Tuesday, 2014-06-10

*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:05
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:07
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan00:10
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:16
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:19
*** rmoe has quit IRC00:19
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC00:19
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:20
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC00:20
*** manishg_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:21
*** manishg has quit IRC00:23
*** manishg_ is now known as manishg00:23
*** gokrokve has quit IRC00:24
*** eankutse has quit IRC00:26
*** eguz has quit IRC00:28
*** michael-yu has quit IRC00:28
*** jaypipes has quit IRC00:32
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:33
*** chuckC has quit IRC00:37
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:41
*** bdpayne has quit IRC00:44
*** edube has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:44
*** nedbat has quit IRC00:46
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:46
*** cjellick has quit IRC00:47
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:47
*** chuckC has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:50
*** nedbat has quit IRC00:50
*** cjellick has quit IRC00:51
*** yamahata has quit IRC00:52
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:56
*** nedbat has quit IRC00:56
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt00:58
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC01:00
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:02
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:10
*** mberlin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:11
*** mberlin1 has quit IRC01:11
*** flaviof is now known as flaviof_zzz01:20
*** ramashri has quit IRC01:22
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:24
*** marun has quit IRC01:28
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:30
*** shakayumi has quit IRC01:30
*** arnaud has quit IRC01:31
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:31
*** tchaypo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:33
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:33
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC01:36
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:37
*** annashe__ has quit IRC01:38
*** annashe__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:38
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC01:40
*** shakayumi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:41
*** shakayumi has quit IRC01:41
*** igordcard has quit IRC01:41
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:42
*** annashe__ has quit IRC01:42
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt01:56
*** caleb_ has quit IRC02:02
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:03
*** amcrn has quit IRC02:08
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:10
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi02:14
*** ijw has quit IRC02:17
*** gokrokve has quit IRC02:18
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away02:20
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:23
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:24
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC02:26
*** sbalukoff has quit IRC02:27
*** manishg has quit IRC02:32
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:33
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:33
*** jjmb has quit IRC02:38
*** richm has quit IRC02:39
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:41
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:43
*** jjmb has quit IRC02:43
*** ramashri has quit IRC02:45
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt02:46
*** rwsu has quit IRC02:52
*** nedbat has quit IRC02:59
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:00
*** tvoran has quit IRC03:01
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:01
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC03:03
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:08
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:10
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:10
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:11
*** lbragstad has quit IRC03:11
*** jeckersb is now known as jeckersb_gone03:12
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:13
*** michael-yu has quit IRC03:15
*** vkmc has quit IRC03:15
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC03:17
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_03:20
*** woodster has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:21
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan03:24
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:25
*** zhiyan_ is now known as zhiyan03:26
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC03:27
*** caleb_ has quit IRC03:29
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:30
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC03:31
*** tvoran_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:31
*** tvoran_ has quit IRC03:33
*** tvoran_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:34
*** tvoran has quit IRC03:35
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:35
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:37
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC03:39
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:41
*** arnaud has quit IRC03:42
*** nosnos has quit IRC03:43
*** annashe__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:47
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:49
*** dims_ has quit IRC03:53
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:54
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:55
*** eghobo has quit IRC03:55
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt03:56
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap03:57
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC04:00
*** tvoran_ has quit IRC04:01
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:01
*** MarkAtwood has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:02
*** MarkAtwood has quit IRC04:02
*** Haiying has quit IRC04:11
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:13
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:13
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:13
*** dlenrow has quit IRC04:14
*** cknight has quit IRC04:14
*** lenrow has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:15
*** ramishra has quit IRC04:17
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC04:18
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:21
*** lcheng has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:21
*** nelsnels_ has quit IRC04:22
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:24
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:25
*** yisun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:26
*** Haiying has quit IRC04:28
*** catherine_d has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:32
*** david-lyle has quit IRC04:33
*** eghobo has quit IRC04:36
*** gokrokve has quit IRC04:37
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:38
*** catherine_d has left #openstack-meeting-alt04:44
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:46
*** banix has quit IRC04:46
*** deepakcs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:48
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:50
*** dims_ has quit IRC04:50
*** eghobo has quit IRC04:54
*** eghobo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:54
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt04:58
*** gokrokve has quit IRC04:58
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away04:59
*** arnaud has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:02
*** OSM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:03
*** OSM has left #openstack-meeting-alt05:04
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:04
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:06
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:10
*** lbragstad has quit IRC05:13
*** gcb has quit IRC05:14
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:14
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:15
*** tsv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:18
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC05:19
*** SushillKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:32
*** SushillKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt05:34
*** gyee has quit IRC05:38
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:43
*** michael-yu has quit IRC05:45
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:47
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC05:47
*** eguz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:50
*** eghobo has quit IRC05:50
*** dims_ has quit IRC05:51
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi05:52
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:55
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt05:57
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:00
*** annashe__ has quit IRC06:02
*** SushilKM has quit IRC06:03
*** arnaud has quit IRC06:08
*** ramishra has quit IRC06:08
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:08
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:10
*** bdpayne has quit IRC06:13
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:17
*** yisun has left #openstack-meeting-alt06:17
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:18
*** mkoderer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:21
*** dims_ has quit IRC06:22
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:26
*** jtomasek has quit IRC06:31
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:33
*** bdpayne_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:35
*** yamamoto_ has quit IRC06:35
*** bdpayne has quit IRC06:39
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:39
*** xuhanp has quit IRC06:40
*** jaosorior has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:41
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:41
*** eguz has quit IRC06:41
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:43
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:48
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC06:48
*** lbragstad has quit IRC06:49
*** SushilKM has quit IRC06:50
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:50
*** michael-yu has quit IRC06:52
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:52
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:52
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt06:59
*** nosnos has quit IRC06:59
*** armax has quit IRC07:01
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:05
*** flaper87|afk is now known as flaper8707:06
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC07:12
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:17
*** dims_ has quit IRC07:22
*** bogdando has quit IRC07:23
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:24
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC07:28
*** rpodolyaka has left #openstack-meeting-alt07:28
*** andreaf has quit IRC07:31
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC07:34
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:36
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:44
*** bobmel has quit IRC07:47
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC07:48
*** ajo|mac has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:50
*** artem_panchenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:52
*** artem_panchenko has left #openstack-meeting-alt07:53
*** stannie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:55
*** andreaf has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:58
*** dguitarbite has joined #openstack-meeting-alt07:59
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:07
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:08
*** ramishra has quit IRC08:12
*** sbalukoff has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:15
*** derekh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:17
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:18
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:19
*** safchain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:20
*** dims_ has quit IRC08:22
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:25
*** aostapenko has left #openstack-meeting-alt08:26
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC08:31
*** ajo|mac has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:33
*** SushilKM has quit IRC08:38
*** bdpayne_ has quit IRC08:39
*** nosnos has quit IRC08:40
*** lbragstad has quit IRC08:43
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:43
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:43
*** nosnos has quit IRC08:44
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:45
*** ramishra has quit IRC08:47
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC08:50
*** aostapenko has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:52
*** jcoufal has quit IRC08:55
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt08:56
*** ykotko has quit IRC08:56
*** nosnos has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:03
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:03
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:05
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:06
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC09:10
*** isviridov_ is now known as isviridov09:12
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:13
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:17
*** zhiyan is now known as zhiyan_09:18
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:19
*** mspreitz has quit IRC09:23
*** dims_ has quit IRC09:25
*** nacim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:35
*** ramishra has quit IRC09:36
*** xianghui has quit IRC09:37
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:46
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:50
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC09:51
*** xianghui has quit IRC09:51
*** sankarshan is now known as sankarshan_away09:52
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt09:52
*** julienvey has quit IRC09:59
*** gcb has quit IRC10:04
*** jgallard has quit IRC10:07
*** xuhanp has quit IRC10:14
*** gcb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:16
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:16
*** jamie_h has quit IRC10:17
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:18
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:21
*** dims_ has quit IRC10:27
*** jamie_h_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:29
*** jamie_h has quit IRC10:32
*** ylobankov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:36
*** xianghui has quit IRC10:38
*** ajo|mac has quit IRC10:43
*** jjmb has quit IRC10:45
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:46
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC10:51
*** jjmb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:54
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt10:59
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:02
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:02
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk11:04
*** bogdando has quit IRC11:04
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:04
*** edube has quit IRC11:06
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC11:16
*** oomichi_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:16
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:19
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt11:21
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:23
*** tkelsey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:24
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC11:26
*** yamahata has quit IRC11:32
*** xianghui has quit IRC11:40
*** gcb has quit IRC11:47
*** jjmb has quit IRC11:47
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:47
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:47
*** nedbat has quit IRC11:48
*** eankutse has quit IRC11:49
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:49
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC11:51
*** Youcef_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:53
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:53
*** Youcef has quit IRC11:56
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt11:57
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:01
*** nedbat has quit IRC12:03
*** SaD has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:03
*** sergmelikyan has quit IRC12:03
*** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:04
*** sergmelikyan has quit IRC12:04
*** radez_g0n3 is now known as radez12:05
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:07
*** sergmelikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:21
*** ylobankov has left #openstack-meeting-alt12:22
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:22
*** xuhanp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:23
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC12:26
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:28
*** dhellmann has quit IRC12:28
*** kashyap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:29
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:29
*** julienvey has quit IRC12:35
*** deepakcs has quit IRC12:39
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:42
*** heyongli has quit IRC12:43
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:43
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:44
*** heyongli has quit IRC12:44
*** pdmars has quit IRC12:44
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:45
*** lbragstad has quit IRC12:45
*** eankutse has quit IRC12:46
*** yhe_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:46
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:48
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:49
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:49
*** yhe_ has quit IRC12:50
*** HenryG has quit IRC12:53
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC12:53
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:57
*** dims_ has quit IRC12:59
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt12:59
*** cknight has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:00
baoli#startmeeting PCI Passthrough13:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun 10 13:00:58 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is baoli. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.13:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.13:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: PCI Passthrough)"13:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'pci_passthrough'13:01
baoliHi13:01
*** vkramskikh has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:01
*** rpothier has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:02
irenabhi13:02
*** BrianB__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:02
*** reaperhulk has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:03
irenabbaoli: how is going?13:04
baoliirenab: Hi. Hope you had a good time in Paris last week.13:04
irenabbaoli: thanks, it was great13:04
*** julienvey has quit IRC13:04
irenabbaoli: you did a good job with the spec, it seems quite finished. Now need cores to appove13:05
baoliirenab, thanks. I reached out to John a couple of times.13:05
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:05
baoliI also kept updating it based on comments13:05
*** sadasu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:05
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:06
*** jecarey has quit IRC13:06
baoliOne comment from Yongli. He still wanted to include product_id/vendor_id in the stats key for sriov networking13:06
beaglesI've asked Dan Berrange to have a look... Russell is back from pto, so he'll probably be taking a look as well (if he hasn't already)13:06
*** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:06
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:06
baolibeagles, thanks.13:07
irenabbaoli: I am still struggeling with neutron pieces of our Md, but hope will upload the code soon, working with your POC code for now.13:07
baoliI addressed Dan's comments13:07
baoliHe seemed to be happy with that13:07
beaglescool13:07
baoliirenab, cool13:07
heyonglihello13:07
baoliYongli, Hi13:08
irenabheyongli: hi13:08
baoliYongli, I'd like to discuss your comments in the spec a little bit13:08
heyonglisure13:08
baoliYongli, in the spec, I proposed to for tagged entries, use the "tags only' as stats keys. And You wanted to include product_id/vendor_id in the stats key as well.13:09
baoliI'd like to hear options from other folks on that.13:09
heyonglii wont to block IT. just best to have13:09
*** julienvey has quit IRC13:11
irenabany idea why bp is now depends on another one: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/pci-passthrough-sriov (look at the bottom)13:11
baoliirenab, do you mean the bottom two reviews?13:13
heyonglinfv sub team?13:13
rpothierI added the review for this, but I made a mistake and it but two reviews13:13
baolioh, you mean the numa scheduling?13:13
irenabbaoli: yes13:14
irenabdoes dependedncy means that till numa is not merged it will block pci code to be merged?13:14
heyongliI am afraid it is13:15
*** mfer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:16
irenabany idea why it requirs bp dependency?13:16
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:17
baoliIt seemed that Adrian added it. We can ask him13:18
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:18
heyonglishould be nvf13:19
irenabI am probably missing something here (but went trhough log of the last meeting :-)). It does not seem to be correct to put dependency without discussing it ....13:19
irenabby the way NFV is not the only consumer for NFV13:19
irenabfor SR-IOV13:20
beaglesI agree, doesn't seem right13:20
irenabwe must to chat with Adrian to see if its really requires dependency13:20
baolilet's send an email to the mailing list13:20
heyonglinfv sub team put this spec in its scope13:21
baoliasking for clarification13:21
irenabbaoli: +113:21
sadasubaoli: agreed13:22
sadasuif this topic is done I had a few questions for Irena13:22
irenabsadasu: sure13:23
baoliOk, so everybody is ok with adding the product_id/vendor_id into the stats key?13:23
heyongligood to me13:23
baoliall right, let's move on13:24
irenabbaoli: I didn't see the need when using your POC, but OK with it13:24
sadasubaoli: seems like there might be a NUMA is making changes to the scheduling filters for PCI devices13:24
heyonglisadsau sound reasonable13:25
baolisadasu, I'm not sure if pci devices are association with particular numa cpu cells.13:25
sadasuI just skimmed through their BP, but I have a feeling that baoli's BP and this NUMA BP might be modifying the same areas of code13:25
baoliassociation/associated13:25
baoliSo we need to understand it. But I don't believe our BP is depending on it.13:26
*** lbragstad1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:26
irenabbaoli: agree13:26
heyonglibaoli numa is important to sriov for nfv Sub team13:26
sadasubaoli: not sure13:26
sadasuhere is a line in their BP: The NUMA filter (in development) will be extended to query the nova.pci_devices to check on the permitted NUMA allocation.13:27
*** tvoran has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:27
sadasuok...so they probably don't worry about the PCI device allocation itself13:27
sadasulets see how it plays out in the ML13:28
baoli#action send query to Adrian and mailing list13:28
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:28
sadasuregarding product_id/vendor_id, how much will it affect baoli's current implementation?13:29
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:29
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:29
sadasuthe currect POC code from baoli seems to be doing fine without this change13:29
heyonglisadasu i believe its small13:29
heyonglisadasu it works but this is best to have13:30
*** lbragstad1 has quit IRC13:30
heyongliand no big impact13:30
baolisadasu, with them added, a user can allocate the device in a few ways: use product_id/vendor_id in the pci alias, use the physical network tag in the alias, plus the way for SR-IOV networking13:30
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:30
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:31
sadasuok13:31
baoliheyongli, right?13:31
*** Obulpathi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:32
heyongliyeah i believe from alias is not the major concern. most of this drive by image constrain13:32
sadasuI am testing only the use case where physical network is specified in the tag13:33
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:33
heyonglithat is enough for my understand13:34
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:34
*** Obulpathi has quit IRC13:34
*** Obulpathi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:35
sadasuother than the UT support that will be provided by baoli, is anyone else testing the other tag types?13:35
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:35
heyonglifrom alias allocation not use it as nuetron port13:35
sadasuheyongli: agreed13:36
baoliHeyongli, I don't think that we have a clear understanding to that requirement yet. But I think it is not a big deal to include them in the stats key. So if you insist, I'll include them, and let's move on.13:36
*** dguitarbite has quit IRC13:37
heyonglithanks13:37
baolisadasu, you want to go ahead with your questions?13:37
sadasujust wanted to spend a couple of mins to see if this has impact on things other than baoli's coding/UT effort13:37
sadasuyes, my question was regarding security groups13:38
*** jeckersb_gone is now known as jeckersb13:38
sadasuwith SR-IOV ports  we cannot apply security groups on the host13:39
sadasuhow are other vendors dealing with this issue?13:39
irenabsadasu: I am currently going to declair in MD that not going to support security groups13:39
*** julienvey has quit IRC13:40
sadasuyes, in the absence of security groups, does your switch that is located on the adapter able to do something like ACLs13:40
irenabsadsu: yes, but not the full list of options as can be done with OVS/iptables13:40
irenabit will require another iteration to enable what can be done13:41
sadasuirenab: can u explain a bit more?13:41
sadasudo you mean another iteration of your driver to be able to turn on these features?13:42
irenabsadasu: for security groups there is both ingress and egress ACLs, current version of the adapter can do only egress13:42
sadasuirenab: ok...thanks for clarifying13:43
irenabsadasu: yes, you got my point. It will require another iteration of the MD + agent to support security groups13:43
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:43
baolisounds like that we have more work down the road13:43
sadasulack of security group support is raising quite a red flag on my MD13:43
irenaband some way to reject unsipported combinations13:43
sadasubaoli: +113:43
irenabsadasu: your plans with MD to manage it on switch?13:44
*** edube has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:44
sadasuyes, but my MD does not talk to a switch13:44
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
sadasuneed to implement it as part of MD for the switch13:45
*** kevinconway has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:45
*** rueben has quit IRC13:45
sadasuin the next iteration13:45
irenabactually, I thought on some mixture of MDs on for Host side and other for Switch side, but as you said there a  lot of work down the road13:45
*** heyongli has quit IRC13:46
irenabsadsu: so seems we are alined13:46
*** noslzzp has quit IRC13:46
sadasuirenab: yes.... we are :-)13:47
sadasualso there is discussion on support of multi-tenant networks13:47
sadasuwhich we are not supporting again in this release13:47
sadasuI would like to add a section on our wiki for future work...and start putting all this there13:48
irenabby multi tenant networks what do you mean?13:48
*** yongli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:48
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:48
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:48
yonglilost connection13:48
irenabsadasu: +1  for further items on wiki13:48
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:48
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:49
baolisadasu: +1. please update the existing list on the meeting wiki13:49
irenabI think we also must follow the NFV sub-team decisions, to eliminate conflicts and duplications13:49
sadasuirenab: multi-segment networks and not multi-tenant networks13:50
sadasubaoli: will do13:50
*** nosnos has quit IRC13:50
baoliirenab, +1.13:50
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC13:50
sadasuirenab: +1 about NFV work13:50
*** haleyb has quit IRC13:50
baolisadasu, the multi-segment network support (or multi-provider extension) is another further work.13:50
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:51
sadasubaoli: correct, will also add that to the list13:51
irenabsadasu: baoli: agree. We must land some initial code during Juno13:51
baoliThere are two code reviews posted, which you can find from the BP whtieboard13:51
*** rueben has quit IRC13:51
irenabbaoli: thanks, saw it today and will start review13:52
baoliirenab, thanks!13:52
sadasubaoli: cool...will take a look13:53
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:53
baoliappreciate everyone's time reviewing the patches.13:53
*** haleyb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC13:54
irenabany other topics to discuss today?13:54
*** yongli has left #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** heyongli has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:54
*** tsv has quit IRC13:56
baoliThat's all from my side13:57
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
*** lbragstad1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:57
irenabgreat, thanks. Lets cross fingers to get spec approved by next meeting :-)13:58
*** lbragstad has quit IRC13:58
*** rueben has quit IRC13:58
baoliI need to attend the nova weekly meeting on Thursday13:58
*** thangp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:58
irenabbaoli: good luck!13:59
baoliThanks everyone. See you next week13:59
heyonglibye13:59
baoli#endmeeting13:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"13:59
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun 10 13:59:32 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)13:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/pci_passthrough/2014/pci_passthrough.2014-06-10-13.00.html13:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/pci_passthrough/2014/pci_passthrough.2014-06-10-13.00.txt13:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/pci_passthrough/2014/pci_passthrough.2014-06-10-13.00.log.html13:59
irenabsee you next week13:59
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt13:59
*** irenab has quit IRC14:00
*** rpothier has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:00
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** iccha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:01
*** Shixiong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:03
*** jcoufal has quit IRC14:03
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:04
*** jeckersb is now known as jeckersb_gone14:07
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:08
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:10
*** jeckersb_gone is now known as jeckersb14:14
*** jdob has quit IRC14:15
*** jdob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:15
*** oomichi_ has quit IRC14:16
*** lbragstad1 has quit IRC14:16
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi14:17
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:17
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:20
*** flaviof_zzz is now known as flaviof14:20
*** sankarshan_away is now known as sankarshan14:21
*** kebray has quit IRC14:21
*** agordeev has quit IRC14:21
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov|away14:24
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:25
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:25
*** tdruiva has quit IRC14:26
*** heyongli has quit IRC14:28
*** luizfar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:28
*** mspreitz has quit IRC14:29
*** jdob_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:31
*** jdob has quit IRC14:31
*** satish has quit IRC14:34
*** cknight has left #openstack-meeting-alt14:34
*** sadasu has quit IRC14:34
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:36
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:37
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs14:38
*** jaypipes has quit IRC14:39
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:40
*** jdob_ is now known as jdob14:40
*** jaypipes has quit IRC14:41
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** nelsnelson has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:42
*** jaypipes has quit IRC14:44
*** jgallard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:45
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:46
*** xianghui has quit IRC14:47
*** BrianB__ has quit IRC14:47
*** tdruiva has quit IRC14:48
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:48
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC14:48
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:50
*** sriram has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:55
*** isviridov|away is now known as isviridov14:56
*** alcabrera has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:57
*** cjellick has quit IRC14:57
*** malini1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** prashanthr_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** james_li has joined #openstack-meeting-alt14:58
*** gokrokve has quit IRC14:59
*** abettadapur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC15:00
*** Haiying has quit IRC15:00
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:00
*** Shixiong has quit IRC15:00
kgriffs#startmeeting marconi15:01
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun 10 15:01:10 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is kgriffs. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'marconi'15:01
kgriffs#topic roll call15:01
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
kgriffso/15:01
alcabrerao/15:01
*** openstack changes topic to "roll call (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:01
sriram\o/15:01
malini1o/15:01
flaper87o.15:01
abettadapurO15:01
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:01
malini1?15:01
sriramare we approaching the land of regexes? :P15:02
*** tjanczuk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:02
*** rueben has quit IRC15:02
tjanczukhello15:02
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:02
flaper87we've got a bunch of things to discuss today and I'd really get to the unified API discussion15:03
*** eankutse has quit IRC15:03
tjanczuk+115:03
flaper87lets move forward15:03
kgriffsyep. that's the big item15:03
kgriffs#topic review actions from last time15:03
*** openstack changes topic to "review actions from last time (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:03
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
kgriffsmegan_w to check trademarks for our shortlist of names15:03
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:03
kgriffsmegan_w: u there?15:04
*** xianghui has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
*** satish has quit IRC15:04
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:04
kgriffsok15:04
kgriffslet me pretend to be megan15:05
kgriffs"Our trademark counsel did a search and recommended Zaqar or Naav as the best potential names with low-to-moderate risk. Tamtam came up as a moderate risk based on TamTamy, but we could still likely pursue it because the software is quite distinguishable. Both Raven and Copper pose a higher risk, because they are registered to companies in dev / cloud spaces (Ravenflow and Copper.io respectively)."15:05
kgriffs"Do you think your team would be happy moving forward with Zaqar, Naav or Tamtam?"15:05
kgriffsdo we want to pick one of these or do another round of brainstorming?15:05
flaper87kgriffs: can we do a vote now?15:05
flaper87I'm happy to vote now and move this forward15:06
tjanczuk+115:06
flaper87you could set a vote poll and use each one of those names as options15:06
tjanczuk(do I get a vote?)15:06
malini1Can someone enlighten me real quick on how to pronounce Zaqar?15:06
*** jtomasek has quit IRC15:06
malini1tjanczuk: everybody does15:06
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:06
kgriffsmalini1: I think it is za'kar ?15:07
vkmco-15:07
vkmco/15:07
flaper87but we only take under consideration kgriffs vote because this is democracy15:07
tjanczukmalini1: thanks. and yes, I think that is one problem with Zaqar and Naav - it needs to come with spelling instructions15:07
malini1hmmm….http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zaqar15:07
flaper87muahahha muahahha muahahahhaa15:07
tjanczukOh, I am used that kind ;)15:07
malini1lets vote15:07
flaper87but pronouncing tamtam is fun, it seems like we're selling chume-gums15:08
kgriffsyes, the pronunciation/spelling did concern be a little too15:08
*** abettadapur has quit IRC15:08
tjanczukaren't we?15:08
malini1I tried to remember tamtam & it ended up as dumdum in my brain15:08
flaper87tjanczuk: nope, just gummy bears and pop-tarts15:08
flaper87:D15:08
flaper87malini1: lol15:08
malini1we need an easily memorizable name15:08
*** marun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:08
flaper87kgriffs: voooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooote15:08
kgriffswhat did tamtam mean again?15:09
sriramI'd go with Naav ;)15:09
flaper87I like Naav because it's easy to write, short and it's from a language I don't know15:09
tjanczuktamtam is a kind of a drum that was used to send signals before internet. OK, well before internet.15:09
flaper87and all those are scientifically provable points15:10
flaper87tjanczuk: LOL15:10
kgriffs#startvote Zaqar, Naav, Tamtam, Abstain15:10
malini1kgriffs: tamtam is  a drum, rt tjanczuk ?15:10
openstackUnable to parse vote topic and options.15:10
*** abettadapur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:10
* kgriffs can't remember the syntax15:10
kgriffsone moment15:10
malini1kgriffs: https://www.google.com/search?q=tamtam&espv=2&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=6R-XU_SGNMqNyATQuoKgCA&ved=0CAYQ_AUoAQ&biw=1152&bih=58615:10
tjanczukhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drums_in_communication15:10
kgriffsah, forgot the question15:10
kgriffssilly me15:10
kgriffs#startvote What should Marconi's new name be? Zaqar, Naav, Tamtam, Abstain15:11
openstackBegin voting on: What should Marconi's new name be? Valid vote options are Zaqar, Naav, Tamtam, Abstain.15:11
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC15:11
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.15:11
flaper87#vote Naav15:11
alcabrera#vote Naav15:11
tjanczuk#vote tamtam15:11
sriram#vote Naav15:11
abettadapur#vote Naav15:11
kgriffs#vote Naav15:11
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:11
prashanthr_Naav since i suggested it ;)15:11
vkmc#vote Zaqar15:11
tjanczukdemocracy at work...15:11
malini1#vote tamtam15:11
vkmc(it's epic)15:12
*** betsy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:12
flaper87prashanthr_: you've to use the #vote OPTION syntax15:12
prashanthr_#vote Naav15:12
flaper87Giving talks about Naav will be fun15:12
kgriffsclosing the vote in 10 seconds15:13
tjanczukYou will now have two projects on your resume ;)15:13
malini1Naav is tongue in my mothertongue :D15:13
flaper87915:13
flaper87815:13
flaper87715:13
flaper87615:13
flaper87515:13
flaper87415:13
flaper87315:13
flaper87215:13
kgriffs#endvote15:13
openstackVoted on "What should Marconi's new name be?" Results are15:13
flaper87115:13
openstackZaqar (1): vkmc15:13
kgriffsrace condition15:13
flaper87015:13
kgriffs;)15:13
openstackNaav (6): alcabrera, kgriffs, abettadapur, sriram, flaper87, prashanthr_15:13
openstackTamtam (2): malini1, tjanczuk15:13
malini1we are Project Naav now !15:13
sriram\____/ -> Naav :P15:13
tjanczukAmen.15:13
flaper87and we have a new name, Naav15:13
kgriffsso it can mean boat or tongue?15:14
* sriram needs better ascii art15:14
flaper87now, to change everything15:14
kgriffsoh boy15:14
malini1quick somebody update devstack15:14
prashanthr_Yaay :)15:14
sriramLOL15:14
vkmc:D15:14
flaper87LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL15:14
prashanthr_sriram: LOl quick art15:14
kgriffswe will start the renaming next week after j-1 is cut15:14
flaper87devstack, channel, mailing list tags, email filters, code, client,15:14
flaper87AAHHHHH FUck trademarks, lets keep Marconi15:14
malini1tempest15:14
kgriffs#agreed Naav is the new Marconi15:15
*** zhangleiqiang has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:15
tjanczukSeriously: I would consider the name change along with announcing the outcome of the [un]unificiation of APIs.15:15
flaper87#agreed Marconi is the old Naav15:15
flaper87^^15:15
kgriffstjanczuk: noted15:15
*** jcoufal has quit IRC15:15
kgriffslet's come up with a game plan for Naav at next week's meeting15:15
malini1arent we also changing the project/program name - whatever tht thing is which is currently 'queuing' ?15:15
flaper87malini1: nope, just the codename for now15:15
*** Barker has quit IRC15:16
kgriffsmalini1: possibly, but would be later15:16
malini1ok15:16
flaper87next topic ?15:16
kgriffsok, next15:16
*** mberlin has quit IRC15:16
kgriffsflaper87: you took the words right out of my keyboard115:16
kgriffs#topic specs15:16
*** openstack changes topic to "specs (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:16
flaper87:D15:16
*** mberlin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
*** samstav has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
*** dprince has quit IRC15:17
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:17
kgriffsHow should we approach the proposed specs process?15:17
flaper87so ?15:18
flaper87:D15:18
kgriffsgo all in for j-215:18
kgriffstry it with one spec in j-215:18
kgriffsput it off until next cycle15:18
malini1lets try one in j-215:18
kgriffsor15:18
flaper87I would prefer not adopting the spec process until we reach the graduation point15:18
kgriffsrequire it for all new feature proposals15:18
flaper87TBH15:18
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:18
flaper87Doing so means that we need to convert all blueprints that have been approved for J into specs15:18
flaper87submit them, review them etc15:18
flaper87this all will happen *after* we setup the repo, gate etc for our specs repo15:19
kgriffsI had thought about trying it with one in j-215:19
flaper87and we've pretty ambitious goals for J15:19
malini1I said let's try one, so we have a better understanding of the pros/cons15:19
kgriffsbut... would it be a pain to do most bp's one way, and one a different way.15:19
kgriffsflaper87 has a good point15:19
kgriffswe may not have bandwidth for implementing a new process right now15:20
kgriffslet's vote15:20
flaper87We can start setting up the whole thing in background (I can help with that) but lets not make J depend on it15:20
sriram+115:20
malini1anybody has insights into if it'll become a grad req?15:21
*** vkmc has quit IRC15:21
flaper87All new blueprints would go through that process but not existing ones and it's certainly not blocking our progress nor occupping our bandwidth15:21
flaper87malini1: not yet but we can ask15:21
kgriffsflaper87: yes, let's be sure to bring that up15:21
kgriffsso...15:22
flaper87I don't think so, yet. It started as an experiment so I think we should give the process more time before making it a grad request15:22
kgriffsrequire new ones to go through the process, but not existing ones?15:22
malini1kgriffs: starting when?15:22
flaper87also, the important thing is to have things setup for future blueprints15:22
flaper87Lets do this, I'll take care of it15:22
flaper87I'll start setting up things for the marconi-spec15:23
flaper87in background15:23
kgriffsok, let's start requiring new bps for j-215:23
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
kgriffssorry15:23
flaper87slowly and without requiring intervention from other folks in the team15:23
kgriffsspecs for new bps in j-215:23
malini1can we do a pilot on 1 or2 bps, so we don't come up with any absurd template ?15:23
flaper87once that's done, we'll sync up again and decide15:23
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:23
kgriffsso, if you have an idea, don't register a blueprint. submit a spec from now on15:23
kgriffsmalini1: mmm, good point15:23
flaper87malini1: I think we can follow other projects templates15:23
kgriffswe did talk about using template to keep things light and learn as we go15:24
*** atiwari has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
malini1flaper87: some of the other projects have really detailed specs15:24
kgriffsflaper87: we may want to mark parts as optional or something if they become too time-consuming.15:24
malini1I wud hate to write down all tht info15:24
*** jcoufal has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
flaper87most of the parts in those templates are optional15:24
kgriffsanyway, we can start with another project's template and adjust it for our needs15:24
flaper87it's up to us, really15:24
*** peoplemerge1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:24
kgriffsok, so for now let's just get the plumbing done and we can work on a template15:25
flaper87it must evolve overtime, but I'd really hate to waste time on this when we've real code to write15:25
malini1We should keep it really light weight, so it add value & doesnt become another process in the way15:25
*** apmelton has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:25
kgriffsmalini1: we might use the Redis Pool as an experimental spec15:25
malini1flaper87: +115:25
*** xuhanp has quit IRC15:25
kgriffsalcabrera: ^^15:25
kgriffsok15:25
sriramgood point.15:25
kgriffslet me drop an action and let's move on15:25
kgriffs#action flaper87 to do the plumbing for specs15:26
*** abettadapur has quit IRC15:26
alcabreraredis pool sounds like a reasonable thing to experiment w/ spec-ing15:26
flaper87topic++15:27
kgriffs#topic FYI: Keystone token changes15:27
*** openstack changes topic to "FYI: Keystone token changes (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:27
kgriffsthis is a quick one15:27
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:27
kgriffsjust wanted to make everyone aware of the work that is going on around keystone auth tokens15:28
kgriffshttp://markmail.org/message/2w7xzjq6i7mfcpez#query:+page:1+mid:7afzhoztzla4jgr3+state:results15:28
*** abettadapur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:28
tjanczuk8K tokens? Is Keystone moving its database to cookies?15:28
kgriffsbasically, UUID tokens are probably going away, and so our HTTP request size is going to go up a little bit. Keystone team is trying to keep the size under control.15:29
flaper87that work is quite important for us15:29
malini1yayyy!!15:29
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:29
flaper87they also mentioned they're trying to shrink it15:29
kgriffsthey are doing some algorithmic things to shrink it15:29
kgriffsalso compression15:29
tjanczukOne more reason to look into websockets15:29
sriramhow much overhead would it add?15:29
*** viktors is now known as viktors|afk15:30
*** satish has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
kgriffsI'm a little fuzzy on whether the keystone middleware will have to do decompression on each request, but I suspect so, and I've been encouraging the use of snappy or lz4 for that... we'll see15:30
*** tuxerman has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:30
kgriffstjanczuk: speaking of websockets, we will need to periodically check for revocation and token expiration15:30
kgriffsanyway, something to start noodling on15:31
kgriffsreply to the email thread with your thoughts/questions/concerns15:31
tjanczukeven so I expect it to be less of an issue than doing to for every HTTP request15:31
kgriffstjanczuk: yep15:31
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:31
kgriffsor we can just wait for HTTP 2.015:32
* kgriffs ducks15:32
flaper87LOL15:32
kgriffs#topic Discuss GET messages on a non existing queue returns 20415:32
*** openstack changes topic to "Discuss GET messages on a non existing queue returns 204 (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:32
tjanczukor quantum computin15:32
kgriffsvkmc, alcabrera ^^^15:32
alcabreraah15:33
alcabrerathis bug15:33
alcabrera#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/marconi/+bug/124375215:33
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1243752 in marconi "GET messages on a non existing queue returns 204" [Low,In progress]15:33
vkmc!15:33
alcabreraiirc15:33
tjanczukwhat would you expect to see? 404?15:33
alcabrerathe question for this was - how do we want to address this for v1.0 vs. v1.115:33
sriramyes, it should be a 40415:33
alcabreraI think v1.0 expects a 404, and v1.1 expects a 20415:33
*** abettadapur has quit IRC15:33
flaper87yup, I think just v1.0 should return 40415:34
alcabreracool15:34
flaper87in v1.1 queues are lazy so, 204 seems correct15:34
vkmcok, so we have to change the behaviour in v1.0 and keep it in v1.115:34
alcabreraso we need to double check v1.0, fix it if it doesn't return 404, and then close off the bug. :)15:35
malini1we decided to keep the 204 in 1.0 due to performance concerns15:35
alcabreraah15:35
tjanczukyou mean one extra request to check if queue exists?15:35
malini1IIRC we changed it to 204 from 404 after a benchmark15:36
kgriffswith my caching patch, that will help perf15:36
malini1tjanczuk: yes15:36
vkmcit's semantically correct for v1.1 to return a 204, and also more efficient15:36
vkmcI'm a bit concerned about tests15:36
*** cpallares has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:36
vkmcfor this case15:36
flaper87Should we worried about this v1.0 detail ?15:36
flaper87worry*15:36
kgriffsgreat question15:37
malini1flaper87: I dont think we should15:37
flaper87I mean, v1.1 will be out not far from now, the client semantics will remain the same15:37
flaper87ok, then lets close it as won't fix15:37
kgriffsTBH, nobody has complained that I am aware of.15:37
peoplemerge1impact to existing clients?15:37
tjanczukDoes this really boil down to whether you  think of queues as first class citizens? If first class -> 404. If not -> 204 is OK.15:37
kgriffspeoplemerge1: basically, if a queue does not exist, we don't give them a hint to go create it first15:38
kgriffswe just pretend it exists15:38
flaper87tjanczuk: that's part of the reason, yes.15:38
flaper87but I don't think that's enough of a reason to change v1.015:38
flaper87I'd just focus on v1.1 unless there's a critical issue to fix in v.1015:38
tjanczukI was thinking more of vNext15:38
*** edube has quit IRC15:39
kgriffsok, I am going to close this as won't fix unless anyone vehemently disagrees.15:39
alcabreraworks for me15:39
vkmcworks for me too15:39
malini1This one keeps reappearing every 2 months :-S15:39
kgriffsmalini1: in what way? are we getting complaints?15:39
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
malini1kgriffs: it keeps coming back from somebody in the team15:40
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt15:40
malini1but not from any users15:40
kgriffsok15:40
kgriffs#agreed close bug #1243752 as won't fix15:40
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1243752 in marconi "GET messages on a non existing queue returns 204" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/124375215:40
flaper87topic++15:40
vkmcwe could mark it as a won't fix and add the reasons in the bug report15:40
sriramyeah, I had some questions on this when I worked on lazy queue create.15:40
vkmcjust to keep track of it in the future15:41
*** Leonr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:41
kgriffsspeaking of that, and the fact that it would be sort of impossible to return 404 with an AMQP driver...15:41
malini1On the same note, does it make sense to keep 'check queue existence' API with lazy queue in place for 1.1 ?15:41
malini1sorry for jumping 2 topics ahead in the agenda15:42
flaper87malini1: probably not15:42
kgriffsmalini1: probably not15:42
flaper87kgriffs: seriously ?15:42
kgriffskgriffs: seriously?15:42
tjanczukit is possible with AMQP 0.015:42
kgriffsoops15:42
tjanczuk0.915:42
malini1kgriffs & flaper87 are in the same firmware version15:42
* kgriffs can't let them know my secret15:42
*** abettadapur has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:42
flaper87ok, lets move on15:43
*** nacim has quit IRC15:43
* kgriffs curses quantum entanglement15:43
kgriffs#topic Reconsidering the unified API model15:43
*** openstack changes topic to "Reconsidering the unified API model (Meeting topic: marconi)"15:43
tjanczukununify!15:43
kgriffsso...15:43
kgriffsa nice light topic15:44
tjanczukI left my thoughts on the ML yesteday15:44
flaper87I loved Mark's email15:44
tjanczukWhat were the key points?15:44
kgriffstjanczuk: if I understand correctly, you proposed an Option C - scrap the feed semantics and just do claims?15:44
tjanczukNo, I proposed to make the queue semantics the "MUST", and anything else a "MAY"15:45
flaper87Mark's email: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/037108.html15:45
tjanczukThe exact mechanics of "MAY" are TBD15:45
kgriffsoic15:45
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC15:45
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:45
*** danpb has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC15:46
kgriffsI think Gordon had some good questions15:46
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:46
flaper87we've 10mins left so, lets start throwing something out there15:46
tjanczukI am not sure I see how Mark's point is relevant to this unification topic?15:46
kgriffsand I liked Mark's thoughts about "don't do it just because you feel pressured and you don't really see any value in it"15:46
*** rmoe has quit IRC15:47
flaper87tjanczuk: it's not relevant to the unification topic but to how much we want to change our API/product based on the store driver15:47
flaper87what benefits would all that bring?15:47
flaper87do we really need it? etc etc etc15:47
flaper87all those are valid questions15:47
kgriffsflaper87: I think you made a good point that we don't know enough yet to make a good decision.15:47
flaper87I really really really think we need to sort out what our base features are15:47
flaper87what we want to deliver as part of marconi in terms of API15:48
kgriffspersonally, I think we need to see POC for AMQP and redis, do some benchmarks and see how they affect the api15:48
tjanczukI thought the unification topic is valid on its own, regardless of how many drivers Marconi (NaaV) aspires to support?15:48
flaper87and what we want to kee as optional15:48
flaper87kgriffs: agreed15:48
flaper87vkmc: you around?15:48
flaper87are you reading this?15:48
kgriffstjanczuk: I feel like they are interrelated. Since once of the pressures for splitting the API is the fact that it can't all be supported by AMQP15:48
kgriffssplitting/reducing15:49
flaper87I think our current API is valid as is to provide useful features and cover several scenarios. I'm not saying it is perfect, nor that we shouldn't change it15:49
flaper87I'm saying that we need to have more information and experience to do that15:49
kgriffsyes15:49
flaper87Julien's and Doug's suggestions were good too15:49
kgriffsone more point15:49
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:49
prashanthr_kgriffs: Sure we can have a POC.15:50
malini1we are running out of time15:50
kgriffsactually, reiterating what flaper87 said earlier15:50
kgriffsfirst, we must decide whether we want to simplify. Do we want to continue to support multiple messaging patterns?15:51
tjanczukI think that is exactly the top question to ask.15:51
malini1sorry my brain interpreted 11:49 as 11:59, ignore my comment15:51
kgriffssecond, if we do, do we continue striving to do that by affordances, or by doing things that are more prescriptive, such as implementing the notion of exchanges15:52
kgriffsthe feeds portion of the API was designed to work at the level of affordances, meaning, here are some basic semantics that let you do several different things15:52
kgriffshowever, it can be difficult to map that to a broker such as AMQP15:53
tjanczukIn general the broader the surface, the narrower the implementation choices.15:53
kgriffswhich brings us to the second question; what does support AMQP buy us?15:53
tjanczukCurrently the only pragmatic implementation choices are DB based.15:53
kgriffstjanczuk: correct15:53
flaper87kgriffs: note that this is not only true for AMQP15:54
flaper87but lets use it as the reference15:54
flaper87since it's the one we're working on15:54
tjanczukTo me AMQP boils down to the benefit of being able to use backends folks already use and know how to operate. The protocol is really insubstantial.15:54
kgriffsbut I am not familiar with every broker out there, so we could be wrong15:54
flaper87tjanczuk: I agree15:54
tjanczuk(There may also be perf benefits, but that remains to be seen).15:54
flaper87I think I mentioned this in the thread too15:54
kgriffswell, sure, but many people also already know how to operate NoSQL15:54
*** nedbat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:54
tjanczukAGPL15:55
flaper87lets also mention we bring something to those brokers too (an easier way to scale(TM))15:55
kgriffsAGPL is a good point. Hence our experiment with Redis15:55
flaper87that said, do we think this is enough of a reason to change the API ?15:55
kgriffsflaper87: good point; the scaling thing15:55
flaper87regardless our choice, I think we should still pursue the POC road15:55
tjanczukyes, that is a benefit, but currently it feels the cost is too large15:55
*** tkelsey has quit IRC15:55
flaper87I don't think redis is a drop-in replacement for mongodb15:56
flaper87:/15:56
tjanczukSo I did the POC on Rabbit. With current shape of APIs it is impossible to use Rabbit.15:56
kgriffs(4 minutes)15:56
tjanczukThe APIs just don't map to Rabbit capabilities.15:56
flaper87tjanczuk: what things are supported?15:56
tjanczukPublishing a message. Currently you cannot even consume a message (at least until the POP change comes in).15:57
vkmcflaper87, I am!15:57
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:57
tjanczukI can do a more details summary on ML after this.15:57
flaper87tjanczuk: that would be awesome15:57
flaper87thanks a lot for your work there15:57
flaper87I'll put more thoughts on this15:58
flaper87As a closing question, based on latest feedback: Would kafka be a better choice for now?15:58
tjanczukNP. I also had some thoughts on the "core" APIs and how they could be shaped such that one can support a broader set of backends (Mongo, AMQP etc). Anyone interested in seeing this?15:58
kgriffsbetter choice than AMQP?15:58
flaper87kgriffs: yup15:58
*** paulmo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt15:58
*** nedbat has quit IRC15:58
*** markwash has quit IRC15:58
flaper87as in, route efforts there and lets give AMQP more time15:59
flaper87tjanczuk: yup15:59
*** julim has quit IRC15:59
flaper87ok, I think we ran out of time15:59
kgriffsTBH, more people have been asking for Kafka as a backend than Rabbit or Qpid, at least what I can tell16:00
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
tjanczukflapper87: check out this: https://github.com/tjanczuk/narconi#endpoint-synopsis16:00
kgriffsflaper87: let's do a little POC or something for kafka16:00
flaper87it was a great meeting. I'd love to follow up on #openstack-marconi16:00
kgriffsfinal thought, then I will end meeting16:00
flaper87kgriffs: Ok, I can play with that16:00
kgriffslet's be careful not to let the tail wag the dog16:00
kgriffsthe API *is* the product16:00
*** Leon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:00
tjanczuk+++116:01
*** Leon is now known as Guest2645216:01
flaper87kgriffs: EXACTLY! well, said16:01
flaper87well said*16:01
kgriffsand several long-time openstacker's have cautioned us about trying to support too many backends16:01
kgriffssaying, it will distract us from our mission16:01
kgriffsthat is all16:01
*** terryw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:01
*** coolsvap|afk is now known as coolsvap16:01
kgriffs#endmeeting16:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:01
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun 10 16:01:37 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:01
* flaper87 waves16:01
kgriffsthanks everyone!16:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/marconi/2014/marconi.2014-06-10-15.01.html16:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/marconi/2014/marconi.2014-06-10-15.01.txt16:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/marconi/2014/marconi.2014-06-10-15.01.log.html16:01
kgriffssomeone got the minutes?16:01
vkmcthanks!16:01
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC16:01
malini1kgriffs: I have it16:02
*** alcabrera has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
*** iqbalmohomed has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
iqbalmohomedHello all16:02
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:02
*** Barker has quit IRC16:03
*** peoplemerge1 has quit IRC16:03
*** Leonr has quit IRC16:03
*** iccha has quit IRC16:03
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
*** pballand has quit IRC16:03
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:03
*** emagana has quit IRC16:04
*** rueben has quit IRC16:04
iqbalmohomedHmm ... this is not the solum meeting, is it16:05
adrian_ottono sir.16:05
adrian_ottoThis morning's OpenStack Containers Team meeting has been cancelled. We will have our next meeting on 2014-06-17 at UTC 2200.16:05
paulmoI believe it is at 22:00 UTC today16:05
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:05
iqbalmohomedk ... thx16:05
*** prashanthr_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:05
adrian_ottoSOlum meeting happens at 2200 UTC today.16:05
*** iqbalmohomed has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:05
*** otherwiseguy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:06
*** markwash has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:07
*** iccha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:08
*** ramishra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
*** rmoe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:09
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
*** terryw has quit IRC16:10
*** thomnico has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:10
*** jaosorior has quit IRC16:12
*** spzala has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:12
*** julienvey has quit IRC16:14
*** zhangleiqiang has quit IRC16:16
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** paulmo has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:16
*** cath6184 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:19
*** jaypipes has quit IRC16:20
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC16:20
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:20
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC16:20
*** cpallares has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:21
*** jgallard has quit IRC16:22
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:23
*** dprince has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:26
*** denis_makogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:27
*** PeterSchwaller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:28
*** abettadapur has left #openstack-meeting-alt16:29
*** james_li has quit IRC16:29
*** PeterSchwaller has quit IRC16:30
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:33
*** ativelkov_mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
*** martin_t has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:34
*** xianghui has quit IRC16:35
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC16:36
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:36
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi16:37
*** Haiying has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:37
*** iccha has quit IRC16:38
*** igordcard has quit IRC16:39
*** isviridov is now known as isviridov|away16:40
*** gokrokve_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:40
*** demorris has quit IRC16:40
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:41
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:41
*** emagana has quit IRC16:43
*** ativelkov_mobile has quit IRC16:43
*** gokrokve has quit IRC16:43
*** Barker has quit IRC16:44
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:45
*** Barker has quit IRC16:45
*** luizfar has quit IRC16:46
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:46
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:46
*** luizfar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:46
*** mwagner_lap has quit IRC16:48
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:48
*** Barker has quit IRC16:49
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:49
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** k4n0 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:50
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:51
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:51
*** thinrichs has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:51
*** arturt has quit IRC16:52
*** jcoufal has quit IRC16:55
*** serg_melikyan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:55
*** emaganap has quit IRC16:56
*** slogan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:56
*** _nadya__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:56
*** stannie has quit IRC16:57
*** slagun has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** james_li has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** ativelkov_mobile has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:57
*** btully has joined #openstack-meeting-alt16:58
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC17:00
*** ankurrr has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** denis_makogon_ is now known as denis_makogon17:00
*** dkehn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** dmakogon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC17:00
*** tsufiev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
*** sjmc7 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:00
ruhe#startmeeting murano17:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun 10 17:02:31 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ruhe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: murano)"17:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'murano'17:02
ativelkov_mobileWill join you in ~ 5 mins17:02
ruhesorry, i didn't update the agenda17:03
tsufievhi there17:03
dteselkinHi17:03
*** julim has quit IRC17:03
*** cath6184 has quit IRC17:03
ruhewe definetely need to discuss status of J117:03
ruhewhat other topics we should discuss today?17:03
*** balajiiyer has quit IRC17:03
slagunhi17:04
katyaferventhi What the blueprints have the most priority17:04
sjmc7we have a number of open bugs we should try to reduce17:04
*** dkehnx has quit IRC17:05
ruheok. let's start with topic "status of J1" and cover blueprints, and pending reviews, and open bugs17:05
ruhe#topic status of juno-117:05
*** openstack changes topic to "status of juno-1 (Meeting topic: murano)"17:05
*** akuznetsova_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:05
btullyI'd like to discuss the app catalog index, specifically the "Latest Apps" section and get some clarification on what that section is supposed to do. Possibly renaming it, etx17:05
btullyetc17:05
ruhe#link https://launchpad.net/murano/+milestone/juno-117:05
ruhebtully: ok. will trigger this topic also17:06
*** igormarnat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:06
ruheit's just two days before we cut the development milestone j117:06
ruhethere are several BPs which aren't even started17:06
tsufievseems that they should be moved to j217:07
*** ativelkov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:07
ruhetsufiev: yep17:07
btullythere is one of mine that is set to "Not started" but it's actually not the case17:07
ativelkovo/17:07
*** ativelkov_mobile has quit IRC17:07
ruhelet's just make sure that these BPs are really "not started"17:07
btullyif you recall I was asked to split up my original blueprint into several17:07
ruheativelkov: hey17:07
serg_melikyano/17:07
btullyhowever in doing my dev work, it really doesn't make sense to split them up since they are dependent17:08
ativelkovsorry for being late folk: Moscow traffic becomes twice as slow when it starts rainign17:08
ruhebtully: can you give us a link? i'll clear the milestone from it17:08
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja17:08
tsufievativelkov, lifehack = subway ;)17:08
ruheis Ryan here?17:08
ruhesjmc7: should i move https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/additional-author-information to J2?17:08
*** michael-yu has quit IRC17:09
btullyhttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/murano-ui-horizon-patterns17:09
sjmc7ruhe - we're trying to finish it17:09
sjmc7it's in progress17:09
ankurrryeah, in progress17:09
ruhesjmc7: ok, can you please update the status? or should i do that?17:10
sjmc7i'll do it17:10
ruhesjmc7: thanks17:10
btullyis the original blueprint with the dependencies. however the dependencies I feel should not be broken up as separate blueprints and instead should be committed on the same bp branch17:10
*** drupalmonkey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:10
ruhebtully: i don't have any problem with that. if you feel that it would be the right approach, then just do so17:11
btullysuper. thanks!17:11
btullyso i'll set the above link milestone to j117:11
ruhebtully: does that mean, that we can clear all its child BPs?17:12
tsufievbtully, do you mean it'll be ready on June 12, which is a cut for J1?17:12
tsufievit is pretty soon17:12
btullyi'd have to look at each one and make sure the info is contained in the parent BP17:13
*** dkehn__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:13
btullythat was the other q we had17:13
btullygiven the deadline of 6/12 and our time differences17:13
btullydo we have a cutoff time for commits?17:13
*** dkehn__ is now known as dkehnx17:13
btullycould use some clarification on that17:14
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:14
tsufievwe have 2 days as an average approve time for UI commits (don't ask me how I calculate it)17:15
*** derekh_ has quit IRC17:15
btullyok, good to know17:15
tsufievso it means that all blueprints not yet committed won't make it for J117:15
ruheif we were an integrated project we would already block all the changes. and we definetely should do so. but in J1 it seems that we'll have just one day June12. also, i can do the release on June13 (by my local time) which will be late evening of June12 in US17:15
btullyso if I have something to commit in a few hours will it make it in?17:15
tsufievruhe, agree, no need to be paranoid :)17:16
ativelkovShould be fine, yes17:16
tsufievbtully, absolutely17:16
ruhebtully: yes it will. also you'll have all day tomorrow17:16
sjmc7we can try and review stuff more aggressively today and tomorrow17:16
btullybut there's a 2 day approve time, no?17:16
*** dkehn_ has quit IRC17:16
btullyso for a release on the 12th, commits should be in by the 10th?17:16
sjmc7btully - only by tradition17:16
sjmc7it's not a rule17:16
ativelkovit is an average, there is not rule %)17:16
ativelkovwe just have a large backlog of commits waiting for approval17:17
tsufievbtully, that is true for complicated changes, but for simple changes it can be less17:17
ativelkovand we may use some help here17:17
btullyk17:17
sjmc7ativelkov - let's talk about reviews later and go through the remaining BPs17:17
ruhelet's move on17:17
ruheslagun: what about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/throw-correct-exception ?17:18
ruheah, again and again i ask you about this superseded BP :)17:18
sjmc7:)17:18
ruhei've just cleared milestone target17:18
slagunruhe, I don't know why it is marked ad complete. It is not17:18
tsufievruhe, how do you order BPs?17:19
ruhetsufiev: i just opened https://launchpad.net/murano/+milestone/juno-117:19
slagunI'd like to move it to j2 actually17:19
*** HenryG has quit IRC17:19
ruhetsufiev: and i check those which look scary17:19
tsufievruhe, got it17:19
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:19
ruheslagun: please update the BP17:19
gokrokve_I just want to make sure that we have actions in j117:20
*** mspreitz has quit IRC17:20
*** HenryG has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
gokrokve_there are customers who want this feature for autoscaling17:20
tsufievgokrokve_, it will be hard for the UI part17:20
*** otherwiseguy has quit IRC17:20
ruheUI will not make it into j117:20
*** sriram has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:20
gokrokve_tsufiev: what are the problems? How can I help?17:20
ruhegokrokve_: we'll get back to the action a little bit ealier17:21
ruhe* later17:21
gokrokve_what is the minimal functionality we can expose in UI?17:21
gokrokve_ok17:21
slagunruhe, it is superseded by bug. But launchpad can mark BP as being superseded only by another BP17:21
ruheativelkov: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/murano-cli-client can you move this one to J2?17:21
sjmc7i can help with that one ruhe/ativlekov17:21
ativelkovruhe: done17:22
ativelkovI am sure katyafervent is working on it right now17:22
sjmc7ah, ok17:22
sjmc7i'll leave it alone then :)17:22
katyaferventyeap, almost ready17:22
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:22
ativelkovWe need a proper manifest generation for MuranoPL-based packages - that is the trickier part17:22
ativelkovBut I am sure Kate will do it the right way17:23
ruhethe next big one is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/online-app-repository by iyozhikov17:23
ativelkovI've moved the BP to j2 just in case17:23
gokrokve_+1 to move it to j217:23
gokrokve_it is not urgent17:23
ruhei've updated status of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/online-app-repository to "Needs code review"17:23
ativelkovgokrokve_: its kinda urgent, as we've announced hot auto importing as a feature, and it requires package-create command17:24
gokrokve_ok17:24
ativelkovBut it's ok to be a little late with it, rather then do it wrong17:24
ruhealso, i've just updated status of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/filter-flavor-for-each-service to "Implemented"17:24
ativelkovI wanted to discuss this a little17:24
ruheativelkov: which one do you want to discuss?17:25
ativelkovfilter-flavor-for-each-service17:25
*** markmcclain has quit IRC17:25
ativelkovI've written an email to ML about it, but havn't got any response17:25
*** thomnico has quit IRC17:26
ruheativelkov: you can bug those who filed and worked on this BP in person and make sure they respond in ML :)17:26
*** caleb_ has quit IRC17:26
ativelkovWell, it is more general question actually17:26
*** arturt has quit IRC17:26
sjmc7ativelkov, we did discuss this before a bit17:26
sjmc7that it should be at the API level17:27
sjmc7or rather, the constraint level17:27
sjmc7but that that was going to be a much bigger piece of work17:27
*** Haiying has quit IRC17:27
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:27
ativelkovRight17:27
sjmc7apologies for not replying, i meant to yesterday17:28
ativelkovSo, I just want to make sure that we are on a common ground here17:28
sjmc7but i agree there's more needs doing there17:28
ativelkovGreat17:28
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:28
*** dims_ has quit IRC17:28
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:28
ruheativelkov: sjmc7: can we move to the next BP?17:29
*** emaganap has quit IRC17:29
sjmc7yep17:29
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
ruhethe next one is https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/improve-engine-logging by sjmc717:29
ruheit's in "Started" state17:29
*** xwizard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:29
sjmc7yeah.. this is still sort of an ongoing one17:29
sjmc7related to the exception BP you mentioned a few minutes ago, and some others17:30
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC17:30
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:30
*** xwizard is now known as tnurlygayanov_17:30
sjmc7i think we should probably close this BP in favor of more specific ones17:30
sjmc7i still think improving error reporting is very important17:30
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
ruheso, just mark this one as "Implemented" with a note that remaining work will be tracked in separate BPs?17:31
sjmc7yeah - i can do that17:31
ruhethank you17:31
*** emagana has quit IRC17:31
ativelkovI would prefer a set of logging functions to be added to the Core MuranoPL lib17:31
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:31
ativelkov(as an example of separate BP)17:31
ruhei suggest everyone to refresh page with https://launchpad.net/murano/+milestone/juno-117:32
*** danpb has quit IRC17:32
ruhenow it looks much better17:32
sjmc7:)17:32
slagunengine logging will be greatly improved after we merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98984/17:32
sjmc7you shou;d've been an accountant17:32
ruhesjmc7: i'd prefer to be an astronaut instead of accountant17:32
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
sjmc7:)17:33
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:33
*** michael-yu has quit IRC17:33
ruheand now we have a clear list of things which we should review first17:33
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC17:33
ruhei suggest to move to the next topic "Bugs"17:33
tsufievruhe, speaking of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/murano/+spec/normalize-dashboard-pagination ...17:33
ruhetsufiev: yes...17:34
tsufievit was originally in Implemented state, but then an idea has come to provide 'Previous' button17:34
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:34
tsufievI'd like to implement that idea in scope of that blueprint17:34
tsufiev(to not create 3 blueprints for one topic)17:35
*** martin_t has quit IRC17:35
tsufievhope I'll do it tomorrow17:35
ruhetsufiev: ok, good17:35
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:36
ruhe#topic bugs17:36
*** openstack changes topic to "bugs (Meeting topic: murano)"17:36
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC17:36
ruhenow the list of BPs look good at https://launchpad.net/murano/+milestone/juno-117:36
ruhebut the list of bugs looks scary17:36
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC17:36
ruhesjmc7 started mini-triage day just an hour ago17:36
sjmc7:)17:37
sjmc7a meeting got cancelled17:37
christopheraedosee if you can get it from here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2hdAztV6b1IdE9GX21tbDhoX0U/edit?usp=sharing17:37
sjmc7went bug-hunting instead17:37
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC17:37
*** amotoki_ has quit IRC17:37
ruhelet's go through the list briefly17:38
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:38
ruheserg_melikyan: https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1326382 will you fix this one?17:38
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1326382 in murano "[python-muranoclient] Get method doen't return information about specific app" [Critical,Confirmed]17:38
*** arturt has quit IRC17:38
*** tuxerman has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:39
ruheok, let's hope serge will get back to us soon17:39
serg_melikyanruhe, probably not :(17:39
serg_melikyansorry, baby-sitting a little bit17:39
sjmc7serg, i might be able to help, you have a load of bugs assigned to you17:39
katyaferventI guess this bug need more verification - dashboard is working, so it's not critical17:40
serg_melikyansjmc7: not so many actually, but it will be great :)17:40
ruhesjmc7: great! please re-assign this bug to yourself17:40
sjmc7curses! :)17:40
ruhemy patch with alembic should fix the next one -  https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132713217:40
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1327132 in murano "Data base exception" [Critical,Confirmed]17:40
serg_melikyansjmc7: I can fill-in you with details after this meeting17:40
sjmc7ok17:40
ruheslagun: will you fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1311755 in j1?17:41
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1311755 in murano "[api] API doesn't detect deployment failure" [High,Confirmed]17:41
*** markwash_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:41
sjmc7this is related to environment deletion17:41
sjmc7environment state transitions17:42
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:42
slagunruhe, lets move it to j217:42
ruheslagun: ok. please do so17:43
serg_melikyanit is actually directly related to actions17:43
*** markwash has quit IRC17:43
*** markwash_ is now known as markwash17:43
ruhenext one is https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1318095 sjmc7, this one is yours17:43
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1318095 in murano "[api] when deploying environment, failed package validation error results in misleading exception" [High,Confirmed]17:43
sjmc7ah, yeah. i'll do that today17:43
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC17:44
*** eankutse1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:44
ruhekatyafervent: you filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/1319677 . maybe you can fix it? how complex would be the fix? and do we really need it in j1?17:45
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1319677 in murano "Obsolete  API calls, which interacts with deployment status reports" [High,Confirmed]17:45
*** _nadya__ has quit IRC17:45
katyaferventlet me think17:45
*** dshurtle has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
*** aglarendil has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:45
katyaferventwe definitely need to fix it. 1 day would be enough17:46
katyaferventwell, may be it can be postponed to j2 - since it doesn't break anything17:46
katyaferventassign it for me please17:46
ruhekatyafervent: you can do it. and if it doesn't brake anything, you can make it "medium priority"17:47
*** eankutse has quit IRC17:47
katyaferventI have no rights for that)17:47
ruhetsufiev: can you help with that?17:47
ruhethe last one with high priority is https://bugs.launchpad.net/murano/+bug/132510117:48
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1325101 in murano "[api] marks environments deleted regardless of actual state" [High,Confirmed]17:48
tsufievruhe, sure17:48
ruheslagun: this one is also yours17:48
slagunruhe, this should be implemented after actions. So probably also in J217:48
ruheslagun: ok. please update the bug accordingly17:49
ruhethat's all about bugs i guess17:49
ruhewe don't have much time and we have 2 more pending topics17:49
ruhe#topic  app catalog index17:50
*** openstack changes topic to "app catalog index (Meeting topic: murano)"17:50
ruhebtully: please go ahead17:50
*** akuznetsova_ has quit IRC17:50
btullysure17:50
btullyso currently at the top of the page there is a section called "Latest Apps"17:50
btullywhich I think is confusing17:50
*** sballe_ has quit IRC17:50
btullyit appears to be something of a "Recent Activity" section17:50
btullyi.e., if an app has been deployed or added to an env it will show there17:51
ativelkovbtully: agree17:51
btullyso i am suggesting 2 things17:51
btullyrename section to reflect true purpose17:51
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:51
btullyand if we show apps there17:51
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC17:51
btullythey should not have action buttons in their "tile"17:52
btullyso some modified tile design17:52
*** SushilKM has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:52
tsufievbtully, why remove the action buttons?17:52
sjmc7yeah - my 2c on this is that if it's 'recently deployed stuff' you hsould instead get a link to the deployment17:52
sjmc7and if it's "recently added applications" it makes sense to have the deployment buttons17:52
btullyif they are showing there, they already will have been acted on, no?17:52
*** SushilKM has left #openstack-meeting-alt17:53
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:53
ativelkovWell, you may want to add another instance of this app to your environment17:53
sjmc7but maybe this can be discussed after this meeting17:53
btullyahh i see what you mean17:53
ativelkovor to different env17:53
btullyyup17:53
btullygood point17:53
btullyok at the very least we should reconsider the title of that section17:53
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:53
sjmc7yes, agree17:54
btullyLatest Activity or Recent Activity, something like that17:54
tsufievthe Lates Apps section should be redone even more17:54
tsufieve.g., all these Apps are stored now in user's web session which is not very good17:54
tsufievthey must be stored in db17:54
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt17:54
btullyright, so for a large percentage of users, that section will be empty17:54
tsufievI agree to change the name for the section17:54
gokrokve_btully: As we consider to support different formats like APS, TOSCA, would it make sense to add type to a title.17:54
btullyso also, do we even show that section if there are no items17:55
gokrokve_btully: Like small icon like text "APS" or TOSCA"17:55
sjmc7gokrokve_ - i think it would def make sense to mention the format in the details somewhere, yes17:55
tsufievbtully, so I agree that thing needs to be changed, but frankly speaking, we don't have enough time to change it the _right_ way at J117:55
gokrokve_sjmc7: By the way did you add BP for APS format?17:55
sjmc7let's agree to a) change the title of that section and b) discuss its use and whether we want to change how it works17:55
slagungokrokve_ this would be useful when we do begin support any of those. At least design such support17:55
sjmc7gokrokve_ - not yet, planning to today17:56
btullyindeed, fir J1 was just  considering the title17:56
btullyfor j117:56
gokrokve_sjmc7: Cool17:56
tsufievsjmc7, +117:56
ruhealso, +1 from me17:56
btully+!17:56
btully+117:56
gokrokve_+117:57
ruhe#agreed to a) change the title of that section and b) discuss its use and whether we want to change how it works17:57
tsufievruhe, what's left?17:57
ruhegokrokve_: should we discuss actions?17:57
gokrokve_ruhe: Sure17:57
ruhe#topic murano actions17:57
*** openstack changes topic to "murano actions (Meeting topic: murano)"17:57
gokrokve_We need to have minimal support of actions.17:57
ruhegokrokve_: define minimal support please17:58
sjmc7in 30 seconds or less, what are 'actions' in this context?17:58
gokrokve_As I know there is API for that but we need to expose this functionality in UI17:58
gokrokve_sjmc7: public methods in APP definitions17:58
gokrokve_action like doBackup or ScaleUP17:58
tsufievgokrokve_, parameterized actions?17:59
gokrokve_this is a workflow to do something as ALM17:59
gokrokve_tsufiev: Without params for j117:59
serg_melikyangokrokve_: to have UI we need to change specification of package, change how DynamicUI process definitions and many other bits :(17:59
gokrokve_just URL with a hook to call an action17:59
ruhegokrokve_: there was no work done on designing the UI part. i doubt it'll make it into j117:59
serg_melikyanruhe: design was actually done17:59
*** rueben has quit IRC18:00
serg_melikyanruhe, gokrokve_ has done some WireFrames on this18:00
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:00
gokrokve_not sure how dinamic UI is related to that18:00
serg_melikyanif we are talking about actions without arfs18:00
tsufievgokrokve_, , I could expose a list of links in each Environment (or Application?)18:00
gokrokve_I need just a list of actions available18:00
ruheserg_melikyan: i haven't seen any discussions about those wireframes18:00
gokrokve_App18:00
tsufievgokrokve_, ok18:00
serg_melikyanruhe: it was before you have joined to us :)18:01
gokrokve_we are out of time18:01
ruhefolks, let's move to #murano18:01
ruhewe're out of time18:01
ruhethanks everyone18:01
*** Barker has quit IRC18:01
ruhe#endmeeting18:01
*** eankutse1 has quit IRC18:01
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:01
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun 10 18:01:22 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:01
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2014/murano.2014-06-10-17.02.html18:01
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2014/murano.2014-06-10-17.02.txt18:01
*** sjmc7 has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/murano/2014/murano.2014-06-10-17.02.log.html18:01
*** serg_melikyan has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** btully has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
*** ankurrr has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:01
sc68calWho's here for the neutron qos API meeting?18:01
s3wongsc68cal: here18:02
pcarverhi18:02
*** rwsu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
sc68cal#startmeeting neutron_qos18:02
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun 10 18:02:32 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is sc68cal. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.18:02
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.18:02
*** rueben has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)"18:02
*** rlandy has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:02
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'neutron_qos'18:02
*** emagana has quit IRC18:02
sc68cal#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NeutronQoS18:02
sc68calSo, I did create a wiki page for the subteam :)18:03
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** jaypipes has quit IRC18:03
*** ativelkov has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
*** rlandy has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:03
s3wongsc68cal: wow, loads of stuff :-)18:03
sc68cal:)18:03
*** colinmcnamara has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
*** slagun has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:04
sc68calI could run an agenda similar to the IPv6 subteam, but I don't want to dictate to people what the agenda is18:04
sc68calblueprints, code reviews, bugs, open discussion18:04
*** ijw_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
sc68calI imagine we18:05
sc68calwould skip over bugs for now :)18:05
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:05
s3wongsc68cal: got to have code first before bugs :-)18:05
sc68calI was planning on it being perfect the first time :-p18:05
sc68caland then vehemently denying the existince of bugs ;)18:05
sc68cal#topic blueprints18:06
*** openstack changes topic to "blueprints (Meeting topic: neutron_qos)"18:06
sc68cal#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88599/3/specs/juno/qos-api-extension.rst18:06
sc68calSo, I have to apologize to everyone for the lack of updates to that spec18:06
sc68calJ-1 is this week so I've been trying to get some ipv6 patches landed18:07
s3wongsc68cal: and I haven't reviewed the spec yet neither, so I also have to apologize18:07
*** ijw has quit IRC18:07
*** emagana has quit IRC18:08
sc68calfor J-2 I will be doing support, rather than dev on the ipv6 side so I've allocated my sprints towards the QoS API for the J-2 timeframe. I recognize that I'm currently the SPOF for the spec, and I want to get out of the way and unblock people18:08
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC18:08
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:08
s3wongcool18:09
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:10
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC18:11
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC18:11
sc68calReally that's all I have to report, the fact that I recognize I'm the SPOF for the spec currently and asking for a little more time to sort things out on the v6 side. It's not the best situation, so I plan on trying to delegate more things to people in the future18:12
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:12
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC18:12
s3wongOK18:12
sc68calI'm hoping that we might be able to get things considered for J-2 or J-3, though I'll have to talk to mestery and see.18:13
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:13
mesterysc68cal: Ready and waiting for that discussion. :)18:13
sc68calHahah :)18:13
s3wongsc68cal: yes. Since we are just having rate-limiting and DSCP marking, it seems simple enough to have hope for Juno timeframe18:14
sc68calNova parity is a big item for the J release, so I prefer to underpromise and over-deliver, rather than the inverse18:14
s3wongsc68cal: certainly :-)18:15
s3wongJust noticed that DVR won't make J-1, and is pushed out to J-218:15
*** tsufiev has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:16
*** thinrichs has quit IRC18:16
s3wongso more stress on core-dev for reviews in later phases...18:16
sc68calyeah - my heart goes out to the people on DVR. :)18:16
*** coolsvap is now known as coolsvap|afk18:17
*** dlenrow has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:17
sc68calThat's about all I have on the blueprint side, unless we want to discuss the ratelimit spec18:17
sc68cal#link https://review.openstack.org/9633118:18
*** tjanczuk has quit IRC18:18
s3wongLinux bridge?18:18
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:18
sc68cals3wong: yeah, the first concrete implementation of the ratelimit type will be via the linuxbridge mech driver18:18
*** _nadya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
s3wongsc68cal: I see. This will utilize the API you have on the API spec18:19
*** slogan_ has quit IRC18:19
*** k4n0 has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:19
*** james_li has quit IRC18:20
*** lenrow has quit IRC18:20
*** adrian_otto has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:20
sc68cals3wong: correct - I just need to update one section of my spec to reflect some of the policy keys the LB ratelimit requires18:20
sc68calsince they want keypairs that correspond to the tc command args, I believe18:20
s3wongsc68cal: while we should satisfy tc command use case, should we really model the API after whta tc needs?18:21
*** james_li has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
sc68cals3wong: a valid concern18:22
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:22
sc68calI would suggest asking that in either my spec or the linuxbridge spec18:23
sc68calto capture that concern18:23
s3wongsc68cal: sure18:23
sc68calMy thinking is that we would start off just validating the args for a ratelimit policy with tc in mind as the target18:24
s3wongsc68cal: yes, certainly we have to ensure it works for the first reference implementation18:24
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:24
sc68calbut when another implementation comes along, try an agree on overlapping keypairs can be validated by common code18:24
sc68calthen have a way to validate the extra keypairs for each implementation18:25
sc68calit might end up creating different types18:25
sc68calratelimit-linuxbridge18:25
sc68calratelimit-next18:25
*** harlowja is now known as harlowja_away18:25
*** dims_ has quit IRC18:25
s3wongsc68cal: creating a flavor framework for QoS :-)18:25
*** caleb_ has quit IRC18:25
sc68cals3wong: good point, or hoping that we can piggy back on the flavor framework that is being discussed18:26
*** gokrokve_ has quit IRC18:26
s3wongsc68cal: that would be interesting. Now the flavor framework is tags used to describe class of network services18:27
*** eankutse has quit IRC18:27
sc68calSounds like we have some wiggle room with that wording to sneak in :)18:27
s3wongsc68cal: though the tags are more associated with the service driver (who it advertises) vs which network / connectivity driver to use18:28
s3wong(I assume it would be the network / connectivity driver who is going to provide QoS18:28
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC18:29
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:29
*** jecarey has quit IRC18:29
*** safchain has quit IRC18:29
*** eankutse has quit IRC18:30
sc68calYeah currently qos is a driver that is set in the agent configuration18:30
*** eankutse has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
sc68calat least for the ml2 plugin and ovs agent combo18:30
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:30
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:31
s3wongsc68cal: yes18:31
*** garyduan has quit IRC18:31
*** jecarey_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:33
*** beagles has quit IRC18:33
sc68calThat's about all I have for today, I can give everyone back half an hour if there is nothing else18:33
s3wongsc68cal: +118:34
sc68calI'm always in #openstack-neutron too, so don't be a stranger :)18:34
*** emagana has quit IRC18:34
sc68cals3wong: thanks for coming, good stuff!18:34
s3wongsc68cal: thanks!18:34
sc68cal#endmeeting18:34
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:34
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun 10 18:34:48 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:34
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2014/neutron_qos.2014-06-10-18.02.html18:34
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2014/neutron_qos.2014-06-10-18.02.txt18:34
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/neutron_qos/2014/neutron_qos.2014-06-10-18.02.log.html18:34
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk18:35
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:35
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
*** jecarey has quit IRC18:37
*** beagles has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:37
*** amrith has left #openstack-meeting-alt18:40
*** gduan has quit IRC18:41
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:42
*** ijw_ has quit IRC18:43
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:43
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** nedbat has quit IRC18:44
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** ilyashak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** jprovazn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:44
*** ilyashak_ has quit IRC18:45
*** ilyashak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:45
*** nedbat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
*** ilyashak_ has quit IRC18:46
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC18:46
*** tdruiva has quit IRC18:46
*** nedbat_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:46
*** tonytan4ever has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:48
*** nedbat has quit IRC18:49
*** balajiiyer has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:49
*** pballand has quit IRC18:50
*** akuznetsov has quit IRC18:51
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:52
*** akuznetsov has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:53
*** rbrady has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:54
*** rbenali has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:55
*** markmcclain has quit IRC18:56
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:56
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:57
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC18:58
*** marun is now known as marun_afk18:59
*** arturt has quit IRC18:59
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt18:59
*** garyduan has quit IRC19:00
*** colinmcnamara has quit IRC19:00
*** agingh1pster has quit IRC19:00
*** Barker has quit IRC19:02
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi19:03
*** harlowja_away is now known as harlowja19:03
*** garyduan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:03
*** gduan has quit IRC19:03
*** sarob has quit IRC19:07
*** emaganap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:07
*** michael-yu has quit IRC19:08
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:09
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:10
*** emagana has quit IRC19:10
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:12
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC19:13
*** iccha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:14
*** emaganap has quit IRC19:15
*** yogeshmehra has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:15
*** _nadya_ has quit IRC19:17
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:19
*** iccha has quit IRC19:19
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC19:19
*** Michalik_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:20
*** amotoki has quit IRC19:22
*** gyee has quit IRC19:23
*** stannie has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:26
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:27
*** iccha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:28
*** ramishra has quit IRC19:28
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:30
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:31
*** pdmars_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:33
*** luizfar has quit IRC19:33
*** luizfar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
*** arturt has quit IRC19:34
*** malini2 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
*** malini2 has quit IRC19:34
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:34
*** ramashri has quit IRC19:35
*** pdmars has quit IRC19:35
*** dshurtle has quit IRC19:36
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC19:36
*** malini1 has quit IRC19:37
*** luizfar has quit IRC19:38
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:40
*** emagana has quit IRC19:41
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:41
*** sarob has quit IRC19:42
*** emagana has quit IRC19:42
*** emagana has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:43
*** michael-yu has quit IRC19:43
*** luizfar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:44
*** nedbat_ has quit IRC19:46
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:47
*** nedbat has quit IRC19:47
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:47
*** jmontemayor has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:48
*** noslzzp has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
*** walker_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:49
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi19:50
*** caleb_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:51
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi19:51
*** rbenali has quit IRC19:52
*** marun_afk is now known as marun19:55
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt19:56
*** caleb_ has quit IRC20:00
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** tsv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:00
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** james_li has quit IRC20:02
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:02
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:03
*** vkmc has quit IRC20:04
*** ijw has quit IRC20:07
*** arturt has quit IRC20:08
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:08
*** Barker has quit IRC20:10
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC20:11
*** Barker has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:12
*** eankutse has quit IRC20:13
*** jecarey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:14
*** jecarey_ has quit IRC20:14
*** denis_makogon has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:15
*** vkmc has quit IRC20:18
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:19
*** Michalik_ has quit IRC20:20
*** tdruiva has quit IRC20:23
*** jamie_h has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:23
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:24
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi20:25
*** jamie_h_ has quit IRC20:25
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi20:27
*** demorris has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:29
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:31
*** Barker has quit IRC20:33
*** arunkant has quit IRC20:33
*** shadower has quit IRC20:33
*** nijaba has quit IRC20:33
*** enikanorov_ has quit IRC20:33
*** jrist has quit IRC20:33
*** esmute has quit IRC20:33
*** ogelbukh has quit IRC20:33
*** ryanpetrello has quit IRC20:33
*** scottda has quit IRC20:33
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** esmute has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** jrist has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** shadower has quit IRC20:33
*** shadower has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** scottda has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** arunkant has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** ryanpetrello has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:33
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:34
*** nijaba has quit IRC20:34
*** nijaba has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:34
*** ogelbukh has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:34
*** apmelton has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:37
*** dhellman_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:37
*** s3wong_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:37
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:38
*** plomakin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:39
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:41
*** zns has quit IRC20:42
*** sarob has quit IRC20:43
*** luizfar has quit IRC20:44
*** balajiiyer has left #openstack-meeting-alt20:44
*** HenryG has quit IRC20:45
*** kgriffs|afk is now known as kgriffs20:46
*** luizfar has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:47
*** dhellmann_ has quit IRC20:48
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:48
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:49
*** sballe has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:49
*** luizfar_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:50
*** gyee has quit IRC20:51
*** vkmc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:51
*** demorris has quit IRC20:52
*** gyee has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:53
*** luizfar has quit IRC20:53
*** lsmola__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:54
*** jamie_h has quit IRC20:54
*** tsv has quit IRC20:54
*** nedbat has quit IRC20:54
*** amcrn has quit IRC20:54
*** iccha has quit IRC20:54
*** manishg has quit IRC20:54
*** s3wong has quit IRC20:54
*** Guest26452 has quit IRC20:54
*** dhellmann has quit IRC20:54
*** drupalmonkey has quit IRC20:54
*** Obulpathi has quit IRC20:54
*** Youcef_ has quit IRC20:54
*** bogdando has quit IRC20:54
*** mattymo has quit IRC20:54
*** coolsvap|afk has quit IRC20:54
*** plomakin has quit IRC20:54
*** lsmola_ has quit IRC20:54
*** dhellmann_ is now known as dhellmann20:54
*** julienvey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:55
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC20:56
*** dhellmann has quit IRC20:56
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:56
*** dhellman_ is now known as dhellmann20:56
*** s3wong_ is now known as s3wong20:57
*** mattymo has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:58
*** enikanorov_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt20:59
*** baoli has quit IRC21:00
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi21:02
*** pdmars_ has quit IRC21:03
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi21:03
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi21:04
*** michael-yu has quit IRC21:04
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:05
*** pballand has quit IRC21:05
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:05
*** mwagner_lap has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:06
*** manishg is now known as 92AABDT0N21:08
*** pballand has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:08
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi21:10
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
*** rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:10
*** tsv has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** amcrn has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** iccha has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** manishg has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** drupalmonkey has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** Guest26452 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** Obulpathi has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** Youcef_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** coolsvap|afk has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:11
*** tnurlygayanov_ has quit IRC21:12
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:13
*** manishg has quit IRC21:13
*** luizfar_ is now known as luizfar21:14
*** michael-yu has quit IRC21:14
*** yogeshmehra has quit IRC21:14
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC21:15
*** dprince has quit IRC21:17
*** nedbat has quit IRC21:19
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:19
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:19
*** annashe__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:22
*** jprovazn has quit IRC21:22
*** nedbat has quit IRC21:23
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi21:23
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:23
*** tbarron has quit IRC21:24
*** banix has quit IRC21:24
*** jaypipes has quit IRC21:26
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi21:27
*** thangp has quit IRC21:28
*** jaypipes has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:29
*** arturt has quit IRC21:29
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:30
*** rockyg has left #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** pdmars has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:31
*** amcrn has quit IRC21:31
*** mfer has quit IRC21:32
*** flaper87 is now known as flaper87|afk21:32
*** jtomasek has quit IRC21:32
*** kevinconway has quit IRC21:32
*** jtomasek has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:32
*** Obulpathi has quit IRC21:32
*** jeckersb is now known as jeckersb_gone21:33
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi21:34
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:35
*** pdmars has quit IRC21:36
*** jdob has quit IRC21:36
*** jaypipes has quit IRC21:37
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:38
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC21:39
*** zz_gondoi is now known as gondoi21:39
*** ijw has quit IRC21:41
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:41
*** sarob has quit IRC21:43
*** adrian_otto1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:44
*** adrian_otto1 has quit IRC21:46
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC21:46
*** thomasem has quit IRC21:46
*** jecarey has quit IRC21:47
*** ramashri has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:50
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** paulmo_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** asalkeld has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** edube has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:51
*** michael-yu has quit IRC21:52
*** dims__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** aratim has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:52
*** drupalmonkey has quit IRC21:53
*** tonytan4ever has quit IRC21:53
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:54
*** dims_ has quit IRC21:54
*** tdruiva has quit IRC21:54
*** dhellmann has quit IRC21:55
*** ramashri_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:55
*** ramashri has quit IRC21:55
*** dhellmann has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:55
*** muralia has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:55
*** nedbat has quit IRC21:56
*** michael-yu has quit IRC21:56
*** kebray has joined #openstack-meeting-alt21:59
adrian_otto#startmeeting Solum Team Meeting22:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun 10 22:00:05 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is adrian_otto. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.22:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.22:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"22:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'solum_team_meeting'22:00
adrian_otto#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Solum#Agenda_for_2014-06-10_2200_UTC Our Agenda22:00
adrian_otto#topic Roll Call22:00
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"22:00
paulmo_Paul Montgomery22:00
adrian_ottoAdrian Otto22:00
asalkeldo/22:00
julienveyJulien Vey22:00
muraliamurali allada22:00
*** iqbalmohomed has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:00
stanniePierre Padrixe22:00
iqbalmohomedHello all22:00
aratimArati Mahimane22:01
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:01
*** datsun180b has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:02
adrian_ottook, let's begin. If you have not yet recorded yourself in attendance, you may chime in at any time.22:02
adrian_otto#topic Announcements22:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Announcements (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"22:02
datsun180bsorry, i kept spelling it wrong22:02
adrian_ottoWe will be tagging a release for juno-1 tonight. Thre are 9 bug/task tickets currently marked as in-progress. Anything that does not land by this evening will be retargeted to juno-2.22:02
adrian_ottoAre there any patches in particular that we should be sure to work together to merge before the release?22:03
asalkelddon't think so22:03
*** arturt has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:03
*** nedbat has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:04
adrian_ottook, thanks. If any thoughts come up during task review, just be sure to bird-dog anything important.22:04
adrian_ottoAny other announcements from any team members?22:04
paulmo_Mind if I post a link for discussion at the open topic time?22:04
adrian_ottoI will share with you about some observations from DockerCon during Open Discussion22:04
*** amytron has quit IRC22:04
adrian_ottopaulmo_: sure, you can do that now22:05
paulmo_Solum + Workflow spec start: http://rst.ninjs.org/?n=37d5ba89876308e82d485333f43531dc   (will move it to Solum repo soon)22:05
paulmo_Thanks!22:05
*** nedbat has quit IRC22:05
adrian_ottook, thanks paulmo. We will cover that in a moment.22:05
adrian_otto#topic Review Action Items22:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Action Items (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"22:06
adrian_ottojulienvey to follow up with Heat contributors about Keystone chained trusted tokens, to offer our support. Include Solum Stackers in discussions.22:06
adrian_ottoany update on this one?22:06
julienveyshardy is working on that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/97569/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/96298/22:06
julienveyand asalkeld is reviewing, so he might have more info than I have22:06
asalkeldadrian_otto, shardy is about to start work on the chained trusts bp too22:07
adrian_ottolooks like that one was just +A today.22:07
asalkeldyeah22:07
adrian_ottook, that's good news.22:07
asalkeldI'll need to do some work in mistral22:07
*** arturt has quit IRC22:07
adrian_ottoDo we feel like this is something taht needs any additional love/attention from us?22:07
asalkeldto get this all working22:07
*** ravips has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:07
adrian_ottoasalkeld: tx22:08
asalkeldthere is some auth issues in mistral that need sorting out22:08
asalkeld(I am working on it)22:08
adrian_ottook, so I will consider this action item completed.22:08
adrian_ottothe next one I have was actually carried over from 2 weeks back, and seems related22:09
asalkeld#link http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org/msg26318.html22:09
adrian_ottoasalkeld follow up with keystone team by ML, and IRC (as needed) to explore options for multi-service trust tokens, OAuth, or chaining, and finding the right fit for Solum.22:09
asalkeldso I believe the solution is trusts22:09
asalkeldand we wait for chained trusts22:09
adrian_ottook, that seems sensible to me22:09
asalkeldbut we can work around the issues for the time being22:10
adrian_ottodo any other team members have further thoughts or concerns about this?22:10
adrian_ottook, so this action item is completed. Thanks asalkeld.22:11
adrian_ottodo we have all the task tickets we need for this?22:11
adrian_ottoor should more be opened?22:11
asalkeldfor what?22:11
adrian_ottoimplementation of chained trusts once the feature is added upstream22:11
asalkeldadrian_otto, I'll make bugs/bp as needed22:11
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:12
adrian_ottot.22:12
adrian_ottox22:12
adrian_otto#topic Review Tasks22:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Tasks (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"22:12
adrian_otto#topic https://launchpad.net/solum/+milestone/juno-1 juno-1 tasks22:12
*** openstack changes topic to "https://launchpad.net/solum/+milestone/juno-1 juno-1 tasks (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"22:12
adrian_ottowhoops22:12
adrian_otto#topic Review Tasks22:12
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Tasks (Meeting topic: Solum Team Meeting)"22:12
adrian_otto#link https://launchpad.net/solum/+milestone/juno-1 juno-1 tasks22:12
adrian_ottothat's better22:12
adrian_ottoso any work items in here that deserve interactive discussion today?22:13
julienveywe can drop oauth22:13
adrian_ottoI created the juno-2 milestone in LP22:13
asalkeldyeah good point22:13
adrian_ottojulien, ok, I will wontfix that one now22:13
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC22:14
*** AlanClark has quit IRC22:15
adrian_ottohttps://bugs.launchpad.net/solum/+bug/131683822:15
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1316838 in solum "Tech Debt: Change to use keystone v3 uuid auth tokens" [Wishlist,Triaged]22:16
*** gondoi is now known as zz_gondoi22:16
adrian_ottothat one may need to be updated, as we now have catalog filtering and token compression which work around the root cause22:16
asalkeldalso it's a deployment issue isn't it?22:16
*** walker_ has quit IRC22:16
julienveyyeah, mostly a devstack config22:16
adrian_ottobut since we now get token compression from python-keystoneclient by default, it basically obviates this concern22:17
asalkeld(or link to some docs)22:17
adrian_ottoonless anyone objects, I am going to withdraw this one22:17
*** denis_makogon has quit IRC22:19
asalkeld+122:19
adrian_ottook, done22:19
adrian_ottoany others catch your eye?22:19
*** jtomasek has quit IRC22:20
asalkeldwe just mainly need to do the pipeline thing22:20
*** adrian_otto1 has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:21
muraliawe should discuss the pipeline next and close on a few open questions.22:21
adrian_otto1are you seeing me back again now?22:21
asalkeldadrian_otto1 meet adrian_otto22:21
muraliayes22:21
adrian_otto1networking has been very sketchy here in San Francisco22:21
adrian_otto1ok, le'ts move to open discussion22:22
adrian_otto1#topic Open Discussion22:22
*** amytron has quit IRC22:22
asalkeldmuralia, I think we really need to figure that out22:22
adrian_otto1paulmo: you first22:22
paulmo_http://rst.ninjs.org/?n=37d5ba89876308e82d485333f43531dc   again22:22
asalkeld(and get stuck into it)22:22
paulmo_I'm really trying to clarify positions and definitions right now.  Hopefully this helps.  Let's start with goals.22:22
muralia:) I think the main question to answer is, do we expose mistral to end users or not.22:22
paulmo_Does everyone agree with the goals stated?22:22
*** smazziotta has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:23
asalkeldpaulmo_, I haven't had time to read fully22:23
julienveyasalkeld: same here22:23
paulmo_There are just 4 short goals... I think this is key to cover before diving into details.22:23
paulmo_•Solum must support a pluggable workflow engine22:23
paulmo_•Create a version 2 Solum REST API and database scheme required to support workflow engines22:23
paulmo_•Use Mistral as the first plugin workflow engine22:23
paulmo_•Must prevent nonsensical or infinitely looping workflows22:23
datsun180bhaving only just read the goals they look all right22:23
stanniedidn't read the whole docs, discovered it when the meeting started22:23
asalkeldso I think mistral is the integration point of workflows22:23
*** smazziotta has quit IRC22:24
asalkeldso -1 to the first one if that means we have to abstract mistral22:24
julienveyyeah22:24
julienvey+1 to the -122:24
paulmo_Ok, so 1 is controversial.  What about the rest?22:24
muraliawe need to get the spec repo up so this can be hosted there and everyone can comment22:24
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC22:24
datsun180bi'm trying to think of a case when a looping workflow would actually be desired22:25
julienvey"Use Mistral as the first plugin workflow engine" this is not a goal, it's an implementation detail22:25
asalkeldthe last one is really mistral's job22:25
paulmo_Good point Julien, I was just trying to put down on "paper" a decision that I think we've made.22:25
asalkeld(to figure out that it is non-sensical22:25
asalkeld)22:25
paulmo_asalkeld: That is fine, I didn't say what would perform that action.  Mistral makes sense to me.22:25
asalkeldsure22:26
*** adrian_otto1 has quit IRC22:26
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:26
adrian_ottois a v2 of the API needed?22:26
asalkeldno22:26
aratimEven if we do not support a pluggable workflow engine, I think we should not expose mistral to the user22:26
asalkeld(logical v2)22:26
paulmo_Ok, so the main point of discussion seems to be around weather Solum directly exposes a Mistral REST API and Mistral DSL to end users directly.  Right?22:26
asalkeldyip22:26
muraliayes22:27
asalkeld#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/036673.html22:27
asalkeldthere some points why I approached it the way I did22:27
*** betsy has quit IRC22:27
paulmo_Perhaps we should work on pro/con lists for each option... would that help?22:27
asalkeldsure22:28
asalkeldI don't want to road block development22:28
asalkeldone question:22:28
paulmo_Well, theoretically you can have Mistral running and access it directly now right?22:28
asalkeldwould doing this iterively be a problem22:28
asalkeldpaulmo_, sure22:28
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC22:29
asalkeldso we could start with little/no wrapping22:29
paulmo_I don't think it would be an issue as long as we know where we are going as an end/ideal goal.22:29
julienveypaulmo_: this is not really iterative =P22:29
aratimyea, I think we can use mistral directly first and later build a wrapper around it22:29
adrian_ottothere is a difference between using mistral to implement the default workflow, and exposing Mistral specifics through a Solum API22:29
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:29
asalkeldtotally22:29
adrian_ottoI think providing a link to the mistral service endpoint is enough22:29
asalkeld?22:30
adrian_ottowe have nothing to add22:30
asalkeldsure we do22:30
paulmo_So adrian favors Option A it sounds like?22:30
muraliaI would prefer not exposing the mistral dsl to end users as there are many things the end user should not be concerned with22:30
muraliaa simplified pipeloine config could look as simple as this22:31
muraliatasks:22:31
muralia unit_test:22:31
muralia   cmd: ./run_tests.sh22:31
muralia create_image:22:31
muralia function_test:22:31
muralia   cmd: (cd functional_tests ; ./run_tests.sh )22:31
muralia deploy:22:31
*** thomasem has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:31
asalkeldwell I think we are really split on the approach22:31
paulmo_asalkeld: Unfortunately I agree.  I'm not sure how to convince one side or another to switch. :)22:31
asalkeldbut again, we could start simply and abstract more later if we feel it does work well?22:31
paulmo_I think it would help to have a bit of a longer roadmap to keep everyone's work queues busy.  Just my opinion though.22:32
*** mspreitz has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:32
asalkeldpaulmo_, that assumes you want to go there22:32
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:32
julienveynot very "agile"22:33
muraliachanging the way a user defines the CI/CD workflow many times over a period of a year will really hurt adoption in my opinion.22:33
stannie+1 asalkeld I'd rather have an iterative approach22:33
*** smazziotta has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:33
adrian_ottodo we share a vision of having a very simple UX for the general case?22:33
adrian_ottoor are we divided on that point as well?22:33
asalkeldUI yes, totally22:33
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:33
stanniealso the Option A looks very hard for a User but there will a UI to make it easier right ?22:33
asalkeldbut the api should not be dumb22:33
asalkeld(IMO)22:34
muralia+1 on simple for the general case22:34
paulmo_stannie: If it is CLI, there isn't much UI to help but there is some..22:34
*** gduan has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:34
*** garyduan has quit IRC22:34
asalkeldpaulmo_, you wouldn't use a cli to check the status of jenkins22:34
stannieindeed...22:35
asalkeld(you go to  a web page to see the status of your jobs)22:35
asalkeldlink to logs etc...22:35
adrian_ottoMy current point of view (willing to be persuaded  otherwise) is that we can let Mistral lead the workflow DSL work, and provide them with requirements. We offer access to that for power users. Our general users can just use UI to do the common tasks, such that it's only the exception that you are seeking out a DSL to adjust workflow steps.22:35
adrian_ottodo we agree on that?22:35
asalkeldtotally22:36
stannieexactly adrian_otto22:36
julienveyalso, from option A, steps 1 and 2 may not be required by the users, if they use a default workflow provided by solum22:36
muraliaok, I agree with that.22:36
aratim+122:36
muraliajulienvey: yes22:36
stannieyep julienvey, it's only for Custom Workflow I guess22:36
paulmo_So no CLI ability to do anything with workflows?  No REST API ability to do anything with workflows?22:37
adrian_ottopaulmo_: CLI + Web UI for that would be useful22:37
paulmo_(solum CLI and REST that is)22:37
adrian_ottoI see no reason to duplicate mistral APIs or DSL22:37
julienvey+122:37
stanniewe didn't say no CLI, but no duplication22:37
adrian_ottoif we have a UI that is reasonably useful22:37
stannie+1 adrian_otto22:37
asalkeld+122:38
ravips+122:38
*** zns_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:38
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:38
adrian_ottook, so seems like we are alights on a DRY approach22:38
*** zns has quit IRC22:38
adrian_ottoaligned22:38
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:38
paulmo_I'm not sure one way or another without more details to be honest.22:38
adrian_ottoand that simplification efforts should be in our tools rather than in our API22:38
asalkeldthis does assume a heave dependence on mistral22:39
asalkeldheavy22:39
asalkeldso we will need to contribute there22:39
paulmo_I thought a top goal was a pluggable workflow engine?22:39
adrian_ottobecause the truth is that anyone preferring to use API's to do CI customization is a power user, and should have hte full depth of capability available in the workflow system22:39
*** vkmc_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:39
adrian_ottopaulmo_: well, almost…22:39
julienveymistral engine can be changed if i'm right22:39
asalkeldpaulmo_, I think we can use mistral to fire off jenkins22:39
* paulmo_ is more confused as this discussion progresses...22:40
adrian_ottowe don't have to implement it as engines, but we need to have clean and simple integration points where other tools can easily integrate22:40
asalkeldand yes you can change the engine too22:40
adrian_ottoand a way to easily noop the default workflow22:40
adrian_ottothat could be a first attempt, and we could then fortify that into a more pluggable system as we see use cases for that22:40
adrian_ottoI'd really like our solution to tha problem to be informed by input from seeing how customers use it22:41
asalkeldadrian_otto, I also think doing less is better initially as we have to integrate with other tools22:41
adrian_ottoand what preferences they express about what the ideal setup would be22:41
adrian_ottoI met a few new potential users this week22:42
asalkeldit's not easy to find an abstraction that works without really trying to integrate (like with zuul)22:42
adrian_ottoand these are *not* 12-factor apps22:42
*** rueben_ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:42
*** sarob has quit IRC22:42
adrian_ottoand I see more of a desire to start over on CI rather than "plug my jenkins into Solum"22:42
*** vkmc has quit IRC22:43
adrian_ottoI was not expecting that, although I still have a pretty small sample set.22:43
asalkeldok22:43
asalkeldI have to go soon - take kids to school22:43
adrian_ottopaulmo: do you have enough input on this to work a revision?22:43
paulmo_Not at all.  It sounds like I'm either A) Done, just expose Mistral REST directly or B) ???22:44
adrian_ottothanks asalkeld. I'll give some insights on Dockercon when we wrap up this subject.22:44
* asalkeld heads off22:45
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:46
adrian_ottopaulmo_: ok, so Murali and I are concerned about an "exposure" of the Mistral services22:46
*** rueben has quit IRC22:46
*** satish has quit IRC22:46
paulmo_So am I22:46
adrian_ottowe want them to be available to those who need them22:46
adrian_ottoand for the default experience to be a simple Solum UI that controls what happens in Mistral22:46
paulmo_UI = web and CLI?22:47
adrian_ottowhether that be web, or cli, or both, we can certainly explore together22:47
adrian_ottoeven if it were web only, that might be sufficient22:47
adrian_ottoat least for a first attempt22:47
adrian_ottoit's just a better tool for that sort of a job22:48
*** Guest26452 has quit IRC22:48
muraliaso do we need a pass through api in solum to talk to Mistral?22:48
*** zns_ has quit IRC22:49
adrian_ottoI could imagine a CLI that does something like "solum pipeline /some/resource disable unit test" or whatever22:49
julienveyno22:49
paulmo_There is no need to do so.22:49
adrian_ottobut I prefer to defer that until after we ahve a web UI we like22:49
*** igordcard has quit IRC22:50
*** amytron has quit IRC22:51
adrian_ottoI'm not sure we are actually in any disagreement, but uncertain what the approach is, and what actions come first, second, third, etc, right?22:51
adrian_ottoor do we in fact have a divergence in what the implementation plan should be?22:51
*** amytron has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:52
*** devkulkarni has joined #openstack-meeting-alt22:52
paulmo_I'm going to have to think about this some... this is a complete change in direction from where I thought we were going.22:52
adrian_ottook.22:52
julienveypaulmo_: it's the direction asalkeld took in his patches22:52
paulmo_Right, and there was a lot of disagreement with that.22:53
adrian_ottook, let's put this on the agenda to follow up on next week.22:53
julienveyyeah, but the main idea was here, right ? even if there were disagreements22:53
adrian_ottolet's continue a dialogue to sort through this so we all feel unified on the next steps.22:54
*** amytron has quit IRC22:54
julienveyI think we just decided to keep this direction for now, and delay to see if we need to change it22:54
adrian_ottook, time to switch topics for the last few minutes?22:56
julienveyyeah, DockerCon ? :)22:56
adrian_ottothere has been a ton of talk at DockerCon this week about a whole fleet of new tools about orchestration with Docker containers22:56
adrian_ottothere are a *lot* of new tools surfacing for this.22:57
datsun180band 1.0 was released, that's worth mentioning22:57
adrian_ottoon the order of like 8 or 9 new things22:57
adrian_ottoyes, libswarmd was announded22:57
*** annashe__ has quit IRC22:57
adrian_ottowhich is worth talking about an OpenStack backend for22:58
devkulkarniorchestration as in replacements for Heat?22:58
adrian_ottoso I will put that on the agenda for the containers team22:58
adrian_ottodevkulkarni: alternatives, or things to be used in combination with, yes22:58
devkulkarnicool.22:59
adrian_ottoI'll stay in #solum a bit this afternoon to point you at a few.22:59
*** luizfar has quit IRC22:59
devkulkarnithat will be helpful22:59
*** mspreitz has quit IRC22:59
adrian_ottotime for us to wrap up for today. The DockerCon conference is *packed* with lots of very excited users who are super interested in the space we are working in.23:00
adrian_ottothanks everyone23:00
adrian_otto#endmeeting23:00
*** annashe__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"23:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun 10 23:00:25 2014 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)23:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/solum_team_meeting/2014/solum_team_meeting.2014-06-10-22.00.html23:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/solum_team_meeting/2014/solum_team_meeting.2014-06-10-22.00.txt23:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/solum_team_meeting/2014/solum_team_meeting.2014-06-10-22.00.log.html23:00
*** paulmo_ has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:00
*** datsun180b has quit IRC23:01
*** pballand has quit IRC23:02
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:03
*** bogdando has quit IRC23:04
*** radez is now known as radez_g0n323:04
*** dane_leblanc has quit IRC23:05
*** michael-yu has quit IRC23:05
*** dims__ has quit IRC23:06
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:07
*** julienvey has quit IRC23:07
*** zns has quit IRC23:08
*** dims__ has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:08
*** dane_leblanc has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:09
*** adrian_otto has quit IRC23:09
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC23:10
*** michael-yu has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:11
*** stannie has left #openstack-meeting-alt23:12
*** zns has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:13
*** atiwari has quit IRC23:16
*** tsv has quit IRC23:16
*** zns has quit IRC23:18
*** gokrokve has quit IRC23:19
*** tvoran has quit IRC23:21
*** emagana has quit IRC23:22
*** tdruiva has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:25
*** bdpayne has quit IRC23:33
*** muralia has quit IRC23:33
*** devkulkarni has quit IRC23:33
*** bdpayne has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:34
*** kgriffs is now known as kgriffs|afk23:35
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:38
*** jmontemayor has quit IRC23:39
*** aratim has quit IRC23:42
*** sarob has quit IRC23:43
*** vkmc_ has quit IRC23:43
*** yamahata has quit IRC23:46
*** lcheng has quit IRC23:49
*** gokrokve has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:52
*** ravips is now known as ravips|afk23:52
*** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:54
*** bogdando has quit IRC23:54
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:57
*** cjellick has quit IRC23:59
*** cjellick has joined #openstack-meeting-alt23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!