09:31:09 <BobBall> #startmeeting XenAPI
09:31:10 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Dec  9 09:31:09 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is BobBall. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
09:31:11 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
09:31:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'xenapi'
09:31:36 <BobBall> Morning all - agenda at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/XenAPI
09:31:50 <BobBall> Who have we got in this morning?
09:31:55 <johnthetubaguy> hello
09:31:56 <huanxie> morning all
09:32:03 <huazhihao> Morning bobball, johnthetubaguy
09:32:11 <jianghuaw> Hello.
09:32:28 <BobBall> yay - full house for who I was expecting :)#
09:32:35 <BobBall> #topic Blueprints / Reviews
09:32:58 <BobBall> Blueprints are easy.  Since the vGPU blueprint was abandoned we're only on reviews
09:33:07 <BobBall> but we have a lot of them at the moment.
09:33:23 <BobBall> most important one I guess is from you huanxie - the VIF bugfix?
09:33:25 <BobBall> What's the status of that?
09:34:10 <huanxie> I have finished coding and tested localing, have pushed in gerrit for code review
09:34:42 <BobBall> has anyone on the subteam reviewed it yet?
09:34:48 <BobBall> I don't think I have have I?
09:34:53 <huanxie> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254022/
09:34:59 <huanxie> No, currently
09:35:33 <BobBall> awesome - ok - so I've added it to the list at https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-nova-priorities-tracking as one that the subteam need to review
09:35:50 <BobBall> I've also moved the nova/neutron race and OVS port bugs to that second list now
09:36:03 <BobBall> as they will need to be rebased on the VIF fix
09:36:24 <johnthetubaguy> was there talk of a neutron based CI?
09:36:27 <BobBall> We still have 6 reviews waiting for core though - one just needs a second +2 https://review.openstack.org/245898
09:36:30 <huanxie> Yes, we have other changes will rebase on that fix
09:36:50 <BobBall> Yes johnthetubaguy - we'll be setting up an internal CI in the next few weeks followed by an external CI once we've got the required changes landed.
09:36:59 <johnthetubaguy> BobBall: cools
09:37:03 <BobBall> Can't have an external CI before they have all landed as the failure rate would be way too high
09:37:31 <BobBall> so huazhihao and BobBall need to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/254022/
09:37:44 <BobBall> jianghuaw too - but he's not here today :)
09:37:47 <huazhihao> Noted
09:38:00 <BobBall> Awesome.
09:38:26 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy: are blueprints now sorted?  i.e. can we start bugging you about getting some of these bugfixes reviewed to unblock other work? :)
09:38:47 <johnthetubaguy> just make sure its in the etherpad
09:38:54 <johnthetubaguy> I hope to get to that soon
09:38:54 <BobBall> I think there are 3 changes which all modify the plugins and therefore change the plugin version which is having fun conflicts
09:39:01 <johnthetubaguy> still going through exceptions though
09:39:23 <johnthetubaguy> sounds like it might be worth stacking those in a priority order
09:40:07 * BobBall thinks the etherpad should be dynamicly ordered so if it's actually used then changes nearer the bottom don't get ignored :)
09:40:46 <BobBall> ok
09:40:51 <BobBall> #topic Bugs & QA
09:41:10 <BobBall> Actually we've talked mostly about them - I haven't seen new bugs coming in
09:41:22 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy: Did we talk about https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1204631 in a previous meeting?
09:41:22 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1204631 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Image created from boot from iso missing min_ram and min_disk" [Low,Fix released]
09:42:02 <BobBall> oh
09:42:02 <BobBall> sorry
09:42:04 <BobBall> yes we did
09:42:07 <BobBall> heh...
09:42:22 <BobBall> I just didn't remove it from the agenda - my bad
09:42:40 <BobBall> #topic Open Discussion
09:42:53 <BobBall> So - is there anything else we should cover in today's meeting?
09:43:29 <huazhihao> I have one blueprint under approval
09:43:37 <BobBall> Ah great point huazhihao
09:43:41 <BobBall> Can you give us a link?
09:43:48 <huazhihao> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/bare-vhd-image
09:44:09 <BobBall> Needs more info
09:44:15 <BobBall> See my -1 on your change at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249627/
09:44:43 <huazhihao> Ah sorry
09:44:53 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy: This is a blueprint we'd like approved as a specless blueprint FYU
09:45:01 <johnthetubaguy> has it been submitted yet?
09:45:02 <BobBall> What sort of details do you normally want to see on the blueprint?
09:45:15 <johnthetubaguy> because we are past the blueprint freeze date now
09:45:35 <BobBall> Does that still apply to specless blueprints?
09:45:39 <johnthetubaguy> yes
09:45:50 <huanxie> BobBall: I also have a BP for neutron security group https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/xenserver-give-support-on-neutron-security-group
09:45:51 <johnthetubaguy> applies to all blueprints and specs, priority or non-priority
09:46:21 <BobBall> Ah.  Let's talk about them one by one then
09:46:51 <huazhihao> ok
09:46:51 <johnthetubaguy> so specless blueprints need submitting for approval still, seems like that has note been done yet? https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Process#How_do_I_get_my_blueprint_approved.3F
09:46:53 <BobBall> bare VHD image is about XenServer being able to download + use a VHD file that was uploaded without a tgz container - do you believe this requires a blueprint
09:47:03 <johnthetubaguy> yes, needs a blueprint
09:47:08 <johnthetubaguy> its a feature
09:48:53 <BobBall> What about security groups being broken on XenAPI with Neutron (due to a missing bridge which libvirt creates but xenapi does not) - can that be classified as a bug?
09:49:04 <johnthetubaguy> yeah, maybe
09:49:09 <johnthetubaguy> its a feature really though
09:50:09 <BobBall> The latter is more important than the former as it will block us getting a Neutron CI working until it's merged
09:50:24 <johnthetubaguy> yep, seems worth trying as a bug
09:50:35 <BobBall> so waiting until N for the neutron bugfix will be very painful
09:51:10 <BobBall> Is there something we can do specifically to help convince you / others that it should be classified as a bug?
09:51:25 <johnthetubaguy> unsure really, it generally depends on the patch
09:51:33 <johnthetubaguy> if its little, it should slip in
09:51:42 <johnthetubaguy> reno notes can cover the adding of that
09:52:09 <BobBall> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/251271/ is the change - almost all of it in vif.py
09:53:15 <johnthetubaguy> OK, I mean add the bug, and see how it goes I guess
09:53:22 <BobBall> ok
09:53:58 <BobBall> huanxie: Can you remove the blueprint and re-write the commit message to be based on a bug.  I think there is a bug already, but if not, raise one based on the tempest results from running the Neutron CI tests
09:54:18 <huanxie> OK, I will raise a bug and change the commit message
09:54:49 <BobBall> Great, thanks.
09:55:42 <BobBall> I think we need to push for the VIF + Neutron fixes above the support for bare VHDs even though bare VHDs are also pretty important
09:55:53 <BobBall> OK - anything else we should talk about?
09:56:35 <huazhihao> That is all from me.
09:56:45 <BobBall> Great - well let's close the meeting there then
09:56:48 <BobBall> Thanks all!
09:56:53 <BobBall> #endmeeting