14:00:15 #startmeeting watcher 14:00:16 Meeting started Wed Apr 6 14:00:15 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is jed56. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'watcher' 14:00:28 hi everyone 14:00:29 o/ 14:00:33 Hi 14:00:40 hi 14:00:47 agenda for today #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#04.2F06.2F2016 14:01:04 o/ 14:01:17 o/ 14:01:33 #topic Announcements 14:01:36 is jed56 the new acabot? :) 14:01:51 tkaczynski: acabot is in holidays :) 14:01:56 Hi 14:02:09 #info we released Watcher mitika-rc-final yesterday with some delay with official schedule. 14:02:21 The April 1st was finally a joke ;) 14:02:21 great job everybody 14:02:23 Great! 14:02:31 The RC-final details are available at #link https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/mitaka-rc-final 14:02:40 There is three new watcher packages 14:02:54 watcher v0.26.0 python-watcherclient v0.22.0 and finally watcher-dashboard v0.2.0 14:03:08 The documentation of watcher has been updated (0.26.0) #link https://factory.b-com.com/www/watcher/doc/watcher/index.html 14:03:21 thanks everyboy! 14:03:26 everybody 14:03:40 any other announcement ? 14:04:51 the slides for the summit are close to being done. I have an Intel person review the slides next week 14:05:14 sballe_: great! you share again the link please 14:05:18 can 14:05:25 let me find it 14:05:30 thanks 14:05:46 Here it is: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1pGaimFOkpZ66bWH8wWkc5eZLvxFovUj2V3YfZsQMKHE/edit#slide=id.p4 14:06:11 it would be good to share some agenda for the summit, especially in context of watcher 14:06:19 where/when do we meet etc. 14:07:11 tkaczynski: yes it is a good idea, can we organize when acabot will return ? 14:07:37 so my understanding is that we were going ot meet on Tuesday afternoon. But I agree let's have acabot organize that agenda 14:07:49 of course, as long as this happens before the summit 14:07:58 tkaczynski: yes of course :) 14:08:01 #topic Review Action Items 14:08:21 There are many specifications which have been reviewed several times. IMHO, we can merge some of them to start the implementation. 14:08:29 I would like that these specifications are merged as soon as possible: 14:08:36 Watcher Scoring Module #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/289880/ 14:08:39 Provide efficacy indicators #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283449/ 14:08:44 Add Overload standard deviation #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286153/ 14:08:50 jed56 +2 ! 14:08:53 Who could take some time to look at these reviews in priority, please ? 14:09:05 I will review the scoring engine today 14:09:40 sballe_: awesome! 14:09:58 I can have a look at the other two if my limited knowledge helps 14:10:02 it takes a long to to review because it is big so I wont; get to the next on euntil tomorrow 14:10:32 #action sballe review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/289880/ 14:10:34 I'll try and review some of them as well 14:10:52 I can review Provide efficacy indicators 14:11:04 #action tkaczynski reviews https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283449/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/286153/ 14:11:17 #action ghzai2 review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283449/ 14:11:29 We also need to have more more reviews for on Airflow event based migration strategy #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275474/ 14:12:08 tpeoplesvacation: When you plan to send a new patchset for WIP: Cluster model objects wrapper https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287019/ 14:12:16 I will look at at: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275474/ 14:12:28 #action tpeoplesvacation send a new patchset WIP: Cluster model objects wrapper https://review.openstack.org/#/c/287019/ 14:12:49 #action sballe review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275474/ 14:13:01 We have two new specs from Grigorios Katsaros that need first reviews 14:13:09 Graph model describing virtual and physical elements in a data center 14:13:09 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298891/ 14:13:09 Consolidation of multiple Action-plans into a single one 14:13:09 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298871/ 14:13:20 jed56: are these for now or later release? 14:13:44 later release 14:13:55 i think 14:14:00 but this is my opinion 14:14:18 I'll give link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/298891/ a quick loook but want to focus on things we want to get merged ASAP 14:14:35 jed56: I agree with you on the later 14:15:07 sballe_: yes we should focus our effort 14:15:21 Since we have released the watcher mitika final the specs are open for Newton 14:15:26 #action acabot sballe jwcroppe review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301753/ 14:15:40 #topic Blueprint/Bug 14:16:25 i've uploaded bug fix 14:16:26 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301190/ 14:16:26 Many bugs have been merged in mitika-rc-final thanks to everybody! 14:17:05 alexchad_: thanks i will take a look 14:17:17 :) 14:17:24 We realized that the blueprint get-goal-from-strategy have some lacks in the specification. 14:17:47 alexchadin: I gave it a +2 14:17:50 We will push a new patchset in the watcher-specs asap to tackle the issue of goal syncing and watcher DB schema for goal (the uuid and id problems). 14:17:54 * edleafe is fighting network connectivity today... 14:18:20 We noticed that the attribute id is used by oslo.db to handle soft delete feature. 14:18:45 and this one fix is coming very soon: https://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher/+bug/1532843 14:18:47 Launchpad bug 1532843 in watcher "Can create Audit with invalid parameters" [Low,Triaged] - Assigned to Alexander Chadin (joker946) 14:19:55 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301774/ 14:20:22 this is a WiP 14:21:01 gzhai2 tpeoplesvacation we will add uuid and id https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301774/8/doc/source/images/get_goal_from_strategy_class_diagram.png,unified 14:21:14 gzhai2: In this, we add back the ID and UUID just like tpeoplesvacation was requesting + clarified how we sync goals and strategies with the Watcher DB 14:21:44 vincentfrancoise: Great! 14:21:46 gzhai2: thanks for your reviews 14:22:28 I actually started to work on making these changes 14:23:04 So you can work on your BP asap 14:23:40 vincentfrancoise: My BP? 14:25:18 gzhai2: yes https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/optimization-threshold 14:26:00 vincentfrancoise: you mean I rebased my patch against your patch set? 14:26:01 gzhai2: because your BP has a dependency on mine 14:26:10 on yours* 14:26:36 ok. you mean change the spec accroding to your spec, right? 14:26:49 gzhai2: when I will be done, yes 14:27:07 gzhai2: no just your code I mean 14:27:26 got it. 14:27:33 any other bugs or blueprints ? 14:29:34 okay let's continue 14:29:38 #topic open discussion 14:30:08 We have to postpone some blueprints and bugs from mitaka to newton. 14:30:13 Do we need to retarget blueprints from Mitaka to Newton in watcher-specs ? 14:30:47 IMHO, every can move his own blueprint to newton 14:30:55 *everybody 14:31:02 +1 14:31:30 ok 14:31:30 you can rebase your patchset to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301753/ 14:31:53 or you can wait that this patchset is merge 14:32:35 #action acabot sballe jwcroppe review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/301753/ 14:32:53 Before the Openstack Summit in AUSTIN, we should run a battery of tests on watcher to be sure that everything is working (Watcher and the available strategies). 14:32:57 Who could take some time to deploy on test watcher on their own infrastructure ? 14:34:01 I actually test every single changeset against a multinode devstack 14:34:16 vincentfrancoise: did you try every strategies ? 14:34:42 Yes apart from the outlet temp one since I don't have the IPMI metrics 14:34:44 I can cover outlet temperature strategy 14:35:06 gzhai2: +1 14:35:06 #action gzhai2 test watcher with outlet temperature strategy 14:35:12 I try strategies sometime 14:35:17 vincentfrancoise: You need one Node Manager machine:) 14:35:19 for the vm_workload_conslidation, I just ran it once 14:35:42 What is the strategy we wants to show at Openstack Summit ? 14:35:45 I have test cluster with 4 nodes 14:36:04 only 2 nodes on my side 14:36:08 alexchadin: great! how many VMs ? 14:36:32 now about 10, can raise up to 100 14:36:49 I am currently waiting for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/299809/ to be merged so we can have mutinode tempest tests on the gate 14:36:51 it's just work env 14:37:53 #action acabot organize the agenda for the Openstack Summit (where/when/) 14:38:51 someone wants to add something ? 14:39:59 who can review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292188/ 14:40:46 #action jed56 vincentfrancoise https://review.openstack.org/#/c/292188/ 14:41:01 thanks! 14:42:04 #endmeeting :) 14:42:16 yes i think so 14:42:16 :) 14:42:19 bye 14:42:20 #endmeeting