14:00:29 #startmeeting watcher 14:00:30 Meeting started Wed Nov 16 14:00:29 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is acabot_. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:31 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:33 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 14:00:36 o/ 14:00:49 ji 14:00:51 o/ 14:00:53 hi 14:00:58 hello 14:00:59 o/ 14:01:02 hi 14:01:05 hi 14:01:06 \o 14:01:14 hi 14:01:33 agenda for today #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#11.2F16.2F2016 14:02:12 #topic Announcements 14:02:23 #info We should send a recap of discussions in Barcelona on the ML 14:02:40 sballe_ : I dont know if you have seen this action from last meeting 14:03:16 I suggested to send a recap of Watcher sessions in Barcelona but as I was not there I'm probably not the best person to do it ;-) 14:03:22 no I forgot. But I do want you guys to welcome the two new intel developers to watcher 14:03:36 pshedimb: welcome 14:03:47 I am not sure what chris' irc nickname is 14:04:05 sballe_ : welcome !!! 14:04:23 pshedimb: Welcome on board! 14:04:36 edwin will be fading out of watcher and moving to a different project. 14:04:47 pshedimb: and chris are located int he US 14:04:52 sballe_: there is a chrisspencer on #openstack-watcher: is it him? 14:04:58 yes 14:05:04 thanks you :) 14:05:22 welcome pshedimb ! 14:05:27 sballe_: nice! 14:05:32 pshedimb & chrisspencer : welcome on board ! 14:05:42 welcome chrisspencer ! 14:06:05 welcome psachin, cholcombe :) 14:06:45 sballe_ : sorry but we have many subjects to discuss today so I'm moving on, could you send the recap on the ML ? 14:06:58 yes will do 14:07:24 #action sballe_ send a recap of watcher sessions on the ML 14:07:37 #info We will start a thread on the ML to discuss the way we can test available strategies 14:07:55 dtardivel : can you handle it ? 14:07:56 love it. that is definetly neede 14:08:55 acabot_: I sent an email this morning 14:09:05 ok sorry I missed it ;-) 14:09:14 #topic Review Action Items 14:09:18 Watcher specs 14:09:26 #info team priorities for Ocata have been merged 14:09:35 #link http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/watcher-specs/priorities/ocata-priorities.html 14:09:48 scale out or delete instance based on workload should be abandonned 14:09:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359690/ 14:10:21 licanwei : can you do it on behalf on jinquan ? 14:10:39 yunmeng do it 14:10:50 licanwei : by the way is jinquan back on the project ? 14:11:07 maybe not 14:11:17 #action yunmeng abandon the spec https://review.openstack.org/#/c/359690/ 14:11:24 licanwei : ok 14:11:33 automatic triggering of action plans for AUDIT should now be reviewed and merged 14:11:48 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342473/ 14:12:26 alexchadin took this bp as diga was not there 14:12:49 sballe_ : can you do a final review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342473/ ? 14:12:54 acabot_: diga started to implement something about it 14:12:59 sure 14:13:02 or hvprash_ 14:13:28 yes acabot_. have some clarifications on that BP which may have some dependency with audit tag 14:13:29 vincentfrancoise : I saw it right before the meeting, not sure it fit the spec 14:14:01 #action acabot_ sballe_ hvprash_ review and merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342473/ 14:14:10 Specs for watcher-versioned-objects must be merged as code has already been merged 14:14:17 acabot_: yes, it's clearly not enough to fully implement what was said in the specs 14:14:20 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383718/ 14:14:44 again hvprash_ & sballe_ could you please +2 +1 this spec ? 14:14:51 definetly 14:14:53 yes 14:15:02 acabot_: it's just that I don't know if it's alexchadin or diga that is supposed to work on it at the moment 14:15:12 this code will be released tomorrow so please do it today 14:15:19 ok 14:15:40 #action sballe_ hvprash_ review and merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383718/ today 14:15:47 Specs for audit-versioned-notifications-api needs final reviews from core 14:15:53 sballe_: the code is already merged anyway 14:15:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385077/ 14:16:13 code will be merged today so we need to merge it as well 14:16:29 ok 14:16:30 #action acabot_ sballe_ hvprash_ review & merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385077/ today 14:16:36 Define grammar for workload characterization needs reviews 14:16:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ 14:17:00 hvprash_ : can we continue reviewing it ? 14:17:01 thanks sballe_ for reviewing. will add the job priority to the characterization. others review too 14:17:22 I will 14:17:22 yes acabot_ pls continue reviewing 14:17:33 #action acabot review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/377100/ 14:17:56 Define when an action plan is stale/invalid needs discussions 14:18:04 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386293/ 14:18:26 are we not discussing the QoS BP? 14:18:31 licanwei : you sent me an email about brunograz comments, I'm sorry I didn't had time to go trough them 14:18:54 sballe_ : link ? 14:19:02 Workload Characterization and QoS needs to be assigned to me. I already changed the BP.We submitted a new Blueprint which is a sub-task of: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/workload-characterization-qoshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/cache-occupancy-strategySpec is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/1 14:19:02 https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/M2FRZ3ae/ 14:19:10 acabot: i need your suggest 14:19:13 these where my updates 14:19:25 sorry for the weird format 14:19:48 Should I just change the ownership to me in the priorities? 14:19:57 no its in the agenda 14:20:03 just wait 14:20:24 ok we can talk afterwards on how to get all this done 14:20:30 licanwei : I will review it tomorrow 14:20:39 acabot: ok,thanks 14:20:48 #action acabot review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386293/ 14:20:58 Audit tag in VM Metadata needs a jenkins fix & reviews 14:21:07 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 14:21:13 hvprash_ : could you fix it ? 14:21:36 i will review 14:21:54 i need to do a PS. also, have some clarifications on implementing this feature. Either acabot_ vincent or jed could help me on this 14:21:57 #action sballe_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 14:21:58 acabot_: I will review it too 14:22:20 #action acabot_ vincentfrancoise review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391374/ 14:22:34 Add improvements to the planner and workflow mechanisms needs reviews 14:22:43 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ 14:23:19 we are thinking of splitting this BP in 2 but it needs to be discussed with alexchadin 14:23:51 #action acabot_ alexchadin discuss BP split for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/385871/ 14:23:58 Add specs for cache occupancy strategy needs discussions 14:24:06 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/ 14:24:09 ok now is the time 14:24:13 sballe_ : yes ;-) 14:24:45 theworkload charcatrization needs to be assignd to me insead of hvprash_ 14:24:50 its great to have a new strategy but if edwin leaves the project, who will work on it ? 14:24:58 We submitted a new Blueprint which is a sub-task of: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/workload-characterization-qoshttps://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/cache-occupancy-strategySpec is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398162/1 https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/R7bYxzNX/ 14:25:18 pru and chris and I will work on this. 14:25:20 sballe_, you mean workload characterization qos 14:25:31 sballe_ : https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/workload-characterization-qos assigned to you already 14:25:57 yes We have done some design and the way to get to the qos functionality we need is by dividing up that bp into smaller ones 14:26:02 yeah, i think I already assigned to you :) 14:26:23 I would suggest that pru & chris work on the framework instead of a strategy if they want to start with watcher 14:26:32 yes the BP and I will change it in hte ocata priotities 14:27:03 acabot_: not an option at this point. 14:27:14 the RDT integration is Intel's highest priotity 14:27:14 sballe_ : we really need more code reviewers on the framework 14:27:34 acabot_: they can review code. 14:28:07 sballe_ : I dont think they will review code from the framework if they dont work on it... 14:28:16 sballe_ : just guessing 14:28:55 sballe_ : but ok if its Intel priority, when do you plan to have this strategy implemented ? ocata-2 , 3 ? 14:29:02 let's talk but for now pru or chris will work on moving forward the Intel RDT integration. We could look at some low hanging task for them to work on too 14:29:17 ocata-3 14:29:24 ok thx 14:29:41 low_hanging tasks for me too 14:29:42 can we start reviewing the spec from edwin ? 14:29:43 there's the config BP that can be done as a starter 14:30:08 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/centralise-config-opts 14:30:11 no it is not ready yet. give it a week and you can review 14:30:17 sorry, forgot about exploreshaifali. she will be working on some of my BPs 14:30:20 I am trying to understand the code of watcher, to contribute ahead 14:30:34 yeah, some low hanging will help exploreshaifali to catch up too 14:30:46 I already did the base so it will be easier to finish the job without having to start fresh on it 14:31:14 same with pshedimb and Chrisspencer 14:31:14 ok lets move to Wathcher code base 14:31:23 Documentation for workload stabilization [1] & workload consolidation [2] have been merged 14:31:39 thx alexchadin & brunograz for handling it 14:31:49 Documentation for Outlet Temperature Based Strategy need a new PS and reviews 14:31:51 I am working on the 3 intel ones. Waiting for some info around version of node manager 14:31:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/397411/ 14:32:25 sballe_ : ok cool as you have set W-1 I suppose you dont need review yet 14:33:02 acabot_: FYI, a new section named 'algorithm' has been added by alexchain in the template doc. Please take time to add it into your strategy documentation 14:33:06 because I still need the version of Node manager I put -1 because even if everything is perfect I don;t want it merged 14:33:26 dtardivel: thx for the pointer to the bug id 14:33:31 sballe_ : ok so you need reviews ? 14:33:56 as the ocata-1 release is tomorrow, we will merge a lot of code right after this meeting 14:33:59 you guys can review it but I need to add the NM version 14:34:07 ok 14:34:07 before I want it merged 14:34:37 its still time to put your +1 for stats on all these patches : 14:34:49 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/watcher+branch:master+topic:bp/watcher-notifications-ovo 14:34:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/watcher+branch:master+topic:bp/audit-versioned-notifications-api 14:35:06 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/378466/ 14:35:28 acabot: blind +1? I like it ;) 14:35:31 so please do it asap because we will have to deal with merge conflicts 14:35:57 brunograz : I would say "stackalytics reviews..." 14:36:08 :D 14:36:13 acabot_: too late for #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/378466/. I've jut mergd it :) 14:36:14 lol 14:36:32 as you know its good for the project to have reviewers from diverse companies so please add your +1 ;-) 14:36:51 dtardivel : too bad I missed it ;-) 14:37:27 lol 14:37:42 2 other patches should be merged for the release 14:37:51 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398299/ 14:38:00 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396281/ 14:38:33 so if some of you can review them we can merge them today as well and be part of ocata-1 14:38:48 ok I can review 14:39:07 #action sballe_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/398299/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396281/ 14:39:10 ^ anyone interested in working on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/centralise-config-opts should probably review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396281/ 14:39:31 +1 14:39:33 vincentfrancoise : thats right 14:39:45 i can if noone is working. 14:39:49 i mean I can review 14:39:51 :) 14:40:07 #action exploreshaifali atuly hvprash_ review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396281/ 14:40:15 +1 - can review as well 14:40:17 :) 14:40:20 atuly: no need to ask, when it comes to reviewing, just go for it ;) 14:40:30 #action brunograz review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/396281/ 14:40:33 Watcher CLI 14:40:39 Add functional tests to watcherclient needs reviews 14:40:39 acabot_: about 398299, we should wait for alexchain review as well .... 14:40:42 :) 14:40:50 acabot_: +1 14:41:44 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/389181/ 14:41:52 #action dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/389181/ 14:42:05 dtardivel : thats right I will try to ping alex 14:42:22 #topic Blueprint/Bug Review and Discussion 14:42:30 #info Ocata-1 will be released tomorrow 14:42:38 #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/ocata-1 14:43:09 hi, sorry got late 14:43:19 there is still 4 bugs in progress 14:43:44 sorry 3 in fact 14:44:30 #info A couple of unfinished blueprints have been moved to Ocata-2 14:44:39 #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/ocata-2 14:44:56 so Ocata-2 is our new target expected 12/12 14:45:16 acabot_: I have started pushing PS on automatic triggerring BP 14:45:19 sballe_ : any update from kevin about the graph model ? 14:45:33 diga : sorry we already discussed it 14:45:35 no is thijs here? 14:45:45 I'll follow up again :-( 14:46:16 acabot_: I can finish the code by EOW, can I continue work on it 14:46:44 diga : we will discuss it on watcher channel after the meeting 14:46:50 ok 14:47:03 #action sballe_ follow up on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/graph-based-cluster-model 14:47:28 #topic Open discussions 14:47:38 Should we use Trello to keep progress on Watcher ? 14:47:50 yes but only if it makes sense 14:48:01 it was a topic to discuss in Barcelona but meetings were too short 14:48:04 if peopel are not going ot pay attention to it then no 14:48:21 the idea is to keep actions in Trello 14:48:35 instead of relying only on the IRC bot from one meeting to another 14:48:45 I like the idea so I can tell my management about the Watcher roadmap 14:49:10 it looks a lot like JiRA so we can keep track of use stories, etc 14:49:16 and also keep ideas for Watcher long term evolutions somewhere 14:49:22 +1 for trello from our side! 14:49:29 +1 same here 14:49:33 i like trello too. +1 14:49:43 +1 14:49:47 +1 14:50:01 #link https://trello.com/invite/b/qPDRBsG7/d735794f93465d1d45ad18729c8395b9/openstack-watcher 14:50:18 I have created a board to give you an overview 14:51:04 as everyone seems happy with trello :-) I will prepare our next meeting with it 14:51:33 if you want to add a column, feel free to do it 14:51:33 cool! 14:52:21 #action acabot_ use Trello for preparing our next IRC meeting 14:52:31 licanwei : can you access the Trello board ? 14:52:47 licanwei : just to check that you can use it from China 14:53:09 ok 14:53:18 i'll try it 14:53:29 acabot_: looks great! 14:53:49 licanwei : can you just click on the link https://trello.com/invite/b/qPDRBsG7/d735794f93465d1d45ad18729c8395b9/openstack-watcher ? 14:54:05 and tell me if it works ? 14:54:25 acabot: need sign up first 14:54:33 ok 14:54:49 if you can access the sigh-up page thats fine :-D 14:54:59 yes 14:55:01 any other topic to discuss today ? 14:55:03 nice 14:55:39 for our new contributors, feel free to ask questions on #openstack-watcher 14:55:50 there is always someone to help you 14:55:58 acabot : regarding some pointer on Workload balance strategy 14:56:03 FYI I'll be on vacation starting next week ;) 14:56:13 vincentfrancoise: enjoy 14:56:27 vincentfrancoise : oh yes I forgot to mention that Vincent will be off for 4 weeks 14:56:37 vincentfrancoise, enjoy :) 14:56:43 vincentfrancoise, i need to catch you then this week :) 14:56:45 vincentfrancoise: that sounds like a great time off 14:56:49 thx all :p 14:56:57 he really deserves it ;-) 14:57:01 yes +@ 14:57:03 +2 14:57:03 vincentfrancoise : enjoy:) 14:57:16 acabot: do you have 10 mins for a quick chat around Intel contributions? 14:57:50 so during next month, the challenge would be to have more commits than vincentfrancoise on the ocata release ;-) 14:57:56 lol 14:58:09 lol 14:58:12 should be easy ;) 14:58:38 sballe_ : 10 min max right after the meeting 14:58:48 cool! 14:59:02 so thank you all 14:59:10 time to close the meeting 14:59:13 bye all 14:59:14 bye 14:59:15 have a good day/night 14:59:20 bye 14:59:21 bye 14:59:23 bye 14:59:24 bye 14:59:28 #endmeeting