Tuesday, 2015-06-16

*** Sukhdev has quit IRC00:17
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC00:20
*** david-lyle has quit IRC00:24
*** Swami has quit IRC00:30
*** dims has quit IRC00:33
*** padkrish has quit IRC00:36
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-400:36
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-400:37
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC00:40
*** padkrish has quit IRC00:41
*** mwang2_ has quit IRC00:42
*** bharath has quit IRC00:45
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-400:46
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-400:55
*** britthou_ has joined #openstack-meeting-400:58
*** Slower has quit IRC01:00
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-401:01
*** britthouser has quit IRC01:01
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-401:07
*** Slower has joined #openstack-meeting-401:07
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-401:19
*** padkrish has quit IRC01:19
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa01:20
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-401:24
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC01:27
*** KunalGan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-401:31
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC01:32
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC01:42
*** banix has quit IRC01:45
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-401:47
*** dims has quit IRC01:50
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-401:56
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-402:04
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-meeting-402:08
*** GB21 has quit IRC02:09
*** amotoki has quit IRC02:20
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-402:31
*** bradjones has quit IRC02:35
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-402:35
*** IlyaG has quit IRC02:35
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-402:35
*** bradjones has quit IRC02:35
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-402:35
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-402:36
*** amotoki has quit IRC02:39
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-402:39
*** banix has quit IRC02:43
*** padkrish has quit IRC02:56
*** amotoki has quit IRC03:01
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-403:05
*** KunalGan_ has quit IRC03:07
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-403:10
*** KunalGan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-403:12
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC03:15
*** tobe has quit IRC03:20
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-403:23
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-403:24
*** banix has quit IRC03:31
*** mfisch has quit IRC03:32
*** sdake has quit IRC03:32
*** mfisch has joined #openstack-meeting-403:36
*** mfisch is now known as Guest6866003:36
*** asselin has joined #openstack-meeting-403:38
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-403:42
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-403:44
*** bharath has joined #openstack-meeting-403:45
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-403:46
*** bharath has quit IRC03:50
*** dims has quit IRC03:51
*** padkrish has quit IRC03:52
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-403:53
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC03:54
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-403:55
*** padkrish has quit IRC03:57
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC03:59
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-404:09
*** padkrish has quit IRC04:09
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-404:10
*** radek_ has joined #openstack-meeting-404:14
*** radek__ has quit IRC04:15
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-404:17
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-404:26
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-404:31
*** belmoreira has quit IRC04:31
*** irenab has quit IRC04:32
*** ildikov has quit IRC04:33
*** tobe has quit IRC04:47
*** padkrish has quit IRC04:49
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-404:50
*** mitchjameson has quit IRC04:53
*** amotoki has quit IRC04:59
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-405:07
*** asselin has quit IRC05:13
*** asselin has joined #openstack-meeting-405:15
*** nkrinner has joined #openstack-meeting-405:18
*** KunalGan_ has quit IRC05:20
*** padkrish has quit IRC05:20
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-405:21
*** irenab has joined #openstack-meeting-405:21
*** jpekkari has joined #openstack-meeting-405:22
*** lazy_prince has joined #openstack-meeting-405:24
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-405:28
*** aswadr has joined #openstack-meeting-405:35
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting-405:35
*** tobe has quit IRC05:37
*** armax has quit IRC05:38
*** asrangne has joined #openstack-meeting-405:50
*** aswadr has quit IRC05:51
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-405:55
*** asselin has quit IRC06:02
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-406:02
*** asrangne has quit IRC06:04
*** numan has joined #openstack-meeting-406:07
*** KunalGan_ has joined #openstack-meeting-406:10
*** numan has quit IRC06:12
*** spandhe has quit IRC06:12
*** sdake has quit IRC06:14
*** numan has joined #openstack-meeting-406:19
*** KunalGan_ has quit IRC06:24
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC06:31
*** ramanjaneya has joined #openstack-meeting-406:31
*** belmoreira has quit IRC06:36
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-406:44
*** salv-orl_ has joined #openstack-meeting-406:46
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC06:48
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC06:49
*** simon-AS559 has joined #openstack-meeting-406:53
*** numan has quit IRC06:55
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-407:01
*** paramite has joined #openstack-meeting-407:10
*** akwasnie_ has joined #openstack-meeting-407:15
*** bradjones has quit IRC07:30
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-407:36
*** bradjones has quit IRC07:36
*** bradjones has joined #openstack-meeting-407:36
*** bharath_ has joined #openstack-meeting-407:36
*** tobe has quit IRC07:40
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-407:47
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-407:52
*** belmoreira has joined #openstack-meeting-407:54
*** tobe has quit IRC08:06
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-408:16
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-408:18
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC08:25
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:29
*** bharath_ has quit IRC08:49
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-408:52
*** yamahata has quit IRC08:57
*** GB21 has quit IRC09:10
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-409:18
*** dims has quit IRC09:23
*** paramite is now known as paramite|afk09:34
*** jdziukx has quit IRC09:39
*** tobe has quit IRC09:46
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-409:56
*** jdziukx has joined #openstack-meeting-409:59
*** asselin_ has quit IRC10:22
*** simon-AS5591 has joined #openstack-meeting-410:29
*** simon-AS559 has quit IRC10:32
*** paramite|afk is now known as paramite10:37
*** tobe has quit IRC10:50
*** tobe has joined #openstack-meeting-410:51
*** tobe has quit IRC10:56
*** salv-orl_ has quit IRC11:09
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-411:21
*** dims has quit IRC11:25
*** dims has joined #openstack-meeting-411:29
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-411:32
*** simon-AS559 has joined #openstack-meeting-411:43
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC11:43
*** simon-AS5591 has quit IRC11:45
*** paramite is now known as paramite|afk11:49
*** bharath_ has joined #openstack-meeting-411:50
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting-411:50
*** marcusvrn1 has joined #openstack-meeting-411:51
*** bharath_ has quit IRC11:55
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC11:55
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-411:56
*** banix has quit IRC11:58
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-412:03
*** paramite|afk is now known as paramite12:04
*** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-meeting-412:15
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-412:16
*** bknudson has quit IRC12:22
*** VW has quit IRC12:41
*** bknudson has joined #openstack-meeting-412:50
*** rods has joined #openstack-meeting-412:54
*** jckasper has quit IRC12:55
*** amotoki has quit IRC12:56
*** agalkin has joined #openstack-meeting-412:59
*** jpekkari has quit IRC13:00
*** klamath has joined #openstack-meeting-413:01
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-413:01
*** klamath has joined #openstack-meeting-413:01
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-413:05
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-413:11
*** GB21 has quit IRC13:14
*** VW has quit IRC13:23
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-413:25
*** agalkin has quit IRC13:28
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-413:32
*** sdake has quit IRC13:32
*** VW has quit IRC13:33
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-413:33
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-413:34
*** Bjoern__ has joined #openstack-meeting-413:41
*** banix has quit IRC13:46
*** armax has joined #openstack-meeting-413:53
*** lazy_prince has quit IRC13:54
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-413:56
*** jckasper has joined #openstack-meeting-413:56
*** numan has joined #openstack-meeting-413:57
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-413:59
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-414:00
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-414:03
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-414:05
*** Bjoern__ is now known as BjoernT14:08
*** qwebirc35267 has joined #openstack-meeting-414:12
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner14:14
*** jwagner is now known as jwagner_ceph_tra14:15
*** sigmavirus24_awa is now known as sigmavirus2414:16
*** nkrinner has quit IRC14:19
*** irenab has quit IRC14:26
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-414:27
*** Guest68660 is now known as mfisch14:30
*** mfisch is now known as Guest8122614:31
*** RichardRaseley has joined #openstack-meeting-414:34
*** Guest81226 has quit IRC14:38
*** aswadr has joined #openstack-meeting-414:39
*** aswadr has quit IRC14:40
*** aswadr has joined #openstack-meeting-414:40
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC14:42
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-414:46
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-414:46
*** padkrish has quit IRC14:47
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-414:47
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-414:47
*** galstrom_zzz is now known as galstrom14:50
*** mdorman has joined #openstack-meeting-414:51
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-414:53
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-414:53
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-meeting-414:55
*** mfisch has joined #openstack-meeting-414:56
*** mfisch is now known as Guest2567614:56
*** carl_baldwin has joined #openstack-meeting-414:59
*** xarses has joined #openstack-meeting-414:59
*** blahRus has joined #openstack-meeting-415:00
EmilienMhello here15:00
RichardRaseleyGood morning.15:00
EmilienM#startmeeting puppet-openstack15:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun 16 15:00:39 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is EmilienM. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'puppet_openstack'15:00
mdormanhola15:00
EmilienMwho is here today?15:00
Guest25676hey15:01
Guest25676dang it15:01
*** vinsh has joined #openstack-meeting-415:01
RichardRaseleyI am here for the first 10 mins or so.15:01
xarseshi15:01
crinkleo/15:01
*** Guest25676 is now known as mfisch15:01
*** mfisch has quit IRC15:02
*** mfisch has joined #openstack-meeting-415:02
sbadiahi15:02
*** VW has quit IRC15:02
Hunnero/15:02
EmilienM#topic review past actions15:02
*** openstack changes topic to "review past actions (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:02
EmilienMspredzy,claryton create a POC and send an email to the ML about parameter default policy15:03
*** chem has joined #openstack-meeting-415:03
chemhi15:03
EmilienMI have no clue about this one ^15:03
EmilienMbut I guess it's WIP15:03
claytonSame status as last week :(15:03
EmilienMcody to finish neutron patch -> still WIP, need reviews though15:03
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-415:03
EmilienM#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184646/15:04
RichardRaseleyI don't see _ody here this morning.15:04
*** VW has quit IRC15:04
EmilienM#link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/189873/15:04
EmilienMneed review *and* rebase15:04
EmilienMsbadia to patch swift module for puppet4 - MERGED15:04
sbadia\o/15:04
EmilienMcrinkle to close this ML thread and explain our decision15:04
EmilienMcrinkle: what was it about again?15:05
EmilienM#link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/puppet-openstack-weekly-meeting-2015061615:05
*** belmoreira has quit IRC15:05
crinklei think that was about the change abandonment policy15:05
EmilienMah yeah, nice15:05
*** paramite has quit IRC15:05
EmilienMso it's DONE15:05
mgagneo/15:05
EmilienMspredzy Send a patch as an implementation reference (dbsync exec) -> I think it's not done yet15:05
*** fallenpegasus has joined #openstack-meeting-415:06
EmilienMsame for the thread15:06
EmilienMspredzy|afk is out anyway15:06
EmilienM#topic CI status15:06
*** openstack changes topic to "CI status (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:06
EmilienMbeaker is almost voting: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190778 \o/15:06
EmilienMthe only thing I noticed until now is an issue with puppet-sahara15:07
EmilienMon trusty15:07
EmilienMI'll figure that out today or so15:07
EmilienMpuppet4: we're still waiting for cody's patches to land and we can enable voting for puppet4 jobs15:07
EmilienManything else about CI ?15:08
EmilienMok seems no15:08
crinklei'm working on a poc to use zuul-cloner so we can test dependent patches, hopefully have something today15:08
crinklein beaker15:08
EmilienMoh, that is awesome15:08
EmilienMcrinkle: any blocker on it now?15:09
crinkleEmilienM: nope15:09
EmilienMcrinkle: ok, thx15:09
EmilienM#topic migration status15:09
*** openstack changes topic to "migration status (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:09
EmilienMcrinkle: o/15:10
*** numan has quit IRC15:10
EmilienMthanks for having worked on that with infra team15:10
*** barthalion has joined #openstack-meeting-415:10
EmilienMI had to *exceptionally* +2 +A some patches to have CI back to work15:10
EmilienMit seems Havana and Grizzly CIs are broken for some modules, we figured that during the migration15:11
sbadiabecause of lack of review ?15:11
mgagneyha, no need to wait for 2x +2 to +A such changes15:11
sbadiaah yes a question related15:11
sbadiaabout patchs for .gitreview on havana branchs (what we do?)15:11
EmilienMsbadia: yes, crinkle sent patches on Friday night but nobody reviewed them yesterday15:11
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-415:12
EmilienMsbadia: so I landed them myself15:12
sbadiaspec tests are failing on theses branchs15:12
EmilienMyeah... Not sure we should spend time on it15:12
sbadiaEmilienM: ok, sorry and thanks!15:12
sbadiaok ok15:12
mfischwhy do we care if Grizzly is broken?15:12
*** yamahata has quit IRC15:12
claytonI don't see much point in fixing them personally15:12
EmilienMmfisch: well, if people are still using it and want to backport something, they can figure how to fix the CI15:12
mfisch+115:13
mgagnemfisch: I think we did not officially stopped the support for it yet15:13
xarseswell, they likely won't figure it out15:13
EmilienMbut I don't think anyone here cares about havana/grizzly, and only for some modules.15:13
xarsesso we will likely have to help15:13
EmilienMmgagne: maybe a good action to take15:13
claytonwfm.  I don't think those releases (or icehouse) are still supported by any vendors15:13
EmilienM#action Emilien to run a thread on ML about some stable branches deprecations (grizzly+havana)15:13
xarseswe are still supporting icehouse15:13
*** saneax has joined #openstack-meeting-415:13
xarsesbut that's our own issue15:14
mgagneyea, we have still to move from icehouse here15:14
*** wojdev has quit IRC15:14
EmilienMcrinkle: anything else to notice about migration? Do we have any blockers?15:14
crinkleEmilienM: i think we're all set15:14
EmilienMcool, and thanks again for that.15:15
RichardRaseleyUnfortunately, I have to run. I will review the remainder of the meeting when I get back to my computer (more specifically on any actions from Zaqar or proposed ML change).15:15
*** _ody has joined #openstack-meeting-415:15
EmilienM#topic Zaqar module15:15
*** openstack changes topic to "Zaqar module (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:15
_odyo/15:15
EmilienMRichardRaseley: o/15:15
*** RichardRaseley is now known as RichardRaseley|A15:15
EmilienMok, we will postpone this one, RichardRaseley|A had to go15:16
EmilienM#action postpone this topic when RichardRaseley is around15:16
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-415:16
EmilienMwe have a topic but I don't know who wrote this15:16
EmilienM#topic How to deal with distributions merging multiple services in one package (RHEL)15:16
*** openstack changes topic to "How to deal with distributions merging multiple services in one package (RHEL) (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:16
EmilienMmgagne: maybe ?15:17
claytonEmilienM: likely have similar issues with virtualenvs or docker support15:17
mgagnewe just have to figure out once and for all a good pattern15:17
mgagnewhich might require refactoring, I just waited to raise the point15:17
mdormanagreed.  what’s there now is kinda a mess15:18
mdormanmgagne:   the only negative reaction i have to the $nova_title approach is how do users external to the module know what the title of the package will be.  but that speaks to having a consistent pattern across all15:18
EmilienMmgagne: maybe we could define services managed by a package in an array?15:18
claytonwhy not tag the resource and users that want to depend on it can use a collector?15:19
claytonthe collector will fail if the package isn't included in the manifest15:19
mgagneI don't have any clear solution in my head, I'm open to all suggestions as long as it helps fixing the resource title issue15:19
EmilienMmgagne: do you have a LP # ?15:19
mgagneEmilienM: no15:19
mdormanclayton:  so just use some tag, rather than changing the title?15:20
EmilienMit would be great to submit a but explaining the issue and with some examples.15:20
EmilienMs/but/bug/15:20
*** asrangne has joined #openstack-meeting-415:20
mgagneI don't think tag were meant for that purpose15:20
EmilienMclayton: this sounds tricky15:20
mgagnewe are suggesting not following conventions already in place15:21
mdormanEmilienM:   here’s the bug from yesterday that explains this problem for one specific case (nova): https://bugs.launchpad.net/puppet-nova/+bug/146543315:21
openstackLaunchpad bug 1465433 in puppet-nova "generic_service declares package incorrectly" [Undecided,In progress] - Assigned to Mike Dorman (mdorman-m)15:21
mgagneit's not just about "getting the job done", it's about making it the most "puppet" way15:21
*** banix has quit IRC15:21
mgagnewhich usually do not involve tag and such15:21
claytonnot sure how puppet tags are non puppet-like.15:22
mgagneit's not something I see in other modules15:22
*** padkrish has quit IRC15:22
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-415:22
*** aswadr has quit IRC15:23
_odygenerally tags frighten me because everything in a catalog is implicitly tagged with something.  If you pick that somethting as your explicit tag, you get all the implicit ones too.15:23
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-415:23
mgagne^15:23
EmilienMI think tags are not the right option here15:23
*** dannywilson has joined #openstack-meeting-415:24
mgagneI don't think we will come up with a solution in this meeting, just wanted to raise my concerns15:24
mdormani am not really up to speed with tags, so don’t have a strong opinion.  but i like the idea of a collector15:24
*** jwagner_ceph_tra is now known as jwagner_away15:24
EmilienMit seems like mdorman and mgagne have a great consensus on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/19200915:24
mdormanmgagne / EmilienM   how about i iterate some more on https://review.openstack.org/192009 and we can go from there, discuss more next week?15:24
mgagnecollector tends to fail silently if you make a typo too15:24
EmilienMmdorman: +115:25
mdormantrue15:25
*** saneax has quit IRC15:25
mdorman#action mdorman to work more on https://review.openstack.org/192009, discuss more next meeting.15:25
EmilienMperfect15:25
EmilienMthe agenda is done for today15:26
EmilienM#topic open discussion15:26
*** openstack changes topic to "open discussion (Meeting topic: puppet-openstack)"15:26
*** puranamr has quit IRC15:26
EmilienMyou can rise your patches/bugs that need specific attention15:26
mgagneI see reviews are on going for the keystone auto refactor. I'm happy about it15:26
EmilienMI made a list for patches we need to land before a kilo release15:27
mgagneand I also see people are ok with puppet openstack usage questions to go on openstack-operators so I'm happy to hear it too15:27
*** ajmiller has quit IRC15:27
crinklehttps://review.openstack.org/191326 and https://review.openstack.org/191328 still needed to fix ci after the project renames15:27
*** ajmiller has joined #openstack-meeting-415:27
_odyEmilienM: Where is this list?15:27
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner15:28
EmilienM_ody: a sec15:28
sbadiacrinkle: done15:29
sbadiathx!15:29
crinklesbadia: ty15:29
EmilienM#link http://paste.openstack.org/show/295543/15:29
*** asrangne__ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:29
EmilienMplease review that ^ for kilo15:29
EmilienMalso for Juno, I have some backports15:30
EmilienMcrinkle: did you have all your backports merged/reviewed?15:30
crinkleEmilienM: look like it15:30
EmilienMI'm still miising 215:31
EmilienMhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/190634/15:31
EmilienMand https://review.openstack.org/#/c/190464/15:31
*** asrangne has quit IRC15:31
_odycrinkle: the beaker failure on trusty for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191328/ looks almost legit.15:31
*** santosh_ has joined #openstack-meeting-415:31
EmilienMmgagne: are your patches on Introduce public_url, internal_url and admin_url a requirement for a kilo release?15:32
crinkle_ody: hrm, thanks15:32
EmilienM_ody: you'll need to rebase https://review.openstack.org/#/c/184646/15:33
crinkle_ody: oh emilien commented on it15:33
EmilienMdoes anyone wanted to raise another topic/patch/bug here? otherwise I can close the meeting in 1 minute15:33
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-415:33
sbadia_ody: I've posted an inline question for 18464615:33
sbadiaEmilienM: seems ok for me :)15:34
EmilienMok. Thanks everyone and have a great day/evening!15:34
crinkleo/15:34
EmilienM#endmeeting15:34
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"15:34
mdormanlater, thanks EmilienM15:34
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun 16 15:34:46 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:34
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-06-16-15.00.html15:34
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-06-16-15.00.txt15:34
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/puppet_openstack/2015/puppet_openstack.2015-06-16-15.00.log.html15:34
sbadiathanks !15:35
*** mdorman has left #openstack-meeting-415:35
*** barthalion has left #openstack-meeting-415:35
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC15:35
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-415:35
*** xarses has left #openstack-meeting-415:35
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-415:36
*** singlethink has quit IRC15:36
*** KunalGandhi has quit IRC15:40
*** krtaylor has quit IRC15:40
santosh_Ping15:45
*** richm has joined #openstack-meeting-415:47
*** puranamr has quit IRC15:50
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-415:51
*** gsagie has joined #openstack-meeting-415:51
*** vinsh has quit IRC15:52
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-415:54
*** gsagie has left #openstack-meeting-415:56
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC15:56
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-415:59
*** pc_m has joined #openstack-meeting-416:00
*** VW has quit IRC16:00
*** pc_m has left #openstack-meeting-416:00
*** svinota has joined #openstack-meeting-416:03
*** RichardRaseley|A is now known as RichardRaseley16:04
*** asrangne__ has quit IRC16:08
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-416:11
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-416:11
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-416:11
*** ildikov has quit IRC16:11
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-416:11
*** daneyon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:14
*** daneyon has quit IRC16:17
*** padkrish has quit IRC16:20
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC16:25
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-416:25
*** rods1 has joined #openstack-meeting-416:25
*** rods has quit IRC16:28
*** amotoki has quit IRC16:28
*** singleth_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:30
*** banix has quit IRC16:31
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-416:32
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting-416:33
*** singlethink has quit IRC16:33
*** wojdev has quit IRC16:35
*** tsbot_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:36
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-416:36
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-416:36
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-416:39
*** simon-AS559 has quit IRC16:39
*** banix_ has joined #openstack-meeting-416:40
*** banix has quit IRC16:40
*** banix_ is now known as banix16:40
*** akwasnie_ has quit IRC16:41
*** mwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-416:46
*** tidwellr has joined #openstack-meeting-416:46
*** Swami has joined #openstack-meeting-416:47
*** banix has quit IRC16:47
*** padkrish has quit IRC16:49
*** puranamr has quit IRC16:52
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-416:53
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-416:55
*** riwinters has joined #openstack-meeting-416:56
*** RichardRaseley has quit IRC16:56
*** wojdev has quit IRC16:58
*** asselin has joined #openstack-meeting-416:58
*** asselin has quit IRC16:59
*** ijw has joined #openstack-meeting-416:59
ijwDouble meetings.  What can it mean?16:59
ildikovijw: double meetings?16:59
*** sarob has quit IRC17:00
*** puranamr has quit IRC17:00
*** ChrisPriceAB has joined #openstack-meeting-417:00
svinotahello all. Hej, Chris17:00
ildikov#startmeeting VLAN-aware VMs BP discussion17:00
openstackMeeting started Tue Jun 16 17:00:45 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is ildikov. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.17:00
openstackUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.17:00
ChrisPriceABHi guys17:00
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: VLAN-aware VMs BP discussion)"17:00
*** pc_m has joined #openstack-meeting-417:00
openstackThe meeting name has been set to 'vlan_aware_vms_bp_discussion'17:00
ildikovHi.17:00
ijwildikov: I have a phone meeting at the same time, so I'll be distracted, but I'm here17:01
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-417:01
ildikovWho's around for the VLAN-aware VMs discussion?17:01
*** tholtzen has joined #openstack-meeting-417:01
ildikovijw: a-ha, ok, thanks :)17:01
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-417:02
pcarverildikov: I'm here to listen (or read)17:02
ijwI'm just here to wind ChrisPriceAB up17:02
svinotaildikov, let's wait several minutes, it takes a time usually for people to join17:02
* ChrisPriceAB is feeling wound...17:02
ijwMy work here is done.17:02
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-417:02
ildikovarmax: mestery: ping17:02
ChrisPriceABlel17:02
ildikovijw: ChrisPriceAB: :)17:03
mesteryildikov: hi there!17:03
mesteryijw: you wind everyone up17:03
ijwIt's a talent17:03
mesteryyou could call it that ;)17:03
ChrisPriceABIt's an English thing...17:03
mesteryijw is english? I thought it was all an act!17:04
*** xingchao has quit IRC17:04
* ChrisPriceAB think's he might be a returned convict...17:04
*** yanping has joined #openstack-meeting-417:04
* pc_m lurking17:05
ijwChrisPriceAB: coming from a close relation to a wombat that's horribly racist17:05
* ildikov wonders how many readers are needed for starting a meeting :)17:05
ChrisPriceABbetter start before things turn ugly...17:05
mesteryildikov: We're likely good, I suggest you run it (you can make me and ijw co-chair if you want assistance)17:05
mesteryChrisPriceAB: Wait, ijw is already here?17:06
mesteryLast joke I promise :)17:06
ChrisPriceABheh17:06
ildikovLOL :)17:06
mesteryAnd I likely owe ijw a few more beers at this point too17:06
ildikovlet's start then17:06
ijwmestery: naturally17:06
ildikov#chair mestery17:06
openstackCurrent chairs: ildikov mestery17:06
ildikov#chair ijw17:06
mestery#chair ijw17:06
openstackCurrent chairs: ijw ildikov mestery17:06
openstackCurrent chairs: ijw ildikov mestery17:06
mesterylol17:06
ildikovok, now we can start :)17:07
* ijw feels flushed with power17:07
ildikov#topic (again) Why VLAN transparency does not fit our needs?17:07
*** openstack changes topic to "(again) Why VLAN transparency does not fit our needs? (Meeting topic: VLAN-aware VMs BP discussion)"17:07
* ChrisPriceAB facepalms...17:07
ijwNow, this one needs to go into the BP, but we're all basically agreed17:07
ijwVLAN transparency covers VMs that know they're talking on VLANs to each other17:08
svinotalooks like not all of us, so I would like to be double sure17:08
ijwThis covers VMs where one end isn't talking VLANs and the other one is.17:08
svinotais Armando here, does anyone know?17:08
ijwsvinota: If they're going to be 10 minutes late we have to make do without17:08
mesterysvinota: armax is lurking I think17:08
armaxI am here17:09
*** mitchjameson has joined #openstack-meeting-417:09
ijwmestery: I thought that violated his parole?17:09
mesterylol17:09
mesteryijw: Remind me what we're arguing about here with regards to use cases?17:09
*** praveens has joined #openstack-meeting-417:09
mesteryI need the tl;dr version, and be gentle17:09
svinotaarmax, great — pls leave comments also, if you have some, I need to be sure that I didn't miss anything17:10
ijwmestery: this is where you want to connect a VM to more networks than it has interfaces by combining the networks on a VLAN trunk before it comes into the VM17:10
armaxsvinota: sure17:10
ijwThe VLAN trunk - as this BP is designed - doesn't exist on a network, just within the port, because that gives you better control over the settings for the VLAN subports. but that's a design choice.17:10
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-meeting-417:11
mesteryijw: ack17:11
*** ildikov has quit IRC17:11
ijwOK - I'll take it from the silence that we've covered those two topics, so we should probably talk about the crux of the matter17:12
svinotayep17:12
ijw#topic API17:12
*** openstack changes topic to "API (Meeting topic: VLAN-aware VMs BP discussion)"17:12
*** spandhe has joined #openstack-meeting-417:12
*** simon-AS559 has joined #openstack-meeting-417:13
ijwIf we accept based on above that this is wanted and nothing else does it (which is is) then the problem we have is that the port that attaches to the VM is not quite like a normal port17:13
*** ildikov has joined #openstack-meeting-417:13
svinotaif I do understand correctly, there are different opinions, should it be a new port class, or can we use original Neutron port class17:13
ijwThe subports connect to a network and 'bind' to the port.  The port connecting to the VM doesn't really need to bind to a network.17:13
*** padkrish has quit IRC17:14
*** simon-AS5591 has joined #openstack-meeting-417:14
armaxI personally don’t see this done any other way than a new port class17:14
ijwI think given the parallels the subport just needs a parent port reference in an extension, and is otherwise fairly normal other than the fact that it's not a VM it's bound to (which, while it's unusual, is not out of the scope of what ports do)17:14
pcarverIn Cisco-speak this is basically the difference between "switchport mode access" and "switchport mode trunk", correct?17:14
pcarverCurrently all Neutron ports are "access" ports17:15
ijwpcarver: yup - and in Linux speak the difference between ifconfig eth0 and ifconfig eth0.0 using the port info17:15
* mestery waits for someone to explain this in docker speak17:15
ijwWell, I'd call them trunk ports, but call them either17:15
ijwIn docker speak, networks are scary so go away17:15
mestery+1 to armax17:15
svinotaarmax, new port class for the trunk port or for all of them? Why can not we use the original class, but make it hierarchical?17:16
ijwSo if we were to create a new port class it inherits behaviour from an ur-port, if you will17:16
pcarverarmax: I agree, but in terms of terminology it's unfortunate that the word "port" ends up being a subnet of what it means on "real" switches17:16
armaxsvinota: I thought I had made this point on the spec proposal17:16
ijwIf I define ur-port is something that can be attached to a VM, it does that bit, and a port does to.  What it can't do is attach to a network.  What it additionally does is have subports17:17
*** Garci has joined #openstack-meeting-417:17
ijwpcarver: Freudian17:17
pcarverright, subset not subnet17:17
*** bharath has joined #openstack-meeting-417:17
armaxbut the crux of the matter is that adapting the existing model is incredibily problematic17:17
*** simon-AS559 has quit IRC17:17
armaxfor a number of standpoints17:18
ijwSo, if we were to create a trunkport (which is probably only the first in that category of ports we might want) then (a) what do we call it and (b) how do we implement it in the least scary way?17:18
* ijw hands the mic and the warm git repo to armax17:18
ijw(I've been sitting on it, which is why it's warm, sorry)17:18
armaxthe most prominent would be that the changes required are pretty invasive and might entirely break the mdoel for all the plugins outta there17:19
*** sdake has quit IRC17:19
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:19
*** guest_____ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:19
armaxlet alone the fact that we have so many efforts in-flight that I am not sure how a coordination with them is feasible in such a small amount of time left for Liberty17:19
ijwarmax: given the time in the cycle the 'small amount of time' is all we will ever get to do this sort of thing17:20
ijwarmax: I think if we use binding to attach to a subport then at least the code can live outside of the plugin17:20
armaxyou mean port-binding?17:20
ijwYup17:20
ijwIt would be no different on that side to a router17:20
*** garci_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:21
ijw(Router binding is also a bit broken in that it's limited but still, the model exists)17:21
*** matrohon has quit IRC17:21
armaxmine is suggestion17:21
*** santosh_ has quit IRC17:21
armaxbased on my experience on how to work on the codebase on a daily basis, that’s how I would go on about17:22
armaximplementing this17:22
armaxbinding is a hack17:22
armaxhijacking the existing port model is a hack17:22
armaxsure, they can be used to make this work17:22
armaxbut that doesn’t make them less of a hack17:22
ijwI tend to disagree on that.17:23
armaxthey are still a hack17:23
armaxsurely the hack is one way that could be pursued17:23
armaxbut that guarantees you 0% chances of success of this effort17:23
armaxor very slim anyway17:23
ijwI would agree with a trunk port would be a hack because the thing on longer behaves like a port at all.  I think a subport is a normal port - a tap on a network with addresses17:23
armaxnow I am not saying that going with first class citizen is going to be a bed or roses17:24
ijwBut I'm only working with what we have.  If you have something you consider to be a cleaner approach that would be great17:24
armaxbut at least chances are going to be higher and we’d be miniziming the side effects of breaking plugins and causing all sorts of regressions17:24
ijwarmax: what would you consider to be a first class citizen?17:25
armaxijw: we don’t have to work with what we have17:25
armaxwe can build what we need from scratch17:25
armaxto enable, effectively what is a new use case17:25
ijwWhat would you build?17:25
svinotaarmax, that will mean Nova change as well, won't that?17:25
armaxripping the code apart to make it do what it was not supposed to do isn’t something I would be comfortable to bless17:25
*** Garci has quit IRC17:25
*** simon-AS5591 has quit IRC17:25
armaxsvinota: nova changes will be required more or less nonetheless17:25
ijwarmax: I agree with that but you haven't really expressed what the specific problem is or what your alternative suggestion is, can you go further?17:26
armaxnot sure how further I need to delve into17:27
armaxmy suggestion is that trunk ports should be first class elements of the API17:27
armaxthat will bring the minimal amount of disruption to the existing model and changes to the codebase17:28
ijwarmax: I think we pretty much agree on that point17:28
armaxwhat else do you need? that I do the coding for you? :)17:28
ijwAnd I wasn't arguing that point at all17:28
svinotaijw, armax : I will do coding, I just need you opinion to choose the direction :)17:28
ijwBut that wasn't what I was saying, I was talking about subports and I wanted to be clear what you thought there17:29
armaxsvinota: sure, I expressed my opionion here and on the spec17:29
armaxsvinota: nothing else will make change my mind or recommednation17:29
armaxsvinota: is there anything else that you would need from me?17:29
ijwarmax: subports17:29
svinotaarmax, subports17:29
armaxijw: go on?17:29
ijwThere are two objects here, trunk and subports17:30
ijwsubports behave a lot more like traditional ports than trunk ports do17:30
svinotacan we use original Neutron ports as subports?17:30
ijwDo you feel that they need to be something different?17:30
armaxok17:30
armaxthat depends17:30
mesteryijw: you want to make trunks a new object in the API but have subports melded into the existing ports?17:31
armaxcould a subport be modeled  as 1-1 to relationship with a port17:31
armax?17:31
*** mwang2 has quit IRC17:31
ijwarmax: yes17:31
ijwmestery: Given that subports behave like existing ports in almost every respect apart from needing a couple of extra bits of information I'm wondering if there's any need to have another object there17:31
svinota(I would say so: can we extend existing port model to be used as subports as well w/o disrupting all the model)17:32
armaxis tehre any relationship attribute that needs to be captured?17:32
ijwparent and encap relationships would be needed (and could be extension attrs)17:32
armaxwell there is no need to capture it in the port model itself then17:32
ijw'parent' might not be the right word given trunk ports aren't really ports17:32
armaxif a subport is a port + some stuff17:32
amotokiit depends on how we model subports. if we introduce a new object "trunk port", we can use a neutron port as subport. "trunk port" ojbect can terminate a normal neutron port and encap it into VLAN.17:32
ijwarmax: true enough but it has to go somewhere17:32
armaxit can be modeled as its own entity too17:33
ijwarmax: it can.  The question is the value17:33
armaxthat can have a 1-1 mapping with port17:33
armaxwhat value? If I need to translate an OO conceptual model into a logical schema17:33
armaxthat’s the only sensible way forward17:33
ijwOK, so you're suggesting trunk attachment points (let's not call them ports) and encap descriptors that we pair up with a port.17:33
armaxstrictly speaking you don’t generate a denormalized schema17:34
armaxjust because it ‘saves' you a table17:34
ijwWhen they're paired up with a port, the port is bound and can't be used any other way17:34
armaxijw or is there any other value you’re talking about?17:34
*** riwinters has quit IRC17:34
ijwWell, my point is that ports are made to take extension attrs, so I'm asking the question whether having a separate 1:1 object that holds data is the choice to use here17:35
ijwIt sounds like a nicer arrangement, but I want to hear your opinion17:36
armaxijw: well as a matter of fact extension attrs are implemented as separate tables17:36
*** yamahata has joined #openstack-meeting-417:36
*** guest_____ has quit IRC17:36
armaxand that is also partially done to ensure that the model addition does not interfere with the rest of the code taht doesn’t understand the extension17:37
ijwYup17:37
ijwarmax: so internally the coding effort is similar.17:37
armaxijw: I guess so, yea17:37
ijwarmax, people who want to use this: any particular arguments for or against?17:38
ijwildikov, ChrisPriceAB, pcarver: speak17:38
armaxijw: all I am debating about is oblivious to the User17:38
ChrisPriceABI don't think it makes a huge difference.  We need to get it in in a way that doesn't cause issues moving forward.17:38
armaxthe user nneds not to care about how we implement this17:38
ChrisPriceABAnd at the end fo the day this is where we would follow guidance from the cores.17:39
armaxso long as they have their use case addressed17:39
garci_Seeing it from the point of view of a user, indeed, I don't care how its done as long as I can attach my vms with a vlan tag.17:39
armaxsure the suggestions made here have implications to the API/CLI17:39
ildikovThis is my opinion too, we would like to fit this into the Neutron architecture17:39
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-417:39
ChrisPriceABSo, if I get it all right: we intend to make a new first class "trunk port" object and extend the regular port attributes with relation/encap for association?17:40
ildikovAs far as the feature we implement fulfills the use cases we identified, we're good IMHO17:40
armaxbut they do not lead to any deficiencies of the use case AFAIK17:40
HenryGAs 50% of API/DB lieutenant for Neutron, I recommend new "trunk-interface" and "attachment-point" resources. amotoki is the other 50%. (And armax is the third 50% for this discussion :)17:40
armaxwow we are at 150% agreement?17:40
ChrisPriceAB:D17:40
armaxthat’s impressive17:41
* ildikov feels issues with the power here :)17:41
armaxHenryG: btw I still need to stand up and drink my gallon of coffee, can you believe that?17:41
ChrisPriceABlet's not get Ian started again...17:41
ijwOK, well one set of you said 'extention attr' and HenryG said 'attachment point', so which have we agreed upon?17:41
armaxattachement point is an extension attr is it not?17:42
ijwarmax: I could tell you what else it could be but I'm not going to start you off again17:42
ijwSo, agreed:17:42
ijw- we create a trunk port (don't call it 'port' or 'interface' please, but something like that)17:43
*** praveens has quit IRC17:43
armaxijw: not sure what the potential source of discord might be, but once we start seeing some coding then I am sure it’ll be immediately clear what is what17:43
ijw- we add extension attributes to a normal port to indicate it's attached to a trunk port17:43
ijw- ports with these attrs are created bound and can't be used by a VM17:44
ijwAnd not stated but I think assumed, this would for preference *not* like in the OVS L2 agent or driver, if we can manage it17:44
ijwDOes that summarise accurately?17:44
amotokii have another view. we create attachment-point on "trunk port" to add some port to "trunk port".17:45
* ChrisPriceAB nods17:45
ijwamotoki: yup, that comes down to the 'separate attachment port object' approach because it's 0+ element list17:45
ijwamotoki, armax: I can see that either will do the job; I just want to pick the best one17:46
ijw(ideally without writing the code for one and changing our mind to the other when it's finished)17:46
ildikovijw: +117:46
pcarverijw: +117:47
ijwamotoki, armax: you're in the ring.  No biting, gouging or punching below the belt17:47
ijwAnd the ref is open to bribery17:47
-amotoki- thinking17:47
HenryGamotoki: how would you "attach" multiple ports to a trunk object?17:47
*** puranamr has quit IRC17:47
amotokifrom API perspective, If we go a way of 'separeate attachmetn point", one thing considered is how we represent a "port" connected to VM side.17:47
pcarverI don't think it matters too much what it's called, but armax makes sense.17:47
ijwamotoki: I'd just bind it17:48
amotokiHenryG: what in my mind is similar to L2 gateway modeling.17:48
ijwBut it would be hard to spot what it was actually attached to17:48
ijwThe attachment point then behaves like a VIF in many ways17:48
amotokiwe can create connections on L2GW. Similarly we can create attachment point on "trunk port".17:49
amotokiperhaps i am in the same page as ijw.17:49
*** praveens has joined #openstack-meeting-417:49
ijwamotoki: I think we're talking about the same thing.  Again, I'm not expressing a preference here, I can see both solutions and I would personally take either17:50
amotokiit is all API perspective. I am not sure we address armax's concern on implementatoin complexity.17:50
armaxI personally exausted my ability to visualize mentally what we’re saying…too many level of indirections17:50
armaxI’d like to see some code if at all possible17:51
ijwarmax: wuss17:51
armaxijw: I am17:51
armaxbite me17:51
armax:)17:51
ijwarmax: just trying to make sure we don't pack someone off who will definitely be writing something you -217:51
HenryGarmax needs more coffee17:51
ijwI mean, if you capriciously -2 it that's fine17:51
armaxijw: when did that happen?17:51
svinotaarmax, I need the BP anyway before I can deliver any code — otherwise we will not be in the timeframe17:52
ijwarmax: not saying it did, but if we don't understand your concerns then it will happen here17:52
ildikovI would like to get the blueprint into an acceptable shape first17:52
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-417:52
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-417:52
garci_+117:53
ijwSo then, it seems like it's on the spec writers to update the spec at this point.  armax can check he likes that17:53
* ChrisPriceAB feels we have enough to be concise on the BP now.17:53
armaxijw: I am sure I agree, we shouldn’t be afraid of taking the wrong turn…it takes much longer to talk than whip up some code and discuss what’s going on17:53
ijw(which it sounds like he will)17:53
amotokias far as I looked the spec, even though we go either way of API modeling the implementation will be similar.17:53
ijwarmax: talk faster17:53
svinotaijw, I will update, but I need you guys to have some common vision :)17:53
armaxall I care is that we minimize the dependencies on the existing model17:53
ijwSo we need a trunk port primary object thing that Nova can bind that isn't a conventional port17:54
armaxand that we don’t rip it out as a result of this effrt17:54
ijw(which implies a new table)17:54
armaxijw: it sounds to me that I have set my bar pretty low17:54
ijwAnd we need either port attributes in an extension or a separate endpoint object17:54
ijwIf we have something along those lines I think it will get a good reception.17:54
ijwWould anyone disagree?17:55
*** s3wong has joined #openstack-meeting-417:55
ijwExcept armax, he doesn't count17:55
svinotaijw, I will update the BP tomorrow morning17:55
armaxijw: now you’re talking sense17:55
* armax doesn’t exist17:55
ijwarmax: I talk so much it has to happen occasionally17:55
*** VW has quit IRC17:55
ijwOK, so we now have 5 minutes to insult ChrisPriceAB in the meeting record17:55
*** mwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-417:56
ijw#topic Insults17:56
*** openstack changes topic to "Insults (Meeting topic: VLAN-aware VMs BP discussion)"17:56
svinotafinally :) yeah17:56
ChrisPriceABhehe, give it your best shot17:56
*** puranamr has quit IRC17:56
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-417:56
* ChrisPriceAB is not competent enough to understand a good insult...17:56
*** garci_ has quit IRC17:56
* armax is okay being insulted17:56
ijwI worry about insulting people who have evolved to be poisonous17:56
*** tidwellr has left #openstack-meeting-417:56
* armax is like a kitty17:57
ildikovit's too late for me to insult anyone17:57
*** daneyon_ has joined #openstack-meeting-417:57
ijwildikov: I'm disappointed17:57
ildikovarmax: you mean Hello Kitty? :)17:57
ijwildikov: Oh no, that counts17:57
armaxsure why not17:57
ChrisPriceABDamn, next time give us some warning ijw.  This didn't turn out very well...17:57
*** pc_m has left #openstack-meeting-417:58
ijwSee, we're even driving people away now17:58
HenryGijw managed to waste an hour of everyone's time17:58
HenryG(is that an insult?)17:58
ijwHenryG: I'm sorry17:58
ijwI can usually manage longer than an hour17:58
ildikovarmax: sorry :)17:58
ChrisPriceABhehe, hey Ian can you link the picyure of the unicorn Ildikov drew?17:58
ildikovok, thanks everyone, I think we managed to choose a direction, which is good17:59
armaxall right guys, feel free to poke me anything17:59
armaxanytime17:59
ijwhttps://twitter.com/lan_wan_ian/status/60107306078392320117:59
ChrisPriceABack, thanks all17:59
svinotagreat. Anyways, armax , ijw , mestery , HenryG , amotoki , ChrisPriceAB , ildikov  — thanks all.17:59
* armax corrects himself17:59
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-417:59
ChrisPriceABwrong ijw!!!!17:59
ijwOh, not wrong17:59
ildikovsvinota will update the blueprint asap, let's get it approved in time and also let's start on do some coding to make armax happy too :)17:59
armaxildikov: I am hardly pleased, but thanks for trying ;)18:00
amotokithanks, ijw and all.18:00
*** puranamr has quit IRC18:00
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:00
ijw#endmeeting18:00
*** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Meetings || https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings"18:00
openstackMeeting ended Tue Jun 16 18:00:16 2015 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)18:00
openstackMinutes:        http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/vlan_aware_vms_bp_discussion/2015/vlan_aware_vms_bp_discussion.2015-06-16-17.00.html18:00
openstackMinutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/vlan_aware_vms_bp_discussion/2015/vlan_aware_vms_bp_discussion.2015-06-16-17.00.txt18:00
mesterythanks!18:00
openstackLog:            http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/vlan_aware_vms_bp_discussion/2015/vlan_aware_vms_bp_discussion.2015-06-16-17.00.log.html18:00
armaxbye18:00
*** yanping has left #openstack-meeting-418:00
*** daneyon has quit IRC18:00
*** VW has quit IRC18:00
svinotabye18:00
ildikovarmax: np :)18:00
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-418:00
ildikovarmax: bye18:00
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-418:01
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-418:01
*** tholtzen has quit IRC18:01
*** matrohon has joined #openstack-meeting-418:01
*** puranamr has quit IRC18:03
*** praveens has quit IRC18:03
*** praveens has joined #openstack-meeting-418:04
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:05
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-418:05
*** padkrish has quit IRC18:06
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-418:07
*** simon-AS559 has joined #openstack-meeting-418:08
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-418:09
*** sarob has quit IRC18:12
*** simon-AS559 has quit IRC18:12
*** svinota has quit IRC18:12
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-418:16
*** simon-AS559 has joined #openstack-meeting-418:16
*** BjoernT has left #openstack-meeting-418:18
*** ijw has quit IRC18:19
*** wojdev has quit IRC18:20
*** sarob has quit IRC18:22
*** mickeys has quit IRC18:23
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-418:27
*** marcusvrn has joined #openstack-meeting-418:28
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-418:29
*** marcusvrn1 has quit IRC18:30
*** banix_ has joined #openstack-meeting-418:30
*** praveens has quit IRC18:32
*** simon-AS5591 has joined #openstack-meeting-418:32
*** banix has quit IRC18:32
*** banix_ is now known as banix18:32
*** puranamr has quit IRC18:34
*** simon-AS5592 has joined #openstack-meeting-418:34
*** Sukhdev has joined #openstack-meeting-418:34
*** simon-AS559 has quit IRC18:34
*** jwagner is now known as jwagner_away18:36
*** simon-AS5591 has quit IRC18:37
*** daneyon has joined #openstack-meeting-418:42
*** wojdev has joined #openstack-meeting-418:44
*** GB21 has quit IRC18:45
*** daneyon_ has quit IRC18:45
*** amotoki has quit IRC18:49
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-418:49
*** spredzy|afk is now known as spredzy18:50
*** wojdev has quit IRC19:03
*** yamahata has quit IRC19:06
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-419:09
*** sdake_ is now known as sdake19:13
*** sdake has quit IRC19:15
*** sdake has joined #openstack-meeting-419:15
*** Rockyg has joined #openstack-meeting-419:16
*** puranamr has quit IRC19:33
*** GeetikaBatra__ has joined #openstack-meeting-419:42
*** GB21 has quit IRC19:44
*** krtaylor has quit IRC19:50
*** richm has left #openstack-meeting-419:54
*** GB21 has joined #openstack-meeting-419:55
*** jwagner_away is now known as jwagner19:57
*** Slower has left #openstack-meeting-419:58
*** GeetikaBatra__ has quit IRC19:58
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-420:02
*** padkrish has quit IRC20:08
*** mwang2 has quit IRC20:10
*** mickeys has joined #openstack-meeting-420:14
*** krtaylor has quit IRC20:14
*** sdake_ has joined #openstack-meeting-420:16
*** marcusvrn has quit IRC20:16
*** sdake has quit IRC20:20
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-420:25
*** chem has left #openstack-meeting-420:25
*** krtaylor has joined #openstack-meeting-420:27
*** ajmiller_ has joined #openstack-meeting-420:27
*** radek_ has quit IRC20:30
*** ajmiller has quit IRC20:31
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-420:34
*** Sukhdev has quit IRC20:34
*** padkrish has quit IRC20:34
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-420:36
*** svinota has joined #openstack-meeting-420:36
*** mwang2 has joined #openstack-meeting-420:37
*** banix has quit IRC20:38
*** puranamr has quit IRC20:38
*** GB21 has quit IRC20:42
*** VW has quit IRC20:47
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-420:47
*** simon-AS5592 has quit IRC20:48
*** padkrish has quit IRC20:58
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-420:59
*** padkrish_ has joined #openstack-meeting-420:59
*** padkrish has quit IRC20:59
*** banix has joined #openstack-meeting-421:01
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-421:01
*** KunalGandhi has joined #openstack-meeting-421:02
*** pshige has joined #openstack-meeting-421:03
*** VW has quit IRC21:21
*** sarob has joined #openstack-meeting-421:24
*** singlethink has joined #openstack-meeting-421:24
*** puranamr has quit IRC21:26
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-421:27
*** singleth_ has quit IRC21:28
*** singlethink has quit IRC21:29
*** fallenpegasus has quit IRC21:32
*** puranamr has quit IRC21:34
*** VW has joined #openstack-meeting-421:46
*** AlanClark has quit IRC21:52
*** sdake_ is now known as sdake22:02
*** klamath has quit IRC22:06
*** ivar-laz_ has joined #openstack-meeting-422:06
*** ivar-lazzaro has quit IRC22:10
*** bknudson has quit IRC22:13
*** jckasper has quit IRC22:16
*** bobmel has quit IRC22:21
*** bobmel has joined #openstack-meeting-422:21
*** ajmiller_ is now known as ajmiller22:30
*** banix has quit IRC22:32
*** galstrom is now known as galstrom_zzz22:34
*** armax has quit IRC22:37
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-422:38
*** padkrish_ has quit IRC22:41
*** padkrish has joined #openstack-meeting-422:41
*** padkrish_ has joined #openstack-meeting-422:44
*** padkrish has quit IRC22:45
*** puranamr has quit IRC22:46
*** bharath has quit IRC22:49
*** Swami has quit IRC22:50
*** ivar-laz_ has quit IRC22:58
*** ivar-lazzaro has joined #openstack-meeting-422:58
*** VW has quit IRC22:59
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-422:59
*** saneax has joined #openstack-meeting-423:00
*** daneyon has left #openstack-meeting-423:01
*** puranamr has quit IRC23:02
*** carl_baldwin has quit IRC23:05
*** mitchjameson has quit IRC23:09
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-423:09
*** matrohon has quit IRC23:09
*** puranamr has quit IRC23:11
*** mitchjameson has joined #openstack-meeting-423:13
*** mwang2 has quit IRC23:24
*** Rockyg has quit IRC23:26
*** blahRus has quit IRC23:26
*** IlyaG has quit IRC23:27
*** _ody has quit IRC23:27
*** IlyaG has joined #openstack-meeting-423:27
*** _ody has joined #openstack-meeting-423:33
*** svinota has quit IRC23:38
*** sigmavirus24 is now known as sigmavirus24_awa23:42
*** mitchjameson has quit IRC23:45
*** mitchjameson has joined #openstack-meeting-423:51
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-423:52
*** ajmiller has quit IRC23:53
*** puranamr has quit IRC23:56
*** puranamr has joined #openstack-meeting-423:56
*** xingchao has joined #openstack-meeting-423:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!