17:00:20 <tjones> #startmeeting VMwareAPI 17:00:21 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Apr 30 17:00:20 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is tjones. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:22 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:24 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'vmwareapi' 17:00:30 <tjones> hi folks - who 17:00:34 <tjones> is here today? 17:00:49 <arnaud> o/ 17:02:00 <tjones> anyone else? *arnaud this may be a short meeting ;-)* 17:02:09 <arnaud> yeah apparently :) 17:02:54 <tjones> well lets get started anyway 17:03:17 <tjones> #topic juno priorities 17:03:36 <tjones> I've updated #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/vmware-subteam-juno 17:04:06 <tjones> going down to the bottom in the section "Strategy" i've listed what i think our priorities are in terms of BP 17:04:27 <tjones> i ordered it by spawn refactor, BP that missed icehouse and the rest 17:04:40 <tjones> lets go through status on those. 17:04:51 <arnaud> sure 17:05:27 <tjones> for spawn refactor i have been rebasing and addressing constantly. i have +2 from dansmith on all but 2 of them and matt said he will do a review this afternoon. So i am pleased right now with where we are (though i wish this was last week not this week) 17:05:44 <tjones> we don't have vui for the next 2 - vsan, and ova support 17:06:02 <tjones> arnaud: how is your clone image handler coming? 17:06:27 <arnaud> this is a third bp in a dependency chain 17:06:42 <tjones> what are the dependencies? 17:06:50 <arnaud> a se 17:06:51 <arnaud> c 17:07:10 <arnaud> 1. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/use-glance-v2-api 17:08:28 <arnaud> 2. https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/image-multiple-location 17:08:56 <arnaud> 3. the clone bp 17:09:05 <tjones> ok i see 17:09:07 <arnaud> I am working on the nova-specs of 1. 17:09:14 <arnaud> the code is ready 17:09:21 <arnaud> sort of 17:09:46 <arnaud> 2. the code is also ready (since it has been merged/backed out in Icehouse), zhiyan is working on the spec 17:10:09 <arnaud> 3. code also more or less ready, but need to get the other specs approved 17:10:10 <arnaud> :) 17:10:49 <arnaud> I will focus on having the 1. approved or at least discussed in the coming week 17:10:55 <tjones> trying to look through all this stuff. do you have the spec links handy? 17:11:08 <arnaud> yeah 17:11:16 <arnaud> 1. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84887/ 17:11:31 <arnaud> 2. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86583/ 17:12:00 <arnaud> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/84281/ 17:12:26 <arnaud> and 3. should happen after the refactor of course 17:12:29 <tjones> ok thanks - i have updated the etherpad 17:12:53 <arnaud> cool thks! 17:12:59 <tjones> ok so basically we need to get those 3 specs approved within the next week or so 17:13:25 <arnaud> it would be nice yes 17:13:36 <tjones> im assuming you are updating, etc. are there specific core reviewers who are interested and reviewing these periodically? 17:13:47 <arnaud> but I would say more next week"s" 17:13:56 <arnaud> yep 17:14:00 <arnaud> for the first one 17:14:08 <arnaud> I got comments from john garbutt 17:14:14 <arnaud> will address them today 17:14:37 <tjones> ok i've added the cores who are helping to the etherpad too 17:14:47 <tjones> just so we know who to ping if needed 17:14:54 <arnaud> sure ok 17:14:58 <tjones> anything else on those BP? 17:15:12 <arnaud> no that's it 17:15:31 <tjones> look like we don't have garyk or sabari here today either :-( 17:15:53 <tjones> hartsocks: last week you said you wanted to finish up https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/improve-vmware-disk-usage 17:16:03 <tjones> do you happen to have the spec review link for that one? 17:16:07 <tjones> or i can dig it up 17:17:04 <tjones> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86074/ 17:17:16 <tjones> hartsocks: you here? 17:17:34 <tjones> wow - i am really not feeling the love today 17:17:43 <arnaud> :) 17:17:51 <vuil> sorry just joined. 17:17:51 <arnaud> is this coming from icehouse? 17:17:53 <vuil> hi 17:17:57 <arnaud> hi vuil 17:18:01 <tjones> hurrah! vuil 17:18:10 <vuil> yep. from like grizzly 17:18:11 <tjones> arnaud: that one is coming from havana 17:18:14 <tjones> yeah 17:18:15 <arnaud> I see 17:18:21 <tjones> ok lets leave that one and go back to vuil 17:18:40 <tjones> vuil: we are reviewing the prio and status of our Juno BP work 17:18:44 <tjones> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/vmware-subteam-juno 17:19:01 <tjones> you have some refactor (waiting on me i know), vsan and ova support. 17:19:17 <vuil> yep. you looking for the priority order? 17:19:19 <tjones> what's the status on the BP reviews for vsan and ova and do you have the spec links handy? 17:19:36 <vuil> a sec 17:19:44 <tjones> yes - starting with the bottom section marked "Strategy for Juno" 17:20:10 <vuil> ova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/86395/ 17:20:45 <vuil> that's approved. 17:20:58 <tjones> hurray! 17:21:12 <vuil> vsan: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85635/ 17:21:15 <vuil> approved too 17:21:47 <tjones> awesome. so you are just waiting for the refactor to finish so you can rebase and start the review process on these? 17:21:48 <vuil> Thanks to the reviewers, esp John. 17:21:56 <vuil> yep. 17:21:59 <arnaud> nice 17:22:05 <tjones> is there significant changes to the design/code from icehouse? 17:22:28 <vuil> other than reacting to the refactor work, no. 17:22:32 <tjones> awesome! 17:22:52 <vuil> (but that's a fair amount of reacting to :-)) 17:22:54 <tjones> in terms of prio do you think this list is correct? 17:23:39 <tjones> you meaning everyone here - not just vuil 17:23:42 <vuil> *looking* 17:24:00 <tjones> and also have i missed anything? 17:24:26 <arnaud> this look correct 17:24:35 <vuil> oslo integration? 17:24:52 <vuil> the 1.0001? 17:25:25 <tjones> added it to the end 17:25:42 <vuil> that needs to come right after spawn refactor 17:25:47 <tjones> there 17:25:48 <vuil> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/85469/, it is approved 17:25:51 <vuil> as well 17:26:02 <vuil> vsan/ova needs it 17:26:07 <tjones> vuil: are you doing that one too? 17:26:18 <vuil> yep 17:26:52 <tjones> ok - so with spawn refactor - the issues i am addressing now are all test related, so you probably can pull down those patches and start working 17:27:08 <tjones> i have +2 on all except for 2 and the comments are test comments 17:27:21 <tjones> and have been for the last week or so 17:27:23 <vuil> I have done that, and updated the phase 2 patch that shawn posted. 17:27:59 <tjones> ok good. im working as fast/hard as possible on those. im hoping its close 17:28:06 <tjones> anything else on BP? 17:28:09 <vuil> thanks. 17:29:05 <tjones> #topic juno summit 17:29:46 <tjones> anything new to discuss here? 17:30:16 <dims> main thing i see is the "Clustered hypervisor support in Nova" design session 17:30:35 <tjones> yes that's an important one 17:31:20 <tjones> that is wednesday the 14th at 9:50 am BTW 17:31:33 <tjones> lets all make sure to attend and participate in that one 17:32:11 <tjones> anything else for the summit? 17:32:12 <dims> we will have to find time to talk about oslo.vmware future 17:32:35 <dims> could not get a session allocated in the oslo slots 17:32:37 <arnaud> +1 dims 17:32:38 <tjones> should we just meet for lunch or do you want to have an uncondference or ?? 17:32:50 <dims> either would be fine 17:33:05 <tjones> #action meet at the summit to discuss oslo.vmware futures 17:33:23 <dims> those were my top 2 TODO's :) 17:33:34 <tjones> dims: you got it 17:33:40 <tjones> #topic bugs 17:34:01 <tjones> i just took a peek and didn't see anything needing discussion. does anyone have a bug they want to talk about? 17:34:27 <tjones> we have a lot of bugs - 61 17:34:50 <tjones> ok lets move on 17:34:58 <tjones> #topic open discussion 17:35:13 <tjones> anyone want to talk about anything? 17:35:19 <tjones> vmwareapi related ;-) 17:35:50 <dims> :) 17:36:25 <tjones> ok sounds like we can have a short meeting today 17:36:36 <tjones> i can get back to fixing my spawn refactor tests :0 17:36:39 <tjones> :-D 17:36:42 <dims> so we may have to cut oslo.vmware before the oslo integration review can be worked on again i think 17:36:57 <tjones> ah ok 17:37:14 <dims> there were fixes to exceptions.py in oslo.vmware that were needed by vui's patch 17:37:22 <dims> for oslo integration 17:37:23 <arnaud> I still have this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80120/ to fix 17:37:25 <vuil> agreed dims. 17:37:29 <arnaud> glance needs 0.3 17:37:33 <arnaud> for SPBM 17:37:42 <vuil> thanks for the oslo.vmwarwe update btw, much needed 17:37:44 <dims> arnaud, can you please ping dhellmann and work it out please? 17:37:54 <arnaud> yep I was planning to do that today 17:38:03 <dims> nice 17:38:06 <tjones> i have to admit i don't know the process for cutting a new oslo.vmware 17:38:06 <arnaud> I have been busy last days 17:38:20 <tjones> can someone explain? 17:39:32 <tjones> hmmm maybe offline then 17:40:31 <tjones> anything else? 17:40:42 <tjones> *listening for slow typers* 17:41:18 <tjones> ok thanks all. have a good week 17:41:22 <tjones> #endmeeting