16:03:06 <pc_m> #startmeeting vpnaas
16:03:07 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jun 30 16:03:06 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is pc_m. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:03:08 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:03:11 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vpnaas'
16:03:27 <pc_m> The agenda is here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/VPNaaS#Agenda
16:03:34 <pc_m> #topic announcements
16:03:59 <pc_m> Does anyone have any announcements?
16:04:36 <pc_m> #topic scenario testing
16:04:53 <pc_m> So... it's key for us to get some scenario tests in place.
16:05:18 <pc_m> Nikolay has some tests, but they are failing in StrongSwan job :  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/159746/
16:05:56 <pc_m> Appears to be some issue with rootwrap daemon. Clients are trying to access the same socket to communicate with the daemon (should be unique sockets).
16:06:12 <pc_m> Works with Openswan, which has a different way to use rootwrap.
16:06:27 <pc_m> If anyone has ideas on this, please help out/
16:07:36 <pc_m> I've asked gus: (Angus) to help during the Neutron mid-cycle. He's been looking, but is in Australia, so hard to connect.
16:08:06 <pc_m> #topic Multiple Local Subnets
16:08:28 <pc_m> I have an RFE out with 3 proposals. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/191944
16:08:53 <pc_m> Please look it over and comment.  I talked to markmcclain, who will look it over as well.
16:09:09 <pc_m> I'm (biased) in favor of option C.
16:09:44 <pc_m> Any questions on this?
16:10:30 <pc_m> #topic Bugs
16:11:00 <pc_m> Please look at the reviews that are out, and the bugs mentioned (both in the Agenda wiki age above).
16:11:29 <pc_m> Any bugs/reviews that people want to discuss at this point?
16:12:23 <pc_m> #topic BGP/MPLS and Edge VPN
16:13:06 <pc_m> Will open up discussion on this...
16:13:18 <pc_m> Not sure where we left off. Any actions?
16:13:24 <mhanif> As per earlier discussion I am splitting the current edge-VPN spec to two
16:13:50 <mhanif> Will soon be pushing them for review
16:13:54 <pc_m> mhanif: Cool. Can you add the reviews to the meeting wiki page, when they are ready?
16:14:13 <mhanif> pc_m: Sure.  Will do.  Thanks.
16:14:15 <vikram_> +1
16:14:37 <pc_m> mhanif: Thank you.
16:15:08 <pc_m> Is there any more thought on trying to split out the BGP API to allow for a separation of the "what" and "how" parts?
16:15:37 <pc_m> And, if so, will there be any alignment with the API I'm proposing in the mutliple local subnet RFE?
16:17:35 <mhanif> pc_m: Haven't looked at multiple local subnet RFE.  Will read about it and let you know
16:17:36 * pc_m any BGP team members on?
16:17:44 <mhanif> pc_m: Any word on the new version of VPNaaS API (v2.0)?
16:17:47 <pc_m> mhanif: Thanks.
16:18:06 <mhanif> pc_m: This was discussed in Vancouver
16:18:48 <pc_m> mhanif: Well, I need to talk to cores about this more. One, is that they are going to microversioning for Neutron, so we need to see if/when we should do that for VPN repo.
16:19:28 <pc_m> Another is that there are several changes that would affect the API and we need to see how to handle them. Local multiple subnets for one, certificates for another, etc.
16:19:40 <pc_m> DMVPN
16:19:57 <mhanif> pc_m: Got it.  OK.  So for now it is on the back burner?
16:20:05 <sridhar_ram> pc_m: agree, we need to plan and scope v2.0 effort
16:20:28 <pc_m> mhanif: Yeah, unless anyone wants to champion it :)
16:21:00 <pc_m> I'm busy with a bug/enhancement, local multiple subnets, and trying to help on the scenario failures.
16:21:11 <pc_m> Oh that reminds me... one announcement.
16:21:51 <pc_m> As part of Neutorn lib work, dougwig is working on running *aaS tests as part of Neutron changesets.
16:22:38 <pc_m> I'm helping and trying to modify the VPN tests so that they will work if there is a neutron change set. I'm also going to enable the functional tests, as part of Neutron Jenkins runs.
16:22:52 <pc_m> Doug will be adding all the *aaS UTs as well.
16:23:11 <pc_m> Hopefully, this will catch some issues and prevent breakage in VPN.
16:24:07 <pc_m> Anyways,  back to the API... we'll need to plan how we get to v3.0 and onward. Sounds like microversioning is the way to go.
16:24:20 <pc_m> BTW: we are at v2.0 now.
16:24:39 * pc_m not sure how we went from 1.0 to 2.0 but at some point we did.
16:25:11 <pc_m> We'll need to try to hook up with the BGP folks about APIs.
16:25:12 <sridhar_ram> pc_m: good to know that
16:25:38 <mhanif> pc_m: Agreed
16:25:47 <pc_m> Anything more on BGP to talk about?
16:25:55 <pc_m> Anything more on Edge VPN?
16:26:16 <mhanif> mhanif: Nothing more from me
16:27:37 <pc_m> #topic Open Discussion
16:29:00 <pc_m> OK, will give you 32 mins (and one leap second) back of your day...
16:29:09 <sridhar_ram> :)
16:29:13 <pc_m> #endmeeting