Thursday, 2015-11-19

*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-400:01
*** dwalleck has quit IRC00:05
*** blahRus has quit IRC00:08
*** bzhou has joined #openstack-meeting-400:10
*** bzhou has quit IRC00:12
*** pmesserli has quit IRC00:14
*** acabot has joined #openstack-meeting-400:20
*** acabot has quit IRC00:29
*** qwebirc90523 has quit IRC00:35
*** Swami has quit IRC00:36
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-400:37
*** sdake has quit IRC00:40
*** andymccr has quit IRC00:46
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-400:49
*** andymccr has joined #openstack-meeting-400:54
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-400:54
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC00:57
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:57
*** gjayavelu has joined #openstack-meeting-400:59
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-400:59
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC00:59
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC01:01
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC01:02
*** bpokorny_ has joined #openstack-meeting-401:15
*** bpokorny has quit IRC01:18
*** bpokorny_ has quit IRC01:19
*** gjayavelu has quit IRC01:22
*** SimonChung has quit IRC01:24
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-401:26
*** iyamahat has quit IRC01:29
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-401:29
*** yamamoto has quit IRC01:30
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC01:35
*** itisha has quit IRC01:41
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-401:43
*** baohua has joined #openstack-meeting-401:44
*** tfukushima has joined #openstack-meeting-401:45
*** mestery has joined #openstack-meeting-401:50
*** joonmyung has quit IRC01:55
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC01:57
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC02:05
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-402:09
*** dims_ has quit IRC02:13
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-402:14
*** bobh has quit IRC02:15
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-402:27
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack02:27
*** pkoniszewski has joined #openstack-meeting-402:28
*** SimonChung has joined #openstack-meeting-402:30
*** yamahata has quit IRC02:36
*** iyamahat has quit IRC02:37
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-402:39
*** armax has quit IRC02:41
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC02:44
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-402:50
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-402:55
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-403:04
*** s3wong has quit IRC03:05
*** bapalm has quit IRC03:15
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-403:15
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC03:16
*** bobh has quit IRC03:21
*** bapalm has joined #openstack-meeting-403:21
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC03:23
*** baoli_ has quit IRC03:23
*** prashantD has quit IRC03:23
*** harshs has quit IRC03:27
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC03:31
*** dims has quit IRC03:32
*** banix has quit IRC03:45
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-403:47
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC03:51
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-403:54
*** baohua_ has joined #openstack-meeting-404:12
*** baohua has quit IRC04:16
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-404:16
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC04:24
*** prashantD has joined #openstack-meeting-404:25
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-404:28
*** prashantD has quit IRC04:31
*** prashantD has joined #openstack-meeting-404:32
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-405:11
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-405:13
*** britthouser has quit IRC05:20
*** britthouser has joined #openstack-meeting-405:21
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-405:29
*** prashantD has quit IRC05:54
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-405:59
*** britthouser has quit IRC06:01
*** dwalleck has quit IRC06:07
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-406:08
*** dwalleck has quit IRC06:12
*** dwalleck has joined #openstack-meeting-406:16
*** dwalleck has quit IRC06:17
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-406:17
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC06:18
*** pbourke has quit IRC06:19
*** pbourke has joined #openstack-meeting-406:19
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-406:20
*** jpekkari has joined #openstack-meeting-406:21
*** subscope has joined #openstack-meeting-406:21
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-406:30
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-406:34
*** bruno_ has quit IRC06:34
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-406:42
*** sdake has quit IRC06:42
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-406:44
*** SimonChung1 has joined #openstack-meeting-406:45
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-406:45
*** SimonChung has quit IRC06:48
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-406:54
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC07:05
*** simon-AS559 has joined #openstack-meeting-407:07
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC07:08
*** iyamahat has quit IRC07:16
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-407:17
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-407:18
*** bobh has quit IRC07:23
*** vtech has quit IRC07:28
*** simon-AS559 has quit IRC07:34
*** killer_prince has quit IRC07:35
*** killer_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-407:36
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-407:42
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-407:43
*** sdake_ has quit IRC07:43
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-meeting-407:51
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-407:56
*** bruno has joined #openstack-meeting-407:57
*** bruno is now known as brunograz07:57
*** lakshmiS_ has joined #openstack-meeting-408:00
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-408:00
*** markvoelker has quit IRC08:00
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC08:03
*** seanmurphy has joined #openstack-meeting-408:05
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-408:06
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-408:09
*** zeih has joined #openstack-meeting-408:13
*** lakshmiS_ has quit IRC08:16
*** brunograz has quit IRC08:20
*** bruno has joined #openstack-meeting-408:21
*** bruno is now known as Guest195908:21
*** Guest1959 is now known as brunograz08:21
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC08:26
*** acabot has joined #openstack-meeting-408:26
*** alex_didenko has joined #openstack-meeting-408:27
*** vincentfrancoise has joined #openstack-meeting-408:31
*** armax has quit IRC08:32
*** clayton has quit IRC08:35
*** clayton has joined #openstack-meeting-408:44
*** numans has quit IRC08:45
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-408:46
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC08:50
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC08:51
*** bogdando has joined #openstack-meeting-408:54
*** jed56 has joined #openstack-meeting-408:55
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-408:58
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-409:01
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:06
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-409:11
*** acabot has quit IRC09:24
*** baohua_ has quit IRC09:29
*** acabot has joined #openstack-meeting-409:31
*** vincentfrancoise has left #openstack-meeting-409:32
*** numans has quit IRC09:34
*** hogepodge has quit IRC09:34
*** acabot has quit IRC09:39
*** acabot has joined #openstack-meeting-409:39
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-409:39
*** dshakhray has joined #openstack-meeting-409:44
*** seanmurphy has quit IRC09:47
*** iyamahat has quit IRC09:49
*** yamahata has quit IRC09:49
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:53
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-409:53
*** hogepodge has quit IRC09:54
*** amotoki has quit IRC09:54
*** acabot has quit IRC09:57
*** _degorenko is now known as degorenko09:58
*** tfukushima has quit IRC10:07
*** subscope has quit IRC10:07
*** subscope has joined #openstack-meeting-410:08
*** subscope has quit IRC10:08
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-410:10
*** acabot has joined #openstack-meeting-410:12
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-410:14
*** acabot has quit IRC10:16
*** openstack has joined #openstack-meeting-410:20
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack10:20
*** subscope has joined #openstack-meeting-410:25
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-410:32
*** acabot_ has joined #openstack-meeting-410:41
*** yamamoto has quit IRC10:42
*** hogepodge has quit IRC10:42
*** acabot has quit IRC10:44
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-410:45
*** hogepodge has joined #openstack-meeting-410:51
*** brunograz has quit IRC11:01
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-411:02
*** acabot_ has quit IRC11:02
*** vtech has quit IRC11:03
*** ekarlso has quit IRC11:05
*** markvoelker has quit IRC11:07
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-411:12
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-411:20
*** jmccrory has quit IRC11:20
*** jmccrory has joined #openstack-meeting-411:22
*** vtech has quit IRC11:22
*** yamamoto has joined #openstack-meeting-411:24
*** bobh has quit IRC11:24
*** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-meeting-411:25
*** jmccrory has quit IRC11:26
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:27
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-411:28
*** yamamoto has quit IRC11:29
*** jmccrory has joined #openstack-meeting-411:30
*** ekarlso has joined #openstack-meeting-411:30
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-meeting-411:30
*** imilovanovic has joined #openstack-meeting-411:33
*** imilovanovic has quit IRC11:33
*** imilovanovic has joined #openstack-meeting-411:33
*** imilovanovic has quit IRC11:33
*** f13o has joined #openstack-meeting-411:34
*** subscope has quit IRC11:39
*** subscope has joined #openstack-meeting-411:40
*** subscope has quit IRC11:40
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC11:42
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-411:44
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-meeting-411:46
*** ujuc has quit IRC11:48
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-412:02
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC12:07
*** julim has joined #openstack-meeting-412:13
*** dims has quit IRC12:16
*** jpekkari has quit IRC12:17
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-412:23
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC12:24
*** vtech has quit IRC12:25
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-412:25
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting-412:27
*** bzhou has joined #openstack-meeting-412:31
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-412:33
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:38
*** bzhou has quit IRC12:39
*** vtech has quit IRC12:44
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-412:48
*** jruano has quit IRC12:49
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-412:54
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-412:56
*** subscope has joined #openstack-meeting-412:57
*** ujuc has joined #openstack-meeting-412:57
*** ujuc has left #openstack-meeting-412:58
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC12:58
*** vtech has quit IRC12:59
*** Kiall has quit IRC13:01
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-413:02
*** Kiall has joined #openstack-meeting-413:02
*** vtech has quit IRC13:02
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-413:03
*** klamath has joined #openstack-meeting-413:06
*** klamath_ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:06
*** klamath has quit IRC13:10
*** jckasper has quit IRC13:11
*** vtech has quit IRC13:13
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-413:15
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC13:22
*** evgenyf has quit IRC13:23
*** openstackstatus has joined #openstack-meeting-413:34
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus13:34
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-meeting-413:35
*** evgenyf has joined #openstack-meeting-413:38
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-413:51
*** abhishekk has joined #openstack-meeting-413:55
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC13:55
*** mfedosin_ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:56
*** ninag has joined #openstack-meeting-413:58
flaper87Courtesy meeting reminder: ativelkov, cpallares, flaper87, flwang1, hemanthm, ivasilevskaya, jokke_, kragniz, lakshmiS, mclaren, mfedosin, nikhil_k14:01
flaper87Courtesy meeting reminder: Nikolay_St, Olena, pennerc, rosmaita, sigmavirus24, sabari, TravT, ajayaa, GB21, bpoulos, harshs, abhishekk, bunting14:01
flaper87Courtesy meeting reminder: dshakhray, wxy, dhellmann, kairat14:01
flaper87#startmeeting Glance14:01
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 19 14:01:14 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is flaper87. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:01
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:01
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:01
dhellmanno/14:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'glance'14:01
flaper87welcome everyone14:01
mfedosin_o/14:01
Jokke_o/14:01
flaper87hope you've had a great week since our last meeting!14:01
mclareno/14:01
rosmaitao/14:01
flaper87#topic Agenda14:01
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:01
abhishekko/14:01
flaper87#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda14:02
flaper87That's our agenda for today14:02
flaper87It's short, feel free to add more topics at the bottom14:02
flaper87#topic Specs recently approved (flaper87)14:02
*** openstack changes topic to "Specs recently approved (flaper87) (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:02
flaper87we've merged 2 specs since our last meeting14:02
flaper87#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/229878/14:02
flaper87That's Glance's trusts support14:02
flaper87mfedosin_: and kairat are going to work on that14:03
flaper87Thank you both!14:03
flaper87The patches are up already14:03
mfedosin_welcome :)14:03
flaper87and those can be reviewed14:03
flaper87Remember this should not impact API v114:03
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-414:03
flaper87That was discussed last week14:03
flaper87This is a v2 only change14:03
flaper87#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/183363/14:03
flaper87That's a cinder driver for glance_store14:04
flaper87The proposal is detailed enough to undersand how this would work14:04
flaper87I believe the code for this is up already as well14:04
flaper87and I'm quite excited about it (hope you're as well)14:04
flaper87:D14:04
flaper87this has been a long standing request14:04
Jokke_++14:04
flaper87Zhi Yan started the work there14:04
flaper87and I'm happy that someone is taking this over14:04
Jokke_it has been lingering too long in a state that it's not really usable14:04
*** bpoulos has joined #openstack-meeting-414:05
flaper87and that we now have os-brick to implement this properly14:05
flaper87There are some bits that could be improved in the future (oslo-rootwrap) but lets not get stuck there for now14:05
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-414:05
flaper87We'll have to sync with cinder folks for this and I'd like to thank all the cinder folks that provided reviews there14:05
flaper87I'll send an email to -dev about this14:05
flaper87We could use extra reviews from them there14:06
flaper87anyway, moving on14:06
flaper87#topic Recent releases (flaper87)14:06
*** openstack changes topic to "Recent releases (flaper87) (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:06
flaper87#link http://docs.openstack.org/developer/python-glanceclient/#id114:06
flaper87That's glanceclient 1.2.014:06
flaper87The release contains quite some enhancements and it also contains a patch required for the work mfedosin_ and sudipto are doing in Nova14:07
flaper87(version listing)14:07
*** baoli has quit IRC14:07
*** bunting has joined #openstack-meeting-414:07
flaper87#link https://pypi.python.org/pypi/python-glanceclient/0.17.314:07
*** dashakhray has joined #openstack-meeting-414:07
buntingo/14:07
flaper87That's a 0.17.3 release for our stable branches14:07
flaper87it contains mostly bugfixes and it caps the required requests version14:07
Jokke_stable/kilo to be exact14:07
flaper87that fixes an issue that was breaking the gate as well14:08
flaper87Jokke_: ++14:08
flaper87Jokke_: am I missing something in this topic?14:08
flaper87also, thanks to Jokke_ for leading the releases14:08
flaper87awesome job!14:08
Jokke_I think that's it ... haven't got anyone yet coming to kill us so might be that we didn't break anything tis time around14:08
flaper87great!14:09
flaper87Keep an eye on gates and mailing list in case something breaks14:09
Jokke_++14:09
flaper87if something breaks, before engaging, remember to give that person coffee and muffins to help with the situation14:09
flaper87:D14:09
flaper87and gummybears14:09
flaper87those always work14:09
flaper87at least with me14:10
flaper87:P14:10
flaper87anyway, Jokke_ thanks again14:10
flaper87moving on14:10
flaper87#topic Glance Bugs/Review squash (flaper87)14:10
*** sabari has joined #openstack-meeting-414:10
*** openstack changes topic to "Glance Bugs/Review squash (flaper87) (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:10
* nikhil sneaks in14:10
flaper87Last week we mentioned doing a REview/bug squash day14:10
flaper87I sent an email to te mailing list14:10
*** cpallares has joined #openstack-meeting-414:10
flaper87(I can get the link, sorry I don't have it handy)14:10
flaper87and the link contained a doodle poll to pick a day between Tomorrow and next monday14:11
flaper87Most of the folks voted for next monday so, the review/bug squash day will be on Monday November 23rd14:11
Jokke_#link http://doodle.com/poll/mt7hwswtmcvmetdn14:11
flaper87I'll work on an etherpad that we can go through14:11
flaper87Jokke_: danke14:11
sabari*finally makes it to a meeting*14:11
flaper87sabari: <314:11
sabari:)14:11
* flaper87 hugs sabari and gives him a cup of coffee14:11
sabari*thanks I sure need a coffee now*14:12
sabari:D14:12
flaper87On monday, each one will work in his/her TZ (obviously)14:12
flaper87The goal is to go through a list of bugs and reviews to triage/review them14:12
flaper87You can pick whatever you prefer but I'd recommend having a balance between them14:12
flaper87Especially if you're in the glance bug team14:12
*** woodard has quit IRC14:13
flaper87if you don't have it already14:13
flaper87Here's the link to the glance dashboard14:13
flaper87#link https://bitly.com/glance-dashboard14:13
Jokke_and please do not set priority (apart from wishlist) unless you can actually confirm the bug14:13
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-414:13
*** woodard has quit IRC14:13
flaper87I normally update it to reflect latest changes in our process. Last change was to include a priorities section14:13
flaper87Jokke_: ++14:13
flaper87ok, any questions? doubts?14:14
flaper87suggestions?14:14
mclarenah so it includes the priorities ones now - nice14:14
flaper87rage?14:14
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-414:14
flaper87mclaren: :)14:14
flaper87speaking of which, for those to be included, the review needs to have a tag14:14
flaper87MitakaPriority14:15
flaper87That in the commit message14:15
sabari^ I was about to ask that :)14:15
*** pmesserli has joined #openstack-meeting-414:15
flaper87I went with that because the topic gets overridden when ppl work in branches14:15
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-414:15
* flaper87 is sooooo looking forward to have hashtags in gerrit14:15
flaper87That way I can start tweeting on gerrit properly14:15
* flaper87 ducks14:15
flaper87jokes apart, that'll be super useful for this14:16
flaper87for now, if you see a review that is part of the priorities list, require the committer to apply: MitakaPriority14:16
flaper87in the commit message14:16
flaper87example14:16
flaper87#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/197388/14:16
mfedosin_are trusts commits affected?14:16
*** mfedosin_ is now known as mfedosin14:17
flaper87mfedosin_: nope14:17
flaper87I guess, for mitaka, it'll be mostly image import process14:17
mfedosinwhat about our commits in Nova?14:17
flaper87and nova stuff that is required in the client/server14:17
mfedosinI think the flag is not required there as well14:18
flaper87Those need to be communicated manually, I guess14:18
flaper87oh no14:18
flaper87this is glance only14:18
flaper87the commits in nova fall into nova's process14:18
flaper87ok, moving on unless there are further questions14:19
flaper87#topic Review Bugs14:19
*** openstack changes topic to "Review Bugs (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:19
flaper87#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1447322 (abhishekk)14:19
openstackLaunchpad bug 1447322 in Glance "Attempting to reactivate a queued image returns a 403" [Undecided,New]14:19
abhishekkhi, this is related to Attempting to reactivate a queued image returns a 40314:19
abhishekkwhat is appropriate return code 400 or 409?14:20
flaper87abhishekk: have we talked to the API-WG about this?14:20
abhishekkflaper87: not sure14:20
flaper87abhishekk: lets do that, then14:20
abhishekkflaper87: ok14:21
flaper87I'd recommend joining their IRC channel and bring this up there too14:21
nikhilactually we did14:21
flaper87nikhil: oh, awesome14:21
nikhilwhen this was first implemented14:21
nikhiland had a big rants from both sides14:21
*** woodard has quit IRC14:21
nikhilthe thing is we are working on the "status" of an image14:21
nikhilit's an internal entity to the project that has been given API access14:22
flaper87mmh, unfortunately, I see this as a breaking change anyway14:22
nikhilso it's not a resource14:22
flaper87we'd be changing the way we respond and that's considered a breaking change14:22
Jokke_I think 400 or 403 would be the correct on at that abhishekk14:22
nikhilso, reactivating is a forbidden operation on non-approved states14:22
nikhilJokke_: I disagree14:22
flaper87makes sense to me14:23
abhishekknikhil: thanks for the update14:23
abhishekkso we can mark this bug as wont' fix14:23
nikhiloops, I read it as 40914:23
nikhilJokke_: sorry14:23
* flaper87 gives nikhil the weekly memory badge14:23
nikhil:P14:23
flaper87I guess we can mark this as invalid14:23
flaper87nikhil: want the honors ?14:24
flaper87you have more context14:24
Jokke_but yeah if the current is something else than 500, won't fix is probably the apropriate thing to do :(14:24
flaper87Jokke_: won't fix ++14:24
nikhilJokke_: but I don't think 400 is applicable14:24
nikhilflaper87: surely :)14:24
flaper87nikhil: coolio14:24
flaper87#link 'show' method for 'members' is not implemented in v1 api https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/api/v1/router.py#L91 (mfedosin)14:25
mclarenwhat do you get if you try to change the status of an image currently? (eg via v1) does anyone know?14:25
Jokke_nikhil: yeah it's not perhaps really the right one as we do understand the request we're just not willing to fulfil it14:25
flaper87mfedosin: ?14:25
mfedosinit's a strange thing we found out today14:25
flaper87mmh, I think the same v1 policy applies here14:26
flaper87I'd rather not implement it14:26
nikhilJokke_: yeah..14:26
flaper87and request people to move to v2 if they really needed14:26
mfedosincurrently in v1 api it's stated that there is 'show' method for members14:26
mfedosinso, yeah. it was my question14:26
mfedosinshould we implement it, because it's required in v1 api14:27
mfedosin?14:27
flaper87apparently no one is using it since it's not implemented and not reported14:27
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-414:27
flaper87what do you mean w/ it's required?14:27
rosmaitaflaper87: ++14:27
Jokke_mfedosin: where about? not in the api ref at least http://developer.openstack.org/api-ref-image-v1.html14:27
mfedosin(I got it from customers, which use Grizzly)14:27
nikhilmclaren: I will check14:27
flaper87jeeez, grizzly14:28
flaper87at least it's not essex *cough* mclaren *cough*14:28
flaper87:D14:28
mclarennikhil: HTTPForbidden I think14:28
mfedosinGET /v1/images/​{image_id}​ Show image details and image binary14:29
mclarenso 403 also14:29
flaper87mfedosin: what error is it throwing now?14:29
flaper87mclaren: erm, lets talk about that after the meeting, pls :)14:29
flaper87we've moved on14:29
mfedosinnow there is 405 error14:29
flaper87... to another topic14:29
mfedosinokay, let's not implement it14:29
flaper87mfedosin: ok, I guess it can stay like that14:29
flaper87unless someone disagrees14:29
flaper87like *STRONGLY* disagrees14:29
flaper87:D14:30
Jokke_It's funny that we don't have it, but I'm in favor keeping it that way :P14:30
nikhilmclaren: confirmed in the code, it's what you said so, 40314:30
flaper87ok, so, lets keep it that way14:30
*** killer_prince has quit IRC14:30
flaper87mfedosin: it'd be cool if you could file a bug and then mark it as won't fix14:31
flaper87just to keep a record/reference for future reporters14:31
flaper87mfedosin: can you do that? Otherwise I'll do it14:31
mfedosinflaper87: I will do14:31
flaper87awesome14:32
flaper87ok, there are no other topics so, open discussion14:32
flaper87#topic Open Discussion14:32
*** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: Glance)"14:32
flaper873... 2... 1... GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO14:32
*** ntt has joined #openstack-meeting-414:32
Jokke_so forgot one thing around bug day14:32
* rosmaita is dying with anticipation14:33
*** bobh has joined #openstack-meeting-414:33
nikhilflaper87: I got feedback on the import stuff from IBM groups14:33
flaper87rosmaita: lol14:33
Jokke_Please tag the bugs you think would fit to the https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch Appropriate Fixes description with liberty-backport-potential14:33
flaper87Jokke_: I think we're missing a chapter about bug triage in our how to contribute guidelines14:34
flaper87I wrote the blueprints part14:34
flaper87who wants to help with the bug part of it?14:34
flaper87#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/234653/14:35
flaper87that's the blueprints guideline14:35
flaper87nikhil: AWESOME!14:35
Jokke_we'll get to those either at Monday or later during the week and see if they fit to picture with the stable-maint group :)14:35
flaper87nikhil: is that something you can report on the spec?14:35
mclarennikhil: I'm interested14:35
flaper87There are still some critical discussions happening there14:35
Jokke_nikhil: shoot14:35
nikhilsurely, I will update the spec14:35
nikhiloops, comment *14:35
flaper87nikhil: AWESOME14:35
flaper87feel free to share here but I'd love to have that on the spec as well14:35
flaper87just to make sure other folks not attending the meeting can read it14:36
mclarenI made a spec update I'd love some feedback on14:36
flaper87I'll read14:36
nikhilack14:36
flaper87mclaren: did you address comments from the last PS?14:36
flaper87s/last/previous/14:36
nikhilso, there are different groups and people want a few common things14:36
*** britthouser has joined #openstack-meeting-414:37
mclarenflaper87: I'm wondering if it's possible to do something simpler -- without the persistent bikeshed14:37
nikhil1) upload using direct-url (copy-from in v1, in v2 it's a bit icky but import does that)14:37
mclarencomment is around line 21314:38
flaper87mclaren: is that your update to the spec?14:38
flaper87I'll read and comment14:38
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-414:38
flaper87mclaren: ah so, you just commented, ok14:39
mclarenyes, thanks. Feel free to beat me up if its horrendous14:39
* flaper87 takes his baseball bat14:39
mclarenhang on, no bats!14:39
flaper87mclaren: thanks for trying to think of simpler ways to do this14:39
* Jokke_ hands over box of 6" nails and hammer to flaper87 14:39
nikhil2) OVA like support14:39
* flaper87 does a ninja jump and goes after mclaren14:40
mclarennikhil: I think a number of people are interested in 'copy-from' type support/will be very interestd when v1 goes away.14:40
flaper87yeah14:40
flaper87and #2 is interesting as we've had feedback fro just one group so far14:40
nikhilhttps://imgur.com/gallery/2YZjYLk14:40
flaper87it's good to know that there's more interest14:40
flaper87we still have a spec up for review14:40
flaper87wonder if it's been updated14:40
*** irenab has quit IRC14:41
nikhilI guess not14:41
Jokke_nikhil: I commented that to spec already, but I'm bit afraid ... There was huge pressure from Inter ref that ova stuff just before release (just like the cycle before) and haven't heard anything back since the exclusion due to the freeze and this planning14:41
nikhilI think that not being in priorities made then not interested14:41
nikhilyet14:41
mclaren*hopefully* the import spec will facilitate OVA stuff14:41
rosmaitamclaren: ++14:41
flaper87yeah14:41
flaper87ah, since it's open discussion14:41
flaper87#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/245897/14:42
flaper87I've applied those 2 tags to glance14:42
flaper87The patches haven't merged BUT I'd love some +1s from other folks in the team14:42
buntingThere is also a spec-lite about moving metadefs into sub-commands14:42
*** krtaylor has quit IRC14:42
bunting#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bug/148953414:42
openstackLaunchpad bug 1489534 in python-glanceclient "Move metadef commands to sub-commands" [Wishlist,In progress] - Assigned to Niall Bunting (niall-bunting)14:42
Jokke_mclaren: That's why I'm extremely dissapointed that they haven't been involved in any ways in this discussion14:42
rosmaitaJokke_: ++14:42
nikhilyeah, I am not sure. I have only gotted the name OVA as feedback but I will ask more. If it's full fledged OVA then it's unlikely to have as image. we nees artifacts for that or no? what do you all think?14:42
flaper87I, obviously, left rolling-upgrades as the only thing that can roll is glance down a hill when trying to do rolling upgrades14:42
Jokke_I don't want to end up to situation where it becomes urgent week before freeze again14:43
flaper87left rolling-upgrades out*14:43
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC14:43
flaper87Jokke_: ++14:43
flaper87Again, we've a priorities list to focus on, other things will have to be pushed by the interested parties14:43
flaper87and those things will be evaluated accordingly14:43
flaper87in a case-by-case basis14:43
nikhilmclaren: ha, I created a tag called lite-spec for the store :P14:43
nikhilhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/glance-store/+bugs?field.tag=lite-spec14:44
nikhilI will change it to spec-lite, don't worry14:44
nikhiljust fyi14:44
flaper87man, the import spec has 89 comments14:44
flaper87ok14:45
flaper87anything else we want to talk about?14:45
mfedosinyup14:45
flaper87otherwise, we can call it a meeting14:45
flaper87mfedosin: go14:45
nikhilJokke_: yeah, I think we should avoid that impl for Mitaka if we do decide to impl import related changes14:45
mfedosin2 things14:45
mfedosinfirst one about glare api version14:45
*** tpeoples has quit IRC14:46
mfedosinshould it be 0.1 while it's in experimental state?14:46
*** aglarendil has quit IRC14:46
mfedosinand 1.0 when it's stable14:46
Jokke_mfedosin: sounds reasonable14:46
*** GheRivero has quit IRC14:46
*** f13o has quit IRC14:46
mfedosinor it can be 1.0 from the beginning14:46
mfedosinI would prefer 0.114:46
mfedosinwhat do you think?14:46
Jokke_mfedosin: is the plan to release it as experimental still in M?14:47
mclarenno reason not to go with 0.1?14:47
*** dtardivel has quit IRC14:47
*** ashtokolov has quit IRC14:47
flaper870.1 sounds good14:47
Jokke_it's easy to bump at any point of the cycle anyways14:47
flaper87mclaren: do we already have patches for that split ?14:47
*** jed56 has quit IRC14:47
flaper87ops14:47
flaper87mfedosin: ^14:47
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC14:47
mfedosinkairat made a patch that removes current implementation14:47
mfedosinI have to write a spec for that14:48
flaper87mmh, why removing it and not moving it ?14:48
mfedosingood question :)14:48
flaper87I saw the patch and I was confused14:48
nikhilI thought we decided to not remove in Monday's meeting14:48
flaper87I'd rather have it moved14:48
mclarenwhat's the latest with glare? Is it intended to be mainly for other services storing things or will it be a full public api in time? (I'm a bit out of touch there, sorry)14:48
Jokke_flaper87: because moving to versionedObject requires pretty much full rewrite :(14:48
mfedosinI want to get the answer as you14:48
flaper87and that was my feeling from the summit to14:48
nikhilmoving makes sense, removing and adding is confusing14:48
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-414:48
flaper87Jokke_: sure but we should move it to the glare package and then they can remove the parts that need to be removed14:48
flaper87I guess14:49
flaper87I just don't want to loose history14:49
nikhilmclaren: semi-public api14:49
flaper87as in removing everything and then having everything added again14:49
flaper87nikhil: ++ on moving14:49
flaper87mfedosin: do you have a link to the review?14:49
Jokke_flaper87: I hear ya, that was my first question as well :D14:49
flaper87I remember seeing it14:49
mfedosinhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/241265/14:49
mfedosinthis one14:50
nikhilwe need to wait on Alex then14:50
mfedosinhe's running around14:50
mfedosinbut I can't catch him :)14:50
mfedosinto talk about it14:50
*** jruano has joined #openstack-meeting-414:51
flaper87there, -2'd14:51
mfedosinI will begin with 'moving' spec14:51
flaper87:D14:51
Jokke_mfedosin: setup tripwire14:51
nikhilflaper87: I agree that we don't need a mini-summit however, it would be good to get a early video conf for such discussions14:51
*** TravT has joined #openstack-meeting-414:51
flaper87nikhil: yeah, that we'll have. We need that for the image import part too14:51
nikhilfor 1. import 2. glare14:51
nikhilcool14:51
flaper87I think I forgot to mention this in my summary14:51
flaper87we actually talked about a video conf at some point14:51
flaper87sorry about that14:52
flaper87and thanks for bringing this up14:52
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-414:52
mfedosinanother question is about .mailmap14:53
mfedosindo we need it in our repo?14:53
Jokke_is there any reason to keep that?14:53
mfedosinhttps://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/.mailmap14:53
nikhilit was used earlier14:53
flaper87I don't really care, I know there was a reason to have it14:53
flaper87we can sync with infra about this14:53
nikhiland I doubt if anyone cares now14:53
Jokke_nikhil: is there, not was there :P14:53
flaper87and get a feeling of what other folks are doing14:53
flaper87but I'd be all for removing it14:53
Jokke_flaper87: ++14:53
flaper87lsat update was 201414:53
nikhilJokke_: dark ages :)14:54
*** jed56 has joined #openstack-meeting-414:54
mfedosin.mailmap exists in all repos, like Nova, Keystone etc14:54
*** sbalukoff1 has quit IRC14:54
mfedosinand all of them outdated14:54
flaper87mfedosin: have those been updated?14:54
flaper87:D14:54
Jokke_can we be for once community leader if it's not used by anything anymore?14:54
*** lakshmiS has joined #openstack-meeting-414:54
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-414:54
mfedosinso we can begin with ML message14:54
mfedosincreate a bug14:54
Jokke_++14:55
mfedosinand remove it from all repos14:55
flaper87Jokke_: I don't mind as long as infra gives ok14:55
flaper87I don't think it's being used elsewhere BUT assume makes an #!$@#$ between U and ME14:55
Jokke_flaper87: yeah, as long as it's not used14:55
flaper87;)14:55
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-414:55
nikhilI think gerrit takes care of things so, not really useful14:55
mfedosinI will send a message today if you don't mind :)14:55
flaper87mfedosin: go for it14:55
Jokke_mfedosin: go for it14:55
flaper87and thanks for doing that14:55
Jokke_tag [infra]14:56
flaper87Jokke_: OUT OF MY MIND14:56
flaper87jeeez14:56
*** jruano has quit IRC14:56
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-414:56
mfedosin:D14:56
Jokke_:D14:56
* flaper87 can't have privacy anymore14:56
flaper87:P14:56
flaper87ok, we're running out of time14:56
Jokke_any last wishes?14:56
flaper87world peace ?14:57
nikhilflaper87: one quick clarification. is there a reason someone shouldn't propose support for hierarchal multi-tenancy support?14:57
nikhilthough, with keystone still cleaning up it wouldn't be until N14:57
flaper87nikhil: oh mmh, I don't think there is. It depends on what will be required to have that support, I guess14:57
*** ashtokolov has joined #openstack-meeting-414:57
flaper87nikhil: thought so14:57
flaper87an early spec would be cool anyway14:58
flaper87it gives time to clearing things up14:58
nikhilok, thanks. ack.14:58
flaper87and for better discussions14:58
*** tpeoples has joined #openstack-meeting-414:58
flaper87coolio14:58
flaper87That's all folks!14:58
flaper87thanks for attending14:58
mclarenthanks14:58
Jokke_Thanks all14:58
mfedosinthanks!14:58
flaper87have a great day, weekend and week until our next meeting14:58
abhishekkthank you14:58
flaper87Break glance and blame mclaren14:58
*** dtardivel has joined #openstack-meeting-414:58
Jokke_Don't forget Monday!14:58
flaper87#endmeeting14:59
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"14:59
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 19 14:59:01 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:59
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2015/glance.2015-11-19-14.01.html14:59
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2015/glance.2015-11-19-14.01.txt14:59
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/glance/2015/glance.2015-11-19-14.01.log.html14:59
*** abhishekk has quit IRC14:59
*** ninag has left #openstack-meeting-414:59
*** bpoulos has left #openstack-meeting-415:00
*** yingjun has joined #openstack-meeting-415:00
TravT#startmeeting openstack search15:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 19 15:00:27 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is TravT. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_search'15:00
*** ppetit has joined #openstack-meeting-415:00
TravTo/15:01
TravTwe'll give a few minutes for people join.15:01
yingjun:)15:01
lakshmiSo/15:01
*** bunting has left #openstack-meeting-415:01
TravTyingjun: what time is it for you?15:02
yingjun23:0015:02
*** lakshmiS_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:03
TravTi know sjmc7 is on his way15:03
yingjunafter the meeting will go to sleep :)15:03
rosmaitao/15:03
TravThow's it going rosmaita?15:04
rosmaitaok15:04
rosmaitano action, though15:04
*** sjmc7 has joined #openstack-meeting-415:04
TravTwell, here's the agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/search-team-meeting-agenda15:04
sjmc7morning, sorry i’m late15:04
TravTmorning sjmc715:05
TravT#topic general updates15:05
*** openstack changes topic to "general updates (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:05
TravTJust to get it logged here as FYI for everybody15:05
TravTwe spent nearly two hours doing BP prioritization in the room on Tuesday15:05
*** aglarendil has joined #openstack-meeting-415:05
TravTgot through most of the list15:05
TravTin giving initial priorities15:05
*** lakshmiS has quit IRC15:06
TravTif there are any BPs that have a priority you disagree with, please mention it15:06
TravT#topic client repo merged15:07
*** openstack changes topic to "client repo merged (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:07
sjmc7thanks for the help with that Li, if you’re here15:08
TravT#link https://github.com/openstack/python-searchlightclient15:08
yingjunjust saw that, i’m working on the initial commit15:08
TravTafter some brief discussion, we thought it would be best for there to be a separate repo15:08
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2415:08
TravTsjmc7 had some packaging concerns otherwsie15:08
david-lyleo/15:08
TravTo/15:08
sjmc7yingjun add me as a reviewer and i’ll take a look; the first commit will need enough to pass the CI jobs15:08
yingjunsjmc7, ok15:09
*** vtech has quit IRC15:09
TravTyingjun sounds great.  thanks for getting that started15:09
sjmc7but appreciate the help getting it created15:09
TravTi do think we should have some more design discussion on all the commands that should be supported15:10
*** vtech has joined #openstack-meeting-415:10
TravTobviously, we can get a couple base ones going.15:10
TravTbut then we should really think through what we can do to make it easy to use... maybe with some common queries.15:11
*** alex_didenko has quit IRC15:11
TravT#topic spec repo started15:12
*** openstack changes topic to "spec repo started (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:12
TravT#link https://github.com/openstack/searchlight-specs15:12
TravTjust FYI15:12
TravTthat is merged in15:12
TravTwe have a few to discuss (later in the meeting)15:12
TravT#topic Reno release notes15:13
*** openstack changes topic to "Reno release notes (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:13
*** mfedosin has quit IRC15:13
TravThttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/247170/15:13
TravTI put up one of the base patches15:13
TravTbut we will need to start adding release notes15:13
TravTThe guidelines are here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247170/3/doc/source/feature-requests-bugs.rst15:14
TravTif you have feedback on those guidelines please provide it15:14
TravTlooks like I already have one comment to address15:14
TravT#topic cinder plugin update15:14
*** openstack changes topic to "cinder plugin update (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:14
TravTwe don't have duncanT on here, but i do have an update from him and from going to the cinder meeting yesterday15:15
TravThe has the initial plugin done.15:15
TravTbut right now it works likes the nova one and has to make callbacks for more data15:15
*** rbak has joined #openstack-meeting-415:16
sjmc7boo15:16
TravTso, he proposed to the cinder team that they improve the notification event data so we can avoid that15:16
TravTand the discussion went really well15:16
TravTso, he's proposing patches to cinder to improve the notification data15:17
TravTand he'll modify his SL plugin to take advantage of that15:17
sjmc7nice. chances of that getting into mitaka?15:17
TravTprobably pretty high, i think.15:17
TravTit helps that he's a core on cinder15:17
TravTmaybe we should twist his arm and have him submit the patch based on API callbacks first15:18
TravTand then update when the notifications are in15:18
TravTwhat do you think?15:18
lakshmiS_you mean add a second patch for notifications?15:19
TravTyeah, get a SL plugin as-is with callbacks.15:19
TravTAnd then update it once the notifications in cinder are improved15:19
lakshmiS_i probably have to do similar to swift ;)15:19
sjmc7i’d be ok with that15:19
sjmc7swift i don’t think we can15:19
sjmc7but that can be a separate discussion15:20
TravTit would actually also give us some code for reference if somebody wants to deploy searchlight against liberty cinder15:20
TravTok, i'll mention this to duncan15:20
TravTand see if he's agreeable15:20
TravT#topic Swift integration updates15:21
*** openstack changes topic to "Swift integration updates (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:21
lakshmiS_I think its getting to a good shape. Will have a patch for review tomorrow.15:22
lakshmiS_obviously without notifications15:22
TravTso this is for initial indexing?15:22
lakshmiS_yes15:22
TravTcool15:22
sjmc7i’ve got middleware that works for swift15:22
sjmc7i need to tidy it up a bit15:22
sjmc7and propose it to swift, though i think they will say no to it being in-tree15:23
sjmc7then decide where it should live15:23
lakshmiS_yeah we can add notifications as another patch once notifications land in swift(whenever that happens)15:23
TravTsjmc7: so plug it in to the deploy pipeline and get oslo notifications?15:23
sjmc7right15:23
TravTwell, this is pretty exciting!15:24
TravTone thing i'm highly interested in, is what this may mean for an improved swift UI in horizon15:24
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-415:25
TravTi also will need to look at the data model you've got lakshmiS_ to see how that might affect the current UI I'm on.15:25
TravTdid you use nesting, parents, etc?15:25
lakshmiS_not much15:26
lakshmiS_are you concerned about complex model?15:26
TravTnot sure if concerned is quite the right term...15:27
TravTjust want to make sure it is the right model15:27
lakshmiS_oh ok15:27
TravTwhich i'm sure you've put some good thought into15:27
TravTwe'll just have to see15:27
*** blahRus has joined #openstack-meeting-415:27
TravTbut what might be really helpful is that once we have it, i ensure that it can somewhat demo via the search panel15:28
TravTthen could record a quick youtube to show the swift team15:28
lakshmiS_sure15:28
* TravT needs to get back to coding on that panel15:28
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-415:29
TravTi think anytime you have something concrete to interact with, it helps move the conversation along15:29
TravTdemonstrate the potential value15:29
lakshmiS_yeah maybe they will accept our notification patch after that...15:29
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-415:29
TravTmaybe i'll prototype out a new swift specific panel with search, depending on the data structure15:30
TravTok, anything else to discuss on swift?15:31
TravTi don't see briancline or daddyjoseph97 on here15:31
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-415:31
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-415:31
lakshmiS_i will add them as reviewers15:31
TravTsounds good15:31
TravT#topic openstack tag assertions15:32
*** openstack changes topic to "openstack tag assertions (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:32
TravTA message went out that we need to assert tags for the project15:32
TravTsince moving to the big tent, tags are the way people are supposed to be able to tell various characteristics about a project15:33
TravTi didn't have time to run through them prior to this meeting15:33
*** marcusvrn_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:33
*** numans has quit IRC15:33
TravTbut they are all listed here: http://governance.openstack.org/reference/tags/index.html15:33
TravTwe've already got the Release Management Tags applied15:34
TravTthe ones under "Project Assertions Tags" are things we'd need to discuss15:35
*** bruno_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:35
*** bruno_ is now known as brunograz15:35
sjmc7hmm :)15:35
*** cpallares has left #openstack-meeting-415:35
TravTi don't think we want to assert the feature deprecation yet15:36
TravTthat's why we released 0.115:36
TravTperhaps that one after the mitaka release15:36
TravTmaybe the upgrade one, but i'd still hesitate to add that until end of mitaka15:37
*** dshakhray has quit IRC15:38
sjmc7yes, i think that’d be premature15:38
lakshmiS_for supporting upgrade we need to look at plugin versions too15:38
lakshmiS_thats where our data model is15:39
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-415:39
TravTtrue15:39
TravTwell, i think we need more work on this before asserting more tags for now15:40
TravTsounds like you guys agree15:40
sjmc7yep15:40
lakshmiS_yes15:40
TravTrosmaita: david-lyle: yingjun:  agree?15:40
yingjunagree15:40
david-lyleyeah15:41
TravTok.15:41
TravT#topic oslo pools15:41
*** openstack changes topic to "oslo pools (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:41
TravTso, the background here is that our deployment architect was questioning why we didn't use multiple queues rather than require a new topic for searchlight notifications15:42
TravTand our answer was the oslo only supported that through pools, and pools were apparently broken15:43
TravTlakshmiS_: is that still our answer?15:43
lakshmiS_yes15:43
lakshmiS_we need to relook at that again15:43
sjmc7does oslo know it’s broken?15:43
lakshmiS_see anything changed since we spoke to ceilometer15:43
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC15:43
*** evgenyf has quit IRC15:44
dimssjmc7 unless there's a bug, oslo is clueless :)15:44
TravTok.15:44
sjmc7yeah :)  we should file a bug with oslo if something’s broken15:44
dimspretty please :)15:45
TravTlakshmiS_: can you give dims a bit more info?15:45
* TravT loves how dims always swoops into meetings when oslo is mentioned.15:45
lakshmiS_oslo pools was basically not working as expected - for sending message to multiple consumers15:45
dimsTravT :)15:46
sjmc7i can take a look at it again15:46
lakshmiS_ceilometer and searchlight were both consuming glance info notifications and only one of them would get it(mostly ceilometer)15:46
*** nkrinner has quit IRC15:46
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-415:47
dimslakshmiS_ interesting, had not heard that15:47
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-415:47
lakshmiS_dims: i can share the discussion we had with ceilometer team with you on that topic15:47
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting-415:47
dimssjmc7 lakshmiS_ yes, please log some details in a bug and add ceilometer and searchlight and oslo.messaging as affected15:48
dimsthanks lakshmiS_15:48
TravT+115:48
lakshmiS_we would love to use the pools back though :)15:48
TravT#action lakshmiS_ to log oslo pools bug15:49
TravT#topic but review and blueprint review15:49
*** openstack changes topic to "but review and blueprint review (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:49
*** zeih has quit IRC15:49
TravTguess we are having a but review right now15:49
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner15:49
dimslakshmiS_ should be easy to replicate using our simulator - https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/tools/simulator.py15:50
lakshmiS_thanks dims:15:50
TravTooohh15:50
TravTthat simulator would be great for our tests!15:50
dimsTravT : ++15:50
TravTcould add that to our functional tests15:50
TravT#action TravT add BP to pull in simulator for notification testing15:51
*** mfedosin has joined #openstack-meeting-415:52
TravTOk, so there are three spec reviews up right now that all need feedback15:52
TravThttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/searchlight-specs,n,z15:52
TravTtwo of them are essential15:52
TravTSpec proposal for allowing searchable admin fields15:53
TravTZero Downtime Reindexing Proposal15:53
TravTwith architectural ramifications15:53
*** angdraug has joined #openstack-meeting-415:53
TravTso, please take a look at them and give feedback15:53
TravT#topic open discussion15:54
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: openstack search)"15:54
TravTAnything else that people want to discuss?15:54
sjmc7i’m hungry15:54
TravTdo you have waffles?15:54
sjmc7i.. do not.15:54
yingjunFYI, just upload the very first client base: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/247565/15:54
kragnizI think the new python-searchlightclient repo needs to be added to the governance repo15:54
rosmaitawho has waffles?15:54
sjmc7that was quick yingjun!15:54
kragnizalso o/15:54
*** stevelle has joined #openstack-meeting-415:55
sjmc7yeah, it does. i’m surprised infra merged it without that. hi kragniz!15:55
TravTkragniz: o/15:55
TravT(rosmaita perks up)15:55
sjmc7there are no waffles.15:55
* rosmaita is very disappointed15:56
TravTkragniz: i submitted a governance patch on that15:56
TravThttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/247271/15:56
TravTalso one for spec repo15:56
*** avarner has joined #openstack-meeting-415:56
yingjun:) sjmc7, please have a look at that, i put it workflow-115:56
TravTspec repo got some love15:57
sjmc7will do15:57
TravThttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/244875/15:57
TravTbut i guess that since we got our repos, i don't know that it is urgent to push those through15:57
TravThowever, adding a +1 from you guys might pop it up in visibility15:57
TravT#action sjmc7 to bring waffles to the next meeting15:58
sjmc7oh, i will15:58
TravTOh one more thing15:58
TravTm1 is December 3rd15:59
sjmc7wow, that crept up fast15:59
TravTyeah15:59
TravTsjmc7: i think we will need a release note added for that plugin restructuring patch15:59
TravTallright16:00
TravTthanks everybody16:00
TravTtimes up16:00
rosmaitabye16:00
sjmc7bye!16:00
*** sjmc7 has left #openstack-meeting-416:00
yingjunbye16:00
TravT#endmeeting16:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"16:00
*** lakshmiS_ has left #openstack-meeting-416:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 19 16:00:13 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_search/2015/openstack_search.2015-11-19-15.00.html16:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_search/2015/openstack_search.2015-11-19-15.00.txt16:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_search/2015/openstack_search.2015-11-19-15.00.log.html16:00
*** yingjun has left #openstack-meeting-416:00
*** odyssey4me has joined #openstack-meeting-416:01
*** afv has joined #openstack-meeting-416:02
*** bgmccollum has joined #openstack-meeting-416:02
odyssey4me#startmeeting OpenStack Ansible Meeting16:02
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 19 16:02:57 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is odyssey4me. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.16:02
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.16:02
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:03
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'16:03
dstaneko/16:03
odyssey4me#topic Agenda & rollcall16:03
*** openstack changes topic to "Agenda & rollcall (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:03
*** egonzalez has joined #openstack-meeting-416:03
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-meeting-416:03
evrardjphello16:03
stevellehello there16:03
ntthellp16:03
jwagnero/16:03
bgmccollumo/16:03
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-416:03
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom16:03
palendaeo/16:04
*** mgariepy has joined #openstack-meeting-416:04
*** afv has quit IRC16:04
*** brunograz has quit IRC16:05
odyssey4meconsidering that last week's action items are today's workshop, we'll skip the review of the action items :)16:05
*** bruno_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:05
*** bruno_ is now known as brunograz16:05
odyssey4meso16:05
odyssey4me#topic Release Planning and Decisions16:05
*** openstack changes topic to "Release Planning and Decisions (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:05
odyssey4me#link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible#Agenda_for_next_meeting16:06
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-416:06
d34dh0r53o/16:06
odyssey4meLet's start with a quick discussion about Liberty's 12.0.1 release16:06
odyssey4mewe've fixed some important bugs, but there are one or two crucial bugs outstanding for reviews16:07
odyssey4mehttps://review.openstack.org/240560 needs another review16:07
odyssey4mewithout it, neutron db migrations do not work properly16:07
*** Swami has quit IRC16:08
odyssey4meand https://review.openstack.org/245704 is also quite crucial16:08
evrardjpit's me or it's not target there? https://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+milestone/12.0.116:08
odyssey4meare there any objections to waiting for those to merge, or are there other patches we need to wait for before tagging 12.0.1 ?16:09
evrardjpthey are close to being merged right?16:09
evrardjpI'd be glad if 12.0.1 would be tagged tomorrow16:10
odyssey4mewell, the neutron migrations patch needs one more review, then a backport16:10
palendaeodyssey4me: That 2nd one looks like it's not passing gate, but has reviews16:10
*** SimonChung1 has quit IRC16:10
odyssey4meyeah, the second one just needs to get passed by Grumpy the Gate16:10
evrardjpodyssey4me: maybe there will be one commit missing16:11
evrardjpthe reno thing?16:11
evrardjpisn't it something that has to be committed?16:11
evrardjp(I mean having the text to give to reno to explain what's released in this 12.0.1 version)16:12
*** Kevin_Zheng has quit IRC16:12
odyssey4meyeah, so we will have to start adding release notes - but it's a little late for 12.0.1 - I'll talk about that a bit later16:13
stevelleI haven't started a review of the neutron db migrations but it is in my queue. Not sure if I will get to it before I go on holiday.16:14
stevelleif that impacts the decision to wait or not16:15
odyssey4mewhat're the thoughts - if it's not in by tomorrow morning, do we tag regardless or do we wait until it merges?16:15
evrardjpfor the gate, it passed in master, and the log mention for the failure a 503 on install pip, which shouldn't be an impact of the xtradbbackup16:15
odyssey4me#startvote Release 12.0.1 tomorrow (yes/no)16:16
openstackUnable to parse vote topic and options.16:16
evrardjpodyssey4me: do you plan to have the neutron db migrations in 12.0.1?16:17
evrardjpit's a long way to tomorrow, so if it can wait, it changes everything, the rest seems easy16:17
odyssey4me#startvote Release 12.0.1 tomorrow, regardless of whether current reviews in progress merge? yes, no16:18
openstackBegin voting on: Release 12.0.1 tomorrow, regardless of whether current reviews in progress merge? Valid vote options are yes, no.16:18
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.16:18
*** TravT has left #openstack-meeting-416:18
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-416:18
evrardjp#vote NO16:18
palendae#vote no16:19
evrardjpis this case sensitive?16:19
odyssey4meI think so. :)16:19
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC16:19
andymccr#vote yes16:19
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-416:20
palendaeNot sure I see the point of releasing something that's known to be broken16:20
andymccrwe do another release in 2 weeks16:20
andymccrso then its fixed16:20
bgmccollumreading the bug, it seems to only be a problem IF lbass is installed...correct?16:20
andymccrthen in 2 weeks after that we do another release16:20
palendaeSo it's broken for 2 weeks?16:20
andymccrthats the point of rolling releases though - when you get into a pattern of "certain patches HAVE to merge before we can release" you start running into weird timelines that are not sustainable16:21
andymccras a matter of principle - sticking to a set cadence is better.16:21
palendaeI don't agree with that, but ok16:21
*** bpiotrowski has joined #openstack-meeting-416:21
palendaeReleasing to release when it's not functional seems to be wasteful16:21
palendaeI get your point that it's short-ish window to fix it16:21
andymccri guess since its 12.0.1 its slightly different - we shouldnt have it be non-functional16:22
andymccrso master should alwyas be functional and we just release whatever is ready at that point. and if you had a bug that wasnt fixed you wait 2 weeks. thats how it is.16:22
stevelleif only we had release notes to indicate known bugs by tag16:22
palendaeAlright16:22
palendaeWell, I don't see more votes so far :)16:23
odyssey4mebgmccollum to answer your question, the effect of not having the patch is that if you re-run the neutron playbook (regardless or enabling or disabling lbaas), the migration task fails16:23
bgmccollumodyssey4me: nod...16:23
*** subscope has quit IRC16:24
bgmccollumand while it fails the second time...it shouldn't leave the environment in a broken state...even if run...?16:24
evrardjpstevelle: :D16:24
*** subscope has joined #openstack-meeting-416:24
odyssey4mebgmccollum not a broken state, but you're unable to complete a playbook run for neutron16:24
*** subscope has quit IRC16:25
odyssey4meok, we've spent far too much time on this16:26
evrardjpok then it's a major issue, so it shouldn't be tagged :p16:26
evrardjppostpone tomorrow?16:26
evrardjp:p16:26
odyssey4mewe'll see where's it's at in the morning - hopefully we'll have another review on it and it can be back ported16:26
odyssey4me#endvote16:26
openstackVoted on "Release 12.0.1 tomorrow, regardless of whether current reviews in progress merge?" Results are16:26
andymccryou can always do a release outside of the regular cadence once its fixed?16:26
openstackyes (1): andymccr16:26
openstackno (2): palendae, evrardjp16:26
odyssey4memoving along, we need to decide whether to tag the next kilo release16:27
odyssey4mehttps://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+milestone/11.2.516:27
odyssey4methe heat signals thing will require a sha bump - so it'll have to wait for the next tag16:28
*** dalees has joined #openstack-meeting-416:28
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC16:29
*** Bjoern_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:29
odyssey4meso it appears to me that kilo is ready to roll, any objections?16:29
evrardjpnone16:30
odyssey4me#startvote Release 11.2.5 tomorrow? yes, no16:30
openstackBegin voting on: Release 11.2.5 tomorrow? Valid vote options are yes, no.16:30
openstackVote using '#vote OPTION'. Only your last vote counts.16:30
andymccrlgtm ship it16:30
andymccr#vote yes16:30
odyssey4me#vote yes16:32
*** prashantD has joined #openstack-meeting-416:32
*** harshs has quit IRC16:33
d34dh0r53#vote yes16:33
stevelle#vote yes16:33
odyssey4me#endvote16:34
openstackVoted on "Release 11.2.5 tomorrow?" Results are16:34
openstackyes (4): d34dh0r53, stevelle, odyssey4me, andymccr16:34
odyssey4meok, done - moving on16:34
odyssey4me#topic Workshop - Install Guide16:35
*** openstack changes topic to "Workshop - Install Guide (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:35
*** subscope has joined #openstack-meeting-416:35
odyssey4me#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/oa-install-docs16:35
odyssey4meThe RPC Documentation team, which also is a major OpenStack documentation contributor, has offered to take on the job of revamping the install guide and helping maintain the documentaiton.16:36
odyssey4mewe need to assist with identifying any issues with the current docs, providing information to them about what we'd like to see, and also about things that need to be in the documentation16:36
odyssey4meI've added some of my own thoughts and questions - can we please all spend around 10 minutes doing the same now.16:37
*** logan2 has joined #openstack-meeting-416:39
*** dmsimard has left #openstack-meeting-416:40
*** bpokorny has joined #openstack-meeting-416:42
*** dalees has left #openstack-meeting-416:44
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-416:45
*** subscope has quit IRC16:46
*** nkrinner has quit IRC16:50
*** georgewang has joined #openstack-meeting-416:50
*** fawadkhaliq has joined #openstack-meeting-416:50
*** belmoreira has quit IRC16:51
evrardjpis there anyone from the doc team on the etherpad right now?16:54
odyssey4meevrardjp unfortunately KLevenstein couldn't make it, but we'll revisit it next week once they've had a chance to look through our comments/questions16:56
evrardjpok16:57
evrardjp3 minutes remaining?16:57
*** cathy_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:57
odyssey4meok, so if we could try and put some time aside to think about other changes, that'd be great16:57
*** sridhar_ram has joined #openstack-meeting-416:58
odyssey4methanks all16:58
odyssey4me#topic Open discussion16:58
*** openstack changes topic to "Open discussion (Meeting topic: OpenStack Ansible Meeting)"16:58
odyssey4meI wanted to raise two more etherpads for input quickly:16:58
odyssey4me#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-upgrade-framework16:58
*** mohankumar has joined #openstack-meeting-416:58
odyssey4me#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-ansible-multi-os-support16:58
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-416:59
odyssey4mealso16:59
*** johnsom has joined #openstack-meeting-416:59
odyssey4me#link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2015-November/079732.html16:59
odyssey4meif you could all chime in, that'd be great16:59
odyssey4meanything else in the last minute?16:59
odyssey4meok, thank all for your time!17:00
odyssey4me#endmeeting17:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"17:00
evrardjpnothing, but we'll have to think about impact of ansible 2 in the future17:00
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 19 17:00:12 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)17:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2015/openstack_ansible_meeting.2015-11-19-16.02.html17:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2015/openstack_ansible_meeting.2015-11-19-16.02.txt17:00
evrardjptoo late17:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2015/openstack_ansible_meeting.2015-11-19-16.02.log.html17:00
*** igordcard has joined #openstack-meeting-417:00
*** ramanjaneya_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:00
nttodyssey4me: for multios support, a completely new developer team is needed? Is there a chance to see a support for rhel and derivatives?17:00
*** evrardjp has left #openstack-meeting-417:00
cathy_#startmeeting service_chaining17:00
openstackMeeting started Thu Nov 19 17:00:56 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is cathy_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: service_chaining)"17:01
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'service_chaining'17:01
cathy_hi everyone17:01
igordcardhi cathy_17:01
*** mgariepy has left #openstack-meeting-417:01
mohankumarhi cathy_17:01
*** ntt has left #openstack-meeting-417:01
ramanjaneya_Hi17:01
*** egonzalez has left #openstack-meeting-417:01
*** LouisF has joined #openstack-meeting-417:02
johnsomo/17:02
LouisFhi17:02
cathy_OK, let's start17:03
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-417:03
s3wonghello17:03
*** bgmccollum has left #openstack-meeting-417:03
cathy_I put the topics in the meeting wiki, I will start from the first one17:03
*** KLuehrs has joined #openstack-meeting-417:04
*** stevelle has left #openstack-meeting-417:04
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-417:04
cathy_#topic Follow-up on previous meeting discussion: Tacker to call networking-sfc API and then our driver model delegates out to whichever SDN controller mech driver is appropriate17:04
*** openstack changes topic to "Follow-up on previous meeting discussion: Tacker to call networking-sfc API and then our driver model delegates out to whichever SDN controller mech driver is appropriate (Meeting topic: service_chaining)"17:04
*** woodard has quit IRC17:04
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-417:05
*** prithivm has joined #openstack-meeting-417:05
cathy_s3wong: This is what we discussed in last meeting. Since you are working on Tacker, is this in sync with what Tacker team is thinking about?17:05
*** angdraug has quit IRC17:05
KLuehrsHi - new to Tacker. Is there a web conference/teleconference bridge for this meeting? I didn't see one on the /Meetings/Tacker wiki page17:06
s3wongcathy_: I asked Tacker PTL to join today's meeting also --- sridhar_ram?17:06
*** cloudtra_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:06
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC17:06
igordcardKLuehrs, text only17:06
s3wongKLuehrs: our weekly meeting is on Tuesday, 1700 UTC on #openstack-meeting-417:06
*** dashakhray has quit IRC17:07
sridhar_ramhi folks .. I'm here17:07
KLuehrsOK thanks.17:07
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-417:07
*** dashakhray has joined #openstack-meeting-417:07
*** masterbound has joined #openstack-meeting-417:07
s3wongcathy_: so I spoke with sridhar_ram on #tacker channel regarding the ODL direct integration17:08
*** masterbound is now known as mbound17:08
s3wong(and sridhar_ram is here now)17:08
*** vtech has quit IRC17:08
s3wongsridhar_ram: you want to take it from here?17:08
sridhar_rams3wong: sure...17:08
sridhar_ramcathy_: and team .. our plan is always use networking-sfc as the preferred option17:08
*** dwalleck_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:08
sridhar_ramwe also understand it will take sometime as we are all building things in parallel..17:09
*** barclaac has joined #openstack-meeting-417:09
*** dwalleck_ has quit IRC17:09
sridhar_ramtacker user community has been asking to try out SFC use-cases for a while ..17:09
cathy_sridhar_ram: OK, great. thanks for the info. Sure it will take time and we will work with you on that.17:10
sridhar_ram.. and now we have an option by using ODL17:10
*** dwalleck_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:10
sridhar_ramcathy_: here is a slides I shared w/ OPNFV-SFC team sometime back .. https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/18AGaiysVgHOd_fIHVpObMO7zUkMjJGOQ98CUwkxU1xo/edit#slide=id.p1417:10
sridhar_ramcathy_: I showed a multi phase approach .. we are in phase 1 (slide 5)17:11
sridhar_ramplan is to eventually move to phase 3 (slide 7)17:11
cathy_sridhar_ram: OK, we will take a look at the slides after the meeting.17:12
pcarver_hi. I joined late.17:12
cathy_pcarver_: hi17:12
LouisFsridhar_ram: slide 8 shows a odl driver - are there plans to add a networking-sfc driver?17:12
LouisFdoes tacker support the ability to add other drivers?17:12
sridhar_ramLouisF: In fact, that was my understanding ... I was about to ask the same to this team here :)17:12
*** qwebirc60098 has joined #openstack-meeting-417:12
*** dwalleck_ has quit IRC17:13
LouisFi think iut would be useful to add a driver manager to tacker to support various SB drivers17:13
cathy_sridhar_ram: slide 7 is in sync with our discussion in last meeting. Great that tacker will move to phase 3 slide 7.17:13
s3wongLouisF: I don't think Tacker is in the business of integrating with SB SDN / network drivers long term17:14
cathy_agree with s3wong17:14
s3wongLouisF: once networking-sfc stabilizes, networking-sfc would likely be the only thing we will be using moving forward17:14
s3wongwhich is the phase 3 diagram in sridhar_ram 's slides17:15
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-417:15
cathy_OK, let's move to second topic17:15
LouisFs3wong: slide 8 shows a sfc driver17:16
s3wonghopefully by the next OPNFV summit, we will have a fully integrated solution :-)17:16
sridhar_ramLouisF: tacker can have multiple SFC drivers backing its sfc-extension API17:16
sridhar_ramLouisF: but our preference is to go through networking-sfc API as much as possible17:17
igordcardit's interesting... tacker team, do you intend to leverage most of the opendaylight-sfc features through networking-sfc (in the case of an ODL networking-sfc driver)?17:17
igordcardincluding SFC encapsulation17:17
s3wongigordcard: encapsulation (and anything plumbing related) --- definitely17:17
sridhar_ramLouisF: .. along the lines we are taking a practical approach to enable SFC in tacker17:17
LouisFsridhar_ram: great i think networking-sfc would be very interested in working with tacker team on a tacker - networking-sfc driver17:17
sridhar_ramLouisF: thanks!17:18
s3wongigordcard: but my understanding (which admittedly is a bit limited) is that ODL SFC also has a chain template portion, which Tacker may need to service17:18
sridhar_ramigordcard: we need reconcile the features of odl-sfc and the networking-sfc api ..17:18
igordcards3wong, that's good, we need to make sure networking-sfc is abstract or flexible enough to allow that, somehow, through their API17:18
sridhar_ramigordcard: +117:18
s3wongigordcard: as this template stuff affects lifecycle management of the service VMs17:18
sridhar_ramI've one question to the team here..17:19
s3wongigordcard: agreed17:19
sridhar_ramhave you looked at ODL-SFC for ideas to expand the proposed networking-sfc api ?17:19
sridhar_ramthe reason I ask.. it seems one of the good opensource NSH-OVS enabled SFC out there ?17:20
*** SimonChung has joined #openstack-meeting-417:20
*** KLuehrs has quit IRC17:20
s3wongsridhar_ram: (now speaking as a member of the networking-sfc team) I believe the SFP portion of the APIs can be well serviced by networking-sfc with minimal changes17:20
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC17:20
LouisFs3wong: agree17:20
s3wongsridhar_ram: for the NSH problem --- unfortunately unlike ODL, us in Neutron need to adhere to what is available as standard (OVS releases)17:21
sridhar_rams3wong: my high level thought pt is .. we should degrade ODL's SFC capability "too much" if consumed through networking-sfc17:21
sridhar_rams/should/SHOULD NOT/17:21
cathy_sridhar_ram: Could you be more specific? which one do you think networking-sfc api does not satisfy?17:21
s3wongsridhar_ram: so we are all eagerly waiting for OVS to have NSH support... it is promising, as folks from Intel is currently pushing for this effort, and that Jesse Gross seems to be working with the folks at Intel to get the support in17:22
cathy_sridhar_ram: the API allows specification of encap mechanism including NSH17:22
igordcards3wong, sure, so should the framework be able support the different capabilities depending on the active driver? while still having a stable API17:22
sridhar_ramcathy_: that's good to hear encap is allowed .. we might also need transport_type (that is up for discussion thougth)17:22
cathy_as s3wong said, when NSH is officially accepted by OVS, we can easily incorporate it in.17:22
s3wongsridhar_ram: that said, once we have networking-sfc driver for ODL SFC, the ODL SFC code is standard release (Lithium), and we would be able to use whatever OVS fork ODL decides to use :-)17:23
*** mfedosin has quit IRC17:23
sridhar_ramcathy_: more info is available in tacker-sfc spec .. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/228007/3/specs/liberty/tacker-sfc.rst17:23
*** sambetts is now known as sambetts-afk17:23
LouisFsridhar_ram: when nsh is available in a released ovs version networking-sfc can take advantage if it17:23
cathy_Our API allows more flexibility than just restricting to one encap mechanism and the flexibility is the feedback we got at our design stage17:23
s3wongsridhar_ram: I do believe ODL SFC integration would likely push us (networking-sfc team) to expand on the params field of the port chain to include NSH and related parameters17:24
sridhar_ramLouisF: sounds good...my understanding is that is getting close..17:24
sridhar_rams3wong: that's promising!17:24
pcarver_We may need to think about adding some sort of capability discovery to the API17:24
igordcards3wong, glad to hear that.. and that pcarver_17:25
*** andymaier has joined #openstack-meeting-417:25
s3wongsridhar_ram, LouisF, cathy_: I do believe (as I mentioned above), with the ODL SFC driver (in networking-sfc), we can have NSH, since technically the ODL SFC support is an official OSS project release (sidestep the fact that THEY are using a fork version of OVS :-)  )17:25
s3wongpcarver_: that's an interesting thought...17:25
*** andymaier has quit IRC17:25
sridhar_rams3wong: pcarver_: as long as we have a n-sfc api that is a rough superset .... we would be good17:26
*** andymaier has joined #openstack-meeting-417:26
s3wongsridhar_ram: certainly17:26
cathy_s3wong: yes, with ODL SFC driver in networking-sfc, we can have NSH. Or even without the ODL driver, we can have it through OVS driver directly17:26
*** FallenPegasus has quit IRC17:27
*** georgewang_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:27
LouisFcathy_: that would work17:27
s3wongcathy_, sridhar_ram: glad we have an agreement on the integration plan. Good discussion!17:28
*** georgewang has quit IRC17:28
cathy_LouisF: s3wong sure:-)17:28
cathy_pcarver_: for the capability discovery addition to the API, we can discuss after we get the first phase functionality and codes merged. OK with you?17:28
*** egonzalez has joined #openstack-meeting-417:29
LouisFsridhar_ram: i think it would be useful to add a slide to your deck that outlines what we are proposing here17:29
pcarver_cathy_: absolutely. We need to cover the common SFC functionality of major SDN controllers first17:29
LouisFpcarver_: +117:30
pcarver_It's just that if we find that some SDN controllers have capabilities that others don't, we don't want networking-sfc to restrict the capabilities17:30
cathy_pcarver_: sure, agree17:30
pcarver_but we don't want end users to have to guess at what's supported either17:30
igordcardcathy_, assuming the API/framework and so on are still open for changes after the first phase gets merged, I'm completely +1 with you - it will also be easier to just check out the code, stack it and try it17:30
LouisFigordcard: +117:30
s3wongcathy_: time for next topic?17:31
s3wong:-)17:31
igordcardpcarver_, +117:31
cathy_igordcard: sure it will be open for changes/extensions. We need to define more extensions to support richer functionality and more scenarios. I have all those in mind, but let's do step by step:-)17:31
sridhar_ramLouisF: sure. I can add one..17:32
cathy_s3wong: sure let's go to next topic17:32
igordcardcathy_, perfect17:32
sridhar_ramLouisF: we can maintain this as a common set of slides for our common user community17:32
pcarver_igordcard: we just added a warning to the docs that the API is experimental and subject to change17:32
*** krtaylor has quit IRC17:32
cathy_#topic Patch update progress17:32
*** openstack changes topic to "Patch update progress (Meeting topic: service_chaining)"17:32
sridhar_rampcarver_: +1 ..17:32
*** qwebirc60098 has quit IRC17:32
cathy_So we have spent quite some time doing rebase and solving those build errors due to dependency order. Now we have re-split the FC plugin from the port chain plugin per our agreement last time.17:35
pcarver_who has all of the code installed and running? I keep running into problems.17:35
*** degorenko is now known as _degorenko17:36
cathy_pcarver_: we once had all codes installed and running.17:36
pcarver_It would be helpful if someone who has it working could replicate setup from a fresh new DevStack and write down all the steps in the correct order.17:36
*** dims has quit IRC17:36
*** banix has quit IRC17:37
igordcardpcarver_, +217:37
cathy_but due to some name changes in FC and other config changes (Vikram made if I am right), we are having some problems. We have been working on fixing those and uploading patches17:38
cathy_pcarver_: What we did is manual installation, not via devstack.17:39
igordcardI have very recently finished a rebase on this even though I'm not sure if FC is working, I can share the git repo if you want to test it... q-svc runs17:39
pcarver_We also need to verify whether the tox config is correct. There are a lot of failures in the gate. I don't know if those are gate problems or code problems.17:39
pcarver_cathy_: What base OpenStack are you using?17:39
cathy_pcarver_: yes, we are working on those problems. If you look at the latest update, most failures are fixed.17:40
LouisFpcarver_: the tox gate failures have been resolved17:40
cathy_pcarver_: what do you mean by base openstack?17:40
cathy_we are based on Liberty17:40
LouisFpcarver_: will post latest ovs driver changes17:41
pcarver_cathy_: Did you mean you're not using DevStack? Or just that you didn't use DevStack to install networking-sfc17:41
cathy_pcarver_: did not use devstack17:41
igordcardLouisF, thanks17:41
cathy_pcarver_: not yet17:41
pcarver_cathy_: I mean are you using Fuel or RDO or a fully manual installation of OpenStack?17:41
cathy_pcarver_: manual17:41
pcarver_cathy_: So everything, Nova, Glance, Keystone all manually installed and configured without automation?17:42
*** joonmyung has joined #openstack-meeting-417:42
cathy_pcarver_: if you talk about basic openstack, then it is not manual17:42
pcarver_cathy_: That's what I'm asking about. What are you using to setup the OpenStack that you're manually adding networking-sfc to17:43
*** matrohon has quit IRC17:43
cathy_pcarver_ it is through devstack. But we also run into some problems which we have to debug and manually fix them.17:43
cathy_pcarver_: Some problems relate to linux version17:44
pcarver_I use DevStack to get clean environments to clone networking-sfc into. But I haven't been able to install it successfully yet.17:44
*** egonzalez has quit IRC17:44
igordcardI would be very happy to help on fixing the rest of the rebases, but I can't do it just like that or the patchsets will clash; or I can help by commenting on the patchsets for the issues that I've been encountering17:44
cathy_igordcard: since we are almost done with rebase, let louis and I finish them, then you can comment17:45
igordcardcathy_, LouisF okay then, so I'll fully try it again when the head (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238428/) gets updated17:46
s3wongGuys: sorry, need to drop off. Talk to you guys in two weeks (since I would imagine next meeting will be canceled due to Thanksgiving).17:46
cathy_There might be some comments which we forgot to incorporate in the new patch. If you see that, I apologize. Please re-add your comments to the latest rebase patches.17:46
igordcardwhen the head works I will start my normal reviewing process on gerrit, otherwise comments will just get buried17:46
mohankumarpccarver_ :  i used de vstack to pull sfc changes and its works for me17:46
*** adduarte has quit IRC17:47
cathy_s3wong: yes, I will cancel next meeting. ttyl17:47
*** s3wong has quit IRC17:47
igordcardcya s3wong17:47
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-417:47
LouisFigordcard: we will update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/238428/17:48
igordcardmohankumar, I'll get in touch with you offline17:48
cathy_mohankumar: great. so everything works automatically?17:48
cathy_mohankumar: without any glitch?17:48
ramanjaneya_ramanjaneya_: igordcard :we will update the patch17:48
igordcardLouisF, thanks, but please update only when all previous patches have been rebased, otherwise 238428 will still not work :(17:48
mohankumarcathy_ : yes17:48
LouisFigordcard: yes will do17:49
cathy_pcarver_: maybe you can sync up with mohankumar to see what is the gap between you two17:49
pcarver_mohankumar: did you write down the sequence of steps?17:49
mohankumarpcarver_ : ok17:50
pcarver_e.g., did you run stack.sh before or after installing networking-sfc?17:50
pcarver_mohankumar: and if you can share your full local.conf that might help too17:50
ramanjaneya_ramanjaneya_: steps already specified in the patch17:50
mohankumarigordcard: can you talk to prithiv , i helped him to get sfc changes with devstack17:50
igordcardmaybe all interested parties can discuss in #openstack-neutron?17:51
igordcardmohankumar, yes I have been in touch with him but he seems to be using an old version of the code, back from when networking-sfc was stackable... the head of networking-sfc is not stackable right now17:51
cathy_ramanjaneya_: mohankumar so just follow the steps in the patch will work with no glitch?17:51
mohankumarpcarver_: i 'l l  share c17:52
cathy_mohankumar: Could you send the local.conf to everyone?17:52
ramanjaneya_cathy_: will work if follow the steps in the patch17:53
mohankumarcathy_: ok , i ve working code without patches added recently17:53
cathy_mohankumar: ramanjaneya_ after we are done with OVS agent patch to fix all the failures, could you work on the devstack patch and the command line patch to fix the errors?17:54
mohankumarcathy_ :  ok17:55
cathy_I will go to the next topic before we run out of time17:55
cathy_#topic Patch dependency issue and how we avoid cross damage to other patches due to change of one patch17:55
*** openstack changes topic to "Patch dependency issue and how we avoid cross damage to other patches due to change of one patch (Meeting topic: service_chaining)"17:55
ramanjaneya_ramanjaneya_: cathy_ :ok17:55
cathy_mohankumar: ramanjaneya_ thanks!17:55
cathy_In the future, I think whenever we upload a new patch which other patches depend on, let's run the gating tests of all the other patches to make sure there is no co-lateral damage before upload the patch. What do you think?17:56
*** jay_s_b has joined #openstack-meeting-417:56
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-417:57
*** SumitNaiksatam has joined #openstack-meeting-417:57
igordcardcathy_, the problem with the current patch dependency is that there are too many patches depending on each other so it's really hard to keep consistency unless you're rebasing everything everytime17:58
*** FallenPegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-417:59
igordcardcathy_, but in the future, with this big chunk merged, it won't be as difficult because patches will be smaller, less dependent, more specific17:59
*** joonmyung has quit IRC17:59
pcarver_cathy_: It's too late to fix now so we need to keep pushing forward to get a working base merged, but it would have been better to stubbed out the framework first so that we could have merged a series of simpler patches.18:00
igordcardI understand it is difficult for you to have it properly resolved at this point, but this is the hardest time of all18:00
*** bpiotrowski has quit IRC18:00
cathy_igordcard: yes, agree. For now that is the issue we need to face since we break up the codes into multiple patches.18:00
cathy_we are running out of time. we cna discuss more in next meeting18:00
cathy_by everyone18:00
cathy_pcarver_: agree18:01
igordcardbye all18:01
pcarver_I think once we get a working and reliably installable package, we can go back and refactor some things in smaller patches.18:01
cathy_pcarver_: yes, we need to first merge the base working package18:01
cathy_#endmeeting18:02
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:02
openstackMeeting ended Thu Nov 19 18:02:08 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:02
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/service_chaining/2015/service_chaining.2015-11-19-17.00.html18:02
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/service_chaining/2015/service_chaining.2015-11-19-17.00.txt18:02
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/service_chaining/2015/service_chaining.2015-11-19-17.00.log.html18:02
*** tpeoples has quit IRC18:02
*** jwagner is now known as jwagner_away18:02
*** johnsom has left #openstack-meeting-418:03
*** singlethink has quit IRC18:03
*** mbound has quit IRC18:03
*** cathy_ has quit IRC18:03
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-418:04
*** ashtokolov has quit IRC18:04
*** GheRivero has quit IRC18:04
*** jed56 has quit IRC18:05
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-418:06
*** aglarendil has quit IRC18:07
*** dtardivel has quit IRC18:07
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC18:07
*** shivharis has joined #openstack-meeting-418:07
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting-418:09
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-418:10
*** aglarendil has joined #openstack-meeting-418:10
*** ashtokolov has joined #openstack-meeting-418:10
*** woodard has quit IRC18:10
*** jay_s_b has quit IRC18:12
*** GheRivero has joined #openstack-meeting-418:14
*** armax has quit IRC18:14
*** ppetit has quit IRC18:15
*** numans has quit IRC18:17
*** cloudtra_ has quit IRC18:17
*** numans has joined #openstack-meeting-418:19
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-418:20
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-418:20
*** prithivm has quit IRC18:21
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC18:22
*** dtardivel has joined #openstack-meeting-418:26
*** bpiotrowski has joined #openstack-meeting-418:26
*** dims has quit IRC18:26
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-418:29
*** tpeoples has joined #openstack-meeting-418:34
*** stanchan has joined #openstack-meeting-418:35
*** mkloberdans has joined #openstack-meeting-418:41
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-418:41
*** jed56 has joined #openstack-meeting-418:41
*** mkloberdans has quit IRC18:42
*** andymaier has quit IRC18:43
*** fitoduarte has joined #openstack-meeting-418:43
*** mkloberdans has joined #openstack-meeting-418:43
*** mkloberdans has left #openstack-meeting-418:44
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-418:44
*** banix has quit IRC18:47
*** david-lyle has quit IRC18:48
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-418:51
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-418:52
*** Prithiv has joined #openstack-meeting-418:53
*** fawadkhaliq has quit IRC18:54
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-418:54
*** banix has quit IRC18:54
*** shivharis has quit IRC18:55
*** trozet has joined #openstack-meeting-418:57
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC18:57
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-419:01
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC19:04
*** avarner has quit IRC19:14
*** numans has quit IRC19:20
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-419:21
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-419:21
*** banix has quit IRC19:23
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC19:25
*** Bjoern_ is now known as Bjoern_zZzZzZzZ19:27
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner19:29
*** Piet has quit IRC19:31
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-419:33
*** Bjoern_zZzZzZzZ is now known as Bjoern_19:34
*** dims has quit IRC19:36
*** banix has quit IRC19:43
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-419:43
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-420:01
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-420:06
*** mohankumar has quit IRC20:08
*** igordcard has quit IRC20:15
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-420:17
*** ramanjaneya_ has quit IRC20:21
*** Piet has quit IRC20:24
*** Prithiv has quit IRC20:31
*** iyamahat has quit IRC20:35
*** britthouser has quit IRC20:37
*** britthouser_ has joined #openstack-meeting-420:37
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-420:40
*** woodard has quit IRC20:40
*** britthouser_ is now known as britthouser20:41
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-420:41
*** harshs has quit IRC20:43
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:45
*** Prithiv has joined #openstack-meeting-420:46
*** yamahata has quit IRC20:47
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting-420:50
*** Prithiv has quit IRC20:52
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-420:56
*** armax has quit IRC21:00
*** gjayavelu has joined #openstack-meeting-421:04
*** baoli has quit IRC21:08
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-421:09
*** Piet has joined #openstack-meeting-421:13
*** banix has quit IRC21:14
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC21:20
*** sdake has quit IRC21:21
*** jmckind has quit IRC21:22
*** krtaylor has quit IRC21:22
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-421:25
*** dashakhray has quit IRC21:29
*** jmckind has joined #openstack-meeting-421:31
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-421:37
*** Swami has quit IRC21:42
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-421:44
*** dashakhray has joined #openstack-meeting-421:45
*** jlvillal has quit IRC21:46
*** jlvillal has joined #openstack-meeting-421:48
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-421:48
*** harshs has quit IRC21:54
*** gjayavelu has quit IRC21:55
*** woodard_ has joined #openstack-meeting-421:56
*** woodard has quit IRC22:00
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting-422:00
*** woodard_ has quit IRC22:00
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-422:03
*** sridhar_ram1 has joined #openstack-meeting-422:06
*** sridhar_ram has quit IRC22:07
*** gjayavelu has joined #openstack-meeting-422:11
*** cloudtrainme has quit IRC22:13
*** Bjoern_ is now known as BjoernT22:15
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-422:19
*** cloudtrainme has joined #openstack-meeting-422:20
*** baoli_ has joined #openstack-meeting-422:22
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:22
*** harshs has quit IRC22:28
*** jmckind has quit IRC22:30
*** gjayavelu has quit IRC22:35
*** harshs has joined #openstack-meeting-422:36
*** baoli_ has quit IRC22:37
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-422:38
*** sdake has quit IRC22:43
*** woodard has joined #openstack-meeting-422:48
*** iyamahat has quit IRC22:49
*** blahRus has quit IRC22:52
*** baoli has quit IRC22:53
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-422:54
*** iyamahat has joined #openstack-meeting-422:56
*** sridhar_ram1 has quit IRC23:02
*** jckasper has quit IRC23:02
*** sridhar_ram has joined #openstack-meeting-423:04
*** klamath_ has quit IRC23:04
*** bobh has quit IRC23:05
*** baoli has quit IRC23:07
*** stanchan has quit IRC23:08
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-423:09
*** logan2 has quit IRC23:10
*** logan2 has joined #openstack-meeting-423:10
*** jwagner is now known as jwagner_away23:11
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-423:15
*** baoli has quit IRC23:17
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-423:17
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC23:18
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa23:20
*** dims_ has joined #openstack-meeting-423:22
*** dims has quit IRC23:24
*** baoli has quit IRC23:27
*** baoli has joined #openstack-meeting-423:28
*** gjayavelu has joined #openstack-meeting-423:34
*** daneyon has quit IRC23:38
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-423:39
*** singlethink has quit IRC23:41
*** rbak_ has joined #openstack-meeting-423:44
*** rbak has quit IRC23:46
*** rbak_ has quit IRC23:54
*** baoli has quit IRC23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!