09:00:27 #startmeeting watcher 09:00:27 Meeting started Wed Aug 17 09:00:27 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is acabot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:28 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:30 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 09:00:31 hello guys 09:00:33 hi 09:00:37 hi 09:00:45 o/ 09:01:19 agenda for today #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#08.2F17.2F2016 09:01:35 #topic Announcements 09:01:47 #info alexchadin is now core on Watcher 09:01:51 congrats ! 09:01:53 wow 09:01:58 thanks! 09:02:11 alexchadin: congrats!!! 09:02:15 you should have a +/- 2 option in gerrit ;-) 09:02:22 hi 09:02:39 thank you, guys! 09:03:03 alexchadin: welcome to the club :D 09:03:04 #info please vote for promoting hvprash as core on watcher-specs 09:03:11 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-August/101750.html 09:03:30 vincentfrancoise: no one speak about club :D 09:03:35 vincentfrancoise: rule 1 09:03:42 alexchadin: hahahaha 09:04:18 #info we now have 5 core contributors for Watcher jed56, dtardivel, vincentfrancoise, alexchadin & gzhai 09:04:47 any other announcement ? 09:04:49 alexchadin: :) 09:05:09 #rtopic Review Action Items 09:05:15 #topic Review Action Items 09:05:22 Watcher specs 09:05:36 Graph model describing virtual and physical elements in a data center needs a new PS and final reviews 09:05:45 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298891/ 09:06:05 #action acabot send an email to greg to get an update on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298891/ 09:06:29 Update define-the-audit-scope spec needs reviews from core 09:06:41 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339456/ 09:06:53 #action sballe jwcroppe acabot review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339456/ 09:07:31 Added spec for automatic triggering audit needs a new PS 09:07:40 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342473/ 09:08:13 diga told me that he will update the spec today 09:08:29 #action diga__ add a new PS to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/342473/ 09:08:43 Limit concurrent actions invoked by Watcher needs reviews 09:08:50 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348049/ 09:08:57 +1 09:08:59 anyone wants to review it ? 09:09:13 #action hanrong review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348049/ 09:09:25 i 09:09:39 #action gzhai-mobl review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348049/ 09:09:42 thx 09:09:48 Move Mitaka specs to Newton cycle & Add ocata folders and template for specs need +2 09:09:55 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/353454/ 09:10:01 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/353320/ 09:10:27 #action sballe jwcroppe +2 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/353454/ & https://review.openstack.org/#/c/353320/ 09:10:35 Watcher 09:10:54 Add Scoring Module implementation needs more reviews 09:11:02 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351577/ 09:11:08 who wants to review it ? 09:11:11 +1 09:11:22 #action hanrong review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351577/ 09:11:25 I will too 09:11:34 #action vincentfrancoise review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/351577/ 09:11:50 Added Monasca Helper has to be merged 09:11:57 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348891/ 09:12:13 because we need it for benchmarks in september 09:12:14 acabot: I will review it 09:12:24 #action dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348891/ 09:12:39 anyone else wants to review ? gzhai-mobl ? 09:12:52 gave comments 09:12:58 I'll take a look 09:13:02 ok thx 09:13:11 #action alexchadin review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/348891/ 09:13:28 Added strategy ID + Action Plan syncing needs reviews 09:13:35 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/325213/ 09:13:49 i will review this one 09:13:55 acabot: I will review it too 09:14:09 #action jinquan dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/325213/ 09:14:12 thx 09:14:28 #topic Blueprint/Bug Review and Discussion 09:14:51 #info current milestone is n-3 due August 29th 09:14:58 #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/newton-3 09:15:22 I would suggest to freeze the code on Friday 26th 09:15:33 in 10 days 09:16:19 alexchadin : are you confident to deliver the audit scope by Friday 26th ? 09:16:19 +1 09:16:39 I'll try to do it 09:16:54 It depends on spec review 09:17:43 I think we can merge the spec today if I got feedback from jwcroppe 09:18:05 did you already start implementing ? 09:18:38 A little bit 09:18:55 ok lets keep it on n-3 then 09:19:04 cool! 09:19:10 gzhai-mobl : what about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/statemachine-transition-permission ? 09:19:23 not yet 09:19:36 gzhai-mobl : did you start working on a spec ? 09:19:58 sorry, have some other task 09:20:06 not yet 09:20:07 ok 09:20:22 will start this week 09:20:40 #info I suggest to move all unimplemented BP to Ocata to keep our next Newton milestones empty and focus on bug fixes 09:20:53 +1 09:20:57 is that ok for you guys ? 09:21:05 +1 09:21:35 as we will have 17 BPs implemented in the Newton cycle, we need more tests before releasing the Newton version 09:21:38 we are closing in to our first big tent release so IMHO we should make things right :) 09:21:50 +1 09:21:53 +2 09:22:13 +1 09:22:41 gzhai-mobl : is that OK for you ? just keep the scalability tests and bug fixes in september ? 09:22:47 many of our open bugs have long store 09:22:50 ok 09:22:55 story* 09:23:19 #action acabot move Automatic triggering Action Plans & Use a state machine to model Watcher objects lifecycle BPs to Ocata 09:23:24 don't we need to review them? 09:23:31 sure we can 09:23:52 there are 5 bugs open 09:24:09 I see 10 bugs 09:24:32 3 of them are in wishlist/undecided 09:24:43 alexchadin : right I was on the newton-3 panel 09:24:53 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher 09:25:23 jinquan : are you working on https://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher/+bug/1599879 ? 09:25:23 Launchpad bug 1599879 in watcher "we should return FAILED status when we create an audit with unspecified parameters" [Medium,Triaged] - Assigned to Jinquan Ni (ni-jinquan) 09:25:51 yes, will done 09:25:58 this week 09:27:49 acabot: Fix on bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher/+bug/1600707 has been merged. We need to update its status 09:27:49 Launchpad bug 1600707 in watcher "use parameters to set the threshold for strategies of Airflow,workload and outlet temerature" [Undecided,Fix committed] - Assigned to junjie.huang (junjie-huang) 09:28:24 :-) done 09:28:39 sometimes gerrit trigger doesnt work... 09:28:48 BTW, the same kind of bug should be filed for the other strategies 09:29:01 alexchadin : any bug you want to discuss in particular ? 09:29:39 acabot: I wouldn't for now 09:29:47 vincentfrancoise: +1 09:30:12 #action acabot do a bit of clean-up in bugs list ! 09:30:39 resize-overload-instance needs a new description and specs 09:30:45 #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/resize-overload-instance 09:31:00 jinquan : you probably had questions about it 09:31:25 acabot:yes i just discuss with vicent 09:31:28 vincent 09:32:09 by the way , i should put the spec into newton folders or ocata folders(not merged)? 09:32:44 jinquan : ok the main idea from the mid-cycle was that the description is unclear 09:32:56 put the spec in ocata 09:33:18 now every new spec must be in Ocata (I will try to have the folders merged today) 09:33:19 when the folder will merged? 09:33:34 acabot: ok get it! 09:33:44 FYI, I just created https://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher/+bug/1614021 09:33:44 Launchpad bug 1614021 in watcher "Remove hardcoded strategy attributes and promote them strategy parameters" [Medium,New] 09:33:48 #action jinquan write a spec for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/resize-overload-instance 09:34:32 thx vincentfrancoise 09:34:55 #topic Open discussions 09:35:08 #info email sent to Monasca PTL to get a status on Ceilosca code 09:35:11 vincentfrancoise: I will ask my colleagues, maybe some of them will take this bug 09:35:34 alexchadin: that would be great! 09:36:11 I 've got a first answer saying that HPE team working on Ceilosca has already fix some bugs and performance isssues and they plan to push them upstream 09:36:31 he will come back to me next week with a timeframe 09:37:25 regarding scalability tests 09:37:40 dtardivel is working on scripts for gzhai-mobl 09:37:48 ok 09:38:04 gzhai-mobl : can we package PKB in a docker container ? 09:38:22 pkb? 09:38:30 perfkit benchamrker 09:38:42 to run scenarios 09:38:56 not sure 09:39:02 the tool will run on top of openstack and call Nova API 09:39:26 would you prefer a VM ? 09:39:45 container seems better 09:40:11 but, big difference? 09:40:18 it will be lighter but you need to have a docker engine deployed somewhere 09:40:48 gzhai-mobl: OK, could you check this point from your side quickly please. I will push a container image today on our public repository. 09:41:35 dtardivel: decision? 09:41:46 vm or container? 09:42:06 gzhai-mobl: yes please :) 09:42:51 #action gzhai-mobl check that we can use a docker container to run PKB on intel infrastructure 09:42:59 either is ok. i prefer vm as i didn't use container before 09:43:27 ok. i'll check 09:43:30 thx 09:43:47 any other open discussion to open ? 09:43:57 gzhai-mobl: I will provide a README doc to explain how to use Docker and PKB. I will be simple 09:44:26 dtardivel: thanks 09:45:39 ok so thank you guys 09:45:44 have a good day 09:45:52 bye 09:45:56 bye 09:46:02 bye 09:46:05 #endmeeting