14:00:09 <acabot> #startmeeting watcher
14:00:10 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb 10 14:00:09 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is acabot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:11 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'watcher'
14:00:16 <acabot> hi
14:00:22 <tpeoples> o/
14:00:28 <jed56> \o
14:00:29 <acabot> our agenda for today #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher_Meeting_Agenda#02.2F10.2F2016
14:00:37 <dtardivel> hi
14:00:48 <vincentfrancoise> o/
14:01:43 <acabot> #topic Announcements
14:01:50 <sballe> o/
14:02:28 <acabot> #info Watcher mid-cycle meetup took place last week in Austin
14:02:47 <acabot> dedicated etherpad is #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/mitaka-watcher-midcycle
14:03:08 <sballe> great meeting BTW. Thanks to everybody who attended. we made great progress on all fronts
14:03:32 <acabot> sballe +1
14:03:53 <edleafe> o/
14:04:17 <acabot> #info edleafe submitted a Nova BP https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276840/
14:04:17 <tkaczynski> hi guys
14:04:18 <sballe> hi edleafe It was great having you at the meetup
14:04:24 <sballe> hi tkaczynski
14:04:37 <acabot> hi tkacynski & edleafe
14:04:47 <dtardivel> I submitted this morning 2 patchsets in order to check automatically requirements on watcher and python-watcherclient: 1 patchset on the openstack/requirements project, and another one on the openstack-infra/project-config project, according to #link http://docs.openstack.org/developer/requirements/#enforcement-in-projects
14:05:02 <edleafe> sballe: it was great seeing you all. I enjoyed the progress we made
14:05:06 <tkaczynski> yes, it was a great meeting, very useful
14:05:16 <tpeoples> thanks dtardivel, was going to do that today :)
14:05:47 <acabot> #topic Review Action Items
14:06:02 <acabot> we have many specs in review
14:06:27 <acabot> and as we have updated priorities last week for mitaka some of them need a drafted spec
14:07:05 <alexchadin> o/
14:07:26 <tpeoples> +1 acabot, playing catch up on other things from last week, but will get a spec drafted for my bp
14:08:31 <tkaczynski> same from me: I had to catch up with my project, moving now to work on the bp (setting up environment, reviewing code etc.)
14:08:34 <acabot> sballe : could you please confirm that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276586 is the targeted strategy for the hands on lab ?
14:09:19 <acabot> it is related to the BP https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/workload-balance-migration-strategy
14:09:27 <sballe> yes it is ... junjie should be starting work as soon as he is back from Chinese christmas
14:10:01 <acabot> because we talk about workload balance in the BP and then airflow balance in the spec...
14:10:34 <sballe> it is the same. I'll ask him to use the same terminology in both bp and spec
14:10:38 <acabot> ok
14:10:50 <acabot> #action sballe jwcroppe review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/276586/1
14:11:32 <acabot> #action seanmurphy add a PS to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/271028/
14:12:17 <acabot> tkaczynski : I need a drafted spec for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/scoring-module
14:12:33 <acabot> tkaczynski do you need help to submit it ?
14:13:22 <acabot> there is a quick doc https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Watcher/Contributing if you need it
14:14:05 <tkaczynski> acabot: my idea was to get everything up and running first and good understanding of what I'm going to do. once I do that I can work out some details of the spec. I believe I should have that in the next few days
14:14:21 <acabot> #action tkaczynski add a drafted spec for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/scoring-module
14:14:24 <acabot> ok
14:14:28 <jed56> tkaczynski : +1
14:14:56 <acabot> #action tkaczynski jed56 update description of https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/scoring-module
14:15:16 <tkaczynski> acabot: ok
14:15:20 <acabot> #action tpeoples add a drafted spec for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/cluster-model-objects-wrapper
14:15:39 <tpeoples> roger that
14:15:50 <acabot> jed56 we need a spec https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/select-destinations-filter
14:16:06 <acabot> #action jed56 add a drafted spec for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/select-destinations-filter
14:16:09 <jed56> yes of course i will do as soon as possible
14:16:33 <acabot> alexchadin what about https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/watcher-overload-underload ?
14:17:06 <alexchadin> I'm woking on it. I suggest there will be first version on the next week
14:17:12 <alexchadin> Hello everyone!
14:17:16 <acabot> ok
14:17:22 <jed56> hi alexchadin
14:17:29 <acabot> #action alexchadin add a drafted spec for https://blueprints.launchpad.net/watcher/+spec/watcher-overload-underload
14:17:44 <acabot> lets move to Watcher code
14:17:58 <alexchadin> i'm writing this as strategy
14:18:42 <jed56> alexchadin: cool
14:18:58 <acabot> alexchadin great, please try to use terms from our glossary http://factory.b-com.com/www/watcher/doc/watcher/glossary.html
14:19:12 <acabot> alexchadin in your spec
14:19:36 <dtardivel> #link http://factory.b-com.com/www/watcher/doc/watcher/glossary.html
14:19:49 <acabot> we need reviews on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274165/ & https://review.openstack.org/#/c/275106/
14:19:50 <alexchadin> ok, i'll rewrite it soon
14:20:32 <acabot> alexchadin and push it asap and set the workflow to -1 to set it as a work in progress
14:20:41 <acabot> alexchadin thx
14:20:47 <alexchadin> ok
14:21:52 <acabot> tpeoples added documentation for devstack set-up and needs review https://bugs.launchpad.net/watcher/+bug/1538291
14:21:53 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1538291 in watcher "Improve DevStack documentation" [High,In progress] - Assigned to Taylor Peoples (tpeoples)
14:22:08 <acabot> sorry the link is https://review.openstack.org/278244
14:22:43 <tpeoples> tkaczynski: would be great to have you review ^ since you're going through that right now
14:23:29 <dtardivel> tpeoples: I will review it too
14:23:42 <tpeoples> thanks
14:23:46 <tkaczynski> tpeoples: sure, I'll have a look
14:24:02 <acabot> #action dtardivel review https://review.openstack.org/278244
14:24:23 <acabot> #action tkaczynski review https://review.openstack.org/278244
14:25:00 <acabot> #info we have our new watcher-dashboard repo https://github.com/openstack/watcher-dashboard
14:25:12 <tkaczynski> btw: is there a way to see all the action items after the meeting?
14:25:26 <acabot> tkaczynski yes there is a log
14:25:34 <tpeoples> tkaczynski: #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/watcher/
14:25:58 <acabot> vincentfrancoise updated our internal code to fit horizon plugin requirements
14:26:20 <tkaczynski> tpeoples acabot thanks!
14:26:32 <acabot> the initial commit is open for reviews https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277342/
14:26:41 <acabot> with a pretty large code base ;-)
14:26:55 <tpeoples> acabot: i am going to review the UI code, but will probably take some time since it's a huge patchset
14:27:09 <vincentfrancoise> It's a bit difficult to review 7k LOCs
14:27:27 <acabot> thx tpeoples, anyone wants to review it ?
14:27:50 <acabot> #action tpeoples review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277342/
14:28:20 <vincentfrancoise> but if you can go through the README.txt + try to set it up that would be good enough
14:28:21 <dtardivel> acabot: I will review only readme part
14:28:39 <vincentfrancoise> at least for now
14:28:51 <edleafe> vincentfrancoise: good point. We should all strive to break patches up into digestible chunks
14:28:51 <tpeoples> yes, i plan to do a quick glance over it, but it will be good to get the repo seeded with the code.  once more people are using it we can incrementally add improvements instead of having it 100% perfect before merging IMO.  i don't want the review to sit there for weeks/months just cause it's so big
14:29:22 <acabot> #action dtardivel acabot review README.txt in  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/277342/
14:29:31 <vincentfrancoise> FYI, I used trove-dashboard and sahara-dashboard as a reference
14:29:33 <tpeoples> +1 edleafe, but may be hard to do it at this point since they have had it done for some time
14:29:59 <edleafe> tpeoples: understood - just a suggestion to keep in mind for the future
14:30:05 <tpeoples> definitely
14:30:06 <vincentfrancoise> tpeoples: +1
14:30:40 <acabot> #topic Blueprint/Bug Review and Discussion
14:30:58 <tkaczynski> edleafe +1
14:31:35 <acabot> sballe : tmetsch planned to submit a BP during the mid-cycle, how do you want to deal with it ?
14:31:56 <acabot> sballe : BP regarding the ability to merge multiple action plans into a single one
14:31:57 <sballe> he is waiting for another bp
14:32:13 <sballe> I'll ping him and have him do it
14:32:34 <acabot> ok
14:32:35 <sballe> he told me there is a dependency on another bp to be submitted first
14:33:23 <acabot> sballe: the graph model is related to a BP tpeoples is working on
14:33:40 <sballe> ok
14:33:43 <acabot> sballe: but maybe it is the same one
14:34:07 <acabot> I have 2 TODOs on the mid-cycle etherpad :-)
14:34:09 <tpeoples> i'm not sure that was related to the merging of action plans though?
14:34:10 <sballe> I'll check at the todos from the meetup and sync-up with tmetsch
14:34:19 <acabot> ok thx
14:34:27 <jed56> IMHO, graph  model is one use case of the BP of tpeoples
14:34:55 <sballe> I agree so maybe thta was the bp we were talking about. I'll get himto submit the other bp asap
14:34:56 <acabot> jed56 I think we need to clarify this point in specs
14:34:59 <tpeoples> right, but for the cluster model.  not sure how that is tied to the action plans directly
14:35:11 <jed56> acabot : +1
14:35:26 <jed56> tpeoples : what do you mean ?
14:35:28 <sballe> acabot: +1
14:36:25 <tpeoples> graph model was to represent the environment (cluster if you will).  merging of action plans seems only tangentially related?
14:36:42 <jed56> no :)
14:37:09 <sballe> I'll make sure tmetch joins the IRC moving forward
14:37:27 <acabot> sballe +1 ;-) I think we will need him
14:37:36 <sballe> I agree
14:37:52 <jed56> the merging of action plan can be done later.
14:38:36 <jed56> IMHO, we need before to have good strategies and after think about how can we merge different action plan comming from different strategy
14:38:47 <sballe> jed56: acabot he will join in 2 mins
14:38:52 <acabot> edleafe thx for submitting the BP for newton to the Nova team, what about the select_destinations() API ;-) ?
14:39:02 <sballe> tmesch
14:40:15 * edleafe is on a call right now
14:41:01 <acabot> #info mitaka-3 status https://launchpad.net/watcher/+milestone/mitaka-3
14:41:13 <acabot> with updated priorities
14:41:20 <edleafe> acabot: I discussed that with some people, and there seems to be almost zero chance of that ever making it into Nova
14:41:30 <sballe> acabot: metsch is now befreax
14:41:39 <sballe> and is in the RC
14:42:04 <acabot> edleafe : ok thank you for asking :-D
14:42:18 <jed56> edleafe: thanks for trying : )
14:42:26 <sballe> edleafe: +1
14:42:28 <tpeoples> edleafe: over IRC?  just curious if there's logs for the record
14:42:28 <edleafe> it was a longshot :)
14:42:30 <acabot> as discussed last week, we will implement our own method for now
14:42:52 <edleafe> tpeoples: no, I PM'd a few people
14:43:02 <tpeoples> OK
14:44:11 <acabot> all our BPs are assigned, do not forget to update the delivery status
14:44:43 <sballe> acabot: +1
14:44:56 <acabot> #topic Open Discussion
14:45:19 <acabot> we received requests yesterday on IRC to support SSL in Watcher
14:46:06 <acabot> I have no idea about the priority of this feature
14:46:14 <sballe> that makes sense to me but I am not sure where that fits in our priorities
14:46:18 <dtardivel> yes we add 2 guys running Watcher on their platform, and they had some issues related to SSL Certificates
14:46:43 <cdupont> Hi acabot, regarding our BPs it's paused for the moment due to resource issues as announced before
14:46:57 <sballe> dtardivel: can they do the work?
14:47:02 <tpeoples> dtardivel: what are the issues?
14:47:04 <cdupont> were're working on that issue, we'll let you know...
14:47:38 <acabot> cdupont : ok as I did not received any update for 1 month, it was unprioritized for mitaka
14:47:42 <dtardivel> SSL certicate error on novaclient
14:48:26 <cdupont> acabot: Ok no pb
14:48:30 <dtardivel> tpeoples: I'm building devstack with USE_SSL=TRUE
14:48:33 <tpeoples> hmm, not configurable with the watcher_clients_auth section?
14:48:39 <dtardivel> to try to reproduce the issue
14:49:03 <tpeoples> ok
14:49:25 <acabot> sballe : dtardivel asked them to register a bug but they didn't...not sure they want to fix it ;-)
14:49:32 <edleafe> dtardivel: what is the error? No SSL, or can't verify the cert?
14:50:01 <dtardivel> tpeoples: I will try to figure out if it is only a documentation issue (configuration part) or not ...
14:51:03 <dtardivel> I don't reminber. It was not clear....
14:51:52 <tpeoples> ok dtardivel, let's try and get more details from them if you can't reproduce their issue
14:52:03 <acabot> I forgot to mention that our talks are now open to votes
14:52:06 <dtardivel> tpeoples: +1
14:52:21 <acabot> #info vote for https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/vote-for-speakers/Presentation/7108
14:52:22 <sballe> +1
14:52:34 <acabot> #info vote for
14:52:39 <sballe> acabot: we have two
14:52:58 <acabot> #info vote for https://www.openstack.org/summit/austin-2016/vote-for-speakers/Presentation/7113
14:52:59 <tkaczynski> do I need a new account in order to vote?
14:53:33 <acabot> you need to have signed the openstack agreement
14:54:46 <acabot> tkaczyncki : https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/How_To_Contribute#Contributor_License_Agreement
14:55:29 <acabot> sballe : any update regarding next mid-cycle and congress meeting ?
14:55:52 <acabot> sballe : there is no rush on that ;-)
14:56:09 <sballe> I just sent email out about the mid-cycle and haven't done any about congress yet
14:56:17 <acabot> sballe : thx
14:56:22 <sballe> I did attend the cross-project meeting yesterday
14:56:40 <sballe> mostly discussions about quotas
14:57:01 <acabot> #info sballe attends cross-project meeting http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/crossproject/2016/crossproject.2016-02-09-21.01.html
14:57:02 <tkaczynski> sballe do we have CCLA for Intel?
14:57:26 <sballe> I am assuming we do
14:57:38 <tpeoples> acabot: are we going to send out a midcycle summary (or did i miss it)?
14:58:04 <acabot> #action acabot send a midcycle summary on the ML
14:58:11 <tkaczynski> sballe the page is saying that there is a list of contributors from the company
14:58:17 <acabot> tpeoples: yes, I planned to do it by EOW
14:58:24 <tpeoples> awesome
14:58:41 <tkaczynski> I wonder how I can get to this list (if there is one)
14:58:59 <sballe> tkaczynski: ok not sure. Let's take this off-line
14:59:05 <acabot> time to end the meeting, thank you guys
14:59:14 <sballe> already?
14:59:14 <tkaczynski> thank you
14:59:19 <jed56> bye
14:59:21 <sballe> bye
14:59:25 <acabot> #endmeeting