14:26:20 #startmeeting weekly_edge_computing_group_cal 14:26:21 Meeting started Tue Mar 17 14:26:20 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is csatari. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:26:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:26:26 The meeting name has been set to 'weekly_edge_computing_group_cal' 14:26:29 #topic Roll Call 14:26:41 #info Gergely Csatari 14:26:50 #info Ildiko Vancsa 14:27:57 What topics should we cover today? 14:28:04 Looks like it'll be a small group meeting :) 14:28:15 these are the regular items: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Edge_Computing_Group#Next_meeting:_Tuesday_.28March_18.29.2C_7am_PST_.2F_1400_UTC 14:28:16 Smallest group. 14:28:32 :) 14:28:37 Cool. 14:28:49 we had some good chats about the reference architectures 14:28:52 recently 14:29:18 I was wondering if it would make sense to draw up reference model diagrams? 14:29:42 thinking along the lines of what we want from an architecture in general and then how it can be realized 14:29:59 and whether it would make it easier to get to the container discussions that way as well? 14:30:55 Drawing is always good. 14:31:18 :) 14:31:34 Do you think about something totally different from the current architecture diagrams? 14:31:54 no I meant the generalized version of the current diagrams first 14:32:10 Like adding functionalities to the different "edge locations"? 14:32:38 kind of identifying what functionality each site would need in the centralized as well as the distributed case 14:32:52 Yes, I think that would make sense. 14:32:52 then we have the architectures that show an example of how to build that system 14:33:37 and the architecture diagrams can be extended by components that support containers 14:34:03 while the model diagrams may already contain the functionality on high level 14:34:33 I'm just thinking that it would be nice to have a few diagrams that's not tied to existing projects/solutions 14:34:55 *that are not 14:35:03 Yes I agree. 14:36:41 I guess I should look for some online diagram making tool thingy that supports collaborating on these :) 14:39:04 Okey, now I started to Google for collaborative chart drawing. 14:39:05 during the whitepaper chats we also talked a bit more about storage so it looks like we may have some info around that to use 14:39:27 :) 14:39:59 I'm not sure if it exists unless we want to draw diagrams in a Google doc which I don't like as it's often painful and not accessible everywhere 14:42:25 csatari: https://creately.com 14:42:40 it says the basic plan is free, need to find out what that means 14:43:21 https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/ug7Mfua0/ 14:43:36 The 3 collaborator limit might be a problem. 14:43:41 yeah :/ 14:44:23 Maybe https://www.lucidchart.com/pages/landing/diagram-tool 14:47:11 it says single user 14:47:21 yep. 14:47:53 so I guess it's not for collaboration? 14:48:32 https://online.visual-paradigm.com/diagrams/ 14:50:15 Can be. 14:50:21 This looks good. 14:50:41 the last one? 14:50:56 Yes 14:51:56 I also found this: https://miro.com/l/remote-collaboration?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=%7B_utmcampaign%7D&utm_term=+collaborating%20+online&utm_content=426018196680&xuid=EAIaIQobChMI35TE_-Ch6AIVi4eyCh1gqAIJEAAYASAAEgKtivD_BwE&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI35TE_-Ch6AIVi4eyCh1gqAIJEAAYASAAEgKtivD_BwE 14:53:18 nah, this seems to have a lot of limitations too 14:54:07 the visual paradigm one says it'll add a watermark, but I think it should be fine unless it's very disturbing 14:54:25 I can always re-draw the diagrams we agree on in ppt or smth like 14:55:03 I'm not sure how can we collaborate with it. 14:55:17 I could not find any menus to share. 14:55:27 https://online.visual-paradigm.com/w/lqlimsns/diagrams/#proj=0&type=BlankDiagram 14:57:35 We need more research on this ;) 14:58:22 I think so too :) 14:58:35 maybe you can invite people once you signed up? 14:58:45 I'll also ask around if someone knows something 14:59:07 Okey 14:59:40 but we have a lan for the diagrams at least :) 15:00:06 Yes ;) 15:00:51 I need to drop off soon. Anything else we wanted to cover? 15:01:22 we can talk more about the diagrams in details next week 15:01:26 and containers 15:01:30 Argeeed. 15:01:34 *2 15:01:42 and if the CNTT group finalizes plans we can talk about collaboration with them too 15:01:55 *3 15:02:03 I will drop a mail to the mailing list if I find a tool in the meantime 15:02:29 Cool, thanks. 15:02:35 * ildikov thanks 15:02:49 #endmeeting