03:00:22 #startmeeting zun 03:00:23 Meeting started Tue Nov 27 03:00:22 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Jw-91. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 03:00:24 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 03:00:26 The meeting name has been set to 'zun' 03:00:30 o/ 03:00:52 #topic Roll Call 03:01:05 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zun#Agenda_for_2018-11-27_0300_UTC 03:01:24 #topic Blueprints 03:01:39 1.Add an installation guide for CentOS 03:01:55 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zun/+spec/installation-guide-for-centos 03:02:19 i saw there is a patch proposed for that 03:02:24 Eduardo Gonzalez has submitted patch 03:02:24 which is good 03:02:33 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619772/ 03:02:33 yes 03:02:48 i saw you already gave a +2 03:02:57 i will follow it up soon 03:03:14 ok :) 03:03:25 2. Support pinning container to specific CPU cores 03:03:32 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zun/+spec/cpuset-container 03:03:42 Zhai Mengdong has submitted patch, #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617928/ 03:03:56 the code looks good 03:04:08 yes, it is awesome 03:04:15 but tempest do not pass.... 03:04:24 i see 03:04:31 no worry, i will take care of it 03:04:50 cool 03:05:15 I will download and test the code 03:05:25 thanks 03:05:44 After my environment is set up。。。:) 03:05:53 no rush 03:06:11 #topic Bugs 03:06:49 1. Cannot access container's console via wss 03:07:04 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/zun/+bug/1762511 03:07:05 Launchpad bug 1762511 in Zun "Cannot access container's console via wss" [High,In progress] - Assigned to hongbin (hongbin034) 03:07:18 yes, this is the one i wanted to bring up :) 03:07:40 i spent a lot of time to investigate the issue 03:07:41 I am concerned that you have submitted the patch 03:07:48 and propose a few patches 03:07:50 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1762511+(status:open+OR+status:merged) 03:08:21 if all teh patches are merged, the issue should be fixed 03:08:44 and you already gave +2 to all the patches, which is good 03:08:54 would need another reviewer for those patches 03:09:42 Yes, I've reviewed these. 03:10:15 Maybe I can ask Shengqin to review it :) 03:10:42 awesome 03:11:17 #topic Open Discussion 03:11:35 i don't have anything specific to talk 03:11:41 you have anything to bring up? 03:12:38 I'm not sure if this patch is necessary. 03:12:52 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619710/ 03:13:09 i don't think it is necessary 03:13:21 i would ignore that patch 03:13:44 Agree 03:14:11 I have no other questions here. 03:14:18 ok 03:14:28 Thanks for your participation. 03:14:32 thanks 03:14:35 see you next time 03:14:44 see you next time 03:14:47 #endmeeting