13:00:37 #startmeeting watcher 13:00:38 Meeting started Wed Mar 29 13:00:37 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is alexchadin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 13:00:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 13:00:41 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 13:00:55 good morning/day/evening! 13:00:57 o/ 13:00:59 o/ 13:01:12 o/ 13:01:29 #info Today we have the following agenda https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#03.2F29.2F2017 13:01:47 #topic Announcements 13:02:00 Project Navigator will have new version soon. We need to know if Watcher may meet some Maturity criteria. #link http://devbranch.openstack.org/software/releases/ocata/components/watcher 13:02:43 fancy mascot 13:02:53 its been a long time the community is complaining about the project navigator…good to see some changes her 13:03:28 yeah that's good news :) 13:03:32 There are items like supporting deprecations, having install guide, corporate diversity 13:03:34 hi 13:03:51 hi 13:03:56 I would remove the monkey on your shoulders Alex ;-) 13:03:58 alexchadin: how will they decide the maturity level? 13:04:22 alexchadin : I dont know what kind of animal it is... 13:04:24 vincentfrancois1: there are seven items we need to meet to get maturity 13:04:34 vincentfrancois1: look at nova page: http://devbranch.openstack.org/software/releases/ocata/components/nova 13:05:24 we simply needs to add TC tags to the project 13:05:36 acabot: it is Malaysian Bear ;) 13:06:11 alexchadin : ok go for the bear ;-) 13:06:37 alexchadin: why api version for watcher is N/A in the project dashboard ? 13:07:40 dtardivel: I haven't contacted management team to give them remarks 13:07:45 yet 13:08:11 o/ sorry, I'm late 13:08:17 This page is still in development so if you have any questions and proposals, feel free to share them 13:08:54 vincentfrancois1: is api version coded in our source code ? 13:11:12 dtardivel: we have v1 folder 13:11:17 dtardivel: yes it's v1 13:11:38 and we have a version number in each controller 13:12:11 Etherpad for Boston discussions will be created by EOW. Everyone is invited to suggest topics to discuss. 13:12:29 dtardivel: https://github.com/openstack/watcher/blob/master/watcher/api/controllers/root.py#L73 13:12:35 We will have about 90 minutes on Forum 13:13:09 alexchadin : does it mean we will have only 90 minutes for watcher meetings ? 13:13:10 alexchadin: can you give the etherpad link please? 13:13:18 it is best place to chat with people interested in getting started on Watcher 13:14:07 acabot: I propose to define meeting times in etherpad 13:14:21 alexchadin : vincentfrancois1 & I will be in Boston 13:14:44 alexchadin : ok cool 13:14:54 vincentfrancois1: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/watcher-Boston-meetings 13:15:06 it just has been created 13:15:31 I will update it soon with structure 13:15:45 alexchadin: how about https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-Watcher-brainstorming? 13:16:00 added to #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/watcher-etherpads 13:16:39 hidekazu: I've looked through proposed brainstorming from other projects and think that it would be redundant for us yet 13:16:40 hidekazu: +1 13:17:01 hidekazu : BOS for Boston ? strange naming… :-) 13:17:45 brainstorming means our project has achieved some point when we can get feedback from users 13:18:06 alexchadin: ok, i understand purpose of BOS-Watcher-brainstorming. 13:18:27 so we will have another meeting, right? 13:19:00 it is the place where everyone can come and say "hi, your product works great in our production but there are some things to do" 13:19:10 hidekazu: yes, of course 13:19:36 any other announcements? 13:19:41 alexchadin: nice. 13:20:05 well move on 13:20:16 #topic Review Action Items 13:20:22 Watcher specs 13:20:31 service-versioned-notifications-api needs core reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445817/ 13:20:48 Vladimir is still waiting for your reviews ;) 13:21:12 yep ) 13:21:19 alexchadin: ostroverkhov: my bad 13:21:44 I have added watcher-specs-core group as reviewers 13:21:46 alexchadin: took too much time on other BPs and questions 13:22:11 vincentfrancois1: no problem with it 13:22:30 #action vincentfrancois1 review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445817/ 13:22:40 workload-fingerprinting-fingerprint-visuzalization should be updated #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448394/ 13:23:20 who knows IRC username of Ananth Narayan S? 13:23:37 ananth 13:24:08 but you should probably ask sballe to get feedback on this 13:24:43 acabot: I have a meeting with ananth in a couple hours 13:24:48 acabot: since sballe_ won't be here during the meeting, will add it as action 13:25:10 and I’m not sure the bp workload-fingerprinting-fingerprint-visuzalization must be part of Pike... 13:26:04 acabot: it is PoC so we can just discuss it yet 13:26:22 alexchadin : ok 13:26:30 #action sballe_ chrisspencer get feedback from ananth about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448394/ 13:26:51 workload-characterization-grammar needs to be answered by acabot #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ 13:27:12 acabot: chrisspencer left comment for you 13:27:22 alexchadin : I will thx 13:27:28 alexchadin: both the fingerprint BP and the ironic BP talk about adding extra API endpoints, so we should be careful about it because APIs will have to be quite stable 13:28:06 vincentfrancois1: I suggest to add it as topic to discuss during the following Summit 13:28:23 alexchadin: why not yes 13:29:14 #action alexchadin add discussions of fingerprint BP to the Boston-etherpad 13:29:32 audit-tag-vm-metadata should be reviewed again #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 13:29:51 I can review it 13:29:58 hvprash provided new PS 13:30:03 dtardivel: great! 13:30:46 #action dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 13:31:01 noisy-neighbor-dashboard needs to be answered by vincentfrancoise #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427308/ 13:31:21 vincentfrancois1: here is some questions addressed to you 13:31:57 alexchadin: I'll answer right away 13:32:27 thanks vincentfrancois1 13:32:39 #action vincentfrancois1 give answers on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/427308/ 13:32:52 cinder-model-integration needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450173/ 13:33:42 it is very interesting new BP so it would be great if almost everyone review it 13:34:30 who would like to review it? 13:34:48 alexchadin: I'll try 13:34:55 +1 13:35:14 #action vincentfrancois1 acabot alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450173/ 13:35:23 background-jobs-ha needs new PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447996/ 13:35:41 thanks to vincentfrancois1, I will provide new PS soon 13:36:01 #action alexchadin provide new PS of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447996/ 13:36:25 Support workload fingerprinting needs new PS and answer questions #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448396/ 13:36:47 chrisspencer: please remind about it too 13:36:59 alexchadin: +1 13:37:18 add-power-on-off needs new PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/435436/ 13:37:43 Yumeng_: have you seen addressed comments? 13:38:38 seems that Yumeng_ is not here yet 13:39:33 #action Yumeng_ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/435436/ needs new PS 13:39:47 build-baremetal-data-model-in-watcher needs to be redefined with dtardivel #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448016/ 13:40:59 dtardivel: I've seen that there are some fundamental issues with the current PS 13:41:00 +1 13:41:47 #action Yumeng_ contact dtardivel to redefine https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448016/ 13:41:53 Watcher 13:42:04 gnocchi support for strategies should be reviewed #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/watcher+branch:master+topic:bp/gnocchi-watcher 13:42:34 there is bunch of gnocchi-related commits that should be reviewed 13:43:28 who would like to take a look at it? 13:43:48 alexchadin: I reviewed 1 13:43:52 I may take workload-stabilization 13:44:15 i will. 13:44:17 alexchadin: but the comment needs to be copied over in all others 13:44:42 vincentfrancois1: the same issue with all others? 13:45:20 Hello 13:45:21 alexchadin: not written exactly the same, but fairly similar 13:45:21 #action hidekazu vincentfrancois1 alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/watcher+branch:master+topic:bp/gnocchi-watcher 13:45:30 vincentfrancois1: ok 13:45:47 suspended-audit-state needs core reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438800/ 13:46:23 I will take it 13:46:43 #action alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/438800/ 13:46:44 milestone of suspended-audit-state is pike-1. 13:47:17 I see, we will merge it before 13:47:26 dynamic-action-description needs to add notifications #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/413893/ 13:48:06 seems that this commit was abandoned 13:48:36 I will take a look at it and will se if someone else can take it 13:48:49 alexchadin: I guess so 13:49:01 audit-tag-vm-metadata needs core reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443070/ 13:50:02 vincentfrancois1: have you resolved last issue with pksingh? 13:50:38 alexchadin: i submitted new patch after comment incorporation 13:50:48 guys please have a look, when you get time 13:51:12 alexchadin: pksingh: I'll try 13:51:22 #action vincentfrancois1 alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443070/ 13:51:28 thanks vincentfrancois1 13:51:32 Added tempest test for workload_stabilization needs new PS #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393355/ 13:52:19 vincentfrancois1: chrisspencer reported that there is a failure on 178 line of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/393355/8/watcher_tempest_plugin/tests/scenario/test_execute_workload_balancing.py 13:53:18 alexchadin: if someone can take over it I would be glad 13:53:34 vincentfrancois1: got it, will mark 13:53:40 dynamic-action-description needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450720/ 13:54:01 alexchadin: I don't have a working devstack at hand right now... 13:54:05 licanwei: is it ready to review? 13:54:16 alexchadin: yes 13:54:40 #action alexchadin add watcher team to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450720/ 13:54:43 and i'll still working for notification 13:55:02 noisy-neighbor-strategy needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451215/ 13:55:11 licanwei: will it come as another commit? 13:55:24 yes 13:56:08 alexchadin: i want to review it 13:56:24 #action Yumeng_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451215/ 13:56:35 Yumeng_: read log of meeting if missed something 13:56:49 Watcher CLI & Dashboard 13:56:53 alexchadin:ok 13:57:14 Here is https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450181/ from Yumeng_ 13:57:38 already got +2 from licanwei, it need more core reviews 13:58:21 Unfortunately, we are out of time to start Open Discussions 13:58:45 I will announce it in our channel 13:58:52 and ML 13:59:03 alexchadin: just W+1 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450181/ 13:59:16 vincentfrancois1: nice! 13:59:27 it is time to end meeting 13:59:35 thanks 13:59:37 have a nice day! 13:59:38 thanks 13:59:42 bye 13:59:43 bye 13:59:44 thank you 13:59:45 bye 13:59:46 bye 14:00:02 #endmeeting