away18:41
*** fitodua53 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:43
*** kebray has quit IRC18:43
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC18:45
*** piet has quit IRC18:47
*** _amrith_ is now known as amrith18:48
*** edwardb has quit IRC18:48
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** edwardb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:50
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
*** bank_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC18:53
*** fitodua53 has quit IRC18:54
*** apetrich has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
*** kebray has quit IRC18:57
*** vilobhmm11 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:57
*** alexandrelevine has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:58
*** catherineD has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
*** matrohon has quit IRC19:00
catherineD#startmeeting refstack19:00
openstackMeeting started Mon Feb  8 19:00:30 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is catherineD. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.19:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.19:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: refstack)"19:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'refstack'19:00
*** nkrinner has quit IRC19:01
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC19:01
*** hyamauchi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
*** amrith is now known as _amrith_19:02
pvanecko/19:02
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2419:02
*** fitodua19 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:02
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:03
alexandrelevineo/19:03
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC19:04
catherineDhi pvaneck: alexandrelevine: Let's waite for a couple more mins19:05
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:05
catherineD#link meeting agenda and notes, please feel free to add items https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-16-02-0819:05
rockygo/19:06
catherineDrockyg: Hi19:06
*** paul-carlton1 has quit IRC19:07
catherineDLet's start19:07
catherineD#link meeting agenda and notes, please feel free to add items https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/refstack-meeting-16-02-0819:07
catherineD#topic      Organization and product entities19:08
*** openstack changes topic to "Organization and product entities (Meeting topic: refstack)"19:08
* rockyg waves19:08
catherineD#link Implementation :  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269066/19:08
catherineDI really would like us to focus on review and merge this one ...19:09
catherineD#link     Product type vs object type.  Please see comments on line 68 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269066/22/refstack/api/constants.py19:09
*** ntrueblo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
catherineD3 options are suggested in the comments.... is there any other options?19:10
alexandrelevineMy preference is type - product_type19:11
alexandrelevineoption 119:11
catherineDalexandrelevine: thx19:11
catherineDpvaneck: rockyg: how about you?19:11
rockyglemme do a quick review...19:11
pvaneckwould product_type be a property or another column?19:12
rockygI'm having a problem with my browser...19:12
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC19:12
catherineDpvaneck: an other column ..19:13
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:13
catherineDpvaneck: is there a way to represent the property without a  column?19:13
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Yes. In the properties19:14
catherineDthat bring us to the next discussuon ... a properties columns is added to the organization column is this for the product type?  What else can be saved there?19:15
alexandrelevinecatherineD: We can store there everything of not much importance which we won't require for indexing or fast search. In fact, with our small number of expected vendors it doesn't matter much.19:15
pvaneckdo we plan on having different treatments based on product_type where quick lookups are necessary? or are product types just informational items that will be on the product page19:15
alexandrelevinecatherineD: I explained. Each vendor in the marketplace has some descriptive and other fields and properties. We need to store them.19:16
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:16
alexandrelevinecatherineD: They'll be asked during vendor registration.19:16
rockygvendor specific metadata19:16
catherineDpvaneck: product type informatio will be on the product page ... and yes we may want  to filter wit hit19:16
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Reviewed and approved by the Foundation.19:16
catherineDwith it19:16
*** fnaval has quit IRC19:16
catherineDrockyg: alexandrelevine: if it is vendor meta data and free form .. wouldn't using a meta table would be better?19:17
alexandrelevinecatherineD: I believe we discussed it. My personal preference is not to spawn many tables. json in the same table will do just fine.19:18
alexandrelevineI even remember someone objecting against xml :)19:18
catherineDalexandrelevine: my issue is how do we parse the information in the properties column?19:19
catherineDbut let's go back to product_type ...19:19
alexandrelevinecatherineD: We load it and parse it as any other json.19:19
catherineDalexandrelevine: with any json it is good to have a schema19:19
pvaneckproperties json will simply be displayed on a product page catherineD19:20
alexandrelevinecatherineD: We can devise something very simple key-value-like.19:20
catherineDpvaneck: alexandrelevine: where do we save the product_type?19:20
alexandrelevinecatherineD: If you want better modifiability in the future - in the properties.19:21
catherineDalexandrelevine: just want to confirm ... you are saying that we save the product_type property in the properties column19:21
catherineDas one of the element in the JSON19:21
alexandrelevinecatherineD: If you want to do paging filtered by product types in the list of Vendors on the server - column.19:22
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:22
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Yes.19:22
*** hyakuhei has quit IRC19:22
pvaneckIf we plan on filtering based on these specific product types, then yea, better to be its own column19:22
catherineDalexandrelevine: we can filter vendor list request by product_type?19:22
pvaneckbut if purely informational, then properties19:22
catherineDpvaneck: ++19:22
alexandrelevinecatherineD: We can do whatever we want :)19:23
catherineDthat if we want to filter it is better with its own column19:23
catherineDalexandrelevine: sure that is why we discuss here on the best way to implement ...19:23
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Keep in mind that paging and filtering can be done in DB or in the code on the server. In the second case you don't need a column also.19:23
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Honestly, we're dealing with such small numbers of Vendors that I don't expect any problems whichever way we go.19:24
catherineDOK like anything there is always many ways to approach ...19:25
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Choose the approach you like :)19:25
rockygI like separate column19:25
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:25
catherineDI lkie separate column19:26
catherineDlike :-)19:26
alexandrelevineseparate column it is.19:26
rockygCould get messy if OpenStack gets big and people get real creative ;-)19:26
catherineDI guess pvaneck: is OK with separate column ...19:26
*** armax has quit IRC19:26
pvanecksure19:26
catherineDgreat !!19:27
catherineD#topic Do we need the properties columns ?19:27
*** openstack changes topic to "Do we need the properties columns ? (Meeting topic: refstack)"19:27
alexandrelevinewe do19:27
catherineDI guess it would not hurt .. so I don't mind ... but if we store JSON .. I would like us to have a schema defined ...19:28
rockygyeah, I think so.19:28
pvanecki thought just key value pairs in json was fine19:28
alexandrelevineSee example page of one of the vendors: https://www.openstack.org/marketplace/public-clouds/cloud-and-heat-technologies/cloud-heat19:28
catherineD#ageed To add a product_type and properties columns to the organization table19:29
alexandrelevineIt has "about", "commitment", "details" and some other stuff.19:29
catherineDhey we are doing good today ...19:29
rockyg++19:29
catherineDnext product type names:19:29
rockygseparate names for distro and appliance.  For display, we can always do an OR19:30
catherineDshould match with OpenStack Marketplace19:30
rockygRight now, appliances are kind of a step child.  Not many left.  But that will change as OpenStack gets more consistent19:31
alexandrelevineWe should ask DefCore. But for speed sakes we can start with "distro", "public cloud", "hosted private cloud" (maybe just private cloud?) only.19:31
catherineDalexandrelevine: ++19:31
catherineDalexandrelevine: I vote for hosted_private_cloud...19:32
alexandrelevineI don't mind.19:32
catherineDdo we all agree for now product type are: distro, public_cloud, hosted_private_cloud (we can add appliance later)?19:33
alexandrelevine++19:33
pvaneck+119:33
rockyg++ for hosted in front.  wondering if we'll see private private cloud in future19:33
catherineD#agreed Product type names are distro, public_cloud, hosted_private_cloud (and may add appliance later)19:34
catherineDrockyg: +219:34
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
*** Ravikiran_K has quit IRC19:35
*** hyakuhei has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:35
catherineDso would all of the agreement here .. after andrey updates https://review.openstack.org/#/c/269066/  please give it a priority for review ... it would be good if we can merge it in the next 2 days19:35
catherineDthank you all!19:35
rockygyay!19:36
alexandrelevinegreat19:36
catherineD#topic     private_vendor vs pending_vendor.19:36
*** openstack changes topic to "private_vendor vs pending_vendor. (Meeting topic: refstack)"19:36
*** f1ller- is now known as filler19:36
*** armax has quit IRC19:36
catherineDalexandrelevine: private_vendor:  can be create by any user.  Do we still need the hidden vendor as described in the Ownership section on page 12 of the requiement document?19:36
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:37
alexandrelevineNothing to discuss here: hidden is private. The term is interchangeable. I just used it in the reqs doc to say that those are hidden vendors.19:37
*** esker has quit IRC19:37
alexandrelevineHidden in the doc meant exactly that - hidden. It's not good to use this term in the constants, though. That's why private.19:37
catherineDalexandrelevine: since user can create vendor , I would like for us not to automatically create a vendor19:38
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:38
catherineDwe require that a vendor has to be created before a product creation ...19:38
alexandrelevinecatherineD: You'll complicate UI.19:38
catherineDhow?19:38
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Better usability wouldn't require User to create something he doesn't care about.19:39
alexandrelevinecatherineD: He doesn't need Vendor. He wants to test his Cloud, i.e. Product.19:39
catherineDalexandrelevine: I agree with the product has its own users19:39
alexandrelevinecatherineD: I didn't understand what you just said.19:39
catherineDnow with users at the vendor level ... wouldn't it be better for him to know where to add user for his vendor?19:40
*** kebray has quit IRC19:40
alexandrelevinecatherineD: I'm a user and I don't want to manage vendors or  other users. I want to test my Cloud.19:40
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:40
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC19:40
*** dprince has quit IRC19:41
catherineDalexandrelevine:  do you want someone else to see your result before you make it public?19:41
alexandrelevineUse-case 419:41
alexandrelevinecatherineD: You'll create a screenshot and send it by email.19:42
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:42
alexandrelevinecatherineD: there is no such use-case now.19:42
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC19:42
alexandrelevinecatherineD: It's either private, i.e. yours only, or public.19:42
catherineDalexandrelevine: could we modify your use case ? that the user can share his/her data before making it public?19:42
*** fnaval has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:42
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Not without several more use-cases and complications. Why?19:43
*** iyamahat has quit IRC19:43
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:43
catherineDmy issue is your say private = yours only19:44
alexandrelevinecatherineD: And we shouldn't modify it because it exists. It's the most easy-to-start use-case for any user. What you ask about is one of the variations which can exist but I don't see why we need it now. And definitely not instead.19:44
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Yes. That's how it works now.19:44
*** lbeliveau has quit IRC19:45
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Later, much later, when we get basic functionality and process feedback from users we'll see if we want to go that route to extend.19:45
catherineDalexandrelevine: Company ABC  registers ... so  a vendor is create of this vednor ABC... what is the type of this vendor?19:45
catherineDprivate?19:46
alexandrelevinecatherineD: I didn't understand.19:46
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Company ABC registers what?19:46
catherineDCompany ABC register itself as a vendor on RefStack19:46
alexandrelevinecatherineD: When it registers a Vendor, i.e. uses the button Register, it becomes Pending.19:47
*** ntrueblo_ has quit IRC19:47
alexandrelevinecatherineD: When it was just created, yes, it was Private.19:47
alexandrelevinecatherineD: When Foundation approves it becomes Official and public.19:47
catherineDso when a vendor object is created it is of type private?19:48
alexandrelevineOf coures19:48
alexandrelevineof course19:48
catherineDhow do you different this private vs the private vendor that was created automatically?19:48
alexandrelevineOk, you're right. Let's add one more type then - personal?19:49
rockygGood catch!19:49
*** lbeliveau has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
alexandrelevineOr really "hidden"?19:49
catherineDalexandrelevine: yea that is what I want to say19:49
catherineDso vendor type = offical, pending, private, personal?19:49
catherineDofficial19:50
alexandrelevineOr we can go a little different here. We can automatically create a private Vendor for User when he wants to add a Product.19:50
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC19:50
rockygI think Official/prending is separate from public/private19:51
rockygYou might want official+private19:51
*** neelashah1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:51
alexandrelevinePrivate->Pending->Official(if accepted) or Private(if declined)19:51
catherineDstill go back to the question of how to differentiate if both automatically created vs someone created vendors if both are of type private19:51
alexandrelevineIt's notseparate19:52
*** neelashah has quit IRC19:52
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:52
alexandrelevineWe don't differentiate in this case19:52
alexandrelevineUser can create a Vendor manually or get a default automatically created one19:52
catherineDok so on 'my vendor' UI, do we display all vendor including automatically created privated?19:53
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC19:53
alexandrelevineIn this case yes19:53
alexandrelevineIt'll just have some predefined automatically generated name. Like "auto-created" or "default"19:53
catherineDhow  to go from private to pending ...19:53
alexandrelevinePush button "register"19:54
*** kfarr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:54
alexandrelevine(or "apply" - whatever we name it)19:54
*** rsyed_away is now known as rsyed19:54
catherineDso user can register an automatically created private vendor and make it pending?19:54
catherineDdo we allow that?19:55
alexandrelevinecatherineD: We can prevent it19:55
catherineDhow to prevent?19:55
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Because we don't want Foundation to be spammed with "Default" Vendors.19:55
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Check for some meaningful name.19:55
catherineDalexandrelevine: wouldn't it be better to give it another type then check the name?19:55
alexandrelevinecatherineD: If he cares to rename it and fill in all of the required "abouts" he can register, yes19:56
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:56
*** daemontool_ has quit IRC19:56
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Not really19:56
*** SridharG has quit IRC19:56
*** nadya is now known as Guest6986519:56
catherineDwhy not?19:57
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:57
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Why do we care if it was created manually or automatically if everything was correctly prepared for registration afterwards?19:57
* catherineD we only have 3 mins left ...19:57
alexandrelevinecatherineD: We'll be checking saneness of the input before registration anyways.19:57
*** silos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:57
catherineDalexandrelevine: i don't mind if that is what we allow ... I just want us to think thru the scenario19:58
catherineDI definitely do not want to check name19:58
*** neelashah1 has quit IRC19:58
alexandrelevinecatherineD: Thanks to you we just did. As far as we can now :)19:58
catherineDif I am going to check something make it obvious for the next code reader ..19:58
alexandrelevinecatherineD: We'll have to check the name anyways. For allowed symbols and such.19:58
*** ijw_ has quit IRC19:59
*** Guest69865 has quit IRC19:59
catherineDwe are about out of time ...19:59
alexandrelevinecatherineD: We can leave it empty, for example. So it won't pass19:59
catherineDlet's move to #refstack19:59
catherineD#endmeeting19:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"19:59
openstackMeeting ended Mon Feb  8 19:59:23 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)19:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2016/refstack.2016-02-08-19.00.html19:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2016/refstack.2016-02-08-19.00.txt19:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/refstack/2016/refstack.2016-02-08-19.00.log.html19:59
*** numans has quit IRC20:00
*** ninag has quit IRC20:00
*** diazjf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** mp1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** jtomasek_ has quit IRC20:00
redrobot#startmeeting barbican20:01
openstackMeeting started Mon Feb  8 20:01:05 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.20:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.20:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'barbican'20:01
redrobot#topic Roll Call20:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:01
edtubillo/20:01
mp1o/20:01
diazjfo/20:01
silos\o/20:01
*** rellerreller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:01
rellerrellero/20:02
*** jhfeng has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** jkf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** ninag has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
jhfengo/20:02
kfarro/20:02
jkfo/20:02
*** woodster_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** arunkant has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
arunkanto/20:02
redrobotquite a few barbicaneers here today20:03
rm_worko/ (semi-here)20:03
woodster_o/20:03
*** neelashah has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
redrobotlet's start with20:03
redrobot#topic Action Items20:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Items (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:03
*** maxabidi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
redrobotI really need to do a better job of following up with these20:03
redrobot#action redrobot to check on status of reported security bug20:04
redrobotso the bug is fixed with jkf 's pcks#11 changes that landed during the midcycle20:04
maxabidio/20:04
redrobotwe still need to figure out what/how to backport it20:04
panatlo/20:04
redrobotso if anyone wants to help let me know, otherwise I'm going to punt20:04
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:05
*** vgridnev has quit IRC20:05
redrobot#action redrobot to ping ccneill about the nova+cinder security bug20:05
jkfI believe the patch I sumitted with that applies to kilo.20:05
redrobotI don't actually remember what the nova+cinder bug was about ...  :- \20:05
jkfand maybe Juno, but needs to be tested.20:05
redrobotjkf cool!20:05
redrobot#action redrobot to touch base with Designate folks20:06
*** ninag has quit IRC20:06
redrobotso I only kinda touched base through a proxy who said they said they were probably ok with waiting for the /sign functionality to land next cycle.20:06
redrobotI should probably go to the next designate IRC meeting and follow up there.20:07
redrobotok, moving on20:07
redrobot#topic Liaison Updates20:07
*** openstack changes topic to "Liaison Updates (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:07
redrobotI missed the oslo meeting this morning, so no updates from me20:08
redrobotpdesai isn't here so I'll skip her.  she's working on documentation updates with the docs team20:08
redrobotalee isn't here either, so no updates from Magnum20:09
*** silmaril22 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:09
redrobothockeynut any updates from QE land?20:09
*** silmaril22 has quit IRC20:09
hockeynutredrobot nothing new sir20:09
*** alexandrelevine has quit IRC20:09
redrobothockeynut awesome, thanks20:09
redrobotok, moving on20:10
redrobotto today's agenda items20:10
redrobot#topic Add support for internal interface20:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Add support for internal interface (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:10
*** daemontool has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:10
redrobotSo currently, and for as long as I can remember, Barbican has only ever had a single endpoint20:10
redrobotthe host_href setting in the conf file controls that endpoint20:11
redrobotso that every URL provided in links as references all use the host_href setting20:11
redrobotThere was a bug reported last week regarding the Version endpoint, which did not use the host_href setting20:12
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
redrobotwhich led to a discussion by arunkant regarding the support of an "internal endpoint" which as I understand is a Keystone concept20:12
redrobotwhereby the Keystone service is able to be accessed by both an internal and external endpoint, which can potentially have completely different URLs20:13
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:13
arunkantredrobot: I have added related bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/barbican/+bug/154111820:13
openstackLaunchpad bug 1541118 in Barbican "Barbican single host setting does not work with internal and public endpoints" [Undecided,New]20:13
redrobotarunkant thanks for the link20:13
*** tkelsey has quit IRC20:14
*** kmsiles has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:14
redrobotas I understand it, it is a requirement for HPE to be able to deploy barbican in a similar manner with support for an internal endpoint20:14
redrobotalthough I think this is more of a new feature than a bugfix, since the internal endpoint is not broken, per se, but rather we never implemented the ability to have more than one endpoint.20:15
arunkantredrobot: yes, its the same barbican instance. Differentiation is from client access pespectivve i.e. .just depends on which network/ interface, its accessed from i.e. internal or public20:15
rellerrellerWhen you say internal what does that mean? Internal to what?20:15
redrobotrellerreller Internal, in this case is the classification that the Keystone catalog uses for endpoints which can only be accessed from within the control plane network20:16
arunkantrellerreller: internal means here..like other openstack services e.g. cinder which are deployed in same control plane20:16
*** tcammann has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:16
rellerrellerThanks!20:16
jkfHow do other openstack components handle generating self-referential links? Most web apps that I know of tend to use the Host header to get the name that was used to call the service, instead if hard coding the hostname.20:17
woodster_so the barbican controller would need to know what network the request came from, and then serve up HATEOAS links appropriate for those respective networks?20:17
redrobotwoodster_ yes, that's the idea20:17
arunkantjkf: That's what was the way implemented on version controller side but not href side20:17
*** armax has quit IRC20:17
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:18
arunkantjkf: last week, it was changed from using header, its using hard coded url in config.20:18
redrobotin the bugfix discussion for the Versions bug, arunkant pointed out that the way that the reference was being constructed (by looking into the request to retrieve the endpoint the request was originally intended for) was working for the HPE deployment20:18
*** rockyg has quit IRC20:19
redrobothowever, that will not work for all deployments.  In the Rackspace deployment, for example, we use Docker containers to run the barbican API process.  In this case, merely reflecting the URL that comes in from the request will not work20:19
arunkantredrobot: I am not talking about specific company. That's the way its being currently done in keystone as well.20:19
redrobotarunkant  I'm only mentioning specific deployments here, because we need a solution that works for those20:20
*** kebray has quit IRC20:20
redrobotso, while it appears to arunkant that the way Versions endpoint was working was correct for him, it did not work for us20:21
*** tcammann has quit IRC20:21
woodster_so it seems if that href is specified in configs, then it is used as the ref host, otherwise it would be dynamically generated?20:21
*** myoung|mobile has quit IRC20:21
woodster_arunkant: ...desired behavior that is20:21
diazjfmaybe for a temporary fix we can have a switch in the conf that tells Barbican which url to use "from conf" or "from request"20:21
*** myoung|mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:21
redrobotwoodster_  diazjf  I think that to be able to arrive at a solution that works for both of these scenarios we should spec it out, instead of trying to guess the solution here.20:22
panatlyes diazjf20:22
woodster_Perhaps just not specifying it would provide the dynamic behavior?20:22
arunkantdiazjf: Yes..that's the discussion we had that last week20:22
diazjfredrobot, agreed, just thinking of a temp fix so hpe is happy until a spec is made :)20:23
*** mhickey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:24
arunkantwoodster_, keystone has something like this https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/common/wsgi.py#L37120:24
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:24
redrobotarunkant do you want to write a spec outlining the changes needed so that Barbican can also use that method of generating URLs ?20:25
arunkantSo, bugfix can be around that change .20:25
*** Yingxin has quit IRC20:25
*** Yingxin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:26
redrobotarunkant I'm not sure I understand your last statement...20:26
redrobotarunkant but yes, the goal is to be able to support an internal URL20:26
arunkantredrobot: I was thinking of implementing the way, its mentioned in above link. I am not sure how soon spec approval is going to be.20:26
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:27
*** kebray has quit IRC20:27
redrobotspec approval has been rather slow... :( ... doesn't mean we should stop writing specs though20:27
*** fitodua66 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
*** edtubill_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:28
*** neilus has quit IRC20:29
arunkantredrobot: I am not sure change like need a spec. I can write details in implementation.20:29
*** armax has quit IRC20:30
*** fitodua19 has quit IRC20:30
arunkantredrobot: will that work ?20:30
*** edwardb has quit IRC20:30
redrobotarunkant I feel like this is not just a bugfix for the reasons I explained above20:30
*** edtubill has quit IRC20:30
redrobotarunkant but if you really don't want to write a spec, I suppose an implementation will have to do.20:31
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC20:32
arunkantredrobot: okay. I will clarify whatever aspect needs to be covered in commit comments.20:32
arunkantredorobot: that's it about this topic from my side.20:33
redrobotok, moving on20:33
redrobot#topic Setup a Barbican Guild meeting20:33
*** openstack changes topic to "Setup a Barbican Guild meeting (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:33
redrobotdiazjf ping20:34
diazjfredrobot, so silos, edtubill_ and I have a bunch of code we want to get into Mitaka, so far its going pretty well :)20:34
diazjfWe wanted to head over to San Antonio sometime next week and get feedback so we have time to get everything in before code freeze20:35
redrobotdiazjf let me check with the boss for a good day y'all could come down20:35
diazjfredrobot, awesome! yeah let me know20:36
redrobot#action redrobot to ask the rackspace overlords for a time to get the guild together20:36
redrobotdiazjf sounds good20:36
jhfengredrobot: code freeze date for Mitaka is on 3/4, right ?20:36
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC20:36
redrobotjhfeng correct20:36
jhfengthx20:36
redrobotjhfeng http://releases.openstack.org/mitaka/schedule.html20:37
redrobotjhfeng ideally it would be on March 120:37
diazjfredrobot, we are making good progress so far!20:37
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:38
redrobotok, moving on20:38
redrobot#topic  KMIP Key Manager for Castellan20:38
*** openstack changes topic to "KMIP Key Manager for Castellan (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:38
redrobot#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/246546/20:38
silos\o/20:38
redrobotsilos go ahead20:38
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:38
silosI'm trying to get this into Mitaka. I just wanted to put out a reminder of some specs are still pending including this one.20:39
redrobotsilos do you need it for some other project to use in Mitaka?20:39
redrobotsilos because Castellan does not follow the release cycle20:39
silosah yea. I keep forgetting. No no dependency.20:40
rellerrellersilos I can review. Keep pinging me.20:40
silosrellerreller: thanks.20:40
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:40
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:40
*** kebray has quit IRC20:40
kfarrsilos, same20:40
redrobotawesome, thanks kfarr and rellerreller !20:41
siloskfarr: thanks.20:41
redrobotsilos  anything else on this topic?20:41
silosnope.20:41
redrobotok, moving on20:41
redrobot#topic Required configuration options without a default value20:41
*** openstack changes topic to "Required configuration options without a default value (Meeting topic: barbican)"20:41
redrobot#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273863/20:41
redrobotrellerreller20:41
rellerrellerYes, we had a question come up about this code.20:42
rellerrellerThere is a configuration option that is mandatory, but it provides no default.20:42
diazjfhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/273863/8/castellan/common/utils.py line 3520:42
rellerrellerShould we specify a default or is it ok to force deployer to choose.20:42
rellerrellerIf nothing is set in conf file then exception will be raised.20:42
rellerrellerWe are wondering what the precedent is for this scenario.20:43
rellerrellerIf there is precendent.20:43
rellerrellerSo the question is, "should we provide a default?"20:43
arunkantis it any different from kmip_plugin setting in barbican.conf ?20:44
*** ninag has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC20:44
arunkanterror will be raised if kmip_plugin is selected but not configured.20:45
redrobotI think that, as long as the error makes it obvious as to why it's happening, then we should be ok?20:45
rellerrellerThis is a top-level configuration option whereas the KMIP section is only active if the secret store type is KMIP.20:45
rellerrellerIt is a good point.20:45
*** dslevin1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:45
* redrobot is not an oslo.conf expert20:45
kfarrrellerreller, diazjf, I think having to specify a value there will make integration more difficult20:46
rellerrellerThat's fine with us. That's what we had, but I was not sure if OpenStack rules specified that things must work out of the box.20:46
*** ninag_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:46
*** nadya has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
diazjfredrobot, rellerreller, I'm thinking an error should be thrown specifing the appropriate types. kfarr, I don't think defaulting any auth_type would work since the rest of the variables are specific to the auth_type.20:47
*** nadya is now known as Guest1754020:47
*** dizquierdo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
diazjfkfarr, like if we set it always to be token, we need to make sure the token is also passed.20:48
diazjfkfarr, but I see what you mean, so to not break anything we should just pass the oslo.context object20:48
*** ninag has quit IRC20:48
rellerrellerThat's true, but it is likely to be the most used option.20:48
diazjfby default20:48
kfarrdiazjf, I think the factory logic could be modified, so that if you pass in a context object, it will always return a KeystoneToken credential that pulled the values from the context object20:49
kfarrand if you only pass in a conf object, then you'd look at what auth type is set, then make sure the appropriate conf values are there20:49
kfarrwhat do you think?20:49
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC20:49
rellerrellerkfarr the problem is that it is tough to override that. The calling code must now decide what to do.20:50
*** rossella_ has quit IRC20:50
rellerrellerWhereas this approach allows the configuration option to choose it and reuse code.20:50
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:50
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:51
*** ninag_ has quit IRC20:51
diazjfkfarr, I'm thinking about it. I'm going to setup a POC with swift encryption and checkout how the flow works and get jrichli to review it20:51
rellerrellerOtherwise the other services will all have common code that says if auth type is context then send it, else do not.20:51
rellerrellerSo redrobot the answer seems that it does not matter?20:51
*** ninag has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:52
rellerrellerWe can debate the rest of this on the code review or in chat if there are other topics.20:52
*** dims has quit IRC20:52
*** mfedosin has quit IRC20:52
*** mrmartin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:52
diazjfrellerreller, sounds good. Thanks for adding this to the agenda20:52
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:52
redrobotI think I'm missing more context to have a good answer...   I recall we were aiming to just have client code (eg swift code) just pass the CONF object to Castellan (probably during instantiation) and Castellan would know what to look for, and instantiate the right auth based on what it finds in the CONF ?20:53
rellerrellerI personally don't care too much one way or the other. I think we should just pick one way or the other by COB tomorrow (or pick some other date) and go with it.20:53
rellerrellerredrobot that is correct. The issue is whether or not the correct auth type must have a default in the code if none is found in the conf.20:54
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:54
*** mrmartin has quit IRC20:54
diazjfI vote no default, but we can hash it out in the reviews20:55
redrobotrellerreller ah, I see...  I would think no default seems like a good option.20:55
*** cloudrancher has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
redrobotbetter to fail early than to use the wrong auth methinks20:56
*** barrett1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:56
rellerrellerI'm ok with that.20:56
*** hichihara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:56
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:56
redrobot+1 ship it!20:56
*** neilus has quit IRC20:57
redrobotokay, sounds like we're done here for the day.20:57
redrobotthanks everyone!20:57
redrobot#endmeeting20:57
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"20:57
openstackMeeting ended Mon Feb  8 20:57:30 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)20:57
diazjfthanks redrobot20:57
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2016/barbican.2016-02-08-20.01.html20:57
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2016/barbican.2016-02-08-20.01.txt20:57
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2016/barbican.2016-02-08-20.01.log.html20:57
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC20:57
*** silos has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:57
*** thingee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:57
*** jhfeng has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:57
*** jkf has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:57
*** dizquierdo has quit IRC20:57
*** kmsiles has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** neiljerram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** leong_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** mp1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** pchadwick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** arunkant has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC21:00
rockygo/21:00
cloudrancherDon't think Shamail is on yet21:00
*** MeganR has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:00
shamailI am21:01
barrett1hi rocky21:01
*** rellerreller has quit IRC21:01
shamailbarrett1, is here too21:01
MeganRHi21:01
pchadwicko/21:01
barrett1#startmeeting product working group21:01
openstackMeeting started Mon Feb  8 21:01:10 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is barrett1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.21:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.21:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: product working group)"21:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'product_working_group'21:01
thingeeo/21:01
rockyghey all!21:01
cloudranchero/21:01
shamailHi everyone!21:01
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
leong_hi all21:01
leong_o/21:01
pchadwickHello21:01
pieto/21:01
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
rockyglots of suff on dev mailing list we need to follow21:01
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:01
barrett1#link: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/product-team21:01
barrett1Here's the agenda for today21:02
*** KrishR has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:02
barrett1Rockyg: Can you hold that til the opens?21:02
rockygyup21:02
barrett1Want to hear more about what you think we should be aware of.21:02
barrett1thanks21:02
barrett1OK - let's start with action items from last meeting21:02
barrett1#topic action item review21:03
*** openstack changes topic to "action item review (Meeting topic: product working group)"21:03
*** nateziemann has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:03
barrett1#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2016/product_working_group.2016-02-01-21.00.html21:03
barrett1Leong: Are you here?21:03
leong_https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ProductTeam/FrequentlyAskedQuestions21:03
leong_I have updated the FAQ21:03
barrett1Excellent - thanks!21:03
*** kebray has quit IRC21:03
leong_It is under the question: "How Product Working Group collaborate with OpenStack Project team?"21:03
rockyg++21:04
kencjohnstono/21:04
* kencjohnston is only half here, I'm on another call that is running long. Apologies.21:04
barrett1Thanks Kenny21:04
thingeeyou can see the diff of leong_'s work here https://wiki.openstack.org/w/index.php?title=ProductTeam%2FFrequentlyAskedQuestions&diff=102746&oldid=10203921:04
shamaillooks great leong_21:04
nateziemannhi everyone, Nate's here21:05
shamailhi nateziemann21:05
barrett1If folks have feedback pls send it to Leong.21:05
barrett1Let's move to the next one.21:05
thingeeleong_: is this going into http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-user-stories/workflow/workflow.html ... which relates21:05
*** reed_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:05
barrett1Shamail - can you give us an update?21:05
shamailI only had one item (to update wiki to reflect workflow discussion) but I think it was overidden by our decision to discuss workflow further at mid-cycle.  I'l be glad to update the workflow on wiki after we have that discussion next week.21:05
thingeewould probably be good not to have this information in multiple places. risk one becoming of outdated.21:05
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:05
shamailI think once we discuss the various topics related to workflow we can update wiki/repo.21:06
rockyg++21:06
thingeeshamail: +121:06
leong_we might want to add a link from the FAQ to point to workflow?21:06
barrett1Sounds good - we'll move your action Shamail to after the midcycle.21:06
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC21:06
pchadwickleong - makes sense21:06
barrett1#action shamail to complete update of work flow after midcycle discussion21:06
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
shamailleong_: +1 and also make sure that the summary and what's documented in repo don't conflict21:06
thingeeshamail: in theory though, leong_ could propose it to the repo workflow document and we can discuss it in gerrit, since that's what it's there for ;)21:06
barrett1leong: +121:06
thingeeshamail: just no one should approve it right away so we can discuss the review first!21:07
shamailthingee: agreed21:07
barrett1Next Action item was for me to add work flow to midcycle agenda: That's one.21:07
barrett1fone21:07
thingeeleong_: +121:07
barrett1done (oops)21:07
rockygSomeone went to a superbowl party.....21:08
*** nsun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:08
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:08
barrett1LOL21:08
barrett1(but true)21:08
* hughhalf joins late21:08
barrett1Kencjohnston: Can you give an update on the next 2? Or do you want us to come back to that later?21:08
barrett1Hi hughhalf21:08
shamailhi hughhalf21:08
hughhalfkencjohnston might be stuck on same call I am21:08
barrett1hughhalf: OK, let's come back to those action items when you all are done with the call  - pls signal when you're ready21:09
kencjohnstonbarrett1 can we come back, sorry.21:09
barrett1kencjohnston: NP21:09
barrett1#topic Product WG Midcycle Agenda Review21:09
*** openstack changes topic to "Product WG Midcycle Agenda Review (Meeting topic: product working group)"21:09
hughhalfbarrett1 will do - pretty close to done21:09
barrett1#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG-LON16-MidCycle21:10
*** tkelsey has quit IRC21:10
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
barrett1Shamail and I did a review of the etherpad with proposals and created the agenda at the bottom of the etherpad from that.21:10
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC21:10
*** ddecapit has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
*** ddecapit is now known as DuaneDeC721:10
barrett1You'll see days, times and topic leaders in the agenda - pls look over, you may find your name!21:11
barrett1It's an action packed agenda, but seems doable.21:11
barrett1Comments?21:11
* kencjohnston is here now.21:11
* hughhalf is also21:11
barrett1kencjohnston: let's finish the agenda review, then go back to action items.21:11
* kencjohnston nods.21:12
*** kebray has quit IRC21:12
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC21:12
kencjohnstonbarrett1 I have no comments on the Agenda, looks good.21:12
barrett1Shamail: We need to figure out what time we need to catch a train on the 18th to make it to the Midcycle in London.21:12
barrett1thanks kencjohnston21:13
shamailYes, I will update that info tonight21:13
barrett1thanks21:13
shamailuser meetup*21:13
rockygThere are at least 4 of us heading down that night.21:13
shamailThis is for Thursday evening21:13
pchadwickNo comments on the agenda - looks good21:13
*** bank_ has quit IRC21:13
*** bana_k has quit IRC21:13
barrett1shamail: yes21:13
*** merooney has quit IRC21:13
leong_agenda looks good to me21:13
rockygOOps.  Sorry.21:13
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:14
cloudrancherWas there going to be a conference line for the stuck at home folks?21:14
barrett1cloudrancher: good question21:14
barrett1kencjohnston: Is that something that can be arranged?21:14
kencjohnstonbarrett1 cloudrancher yep I'll add that details to the Etherpad.21:14
kencjohnstonWe will have a conference phone in the room.21:15
cloudrancherThanks!21:15
barrett1Excellent - Thanks21:15
shamailthat's great news kencjohnston21:15
leong_kencjohnston: also for the Enterprise WG Friday21:15
barrett1OK - let's go with this as our plan and we'll tweak as needed during the 2 days.21:15
kencjohnstonbarrett1 can you mark the action for me?21:15
kencjohnstonleong_ correct, I'll get with you offline about that.21:15
leong_thanks!21:15
barrett1#action Kencjohston post a bridge for the Product and Enterprise Mid-cycles for people to call into21:15
pchadwickI thought there was a suggestion to try and use Google Hangouts21:16
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:16
pchadwickDid we decide against that:21:16
barrett1For folks who will be at the mid cycle, pls take a few mins and prep for the prioritiy/focus topic.21:16
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:16
leong_ok carol21:16
*** kgiusti has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:16
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:16
thingeepchadwick: the problem with hangouts is there is a limit on attendees (still I believe) and it excludes those who don't have access to google from their country.21:17
*** kebray has quit IRC21:17
shamailthingee: limit still exists (unless you do an "on-air" hangout)21:17
leong_if i'm not wrong the limit (for free account) is 1021:17
pchadwickOK21:17
kencjohnstonthingee pchadwick - There is an option to use Rackspace's internal video chat system while at our office.21:17
kencjohnstonIt's called Vidyo21:18
kencjohnstonnaturally.21:18
barrett1of course...21:18
shamailnaturally.21:18
kencjohnstonI can set that up if folks will utilize it21:18
pchadwickI will be there, so defer to those who won't21:18
*** Guest17540 has quit IRC21:19
barrett1Show of hands from folks who won't be able to attend in person - would you use the messaging system?21:19
cloudrancherVoice is all i'm after21:19
leong_my suggestion is "etherpad" + "voice"21:19
KrishRi can use vidyo21:19
barrett1leong +121:19
leong_unless you all want to see our face :-)21:19
*** nsun_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:19
*** fitodua66 has quit IRC21:20
thingeeyes etherpad to conference call is all you should need. I'm not that pretty to look at over vidyo.21:20
hughhalfehterpad+ voice works for me as would vidyo.  I think etherpad + voice is best bet though21:20
barrett1Let's go with that for this round.21:20
leong_barrett1 +121:20
kencjohnstonbarrett1 ok I'll make sure we have voice setup.21:20
cloudrancher+121:20
barrett1#decision use voice + etherpad to include non-travelers in our mid-cycle21:20
shamailis it called audiyo?21:20
kencjohnstonshamail ha21:21
barrett1OK - let's move on.21:21
barrett1#topic London Meetup21:21
*** openstack changes topic to "London Meetup (Meeting topic: product working group)"21:21
barrett1Nate: Can you cover this one?21:21
shamailping nateziemann21:21
nateziemannhi everyone21:21
shamailhi21:21
nateziemannI have a draft agenda for discussion w/ the group.  seeking volunteers to speak at differnet sections21:21
barrett1#link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B43pcRkOVMWCSFRFa1UxQU94OGs/view21:22
barrett1nateziemann: I'll do the Intro if you want21:22
kencjohnstonnateziemann I can cover one of the userstories, Rolling Upgrades21:22
shamailI can help w/ roadmap21:22
nateziemannthanks barrett121:22
pchadwickThis is for the 18th?21:22
shamailyes21:22
shamail6:30-???21:22
kencjohnstonpchadwick evening of21:22
shamail6:30PM*21:22
leong_do we want to also include this "London Meetup" in the PWG etherpad.. so that people can find the info easily, maybe the very last section?21:23
*** neilus has quit IRC21:23
pchadwickOK - I will not be able to attend as I have to fly out for a customer meeting21:23
nateziemannin the midcycle etherpad?21:23
shamail#link http://www.meetup.com/Openstack-London/events/228549481/21:23
shamailleong_: +121:23
*** nsun_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:23
kencjohnstonshamail leong_ adding now.21:23
leong_cool!21:24
shamailthanks21:24
nateziemannthnx21:24
*** derekh_afk is now known as derekh21:24
shamailDo you have enough volunteers nateziemann?21:24
nateziemannok, so we have one user story selected.  I propose we try and cover two.  suggestions for a 2nd?21:24
kencjohnstonnateziemann I'm happy to cover two21:24
kencjohnstonBut I'd be subing in for a user story owner21:24
*** dane has quit IRC21:24
shamailI think with the people attending... maybe lifecycle management or vm ha?21:24
kencjohnstonAny other user story owners planning on being at the meetup?21:25
shamailI'd be glad to help as well (not an owner though)21:25
kencjohnstonleong_ are you able to attend?21:25
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:25
leong_i will21:25
shamailthats why I suggested vm ha :)21:25
leong_i can present HA VM if needed21:25
shamailleong_: +121:25
nateziemannfor each user story, I would like one person to create a few slides, present and try to get some good feedback going in the room.21:26
shamailit's light on details but would be good to gauge importance and whether openstack itself needs to present a solution to the issue21:26
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:26
leong_nateziemann, kencjohnston, let's work offline for the slides?21:26
nateziemannso it sounds like Kenny for Rolling Upgrades.  and Leong_ for HA VM.21:26
kencjohnstonleong_ sounds good. Want to start a GoogleDoc?21:26
kencjohnstonnateziemann +121:27
leong_i like google doc :)21:27
nateziemanndoes someone want to partner up w/ me on the roadmap topic?21:27
kencjohnstons/doc/presentation21:27
leong_Google Slide (to be specific) :21:27
barrett1#action Kencjohnston prep slides for Upgrades User Story for London Meetup21:27
barrett1#action leong prep slides for HA VM User Story for London Meetup21:27
leong_nateziemann do we want to add into your existing Google Slide?21:27
kencjohnstonnateziemann I thought I heard shamail agree to do the roadmap.21:28
nateziemanneither way.  I have an existing draft PPTX all ready that includes the rest of the 1 hour agenda.21:28
shamailI added speaker details to etherpad for the user meetup21:28
shamailyes, please add me to roadmap nateziemann21:28
leong_let's ping offline.. my email is yihleong@gmail.com, i don't think i have your email21:28
nateziemannok, have shamail for roadmap with me.21:29
shamailThanks21:29
nateziemannit would be nice to have a list of everyone who's going to attend.  I'll update the overview slide listing attendees from PWG.21:29
shamailnateziemann: +121:29
*** dims_ has quit IRC21:29
MeganR@nateziemann: I am planning to attend, if you need additional help21:30
pchadwickshamail: I will help with the roadmap slides since I submitted that for the summit.21:30
nateziemanncan we use our midcycle etherpad planning page?21:30
*** ijw has quit IRC21:30
barrett1nateziemann?: +121:30
shamailSounds good pchadwick21:30
shamailnateziemann, please replace me with pchadwick21:30
nateziemannwill do.21:30
nateziemannpchadwick, will you be at the ops summit?21:30
pchadwickYes, but not the meet-up21:30
leong_https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG-LON16-MidCycle line 11221:31
leong_nateziemann https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/PWG-LON16-MidCycle line 11221:31
nateziemanni'm confused, we are talking about the meetup21:31
barrett1nateziemann: what are you confused about?21:31
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC21:32
barrett1yes, we are talking about the London Meetup21:32
nateziemannneed to select one additional speaker for the london meetup for Roadmap.  pchadwick or shamail21:32
shamailpchadwick, the roadmap topic was for Thursday evening21:32
pchadwickAh - yes - I can help pull the slides together, but will not be at the meet-up21:32
nateziemannI already have the slides for roadmap put together.21:32
shamailThanks, i'll re-add myself as co-presenter then21:32
barrett1sounds like pchadwick is off the hook this time!21:32
nateziemannbased on the Tokyo charts.21:32
pchadwickOK - misunderstood21:33
shamailpchadwick, barrett1: for now... the roadmap refresh is coming soon :)21:33
barrett1Anything else nateziemann?21:33
nateziemannok, I think we are done.  any other suggestions on the agenda?21:33
barrett1I think the agenda is good - like leaving time for Q&A/discussion21:33
kencjohnstonnope looks great nateziemann thanks for organizing and inviting us21:33
nateziemannlets cross our fingers for a great turnout.  I saw 50+ sign up already.21:34
*** jprovazn has quit IRC21:34
nateziemannback to you barrett121:34
barrett1Let's go back to the action items - Kencjohnston21:34
barrett1#topic Action Items - Part 221:34
*** openstack changes topic to "Action Items - Part 2 (Meeting topic: product working group)"21:34
*** mtanino has quit IRC21:34
kencjohnstonwhat was my action again?21:34
barrett1kencjohnston: over to you21:34
* kencjohnston scrabbles to find the link for action items from last meeting21:35
barrett1The 1st was to delete/repost Upgrade user story21:35
barrett1#link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2016/product_working_group.2016-02-01-21.00.html21:35
barrett1The 2nd was to send the call for reviews21:35
kencjohnstonbarrett1 Yep, completed the delete which was merged, and sent a note to dev list for reviews21:35
kencjohnstonbarrett1 I also added the identified CPLs to the review21:35
shamailand you certainly got reviews kencjohnston  :)21:35
kencjohnstonGotten great feedback, on the second interation.21:36
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC21:36
kencjohnstonI have a new patch in the works, will be submitted this evening.21:36
barrett1Good to hear.21:36
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:36
kencjohnstonbarrett1 Even got some feedback from Operators, which was cool.21:36
barrett1That's fabulous!21:36
barrett1Any add'l outreach for feedback needed?21:36
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:37
*** thomnico has quit IRC21:37
kencjohnstonbarrett1 no other than the regular call of pointing any developers working on rolling upgrades within your organization to look at it and provide commentary21:37
kencjohnston#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274969/21:37
barrett1 kencjohnston: anything else?21:38
kencjohnstonbarrett1 nope, thanks21:38
barrett1Thanks21:38
barrett1moving on21:38
barrett1#topic Ops Summit Participation Plan21:38
*** openstack changes topic to "Ops Summit Participation Plan (Meeting topic: product working group)"21:38
barrett1Hopefully everyone has seen the latest info on the agenda and sessions where moderators are needed21:38
barrett1if you haven't pls raise your hand and will forward21:39
pchadwickRaises hand21:40
shamailbarrett1: I volunteered to help moderator the "writing user stories" and "Tokyo Highlights"21:40
shamailmoderate*21:40
kencjohnstonbarrett1 and I'm moderating Top 10 Bugs / Feature Requests21:40
MeganRbarrett1: pls forward to me as well21:40
nateziemannpls forward to me as well.21:41
kencjohnstonI think it was only sent to those who are moderating sessions.21:41
*** dslevin1 has quit IRC21:41
shamailkencjohnston: +121:41
barrett1email forwarded, pls respond to Matt if you can cover any of the open sessions.21:41
shamailthere was also a general email on ops too21:41
barrett1Any questions or comments on this?21:42
barrett1If not we'll move along - 2 topics and 18 mins to go.....21:42
barrett1#topic Review Open Commits21:42
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Open Commits (Meeting topic: product working group)"21:42
barrett1Shamail - Pls take this one21:43
shamailsure.21:43
shamail#link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/openstack-user-stories+status:open21:43
kencjohnstonshamail just cleared outa couple of items21:43
kencjohnstonshamail thank you sir.21:43
shamailWe have 5 items for review21:43
shamailsorry for the delay kencjohnston21:43
shamail#link https://review.openstack.org/26599821:43
leong_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276933/ - stable branch support - need review21:43
shamailIs the review to merge the tracker template21:43
shamailand already has a +221:44
*** annilai has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
shamailhttps://review.openstack.org/274969 is the rolling upgrade user story21:44
shamailThis one needs reviews from everyone that kencjohnston mentioned... but we won't +2 it until the dust settles21:44
kencjohnstonshamail agreed21:44
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC21:45
kencjohnstonhttps://review.openstack.org/253228 is work in progress so is exempt21:45
shamailThe remaining three: https://review.openstack.org/276933, https://review.openstack.org/276596, https://review.openstack.org/253228 need reviews from team21:45
leong_https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276933/ - stable branch support - need review21:45
shamailgood point kencjohnston21:45
shamailso just https://review.openstack.org/276933, https://review.openstack.org/25322821:45
*** safchain has quit IRC21:45
shamailPlease review those when you have time21:46
kencjohnstonleong_ I added some comments to stable branch support which weren't covered in the next patch21:46
barrett1shamail: this week?21:46
leong_ping annilai pls review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276933/21:46
shamailI suggest adding a calendar entry as a weekly reminder to spend 30 minutes looking at commits :)21:46
barrett1shamail: +121:46
kencjohnstonshamail I'd like to make sure we have more than just you and I doing regular reviews.21:46
cloudranchershamail +121:46
leong_saw that kencjohnston.. i need help from anni and rock on that21:46
shamailexactly kencjohnston21:46
kencjohnstonDoes anyone else consider themselves a regular reviewer?21:46
shamailleong_ is pretty active too21:46
rockygIm trying to get back into it21:47
leong_i volunter myself :)21:47
kencjohnstonEven if you aren't core we can still use more review, I've found myself missing things on reviews that would have benefitted from a larger reviewing community21:47
barrett1I'm getting spun back up and will be more timely moving forward21:47
shamailThis is one of the topics at the mid-cycle, but yes, we need to get more reviews going..21:47
shamailkencjohnston: +121:47
pchadwickguilty - need to start21:47
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:47
annilaiI can help review too21:47
shamailbarrett1: I'd like for a core to at least look at https://review.openstack.org/265998 this week, it needs one more core reviewer at a minimum21:48
shamailThanks everyone!21:48
kencjohnstonshamail ok, didn't meant o jump the gun. Not complaining, but I think if we are depending 50% on my ability to review we are in a sad state :)21:48
shamailLook forward to your +s and -s21:48
barrett1We've got to make it a team effort.21:48
barrett1Thanks Shamail21:48
shamailkencjohnston: I completely understand... I think this is a good way for our WG to conduct discussions and stay updated21:48
shamailThanks barrett1, that's all for now... we can discuss further next week!21:49
barrett1#topic Opens21:49
*** openstack changes topic to "Opens (Meeting topic: product working group)"21:49
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:49
shamailI have a small open21:49
barrett1RockyG: Do you want to start off?21:49
*** sshnaidm has quit IRC21:49
barrett1ping rockyg21:50
barrett1Shamail: Go ahead while rockyg gets back to us21:50
shamailI have registered #openstack-product and submitted patches to update the relevant bot config files... Please start idling there when you are on IRC. :-)21:50
rockygo/21:50
shamailThe channel also shows repo activity so it will give a reminder to go review things :)21:50
rockygcouple of things....21:50
shamailThat's all21:51
barrett1Shamail: That's great - Thanks!! Can you add that to our wiki page too?21:51
*** ihrachys has quit IRC21:51
kencjohnstonshamail nice work, thanks!21:51
shamailWill do barrett121:51
rockygwhat is core?21:51
barrett1?21:51
*** ihrachys has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
rockygand names vs. services21:51
shamailbarrett1: rockyg is listing out some interesting topics in mailing lists this week21:51
rockygso, there is a shakeout with big tent21:51
rockygleading to discussion on what is core21:52
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC21:52
barrett1rockyg: is that the same as OpenCore?21:52
kencjohnstonrockyg I've been following, could you provide links for those who haven't?21:52
pchadwickIs this an extension of DefCore or a debate about DefCore?21:52
shamailmainly whether our projects can require items to implement that are not free.21:52
rockygand now also splitting the summit ansd design summit21:52
*** nsun has quit IRC21:52
shamailPoppy came up as the example.21:53
kencjohnstonpchadwick not DefCore related.21:53
leong_u mean what project should be considered "core" openstack ?21:53
rockygI'd love to, but my puter is being difficult21:53
kencjohnstonpchadwick questions about adding projects that require commercial services in order to be tested.21:53
shamailI'll try to find it21:53
kencjohnstonas well as a general discussion about our "no open core" stance.21:54
thingeefor those that are curious about what rockyg is talking about and if you don't have time to keep up with the developer mailing list I recommend reading the dev digest that's posted weekly to the OpenStack blog21:54
thingeehttp://www.openstack.org/blog/2016/02/openstack-developer-mailing-list-digest-20160205/21:54
shamailleong_, rockyg: I believe this related to revisiting no open core21:54
pchadwickkencjohnston: Services but not code??21:54
* hughhalf picked up some of these in Lwood - the summit one is likely to be long running I suspect21:54
thingeeI summarize things the best I can on these digests21:54
kencjohnstonthingee +121:54
shamailthanks thingee21:54
hughhalf+1 thingee21:54
kencjohnstonpchadwick yes21:54
leong_thanks thingee21:54
thingeeif anyone has questions on those things, let me know since I'm active in all the discussions.21:54
* hughhalf provides a similar thing here but not as comprehensive as thingee http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/21:54
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:55
thingeeyes http://hugh.blemings.id.au/openstack/lwood/ compliments things well from the feedback I gathered on the ops list.21:55
hughhalfthanks thingee  :)21:56
shamail#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/085748.html (this is the other topic rockyg mentioned)21:56
thingeebut there are currently issues on where we stand with open core in OpenStack. Also we have an issue being raised with competing projects and how we handle their APIs since they conflict.21:56
thingeealso the open core discussion http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/085855.html21:57
barrett1thingee: is there a link to that thread you can post?21:57
barrett1thingee: Referring to conflicting projects/APIs21:57
barrett1Rockyg: Is there a discussion you want to have or a call to action on these?21:57
pchadwickthingee: How will the OpenCore question get resolved? At the board level?21:57
thingeebarrett1: sure, it was raised when someone announced another backup project ekko http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-January/084739.html21:57
thingeethere's a lot of debate in there21:58
*** boris-42 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:58
barrett1thingee: Thanks21:58
thingeealso another thread on beginning to work on a solution for these problems http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/085748.html21:58
rockygjust wanted to raise awareness.  Oh, and the mission statement21:58
shamailI also think that the thread discussing the seperation of user conference and design summits might be of interest to folks in PWG....21:58
shamail#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-February/086007.html21:58
thingeeit's a lot to read. I really do recommend reading the digest and then going through the thread for fill ins.21:59
thingeeshamail: happy to speak on these issues with the group21:59
* hughhalf nods in agreement with thingee 21:59
shamailthanks thingee21:59
*** bana_k has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:59
shamail#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2016-February/002263.html (for mission statement topic)21:59
MeganRthank you thingee - great info!21:59
barrett1I'll add some time to the agenda for our midcycle to follow-up on these discussions21:59
* shamail wipes sweat from forehead... so many topics to discuss/find21:59
nateziemannshould the topic above get some time at our midcycle?  +1 from me22:00
barrett1nateziemann: +122:00
nateziemannbarrett1 you beat me by 1 second to that thought :-)22:00
shamailbarrett1: time check22:00
annilai+122:00
*** bank_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
barrett1OK - we're out of time! See (some) of you next week! Safe travels22:00
leong_+122:00
pchadwickbye!22:00
cloudrancheradios!22:00
shamailLook forward to the mid-cycle!22:00
leong_see u in Manchester/London22:00
MeganRbye22:00
barrett1#endmeeting22:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"22:01
*** pchadwick has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
hughhalfSafe travels all, have fun :)22:01
openstackMeeting ended Mon Feb  8 22:01:01 2016 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)22:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2016/product_working_group.2016-02-08-21.01.html22:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2016/product_working_group.2016-02-08-21.01.txt22:01
nateziemannsee you there !!22:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/product_working_group/2016/product_working_group.2016-02-08-21.01.log.html22:01
*** DuaneDeC7 has quit IRC22:01
*** MeganR has quit IRC22:01
*** KrishR has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
*** leong_ has quit IRC22:01
shamailbarrett1, I'll cancel the PWG meeting invite for next week...22:01
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC22:01
shamailWe won't meet on Monday, right?22:01
*** kencjohnston has quit IRC22:01
nateziemannbarrett1 indicated "no" in her email on Friday.22:02
shamailthanks nateziemann22:02
*** e0ne has quit IRC22:03
barrett1shamail: Thanks22:03
*** daemontool_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:03
*** barrett1 has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
*** ninag has quit IRC22:05
*** daemontool has quit IRC22:06
*** derekh has quit IRC22:07
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:08
*** banix has quit IRC22:09
*** shayneburgess has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:10
*** vahidh has quit IRC22:10
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC22:12
*** neilus has quit IRC22:13
*** mhickey has quit IRC22:14
*** weshay has quit IRC22:14
*** shwetaap has quit IRC22:14
*** ihrachys has quit IRC22:16
*** hichihara has quit IRC22:16
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:18
*** amitgandhinz has quit IRC22:22
*** sshnaidm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:22
*** esker has quit IRC22:22
*** kzaitsev_mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:22
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC22:22
*** kzaitsev1mb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:22
*** esker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:23
*** kzaitsev1mb is now known as kzaitsev_mb22:24
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:24
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:24
*** bana_k has quit IRC22:25
*** sshnaidm has quit IRC22:26
*** tcammann_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:27
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:27
*** weshay has quit IRC22:28
*** weshay has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:28
*** weshay has quit IRC22:29
*** kzaitsev_mb has quit IRC22:29
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC22:29
*** jungleboyj has quit IRC22:29
*** tcammann_ has quit IRC22:31
*** dims has quit IRC22:31
*** Yingxin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:34
*** weshay_xchat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:34
*** nelsnelson has quit IRC22:36
*** diazjf has quit IRC22:36
*** Yingxin has quit IRC22:37
*** Yingxin_ is now known as Yingxin22:37
*** neiljerram has quit IRC22:37
*** neelashah has quit IRC22:37
*** edtubill_ has quit IRC22:39
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:40
*** sshnaidm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:43
*** cloudrancher has quit IRC22:44
*** jecarey has quit IRC22:45
*** MarkBaker has quit IRC22:46
*** clopez has quit IRC22:47
*** merooney has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:49
*** merooney has quit IRC22:50
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:51
*** nateziemann has left #openstack-meeting-alt22:51
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck22:53
*** kfarr has quit IRC22:53
*** rsyed is now known as rsyed_away22:53
*** weshay_xchat has quit IRC22:55
*** clopez has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:55
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC22:58
*** dprince has quit IRC22:59
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:00
*** rmoe has quit IRC23:01
*** tcammann_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:01
*** cbouch has quit IRC23:02
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC23:03
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa23:04
*** neilus has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:04
*** mtanino has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:06
*** ntrueblood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:06
*** tcammann_ has quit IRC23:07
*** daemontool_ has quit IRC23:07
*** neilus has quit IRC23:09
*** spzala has quit IRC23:09
*** ntrueblood has quit IRC23:11
*** dims_ has quit IRC23:14
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:14
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:15
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:19
*** ajmiller_ has quit IRC23:20
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:23
*** IlyaG has quit IRC23:27
*** zz_dimtruck is now known as dimtruck23:27
*** dimtruck is now known as zz_dimtruck23:28
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:28
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:29
*** fitodua90 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:31
*** fitoduarte has quit IRC23:32
*** piet has quit IRC23:35
*** kei_yama has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:37
*** piet has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:38
*** liewegas has quit IRC23:39
*** liewegas has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:40
*** esker has quit IRC23:43
*** piet has quit IRC23:43
*** MarkBaker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:45
*** spotz is now known as spotz_zzz23:47
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC23:51
*** hyamauchi has quit IRC23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!