14:01:15 #startmeeting watcher 14:01:15 Meeting started Wed Jan 25 14:01:15 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is acabot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:20 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 14:01:25 hi 14:01:30 o/ 14:01:31 o/ 14:01:33 o/ 14:01:33 o/ 14:01:38 hi 14:01:55 agenda for today #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#01.2F25.2F2016 14:02:07 hi 14:02:24 #topic Announcements 14:02:42 #info Pike PTLs self nomination has started and Watcher has no candidate yet 14:02:49 #link https://governance.openstack.org/election/ 14:03:01 PTL nomination ends in 4d9h42m1s 14:03:03 acabot: I've placed my self-nomination couple of hours ago 14:03:10 alexchadin: +1 14:03:21 alexchadin : yop sorry I missed it 14:03:23 alexchadin: Nice! 14:03:29 alexchadin : review # ? 14:03:40 acabot: seconds 14:03:50 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425163/ 14:04:25 alexchadin : thx Alex, looks great 14:04:40 alexchadin: I like your plans! 14:04:58 acabot, sballe_, vincentfrancoise thank you! 14:05:18 great alexchadin ! 14:05:48 hvprash: thank you! 14:05:55 #info alexchadin has submited his candidacy as Watcher PTL https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425163/ 14:06:12 #info Meeting time for odd weeks will be moved from 9:00 UTC to 13:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt 14:06:23 as requested by US contributors 14:06:34 all thx a million for agreeing to move the time :-) 14:06:39 +1 14:06:43 I hope it will be easier for you guys and still compatible with asian agenda 14:06:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/425107/ 14:07:20 acabot: It will be for me since I have been travling a lot to CA and it was at 1am i nthat timezone 14:07:32 as soon as the review will be merged we will met at 13 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt 14:07:42 hi guys 14:07:46 hi 14:07:46 hi Yumeng 14:07:52 hi Yumeng 14:07:55 hi Yumeng 14:08:11 thank you such warm welcome! 14:08:26 Yumeng : our weekly meeting on odd weeks will be moved to 13 UTC 14:08:39 Yumeng : I hope its still good for you 14:08:55 #info PTG is in one month, a dedicated etherpad is now open, please submit topics that you want to discuss 14:09:02 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-watcher-ptg 14:09:18 please add at least your name in the attendees list 14:09:41 I hope to have around 10 people here but I still dont know who bought a ticket 14:10:05 thx chrisspencer 14:10:11 :) 14:10:16 acabot: we got travel approval for pshedimb and chrisspencer 14:10:42 chrisspencer: +2 14:10:50 ok Yumeng any update on your visa approval ? 14:11:04 not yet 14:11:09 ok 14:11:31 feel free to add topics in the list even if you dont plan to be in Atlanta 14:11:45 #info Call for presentations for Boston summit is now open (deadline is February 6th), a dedicated etherpad is ready to be completed 14:11:53 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Watcher_abstracts_boston2017 14:12:12 Yumeng : thx for your contribution 14:12:33 if we could submit at least 3 talks next week it would be great 14:12:35 acabot: :) 14:12:46 I will submit one today 14:12:53 sballe_ : thx 14:13:11 #info Watcher CLI has been released as 1.0.0 14:13:18 #link https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/#ocata-python-watcherclient 14:13:33 thx dtardivel & vincentfrancoise 14:13:34 alexchadin: since you are our new PTL you should be on the Watcher, the Infrastructure Optimization service for OpenStack: Plans for the P&Q-releases 14:14:09 sballe_ : I think we can wait for the end of the week to see if we have any other candidate ;-) 14:14:11 For some reasons I am thinking that only two speakers can be on talks. If that is true I would suggest you and acabot on the talk 14:14:27 acabot: make sense 14:14:42 #topic Review Action Items 14:14:48 Specs 14:14:55 Add improvements to the planner and workflow mechanisms needs a final core review before release 14:14:56 sballe_: 95% I'll be in Boston 14:15:04 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ 14:15:24 sballe_ : could you do a W+1 on this ? 14:15:30 yes 14:15:33 sballe_ : all code has been merged already 14:15:34 sballe_: code already has been merged 14:15:46 #sballe_ : W+1 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ 14:15:52 #action sballe_ : W+1 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ 14:16:04 Define grammar for workload characterization needs a new PS answering previous comments 14:16:09 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/19 14:16:23 hvprash : what's the status for this spec ? 14:16:42 acabot, there are still certain things unclear for the workload characterization. would have to discuss during the design summit 14:16:58 i am working on the PS though 14:17:27 may have to move this to Pike 14:17:27 hvprash : ok please add it in the topics list then, I think its a major topic we have to discuss 14:17:29 sballe_: give me more time to review it please #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ 14:17:39 ok 14:17:44 yes, will do 14:18:29 #action hvprash add a new PS for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ and add it to the topics list in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-watcher-ptg 14:18:38 Support Description For Dynamic Action needs a new PS 14:18:44 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401111/ 14:18:55 is hanrong here ? 14:19:29 Yumeng : any update on this spec ? 14:19:51 Noisy Neighbor Strategy has still work in progress 14:19:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/ 14:20:09 sballe_ : could you please complete it ? 14:20:38 acabot: I will pass the message :) 14:20:56 Yumeng : ok thx 14:21:11 acabot: yes. we got our systems working this week so we are now good to go. I will finish the spec 14:21:18 thx 14:21:38 #action sballe_ complete https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/ 14:21:58 sballe_ : this strategy could be a good candidate for Watcher talk in Boston 14:22:15 yes thta is the talk I am submitting 14:22:22 sballe_ : ok 14:22:26 Audit tag in VM Metadata needs reviews 14:22:32 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 14:22:41 thx hvprash for adding a PS 14:22:46 sballe_ vincentfrancois - need your help on this. pls review. pksingh and sanfern have started looking into the code. 14:22:47 who wants to review it ? 14:23:06 acabot: tag me 14:23:14 #action sballe_ vincentfrancoise acabot alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 14:23:15 i would need vincent to take a look and have some clarifications on the cluster data model 14:23:37 thabnks alexchadin 14:23:48 moving to Watcher 14:23:56 hvprash: well, this week I'm still busy to finalize the release but we can discuss about it next week 14:24:10 just need 10 mins of your time. after this meeting ? 14:24:29 we should release Watcher O3 tomorrow so a lot of code has been merged recently 14:24:30 hvprash: oh ok then 14:24:40 thx a lot 14:25:02 #info New default planner has been merged #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406991/ 14:25:17 thx alexchadin vincentfrancoise for this great addition 14:25:20 2(!) new default planners:D 14:25:29 thanks vincentfrancoise 14:25:33 alexchadin: sure :p 14:25:43 alexchadin : yes now we have 2 planners :-) 14:26:03 good to see that the plugin system works well 14:26:08 acabot: just need to be able to be able to select one in PIke :) 14:26:27 vincentfrancoise : yes indeed 14:26:39 #info Graph cluster model instead of mapping one & Remove obsolete Resource element have been merged 14:26:51 thx tmetsh & vincentfrancoise for this 14:27:23 all this work really improve watcher 14:27:42 Fix multinode tempest test failure multinode gate is still being fixed 14:27:47 thx to intel folks for also giving us a good starting point to integrate cinder and neutron data in the future 14:27:48 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419544/ 14:28:28 vincentfrancoise: +1 14:28:51 sballe_ : as the graph model is now used by watcher, you should probably check that all Intel's strategies are still working 14:29:09 acabot: +1 14:29:14 acabot: make sense. chrisspencer can you do that? 14:29:26 because we check only workload consolidation & dummy strategies with the gate 14:29:34 all strategies aren't covered by integration tests so can you all test the strategies 14:29:44 acabot: can you add an action for chrisspencer 14:29:49 sure 14:30:22 #action chrisspencer check that existing Intel strategies are still working with graph model implementation 14:30:54 so our multinode tempest gate still has problems 14:31:01 vincentfrancoise is investigating it 14:31:24 acabot: we are getting there though 14:31:40 we hope to have it fixed before the release to test Watcher in multinode 14:31:50 acabot: but right now people are merging code big time so things are moving slow 14:32:14 #action vincentfrancoise Fix multinode tempest test failure https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419544/ 14:32:22 check the state of action plan needs final core reviews 14:32:28 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391383/ 14:32:41 who wants to review this last BP for O3 ? 14:33:12 does anyone wants to fix the merge conflict ? 14:33:32 =& 14:33:33 +1 14:33:41 ok thx 14:33:52 #action dtardivel fix merge conflict for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391383/ 14:34:06 who wants to review it before merge tomorrow ? 14:34:22 acabot: I'll work with dtardivel on it I guess 14:34:41 #action vincentfrancoise review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391383/ 14:34:52 Documentation update needs reviews 14:35:02 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424187/ 14:35:17 dtardivel reviewed our current doc before the release 14:35:30 and provides a new architecture diagram 14:35:42 I think its good for all to take a look at it 14:36:00 http://docs-draft.openstack.org/87/424187/8/check/gate-watcher-docs-ubuntu-xenial/1dfdacb//doc/build/html/architecture.html 14:36:01 +1 14:36:48 #action alexchadin sballe_ hvprash acabot review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424187/ 14:37:09 add Ocata release notes needs reviews 14:37:09 will do 14:37:16 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421281/ 14:37:36 I have created Reno release notes for Ocata 14:38:01 I would really like to have a quick feedback about it before merging it 14:38:06 dtardivel: I guess joe W+1 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ right now and didn't wait for you to review :-( 14:39:04 who wants to review release notes ? (its really quick) 14:39:18 +1 14:39:23 acabot: will do 14:39:31 +1 14:39:43 #action sballe_ chrisspencer hvprash review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421281/ 14:39:48 thx 14:39:56 Add period input parameter to basic strategy is in merge conflict 14:40:03 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416432/ 14:40:12 I dont think hidekazu is here 14:40:24 vincentfrancoise : should we merge it for o3 ? 14:40:31 or it can wait 14:40:32 I can resolv this issue as well 14:40:43 +1 14:40:47 can resolve 14:40:50 acabot: we could 14:41:00 acabot: it's a nice to have only though 14:41:08 #action alexchadin fix merge conflict on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416432/ 14:41:39 #action dtardivel merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/416432/ in o3 14:41:49 #topic Blueprint/Bug Review and Discussion 14:42:00 #info Ocata 3 Milestone, with Feature and Requirements Freezes: 26 Jan 14:42:08 #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/ocata-3 14:42:32 we still have bugs and 1 BP in progress 14:42:57 I plan to submit the release in 24h 14:43:47 atuly_ : are you still working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher/+bug/1640099 ? 14:43:47 Launchpad bug 1640099 in watcher "Add tempest test for workload_stabilization" [Low,Triaged] - Assigned to Atul Pandey (atul-4you) 14:44:15 #info Ocata RC1 target: 2 Feb 14:44:22 #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/ocata-rc1 14:44:59 hvprash : I will move your 2 BPs to Pike 14:45:12 thanks acabot 14:45:28 #action acabot move hvprash BPs to Pike cycle 14:46:09 #info Ocata Final Release candidate deadline: 16 Feb 14:46:19 #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/ocata-rc-final 14:46:56 so we will have at least 3 weeks to run tests between tomorrow and the final release 14:47:45 I hope everyone will run tests on master branch during this period 14:47:56 as we are targeting 1.0.0 version 14:48:20 #topic Open discussions 14:48:43 i have an open discussion topic 14:48:56 hvprash : please go ahead 14:49:13 with the monasca helper, does that mean the existing strategies needed to be modified too ? 14:49:20 I've done all BPs related to Applier except limiting 14:49:24 existing action plans 14:49:32 I think it is time for that old BP 14:49:58 hvprash: yes we still need to make each one Monasca-compatible 14:50:31 vincentfrancoise: have you installed it yet? 14:51:10 alexchadin: you mean Monasca? Yes dtardivel did in our lab 14:51:45 hvprash : yes you have to modify the strategy like this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/414617/ 14:51:51 vincentfrancois - so we will be maintaining multiple versions or something configurable ? 14:52:21 thanks vincent. that helps.. will go thru it 14:52:26 vincentfrancoise: yeah, Monasca. Do you have proper installation guide? There are a lot of technologies to be configured well 14:52:59 hvprash: well each strategy has to provide a datasource switch like I did for basic_consolidation 14:53:14 alexchadin: please have a look on https://github.com/b-com/ansible-monasca 14:53:17 got it ! 14:53:41 hvprash: but some like IPMI based do not have the corresponding metrics in Monasca I believe so this can be a bit complicated 14:53:56 ok 14:54:09 dtardivel: thanks! 14:54:38 alexchadin : alex, could you please send an email on the ML with your PTL candidacy ? 14:54:48 alexchadin: I also have a quick memo to configure the libvirt metrics somewhere if you want 14:55:06 vincentfrancoise: If I need them I will let you know:) 14:55:32 acabot: yeah, just the message with the same content? 14:55:41 alexchadin : yes please 14:55:49 acabot: will do 14:56:05 #action alexchadin share PTL candidacy on the ML 14:57:03 thank you all 14:57:10 have a good day/night 14:57:14 bye 14:57:15 thanks ! 14:57:19 bye 14:57:19 bye 14:57:24 #endmeeting