09:31:26 <BobBall> #startmeeting XenAPI
09:31:27 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jul 22 09:31:26 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is BobBall. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
09:31:28 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
09:31:30 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'xenapi'
09:31:34 <BobBall> johnthetubaguy - ping!
09:32:44 <BobBall> Ah - hi huazhihao
09:32:46 <BobBall> I see you now
09:32:48 <BobBall> sorry :)
09:32:55 <BobBall> But we're kinda stuck waiting for johnthetubaguy
09:33:02 <huazhihao> @bobball Hi Bob
09:33:20 <BobBall> I did add a couple of items to the agenda but they are ones we need to discuss
09:33:31 <huazhihao> :bobball no problem
09:33:32 <BobBall> Agenda at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/XenAPI#Next_meeting for those interested
09:34:07 <BobBall> Specifically I wanted to talk about https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1204631
09:34:08 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1204631 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Image created from boot from iso missing min_ram and min_disk" [Low,Confirmed]
09:34:10 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1204631 in nova "Image created from boot from iso missing min_ram and min_disk" [Low,Confirmed]
09:34:11 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1204631 in nova "Image created from boot from iso missing min_ram and min_disk" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1204631
09:34:29 <BobBall> Helpful.  Double bot and double messages from one bot!
09:34:37 <BobBall> Anyway - comments on the bug suggest that it might already be fixed
09:34:41 <BobBall> and the code appears to agree
09:34:44 <BobBall> so I want to close it
09:34:56 <BobBall> or at least move it back to unconfirmed (which will probably mean it gets auto-closed)
09:35:53 <BobBall> In terms of the CIs, check out zuul.openstack.xenproject.org/scoreboard
09:35:59 <BobBall> the XenServer CI is still doing v well
09:36:09 <BobBall> and the libvirt+xen CI is doing well too
09:36:27 <BobBall> but there are some interesting cases for the libvirt+xen CI - for example https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192736
09:36:41 <BobBall> This change has been negative-voted for different reasons several times
09:37:05 <BobBall> More than you'd expect from the percentage of failures seen by the libvirt+xen CI in general
09:37:14 <BobBall> I've forwarded it on to the xen group and hope to hear more soon
09:37:28 <BobBall> But that's about all
09:37:53 <BobBall> We also needed to talk to johnthetubaguy about tty.gz in stack.sh
09:38:01 <huazhihao> Yes
09:38:04 <BobBall> I don't know why it's there or what it's used for so would propose removing it
09:38:35 <BobBall> but I thought johnthetubaguy might have some thoughts on whether it might be used in contexts we don't know about
09:40:50 <BobBall> Just tracking down the change that added it
09:41:08 <BobBall> Yay
09:41:16 <BobBall> was added in the initial XenServer devstack support
09:41:17 <BobBall> b62b4ca2928fbcdf339be804da9d4aade41380e4
09:41:55 <BobBall> I suspect that it has not been tested since
09:43:36 <BobBall> I think we should just propose removing it and see if johnthetubaguy or anyone else complains
09:44:26 <BobBall> OK - we'll close there since I think that we can continue to discuss MOS progress offline huazhihao
09:44:57 <BobBall> I'll catch up with johnthetubaguy offline
09:45:13 <BobBall> Next meeting in a fortnight: 5th August
09:45:26 <BobBall> #endmeeting