14:00:27 <alexchadin> #startmeeting watcher
14:00:28 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Sep  6 14:00:27 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is alexchadin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:29 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:32 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'watcher'
14:00:41 <alexchadin> o/
14:00:44 <suzhengwei> hi
14:00:49 <adisky__> Hi
14:01:31 <licanwei_> hi
14:01:36 <Yumeng__> hi
14:01:36 <hidekazu> hi
14:02:29 <alexchadin> we continue our cycle of prioritizing BPs
14:02:36 <alexchadin> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#09.2F06.2F2017
14:03:14 <alexchadin> Do someone have something to announce our discuss before we begin?
14:03:26 <alexchadin> or discuss*
14:04:02 <adisky__> alexchadin:  do we continue this discussion in next meeting as well??
14:05:10 <alexchadin> adisky__: I propose to do it until the end of PTG
14:05:18 <adisky__> alexchadin: ok
14:05:35 <alexchadin> let's begin
14:05:40 <alexchadin> #topic Blueprint Review
14:06:00 <alexchadin> watcher-strategy-selector #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/watcher-strategy-selector
14:07:25 <alexchadin> now we have two ways to choose strategy: either to define it or to delegate it to random
14:08:19 <adisky__> adisky__: we need to design it on the basis of efficacy
14:08:20 <suzhengwei> delegate it to random or default?
14:08:29 <alexchadin> Jean Emile proposes to use some factors to select the strategy
14:08:37 <alexchadin> adisky__: +1
14:09:11 <alexchadin> suzhengwei: random or manual choice
14:10:19 <alexchadin> If someone wants to take it, I will assign it. Otherwise I propose to set low priority on it
14:10:58 <adisky__> alexchadin: i want to do it after current assignment
14:11:42 <alexchadin> adisky__: then I will assign to you
14:11:52 <adisky__> alexchadin: +1
14:12:52 <alexchadin> workload-characterization-qos #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/workload-characterization-qos
14:13:43 <alexchadin> unfortunately, Susanne can't to discuss it on this meeting so I will leave it as is
14:14:16 <alexchadin> storage-workload-balance #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/storage-workload-balance
14:15:26 <alexchadin> Yumeng__, hidekazu do you plan to work on it during Queens cycle?
14:15:42 <Yumeng__> Yep
14:15:53 <Yumeng__> I and licanwei will work on it
14:16:02 <licanwei_> yes
14:16:39 <Yumeng__> This is a strategy which we have embedded in our cloud product
14:16:51 <alexchadin> licanwei_, Yumeng__ great. Medium or High priority?
14:17:16 <Yumeng__> I'm fine with either medium or high
14:18:37 <alexchadin> check-strategy-requirements #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/check-strategy-requirements
14:19:00 <alexchadin> I'd really like to see it in Queens
14:20:12 <alexchadin> Checking strategy requirements would be useful especially for fresh installations since this release is intended to improve stability
14:21:13 <alexchadin> I'd like to take it, if you don't mind
14:21:24 <adisky__> alexchadin: +1
14:21:36 <Yumeng__> Agree, this is useful.
14:21:55 <Yumeng__> +1
14:22:21 <alexchadin> max-aggressiveness-level #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/max-aggressiveness-level
14:25:05 <alexchadin> This functionality already exists in one form or another (by using audit scope, audit continuous with auto executing actions, strategy thresholds)
14:26:23 <alexchadin> To be honest, I'd set Undefined priority for a while
14:28:21 <suzhengwei> I would like to discuss it with you later.
14:28:41 <licanwei_> It is difficult to define the max aggressivenss level
14:28:58 <hidekazu> alexchadin: this is not concrete, set low now.
14:29:26 <alexchadin> hidekazu: it is already low. leave it as is?
14:30:00 <hidekazu> alexchadin: yes, leave it, i think,
14:30:42 <alexchadin> audit-scope-exclude-project #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/audit-scope-exclude-project
14:31:32 <hidekazu> alexchadin: i will do it in queens-2
14:31:54 <hidekazu> alexchadin: after cdm-scoping.
14:32:26 <alexchadin> hidekazu: medium level then
14:32:56 <hidekazu> alexchadin: please set cdm-scoping medium also.
14:34:20 <alexchadin> hidekazu: cdm-scoping for queens-1?
14:34:30 <hidekazu> alexchadin: sure.
14:34:59 <hidekazu> cdm-scoping #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/cdm-scoping
14:35:31 <alexchadin> audit-scoper-for-storage-data-model #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/audit-scoper-for-storage-data-model
14:36:00 <hidekazu> alexchadin: again i will do it.
14:36:36 <alexchadin> hidekazu: queens-2?
14:36:42 <hidekazu> alexchadin: sure
14:37:41 <alexchadin> policy-and-docs-in-code #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/policy-and-docs-in-code
14:37:44 <hidekazu> alexchadin: i added two more bps in agenda.
14:38:12 <hidekazu> alexchadin: yeah, that is one of openstack-wide goal.
14:39:12 <hidekazu> #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/queens/policy-in-code.html
14:39:36 <alexchadin> hidekazu: you plan to take it?
14:40:06 <hidekazu> alexchadin: i am not sure i have  time to do now.
14:40:28 <hidekazu> alexchadin: i am happy someone takes it.
14:41:04 <alexchadin> who would like to take it?
14:41:15 <Yumeng__> I can take it
14:41:22 <suzhengwei> Lance Bragstad?
14:41:39 <suzhengwei> sorry
14:42:45 <hidekazu> suzhengwei: right, leader of this goal is Lance Bragstad
14:43:10 <alexchadin> Yumeng__: agreed ;)
14:43:30 <hidekazu> Yumeng__: thanks!
14:44:23 <alexchadin> Yumeng__: I'll set it to Queens-3 since it is cycle goal
14:44:37 <Yumeng__> hidekazu, alexchadin: :) ok
14:45:07 <alexchadin> zone-migration-strategy #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/zone-migration-strategy
14:45:29 <hidekazu> alexchadin: yes, i will do it.
14:46:38 <hidekazu> alexchadin: this bp depends multiple-global-efficacy-indicator #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/multiple-global-efficacy-indicator
14:46:43 <alexchadin> hidekazu: do we need additional engine for one strategy?
14:47:17 <hidekazu> alexchadin: what is 'engine'?
14:47:39 <alexchadin> hidekazu: "zone migration workflow engine"
14:48:19 <hidekazu> alexchadin: as of now, i do not propose additional workflow engine.
14:49:36 <alexchadin> hidekazu: ok, I'll read the proposed spec
14:49:40 <hidekazu> alexchadin: if you think we should, please add review comment.
14:50:06 <hidekazu> alexchadin: i want spec to be reviewed :)
14:50:43 <alexchadin> Unfortunately, I have to go today earlier than usual
14:50:55 <alexchadin> so thank you for coming and see you next time!
14:51:12 <suzhengwei> bye
14:51:14 <hidekazu> alexchadin: thanks.
14:51:23 <Yumeng__> See u
14:51:24 <adisky__> Bye
14:51:25 <licanwei_> bye
14:51:30 <alexchadin> #endmeeting