09:30:16 <BobBall> #startmeeting XenAPI
09:30:17 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jun 22 09:30:16 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is BobBall. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
09:30:18 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
09:30:20 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'xenapi'
09:30:35 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy, jianghuaw, huazhihao, huanxie
09:30:40 <BobBall> Morning / afternoon :)
09:30:42 <jianghuaw> Hi, Bob.
09:30:45 * johnthetubaguy waves
09:30:57 <BobBall> #topic Newton (Blueprints / Bugs)
09:31:04 <BobBall> So - first fun topic first...
09:31:05 <jianghuaw> johnthetubaguy: good morning.
09:31:14 <BobBall> I'll talk about XenAPI independent compute blueprint first
09:31:40 <BobBall> All code is up and "ready for review".  Three patches and the first in the series is entirely ready.  Second and third have UT failures and missing UT that I need to add, but code is good and works
09:32:04 <BobBall> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331254/ is the big change and is the one ready for core review now
09:32:23 <BobBall> The other two just tidy a few things up.
09:32:34 <BobBall> Can this be added to your review list please johnthetubaguy ? :)
09:32:55 <BobBall> Getting very close to non-priority feature freeze, so any review time you have would be greately appreciated.
09:34:08 * BobBall pokes johnthetubaguy gently
09:34:14 <johnthetubaguy> possibly, by frankly my list is stupid long already with the OSIC priorities
09:34:38 <johnthetubaguy> (and general upstream priorities)
09:34:40 <BobBall> What can we do to help reduce that list so you have time to look at these?
09:35:14 <johnthetubaguy> review the centralise configurations options work, and live-migrate works I guess
09:35:23 <BobBall> Links?
09:35:48 <johnthetubaguy> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/centralize-config-options-newton+status:open
09:36:19 <johnthetubaguy> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-nova-priorities-tracking (particuarly live-migrate)
09:36:24 <johnthetubaguy> I am also currently coding
09:36:32 <johnthetubaguy> trying to meet the deadline for the neutron refactor
09:36:41 <BobBall> Can we do a deal - if we do 3 reviews, can we exchange it for one of yours on our BP / bugfix? :)
09:36:58 <johnthetubaguy> (and sorting out summit presentations for Rackspace OpenStack engineering...)
09:37:17 <BobBall> Yeah; those two are things that would be harder to jump in and help with ;)
09:37:37 <johnthetubaguy> its on my radar, for sure, I do hope to get to those things
09:37:54 <johnthetubaguy> the neutron stuff, is probably going to have to be paused, at this point, not getting any review on it
09:38:04 <johnthetubaguy> actually, thats a good point, eyes on that would help me out too:
09:38:16 <johnthetubaguy> #link https://review.openstack.org/#q,topic:bp/prep-for-network-aware-scheduling,n,z
09:38:56 <BobBall> Understood.
09:39:28 <BobBall> A high level review of https://review.openstack.org/331254 would be good to see if you're happy with the general approach even if you don't have time today to do a more detailed review.
09:39:37 <BobBall> Next BP - Neutron security groups.
09:39:45 <BobBall> huan / jianghuaw: What's the status of those?
09:40:07 <huanxie> Neutron security group source code is ready for review
09:40:22 <huanxie> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251271/
09:40:58 <BobBall> Depends on a bugfix from jianghuaw which already has one +2 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242846
09:41:29 <BobBall> So a second +2 would be much appreciated for that bugfix so we can then focus on getting reviews for the Security Group blueprint
09:42:29 <jianghuaw> yeah. I hope it won't cost @johnthetubaguy much time as you reviewed it before:-)
09:42:43 <BobBall> So - I think long story short, any review time you have would be greatly appreciated on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242846 and https://review.openstack.org/331254 as these two are the basis of the two blueprints which were approved for Newton.
09:42:50 <johnthetubaguy> yeah, agreed
09:43:03 <johnthetubaguy> do we have this all on a dashboard or etherpad somewhere handy?
09:43:45 <johnthetubaguy> I recon we should delete those struck out ones
09:43:50 <BobBall> Guess where
09:43:54 <BobBall> Just updated it :)
09:44:07 <BobBall> Deleted
09:44:12 <johnthetubaguy> cool, that looks better
09:44:31 <BobBall> Awesome, etherpad really loves numbering.
09:44:33 <johnthetubaguy> so that spec will need moving to octa now right?
09:44:45 <johnthetubaguy> yeah, I tend to go for bullets
09:44:50 <BobBall> Yup; although from what I hear it's not got much of a chance to get in Octa
09:44:55 <johnthetubaguy> right
09:45:22 <johnthetubaguy> anyways, thanks, thats looking more complete now
09:46:07 <BobBall> OK - so I'll do 3+ reviews on centralise config options today
09:46:32 <johnthetubaguy> thanks, that would be a big help
09:46:51 <johnthetubaguy> I suspect there could be xenapi ones up there, but I don't remember right now
09:46:52 <BobBall> Already - do we have AOB to discuss
09:47:24 <BobBall> #topic AOB
09:47:31 <BobBall> There was a bugfix for domid=-1 which has already gone in, but that's likely important for deployed envs as well
09:48:04 <BobBall> I think we'll backport it to Mitaka
09:48:16 <BobBall> but not planning to backport further.
09:48:56 <BobBall> Anything else we should cover?
09:49:05 <huanxie> none for me
09:49:34 <BobBall> Awesome.  We'll close there and give johnthetubaguy 10 minutes of time back.
09:49:42 <BobBall> Thanks all
09:49:44 <BobBall> #endmeeting