14:00:48 #startmeeting watcher 14:00:49 Meeting started Wed Apr 5 14:00:48 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alexchadin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:50 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:53 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 14:01:04 welcome here! 14:01:06 o/ 14:01:07 o/ 14:01:10 hi 14:01:14 hi 14:01:15 o/ 14:01:18 o/ 14:01:20 o/ 14:01:41 #info Today's agenda is placed here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#04.2F05.2F2017 14:01:51 #topic Announcements 14:01:57 Our current milestone target is Pike-1 due April 10th 14:02:00 o/ 14:02:34 so we have 5 BPs and 3 bugs for P-1 14:03:13 I'm not sure that Noisy Neighbor Strategy and gnocchi support will be merged by release time 14:03:45 So I propose to move them to the Pike-2 14:04:11 alexchadin: Support gnocchi in watcher i not well updated in laucnhpad 14:04:26 alexchadin: it's actually well under way 14:04:29 pshedimb_ sballe_ what do you think about it? 14:04:35 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/gnocchi-watcher 14:04:42 vincentfrancois1: ok, I've seen your comments 14:04:42 looks ok for pike-1 no ? 14:04:56 alexchadin: I reckon it can be merged on time 14:05:02 acabot: +1 14:05:10 yeap, vincentfrancois1 started to review couple of hours ago 14:05:19 I will let pshedimb_ answer. We are very close. We could merge what we have and then if we see issues fix them as bugs 14:05:40 but pshedimb_ has the last word 14:05:43 ostroverkhov: what about Versioned Notifications for service object? 14:06:05 sballe_: great! 14:06:19 alexchadin, Yeah I can merge whatever I have. But my priority now is to prepare a demo for Boston summit on this. 14:06:33 pshedimb_: +1 14:07:02 We want to make sure it works the way we want it do work and that is why we spend extra time testing the behavior and corner cases 14:07:26 pshedimb_: push for review what you have so you can get feedbacks 14:07:36 sballe_: pshedimb_ let's make decision this Friday then 14:07:38 So once I receive reviews on the spec and once the spec is approved, I will push in the code change. 14:07:39 vincentfrancois1: make sense 14:07:51 pshedimb_: +1 14:08:05 vincentfrancois1, You want me to push the code before spec review? 14:08:19 pshedimb_: code change will be appointed to P-2 14:08:35 pshedimb_: push what you already have 14:08:56 pshedimb_: just mark it with [WiP] tag 14:08:57 alexchadin, Okay, I'll do it in the next 1-2 days. 14:09:08 Once I integrate with recent changes. 14:09:28 alexchadin: +1 14:10:13 move on 14:10:14 Open Discussions topic will be follow after Announcements every even weeks. 14:10:33 alexchadin: I read the messages, but there are a few questions 14:11:05 ostroverkhov: ok, I will be in sync with you till the Friday 14:11:20 alexchadin: ok 14:11:40 I hope, nobody will mind about open discussions 14:12:06 There are two hacking rooms for gathering on Summit. #link https://ethercalc.openstack.org/Boston_Forum_Hacking_Rooms 14:12:30 They will be filled with roundtables for ad-hoc discussions that projects want to have. 14:12:44 Hynes MR 108 and 109 14:13:44 nice! alexchadin can you add this to our Boston summit etherpad? I am loosing track of all the details 14:13:53 I will set time for us when we can gather 14:13:58 sballe_: sure 14:14:19 #topic Open Discussions 14:14:25 We should be prepared for onboarding rooms, where new contributors can come and we may teach them about the project, code, and give them an opportunity to meet established community members. 14:15:52 we will have 90 minutes to show newcomers demo of Watcher and teach them our features/show live demo for everyone 14:15:52 alexchadin: what do you think we should prepare? slides? 14:16:14 alexchadin: one more thing. Did you update the generic Watcher slides from last summit? I am working on my slide set and just used the Watcher main arch slides from last summit. We have new contributors from NEC, and other companies that I would like ot add to the contributor slide. 14:16:30 vincentfrancois1: I think we need OpenStack controller and 2 computes at least 14:16:41 alexchadin: oh ok, then maybe we need to show multiple Watcher strategies in action 14:16:54 vincentfrancois1: alexchadin good ideas 14:16:55 vincentfrancois1: totally agreed 14:17:09 alexchadin: there's also a video on youtube we can use to explain how it works 14:17:33 #link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJttohkf0sM 14:17:41 sballe_: I haven't worked with slides yet, I will adapt them for Pike and hope to do it with you 14:17:56 alexchadin: ok 14:18:56 vincentfrancois1: we can share video, but it isn't main reason to come for contributors, live demo would be great 14:19:19 alexchadin: yes but the animation is good to explain the concept 14:19:33 vincentfrancois1: I agree 14:19:45 alexchadin: whereas live demos are to show the different use cases 14:20:11 agreed but video is great if live demo doesn't work 14:20:18 vincentfrancois1: we need to place demo on wiki page 14:20:19 alexchadin: and also to show it's no bullsh*t 14:20:32 vincentfrancois1: +1 14:21:26 I will add appropriate topic on etherpad 14:21:29 move on 14:21:30 adisky_ said that rdo-package for python-watcherclient will be prepared by number80 (Haïkel Guémar). We still need to find the ways to prepare watcher package. 14:22:32 #link https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350974 14:22:32 bugzilla.redhat.com bug 1350974 in Package Review "Openstack python-watcherclient" [Unspecified,Assigned] - Assigned to karlthered 14:23:40 we still isn't in sync with packages for systems (except of python packages) 14:23:54 I will discuss it with adisky_ 14:24:05 #action discuss packages issue with adisky_ 14:24:15 #topic Review Action Items 14:24:23 Watcher specs 14:24:31 Noisy Neighbor Strategy has got algorithm description and now is ready to be reviewed #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/ 14:25:22 who would like to take full review here? 14:26:01 I may take it since I worked with strategies before 14:26:22 alexchadin: +1 thx 14:26:23 +1 14:26:30 +1 14:26:57 #action alexchadin chrisspencer licanwei review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/ 14:27:14 Define grammar for workload characterization Chris is waiting for Antoine's answer #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ 14:27:25 seems chrisspencer has got it ;) 14:28:00 done 14:28:09 thank you, acabot 14:28:29 thank acabot 14:28:53 BTW, help is appreciated here 14:29:29 sballe_: will you take a look? 14:29:36 sure 14:30:13 #action sballe_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ 14:30:53 Spec for noisy-neighbor-dashboard needs new answers and probable PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427308/ 14:31:00 probably* 14:31:20 +1 14:31:49 #action pshedimb_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427308/ 14:32:01 Support workload fingerprinting needs new PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448396/ 14:32:34 Audit tag in VM Metadata needs final core review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 14:33:10 hvprash: I like integrating with audit scope 14:33:22 I will review it, who else? 14:33:29 dtardivel: thx for review 14:33:35 +1 14:33:39 alexchadin: put me in too 14:34:25 #action alexchadin acabot vincentfrancois1 review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 14:34:36 Add spec for services-versioned-notifications-api bp needs new PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445817/ 14:35:32 vincentfrancois1: I had conversation with ostroverkhov and we decided that we might need to put status checking into new background job 14:36:01 vincentfrancois1: it is useless to send notifications only when we request service status 14:36:38 alexchadin: Ah I though it was already the case actually, that's why I was talking about polling in my comment 14:37:02 alexchadin: so if there is no such job, then it doesn't make much sense indeed 14:37:43 vincentfrancois1: ok, seems there will be some changes 14:38:01 #action alexchadin ostroverkhov work on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445817/ 14:38:08 move on 14:38:14 Support visualizing workload fingerprints needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448394/ 14:39:09 +1 14:39:34 #action dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448394/ 14:39:53 Add spec for Cinder model integration needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450173/ 14:40:40 vincentfrancois1 already put some comments, who else would like to take a look? 14:41:19 alexchadin : I already looked at it and I have the same comments as vincentfancois1 14:42:00 I think we will discuss some details from this spec on Summit 14:42:21 acabot: thx 14:42:43 alexchadin: sure 14:43:07 Watcher 14:43:10 Added Actuator Strategy still needs to be taken by someone. Can Vladimir take it? 14:43:16 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425110/ 14:43:46 ostroverkhov: alexchadin: go ahead, it's up for grab 14:44:13 ostroverkhov: I think you can pick it up, what will you say? 14:44:48 alexchadin: ok, i will pick it up 14:45:09 alexchadin: just one general remark: the multinode gate is always failing for a month now, we need to fix it 14:45:28 #action ostroverkhov take https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425110/ to end it up 14:45:41 vincentfrancois1: let's discuss it on main channel 14:45:59 alexchadin: np 14:46:00 vincentfrancois1: just remind me sometime 14:46:13 Added suspended audit state needs reviews. Have some tested it yet? #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438800/ 14:46:45 licanwei: have you tested it in Devstack for example? 14:46:55 yes 14:47:40 licanwei: great! I will review it 14:47:57 #action alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438800/ 14:48:09 it works well 14:48:14 Prevent the migration of VM with 'optimize' False in VM metadata needs final core reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443070/ 14:48:31 vincentfrancois1: thx for review! 14:49:19 alexchadin: you're welcome ;) 14:49:26 #action alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438800/ 14:49:36 gnocchi support topic should be reviewed #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/watcher+branch:master+topic:bp/gnocchi-watcher 14:50:12 chrisspencer, licanwei, dtardivel, pshedimb_ will you take it? 14:50:22 +1 14:50:25 +1 14:50:28 +1 14:51:04 #action licanwei pshedimb_ chrisspencer review patchsets of https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/watcher+branch:master+topic:bp/gnocchi-watcher 14:51:22 Added tempest test for workload_stabilization needs to be tested by someone else #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393355/ 14:52:23 looks like it is up to me 14:52:32 vincentfrancois1: I will contact you about it 14:52:53 Add action description needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450720/ 14:53:00 alexchadin: ok 14:53:39 vincentfrancois1 will you take this commit? 14:53:56 to review 14:54:06 alexchadin: I can review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393355/ 14:54:43 vincentfrancois1: you've sent link to your patch ;) 14:54:45 alexchadin: as for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450720/ I'll do it if I have time 14:54:58 alexchadin: but no promises :p 14:55:20 #action vincentfrancois1 review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450720/ 14:55:29 Add Watcher JobStore for background jobs needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/449659/ 14:56:05 this PS will be updated soon 14:56:21 Run Watcher-API behind mod-wsgi needs new PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450740/ 14:56:36 alexchadin: made a quick review of that one 14:56:59 who else will take it? 14:57:47 #action alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450740/ 14:58:26 hidekazu proposed new BP today: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/zone-migration-strategy 14:59:13 It isn't clear to me yet, we agreed to wait spec for it from hidekazu side 15:00:26 well, let's continue to prepare for Summit 15:00:34 have a nice day! 15:00:48 bye 15:00:49 bye :) 15:00:50 thank you for your attention 15:00:52 bye 15:00:53 bye 15:00:57 Bye 15:01:01 bye 15:01:03 bye 15:01:08 #endmeeting