09:00:03 #startmeeting watcher 09:00:03 Meeting started Wed Jun 8 09:00:03 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is acabot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 09:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 09:00:07 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 09:00:10 hi 09:00:14 hi 09:00:17 hi 09:00:18 hi 09:00:20 hi 09:00:32 hi 09:00:35 hi 09:00:51 hi 09:01:02 agenda for today #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#06.2F08.2F2016 09:01:12 hi 09:01:28 please add anything you like in open discusssions before the end of the meeting 09:01:50 #topic Announcements 09:02:09 #info Watcher n1 version has been released by the release team but no announcement sent yet 09:02:27 I dont know why no mail has been sent 09:02:54 I will check with dhellman today 09:03:23 #info Watcher documentation is now available on docs.openstack.org #link http://docs.openstack.org/developer/watcher/ 09:03:50 for now there is only Watcher, I will add watcher CLI soon 09:04:04 #action acabot add watcher CLI doc on docs.openstack.org 09:04:19 specs.openstack.org link is broken 09:04:21 #info Watcher specs are available on specs.openstack.org 09:04:37 yes because we need a merge to build the repo :-) 09:04:56 Ah, didn't see;) 09:05:05 the gate job is in place but we need to merge a spec to have it run 09:05:19 I hope we will have one until end of week 09:05:42 #info The Call for Presentations is now open for the upcoming OpenStack Summit in Barcelona, October 25-28 ( submission deadline is July 14th at 6:59 UTC) #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/barcelona-2016/call-for-speakers/ 09:05:58 does anyone here wants to present Watcher in Barcelona ? 09:06:56 #action acabot open an etherpad to write down sessions descriptions for the Barcelona summit 09:07:16 #info Mid-cycle details have been announced on the ML #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-June/096379.html 09:07:38 if you plan to come to our mid-cycle, please register now 09:07:52 any other announcement ? 09:07:57 acabot: I can 09:08:20 jed56 : what can you ? :-) 09:08:42 does anyone here wants to present Watcher in Barcelona ? yes i can :) 09:09:12 #info jed56 would like to present Watcher in Barcelona 09:09:18 #topic Review Action Items 09:09:27 Watcher specs 09:09:48 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/317130/ needs a new PS from hvprash 09:10:10 anyone here from walmart ? 09:10:36 #info vincentfrancoise will provide work items for Cluster model objects wrapper #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287019/ 09:10:46 #info Graph model describing virtual and physical elements in a data center & Consolidation of multiple Action-plans into a single one need reviews 09:11:09 any volunteer to review these specs ? 09:11:33 ok moving to watcher code 09:11:52 Uniform Airflow migration strategy implementation needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324169/ 09:12:04 junjie : is your code ready for reviews ? 09:12:08 yes 09:12:22 ok who wants to review a new strategy ? 09:12:45 I can review consolidation action plan 09:12:54 i can review 09:13:11 hello gzhai-mobl2 09:13:14 great, thanks 09:13:26 #action jed56 review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324169/ 09:13:43 #action gzhai-mobl2 review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298871/ 09:13:46 Hello 09:14:07 Add continuously optimization needs reviews from core #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321411/ 09:14:28 alexchadin : I think your code has been reviewed now and need validation from cores 09:14:47 acabot: vincentfrancoise reviewed it 09:14:54 dtardivel : can you review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321411/ ? 09:14:58 yes 09:15:19 #action review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321411/ and merge it as vincentfrancoise already reviewed 09:15:20 acabot: new PS is waiting for new reviews;) 09:15:36 #action dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321411/ and merge it as vincentfrancoise already reviewed 09:16:00 efficacy indicator need reviews from core #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/watcher+branch:master+topic:bp/efficacy-indicator 09:16:02 I will review it once again 09:16:20 #action vincentfrancoise review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321411/ 09:16:44 gzhai-mobl2 : could you review https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/watcher+branch:master+topic:bp/efficacy-indicator before next meeting ? 09:17:01 dtardivel is currently reviewing it 09:17:06 acabot: I'm reviewing it 09:17:51 gzhai-mobl2 : Enable strategy parameters needs a new PS https://review.openstack.org/#/c/297556/ 09:18:12 #action gzhai-mobl2 submit a new PS for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/297556/ 09:18:30 WIP Implement immutable audit_template CRUD needs a status #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324652/ 09:18:33 hi guys, sorry for being late. morning meetings are not in my calendar yet :| 09:18:49 #action hvprash provide a status for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/324652/ 09:18:53 I am doing it 09:18:55 tkaczynski : no pb 09:19:00 hi tkaczynski 09:19:21 jinquan : Select destinations filter implementation needs a status #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305596/ 09:19:40 acabot : OK 09:19:44 I'm modify jed's suggestion about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/select-destinations-filter, But have not completed. 09:20:02 jinquan: I think i will amend a bit the specification of acabot 09:20:33 jinquan: for you information i currently looking at the nova code 09:20:45 #action jed56 jinquan update the spec regarding https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/select-destinations-filter 09:20:52 jed56: i read your comment in patch set 09:20:58 if have any questions don't hesitate 09:21:17 jed56: yes thankyou :) 09:21:27 welcome ! 09:21:45 as the spec has been approved for mitaka, we will have to copy it to newton before amending it 09:21:58 acabot: copy that 09:22:22 moving to watcher CLI 09:22:41 Add support continuously-optimization needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321421/ 09:23:06 Enable strategy parameter needs reviews #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/297557/ 09:23:30 Any volunteers to review CLI improvements ? 09:23:40 I can review 321421 09:23:53 #action jed56 review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/321421/ 09:24:22 #topic Blueprint/Bug Review and Discussion 09:24:44 #info our current milestone is Newton-2 #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/newton-2 09:24:59 9 BPs targeted 09:25:30 tkaczynski : update needed on Provide a scoring module for Watcher #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/scoring-module 09:26:08 * acabot waiting for tkaczynski comments 09:26:21 acabot: update is the same as it was last week - yesterday I've finished working on TAP features, from today moving to Watcher 09:26:56 #action tkaczynski start working on scoring module today 09:27:13 I would like to define the tasks which I need to do and start executing them, also refresh myself on the changes which happened when I was out 09:27:34 #info Define the scope of an Audit as a pool of resources has been assigned to Charlotte Han from ZTE, can we set a target milestone ? #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/define-the-audit-scope 09:27:45 jinquan : do you now Charlotte ? 09:27:55 I want to join the watcher community, but I don't know what to do. Jinquan assgined a BP to me, https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/define-the-audit-scope 09:27:58 yes 09:28:06 she is online now 09:28:17 ok welcome hanrong 09:28:30 she want to join the watcher team 09:28:39 so she assign the bp 09:28:47 welcome hanrong :) 09:28:55 welcome :) 09:28:58 hanrong : did you already looked at watcher code ? 09:29:00 Welcome 09:29:07 welcome 09:29:19 Has not yet been 09:29:20 Welcome 09:29:36 欢迎 09:29:41 lol 09:29:54 jed56: great!!! 09:30:23 hanrong : ok in this case I would suggest you to take this BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/watcher-policies to enter Watcher code 09:30:46 hanrong : it would be much easier and its in our priorities for newton-2 version 09:31:06 @acabot ok 09:31:29 hanrong : or fix bugs as there are some for Newton-2, as you prefer 09:32:30 #action hanrong take time to discover Watcher, fix bugs or take the BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/watcher-policies 09:32:37 @acabot Ok, I look at the bug 09:33:19 jinquan : so you now have 2 BPs assigned :-), what about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/select-destinations-filter ? 09:33:47 jinquan : I think you should stay with one BP at a time 09:34:04 jinquan : especially if you need to rework specs with jed56 ;-) 09:34:23 ok, 09:34:41 yeah, just i am very interested in the BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/automatic-triggering-audit. 09:35:02 jinquan : ok but do you plan to work on specs for it ? 09:35:41 i can review the specs if someone commit specs 09:36:06 jinquan : IMHO you should now focus on select_destinations, then move to the other BP 09:36:18 consider that you think should stay with one BP at a time 09:36:31 #info jinquan is interested in contributing to specs for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/automatic-triggering-audit 09:36:32 yes, i will unassign the bp 09:36:48 jinquan : ok thx 09:37:02 nothing :) 09:37:12 #topic Open Discussion 09:37:34 now that Watcher is big-tent, should we provide a DB migration tool ? 09:38:12 as suggested by brunograz yesterday on IRC, he tried to update watcher without recreating the database 09:38:12 IMHO, we can wait the version 1.0 of watcher 09:38:26 the first stable version 09:38:44 and then, we should provide the db migrations tools 09:38:45 jed56 : perfect transition, so should we target a 1.0 version now ? 09:39:18 jed56: should stable version 1.0 integrate DB migration tool ? 09:39:40 no, we should wait the next realase 09:39:49 dtardivel: for me yes 09:39:51 * acabot has seen many projects moving to 1.0 in the big tent 09:40:23 #info currently Watcher version is 0.27 09:40:24 IMHO, watcher should scale and respect the nova policies before to be tagged has 1.0 09:40:58 I also think that 1.0 means "production ready", not "big tent" ;) 09:40:59 jed56 : I agree with you on nova policies, and it is something we should fix during the mid-cycle 09:41:19 what is the next Openstack Release ? 09:41:36 jed56 : you mean when ? 09:41:49 jed56 : Ocata 09:42:05 Ocata will be april 2017 09:42:12 so, maybe watcher can manage db migration for Ocata 09:42:22 o-1 09:43:02 tkaczynski: i agree with you 09:43:15 jed56: could we discuss rally id issue? 09:43:17 we need to define what we need to consider watcher as production-ready 09:43:38 alexchadin: yes of course 09:43:49 tkaczynski : I agree with you, its just that I we want to have more users after the Barcelona summit and moving to 1.x version is better for users 09:44:18 alexchadin : yes go ahead with Rally 09:44:38 Should I submit it as a bug? 09:44:47 acabot: why is the better for the users to have 1.0 ? 09:45:06 jed56 : users dont install beta software 09:45:15 jed56: I mean renaming of uuid 09:45:50 acabot: but if we name it "1.0" and we are not production ready, then we are beta, no? 09:46:01 if watcher is production-ready we can tagged 1.0 09:46:13 jed56 +1 09:46:28 acabot: We will test watcher in july-august on 20 nodes 09:46:41 tkaczynski : if we name it 1.0 its because we are production ready, we plan to test watcher on a large cluster in september 09:46:41 alexchadin: you can send a mail to the ML regarding the problem with have with Rally 09:46:48 acabot: in private cloud 09:47:13 jed56: then push new commit? 09:47:35 #info alexchadin will test Watcher on a 20 nodes private cloud in july-august 2016 09:48:01 alexchadin: we should wait that the contributors of watcher give theirs opinions 09:48:19 acabot: we have high hopes for watcher 09:48:32 alexchadin : me too ;-) 09:48:37 jed56: got you 09:49:06 IMHO, this is more a Rally problem 09:49:36 jed56: that's was strange decision, I agree 09:50:14 alexchadin: As I see it, I would fix this on the Rally side as well as jed56 said 09:50:28 junjie : do you plan to work on additional strategies ? 09:51:02 not yet 09:51:10 will do more this year 09:51:50 junjie : ok if you can register your BPs before the mid-cycle it would be great 09:52:08 junjie : we will be able to prioritize them 09:52:15 got it, i will check with team 09:52:25 junjie : thx 09:52:31 vincentfrancoise: I will discuss this problem with Andrey Kurilin, he is rally senior developer 09:52:48 alexchadin: okay 09:52:53 tkaczynski : did you manage to get funding for the mid-cycle ? 09:53:39 acabot: no, I'm not going. but I will switch my working hours and Susanne will organize a conf call or something 09:53:55 tkaczynski : ok thx 09:54:05 any other discussion to open ? 09:54:29 no for me 09:54:36 I forgot to complete OSIC form 09:54:51 #action acabot complete the OSIC form by next week 09:55:14 acabot: what is OSIC form? is that something everyody must do? 09:55:52 tkaczynski : no no its the OpenStack Innovation Center to request a cluster to test Wathcer 09:56:38 #info watcher-puppet has been added to gerritbot to get notifications on our IRC channel 09:56:39 acabot: ok, thanks 09:56:56 so we can close the meeting 09:57:00 thx 09:57:02 bye 09:57:12 bye 09:57:17 bye 09:57:19 bye 09:57:23 bye 09:57:27 bye 09:57:29 have a nice day or afternoon 09:57:34 u2 09:57:37 bye 09:57:38 #endmeeting