03:00:10 #startmeeting zun 03:00:11 Meeting started Tue Nov 28 03:00:10 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is hongbin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 03:00:12 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 03:00:15 The meeting name has been set to 'zun' 03:00:32 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Zun#Agenda_for_2017-11-28_0300_UTC Today's agenda 03:00:33 #topic Roll Call 03:00:47 o/ 03:01:04 o/ 03:01:49 hi kevinz mkrai 03:02:09 hi hongbin kevinz 03:02:10 it looks it is three of us today, we could have a short update for each other, then end the meeting shortly 03:02:28 ok 03:02:34 kevinz: want to go first ? 03:02:40 hongbin: OK 03:03:12 Last meeting I referred that add support for run container with create new volume 03:03:33 This patch has finished, I will push to review in 5 minutes 03:03:40 awesome 03:03:48 Also, I've checked kuryr-kubernetes 03:04:07 Plan to refer it first to do the POC of the connector-k8s 03:04:32 why refer kuryr-kubernetes ? 03:04:55 Kuryr-kuberbetes has some same implementation do things as a intermediary 03:05:19 oh i remembered, you mentioned the watch framework in async 03:05:27 For kuryr-k8s, it need to talk with k8s api server and neutron client 03:05:44 So for us, it need to talk with k8s api server and zun client 03:05:44 yes 03:05:52 So the framework is the same 03:05:58 i see 03:06:08 sounds good 03:06:44 anything else from your side ? 03:06:48 The aci-connector-k8s use timer task, I find it is not very good solution for production env 03:07:02 Just a "demo" I think 03:07:04 what is timer task ? 03:07:52 aci-connector-k8s will talk with K8s api server every several seconds 03:08:02 oh i see 03:08:13 just like polling 03:08:24 it is definitely not ideal since we k8s api is watchable 03:08:51 yes i think so 03:09:27 So move to kuryr-k8s framework 03:10:44 that's all from my side 03:10:44 ok, thanks kevinz for the update 03:10:56 mkrai: want to go next ? 03:11:04 yes sure 03:11:26 I posted update on my patch on including Clear Container as new runtime 03:11:31 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499534/ 03:11:36 But it didn't work 03:12:02 I will post another patch today 03:12:02 need any help for that ? 03:12:18 ok 03:12:43 I will try it today and if it doesn't work, will ask for help :) 03:12:48 hongbin: Thank you :) 03:12:48 That's all from me 03:12:57 mkrai: thanks madhuri 03:13:11 then, i will give a short update from my side 03:13:26 last week, i am cleaning up the sriov patches 03:13:45 most of the patches were merged, thanks all for reviewing 03:14:07 in addition, i am opening a new track for the package manager 03:14:25 there is a WIP spec up for review 03:14:34 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zun/+spec/zun-app-package-manager 03:15:03 I saw the spec. I will review the spec and post my comment there 03:15:16 This will be a great feature. 03:15:18 this feature is targeted for application deployer, and make them easier to deploy zun applicaiton 03:15:24 Does the file stored in DB or local directory? 03:16:03 it is like k8s helm, it could be stored in a github repo 03:16:21 or it can be local 03:16:26 sorry, I mean the "helm chart file" 03:17:21 i think there are two options: local and github 03:17:58 we could maintain a github repository for storing package that is for sharing (like docker hub for docker image) 03:18:10 OK thanks hongbin 03:18:17 by default, chart is pulled from github 03:18:35 however, there is another option to upload local 'chart' 03:18:46 i will write down the details in the spec 03:19:01 I have one more question, I don't like heat :-) Do we support other more friendly deployment tools? 03:19:38 Maybe a not proper question, haha 03:19:47 :D 03:19:54 We don't use heat now 03:19:57 i am thinking how to answer it :) 03:20:18 Where it will be used kevinz ? 03:20:18 kevinz: if we don't use heat, any other options available ? 03:21:05 mkrai: use heat template to deploy the container from the spec 03:21:40 ok you mean container orchestration? 03:22:09 hongbin: I'm thinking also. I suspect user may don't like to learn more complex heat template 03:22:29 kevinz: ack 03:23:08 mkrai: Yeah, deploy server container to realize a function. That need orchestration 03:24:19 mkrai: Just like here in line 89 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/523009/2/specs/zun-package-manager.rst 03:24:57 kevinz: Thanks for the link 03:24:59 I will have a look 03:26:17 kevinz: could you leave your comment in the spec, i will think about it 03:26:31 kevinz: about the heat alternative idea 03:26:36 hongbin: Sure, I will 03:26:39 thanks hongbin 03:26:42 kevinz: thanks 03:27:02 ok, all, thanks for joining hte meeting 03:27:14 if there is nothing else, i will end the meeting shortly 03:27:16 Thanks everyone 03:27:39 #endmeeting