14:00:03 #startmeeting watcher 14:00:04 Meeting started Wed Jul 12 14:00:03 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alexchadin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:08 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 14:00:12 hi 14:00:16 Hi 14:01:06 when it starts at 14:00 utc, there are less people than at 13:00 utc 14:01:17 hi hidekazu suzhengwei 14:01:21 hi Yumeng__ 14:01:23 hi 14:01:55 today we have the following agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#07.2F12.2F2017 14:02:12 #topic Announcements 14:02:22 watcher repo has prepared docs. watcher-dashboard and python-watcherclient are still on the way. 14:02:52 we've made almost all required steps to reach new docs standards 14:03:15 Yumeng__ thank you for your help with doc-migration 14:03:38 lakerzhou 14:03:39 hi, lakerzhou 14:03:44 My pleasure . I noticed that we have lots of bugs in dashboard 14:04:02 Hi, Suzhengwei 14:04:25 We should fix those bugs and then we can be able to merge doc-migration in watcher-dashboard 14:04:38 Yumeng__: yeah, I'm working on it 14:05:28 alexchadin: great! 14:05:30 Three presentations have been submitted #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/watcher-Sydney-meetings 14:05:48 Don't hesitate to submit your own 14:06:23 two of three are in the same category 14:06:29 alexchadin: sorry i missed write to etherpad. 14:06:36 Hi sorry for late 14:06:41 hi adisky__ ! 14:06:55 hidekazu_: no worries, just don't forget to do it ;) 14:07:11 And I have one idea to share with you guys! 14:07:35 Yumeng is on all three talks! 14:08:01 Yumeng__: three is max. 14:08:29 I hope they won't be at the same time 14:08:36 yep 14:08:44 as it was in Boston :) 14:09:06 two watcher presentations at the same time 14:09:15 some kind of magic 14:09:20 Sorry to disturb you. I noticed that recently we have quite a few patches waiting for review but only have limited developers to do the review. 14:10:02 So I would suggest that we give different priorities to the patches and review according to their priorities. 14:10:18 Here I proposed a example on etherpad, please take a look 14:10:29 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/watcher-review-priority 14:10:31 Yumeng__: personally i am reviewing for pike-3 14:11:08 hidekazu_: Good! 14:11:23 Yumeng__: I try to review as much as I can, but there are a lot of deals with Foundation's crew 14:11:27 Yumeng__: now only milestone is important. 14:11:33 hidekazu_: +1 14:12:09 https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/pike-3 14:12:12 if all milestone patches needs new PSs, we may review other ones 14:12:15 hidekazu_ :+1. It's just a personal idea! Leave any comment on etherpad. 14:13:18 alexchadin: +1. I remember Vincent suggested that we give him a priority about reviewing. 14:14:06 so 14:14:13 any other announcements? 14:14:52 everybody, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468261/ this spec is important to watcher. It need your review. 14:16:34 suzhengwei: IMHO, you should attract an attention of nova's folks to be sure that it's not -2 commit 14:16:44 suzhenwei: this is nova spec, you need nova help. 14:17:09 s/suzhenwei/suzhengwei/ 14:17:23 suzhengwei: we will review it, but I personally will do it only when nova team are agreed with it 14:18:23 suzhengwei: cause there may be 1000 reasons why it's not correlate with nova policies ;) 14:18:47 yes, but it infect watcher. It need promote. 14:19:24 suzhengwei: I recommend you to contact with ed leafe 14:19:37 ok 14:20:02 suzhengwei: he is our liaison with nova team 14:20:15 hi 14:20:19 hi sballe_ 14:20:44 well, let's move on 14:21:05 #topic Review Action Items 14:21:07 watcher 14:21:10 specs 14:21:19 Add notfications for actionplan cancel needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/482902/ 14:22:06 adisky__: is it ready to be reviewed? 14:22:36 alexchadin: yes 14:23:25 adisky__: please take a look at it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445817/7/specs/pike/approved/services-versioned-notifications-api.rst 14:23:59 adisky__: you should show notification structures at least 14:24:12 alexchadin: ok, I will add 14:24:19 adisky__: thank you 14:24:29 adisky__: and tag me as reviewer 14:25:00 alexchadin: I thought, it is same as previous notifications , so no need to add structure 14:25:12 Add Volume migrate action spec needs final core review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468817/ 14:26:14 adisky__: anyway, it is standalone spec and should be prepared accordingly 14:26:44 hidekazu_: diagram is great! 14:26:47 alexchadin: I will add 14:27:07 #action adisky__ update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/482902/ 14:27:48 Add Volume migrate action spec needs core reviewer other than me. 14:28:27 hidekazu_: I will review it 14:28:41 alexchadin: thanks! 14:28:58 hidekazu_: I'll do it tomorrow, ping me to remind please 14:29:19 alexchadin: ok. 14:29:26 #action alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468817/ 14:29:38 Specs for Saving Energy Strategy needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/476416 14:30:12 how would like to review it? 14:30:18 who* 14:30:32 alexchadin: i first reviewed code, if new ps of code proposed, i will review spec. 14:31:21 alexchadin: code is readable than spec about saving energy now. 14:32:26 agree 14:32:52 suzhengwei, hidekazu_ I will tag you as reviewers, ok? 14:33:06 alexchadin: ok. 14:33:10 ok, i will give new review. 14:33:48 #action suzhengwei hidekazu_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/476416 14:33:59 update action description needs to be updated #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/459529/ 14:33:59 hi everyone 14:34:03 hi vincentfrancoise 14:34:24 unfortunately, licanwei isn't here today 14:34:46 [WIP] Spec for multi-datasource support] needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467102 14:34:47 vincentfrancoise: hi 14:35:16 Will review 14:35:17 vincentfrancoise: seems it's your commit to review ;) 14:35:40 adisky__: nice! 14:35:49 didn't have time to do any meaningful review since it's a short week in France (14th is a bank holiday) 14:35:59 #action adisky__ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467102 14:36:56 vincentfrancoise: I'll tag you as reviewer, ok? 14:37:49 French also has bank holiday.. 14:37:50 alexchadin: yup 14:37:54 sorry. 14:38:15 I will review Spec for multi-datasource support,tag me too. 14:38:22 suzhengwei: thanks! 14:38:29 thanks suzhengwei 14:38:36 #action suzhengwei vincentfrancoise review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467102 14:38:37 welcome 14:38:48 add name for audit needs new PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474865/ 14:40:08 suzhengwei: contact to licanwei when he is available 14:40:18 ok 14:41:00 Support visualizing workload fingerprints needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448394/ 14:42:20 suzhengwei: I will investigate your commit 14:42:35 extend-node-status needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464549/ 14:43:02 adisky__: could you please review it again? 14:43:52 alexchadin: add me please. Sorry for late review. 14:44:11 #action Yumeng__ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464549/ 14:44:20 watcher 14:44:25 New cron type for audit interval will be updated soon 14:44:36 Cinder model integration needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450642/ 14:44:43 it's hard to review 14:45:23 alexchadin: will review extend node status 14:45:38 alexchadin: merge and fix is one way ;) 14:45:51 #action adisky__ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464549/ 14:47:09 for the Cinder model IMHO we should get it merged as-is 14:47:18 alexchadin: no harm because of not part of core framework. 14:47:43 I agree 14:47:59 I give it a +2 then 14:48:58 +1 W 14:49:08 Enable migration to rely on nova-scheduler needs final core review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/476369/ 14:49:39 Yumeng__: will you take it? 14:50:10 alexchadin: yes no pb 14:50:28 #action Yumeng__ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/476369/ 14:50:37 Get load of every available host by gathering instances load needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/482780/ 14:50:52 suzhengwei: have you seen my comment? 14:51:06 yes. 14:51:49 suzhengwei: we have discussed it when this strategy was in development 14:52:19 Add action description notification needs new PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454638/ 14:52:34 I have noticed the discusion 14:52:49 sorry, licanwei hasn't updated spec 14:53:10 Abort operation for live migration needs final core review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474568/ 14:53:58 alexchadin: +1 14:54:14 #action Yumeng__ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474568/ 14:55:07 extend-node-status needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/464557/ 14:55:18 I propose to review implementation after spec is merged 14:55:32 Watcher CLI & Dashboard 14:55:40 Move existing content into the new standard structure needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/478342/ 14:56:18 please, don't forget to review python-watcherclient and watcher-dashboard commits 14:56:29 +1 14:56:53 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479257/ this need more review. 14:57:39 alexchadin: W+1 14:57:41 suzhengwei: yeap 14:58:01 who would like to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479257/? 14:58:55 hidekazu_: please take it 14:59:07 ok 14:59:08 I will also review 14:59:14 thx 14:59:20 #action adisky__ hidekazu_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/479257/ 14:59:22 well 14:59:28 thank you for coming! 14:59:34 our time is running out 14:59:42 we've made great job! 14:59:54 hope to see you next time ;) 15:00:03 see you 15:00:07 See you 15:00:10 bye 15:00:16 bye 15:00:16 bye 15:00:17 #endmeeting