09:20:19 #startmeeting watcher 09:20:19 Meeting started Wed Dec 21 09:20:19 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is vincentfrancoise. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:20:20 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:20:22 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 09:20:24 hi 09:20:38 hello 09:20:50 Today's meeting will be driven by me 09:20:58 hi 09:21:10 the agenda was made in 10mn so please tell me if you want to discuss any extra point 09:21:36 agenda for today #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#12.2F21.2F2016 09:21:52 #topic Announcements 09:22:04 Any annoucement? 09:22:32 ok so let's move on 09:22:33 #topic Review Action Items 09:23:26 hi 09:24:11 #item https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ Define grammar for workload characterization needs a new PS an answering previous comments 09:24:52 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ Define grammar for workload characterization needs a new PS an answering previous comments 09:25:36 is hvprash_ here? 09:26:25 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401111/ needs a new PS 09:27:03 hanrong: I made a comment following what dtardivel said in a previous PS 09:27:11 did you see my comments? 09:27:20 Yea, I see 09:27:44 I am trying to using notification 09:28:13 I will update it later 09:28:51 hanrong: if you go with the notification option, you first need to implement the action notifications and that would mean you need https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/action-versioned-notifications-api 09:29:29 ok , I will study it, thank you. 09:29:34 in order to publish the list of all actions along with their description 09:29:39 hanrong: ok great :) 09:30:02 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/ needs reviews 09:30:49 who wants to review this spec? 09:31:04 +1 09:31:30 #action Yumeng_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/ 09:32:26 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ There are many +1s but TODOs are still left in spec 09:33:10 Ok 09:33:22 see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/5/specs/ocata/approved/audit-tag-vm-metadata.rst@264 09:34:04 I wasn't there last week 09:34:24 does anyone know if there was anything important said about this one last week> 09:34:26 ? 09:35:41 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ needs a new PS 09:35:57 from last meeting: needs review 09:36:12 tmetsch: ok thanks 09:37:07 so can someone that already reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ give their grain of salt on the todo's any the open questions left in the spec ? 09:38:04 ok so let's switch to Watcher reviews 09:38:18 all US folks who volunteered to review afaik - so probably nobody here :-) 09:39:27 tmetsch: yeah possible but I didn't pay attention about it when quickly making the agenda :) 09:40:01 #info https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/centralise-config-opts needs a new PS to remove _opts.py 09:40:50 pshedimb: are you there? 09:42:19 vincentfrançoise will come back soon his client has crashed 09:42:49 I'm back 09:43:09 :) 09:43:15 #action pshedimb add a new PS to remove _opts.py for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/centralise-config-opts 09:43:58 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403718/ needs final reviews & merge 09:44:47 alexchadin: did you fix the issue raised by dtardivel on this one? 09:45:09 vincentfrancoise: here is fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403718/7..8/watcher/decision_engine/audit/base.py 09:46:04 #action vincentfrancoise review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403718/ 09:46:12 anyone else to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403718/ ? 09:46:48 +1 09:46:48 +1 09:47:11 #action hanrong Yumeng review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403718/ 09:47:37 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362730/ needs reviews 09:48:00 this one is around for quite a while now 09:49:23 I remember that I wanted to replace our current compute model with its graph based counterpart instead of having to maintain both since they are storing the same information 09:49:59 that would be cool - but maybe that is sth for Pike? 09:50:09 but never actually took down to explain how/why 09:50:15 time* 09:50:46 tmetsch: sure this can be done in 2 stages 09:51:44 I'd support that - for upcoming releases. For now a review of PS 15 would be great :-) 09:51:45 # action vincentfrancoise acabot create a BP for Pike to replace the current compute model with the graph based one 09:51:57 #action vincentfrancoise acabot create a BP for Pike to replace the current compute model with the graph based one 09:52:16 in the meantime, who wants to review this? 09:52:53 #action vincentfrancoise review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/362730/ 09:53:06 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/406991/ needs a new PS 09:53:31 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391383/ also needs a new PS 09:53:44 now for Watcher CLI 09:54:35 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/403716/ needs final reviews but will be merged after its dependency 09:55:04 #topic Blueprint/Bug 09:55:29 #info https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/ocata-3 Watcher ocata-3 has started and finishes on January 23rd with 12 BPs to finish 09:56:04 so please focus on the BPs and bugs listed there 09:56:57 #info https://review.openstack.org/#/c/413079/ has been pushed by alexchadin and needs reviews (I missed it from earlier) 09:57:38 I personally won't have time myself to review this one this week 09:57:44 but maybe next week 09:57:55 who's willing to review it? 09:58:16 #topic open discussion 09:58:45 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/cluster-energy-saving 09:59:05 Yumeng you wanted to discuss this BP? 09:59:13 yes 09:59:34 I saw it was marked as superseded 09:59:40 (1mn left) 09:59:40 This bp need to discuss again 09:59:55 I add new description 10:00:03 ok 10:00:23 #action hanrong rewrite description for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/cluster-energy-saving 10:00:28 time's up 10:00:39 #endmeeting